The Obama administration continues to insist that Israel is not a burden to the US, but even the LA Times came out with an article showing describing the problems that Israel presents to the US. (Print version headline: “Raid throws a wrench in U.S. agenda“). The article lists several current foreign policy problems exacerbated by the raid:
- US-sponsored peace talks in the region (despite the fact that Israel has no interest in peace);
- US drive for new U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran (in other words, Israel has made it more difficult for the US to advance Israel’s agenda);
- Complications with the US relationship with Turkey which is “a NATO member and has been important to U.S. military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan” (several Turkish nationals were killed in the raid, and the ships sailed under Turkish flags);
- Difficulties in the US push for nuclear non-proliferation given that Israel is well-known to have nuclear weapons: “other countries demanded that Israel take a more active role in the effort to reduce nuclear arms, a reference to the atomic arsenal Israel has never acknowledged possessing.”
The article also highlights comments from a prominent foreign policy expert and from General David Petraeus:
“The costs of alignment with Israel are becoming ever more apparent, and the benefits are becoming harder to identify,” said James Dobbins, who was an envoy for both the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations and now heads Rand Corp.’s International Security and Defense Policy Center. …
This week’s raid underscored concern expressed in recent congressional testimony by Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, head of U.S. forces in the Middle East, who said perceived U.S. bias toward the Jewish state was a negative factor in the Muslim world.
What’s remarkable about this article is that it doesn’t quote the usual well-placed Zionist fanatics in the media who claim that Israel is a great asset to the US. Glib talk about the benefits of Israel to the US will be more difficult to maintain with a straight face. But of course those concerned about their political future will continue to do so:
U.S. officials say they do not view their relationship with Israel as a burden, regardless of criticism from the Middle East, Europe or elsewhere.
“Let me be clear here,” White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday. “We have a trusted relationship. They’re an important ally. And we are greatly supportive of their security. That’s not going to change.”
The Joys of Jihad: Islamentable, Isatrocious, Isbetrayal
Nordics versus Implicit Jews in "The Switch"
When Heidi went to Heaven 
There is a very elightening op-ed piece in the “Wall Street Journal” by Ronen Bergman who is an Israeli journalist writing for “Yedioth Ahronoth,” which is Israel’s biggest circulation newspaper. He writes that the Israeli government and people now feel completely ostracized from the rest of the world and that there is nothing that they can do or could do to change things. So to hell with world opinion. This is a manifestation of Dr. Mac Donald’s “A People That Shall Dwell Alone” on steroids.
The left can never admit that Israel is a millstone round the neck of US grand strategy because they are still wedded to the idea of a WASP military-industrial/ extraction industry complex carving up the world . against Isaels’s long term interest.
The US is not an ally of Israel it’s their satellite, US troops function as expendable attack dogs for destroying Arabs states. When the last Arab state (Egypt) is ground into dust maybe they’ll begin to understand that it was all for Israel and nobody else.
Repatriation singles out no one, but follows a simple rule of thumb: those that organize into parallel nations with their own identity, agenda and alien loyalties to the point of threatening the sovereignty of America belong in the nation to which they are loyal.
Whether this is applied to La Raza (Mexico), the Israel lobby, or any other ethnic-nationalist group working at the behest of a foreign agenda makes no difference. For example, if the powerful Turkish lobby rose to the point of threatening American sovereignty, as the Israel lobby has, it too would be repatriated.
It really wouldn’t be that difficult to set up tribunals to identify, convict and deport the leaders of these foreign nationalist movements, which is all it would really take to break their backs.
Those opposed to this concept are simply suffering from a lack of patriotism and divided loyalties — and not just between America and a foreign country. There are other visions prodding and pulling Americans in opposition to the American interest, e.g. triumphalist Judeo-Christianity vs. America, White nationalism vs. America, money worship/Corporatism vs. America, the Globalizationist agenda vs. America, the international Statist-liberal/Leftists-Marxist vision vs. America. Some of these may be legitimate viewpoints, but when it comes right down to it, why should milquetoast Americans willing to subordinate and even destroy the American interest in favor of a competing vision be setting American policy? A country led by these types ends up confused and crumbling, which is where America is today.
The concept of repatriation is one component of libertarian nationalism, which unlike the corrupted, international profiteering GOP version of nationalism (not to mention the scatterbrained Democrats’ schizophrenic and contradictory internationalist “patriotism” that is filled with hostility to the very concept of national sovereignty itself) wouldn’t get the American people dragged into foreign wars and hair brained ideological experiments the world over. Puffed up, hostile elites with all manner of foreign, utopian, self-serving or just plain misguided loyalties and agendas that conflict with the idea of America itself by using and exploiting the country to the breaking point are the very last people who should be holding themselves up as model Americans, and setting American policy.
http://www.libertariantoday.com/2010/06/repatriation-and-libertarian.html
Occasional whimpers of protest from the “realist” foreign policy establishment. But if George Marshall and George Kennan couldn’t beat the Jews back then I doubt this Dobbins guy can now.
The irony is if they’d been satisfied with a normal level of US support and hadn’t had a paranoid need for a unconditionally obedient superpower golem they might have been less reckless and careless over the years and wouldn’t be in this situation now.
Justin Raimondo has a vaugely racialist take on the Israeli raid in his latest column:
the Mediterranean Massacre
It is often said, by Israel’s defenders, that the Jewish state is part and parcel of the West: that Israel, the only democracy in the region, must be defended because they are, after all, reliable allies who share our values, the heritage of Athens and Jerusalem. That has been the conventional wisdom – and it’s wrong. The Mediterranean Massacre underscores the wrongness of this assumption.
Israel is not a Western country, and hasn’t been for some time: helped along by this latest incident, the realization of this fact by Western governments and peoples will represent a turning point in the Jewish state’s relations with the civilized world, especially including Jews in the Diaspora. I have argued this for years: that the successful aliya program pushed by the Israeli government has displaced the old European-derived Israeli elites with a new, more Asiatic influence, one that is now – with the rise of the Israel far right – the dominant factor in Israeli politics.
Birthed by leftist Zionists who sought to build an egalitarian community in the midst of a desert, the modern state of Israel has taken on the characteristics of its neighbors – gone native, so to speak, both culturally and politically. The large scale infusion of North African and Asiatic populations has changed Israeli society irrevocably, so that, today, the rise of a thuggish fascist demagogue like Avigdor Lieberman, the former bouncer turned Foreign Minister, is all too believable. Lieberman isn’t a political anomaly: he and his party represent what is the dominant trend in Israeli politics.
In understanding how the Israelis justify killing sixteen civilians in international waters – and kidnapping hundreds – we have to look at it from the viewpoint of a savage. Now I don’t mean by that term someone necessarily wearing animal skins, and wielding a club: savages can wear Armani suits, and wield nuclear weapons, as the history of the twentieth century attests. In the West, however, the culture and especially religious belief prevents the celebration of savagery as civic virtue: when we commit atrocities, we justify it as a proportionate use of force in retaliation for previous acts of aggression by the victims of our wrath. Hiroshima and Nagasaki – and the arguments used to buttress the case for killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians – come to mind. The death of innocents is explained away as “collateral damage.”
