Christopher Donovan: Pick Your Poison: Death, or a Civil Rights Lawsuit

Life in multiracial America presents us with stark choices:  live in an urban area with a short commute and risk mugging or murder, or live in the suburbs and spend hours of your life behind the wheel.  Send your kids to public school and leave them uneducated and terrorized by blacks and Hispanics, or send them to private school, and work long hours to pay for it.

The choice for a food delivery person in an inner-city area:  risk getting shot in the stomach for your Chinese food delivery cash, or risk being sued and called a racist.  (“Delivering food is a risky joby, but denying service could be catch-22, experts say.”)  Some might say the latter is worse.  A black, corn-rowed thug with a gun, or a Jewish lawyer whining about “hate and intolerance” and deposing you… it’s a tough call.  (I personally suspect that the targeting of Chinese food delivery people is a form of hate crime:  the black robbers assume that the Chinese will be meek and give it up easily.)

I’ve read that some pick a third option:  go home.  This is apparently what many Koreans in the Los Angeles area have done.

We whites, of course, don’t have the option of returning home in order to escape this madness.  This is our home. We’re stuck.

The lesson is getting clearer and clearer:  we cannot continue to live like this.  It’s going to kill us.  We need to move toward something else, whether it’s some form of separation or a greater white consciousness that serves as a much stronger bulwark against black violence and theft — and other anti-white ethnic attacks.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

37 Comments to "Christopher Donovan: Pick Your Poison: Death, or a Civil Rights Lawsuit"

  1. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 6, 2011 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

    All the other races of the world believe the white man is quite capable of violence. It is part of their PR effort to criticise us. They claim what we have we have taken by violence. I myself think that too many of the tough white men died saving the jews in WWII and we need to repopulate, and show them what we are made of boys. This time, fighting for ourselves, not against the muslims on behalf of the jews in Israel, who are terrified of Egypts’ masses. If the jews of Israel want to be their asshole selves over there, why should we fight against the muslims to save them again.
    I have personally been to Israel. Even though as an American I essentially pay the taxes to support their piece of crap country, they were totally unappreciative assholes who sought to rip me off at every opportunity . I’ve received more thanks buying a glass of tea at a restaurant in Tennessee than in 2 weeks paying for a room in their filthy “hotels” in Israel. If the jews are as great as they tell us, those pussies should fight for themselves. To my fellow Christians who say God wants us to protect Israel, I say if God wants to protect them, he could do it without our help!

  2. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 1, 2010 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Yikes! Looks like there’s been an explosion at the tranny factory. These are for you, darlin’! :-)

    http://www.truetrust.com/Famous_Wills_and_Trusts/Marilyn_Monroe_Dress_Picture.jpg

    http://www.mydisguises.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/marilyn-monroe-skirt.jpg

  3. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 1, 2010 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    Whooaaaa there. All I’m doing is problem-solving.

    Let me explain to everyone what this is about. The problem I see is this: participants like “Der Weise Engel” are not only useless to the cause of White salvation, they’re destructive. All they do is

    (1) Sit around and grouse about how Whites, being “racially unconscious”, are doomed to extinction, more or less to the tune of “Nobody likes me, everyone hates me, I think I’ll go eat some worms”, thus demoralizing the group they’re pretending to help;

    (2) Inject specious argumentation delivered with such conviction and so many self-congratulatory protestations of mental clarity that the unwary are sucked into the delusion that they’re dealing with some kind of master intellect.

    How can participants like “Der Weise Engel” be educated in the error of their ways, optimistically assuming that this is possible in any given case?

    In the case of DWE, the first requirement is to rub his nose in his own cheap rhetorical tricks…for example, casually insulting those who find holes in his arguments. Obviously, DWE needs to learn that he cannot win arguments by casually making impolite or insolent comments and then blaming his interlocutor(s) for reacting in kind. That’s blatantly childish, and we’re trying to discuss serious issues here.

    DWE then needs to learn that he’s not half as smart as he evidently thinks he is, and that he can’t get away with muddying up various discussions with demoralizing sophistry while pretending to know what the hell he’s talking about when even a cursory glance at his opinions reveals that he might as well have graduated from the Frankfurt School for Backward Shabbos Goyim, bottom of the class.

    Now, I’ve dutifully tried to do my part in solving this problem. People like DWE never have a beneficial effect on this kind of forum, and rather than trying to chase them off – which I suspect would be impossible in the case of DWE himself – it’s better to try to wake them up to the off-putting nature of their style of expression, their negative effects on group morale, and the essential weakness of their argumentation (which, in DWE’s case, is always a superficial brain-dead attempt to support his prejudicial, half-baked, and inevitably damaging misconceptions).

    Unfortunately, I have not met with success. Instead, DWE continues to pretend, like an obstreperous 2-year old sucking down a huge chestful of air and holding its breath until its face turns blue, that hey, it wasn’t him – far from it! Why, he had every right to be impolite and insolent! It was the guy who reacted in kind and then wouldn’t suck it up and let it go without an apology. (Man, what a hothead – just look at Mary’s skirts blowing up, blah blah, eating dog shit, blabber, heh heh!)

    In other words, my attempt to wake DWE up out of his dim-witted narcissistic stupor has been rebuffed. The proverbial skunk at the garden party, the little turd continues to waddle along in a straight line, blithely perfuming the atmosphere with his telltale odor. Like a masturbatory nose-picking teenager, he chuckles at his own wit and rhythmically pursues business as usual under his desk.

