I lived in New York City for seven years. It was quite a time: I grinded through the hellfires of law school, watched as Plane No. 2 hit the World Trade Center, and came to racial and ethnic consciousness.
I do not miss living there. It had its excitement, its restaurants and museums, its bright lights and maximum adventure. But ultimately, it was not a place to call home. I could have been hit and killed by a bus and it would not have been even a brief item in the newspaper.
As an “undifferentiated White”, or white man without clear Irish, Italian or other ethnic source, I certainly did not have an ethnic family to embrace. I paid a handsome sum for rent for the privilege of living in an atmosphere of vague to explicit racial hatred toward straight White non-Jews with traditional yearnings.
I was never comfortable with the juxtaposition of extreme wealth and extreme poverty. As a practical matter, if civil unrest got out of hand, New York’s wealthy would be sitting ducks for armies of poor Blacks and Hispanics: unarmed, exposed, forced to use the same streets if not the same elevators. Everyone’s on the same power and support grids. How long could one survive in the Trump Tower with complete anarchy down below? You didn’t have to go farther than an outer borough — even Staten Island — or above 125th Street — to feel unsafe as a white person. And that was with Rudy Giuliani as mayor.
In midtown and downtown, smartly-dressed White (and Jewish) law firm partners making seven figures would glide along fine carpeted hallways high above the honking, yelling and grit down below, munching on $15 sandwiches and $4 coffees while small-time drug deals unfolded below. Tom Wolfe‘s written about this somewhere — was it Bonfire of the Vanities? The whole affair just seem unnatural, untenable, unhealthy.
A recent story gives a clue. Residents of this buidling downtown pay $4,000 a month in rent — only to have drug-related execution-style killings right inside the building. That’s your reward for billing 2200 hundred hours a year? By what standard is that a good life? By what standard is that a good society?
This differential is too much to sustain, which is why the middle class is leaving.
Some statistics show that the steady half-century of white flight from New York has slowed, and their numbers have even gone up slightly.
I don’t know what to make of that — the beginnings of a White ghetto in Manhattan? If there’s a racially conscious White ingathering in Manhattan, by all means, join it if you will.
But I doubt it. My advice to young Whites wrapping up their big city adventure is to aim for White community and the acquisition of real property where it will be safe in the event of meltdown.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
I agree completely Mr. Donovan. I grew up in New York city but left more than a decade ago. By the way you say you have no ethnic group you belong to. Is Donovan a Siberian name?!
CD any advice for a. where to move in the east coast? b. how to move -
for example I would like to move to a smaller more white state like Maine or NH – but what sort of job market do they have?
any advice, anyone?
as for whites moving into NYC – Steve Sailer pointed out that what the elite are doing is pressuring blacks to move to housing in outskirt suburbs and they are replacing poor chinese in the housing projects – Harlem for example is pretty safe now, belief it or not.
also Wall Street thanks to TARP has actually been doing well rents are going back up in Manhattan.
But NY as you say is only one disaster away from complete chaos.
whalen – i think he means in NYC – there are pockets of white irish or italian neigborhoods but wasps no longer function as an ethnic group as they did in NYC well into the 1960s
Excellent column.
A perspective that rings true for me, living near NYC. I enjoy you advice for younger educated whites. Keep up the good work
You can talk about Irish and Italian New Yorkers until your eyes change color, but NYC is a Jewish town, period. Pick a white-skinned English-speaking person at random, and he/she will be a Jew to well over 50% probability. Add to that the abundance of militant fags and dykes and loud, aggressive Negroes who act like they own they place (they don’t, almost everything belongs to Jews), and the general police state atmosphere – low-IQ pigs on crack everywhere you go, all specializing in the harassment of relatively low-risk White people – and the fact that you can go the better part of a day without hearing an American accent, and the place really doesn’t have much to recommend it. Many of the restaurants, museums, libraries, and theaters are as good as they say, but expensive and packed with foreigners and weirdos. Traffic is horrible and parking all but nonexistent. Some people love it; I wasn’t one of them. So I left. Last time I was there, an average hotel room was $400 a night (you can easily pay twice that). Unless you’re in town for something lucrative, it’s simply not worth it.
