Frank Rich’s Triumphalism

Frank Rich, writing in the NYTimes, thinks the battle is over and his people won. (Not for the first time. See here.) The basic idea is that it’s a bit too late for all those middle and working class White folks all up in arms (some literally) and saying that they want to take back their country. Rich is happy to report that in 2008 Whites represented only 52% of the births, and by 2012 they will be a minority. And that means that the Republicans can decide to be an all-White minority party — “That’s their  right.” (Thanks!)  But, according to Rich, what they can’t do is encourage the “mass hysteria” among Whites who see themselves being dispossessed.

Rich presumably sees this as a moral imperative that is so obviously true there is no need to explain why White people have no right to be extremely angry about what is going on and to try to change things as they see fit.

According to Rich, Republicans have every right to be the party of the White folks as they peacefully head off into the political sunset. The main role for Republican elites should be to quell the rage and prevent things from getting out of hand. Republicans should strive to make their members into a new model minority that accepts their minority status and rejects any claim to having a right to hold onto the country as their ethnic possession as it was only a few short decades ago — until people like Rich, who dominate the most prestigious and powerful positions of our media, academic, and political culture, prevailed in their long campaign to displace the traditional people and culture of the US.

Sadly, I have no doubt that the Republican elites will do their best to comply with Rich’s marching orders. After all, they wouldn’t want to be called racists by people like Rich.

Rich:

If Obama’s first legislative priority had been immigration or financial reform or climate change, we would have seen the same trajectory [of White rage]. The conjunction of a black president and a female speaker of the House — topped off by a wise Latina on the Supreme Court and a powerful gay Congressional committee chairman — would sow fears of disenfranchisement among a dwindling and threatened minority in the country no matter what policies were in play. It’s not happenstance that Frank, Lewis and Cleaver — none of them major Democratic players in the health care push — received a major share of last weekend’s abuse. When you hear demonstrators chant the slogan “Take our country back!,” these are the people they want to take the country back from.

They can’t. Demographics are avatars of a change bigger than any bill contemplated by Obama or Congress. The week before the health care vote, The Times reported that births to Asian, black and Hispanic women accounted for 48 percent of all births in America in the 12 months ending in July 2008. By 2012, the next presidential election year, non-Hispanic white births will be in the minority. The Tea Party movement is virtually all white. The Republicans haven’t had a single African-American in the Senate or the House since 2003 and have had only three in total since 1935. Their anxieties about a rapidly changing America are well-grounded.

If Congressional Republicans want to maintain a politburo-like homogeneity in opposition to the Democrats, that’s their right. If they want to replay the petulant Gingrich government shutdown of 1995 by boycotting hearings and, as John McCain has vowed, refusing to cooperate on any legislation, that’s their right too (and a political gift to the Democrats). But they can’t emulate the 1995 G.O.P. by remaining silent as mass hysteria, some of it encompassing armed militias, runs amok in their own precincts. We know the end of that story. And they can’t pretend that we’re talking about “isolated incidents” or a “fringe” utterly divorced from the G.O.P. A Quinnipiac poll last week found that 74 percent of Tea Party members identify themselves as Republicans or Republican-leaning independents, while only 16 percent are aligned with Democrats.


Bookmark and Share

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

129 Comments to "Frank Rich’s Triumphalism"

  1. me's Gravatar me
    March 29, 2010 - 11:58 am | Permalink

    yes, Republicans will do just that – that is what they have been doing – but they will be shocked when they are not treated as ‘heroes’ by the Jewish elite – but as what they are – jackals. McCain was geniunely amazed that his buddies who called him a ‘maverick’ turned on him when Obama came along. I am sure some people who let Colin Powel sail up the ranks were shocked when he crossed party lines and voted with his skin color.

    as for Frank Rich and the Jewish elite – their boasting at this point is curious -are they trying to provoke us, demoralize us? Or they just can’t contain themselves from boasting.

    As someone on this website so poigninently said once, first they criticized us, then they demonized us, the next step is start killing us. I have no doubt underneath Frank Rich’s seething hatred, that is exactly what he wishes would happen.

    I love the way the media simultaneously portrays this demographic change as something as inevitable as the weather, yet often refers to it as steps in a well planned objective with statements like ‘we have now reached the point where a white minority will be achieved by 2041′ -

  2. dan neil's Gravatar dan neil
    March 29, 2010 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

    Oh how bitter sweet the smell of sacrafice yet how week and unwillful we are to it..

  3. dan neil's Gravatar dan neil
    March 29, 2010 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

    I meant weak..

  4. dan neil's Gravatar dan neil
    March 29, 2010 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Oh how bitter sweet the smell of sacrifice yet how weak and unwillful we are to it..

  5. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    March 29, 2010 - 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Now is our last chance to prevent ourselves from becoming a minority.

    Vote in the congressional primaries for the most anti-immigration of the available candidates.

    Give to immigration reform group F.A.I.R.

    Don’t hire illegals, and don’t do business with anyone who does.

    Don’t retreat into escapist revolutionary fantasies, and don’t let extreme rheotoric alienate potential allies.

  6. March 29, 2010 - 1:16 pm | Permalink

    NYT columnist Frank Rich: Big Government “liberal,” Jewish, and a Ron Paul/Tea Party hater; No wonder he takes diction from Israel-first neocons
    http://www.libertariantoday.com/2010/03/nyt-columnist-frank-rich-big-government.html

  7. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 29, 2010 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Frank Rich is not a particularly Jewy-looking Jew either.

    http://infomash.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/frank_rich1.jpg

    Just on grounds of physiognomy, I suspect his mommy was a shiksa. I bet he’s the sort of militant Jew who, like Tim Wise, probably gets mistaken for being white a lot, and trades on it when it suits him. That’s probably the worst damage done by raceless white women who bed down with Jews and end up squeezing out little half-Jews. The vast majority of these become infiltrators, role models for whites who delight in destroying their own race, a description that fits a not-insignificant portion of them. Contrast that with the behavior of the Jew:

    “The Jew is the most astounding instance of racial solidarity ever offered by world-history. Without a fatherland, a mother-tongue, midst every people’s land he finds himself again: even commixture of blood does not hurt him; let Jew or Jewess intermarry with the most distinct of races, a Jew will always come to birth… he has no religion at all — merely the belief in certain promises of his god — whereon his race is ensured dominion over all that lives and lives not… The Jew is the plastic demon of man’s downfall in triumphant surety…”
    – Richard Wagner, Know Thyself, 1881

    Also of interest is that, according to wiki, he’s a product of what has become the Jewish anus of the universe, Harvard — the point of origin of such anti-white luminaries as Franz Boas, Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin, Noel Ignatiev, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Edward Kennedy, and … let us not forget, Barack Hussein Obama.

  8. Darren's Gravatar Darren
    March 29, 2010 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

    The vast majority of whites can’t tell the difference between full-blooded Semites and non-Semites so I doubt it makes much difference, nor would they care if you pointed it out for the sake of observation.

  9. David F.'s Gravatar David F.
    March 29, 2010 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    I smell fear. The Times reeks of it.

    Rich is doing us a favor. In his hysteria he is letting the mask slip.

    Population replacement and the destruction of the US as we knew it? How silly of me…all this time I thought you liberals cared so much about your fellow Americans!

  10. BK's Gravatar BK
    March 29, 2010 - 3:49 pm | Permalink

    ***births to Asian, black and Hispanic women accounted for 48 percent of all births in America in the 12 months ending in July 2008.***

    And how many of these future voters will support funding Israel and middle eastern occupations? Rich should be careful what he wishes for.

  11. WontBeLongNow's Gravatar WontBeLongNow
    March 29, 2010 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    All one has to do is step back and look at how quickly things can change. Frank Rich is much like the amateur trolls that hit this site day and day out. They hope their claims of triumph, of the impossibility of whites banding together, their stories of it being mere fantasy to remove millions of non-whites and others from the US, will make everyone just throw up their hands and give up.

    I side with David F. It’s fear that’s causing the more and frequent appearance of articles like this in the Bolshevik media. You get a lot of whites pushed against the wall, whites who decide to take overt action, and it’s a lot more people, firepower on all levels, brainpower, and courage than the hordes of hateful jews who conspired and waged secret, behind the scenes war against whites in the US for decades. They know this. It frightens them on one level. The innate arrogance, the self-deception won’t allow most of these individuals to see or understand their feelings, their ideas as fear. Instead they feel they must brag, prod, make the hated goyim surrender. After all, they’ve already won, they just don’t want someone to drag things out, mess up their party.

    The funniest thing about it is the fact that they believe all the non-whites they think they’ll Lord it over will see them as jews, a victimized people, a chosen people. The non-whites brainwashed to hate whites simply see jews as very privileged, very cowardly, very self-centered whites. That’s all. If things go the way they look they’re going to go, then the few elitist jews who don’t get out after The Big Collapse, will find out just high an opinion the non-whites have of the jews, when they run into them in the riots on the streets or in the camps and prisons that will be filled with those awaiting sentencing, deportation or execution. Many people will laugh or roll their eyes, but that’s what’s going to happen, even if the jews and their puppets think they can use Chinese or UN Troops as a fake invasion or a force to quell disturbances. It isn’t going to work. They always overreach. Always. It’s their arrogant, greedy nature.

  12. ba's Gravatar ba
    March 29, 2010 - 5:01 pm | Permalink

    I agree with Whites Unite. Do research on individual candidates and donate directly to those who support immigration enforcement. Financially support Fair and also Numbers USA. Donate money now to stop the takeover, or have it taken later if we lose.

  13. Hawk's Gravatar Hawk
    March 29, 2010 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

    Frank Rich’s son, Nathaniel, looks pretty Jewy:

    http://dcist.com/attachments/dcist_sommer/NathanielRich.jpg

  14. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    March 29, 2010 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    I’m afraid the idea that we can prevent ourselves from becoming a minority, or that we can restore the America of the 1950s at this late stage is delusional. The task now is to build a mass movement that is predicated upon securing our racial/genetic survival via the creation of a White ethnostate. That means bringing the United States to an end, that means treason, that means revolution.

  15. March 29, 2010 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    As I say in my blog, STOP PAYING TAXES (withholding and sales you can’t do anything about, but everything else).

    They can only transfer our wealth by taking our money through taxes. The original Tea Party movement was about taxes, and the modern Tea Party movement needs to return to its roots.

    So Mr. Rich thinks whites are basically a useless demographic? Um, whatever, but we actually keep the welfare state afloat because we actually pay in more than we get out – unlike most other ethnic groups.

    If tens of millions of white Americans across the country “boycott” their taxes, maybe the govt and elites would see they shouldn’t be spitting in whitey’s face.

  16. me's Gravatar me
    March 29, 2010 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Captainchaos, i hope the splc/adl/fbi/whomever is paying you well for your work.

  17. me's Gravatar me
    March 29, 2010 - 6:22 pm | Permalink

    RR: I think the next step is going to be seizing 401K wealth – since real estate is kaput that’s the only middle class big ticket item left.

  18. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    March 29, 2010 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

    Me, I refuse to delude myself. The political class, down to the local level, is irredeemably rotten to its core. They will make just the kinds of accommodations Rich suggests they should. Of course they will, it is in their self-interest to do it. Standing for our people requires risking everything. The existing United States has become an engine of genocide against our people, I do not think of its continued existence as desirable. The thing now is to build a mass movement the culmination of which is to achieve racial separation, of course I realize most people are not ready to hear that at this time. Yet it is no less true.

  19. me's Gravatar me
    March 29, 2010 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    Captainchaos
    as others have said, there is no way you could be saying what you said and not be arrested. Especially after what has been in the news -
    you know full well it is illegal to incite violence, and needless to say, treason – you are obviously trying to incite others to do so.

  20. Fabricius's Gravatar Fabricius
    March 29, 2010 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

    So Captainchaos is a shill for someone? I had that feeling about Neoboudica, or whatever her name was. Whatever happened to her? Her rants were sort of entertaining, in a shocking way. I hope Mossad didn’t get her.

  21. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    March 29, 2010 - 7:38 pm | Permalink

    It is treason to resist our genocide, that is precisely correct. And that you dare implicitly accuse me of race betrayal for pointing that out only goes to show the truth of what I say.

  22. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    March 29, 2010 - 8:04 pm | Permalink

    I advocate building a mass movement aimed at secession. If that be treason, then so be it.

  23. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    March 29, 2010 - 8:29 pm | Permalink

    Adam, the word “shiksa” is not a nice word, so how about just saying “gentile” next time, okay?

    n. Offensive
    Used as a disparaging term for a non-Jewish girl or woman.

  24. George Stephen Morrison's Gravatar George Stephen Morrison
    March 29, 2010 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    If whites are to survive in North America, there’s a few simple steps.