    I half expected this. In fact, I expect that DWE will neither change his Pepe Le Pew stripes nor relax his tick-like grip on this particular forum under any circumstances…not ever. At best, he might change his ridiculous handle and start afresh, resulting in no improvement at all. That’s simply the way of such characters.

    But for the sake of the forum, at least I tried. That’s all one can do.

    My apologies to anyone offended by my well-intentioned efforts (except, of course, the unapologetically odiferous Pepe himself).

  4. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 1, 2010 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    @ Reginald

    The Westermarck effect doesn’t really refute Freud’s argument. It just states that due to a kind of imprinting, people aren’t interested in having sex with their close relatives. But if no one is interested, why the taboo, and why such a strong taboo? It doesn’t make sense to have a taboo or laws against something that only a tiny amount of people would be crazy enough to do. There are, for example, no taboos or laws against plunging knitting needles into your own eyes, or eating dog shit (not trying to give you any ideas here, eurodele!). That’s because they are not needed. Nobody wants to do those things unless they are psychotic. Freud is saying that taboos and laws are to keep a proscribed act from becoming common, because it’s something that everyone wants to do, and would do, but for the taboos and laws. This is how Freud justified the seemingly self-contradictory notion of unconscious desires; in a way, this single insight is the foundation stone of psychoanalysis and the entire Freudian psychodynamic apparatus.

    Incidentally, Freud went on to argue that the strength of the impulse to commit an act could be judged from the strength of the taboo against it. That raises the interesting question of what is considered the worse sin in modern American culture, being known as having had sex with your own mom, or being known a racist? I’d say it’s still sex with your mom, but it’s a close call.

    @ eurodele

    Oh, it’s clear someone’s been having a lot of homoerotic fantasies alright. Didn’t you find it difficult to type all that using only one hand? Crikey, what a closet case!

  5. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 1, 2010 - 6:55 am | Permalink

    Reginald – “If there’s no tendency toward ethnocentrism among whites, why do the elite put so much effort into making white ethnocentrism such a taboo?”

    Very good question. Strong laws are enacted against (e.g.) pedophilia and incest because they are non-consensual acts committed by a few isolated deviants against helpless victims (sometimes including the resulting offspring). Ethnocentrism is another matter entirely; it is a proclivity of entire groups which need not result in victimization, and laws against which cannot be explained or rationalized in those terms. The two kinds of “crime” are only weakly comparable.

    Given that White ethnocentrism is essentially a “victimless crime”, we must ask two questions.

    (1) whose interests, if not those of victims, are served by passing laws against White ethnocentrism?

    (2) Why are these interested parties threatened by it?

    The first question is easy to answer: as nearly all intelligent people are by now aware, those behind such laws are Jews and their allies of temporary convenience. That’s because Jews want it all, and whites, having become rich in the course of building Western civilization, are attractive targets for a large-scale mugging. The answer to the second question is just as obvious: Jews are threatened by White ethnocentrism precisely because it has the force of numbers; left to their own devices, Whites are naturally ethnocentric enough to defend their common interests in the event of an attack.

    Virtually everybody old enough to look in a mirror is “conscious” of his or her race, but not necessarily “race conscious”. In practice, “race-consciousness” is simply a readiness to interpret news and personal experience in racial terms. This is what allows a person to become aware of the differences and dynamics between the races; e.g., the fact that one or two races tend to be stupid and violent, that another tends to be cunning and vicious and bent on exploitation, that another is hard-working but uncreative and rather self-absorbed despite being extremely numerous, and that another is naturally ingenious, creatively constructive, and highly receptive to a compassionate worldview.

    Whites have been expressly forbidden to make these distinctions by their teachers, pastors, political leaders, and television sets. Hence, they avoid “racial consciousness” in order to avoid censure and opprobrium, the same way a child avoids using profanity in front of his/her parents in order to avoid being caught and punished. As White children grow up, they are indoctrinated to the effect that racial consciousness is “immoral” for a White person, but acceptable and in fact inevitable for everyone else. They learn and adapt to this principle, finally convincing themselves that race “never enters their minds” (and indeed, it often doesn’t, because they stand guard at the gate and deliberately squelch it when it threatens to emerge in their thought or behavior). Thanks to their socially pathological conditioning, they filter their mental content at an early stage of awareness.

    Fortunately, most of those in the forum do not suffer from this deliberately-induced syndrome.

    Der Weisenheimer Engel – Fair enough. But a word to the weise – you need to watch your step with a handle like “Der Weise Engel”. Given your addiction to homoerotic innuendo – and mind you, I’m trying not to be too judgmental in this degenerate, different-strokes kind of “culture” we inhabit – it might inspire unintended associations. For example, it looks less like the name of a well-meaning White person than the nom de strip of a matronly transexual dominatrix who dresses up like an Ashke-Nazi and runs an S&M bordello in one of the seedier neighborhoods of Tel Aviv.

    In fact, many would call that a perfect fit.

  6. August 31, 2010 - 9:50 pm | Permalink

    “I was only trying to communicate the irony that these people who were being described as race conscious (e.g., above from heartfelt: ‘Whites already do have a racial consciousness …’) didn’t act like it and often vehemently assert that they are not conscious of this supposed racial consciousness in themselves.”

    This is correct, Der weiße Engel.

    We aren’t talking about something at a conscious level with the vast majority of White Americans today.

  7. August 31, 2010 - 9:48 pm | Permalink

    “This is an interesting argument.”

    Thank you.