The savage mind, however, works differently. Shorn of what we would recognize as a moral sense, the savage glories in his capacity for pitiless violence. It’s a survival mechanism: in his world, red in tooth and claw, instilling fear in your opponent means winning more than half the battle.
Its the influence of the Talmud. Jesus attacked the Talmud and so did the Quran. And what do the Arabs do, they came up with their own Talmud, the Hadith literature(oral traditions). So in a way Raimondo is correct. There is a semitic twist to all this.
http://www.islamicaweb.com/forums/religion-spirituality/913-koran-torah-gospel-corrupted.html
I don’t think that you can come to any sort of a sane solution when you are dealing with a goofball cult like the Jews.
Wandrin says: “The irony is if they’d been satisfied with a normal level of US support and hadn’t had a paranoid need for a unconditionally obedient superpower golem they might have been less reckless and careless over the years and wouldn’t be in this situation now.”
It is what it is. They can’t help themselves.
This flotilla was a provocation, a tactic along the same lines Jews used in displacing the British and establishing their own power in Palestine. The Jews should know how this works and they shouldn’t have taken the bait, but they are too aggressive and too averse to out-groups. They had to hit the target.
(For that matter, the Muslims could have managed their provocation more adroitly by being less violent, but Islam has its own cultural issues with excessive aggressiveness.)
In sustaining their American support, Jews would be better off if they treated their strongly identified pro-white Christian supporters with consistent kindness or at least respect, but they can’t do it, because they are too aggressive to their negatively identified out-groups. The disinvitation of Sarah Palin from an anti-Iran rally by the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations illustrates this. They had to humiliate their blind supporter, because they dislike her ethnicity, that’s what it comes down to.
Globally, Israel’s preferred strategic orientation is a mirror of American Jewry’s strategic orientation. From the foundation of Israel, Jews were calling “Nazi!” and “Holocaust!” on the British, who had bled to beat the Nazis and stop the Holocaust, and while they practiced terrorism against the British Zionists sought support from all enemies of White imperialism, such as Egypt. (I’m sure that even today Israel sincerely wants peace and acceptance from its neighbors, if it can get them totally on its own terms, and if it could get them it would be leading ferociously anti-White international movements.) This is the same as supporting all anti-White ethnicities to grow stronger in America, while constantly demoralizing American Whites.
It’s an astonishingly aggressive policy which assumes in the face of all the evidence that non-Whites will be easy for Jews to befuddle once Whites are out of the way and that driving Whites into a enervated state where they can barely understand a concept of legitimate self-defense for lighter-skinned people will be cost-free.
A calm, un-contentious people, without too much intensity, too much aggressiveness and too much ethnocentricity would not persist in policies like this. But for the Jews it’s inevitable.
Israel will use up all its support and all its supporters, while berating them for not doing enough and weeping in sincere self-pity for the sufferings of Israel and over the coldness and maliciousness of non-Jewish hearts. They will do this while driving those same supporters not only into diplomatic embarrassment but into demographic destruction, so that they would not be able to supply the needed support for Israel indefinitely no matter how much they wanted to. And future generations of Jews will be taught all of this as another chapter on the millenia-long history of how “they tried to kill us but we survived”.
That’s why we shouldn’t worry at all about the Jews and their future. That future is set, especially the interpretation that Jews will give it.
The Arabs and the Turks are also in no demographic danger, to put it mildly.
It’s our future that’s up for grabs. We’re the only people we should be worrying about. Because we are vanishing, and that’s a vast pity.
I commented yesterday on another recent post about how Israel is waging the information war online on social media websites. Well they’ve just been exposed for lying and deception on the photo social media site “Flickr”:
Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs Fakes Photos of Seized Weapons
“Christianity vs. America, White nationalism vs. America”
Yup, gotta stamp out those pathological gentile group loyalties to defend America, which is after all a conceptual nation based on the ideas of Ayn Rand.
Latest decree of the Libertarian Politboro:
“Rand-ism in One Country” is the party line. NeoConservative heretics who seek to “Export the Revolution” will be expelled from the party (and exiled from America!).
Libertarians and rightwing Republicans privatize the profits.
Democrats and centrist Republicans socialize the losses.
Wall Street uses the appropriate tool at the appropriate time.
Anyone who sincerely thinks that the costs Israel imposes on the United States are just now “becoming apparent” has been living on the moon for the past 40 years or is wilfully ignorant. Of courae, wilful ignorance in this regard is a good career move in contemporary America.
The clearest cost to the United States is the threat of “terror” retaliation by Muslim resistance fighters.
Bin Laden and his soldiers targeted the twin towers and the Pentagon in retaliation for U.S. complicity with Israel’s slow moving genocide in Palestine. Got that, America? Violence was brought upon you because of your support of Israel. Here it is from the horse’s mouth:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137129,00.html
And then consider all the costs at so many levels that have followed from that attack. How much are you willing to pay in taxes, resources, and lives to further the Jewish supremacist project in the eastern Mediterranean?
There are a lot of other costs Americans are not aware of.
Bobby Kennedy was shot, by a Palestinian Christian, in retaliation for U.S. support of Israel
The 1973 oil embargao was a direct result of the U.S. decision to supply Israel with miliitary assets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_embargo
Chris Moore:
I like your writing and ideas. You are having an impression on at least one person. I do think you need to drop the Libertarian label though. Too much baggage associated with it.
libertarian nationalism – biggest oxymoron of all time
Libertarianism takes one aspect of our rich national heritage, the Rights of Englishmen, and twists it into a dogmatic political ideology which left-Libertarians (the most intellectually consistent kind) use as a tool for tearing down the all the rest – God, family, race.
We could begin to shake out the scam artist jews when we start demanding that White jewish synagogues must integrate or else be tried in the court of public opinion for the crime racism.
Wouldn’t you love to see a Craig Boedeker investigative video on the ongoing problem of racial segregation in jewish institutions?
Somehow, we must force abe foxman to admit that jewish segregation is the same White bias he decries as “racist and hateful.”
When will White jewish girls stop dating White jewish boys and start showing their commitment to Diversity by only dating the blacks?
Every time abe foxman attacks Whites for expressing unity with Whites, we must have an organized response that demands he answer this question: “So you agree that White jewish girls are racist when they don’t date blacks?”
@ Whites Unite,
What I actually wrote was not “Christianity vs. America” but “triumphalist Judeo-Christianity vs. America…” There’s a big difference between the two, as plenty of Judeo-Christians are Jewish supremacists themselves, with an education that tends to begin and end with the bible (and stop at the end of the Old Testament, at that).
“Yup, gotta stamp out those pathological gentile group loyalties to defend America, which is after all a conceptual nation based on the ideas of Ayn Rand.”
