Kevin MacDonald: The mainstream media is influential partly because of constant repetition. The theme of Edmund Connelly’s current TOO article, “Selective Moral Panics in Higher Education,” is one that should be repeated over and over again by White advocates. The least little public departure from political correctness receives wall-to-wall national media treatment and an outpouring of candlelight vigils and expressions of moral outrage, while murder and mayhem committed by non-Whites against Whites is ignored or given grudging local coverage in which the race of victims and perpetrators is downplayed if mentioned at all. This pattern is not merely an expression of media power and the cowardice of university administrators steeped in the culture of the left. It is also a harbinger of the future when Whites will be a minority in a sea of hostile non-Whites.
Neither of the two Kent state murders mentioned in Connelly’s article was the result of planning. It’s not as if the Black murderers consciously set out to murder a White person. They were impulsive crimes motivated by uncontrolled anger. For example, in the Kernich case, the story I get is that Kernich yelled “you morons” (not “you Black morons,” much less the N-word) at a car that almost hit them. The Black men in the car got out and there was a fight–a classic male status thing made more intense because of race differences and perhaps because word ‘moron’ feeds into Black insecurities about intellectual ability. The fact that the fight escalated to murder was quite possibly facilitated by racial differences in impulsivity and behavioral restraint (see Rushton’s Race, Evolution, and Behavior). The racial difference may also have energized the murderers by tapping into latent or overt Black hostility toward Whites made more intense by the emotion of the moment.
The bottom line, however, is that once again, a White person was victimized by a Black person and the media and the university did everything they could to downplay the racial angle. Most importantly, the public is largely unaware that Black on White crime is vastly more common than White on Black crime and much more of a public policy problem than White fraternity boys making fun of Black History Month at UC-San Diego.
Facing the Future as a Minority
The Akron & Cleveland Blacks’ may not have been looking to kill someone—but—they sure as hell were looking for trouble. It’s at least 20 miles to Akron from Kent, and at least 40 miles from Cleveland to Kent.
I think Ohio Wesleyan (OWU) needs a little wake up call too. The young vet who was murdered was a fairly recent graduate of that institution.
This comment by MM appeared in response to a different blog post but is relevant here. In fact, one reason I made this post was to encourage comment on this vital topic. This is MM’s comment:
Off topic to this, on topic to Edmund Connelly’s recent: Drudge Report runs a story on flash mobs in inner-city Philly:
http://cbs3.com/local/Police.Respond.Thousands.2.1579054.html‘
Story reports two beaten severely. Doesn’t mention the races of the mob or the victims. But we can guess. And the video confirms one of the victims, “Olympia Pizza employee Seth Kaufman,” as white. The other, more severely beaten victim: “At 15th and South Street, a 27-year-old woman was brutally attacked after being surrounded by scores of people… “She had a broken nose and they knocked out two teeth,” said Good Samaritan Rick Almeid, who aided the victim. “She was just an innocent young girl.””
Mob in video looked predominantly, but not exclusively, black.
Third flash mob in recent months, according to the video report.
National coverage?
Really makes you wonder, doesn’t it?
How many promising White students go away to college, only to be driven out before they can graduate by the sanctimoniously expressed anti-White bias of academia and its stultifying PC drivel? After all, those who are driven away for such reasons are precisely those whose critical faculties are intact, and who are morally capable of experiencing anger and anxiety commensurate with what is at stake.
What price has White society, and society at large, paid for the exclusion of such people from the mainstream, which increasingly requires college credentials of its participants … not as proof of intellectual strength, but of indoctrinability and thus of intellectual weakness?
No question about it: academia has become the rickety, wheels-falling-off handcart of social and evolutionary degeneration. If you are proud to possess its credentials, maybe you shouldn’t be.
Driving to work today a radio station in LA (the same one that broadcasts Rush Limbaugh) had a story on racial insensitivity by a New Zeeland airline. In other words, the fact the airline informed its workers that Tongans drink a lot is an international story of White racial intolerance while violent crime by non-Whites against Whites is ignored. The airline has of course apologized and removed the offending material. Kevin M
http://www.digitalspy.com/odd/news/a210032/airline-sorry-for-drunk-tongans-slur.html
Moral panics and “schizophrenia” seem to be part of the post-WWII Zeitgeist throughout the West. Journalism is obviously at the epicenter of these “seismic events,” constantly injecting anxiety and fear.