    “It’s the same argument that Freud used to ‘prove’ the existence of Oedipal desires. He asked why there is such a strong taboo against incest unless it’s something people strongly want to do.”

    It seems from modern research on Genetic Sexual Attraction that people would be sexually attracted to their close relatives to a remarkably disproportionate extent, if it wasn’t for the Westermarck effect.

    If it wasn’t for the Westermark effect, people would strongly want to commit incest.

    That’s why the Westermark effect evolved, along with supplemental cultural taboos.

    It is very notable that sometimes without the supplemental cultural taboos, the Westermark effect isn’t enough to prevent incest.

    We just don’t hear of these cases much because the cultural taboos against incest are so nearly universal.

    But just look what happened with the ancient Egyptian royal family, in terms of all the brother/sister pairings they had in the absence of an incest taboo in that class.

    “You could also make the same argument about pedophilia. If no one wanted to do it, there’d be no reason to make strong laws and social taboos against it, would there?”

    Indeed.

    And as a matter of fact, some people DO want to commit pedophiliac acts.

    Even with the strong laws and social taboos against it, there’s still a non-trivial number of people who go through with it.

    I can only imagine how common it would be without strong laws and taboos against it.

    But of course pedophilia is unnatural enough that it probably wouldn’t be all that common even without it being taboo and/or illegal.

    “So it would appear that people who find your argument persuasive must also agree with Freud.”

    Not unless a racial equivalent of the Westermark effect is found for whites.

  8. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 31, 2010 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

    @ Reginald

    “If there’s no tendency toward ethnocentrism among whites, why do the elite put so much effort into making white ethnocentrism such a taboo?”

    This is an interesting argument. It’s the same argument that Freud used to “prove” the existence of Oedipal desires. He asked why there is such a strong taboo against incest unless it’s something people strongly want to do. You could also make the same argument about pedophilia. If no one wanted to do it, there’d be no reason to make strong laws and social taboos against it, would there? So it would appear that people who find your argument persuasive must also agree with Freud.

    But let’s note that my objection here was to the use of the phrase “racial consciousness”. There could well be some kind of tropism based in genetic similarity, such as that documented by Rushton, that doesn’t rise to the level of consciousness. I was only trying to communicate the irony that these people who were being described as race conscious (e.g., above from heartfelt: “Whites already do have a racial consciousness …”) didn’t act like it and often vehemently assert that they are not conscious of this supposed racial consciousness in themselves. I think describing white ethnocentrism, to the extent it exists at all, by using the word “consciousness” is a deceptive misuse based on the idea, in my view probably false, that such a “consciousness” in Whites can easily be made, under the right conditions, to flare up into White supremacy.

    @ eurodele

    It’s clear you have quite an active fantasy life, dearie. I did not mean to “out” you, so if my words gave offense, I apologize. Really, “if that’s what blows your skirt up” is just an expression, and I meant nothing by it. I could just as easily have written “floats your boat”, or “rings your chimes”, or “gets you off”, or a similar catchphrase. Try not to be so sensitive. Just forget about it. :-)

  9. August 31, 2010 - 8:34 am | Permalink

    The thing is we aren’t just talking about a some people getting offended by what expressions of white ethnocentrism exist.

    We’re talking about a very well organized effort, lavishly funded to the tunes of millions of dollars a month.

    If you compare how much money the SPLC spends to try and maintain and/or expand taboos on ethnocentrism, as compared to how little money the groups they are involved in conflict with have, it’s telling.

  10. August 31, 2010 - 8:14 am | Permalink

    As I’ve said to Der weiße Engel multiple times before:

    If there’s no tendency toward ethnocentrism among whites, why do the elite put so much effort into making white ethnocentrism such a taboo?

    I think if Der weiße Engel lived in the Victorian Era, he would’ve figured that nobody but a very small minority had a desire to have extramarital sex.

  11. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    August 31, 2010 - 6:54 am | Permalink

    Not the nerve you wanted to touch, apparently. I keep that one covered.

    But now it all comes clear – you’re not just confused about what I wrote. No indeed. You’re globally confused. Confused about consciousness. Confused about race. And confused about your own sexuality, to the extent that you indulge in hopeless crypto-lesbian (??) sweet talk with strangers on the Internet.

    Better be careful. You might end up in a daisy chain with the two Janets, Reno and Napolitano…trussed up like a suckling pig, and probably with a sack over your head. ;)

  12. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 30, 2010 - 9:28 pm | Permalink

    Looks like I touched a nerve, eh Mary? :-) Don’t worry. Your little secret is safe with me.

    How about “a racial consciousness of which they are not conscious, and one which they strenuously deny having”? Better?

  13. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    August 30, 2010 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    “You are welcome to continue to believe in unconscious race consciousness, if that’s what blows your skirt up.”

    OK now, no need to get catty. Take a deep breath, unknot those panties, and work the annoying twist out of that garter belt. Then try to read what I actually wrote. (Here’s a hint: “unconscious racial consciousness” had nothing to do with it.)

  14. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 30, 2010 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

    @ eurodele

    “… you seem to think that oppressive White policemen are simply unaware that they are White…”

    Oh, they’re aware of it. They just don’t care. They don’t regard race as an important fact about themselves, or others. They don’t think of the White race as superior, and it would literally never occur to them to favor Whites over others. That’s what they’ll tell you if you ask, and their actions prove they believe it.

    I agree that the consciousness is something that science doesn’t fully understand yet, and that leads to many contradictions and imprecisions in use of the word. You are welcome to continue to believe in unconscious race consciousness, if that’s what blows your skirt up. It appears that such a belief, however unwarranted by the facts, is necessary to give you hope.

