The English jew and his role in the British Empire, and the 20,000 Hessian mercenaries stationed in Britain to compel the British to submit to this foreign rule is one of the most important and little known aspects of history. Canada, the US, Australia, and GB are all under the sway of these German Jews who staged their coup d’etat in the late 1600s to take over Britain.

Dogson…I started looking for the jew name Dogson and it led me here. And Charles Dodgson, the pedophile mathematician of Alice and Wonder fame…was he a crypto jew too?

This became obvious during the Yugoslav war. He was the Clinton administration’s tweedy point man for the NATO bombing of Belgrade and the war on Orthodox Christianity in Kosovo. He’s exudes arrogance. Whenever I hear Warren Zevon’s “The Envoy” I think of Richard Holbrooke.

“Things got hot in El Salvador
CIA got caught and couldn’t do no more
He’s got diplomatic immunity
He’s got a lethal weapon that nobody sees
Looks like another threat to world peace
For the envoy
Send the envoy
Send the envoy”

How many people know Samantha Power is married to Cass Sundstein?

Since 2001 we’ve had 911, anthrax attacks, war in Afghanistan and Iraq, major fights over international law, torture, Geneva conventions, espionage scandals, endless problems with our “ally” Israel, financial meltdown, the AIR FORCE “mishandling” nuclear weapons, on and on, etc.

Where is the officer corp of the military? I remember one semi-high profile resignation, over the torture program. Supposedly General Petraeus is going to run against Obama in 2012, but he’s more neo-con and pro-war than Obama is. Petraeus wants his “legacy” to be “winning” the occupation of Afghanistan. With white leaders like this, who needs enemies?

The top leadership of the US military is still mostly white, American, and Christian. Where are they? In the last ten years I can only remember one or two who actually took a personal risk to speak out, perhaps costing a retirement or something.

William Gates? What’s he doing, counting down until retirement? Trying to cash in something? I wish voting for Scott Brown would help, but I don’t think it’s going to.

The West has become a Transnational ‘open society.’*
The the US there is competition between models, the Neoconservative’s Global Capitalism or the Left’s Global Socialism.** Either way, both are going to be statist. It’s now in organized Jewish interest to support the former*** — so they are giving it a boost. And of course it’s in many ‘minorities’ interest to support the latter.

Either way we loose our land. But the later allows us to organize as an ethnonetwork. Given that the neomarxist ideology**** is based on race conflict as opposed to class conflict, the later does not bode well for our interest.

My point would be that we need to focus on building an ethnonetwork. Let those white leftists that think that giving up their interests and their group identity will usher in a new word, that think that other ethnogroups will not organize and grab power,***** fend for themselves. There is no point in talking to them.

That said, talk about White America or White Nationalists or anything predicated on that should have been done 30 years ago, say before the Neocons triumphed on the ‘right.’ Now, we need to try to form an ethnolobby, which means toning the nationalism down.

*This is an example of the ruling ideology:
http://www.transcomm.ox.ac.uk/working%20papers/WPTC-2K-06%20Vertovec.pdf

**This is an ok analysis
http://www.hudson.org/files/publications/idealogical_war.pdf

***http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/01/jews_leaving_dems_adls_foxman.html

****http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/westernmarxismfinal.pdf

*****For example: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/120089987/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

http://www.amconmag.com/article/2003/mar/10/00014/

“I’m not sure what you are saying, perhaps you could clarify.”

Well, if by liberal we mean radically inclusive and having no particular national interest and accept everyone other, this puts the nation at a competitive disadvantage. It’s just like when European Americans give up there own specific group interest and everyone else keeps there’s or when they decide to work exclusively as individuals and everyone else decides to work in groups. Liberal Socialism (as opposed to ethnosocialism) is equivalent to European Americans deciding to work for the good of others and Liberal Capitalism (as opposed to conservative capitalism) is equivalent to individual European Americans deciding to work for their individual good. If everyone does the same, it’s functional. If only EuroAmericans do it it isn’t. Obviously.
Well, imagine this on a national level.

