Kevin MacDonald: I am beginning a series of articles on the Leo Frank case, beginning with an account of Albert Lindemann’s important work in his 1991 book, The Jew Accused. The Frank case is important because it is part of the lachrymose view of Jewish history in America — a defining event that has been used by Jewish activist organizations ever since to indict the traditional culture of America, particularly the South. It is a truly amazing story that in the end broaches a great many of the issues that continue to surround Jews in America, particularly Jewish media influence and how Jews construct their own history from the perspective of the ingroup.
Kevin MacDonald: Series on Leo Frank, Part I
You can follow all the replies to this entry through the comments feed
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
Brilliant. I’ve longed for an unbiased account of this affair. I have read in several places, on Wikipedia and somewhere else, that five Jews were actually on the grand jury that condemned Frank. This is an important factoid, if true.
There were four Jews on the Grand Jury. I’ll be mentioning that in a later article. Kevin M
History is a palimpsest. Those who OWN the media, who control the education system, who own the congress, House and Senate both, they DETERMINE what is put on television, what is permitted in schools.
What is not surprising is that the literal, lineal descendants of the Bolshevik Butchers now are in power positions throughout the American society.
What concerns me is when, rather than if, they get TOTAL CONTROL.
Kruschev said the Bolshevik Jews killed TWENTY MILLION Christians in Russia.
Look at the Palestinians.
Only God will stop them now.
I believe He will.
Their little desert tribal demon won’t know what him, the genocidal maniac known as Hashem aka YHVH.
You can read what Thomas E. Watson wrote, and the case he made for Frank’s guilt in his “Tom Watson’s Magazine” here:
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=title%3AWatson%27s%20magazine%20AND%20mediatype%3Atexts&page=3
Dr. MacDonald has a firm grip on Tom Watson’s character.
From what I’ve read Watson had successfully defended numerous Negro murderers, including Negroes who had killed White men. No small accomplishment in the Georgia of his day. This experience may have given Watson some of his insights into the Frank murder case.
Watson was strongly opposed to American involvement in World War One. His newspapers and magazine were banned from the US Mail, but, Watson himself was too strong politically in Georgia, and across the nation to prosecute for anti-war activities.
Watson was also a critic of the Roman Catholic church, and his publications had been temporarily banned earlier from the US Mail because he had exposed in detail the Roman Catholic scandals of his day, and prior days.
@ Mo—I’ve read that about the jury that indicted Frank too. Five or Six Jews.
Thanks much for the link to Watson’s paper. Oney quotes it quite a bit, but there’s nothing like the real thing. Kevin M
Frank had a first class team of attorneys defending him and it was they who constantly brought up his Jewishness and said it was the only reason he was on trial
As Lindemann said anyone with the evidence against them that Leo Frank had could have found himself on trial. However his unusual appearance with full lips and staring eyes probably did make it easier to believe a Cornell educated manager would do such a thing.
If memory serves Jacob Schiff of Bolshevik financing fame was also instrumental in consolidating the New York press to rally to Frank’s aid.
This reminds me of the Court TV broadcast of the trial of Byron De La Beckwith for the murder of Medger Evers. They had mostly Jewish lawyers on Court TV and they spun everything anti Southern as you can imagine.
Rob Reiner was a guest and he talked of how most people don’t know the facts about these things and Hollywood makes movies to inform people. No kidding Rob? Thanks a lot.
They would interview blacks in Mississippi and bait them into saying bad things about White people but they never did because the South is not like they say on tv, regarding race anyway. But I will not forget what Reiner and the other Jews said during those broadcasts and how they tried to make the South appear.
When I first came online and began reading the Jewish/Liberal internet I continually read attacks upon Southern White people and Christians as we were called every name in the book.
We were stereotyped as anti Semitic and other things and when I would take issue with writers and owners of websites they defiantly told me that what they said was true even tho I am the one who should know. You cannot imagine how infuriating that is because we don’t have media or the means to fight back.
In our Southern culture we were always told by every authority from family, educators, and Church organizations that Jews were special. Jesus was a Jew, Jews are God’s chosen people, Jews are innocent victims of Nazis and we should never be unkind to Jews. Does that sound anti semitic? Even today Southern Baptists are the best friends Zionists could have.
It really messes with your head when you have experienced one reality but you are continually told that it was another reality.