    @ Clytemnestra

    You think these policemen are “closet racist” cowards, but I say they are egalitarian cowards. Why don’t we just agree they are cowards and leave it at that?

    “More not less of these attacks are needed in the state of Iowa who voted in Barak Obama by overwhelming numbers.”

    Yes, just look at the foul creature that is squatting in the White House right now — put there by the votes of all those oh-so-implicitly-White “closet racists” in Iowa, and the rest of the states. If that’s implicit Whiteness, you can have it! Any more of it and we’ll all be ruined. A few years from now, I can just see my good friends eurodele and Clytemnestra, saying to the White concentration camp guard as he leads them to the gas chamber, “Secretly, you’re really a racist like us, aren’t you?” *wink* *wink* :-)

  15. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    August 30, 2010 - 6:50 am | Permalink

    The idea that the White police in Iowa have no sense of race consciousness is ridiculous. They know what the color of crime is and have been very careful to take jobs in high White populations, because they know that greatly lessens their chances of being killed on the job.

    The average police officer knows these “Get Whitey” attacks are being conducted by young, Negro racist thugs who are doing it, because they can get away with it. If a White cop hammers one of them even if they are caught in the act, there will be Reverends Jesse Jackass and Al Sharpster leading a Rainbow mob of Snivel Rights Activists. The police department will be sued. Their pockets are limited where the pockets of the $PLC, etc are bottomless. If the officer is lucky, he will be fired. If he is singularly unlucky he will face criminal charges for a civil rights violations.

    More not less of these attacks are needed in the state of Iowa who voted in Barak Obama by overwhelming numbers. Once that happens, these citizens will vote in concealed weapons permits and right to carry laws and the next time one of these feral Negro brats gets aggressive with th wrong White people, they will be blown away.

    If they want customers, fairgrounds will also have to be more proactive. If I were an owner, I would put up cameras to record all sound and motion, I would also hire a private security force (preferably manned with returning veterans who have combat experience) to dress up like civilians and wait for the next attack. I would order them to show no mercy the next time these little thugs attacked. And when the usual suspects showed up to give me grief, I’d fight them tooth and nail, blast the information all over the internet, talk radio, etc. Make sure the news reached all corners of the world, so this administration would have to back down lest it ruin their chances at re-election.

  16. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    August 30, 2010 - 6:17 am | Permalink

    As long as we’re on the topic of “muddy thinking”, I should perhaps add another caveat or two.

    Consciousness is not well-understood, and definitions of consciousness vary. Insofar as one can refer to (e.g.) “partial consciousness” and “group consciousness”, it is not quite the singular all-or-nothing property you make it out to be. Simple awareness as you understand it qualifies as a *kind* of consciousness, but not necessarily the only kind.

    For example, say we define consciousness as a reflexive operation of mind (a reflexive operation is an operation of something on itself) akin to recognition. What component of mind? You might be tempted to answer “the portion of which I am aware”, in which case the definition becomes “a reflexive recognition operation of the portion of mind of which I am aware”. But where consciousness is simplistically equated to your personal awareness, this amounts to:

    “Consciousness is a reflexive recognition operation of the portion of mind of which I am conscious”.

    That’s a circular definition, all but information-free. It’s wholly subjective and unscientific as hell. Which, of course, raises the possibility that what you call “consciousness” is empirically indistinguishable from other reflexive operations involving other levels or components of mind, and even from nonreflexive functions that might be simulated by the output of a Turing machine.

    So as it turns out, definitions of “consciousness”, including the one you seem to favor, are all rather “muddy” in the sense that they are empirically indistinguishable and their exclusivity cannot be established, which of course introduces a certain amount of semantic ambiguity.

    But perhaps this is overly technical, so let’s forget about it for a moment. What we’re actually discussing is a latency of or tendency toward racial consciousness – simplistically, a tendency toward awareness of one’s race which would be realized on the abeyance of psychological repression – and it is probably not too much to ask that we not be pedantically denied any use of the word “consciousness” in doing so.

    In fact, almost every mentally-unimpaired person of any race is aware (“conscious”) of being (white, black, asian, latino, etc.). So racial consciousness is given after all, and we see that what is really being repressed is awareness of the wider significance of that identification in various contexts.

    Inasmuch as repression can act on consciousness through mechanisms that are at least partially conscious (e.g., as when a remorseful pedophile strenuously distracts his own attention away from thoughts of nude children), it is not easy to disentangle from consciousness itself. One might, by invoking once again the disputed term “consciousness”, almost describe it as “consciousness limiting consciousness”…a conscious self-function of consciousness.

    And thus we come around to yet another point of confusion. You write:

    “To say, as you do, that it is an ‘inchoate’ race consciousness that is ‘verging’ on ‘full consciousness’ assumes that what you would like to see will actually transpire at some future point.”

    Not quite. Racial consciousness is a natural ideation which has already transpired and is ongoing in the minds of all intelligent people, but away from which their attention has been (in this case) consciously and intentionally diverted…again, the way a repentant paedophile might divert his own attention away from thoughts of nude children.

    So I guess that’s the real substance of our disagreement: you seem to think that oppressive White policemen are simply unaware that they are White, or at least unaware of the wider significance of that fact, while I maintain that their attention has merely been diverted away from certain (social and evolutionary) implications of that fact by years of indoctrination and social engineering of which they were, and are, quite well aware.