    Stop immigration. Forget whatever is happening in New York City or Los Angeles, you have to stop immigrants from settling in “flyover country.” Outside of the Boston-Washington corridor, and certain California locations, whites are still the majority in the vast stretches of land in North America.

    TPTB are working hard to change that – the immediate fight is to prevent more immigrants from crossing the borders.

    The second step is to “secede” from TPTB as much as possible, and bring as many people as you can.

    This isn’t even rocket science, it’s mostly a practical engineering problem.

    One major problem – the majority of white people in America and Canada spend hours watching the television and believe that it’s “real” to one degree or another. How do you interrupt that brainwashing?

  25. Pitbullexpress's Gravatar Pitbullexpress
    March 29, 2010 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    Darren says:
    March 29, 2010 at 2:28 PM
    The vast majority of whites can’t tell the difference between full-blooded Semites and non-Semites so I doubt it makes much difference, nor would they care if you pointed it out for the sake of observation.

    Yes. There is a part of me that agrees with this.
    But I have had some very surprisingly pleasant conversations with people about this. Pleasant because surprising. But also because they seemed genuinely interested.
    One thing I will not is that when I used to talk about this before it would upset me and so I came to see people as responding to my process much more than the content. But then if the process is not in line, people do tend to conflate the two.

    In any event, I am much calmer now, and my delivery much more relaxed. I am also more considerate of my listeners. Still, though respectful and far more relaxed, I am also firm and clear.
    The reason is that I’ve been at this for a while and I came at one point to see everything – everything – I do as an opportunity to practice the virtues.

    It works EVERY time, and when it doesn’t I still work. I don’t doubt myself later or feel ashamed and I don’t rise to the usual bait because I can see right through it.

    Standing up to this Evil Leviathan has taught us all alot about ourselves as a group and as individuals. I have no doubt that, for all of our differences, if we could meet in the flesh there would be an instant and long-lasting bond. But that probably could only be solidified by constant and close contact.

    I have to also say in passing, that I have no real use anymore for the Right or Left and that has helped enormously with all of this. I still read stuff from botha and, of course, am well aware of the fact that many here still consider themselves of the Right. That’s fine. But not for me, and my reasons are firmly grounded in European Cultural History.

    I even think that the recent Alternative Right is an indication that the smarter and more talented of the Right are moving toward a gradual transcendence of the whole Right/Left enmeshment that has contributed to our cultural stagnation and therefore helped worsen our currnet dilema.

  26. Pitbullexpress's Gravatar Pitbullexpress
    March 29, 2010 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

    “One thing I will not is that when I used to talk about this before…”

    It should say “One thing I will note is that…”

  27. mark's Gravatar mark
    March 29, 2010 - 8:56 pm | Permalink

    You are right, Captainchaos.

    “Me” is too stupid to see the situation as it really is. He thinks that we’ll be able to vote our way out of this mess. He thinks that the theoretical discussion of revolution, secession, and its tactics are illegal and that everybody who does so is working for the FBI/ADL/$PLC.

    He’s always accusing people of being an agent an agent provocateur.

    Actually, “Me” is an agent provocateur of a different type: the type who tries to channel White patriots’ efforts toward voting, praying, and other useless ideas and tactics.

    So let’s continue to agitate and incite White activists to patriotic activity and encourage secession and the establishment of an all-White nation in North America.

    In fact, I believe there is a provision in the U.S. Constitution for secession.

  28. March 29, 2010 - 9:48 pm | Permalink

    I can’t believe Captainchaos would say such things particularly in light of what’s happening with the Christian militias. But he’s probably an FBI informant, which would explain why he’s not afraid of arrest.

    Anyway, back to the discussion. Just gotta love Rich’s tone towards whites. Submit. And submit now. Elite whites and underclass minorities are now in charge of this country. Resistance is futile. Yes, I know America used to be a country where working class and middle-class whites could enjoy good-paying jobs, safe neighborhoods, and quality schools. But those days are over. We’ve flooded your neighborhoods with improverished Third World immigrants. Ha! You were always expendable for us. And we have brainwashed you middle class whites into believing that anyone who comes along (like Pat Buchanan or Tom Tancredo?) promising to save your communities from the hellholes they are spiraling into are “racists.”

  29. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 29, 2010 - 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Barkingmad says:

    Adam, the word “shiksa” is not a nice word, so how about just saying “gentile” next time, okay?

    n. Offensive
    Used as a disparaging term for a non-Jewish girl or woman.

    I am well aware of that. My view is that white women who give themselves to Jews should know what the Jews really think of them. Here are some fuller expositions:

    “… As a matter of fact, every Gentile woman is regarded as N.Sh.G.Z. – acronym for the Hebrew words niddah, shifhah, goyah, zonah (unpurified from menses, slave, Gentile, prostitute). Upon conversion to Judaism, she ceases indeed to be a niddah, shifhah, goyah but is still considered zonah (prostitute) for the rest of her life, simply by virtue of having been born of a Gentile mother.”
    –Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (London: Pluto Press, 1994), 87-88, 116 n.46.)

    shickster; occ. shickser, shiksa, shikster, shickter.

    [...]

    2. Hence, any (Gentile) woman or girl: mostly Jewish and pej[orative]: late C.19-early 20 … Adopted from Yiddish, it is the feminine form of Yiddish sheggetz, a Gentile man; sheggetz and, through it, shicksa come from the Hebrew sheckets, which means ‘detestable thing’ or ritually ‘unclean animal’ … 3. A Gentile female servant: among Jews: late C.19-20.
    –Eric Partridge, Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English, 8th edn (New York: MacMillan, 1984), sv shickster.

  30. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 29, 2010 - 10:14 pm | Permalink
  31. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    March 30, 2010 - 1:02 am | Permalink

    Yes, the mask is falling. But don’t forget Whites still have the army and security firmly in their hands. The hispanics are just across their home countries and it will be a breeze to “help” them cross back the borders.

    No doubt Rich is afraid. No doubt they are relying on Israel for their get away plan. But unlike Europeans, the Arabs have them surrounded in every corner. Sooner or later they will break through.

    Then from America to over there in Israel(sorry Palestine) they will be some interesting stuff.

    Europeans are corrupt and thus easy to control. But the Arabs will ruin their get away plans. Without America Israel will perish in 48 hours. The Arabs will take care of them.

    Revenge runs deep in Arabia. Real deep.

  32. John Stonehouse's Gravatar John Stonehouse
    March 30, 2010 - 3:41 am | Permalink

    Unfortunately many Whites dismiss KMac as an extremist, an alarmist and even a ‘rabble-rousing anti-semite’.
    But as extreme and unpalatable as KMac’s writings are, this article confirms their esstential truth.

  33. John Stonehouse's Gravatar John Stonehouse
    March 30, 2010 - 3:47 am | Permalink

    Adam,
    During their long sojourn in Poland, Jews picked up so many Polish traits and genes, that the archetypal ‘semitic’ looking Jew is only one type in whole spectrum.
    People have an unfailing instinct for this sort of thing (as it happens mostly ethnic Poles and Germans) have an internal gauge in which the whole cast of features and physignomy and not just the ‘typical’ trais are evaluated, and their instinct is uncannily correct.
    The key concept is ‘foreigness’.

  34. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    March 30, 2010 - 4:18 am | Permalink

    Although Dr. MacDonald’s articles and books about Jews are specimens of solid academic standard and good sholarship, I disagree with him on Republican elite willing to lead the white American into the sunset.

    I see it differently.

    Just like Jews infiltrated American universities and the Democraitc party, they are now infiltraring the power structures of GOP. Many Americans are aware of it and have even coind a code-word for Jewish converted Republicans: neo-cons.

    When I watch TV, and they show GOP leadership, there are almost always Jews in front of the camera.

    (The same seems true with Fox News, that appears to be the Plan B for Jewish establishment to control America.)

    So, we are witnessing an attempt hostile takeover that hasn’t been finalized, not yet.

    • admin's Gravatar admin
      March 30, 2010 - 8:03 am | Permalink

      Re A Reader’s comment: I am not denying Jewish influence on the Republicans. The neocon takeover of the Republican Party during the Reagan administration and pushing out traditional conservatives is an ongoing disaster. That’s a big reason why I expect the Republican leadership to do what Frank Rich wants them to do.

      Kevin M

  35. me's Gravatar me
    March 30, 2010 - 6:42 am | Permalink

    I can’t believe Captainchaos would say such things particularly in light of what’s happening with the Christian militias. But he’s probably an FBI informant, which would explain why he’s not afraid of arrest.
    exactly notice how him and mark avoid answering this, and then try to accuse me of being an informant?

    mark and Captainchaos would be arrested in a heartbeat if they were not in some government approved capacity – and even if they weren’t the fact that they would be saying such stuff (which i disagree with anyway) in light of those FBI raids, is simply stupid. Stupid or informants – those are the choices – either way they should be ignored and i do think the admins should start deleting such posts.

    and PS mark, I advocate everything Kevin McDonald does – is he stupid or do you find his ideas useless? Evidently you, the SPLC, ADL FBI, etc find them very threatening which is why you are here trying to incite violence and entrap people.

  36. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    March 30, 2010 - 6:42 am | Permalink

    John Stonehouse,

    I didn’t think Culture of Critique was “extreme and unpalatable”. I found it to be a convincing explanation for the unscientific nature of “Social Sciences” such as Boasian Anthropology, Freudian Psychology, Marxist (or Ayn Randist) Economics, and Frankfurt School Sociology.

  37. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    March 30, 2010 - 7:00 am | Permalink

    Kevin, Frank Rich’s article basically evinces his tribal hubris at their success in psychologically emasculating and defeating their “host” Anglo population. It’s amazing how they brag about the surreal “accomplishments” of their machinations, and yet, the impacted victims, never seeming to notice, roll over like Pavlov’s dogs, for more abuse. They have succeeded in foisting a mulatto demagogue into the head of state position, and are having a field day racially and politically humiliating the clueless, credulous White masses of asses. Jewry has no respect for the tepid, race denying tea bag reaction, who they know to be kosher conservative, Foxtard ‘goy’ pushovers. They will belittle and toy with the weak kneed Anglo ‘opposition’ for a while, and then crush them with their media power, when it suits their purpose.

    Anglo-Whites are just beginning their racial education, and have a long way to go, and a very short time to get there. The most simple, Jew wise, East European peasant has forgotten more about vital racial issues than most clueless, willfully ignorant Amerikinder will ever hope to know; most readers of this blog, excepted.

  38. MGLS's Gravatar MGLS
    March 30, 2010 - 9:56 am | Permalink

    When two groups occupy the same territory, mixture and amalgamation are inevitable. Racial preservation requires reproductive isolation, which requires geographic separation. Segregation, apartheid, caste systems, and supremacism cannot save us. Separation is the only thing that can.

    A peaceable partition of the United States into independent ethnostates is the only solution. To those who advocate, as Sam Francis did, a white cultural “reconquest” of a multiracial America, I recommend Richard McCulloch’s reply to Francis in the June 1995 issue of American Renaissance.

    Wanting to turn back the clock to 1960 is merely wishful thinking. First, I see no reason to believe such a goal would be easier to accomplish that than a racial partition of the United States. Additionally, it is vastly inferior to the ethnostate solution. It would ensure racial destruction, albeit more slowly than is occurring now. Separation is a necessary condition for racial preservation, so to those who want racial preservation, a peaceable partition of the United States must be the goal. As Richard McCulloch says, separation is the preservationist imperative.

  39. mark's Gravatar mark
    March 30, 2010 - 10:05 am | Permalink

    Mentally challenged “Me” said:

    “mark and Captainchaos would be arrested in a heartbeat if they were not in some government approved capacity – and even if they weren’t the fact that they would be saying such stuff (which i disagree with anyway) in light of those FBI raids, is simply stupid.”

    The militias were planning very specific acts to be carried out in the very near future. There’s a big difference between that and having cryptic, hypothetical, and futuristic discussions on a website. I know that concept is a little over your head, but try to think about it for a few weeks and maybe you’ll figure it out. Have your counselor explain it to you if you can’t get it.

    You seem to be more of a conservative—is that correct?

    Voting, praying, getting involved with the Republican party, and adopting paleo-conservative politics are useless as far as getting Whites out of the racial quagmire they find themselves in. Those tactics do not threaten the power of the enemy and are, therefore, useless. Anybody who suggests using such tactics is either dumb or is trying to or is trying to get Whites to use their financial resources and their energy in ways that are not productive.

  40. Charles U. Farley412's Gravatar Charles U. Farley412
    March 30, 2010 - 10:23 am | Permalink

    Captainchaos and MGLS are posting great information about the ethno-state solution.

    The late Wilmot Robertson came to much the same conclusion. He once advocated that Whites re-take all of North America, but wisely foresaw that the ethno-state was the only reasonable solution given trends… and the forecast this in one of his books all the way back in 1992!!

