The Jews turn on Turkey

Well, that didn’t take long. Turkey’s involvement in the flotilla and its support for the Palestinians has now made it an enemy of the Israel Lobby, with all that that entails. All in all, it’s a good example of Jewish power and moral particularism. After long opposing any resolution on Turkey’s genocide of Armenians, Rep. Howard Berman, a major force for Israel in the US Congress,  suddenly supports a Congressional resolution, stating, “nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.” He and “a host of other members of the House’s unofficial Jewish caucus have signed on as co-sponsors.”

Berman suddenly found his moral bearings, along with the organized Jewish community. The neocons are naturally leading the charge, summarized byJim Lobe who quotes from a report by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs:

“If Turkey finds its best friends to be Iran, Hamas, Syria and Brazil (look for Venezuela in the future) the security of that information (and Western technology in weapons in Turkey’s arsenal) is suspect. The United States should seriously consider suspending military cooperation with Turkey as a prelude to removing it from [NATO],” suggested the group.

[JINSA's]  board of advisers includes many prominent champions of the 2003 Iraq invasion, including former Defence Policy Board chairman Richard Perle, former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director James Woolsey, and former U.N. Amb. John Bolton.

What’s interesting here is the proposal to eject Turkey from NATO. It wasn’t long ago that Turkey was being assured that it could become a member of the EU. Turkey’s exclusion from Europe is widely seen as a big factor in its change of foreign policy.Thomas Friedman: “After a decade of telling the Turks that if they wanted E.U. membership they had to reform their laws, economy, minority rights and civilian-military relations — which the Erdogan government systematically did — the E.U. leadership has now said to Turkey: ‘Oh, you mean nobody told you? We’re a Christian club. No Muslims allowed.’ The E.U.’s rejection of Turkey, a hugely bad move, has been a key factor prompting Turkey to move closer to Iran and the Arab world.”

And that’s the good news. The neocons and the organized Jewish community were big supporters of Turkey’s bid to join the EU–which would have meant that  71 million Turks would havethe right to move anywhere in Europe. This would mean the end of Europe as having any defining culture or biological coherence — obviously not a concern to Jewish activists like Friedman.

It’s worth remembering that Jewish activist organizations regarded the admission of Turkey to the EU as a way of civilizing Europe and ensuring cultural, religious, and ethnic pluralism — precisely the policy proposals that the Jewish community has advanced in all Western societies, particularly since the end of World War II. In 2002, at the height of the push for Turkey’s admission to the EU, the Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC) had this to say in response to former French president Valéry Giscard d’Estaing’s argument that Muslim Turkey has no place in the European Union:

Ironically, in the fifteenth century, when European monarchs expelled the Jews, it was Moslem Turkey that provided them a welcome…. During the Holocaust, when Europe was slaughtering its Jews, it was Turkish consuls who extended protection to fugitives from Vichy France and other Nazi allies…. Today’s European neo-Nazis and skinheads focus upon Turkish victims while, Mr. President [d'Estaing], you are reported to be considering the Pope’s plea that your Convention emphasize Europe’s Christian heritage. [The Center suggested that Giscard’s new Constitution] underline the pluralism of a multi-faith and multi-ethnic Europe, in which the participation of Moslem Turkey might bolster the continent’s Moslem communities—and, indeed, Turkey itself—against the menaces of extremism, hate and fundamentalism. A European Turkey can only be beneficial for stability in Europe and the Middle East. (Seehere; the statement has presumably been removed from the SWC website.)

Turkey in the EU was obviously a win-win situation for Jews: The end of Europe as a Christian civilization with an ethnic core combined with a moderating influence on the Muslims that would benefit Israel. I rather doubt that we’ll be seeing this sort of thing anymore. The chances of Turkey being admitted to the EU now are less than zero.

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing’s argument that Turkey has no place in Europe is just as valid against admitting any Muslims to Europe. Although the rejection of Turkey doesn’t change the present suicidal dynamic in Europe, it will certainly slow down the process compared to what would have happened had Turkey been admitted, perhaps allowing enough time for Europe to waken from its slumbers.


Bookmark and Share

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

84 Comments to "The Jews turn on Turkey"

  1. June 29, 2010 - 1:16 am | Permalink

    Daybreaker:

    “By way of deception: The making and unmaking of a Mossad Officer” is a book written by Victor Ostrovsky and Claire Hoy about Ostrovsky’s alleged career as a katsa in the Israeli Mossad.

    Throughout the book, Ostrovsky claims to reveal details of the internal workings of the Mossad itself. Ostrovsky claims that Mossad has access to Jewish helpers all around the world called sayanim (sg. sayan). Their services can supposedly be requested on short notice and no questions are asked. Because of this, Mossad only needs 30-40 active case officers at any given time. He also explains the different departments functions and how liaisons are conducted with foreign intelligence agencies. One topic in his book, By Way of Deception, that may alarm Americans, is the suicide bombing of the US Marine’s compound in Beirut Lebanon that killed several hundred US Marines: Ostrovsky maintains that the Mossad knew there was going to be an attack on the American’s peace mission in Beirut and intentionally withheld that information from the Americans.

    BTW, looking forward to KMac’s review of

    Op-Ed Contributor
    The Triumphant Decline of the WASP By NOAH FELDMAN
    Published: June 25, 2010

    Why did the Protestant elite open its institutions to all comers? The answer can be traced in large part to the anti-aristocratic ideals of the Constitution, which banned titles of nobility and thus encouraged success based on merit.

    Another key source was the ideal of fair play, imported from the ideology of the English public schools, but practiced far more widely in the United States than in the class-ridden mother country.

    LOL!

    It would seem many big-wigged blowhard jews are trying very hard to dominate the ‘Causes of the Fading WASP Elite’ debate lately…are they worried about something?

    Thanks Prof KMac! Let’s keep the bastards on the run!

  2. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    June 28, 2010 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    no great matter.
    my point is that if a god behaves like a jew, he is a jew, which fits the talmudist agenda to a “t” (children of god, now having supplanted him as top ranking beings).

    an inveterate antisemite that i am (and i make no bones about it, in a traditionally accepted sense, i.e., i certainly got no fight with real semites, the philistines/palestinians but cannot abide by talmudists), i am in no mood to look the other way in order to placate some jewish-acting, conniving, deceit+lies marketing god.

    my god is either an honorable, gentile-like god or none at all.

  3. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 28, 2010 - 3:14 am | Permalink

    lobro says: mossad’s motto (etc.)

    Fair enough. You have a quote that supports what you have said. I have not heard it as a motto in common use. Obviously it exists whether I have heard it or not.

  4. mystic's Gravatar mystic
    June 27, 2010 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

    “The Jews have a motto: Make war by deception. This means, to put it bluntly, Jews are backstabbing, lying, thieving, do anything they want, treacherous, dogs. They have only “PRETEND” friends that they use. Not my type of people” (John Taurus)
    Well said. That’s why I renounced my Judaism. I have been embezzled or scammed 6 six times in my life and ALL by Jews, one was a “friend”, the other a sister. You have to be crazy to entrust your money to a Jew, no matter much you “trust” him or her. In fact it’ the trust that allows them to embezzle.They only associate with people to get something out of them. Attributes like loyalty or true friendship are anathema. Shakespeare wrote profoundly about this attribute which has existed for thousands of years. They would extract their pound of flesh i.e. kill you, as easily as eating a pie. They sometimes change their Jewish sounding names or have rhinoplasties so that their Jewishness cannot be recognised only to embezzle or scam. Avoid them like the plague.
    They are the ones who talk loudly in the theatre or sue anyone with impunity. They are unbearable and have always been troublemakers.

  5. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    June 26, 2010 - 3:03 pm | Permalink

    okee-dokee, my point is just that; the use or abuse of old testament to justify evil in various forms, lie, hate, intolerance, slavery, elitism, theft, callousness, to name just a few traits of the jewish cluster.

    whether new testament can elegantly restore the old one to a morally even keel is another matter, of no great importance to me now.

    the fact is that jews found the nastiness in o.t. insufficient for their requirements and thus developed talmud.

    so, either way, old testament has been supplanted to radically diverging systems.

    as for the traditional catholicism, i imagine that you refer to st. pius x society, since vatican’s eucharist is these days stamped with the kosher approval.

  6. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 25, 2010 - 10:23 pm | Permalink

    Each person with power of reason has the free will to establish his own subjective belief. The principle of equality before law is apparently part of that Natural Law written on every man’s heart. However, the subjective will of the Creator is, by definition, the permanent objective reality of the created. Therefore, the only binding law upon the Creator, who exists outside of time, is His literal inability to lie.

    Man’s pride and fear of estrangement from his often faithless fellows has always impeded his willingness to submit before the seemingly distant and non-human Creator. That is why the work of the Old Testament was graciously completed in the New with the human enfleshment and sacrifice of God in the second person of the Trinity. Even though Moses made provisional rulings for particular instances, the universal principles incipient in Pre-Christian Judaism were confirmed and expounded upon in Christianity.

    Post-Christian Judaism is condemned by the NT as the rejection of God and embrace of that powerful but non-creative nemesis whose very essence is the lie. Unaided reason is enough to confirm there can be only one true faith. There have been periods of widespread, diabolical confusion such as the present, but traditional Catholicism remains intact after 2000 years.

  7. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    June 25, 2010 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

    i think that this is a very fundamental issue under discussion.

    assumption of subjectivity is linked to that of a vertical structure, whereby different laws apply to different hierarchical units, i.e., the privileged ones are allowed greater laxity.

    without claiming any sort of new testament scholarship, it seems to me a core principle of the christ that equality of treatment should apply to all living (or is it sentient) beings.
    this view is expressed emphatically throughout the n. t.

    if i am wrong, then i labor under a grave misreading.
    but if not, the starting point is quite an objective one, presenting symmetry from all viewpoints, i.e., no one is chosen a priori, pro- or de-motion is based on merit alone.

    this is a new development that radically differentiates the two testaments to the point of complete alienation and the fact that a huge majority of self professed christians fail to see it would be funny if it wasn’t tragic.

    in your example of a parent stealing in order to feed a hungry child, you seem to be referring to something else altogether, namely that none of us can presume to be the ultimate judge without knowing all the relevant facts – no disagreements there.

  8. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 25, 2010 - 2:52 pm | Permalink

    lobro,
    All ostensibly objective schools of morality require a subjective starting point. Talmudic self-worship is one such staring point. Historic Christianity is another. As for Christian Zionism, that is only the latest manifestation of that Judaizer Christian heresy condemned in the New Testament.

  9. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    June 25, 2010 - 1:34 pm | Permalink

    hmm edward, the trouble with this sort of relativism is that any line in the sand drawn thereafter is quite arbitrary and the principle can be abused.
    in fact, it is abused all the time.

    jews, by virtue of (self declaration of) being a divinely chosen group, assume the same prerogative, namely, we have no right to judge them and their actions, since as children of god, or rather, by placing themselves on par or even above god, they can do as they please given that the range of their parameters greatly exceeds ours.

    ziochristians pretty much use their happy ignorance as excuse for moral laxity, to them jews are a caste of confessors onto whom the z-x’s offload all decision making and responsibility.
    yowsa.

  10. Arif Sahin's Gravatar Arif Sahin
    June 25, 2010 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Have u seen the article of JAMES TRAUB, the Turkish Dilemma ?! Where he says: So yes, young people: Do learn Turkish !

    The enemy :-) feels the right thing to do by instinct ! Teaching Turkish is against the Turkish State Doctrine !

    Turks learn the languages of others but do not encourage others for learning Turkish. That is very Turkic actually. For example, during Genghis Khan times, learning the Mogul language was a crime punished by death.

    Turks had always been minorities within their own empires ! Their managerial skills obviously came from some secret teachings. One such secret text is quite famous: the 7 th volume of Mesnevi (The Masnavi). It is believed that Turks also do have the missing parts of the Critias (dialogue).

    There is a part of Istanbul called Karay Koy (Karakoy). It means the Karay Village. The name comes from the Crimean Karaites. No one can be as Jew as the Turk !

