Punched for Listening to Rap: Amy Biehl Syndrome Strikes Again

A  favorite theme of mine is “Amy Biehl Syndrome“, whereby whites who seek to prostrate themselves before non-white cultures end up getting physically hurt or killed in the process. The outcome is the opposite of what they expected: Amy Biehl, for instance, was hoping to be lauded as a liberal white hero who selflessly threw herself into the cause of black rights in South Africa. Instead, blacks killed her for being white. The reality of racial differences is a sharp rock that smashes the balsam-wood boats of racial equality and harmony fantasies. Another recent occurrence of “Amy Biehl Syndrome” took place in Florida, where a 14-year-old black male struck a 22-year-old white male for listening to rap music.

Whatever sincere enjoyment of rap music this white male had, it’s safe to presume that he also thought listening to rap would make him cool in the eyes of the world, especially blacks. He’s not one of those backward whites who listens to country music — oh no. He’s down with the brothas because he listens to rap. Of course, as Jared Taylor so eloquently notes, whites and blacks do not see these issues the same way. Other whites might admire this white male, but this black male obviously did not: he felt that the white male had invaded on his black turf. Rap “belongs” to blacks, not whites. So, he punched him. The lesson is that no matter what whites try, they’re not going to be appreciated by non-whites. Whether you’re Eugene Terreblanche or Amy Biehl, you stand a chance of getting hurt or killed by nothing more than proximity to non-whites. Does a move toward peaceful racial separation sound so radical by comparison?

Bookmark and Share

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

36 Comments to "Punched for Listening to Rap: Amy Biehl Syndrome Strikes Again"

  1. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 9, 2010 - 9:07 am | Permalink

    “For my part I doubt, though, that even if Lincoln had lived, that there would have been the will or the money found to expel the negroes from these shores. ”

    Yes, Lincoln himself said it would be an enormous undertaking, and would take decades to accomplish. It was obviously
    something his administration couldn’t have accomplished on it’s own. Also, recovering from a disasterous civil war was obviously the nation’s first priority. Then there was westward expansion.

    There was, however, at least a slim
    chance with Lincoln. None existed after his death.

  2. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 8, 2010 - 7:10 pm | Permalink

    In Lincoln’s defense, I’d have to say that we must remember that race as a biological concept was in a very primitive condition back then, particularly as applied to hominids. In many ways, it was more plausible back then to believe that negroes could be brought to assimilate White norms of behavior than it is today. Nowadays, after so much blood and treasure has been wasted trying to make humans out of them, there is really no excuse to believe such nonsense. But back then, scientific knowledge of these differences was close to zero. And as ever, the ability of the “talented tenth” of negroes to mimic human behavior offered a ready excuse to indulge White egalitarian fantasies. If one negro could ape human norms of conduct, so the thinking went, then maybe all of them could. Another contributory factor to egalitarian delusions was that the inevitable miscegenation that was occasioned by the physical propinquity of the two races made for the production of a confusing number of hybrids, and because of the one drop rule, these hybrids were all assigned to the negro race. A wholly unintended side effect was that the entire negro race then got credit for the accomplishments of these mixed-race people, which in some cases (George Washington Carver, or W.E.B. DuBois, for example) were of more than passing interest.

    For my part I doubt, though, that even if Lincoln had lived, that there would have been the will or the money found to expel the negroes from these shores. If White people, and especially the White elites responsible for importing them in the first place, had had that much regard for their posterity and for their race, they never would have imported them at all.

  3. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 8, 2010 - 3:40 pm | Permalink

    “…Lincoln was not racist out of principle. He was just a politician, and was apparently in the process of changing his mind about the negro when he was shot.”

    You’re probably right. His nickname was Honest Abe, not Sincere Abe. Still, I wonder if “changing his mind” wasn’t just a political ploy as well, and potentially a very lucrative one. Remember, there would soon be millions of new negro voters in America. Egalitarianism can only go so far to motivate people.

  4. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 8, 2010 - 10:55 am | Permalink

    Although he is on record as having said quite a few racist things, especially while campaigning, Lincoln was not racist out of principle. He was just a politician, and was apparently in the process of changing his mind about the negro when he was shot.