    ” It is widely recognized that America is in decline but very few authors recognize the extent to which the loss of will among whites is central to that decline. Massive non-white immigration, schools that teach minority ethnic pride rather than facts, the refusal to recognize racial differences, constant attacks on Western civilization, racial hiring quotas — all are enormously damaging to our country and all continue only because whites let them continue.

    Wilmot Robertson once believed that these corrosive forces could be brought under control and that the United States could regain the racial and cultural coherence that made it great. No longer. In The Ethnostate, he outlines a new form of statecraft that might emerge from the wreckage of 21st-century America. He argues that huge, multi-racial conglomerates are probably doomed, and that just as the Soviet empire has broken up along ethnic lines, so could Canada and the United States. In Mr. Robertson’s view, small, streamlined, homogeneous “ethnostates” are not only the last hope for keeping Western civilization alive in an increasingly non-white, anti-white world, they are also the best proving grounds for evolutionary improvement.”

    http://www.amren.com/ar/1993/05/#article2

  41. Charles U. Farley412's Gravatar Charles U. Farley412
    March 30, 2010 - 10:31 am | Permalink

    (sorry for double post)

    Check this out, got the kryptonite right here from THE MAN HIMSELF:

    “The best way to preserve ethnic interests is to defend an ethnostate—a nation that is explicitly intended to preserve the ethnic interests of its citizens. From an ethnic point of view, a major problem with massive immigration is that there is likely to be an increase in ethnic competition. Multicultural societies sanction ethnic mobilization because they inevitably become a cauldron of competing ethnic interests.”

    – Kevin Macdonald ( ‘Can the Jewish Model Help the West Survive?’ – http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/WestSurvive.htm )

  42. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    March 30, 2010 - 10:58 am | Permalink

    A certain individual, who advocates the mass-murder of white clergy and all white men who do not fully share his opinions on the subject of miscegination (and accusses those who disagree with his murderous platform of cowardice), made this inaccurate statement:

    “paleo-conservative politics . . . do not threaten the power of the enemy”

    If that is the case, why is Buchanan censored? Why have hackers disabled his website for the 100th time?

    Paleo-conservatives scare the enemy, because the paleo-conservative platform is moderate enough to appeal to the mass of White Americans. It thus provides a bridge to unite sensible White advocates with the people whose interests they are allegedly interested in defending.

  43. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    March 30, 2010 - 11:05 am | Permalink

    MGLS says:
    March 30, 2010 at 9:56 AM

    [...]Wanting to turn back the clock to 1960 is merely wishful thinking [...]

    This we don’t know any more than whether breaking the US on smaller ethnostate is possible or not. One is certain, though, and Dr. MacDonald has provided an ample evidence in his works that established that certainty: both goals (returning to pre-1964 America and constituting a bunch of ethnostastes) are attainable if, and only if, the Jews do not derail an effort going in any of these directions.

  44. me's Gravatar me
    March 30, 2010 - 11:32 am | Permalink

    A certain individual, who Advocates of the mass-murder of white clergy
    and we all know there is only one group who actually did carry out such a mass murder. Perhaps it was a, well, freudian, slip on Mark’s part.

    There’s a big difference between that and having cryptic, hypothetical, and futuristic discussions on a website.
    you are lying mark, and again most tellingly, you repeat the same lie you were refuted on a few days ago… your posts were in the present tense.
    ::
    mark: “I was trying to illustrate a point based on what I think we’re going see in the future.”

    me: yeah that’s why you used the present tense… Again you’re either stupid or lying:

    Because the churches are providing aid and comfort to the enemy, the leaders of the churches are legitimate military targets of the White Revolutionary Army.

    again, if you were NOT a provocateur, you would have been arrested already.

    of course mark will return tomorrow, try to incite violence, repeat the same lies, make people waste digging up ‘proof’ -

    it is fairly obvious at this point you are trying to incite violence and it is

  45. me's Gravatar me
    March 30, 2010 - 11:36 am | Permalink

    If that is the case, why is Buchanan censored? Why have hackers disabled his website for the 100th time?
    exactly. And why the hysterical reactions towards Christianity -the dog piling on trying to smear the Catholic Church – obviously the SPLC, ADL and Jewish power elite are very very afraid or fearful of something.

    The truth it is if we were to simply start enforcing our existing laws -especially on espionage, illegal immigration, foreign lobbying, and financial ethics that alone would be enough to probably knock 90% of the jewish elite out of power.

  46. March 30, 2010 - 11:40 am | Permalink

    @Whites Unite: “Paleo-conservatives scare the enemy, because the paleo-conservative platform is moderate enough to appeal to the mass of White Americans.”

    I agree, too. Beyond that, probably a majority of white Americans now have at least one “person of color” relative. The whole “white nationalist” concept is as loathsome and inbred as the Jewish nationalist one. Most of the kinds of whites that are going to be attracted to it are about at the level of those recently arrested “Christian” militia knuckle-draggers who were so easily snookered by the FBI and marched in front of the cameras for political purposes. Functioning retards.

    I’m not saying there’s no place for white racial consciousness as the proud standard-bearers of Western (Christian) civilization. But the biggest enemies of Western civilization in its history are the Judeofascists and their (mostly white) Left-Right collaborators, from the Old Testament thumping southern slavers to the cheap-labor open borders crowd to the money-worshipping Wall Streeters on the Right, to the Marxists on the Left. If “whiteness” was the answer, those brands of white trash wouldn’t have been so numerous nor so easily co-opted by the Judeofascists.

    It’s a matter of separating the snakes (of any race) from the folks of honesty and good will. There are even a few Jews who aren’t snakes, believe it or not.

  47. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    March 30, 2010 - 11:49 am | Permalink

    Charles U. Farley412 says:
    March 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM

    [...] all are enormously damaging to our country and all continue only because whites let them continue.

    I disagree with the “whites let” part. It’s not the whites’ choice, unless one asserts that whites are the only racial group that by and large is capable to adher to what the U.S. Constitution (and the Supreme Court) says.

    It’s that the Jews learned how to use our legal system (as well as known loopholes in it, like the over-reaching First and the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment) and our liberties against us. In a sense, what we see is a logical consequence of their presence in the U.S.

    The loopholes have been made made bigger and bigger, largely due to vigorous efforts of Jewish lawyers and activist judges. For instance, fallacious reasoning paradigms that are somewhat characteristic of the Jewish logic, have been massaged into many seminal judicial arguments. And it wasn’t before recently that the Supreme Court criticized those, for instance, rejecting notorious Jewish fallacy of “piling inferences upon inferences” (in U.S. v. Lopez ).

    See http://www.geocities.com/readerswrite/commentaries/Federal_supremacy.htm#footnote4
    for more examples.

  48. Istvan Roszavolgyi's Gravatar Istvan Roszavolgyi
    March 30, 2010 - 12:17 pm | Permalink

    The jews have used the legal system and everything else to get what they want. Working as a unified group amongst the atomized white population of the US (and other Western nations) allowed them to subvert and pervert laws over the decades. We all know that. But one can’t go overboard in pointing out how important this group think, this cohesiveness of theirs was and is, in getting what they want implemented. Even the clear heads here fall victim once in a while, and end up giving someone like Alinsky too much credit. He’s not the great strategist many believe. Anyone with half a brain and common sense, who would sit and ponder how to ruin people would come up with the same ideas (many of which he ‘borrowed’ from others anyway, in usual semitic style). What white would sit around doing that? But how many jews sit around, spend all their time thinking about destroying others, ruining lives, stealing? A very high percentage indeed. Their actions are now creating an ever growing, higher percentage of whites who finally see what is happening, and realizing who is responsible. It can’t be helped and it can’t be stopped. The tribe is kicking it in high gear with their taunts, more and more media garbage telling whites to give up, and more and more fervent lies and stories about evil Iran to get American boys to do what jewish boys, from time immemorial, have been too cowardly to do.

    It’s interesting that “A Reader” brought up jews and their piling of inferences upon inferences. Because that’s what more of us should do in conversation with those just waking up, those on the edge, those who are beginning to shake off the cobwebs as the cognitive dissonance becomes too much. And you know exactly what I mean, and the inferences that need to be made. Play their game.

  49. Gussie Fink-Nottle's Gravatar Gussie Fink-Nottle
    March 30, 2010 - 12:31 pm | Permalink

    Beyond that, probably a majority of white Americans now have at least one “person of color” relative.

    Laughable, given the relatively low rate of miscegenation among American whites.

    Most of the kinds of whites that are going to be attracted to it are about at the level of those recently arrested “Christian” militia knuckle-draggers who were so easily snookered by the FBI and marched in front of the cameras for political purposes.

    The overwhelming majority of whites attracted to libertarianism are quasi-autistic beta male nerds.

  50. Michael Brewer's Gravatar Michael Brewer
    March 30, 2010 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

    Fundamental political change does not come from voting, but from violence. A simple fact. This nation “conceived in liberty” was also conceived in violence. It’s no advocacy of illegal acts to offer that (rather obvious) analysis.

    It seems likely these people won’t stop or even back up, until a number of them are – as a hypothetical example – beheaded on video and these videos are all over the web. The time McVeigh bought is used up.

    Speeches have their place, but if everyone only talks, we’ll be talking until we’re blue in the face, i.e. dead.

  51. Joe DaGentile's Gravatar Joe DaGentile
    March 30, 2010 - 2:15 pm | Permalink

    It’s really simple people. Talk to people, turn them on to KM, call your Congressman, tell your neighbors, speak to co-workers, call advertisers, etc. We are not prostrate. I’m in the financial field and i talk to clients all the time about this.

    We need more of our own American Al-Manar-like media outlets. We have the internet, technology, and more importantly, the 1st Amendment. We’ve stood on the moon. We’re hardly inconsequential.

    But we do need to wake up and pool resources. That’s right…that means a $50 here and a $100 there.

  52. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    March 30, 2010 - 2:22 pm | Permalink

    Good old Frank Rich still running off at the mouth.

    Somebody talk above about the mask slipping. I have news for you its totally been taken off.

    The attacks are relentless on the Ziotube wether its News, Entertainment Sports, Fiance

    It’s so in your face now Stevie Wonder(pun intended) could see it.

    What Mr Rich doesn’t understand is that most people don’t vote!!!

    If White Americans of European descent went to the polls let’s say 90% we could wipe out this so called difference in a second.

    Then simply enact Legislation that prevents everyting Rich and his cohorts want.

    Presto!!

    Rich and his gang of mixed multitudes will go from the mountain top to being cast into Hell with his Master

  53. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    March 30, 2010 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

    test

  54. Mike's Gravatar Mike
    March 30, 2010 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

    In California Steve Poizner has made illegal immigration an issue in the republican primary. This could be the year that to stop the programs which make California a magnet for illegal immigration. In Arizona JD Hayworth is mounting a serious challenge to Amnesty John McCain.

  55. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    March 30, 2010 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Me,

    You do nothing except confirm in the minds of others your essentially hysterical and craven personality. I said I advocate building a mass movement whose goal is racial separation via secession. That would entail bringing tens of millions, at a minimum, of Whites onto our side. Yes, the numbers need to be of that size otherwise any sincere push to achieve the stated goal would be suicidal. I do not exhort suicidal actions with no real likelihood of success against ZOG. The thing now is to swell our numbers, and that means abiding by the law. Yet and still, a glorified version of Steve Sailer’s “citizenism” is simply not acceptable long term. In that scenario our race would wither on the vine, taking the long view. Wholly unacceptable, unless one – are you one of them? – truly doesn’t give a damn about the survival of our race, that is.

  56. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 30, 2010 - 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Gussie Fink-Nottle says:

    Beyond that, probably a majority of white Americans now have at least one “person of color” relative.

    Laughable, given the relatively low rate of miscegenation among American whites.

    Claims of white racial solidarity derived from a “low rate of miscegenation” are an illusion based on the relative (though at this point rapidly dwindling) size of the white population in relation to various minorities. It’s like mixing paint. If you take a gallon of white and add a few drops of black, red, brown, or yellow, you will hardly be able to see it at first. The relatively small amounts of non-white get absorbed and “whitened”, but obviously this can’t go on forever before the white paint is no longer really white. There’s an awful lot of mystery meat out there, and you get a more accurate idea of what’s actually happening by paying attention to the rate of change in the frequency of interracial sexual relationships, which is rising steeply in comparison to historical norms. Even genetic sampling of whites tells us much more about what happened in the past than about current trends.

    Out here, in the real world, I see evidence of increasing miscegenation all the time. Even in my town, which is nominally about 90% white, it’s all too common to see a young white woman pushing a little dark-skinned half-ape a stroller. Rarely do you see the male ape responsible for the monstrosity. It’s clear that most of these pickaninnies are bastards, so it’s a mistake to get focused on rates of interracial marriage as an index to miscegenation. Focus on rates of interracial cohabitation (which is about double rate of interracial marriage) is likewise deceptive. Many of them could be, and probably are, the product of failed relationships, one-night stands, or even rape.