I’m not sure what open borders, internationalist (and likely crypto Jewish supermacist) Ayn Rand had to do with the libertarian nationalism of America’s Founders, who after all advocated patriotism, sovereignty, and trade with all, but entangling alliances with none. They also advocated the idea that “all men are created equal,” which itself is “conceptual” and could be accused of undermining group loyalties.
The problem with Jewish nationalists and Judeo-Christians (like yourself?) is that deep down they don’t subscribe to the beliefs of America’s libertarian nationalist founders, and set out to set themselves up as some kind of supreme caste, and hence have been sabotaging the idea of America in big ways and small for decades.
How many of America’s problems today are the result of tribalists on both the Right and the Left who didn’t want to play by the rules as prescribed by the founders, and instead abuse the system and elevate their own piggish tribe above others?
Jewish nationalists and their fan club wannabees and emulators think they’re all so clever, but all they really are is primitive, self-serving, narrow-minded little piglets incapable of grasping the concept of America.
We are not learning for the first time that America’s support of Israel has diplomatic costs. But a new generation is getting a look at how high these costs are.
And as time goes by, the line that Israel is an important ally gets weaker. The benefits that should compensate for the high cost of supporting Israel never materialize.
@Daybreaker
Great post. You wrote:
“I’m sure that even today Israel sincerely wants peace and acceptance from its neighbors, if it can get them totally on its own terms, and if it could get them it would be leading ferociously anti-White international movements.”
I agree. In an alternate history scenario, if Israel had not been founded, the entire ferocity and resources of Judaism would have been directed almost solely against Whites. As it is, Whites are sorely beset, and in that alternate scenario, things would be grim indeed, a nightmare. Its probably very fortunate for Europeans that the Jews must focus so much of their energy and resources fighting cat against dog in the unforgiving hell that is the Middle East.
You also pointed out that Anglo America will not be there forever for Israel. In the long term (50+ years), the long-suffering White Christian supporters of the Jews, hated by the Jews as incorrigible, guilty anti-Semites will become a minority within the nation they founded. It is probable that the twilight of Anglo America will see its eclipse economically and politically by China, which will want no “special relationship” with Israel, the Chinese are political realists, not Zionists. This tale is so ironic, poetic and tragic that it would make a fantastic novel, were that it was fiction and not the future.
Note to Chris Moore: Libertarianism is a Jewish ideology.
But at least you seem to be aware that the egalitarian, Freemasonic ideas contained in the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution sowed the seeds for the eventual cultural and demographic destruction of America at the hands of the Jews.
@Chris Moore,
Your views are an outstanding example of one of the problems that Whites face surviving the present day world, which Dr. MacDonald has discussed before. You ascribe to high-minded, noble principles such as Libertarianism, with its promise of freedom for mankind. The European mind is inevitably and irresistably drawn to them. You write:
“How many of America’s problems today are the result of tribalists on both the Right and the Left who didn’t want to play by the rules as prescribed by the founders, and instead abuse the system and elevate their own piggish tribe above others?”
You look down on these tribalists, these ethnocentrists who are interested solely in the survival of their kind, for whom political/economic systems are just a means to an end, tools that can be discarded if they do not serve the goal of survival.
Yes, your ideals are noble, your intentions are the best, etc., etc. But from an evolutionary standpoint, you are showing traits that are maladaptive for a species in its current environment. A human sub-species (“race”) that is more concerned with ideals and principles than the survival of its genepool will probably eventually be outcompeted by those sub-species that are aggressively tribalistic and ethnocentric. Thus, your ideas may be the noblest and high-mindedest that ever existed, but they will also probably go extinct with your genes.
Meanwhile, the tribalists, those whose main concern is the survival of their own kind, will thrive and prosper in the future. You may disdain “piggish” tribalists like the arabs, but they will almost certainly exist in 1000 years, and so will their culture. Your genepool though, and your culture may not. I suppose you would be happy though if your kind died out living the ideals of Libertarianism, the artifacts of your race remembered only in dusty Chinese museums many centuries from today.
From an evolutionary perspective though, your failure to survive would be an indication of a defective sub-species. Never fear though, the defectives are inevitably weeded out over time by natural selection.
Andrew says:
June 2, 2010 at 11:51 PM
@Chris Moore,
Good post, Andrew. I’ve tried several times in different ways to explain that to him, but he’s living in the remote past.
@Daybreaker
Yup. The secret of their success is the secret of their constant downfall as well – repeated over and over.
Their reaction to Palin is very telling. She’d be their ideal tool in almost every way but she is just *so* implicitly white they can’t stand her.
Andrew, Wandrin, we agree.
Funny. You guys really think Israel can take Obama’s America seriously?
You and I don’t take it seriously, why would Israel?
Israelis are realists, they are not about to place their faith in Obama backed “peace talks”.
Again, I would expect WN to cheer Israels activities, as Israel hit the same enemies that WN have.
This is a time for unity. WN need to come out strong in support of Israel’s actions.
AngryJew,
If you want support for Israel from us, then support Jew-free White ethnostates.
Reciprocate – don’t dissimulate.
If Israelis were realists, they would accept the traditional restraining tenets of international relations, like balance of power and just war theory. Instead, Israel’s conduct reflects the traditional Jewish blind hatred of all goyim, and is in the process of uniting the world in the cause of Israel’s destruction. For that I cheer.
@Oakley
That’s like saying you want an Irish, German, or Russian free “White Ethnostate”.
Makes no sense.
It’s a shame the moderators feel the need to provide hostile and disruptive Jews a voice on this blog, which you can be sure is a privilege they will never grant to us on theirs.
@Someday “The left can never admit that Israel is a millstone round the neck of US grand strategy because they are still wedded to the idea of a WASP military-industrial/ extraction industry complex carving up the world.”
And one can say the same thing about the right, who is even more fanatically pro-Israel than the left. In fact, they only anti-Israel sentiment in modern America is from the left.
The US relationship with Israel is all liability and zero benefit.
@ Andrew: “Thus, your ideas may be the noblest and high-mindedest that ever existed, but they will also probably go extinct with your genes.”
The idea is that if true Christianity (as opposed to Judeo-Christianity) is allowed to do its work, libertarianism is its natural jumping off point, as it was with the founders. (But I suppose you believe Christianity is destined for history’s trash heap, too, just as are the ideas of founders).
The problem with tribalists is that they lack faith and vision. All their little calculating, reptilian minds can ever imagine is scheme and grab, and scheme and grab some more, like lizards optimally positioning themselves to loop in flies. And of course, having the most calculating, reptilian minds of all, organized Jewry plays this game better than anyone, which is why they are the lizard kings.
My point is, if you agree to play by Jewry’s reptilian rules, sooner or later you or your progeny will be eaten anyway. But if you get up off of all fours, then it’s the lizards who have to fear for their lives, and end up scrambling back into their holes.
Because White elites tend towards the intellectual, I think many will choose not to reproduce in a world where their progeny is likely to be eaten by lizards. On the other hand, if the world can be made safe from lizards, they will bloom again.