    Listen to this:

    From his own writings it is clear that his version of Freemasonry incorporated aspects of Islamic Sufi mysticism, alchemy, astrology and Rosicrucianism. In his autobiographical novel Der Talisman des Rosenkreuzers (The Rosicrucian Talisman), he made a clear distinction between Turkish Freemasonry and regular Freemasonry: It must be shown that Oriental Freemasonry still retains faithfully even today the ancient teachings of wisdom forgotten by modern Freemasonry, whose Constitution of 1717 was a departure from the true way.

  11. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 25, 2010 - 6:17 am | Permalink

    A parent may justly break the moral law to steal bread for his starving child. Finite man has no capacity to judge the purpose of the infinite God.

  12. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    June 25, 2010 - 5:48 am | Permalink

    well, edward, i am in no mood to argue about these definitions but i place the moral law above god.

    there is no reason to excuse him from any of the constraints we place upon ourselves, therefore, either the bible has been transcribed badly or he is in the wrong or his nature is plural and contains the elements of the devil.

    whatever.
    i am like a cop who has no qualms in arresting a transgressing judge, and if i wasn’t, i wouldn’t be deserving respect.

    pax

  13. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 24, 2010 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

    lobro,

    The Old Testament is the inspired word of God and is quoted extensively in the New Testament. The bible is opposite of satanic and condemns the Devil in numerous place.

    Even if wars commanded by God in the OT seem to violate Just War principles, God has sovereign power over life and death so the laws made for men do not apply to Him. Having said that, all public revelation ended upon the death of the last Christian Apostle so there is no excuse today for anybody to transgress Just War.

  14. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    June 24, 2010 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

    mossad’s motto:
    be-tachbūlōt ta`aseh lekhā milchāmāh
    by way of deception you shall wage war.

    Proverbs 24:6: “For by wise guidance you can wage your war, and in abundance of counselors there is victory” (NRSV). (In Hebrew, “tachbūlōt” – “wise guidance” in English – can also be translated as “cunning”, “trick”, or “deception”)

    basically, bible (o/t) is a satanic document too and deception, thieving, treachery and cruelty are the building blocks of judaic dna.

  15. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 24, 2010 - 6:10 pm | Permalink

    John Taurus says: “The Jews have a motto: Make war by deception.”

    I never heard this motto, and I don’t believe it exists.

    You may have misunderstood something you heard, but Israeli military thinking draws on normal Western sources.

  16. Bluemananalyst's Gravatar Bluemananalyst
    June 24, 2010 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    The territory of modern Turkey was (in New Testament time) occupied by Greek-Macedonian and other Aryan Adamic folks who migrated SW from the Aryan Adamic core area. Ayran Medes and Parthians, and similar folks of Elam, Persis, Bactria [=Afghanistan], filled what is now Iran thru to Kashmir. Then they migrated west to fill Europe.

    [Some folks in the old homeland are truly “white” to this day; see youtube video “real Aryans”, but most are now mixed. And the Islamic anti-christ “religion” system for dominating us is the major mindset there now. Islam is toxic to a Christian society. They are incompatible! You can’t have 2 masters!! We’re NOt to bond with unbelief.

    The “lost” Israelites were put among (Aryan) Medes says a quote preachers refuse to remember: 2 King 18:11-19:30. Almost all of all 12 tribes got put there in the 700s BC. These “lost” Israelite tribes merged with other tribes of the same basic (white) race.

    They migrated west to fill Europe… becoming Christians! (Medes, Parthians, Elamites begin a list of Pentecost converts in Acts 2:7-9… another line preachrs forget.)

    They had filled what is now “Turkey” and it became a major Christian region thanks to Paul and other disciples! But the abominable “Turk” invasion and rise of Islan wiped it out!

    For data on the migration of white (not “Jew”) Israelites embedded with Aryan Adamites, see “Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets” by Raymond Capt, or “Your Inheritance” by Robert Balacius of “STM.”

    So I’d like to see our (white Christian) people regain their land now called “Turkey.” That would solve a lot!!

    Why not move Turks far northeast to their homeland, where they became a mixed group, similar to “Ashkenaz” Turk-mixed ones (including Mongols and Edomites) who later took the name “Jew” as in Kostler’s book ” Thirteenth Tribe.” this gang moved west and built an empire NE of Black Sea, called Khazaria (capital Atil/Itil, Sarkel another big city). They got crushed in 1065 by Syatoslav (a Kievan Rus) , so they dispersed as traders/lenders in Europe. I’d love to see these pretenders to the “Israel” name get booted far far out!

    And don’t turn it over to Arabs (descendants of Ishmael who are mixed; note “arab” comes from a verb to mix and turn dark – it’s like the word for evening. Check Hebrew word!) Nor to Palestinians (reworked Philistines). Nor to Phoenicians; they are just a mixed Israel-Canaan group.

    Note that Around 130 BC John Hyrcanus defeated the notoriously evil Esau clan (Idumeans) and forced them to become “Jews” as in many older encyclopedias. Jesus separated real Israelites (who accepted him and became Christians!) from false ones (remaining “Jews”). Jesus noted the division in John 10:22-30.

    Interestingly the Edomites had mixed (Gen 36) with earlier cursed Canaanites. (Gen 9). Secular archeology discovered (60 years ago) that Canaanites were lead by offspring of Cain! See C.W. Ceram’s “Mystery of the Hittites” based on deciphering the Canaanite Hittie language, from artifacts in what is now “Turkey!” The lingusitic “mystery” was solved, and it shed surprising data on (Bible-cursed) lineages!

    So…. the long and short of it is that from Turkey thru to modern “Israel” and Palestinians and Arabs, etc. that whole region is full of people actually listed as God’s enemies! Yes, look in a Psalm almost totally ignored. Ps 83. Read it!

    So from a logical Christian viewpoint, it is important to cut out all these sorts in Europe… or you’ll have the invasion from North Africa (Moslems, Jews, etc.) all over again!

    Charles Martel stopped the invasion centuries ago with a big army from the north. He swept down and killed aliens, until he got stopped. Then the pace was slower, but our folks kept at it until the last of them left Granada in 1492, except some “Jews” who nominally converted to Roman Christianity. They were left. You see how that turned out!

  17. Bonnie's Gravatar Bonnie
    June 24, 2010 - 8:48 am | Permalink

    The Grassroots Europeans do NOT want Turkey. The ptb may, but that’s becauswe they have their limousines, and mansions and salaries apart from the European Grassroots.

    It was only a wink in the eye of Time, a couple of centuries ago, when the Turks were all over Europe in a conquering state of mind. The horrors they committed them, to the natives, is beyond belief.

    That’s the methods of islam.

    And the Turks, haven’t changed, Nor the rest of their cohorts in that abominable religion.

    In Germany alon, the majority of immogrants are Turkish, pushing their religious agenda ( which in one and the same, with the State- there’s no separation of religion and State- they practice Sharia law). These insidious Turks have built thie mosques all over, whre they have their “call to prayer”- 5x a day – including 12 A.M. and 4 A.M. – 7 days/wk.

    These abominable Turks insist on the European laws bending their way to accomodate them. This includes making European woman 2nd class citizens- while men, will enjoy the fruits of all.

    This goes on from Norway to Germany.

    You, people, better wake up, and stop the nonsense of “Multi-culturism” foisted on us, by the Eur. elite.

    Remember while the Elite will live in their mansions, and ALWAYS inermarry with the new conquerors, it is WE, the lower classes, that will bear the weight of the yoke!

    I, for one, refuse to serve men tea, all the while standing behind his chair.

    AHO!

    A Maverick Amazon Gnostic

  18. John Taurus's Gravatar John Taurus
    June 23, 2010 - 10:22 am | Permalink

    The Jews have a motto: Make war by deception. This means, to put it bluntly, Jews are backstabbing, lying, thieving, do anything they want, treacherous, dogs. They have only “PRETEND” friends that they use. Not my type of people.

  19. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    June 23, 2010 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    netwit: “The Jews are merely exploiting, or quite literally “capitalizing,” on an already existing pathology of self-betrayal.”

    Everyman has both materialistic and spiritual instincts. In the past, our elites used to encourage our high-minded instincts. But the institutions have been hijacked. Young people’s idealist tendencies are being hijacked by the media who teach them that the moral thing is materialism and immigrationism, whereas caring for their own people is immoral. The problem comes from the top, not from our natural tendencies.

    “democracy is conducive, nay instrumental, to just such an ethnocultural sell-off.”

    In a democracy, the media wouldn’t be dominated by a hostile elite, and government wouldn’t impose mass immigration against the will of most people. There is no democracy today in the West.

  20. Mihail's Gravatar Mihail
    June 23, 2010 - 4:23 am | Permalink

    The Bible:

    Relates that the Khazar (Ashkenaz) Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem:
    “Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;…the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz…”
    (Genesis 10:1-3)
    Therefore, the Bible proves that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars] are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite.

    New Grolier Encyclopedia:

    Khazars {kah’z-ars} The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the kagan (king) were converted to Judaism. The Khazars established their capital at Itil (or Atil), in the Volga delta, and for four centuries thereafter this Jewish empire held the balance of power between the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim Caliphate. The fortified Khazar city of Sarkil on the lower Don River was built with Byzantine help and served as a crossroads to central Asia. The Khazars controlled many of the trade routes to the Orient; some of the Radhanites (Jewish merchants from Gaul), for example, were accustomed to crossing the Khazar empire while traveling to and from China and India. During the late 10th and early 11th centuries an alliance of Byzantines and Russians broke the power of the Khazars in the Crimea. In 965, Svyatoslav I, duke of Kiev, decisively defeated the Khazar army. Further to the east new waves of Turkic invaders overran the remains of the Khazar state.

    Collier’ s Encyclopedia, Volume 14, page 65 states:
    “Khazars [kaza'rz], a semi-nomadic tribe of Turkish or Tatar origin who first appeared north of the Caucasus in the early part of the third century…in the Eighth Century Khaghan Bulan decided in favor of the Jews and accepted Judaism for himself and for his people..

    The Cadillac Modern Encyclopedia, page 822, states:
    “Khazars (khah’-zahrz), a S Russian people of Turkic origin, who at the height of their power (during the 8th-10th cent., A.D.) controlled an empire which included Crimea, and extended along the lower Volga, as far E as the Caspian Sea. The Khazar Royal Family and aristocracy converted to Judaism during the reign of King Bulan (768-809 A.D.) and Judaism was thereafter regarded as the State Religion..

    The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 6, page 836 relates:
    “Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century A.D. established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia…but the most striking characteristic of the Khazars was the apparent adoption of Judaism by the Kagan and the greater part of the ruling class in about 740…The fact itself, however, is undisputed and unparalleled in the history of Central Eurasia. A few scholars have asserted that the Judaized Khazars were the remote ancestors of many of the Jews of Eastern Europe and Russia.

    Books writen by jewish authors;
    The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler

    The Jews of Khazaria by Kevin Alan Brook

    The Kuzari and the Shaping of Jewish Identity, 1167–1900 by Adam Shear

    Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman

    The Invention of the Jewish People by Shlomo Sand

    “It’s a Trick, We Always Use It.” (calling people ” Anti-Semitic);

  21. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 23, 2010 - 12:38 am | Permalink

    I don’t like turning a blind eye to genocide, especially not the genocide of the Armenians.

    But it seems to me that by pushing America’s government to make Turkey pay a painful price for anti-Israeli rhetoric, the Jewish lobby is playing a very nasty game of “let’s you and him fight” and it is deeply contrary to the American national interest to play that game.

    The point is, the aggressive Jewish temperament will not allow Jews to leave well enough alone. Now that the Turks have stepped out of line, there will never be a right time for all Jews to say, “the price is too high, so stop.” Perpetual moral accusation and escalation is more likely. It’ll be on and off, but it’ll never really end.

    The price of this perpetual escalation can be paid by Israel and Jews, or by American Whites, who still get the blame for everything America does, though they are not really in charge.

    Of course it’s in the Jewish interest for the Turks to decide that America is their real persecutor and problem and that anti-American alliances are the best response, while Israel’s role is forgotten. And countries already running anti-American foreign policies are likely to make the case for this to Turkey.

    I don’t think the Turks are going to buy it.

  22. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 23, 2010 - 12:14 am | Permalink

    mystic says: “The slogan “Never Again” rings hollow, because it has come really mean: “Never Again For Jews Only, Who Reserve The Right To Perpetrate Their Own Holocaust””

    It is “never again to the Jews” and it always was. I had this explained to me forcefully when I asked about a big, costly Holocaust educational project, and nobody was rattling a cup for or even saying a kind word about protesters who were trying to stop the current “Holocaust” in former Yugoslavia.