    Also, reflect on how common it is among American whites to proudly claim to have a Cherokee great grandmother, or the like. In fact, the injuns have already been assimilated, for the most part, (“Native Americans” are now more likely to be married to a white than another injun), and the Jews are well on their way to being absorbed. The negroes are heading in that direction at a good clip as well, since the average American negro is now about 20% white by genetics. Hard data on the actual rate of miscegenation can be difficult to come by, given that it is often deliberately obscured by the government agencies who are usually put in charge of collecting it. Misdefining Jews and mestizos as white, as the government usually does, is just one way. Another thing to consider is that there must be vast amounts of half-Jews, quarter-Jews, and octo-Jews that regard themselves as Jews, or at least are extremely sympathetic to Jewish causes. Perhaps this is why one so often hears the claim in these circles that the 2 or 3 percent of the population that is commonly cited for the amount of Jews in America is a radical underestimate. Still another difficulty is a focus on marriage rates, especially when marriage is declining in popularity. Nearly 40% of babies are now delivered out of wedlock. But it is undeniable that, by any measure miscegenation is increasing, and it is increasing rapidly. For example, according to census data, white intermarriage with blacks increased from .10 percent in 1970 to .45 percent in 2000. If only half of one percent of whites are married to a negro, that is still an awful lot of such marriages on an absolute basis — hundreds of thousands of them. Given the explosion in the acceptability of interracial relationships, it also seems likely that in the next 30 years, by 2030, the rate will have more than quadrupled again, perhaps much more.

    Further, almost 10% of white women, at any given time, are now cohabiting with non-whites. How many more are “dating” them, or have “dated” non-whites in the past, nobody really knows, but it certainly must be a lot of them — much more than 10%. My impression is that for a lot of young white women, spreading their legs for a non-white is more or less a post-feminist rite of passage. They are expected to do it, to prove to themselves and society at large that they’re not a racist. Spreading for Jews or part-Jews, who by most whites are regarded as white, probably doesn’t even count. Of course, it’s only to be expected that once a white woman begins having sex with non-whites, many of them will go on to have children with them. Clearly, the situation is much worse than a lot of us would like to think.

  57. Freddie Turnill's Gravatar Freddie Turnill
    March 30, 2010 - 4:40 pm | Permalink

    Most whites can’t get their head around the Tribe’s Secular Sanhedrin’s agenda of ruthless ideological war aimed to bring about the physical and economic subjugation and possible annihilation of the European ethnic groups.
    Most whites are either brainwashed, made afraid or intimidated or see short-term material or social gain in accepting the reproduction of the Tribe’s preposterous slogans about the supposed capability of group “equality”= sameness. A huge pretence has been set in motion which is nothing more than the imposition of a warped script with a bizarre twisted plot played by actors, who, in reality range from the Shakespearian to the Ham but who are told are all just as capable, just as good, is concocted at massive expense to the paying audience.
    So the supposed message that all groups are capable of equal inputs if given an “equal” chance therefore legitimises the “Leftists” assertion that there should be an equality of outcome for all races and that if societal outcomes do not reflect the assertion (which is presented as an accomplished fact) then that “proves” that that society is guilty of the usual thought crimes.
    Of course the “test” is designed to be failed. That’s the whole point of such a “test” and no matter what movement towards such goals might be made to pursue and attain the suppose target, have no fear the goalposts will be moved anyway.
    Rather like the activity of one of the most interesting of the pigstyocracy of “Animal Farm”, the resourceful Squealer, altering overnight the principles on the shed wall, they are guaranteed never to be attained. For the manufacturers of the “principle”, the Secular Sanhedrin, they are there to de-legitimise but for the Euros involved they now are only allowed to think that to attain is the only sign of legitimisation. The “dog” is only allowed to chase its tail: not a very productive exercise and is guaranteed to make it dizzy and disoriented.
    The Tribes “belief” in equality is somewhat conditional on whether or not it suits its purpose, somewhat like its conditional belief in “free speech” and continued employment (Its a “McCarthyite witch-hunt” if it’s their free speech and employment involved but if it’s yours their suppression of it is legit because yours is “hate speech”, you are a hater and deserve to lose your job). If each Ethnic group was only allowed its % representation into elite society channels and professions then the Tribe would be stymied for control purposes but for them to have more than their “market Share” (even a monopoly or near monopoly in some cases) that’s their right because it would be anti-Semitic to “discriminate” against them.
    Euro people have been brainwashed into thinking that the Tribe thinks of fairness because they talk endlessly about it but once they attain their positions of power and influence they have no intention of letting such thoughts of “fairness” enter their head. Euro people think in terms of legitimacy mostly by reciprocity and not purely by advantage and it is the illusion that the Tribe have created for themselves that this phoney script of theirs, endlessly repeated but only endlessly practiced in its negation is believed. Hence they forever parade their supposed “liberal ideals”.

    As we know exchanging the old Anglo ruling class by a hostile elite is not a good move in the direction of continuity as continuity is the very last thing on the minds of our new ruling class but their destructive hostile mindset is only one string in their bow as it is paralleled by their natural economic functioning as a parasitic minority with an urge for huge short-term rewards. (I’m not saying that all Tribe are parasites which is ridiculous but the ones who count more and more over societies resources and policies as they assert more openly their normal MO unencumbered by the restraints of needing not to antagonise a host elite is eliminated as a parameter in their behaviour in their everyday lives). Hostility to the host plus parasitism does not equal prosperity.

    I feel that there is a coming deep fissure in the Euro peoples will be between those who have no choice to fight their dispossession and an antagonistic class of apparatchiks who will maintain their allegiance to the Tribe despite undergoing a huge contraction in the take from the managerial/State/Academic/Legal bureaucracies until they are virtually extinct, somewhat like the French in Haiti if it happens quickly or a slower extinction as the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy after the 1066 Norman Conquest.
    As for the Tribe they cannot change their course. Destruction is their handiwork because they are incapable of anything other than the quest for total power and William Pierce characterised this trait for better than I.

    Hear his Bob Grant interview either @
    http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=58259307
    or
    http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/entertainment/wath/v185429835J95zDym

    Back in June 2001 he followed this the following week with this broadcast to clarify some of his points:

    http://www.natall.com/cgi-bin/audio.cgi?year=2001

    The Scorpion and the Frog by Dr. William Pierce
    Broadcast Date: 06-23-2001

    The text to the follow-up broadcast can be found here:

    http://www.natall.com/free-speech/fs0107b.html

    “Then Bob Grant said to me: “I don’t understand. You said that Sumner Redstone and the other Jewish media bosses are deliberately trying to destroy our society.
    Why would they want to do that? They are rich and powerful and influential.
    This society has been good to them. Why would they want to destroy it?
    That doesn’t make sense to me.”
    That was the question he asked me, and it was a very reasonable question.
    It was the question that almost any intelligent, honest person might ask in those circumstances.
    It was the natural question to ask: Why do the Jews want to destroy a society that has been so good to them — especially the richest and most powerful Jews?….…………………
    And so one might ask, as Bob Grant did, why, having become privileged insiders, are they still bent on destroying our society?
    Why do even the richest and most powerful Jews — Jews such as Sumner Redstone and Michael Eisner — who have access to anything in our society they want, still work day and night to corrupt and degrade us?
    Why, having wormed their way in, do all of them push for increasing the flood of non-Whites into the United States from the Third World, thereby weakening their own position?
    Why do they still encourage our young girls to have sex with Blacks, thereby generating hatred against themselves?
    Why, having gotten so much of our wealth and power into their hands, don’t they strive to strengthen our society instead of continuing to destroy it?

    Well, there are several reasons for that, but let me again give you the simplest answer, which also is the most profound answer: Jews do what they do because they are Jews.”

  58. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    March 30, 2010 - 4:47 pm | Permalink

    But Adwarf, one interjection if I may. The level of ethnocentrism amongst Whites in quite likely genetic and corresponds to a normal curve. Meaning, the least ethnocentric Whites are leaving our gene pool. Meaning, a more ethnocentric White race is being bred. Also, there will be more than enough Whites (of the more ethnocentric variety) left when the time of the final push arrives. You cannot count on mongrelization of the White race to save your fellow Jews.

    Itz coming.

  59. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 30, 2010 - 5:30 pm | Permalink

    Adam says:

    There’s an awful lot of mystery meat out there, and you get a more accurate idea of what’s actually happening by paying attention to the rate of change in the frequency of interracial sexual relationships, which is rising steeply in comparison to historical norms. … Of course, it’s only to be expected that once a white woman begins having sex with non-whites, many of them will go on to have children with them.

    One thing I neglected to mention is that a lot of this effect is currently being masked by the widespread availability and use of contraceptives and abortion. This masking of what is really going on is yet another unintended and racially disastrous side effect of these techniques, in that it is leading whites to overestimate their position. Certainly, if all of the interracial copulation we see nowadays were taking place without the benefit of contraceptive techniques, we’d already be up to our asses in mystery meat. While that part is good, it only means that the day of reckoning has been postponed a bit. Another way to look at it is that contraception-protected interracial intercourse is hiding a lot of pent-up demand for interracial babies. It’s a snowball effect that is building each day: the more socially acceptable interracial sex becomes, the commoner it is to see, which makes it even more socially acceptable. At some point the rubber will get thrown away. White women will stop “experimenting” with non-whites or using them to prove their anti-racist cred, and start having children with them at an equal or higher rate than they do with white men. Perhaps, by some measures, we are already in the beginning stages of this.

    We also must keep in mind that as the percentage of whites in the population continues to decline, a steep uptick in the rate of white women producing non-white babies will be the inevitable result. If, by 2042 or thereabouts as is predicted, whites only constitute 50% or less of the population, then half or more of the prospective breeding partners for white women will be non-white. This is another reason that as the white fraction of the population continues to shrink, it will be much more rapidly absorbed into the dark mass that has become the new majority.

  60. mark's Gravatar mark
    March 30, 2010 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    me says:
    March 30, 2010 at 11:32 AM

    A certain individual, who Advocates of the mass-murder of white clergy…

    I thought you were going to ignore my posts.

    Don’t forget you Klan klavern’s meeting. You ARE, after all, the Exalted Cyclops and your presence is expected.

  61. Madam is Adam's Gravatar Madam is Adam
    March 30, 2010 - 9:01 pm | Permalink

    Adam takes time from his “law school studies” (as he claims on another site – but he won’t admit it here) to continue Frank Rich’s line of verbiage, filled with “observations” that have no bearing on actual numbers of course. For someone who believes whites can’t organize, he sure is worried about it. He sure spends a lot of time trying to convince us it won’t happen. 97% of whites in the US marry other whites. And that’s with the white population much closer to 50% than the MSM will admit, for now.

    Then again, maybe Adam is angry because mom dumped pop and took up with Cletus, the local afro-layabout. It’s one or the other. To us, it really doesn’t matter which.

  62. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 30, 2010 - 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Madam is Adam says:

    97% of whites in the US marry other whites.

    As I said, the thing to watch is the steeply climbing rate of interracial sex relative to historical norms. Overall marriage rates have declined in recent decades, and at this point 40% of all US children are born out of wedlock, so marriage rates are less important than ever. Even cohabitation rates are more informative than marriage rates, and about 10% of white women are currently cohabiting with non-whites. Adding in the amount that have done so at any time in the past would increase the total, and the figure for those who have had sex with non-whites but never cohabited with them is no doubt larger still. The result of all this is that of those whites who do marry other whites, a lot of the white men are getting white women who have already had sex with non-whites, lived with them, or even had children by them.

    But, by all means, continue with your happy talk, fool. People with weak egos and weaker brains need to bolster themselves somehow.

  63. Gussie Fink-Nottle's Gravatar Gussie Fink-Nottle
    March 30, 2010 - 11:16 pm | Permalink

    Another way to look at it is that contraception-protected interracial intercourse is hiding a lot of pent-up demand for interracial babies.

    This is nonsense, even by your dissembling standards.

    It’s a snowball effect that is building each day: the more socially acceptable interracial sex becomes, the commoner (sic) it is to see, which makes it even more socially acceptable.

    This isn’t 1920; it’s already perfectly socially acceptable. We’re closer to the high-water mark of miscegenation than the low. Even in majority non-white countries like Brazil a sizeable white population remains because some women simply won’t miscegenate.

    White women will stop “experimenting” with non-whites or using them to prove their anti-racist cred, and start having children with them at an equal or higher rate than they do with white men.

    There’s absolutely nothing to suggest that will happen.

    Then again, maybe Adam is angry because mom dumped pop and took up with Cletus, the local afro-layabout.