I have to agree with Andrew – the problem is an excessive reliance on ideologies, of any kind. The Founders of the US were not gods; they were politicians. Their ideologies were not monolithic; they constantly argued. Some parts, like the Declaration of Independence, were not even believed by anyone, it was war propaganda (hat tip Whittaker).
There’s a fine line between “idealist” and “ideologue.”
“Biden: Israel Right to Stop Gaza Aid Ship
AIPAC Lauds Biden for Support of Israel”
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/06/02/biden-israel-right-to-stop-gaza-aid-ship/
really, just how brain dead are Americans?
AmusedEuro says:
June 3, 2010 at 7:34 AM
It’s a shame the moderators feel the need to provide hostile and disruptive Jews a voice on this blog, which you can be sure is a privilege they will never grant to us on theirs.
Agreed.
Again, I would expect WN to cheer Israels activities, as Israel hit the same enemies that WN have. – angry jew
There is a big difference – the same Jewish elite that supports Israel as an ethno-religious state supporting destroying the white christian west – they have been doing everything in their power to flood our nations with immigrants, to marginalize and critique our culture and then scream ‘anti semitism’ when we bring it up.
There are Anglo elite liberals trying to destroy us but they are not being so blantantly hypocritical as the Jewish elite. In fact WASP elite go out of their way to treat us WORSE.
The jews are the new ellite – that’s pretty obvious now – but they are a lousy elite because of their hostility and complete lack of any sense of stewardship.
They have shown they are not open to reason, not open to criticism, not open to discussion.
Now they openly support israel spying on us, stealing our technology and stabbing us in the back.
At this point what are we supposed to do? Its almost as if Israel/the jewish elite WANT a ‘pogrom’ to reign you guys in.
read the first comment:
There is a very elightening op-ed piece in the “Wall Street Journal” by Ronen Bergman who is an Israeli journalist writing for “Yedioth Ahronoth,” which is Israel’s biggest circulation newspaper. He writes that the Israeli government and people now feel completely ostracized from the rest of the world and that there is nothing that they can do or could do to change things. So to hell with world opinion. This is a manifestation of Dr. Mac Donald’s “A People That Shall Dwell Alone” on steroids.
I believe that collectively the Jewish people have gone collectively paranoid and insane, and with nukes they are not only crazy, but deadly.
Regarding Jews commenting here- I am all for discussion. I think dialog is pretty fruitless at this point but I am willing to try.
“Regarding Jews commenting here- I am all for discussion. I think dialog is pretty fruitless at this point but I am willing to try.”
I think they’re nuts and will only get nuttier as things continue to unravel but it’s useful seeing the arguments they use so you’re ready for them out in the real world.
VERY, VERY WELL SAID, ANDREW !
@AngryJew
Jews aren’t White.
Furthermore, if a sovereign White ethnostate wished to exclude a particular White ethnic group, it should be free to do so.
Someday says:
The left can never admit that Israel is a millstone round the neck of US grand strategy because they are still wedded to the idea of a WASP military-industrial/ extraction industry complex carving up the world . against Isaels’s long term interest.
What is the US grand strategy other than control of other nations’ resources and behavior? Would the US would be uninterested in the Middle East if Israel didn’t exist? I don’t think so. The oil there provides a material motive for US meddling in the region, while defending Israel provides a convenient excuse.
It’s not as though this is behavior that is uncharacteristic for the gang of criminals headquartered in Washington, DC. They have a history of rapine and plunder going back at least a couple of centuries, and have militarily intervened all over the world whenever they thought it was in their economic interests. The US has military bases in how many countries now? 25? 63? 156? Let’s keep in mind that what they tell the rubes out in flyover country to justify these missions has very little, if any, relation to the truth.
The US is not an ally of Israel it’s their satellite, US troops function as expendable attack dogs for destroying Arabs states. When the last Arab state (Egypt) is ground into dust maybe they’ll begin to understand that it was all for Israel and nobody else.
US elites understand that allowing resources required by their society to fall into the hands of competing centers of power would be bad for business. Of course, global thermonuclear war would also be bad for business, and as the Arab states start to make moves to acquire nuclear weapons, we can predict that the US will begin to drop its Israel-first attitude. Compelling Israel to become a signatory to the NNPT is perhaps the first step, a crack in the structure of that Jew-WASP alliance. From the article:
@ChrisMoore
“the idea of America”
That is the essense of the disagreement between PaleoConservatives and Libertarians.
Libertarians see America as an idea which suddenly sprang into existence in 1776, while PaleoConservatives see America as a nation which gradually developed begining in 1607.
The Soviet Union was an idea, Russia is a nation, and America is a nation.
Please note, my sarcasm is directed at the idea Libertarianism, not the man Chris Moore.
Der weiße Engel have to disagree with that analysis. American Israel First foreign policy is a detriment to US imperial ambitions. Saudi Arabia is our protectorate and our support of the Zionist regime in Palestine causes instability in our relationship with the major oil suppliers.
For years it was said that Iraq was pushed by the oil companies, which is absolutely false. The oil companies that were very influential in the Bush administration had zero interest in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, who was a reliable oil supplier. Iraq was done for the benefit of Israel and only Israel. It’s the same case with Iran. The realist/Brzezinski wing considers a nuclear armed Iran to be a way to keep China and Russia out of the Middle East. It would be in our best interests to become close allies with Iran, instead, we’re going to bomb them *because* of Israel.
It may be the case that Israel’s interference with our imperial ambitions could lessen the stranglehold Israel has on our foreign policy. But at this stage of the game, our government is literally owned and financed by the Jewish lobby.
“Jew-WASP alliance.”
There hasn’t been a Jew-WASP alliance in the US since the 1960s, it’s quite the opposite, it’s the Jews-and-non-Whites vs. the WASPs since then. One needs only to look at our Supreme Court to see that’s the case.
There hasn’t been a Jew-WASP alliance in the US since the 1960s
The Jewish ‘thank you’ for WASPs sharing power and opening up corridors of influence, like the ivy league schools, was to subsequently kick WASPs out and do everything in their power to marginalize them.
They see us as a dangerous, competitive rival group, and the main obstacle in their way to complete dominance. They may have appreciated Anglo Saxon ideals of fairness, fair play and justice when they were on the outside, or during WWII (however misled) but now that they in power the last think they want are Anglo Saxons with a sense of justice.
AmusedEuro says:
Der weiße Engel have to disagree with that analysis. American Israel First foreign policy is a detriment to US imperial ambitions.
You may think so. But the crooks in Washington, DC don’t. At least, aside from the nuclear proliferation question, not in most cases.
The oil companies that were very influential in the Bush administration had zero interest in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, who was a reliable oil supplier.
An interesting assertion. Do you have any evidence that they had “zero interest” in obtaining complete control over it, rather than just continuing to buy it from Saddam? On the face of it, that doesn’t make much sense.
The realist/Brzezinski wing considers a nuclear armed Iran to be a way to keep China and Russia out of the Middle East. It would be in our best interests to become close allies with Iran, instead, we’re going to bomb them *because* of Israel.