    Should somebody have said something? No! It’s never again TO THE JEWS and only to appease the antisemites was the last part ever left out. That’s why antisemites, such as Poles, have no answer to “Never again!” Because it sounds like it protects them too. But what was happening in former Yugoslavia was not directed against the Jews, so it had nothing to do with “Never again!”

    Hoo-kayyy…

    Understand with all your clarity of mind and strength of will that “Never again!” means absolutely zero protection for Whites with Jews as a hostile elite.

  23. mystic's Gravatar mystic
    June 22, 2010 - 10:31 pm | Permalink

    “Nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.
    “Nothing justifies Israel’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Palestinian genocide” (Andrew)

    Andrew, didn’t anyone ever tell you that the (crypto)Jews perpetrated the Armenian holocaust, and that’s why America and Israel officially deny it (although both go hysterical over anyone denying the Jewish holocaust in WWII) (Turkey’s military is said to be comprised of mostly crypto-Jews–hence their own denial)

    The slogan “Never Again” rings hollow, because it has come really mean: “Never Again For Jews Only, Who Reserve The Right To Perpetrate Their Own Holocaust”

  24. June 22, 2010 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    As long as white people, or “Euros,” put their immediate economic gain above their long term “social capital” they are doomed. The Jews are merely exploiting, or quite literally “capitalizing,” on an already existing pathology of self-betrayal. And democracy is conducive, nay instrumental, to just such an ethnocultural sell-off. Today, we in the West must endure all the oppressiveness of statism without any of the privileges of a just, i.e., Christian, fascism. Which will expire first: democracy or the race?

  25. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    June 22, 2010 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    Nordman: “The American white nationalists say “All whites should unite” in some kind “pan-white alliance” – in Europe many nationalists say, keep borders, nation and people. These nationalists do not call themselves “white nationalists”, because it is not needed”

    We don’t call ourselves white nationalists because we are afraid to do so, but the Americans have no choice, since their ethnic roots aren’t in one single European country. It doesn’t mean that American “white nationalists” are more racially oriented than the nationalists in Europe.

    When government and the media say that Blacks and Arabs who live in France are just as French as the French, we should be explicit that they are not, because their ancestors are not French. It makes no difference whether we say their ancestors are not White or not French: it is a racial argument.

    I think the cultural differences between white nations are becoming less relevant today because we are no longer allowed to live in natural societies. The more alienated we are from government and the media, and the more non-whites there are around us, the more we see ourselves as white, and the less we care about our specific nationality. If a Russian, a Portuguese, or an American settle down in Paris, I think that ethnically French Parisians will see them as fellow white people. Today, people think like that: if you are around white people, you are safe. If not, you are unsafe.

  26. Kelt's Gravatar Kelt
    June 22, 2010 - 7:11 pm | Permalink

    Mr. MacDonald is bang on correct.
    Turkey doesn’t belong in Europe (not based on race but on religious & cultural reasoning)…but then again, neither do the Jews who are running Europe.

    How do we stop them? Most Europeans & Americans get very tense at the least bit of criticism towards Jews or Israel…it is as though the Jews have a “spell” over the West.
    But History progresses cyclically. I believe we will expel them…and hopefully VERY soon.

    The Jews are like the Borg (Star Trek)…they are a collective and operate in strange & frightening ways. Though they are sometimes at odds with one another, they work towards survival for themselves & destruction (or at best; forms of slavery) for those who oppose (or don’t openly worship) them.

    I am so glad to see that many have woken up. I pray more and more will…and soon!

    Very glad to read Kevin MacDonald’s articles here. What an intelligent and keen observer of the human mind & sociol order.

  27. Andrew's Gravatar Andrew
    June 22, 2010 - 7:03 pm | Permalink

    “nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.”

    Nothing justifies Israel’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Palestinian genocide.

  28. June 22, 2010 - 6:59 pm | Permalink

    T Norman:

    Interesting, but honestly it is irrelevant blather. It almost seems you are trying to put us off the task by distinguishing the European aspect so. The white racial groups are under attack and in decline no matter where you are. Oh did I fail to mention Christianity? Do you not understand the meaning of this?

    You speak from a perspective that Americans (when white meant American, and WASP meant definitely so) spoke from in the 50’s, 60’s and prior. The tidal wave has been crashing over Europe for 40 years, regardless of how confined and coherent you say your racial consciousness is. That nationalism is implicitly white obviously negates that a non-white could love the nation they are in. That may cause one to live with a lie. After all, it is not impossible for it not to be so.

    You have an incorrect understanding of racial identity here. What the TV shows you is what the Jews (here and in Europe) want to program into the people to uproot and disempower them. So, a WASP does not equal [as in mean] an Italian American does not equal an Irish American does not equal a German American, although they can be, and are oft, true friends and brothers.

    Jesus could be an American whereas, apparently, he could not be a Scandinavian.

    Here, acknowledged, nationalism is spread among whites – and non-whites. That does not mean to say that identities do not remain, embedded in tradition, country, and family (it is a bigger country than yours). You are still allowed to love the national gestalt and land, although whites are the vast majority of these who actually do strongly, especially when the subject is ‘the land’ (taken as a cultural-historical construct and not only in admiration of its beauty; we usually do not like our government, and we especially do not like it now).

    It may be said that identity is the heart of racial consciousness. Same with national consciousness. In back of both, to perhaps unascertainable extents, is security. So, along with the recognitions and allowances for American freedoms and liberty, we maintain (and value and want) the trunk of racial identity that manifests itself in the imperative for a “White” majority with the definite requirement it abide by bedrock American ideas and culture.

    The old stock groups, particularly the WASPS and Germans, have been under incessant attack by the Jewish cabal controlling key institutions via their control of the press and money – a little easier to do if the cultural identity mandate does not revolve around strictly racial lines. America is not unique in regard to having Jews meddle in its situation, as you are well aware; however the American concepts of freedom and liberty bear with them a fairly vigilant commitment to fairness and justice, necessary corollaries. This commitment, along with the aforementioned generalized acceptance of white nationalism has left the old stock groups more vulnerable than the European nationalists to the same forces that we are both continually under attack by.

    There is no evidence that European race/national-white identity has been any more successful than American white[race]/national identity in dealing with the same varieties of problems we both have nationally and internationally, particularly as regards the religion of Christ. We are both losing.

    Perhaps everybody (save for one group) is really losing thereby.

  29. Abaris's Gravatar Abaris
    June 22, 2010 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

    To T.Nordman,

    Out of curiosity, I read somewhere once that freemasonry in Sweden is a strictly Christian organization, and that the monarch is the hereditary Grand Master of Swedish Freemasonry. Does it play, or has it played any roll at all in Sweden’s immigration mess, or is it non-political?

  30. Roland Ansgar's Gravatar Roland Ansgar
    June 22, 2010 - 6:05 pm | Permalink

    Judaism is fundamentalism, and all of the psychological idiocy that accompanies such delusional ideologies.

  31. Stark's Gravatar Stark
    June 22, 2010 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Hey all.
    About whites; sheesh; whites. Hmm, Irish? Irish are descendants of the Kelts & the Iberians (Spaniards)…thus the mix of blond/blue & black/brown hair and eyes as well as fair/darker skinned; but they are all “white”.

    Look at Italians. In the North they are just as the Germanics; but in the south they become darker; are they not all “whites”?

    Then, you take an Italian from the south and compare him with an Indian from Gujarat or Punjab…& all of a sudden it becomes difficult to tell them apart…as long as we make them wear the same clothes, hair styles & don’t let them speak. Now are the Indians “white”?

    Speaking of India, many of the North Indians are whiter than the Greeks and maybe even as “white” as the English Saxons….as said also the Arabs have their fair share of “white” peoples too.

    I think, if we look at this from a proper perspective; it has little to do with “whiteness” but rather culture & beliefs (religious or no).

    We (whites) are of the Arthurian culture…or at least the best of us are. Perhaps not under that name; but all tend to hold that moral, ethical viewpoint. We want and try to work toward equality, fairness, justice, industriousness/hard working, inventive, moral & ethical decency, high-minded spirituality, freedom, chivalry and such. This is WHY Christianity did so well amongst us. We had this in our culture and it took root easily there.
    Sure we had times when we “went a Viking” or raided places as needed. We tried to expand our kingdoms in some cases (like the Romans or the Saxons); but we also tried to make the lives of our cohabitants on par with our own…the bastardized “Christianity” that we hear so much of however, was the making of some miserable control freaks who lived for profit & the banker’s favors (we know where they came from).

    The “Jews” did not have this in their cultural soul. They were greedy, violent, backbiters, lazy (as far as labor goes), arrogant, liars and manipulators.

    Even their own laws they manipulated to omit “non jews; aka Goyim” from any benefit therein (eg Jubilee, no usury, murder victims, rape victims). So the “Jew” can do whatsoever he wants to the non-jew “Goyim” because his Talmud makes us non-applicable to the laws of their god. Sounds like a bunch of crooked lawyers; and that is precisely what these “Rabbis” were/are.

    Then what we must consider are those people who have like mindsets to our own.
    First and foremost, we cannot permit Jews to rule our media, commerce, internet, education, legal & every other area of critical influence. This is what is turning us “white folk” into what is completely contrary to our history….a bunch of lazy, fat consumers without the moral compass to say no to our lusts…etc.
    Then after we take back our “world” from the Jews, we must also ensure that no Muslims are permitted to hold their laws in our lands. If they want to live here; abide by OUR laws, or go home.
    For instance; killing children for rebelliously wearing the wrong garment is not a proper punishment in our culture…these vile creatures (the ones who would do such a callous thing) need to be wiped out.
    Likewise, we are not at all able to compare our culture with Africa or Jamaica etc. These people do not share enough of the same values with Europeans & North Americans etc.

    We must learn to keep our borders tighter and be far more selective of who we let in. If their ethics, morality, culture etc; does not equate or surpass our own; we don’t need or want them.

    Turkey, Islam aside; are generally white people. Israel, Jewishness aside, are generally white people. Both are diametrically opposed to each other (though technically they should be fairly close due to almost the same laws in their books) and to us.
    Turkey has done no harm in this situation and Israel is completely guilty. But Israel can do no wrong in the eyes of the world (unless you are an Arab)…& that is another long and frightening discussion.

    Like I said earlier; the first and best thing we can do for ourselves is to rid our lands of Jewish control. Ship them (and all their Zionist lapdogs) all off to Israel where they can live happily ever after.

  32. caterina's Gravatar caterina
    June 22, 2010 - 3:43 pm | Permalink

    Good. Turkey is better off not being in the EU. Also maybe they have learned their lesson about trusting the Jews. Time to rid the country of the JEWS, Take their property and send them over the border into ISRAHELL,
    put a big fence up, and do not let them back in. I think the whole world is waking up to the evil Jews brining down the banking system, the education system, staring wars, the list goes on. TIME TO EXPOSE THE ZIONIST JEWS>…….murders since time can remember. They try to re-write history with lies……oh the poor jews etc…….time for people to see through their lies……

  33. T.Nordman's Gravatar T.Nordman
    June 22, 2010 - 9:05 am | Permalink

    Daybreaker

    Whiteness in itself is not worthless. I think we European and Americans have a different concept of “whiteness”. To be Swedish is to be white, but it is even more, it is to be a part of the Nordic race, and the Nordic race is a subgroup, or a sub-race of the white race. Arabs and Iranians can also be considered whites, and are considered whites in America.

    Here in Europe we do not see them as whites. Actually, here in Europe, “race” is not a topic because we assume that Europeans are white and Europeans are seen as something different from other “Whites” that are not Europeans, and then you have European nations, which people are divided once again into “subgroup/sub race” of the European race.

    As Wandrin say, whiteness is in our nationality. Whiteness is a very complex thing in Europe; it is not as easy as in former colonies.

    The American white nationalists say “All whites should unite” in some kind “pan-white alliance” – in Europe many nationalists say, keep borders, nation and people. These nationalists do not call themselves “white nationalists”, because it is not needed – because if you are a nationalist in Europe, you are implicit a “white nationalist”, but not in the sense of a “pan –white alliance”, rather you are Swede, Britt or Greek. The British National Party talk about those who are ethnically British – they do not talk about the “white race” in general. They talk about the “peoples” of Europe – and they happened to be white.

