The English translation of Chapter 18 of 200 Years Together, “The 1920s,” is now available. (See here, and notice the link requesting donations.) It has a very different feel from Chapter 20, on the Gulag. Whereas Solzhenitsyn’s account of the Gulag stresses his own experiences, this chapter relies on a wide range of academic historical writing to paint his picture of the USSR during the critical decade of the 1920s. His account is therefore based on mainstream scholarship and overall is similar to other accounts, such as Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century. However, it goes beyond other accounts in several important ways and provides a great deal of new information for Western audiences. It is a very long chapter (>26000 words). In the current TOO article, I summarize some of the main points and draw analogies to the current situation in the West. I encourage comments on Solzhenitsyn’s chapter and my article here.
Kevin MacDonald: Alexandr Solzhenitsyn's “The 1920s.” Chapter 18 of 200 Years Together
Posted in Anti-Semitism, Anti-White attitudes, Jewish ethnocentrism, Jewish influence, Jews and the Left, Jews as an elite
|
Tagged Kevin MacDonald
Facing the Future as a Minority
Very very few conservatives have read The Gulag Archipelago, perhaps because it’s 1,600 pages and written for nationalist Russians (or Western scholars). I strongly recommend readers of this blog to get a copy of the splendid, much abridged version (my copy has 472 pages). Solzhenitsyn himself gave his imprimatur to this abridgement by Edward Ericson.
It might be worthwhile to watch Eisenstein’s “October” on You Tube. One thing that I noticed is that all of the Bolshevik leaders are portrayed as dark complected & semitic featured with the exception of Lenin who looks more Asiatic than anything else. The average Russian is portrayed as blonde & fair. Other Jews like the Mensheviks, and Kerensky are portrayed as semitic, but, fruity(gay). LOL.
I enjoyed the article, and appreciate Solzhenitsyn’s insights, the parallels to present day America are striking. I feel like Ive been reading forbidden material, condemned by the establishment, writings that I was not supposed to ever have seen nor heard of, which would shock the sensibilities of the respectable establishment. Ive been a very, very bad boy.
Well then if you like it please donate. As much as you think it worth. I found another translator who promised to get Ch 22 done by next weekend. It will cost $300.00 – I will pay it from already collected funds.
I wouldnt take a cent for myself, but eventually the success of the entire project depends on you, readers.
“Jews also took full advantage of new opportunities for education, aided by the “social origins policy” in which non-Jews who were children of the pre-revolutionary middle and upper classes were expelled from the universities. Jews were not subject to exclusion based on social origins because they were classified as a “repressed nationality” under that Czar”
Notice how the Ivy league schools in the US are now filled with the dumbest gentiles (affirmative action) and over-represented in the # of jews? -harvard for example is less than 10% white christian male and about 18-25% jewish.
all under the guise of ‘equality’
….waiting for Angry Jew to come on and tell us the Soviet Union was ‘anti semitic’
Did somebody say anti-Semitism?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/06/books/06antisemtism.html?8dpc=&_r=1&pagewanted=all
Murphy.. wow and its not a parody.
from the article:
“There are other landmarks: the expulsion of the Jews from England, Spain and Portugal;”
Hasn’t anyone jewish ever asked “why” beyond “gentiles hate jews”?
Prof Kmac’s brilliant article brings to mind an amazingly forthright Guardian piece from a few years ago about another Hollowcost SurvivorTM. This poor, defenseless, persecuted 16 year-old Jewess just wanted a normal life of fun, dances, and…murdering Ukrainians as a Communist Hanging Judge!
It would seem that even teenage jewish girls aren’t afraid to get their hands dirty…
Memories caught on the brink of extinction
Internet archive rekindles family life in the shtetls, the eastern European Jewish villages razed in the Holocaust,
Guardian (UK), January 3, 2003
“At the age of 16 Basya Chaika played God, deciding who should live and who should die. The year was 1943. The place was Konotop in Ukraine, in Stalin’s wartime Soviet Union. The Jewish teenager was a zealous communist sitting on a military tribunal which dispensed execution orders for ‘traitors of the motherland’. ‘I was very radical and uncompromising,’ Mrs Chaika recalled. “I had to sign death sentences more than once. Such a responsibility really changes a girl’s character … When my friend and I turned up at the dance, people fled. People tried to kill me. My poor mother cried a lot because of me.’ Mrs Chaika reflects on her teenage years as a communist hanging judge in a pioneering web project which aims to recreate the shtetl (small Jewish communities in eastern and central Europe) while its elderly survivors are still able to recount their lives during the cruelest of European centuries. Combining oral history with family snapshots and old Jewish community photo albums, the Centropa project is also unearthing valuable records of once- vibrant but now vanished Jewish communities in central Europe.”