    “The amount of constituency, so to to [sic] speak, on which the new Louisiana government rests, would be more satisfactory to all, if it contained fifty, thirty, or even twenty thousand, instead of only about twelve thousand, as it does. It is also unsatisfactory to some that the elective franchise is not given to the colored man. I would myself prefer that it were now conferred on the very intelligent, and on those who serve our cause as soldiers.”
    - Abraham Lincoln, last public address, April 11, 1865.

    The egalitarian delusion runs deep in White people.

  5. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 8, 2010 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    I think the hope of separating white from black once and for all died at Ford’s Theatre. “Colonization societies” were common among liberal whites in the north during the Civil War, and I believe Lincoln would have tried to make good on his promise to repatriate freed slaves back to africa. One of his biggest problems with slavery was that it was the only institution in America where miscegenation took place.

    Thanks alot, John Wilkes Booth.

  6. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 3, 2010 - 6:27 pm | Permalink

    “You could very well ask yourself where is the Chinese Bach, the Indian Shakespeare or the Aztec Newton. Would you judge these races not to have great civilizations?”

    Aztecs – No. They produced nothing but some monumental architecture, and I suspect that was likely borrowed from somewhere else.

    Indians – Yes. But of course there was the Aryan influence there.

    Chinese – Yes, but quite different than ours, probably due to biological differences. Taking these differences into account, such luminaries as Confucius, or Chang Tzu, or Lao Tse, are impressive, if not directly comparable.

    “As far as the Palestinians and the Israelis go, there is such a thing as winning the battles and losing the war. It’s what happen to the States in Vietnam. Israeli kill ratio is much, much higher, but world opinion is on the Palestinian side.”

    Unlike Israel vs. the Palestinians, the U.S. experienced significant casualties in Vietnam. With 50,000 killed, it obviously lost a lot of battles.

    How you can pretend to know what “world opinion” is or why you think it favors the Palestinians, and even if that’s true, why you think it matters, escapes me.

    This much seems clear: If you never win any battles, you don’t win the war. What battles have the Palestinians ever won against the Jews?

  7. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    August 3, 2010 - 6:16 pm | Permalink

    All human ethnic groups & all plants and all animals are hybrids. But if they stay among themselves long enough, they are said to be “stabilized” and can be considered “pure” or “heirloom”. In the world of seedsavers, 50 years will do it. For human ethnic groups or races, I don’t know what the standard is – 50 generations, maybe?

  8. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 3, 2010 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

    “Of course [other races] are lacking because they don’t value what we value and therefore they don’t try to achieve in those areas.”

    So you think that negroes never produced a Newton, a Bach, or a Mozart, or indeed, even wheeled vehicles or writing, or a civilization past the mud or thatched hut stage, just because they weren’t trying? Just because they didn’t value such stuff?

    LOL. Helvena, you’re nuts!

    In my opinion, negroes are barely human; more like some kind of monkey. This occurred to Darwin, as well.

    “[Man] has diverged into distinct races, or as they may be more fitly called, sub-species. Some of these, such as the Negro and the European, are so distinct that, if specimens had been brought to a naturalist without any further information, they would undoubtedly have been considered as good and true species.”
    –Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed., John Murray, London, 1874, p. 929.

    When you get right down to it, I think they were probably misclassified.

    “… you are a white supremacist …”

    Yes.

    Life is struggle, and what is more, it is racial struggle. And in that contest, I want and expect Whites to emerge supreme.

  9. Kooler than Jesus's Gravatar Kooler than Jesus
    August 3, 2010 - 2:06 pm | Permalink

    Dude, am I harshing your mellow?

  10. Kooler than Jesus's Gravatar Kooler than Jesus
    August 3, 2010 - 1:31 pm | Permalink

    White-skinned peoples have to stop acting like they are the greatest thing that ever touched earth’s surface. That really is supremacist. We are merely one race among many that has certain gifts.

    Okay everybody, now let’s all hold hands and sing kumbaya!