The same thing happens with religion, I hear people describing Southern Christians and I have no idea who they’re talking about but they sound pretty cock sure.
We have to remember though that Frank ended up being lynched. This is terrorism, and the White men of the South practiced it frequently, that would make Jews as well as blacks very fearful. Plus the fact that Jews had to be conscious of the things they were doing and planning to do to Anglo Saxon and Christian people so they had every reason to fear us and to still fear us today.
It was just in the news that the South today has the most non White immigrants than any place in the United States but we still have the reputation that we earned in the past.
Years ago the Knoxville News Sentinel reported that hundreds of languages are spoken in East Tennessee. My personal physician is an African Indian. My cousin interned in Chicago and met and married a Doctor from India. My best friend’s daughter married a black man. My neighbor, a devout Christian, just got back from Israel. But the stereotypes of the South are still there.
Southerners are completely reduced to being like the German people, beaten down, bending over backward to show we’re not racist.
That’s why I have come to think that the A3P should stand for being anti neo Liberal economics because the party of explicit Whiteness will be impossible to sell.
If people think going back to our previous economic policy will bring auto manufacturing back to Detroit, textile manufacturing back to NC and keep TVA from being privatized then that is something they will support but there is not a snowball’s chance that most people will go against the PC they have been drowned in.
Of course that is obviously not the way all of us feel. The South was the only region that voted against Obama and when Jimmy Carter says its about race he ain’t lying. I can’t stand having a black in our White House and its because he’s black.
I’m not sure how things were back in the time of Leo Frank but I imagine it was much the same as it is today. There is one class of professionals, lawyers, judges, journalists, merchants and then there are the other classes. The ones who dragged Frank out and lynched him.
A Jewish professor who is skeptical of the received narrative:
http://www.leofrankcase.com/
(…)
“Recently promoted to chief bookkeeper of the NPCo, Herbert George Schiff was only 20 years old at the time of the crime. The issue remains: was he truly expected to come in to work on April 26th? (such a previous arrangement would imply that no assignation between Leo Frank and any ‘lady’ was planned or likely). According to watchman Newt Lee, Mr. Frank reminded him several times on the day before (Fri.) to report for his own duties (on the Holiday) an hour earlier than usual, i.e. 4pm instead of 5pm, so that Leo could attend an afternoon ballgame with his brother-in-law. Yet when Newt appeared at the appointed time, he was instructed by Leo to leave the building until even later than usual (6pm), not take a nap inside, and “have a good time (at the Parade).” Mr. Frank had cancelled the game-date with Ursenbach by phone at 1:30pm. Schiff’s long-time maid (Emma Beard) said she usually wakened Schiff on Saturdays, but did not do so that morning. Yet when a call was placed from the factory by Alonzo Mann, Emma later said she was “unable” to rouse him and Schiff never reported for work that day (or even called back). Emma and Schiff would later recall this ‘summons’ as occurring twice, at 10:30 and 11am, but Mr. Frank described it as a single call, at 11:30am. Alonzo also said ‘once,’ but did not specify the time. We are left with the puzzle of why any call(s) from the head office were essentially ignored that morning, although Schiff had stated that he knew he didn’t finish all his weekly calculations by Friday evening. He was also proud that he had not previously missed one day of assigned work in five years (except for the Ohio Flood disaster in Jan.). To further complicate matters, there is some evidence that although a call was made, it was not about work but only concerned an early morning delivery of Schiff’s forgotten clothing. If this interpretation is correct, then Schiff was never intended to come in that Saturday morning. Sorting out what really transpired in reference to these call(s) will probably result in a conclusion no one will want… ”
(…)
Three Cheers for the Revisionists!
More inconsistencies from the antisemitic wing of White Nationalism.
Previously, white culture was unique for its rule of law, and democracy.
Now it is unique in its ability to trump the law (the Frank ruling) and promote ochlocracy.
Speaking of controlling the narrative…still not getting harder.
If you expect that mainstream America is going to “wake up” to the idea that lynch mobs were an effective method of carrying out justice, and obsessions with Jewish rapists are acceptable norms – then you are promising us a White culture that will increasingly look like Haiti.
We should put Lindemann’s name on a list of historians we can count upon to speak the truth.
@AngryJew, Nobody here has said anything about supporting lynch mobs.