    The concept of race is very different in Europe then in America. You have a simplified view on race. Whites are whites. The USA has since the beginning been a multicultural and multiethnic country.
    Whites, when they came to USA came from different nationalities and “sub races/subgroups” but in context of multiethnicity, they had to define themselves as “whites”.

    In Europe this has not been necessary, especially in Scandinavia – which has pretty much no colonial history at all and therefore very little “non-European” (or non-white, you like) immigration until the 1980s. When it comes to loyalty, our loyalty goes first to our nation, and then to our fellow nations, which in a European context, are always white, and often share the same religion.

    But then again, I may be biased because I’m not a white nationalist, rather a Paleoconservative that want to halt immigration from the third world until we solve our growing problem with religious, cultural and ethnic unrest in our nations.

    I was in New York a couple of years ago and then I travelled awhile around the states around the East Coast, it I not “white”, rather the opposite. Our European countries are about to be colonized. The massimmigration to Europe began 30-40 years ago. Some European countries like Finland and Iceland have less than three percent foreigners living in their land and Eastern Europe is still “white”.

    We are getting swamped and it going fast, very fast now. USA on the other have, always been multicultural and multiracial, and your solution will be very differently from ours. We may deport our third world immigrants back home; you have to live your former black slaves and Native americans.

    When it comes to Turkey – they will never become a member of the European Union. European Union is an exclusive club for Christian countries. The European Union is about to crack anyway. Greece, Italy and UK have deep economical troubles and the EURO (EU currency) is pretty much going straight to hell. European Union works hand in hand with the internationalist elite.

    To defend Europe and it peoples, European Union has to go and then Spain, Greece, Malta and Italy can defend their borders by using force to hold MENA and black African immigrant out. European Union work pretty much as the US federal does when it comes to borders, keep the individual states from becoming independent and do something about the illegal immigration.

    I think the flotilla incident has helped Turkey to become more popular among Europeans. Europeans (especially France and Scandinavian countries) dislike Israel. But, Muslims are not popular among the indigenous people of Europe. But then again, Albania and Bosnia is “partly” Muslim nations and they are “white” and European.

    Both countries are disliked and there are growing numbers of voices that do not want to include Eastern Europe in the European Union, especially not former Yugoslavian countries. The paradox is that Eastern Europe; if they not enter European Union will be saved from western European multiculturalism, feminism and appeasement of Islam. Just look at Poland and Czech Republic, when they entered European Union, their culture has now begun to be eroded.

    If USA keeps their hands out of Europe – I think we Europeans will solve our problems. But the history tells us, that American mentality of spreading liberal democracy and capitalism – will throw a spanner in the European works.

  34. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 22, 2010 - 1:55 am | Permalink

    Recent history has revealed and is revealing the limitations of implicit Whiteness.

  35. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    June 21, 2010 - 10:21 pm | Permalink

    “So Whiteness in itself is worthless or actually evil as with the Afrikaners. It’s only value is as a precondition for being really Swedish.”

    This is natural for Europeans. Whiteness is implicit in their nationality as i think it would be in America if slavery hadn’t happened.

    WN in Europe wil be different than America because of it. If it grows big enough it will be an over-layer recognising mutual threats and enemies rather than some kind of pan-European thing.

  36. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 21, 2010 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    In the context of a demographic threat like the potential of Turkey in Europe, how would you organize a defense, if no White people see value in any other White people as White, and if specific, narrow cultures are the only basis to act collectively other than on Leftist, pseudo-Rightist (Neocon) or Islamic terms?

    It seems that the flotilla may have ended a threat that White Europe did not have any answer to except foot-dragging and the possible discouraging effect of bureaucracy and boredom.

  37. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 21, 2010 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

    T. Nordman says: “The racial aspect here is very deep rooted, even though people will not say it out loud. Our politicians and media do their best to say that “all people” can be Swedes and Sweden can continue to be Sweden without Swedes. But, let’s face it – no one believes it for real. I think that Scandinavia will be the first “white” part of the world that will go strongly on ethno nationalism.”

    T. Nordman says: “To answer Mr. Day breakers question if Swedish Media and the rest of elite support the whites that are suffering in South Africa and Zimbabwe? No, they do not.” [...] “All our elites are “Anti-white”. The “Right Wing” part is Pro-America, Pro-Israel and pro-Judaism. The Left Wings part is anti-America, anti-Israel and pro Islam. Only, Swedish democrats seem to be pro-white, or rather pro Swedes. The politics here go by cultural lines, not racial lines.”

    So Whiteness in itself is worthless or actually evil as with the Afrikaners. It’s only value is as a precondition for being really Swedish.

    There is no objection to demonizing other Whites who are not culturally Swedish. Even Dutch, German and French descended Christian Boers are too culturally alien, too far away.

    And it’s easy to decide from this point of view that Americans, Australians etc. should accept that their countries should be eliminated and they should move back to Europe or to nowhere, since the White people there are not culturally Swedish or of any specific European culture any more.

    Pardon me, but this kind of identity seems weak. It’s too easy to turn Whites against each other if you play by these rules.

  38. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    June 21, 2010 - 5:47 pm | Permalink

    T. Nordman
    Yes, the elites can’t cope with all the contradications they have created.

    It will be interesting to watch and see if the most liberal and egalitarian countries become the first to rebel.

  39. T. Nordman's Gravatar T. Nordman
    June 21, 2010 - 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Wandrin:

    Like for the rest of the west, it all begun in 1948 and the fall of Nazism in Europe. Sweden wanted (as always) be a good example to the world. In 1953, the “ban on gypsy” immigration was reverted. Our “race-biological” institution (SIFR), was also downed play in 1958, and it was connected to Uppsala University instead of being a state govern institution.

    They did the same thing; it just changed names and titles. It exists still, now under the name, “Uppsala University genetic Centrum”. It had been operational since 1922, and was the first of its kind in the world. It was actually created by the Social Democrats. Funny as it is, when their new leader Mona Sahlin says publically that her most important issue is “combat racism, homophobia and Islamophobia”.

    Now of course you cannot take courses in race biology or anything like that. In 1960-1980 Sweden need a new workforce, this was actually not true, but hey. Why not, so Italians, Spaniards and Yugoslavians were welcomed. They created some fuzz among the bluecolor workers and in the 1968, Riksdagen voted yes for “hemspråk” (Home language), so all this Europeans could return home, and still have their culture and language, sometimes in the end of 1970.

    But they never did. In the middle of 1960 socialists and some Jewish journalists began to advocate for “multiculturalism”, in the sense of minority rights. This now the great conflict between them that see assimilation as an option and those that wants to see minority “identity politics” begins. There is also a third part that wanted to send minorities back to their homeland.

    I think this three part conflict set the problematic politics for the 2000 immigration policy. Some parts of Swedish integration policy is built on ethnic separatist believes, that the minorities should keep their culture and not mix some parts focus on assimilation.

    I have read some of the old “Commission of Inquiry’s recommendation” (SOU) from the 1970: s, and there is a great strife, which way we should go. Now it was mostly about gypsies. In the 1975 – our parliament decided to open for immigration for all people. For many, this is the starting shot for massimmigration.

    In the end of 1980s new laws came, like abolishment of “female circumcision” (It is common among Somalis). In 2001 circumcision of boys was close to be illegal, but Jewish and Muslim organizations fought well, and now it is only heavily regulated. Our politicians thought it would stop, that they would find reason. But this never happened and because it “then” was not included in the free healthcare, Muslim continued to do it out of the healthcare service and many counties refused to do it on ethical matters.

    What happened? In 2009 there comes a new direction that it would be “free of charge” from the “central county commission”. But because 2/3 of the medicinal doctors refuse it is done in private clinics for tax kronor.

    We faced the same problem with “Halal and kosher butchering” that for a long time was illegal, and it is still, but because of multiculturalism there will be no tightening. This is of course has become a very interesting issue among the left – should they huge the Muslim minority or secure children and animals rights.

    The election in September will be one of the most existing elections for maybe twenty years. The cultural conservative Swedish Democrats (called racist by the media and politicians, but is not more racist then Paul Gottfried or Roger Scruton) stand against the liberals and the left.

    What our elite does not realize is that you cannot in one sense argue for more Mosques and for infant mutilations and Halal/kosher butchering and in the same time try to make Christianity illegal in Schools and blames Swedish for “savage” traditions like “hunting”.

    This circumcision issue will be a big thing after these elections. It has virtually no support among Swedes and it’s a very important identity marker for Jews and Muslims, even though it’s a bit uncommon for the Jews to circumcise their children.

    I guess the socialists, beginning with Olof Palme, should have stayed away of arguing for “children’s” and “animals” rights – when our new immigrants care nothing for it. They thought all “immigrants” would become Swedes, but well no.

    I read something funny a year ago. One of the Green Party officials claims that gays can walk happy through Rinkeby (a ghetto suburb in Stockholm), but never through Djursholm (Upper class suburb), but the homosexual-rights lobby groups got really mad at here, saying that she try to hide the fact that immigrant homosexuals has a hard time among their own ethnic group.

    Again, this election will become funny – not only because there will be a new party on the rise, but because our elites has painted themselves in corners – they cannot be “Gay right” supporters, “children’s right supporters” animal rights supporters on the same time they are “cultural relativists” and hugging Jews and Muslims.

    Our elites have become so irrational when it comes to values, immigration and culture that their time in office is bleeding out fast. Today a site named Political Incorrect is the among the 200 largest internet sites in Sweden. It is actually larger then some conventional media sources on the internet.

    The thing with that site is that no one knows who is handling it. Expo (similar to ADL) was close to discover who it was behind it, but they never dropped the name. This means that PI and other sites like can continue, without being harassed by the violent left. There are becoming many sites like that all over the “Swedish” speaking part of internet. The elite newspapers (on the internet), is actually losing to the “extreme” left and “extreme” right. It is actually really exciting times we live in.

    Normal Swedes to be keener on “Mussolini” and “Lenin”, then Fredrik Reinfeldt and Mona Sahlin? Why, well, our elites has all become “catch all parties” that do the opposite of what the people believes in – like keeping jobs in Sweden, tuff on crime, larger defense forces, halt on third world immigration, keeping Swedish humanistic values intact, stop fractional banking (not a big issue here, though), no to European Union and many other things that normal people like.

    Sweden, Holland and Belgium will be a good example of why the elites should hide now, because of countries is slowly awakening. If they are smart they try to neutralize the situation like in Denmark, so they can stay in power for longer time, but here they follow the other path, say no and hope that we are dumb, but we are not.

    Swedes have not only one of the highest IQ:s in the world (Yes, it is higher than in Israel) – but we have long tradition of “real” racism and true savageness, and if our elites know what is best for them and non-Swedes, they end multiculturalism now and go for an assimilation policy .

    Next generations of Swedes will not be as unforgiving and understanding to reason as we on conservative right are now, and no one wants another inquisition, just because our elites dreamed on a “multiculturalistic” global liberal-socialist paradise and not upkeeping borders.

  40. T. Nordman's Gravatar T. Nordman
    June 21, 2010 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Chris Moore

    Soviet and later communist Poland turned against Judaism and Jews. You are very correct that Jewry and Socialism will crash, because they are both selfish and self-serving authoritarian. Maybe America will turn Neo-conservative and a paradise for Jews and Europe turn into a socialism with Islamic tendencies and a not so great paradise for Jews. Personally I do not think Jews can be blamed for Marxism. Yes, Marx was a Jew, but he was critical of Judaism and Jewry.

    I do not think “Jewry” is the largest force behind multiculturalism in Europe. Maybe I’m writing this on the wrong site, but there are other forces that I believe are keener on multiculturalism then Jews. Personally I think multiculturalism as an ideology is a much worse problem then an “ethno pluralistic society”. When the idea of multiculturalism and internationalism is abolished and we see the rise of the old Christian nationalist Europe – then those people that cannot or will not assimilate will leave Europe, either by force or voluntarily.

    Just look at Denmark, they put up some “soft rules” that contradicts the ideology of multiculturalism and massimmigration and immigration have dropped rapidly. Denmark is now thinking of moving further in their effort to halt immigration. The reversion has not begun yet, but they are on their way.