No matter what happens, there will always be advantages and disadvantages. A bombed out, prostrate Iran can be subjugated and made into a vassal state, and its oil plundered, whereas a nuclear-armed Iran could act to inhibit Chinese and Russian expansion as you say. But then, so could a nuclear-armed Israel. And it is far from certain that Iran will be bombed. If Bush didn’t bomb them, why would you think Obama would?
… at this stage of the game, our government is literally owned and financed by the Jewish lobby.
“Jew-WASP alliance.”
There hasn’t been a Jew-WASP alliance in the US since the 1960s, it’s quite the opposite, it’s the Jews-and-non-Whites vs. the WASPs since then. One needs only to look at our Supreme Court to see that’s the case.
Let’s not get carried away here. George W. Bush is a WASP, if I’m not mistaken, as was his father, as are the majority of members of the Congress. The vast majority of the corporate elite are WASPs, and also the military elite. The Christian Zionists are also WASPs, and most of America’s wealth is still in the hands of WASPs.
It’s wrong to think that these people are powerless. You could argue that they are crazy, maybe, and certainly from the White racial point of view mistaken, but not they are not powerless.
Anyone who believes that must at least come up with some reasoning to explain it, and also to explain why Washington has just singled out Israel for not signing the NNPT — an act which has got the yids all in an uproar and which they vigorously opposed.
It’s wrong to think that these people are powerless
Look what happened to Fulbright and every other politician there after who stood up the lobby. Look what happened to Meirshiemer and Walt – and you’d better bet that the Jewish elite are going to do their best to make sure another ‘loose canon’ doesn’t happen.
Look at the vanity fair list of the world’s most powerful people.
Look at the double standards. Adelson was able to support a charity dedicated to preserving jewish dna (forbidding intermarriage) and recieve warm praise from the media.
Lets imagine ( a complete fantasy, i realize) bill gates were to get some racial consciousness. How long do you think he would be power? How long before there were federal investigations, editorials smearing him, etc.
Same goes if he took a strong stance on Israel.
The jewish elite has way way way too much power. Either it or we will be broken.
“Do you have any evidence that they had “zero interest” in obtaining complete control … On the face of it, that doesn’t make much sense.”
You can’t prove a negative. Is there any evidence that Exxon-Mobil was lobbying for an invasion of Iraq? On the face of it, it doesn’t make any sense that they would.
“You may think so. But the crooks in Washington, DC don’t. At least, aside from the nuclear proliferation question, not in most cases.”
No, they don’t. The recent rumblings from the military show that they believe Israel is “getting our soldiers killed.”
“bombed out, prostrate Iran can be subjugated and made into a vassal state, and its oil plundered, whereas a nuclear-armed Iran could act to inhibit Chinese and Russian expansion as you say. But then, so could a nuclear-armed Israel. And it is far from certain that Iran will be bombed. If Bush didn’t bomb them, why would you think Obama would?”
The US cannot afford to occupy the Middle East forever, and when we are gone, China is likely to take over. While us occupying might be the ideal situation, all factions agree that’s impossible, so the question is what happens when we leave? Israel has shown itself to be incapable of stable leadership in the area so they are not an option, as seems clear. The Bush administration did everything they could to strike at Iran, but with the failure of their Iraq policy, lost the political capital to do so. Obama is even more tightly controlled by Zionist Jews (Emmanuel, etc) than Bush was, and the situation has deteriorated. If Israel decides to bomb Iran, the US will certainly do nothing to stop them.
As for Wasps and Jews, I think MacDonald’s work on this is definitive enough. To pretend that Jews are not *the* elite class in America is dissimulation. The Jews have long beaten the Wasps in America, and as for Christian Zionists – they provide votes, and most assuredly do *not* make any policy. This is a Jewish liberal canard, to say that it’s not Jews and AIPAC causing America’s unending support for Israel, it’s really Bible thumpers in Texas. Ludicrous on it’s face.
“why Washington has just singled out Israel for not signing the NNPT”
As if this purely symbolic resolution somehow outweighs the US’s long standing total support for Israel in the UN for, well, my entire lifetime?
America’s total support for Israel has a very readily observable cause – the wealthy Jewish establishment in the US. Attempts to obscure that by talk of oil companies, Christian Zionists, Bush Jr., or the meager attempt of the Obama administration to ask Israel not to insult them openly are simply distractions from the obvious.
Also, as MacDonald has written, while George H. W. Bush was the quintessential WASP, W. neither looked, spoke, nor acted like a WASP. Bush Sr., like Carter, put measurable pressure on Israel and was repaid by extremely hostile media and economic attacks resulting in a single term. Bush Sr. may have been the final swan song of the WASP. Unless Petraeus is a WASP of the non-Zionist variety, which I don’t know.
Power requires skills, willingness and resources.
American Whites still have resources, though a much, much smaller piece of the big pie than once they had.
The loss of governing skills is greater. George W. Bush had a problem finding people he knew and could count on that could impress others as competent, hence the Harriet Miers debacle. If he had decided out of the blue that from Day X he was going to dedicate his presidency to advancing White interests, it’s unlikely he could have called on reliable people who would have known how to do that.
But where White America has really collapsed is will. Potential power is nothing without mobilization, and it can’t sustain itself in a competitive environment without articulating and securing the collective self-interest of those who bear it. The lack of explicit White identity and elite authority and power brought to bear to support explicitly White collective self-interest is obvious. When Whites face a political situation that is gravely detrimental to their collective self-interest, such as on immigration policy, they lose, without a fight. Nobody dares organize a pro-White lobby.
There is no Conference of Presidents of Major White Organizations.
Consequently, Whites bear the cost of American support of Israel, but they don’t have a say over it.
Others, with vastly greater mobilized resources, with legitimately explicit ethnic identities and with practiced skills of networking in the collective ethnic self-interest have a greater say over this and related issues.
Holy Roman Catholic Joe Biden sure came out strong for the Jews & their homeland didn’t he? LOL. I guess technically,as President of the Senate, Biden’s still part of the Jew & Roman Catholic alliance in the Congress.
Actually, me’s hypothetical has already happened. Back in the 1970′s, ARAMCO and its US parents tried a lobbying and PR campaign in the US in favor of more evenhanded Mideast policy, which was clearly in the US national interest re: energy supply. They were promptly denounced in the Jewish media as disloyal (without a hint of irony) and then there were Congressional hearings under one Howard Metzenbaum. Bigoil sensibly gave up and devoted all their policy efforts to things like ITC’s and depletion allowances–that don’t conflict with Jewish interests. Make no mistake, these whites may be rich but the Jews have the power.
@ me
To act wrongly or be mistaken as to the proper course of action is different from not having power.
@ AmusedEuro
As for Wasps and Jews, I think MacDonald’s work on this is definitive enough. To pretend that Jews are not *the* elite class in America is dissimulation. The Jews have long beaten the Wasps in America, and as for Christian Zionists – they provide votes, and most assuredly do *not* make any policy.