I wonder how many of the 30-35% of “White” New Yorkers are actually of European ancestry? My guess is the overwhelming majority of NYC “Whites” are Jews, Syrians, Lebanese, Turks etc. etc., marginal Whites of Asian ancestry.
In the Carolinas they refer to New Yorkers as “half backs”, half way back to New York. LOL.
Tom, eurodale – statistically yes but you’d be amazed how your ‘circle’ becomes pretty white – keep in mind, i think jews are only about 10% of the population here – maybe higher – but large % are hassidim or orthodox and are a closed community -
by nature of whatever your activities are you start hanging around your own kind. just as you would with american in a foriegn country .
I agree its rapidly going downhill -perhaps to the point that it will become like the 70s. such a shame because what the Anglos built is still the only part that makes it beautiful – the jewish elite have by and large ruined it and continue to trash it because they don’t think long term, have no love of nature (hence they reduce park land rather than increase it) and have poor aesthetic judgement and are hostile to anything remotely ‘western’ looking – hence their desire to tear down landmarks, etc.
me: “i think jews are only about 10% of the population here”
If you include all five boroughs of NYC, me, that might be about right. But Jews probably account for at least one fourth of the total population of Manhattan, or did when I lived there (and I doubt that the percentage is any lower now). Bear in mind that quite a few of them claim to be of European or “Russian” ancestry, but their names and other cues tell a different story. Also consider that many of those who commute to work from the suburbs – Westchester, Nassau, Suffolk – are Jews who don’t show up as residents in the official demographic, but are nevertheless crawling all over the place like ticks on a coon dog during business hours.
Manhattan is as close to Israel as many of the Chosen will ever get.
spokane washington, coure da lane or anywhere in idaho Montana Oregone,.. pnw…
The PNW (seattle) is getting inundated with Somalis and Chinese – the Beacon Hill area in Seattle is almost exclusively those groups, with a few African-Americans and hispanics thrown in. The place is known for gang activity.
I went to the U of Washington, and one of the Jews who was head of a certain dept. there said she’d moved to the NW because there wasn’t enough diversity there and (I am assuming) she felt compelled to “do something about it”.
Go thru the main hall of Seattle Central Community College and you will see pictures of the current students on the walls (all Asian – not a single white or home grown black among them).
The fact that a mostly white area like the PNW is getting inundated with Asian and African “immigrants” (and we’re not sure how many are legal) is probably orchestrated by the likes of this character I mentioned and others like her. This is an orchestrated event. Not something that just happened randomly.
Please read and pass along KMac’s new article. IMO, it really gets to the heart of the matter. He really nails it in the last two paragraphs:
Recent research on Individualism/Collectivism
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Individualism-Collectivism.html
There just aren’t very many places that whites can escape to nowadays, that is those places that are clean, have inexpensive housing and land, a temperate climate and plenty of jobs at good wages. Idaho, Montana and eastern Washington would be ideal, if jobs were plentiful there; They’re not. August Kreis thought that northern Pennsylvania was a good location. That area is about 98% white, has plenty of homes with acreage, a climate that is suitable for northern Europeans and adequate jobs. But the folks thataway didn’t take much to August and he left in a huff, saying that the people there were “inbred.”
TGD: “Idaho, Montana and eastern Washington would be ideal, if jobs were plentiful there; They’re not.”
The Whitest and most fiscally solvent part of the US includes the Heartland and points north, notably including the Dakotas. Reasonably priced land is still available, and while the jobs aren’t exactly plentiful, the situation is above-par. Montana, Idaho and Wyoming are perched securely on our shoulder.
This area would have taken off quite some time ago with disgruntled Whites, but most modern White boys lack the right stuff to make a go of it here…winters too cold, too much hard physical work and machine-savvy in keeping up the land, too many “toothless hicks” for a “fulfilling social life”, too few department stores and other commercial conveniences. (My heart just bleeds for you little pussycats.)