In STALIN’S WILLING EXECUTIONERS it is stated :-
“The rise of the Jews in the USSR came at the expense of the
Germans”. To me the parallel with Russia’s ethnic Germans is with the WASPs The White working class are the greatest losers of the multicultural revolution because they now have an elite who are hostile to their existence. The problem is the unpacified non elite whites are ineffective at the intellectual level where Jewish ideological aggression could be fought while WASPs seem to be a living confirmation of Adam Ferguson’s point about the economically successful members of polite society being unable – or unwilling -to defend themselves against ( ideological )aggression.
successful members of polite society being unable – or unwilling -to defend themselves
i can say this from direct experience – what’s left of the ‘wasp elite’ has no idea how much Jews hate white europeans- particularly northern europeans. They have no idea of how much bitterness and animosity jews have towards wasps and the west in general.
Deep down, people who identify jewish pretty much believe that northern european =nazi no matter what your political stripe. being a penitent liberal won’t save your life, in fact it will get you killed sooner.
As KM has pointed out before – the speed and intensity which ordinary jews turned into vicious killers in the soviet union was astonishing.
Look at jewish anamosity and hatred of something as simple and joyful as Christmas – ask yourself, what kind of people can think like this? And given power, what will they do?
Exposing the Jewish angle in Bolshevism to the general public is near impossible. But the evidence, at least to me, is clear-cut – GUILTY! The frightening thing is the similarities with the Bolshevik revolutionaries to what’s happening in the West. “History repeats itself”, some say, but maybe if we had been educated on the Jews, we may have had a greater chance at putting an end to their vileness. I can switch on my t.v. and watch programmes on Communism for a whole year and not ever appreciate the Jewish gangsters leadership In the world’s most devilish regime – most likely see them as victims. Allowing the Jews to get control of OUR media was our biggest mistake.
The media is plenty-more dangerous than any army.
“Thousands of Jews left their settlements and a handful of southern towns for Moscow, Leningrad and Kiev to find “real life”
And once they found it, they did everything they could to destroy it.
I have come to the conclusion that 200 Years Together has not been published in a formal English translation because Solzhenitsyn himself and now his estate wanted it that way. The translation that Dr. McD. has used is probably a bootleg and as such could be subject to a copyright law infringement suite. Solzhenitsyn’s trenchant, cogent and essentially unbiased narrative of Jew-Russian interactions if widely disseminated could become an eye-opener for heretofore philosemitic whites. I don’t think that it was Solzhenitsyn’s intention to ignite an antisemitic movement, but rather to enlighten the Russian people on a dismal chapter in their sad history.
I’d like to hear how the Soviets turned things around. By the Brezhnev years Jews, while not persecuted as they allege, were certainly limited in political and cultural power. It’s interesting that Jewish influence declined over time under communism but reaches new heights daily under capitalism.
Mr. Murphy: We are all in your debt for this link. When will Obama start subsidizing the Times? Does the Sulzberger family have to go broke before he and the Congress realize that the time to act to preserve this national treasure is now? When the Times is gone forever, will there be any institution left with the guts and the perseverance to keep reminding us all of the great, timeless hate that persists in our very midst?
This Times story has left me in such a state of nervous exhaustion that I simply don’t have enough energy left to continue burning my copies of T.S. Eliot’s anti-Semitic writings.
One point to take from the chapter relates to the argument over how jewish were the Bolsheviks and i think the answer is two-fold. Pre-revolution they were disproportionately over-represented but after the revolution standard jewish ethnic nepotism kicked in without even any nominal restraints and the vast majority of jews moved to the urban centres and joined in.
“I have come to the conclusion that 200 Years Together has not been published in a formal English translation because Solzhenitsyn himself and now his estate wanted it that way.”
No doubt your research into the matter is impeccable, but you seem to overlook the attempts that have been made to publish the material in English, and how the large mainly Jewish-run publishing houses havent been very excited about publishing an important work by one of the nobel-prize winning literary giants of our time. I suppose Solzhenitsyn didnt want his work to be published in English because as someone living in America, whose wife and children were citizens, he didnt want to burden Americans with more reading material, as there are already so many books available out there today. Obviously, you have come to the conclusion that authors that spend years and years of their lives writing material usually do not want others to read it, and thus have a strong dislike for it being published, and especially eschew receiving royalties for their work, or their families receiving such. Doubtless, you yourself are a writer, and feel exactly those sentiments.