    So what did Denmark do? Not much actually. To give an example, they just made it pretty much impossible for young immigrants to marry abroad. The Conservative Party and Danish Peoples Party said that they wanted to stop forced marriage and fake marriage, and that became a very effective method to stop immigration.

    The problem in Scandinavia is Muslim immigration and also for large part of Europe (Like France and UK). When you denounce Islam, you denounce immigration. This will be done, sooner or later, by all European parties, they have no alternative, or the west will disappear and our elites “liberal bull” will burn together with all European conservatism.

    Muslims are actually taking control over many European institutions and they are pretty much protected from being called racist. When they are called anti-Semites after calling for the death of all Jews (which happens time to time), the Moslem community screams Islamophobia and the extreme left comes for their aid, calling the very Zionist Jews and neo-conservatives, racist, Islamophobic and “Far Right”. Yes, it is crazy!

    The liberal media is still “running” things so they can keep the very extreme left outside the political discourse. Now some of the more Pro-Israeli and Pro-Jewish organizations like Expo have begun to smear the extreme left, calling them anti-Semites. But it is not smart to fight wars against their own storm troopers, and it seems that ANTIFA will join the Muslim Youth, rather than Expo and the liberal pro-Zionist media.

    So how prominent is the very extreme left? Well, If I look among my former course mates at my University, I see a large portion of people that thinks Hitler was Jewish and that Israelis and sometimes Jews are evil, because they “murder” Palestinians.

    In the same time they hate white men, which they think should be exterminated. Views like these are actually “okay” among the most socialist institutions at Universities around Scandinavia. My “libertarian” views on economy and social service were as keen to “Hitler”, according to some of my course mates and I was called “Far Right” by a professor I had because I believed that capitalism were a better economical system then socialism.

    Now I’m very conservative, but I always take libertarian positions when I’m in academia instead of conservative positions, but I guess I would be more accepted if I took conservative views. I have a hard time to figure out what is political correct or not. The left is really crazy, they are nuts.

    When Obama won the election all the liberal media was happy in Sweden. But in Stockholm University and Uppsala University, just weeks after, there were posters of Malcolm X, Palestinian freedom fighters and Cindy Sheehan. Apparently, Obama was a Zionist, capitalist and imperialist.

    All parts of the world have their different political cultures. I think Scandinavia is infected with internationalist communism (academia) and liberalism/soft socialism (Media and politicians). It is also seem to be the problem in other parts of Europe. I think America is infected with Zionism and neo-conservatism, together with UK and as you say, all very destructive ideologies.

  41. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    June 21, 2010 - 2:01 pm | Permalink

    @T. Nordstrom
    Intersting posts ty.

    “In the 1991 election, the liberal party (Peoples Party – the liberals) did also a good and the chairman and party leader Bengt Westerberg said that he would not support a Center-Right government if this Lucia Treaty would be launched. The Conservatives said yes and mass immigration continued.

    The propaganda begins…..

    (snip)

    All the 1994 it was a long debate about what we Swedes contributed to “Nazism” and how until the late 1970 we institutionalized people on basis of race and sexuality.”

    Yes. Media-induced guilt to stop people resisting.

  42. June 21, 2010 - 11:47 am | Permalink

    Neither organized Jewry nor the Left really wants a classically liberal, race-neutral future in the West that doesn’t single out this group or that for special treatment by government in an effort to stick it too both Whitey and Christendom, and to provide itself an unfair, government guaranteed advantage. The Left may today indeed be turning on organized Jewry, which despite all its camouflage is innately an extreme right-wing enterprise and has always been. But because Jewry largely invented Leftism as its “cover,” the Left too possesses Judaism’s self-contradiction of posing as “progressive” but secretly subscribing to extremely selfish and self-serving authoritarianism.

    In other words, both organized Judaism and the Left are frauds and swindlers running the most scurrilous rackets, and employing self-righteousness and false moral authority to portray themselves as beyond reproach.

    The West can never participate in any meaningful or healthy partnership with swindlers and ever hope to regain an iota of moral and social integrity.

  43. Nicholas Barbosa's Gravatar Nicholas Barbosa
    June 21, 2010 - 11:08 am | Permalink

    Lets stop saying that “Europe is commiting suicide”…, and instead let us state the truth…”Europe is being MURDERED”.

  44. Mr. Dithers's Gravatar Mr. Dithers
    June 21, 2010 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    We shouldn’t be surprised by this sudden Jewish behavioral turnabout towards Turkey. If La Raza elected to adopt an anti-semitic platform the Jewish lobby would become the biggest border control and anti-immigrant fanatics in the country. Instead of a “virtual fence” that does nothing we would get a 20 foot high brick and mortar wall to keep out more brown anti-semites.

    Not that I have any love or admiration for Turkey especially given how Muslim Turks behave in Europe.

  45. T. Nordman's Gravatar T. Nordman
    June 21, 2010 - 9:05 am | Permalink

    Day breaker and Joe Webb

    Social democratic chairman Olof Palme (prime minister and Swedish politician) was actually a good friend of Mr. Mugabe, and he supported all “nationalist” and “socialist” causes against “US imperialism”. He called Americans for “Satans mördare” (Murderer of Satan) in 1975. Palme was murdered in 1986. A murder not yet solved.

    He was in office 1969-1976 and 1982-1986. He was one of them responsible for the beginning multiculturalism and massimmigration. But as all social democratic leaders after him he wouldn’t want it to go to fast, he warned about it in Dagens Nyheter before he was murdered. He had actually a hard time to sell that idea among bluecolor workers. Tage Erlander was former Social democratic chairman and prime minister between 1946-1969 and preceded Olof Palme. Erlander said in 1962:

    ”Vi svenskar lever ju i en så oändligt mycket lyckligare lottad situation. Vårt lands befolkning är homogen, inte bara i fråga om rasen utan också i många andra avseenden.”

    With a”loose” translation

    “We Swedes are living in a very fortunate situation. Our country’s population is homogeneous, not only in terms of race but also in many other respects. ”

    Actually, the Social Democratic Party in alliance with Centre Party created something that was very similar to “National socialist ideology – without the imperialist and genocidal spectrum. It premises was that immigrants and actually Swedes that could assimilate (were of right race and healthy) should be given state grants like child benefits and those who were not “healthy” and of non Scandinavian/Nordic race should keep away from Sweden.

    We had extended sterilization programs into the 1970s. It is called “Folkhemmet” (The Peoples home) and it still deep rooted among many older people and it is still defended today, but without that racist spectrum. The new leaders of the Social Democratic party try to integrate multiculturalism, internationalism and minority identity politics in “Folkhemmet” – it goes not very well, because “Folkhemmet” is a nationalist idea, very similar to Golda Meir idea for the Jews in Israel.

    Since 1975, maybe 1980 (when multiculturalism became a state doctrine) race has been a “forbidden” topic. In the end of 1980 and in the beginning of 1990 the Social Democratic party was moving to stop all non-European immigration to Sweden. Why? Well, Palme had his doubts in the end of his life. Ingvar Karlsson, the social democrat that succeeded Olof Palme and also a friend of Tage Erlander saw the impossibility with multiculturalism when he became prime minister in 1986.

    The party grassroots demanded that immigration had to halt in the middle of 1980s and in 1991 most Swedes wanted to immigration to stop. In the same time “neo-Nazism” was on the rise and “New Democracy” (Cultural conservative with some racial influences) took some seats in Riksdagen (Parliament) in the 1991 election.

    The moderate party (conservatives) was also ready to stop immigration to Sweden. This is called “Lucia Treaty” – a treaty to halt all immigration – and it was launched by Social democratic chairman Ingvar Karlsson. All political parties wanted to end immigration in 1991, but not the liberal party.

    Under 1989-1992, there were also an economical crisis in Sweden and the unemployment were high, maybe as high as 10 percent. The European immigration from the 1970-1960 was also not popular among bluecolor workers, because they felt that they had stole their job and find foreigners in general were seen as “something” strange and dangerous.

    Sweden together with Scandinavia were the most ethnic and cultural homogenous parts of the world until 1980. Our politicians thought this Italians, Spaniard and Yugoslavs would return home, but they never did in a large scale when their contracts were closed in the beginning of 1980. Now they are assimilated and they very actually quite a few.

    Now in the beginning of 1990, the Swedish people were even angry because now immigration from the third world (mostly Muslims and Assyrians) had begun since a couple of years back. These non-Europeans were here as refugees (We have still no “real” working immigration, just refugees) and probably half of them lived and live on social welfare.

    In the 1991 election, the liberal party (Peoples Party – the liberals) did also a good and the chairman and party leader Bengt Westerberg said that he would not support a Center-Right government if this Lucia Treaty would be launched. The Conservatives said yes and mass immigration continued.

    The propaganda begins…..

    Now the media saw their mistakes during the period of 1991 and 1994 with helping this populist New Democracy to power. They saw a xenophobic populist monster – and the party became more and more racialist. Mostly because it was governed by two “high ranked” celebrities, Count. Ian Wachtmeister and Record label director Bert Karlsson that could not agree upon which way they would go – when it came to economical matters. When they jumped ship, it became racialist in a Skinhead Neo Nazi sense and the party imploded.

    All the 1994 it was a long debate about what we Swedes contributed to “Nazism” and how until the late 1970 we institutionalized people on basis of race and sexuality. We had also a hard assimilation policy, together with some separatist policies.

    All Swedes that criticized “immigration” or talked in cultural conservative tones was banned. The largest newspapers also begun to “purify” doctrine and “old conservatives” and “nationalists” were fired from their jobs. From 1994 until 2001 there were a long indoctrination in multiculturalism and inquisition of people. In these deep black waters the Swedish Democrats rise. They were founded in 1988. The begun as a “racialist party” but in 2001, Swedish Democrats said no to “Ethno nationalism” and National Democrats were formed.

    Now Swedish Democrats with their cultural conservatism is the largest enemy of the Swedish elites – because they will take Sweden back to 1991 and the Lucia Treaty. When this happens the tides will be turned in Sweden. In Scandinavia you can never become a “real” citizen, if you are not white, I will go further and say that among common people, even adopted children are not seen as Scandinavians.

    The racial aspect here is very deep rooted, even though people will not say it out loud. Our politicians and media do their best to say that “all people” can be Swedes and Sweden can continue to be Sweden without Swedes. But, let’s face it – no one believes it for real. I think that Scandinavia will be the first “white” part of the world that will go strongly on ethno nationalism.

    The Swedish Democrats are just the beginning and that is why our elites try their best to portrait them as “neo-Nazis”. Here our elites see “language exams” for citizenship as “racism”. Our elites are so extreme in their multiculturalism and support for Islamic causes, that they will never survive in the future.

    To answer Mr. Day breakers question if Swedish Media and the rest of elite support the whites that are suffering in South Africa and Zimbabwe? No, they do not. They are critical of Mugabe, like the rest of the European Union. In South Africa, whites are portrait as evil. As I have written in my Post – our elites are so extreme here in Sweden that our neightbours in Denmark, Finland and Norway, sometimes talk about us as “security threat”. We even give refugee statues to people that America and Israel sees as “terrorists”. All our elites are “Anti-white”. The “Right Wing” part is Pro-America, Pro-Israel and pro-Judaism. The Left Wings part is anti-America, anti-Israel and pro Islam. Only, Swedish democrats seem to be pro-white, or rather pro Swedes. The politics here go by cultural lines, not racial lines.

    To answer Mr. Joe Webb comment. I’m very aware of the racial aspect. I do think the majority has to be of the same ethnic origin for a cultural to be sustainable. I also believe race is partly behind why cultures are different, the other part of culture is social constructed and has emerged through many different variables; some of them may be geography or random events.

    Personally I see America and its “Unversialism” (promoted by American constitution) as a threat to Europe and European interests. Your country (no offense) has been partly corrupt from the beginning. I’m aware that it was not the founding fathers plan that America would become a multicultural and multiethnic country – and that its constitution was very well suited for white Christians and maybe even responsible for the success of USA. Today, American Unversialism institutionalized is a way that does not promote “white emancipation”; it is rather in the way.

    I will go so far to say that if the west will survive, in any way – USA need to fall. The First World War, the Second World War, your war against communism and today’s wars in the Middle East for Israel and for neo-conservative universalistic causes is evidence that USA is a danger for survival of the western civilization. That you did fight the war against Serbians and for Albanian and Bosnian Muslims says it all – America is a politically dysfunctional country.