  11. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 3, 2010 - 1:14 pm | Permalink

    “Angel, Dr. Chang Miao translated my edition, so unless you are more proficient in Chinese then Dr. Chang, I will rely on his word, unless you want to argue about experts which seems a waste of time.”

    Okay, after researching this a bit, I see that this phrase occurs in a book titled Art of War for Executives, which is not available on line. Seems kinda screwy that you accept that as authoritative, but whatever. I just found it puzzling that I could find no similar passage in the Giles translation, which is available free.

    Possibly the verse you cite may correspond to this, from chapter 9:

    40. If our troops are no more in number than the enemy, that is amply sufficient; it only means that no direct attack can be made. What we can do is simply to concentrate all our available strength, keep a close watch on the enemy, and obtain reinforcements.

    41. He who exercises no forethought but makes light of his opponents is sure to be captured by them.

    However that may, in no case is the word “respect” being used in the sense of veneration, which you appear to want it to mean. It’s being used in the sense of knowing the enemy, as I said. Compare this, from chapter 3:

    17. Thus we may know that there are five essentials for victory: (1) He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight. (2) He will win who knows how to handle both superior and inferior forces. (3) He will win whose army is animated by the same spirit throughout all its ranks. (4) He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared. (5) He will win who has military capacity and is not interfered with by the sovereign.

    18. Hence the saying: If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.

    This is echoed again in Chapter 10:

    31. Hence the saying: If you know the enemy and know yourself, your victory will not stand in doubt; if you know Heaven and know Earth, you may make your victory complete.

    “Of course [other races] are lacking because they don’t value what we value and therefore they don’t try to achieve in those areas.”

    So you think that negroes never produced a Newton, a Bach, or a Mozart, or indeed, even wheeled vehicles or writing, or a civilization past the mud or thatched hut stage, just because they weren’t trying? Just because they didn’t value such stuff?

    LOL. Helvena, you’re nuts!

    In my opinion, negroes are barely human; more like some kind of monkey. This occurred to Darwin, as well.

    “[Man] has diverged into distinct races, or as they may be more fitly called, sub-species. Some of these, such as the Negro and the European, are so distinct that, if specimens had been brought to a naturalist without any further information, they would undoubtedly have been considered as good and true species.”
    –Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed., John Murray, London, 1874, p. 929.

    When you get right down to it, I think they were probably misclassified.

    “… you are a white supremacist …”

    Yes.

    Life is struggle, and what is more, it is racial struggle. And in that contest, I want and expect Whites to emerge supreme.

    “You could very well ask yourself where is the Chinese Bach, the Indian Shakespeare or the Aztec Newton. Would you judge these races not to have great civilizations?”

    Aztecs – No. They produced nothing but some monumental architecture, and I suspect that was likely borrowed from somewhere else.

    Indians – Yes. But it’s hard to separate the Aryan [i.e., White] influence here.

    Chinese – Yes, but quite different than ours, probably due to biological differences. Taking these differences into account, such luminaries as Confucius, or Chang Tzu, or Lao Tse, are comparable.

    “As far as the Palestinians and the Israelis go, there is such a thing as winning the battles and losing the war. It’s what happen to the States in Vietnam. Israeli kill ratio is much, much higher, but world opinion is on the Palestinian side.”

    Unlike Israel vs. the Palestinians, the U.S. experienced significant casualties in Vietnam. With 50,000 killed, it obviously lost a lot of battles.

    How you can pretend to know what “world opinion” is or why you think it favors the Palestinians, and even if that’s true, why you think it matters, escapes me.

    This much seems clear: If you never win any battles, you don’t win the war.

  12. August 3, 2010 - 10:49 am | Permalink

    General Patton described in his diary one DP camp,

    “where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression ‘lost tribes of Israel’ applied to the tribes which disappeared — not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe — lost to all decency.”

    Patton’s initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower’s insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:

    “This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it.”

    These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that the Jews were an especially unsavory variety of creature and hardly deserving of all the official concern the American government was bestowing on them.