    Although I think I see where you might be coming from on this issue, I don’t see any rational alternative to my own viewpoint.

  17. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 29, 2010 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    “Er…we’re talking about latent, incipient, or inchoate racial consciousness … something that is on the verge of emerging into full consciousness, and is even now foreshadowed by certain behavioral trends with an implicit motivational aspect (people simply refusing to admit their true motives). ”

    It is this sort of muddy thinking I was challenging. Broadly, my point was that we ought to use words like “consciousness” with more precision. Consciousness is explicit. When I am conscious of something, I am aware of it, and I am aware that I am aware of it. Calling some vague racial regard Whites may have towards each other that they are not conscious of, if it exists at all, by the name of race “consciousness” only confuses the issue by assuming what some here desperately want to believe. In this case the subjects themselves not only aren’t aware of having this racial fellow feeling, they even, with nauseating sincerity, go to great lengths to deny having it and to prove they don’t have it. Further, as my examples showed, if we look only at their behavior, they really do act as if they have no regard for their race. Therefore, does it make any sense to speak of an unconscious race consciousness in Whites, i.e., implicit Whiteness? Strictly speaking, it seems to me it makes about as much sense as speaking of rich people who are not rich, or red things that are not red. To say, as you do, that it is an “inchoate” race consciousness that is “verging” on “full consciousness” assumes that what you would like to see will actually transpire at some future point. Maybe, maybe not. This is what needs to be shown. It’s an expression of hope on your part but not evidence. You also relate an anecdote about Iowa in support of your case. Apparently it didn’t occur to you, though, that the fact that White policemen in Iowa go to such great lengths to protect their population of wilding negroes in their depredations against Whites is just more indication that there is no emerging race consciousness. Judging from the behavior of these policemen (and what else could we judge them by?), they have no race loyalty at all. Egalitarians both by nature and by training, they are, in other words, Whites who are all too typical examples of the breed. Their egalitarianism and lack of racial consciousness is easy to prove. They admit it freely, and their actions accord with their words. But is it as easy to prove they have an unconscious racial consciousness, even if they happen to work in an all-White town? No, it isn’t, and I suggest that’s because they don’t. After all, that’s the simplest hypothesis.

  18. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 29, 2010 - 6:36 pm | Permalink

    That’s good to know about the Iowa cops. I brought my .38 when I went to Des Moines this summer, but checked the Iowa website on firearms first. (It has to be unloaded in the trunk.) Yeah, I don’t know what it is about Iowa. They seem, like a lot of rural places, to be trying to live down their white/agri image.

    By contrast, I also went to Colorado, a state I consider much more liberal than Iowa, and was surprised to read that you can keep a pistol loaded and in the passenger compartment (…and the scenery’s a whole lot better, too.)

  19. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    August 29, 2010 - 9:39 am | Permalink

    “These are all good reasons to think that it does not exist. Yet there’s another reason. The thing about consciousness is that it is, by definition, explicit. A “suppressed” White racial consciousness is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms reminscent of other equally questionable concepts like “repressed” memories, or Freud’s theories about unconscious sexual desires. It isn’t really consciousness at all. It bears no discernable relationship whatsoever to White racial consciousness, which is, if it is anything, a conscious proclamation of the unconditional superiority of the White race, and holding a preference for it above all other races.”

    Er…we’re talking about latent, incipient, or inchoate racial consciousness … something that is on the verge of emerging into full consciousness, and is even now foreshadowed by certain behavioral trends with an implicit motivational aspect (people simply refusing to admit their true motives). We’re talking about something that was once on the surface, but which has been actively suppressed through mass conditioning of the kind assiduously practiced in “The People’s Republic of Iowa”, as I recently heard a local Deputy Sherriff describe it.

    I happen live near the People’s Republic of Iowa. “Get Whitey Night”, as the Des Moines Fairgrounds problem was dubbed by the wild, hate-filled simians who perpetrated it, is a topic of open conversation here. People discuss it in connection with their 2nd Amendment rights.

    Unfortunately, the PRI frowns on the 2nd Amendment, to the extent that I (among others with out-of-state plates) have been stopped for no apparent reason and questioned as to whether I happened to have a pistol in the car. When you show your license to the officer, he pretends to have seen an out-of-state pistol permit peeking out from an obscure corner of your wallet. Of course, if you admit to actually having a pistol in the car, or even a non-Iowa permit for same, he’ll call as many of his fellow sell-outs as he can raise by radio or cell phone and they’ll ransack your vehicle, grab your weapon, and possibly incarcerate you, ostensibly to stop you from maybe possibly (as little Rahm might put it) endangering the precious Des Moines wildlife population.

    My point is that racial consciousness is being actively suppressed in places like Iowa. Don’t be foolish enough to presume that where repression is active, White passivity indicates White race-denial. It may be that Whites just don’t want to end up in the slammer, courtesy of their local Federal-funds-grabbing crooked politicians. (That’s what happens when governments and local political machines, enamored of easy bribe money and the absurd ease of throwing elections, disconnect themselves from the people whose interests they purport to represent.)