    I do not think America will in any time soon move towards a paleo-conservatism, therefore I think European will face a conflict in the future with USA, when we defend our land, values and people from 80-100 years of massimmigration.

    It is sad, but maybe it is best for us all if America end up in ethnic conflict or becomes similar to Brazil. All whites in America have racial and cultural lines from Europe. Europe is the home of whites living in Diaspora – maybe South African whites, American Whites , Australian Whites need to accept it, That our own imperialistic history need be reverted – even if it leads to the fall of many “now” western historical countries outside Europe.

  46. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    June 20, 2010 - 9:16 pm | Permalink

    to T. Northman. enjoyed your report. I was in Norway 2 years ago and talked to many folks. The over 40 folks were receptive to my racialist ideas and observations. A 40ish gal said, “We were very naive”, summing up her thoughts about immigration.

    Did I see a report about a Norwegian nationalist party forming last year, with a good lookin’ woman leading it?

    Per your comments about cultural nationalism and racial nationalism, you are probably correct that the first step is cultural nationalism. However, do not forget that Culture comes from the genes. If not from the genes, then where? Obviously I am not talking about a feral child developing full blown like something from the head of Zeus. We grow up and learn from our culture. However, what feels alien we sooner or later discard, just as the evolutionary biologists/psychologists remark that the older we get as individuals, the more we realize our true selves…that is, we shed false identities and ideas, and get more congruent with our genes. LIkewise, White Culture is “bio-culture”. It develops over time and every individual learns but he learns and accepts only what is real…in the final analysis. This of course depends on Freedom and relative protection from propaganda.

    I think your own “cultural conservatism” will get more racial as time goes by. Try living with blacks for example and see how well you get on with cannibals. Joe Webb

  47. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 20, 2010 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    T. Nordman says: “The largest problem of Scandinavia is not “Judaism”; it is rather that our elite are former communists or post-socialists. They always support the “weaker” part and Palestinians and Kurds are the weaker part in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Turkish-Kurdish conflict.”

    Do they support suffering Whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa?

  48. T. Nordman's Gravatar T. Nordman
    June 20, 2010 - 6:44 pm | Permalink

    The only state in Europe was 100 percent of the parliamentary supports a Turkish membership is Sweden. France said no years ago. Sweden is also together with Norway heavily critical of Israel. Not on racial or religious lines, rather that Scandinavia embraces international socialism – that has since the 1960s condemn Israel.

    Just a couple a weeks ago, a professor in Practical Philosophy at Stockholm University (Torbjorn Tannsjo) wrote a column in the tabloid Expressen (If I remember correctly) that Jews should condemn the Israel attack. Some prominent Jews (as always) went a bit angry calling for anti-Semitism.

    All the media (even the Jewish owned) had for weeks condemn Israel – some even called it a racist state. Tannsjo got of course a change to present arguments against the charges of anti-Semitism. Sweden is a pretty interesting country, anti-Semitism is very low here and the Jews (which are about 0, 1 right now) are about to fully assimilate. The intermarriage rate here is extremely high among Jews. Interesting enough the core of “Jews” seems to be stronger than ever.

    The largest problem of Scandinavia is not “Judaism”; it is rather that our elite are former communists or post-socialists. They always support the “weaker” part and Palestinians and Kurds are the weaker part in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Turkish-Kurdish conflict. Our Muslim population in Sweden is now close to 350 000 or even 500 000 individuals.

    They are on the beginning of being an important part of the socialist elites voting base. These Muslims are in fact highly critical of Judaism and Jews. If we see beyond “Expo” (founded by socialists and some Jews and is partly pro Israel) – most of our “anti-racist” organizations is heavily pro Islam.

    A couple of months ago, Jews (just one family actually, but not according to the media) had begun to leave Malmo after being attacked by Muslim Youths. It is the most heavily Muslim populated city in Scandinavia. The highest ranked political official in the city, social democratic Ilmar Reepalu made some “insensitive” comments and claimed that if Jews did not like the multiculturalism in Malmo, they could move to Israel. He is fully depended on Muslim voters, so his comment was very rational.

    To say that you see Zionism as racism is fully accepted in Sweden – but Mr. Reepalu went beyond that. When some Jewish officials and more known neo-conservative politicians called him an anti-Semite, the social democratic party felt that they had to act. The Christian-Democratic leader Goran Hagglund in a debate with the Social Democrat leader Mona Sahlin (called Mona Muslim or Halal Hippi among political antagonist) turned the debate calling Goran Hagglund Islamophobic. The hardcore lefty’s blogs went all out defending Reepalu.

    A year ago, an immigration handling officer at Migrationsverket (Immigration board) almost got sacked because he supported Israel and Zionism on his blog. When Jewish organizations go out talking about hate – they always begin with “Islamophobia” and then, in the and they say things like “If this cultural conservative wins, Muslims will be marginalized…Jadda, Jadda, Jadda…who will be next, maybe the Jews”.

    In fact, Islamophobia is a much worse accusation, then anti-Semitism. When I was in undergraduate School, I wrote a PM positive to Israel and America and critical of Iran and Palestinian organizations like Hamas. That was not popular and my professor said that I will “pass”, but my views were reactionary.

    Jinge is one of the most popular leftwing bloggers in Sweden. His blog is read by thousands of communists and socialists. Interesting enough among Green Party and Socialist Party (Vansterpartiet – left party, members) and what he writes about Jews and Israel seem to be “okay”, not politically correct, but “okay” among the elites. If you give the same critic of Muslims – you will be called Islamophobic.

    Of course of politicians and journalist do not only dislike Israel, they practically hate America and the indigenous people of Europe. Now, some Jews have begun to co-operate with the so called “Xenophobic” parties, because the situation is going out of hand, mostly for the white Christian population of Europe, but also for Jews.

    I think Kevin MacDonald is correct here, even though he just analyze American politics towards Turkey. I see the same patterns in Europe. The Jews in Europe (especially the middle class Jews) sees that Islam is maybe leading to Auschwitz – so they have begun to hold hand with these “nationalist” parties. The Danish people’s party is heavily Zionist. The Swedish Democrats are more interesting – because they oppose circumcision and Kosher (seeing it as barbaric), and those who are most vocal are two Jewish brothers (father is Swedish and Christian), that both have high positions in the party.

    They are not raised Jewish, but one of them is very active in a Zionist cause. According to my analysis of one their writings, they wants to make the Swedish people into some kind ethno-nationalist in a Zionist sense, but with one condition, heavily support for Israel and Jews.

    I see a future where Islam will become the sole enemy of Europe – and I see a future of inclusive nationalism, based on authoritarian liberalism. Multiculturalism and relativism seem to be changed to a new “neo-conservative” and “pro-Israel” future for Europe.

    But when you end multiculturalism and cultural relativism and replace it with “natural rights” – built on partly liberalism, you take your first step towards nationalism. This is why the European elite need to have multiculturalism has an ideology, when you leave it; you open your door for ethnic emancipation. Yes, I think “multi ethnicity” as an ideology, will continue to be “untouchable” for a long time, but the first step for white Christian emancipation is to get rid of cultural relativism and multiculturalism as a state ideology – then we will see this “Clash of Civilization” that Samuel P. Huntington wrote about. Why? Millions of Muslims and Africans will never accept to live in a Europe that deprives them from their culture – and force them to become liberal and Zionist.

    The extremism of multiculturalism is Scandinavia is about to end. Denmark begun, now are Norway and Finland taken their first step and in September, cultural nationalist party (argue cultural assimilation) – will enter the Swedish Parliament. It will take many, many years but the tide will slowly turn.

    If we look at Netherlands, we saw Geert Wilders, a libertarian atheistic Zionist and critical of Islam is growing beyond the imagination of the elite Dutch elite after the national election a week or two weeks ago. Yes, Geert Wilder’s politics is far from ethno-nationalism. It is rather cultural nationalism, but there cannot be ethno-nationalism if not cultural nationalism is accepted in the political discourse. This is why we see the failure of all ethno nationalist political parties and groups. There have to be a discursive consensus on cultural nationalism – only then we will see the rise of ethno nationalist parties.

    I’m not an ethno nationalist, rather a cultural conservative like Mr. Paul Gottfried, but I must say that I learn a lot of reading Occidental Observer. Im sorry about my english, I wrote this in a hurry and it is not my first langague.

  49. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    June 20, 2010 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    They have the multi-faith?

  50. Paul DiBenedetto's Gravatar Paul DiBenedetto
    June 20, 2010 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

    Nothing is funnier than listening to anyone named Berman spout out moralist hypocrisy.

    First there’s…
    Matvei Berman one of the founders of the Gulag death camp system.

    Then there’s Boris Berman: executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police

    And then in Poland we have the Politburo commander Jacob Berman.

    So a Jew named Berman has no idea about the crimes committed by his own relatives. And yet he takes the moral high ground.

    I guess he listens to the same Jewish contolled media that represses discussion and events in the Soviet Union, and the Jewish penchant for communism.

  51. giovanni's Gravatar giovanni
    June 20, 2010 - 3:28 pm | Permalink

    You cannot do anything as “Americans white nationalists” because of media and money, but the logic of the jewish elite is to exaggerate, miscalculate and it misfires sooner or later.

    If you read history the “Jewish system” is the most successful ever invented for an elite to prosper in every age and country, the most flexible and resilient, but has an inner flaw that leads periodically to disaster

    Paul Johnson “History of the Jews” is a mainstream book approved by censorship, but hides lots of information, the jews are always oppressed and suffering almost at every page, but also “always rich”, at the times of Seneca and Nero, in Babylon when the Roman Empire falls, and in 1100 with the crusades in Bisanzium and in Spain in 1300…. Johnson does not try to reconcile those facts, but the reader wonders how does it work

    In the “30 years War” in Germany they prosper financing and supplying all armies fighitng and are the only people that do not suffer any looting and killing because all Kings order to pillage the towns surrendering except for their jewish quarters. In 165r0 they are financing both sides of the biggest Europe experienced

    If you read it though you notice that they reach a point of maximum influence and power and then fall down hard,
    in Rome and Egypt before the rise of Christianism,
    in muslim Babylon after the fall of Rome,
    in Spain before Isabella kicks them out
    in Western Europe before the Renaissance expulsions
    in Germany before Hitler
    in Eastern Europe before the late Stalin turns against them and then finally all russians, poles, ungarians kicks them out….

    In all those places they started from almost zero, went high and fell.

    As of now in all muslim countries and Turkey they are almost totally expelled, and physically in danger except for Kurdistan, they gained Gerusalem but they cannot go from Karachi to Marrakesh

    Eastern Europe, Russia, Poland, the Baltics and Russia are full of harsh attitudes against them and”white nationalst” are more or less OK

    in Germany they are very few… and so in Austria and there are not many in the rest of Western Europe although influential in the UK and less so in France. Muslim presence is now a problem for them, muslim famous comedians in Paris say things in theaters that in America have you erased from society, and the big immigration is now from EasternEurope, the people that in the world like them less. Do not ask Ukrainians, Poles and Russians what they think of jews…. Maybe they miscalculated, because they lost the Middle East, Eastern Europe and are not many in Western Europe

    The USA, Canada, UK and Australia is their kingdom, they own the media and wall street, the academia and then lawyers and doctors…

    But they took big chances with 911….and also the financial game of Wall Street of off-shoring and off-sourcing and immigration that is destroyng the US economy for the benefit of the global elite…and pushing Israel interest ahead always in Iraq, Afganistan, Palestine, Iran

    The logic of supporting Israel that gets more and more aggressive because it cannot stop and has always to up the ante like Germany 1940, the logic of the financial globalization and immigration that destroys the US economy and the dollar do not allow for pause… things are coming to a head… what if the US military more people think at Mossad and 911 and meanwhile Israel has to attack Iran… while the Global Financial Crisis destroys the dollar and brings Depression…

    You cannot do anything as “Americans white nationalists” (which is a wrong name by the way) but the logic of the jewish elite is quite destructive, it brings (or contributes a lot) to war and depression. Israel is leading them into trouble

  52. Kratos's Gravatar Kratos
    June 20, 2010 - 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Most people don’t know, but Turkey is an economic power house likely to succeed major European economies. They have the population, multi-faith, and at the cross roads of major three continents although Americans always think big of themselves.