We discuss lynch mobs because they were a part of our history and we do not deny that history nor lie about it. Nor do we set up anti defamation organizations to prevent others from telling the truth about what we did. If our victims hate us for what we did then we don’t pretend that they’re are evil anti Anglo devils who hate us for no good reason. I can see how that would be a cultural shock for you.
We White people are the ones who formed the United States government and created the law and order you speak about. Things only began to fall apart when the Jews came here and begin to meddle with us the same way they had meddled with the Catholic Church and White nations in Europe and the CIA meddles with third world nations.
We talk about lynch mobs because we do not delude ourselves that we’re perfect and always innocent victims and everybody else is evil because they pick on us. You might find that difficult to understand.
We speak truthfully and freely about our history because this freedom and the people’s right to know is a central part of our government and way of life.
We speak from the strength of our accomplishments and abilities to thrive and function independent of other people. Therefore we don’t have to spread lies and self serving propaganda because we don’t feed off of others. Its insignificant what they think about us. For instance, if you are angry and upset with what we do then what are you going to do about it?
On the other hand what if the people you mention did “wake up” to what Jews have done to America and Western civilization? Do you think we could do something about it?
You have only the freedoms you can defend and I think White people are in a pretty good position of being able to defend ourselves. That’s not exactly true of Haitians and some other people I could name.
It always irritates me when people whine about White people and are critical of us. Why do you choose to live in the United States and not Israel? You have your own state so why choose America over the Great state of Israel where God’s chosen people live? Can you please solve this everlasting mystery for me and explain why you like living among the goyim?
If historically, the founding stock of America did not wish for their nation to be diverse, could you please tell us what would have been the proper way to respond to the Jews who were determined to make it so? This is the very thing we are attempting to figure out and we would love to have your input. Now we know that lynch mobs are out so what should we do as a solution to Jewish enemies within our nation who are determined to destroy Western Civilization and Christianity?
Should we lynch Jane Harmon or allow her to remain within our government where she can do us more harm?
AJ should know that the discussion is not about whether Frank should have been lynched or not but about whether he was guilty or not.
I think it is best to ignore AJ. His posts lack substance, and it seems he is here mainly to divert constructive discourse. What good is a shouting match with someone who is ideologically unmoveable?
The discussion is not about lynching, nor really about whether Frank was actually guilty or not(although this is an important factor), but rather whether Frank’s conviction and ultimate lynching were motivated by anti-semitism. With my current knowledge of the affair, I tend to think that Frank was not guilty(using the common things being common logic), but I equally do not believe that anti-semitism was a motive in the affair.
The point is that organized Jewish community reflexively takes the position of Frank’s innocence without any specific knowledge of the case. I think there was a similar, but more subdued response during the fall of Enron, when there were many claims in the media that Fastow was framed.
From the article:
The Frank case is important because it is part of the lachrymose view of Jewish history in America — a defining event that has been used by Jewish activist organizations ever since to indict the traditional culture of America, particularly the South.
The lesson here is that if you are indictable, you will be indicted; if critique-able, you will be critiqued. The Jewish strength (as was the Roman) is that they are not critique-able. They simply don’t tolerate it. Jews are an amoral people without shame, and they are without shame because they are such born liars that they lack a capacity for honest self-examination. Hence we have guys like AJ, a shamelessly intolerant advocate of tolerance. The contradiction never even occurs to him.
In the sometimes mutualistic, sometimes parasitic symbiosis of whites and Jews there is a lot of jockeying for position that goes on. In the times of the Roman Empire, whites were able to adapt to their own purpose Jewish survival memes in the form of Christianity, as I mention below in the thread titled “Reginald Thompson: How Pro-Life Are White Evangelicals?”. But the Christian memes also had a great many weak points — among them an emphasis on self-examination and a hatred of hypocrisy — and the Jews have figured that out and are now exploiting that weakness to the fullest. Deeply buried in their culture as a result of 2000 years of Christian practice, the cry of “Hypocrite!” has a paralyzing effect on almost all whites even if they don’t call themselves Christians. The Jews and their epigones rely on this, since the weapon can’t be turned around. Any charge of hypocrisy leveled at the Jew is laughed off. It’s not something they care about at all. That kind of hokum is strictly for the goys.