“The translation that Dr. McD. has used is probably a bootleg and as such could be subject to a copyright law infringement suite.”
You are correct that Solzhenitsyn would be appalled that others greatly value his scholarship, and would spend hundreds of dollars in the attempt to read what he has written. Solzhenitsyn, as someone who lived under the former Soviet Union, had an unshakable respect for laws that would prevent people from reading literature. Our author fully supported the Soviet Union’s banning his books in the past, and thus would fully support their suppression here in the US as well.
Thank you for your conclusions, I look forward to your other important, nay essential, insights into the matter.
Well said Andrew
me, check this out:
Who Controls the Ivy League?
http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?15300-Who-Controls-the-Ivy-League
“ZOG”- thanks for the info – i would assume the boards/trustees (which usually =$) are the same if not higher
worse than i thought. one has to assume other than the rogue remaining wasp – most of the minorities are useful idiots/frontmen (much like KM well documented with Bosian anthropology and Freudian psychology (though Jung caught on an left)
it also is no wonder than the quality of these univerisites has plummented, the cost out of reach, and the reputation for ethics or any sort of dignity by the wayside.
The jewish elite is feeding off the reputation of these schools which came from the WASP elite – and using it to do thing like loot Russia. Disgusting.
What’s further disgusting is nearly all these had some religious affiliation – and now all have not only divorced themselves from any Christian affiliation but have turned into anti-christian anti western institutions.
The same year Dartmouth banned Christian groups from using the campus mail, they opened a jewish center on campus – can the hypocrisy be any more blatant. ?
@TGD: why have u arrived at such a conclusion? the book has been translated into French and German. In German it was divided into 2 volumes which can be found here;
http://www.amazon.de/Zweihundert-Jahre-zusammen-Alexander-Solschenizyn/dp/3776622873/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1278538337&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.de/Zweihundert-Jahre-zusammen-Juden-Sowjetunion/dp/3776650206/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1278538337&sr=1-2
Predictably, Solzhenitsyn has been accused of anti-semitism(Yawwnn) and the Wiki pages on him and on “2 hundred years together” are quite negative showing the usual bias. Interesting as prostitute historians are still in denial re the Jewish involvement in the Bolshevik regime. Have a look http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Hundred_Years_Together
@Sledgehammer and Andrew
Perhaps Andrew can tell us the names of the publishers that rejected 200 Years Together for an English language edition? As to royalty income, I don’t think that Solzhenitsyn was motivated to write for money (after all, he wasn’t Jewish) but by a driving need to expose the beastliness of the Soviet system and those who were responsible for originating and implementing its policies. In his famous Harvard speech of 1978, he chided the USA and the west for its unbridled materialism.
Sledgehammer, neither French nor German are the “lingua Franca” of the world, English is. There are 2 billion+ people who speak English as a 1st or 2nd language or have enough of a grasp to read it. A widely circulated English edition would cause a backlash (orchestrated by you know whom) against Solzhenitsyn’s literary reputation. I don’t think that he wanted that.
His sons are all highly successful and U.S. citizens to boot and either one or all control the copyright. If they wanted to, they could commission a translation and if no publishing house agreed to issue the book, they could send the manuscript to China for printing and binding and then circulate it themselves.
It will be interesting to see what all Jews are named. For example, Antonov-Ovseyenko who led the storming of the Winter Palace. In Eisenstein’s “October” he is portrayed as a “Groucho Marx” type of character. But, few people knew Antonov-Ovseyenko was a Jew until his son wrote a biography of him after the fall of the Soviet Union.
I’m sure there are hundreds of other cases.
Stalin reduced the percentage of Jews in the government apparatus to about 60-70% of the influential position (note not secretaries), this is what is considered a purge. I’ll cry crocodile tears.
“ME” – that’s a good point about Universities. It should be noted that in 1993 it was shown that Jews and E. Asians, while having a rep for being studious, were admitted to Harvard and Yale at three times the rate they would have been if test scores and grades were the sole criteria. Blacks and Hispanics were of course admitted at even higher rates than that. Obviously the goal was to crowd out whites. To keep the attention off Jews, the Jews would classify themselves as white when presenting student body info to the public, but turn around and classify themselves separately in their “intramural” publications, info from Hillel House, etc. It’s a nightmare.
