Christopher Donovan: Kevin MacDonald has done great blogging about Elena Kagan, who’s now known to be Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court. She is, of course, Jewish, and stands as a spectacular example of the “Good Ol’ Jews Network” — her main qualification seems to be that everyone (as in, fellow power-Jews) gushes praise for her, which in turn causes more gushing. Everyone wants to comment on the king’s fine new clothes. This type of thing happens to wealthy Jews from the Upper West Side. It does not happen to White Protestants from Oklahoma, no matter how smart they are.
Speaking of which, there are now no Protestants on the Supreme Court. One might think that white Protestants would bemoan this fact. But they aren’t. They’ve been trained not to, of course. Which stands in sharp contrast to, say, the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor. She’s supposed to be the Hispanic representative. The Hispanic complaint was that they didn’t have anyone on the Supreme Court. Obama fixed that.
So, all things being equal, white Protestants would have just as much of a complaint now that they’re on the outs. But we all know that racial politics in America today aren’t about actual equality, they’re about pushing Whites off the stage. Elena Kagan will turn the Supreme Court into a “Sanhedrin”, in the phrase of some associates — 1/3 Jewish. This reflects the shift in America’s powerbase from white Protestant to Jewish.
This has consequences: policies that hurt whites are enacted, and Whites suffer. It’s that simple, and that monumental. Yet the conservative legal blogosphere is completely silent on this point. It is even censoring comments of anyone who mentions it.
At National Review — long discredited in any event, but worth noting as a gauge of the absurd — says nothing about it. Some of them are taken in by Kagan’s having reached out to the Federalist Society as a sign that she’s “not hostile” to conservatism.
This is a complete crock. Kagan just grasps that it’s “hip” to hang with the Federalist Society because it shows your open-mindedness, but the Federalist Society has absolutely nothing to say on issues that affect Whites. In fact, it’s a tool for the promotion of Israel-friendly “war on terror” policies.
Most “conservative” legal bloggers are, of course, themselves Jews, so they make sure to keep the focus on silly details. Ted Frank and Eugene Volokh are good examples. See here, here, and here.
America no longer belongs to whites. Its machinery is controlled by those hostile to their interests. We need to recognize this fact and respond.
Christopher Donovan is the pen name of an attorney and former journalist. Email him.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
Why are you calling her a lesbian? This is an unfair charge.
If you’re discussing Kagan’s identity – and there’s really no alternative, given that ethnic networking has taken her to the top without her having to provide any paper trail to discuss – there are three options:
* the Jewish angle – indisputably true, very important in her appointments, who has brought her forward and how she can be expected to act, and met with silence.
* the female angle – also indisputably true, but there’s no evidence that it’s been or will be of any comparable importance.
* the lesbian angle – mere speculation, and even if true with little relevance to her ethnic networking or how she could be expected to act on any issue but one.
The mass media is all about the speculation that leads nowhere, and not the clear fact that leads dangerous places.
“Serious” voices online are displaying an amazing lack of curiosity about what’s clearly factual and important, preferring to focus on trivia and issues on which Kagan’s lack of a paper trail means that there is nothing much to say. Christopher Donovan’s links support that.
Nobody thinks there’s a lesbian network equal in power to the Jewish network. For a media that was about truth and facts, with a focus on what matters, that would mean “the story is the Jewish network”. For an un-serious media that covers for those on the left who can wield sticks and carrots, the story would be the lesbian speculation.
So we know there’s a taboo on the discussion of Jewish ethnic networking, money power and place-seeking. In the abstract, when it doesn’t matter, such things might be alluded to (and then again they might not), but when big moves are happening in front of our eyes there’s a great quiet.
That’s why we need the Occidental Observer and other sources that disregard the taboo. It’s not about “prejudice” it’s about truth.
There have been numerous reports including by CBS, and a plethora of gay & ivy league blogs saying that Kagan is a lesbian.
The fact that she is a homosexual advocate cannot be challenged—her record is quite clear.
BOMFOG:
It has been suggested in many quarters that she is a lesbian. I personally don’t know if she is or isn’t. There is a discussion on the legal blog “Above the Law” on this topic. I’m simply using “lesbian” here as a replacement for “elephant”, to make the headline (which I wrote). It may have been gratuitous.
Do you ever refer to people as anglo-saxon,Christian,heterosexuals? And do you then look at every decision they may have made to see if has a heterosexual,christian or anglo-saxon bias?
Try looking at people’s decision to see if they are based on law.
stj911 says: “Try looking at people’s decision to see if they are based on law.”
We can’t, in this case. Kagan has no judicial record to examine.
This is a complete crock. Kagan just grasps that it’s “hip” to hang with the Federalist Society because it shows your open-mindedness, but the Federalist Society has absolutely nothing to say on issues that affect Whites. In fact, it’s a tool for the promotion of Israel-friendly “war on terror” policies.
The Federalist Society? Isn’t that what Jews like Elena Shagall use to ambush White women like Stephanie Grace? Elena Shagall was supposed to be a “conservative”, but Ms. Grace found out otherwise.
Of course Elena Kagan is a lesbian. She looks like a freaking transvestite, for God’s sake.
I kind of doubt she is a lesbian. She doesn’t have a history of even having ANY relationship, so the only reason people are saying she is lesbian is because she looks the part. That’s not enough evidence.
you seem to overlook that she is tied into the goldman sachs group. This criminal organization of zionists is set upon destroying usa economy and replacing it with a new zionist government. Yes I know we have a pro zionist government, however it was complete we would not be here, we would be in restricted areas, in jial or in the ground like the Palistinians.
Here’s another very silly comment about Kagan on the Volokh webzine:
http://volokh.com/2010/05/11/my-own-kagan-experience/
Is this just another neocon/Jewish smokescreen,it sure produce many words.
I have a comment in there where i linked to this blog and a article by K.Macdonald,and the answer was as usual…
Please,write something about what you think about this way to spread the words.
Thought is visual.
On sight and by any observable act this woman (Kagan) is unfit to make any decision outside the closet.
Great information! I’ve been looking for something like this for a while now. Thanks!
“there are now no Protestants on the Supreme Court. One might think that white Protestants would bemoan this fact. But they aren’t. They’ve been trained not to, of course.”
My local paper in Knoxville TN did a story on this fact, interviewing local P preachers. All said it made no difference, as long as her principles were good.
Ah, white individualists! Their religion and their people don’t matter. Only “principles” (?) matter…even while they and their children are drowning in a sea of mud. Keep articulating