When the US is anti-protectionist and China is protectionist, or when the US promotes world good and China promotes its own good — we get what we get. Anyways, so internationalist countries must see to it that internationalism is worldwide. Liberal systems must see to it that Liberalism is worldwide. This is why you get people saying this:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2009/12/16/islam_needs_a_civil_war_226321.html

Say, as opposed to saying that WE need to become less liberal.

“This should be obvious. Unless all nations and peoples are liberal, being liberal is dysfunctional.”

I don’t think it’s a very careful use of the word dysfunctional.

I’m not sure what you are saying, perhaps you could clarify.

In any case, I would worry about White dysfunction.
Especially since it’s very widespread indeed, and we can hope to do nothing about the influence of their dysfunction without addressing our own.
Nothing at all.

But they are both Imperialistic, or, to put it baldly, Totalitarian.
And the minority-oriented one is still controlled by Jews.

I was saying something similar to a friend recently, to explain why liberals hate Fox News so much. Prior to the advent of Fox News, the all broadcast news formed a liberal Trust designed to fix ideas, rather than prices. As long as they all toed the line, they could control discourse without suffering economically. Enter Fox News stage left, and now all the other news outlets are taking a beating. So the memos go out, and the liberals are all foaming at the mouth over Fox News.

(not that Fox News is anything but Kosher Konservative, but they are well to the right of the rest of the far left media).

My friend mentioned how Fox News “isn’t a real news organization” according to the lefties. I responded “of course it isn’t!” Fox has to deprogram all its journalists as soon as it hires them, because they all come out of school far left radicals. A “real” news organization could just rely on journalists to follow the programming they get in J-school.

I heartily agree that multicult=dysfunction, and this is made apparent only when it lacks hegemony.

As for a war between Leftists and Neocons, who cares? Trotskyists vs. Stalinists. They all agree on points 1 through 4 above.

I believe that would be this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/opinion/20friedman.html

“Liberal Democracy” in the open-borders Multicultural transnational sense, whether manifest as Neoconservative Global Capitalism or Leftist Global Socialism, must exist worldwide to be functional. This should be obvious. Unless all nations and peoples are liberal, being liberal is dysfunctional. We, of course, know that there will always be some group that is self-interested, whether that group is an international disporia or business elite — which is why we are advocate what we do.

I think some of you miss this. To some extent, what we are seeing is a struggle between the Neocon model and the Leftist Model, it’s an ideological battle to define what type of transnational ideology the US should be governed by — given that is has it’s ethnic character has been deconstructed. Should we be governed by a modern form of imperialism or a modern form of Socialism? As we know, backing the former is becoming more in line with Organized Jewry’s interest — and the later is becoming more in line with Minority interest. For us, of course, the former is also preferable — since at least it gives us the opportunity to construct an ethnonetwork, as difficult as this is, given out individualistic tendencies.

Regardless, the elites are realizing, that the Han Chinese are fundamentally illiberal. Dogson, mentioned that China was Marxist and now is tending towards nationalism. While this is true, to some extent, it’s misleading since China was never not nationalistic, at least in the sense of natio or ethnos. While China embraced the Marxism of Class conflict and pushed a Cultural Marxism of race conflict in the West, it never was in any sense culturally (ie racially) Marxist — it was ethnosocialist. China was Communist with (Han) Chinese Characteristics and was never Communist with Jewish Characteristics.

What China is doing is largely substituting Confucian ideology for Marxist ideology. In some ways they are becoming what the US was pre-60′s, minus the democracy They are becoming a Capitalist nation based on a Han-Confucian national identity — much as we were a Capitalist nation based on a Anglo-European Christian national identity.

Given this, we should have no doubt that China, unless it collapses internally, will be seen as a fundamental threat to our elite. That said, I find Dogson’s view that it will collapse to be odd, given that many here believe in the potency of genetic attraction. While most Han, who comprise 90% of the population, are not racially conscious, they have a high genetic and cultural relatedness.

While I imagine that many here may disagree, I do not seem them as a threat, except when they are over here, given that their views align with ours.

Regardless, the Western Elite is beginning to