But don’t panic just yet. The Christian Whites already here are holding down the fort … for now.
js: “Please read and pass along KMac’s new article. IMO, it really gets to the heart of the matter.”
Great article by MacDonald…those maps do tell a very clear story.
However, I suspect that the “collectivism” variable is largely politically defined, and that religion has been omitted from its determination. A map of religious prevalence, including atheism, would nicely complete the ensemble.
This would no doubt support a strong correlation between Christianity and individualism (and its correlates), clearly implying that a “personal relationship with God” – one of the key features of Christianity – is psychologically supportive of individualism, compensating for the relative absence of collectivism (whereby the social collective takes over certain functions of the God “construct” to blunt isolation anxiety).
The former polytheism of Western peoples performed somewhat the same function by anthropomorphization.
(By “politically defined”, I naturally mean “defined on social criteria including cultural and economic factors”.)
I don’t understand. Why are we calling the reason for the downfall of West a measure of success? If individualist “Christian Whites” have proven anything, it’s that they can’t hold down a box of cereal. There has not been a white area in America yet that has resisted cultural decimation by outlanders. Entire neighborhoods, towns and cities destroyed. And it goes on and on and on. That’s the thing about a having a “personal relationship with God” – it means you can do whatever the hell you want. As religions go protestant “Christianity” is about as capricious as Islam. Except at least Islam affords its acolytes the moral fortitude to protect their lands.
Like any impulse with possible negative implications, the individualist impulse can and should be controlled by any reasonable culture. Especially a culture that doesn’t wish to be controlled by Jews. No matter where you go, there you are. And there everybody else is. Everybody and their “personal relationship with God.” Not a personal relationship with right and wrong and restraint, but with every impulse that can be shoehorned into a reasonable rationale.
Don’t change your location, change yourself.
Lilli – “The fact that a mostly white area like the PNW is getting inundated with Asian and African “immigrants” (and we’re not sure how many are legal) is probably orchestrated by the likes of this character I mentioned and others like her. This is an orchestrated event. Not something that just happened randomly.”
True. The treasonous American elites are trying to turn the entire North American West Coast in an Asiatic colony. If current trends continue, most of the American and Canadian Pacific coastal states – from San Diego all the way up to Vancouver – will be majority Asian with a large Hispanic underclass.
TO ME SAYS- WHAT I MEANT WAS DONOVAN IS OBVIOUSLY AN IRISH NAME. YET DONOVAN HAD NO GROUP TO GO TO. I KNOW ITS A PEN NAME .IF SO WHY DIDN’T HE CHOOSE ONE THAT IS MORE WASP SOUNDING LIKE CHURCHILL.
Spooky: “There has not been a white area in America yet that has resisted cultural decimation by outlanders.”
Ever been to Appalachia, Spooky? Many of the hollers are still dead White, with little Christian chapels and cemeteries right in the centers of them. (Admittedly, the so-called “trailer trash” Whites are better at discouraging interlopers than the yuppies.) But it’s not just Appalachia. Within ten miles of where I live, a considerable distance from the nearest community of hill folk, a hotel housing Mexican illegals imported to work in a local meat packing facility was recently burned to the ground by outraged locals, God bless them (no casualties except the hotel and the bedbugs).
“Everybody and their ‘personal relationship with God.’ Not a personal relationship with right and wrong and restraint, but with every impulse that can be shoehorned into a reasonable rationale.”
In fact Christianity makes a very strong distinction between right and wrong. But my point is that the religious continuum with Christianity on the far right and Atheistic Materialism (communism, PC) on the far left is characterized, more or less, by decreasing individuality and greater social collectivism. At one end, we have “Western democracy”; at the other, we have the police state, with a totalitarian bureaucracy functioning as the material equivalent of God.
