Christopher Donovan: This weekend was to have been the American Renaissance conference, a fantastic gathering of white advocates from across the Western world. Its cancellation was forced, as most know by now, because of pressure and terroristic threats received by three (or four?) hotels that were to have hosted. The anti-white and left-wing elements are gleeful about this development, naturally.
I don’t personally know all the details, and this was actually the first of about four or five conferences in a row that I would have missed (financial reasons, in part). So I’m casting about in the dark here, but here is what I would like to see.
1. A thorough investigation by federal law enforcement. Whether the FBI, the civil rights division at the Department of Justice (criminal or civil sections) or Homeland Security, this entire episode screams out for agents to look into what happened. Imagine if the NAACP had to cancel a conference because of similar threats. What would law enforcement’s reaction be? Swift, fierce and overwhelming. Law enforcement should set up a sting. It would be so easy — and bound to catch someone, as the anti-whites are increasingly convinced they’re untouchable. Yes, most white advocates laugh at the notion that the federal government would ever investigate crimes against us — but don’t be too sure. Not everyone in federal law enforcement is sitting around itching for the death of the white race, believe me.
2. Consideration by American Renaissance organizers of civil legal options. A lawsuit against the hotels, against Fairfax County or D.C. government, against law enforcement, against One People’s Project — whoever else could be named. Breach of contract, outrageous conduct, prima facie tort, tortious interference, interference with First Amendment rights of assembly and speech, interference with civil rights, emotional distress… you name it, there’s a cause of action, if not a hundred. Who is this Daryle Jenkins? Or Jeffrey Imm? What do these men know about what happened? Did they encourage illegal activity? Or civilly tortious activity? Who are their financial backers, and could those sources be reached? This option may go nowhere, but it’s worth thinking about. As a civil defense attorney, I saw the absolute fire-bombing a plaintiff’s attorney could accomplish with nothing but a well-pleaded complaint and discovery. If you can lay waste to a company because one employee claims sexual harassment — bringing the CEO on down to the cleaning lady in for day-long depositions — imagine what else you could do.
3. Coverage by the press. The press hates white advocacy, but they love a juicy story. ”White supremacist conference cancelled” is a juicy story, and there are plenty of people to talk to and comment. A good reporter should do some digging around. He (or she) might come up with gold. If not the NYT, how about the Village Voice? If there’s no legal recourse here, this must at least be known to the general public, who can usually be expected to say “I don’t agree with those guys, but they should have the right to speak.” We as white advocates cannot let this incident go undocumented and forgotten, like a modern-day Katyn. Are you listening out there, journalists? Jared Taylor will speak to the press, and Lord knows the SPLC will, too. It’s all packaged up and ready to go… unless, of course, you actually have zero sympathy for white advocates being prevented from meeting, and actively seek to suppress that story because it would present them in too sympathetic a light. I will be watching, I can assure you. And I know damn well some of you know about this incident.
4. Strategizing by white advocates about how to stop this in the future. This has already been going on, and lots of good ideas have come out, like more-public (i.e., government-run) or private venues.
What’s so depressing about this episode is that it can’t really be called a “wake-up call” for white advocates. We already know exactly how marginalized we are. We know exactly what the stiff consequences are for standing up publicly on these issues. We’ve seen violence against our people. We’ve seen our people fired from their jobs. We can’t get paid ads run in publications. We know CPAC wouldn’t allow us a table. So, this really is a hard blow.
Could the speakers have their comments recorded and uploaded to the AmRen site for youtube-style viewing?
Christopher Donovan is the pen name of an attorney and former journalist. Email him.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
I have a question for Christopher Donovan: I read somewhere that the ADL got a prosecutor(lawyer, I guess) fired from his job for attending an American Ren. conference. Is this true? Is this possible? How far is one protected in terms of second ammendment rights? Say for example, that a TOO writer’s, such as yourself, identity were somehow determined, would an organization such as the ADL be able to get you fired from a public defendor position say? Or if a student made a monthly donation, might his school be able to expell him or her?
I realize that tenure is an unusually powerful contract, and professors everywhere would like to keep it that way, so people like Prof Macdonald, or say, Arthur Butz, are safe. But what about us peons? It would be nice to see someone with legal expertise and familiarity with this environment expound on this topic.
Donovan has made excellent suggestions and I hope that each one is acted upon. I would like to see those behind this caught and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Plenty of people would come out in support of actions against the anti American usurpers.
@Fabricius – It is really scary in America today, Ernst Zundel was dragged from his East Tennessee home and put into prison. He will be released on March 1, after serving 8 years for “holocaust denial”. You can be put into prison for denying history! Obviously no one would care if you denied slavery or the Civil War. How is this sort of thing supposed to make a person feel about jews?
There are a lot of experts who claim there were no gas chambers in Nazi Germany but what will happen to us if we discuss it? jews get their hate crime laws passed everywhere and there is no place to get away from Jews?
An old white man has become a hero on youtube because he beat up a black thug. Over two and half million people have seen this video which is unprecedented. Its very sad because obviously the elderly white man became very agitated and upset but the point is that Americans are fed up with non Whites in our country and seek any evidence that someone is fighting back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL0s_jHc1dc&feature=related
Here is an excellent timeline of the takeover of the world by the Jews
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm
Down thru history people such as Andrew Jackson, Abe Lincoln, Sir Walter Scott and others have discussed this Jewish problem to which we continue to seek a solution.
If Taylor is as smart as I think he is, he has been talking to his friends who are lawyers about being deprived of his Constitutional Rights by a number of individuals and organizations.
One individual, a Canadian citizen of French Roman Catholic background living in the United States, even posted his threats & smears on his organization’s website, and he was speaking for his organization. This should be an almost automatic payday for Taylor.