  13. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 3, 2010 - 4:45 am | Permalink

    @ Angel, Dr. Chang Miao translated my edition, so unless you are more proficient in Chinese then Dr. Chang, I will rely on his word, unless you want to argue about experts which seems a waste of time.

    You judge other races by what is valued in the West and find the other races lacking. Of course they are lacking because they don’t value what we value and therefore they don’t try to achieve in those areas. It’s not wrong for you to value what the West has achieve but if you do not respect what is valued in other cultures and what they have achieved then you are a white supremacist and that is foolish, naive and more importantly dangerous because you will underestimate others. You could very well ask yourself where is the Chinese Bach, the Indian Shakespeare or the Aztec Newton. Would you judge these races not to have great civilizations? Or are you saying Whites are only superior to Blacks?

    As far as the Palestinians and the Israelis go, there is such a thing as winning the battles and losing the war. It’s what happen to the States in Vietnam. Israeli kill ratio is much, much higher, but world opinion is on the Palestinian side.

    The Jews are still here because parasites have a function in nature. Which brings me back to my original post at the top of the thread and so I believe my argument is complete.

  14. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 3, 2010 - 12:35 am | Permalink

    @ Helvena

    Sun Tzu quote: This snippet turns up a couple of times in my searches, but I can find no link to a source text for it. What chapter of Art of War is it supposed to be from, and who did the translation? I suspect it to be garbled or invented.

    “I’ve never claimed race doesn’t exist, what I said was that it isn’t the most important feature of a people.”

    Then that leaves culture as the most important feature. Since it’s obvious that culture is itself a racial construct (or where is the negro Newton, Shakespeare, or Mozart?), it’s safe to say that people who believe that culture is more important than race don’t understand either one very well.

    “You’re quite right that the Jews show no respect for the Palestinian and from what I see the Palestinians are winning.”

    Quite a pair of rose-colored glasses you’ve got there, Helvena. Yeah, the Palestinians are just playing rope-a-dope, letting the Jews punch themselves out. That’s the ticket! No doubt you probably also think that Whites are absolutely crushing the Jews; winning every contest against them in every area. But if that’s the case, why are you here?

    “I don’t hate a mad dog, but I understand …”

    Do you? I don’t see any sign of it.

    “… the dog must be put down.”

    But why kill the dog if all the people the dog has bitten are “winning”?

  15. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 2, 2010 - 4:43 am | Permalink

    Sun Tzu said: In war we do not need to have the largest army in order to win. It is important not to advance recklessly. When we concentrate our forces so they match those of the enemy, if we respect the enemy’s strength and carefully study his movements, we will win. If we underestimate the enemy and so not consider the meaning of his movements, we will lose.

  16. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 2, 2010 - 3:51 am | Permalink

    Angle dearest, I’m sure Aristotle would be surprised about a lot of things today. I take your point, I never have thought the Jews were terribly creative.

    Angle, read what I wrote again. I’ve never claimed race doesn’t exist, what I said was that it isn’t the most important feature of a people. That race in the biological sense doesn’t insure survival. I don’t believe the jews are a race in the biological sense. They are a race in their *heads* and this is what makes them strong, not their hate. Hate is definitely a part of what defines them, but it is the weakest part. It is what pushes them to excess and trips them up.

    You’re quite right that the Jews show no respect for the Palestinian and from what I see the Palestinians are winning. In less then 50 years time the Palestinians will hold the land and the Jews will be scattered. The mask has slipped from the Jewish face because of their hate.

    I don’t hate a mad dog, but I understand the dog must be put down.

  17. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 1, 2010 - 11:05 pm | Permalink

    “your argument is dualistic and simplistic …”

    So it seems to you. Nevertheless, it is simply a fact that without falsehood, there can be no truth. Likewise, without hate, there can be no love.

    “… it is also very Jewish to view things in black vs white, good vs evil, right vs wrong.”

    Aristotle would probably have been quite surprised to learn that, in addition to being dualistic and simplistic, the law of the excluded middle is also “very Jewish”. :-)

    But in the post above, I am more concerned with what works and what doesn’t work. The Jews’ way works. Your way doesn’t work. Between these two, I recommend choosing what works.