    He’s a Jew, and Jews tend to have a pathological obsession with white female miscegenation. Beyond that, if you haven’t noticed, Adam’s other obsession is spamming the comment section here with post after post claiming that we’re doomed.

  64. Gussie Fink-Nottle's Gravatar Gussie Fink-Nottle
    March 30, 2010 - 11:24 pm | Permalink
  65. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 31, 2010 - 12:05 am | Permalink

    Gussie Fink-Nottle says:

    Another way to look at it is that contraception-protected interracial intercourse is hiding a lot of pent-up demand for interracial babies.

    This is nonsense, even by your dissembling standards.

    Well, Gussie, I hate to break it to ya old gal, but people fuck for a reason, and as a matter of instinct, that reason is to make little copies of themselves. What I am saying is that the demand is there, but contraceptive technique is inhibiting the natural outcome while social norms change.

    … it’s already perfectly socially acceptable.

    Well THAT’S sure encouraging. :-( Whose side are you on in this argument, anyway?

    Even in majority non-white countries like Brazil a sizeable white population remains because some women simply won’t miscegenate.

    You mean like Gisele Bundchen?

    http://bigsole.blogspot.com/2009/05/what-if-gisele-bundchens-photo-was.html

    But anyway, because Brazil lacked the one drop rule, the amount of “whites” there is greatly exaggerated. See here, for example.

    As much as 52% of the Whites from Rio reported they have some non-European ancestry: 38% reported to have some Black African ancestry and 29% reported Amerindian ancestry (15% of them reported to have both). Only 48% of the Whites from Rio did not report any non-White ancestry. So, in Brazil, to have African or Amerindian ancestry and identify as White is not inconsistent, neither is it a problem for them to admit to having non-White ancestors[13].

    The conception of Whiteness in Brazil is based on the skin color of a person, which contrasts with the conception of race and ancestry, as used in the United States. According to the 1991 Census, 55% of the children whose mother was White and father was Brown were classified as Whites. Another 6% of children born to both Brown parents were classified as Whites and 2% of children born to a Black-Black couple were also identified as Whites. This analysis shows that the ancestry of a person is quite insignificant to racially classify people in Brazil. [13]

    From the white point of view, a Brazilian future is nothing to look forward to.

    White women will stop “experimenting” with non-whites or using them to prove their anti-racist cred, and start having children with them at an equal or higher rate than they do with white men.

    There’s absolutely nothing to suggest that will happen.

    Except common sense. I suggest you check into it. You could also try opening your eyes and looking around. That’s frightening for someone like you, I know, but give it a try. When I do it, I see a lot of white women who might have a child or two with a white man pairing up instead with a non-white and becoming a brood sow, squeezing out big litters of mud puppies.

  66. Darren's Gravatar Darren
    March 31, 2010 - 3:49 am | Permalink

    Adam is a dissembler and is often intellectually dishonest on here BUT miscegenation as a phenomena is real. Whites are not all that ethnocentric.

    The statistics he is reporting on the so-called whites of Brazil are accurate as far as I know and reflect a general trend in South America. If you think we’re close to the high water mark of miscegenation, then you clearly haven’t seen how things are like in Brazil.

    The good thing is that we have a long way to go before we ever get that far, so there is time to fight.

  67. Darren's Gravatar Darren
    March 31, 2010 - 3:53 am | Permalink

    Similar trend in Argentina:

    http://racehist.blogspot.com/2009/08/latin-american-white.html

    If you’re worried about white racial purity then the only answer is a white American ethnostate.

  68. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    March 31, 2010 - 7:36 am | Permalink

    With all due repsect Mr Brewer.

    You are way way way out of line with that statement. I assume you are SPLC ADL or even OGA. If so spare us the clap trap

    Like I said if 90% of White Americans of European descent went and actually voted we could change course very rapidly.

    The Supreme Court ruling that allows unlimited funding to candidates is now allowed has opened the door in a much bigger way then we are realizing.

    If Obama attacked it right away you know they are not happy

    Ron Paul may make a good Treasury Secretary but he is no longer an option for President. We need a 3rd Party to form in the next 2 years

  69. Freddie_turnill's Gravatar Freddie_turnill
    March 31, 2010 - 7:42 am | Permalink

    I wrote in my previous entry: “Its a “McCarthyite witch-hunt” if it’s their free speech and employment involved but if it’s yours their suppression of it is legit because yours is “hate speech”, you are a hater and deserve to lose your job”.
    I think I should have made clear that I don’t think that the two phenomena have a real parallel contemporaneous existence.
    The last time Tribe Leftists were thrown on to their political backfoot and had to endure punishment for their driven agenda quest for absolute power was way over 55 years ago back in the mid-fifties so for the vast majority of Tribe whose whole identity revolves around the idea of “suffering” it is not a real life experience but a proxy one whose “existence” is for 99.999% of them in the Tribal community mind.

    It parallels and complements the continuous wailing sirens of white-noise about the sufferings and death of some of their number in Europe (and I wouldn’t want to make light of that though I intensely dislike the focus on one group above all others) which now carries the brand name of “The Holocaust” (now over 65 years ago) but the “McCarthyite witch-hunt” myth carries the “Made in the USA” (one of the few things that are these days) label, which was/is a handy post-WWII way of pathologising that society and ditching the debt of the European Tribe’s survival owed to all those Euro-Americans who died real deaths and suffered real trauma in defeat of National-Socialist Germany.

    A contrived phantom contemporaneous existence, a kind of virtual world of suffering for those who not only haven’t suffered but have prospered, has been conjured into an “existence” and treated as real (when in fact it is surreal) by the MSM and State bureaucracies in the West so that this “virtual world of suffering by proxy” also incorporates the “McCarthyite witch-hunt” as part of their community myth.

    This conflation is also believed by the vast majority of Europeans but the Euros are cast in the role of either perpetrators or uncaring bystanders whilst the greatest tragedy the world as ever seen was played out in Europe whilst its “counterpart” in the US, the blacklist, plays the role of the gas chambers. European America persecuted
    the innocents of the Tribe who were picked on for no good reason other than Anti-Semi prejudice.

    Due to the financial, political, social and cultural traction and mass-media leverage of the Tribe events from 2-3 generations ago have a contemporaneous power which completely overlay the reality of who now has power and who now is doing the real suffering in the gradual dispossession for most but for a growing number a violent and chaotic dispossession is ever present in the form of the threat by Afro and other 3rd World violence to their physical well being and sometimes their very existence.

    Meanwhile whilst this real contemporaneous threat to Europeans is ignored a fantasy of “suffering by proxy” is played out day after day in the virtual space controlled (and mostly owned) by the Tribe.

  70. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    March 31, 2010 - 7:43 am | Permalink

    “10% of white women are cohabitating with non-whites”

    “50% of Jewish women have slept with negroes”

    Hey this quoting stats is fun.

  71. Jupiter's Gravatar Jupiter
    March 31, 2010 - 8:19 am | Permalink

    Jews shouldn’t be shocked if in the future there is complete intolerance for their prescence in America. I will say with 100 percent certainty that they will not be tolerated. NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN CHRISTIANS made the very big mistake of trusting them.

    There will never be a large number of Jews in the WHITE NATIONALIST movement. And the handfull of Jews who are in the White Nationlaist expect White Nationlaist interests to be subservient to the interests of the state of Israel.

    The future for Jews:The nonwhite areas of the former Jews will be massively intolerant of Jews;the White areas of the former the US will be massively intolerant of Jews…and that includes rootless cosmopolitian such as Frank Rich.and his insect of a son.

    NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICANS never should have trusted Jews. Jews whined about being kept out of Ivy league schools. WE let then in…Jews went on to create a totalatarian police state that viciosly persecutes NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN MALES.

  72. Jupiter's Gravatar Jupiter
    March 31, 2010 - 9:04 am | Permalink

    Secession is not the answer. I want a very large ocean between china and America. Although I think that it is urgent that NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICA secede from the beltway.

    Frank Rich is ultimatley an imbecile. The Jewish strategy of racially balaknizing America will produce the exact opposite result that Jews want.

    A racially balkanized “America” will not be a safe place for Jews. This point is so obvious that it hardly requires much elaboration. You can be 100 percent that Jews will be booted out of White ethnostates..and you can be 100 hundred percent certain that the muslim,hispanic and asian nations within the former US will not make the same mistake that NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN CHRISTIANS made in letting Jews run foreign and immigration policy.

    I can’t predict whether the UK or America will blow-up first. Which ever country blows-up will signal to the other nation that it is time for a race -revolt against race-replacement at the hands of non-whites.

  73. Jupiter's Gravatar Jupiter
    March 31, 2010 - 9:14 am | Permalink

    Frank Rich is rancid lump of rootless cosmopolitan filth hell-bent on creating a demographic-political rearrangement of NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICA that will result in the mass-murder and enslavement of NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICANS…this is the endgame of the rootless cosmopolitan neurotic cabal.

  74. March 31, 2010 - 9:30 am | Permalink

    Paul Hausser,

    Like I said if 90% of White Americans of European descent went and actually voted we could change course very rapidly.

    And if you had some bacon you could have bacon and eggs…if you had some eggs.

    Adam,

    People have a hard time grasping the most basic racial reality. It’s like statistics. Most people can understand the general gist of basic statistics, but they have an incredibly difficult time thinking statistically about statistics. Most people can basically get race, but attempts to get them to think racially about race are a complete non-starter.

  75. Charles U. Farley412's Gravatar Charles U. Farley412
    March 31, 2010 - 9:31 am | Permalink

    “Most whites can’t get their head around the Tribe’s Secular Sanhedrin’s agenda of ruthless ideological war aimed to bring about the physical and economic subjugation and possible annihilation of the European ethnic groups.
    Most whites are either brainwashed, made afraid or intimidated or see short-term material or social gain in accepting the reproduction of the Tribe’s preposterous slogans about the supposed capability of group “equality”= sameness.”

    The root of this can be traced to Antonio Gramscis call for ‘Ideological Hegemony’. The Jews picked up this baton and ran with it.

    This Ideological Hegemon must be overthrown. Indeed the egg-heads really do have a role to play in the emergent White Nationalist Proto-movement and it is in dismantling what Gramsci and Organized Jewry have created!

  76. March 31, 2010 - 10:44 am | Permalink

    “What I am saying is that the demand is there, but contraceptive technique is inhibiting the natural outcome while social norms change.”

    Adam,

    The social norms have already changed. America is so far from being biased against Half-Breeds that they are actually given preference in hiring over Whites.

    Now maybe some White females use contraception to avoid producing children with Non-Whites.

    However, this is irrelevant outside the context of meaningfully answering the question: “Why?”

    The most likely explanation is that Black and Hispanic Men are far more marriage averse than White Men are, therefore creating a situation where the White females involved with them are more likely to be unmarried.

    And here’s the thing: When a White Woman is unmarried, she is FAR less likely to produce children, even if she’s having sex.

    What gives you the idea that this will change?

    Do you have evidence that Black and Hispanic men have a low marriage rate because of Racism, so as America becomes less Racist (which according to you is for some reason inevitable), they’ll have their marriage rates rocket to White levels?

    What a manifestly idiotic idea.

  77. March 31, 2010 - 11:29 am | Permalink

    –”Beyond that, probably a majority of white Americans now have at least one “person of color” relative.”
    –”Laughable, given the relatively low rate of miscegenation among American whites.”

    Fair enough. I have no source for my statement, and don’t know if a source even exists. But the point I’m trying to convey is that A) a lot of white Americans are related one way or another (marriage, shirt-tail relatives, etc) to a person of color (native american, hispanic, black, asian or mixed blood); beyond that, B) a lot of white Americans have friends that fall into the person of color category; C) a lot of white Americans have employees in the p of c category; D) a lot of white Americans would look at the “white nationalist” movement and say “Gee, I wonder if I qualify” (Italian-Americans, for instance). Or they’d say, hey, I’m not going to join the white nationalists and turn against A,B, and C above.

    Besides, IMO, the obsession with blood lines is so Old Testament and anally Jewish.

    The reason Western civilization was so successful and the Nazis were not is because Western civilization incorporated the various tribes it conquered into its value system and marched forward. The Nazis (and Zionists) by definition of their ideology, are exclusive and seek to keep people OUT (although the Zionists have plenty of 2nd class, non-Jewish useful idiots on both Left and Right doing their bidding).

    The problem with what’s going on in this country is a combination of ideological Zionism and ideological multiculturalism (which was engineered by Jewish Zionists and Leftists to allow the former to keep their identity and pursue their supremacy without assimilating and to allow the latter to assemble various “tribes” and fashion them into a powerful coalition for political gain).

    IMO, the solution is a Christian-ethic based, explicitly philo-Western civilization mass movement that crushes all tribal ideologies within our borders, including multi-culturalism and Zionism. This means routing the tribalistic rouges, multicultural Leftists, and neocons from the federal government, and preventing them from using it to tribalize us ever again by replacing their ideologies with libertarianism.