I would think that Taylor, and his lawyers should be talking to both the FBI and the DOJ about being deprived of their Constitutional Rights, and other violations of federal law that did occur.
The Attorney General of Virginia, and the Virginia State Police should also be contacted about this situation—according to Taylor’s press releases there were death threats made to innocent third parties.
Fabricius:
The firing of the prosecutor who went to AmRen was frightening, but probably legal (keep in mind that he gave his real name to a reporter from the Washington Post, so he had a hand in “outing” himself.)
He could have sued his employer for civil right violations, but probably would have lost on grounds that the district attorney exercises wide discretion in deciding whom to employ or not — and that association with controversial political issues is just such a reason, because it would affect “public confidence”. I’m not saying I agree with this line of reasoning, of course — just what a court would probably say.
He could have sued the ADL for tortious interference with contract, but probably would have lost. They would have argued that they were simply passing along information. And imagine the strength of the ADL’s legal team – they’d have, paid or pro bono, the world’s most prestigious lawyers and law firms lining up to defend them.
Most states have what’s called “at-will” employment: that means that barring racial reasons, a person can be fired at any time, for almost any reason. My boss could fire me tomorrow because he doesn’t like my tie — never minding my political views.
I’ll tell you another thing, too: blacks and Hispanics often file discrimination-in-employment cases, but even in today’s liberal world, judges toss these cases out left and right. Often, they’re meritless, but at bottom, courts don’t want to be bothered with what they see as basically private business interactions that should not be second-guessed by courts.
I would advance an argument that firing someone for white advocacy is akin to firing them for being white, which is actually illegal. But I can tell you that if forced to look at the issue, a court might even agree that a boss could fire someone for off-duty association with the NAACP. As a practical matter today, of course, that’s extremely unlikely to happen. I’m just thinking out loud here.
That might actually be an advantage of being fired for white advocacy over bad ties, incompetence, etc.
One thing I should I have expanded on in my blog item is this:
What AmRen is going through now is, more or less, what black civil rights groups and activists went through several decades ago. The GOVERNMENT, because of the 14th Amendment, couldn’t directly discriminate against blacks, but private parties sure could. That’s how all the civil rights laws anchored jn the “commerce clause” came to be — it was an end-run around the Constitution’s inability to reach private behavior, i.e., a hotel that cancels a conference or a whites-only lunch counter.
The legal battles of that era were fought in an atmosphere of strong hostility from whites, who, as we know, had the upper hand back then. The law firm of Davis, Polk & Wardwell — an NYC powerhouse — actually sided WITH the Topeka Board of Education in Brown v. Board. Think about that one for a second. How times have changed! Today, Davis, Polk would line up against us, not for us.
Let’s not forget that these are individuals, and, organizations who deprived Taylor & others of their First Amendment Rights—not the federal government, or the State of Virginia.
I think an investigation would reveal cooperation with law enforcement, gov, the ‘anti facist’ groups and probably a shadowy connection to the ADL or SPLC – one can’t get away with death threats without the complacency or cooperation of the government and the defacto ‘deciders’ of who gets ‘civil rights’ – the organized jewish elite.
“What’s so depressing about this episode” is all those kosher meals gone to waste. Jared should donate them to his buddies at the local Chabad.
The first Palestinian to die at the hands of the Jews was Jesus Christ.
“You resent the Jew not because we crucified Jesus but because we gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it on you.”
— Marcus Eli Ravage, American Jew (1928).
C. Donovan:
Yes, blacks and others do often file discrimination lawsuits when they don’t get what they want. In the “utopia of diversity” that is my workplace, I have seen several such lawsuits over a short period. It doesn’t matter how nice you’ve been to them–it’s a weapon of professional advancement in their eyes. Human kind, especially non white Europeans, are very tribalistic when it comes down to it.
I just can’t get over how nasty and ruthless the ADL really is to get someone fired from their job just for attending a conference!! All these mob organizations, ADL, SPLC, NAACP, designed to harange private individauls have a common origin, obviously. The peculiar aggression against AmRen, I bet, is that they see it as perhaps an inchoate early precursor to a pro white organization analagous to the NAACP. That must be nipped in the bud.
To be fired for white advocacy, you say, would be good martyrdom, but I disagree. When you try to find another job later, everyone will assume you were actually fired for some truly egregious expression of racism, and will want none of it. Thanks for the copiuos reply. I love reading your articles. You make the law interesting.
Donovan says: “commerce clause” was an end-run around the Constitution’s inability to reach private behavior,
What is the commerce clause? Could it be used to sue for equal control over media which is now owned by Jews?
Doesn’t Jewish control of media have the same negative effects upon other races as Whites control of buses or schools or lunch counters?
I would hate to sound pessmisitic, but in this case the law would be applied as fairly as ‘hate crime’ laws are now. there have been, i believe, cases of genuine assaults on right, far right, WN, speakers that have not been prosecuted or, in some cases thrown out by Judge Levy-farb-stein-witz-berg
History, will we ever learn from it.
When a man tried to speak in the last century his meetings were disrupted by club wielding, heckling, communists. The reds would BEAT the attendees as well as the Party members and trash the hall.
This happened REPEATEDLY, and the police, DID NOTHING, per usual.
So the man thought about it, and thus was the SA born. Guess what? The reds quit attending, they were afraid, of course this nation has REDS in charge so the enemies of White people have free reign.
link
The complete disregard for civil liberties, for freedom of speech by the enemy of humanity is clear. The destruction of lives by the enemy, figuratively and literally, of patriots of the past and contemporary, should demonstrate, to the most conformist conservative, that they mean business.
They are the UN-Americans.
The Last Days of the Romanovs (review)
From the article:
1. A thorough investigation by federal law enforcement. … Yes, most white advocates laugh at the notion that the federal government would ever investigate crimes against us — but don’t be too sure.