It’s the culture that must be changed in order to bring back the ancient Aryan warrior spirit. The particulars have yet to be worked out, but the general idea is sound. Our people used to have a legendary contempt for death, as shown, for example, in the gladiatorial combats of old Rome. This is an attitude that should be cultivated and brought back. On a typical day in Rome perhaps fifty pairs of gladiators might publicly fight each other to the death, and such celebrations might go on for days, weeks, and even months. This was both entertaining and instructive for the people. It helped give the Romans the kind of spirit they needed when, after they had suppressed the Spartacus slave revolt, they crucified 6600 rebel slaves — that’s one about every hundred yards, along the whole 400 mile distance from Rome to Brundisium, via the Appian Way. They left the crucified bodies to rot, an example to others of how Rome dealt with traitors that continued to improve the character of natives and visitors alike for years.
The Tom Watson material is fascinating. See this article:
http://www.archive.org/stream/watsonsmagazines214wats#page/182/mode/2up
I hope Dr. MacDonald reads it, if hasn’t already.
@Captain Chaos,
Your plan reminds me of the Morgenthau Plan for the Germans after WW2, except with more of an emphasis on sterilization and low calorie dieting. This approach smacks a little of Old Testament justice. The Occidental Quarterly has some articles about secession, perhaps a division of the US into two or more parts. Wouldnt this be a better and more workable solution than your emigration proposal?
@ Sing
There is a collection of Thomas E. Watson’s editorials against American involvement in World War One that is also fascinating, and unknown to even the scholars of the era:
http://www.archive.org/details/mrwatsonseditori00wats
The pdf version is available by clicking on the sidebar.
whether or not Frank is guilty is immaterial. Stating he is guilty is a hate fact.
Would it were possible to exhume the body of that poor girl and do an DNA test …I am sure the ADL would make sure the results, if the ‘wrong’ results’ were suppressed.
The ‘truth’ in our sense means NOTHING to the Jewish community. NOTHING. Even if they knew Frank were guilty, prosecuting him, or these days, speaking of his guilt is ‘anti semitic’ .
As Prof. Macdonald often rhetorically asks, how do you have a dialogue with such people?
angry jew, I have an idea…let’s go to a jewish blog or discussion group and have this conversation. Since Jews are so much more open minded and tolerant than evil gentiles, certainly, an open minded debate will take place…
Ooops that was in bizzarro world. here on earth, we’d be banned, possibly have our IPs turned over to the ADL for ‘hate investigations’ (and no doubt future prosecution) while you can come to this ‘intolerant’ website and vent your views and, in your case, unfounded insults.
KM quotes;
“Watson the populist seemed much more motivated by his perception that a rich person was throwing around money in an effort to overturn a just verdict for a heinous crime against a poor southern girl — “that rich men escaped scot-free for doing things that brought down harsh punishment upon the poor” (p. 263).
He warned about a “gigantic conspiracy of big money” aimed at undermining the judicial system to free a “rich Sodomite” ”
The role that the class angle played in this crime as indicated from the above quotes by KM on what motivated editor Tom Watson should also be a litmus test as where and to whom the allegiance of the various Jewish radicals of that period really laid.
If the various brands of Tribe leftists and not just the proto-Zionist factions identified with the standard B’nai B’rith assertions that anti-semi motivations were “behind” the accusation and conviction of Franck, e.g.
“much of the writing on Mary Phagan’s murder makes it into a Jewish morality tale emphasizing Southern racism, bigotry and xenophobia”
then this would indicate precisely that Tribe ethno-identity eclipsed any notion of the “international brotherhood of the proletariat”.
Anti Zionist Tribe radicals spent all of their time telling the ethnically European American working class they should be showing solidarity with, irrespective of ethnic identity, this international beyond-the nation state brotherhood of workers against the boss class.
This class identity was supposed to supersede, if not totally eradicate, any feelings of nationalist identity that a Euro working class militant might hold towards “their” nation-state capitalists.
All radical Tribe propaganda revolved around this concept of Class War irrespective of borders which was obviously antipathic towards national identity.
I wonder if this was a case of er “making an exception” ‘cos I’m Jewish?
Did anti-semi somehow mysteriously override these Tribe Radicals supposed sole allegiance to “international proletarian solidarity” when it was, in reality more a case of a rather different soul allegiance?
Perhaps Tribe radicals have always had an anti-semi free pass on this “bedrock principle” tho’ I’m sure no such exception applied to the Euro-proletariat.