The fact that Christianity, the most individualistic of these ideologies, is even now being directly displaced by the most collectivist of these ideologies (communism / PC) is quite ominous, as this trend is maximally inconsistent with the genetic constitution of White Americans and Europeans. This suggests, once again, that the ultimate idea is to eliminate the White genome.
js: “Please read and pass along KMac’s new article. IMO, it really gets to the heart of the matter. He really nails it in the last two paragraphs:
Recent research on Individualism/Collectivism
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Individualism-Collectivism.html”
The terminology used is confusing, and threatens to lead down a rabbit hole, as usual. For example, it’s not very clear in this article if KMD means that individualism/collectivism is the same thing as lack of ethnocentrism/ethnocentrism, or merely its correlate. In the first paragraph he states these dimensions are “intimately related”, but then goes on to imply, in the concluding paragraphs, that it’s more or less the same thing. He also seems at times here to equate individualism/collectivism with non-conformism/conformism, which to me seems highly questionable.
I marvel that someone like KMD, ensconced (or is that more like, barricaded in his office?) in the politically correct environment of the university, can believe that the West is high on a scale of non-conformism. If there is anything that typifies the mass man it is his conformism, and in the educational system, especially his ideological conformism. The political correctness found, naturally, in every last one of our colleges and universities (and what else would we expect of a society of born conformists?), is simply one of the more odious forms it takes right now. In general, conformism is both a product and a requirement of mass culture; i.e., of technological civilization. Moreover, there is no escape: Even when mass man undertakes to rebel against conformity, he has been fashioned by the system into such a conformist that even his rebellion conforms to a socially-approved pattern, as KMD can confirm simply by counting the number of piercings and tattoos among the more “daring” and “rebellious” campus youth. It will be more credible to discuss the relative prevalence “individualism” in American culture vs. other cultures when more than one in a thousand of his students will dare to publicly associate himself with KMD’s ideas.
There are many aspects to social conformism, and they are particularly difficult to render into quantitative, rather than qualitative measure, which means that they are difficult to treat scientifically. When we look honestly at the Whites of the mind-deadened, politically-correct, sheep-like West, happily chewing their cud as they march off a cliff, it seems clear that the capacity for technical innovation found in a tiny fraction of a percent of these sheep is only a rough measure of social conformism, if it’s related at all. Likewise with ethnocentrism; it appears to stand in no necessary relationship to social conformity. Are modern Whites are individualists? No! They are conformists to the core; and, unfortunately for the future of their race, they are conformists who are set on proving that they lack any vestige of ethnocentrism.
” Idaho, Montana and eastern Washington would be ideal, if jobs were plentiful there; They’re not.”
Define “plentiful.” WY has the LOWEST unemployment rate in the nation. Plenty of good mining jobs. Proof? CAT (Caterpillar corp) is leading the DOW.
As worldwide Peak Oil continues to bump along the plateau of production and heads into the coming precipitous decline, WY’s oil, natural gas, coal (to farm for coalbed methane) and uranium will become ever more valuable. WY’s economy is so good BECAUSE of Peak Oil and will only get better. Plus, we’ve got nukes for The Stand, should it come to that.
Come. But put rocks in your pocket. The wind is fierce.
I recently blogged about an excellent book that relates to your experience of rich lawyers floating about chaos: The Trap by one Brooks. He quantifies and explains something I saw but couldn’t quite put my finger on: up to Reagan, teachers, bankers and lawyers could live in the same neighborhoods, since they made about the same [to start, of course]; since the Reagen era, there’s been an explosive increase in the mega-rich, who have priced the rest of us out of a middleclass lifestyle. Now, its corporate lawyer or live in a cardboard box. Of course, the author is a liberal goo-goo, but the analysis is spot on, and only more true today; “destruction of the middle class” strike a bell?
http://jamesjomeara.blogspot.com/2010/09/trapped-in-another-closet-reading.html
Talk about “the number of jews” reminds me of a survey I heard about a while back. Americans in general wildly overestimate the number of Jews; 2-3 % and declining [intermarriage, Arabs and Hispanics, etc.] but estimates ran from 20-60%! This, of course, was attributed, of course, to anti-Semitism.