The federal government doesn’t investigate crimes against us, it perpetrates them.
2. Consideration by American Renaissance organizers of civil legal options. … As a civil defense attorney, I saw the absolute fire-bombing a plaintiff’s attorney could accomplish with nothing but a well-pleaded complaint and discovery. If you can lay waste to a company because one employee claims sexual harassment — bringing the CEO on down to the cleaning lady in for day-long depositions — imagine what else you could do.
“Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them.”
–Mary Frances Berry, Chairman, US Commission on Civil Rights
3. Coverage by the press. The press hates white advocacy, but they love a juicy story. … It’s all packaged up and ready to go… unless, of course, you actually have zero sympathy for white advocates being prevented from meeting, and actively seek to suppress that story because it would present them in too sympathetic a light.
From the point of view of the press, this isn’t a good story because publishing it would expose their own hypocrisy and that of most of their readers, who profoundly approve of the ideas of “fighting racism” and suppressing “hate speech”, even if it does somewhat bend, fold, spindle, and mutilate the First Amendment. In their minds, this is an acceptable price to pay. This reluctance to face one’s own inconsistencies is just human nature, as true of those on the right as those on the left. As my own efforts in these pages have shown over the last couple of months, people don’t like having their hypocrisy exposed. This is counted on. Without the acquiesence of the media and the population at large, such bully tactics would not have been possible.
4. Strategizing by white advocates about how to stop this in the future. This has already been going on, and lots of good ideas have come out, like more-public (i.e., government-run) or private venues.
They will doubtless do nothing illegal, which means they will do nothing.
What’s so depressing about this episode is that it can’t really be called a “wake-up call” for white advocates. We already know exactly how marginalized we are. We know exactly what the stiff consequences are for standing up publicly on these issues. We’ve seen violence against our people. We’ve seen our people fired from their jobs. We can’t get paid ads run in publications. We know CPAC wouldn’t allow us a table. So, this really is a hard blow.
It’s what you’d expect in a country that is still, nominally at least, in the hands of the white race, which in biological terms is easily the least ethnocentric race on the planet. In fact, that is a radical understatement, probably something one would get from taking KM’s paradigms too seriously. The real problem is not that there is an implicit white racism that is bubbling just under the surface, actively being suppressed by a culture of critique and elites who have sold out to an ascendant, hostile Jewish minority. The problem is that the great mass of white people themselves don’t think of themselves as white and in fact, if not consciously so, are actively anti-white. These are the people who watch with great attentiveness and not a trace of outrage or disgust as negros bed and breed with their women. They will happily and proudly state that they are opposed to racism in all its forms. Almost half of them voted for Obama, for example. It is hard to imagine a more anti-white act than that. Referring back to my previous comments about the relative EQ (ethnocentrism quotient) of the various races, if the biological ethnocentrism of whites really were equal to that of Jews, this would roughly be the equivalent of Israeli Jews electing a kaffiyeh-wearing Palestinian leader like Yasser Arafat to be their Prime Minister.
Could the speakers have their comments recorded and uploaded to the AmRen site for youtube-style viewing?
Sure. But meet, eat, and retreat just isn’t the same without the first part.
HA says:
February 21, 2010 at 12:20 PM
“What’s so depressing about this episode” is all those kosher meals gone to waste. Jared should donate them to his buddies at the local Chabad.
:lol:
Samuel Schneider strikes again.
“The problem is that the great mass of white people themselves don’t think of themselves as white…”
Adam,
This is a grey area.
I’ve never encountered an White in America who actually denied being White when pressed on it.
It’s more that they’re ashamed to admit it.
Why would they be ashamed?
Well, maybe it has something to do with how Whites are subjected from birth to millions of hours of Anti-White Propaganda from the Media and School Systems.
As you rightfully said on a previous occasion, most people will submit to the Group Norm, no matter how insane and no matter how clearly hijacked by an Enemy Race from the Middle East, due to Evolution programming Humans to want to stay in the group.
Outside the group, it was hard to protect yourself from Sabertooth Tigers or to find Cavewomen to knock up.
“and in fact, if not consciously so, are actively anti-white.”
There are certainly more Anti-Racist Whites than there are Pro-White Whites.
Part of the problem though is that a lot of the Anti-Racist Whites have been too brainwashed to realize that Anti-Racist positions are de facto Anti-White positions.
To realize that being Anti-Racist is being Anti-White, you have to realize the protective nature of what is now called “Racism”, and to understand that you have to understand that Non-Whites are agents.
Most Anti-Racist White Liberals are incapable of understanding that Non-Whites are agents or that they have interests of their own that they can act on.
That’s why NO ONE in the Democratic Party foresaw that electing a Black as the Prez would lead to a massive increase in Welfare Spending.
Suckers.
“They will happily and proudly state that they are opposed to racism in all its forms.”
Most Whites would say that by now. Partly this is because the Secular Religion inverted morality so that what once was called evil is now called “Tolerance”, while the place of actual evil has been replaced by “the Racism of the White Man” which is blamed for every failure of inferior races to achieve equal outcomes relative to Whites.
If you gave me control of Israeli Culture for 50 years, I could get the Jews to consider Abortion a Sacrament and Jewish Ethnocentrism the ultimate evil.
Maybe I could even get them to think it’s evil to eat the wonderful food called Bacon.
To paraphrase Hamlet:
“There is nothing either good or bad, but being told by culture leaders makes it so.”
Reginald says:
If you gave me control of Israeli Culture for 50 years, I could get the Jews to consider Abortion a Sacrament and Jewish Ethnocentrism the ultimate evil.
First, I would say that the idea that environment is everything and that genetics count for nothing is the essence of anti-racism. As a biological racist I reject that point of view. I believe that the Jews differ from us at a genetic level and that those differences are both significant and ineradicable short of altering the genome.