In CoC, MacDonald puts the level of Jewish control of American wealth and cybernetic resources at about 25%. If it’s more than that, he’s never updated that figure, to my knowledge. Perhaps he can clarify.
Yes, Jewry used their powerful influence over mass media to set the terms of debate in the country decades ago, which allow and even encourage minority racial ethnocentricity, but pathologize any White ethnocentricity. They also set the tone that those opposed to Israel were anti-Semites, even though Israel has clearly been a fascist state for years; ironically, the tone was also set that those opposed to Jewish power anywhere were the fascists.
The WASPs quickly fell into line, because they are more interested in money than principle, and getting into dust-ups with Jews could affect their bottom line. Also, their Christian character was long since subordinated to money worship and cynicism, to the point of irrelevance.
Re the Iraq war for oil and not Israel: Stephen Sniegoski pretty much debunked that myth,
http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_oilwar.htm
which was perpetrated primarily by the left-liberal Dems, who knew it was a war for the Jewish Zionists and yes, to a lesser extent GW’s ego, and the war-profiteering complex. But Israel was the main beneficiary, and the Jewish Zionists and their media apparatus’ were the linchpin to pulling it all off.
Because Jewry is also the linchpin to the left-liberal coalition, the lefties went out of their way to protect the Jewish Zionists to the point of perpetrating a massive “lied into war for oil” fraud on their own base. Thus, not only did the idiot Bushcons/GOP bear the brunt of the electoral punishment for the Iraq war disaster, but even more Jewish Zionist Dems were elected, and thus Jewry ratcheted up ever more power.
If the Right ever really wants to get serious about taking power in this country, it will pull the Jewish linchpin and watch the Judeofascist grenade blow up in the Left’s face. Until it’s willing to do this, it must be presumed that it is comprised of clowns, frauds, charlatans, money-grubbers and fools who aren’t really serious about patriotism or preserving America, nor even capable of exercising power intelligently.
@Chris Moore
“The idea is that if true Christianity (as opposed to Judeo-Christianity) is allowed to do its work, libertarianism is its natural jumping off point, as it was with the founders. (But I suppose you believe Christianity is destined for history’s trash heap, too, just as are the ideas of founders).”
Personally, I am a big fan of Christianity, mainly because I believe that true Christianity is very adaptive, people who follow it have more kids, less dysfunction and avoid much of the corrupt entertainment world (I was raised as a Mormon, and the fundamentalist Mormons are especially healthy in that regard). I also respect and honor the founders, and believe that their ideas hold great relevance for us today. However, there is a major difference between my position and yours.
You place ideas and ideology in the premier position. You describe yourself as a “Libertarian”, for you these (admittedly noble) ideals and ideas hold a prime place. There is much to be said for free markets (which lead to greater economic output) and personal freedom (which leads to greater personal happiness for individuals).
For me though, there is something much, much more important, vastly more precious and in fact priceless: this is my people, my kinfolk and the existance of the unique genepool that I share (European). The survival of my people is paramount.
To make our different views more clear, lets say we hypothetically had two options:
A) A glorious existence for Europeans in a Libertarian system, which will ensure vast wealth and happiness for them but ensure their extinction in a few centures.
B) A backward medieval system, with almost no individual rights and only grinding poverty, but their survival is ensured for at least a thousand years.
You would probably choose A, while I would unhesitatingly and happily choose B. I could list all of the reasons why Europeans are a special people, of inestimable value, and why they should in fact survive. They are responsible for 98% of all significant human accomplishment from 800BC to 1965AD according to Charles Murray. They are the most beautiful people, all of the world’s strongest men are Europeans, etc. etc. But even if they were not, even if they were stupid, ugly, weak and devoid of any virtues we could name, they would still be my people, my kinfolk, my family. I would still want them to survive just as much.
We should note that if this genepool is ever lost, it is lost forever, it can never be regained. I do not want that to happen.
One thing that I think you miss when you revere ideas, placing them above the survival of your people is a very basic rule that applies to all living beings: there is an imperative for all life to survive and procreate. Survival is the great game of nature. The only reason you are here today to contemplate your ivory tower ideas is because your ancestors played and won the game since the very first man. Since we have probably never had to encounter real survival experiences, we are so divorced from nature’s imperative that we have the luxury to ignore them, though it moves our kind closer to extinction in the long haul.
“All their little calculating, reptilian minds can ever imagine is scheme and grab…having the most calculating, reptilian minds of all, organized Jewry plays this game better than anyone, which is why they are the lizard kings”.
The one thing that Jews do better than anyone is survive. Their ethnocentricity, their loyalty and love of their people and their savagery when they are threatened are all very adaptive traits. Jews will almost certainly survive far into the future.
“Because White elites tend towards the intellectual, I think many will choose not to reproduce in a world where their progeny is likely to be eaten by lizards. On the other hand, if the world can be made safe from lizards, they will bloom again.”
Your apparent assertion that economic prosperity and individual freedom, which are promoted by Libertarianism will help save the White race is contrary to the evidence. Higher prosperity and freedom tends to lower the birthrate, we see it throughout the West and in Korea and Japan. In other words, your ideology is no antidote for the threats that Whites face, namely dispossession by other races. In fact, your ideology appears to promote this dispossession, with its disdain for the importance of ethnicity.
I find it ironic that if any of earth’s species are endangered, or being displaced by non-native species, the world shows great concern. No doubt you would be very concerned if lions or elephants were allowing themselves to be displaced by some other species and on the road to extinction. But of course when it comes to your own genepool, your own kind, its completely ok, as you are more concerned with political and economic systems.
The bottom line is that in my view, you have completely lost sight of what is truly important, that its about race, not ideas. The possibility that Whites could become extinct should inspire horror and a desire to prevent such a future spectre from occurring. That it does not is a sign that something has gone very wrong, that there is something gravely mentally unhealthy going on.
Chris Moore, thanks for that excellent article by Sniegoski “Not oil but Israel” you made the point much better than I could. Some juicy excerpts:
Noam Chomsky, the left wing Jew that has written 10,000 pages about the corporate media but has never breathed a word about how they’re all Jews. Chomsky is one of the key people to promote the idea that AIPAC is simply a tool of WASP imperialism, the Jews just taking a ride. He also explicitly opposed any discussion of Israeli involvement in various terrorist events and immediately attack the Mearsheimer & Walt Israel Lobby paper, using the same line that it’s really the evil White imperialists, not Jews, running the show.
Works with HA’s notice of the 1970′s oil lobby efforts above. The Bush clan has been in business with the Bin Laden family for years. Oil companies love Arabs. They have never had any interest in overthrowing despotic dictatorships over “human rights” and the like, that’s a purely neo-conservative/Jewish talking point – and the utter hypocrisy is clear to everyone reading this.
One only has to notice the vast difference between European and American views and media coverage on the latest Israeli attack on the Freedom Floatilla to see how pro-Zionist interventions in the middle east help to weaken NATO and alienate our natural European allies.
Must read article:
http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_oilwar.htm
@ Andrew,
I don’t think we disagree about the great accomplishments of the White race, nor of the desirability of preserving it. Where we disagree is on the best means to go about that.