@Sledgehammer and Andrew
“Perhaps Andrew can tell us the names of the publishers that rejected 200 Years Together for an English language edition?”
This was discussed in a previous blog entry, which should still be available on TOO somewhere. The Solzenitsyn family has publicly announced that “We are actively seeking an English-language publisher”. http://publishingperspectives.com/?p=10523.
“As to royalty income, I don’t think that Solzhenitsyn was motivated to write for money (after all, he wasn’t Jewish)”
Everyone expects or at least hopes to get paid for their work. Plumbers, construction workers, teachers and just about everyone else wish to be get fair compensation for their labors. There is nothing shameful or greedy about that. Dont you expect to be paid for whatever work you do in your occupation? Creative individuals do as well, even the greatest artists like Michaelangelo, creating timeless, priceless works of art, expected compensation. What are authors or other creative people supposed to live on, sawdust?
“but by a driving need to expose the beastliness of the Soviet system and those who were responsible for originating and implementing its policies.”
Okay, so you are telling me that Solzenitsyn had a driving need to expose the Soviet system, but didnt want his work to be published in certain languages? Seems difficult to reconcile that.
“There are 2 billion+ people who speak English as a 1st or 2nd language or have enough of a grasp to read it. A widely circulated English edition would cause a backlash (orchestrated by you know whom) against Solzhenitsyn’s literary reputation. I don’t think that he wanted that.”
So he (and/or his family) was ashamed of his work, embarrassed by what he had spent all those years writing? He was so sensitive of the condemnation of others that he didnt want the truth to come out? Our author, a decorated WW2 veteran, survivor of the camps, willing to pay all of the financial costs and social ostracism of being a dissident during the Soviet era, had grown too timid to truth-tell because some people wouldnt like it, and he wouldnt be as popular?
You also seem to be ignorant of the Jewish ownership stake and influence in the publishing industry. Almost all the major houses are owned by the 5 giant media conglomerates in the US (Viacom, Disney, etc.) which are overwhelmingly managed/owned by people that happen to be ethnically Jewish.
“If they wanted to, they could commission a translation and if no publishing house agreed to issue the book, they could send the manuscript to China for printing and binding and then circulate it themselves.”
Yes, they could. But condemned by the establishment, especially the legion of Jewish critics, there would be no market for it, especially in the intellectual/academic world, where Jews and Jewish influence is so powerful. Is his family supposed to publish his work only to incur a financial loss? Book reviews are a very important factor in the success of any book. You apparently dont recognize that disparaging a work of scholarship as “ANTI-SEMITIC!” is a method of suppression often even more effective than outright banning (banning a book adds interest). Of course, Jewish critics have all kinds of other things to say, that Solzenitsyn is an “anachronism”, his scholarship is shoddy, its poorly-written and boring, and so forth.
The fact remains that most publishing houses would normally jump at the chance to get their hands on an important life work authored by a world-famous, nobel-prize winning individual, especially after he had recently passed away, even if he had just scribbled insane gibberish using a broken crayon on a roll of toilet paper. And 200 Years Together represents Solzenitsyn’s scholarship at its finest.
It is likely that Solzenitsyn’s sons were involved to some degree in his work, and it is unlikely that they are ashamed of their famous father’s scholarship. Solzenitsyn has been attacked for anti-Semitism since the 1970s, and that never stopped him before. I think that his family is immensely and rightly proud of their literary lion father, and wants all of his writings published in all languages. They have no fear of the truth, regardless of who is offended, understand that his work will always be attacked as anti-Semitic, and trust that their father’s reputation will stand on its own merits.
i think we all agree- no matter what the theory- publishing this in english would be a major ground shift about viewing the 20th century – no holocaust’ ‘denial’ required- the Jewish elite would have to more or less say ‘so what’ about their community support of communism – oh wait, they already have.. and they claim trying to equate the communist mass murders with the holocaust is a form of anti-semitism.
here is the article:
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/holocaust-scholars-slam-eu-for-backing-nazi-communist-comparison-1.262074
Holocaust scholars slam EU for backing Nazi-Communist comparison
Researches call comparison ‘gravest threat to preserving the memory of the Holocaust.’