  20. August 28, 2010 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    “Everyone can see how easy it is even for negroes to bed White women if they happen to acquire fame or fortune”

    Blacks and Mexicans can be penniless nobodies and attractive White women and girls will bed them, I see it all too often. As a Christian I do have the hope that God will intervene.
    We shall see.
    For the future support your right to self-defense: http://gunowners.org/

  21. August 28, 2010 - 10:08 pm | Permalink

    Just observe the Glenn Beck crowd. All gushing over Martin Luther King and how they support legal immigration and all the rest of it.
    It is our hope that Whites will wake up yet Der weiße Engel’s view seems all to sadly to be more realistic. Of course the future may reveal a White awakening but observing Whites in stores and so forth I have little confidence in that happening.
    ANY group that allows to happen what Whites have allowed to happen, make that PAID to have happen, without resistance is fit for the dustbin of history. Unless they prove otherwise they were UNFIT in the Darwinian sense.

    • Stephane Hardy's Gravatar Stephane Hardy
      November 25, 2010 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

      The “Glenn Beck” crowd, like most of the average whites are just cowering from the repercussions of the racist tag, which is a real threat to social life today. That’s the price of individualism: no cohesion. Although I share Der weiße Engel’s view, I believe there are more people than we might think that are on “their toes”, waiting for the perfect timming to unleash hell.

  22. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 28, 2010 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

    “If it’s not clear to you, then you must not be very bright. ”

    […]

    “As these events continue, Whites will be pushed to the edge and some will react. That’s all it takes.”

    The General makes another dire prediction of some (almost certainly ineffectual) action at some vague time in the future. My failure to find him persuasive is supposed to prove that I’m not very bright. But again, he supplies no real reason why the current state of affairs will not continue indefinitely. After so many outrages have provoked no reaction, what’s one more, or a hundred more? According to DOJ statistics in the National Crime Victimization Survey, Whites are already letting tens of thousands of their women be raped by negroes each and every year, and yet they do nothing. In reality, even the tens of thousands reported by the Survey is probably a radical undercount, since that’s only about 100 per day, or 2 per state per day. Large states such as California or New York probably have orders of magnitude more rapes of White women by negroes than that, maybe 100 each all by themselves on many days. But Whites do nothing about it. They even refuse to talk about it. If you try to make them aware of it and get them to discuss it, they’ll call you a racist and run away as fast as they can. This failure to act on something that concerns their race so closely, in a Darwinian sense, gives me no reason to think that they will ever rebel.

    “Whites already do have a racial consciousness, and though it is suppressed it manifests itself in certain ways, e.g. ‘implicit whiteness,’ etc. ”

    The bogus concept of implicit whiteness is a good case in point. Let’s examine it. You define it as suppressed racial consciousness. But it’s pretty easy to show that the racial component of this supposed racial consciousness is weak to non-existent. The Tea Party is supposedly an implicitly White movement, as was the popular support for Ron Paul in the last election. But Ron Paul’s almost all-White supporters denied being racist, and Ron Paul himself swore that Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks were great heroes of his. Almost everyone in the Tea Party, too, will strenuously deny being racist. They would be delighted, and ARE delighted, on the rare occasions that present themselves, to bring negroes, Jews, and other non-Whites into their movement, and the only thing that prevents it is a shortage of recruits. In other words, what makes their movement White is non-Whites moving AWAY from them, not them moving towards each other, which would be more suggestive of a developing race consciousness. Or take the desire of Whites in America to live only among Whites, erroneously inferred from the statistical fact that neighborhoods, at this historical juncture, still have some relationship to race. How can it be distinguished from just the desire to live in a prosperous, crime-free neighborhood? It can’t. Or, take the vast number of White women who cavort with rich non-White celebrities. Everyone can see how easy it is even for negroes to bed White women if they happen to acquire fame or fortune, when even a casual inspection shows that negroes are barely human. If it exists at all, one must conclude it apparently doesn’t take much to overcome this “suppressed” racial consciousness.

    These are all good reasons to think that it does not exist. Yet there’s another reason. The thing about consciousness is that it is, by definition, explicit. A “suppressed” White racial consciousness is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms reminscent of other equally questionable concepts like “repressed” memories, or Freud’s theories about unconscious sexual desires. It isn’t really consciousness at all. It bears no discernable relationship whatsoever to White racial consciousness, which is, if it is anything, a conscious proclamation of the unconditional superiority of the White race, and holding a preference for it above all other races.

  23. heartfelt's Gravatar heartfelt
    August 28, 2010 - 6:15 pm | Permalink

    If it’s not clear to you, then you must not be very bright. I would suggest for you more time away from the computer and more time reading a few books and talking to real people. Put away the video games, kid, and join the real world.

    Every action has a reaction and eventually (I’m not sure when) Whites will act. Probably not en masse, but a little backlash here, a little hit-and-run there, and then it starts. History proves it. Human nature has not changed. It remains the same. Whites are still subject to the same passions and emotions as other people.

    Whites already do have a racial consciousness, and though it is suppressed it manifests itself in certain ways, e.g. ‘implicit whiteness,’ etc. I myself have noticed Whites talking about racial issues in a much more frank manner in the last year or so. I have recently met White people talking about leaving the US because of demographic changes. Anecdotes, I know, but novel encounters all the same at least for me.

    It is not necessary for Whites suddenly to develop a ‘White Supremacist’ mindset for us to set a different course. That you would seriously suggest this absurd idea reveals adoloescent thinking. It is necessary, however, for Whites to get behind (voluntarily or not) a dedicated core of White Nationalists who are focused on political/direct action, not endless theories. Successful revolutions are always perpetrated by an aggressive minority.

    Hey Junior, are you not aware of the recent massacre of Whites in Connecticut and the beatings of innocent Whites at the hands of African savages in Iowa? Are you even paying attention? As these events continue, Whites will be pushed to the edge and some will react. That’s all it takes.