From my perspective, here are the three biggest threats to the White race, in order of threat:
1) Leftism
2) Organized Jewry
3) it’s own greed
Being raised a Judeo-Christian Mormon, I suspect you would rather remain in denial about the last two items on that last (in part, because Joseph Smith stole most of his ideas from the Old Testament).
So since it’s you that is denial about the true threats to the White race, and thus incapable of confronting them, its your thinking that is psychologically defective, not mine.
Maybe there’s something to be said for just breeding like rabbits and hoping for the best, but when one studies how many millions the Jewish Bolsheviks murdered, and how easily they got away with it, it’s hard not to conclude you may just be breeding cannon fodder.
I’m not being fatalistic, just realistic. If there were more Whites willing to face reality, we wouldn’t be in the jeopardy we are currently in. Our very jeopardy is proof of our failure to confront reality.
It seems to me the White race can only ensure its own survival when its would-be assassins have been permanently disabled and defanged (or as close to permanently as is reasonably possible). And certain Judeo-Christian attitudes are sabotaging that initiative, and thus complicit in homiciding and suiciding Whites.
The Jews murdered an American citizen on that flotilla.
Washington Post 6/3/2010:
http://tinyurl.com/39rszdm
But who cares? Only an American citizen. What does citizenship mean here now, anyway?
Far more important than any American citizen are Israelis abroad and mestizos domestically. How can the American citizen command respect again? By making a reasoned argument at a conference, maybe. Another conference.
I don’t think the Sniegowski article is very impressive, for a lot of reasons. It was written in 2004, and it hasn’t aged well. For example, he goes to some trouble to try to show that invading Iraq would supposedly hurt oil company profits, and yet as we now know Exxon and other oil industry powerhouses such as Halliburton have had record profits since the occupation. He argues that they opposed the embargo, and illogically infers from that they opposed the war. But gaining control of the resources directly is obviously even better than lifting the embargo, so that makes no sense. He also scoffs that in order for the war for oil scenario to be true, the US would have to be prepared to occupy the region for decades. Yes, precisely. Anyone who hasn’t figured out that that is part of the current game plan hasn’t been paying attention. He also rather ludicrously claims that no preparations are being made for that kind of lengthy stay. Of course, writing in 2004 he couldn’t know that the US has now spent $700 million dollars just building its embassy in Iraq, which is the size of 80 football fields. Clearly, you don’t spend that kind of money on an embassy unless you plan a long-term occupation.
The second half of his essay deals with the question of the control of oil as a strategic asset, but is just as inadequate, in my view. He argues that the invasion was a mistaken policy if strategic control was the objective. Perhaps so, but what was the alternative? Leave the area to the control of others, such as the Russians or the Chinese? I don’t think so. Leaving such an important world resource in the control of weak states such as Iraq and Iran makes little sense from a geopolitical point of view. The WASP elites may have allowed themselves to be in a sense dragged along for the ride by the neocons, but if they were opposed, most of them were pretty quiet about it. I believe it makes more sense to think they saw the Iraq invasion as increasing US power in the region and ultimately very good for business, but let others take the lead in advocating for it. But even if they were mistaken in thinking this, that doesn’t absolve them of responsibility for their decision.
This article did nothing to move me to change my view that Israel (and fighting “terrorism”) was the excuse, but oil and power were the material motives. Sniegowski tries to make it a question of either/or, when it’s really both/and.
Israel was the prime motive behind the invasion of Iraq, according to the executive director of the 9/11 commission, Philip Zelikow. In addition to holding a high-level security clearance, Zelikow was very tight with Condoleeza Rice and Dick Cheney. He knows of what he speaks:
“‘Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I’ll tell you what I think the real threat is and actually has been since 1990 – it’s the threat against Israel,’ Zelikow told a panel of foreign policy experts assessing the impact of 9/11 and the future of the war on the al-Qaeda terrorist organization.
“‘And this is the threat that dare not speak its name, because the Europeans don’t care deeply about that threat, I will tell you frankly. And the American government doesn’t want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell,’ said Zelikow.
“The statements are the first to surface from a source closely linked to the Bush administration acknowledging that the war, which has so far cost the lives of nearly 600 U.S. troops and thousands of Iraqis, was motivated by Washington’s desire to defend the Jewish state.”
http://www.antiwar.com/ips/mekay.php?articleid=2208
Interesting article, by a libertarian patriot. on the massacre by Israeli pirates of Gentiles aboard the aid ship bound for the Gaza Ship.
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/06/03/this-says-it-all/
@ Jennifer Z
Congratulations, by omitting the first paragraph, where it is stated that defending Israel was ONE reason for the invasion, and changing the wording in your paraphrase – from A prime motive to THE prime motive, you give a completely distorted picture of this article. If you read the whole piece, it turns out that Zelikow, the Jewish director of the 9/11 cover-up commission, seems actually to have been boasting when he made these remarks, and (typical for a Jew) getting in a sly dig both at the Europeans for their implied antisemitism in not caring about Israel enough, and at flyover country American Whites (i.e., defending Israel “not a popular sell”). Of course, he’s wrong, it was just the usual Jewish paranoid suspicion. The Zionist Christian Whites in the hinterlands remain perfect doormats and think that defending Israel is a terrific reason both for spending the lives of their sons and daughters, and emptying their country’s treasury. None better! On the other hand, they would have objected vociferously to the truth, that the real reasons had as much to do with control of oil, profits, and regional power than anything else. That’s why they were never told the truth.
@ Sean Gruber
“The Jews murdered an American citizen on that flotilla.”
4 shots to the head and one to the chest just to make sure. A quintuple tap execution. That’s evidence there may be something to Lasha’s post above about a hit list with targeted assassinations, an Israeli specialty. Let’s hope the list doesn’t get dropped down the memory hole along with the attack on the USS Liberty, Rachel Corrie, the Lavon Affair, and the rest.
Does it really matter if the Iraq war was exclusively a war for organized Jewry, or a war for organized Jewry AND post-Christian, post-American Judeo-Christian greed, statist-corporatism and open borders globalism (initiatives which reside in both the Dem and Pub parties)?
What matters is that America has a Judeo problem on its hands that is, among other things, socially and spiritually degrading and demoralizing the country, and helping to destroy the White race and Western civilization in the process.
Mark Steyn’s latest National Review Online column “Israel, Turkey, and the End of Stability” begins bluntly: “Contempt for Israel is contempt for Washington.” It’s hard to argue with that, given how closely Washington and Tel Aviv are identified in the Middle East.
Mark Steyn, as usual, is interested in the demographics of how this came about. He’s happy to leave as taken for granted that the appropriate response is contempt for Turkey:
“Day by day what was formerly the Zionist entity’s staunchest pal talks more and more like just another cookie-cutter death-to-the-Great-Satan stan-of-the-month.”
If he wants to continue to write for NRO, that’s a good approach.
Others might conclude that (since it would be unthinkable for America to be less supportive of Israel) American must force other countries to respect Israel.