Second, I will observe that control of the culture was something that whites had for the first century or so of America’s life (roughly 1780-1880), and during that period they fought the bloodiest, most expensive war in the nation’s history, in which white men killed other white men with the express purpose of crushing white supremacy. So white culture, such as it is, has always been anti-white. That is more proof of their abysmally low EQ compared to Jews. By contrast, when Jews fought a civil war during the revolt of the Maccabees, they fought to expel the Hellenizing foreign influence that would have placed them on an egalitarian footing with outsiders. In other words, they fought to purify and preserve their race, not to destroy it.
Third, as a practical matter, and keeping the Maccabean revolt in mind as an example, I would note that it would be very unlikely that any outside cultural influence would be able to gain control of Jewish culture using any known method short of genocide. That the Jews would die before giving up their ethnocentrism is just more evidence that such a thing as differing average racial EQs must exist, even if for now experimental support is lacking. By contrast, whites surrendered their culture without a shot being fired, and the vast majority of whites today recognize the Jews as fully equal to themselves, or even their moral superiors. They have accepted the Jewish yoke with the submissiveness of a born slave. Jews would never do that, and did not do that even when they were forcefully subjugated by the Romans.
“during that period they fought the bloodiest, most expensive war in the nation’s history, in which white men killed other white men with the express purpose of crushing white supremacy”
Hooey. The Civil War was about money, as all wars.
“Ending White Supremacism” was just a propaganda bit tacked on later so the Northerners could go back to feeling good about themselves after their sin of fratricide.
The question of the Civil War wasn’t about how to end White Supremacism. It was about WHICH Whites get to BE supreme.
Jews then saw an opportunity to turn the Northerners’ own propaganda against the very Northern Whites then currently reigning supreme, in order to make THEMSELVES the supreme ones.
They will doubtless do nothing illegal, which means they will do nothing.
This is almost certainly true, with the boy scouts, budding Evola-lites, and young computer geeks who currently run the WN movement. Total risk avoidance is the name of their game, while our enemies continue to stamp harder on our faces.
1836: Following his years of fighting against the Rothschilds and their central bank in America, President Andrew Jackson finally succeeds in throwing the Rothschilds central bank out of America, when the bank’s charter is not renewed. It would not be until 1913 that the Rothschilds would be able to set up their third central bank in America, the Federal Reserve, and to ensure no mistakes are made, this time they will put one of their own bloodline, Jacob Schiff, in charge of the project.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild dies and the control of his bank, N. M. Rothschild & Sons is passed on to his younger brother, James Mayer Rothschild.
1837: The Rothschilds send one of their own, August Belmont, an Ashkenazi Jew, to America to salvage their banking interests defeated by President Andrew Jackson.
1840: The Rothschilds become the Bank of England’s bullion brokers. They set up agencies in California and Australia.
1841: President John Tyler (the 10th President of the United States From 1841 to 1845) vetoed the act to renew the charter for the Bank of the United States. He goes on to receive hundreds of letters threatening him with assassination.
1845: The Great American Patriot, Andrew Jackson (7th President of the United States) dies.
Before his death he is asked what he regarded his as greatest achievement. He replies without hesitation,
“I Killed The Bank,”
This is in reference to the fact he banished the Rothschilds Second Bank of the United States in 1836.
1861: President Abraham Lincoln (16th President of the United States from 1860 till his assassination in 1865) approaches the big banks in New York to try to obtain loans to support the ongoing American civil war. As these large banks were heavily under the influence of the Rothschilds, they offer him a deal they know he cannot accept, 24% to 36% interest on all monies loaned.
Lincoln is very angry about this high level of interest and so he prints his own debt free money and informs the public that this is now legal tender for both public and private debts.
1862: By April $449,338,902 worth of Lincoln’s debt free money has been printed and distributed. He states of this,
“We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”
That same year The Times of London publishes a story containing the following statement,
“If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce.
It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”
1863: President Abraham Lincoln discovers the Tsar of Russia, Alexander II (1855 – 1881), was having problems with the Rothschilds as well as he was refusing their continual attempts to set up a central bank in Russia. The Tsar then gives President Lincoln some unexpected help.
The Tsar issued orders that if either England or France actively intervened in the American Civil War, and help the South, Russia would consider such action a declaration of war, and take the side of President Lincoln. To show that he wasn’t messing about, he sent part of his Pacific Fleet to port in San Francisco and another part to New York.
1865: In a statement to Congress, President Abraham Lincoln states,
“I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greatest foe.”
Later that year, on April 14, President Lincoln is assassinated, less than two months before the end of the American Civil War.
Following a brief training period in the Rothschilds London Bank, Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild, born in their house in Frankfurt, arrives in America at the age of 18, with instructions and the finance necessary to buy into a banking house there. The purpose of this was to carry out the following tasks.
1. Gain control of America’s money system through the establishment of a central bank.
2. Find desirable men, who for a price, would be willing to serve as stooges for the Illuminati and promote them into high places in the federal government, the Congress, Supreme Court, and all the federal agencies.
3. Create minority group strife throughout the nations, particularly targeting the whites and blacks.
4. Create a movement to destroy religion in the United States, with Christianity as the main target.
1963: On June 4th President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve.
Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.
This Executive Order 11110, is rescinded by President Lyndon Baines Johnson (the 36th President of the United States 1963 to 1969) on Air Force One from Dallas to Washington, the same day as President Kennedy was assassinated.
Another, and probably the primary, reason for Kennedy’s assassination is however, the fact that he made it quite clear to Israeli Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, that under no circumstances would he agree to Israel becoming a nuclear state. The Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz on February 5, 1999, in a review of, Avner Cohen’s book, “Israel and the Bomb,” states the following,
“The murder of American President John F. Kennedy brought to an abrupt end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S. administration on the government of Israel to discontinue the nuclear program…The book implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether Israel would today have a nuclear option.”