  78. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    March 31, 2010 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Libertarianism = tax cuts and legal hardcore porn for rich Jews

  79. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 31, 2010 - 2:21 pm | Permalink

    Reginald says:

    And here’s the thing: When a White Woman is unmarried, she is FAR less likely to produce children, even if she’s having sex.

    What gives you the idea that this will change?

    The fact that it is already changing, and that the trend is steeply upward for more change in the same direction. The white bastardy rate is now 28%, sharply up from 22% only ten years ago, and way, way up from the 3.5% it was in 1940. I predict it will continue upwards as whites and their culture assimilate negro norms of behavior and whites absorb more and more of their genetics.

  80. March 31, 2010 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

    It’s clear that most of these pickaninnies are bastards, so it’s a mistake to get focused on rates of interracial marriage as an index to miscegenation.

    The rate of black male-white female sex (let alone miscegenation) is only slightly higher than the black-white intermarriage rate (about 3% last I heard):

    The percent of white females in this sample who report any black sex partner, by hair color:
    Black 8.2%
    Brown 5.0%
    Blond 3.9%
    Red 3.9%

  81. March 31, 2010 - 4:00 pm | Permalink
  82. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    March 31, 2010 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Svigor says:

    It’s clear that most of these pickaninnies are bastards, so it’s a mistake to get focused on rates of interracial marriage as an index to miscegenation.

    The rate of black male-white female sex (let alone miscegenation) is only slightly higher than the black-white intermarriage rate (about 3% last I heard):

    The percent of white females in this sample who report any black sex partner, by hair color:
    Black 8.2%
    Brown 5.0%
    Blond 3.9%
    Red 3.9%

    Apparently what is being referenced is something called the “National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health”, which is a study of high school students. It’s almost 15 years old now. What it means is that, at that time, by high school, already those percentages of white girls had been defiled by negroes. This is not exactly something to be cheerful about, and we have to keep in mind that the white racial situation has worsened considerably over the last 15 years. You also must understand that these percentages will rise if the sample includes white women of all age groups. This is quite clearly shown by the fact that, according to census data, about 10% of American white women are currently cohabiting with a non-white. No one knows what the real figure is for all white women who have ever had sex with a non-white, but it seems obvious it must be considerably higher than 10%.

  83. Question's Gravatar Question
    March 31, 2010 - 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Why did “Adam” change his name from “Progress” to “Adam”?

  84. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    March 31, 2010 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    That some Jews are engineering a “minority-majority” America in which they can safely and openly refuse to assimilate is only a half of the story.

    The other half is is a consequence of the fact that one of the things they have been good at for centuries was playing the self-appointed intermediary role between the upper and the lower class. This would let them to challenge the upper class and to eventually replace them, as – for instance – they (temporarily) managed to by means of laying background for the Bolshevik revolution in Russia.

    The problem was, the blacks that some Jews took under their care were not ready to become America’s Bolsheviks, so the plot was mostly a misfire. But you should never underestimate Jewish ingenuity; now they are importing future revolutionaries from Mexico and similar banana republics in millions and are grooming them for take over of the country, and that’s the other half of the story.

    In 1917 Russia, the Bolsheviks were hunting “capitalists” and “exploiters” werever they could. When they caught someone with white hands (which they called in Russian “bieworoochka”), an indication that the suspect was not a worker, they had a tendency to shot him on the spot.

    I wonder if future Bolsheviks from Mexico will hunt “gringos” in a similar way on the streets of Ameirica. If so then your white skin may pronounce a death sentence on you. But when it happents it will not be called “racism”. I will be called “social justice”.

  85. March 31, 2010 - 6:18 pm | Permalink

    “The fact that it is already changing, and that the trend is steeply upward for more change in the same direction. The white bastardy rate is now 28%, sharply up from 22% only ten years ago, and way, way up from the 3.5% it was in 1940.”

    Even at a 28% bastardry rate, White Women are still producing half-breed children at a rate far lower than you say they’re having sex with non-Whites.

    Also you are neglecting to consider that the White Women who have sex with Non-Whites are the ones who are the most liberal leaning, and the most liberal leaning White Women are the ones who have the least children.

  86. March 31, 2010 - 6:21 pm | Permalink

    Also, the most Liberal leaning White Women are the least likely to say they think Abortion is morally wrong.

    Seriously, how hard is it to notice the correlation between Liberal Attitudes toward Race and Liberal Attitudes toward Abortion?

    And how hard is it to see the correlation between Liberal Attitudes toward Abortion and a really low Birth Rate?

    The Race Mixing Bloodlines of the White Race are the ones that are dying, the ones that would be dying even if it wasn’t for the Race Mixing.

  87. March 31, 2010 - 6:51 pm | Permalink

    I’ll raise the issue again: If “whiteness” is the whole answer, why have so many modern whites embraced Marxism, socialism, left-liberalism, neoconservatism, and civilization-killing globalizationism, materialism, and money worship — all of which have made them putty in the hands of the Zionists? The Judeofascists may be at the root of many of these ideologies and movements, but being white in no way immunized whitey. Modern whites may be even MORE likely to join one of the above, and unquestionably more likely to join one of the last four.

    In a pinch, I’d jump into a fox hole with a brown peasant with authentic Christian principles way before I’d ever get into one with a contemporary white who subscribes to any of the above.

  88. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    March 31, 2010 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Chris Moore says:
    March 31, 2010 at 6:51 PM
    I’ll raise the issue again: If “whiteness” is the whole answer, why have so many modern whites embraced Marxism, socialism, left-liberalism, neoconservatism, and civilization-killing globalizationism, materialism, and money worship — all of which have made them putty in the hands of the Zionists?

    ANSWER: Because your “Zinists” control public education, mass media, and enertainment – the most effective means of brainwashing and indoctrination.

    If the Chinese were in control of the above, your “modern whites” would, most likely, speak Mandarin.

  89. Darren's Gravatar Darren
    March 31, 2010 - 7:31 pm | Permalink

    I predict it will continue upwards as whites and their culture assimilate negro norms of behavior and whites absorb more and more of their genetics.

    Do you have statistics on the rate of increase of negro genes among self-labeled whites?

    I would argue that such assimilation is nominal to nil because explicitly labeling oneself as black confers social advantages as opposed to labeling oneself as white. (Take our President, for instance).

    From this basis, it would seem more reasonable to suggest that it would be blacks who are getting whiter and assimilating more white behavioral traits.

  90. March 31, 2010 - 10:05 pm | Permalink

    “…Zionists control public education, mass media, and entertainment – the most effective means of brainwashing and indoctrination.”

    And how were they able to wrestle all that from the Protestant establishment? Because the Protestant establishment was more interested in money worship, liberalism and golf than protecting Western civilization, and because organized Jewry and the Left were able to rewrite history and lay Nazism at the feet of Christianity, shattering both Christianity’s moral authority and damaging the cause of Western civilization. The corrupt Jewish establishment became America’s new moral authority, and has been raping America ever since, and using it to advance Zionism.

    The problem was that while establishment liberalism may have joined the Right in anti-Communism, it was soft on the American Left, and soft on organized left-Jewry, and every time the Right pushed against left-Jewry and the American left, they got the “fascist” cat-call thrown in their face. Taking on a fifth column AND defeating Soviet Communism while simultaneously being sucker-punched with inferences of Nazism proved to be too much.

    Regaining the moral authority is key to saving the country. That means hammering the left-liberals, Zionists, neocons, and their partnership in evil, not emulating Jewish nationalism with white nationalism.

  91. CompassionateFascist's Gravatar CompassionateFascist
    March 31, 2010 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    I like Chris Moore’s post. I too will fight beside anyone who shares my hard-right values, race notwithstanding. If anti-Jewish Blacks, Browns, queers, whomever -and there are millions of them – want to help us overthrow ZOG and its white liberal stooges – and their are millions of them – so much the better. First WIN, then we’ll see who wants to live where, and screw with whom.

  92. March 31, 2010 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, because everything about this Country is great except for the Government.

  93. March 31, 2010 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

    I was being sarcastic, by the way….

  94. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    April 1, 2010 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    Chris Moore says:
    March 31, 2010 at 10:05 PM
    “…Zionists control public education, mass media, and entertainment – the most effective means of brainwashing and indoctrination.”

    And how were they able to wrestle all that from the Protestant establishment?

    Your second question (above) is largely irrelevant to the first one. If you have a pre-conceived theory of what has happened to WASP America then asking a chain of questions that appear like never-ending is not what I would call being up front. After all, Dr. MacDonald and others’ works provide thorough and convincing explanation of “how”. Just read them. And if you find flaws in those then bring them up for discussion rather than playing Socrates.

    The bottom line is that brave and friendly Anglo-Saxon protestants build a society based on individual liberties, limited government, and rule of law, that favored honesty and hard work and punished deceit and social parasitism, at least in principle if not always in practice.

    Some Jewish immigrants took advantage of the benevolence of their hosts, as well as the loopholes in their legal system, and infiltrated nation’s most critical communication structures. Eventually, this gave them firm control of hearts and minds of unsuspecting Americans. If they (the Americans) weren’t so good people as they were then that hostile takeover wouldn’t have taken place. But then, America wouldn’t be such a great country as she used to be and still is.

    I think you may save your rhetoric for another forum.

  95. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    April 1, 2010 - 10:55 am | Permalink

    Adam says:
    March 30, 2010 at 4:13 PM

    Even in my town, which is nominally about 90% white, it’s all too common to see a young white woman pushing a little dark-skinned half-ape a stroller. Rarely do you see the male ape responsible for the monstrosity. It’s clear that most of these pickaninnies are bastards, [...]

    This is really a disgusting comment.

    Free speech is free speech, but we are here to search for truth and not to pit racial groups one against anothes. How calling a human being who, possibly, haven’t commited any crime a “half-ape” or an “ape” can help us to sort things out? What guilt does a child have to call it a “bastard”? If you are so superior to those you call names then it doesn’t show at all in your comment. On the contrary, your language suggests that you, and not them, belong to ZOO.

    If you are unfit to reason or unable to engage in a scholarly discussion then you won’t do any better if you resort to insults and other emotionally-loaded language. Your anger (amplified by your inability to present a truly rational argument, I suppose) stands between you and facts and logic. The only thing that your rant may accomplish is to prove this quasi-idiot Rich right, in addition, perhaps, to reinforcing the white guilt in some Americans of European ancestry.

  96. barb's Gravatar barb
    April 1, 2010 - 11:09 am | Permalink

    “That means hammering the left-liberals, Zionists, neocons, and their partnership in evil, not emulating Jewish nationalism with white nationalism.”

    Mr. Moore, are you young? If you are middle age, you must see that the last 40 years have been all about (unsuccessfully) trying the strategy you embrace. White Americans are the worse for it.
    Can’t you see it’s time for a new approach?

  97. barb's Gravatar barb
    April 1, 2010 - 11:15 am | Permalink

    “This is quite clearly shown by the fact that, according to census data, about 10% of American white women are currently cohabiting with a non-white. No one knows what the real figure is for all white women who have ever had sex with a non-white, but it seems obvious it must be considerably higher than 10%.”

    Adam, your gloating triumphalism is showing.

  98. barb's Gravatar barb
    April 1, 2010 - 11:20 am | Permalink

    “The only thing that your rant may accomplish is to prove this quasi-idiot Rich right, in addition, perhaps, to reinforcing the white guilt in some Americans of European ancestry.”

    That’s exactly his goal.

    Since WNs don’t, in real life, use words like “pickininnies,” Adam must pose as one in order to try to make us all look bad.

  99. me's Gravatar me
    April 1, 2010 - 11:24 am | Permalink

    Anglo-Saxon protestants build a society based on individual liberties, limited government, and rule of law, that favored honesty and hard work and punished deceit and social parasitism, at least in principle if not always in practice.

    Some Jewish immigrants took advantage of the benevolence of their hosts, as well as the loopholes in their legal system

    A Reader: an accurate description…but the Jews don’t see it that way – whenever they were thwarted, they only saw antisemitism – if they tried to sell porn and were stopped by Protestants, it was anti-semitic. If they tried to cheat their way into universities and were caught, it was anti-semitism, because, of course, every one cheats (in their minds) .
    If their boorish behavior and obnoxious manners meant AngloSaxons didn’t want to spend their leisure time around them (in other words social and athletic clubs) it was anti semitism.

    I remember reading an article about the president of harvard who was worried about the high number of jews scoring high on examinations, and he justified not letting them in because in his words ‘jews cheat’ – this was absolutely true – they did cheat – a lot

    Notice how most all “Sat prep’ courses’ are jewish -jews became well known for ‘gaming’ tests that was supposed to be an honest measurement of knowledge and intellectual ability .