But the kicker was was that JEWS also were wrong, though much lower: 8-10%. So how come smart, well-educated Jews overestimated their own numbers? In both cases, this is due to media/political dominance, though it was mitigated by the aforementioned smarts, education, and just basic knowledge of ones own tribe.
I believe that Jews make up twice the % in NYC, but that still is an unbelievably low 5-8%. Yet it seems that it’s Jew-Jew-Jew all day long.
Why? Well, the same media saturation, plus political power [holidays celebrated openly at City Hall and days off, etc.], as well as the factor I mentioned in my last post: there are no more jobs for the White middle or working class. As I wander Manhattan, there are only negros and hispanics, who hold down the deli, taxi, bus driving jobs, and a handful of “whites” mostly Jews, who hold the offices-high-in-the-sky law, business and politics jobs.
I ask myself every day: Where beez de white pipple?
BTW, a learned from a Facebook pal that in his state, Wisconsin [!] every member of the congressional delegation, house and senate, is a Jew.
Yeah, there are still plenty of mostly white regions left in the US, but they’re so far off the radar of white people who claim they want to be around other whites that they rarely come up in conversations about the best places to live. WHY? Because even though pro-whites may say they want to live in the best place to raise a family, they’ll never leave their high paying computer/professional jobs in large urban centers…they’re addicted to their affluence just like everyone else.
But before you think I’m being overly condemning, consider this – I also think it’s best they stay where they’re at. Why? North Dakota doesn’t need more conservative whites, Milwaukee does. Remember, white flight is how the Charlie Rangels and Andrew Youngs and Marion Barrys of the world got into positions of power (not to mention the legions of white politicians who will gladly sell their allegience to the biggest voting block.)
BTW, most under-40,000 pop. towns west of the Appalacians and north of the Ohio River (in other words, throughout most of the countrty) are still largely white. So are rural northern Alabama and rural northern Arkansas (last time I was there.)
@James O’Meara: and for an apotheosis of the Chosen, see Calif.: 2 Senators, it seems like forever now, both Jewesses: one Red subversive, one corporate crook. Still, they rise high, then fall hard. I’ve a feeling their next plunge is going to attain terminal velocity.
@O’Meara: Both WI sens are jewish, but only one of its 8 congressmen is.
Lili wrote: “The fact that a mostly white area like the PNW is getting inundated with Asian and African “immigrants” (and we’re not sure how many are legal) is probably orchestrated by the likes of this character I mentioned and others like her. This is an orchestrated event. Not something that just happened randomly.”
The PNW was a better place to live before all this “diversity” crap. As to the Jewish head of the dept. who moved to the PNW because there wasn’t enough diversity, you should have asked her if she thought there was enough diversity in Israel, where they actively work to keep non-Jews out and their native non-Jews down.
“Diversity” is destroying our country. Time for whites to wake up and recognize they are under a state of siege.
Unfortunately, New York City has long become a balkanised society of blacks, mulattoes, mestizos et cetera. Given such racial realities: it is advisable that we as European-Americans (including the Continentals) tell other whites never to consider living there.
New York City’s Third-World maladies seem to be permanent at this point of its history.
Don’t think about a geographic move. STAND where you are – like a man! As Huey Long once said, even a dog can learn to do that.
Spooky doesn’t understand that white areas remained white and kept non-whites out. When whites were in charge. Once the jews bought up DC – with our money – they were able to start the big change. Notice the govt. hauls in stinking, filthy third world invaders from Somalia etc. and makes dead sure to dump them in the whitest towns in the US.
I’ve lived in New York for over 10 years and agree with almost everything in the article.
Having lived in other major cities in the US, though, I must say that I have perceived as much or more violence in West Coast cities like LA & SF.
Recently I took a road trip up through New England and was horrified to discover the “cultural diversity” of ghettos and slums all along there as well. Silly me … thought that I could get away from it.
ny sucks, except for the food. the city that never sleeps is such a crock.
You cannot even go to a decent club. It’s just a big drinkland of corporate suits.