Social Security Will Fall To Obama Before The Taliban Do
by Paul Craig Roberts
Hank Paulson, the Gold Sachs bankster/U.S. Treasury Secretary, who deregulated the financial system, caused a world crisis that wrecked the prospects of foreign banks and governments, caused millions of Americans to lose retirement savings, homes, and jobs, and left taxpayers burdened with multi-trillions of dollars of new U.S.debt, is still not in jail. He is writing in the New York Times urging that the mess he caused be fixed by taking away from working Americans the Social Security and Medicare for which they have paid in earmarked taxes all their working lives.
Two Wall Street henchmen, Alan Greenspan and David Stockman, set up the Social Security raid in this way: The Carter administration had put Social Security in the black for the foreseeable future by establishing a schedule for future Social Security payroll tax increases. Greenspan and Stockman conspired to phase in the payroll tax increases earlier than were needed in order to gain surplus Social Security revenues that could be used to finance other government spending, thus reducing the budget deficit. They sold it to President Reagan as “putting Social Security on a sound basis.”
Along the way Americans were told that the surplus revenues were going into a special Social Security trust fund at the U.S. Treasury. But what is in the fund is Treasury IOUs for the spent revenues. When the “trust funds” are needed to pay Social Security benefits, the Treasury will have to sell more debt in order to redeem the IOUs.
Social Security was mugged again during the Clinton administration when the Boskin Commission jimmied the Consumer Price Index in order to reduce the inflation adjustments that Social Security recipients receive, thus diverting money from Social Security retirees to other uses.
Today Social Security revenues are being used to fund trillion dollar bailouts for Wall Street and to fund the Bush/Obama wars of aggression against Muslims.
Having diverted Social Security revenues to war and Wall Street, Paulson says there is no alternative but to take the promised benefits away from those who have paid for them.
Social Security, formerly an untouchable “third rail of politics,” is now “unsustainable,” while the real unsustainables—a pre-1929 unregulated financial system and open-ended multi-trillion dollar Global War Against Terror—are the new untouchables.
How do you stop these people?
http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=482
Nice posts Neoboudica.
It’s like a “The Best of….” from the Internet, stuff we’ve all seen before, but it’s nice to see arranged in one place in one post. Thanks.
And how do you stop these people indeed.
Their work is, though ultimately very simple – stealing, lying, cheating, killing – it’s superficially very complex. And, though most people live at the surface anyway, they can’t even see what these evil Banksters, and their hired hands in the Media, etc are doing beause their method of working is intensely secretive, covert.
We are still in the stage now of properly identifying Tne Beast, while also doing some soul-searching to see what it is in us that made this all possible.
It’s only after that that we’ll be able to take any effective action.
Hopefully, by then, it won’t be too late.
Above, Neoboudica dares to mention the Rothschilds.
Here we have Baron David de Rothschild, head of the Rothschild Bank, openly if perhaps unwittingly attesting to the Rothschilds’ stellar exemplification of certain themes strongly recurrent in the work of Professor MacDonald:
“There is no debate that Rothschild is a Jewish family (…) Building a global firm before globalisation meant a mindset of sharing risk and responsibility. If you look at the DNA of our family, that is perhaps an element that runs through our history. (…) Finally, don’t be complacent about giving the family jobs.”
[http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10855]
There we have it: racial identification, unabashed nepotism, and an ongoing historical conviction that the Jewish DNA of the Rothschilds carries the secret of their success!
Unfortunately, not all of us whom the Rothschilds and their tribal relatives have economically subjugated are permitted to claim a genetic identity of our own, let alone count ourselves the victims of interracial “terrorism”.
Go figure!
Today Social Security revenues are being used to fund trillion dollar bailouts for Wall Street and to fund the Bush/Obama wars of aggression against Muslims.
Having diverted Social Security revenues to war and Wall Street, Paulson says there is no alternative but to take the promised benefits away from those who have paid for them.
——
Just watched that Jew ass-licker Alan Simpson say it on CNBC. Don’t forget the Jews would love to get their hands on the Social Security Trust Fund in order to “SAVE” Social Security. Look at that greasy Greek (Jew?) Peterson and his equally greasy Jew partners like the various Schwartzmans.
@ Neoboudica: You asked “How do you stop these people?”
You know very well what needs to be done to stop them! Writing articles about the problem sure as hell isn’t going to do it…no matter how well written they is [sic]!
Getting back to the point of this thread: AmRen, which refuses to name the Jew, got squelched by the Jews anyway. Next time, AmRen, face reality. Next time, put your shindig someplace secure, like in a right-wing White environment – plenty of places in Fly-Over country to do this – and provide your own, armed security: stop depending on the hostile ZOG to do it for you. In other words, stop talking back, start fighting back.
The jews have caved in time and time again throughout history. Sure, they’ll keep their ethnocentrism, but hide it, and hide their rituals and all else depending on the circumstances. Jews try to make themselves seem heroic, but their hiding of their own culture when needed is a mixture of ethnocentrism plus cowardice. When things become physical, they retreat immediately unless the odds are mightily in their favor. This is why they have made up the legends of Masada etc. When the coming, inevitable backlash hits, the jews will use their proxy warriors to fight. When that goes South, they will run for it. It’s in their nature. They’d rather run than fight to the death. They’re genetically predisposed to this behavior. After all, look at their recent performances against Hezbollah when the latter could actually fire back with guns, rather than just throw rocks. “Girly men” as a description of the IDF and its soldiers would be too kind.
B says:
“during that period they fought the bloodiest, most expensive war in the nation’s history, in which white men killed other white men with the express purpose of crushing white supremacy”
Hooey. The Civil War was about money, as all wars.