  24. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 28, 2010 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    “The lack of a White response is unsustainable.”

    It’s not clear to me why you think this. There would appear to be no good reason to. Since it is the egalitarian fantasies of the White race itself that are primarily responsible for its own racial debacle, it would in that respect have to become un-White in order to change course. In other words, the current course charted towards racial oblivion is an outgrowth of who Whites are; the logical result of their genetics and their historical interactions with others. To avoid this fate, they would have to suddenly change their worldview completely, develop a racial consciousness of their own, and become White supremacists. That doesn’t seem likely, as it is not in their genetics — at least to the same extent as it appears to be in the Jews’. Further, it’s simply not enough for a handful of them to dream of an ethnostate, with equal rights and privileges among all other states, for this is just another version of egalitarianism. It’s pretty easy to see that “separate but equal” race segregation on a planetary scale would fail to preserve the genetic integrity of race just as surely as it always has when tried within the confines of a single state, and for many of the same reasons. But then, that seems to be what they want.

    The problem is egalitarianism. If Whites could be compelled to forsake it, then it would obviate the need for their own racial state. But if they continue this delusional thinking that all other races are equal to themselves, then even having their own state will not matter, because it will have been raised on a defective foundation, and soon fall down.

    “Massacres that target whites, such as the one in Iowa recently, will serve to wake up whites and legitimize racial violence. It’s happening. As white bodies pile up in the streets, Whites can not help but notice and act.”

    It’s happening? Where, General? Where is it happening? I’ve heard of no reprisals whatsoever. No reprisals for this, or Knoxville, or Wichita, or any of myriad of other outrages in recent years. Even YOU haven’t acted. What’s stopping YOU? From doing something more than going to the library to read Sorel again, I mean.

  25. heartfelt's Gravatar heartfelt
    August 28, 2010 - 7:46 am | Permalink

    I keep telling you people, the race war has started. The power elites in government and media are turning a blind eye, and by doing so, are tacitly giving their support to such anti-White terror operations.

    The lack of a White response is unsustainable. Sooner or later, white people must ACT. We WILL act. Don’t delude yourselves that we will experience a peaceful future, or that we can solve this crisis via a political process. The ongoing racial revolution in the US will be accompanied by bloodletting on a massive scale with enormous geopolitical, demographic, economic, and cultural effects.

    On the issue of revolution or liberation war, I think Whites need to look into their soul and ask themselves, would you be willing to commit extreme acts of violence in defense of your family, your people, your country? For White people, that is ALL IT COMES DOWN TO. That’s it. We are not in a difficult dilemma. Once you accept the moral necessity of revolution and its attendant behaviors, then the process simply becomes a question of, How? Where? When?

    Massacres that target whites, such as the one in Iowa recently, will serve to wake up whites and legitimize racial violence. It’s happening. As white bodies pile up in the streets, Whites can not help but notice and act. Liberation war becomes a moral imperative. It becomes inevitable.

    By all means read your Traditional texts, your survival guides, and your combat manuals. But above all don’t forget to read your Georges Sorel.

  26. August 26, 2010 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

    me @ August 26, 2010 at 4:32 AM

    Fools think we have a “free press” you just showed the truth. Good one.

    The Pearcy Massacre

  27. August 26, 2010 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

    White couple attacked in Richmond VA Denny’s
    Ebonics title from homies videosite. youtube takes down any vids of our persuasion.

    Video: In Richmond, Virginia: White Dude Tries To Stick Up For Himself & Gets It Bad By 2 Guys Inside Dennys! (His Girlfriend Goes Hard)

  28. Kratos's Gravatar Kratos
    August 26, 2010 - 10:13 am | Permalink

    You don’t have to be too plain about “separation” because we all do have our own little ghettos. They don’t care about us, so we should return that in kind and ignore them.

  29. me's Gravatar me
    August 26, 2010 - 4:32 am | Permalink

    How is this for orwellian goodle des moines fair grounds.. the first result:

    “2010 Iowa State Fair | Non Stop Fun”
    http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1_____enUS358US359&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=des+moines+fairgrounds

    “News for des moines fairgrounds

    KCRG
    Des Moines police unable to confirm State Fair violence was race …‎ – 12 hours ago
    Des Moines police investigators are unable to confirm weekend violence that occurred outside the Iowa State Fairgrounds was racially motivated, “

  30. me's Gravatar me
    August 26, 2010 - 4:16 am | Permalink

    Shiva.
    there won’t be any hate crime charges .. Eric Holder has made it clear they do not apply to white people when whites are attacked.
    MSM will not become outraged – this is what the elite owners want – the more chaos, the more control. Anarcho-tyranny.

    Yes, it cannot go on like this. Where it will go is the only question now, and how fast.

  31. August 25, 2010 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

    I read about such coordinated attacks quite frequently, this is one from IOWA, which is 3% negro and yet went BIG for Obama in 2008.
    The ABSENCE of national news on this, the ABSENCE of FBI, DHS, JTTF, et al in Iowa on this surely presages what Connely, MacDonald and others have warned.

    Fair Fights: Police Trying to Figure Out if Race Played Role in Attacks

    Police spokeswoman Lori Lavarato said officers are still trying to figure out what role, if any, race had in the incidents. She said, “We had a lot of assaults on people randomly walking out of the Iowa State Fair. Most of our victims happen to be white. Is that a racial thing? I don’t know. It’s all under investigation.”

