Christopher Donovan: According to the Augusta Chronicle, entrepreneurs are planning an all-White pro basketball league. (“Basketball league for white Americans targets Augusta“) Assuming this is all on the up-and-up and not a joke, it would make a great test case for legal exclusivity. The Supreme Court held in Boy Scouts v. Dale that some forms of “expressive” association can exclude others, though they’ve also held that purely private all-male clubs are unconstitutional. Law schools also unsuccessfully argued that they have the right to exclude military recruiters, though there was a federal statute on point that made this a slam dunk for the military.
On the whole, of course, we are denied the right of racial exclusivity in employment, housing and most major areas. This is the truly new policy hegemony that none of our ancestors would have approved.
My argument is that freedom of association is a primary — if not the primary — human right, outstripping even freedom of speech in its importance to human fulfillment. Or the “right of privacy”, advanced by Brandeis and Warren. It’s so basic, perhaps, that it doesn’t have fully-fleshed arguments on its behalf. But that’s what it needs.




Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?




If this is real are they going to make the case that Whites are discriminated against in basketball? If not then its going to look like sour apples and attract a lot of ridicule and criticism.
There is a simpler solution than attempting to start an all White basketball league: watch and support hockey instead. It’s already 99% White.
@ William
Yeah, you could support hockey or NASCAR since both are majority white. The issue for me is that both sports openly promote their desire for more diversity. It won’t be long before even those sports become increasingly less white.