Yes, there were other factors involved. But this is more a case of “both-and” rather than “either-or”. What people say about their own motives in going to war is important, and in the North their expressed purpose was to end slavery, which for them made the War a grand and stirring cause.
“Ending White Supremacism” was just a propaganda bit tacked on later so the Northerners could go back to feeling good about themselves after their sin of fratricide.
No, the Yankees were singing about that all the way; singing as they slew their fellow whites so that the negro might be free. Whites were raceless lemmings even back then. The story of Abolitionist John Brown was made into a great marching song.
John Brown’s Body
Old John Brown’s body lies moldering in the grave,
While weep the sons of bondage whom he ventured all to save;
But tho he lost his life while struggling for the slave,
His soul is marching on.
John Brown was a hero, undaunted, true and brave,
And Kansas knows his valor when he fought her rights to save;
Now, tho the grass grows green above his grave,
His soul is marching on.
He captured Harper’s Ferry, with his nineteen men so few,
And frightened “Old Virginny” till she trembled thru and thru;
They hung him for a traitor, they themselves the traitor crew,
But his soul is marching on.
John Brown was John the Baptist of the Christ we are to see,
Christ who of the bondmen shall the Liberator be,
And soon thruout the Sunny South the slaves shall all be free,
For his soul is marching on.
The conflict that he heralded he looks from heaven to view,
On the army of the Union with its flag red, white and blue.
And heaven shall ring with anthems o’er the deed they mean to do,
For his soul is marching on.
Ye soldiers of Freedom, then strike, while strike ye may,
The death blow of oppression in a better time and way,
For the dawn of old John Brown has brightened into day,
And his soul is marching on
The Battle Hymn of the Republic also proclaimed that liberating negroes from the yoke of white oppression was the purpose of the war.
Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord:
He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;
He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword:
His truth is marching on.
(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
His truth is marching on.
I have seen Him in the watch-fires of a hundred circling camps,
They have builded Him an altar in the evening dews and damps;
I can read His righteous sentence by the dim and flaring lamps:
His day is marching on.
(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
His day is marching on.
I have read a fiery gospel writ in burnished rows of steel:
“As ye deal with my contemners, so with you my grace shall deal;
Let the Hero, born of woman, crush the serpent with his heel,
Since God is marching on.”
(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Since God is marching on.
He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
He is sifting out the hearts of men before His judgment-seat:
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer Him! be jubilant, my feet!
Our God is marching on.
(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Our God is marching on.
In the beauty of the lilies Christ was born across the sea,
With a glory in His bosom that transfigures you and me:
As He died to make men holy, let us die to make men free,
While God is marching on.
(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
While God is marching on.
He is coming like the glory of the morning on the wave,
He is Wisdom to the mighty, He is Succour to the brave,
So the world shall be His footstool, and the soul of Time His slave,
Our God is marching on.
(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Our God is marching on.
The question of the Civil War wasn’t about how to end White Supremacism. It was about WHICH Whites get to BE supreme.
Jews then saw an opportunity to turn the Northerners’ own propaganda against the very Northern Whites then currently reigning supreme, in order to make THEMSELVES the supreme ones.
That the purpose of the war was to set whites on an equal legal footing with negroes — to end white supremacy — can’t really be doubted. That was the result, after all, and the cause continued to be pushed after the War ended. Negroes were set free and given the vote, and Reconstruction was implemented to make sure that it stayed that way. In that respect, Reconstruction was like an early version of de-Nazification in post-WWII Germany. Both were aimed at reforming the local white culture to make white supremacy an impossibility. This inherent racelessness and egalitarianism of whites stands in stark contrast to the biologically-based racism of the Jews, who proclaim as a fundamental tenet of Judaism their own supremacy over the rest of humanity, whom they have always regarded as mere cattle.
“No, the Yankees were singing about that all the way; singing as they slew their fellow whites so that the negro might be free. Whites were raceless lemmings even back then.”
NORTHERN Whites were.
And even in the North, there were the Copperheads:
Even in an era of extremely partisan journalism, Copperhead newspapers were remarkable for their angry rhetoric. Wisconsin newspaper editor Marcus M. Pomeroy called Lincoln “fungus from the corrupt womb of bigotry and fanaticism” and a “worse tyrant and more inhuman butcher than has existed since the days of Nero… The man who votes for Lincoln now is a traitor and murderer… And if he is elected to misgovern for another four years, we trust some bold hand will pierce his heart with dagger point for the public good.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copperheads_(politics)
Reginald says:
“No, the Yankees were singing about that all the way; singing as they slew their fellow whites so that the negro might be free. Whites were raceless lemmings even back then.”
NORTHERN Whites were.
It’s also interesting that although, as you pointed out, some Confederate politicians expressed white supremacist sentiments, that wasn’t what the soldiers of the South were singing about. Preserving white supremacy wasn’t a big concern for them, apparently. In their marching songs, they talked a lot about preserving their freedom, their honor, and kicking the Yankee invaders out of their land, not white supremacy. But then, I suppose it is difficult to get all worked up about preserving white supremacy when the people you are fighting against and who are desperately trying to kill you are virtually all other whites. It’s not exactly a situation that inspires warm feelings of racial kinship or solidarity.
In this extensive list of Confederate songs here, I was only able to find just one song in which the Confederates even mention slaves, and even that mention was in non-racial terms.