Even if that’s the correct approach, and America has enough free cash and military force to induce and coerce all relevant countries into respecting Israel, that’s still an admission that the relationship is costly. Maintaining the same amount of respect has a price in blood and bribes.
The great thing about blaming everything on da jews is that it allows us to ignore our faults as a people; e.g., making mo’ of dat E-Z money:
Uncle Zug’s World Wide Casino
https://www.mbtrading.com/stocksAccountRequirements.asp
“Due to various securities regulations and requirements for each country, we can only accept new accounts from residents of the countries listed below.”
All 79 of them.
If you inspect MB’s country listing you’ll see that India, Iran, Pakistan and Indonesia are the only large concentrations of humanoids currently excluded from the approved client countries. Otherwise chunk in $1,000 and you too can start trading with a laptop and wifi connection from the convenience of your Third World slum. US stocks, options, futures, FOREX or any of dozens of other exchanges worldwide. Not that transacting on foreign exchanges is essential. “American Depository Receipts” (ADRs) and “Exchange Traded Funds” (ETFs) have brought these foreign issues onto what are nominally “US” stock exchanges.
Speaking of “Client” countries, MB’s criteria is “resident”, not “citizen”. Definite legal distinctions there. For MB’s purposes I might be able to establish Russian residency via documents. Imagine you’re a pimp and dealer running a string of girls in Panama City, Panama. You can see how convenient this is. And also the range of FOREX facilities if you’re a Mexican cartel.
Or imagine you’re a “resident” of Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece or Spain. These four are eurozone countries now enacting extreme fiscal measures to cope with excessive government spending. And all four just happen to be on MB’s approved list. Can you imagine the euros now flowing into MB and its peers. And all subsequently being sold for dollars, pounds, Canadian/aussie dollars, gold, silver…?
The great thing about blaming everything on da jews is that it allows us to ignore our faults as a people; e.g., making mo’ of dat E-Z money:
Uncle Zug’s World Wide Casino
https://www.mbtrading.com/stocksAccountRequirements.aspx
“Due to various securities regulations and requirements for each country, we can only accept new accounts from residents of the countries listed below.”
All 79 of them.
If you inspect MB’s country listing you’ll see that India, Iran, Pakistan and Indonesia are the only large concentrations of humanoids currently excluded from the approved client countries. Otherwise chunk in $1,000 and you too can start trading with a laptop and wifi connection from the convenience of your Third World slum. US stocks, options, futures, FOREX or any of dozens of other exchanges worldwide. Not that transacting on foreign exchanges is essential. “American Depository Receipts” (ADRs) and “Exchange Traded Funds” (ETFs) have brought these foreign issues onto what are nominally “US” stock exchanges.
Speaking of “Client” countries, MB’s criteria is “resident”, not “citizen”. Definite legal distinctions there. For MB’s purposes I might be able to establish Russian residency via documents. Imagine you’re a pimp and dealer running a string of girls in Panama City, Panama. You can see how convenient this is. And also the range of FOREX facilities if you’re a Mexican cartel.
Or imagine you’re a “resident” of Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece or Spain. These four are eurozone countries now enacting extreme fiscal measures to cope with excessive government spending. And all four just happen to be on MB’s approved list. Can you imagine the euros now flowing into MB and its peers. And all subsequently being sold for dollars, pounds, Canadian/aussie dollars, gold, silver…?
A majpr concern for me is that the Jews have clearly infiltrated and compromised our intel agencies. A thousand scientists have challenged how 9/11 occurred, citing scientific facts and observations.
And this seems to be aided and abetted by the traditional power structure, i.e. Rockefeller.
And then despite alleging that Saudi terrorists caused 9/11, the Zionist leades turn around and attack two Third World countries, neither of which are capable of attacking us. And they keep the borders wide open, thus affirming absolutely that former Italian president Cossegio is correct when he says it was an inside job/
Chris Moores, Andrew, Jennifer ect. said it much better than I could. And they are correct. The US of A, being as bankrupt or more so than Greece will meet it’s Waterloo because of it’s support for Isreal.
To all of you I would like to add, I am certain I am quite a bit older than most of you. I have lived through WW2 and which was worse, the time of the so called “liberation” and re-education.
The time when the re-education in Germany started, planned in “think-tanks” for years, headed by Jews, the devastated Germany was a fertile ground for Zionists to plant their seeds. And boy were they successful.
The holocaust lie and the lie of the 6 million grew out of it. Just look at it today. It’s in every school, there is a holocaust memorial just about everywhere and a Jewish-Holywood something on TV or in theaters all the time.
You may ask what has this got to do with the threat of war against Iran? The criminal activity attacking ships in international waters? The war in Iraq? The genocide in Palestine?
Everything. Because of those planned lies, the Jews, Zionists made the rest of the world feel guilty and obligated to Israel. The plan worked as none has ever before.
This statement is completely ANTI-SEMITIC and could earn me a minimum of 5 years behind bars in 14 countries.
Does this give you any idea of Zionist power?
The attacks on Helen Thomas are breathtaking hypocrisy. The U.S. media is full of backers of the Israeli government, which ethnically cleanses the indigenous Palestinian people and opposes their right of return, guaranteed under international law.
U.S. Media = Total Hypocrites
AngryJew says (June 3, 2010 at 2:31 AM): “Israelis are realists, they are not about to place their faith in Obama backed “peace talks”.”
I wouldn’t so why should they?
AngryJew says (June 3, 2010 at 2:31 AM): “Again, I would expect WN to cheer Israels activities, as Israel hit the same enemies that WN have.”
I would cheer any ethnic nationalist state trying to survive in the face of Islamic aggression. This includes Israel. BUT. That same state cannot be “Siamese twins” with a lobby that’s strangling White ethnic nationalism.
If Jews, collectively and institutionally (not just as a few individuals) come out for White ethnic nationalism, I will gladly start doing the “proud friend of Israel” thing.
AngryJew says (June 3, 2010 at 2:31 AM): “This is a time for unity. WN need to come out strong in support of Israel’s actions.”
How can is be a time of unity when organized Jewry is still against us?
And now, a few words from the King:
If you want to be loved,
Baby, you’ve got to love me, too.
If you want to be loved,
Baby, you’ve got to love me, too.
Oh yeah, ’cause I ain’t for no one-sided love affair.
Noam Chomsky is fundamentally a kike in his world view. He and his daughter Aviva are fanatically pro-nonwhite immigration. Aviva Chomsky wrote a cheerleading book for increasing legal nonwhite immigration. She makes the case for increasing nonwhite immigration by quoting pro-corporate whore economists.
I wouldn’t put my family’s fate in the hands of the dirty kike Chomsky. He is without a doubt waging ethnic warfare against the White Christian majority. He is a kike through and through.
WE can wage a war back at Noam Chomsky and what he stands for. Ad what he stands for is the racial extermination of the Native Born White Christian majority through nonwhite LEGAL IMMIGRATION. The kike Chomsky is my mortal enemy.