    We have to find a nicer balance to the emerging Muslims like Turkey without causing them aggro as our enemies would like us to appear.

    These Jewish people see Turkey as a prelude for Jewishtan joining the EU as they would very much like to validate their claim to being “White” like some guy here on a 24/7 bases. If Jewishtan is already a baby in USA, why shouldn’t their Jewishtan be the baby of Europe is the logic inside Jewish heads?

  53. James's Gravatar James
    June 20, 2010 - 11:10 am | Permalink

    Raising the issue of the Armenian genocide,
    one of the great crimes of the 20th century,
    is very important as it may offer at last the
    opportunity to shed light on that terrible
    event in history and maybe give mankind an
    opportunity to learn such lessons as are
    impregnated in the truthful details of that
    very sad history.
    Luckily, the magnum opus on this historical
    horror, the Turkish genocide of the Armenians,
    is waiting patiently in the shadows for just such
    a movement, at last, toward interest in
    frankly delving into just what did happen,
    how and why:
    The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians
    by Christopher Jon Bjerknes
    Let the light shine in on this thorn in the side
    of human history. Justice is no longer possible
    for the Armenian victims; but the delayed light
    of justice can benefit us, the living, and illuminate
    our future course. Like ripe nuggets left too long
    on the tree of knowledge, the truth about the
    Armenian genocide is ripe and ready to be picked.
    see:
    The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians
    By Christopher Jon Bjerknes
    Enlarged Second Edition
    Complete 575 page book is available
    free online pdf:
    http://www.jewishracism.com/Jewish_Genocide_Enlarged.pdf

    from: author Bjerknes’ website: http://www.jewishracism.com

  54. Walter Duranty's Gravatar Walter Duranty
    June 20, 2010 - 10:52 am | Permalink

    Anything which further isolates Israel from the rest of the civilized world is a good thing. Maybe Turkey can read the writing on the wall, with regards to the death throes of Zionism, and doesn’t want to associate itself with a country marked for death and destruction?

  55. -jc's Gravatar -jc
    June 20, 2010 - 9:04 am | Permalink

    Talk about the left-liberal mass media of so called news and entertainment: http://www.YoungTurks.com.

  56. June 19, 2010 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    A metaphor is like a simile.

    Sent from my Android phone

  57. June 19, 2010 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    It seems the lesson of history is “What’s good for Jews, is bad for mostly everybody else”. Hence the inverse is also true. As Gentile fortunes wax, Jewish fortunes wane. Here is a brilliantly concise summary that speaks volumes in few words:

    THE JEW IN EUROPE
    Even The Coins Were Jewish
    We find the first Jews filtering into Europe some time before the Christian era, particularly in the region of Greece. The ancient Greeks spoke of these Asiatic invaders with considerable bitterness. Very quickly they spread throughout the Roman Empire and into Europe proper. The Jewish merchant, artisan, and slave trader appear on the Roman scene with increasing frequency after the second century A.D. and there can be no doubt that their position in the Roman world was one of growing importance even as the Empire drifted to destruction. Under Justinian, says the Jewish Encyclopedia,

    “They enjoyed full religious liberty, in return for which they assumed all a citizen’s duty toward the state; minor offices were also open to them. Only the synagogues were exempt from the duty of quartering soldiers. The trade in slaves constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews, and decrees against this traffic were issued in 335, 336, 339, 384, etc.”

    [Funk & Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia, page 460, vol. 10]

    Seneca, in his writings, bitterly assailed the Romans of his day for aping the Jews, and some historians (notably Gibbon in his monumental Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) have ascribed the downfall of Rome to their corrupting influence. Nero’s wife, Poppaea, was a converted Jewess. As Rome reeled into decline and final collapse, and as the Dark Ages descended over Western civilization, we find the Jew taking a strangle-hold over what remained of European commerce. Says Encyclopedia Britannica:

    “. . . there was an inevitable tendency for him to specialize in commerce, for which his acumen and ubiquity gave him special qualifications. In the dark ages the commerce of western Europe was largely in his hands, in particular the slave trade, and in Carolingian cartularies Jew and merchant are used as almost interchangeable terms.”

    [Encyclopedia Britannica, page 57, vol. 13—1947.]

    This hold over European commerce finally became so utterly complete that few gentiles engaged in trade at all; it had become almost entirely a Jewish monopoly. In Poland and Hungary, the coins bore Jewish inscriptions …

    Throughout the Medieval period, ["Dark Ages," "Medieval Period," and "Middle Ages" are synonymous terms used to describe the period of decline which characterized western civilization between 500-1300 A.D.] which lasted from 500 A.D. to 1300 A.D., the Jew merchant was dominant all over Europe (except Scandinavia, where he was never permitted to enter) and this dominance included control over the eastern trade routes to the Levant. There was to be no relief from this situation until the Jews were evicted from Europe in the century directly preceding the Renaissance.

    (…)

    Expelled
    The Fourth Lateran Council restricted Jewish commercial advantage but it did not end the Jewish problem. Beginning in the latter part of the 13th century, one European country after another expelled its Jewish population as the only final solution to the problem. First to take the step was England which banned them in 1290. Fifteen years later in 1306 the French followed suit. In steady succession the various states of Europe emulated this example with Spain being one of the last to enforce the ban in 1492. The situation in Spain is worth noting. Says Encyclopedia Britannica: [page 57, vol. 13 - 1947]:

    “… The 14th century was the golden age of their history in Spain. In 1391 the preaching of a priest of Seville, Fernando Martenez, led to the first general massacre of the Jews who were envied for their prosperity and hated because they were the king’s tax collectors.”

    Ferdinand and Isabella, after uniting Spain and driving out the Moors turned their attention to the Jewish problem, with the result that they were evicted completely in 1492. In 1498 Portugal evicted its Jewish population also.

    (…)

    Back to Poland
    By 1500 all of Western Europe except northern Italy, parts of Germany, and the Papal possessions around Avignon, had been rid of the Jewish invasion. For a while, at least, Europe was free of the Jews; not until 1650 did they return in any numbers. Says Encyclopedia Britannica: [page 57-58, vol. 13 - 1947.]

    “The great mass of the Jewish people were thus to be found once more in the East, in the Polish and Turkish empires . . The few communities suffered to remain in western Europe were meanwhile subjected at last to all the restrictions which earlier ages had usually allowed to remain as an ideal; so that in a sense, the Jewish dark ages may be said to begin with the Renaissance.”

    THE RENAISSANCE
    As the Jew Departed …
    The period marked by the evictions—1300 to 1650—also marks the period of the Renaissance which broke over Europe as the Jews departed. Starting at first in the trading cities of northern Italy in about 1300, there began a great rebirth of culture and learning which at first was based almost entirely on the writings of the ancient Greeks and Romans. Very quickly this renascent culture spread over Europe and when the age had ended, in about 1650, Europe was by comparison with her former status, enlightened and civilized. Quite obviously all this could not have taken place had it not been for a great upsurge of commercial activity which occurred simultaneously with, and as an adjunct of, the Renaissance. Not until the nations of Europe had wrested commercial control from the ghetto did this rebirth of western civilization occur.

    …”Behind Communism”, Frank L. Britton, 1952.

    What is most striking at least to me is that European history has a distinct biological component; once her parasites were expelled, the host’s labours became entirely devoted to its own interests and the organism’s health returned.

    The Jewish Golden Age was Europe’s Dark Age; the Jewish Dark Age was Europe’s Renaissance. From no less an authority than the Encyclopedia Brittanica.

    Let us all work together to usher in our next Renaissance.

  58. me's Gravatar me
    June 19, 2010 - 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Today, and throughout history, what’s good for the Judeos is bad for the People, and what’s good for the People is bad for the Judeos
    Think of a candidate who is ‘good for the people’ – what would they do?
    stop immigration
    adapt an America first foreign policy
    pursue a sound fiscal policy.

    All these things are disasters for organized jewery. Thus, they label candidates ‘anti semitic’ despite not overtly doing anything ‘anti jewish’

  59. June 19, 2010 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

    @ me says: June 19, 2010 at 12:20 PM: “One curious aspect of this – the monarchs they consider ‘good for jews’ were often the most corrupt and hostile to commoners – and the monarchs they considered ‘bad’ for Jews – like Isabel of Spain – were good for commoners, the people and the country and usually anti-corruption…”

    Hence it follows that today’s organized Jewry in America love the elitist, Statist-Corporatist neocon Right and the limousine liberal Left, and fear and loathe the middle American “rubes.”

    This is why Jewish nationalism/elitist Jewry doesn’t fit or belong in America or any other democracy: they hate and fear the People and their traditions and customs, thus they hate the concept of People’s rights, free speech and equal representation. Deep down, they believe if the People take power, the first thing they will do is persecute the Jews (which becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy/cycle manifesting from Jewry’s own attitudes and behavior.)

    Thus, the way they have subverted democracy in America is to seize and buy off the elites and their institutions, using the mainstream media to create a false consciousness in the masses that they are still indeed living in a democracy, even as it is closer to a plutocracy/kleptocracy largely run by organized Jewry, ideological Zionists, Judeophile lefties and Judeo-supremacist neocons/Bushcons (my shorthand for all: “the Judeos”) for Jewry’s benefit and the benefit of its corrupt partners.

    Today, and throughout history, what’s good for the Judeos is bad for the People, and what’s good for the People is bad for the Judeos.

    This is why to my mind it is inevitable that sooner or later, the Judeos will lose. The only question is how much suffering and loss we will have to endure before they taken down and put on trial for treason, or packed off to Israel.

  60. me's Gravatar me
    June 19, 2010 - 12:20 pm | Permalink

    for the SWC, european history is all about the Jews, who expelled them, who catered them, who helped them, who didn’t help them etc.
    One curious aspect of this – the monarchs they consider ‘good for jews’ were often the most corrupt and hostile to commoners – and the monarchs they considered ‘bad’ for Jews – like Isabel of Spain – were good for commoners, the people and the country and usually anti-corruption…

  61. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    June 19, 2010 - 10:06 am | Permalink

    Alex makes a few good points.

    Imagine if the Tea Party behaved like that.
    Or a BNP gathering.

    The media would have condemned them as violent thugs.
    But because they`re a protected group -a minority, the media says nothing.

  62. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    June 19, 2010 - 9:54 am | Permalink

    Hey guys, did you see the illegal aliens rioting after Lakers win in LA ?

    http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel#p/u/3/z9lYdmobSrk

  63. omop's Gravatar omop
    June 19, 2010 - 8:37 am | Permalink

    What is the blind spot that keeps “non-jews” from acknowledging and adjusting to the following ideology/rational of all Jews? And which has been articulated over the past 4000 years, as “La Difference”.

    “The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews — all of them in all different levels — is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”

  64. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    June 19, 2010 - 7:59 am | Permalink

    Turkey in the EU was obviously a win-win situation for Jews: The end of Europe as a Christian civilization with an ethnic core combined with a moderating influence on the Muslims that would benefit Israel.

    The democratisation the the EC insisted on loosened the grip of the Kermalists. (All in all rather similar to Algeria where European advice to have elections took no account of the actual level of support Islamist parties would have if allowed to organize.) Europeans’ demand for democratisation made the profound social changes, like the emancipation of women very difficult to achieve and hence was in practice a barrier to Turkey being admitted to the EC.

    Israel’s alliance was with the Kermalist generals but the power of the generals has been broken. Paying price for EU follies The author is correct to doubt that the EU leaders were sincere about letting Turkey become a full member in the forseeable future ( as already said I suspect that’s because they don’t dare, not because of any principle of religious or ethnic defence).

    Some say the Turkish ‘secularist’ elite is heavily larded with the descendants of Jews: The Dönme

  65. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    June 19, 2010 - 6:42 am | Permalink

    Europe is not so much ‘slumbering’, as it is anaesthetised by the overwhelming liberal/Marxist Jewish victory of 1945. Ditto in spades for the English speaking White world.

  66. June 19, 2010 - 6:31 am | Permalink

    Chris Moore says:

    “These Jewish nationalists are so shamelessly and transparently self-serving and opportunistic, its a wonder that they have any friends whatsoever. ”

    Oy veh, goiische kopf!

    “Sincerity” is for stupid Aryan squareheads.