” … War to the hilt, theirs be the guilt,
Who fetter the free man to ransom the slave. … ”
– From “God Save the South”
“Judge Douglas has said to you that he has not been able to get from me an answer to the
question whether I am in favor of Negro citizenship. So far as I know, the Judge never asked
me the question before. He shall have no occasion to ever ask it again, for I tell him very
frankly that I am not in favor of Negro citizenship. Now my opinion is that the different States
have the power to make a Negro a citizen under the Constitution of the United States if they
choose. If the State of Illinois had that power I should be opposed to the exercise of it. That is
all I have to say about it.” – Abraham Lincoln, speech at Springfield, Illinois on June 26, 1857
Adwarf is a lying kike.
“In this extensive list of Confederate songs here, I was only able to find just one song in which the Confederates even mention slaves, and even that mention was in non-racial terms.”
That is because White and Negro equality was considered so absurd as to not even be worth mentioning, Adwarf, you lying kike. White supremacy, likewise, was taken for granted.
Speaking of Lincoln, Lincoln’s stump speeches about negroes are well known. But less well known, and not known at all to anklebiters like my fan club president CC, is that Lincoln changed his mind. In a stunning display of the raceless egalitarianism all too typical of whites, he went on record as being in favor of giving them the vote.
“The amount of constituency, so to to [sic] speak, on which the new Louisiana government rests, would be more satisfactory to all, if it contained fifty, thirty, or even twenty thousand, instead of only about twelve thousand, as it does. It is also unsatisfactory to some that the elective franchise is not given to the colored man. I would myself prefer that it were now conferred on the very intelligent, and on those who serve our cause as soldiers.”
– Abraham Lincoln, last public address, April 11, 1865.
“But then, I suppose it is difficult to get all worked up about preserving white supremacy when the people you are fighting against and who are desperately trying to kill you are virtually all other whites. It’s not exactly a situation that inspires warm feelings of racial kinship or solidarity.”
The Confederate Soldiers did have warm feelings of Racial Solidarity with their fellow White Southerners.
Obviously they didn’t feel such feelings toward the race traitors from the North who were fighting them.
It’s like how the Macabees had Racial Solidarity with their fellow Macabees, but not with the Race Traitors of the Hellenistic Party like High Priest Menelaus.
Sorry, “Maccabees.”
Given the difference between the North and the South it could be argued that the South won the war of Northern aggression and today we’re two different nations.
The South has been backward, less educated and poverty stricken as a result of the war, reconstruction and the oppression since the war. We lost our best and brightest and this is still happening to us today as our children become soldiers on behalf of Israel.
Roosevelt gave us the TVA but President Kennedy worried that jobs were leaving the North because of cheaper labor in the South as tho he didn’t represent the South or somehow it didn’t matter. We were treated like the burden of the Northern White man and therefore subject to whatever charity he chose to dole out.
The Kennedys traveled in Southern Appalachia and highlighted the poverty of the area, as a ploy to win election. Such things create resentment among White people because we don’t appreciate the Kenndys or anyone else making themselves feel superior at our expense. The social programs they then created helped minorities rather than Southern Appalachia.
I prefer that others have the expectation that we lift ourselves up rather than giving us this unwanted charity which calls attention to our problems. I cannot imagine how an entire race of Black people can not only tolerate the patronizing of White people but welcome and demand it.
Therefore doesn’t that mean that Anglo Saxon, Nordic and Aryan people have higher expectations of one another. We cull the weakest so that we grow stronger and more fit. The Jews could all be wiped out if some genetic weakness or disease strikes them they’re so inbred and dependent upon the Tribe.
Dolly Parton realizes the problems we face and she started her Imagination Library. If only those in government representing the South had her vision and values. This is the road we need to take rather than expecting other White people to treat us like we treat Haitians.
There is a world of difference in attitudes which mark the races and you certainly do not wish to see other White people humbled like other races do you? Sometimes that results in wars between us but given what we create there are things worth fighting over.
But going back to the topic of this thread, we should sue over Jewish ownership and control of media, which hurts Americans every bit as much as segregated schools, drinking fountains, movie theatres, and job discrimination etc, hurt blacks. Our media would bring attention to what happened to AmRen which is illegal and outrageous since people were threatened.
We have to get access to news media as a first and vital step. We have to usurp Jewish control in government, finance, entertainment and media. I suppose we could sue as Donovan suggested but it seems we have too much pride and would rather accomplish these things based upon our abilities. Fine, so the question is how do we do this.
Kevin says it must be from the top down. I wonder if the A3P can attract economists who can serve to counter Jewish usury and the derivatives, speculation and other Jewish crime that has taken over our economy and also get rid of the Fed?
Can the A3P attract candidates, foreign policy experts, visionaries, educators, scientists and all of the people necessary to lead? I would like to hear more about these issues and what efforts and outreach are being made by A3P if that is possible.
Kevin says it must be from the top down. I wonder if the A3P can attract economists who can serve to counter Jewish usury and the derivatives, speculation and other Jewish crime that has taken over our economy and also get rid of the Fed?
———
Let’s not forget the Golden Rule: He who has the Gold makes the rules.
One thing is for sure, the jews are nervous, even if only on a subconscious level. Otherwise they wouldn’t spend so much time here and at other sites telling us how hopeless it all is, lol.
[Adam is a suspected internet troll]
It appears that our anti-White troll has returned, after a short sabbatical. Lets see what new gambits he has learned.
“They will doubtless do nothing illegal, which means they will do nothing.”
He suggests White advocates will do nothing. Its hopeless. Unless of course White advocates “get smart” and do something illegal. This is the old “despair gambit”, dredged up again, with the added twist of implying that illegal actions might be something to think about. Our lovable troll is full of great ideas. But while peddling despair, he doesn’t mention that pro-white sites are growing fast. The message is starting to get through. Shutting down the Amren conference has alarmed people, got them angry, and motivated them.
“By contrast, whites surrendered their culture without a shot being fired, and the vast majority of whites today recognize the Jews as fully equal to themselves, or even their moral superiors. They have accepted the Jewish yoke with the submissiveness of a born slave.”