They sell people 2 bedroom flats for $500,000 only for rats to kick the poor purchasers out in a fortnight. Sell a house for $500,000 and buy it back less than half that ammount is not bad huh.
Do these developers warehouse rats somewhere in NY just to release them when its convinient for them.
Hmm… sounds like Lower Manhattan… I once visited Lower Manhattan’s South Street Seaport. While on my way to this area via William St. (just off of Broadway), I came across many rats along the side walks. The people in those expensive residences are surrounded by urban conditions that should have questioned their sanity prior to moving in.
En fin: it’s not a healthy area to raise a white family no matter what salary is being paid to the father working for nearby Wall Street (criminal, anti-White Wall Street that is).
Here’s an idea to blow you back on your heels: Group Cooperation.
Consider the wagon trains that once traversed the Great Plains. Not one of those pioneers wondered if a job would be available when he arrived. But every one here who mentions moving mentions “job” in the next breath.
We’re a century deep into industrialization. Most of us are the timid sons of office cube occupants, and the grandsons and great-grandsons of Ford drill press operators. For generations we have been genetically selected for passivity, docility, and submissiveness to orders. As movement raw material we have less potential than a pack of teacup Yorkshire Terriers do for heeding the Call Of The Wild.
Group Cooperation. The New Pioneers. Are these things possible?
In my humble opinion: an eventual revolution will force a genetic adaptation into a fullness of courage and clarity (i.e. an ‘active’ manhood for one’s ‘nation’).
Such is the ‘Group Cooperation’.
“Group Cooperation. The New Pioneers. Are these things possible?”
Unfortunately, not to the extent that they were for the American pioneers, who were often provided with hundreds of pristine acres without cost or taxation and unbound by laws designed for government and corporate control of agriculture.
But then again, the pioneers enjoyed far less security and had to work much harder per acre than do modern farmers. So, given any real work ethic at all – not the kind of “work ethic” designed for shuffling paper, tapping on keyboards, and ambitiously navigating corporate spider webs, but for actually generating sweat – it would indeed be possible for groups of constructive White people to spread out across the land and establish their own “wilderness communities” wherever the start-up costs are not prohibitive.
But they’d better be prepared to do some actual physical work, as opposed to merely bellyaching about the fact that too many of the cushier jobs have been stolen by Jews. They should also be prepared to shun the Jewish banking system that has been the death of small farming, striving instead for economic self-sufficiency and establishing their own medium of trade.
Eurodele,
On this blog you seem to be one of two people with a clue.
I previously wrote:
“For generations we have been genetically selected for passivity, docility, and submissiveness to orders. As movement raw material we have less potential than a pack of teacup Yorkshire Terriers do for heeding the Call Of The Wild.”
When I began my search for evidence of the above, Dr. MacDonald was unable to provide any. Soooo, I had to find it on my own. Here’s a wee bit you may enjoy, thanks to Dr. Lynch…
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/3/961.full.pdf+html
From page 6:
“Thus, with a complete relaxation of natural selection, the expected decline in fitness associated with mutations in coding DNA alone appears to be on the order of 1% to 3% per generation.”
…
“Although such a mutational buildup would be unnoticeable on a generation timescale, over the course of a couple of centuries (approximately six generations), the consequences are likely to become serious, particularly if human activities cause an increase in the mutation rate itself (by increasing levels of environmental mutagens). A doubling in the mutation rate would imply a 2% to 10% decline in fitness per generation, and by extension, a 12% to 60% decline in 200 years.”
We can reasonably date the start of the industrial revolution in England to no later than 1820. And in the USA to 1840. For average reproductive purposes a “generation” is 25 – 30 years at the outside. England has probably experienced eight full generational cycles since the start of the industrial revolution. Here in the USA we’ve seen about six.
1 x .97 x .97 x .97 x .97 x .97 = 0.858 This is the NYC crew now talking about leaving NYC.
Eurodele,
Six to eight generations of selection for passivity, docility, and submissiveness to orders. Throw in one Civil War and a two World Wars for paring purposes. Throw in one Korea, one Vietnam, and one permanent War to End All Wars. Blend the results well in an increasingly Third World environment for one to three generations.