Not sure what is behind the KM observation “Watson eschewed the Jewish angle during the period leading up to the trial, even defending Jewish revolutionary anarchist Emma Goldman” Did Goldman put class before ethnicity? If she did was she, as I rather suspect, an exception amongst Tribe radicals?
People were probably very upset with Frank because at that time our society was a lot more prudish and they would have been outraged at his sexual escapades and they would have hanged him for that alone. Which may be another reason Jews hate Christians and tried to destroy WASP culture.
Vermont and the South are working toward secession.
However, there are problems with this. Israel uses walls, control of the infrastructure, below ground, on the ground and in the air to divide the Palestinians and control them so they cannot stand together and fight.
If states seceded then they would have us separated and could control us, especially if they end up with the Federal government and the military with its superpower weapons, I don’t know how that would work.
If the USA is divided by regions then we would end up having to migrate away from our own distinct culture which conflicts with other parts of the nation. Southerners don’t wish to move North and you know New Englanders or Californians, Washingtonians, etc do not wish to move South.
Another reason secession is not the answer for White people, Europe is much, much worse off then we are regarding immigrants, how can the British people secede? Or the people of other nations such as Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Italy, France? Why should we have to divide up our countries and how could we defend ourselves if we did that? Muslims are so great in number in Europe they could easily defeat and destroy White people and drive us out.
What will we White Americans do if we don’t have our White allies in Europe, Australia and Canada because they’re all broken up and having to contend with other races in their own countries?
We have to fight for our survival because they have backed us into a corner and its all or nothing.
@freddie_turnill
Looking back we have to keep in mind that Thomas E. Watson was a well known national political figure and he was acquainted with the other national political figures particularly those in the populist-Democratic-Socialist camp.
During the railroad strikes of the 1890′s Emma Goldman had said of one railroad tycoons’, that he treated his St. Bernard dogs better than he treated his workers. Watson got a kick out of this line of Goldmans’ and used it.
Although, Watson had a printing press on his farm in Georgia—he also had a publisher in New York City.
@Captain Chaos,
I read O’Meara’s article and it made a lot of sense to me. I would like to see your counter-argument. I am not sure if the “all or nothing” approach is very practical. Although we are in a gradual process of awakening, and many more people will awaken with time, its hard to imagine a situation where all Whites will awaken, or at least a large enough majority that would be willing to support the type of “hard line” policy that you advocate (an expulsion of Jews and others from the US). Even many US supporters of a White ethnostate would probably not support such drastic measures.
Lets assume that at some point in the future, enough Whites have awoken, and do not want to be a part of the multicultural nightmare that the US has become. At that point, Whites will be approaching, or possibly less than, half of the population (European Whites are already down to a bit over 60% of the population). Why wouldnt the most logical solution be then to divide the nation in half (or some other division based on mutual agreement)? Such a thing has worked for the Czechs and Slovaks, in Eastern Europe and elsewhere. The British possessions separated into Canada and the US after the revolutionary war, and we have all got along fine ever since. Do you suggest that a White ethnostate would not be a viable nation, if it bordered a multicultural US?
@Captain Chaos,
Sorry, I was referring to O’Meara’s essay on secession posted some time ago, which suggested that dividing the US was a logical solution to the situation. As far as his assertion “the Jews were not a necessary element in bringing our race to the edge of the abyss”, I havent read that article. I would disagree with that statement, and suppose Kevin MacDonald would also.
@Barbara,
Lets imagine a situation in the future where there is a very vociferous White movement, where millions of Whites from all over the country are very unhappy with the multicultural nation. In this scenario, lets imagine that the federal government is willing to agree to a partition of the US in some way (perhaps this is forced upon them by some kind of insurrection, not necessarily a military one, possibly just huge protests and trying to make the economy grind to a halt, blocking roads or whatever). Why wouldnt such a partition be the best solution?
“If states seceded then they would have us separated and could control us, especially if they end up with the Federal government and the military with its superpower weapons, I don’t know how that would work.” Canada’s independence is secure, and it borders the US with its weaponry. Also, note that the bulk of US military personnel, especially in the highest ranks, are Europeans, and it is hard to imagine that they would agree to an unjust war against a peaceful neighboring state. There is the example of the Civil War of course, but this was a different era.