    Kaplan, Princeton Review and other SAT gaming t may seem ‘normal’ now – but it is in fact a reflection of how they lower civic standards .

  100. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    April 1, 2010 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Silver

    My point still holds. One must shoot for an objective(90% white voter turnout) then apply the means to reach that objective. Thats where the hard work comes into play AND as Prof Kevin M says the money

    Getting off ones butt to go to the store to get the bacon so to speak.

    Turnout will be very very high in November. (I bet 75% voter turnout) So let’s see and build from there. We have 200 million white folks. We need them mobilized.

  101. April 1, 2010 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

    @ A Reader,

    The REAL bottom line is that (certain) brave and friendly Anglo-Saxon protestants started collaborating with (certain) Jews in the rape and plunder of the country — certain kinds of “brave and friendly” Anglo-Saxon Protestant in the vein of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton — certain kinds of unprincipled, money-worshipping and liberal “Protestants” who started cutting Faustian bargains and couldn’t stop.

    But hey, if you’d rather put your head in the sand and ignore the role of “honest and hard working” “Protestants” like George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and their predecessor ilk (who probably never put in an honest days work in their lives) well then I can see why my “rhetoric” would rub you the wrong way.

    Accountability is a bitch, especially for the recent generations of Americans who fell down on the job due to their own lack of character, and who are handing off an America that is increasingly a Zionist infiltrated cesspool.

    Please spare me your despicable excuse making and finger pointing. It’s quite craven.

  102. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    April 1, 2010 - 7:10 pm | Permalink

    A Reader says:

    Adam says:
    March 30, 2010 at 4:13 PM

    Even in my town, which is nominally about 90% white, it’s all too common to see a young white woman pushing a little dark-skinned half-ape [in] a stroller. Rarely do you see the male ape responsible for the monstrosity. It’s clear that most of these pickaninnies are bastards, [...]

    This is really a disgusting comment.

    Thanks! :-D Are you a pickaninny yourself, or just an advocate for them?

    Free speech is free speech, but we are here to search for truth and not to pit racial groups one against anothes. How calling a human being

    There’s your problem! You think apes are humans.

    who, possibly, haven’t commited any crime a “half-ape” or an “ape” can help us to sort things out? What guilt does a child have to call it a “bastard”?

    On this count, you’re absolutely right. Negroes aren’t really “persons”, nor is a half-ape a “child”, so definition 1 doesn’t really apply. Let’s change that to “taxpayer-supported mutants”, m’kay?

    bas·tard
       /ˈbæstərd/ Show Spelled[bas-terd] Show IPA
    –noun
    1.
    a person born of unmarried parents; an illegitimate child.
    2.
    Slang.
    a.
    a vicious, despicable, or thoroughly disliked person: Some bastard slashed the tires on my car.
    b.
    a person, esp. a man: The poor bastard broke his leg.
    3.
    something irregular, inferior, spurious, or unusual.
    4.
    bastard culverin.
    –adjective
    5.
    illegitimate in birth.
    6.
    spurious; not genuine; false: The architecture was bastard Gothic.
    7.
    of abnormal or irregular shape or size; of unusual make or proportions: bastard quartz; bastard mahogany.
    8.
    having the appearance of; resembling in some degree: a bastard Michelangelo; bastard emeralds.
    9.
    Printing. (of a character) not of the font in which it is used or found.

    Origin:
    1250–1300; ME < AF bastard, ML bastardus (from 11th century), perh. < Gmc (Ingvaeonic) *bāst-, presumed var. of *bōst- marriage + OF -ard -ard, taken as signifying the offspring of a polygynous marriage to a woman of lower status, a pagan tradition not sanctioned by the church; cf. OFris bost marriage < Gmc *bandstu-, a n. deriv. of IE *bhendh- bind; the traditional explanation of OF bastard as deriv. of fils de bast “child of a packsaddle” is doubtful on chronological and geographical grounds

    —Synonyms
    6. fake, imitation, imperfect, sham, irregular, phony.

  103. me's Gravatar me
    April 1, 2010 - 7:47 pm | Permalink

    certain) brave and friendly Anglo-Saxon protestants started collaborating with (certain) Jews i
    a greek traitor showed the persians the passage that allowed them to slaughter the spartans at thermopylae….doesn’t make greece or greeks not worth defending, or mean it was valueless.

    By and large A Reader’s assessment was entirely correct. Yes there are have been some protestant elite who are genuine globalist /world visionaries (same w/ the EU elite, but for the most part it was jews violating social norms, customs, ignoring the spirit of our laws mores for their own gain.

    think about it, we live in a society where we’re practically on the verge or child pornography being legal (who runs that industry) and political expression being illegal – only an utterly warped people could have taken the constitution and twisted it to that extent.

  104. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    April 1, 2010 - 7:48 pm | Permalink

    Darren says:

    I predict it will continue upwards as whites and their culture assimilate negro norms of behavior and whites absorb more and more of their genetics.

    Do you have statistics on the rate of increase of negro genes among self-labeled whites?

    I would argue that such assimilation is nominal to nil because explicitly labeling oneself as black confers social advantages as opposed to labeling oneself as white. (Take our President, for instance).

    Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. Whites are becoming more black, culturally and genetically. The HNIC is a good example of that.

    From this basis, it would seem more reasonable to suggest that it would be blacks who are getting whiter and assimilating more white behavioral traits.

    Both things are happening at once.

    It’s important to note, however, that in genetics, where there’s a great disparity in size between two groups that are trying to assimilate each other, the larger group always dominates genetically. Because the larger group can “swallow” a small group without much genetic damage, that can lead those who rely only on genetic studies to an illusory sense that the larger group has a racial cohesion that it may not in fact possess. The true test of racial cohesion is the ability of a race to persist in a country in the face of its being a tiny minority, and both whites and asians, at various times and places, have failed that test. Jews, by contrast, have already passed the test with flying colors, and passed it many times. My view is that this ability of theirs to resist assimilation indicates significant underlying genetic differences between Jews and their host peoples.

    Culturally, the opposite is often the case. In history, a small group has often dominated a larger one, and, with varying degrees of success based on the amount of genetic distance between the two, been able to impose its cultural standards on them. Examples: the Jews dominating whites now, the way whites dominated all other races in the world throughout much of the 20th century, the Spanish and Portugese in the New World, the Roman dominance of the Western world around the time of Hadrian, Alexander’s conquest and Greek dominance of the known world in his day, etc.

    The working out of these two opposing trends is the stuff of which history is made.

  105. Orbitronio's Gravatar Orbitronio
    April 1, 2010 - 8:58 pm | Permalink

    The haughtiness can’t hide the stench of fear behind the catty remarks from the ADL and Hillel House monitoring centers, among other dirty little sweatshops the haters have their minions sitting in, doing their work for the tribe. Tossing out vacuous posts filled with inaccurate facts gussied up as truth and history. It’s all collapsing. Because anything the jews end up running, they end up running into the ground. Israhell wouldn’t exist without confiscated funds from American taxpayers. Now the US is collapsing, with no handouts in sight. And some of the silly tribesmen actually think the minawties will coalesce into an unified group, marching forward and crushing whitey while tubby little Abe shouts orders from a megaphone. From very far away. It’s going to get worse, then it’s going to get better for whites. Which means it won’t be quite so nice for the ultimate hypocrites or their not too bright foot soldiers. As of late, they can’t even do a good job of derailing threads.

  106. Horst's Gravatar Horst
    April 1, 2010 - 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Dr. MacDonald, someone on this thread cited the late, great Dr. William Pierce, probably the greatest, most uncompromising teacher that our People had in the last 30 years. You yourself are a worthy intellectual successor to this great man, as you prove again, in your diagnosis of the jewish supremacist Frank Rich. I would love to see the reactions that your writings provoke in Rich, Dershowitz, Foxman and others of their jewish ilk. “How dare you respond to our hatred for your European race, goy, by reminding your readers that we are Jews?”

    Dr. MacDonald, please stay safe and stay strong; you are an irreplaceable treasure in these dark days for our People.

  107. April 1, 2010 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

    me says: “a greek traitor showed the persians the passage that allowed them to slaughter the spartans at thermopylae….doesn’t make greece or greeks not worth defending, or mean it was valueless.”

    Millions of (white) Judeo-Christian Zionists, and millions of (white) Judeophile liberals, and millions of (white) money-worshipping Faustians easily adds up to a hell of a lot more than one Greek; it adds up to a plurality (if not a majority) of whites. And what all of them have in common is that they buy into this Zionist-pimped nonsense of a new, post-Western civilization, brave new world led by Judeo-America. Yes, even the liberals (or more correctly, neoliberals). And they’ll flog that horse until the country collapses, because they’re like a massive cult of crazy Hebrews.

    It’s a new paradigm, people. And you’ve got to pick your battles. And if you want to take on all of them on one front, and all of the people of color (including Christian minorities) on the other, then you…will…lose.

    It is ESSENTIAL that this battle be fought by every human being of good will, color be damned.

  108. April 1, 2010 - 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Adam,

    How is the Head Negro in Charge an example of Whites becoming more Black?

    Obama identifies as Black, is married to a Black, etc.

    He isn’t an example of Black genes entering the White Race, but rather of White Genes entering the Black Race.

  109. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    April 2, 2010 - 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Reginald says:

    Adam,

    How is the Head Negro in Charge an example of Whites becoming more Black?

    Obama identifies as Black, is married to a Black, etc.

    He isn’t an example of Black genes entering the White Race, but rather of White Genes entering the Black Race.

    The HNIC is a perfect example of the convergence of American whites with the black race. He’s the son of a white race traitor whore, and what race he “identifies” as is more a matter of political expediency than anything else. Genetically, he is as white as he is black, and through him, his mother’s line has moved towards black, and his father’s line has moved towards white. Culturally, he is more white than black. He’s much more refined, and perhaps a bit more intelligent than your average, feral, street negro. You could say he’s kind of an uptown version of the black President in the movie Idiocracy. Unless the technological system is destroyed, he represents the wave of the future for American whites.

  110. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    April 2, 2010 - 2:37 pm | Permalink

    me says:
    April 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM

    [... ] A Reader: an accurate description…but the Jews don’t see it that way – whenever they were thwarted, they only saw antisemitism [...]

    That is very true. As a matter of fact, I would say that Jews expect antisemitism wherever they go. If one believes in evolutionary psychology (that Dr. MacDonald uses as a tool in his research), that expectation of antisemitism proves that it has been caused by Jews’ traits and not by their hosts’ prejudice or xenophobia.

    Just like an invading army expects resistance from the invaded. If it didn’t then the invasion would not be armed.

  111. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    April 2, 2010 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Chris Moore says:
    April 1, 2010 at 6:43 PM
    @ A Reader,

    [...] But hey, if you’d rather put your head in the sand and ignore the role of “honest and hard working” “Protestants” like George W. Bush [...]

    I don’t think you are getting it and there is nothing I can do about it.

    Besides, GWB looks obviously Jewish to me. Also, “Bush” was a name of an afluent Jewish family in New England some 200 years ago.

    Anyway, infiltration and control and not collaboration is the main cause of our sorry predicament here.

  112. A Reader's Gravatar A Reader
    April 2, 2010 - 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Adam says:
    April 1, 2010 at 7:10 PM

    Negroes aren’t really “persons”, nor is a half-ape a “child”, so definition 1 doesn’t really apply.

    Adam, you sound like a Jewish provocator, who I think you are.

  113. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    April 2, 2010 - 3:58 pm | Permalink

    A Reader says:

    Adam, you sound like a Jewish provocator, who I think you are.

    So you ARE a pickaninny. Just as I thought!

  114. April 2, 2010 - 4:42 pm | Permalink

    @ A Reader: “I don’t think you are getting it and there is nothing I can do about it.”

    Oh, I get it all right. “Humph! Authentic Protestants would never…”

    But you’re missing my point. Authentic Protestants would indeed — they’re called Christian Zionists, and today they’re considered as authentically Protestant as you are — in fact, perhaps even MORE authentic than you. From their perspective, you’re just an old school, stick in the mud anti-Semite. The new word is that the Jews have a special dispensation, and the Jewish Israelites are to be praised and followed to the high heavens, no questions asked. Or haven’t you heard?

  115. San Fernando Valley is Gone's Gravatar San Fernando Valley is Gone
    April 2, 2010 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

    All I know is that in Los Angeles, the majority of the “white” women who run with blacks and mexicans are jews. No exaggeration. Just fact. Despite all the claims about fat white trash. They’re second behind their semitic sisters when it comes to running with the dark stuff. Sure, the jewish girls marry mopey little Seth when the time comes, but in their formative years, they’re sneaking off with Clerow and Juaquin. Just take a look at the “white” high schools left in the LA School system. Most of the whites are jews, and the jewish girls are notorious not only for being “nymphos” as high schoolers understand the term, but they all seem to be more than familiar with the congoid starting five on the basketball teams and so on. Just visit the town and you’ll see. Look at the way the ‘nice jewish girls’ carry on at places like El Camino High, Taft, and a few others. Not surprisingly, the tribe has infected a lot of their own to a certain degree with their multi cult lies. Especially their women. It’s very funny in a lot of ways. And it enrages the tribe to point out these inarguable truths.