Group Cooperation. The New Pioneers. Are these ideas possible for whites? Not for most of us. The majority have been “socially engineered” past salvaging. They can’t be persuaded to do “the right thing,” if it involves risk. Period. End of story.
Something else is required – something which targets the minority of the white population worth salvaging.
Praxis: “Here’s a wee bit you may enjoy, thanks to Dr. Lynch…
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/3/961.full.pdf+html ”
That’s quite an excellent paper by Lynch. It’s exactly the kind of research that establishes the need to reverse accumulating genetic deterioration due to modern civilization.
You’re right about dysgenic influences on initiative – loss of fitness is reflected in avoidance of risk and stress. Its victims become fearful and dependent, unwilling to leave their perceived safety zones no matter what the potential gain. In principle, it should be possible to combine genetic and psychological testing to measure the kind of fitness that would characterize a new breed of pioneer. But merely locating acceptable stock is not enough; motivation is also important, necessitating some amount of self-selection.
The prospects for this will improve as times get harder, which they probably soon will do. Those with the right stuff will be less inclined to hold out for the privileged life that their high general fitness would otherwise seem to promise. As the economy, crime situation, food supply, and service levels deteriorate in society at large, the promise of a cleaner, healthier, more vital, more responsible, more cooperative, and more racially homogeneous “pioneer” lifestyle will become increasingly attractive to those with the strength and independence to bear it.
Shorter-range incentives may also be explored.
“But merely locating acceptable stock is not enough; motivation is also important, necessitating some amount of self-selection.”
Right. Ancestry is insufficient.
“As the economy, crime situation, food supply, and service levels deteriorate in society at large, the promise of a cleaner, healthier, more vital, more responsible, more cooperative, and more racially homogeneous “pioneer” lifestyle will become increasingly attractive to those with the strength and independence to bear it.”
These are the people serious whites should strive to attract.
This “New Pioneer” business needs careful definition. Previously my associate and I put a lot of effort into exploring the implications of “Pioneer Little Europe”. In my opinion, however, the English libertarian model of rugged individualist pioneering has proven unsustainable. Not only did it come late to the scene after the Indians were pretty well subdued, but the Depression era Dustbowl wiped out those weak, individualist homesteads by the tens of thousands. Thus we had the Great Depression Migration of “Okies” to the promised land of California.
I think a great deal of our near future will look much like the Hanseatic League period in Northern Europe:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanseatic_League
”The Hanseatic League (also known as the Hanse or Hansa) was an economic alliance of trading cities and their guilds that dominated trade along the coast of Northern Europe in the later Middle Ages. It stretched from the Baltic to the North Sea and inland during the Late Middle Ages and early modern period (c.13th–17th centuries). The Hanseatic cities had their own legal system and furnished their own protection and mutual aid, and thus established a sort of political autonomy and in some cases created political entities of their own.”
It’s certainly worth much study given how much influence it played in the real development of our people. It is certain that large-scale urbanization has not been a successful experiment for whites.
“Shorter-range incentives may also be explored.”
As long as they enforce the behavioral standards we’re looking for.
Our path out of the abyss, as I see it:
Get a good education or training in a useful trade (whites totally dominate relatively high paying trades such as electricians, auto mechanics, plumbers, computer techs) marry a like minded white woman, raise your 4-5 kids in a small economical suurban home. Devote yourself to your children getting ahead in life with a good education, play physically demanding games with them often, teach them to eat right, help them get into a good school, make them do their homework,drive a non flashy economical car, hold no debts save a small low interest mortgage. pay it off as soon as you can. Then, they marry a like minded white person and repeat the process. We can double and triple up in a couple of generations. If we are willing to work hard and do the jobs others won’t, we can make a living and enjoy our families.
One argument for leaving the cities is that the darkies will fight each other like they always do in their own communities. You just get caught in the crossfire when you go through their war zones. Whitey is a target of opportunity just as a mexican construction worker is on a Friday in the whorehouse.