    The Judaic Two-Step, as I call it, the positioning of Jews in positions of power ON BOTH SIDES is what allows the Jew to win every time.

    Ever notice how the leaders of every “political movement” are Jews?

    Sure, the liberals and Democrats. But don’t forget the Republican “Neo-cons.” Even the American Nazi Party [David White, nee Weiss]

    And if not Jews, then don’t forget the Jew Within. Dead Jew Worshipping Christian Zionists, for example. And only three Jews on the Supreme Court? Guess again: So-called “Catholic” Scalia worships the Talmud as “the basis of our American law,” and of course Thomas is his hand puppet, so make that 5 Jews; game over.

  67. THM's Gravatar THM
    June 19, 2010 - 6:19 am | Permalink

    Generally the Western Mainstream Media suppresses news of the vicious oppression of Christians in Islamic countries (but gives endless coverage of any real or imagined slights to Muslims in European ethnic countries).

    Here is an exception to that — a Sixty Minutes report about how the Turkish government is treating Patriarch Batholomew and Orthodox Christians):

    http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6001717n&tag=api

  68. kirk's Gravatar kirk
    June 19, 2010 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    “Ironically, in the fifteenth century, when European monarchs expelled the Jews, it was Moslem Turkey that provided them a welcome…. During the Holocaust, when Europe was slaughtering its Jews, it was Turkish consuls who extended protection to fugitives from Vichy France and other Nazi allies… ”

    (Not so) Ironically, for the SWC, european history is all about the Jews, who expelled them, who catered them, who helped them, who didn’t help them etc.etc.

  69. Amazed's Gravatar Amazed
    June 18, 2010 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

    We must remember that this sort of tac is not taken on a whim. There will be a strategy behind this move .Probably to remind Turkey that in a coming war in the Middle East , be careful or we will clobber you with the full force of the our American controlled military.The parasite maneuvers the host.

  70. me's Gravatar me
    June 18, 2010 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Ironically, in the fifteenth century, when European monarchs expelled the Jews, it was Moslem Turkey that provided them a welcom
    Notice:
    a. they don’t mention WHY they were being expelled.. the implication here is it was bad to expel jews because they were jews, no matter what they did.
    b. Muslim “turkey” – eg the Ottman Empire, was brutally supressing Christians, enslaving them, forcing women to be sex slaves, stealing children from famlies for the Jannisaries and slave trade.. but THAT doesn’t matter – the ottoman empire was good because they treated jews well.

    angry jew if you are reading : this more than anything illustrates mainstream organized jewish community hostility towards the christian west and utter indifference to our well being

  71. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    June 18, 2010 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Lets review some Turkish actions, and some Jewish responses to those actions:

    1821 – The Patriarch of Constantinople, the Eastern Orthodox equivalent of the Pope, is murdered by the Turks. A mob of Jews drags his dead body through the streets of Constantinople and dumps it in the Bosporus.

    1822 – The Turks almost completely wipe out the Greek population of Chios, killing 20,000 and enslaving 50,000. Jewish slave traders buy Greek slaves at bargain prices.

    1876 – Turkish irregular troops massacer up to 60,000 Bulgarians. When the Russian send troops to liberate Bulgaria, Prime Minister Benjamin D’Israeli threatens to go to war against Russia.

    1894 – Turks massacer 100,000+ Armenians. Jews and Donme of Thessalonika and Constantinople stay loyal to the Ottoman Empire through it all.

    1915 – Turks massacer 1.5 million Armenians. Donme occupy important positions in the government responsible, Constantinople Jews stay loyal to the Ottoman Empire until the very end.

    1974 – Turks invade Cyprus, force 180,000 Greek Cypriotes to flee their homes. “Kissinger exerted himself very strongly to protect Ankara from any congressional reprisal for this outright violation of international law, and promiscuous and illegal misuse of US weaponry.” (London Gaurdian, 2/26/01)

    2010 – Turks send food and medicine to Gaza. “Erdogan government has put an end for this friendship.”

  72. HA's Gravatar HA
    June 18, 2010 - 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Re: “No Muslims allowed,” it seems Albania is well on the way to EU accession, and then the Mafia enclave known as Kosovo, already in effect an EU protectorate. What isn’t Friedman telling?

  73. TGD's Gravatar TGD
    June 18, 2010 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think that the previous generation of Israeli leaders would have discarded Turkey as a friend and ally so readily. This new generation of Zionist leaders and their US lackeys have no qualms at all about denigrating the Turks and gleefully rubbing in the contempt by broadcasting that stupid parody of “We are the World.” Before the flotilla incident, the deputy foreign minister, Danny Ayalon, deeply humiliated the Turkish ambassador to Israel by seating him on a couch much lower than the Ayalon’s chair while he scolded the ambassador about a TV program produced by a private Turkish company. The old inhibitions that once moderated Jewish behavior in the gentile world have gone by the wayside.

    Have you seen the movie Midnight Express about conditions inside a Turkish prison? Any European who still feels that Turkey should join the EU should be made to watch it.

  74. admin's Gravatar admin
    June 18, 2010 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

    @Anonymous: Good point. The troubles between Israel and Turkey began some time ago. The famous incident with the Turkish ambassador was a big deal:
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/peres-humiliation-of-turkey-envoy-does-not-reflect-israel-s-diplomacy-1.261381
    This article in Salon also emphasizes the turnabout on the genocide issue:
    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/16/israel_lobby_genocide_armenia

    What to make of the rush of Jewish leaders — from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Washington to a city councilman named Jack Weiss in Los Angeles — coming forward in the past few weeks to divulge their role in genocide denial?

    “Frankly, [it] was not becoming for Jews, given that we have likewise been victims of genocide,” Weiss wrote in an inelegant piece in the Jewish Journal.

    How to account for these sudden confessions? A pang of remorse? A cleansing of the soul? I’m afraid not. These aren’t confessions, at all. Rather, they are reminders of the debt Turkey owes Israel — and they come with teeth bared.

  75. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    June 18, 2010 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    This is not new in relation to the Gaza blockade and Israeli slaughter of the flotilla. The JTA story linked is dated March 2010. According to information from Thomas.LOC.gov for H.Res. 252, Berman signed on as a co-sponsor on March 17, 2009, when the bill was introduced. The only members to sign on as cosponsors recently are Dean Heller of Nevada on June 10 and Michael Michaud of Maine on June 17.

  76. me's Gravatar me
    June 18, 2010 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

    I’m not a superstitious person, but it seems to me America has been under a darkening shadow since Jewry’s ascension to the helm
    there is something deeply disturbing about their particular brand of ‘evil’ – i think its almost ‘archetypal’ ”evil’ – their behavior, actions and appearance resonate with our folk and religious depictions of evil – ie – the troll, the witch, the devil – look at traditional depictions of evil and compare them to prominent askanazi – you can practically use the current jewish elite to illustrate a grims fairy tale book’s evil characters.

  77. me's Gravatar me
    June 18, 2010 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

    the Young Turks who engineered the Aremenian holocaust were themselves crypto-Jews.
    and as with multiculti programs here and in bolshivik russia -the curious result: a competing ethnic group is knocked out and easy to control inferiors are brought in.

  78. June 18, 2010 - 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Although the rejection of Turkey doesn’t change the present suicidal dynamic in Europe, it will certainly slow down the process

    The question has never been put to popular referendum. Like mass immigration and “hate” laws it is imposed from above by people who expect to profit. It is a genocidal dynamic, not suicidal.

  79. me's Gravatar me
    June 18, 2010 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    In reality doubt the Euro elites would have dared let Turkey become a full member of the E
    But it would have happened anyway because, at the time it would have been ‘good for jews’ now that it no longer is, it will not..

    The selfishness and hypocrisy is stunning.. stunning.

  80. June 18, 2010 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

    From Brief History of Turkish Jews:

    Since 1492, through five centuries, the Ottoman sultans and the modern day Turkish Republic, welcomed the Jews and offered them a safe haven from persecution in the European countries. The Ottoman Empire at its zenith became one the largest empires in World History covering most of Mediterranean basin region extending from North Africa to Eastern Europe. It has been suggested that one of the characteristics that extended the domination of the Ottoman Empire was its allowance of religious freedom for the different nationalities and minorities under its rule. While many European nations expelled, persecuted or tried to convert the Jews under their dominion, the Turkish people of the Ottoman Empire, remained as an outstanding example of tolerance of different nationalities with different religions.

    The presentation above sometimes sounds unusual to strangers who may have heard Turkey only in the context of conquests of the Ottoman Empire.

    When I first ran into this page several months ago it was entirely positive – “the jews” and Turks, bestest friends forever. Now it begins with a bitter disclaimer, citing the flotilla fiasco and ending like so:

    These pages were titled “Turkish-Jewish Friendship Over 500 Years”. Erdogan government has put an end for this friendship. So this title was removed from this site.

    The next step is emach she’mo – May His Name Be Erased.

  81. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    June 18, 2010 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    “nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.”

    Now if only he’d admit that nothing justifies Jews turning a blind eye to the reality their role in East European Communist crimes against humanity.

  82. June 18, 2010 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    Additionally, let’s not forget the reports that many of the Young Turks who engineered the Aremenian holocaust were themselves crypto-Jews. In fact, there are a couple of books about the Dönme — Sephardic Jews who converted to Islam but maintained their secret Jewish identity and associations. Here’s a passage from a magazine article that encapsulates the history and the books called The Other Secret Jews from the Jewish magazine Tablet.

    “Most important, several Dönme were leading members of the Committee for Union and Progress, the revolutionary party known as the Young Turks, who in 1908 forced the Sultan to grant a constitution. The Dönme, like Jews and Freemasons, sympathized with the CUP’s scientific, reformist program, though Baer emphasizes that the CUP was not a Dönme party—any more than the Russian Bolsheviks, though they included many Jews, were a Jewish party. Even so, some prominent Young Turks were Dönme, including the editor of the Party’s newspaper and the finance minister in the new CUP government.”

    Funny how Jewish conspirators love to brag about prominent roles played by Jews who organized as Jews in plots for revolutionary upheaval that end in mass murder, but deny that Judeofascism plays any role whatsoever in their murderous outcomes.

    It’s also interesting that these diaspora Jewish revolutionary groups demand constitutions supposedly guaranteeing equal rights for all, but then implement governments that end up securing special rights and privileges for Jewish cliques that go on to carry out mass murder of non-Jews (and Jewry then professes to believe that history has been so rough on the Jewish people simply because they are different.) And in the case of Israel, the Jews refuse to write and implement a constitution at all because the articles of the state already grant special favoritism to Jews, hence a constitution of rights for all citizens would water down Jewish privilege.

    Given all these facts, it becomes clear that not only are Gentile supporters of Judeofascism helping to set up Jewish-supremacist societies the world over, but they are also helping to cut the throats of their own progeny by doing so. I guess certain kinds of trash will do anything for money, power and temporal luxuries.

    From:
    http://www.judeofascism.com/2010/02/for-opportunistic-zionists-recognition.html

  83. June 18, 2010 - 10:12 am | Permalink

    ‘After long opposing any resolution on the Turkey’s genocide of Armenians, Rep. Howard Berman, a major force for Israel in the US Congress, suddenly supports a Congressional resolution, stating, “nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.’

    So why did the Jewish nationalist occupation in Congress, including Berman, turn a blind eye for decades? These Jewish nationalists are so shamelessly and transparently self-serving and opportunistic, its a wonder that they have any friends whatsoever. That so many politicians and Americans dance to their tune with a grin on their faces just goes to show how corrupt and decayed our society has become.

    “Those that bless the Jews are blessed by God,” so the saying goes. Like so many other phenomenon revolving around organized Jewry, it appears up is down and black is white in this case, too — meaning its more likely that those that bless the Jews are touched by Satan.

    I’m not a superstitious person, but it seems to me America has been under a darkening shadow since Jewry’s ascension to the helm.

  84. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    June 18, 2010 - 9:59 am | Permalink

    In reality doubt the Euro elites would have dared let Turkey become a full member of the EC; it would be difficult to disguise such a fateful step.

    The elites tend to avoid obviously drastic changes for ones which are more easily downplayed.

2 Trackbacks to "The Jews turn on Turkey"

  1. on June 22, 2010 at 1:47 pm
  2. on June 20, 2010 at 1:10 pm

Comments are closed.