Just as they denied genocide of Armenians, Zionists deny Communist-perpetrated genocide of Ukrainians, all to advance a Jewish-exceptionalist agenda
Dr. Efraim Zuroff, Director of the Simon Weisenthal Center in Jerusalem, claimed in a recent interview that the push in many countries formerly under Communist control or domination to recognize the millions of 20th Century victims of Communism as on par with the victims of Fascism by passing official resolutions comparing Stalinism to Nazism is an attack on the allegedly “unique” nature of the Holocaust.
Zuroff claims Communist crimes are different than those of Fascism because the Nazis were engaged in genocide, “a deliberate attempt to destroy a people, wipe them off the face of the earth. And that was never the case as far as the crimes of Communism were concerned…There was never an intention to destroy an entire people.”
This is a risible lie that totally ignores the Holodomor (death by starvation) engineered by Joseph Stalin and his Communist henchmen (many of them Jewish) of the Ukrainian people from 1932-33, which murdered six to eight million people in order to steal Ukrainian grain for export to the West, and make an example to those who would resist submission to Communist totalitarianism…
http://www.judeofascism.com/2009/10/just-as-they-denied-genocide-of.html
—–
Alexander Solzhenitsyn on ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”
http://www.judeofascism.com/2010/03/alexander-solzhenitsyn-on-protocols-of.html
“Alexander Solzhenitsyn on ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”
What I find most fascinating about the Jewish dismissal of Protocols is their choice of words.
Notice, they tell us it is a “forgery.”
Definition of forgery:
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
counterfeit: a copy that is represented as the original
So, use of the word “forgery” would suggest there exists somewhere an original document from which the circulating Protocols was counterfeited.
IF, what was meant was that the Jews’ enemies made up, out of whole cloth, specious accusations with no basis in fact, the correct word would be “fabrication.”
We’re told Jews are smart, have high IQs, particularly verbal.
So:
I’m supposed to believe that a verbally facile people, trying to persuade others that a very damning document is not true, are incapable of choosing the correct word to say what they mean?
But if the word they use, “forgery,” is the word they meant, it would be fascinating to see the original Protocols. Somehow I doubt the likelihood of THAT event coming to pass, however.
“counterfeit: a copy that is represented as the original”
Actually, I have to disagree on this point – - it can also be used to in the sense of representing yourself as someone else – as in ‘forging’ a check.
“counterfeit: a copy that is represented as the original”
Actually, I have to disagree on this point – – it can also be used to in the sense of representing yourself as someone else – as in ‘forging’ a check.”
I think the definition of “counterfeit” being a copy represented as the original works for forging checks, too:
When you forge a check, you are copying the signature of the rightful owner of the checking account. You’d have to have gotten hold of a document signed by the checking account owner and practiced signing to imitate his.
So, a forged signature is a copy (of the signature the forger got hold of) that is representing itself as being an original signature(that is, a signature that originates with the rightful signatory ).
I was struck by a couple of paragraphs by Solzhenitsyn on The Protocols:
“The Protocols … show a blueprint of a social system. Its design is well above abilities of an ordinary mind, including that of its publisher. It is a dynamic process of two stages, of destabilization, increasing freedom and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm, and on the second stage, new hierarchical restructuring of society takes place…”
AND
“The text demonstrates impressive foresight on the two systems of society, the Western and the Soviet one. While a strong thinker could possibly predict the development of the West in 1901, how could he grasp the Soviet future?”
—–
The first paragraph brought to mind much of what is happening in America today — social cataclysms, with the “restructuring of society” revolving around Jewry, neocons and Obamunists ratcheting up control and displacing the traditional elites.
The second paragraph reminded me of Anthony Sutton’s books “Wall Street and the Bolsheviks” and “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler,” and how international banks and finance, including Jewish banking and finance, underwrote and profiteered from both.
Whether The Protocols were a forgery or “frame up” of revolutionary Jews (in an effort to both discredit Communism and Western Capitalism as the product of sinister Jewish scheming), or actually based on widely recognized and acknowledged revolutionary Jewish thought and subversive agenda fueled by “persecution” and grievance doesn’t really matter.
What matters is that they were prophetic, and what they predicted has largely come to pass. This, to my mind, is evidence that there are indeed sinister, somewhat inter-connected subterranean forces or networks following a rough ideological road map or “vision” revolving around mass subjugation, and who either truly believe, or have deceived themselves into believing, that what they are doing is beneficial to humanity.