This is a bit off-topic, but I thought you might want to have a look at this article:
The History of White People
I find it ironic that so much energy is devoted to the project stigmatizing and belittling the notion that being White can rightfully be part of one’s identity.
Sure the lines that separate one ethnic group from another are fluid but so what? The fact remains that if you showed three people one whose roots are entirely subsaharan African, another whose family history is 100% scandanavian, and a third whose entire family lineage traces back to Japan virtually anyone who can see would instantly recognize which one was white, black, and east asian. It doesn’t matter if 99.99% of their genes are the same. There are still demonstrable differences in appaearance and even differences in phsiology that might lead to differing risks for heart disease, stroke, alcohol or lactose tolerance, etc..
What is the point of saying that 99% of actively transcribed genes ares are identical. My dog probably has 95% of the same genes but no one would say I am 99% dog, would they?
Also why say that the notion of being white originates in 1789. Europeans have always seen themselves as part of the “Western World” long before 1789. This is the same as being white by most definitions.
Anyway, its sad to see an Ivy League professor have so little to say. Virtually everything in that article is a mere regurgitation to the hackneed cliches we hear repreated time and again with no substantive examination or new evidence to bring to bear upon his argument. The impramatur of his degree and his alma mater are cited in that article primarily because so little evidence is brought to bear to support the professor’s views.
This kind of media bias didn’t just start happening. It’s a venerable media tradition.
Twenty years ago, I was caught in a full-fledged race riot in which about fifty enraged blacks went absolutely ape (what a surprise!) against half a dozen Whites, me included. One White man’s throat was cut, another was stabbed, the face of another was laid open with a motorcycle chain, and every single window was smashed in a certain upscale mall near one of the most luxurious and high-income residential areas in the US.
Later, it emerged that a dozen White police, the entire local police force, were parked down around the corner at the 7-11 in full knowledge of what was transpiring…for over 45 minutes! Only after the apes disbanded and ran away did the police cruisers come-a-rolling.
And what did “our” valorous boys in blue then do? They proceeded to interrogate, threaten, and berate the White victims as though they were personally responsible for the riot. (They weren’t; it turned out that certain underage Blacks had attempted to enter a drinking establishment without proper identification, were refused, and called up their homies. When a sufficient number of them had gathered, they launched one of their instinctive “Pandemonium on Monkey Island” routines.)
To this day, not one word of the incident has ever been reported by any element of the media, including the local newspaper. It didn’t merely vanish from the record; no record of it was ever generated.
I could go back even farther.
From the article:
Just prior to Christmas Break 2006, healthy Eastern Michigan University coed Laura Dickinson passed away unexpectedly in her dorm room. There was no foul play, the school said. Well, they lied. In fact, officials had reason to be suspicious of a black student, Orange Amir Taylor III, 20. Eventually he was arrested for raping and killing Miss Dickinson.
An interesting followup story on this that Connelly, for whatever reason, omits, and that some here may not know: The first trial of Orange Taylor ended in a mistrial, in spite of massive evidence of his guilt. The jury split 10-2 for conviction, the two holdouts being women, one white and one black. Taylor’s alibi, if you can call it that, was that, in the course of trying to burglarize her dorm room (his entry was caught on surveillance tape), he simply stumbled on Laura’s body after she was already dead. Then, nigga did what anyone would do, right? He became aroused and masturbated on her corpse! That was how he explained the presence of his semen on the body, and two women on the jury bought it! :-D
Perhaps amazingly, even in brainwashed America, they did eventually find twelve jurors “raciss” enough to convict this poor unfortunate negro, who clearly just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. After the conviction at retrial he was sentenced to life without parole by some ol’ raciss honky judge. If God is just, unser Führer Obama will certainly pardon him.
A brief recap can be found here:
http://www.jurorthirteen.com/OrangeTaylor/tabid/349/Default.aspx
this may sound like a dumb question.. but… what is in the ‘end game’ for our elite? Or do they even know? I am willing to except that the Jewish elite bears the brunt of the blame – and even though things are worse for whites they have effectively knocked out their competition, the wasp elite (hmm maybe I am answering my own question)
But do they have that kind of domination across europe where the same thing is occurring? What about white traitor elite – is everyone just scared?
can’t everyone see where this is going? do they care? Or do they not see and actually believe their own bs?