    “I suggest to you that the world is not like that. That gray and OK exist and that maybe you should expand your thinking to include those.”

    The existence of hybrids is proof that races must exist. The existence of gray is proof that black and white must exist. But in your foggy world Helvena, evidently everything is gray.

    “Hate is a waste of energy.”

    Only if love is also a waste of energy, since without hate, there could be no love.

    “respect your enemy (read Sun Tzu)…”

    Sun Tzu teaches knowing the enemy, not respecting him. Insofar as it denotes something different from knowledge, respect is completely irrelevant. Did Cain respect Abel? Do the Jews respect the Palestinians?

    “If you respect your enemy you don’t made the mistake of understimating him.”

    To underestimate is to lack knowledge. What do you know about hatred of the Other as a Jewish technique, Helvena? Do they use it? Has it worked? Unless you answer both questions in the affirmative, I must conclude you know nothing about it, and that you are the one doing the underestimating here, not me.

  18. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 1, 2010 - 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Unfortunately today the field of science has been whore(d) up with special interests. Case in point. Only research that is politically correct is funded. When money matters the results are what is wanted. Trust your eyes Capt. and tell me if all Jews are more genetically linked to each other than to their surrounding gentiles, i.e. European Jews to Europeans. Common sense Capt. common sense.

  19. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 1, 2010 - 2:15 pm | Permalink

    You argue like a Jew. When you can’t refute an argument you resort to crassness. I win.

  20. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 1, 2010 - 1:44 pm | Permalink

    I didn’t want to spell it out because I didn’t think it was necessary to insult your intelligence but it is obvious that I was wrong…about an intelligence. So here is the point I made above that you didn’t grasp, the Jews are of mixed race and they are still around…got it??? so don’t worry about losing your *white* because it will just be defined in another way and white will still be here.

    Would we know if any other scientist came to a different result? Do you honestly think that it would be reported if someone had proof that they weren’t genetically a people? That would be antisemitic. You, yourself, insist that their research is genuine and yet you can see with your own two eyes that a Ashkenazi is not phenotypically the same as a Beta Israel, so their genetics can’t possibly be the same. Even if they had one or two genes that were the same and no other people had them, it’s obvious they have far more genes that are different. If the Ashkenazi and the Beth Israel can be genetically the same people then you could very well be equally related to a Nigerian brother and there goes your precious *white*. Think about it.

    If I’m being obtuse it’s so people like you wake up to what is important and hopefully stop being made a fool of.

    Captain CHAOS isn’t that what the big jew likes to sow?

  21. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    August 1, 2010 - 11:26 am | Permalink

    “The Jews are mongrelized,”

    Taking the above statement at face value I say, So what? Then Bob’s your uncle. It hardly follows that because Jews are mongrelized that Whites should also aspire to mongrelization.

    “Here are their race catagories (there may be more, I don’t know nor do I care) Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Kaifeng, Beta Israel.”

    If there is not something essential, something objectively definable to these categories which you yourself employ, then you are doing nothing but talking nonsense. Also, why is it that you can spot a mongrel but not the pure article if there is nothing essential involved in any of this? After all, what sense does it make to speak of a “mongrel” if one does not recognize and cannot define what was mixed to produce said “mongrel”?

    “This is why we have the Jews funding genetic research that low and behold discovers that genetically they are all closer to each other then to us, the *Other*.”

    More gibberish. No. The method by which Jews conduct genetic research can be said to be scientifically valid if the methods they use to produce their results can be replicated, yielding the same results, by other scientists.

    You are being intentionally obtuse and are a troll.

  22. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 1, 2010 - 4:31 am | Permalink

    Thxs Serverus and for the link you posted in the other thread.