Lets see, previously he tells us “most whites have no principles”, “most whites are traitors”, and now they are born slaves. Its his old “hate Whitey” gamebit, he certainly doesn’t like Whitey very much. He also pretends he is a self-hating White, when his Semitism has been unveiled before. What a devious, long-forelocked fellow he is.
“So white culture, such as it is, has always been anti-white. ”
This is his “repeat it enough times and they will believe you” gambit. The complete lack of White ethnocentrism is one of is long-running themes, he has at least 10 posts on this, as he attempts to argue against Dr. MacDonald’s well-argued position, supported by brain studies and human behavior patterns. Its pointless to refute him again, because the troll refuses to be persuaded, and part of his strategem is to make his interlocutor exasperated.
“Whites were raceless lemmings even back then.”
More anti-White rubbish. In the civil war era, when there was race-based slavery, when intermarriage was forbidden, Whites were raceless? Our troll has the chutzpah to peddle bare-faced idiocy to those who would buy it.
A vital counter-tactic to the troll is not to feed him. When you talk to him, he continues his long dialogues, and he succeeds. For the troll to succeed, he needs dupes, people who will engage him. When you do so, you become one of the “useful idiots” that Jewish Marxists love so much.
Andrew, did you get my last e-mail?
Israel sends out people to post at blogs and spread pro Israel propaganda, so I would be surprised if they didn’t target Kevin’s site and plot other evils to be done to us.
I’m not saying Adam is an Israeli but I will say he likes to play devil’s advocate.
Obvious Game says:
One thing is for sure, the jews are nervous, even if only on a subconscious level. Otherwise they wouldn’t spend so much time here and at other sites telling us how hopeless it all is, lol.
Persisting in the same tactics that have repeatedly failed for the last 60 years is indeed probably hopeless, and seems to me to be the very definition of insanity. Rockwell failed, Pierce failed, Duke failed, and it appears there are now others who are determined to follow in their footsteps. Such people are in reality one of the strongest pillars of support for the status quo, since they divert revolutionary energies into harmless channels that will not pose the system any threat. Many of them are degenerate whites who identify themselves for you when they smear any attempt to understand the reasons for the past 60 years of failure as “defeatism” or “Jewish sabotage”. These degenerates use tactics any Jewish commissar would approve, flinging scurrilous charges everywhere, knowing full well that most will not bother to sort through the details and assume that surely a few of them must be true. Such hysterical attacks make sense when you realize that continued failure for whites is what they really want.
The ancient Stoic philosophers had a saying: An ignorant man is one who blames others for his problems; a man at the beginning of wisdom blames himself; the man of perfect wisdom blames neither himself nor others. This meshes in an interesting way with an insight from Sun Tzu in Art of War: Know neither yourself nor your enemy, and you will lose every battle; know yourself but not your enemy, or your enemy but not yourself, and you will win half the time and lose half the time; know yourself and know your enemy, and you will win every battle.
Lately the white race has been losing every battle. Victory for the white race will occur when it understands both itself and the Jew, gets over its obsession with affixing blame, and instead just takes steps to solve the problem. The complete destruction of the global technological system cannot fail to accomplish this. It would reduce the Jew to what he would have been all along, except for the power that that system grants him. Without the system, Jews would be instantly reduced to a tiny tribe of hate-filled religious fanatics, irrelevant and powerless.
Adam said:
February 24, 2010 at 4:54 PM
“Victory for the white race will occur when it understands both itself and the Jew, gets over its obsession with affixing blame, and instead just takes steps to solve the problem. The complete destruction of the global technological system cannot fail to accomplish this.”
Well, why don’t you give us a step-by-step primer on just exactly how to destroy the global technological system? As long as you’re going to be here, you may as well talk us through it.
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
Let’s hear it!
Step one: Obtain the knowledge and the means.
Step two: Execute.
Adam says:
February 24, 2010 at 8:20 PM
Step one: Obtain the knowledge and the means.
Step two: Execute.
Ok, we’ll be working on that. Meanwhile, we’ll continue doing things the old-fashioned way.
I see that you, too, believe in doing it the old-fashioned way—otherwise you wouldn’t be here.
Is it your opinion that we should stop all of the other White Nationalist activism now and not waste any more time with it?
Adam,
You still haven’t addressed my concern that the techniques discussed in that article are all too likely to lead to the destruction of the entire Human Species, including Whites.
If you weren’t up to no good, I would think you’d link to this story instead:
http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-cyber-attack17-2010feb17,0,803757,full.story
The only people I would not want to have access to such technology because they are so twisted are Jews.
When the first heart transplants happened there were people who were freaked out at the idea of heart transplants but today nobody gives them a second thought.
Having someone else’s heart keeping you alive does not alter your humanity in any manner nor does it result in a combination human with different personality or combined intellect. In fact the recipent body rejects the transplant.
I cannot imagine that a human being would wish to live to be 200 if it would in any way alter who and what he is. It might be possible to reanimate a dead person but if that means the person is someone else because of the death of brain cells then he is allowed to die.
What would be the point of keeping alive a body if the “person” who used that body is gone?
Whatever technology is used in the future it will have to be technology that makes it possible for us to remain the “person” we were born or it will be useless. Having someone else’s heart or little future thingies flowing in your blood stream which keep you alive and make your life worth living will not destroy the human race.
There is always the threat that some nut, such as those in Israel, will misuse technology just as Israel used phosperous against their hapless victims but those dangers we live with today. Because of israel and jews we live with the threat of a nut with a suitcase bomb.
We still haven’t found a way to protect ourselves from nuts and technology today and I imagine it may very well be like that in the future but I don’t see how that means that we should stop worrying about jews, diversity and the destruction of America.
Americans are the best hope of the future and its technology.