One wonders how long this current Anglo/Judeo, ‘Planet Of The Apes’ like, Negrophilia madness is going to continue, and to what ridiculous levels of White self abasement & self-destruction it will ultimately descend to. For a picture of what’s looming, look at the suppressed story of what Whites in S. Africa are enduring today. The Jewish vetted, main stream media actually aids and abets this low level anti-White race war by programing & encouraging it, and then glossing over, or rationalizing the murderous racial consequences of it. Meanwhile, the clueless, anesthetized Whites are being picked off one at a time. America is becoming a Negro hunting ground, without warning signs!
An excellent evolutionary racial study of this problem can be found at:
http://www.erectuswalksamongstus.us/index.html
Wow… “Adam” actually posted a readable and even funny comment! I thought he was one of Abe Foxman’s lackeys who got paid to read and comment on this site. (I remember a commenter a while back who said the blog should be renamed the “Kevin & Adam Blog” because it seems like “Adam” contributes more words than Kevin MacDonald!)
Anyway, keep up the good work everybody, and Eurodele, you should think about submitting a full post. Some of your comments are so good I actually saved them. I also have several personal anecdotes about policemen harassing whites while turning a blind eye to black thugs.
‘me’ – it’s heading toward a good old civil war, no matter that the elites, jews, self-absorbed fools trying to deny white identity and droves of other arrogant, ignorant fools believe otherwise. In the long run it’s good for whites. The jews have already achieved their goal of destroying the US and Europe. But what do they do when it’s over? Let ‘em have their Samson option. All the more excuse for everyone else to take things right to the end. Which they are going to do.
@Me
“this may sound like a dumb question.. but… what is in the ‘end game’ for our elite? Or do they even know?”
You are scratching the surface of a very big subject when you get into end games. There are various theories about a Jewish end game, if there is one, that range from deep conspiracies to closely related people just “doing their thing” independently.
For the European American elites, I think there are 3 main categories:
1) Globalists: These are epitomized by the Rockefellers, who feel that a one-world government would be a great step forward for mankind. “The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller, 1991 (http://www.svpvril.com/nwo.html). These make up perhaps 5% of the European elite. Their endgame resembles probably resembles a giant United Nations, where all nations and races resolve their disputes peacefully and govern the earth together, democratically, and world trade thrives accordingly.
2) Multiculturalists: These are probably typified by the bigwigs in the Democratic Party, perhaps Ted Kennedy was an archetype. They really, truly, honestly believe in a multicultural nation, a great rainbow of nationalities and cultures making up a Utopia of diversity. These make up perhaps a third of the European elite. Their endgame probably resembles the vision that Martin Luther King had for the U.S., where social and economic equality is achieved through government intervention, and there is no majority race.
3) Conservatives: I am using this term very loosely, and am applying it to “standard” elites that range from Rush Limbaugh to the Republicans and Wall Street Journal readers. The common theme that unites these people is a desire to maintain the “traditional” culture of the US. There are a lot of implicitly White people in this crowd. They tend to be patriotic, Christian and Republican-leaning politically. These make up perhaps 60% of the European elite. Their endgame probably resembles the United States under Ronald Reagan, where the U.S. is the world’s superpower, its language, culture and government has a distinct Anglo-saxon character, and there are good relations between the races.
There is another small minority that does not fit into any of the above categories. The problem with the above is that they do not take into account:
1) Race Differences in IQ and behavior.
2) Strong influence by a hostile elite.
I think that also, part of the answer is that most of the elites have a “vision” of what they want the world and nation to be like, but not necessarily a path to achieve that with realistic goals. The majority of the elite are either not aware of race differences, or do not see how they interfere with their vision. For example, Republicans desire a traditional US, and want to be inclusive of minorities such as blacks, to help create a political coalition to achieve legislative goals. However, Republicans ignore the IQ factor and historic voting patterns of blacks (who obviously prefer big government that provides them with goodies).
Probably the bottom line is that we need to recognize that our current European elites on the whole are working toward short-term goals with short time horizons, and dont have much in the way of a “master plan”.
And yet MacDonald says he doesn’t support Whites having the ability to segregate themselves from niggers by force of law. Perhaps he should rethink his position.
andrew, thank you very helpful
Aki Adam, I agree – one would think with the massive failures – that they woudl be worried but , it seems, to many it’s actually a ‘good’ sign. To say and ADL type – it shows ‘white privlidge’ no longer exists if we’re the ones getting ‘lynched’ .
i guess if one is hungry for power – say the non-jewish EU elite – the more chaos, the more turmoil means more justification to restrict free speech, to restrict arms ownership, etc.