  23. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    August 1, 2010 - 4:28 am | Permalink

    Capchaos – The Jews are mongrelized, just a look at them, but they are a people. Here are their race catagories (there may be more, I don’t know nor do I care) Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Kaifeng, Beta Israel. This is why we have the Jews funding genetic research that low and behold discovers that genetically they are all closer to each other then to us, the *Other*. It’s just Jew B.S. What makes a Jew a Jew is the brainwashing/abuse they receive when they are young and the whole Kahal reinforced this. So your idea that mongrelization weakens people is *weak*. In your favor I will say this, that it is natural for people to be attracted to their own kind so given the absence of any outside propaganda most will stick to their own race and there is nothing wrong with this.

    Der weiße Engel – your argument is dualistic and simplistic, it is also very Jewish to view things in black vs white, good vs evil, right vs wrong. I suggest to you that the world is not like that. That gray and OK exist and that maybe you should expand your thinking to include those. Hate is a waste of energy. My reading of Valtaire is that he isn’t recommending the Jewish mode. The pagan way is to respect your enemy (read Sun Tzu) but to make no mistake that he is your enemy. If you respect your enemy you don’t made the mistake of understimating him.

  24. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    August 1, 2010 - 12:40 am | Permalink

    Chris,

    This “Amy Biehl Syndrome” is pretty tragic but these do-gooders are well-dangerous to Aryan peoples. They head off to Africa to help Blacks but don’t give a second thought to the sufferings of Aryans. And if they don’t get raped, tortured or murdered by the People they want to help, what happens when they return to Aryan homelands ?

    They advocate for non-Aryans and would most likely, nah, definately see White nationalists or White advocates as nazi racists.

    I really don’t want to say this, but I will: I hope more of these traitors to the Aryan race get similar treatment.

  25. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    July 31, 2010 - 10:11 pm | Permalink

    Helvena says:

    “Going on about Black, Hispanic or others is a side show and a diversion. The main event, is our lack of communal self. This isn’t the fault of Black or Hispanic or even Jews because We have bought into the material, to individual competition that is assumed in capitalism (the worship of money), to faith in science to the exclusion of what can’t be measured and sensed. We have lost faith in ourselves as a community. We are our own worst enemy and until we embrace that idea and solve it all the nigger and spic and kike bashing in the world won’t help us, it will only waste our energy and our time. To be honest and upright about helping our own first is a principled position. The rub is *Who are WE*”

    No, the rub is that love of one’s own people and hatred of the Other arise together, and it must be so. Us and them, light and darkness, truth and falsehood — in this world, all dualities arise together. You can’t have one without the other. This lack of inborn hatred for the Other, which is possibly a unique characteristic of the White race, is why it is losing. It’s symptomatic of its mania for egalitarianism, which corresponds to a lack of racial boundaries. But the purpose of hate is to set those boundaries. A White race afraid to hate its enemies will inevitably one day be conquered, since its enemies always bear it the most burning and inextinguishable hatred, which will never let them rest until they have destroyed it.

    Look at the Jews, who are world champion haters, and so far, the victors!

    Cf. Voltaire:

    “The Jews are the most hateful and the most shameful of the small nations.”
    God and His Men

    “They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”
    Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771

    “The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous – cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity.”
    Essai sur le Moeurs

    Or as Elie the Weasel says:

    “Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate – healthy, virile hate – for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.”

  26. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    July 31, 2010 - 7:41 pm | Permalink

    “Don’t let your *whiteness* be used to take your eye off the ball.”

    “*whiteness*” is hardly an impediment to cohesive community for those of us who are genetically White but the very basis of it. And mongrelization is in the end the absolute destruction of the community that only we as Whites can enjoy because if there are no more Whites as such then our specific organic life (our community) which is the expression of our being will have been destroyed as well. The genetic preservation of our race and the realization of our community are effectively one and the same.

    Really, this isn’t rocket science.

  27. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    July 31, 2010 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Judge a man by is character, not the color of his skin. White slavery in America

    Now look at this piece of scum (ron braunstein) who plays off of race but never mentions once who the slavers are, however, twice Braunstein mentions woman being sold into Arab countries and Iran – interesting.

    http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Uk/uk.politics.misc/2005-11/msg03551.html

    http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/israel.htm

    Don’t let your *whiteness* be used to take your eye off the ball.