    Videos:
    racially motivated attacks at Iowa State Fair:
    MYABC5.COM Video

    blacks attack people leaving Iowa State Fair:
    MYABC5.COM Video

    A black police officer is now under investigation for calling the arresting officer and asking for a suspect’s release because she knew him.

    <A HREF="http://www.whotv.com/news/who-story-fair-fight-police-report-082310,0,7364386.story"OFFICER INVESTIGATED: Des Moines Sergeant Asked Officer To Release Suspect

    Police Sergeant Lillie Miller called the arresting officer and asked him to release White with just a ticket. When the officer refused, according to the report, Sgt. Miller replied, “Fine, I will just bond him out”. And, police say, that’s what Miller did.

    <A HREF="http://www.whotv.com/sports/who-player-arrested,0,1517665.story"Hoover Basketball Player Arrested

    officers arrested Reginald White on a charge of assault causing bodily injury. Police say a group of young men including the 18 year old, White, were randomly attacking people.

    Security to increase outside fairgrounds

    About 1 a.m. Saturday, a roving group of hooligans attacked several fairgoers outside the gates.

    “I was bleeding all over the place,” said Bo Gaudineer, 24, of Des Moines, after being attacked by a large group of people in the 200 block of East 30th Street, near the fairgrounds. “They just pummeled me. One of them hit me on the side of the head with brass knuckles. Fifteen people were kicking me. My brother needed four staples to close the cut on his forehead.”
    Gaudineer said he was leaving the fair when he was attacked.

    Police say it’s ‘very possible’ attacks near fairgrounds had racial overtones

    YouTube – Gangs of Blacks attack Whites at Iowa state fair

    August 25th, 1967

  32. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    August 25, 2010 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Der weiße Engel said:

    “You just don’t get it. White racists are racists not because they don’t know any negroes or latrinos, but because they know them all too well. ”

    This is ABSOLUTELY true. I live in the midwest, and without a doubt, the people in my state mosty likely to have “peace love and understanding” attitudes concerning race are whites from small towns or ‘burbs. I’ve lived 12 years in black neighborhoods and another 10 years in a “multi-ethnic” neighborhood. Not anymore. To paraphrase: once you’ve left black, you never go back.

    Of course, it’s different in the South were there are lots of rural blacks. Rural whites have more sense than to consider such nonsense.

    Of course, there are decent blacks, but we’re talking about populations, NOT individuals. There are definitely crappy whites, I would never deny that, but as a population, there’s no comparison… and no question as to which population I would prefer for my genetic destiny.

  33. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    August 25, 2010 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

    james:”Please! Learn to befriend some blacks and Hispanics. They’re really not that bad. Most are even Christians… :[

    I take it you live in the burbs, and that’s fine, just don’t pretend to know what it’s like on the other side. You depiction of the city verse suburb is comical.”

    james, james, james. You just don’t get it. White racists are racists not because they don’t know any negroes or latrinos, but because they know them all too well. I have personally known quite a few of each, and they all, without exception, sucked. In every way possible. All of the time. It can’t be denied that throughout the land, American cities have been laid waste by them. Wake up! Do a little research into your subject before spouting off with your canned, ADL-approved spiel.

    America’s biggest problem has become one it cannot even name, and james’ comment here is indicative of this state of denial. It’s a human capital problem that is bad now and will only get worse, based as it is in the biological differences between the races, particularly the differential in birth rates. Mexicans build Mexicos — corrupt sewers of overpopulated countries that are crude imitations of the White man’s civilization. Africans lack even that much imitative ability. They build Africas — mud-hut cultures teeming with violence, disease, cannibalism, and death.

  34. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    August 25, 2010 - 11:13 am | Permalink

    Syrians, Lebanese, and other newly arrived Asiatics like to set up their tents, and sell their wares in Negro neighborhoods near the housing projects. Their money is more important to them than their lives.

    Nothing more disgusting than these brand name gas station/grocery stores owned by these damn Asian medical doctors, and staffed by their imported tribesmen & women. They are everywhere today, and the only thing they all have in common is filth.

    Brand name oil companies let these Asians get away it.

    One look at one of these Asian owned shitholes, and you don’t have to wonder why we are having all of these weird outbreaks in and around our hospitals.

    In someways these Asiatics are as bad or worse than Jews.

  35. james's Gravatar james
    August 25, 2010 - 10:47 am | Permalink

    “We whites, of course, don’t have the option of returning home in order to escape this madness. This is our home. We’re stuck.”

    – this sounds like victimhood crap. Golda Meir could’ve said this junk.
    Please! Learn to befriend some blacks and Hispanics. They’re really not that bad. Most are even Christians… :[

    I take it you live in the burbs, and that’s fine, just don’t pretend to know what it’s like on the other side. You depiction of the city verse suburb is comical.

    Last paragraph: “The lesson is getting clearer and clearer: we cannot continue to live like this. It’s going to kill us. We need to move toward something else, whether it’s some form of separation or a greater white consciousness that serves as a much stronger bulwark against black violence and theft — and other anti-white ethnic attacks.”

    -Replace white with Zionist and you have Israeal’s argument in a nutshell.
    May want to revise your thinking on this, cause, sorry to say, it lacks depth.

  36. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    August 25, 2010 - 8:25 am | Permalink

    Chinese once had the reputation (among criminals) of refusing to give up the money to robbers, even at gunpoint.

1 Trackback to "Christopher Donovan: Pick Your Poison: Death, or a Civil Rights Lawsuit"

  1. on August 27, 2010 at 8:43 am

Comments are closed.