The same way, say the neocons wish there would be another 9-11 globalists actually welcome chaos. Guess we’re the kulaks
Regarding “me’s” questions (several comments above) about what the Jewish and white élites who are, respectively, pushing, and collaborating in, forced race-replacement think about “the end game”: I also have asked myself if the central core of Jews pushing this are concerned lest race-replacement risk spreading to Jews too.
I suspect these Jews feel Jewry is safe (they must, otherwise they wouldn’t be doing it), because though they may feel some Jews are bound to succumb, which is unavoidable, they may see any who do as “expendable” and best eliminated from their tribe anyway, to keep it in fighting trim. They may see the Jewish race as including a genetic core that doesn’t change racially from age to age no matter what, always staying genetically Jewish and producing new generations of Jews continually, Jews who, as they are produced, sort of radiate out from this “tribe-replenishing” center that resembles the “apical-meristem” of plants.
The apical meristem is the plant’s “growth tip” that constantly produces new cells which radiate out and differentiate into leaves, stems, and so on, leaving the apical meristem cells themselves unchanged: growth takes place from the meristem out. In similar fashion, some of each generation’s Jews produced by this tribe-replenishing center will be more apt at maintaining Jewry, with others being less apt (and ultimately getting sloughed off by the tribe as a result), but the “tribal apical meristem” doesn’t change.
The Jews deemed less apt by their central-core cotribalists will doubtless include any Jewish race-mixers.
So the Jews can take part in forcing race-replacement on whites while confident it won’t spread to them because things extrinsic to the Jews don’t spread to the Jewish apical meristem.
See this, excerpted from a recent TOO log entry:
The end game for Jews is the mongrelization of the White race out of existence. They seek our genetic annihilation. Shhh, don’t tell the lemmings, it might frighten them off.
@Fred
The comparison of Jewry to an apical meristem is an ingenious analogy. However, I think that there is a strong tendency for us to ascribe too much organization to what is occuring. If we could somehow grab thousands of Jewish elites and interview them with lie detectors, I think we would find that the majority actually do believe in multiculturalism. From our interviews, we would probably find that a lot of their beliefs have an emotional basis rather than pure logic. We might find people who have a mix of beliefs that include strong feelings for Israel but distaste of oppression, distrust of Whites in general but interest in relationships with Whites, good feelings about immigration but a sense that Mexicans and blacks commit a lot of crime and have a lot of social dysfunction. In other words we would find a lot of real life liberals (probably a majority) as well as some cynical two-faced operators.
It seems to me that much of the intermarriage and assimilation is happening with many of the most talented Jews, who seem to be the secular ones. The Hassidim and high-fertility groups seem to have fewer of the most capable genes, at least large numbers of them have low incomes and fewer achievements. So, it may well be that the new waves of Jews replacing the secular ones are not of the same quality those that were lost.
One of my pet theories is that Jews tend to be highly emotional (like women), right-brain dominated people. They have a different mix of motivations, some of which clash with each other, but do not cause much cognitive dissonance because their minds operate substantially on emotion and impulse. One example of this is perhaps Israel’s foreign policy, where they carry out all kinds of brutal oppression against the Palestinians based on a Jewish survival instinct. Its not a very well thought-out plan, and results in the alienation of other countries serious long-term problems where they are at war with the entire Muslim world. Similarly, the Jewish settlement of that hellhole was a bad idea to start with, but was carried out through emotional impulses rather than reason and logic.
In the case of importing hordes of immigrants, I tend to think that there is also not a master plan behind this. Instead, it is probably based on emotional impulses (in this case, an instinctive fear of and antagonism against the White majority). Its like the Scorpion and the Frog, the scorpion cant help itself (bringing in the immigrants ultimately screws up Jewry as well as Europeans, the same with a degenerate culture).
In the case of importing hordes of immigrants, I tend to think that there is also not a master plan behind this.
I think there is a short term plan – both here and in the EU – in the EU, it breaks the back of nationalism and makes consolidating EU power easier.
In the US, it will mean the democrats (center of jewish power) will have a permit, machine like majority over the US the same way they have in all cities now. and the more uneducated, low iq, immigrants from cultures who are used to submitting to authority, the better.