  28. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    July 31, 2010 - 8:56 am | Permalink

    Nothing against Blacks in general, I just don’t want to live next to them, but rap music is absolutely hideous. It makes me ill when I hear it. Even worse, when White people try and act like Blacks and rap the Black-trash music. So I think he deserved to get punched.

    Talk about Poles Apart, how many Blacks like Beethoven ?

  29. Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
    July 31, 2010 - 5:41 am | Permalink

    Going on about Black, Hispanic or others is a side show and a diversion. The main event, is our lack of communal self. This isn’t the fault of Black or Hispanic or even Jews because We have bought into the material, to individual competition that is assumed in capitalism (the worship of money), to faith in science to the exclusion of what can’t be measured and sensed. We have lost faith in ourselves as a community. We are our own worst enemy and until we embrace that idea and solve it all the nigger and spic and kike bashing in the world won’t help us, it will only waste our energy and our time. To be honest and upright about helping our own first is a principled position. The rub is *Who are WE*

    http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/jewish/lazare-anti.html#Chapter%20Fourteen

    United, then, by the strongest feelings of solidarity, the Jews can easily hold their own in this disjointed and anarchic society of ours. If the millions of Christians by whom they are surrounded were to substitute this same principle of co-operation for that of individual competition, the importance of the Jew would immediately be destroyed. The Christian, however, will not adopt such a course, and the Jew must inevitably, I will not say dominate, the favourite expression of the antisemites, but certainly possess the advantage over others, and exercise that supremacy against which the antisemites inveigh, without being able to destroy it, seeing that its reason lies not only in the middle class among the Jews, but in the Christian bourgeoisie as well.

  30. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    July 31, 2010 - 3:49 am | Permalink

    You get the same basic message, whether underlying or overt, in a variety of musical genres: Kill All The White Man (NoFx).

    You’re practically telling people how you want to be treated when you allow this stuff to be part of your environment. And you’re encouraging people to treat other Whites just as badly.

  31. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    July 30, 2010 - 8:26 pm | Permalink

    J. Clark: “He may just have wanted to listen to the music and not cared what other people thought.”

    We like music both for itself and for everything that is associated with it. But most rap has no value in itself. Even if you find a rap song that can be liked for itself, listening to it publically is a kind of polical statement.

  32. Randy's Gravatar Randy
    July 30, 2010 - 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Rap equals Black equals ghetto.

  33. July 30, 2010 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

    The 14 year old black assailant was a thug. Fortunately he went to jail.

    It does not follow, however, that the white victim “thought listening to rap would make him cool in the eyes of the world, especially blacks.”

    He may just have wanted to listen to the music and not cared what other people thought. Some rap is in fact more musically interesting than some country music.

    The issue is not that whites shouldn’t listen to music created by blacks, but that blacks tend to behave criminally more often than whites.

    The Jewish-run music industry promotes rap songs that glorify hating and killing whites.

  34. HA's Gravatar HA
    July 30, 2010 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    As Jared Taylor so insidiously fails to note, whites and Jews do not see these issues the same way. This moron wouldn’t be listening to jungle noise if jewish MTV didn’t cram the gangsta lifestyle lite down his throat. He’s not trying to be appreciated by non-whites, he’s trying to look cool to his white friends who are also brainwashed by the jewish media.

  35. July 30, 2010 - 4:48 pm | Permalink

    “… he felt that the white male had invaded on his black turf. ”

    Yeah, maybe. More likely is that he knew that whiggers are pathetic creatures, deferential to blacks and easy for them to push around, and he felt like amusing himself.

  36. Jack Saxon's Gravatar Jack Saxon
    July 30, 2010 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    I absolutely refuse to recognize Wiggers as White. I mean, a man’s gotta draw the line somewhere. Wiggers and lesbians are dead to me as White people.

3 Trackbacks to "Punched for Listening to Rap: Amy Biehl Syndrome Strikes Again"

  1. on March 28, 2011 at 8:05 pm
  2. on March 25, 2011 at 9:43 pm
  3. on July 30, 2010 at 5:33 pm

Comments are closed.