“If the USA is divided by regions then we would end up having to migrate away from our own distinct culture which conflicts with other parts of the nation. Southerners don’t wish to move North”. Hopefully, Whites would be willing to abandon their regional culture and loyalties for the greater good of the survival of their race. A partition would require a lot of sacrifice, that is true. But a race war, necessary to create an all-White nation, would be very destructive, and require many times the sacrifice. I can stand to leave my farm behind, to start anew elsewhere. But would I be willing to fight for years in battle, kill others and possibly lose members of my family? Thats going to turn off a lot of people.
“Europe is much, much worse off then we are regarding immigrants, how can the British people secede? Or the people of other nations such as Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Italy, France?” It is the central government of the EU that helps push third world immigration. Being separated into states allows nations such as Denmark to design their own anti-immigration policies. If the EU had sovereignty, Denmark would have no such option. Whites are better off in a small ethnostate than a large multicultural one.
“We have to fight for our survival because they have backed us into a corner and its all or nothing.” I think we want to keep a flexible mindset, and keep all options on the table.
@Andrew – the biggest problem with secession – some Jews would secede with us and the cancerous process and Jewish sabotage would begin all over again and destroy us from within.
The case for Frank being innocent rested on Conley being the killer and composing and writing the note by himself. However the note was clearly not what it purported to be to be, it claimed that it was written while the assault was actually in progress ( ‘he is playing with me now’) which no one would have believed for one minute. This detail makes it most improbable the note was an attempt by Jim Conley to implicate Newt Lee (‘tall sleam negro’).
Even if Conley was dumb enough to believe his handwriting and spelling could pass for Mary Phagan’s he would certainly not have written a note which made the fantastic and totally incredible claim that the killer allowed Mary Phagan to write while he was assaulting her, if he was trying to make the letter sound genuine.
The imaginative nature of the letter is more consistent with the literate Frank having composed it but not really trying to make it believable. That is not to say Frank was thinking straight, the letter was harebrained just like his repeated calls to the factory, which were completely unnecessary and sure to draw attention to him.
Much of the behaviour that made the detectives suspect Frank could be down to him being a nervous high IQ type who got jumpy and talkative around the police. That could explain how and why he came up with unprompted and extremely detailed accounts of his activities and whereabouts the previous day off the top of his head. Detectives saw this as evidence he’d been working on an alibi but he might just have been too forthcoming and good at coming up with such details.
However Frank claimed not to know a worker called Mary Phagan despite paying her for years and walking within 3 feet of her work station every day. Phagan was striking (‘well developed’) and had attracted attention from other men, she also had that most noticeable of characteristics – golden hair. Some of Frank’s early behaviour could be explained by his brilliance and nervousness but telling a deliberate lie about knowing Mary was a different thing.
Long before he was treated as a suspect Frank’s behaviour was not that of an innocent man.
If any of you have friends or acquaintances in any big city police department, see if you can get them to tell you the truth about Jewish crime levels, especially among rabbis. And have them tell you about ADL interference. Several friends and one relative who are police officers have told me that Jews are arrested a lot for or receive a lot of complaints regarding sexual crimes, never mind the usual business based theft and drug dealing, with rabbis for some reason being involved in stalking at a higher rate than the rest of the population, and in a surprisingly high (to the police) number of drug arrests. I guess they’re surprised because so many people, including police, look at rabbis as being something like priests. This is no joke or exaggeration, these cops are just telling me what they’ve dealt with. One guy is funny in that his take on Jews is that they’re a bunch of “liars and perverts who play word games and they believe they are smarter than they really are.” These guys have also said the Jews seem to believe they can get away with anything and are as quick as blacks and latinos to play the race card.
I find it interesting that the Catholic League worked up the nerve a few months ago to point out that the rate of arrest for rabbis when it comes to pedophile activities is far higher than that in the Catholic Church, but the media never mentions this fact. At least they did something right: http://catholicleague.org/release.php?id=1693 ” … Last year, 40 minors in this small Jewish community said they were abused. Last year, there were 10 such allegations in the entire Catholic Church in all 50 states. Catholics are fed up with the duplicity.”
Ok, they’re fed up. Time to organize and do something. But the higher ups are bought and paid for, just like those in the “US” government.
Alex Linder discussed quite a bit ago on his Radio Istina show. He read from and commented extensively on an E. Michael Jones article in the April/May issue of Jones’s “Culture Wars” magazine. Link to show:
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:iRWYk2951jMJ:radioistina.com/+%22e+michael+jones%22+%22leo+frank%22&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us