The ADL or AJC had an article (i can’t recall where i read it, sorry no link) saying how great multiculti is for jews because they could form all sorts of alliances (against whom, the unanswered question) for example, when (jews) wanted to ban christmas, they no longer had to be the only ones speaking out, they could get alienated hindus, sikhs, muslims, etc (the funny thing is, very often the latter groups just dont share the same hatred of Christianity that jews do)
The greatest (maybe only) hope for saving the white populations of the West from demographic oblivion is the very Jewish ethnocentrism that is currently the main cause of the problem. Imagine a terrorist attack on the American Jewish community by homegrown Islamic terrorists (sufficient to make the wider Jewish community feel vulnerable). I think this would provoke a dramatic rethink of Islamic immigration into the US among elite opinion in the Jewish controlled media. Once a climate of opinion exists in elite circles that accepts that the nation (they will say this…rather than the American Jewish community) has the right to exclude certain categories of people from its immigration program for its own self-interest, the current principle of come one come all will end…and white activists will be able to invoke this argument to extend the principle (citing the Islamic example to defend their position when charges of racism are inevitably levelled against them). Given the Jewish monopoly on the speaking position in the organs of elite opinion – I think is the only hope we have.
“… once again, a White person was victimized by a Black and the media and the university do everything they could to downplay the racial element.” Why? Could it be that Jews and Jew allies have the top priority of destroying White racists?
@Captainchaos:
“The end game for the Jews is the mongrelization of the white race out of existence. They seek our genetic annihilation. Shhh, don’t tell the lemmings. It might frighten them off.”
Do White racists have two enormous problems: Jews and Jew allies at the top and Blacks and Muslims at the bottom?
For multiculturalism in Malmö, Sweden, see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzLECtFT4aU …
Should White racists do three things:
1. Prepare a 1200 word propaganda sheet that explains the White racist viewpoint.
2. Make a list of ten books that help Whites to understand the White racist
viewpoint.
3. Make a list of ten YouTube or other videos that help Whites to understand the White racist viewpoint.
I recommend the slogan: Jews are bad. White racism is good.
Does anyone have any better slogans? Does anyone have any better ideas?
Fair play. The New York Times picks up the story. HT, Am. Ren. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/us/25mobs.html?hpw
And the Times addresses race:
“The flash mobs have raised questions about race and class.
“Most of the teenagers who have taken part in them are black and from poor neighborhoods. Most of the areas hit have been predominantly white business districts.”
“Eric Gebieler says:
I recommend the slogan: Jews are bad. White racism is good.
Does anyone have any better slogans?”
how about:
“Deport the Jews? Just do it!”
More legs. Just on MSNBC. With video and a Philly executive/bureaucrat of some sort.
Clearly, there is a racial AND religious war being waged, using Blacks and other mentally sub-standard races as pawns in the war. If you doubt that, then a re-read of the Bible, the Communist Party Platforms, and the current subservient ‘shabbas goy’ attitude of the Obamaniacs should enlighten you.
Solutions? I just finished watching a very informative video -
http://www.americanvision.org/media/download/how-we-got-to-this-point/
-on the fallacy of Luther’s “Two Kingdoms” Theology, and how it ‘morphed’ the basically hierarchic, Covenantal, and Patriarchical nature of antebellum America, into our multicutural a-moral (because NOT theocratic) ‘paradise,’ precisely because we have left off the idea of:
a) America as unique
b) whites as God’s Elect
c) God’s law as undergirding ALL law, and holding ALL to the same standard; and therefore,
d) the non-whites as worthy only of serving God’s elect. (in short, Lincoln was wrong)
Is it different from the ‘Zionist supremacism’ now wrestling to hold sway over the world? Yes, in that it is
a) TRUE [Rev. 2:8,9]
b) beneficial to all concerned, unlike Zionist butchery, both here and abroad.
c) outside our depraved minds (unlike talmudic ever-changing, ‘one law for me, another for thee’ rationales)
and therefore, would be a better future, for it is
c) how the ENTIRE WESTERN world ran, before 1929.
Apart from that, wearing a gun and using it at EVERY OPPORTUNITY for self-defense, is our Second Amendment right. But I would admit, having a holster over my clericals might cause ANYONE to thik twice before starting a fight with me, with BOTH symbols of rectitude (Collar and Colt) on my person!
Deo Vindice.