This is germane to the question of why many White elites have seemingly turned their backs on their own people, because other than ideology explicitly revolving around a racial consciousness (e.g. Nazism and Zionism), True Believers generally always subordinate their race to their ideology, be it religious ideology like Christianity, or political ideology like Communism or “progressivism.”
I think those liberal Gentile elites who have indeed subordinated race to ideology are rightfully feeling cheated by their Jewish partners right now, who pretended to be working towards a race-blind ideological future, but who the whole time were secretly working on a Jewish supremacist agenda, which has only recently become crystal clear. These liberals, who thought they were so sophisticated and smart, have been shown up for fools.
Some of the chaos we are currently experiencing may be a battle-royal taking place just below the surface between these two forces. Jewish ascension to leadership coupled with the existence of Israel has forced Jewry to show their true colors, where in the past they could get away with being subversives, rabble rousing back benchers and bomb throwers. Jews are finally being forced to make their choice, and they don’t like it one bit. As always, they want their cake, and to eat it too.
No wonder The Washington Post’s Richard Cohen declared that “Israel is a mistake,” and no wonder a lot of left-wingers (some of them Jews) are angrily striking out against organized Jewry and Zionism. They would have much preferred to have used the subterranean Jewish network on their own arrested, nihilistic agenda into perpetuity.
Homaged by literary giants from Orwell to Jack London, The Protocols are a helpful roadmap to understanding elitist treachery to this day
http://www.judeofascism.com/2010/07/homaged-by-literary-giants-from-orwell.html
To: Murphy
Wow. Another book on anti-semitism and yet nothing on widspread antipathy toward gentiles by Jews?
In other words, why can Julia Louise Dreyfuss call someone a shiksa and expect everyone to laugh, yet, God forbid, someone should call her a kike?
From Louis Ferdinand Celine’s <Trifles For A Massacre:
The Jew who was less than nothing in the time of Nero, is in the process of becoming
everything… In Russia, this miracle has been accomplished… In France, almost… How can
it be recruited, and reformed into a Soviet of the USSR? With workers, manual workers (to
the second generation, at least) as most enthusiastic Stakhanovites, and then the
intellectuals, Jewish bureaucrats, exclusively Jewish… No more white [”/51] intellectuals!
The possibilities for white critics no longer exist!… This is the prime directive implied in
every Communist revolution. The Jews can remain in power only on the condition that all of
the Party intellectuals be Jews, or at least be furiously Judaized…espoused to Jewesses, halfbreeds,
half- and quarter-Jews…(these latter are more rabid than the others…). For the sake of
good form, various well-enstooged Aryan figures are tolerated, for the parade before
foreigners… (genre Tolstoy) brought into perfect submission by favor and fear. All of the
non-Jewish intellectuals, that is to say all of those who must not be communists, Jewish and
communist being for me synonymous, have all been hounded to death… They can be seen at
Baykal, and at Sakhalin in due season… Evidently there exist some reprobate Jews in that
number, the “Radeks” … some traitors for the sake of show… such as Serge Victor, a new
kind of Judas… They are maltreated a little… A few dozen are shot… They are exiled pro
forma…but the ferocious convention of blood continues, I believe… Litvinov, Trotsky, and
Braunstein are hated only in our eyes… The rare surviving Aryans, the former official cadres,
the ancient families still extant…the rare escapees from the great hecatombs, who continue to
vegetate in the government bureaux…the embassies…must give daily proof of their most
absolute, most crawling, most extreme submission to the Jewish ideal, that is to say to the
supremacy of the Jewish race in every domain: cultural, economic, political… The Jew is a
dictator at heart, twenty-five times worse than Mussolini. Democracy is always and above all
nothing but the veil of the Jewish Dictatorship.
Solzhenisyn’s account of Jewish dominance in the pre-War Soviet Union is very much confirmed by everything that my Lithuanian grandfather told me of his own experiences in Lithuania. When the Soviets invaded the Baltic States in 1939 after the Nazi/Soviet pact Stalin installed a fiercely hostile Jewish elite who liquidated all Lithuanian nationalists and Catholic clergy (which included members of his family). Given this, it is hardly surpising that the Balts were such enthusiastic collaborators when the Germans invaded in 1941. In the decades that followed one-third of the population of the Baltic states were killed (over one and half million people). You won’t, however, find any memorials or museums or Hollywood films about these unfortunates. To even raise the subject of the Jewish role in Soviet mass-murder renders one anti-Semitic.