  116. Oberving Occidentals's Gravatar Oberving Occidentals
    April 2, 2010 - 8:22 pm | Permalink

    Adam should stay away from numbers. His inability to grasp percentages, the rudiments of statistics and probability, would no doubt be embarrassing if he had a mind capable of grasping just how far off he is. But he does like to jabber about weak minds, even copying line after line of material from the posts of others across the net. Or is the verbiage merely part of the yellowed script tacked to the cubicle wall?

    The post by “me’ makes good points regarding the SAT. When the first scandal erupted in Southern California at Beverly Hills High over children being prescribed Adderall just before taking the SAT, the jewsmedia went through great pains to hide the fact that 100% of the kids were jews. Just as they’ve covered up other jewish cheating scandals at high schools and colleges around the US, not to mention more than a few involving Asians, two of which I witnessed first hand in college. But if a white kid cheats on test, wow, fodder for weeks on CNN.

  117. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    April 2, 2010 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Oberving Occidentals says:

    Adam should stay away from numbers. His inability to grasp percentages, the rudiments of statistics and probability, would no doubt be embarrassing if he had a mind capable of grasping just how far off he is. But he does like to jabber about weak minds, even copying line after line of material from the posts of others across the net. Or is the verbiage merely part of the yellowed script tacked to the cubicle wall?

    Hmm, sounds like Madam is Adam/Captaindoofus/Oberving [Oberving?] Occidentals got its li’l feelers hurt when I called it on its weak ego and weaker brain. The poor critter was so emotionally shaken it’s now developed a multiple personality problem. That means it’s time for a repost! :-D

    Madam is Adam says:

    97% of whites in the US marry other whites.

    As I said, the thing to watch is the steeply climbing rate of interracial sex relative to historical norms. Overall marriage rates have declined in recent decades, and at this point 40% of all US children are born out of wedlock, so marriage rates are less important than ever. Even cohabitation rates are more informative than marriage rates, and about 10% of white women are currently cohabiting with non-whites. Adding in the amount that have done so at any time in the past would increase the total, and the figure for those who have had sex with non-whites but never cohabited with them is no doubt larger still. The result of all this is that of those whites who do marry other whites, a lot of the white men are getting white women who have already had sex with non-whites, lived with them, or even had children by them.

    But, by all means, continue with your happy talk, fool. People with weak egos and weaker brains need to bolster themselves somehow.

    You wish you could dispute those numbers, Captaindoofus. But you can’t.

  118. April 2, 2010 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    “He’s the son of a white race traitor whore, and what race he ‘identifies’ as is more a matter of political expediency than anything else.”

    Have you even skimmed his Autobiography!?

    It’s unbelievable how ignorant this statement is.

    Obama identifies as a Black on far more than just a political level, and he resents Whites far out of proportion to any political utility.

    This was markedly shown when his siding with Henry Gates over the White Cop led to a huge drop in his support.

    “Unless the technological system is destroyed, he represents the wave of the future for American whites.”

    If you really believe that, just go ahead and destroy the technological system already, you lazy bastard.

  119. Madam is Adam's Gravatar Madam is Adam
    April 3, 2010 - 8:25 pm | Permalink

    Adam can’t refute anything. He can claim to make observations from his grimy Brooklyn walk-up, but has no solid numbers. Unless one is poor enough at mathematics to take his guesses as percentages as worth something. Guesses from someone who admits he’s weak with numbers. But he can call people names. Which is what they always do when countered. Yell. Resort to name-calling. Make things up, lol. For all we know, we’re dealing with a group of Adams, who go by Allan, Josh, Seth, Morrie and more when out desperately chasing da shiksas.

  120. Chase's Gravatar Chase
    April 3, 2010 - 9:19 pm | Permalink

    Madam, I believe Adam is more irritated by the highly accurate post remarking on Jewish women and their rampant sexual escapades with non whites before settling down, than anything else you or others may have posted. This dirty little secret galls Jews to no end and probably has the guys rightfully wondering about their girlfriends, wives, daughters and mothers. Jews are promiscuous as a culture to begin with.

  121. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    April 3, 2010 - 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Reginald says:

    “He’s the son of a white race traitor whore, and what race he ‘identifies’ as is more a matter of political expediency than anything else.”

    Have you even skimmed his Autobiography!?

    You mean you’re gullible enough to think he wrote it himself? :-)

    It’s unbelievable how ignorant this statement is.

    Obama identifies as a Black on far more than just a political level, and he resents Whites far out of proportion to any political utility.

    Who cares what race he identifies with? He could think he’s a Klingon for all I care. That’s completely irrelevant to the cultural and genetic convergence of the white and black races in America that’s taking place right in front of our eyes.

    “Unless the technological system is destroyed, he represents the wave of the future for American whites.”

    If you really believe that, just go ahead and destroy the technological system already, you lazy bastard.

    Knowing that something needs to be destroyed and actually having the power to destroy it are not the same thing, unfortunately.

  122. April 4, 2010 - 2:46 am | Permalink

    “You mean you’re gullible enough to think he wrote it himself?”

    Do you have any evidence he didn’t?

    “Who cares what race he identifies with?”

    There’s a difference between Gene Flow into and Gene Flow out of a Race.

    Look at the the Spanish.

    They had a lot of their genes flow into the Latin America, but didn’t have Non-White Genes from those places flow into the Spanish Race.

    Therefore the purity of the Spanish Race was preserved, even if it came at the cost of somewhat reduced numbers.

  123. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    April 4, 2010 - 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Reginald says:

    “You mean you’re gullible enough to think he wrote it himself?”

    Do you have any evidence he didn’t?

    There’s plenty of reason to think he didn’t.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/who_wrote_dreams_from_my_fathe_1.html
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=77815

    It could be 40 or 50 years, though, before the truth is allowed to emerge, if it ever is. There’s a lot of precedent for this. Manufacturing a public image for prospective presidential candidates to make them seem intelligent and capable of leading a nation is a stock in trade of the media. It’s a technique that has been in regular use since the tremendous expansion of media influence in the 1960s. I’m a little surprised you don’t know that. Don’t they teach you anything in anti-semite school these days? But then, there’s no cure for being inherently gullible, I suppose. You probably also still give John F. Kennedy credit for writing Profiles in Courage, even though it was almost certainly written by Ted Sorenson.

    “Who cares what race he identifies with?”

    There’s a difference between Gene Flow into and Gene Flow out of a Race.

    While this is true it has nothing to do with either Obama or who he identifies with.

    Look at the the Spanish.

    Look at the congoid ape Obama Sr., as his genes flow into Obammy’s white mammy and through her, into the white race.

  124. April 4, 2010 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

    Steve Sailer is far smarter than you, and wrote about the Autobiography from the perspective that Barak Obama was responsible for it.

    Profiles in Courage wasn’t an Autobiography, much less an Autobiography written from a highly personal perspective.

    Nobody was surprised that it was Ghostwritten, given that and given how unrelated it was to the rest of JFK’s intellectual output.

    Dream From My Father, in contrast, deals with so many of the same themes and tropes that have dominated Obama’s intellectual career.

    But I guess cause WND and American Thinker, those paragons of balanced journalism, say they were Ghostwritten, I should ignore all that.

    “Look at the congoid ape Obama Sr., as his genes flow into Obammy’s white mammy and through her, into the white race.”

    Obama isn’t part of the White Race.

    Therefore your statement is blatantly false.

  125. Adam's Gravatar Adam
    April 4, 2010 - 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Reginald says:

    Steve Sailer is far smarter than you, and wrote about the Autobiography from the perspective that Barak Obama was responsible for it.

    Yes, let’s forget about all of the textual analysis that indicates it was written by someone else, a someone else who in all likelihood was Bill Ayers. Let’s also forget that writing is a difficult art, not easily mastered even by humans, let alone a half-human sired by an African ape. Let’s also forget that this was supposedly a first effort from a guy who had basically written nothing ever before, and whose record has been carefully sealed from public scrutiny. If the self-confessed part Jew Steve Sailer writes a book based on the assumption that Obama’s so-called autobiography is legitimate, there’s an end on it. Case closed, according to you.

    Un-freakin-believable!

    By the way, Sailer himself has now admitted that he “certainly find[s] it plausible that Ayers copy-edited Dreams from My Father. While no one but Sailer can say what he really means by this, it looks to me like this is essentially an admission that he too believes the book was probably ghosted, or at least extensively re-worked. Maybe you should take a hint from your idol and do likewise.

    Profiles in Courage wasn’t an Autobiography, much less an Autobiography written from a highly personal perspective.

    So what? You can get a ghost writer for any kind of book you want. Profiles even won a Pultizer Prize, fer cryin’ out loud! That’s an eerie parallel with this book, which also was awarded prestigious prizes and praised to the skies by gullible dolts who thought Obama was its legitimate author.

    Nobody was surprised that it was Ghostwritten, given that and given how unrelated it was to the rest of JFK’s intellectual output.

    NOBODY WAS SURPRISED????!! What planet are you living on, really? When news of it first broke on the television program “60 Minutes”, the enraged Kennedys threatened to sue and forced the network to issue a public retraction. It took 53 years for the ghost writer to come forward and admit the deed in writing. Even to this day the authorship question is still disputed, and you say nobody was surprised.

    Sheesh.

    Dream From My Father, in contrast, deals with so many of the same themes and tropes that have dominated Obama’s intellectual career.

    Obama’s intellectual career????? Stop, yer killin’ me! Ever try standup? You should.

    The fact is the guy is a cipher. No one knows the slightest thing about his “intellectual career”, including you, because all of his school records were carefully sealed. Nobody knows his IQ or what his grades were. He’s a so-called “Professor of Constitutional Law” who’s never written a single article on the subject, let alone a book. It can’t even be confirmed that he’s an American citizen, and yet they’ve got you and all the other lemmings believing he’s some kind of literary genius.

    But I guess cause WND and American Thinker, those paragons of balanced journalism, say they were Ghostwritten, I should ignore all that.

    Cashill makes a good case, supported by evidence and logic. You don’t.

    “Look at the congoid ape Obama Sr., as his genes flow into Obammy’s white mammy and through her, into the white race.”

    Obama isn’t part of the White Race.

    Therefore your statement is blatantly false.

    Oh I see. When the Portugese and the Spanish males impregnated New World native women, that was white genes flowing out. But when a congoid ape impregnates a white woman, then that isn’t an example of ape genes flowing in.

    You’re delusional.

  126. April 4, 2010 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

    Adam, you don’t seem to appreciate that the phrase “copy edit” is a well known term in publishing that doesn’t mean the same thing as “Ghost Written” at all.

    When you copy edit it means you take text written by someone else and turn it into something publishable.

    Thus the ideas are going to be from the writer, and not the editor, even if the editor is responsible for improving the quality and especially the tightness of the writing.

    “Oh I see. When the Portugese and the Spanish males impregnated New World native women, that was white genes flowing out. But when a congoid ape impregnates a white woman, then that isn’t an example of ape genes flowing in.”

    If a Human Female had sex with a Chimpanzee, and then the resulting hybrid become a member of Chimpanzee society who married a Chimpanzee female, then that would be an example of Human genes flowing out into the Chimpanzee Race.

    You are confusing two issues.

    Women are the limiting factor on reproduction. Thus when a White Female marries a Non-White, it is more of a numerical loss to the White Race than when a White Man marries a Non-White.

    At the same time, if the half-breed offspring of a White Female takes after Barack Obama and doesn’t end up a part of the White Race in any meaningful way, an advantage of it is that the ethnic core of the White Race will be untouched.

    It’s like with Jews: A lot of Jews Race Mix, but since the offspring are more likely to identify as White, the ethnic core of the Jewish Race tends to be unaffected by this.

  127. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    April 4, 2010 - 9:50 pm | Permalink

    My goodness, hell must just have frozen over. I find myself agreeing with Adwarf in this exchange.

  128. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    April 4, 2010 - 10:08 pm | Permalink

    Not to be unjustly hatin’ on Obongo, it has to be conceded that he is palpably smarter than his predecessor Jorge W. Boosh, but still, that ain’t sayin’ much.

    P.S. Anyone who thinks Adwarf isn’t a gift sent from Odin doesn’t have a clue. When he is putting on the facade of being in agreement with us, he is carrying our water. And when he is attempting subversion it so crude and transparent as to render manifest for even the most naive observer the pressing need to expel the Jew totally from our living space.

    Keep doin’ yo thang, Adwarf.

Comments are closed.