David Horowitz: “Ron Paul is a Vicious Anti-Semite”

A very encouraging development is that the Israel Lobby is increasingly on the defensive with the Republican base. Both Ron Paul and Rand Paul have proposed cutting the foreign budget. A letter from Ron Paul was headlined “Stop buying friends overseas, save $6 billion!”

“Borrowing money from China — or printing it out of thin air — to hand out overseas in [an] attempt to purchase friends has been a failing foreign policy, as we see most recently in Egypt where there is not even a government in place!” Paul wrote in his Dear Colleague letter. “We should seek friendly relations and trade overseas, but we cannot justify lavish gifts to foreign leaders when American taxpayers are increasingly feeling the pain of our economic crisis…. We cannot afford to have ‘business as usual’ when we are bankrupt.”

The bill is not endorsed by the leadership and probably won’t pass, but “Paul’s amendment represents the rising tide of opposition to foreign aid and the increased difficulty of defending such aid in Congress.”

These calls to restrict foreign aid are framed entirely within the context of a completely out of control federal budget. But that hasn’t stopped the David Horowitz from his usual over the top craziness, painting anyone who doesn’t do everything Israel wants as an anti-Semite: “Ron Paul is a Vicious Anti-Semite and Conservatives Need To Wash Their Hands of Him.”

Advertisement

Long ago Bill Buckley drummed the anti-Semites out of the conservative movement, and the movement thrived as a result. But the Jew-haters have returned. For years the Texas crackpot, Ron Paul, has been attacking America and Israel as imperialist powers — the Great Satan and the Little Satan, and calling for America’s retreat from the battle against our totalitarian enemies. At the recent CPAC conference Paul’s Jew-hating storm-troopers swarmed the Freedom Center’s table to vent their spleen against Israel as a Nazi state. Now Paul is making a priority of withdrawing aid for Israel  — the only democracy in the Middle East and the only reliable ally of the United States.

“Vicious anti-Semite”? “Jew-hating storm troopers”??

The “Jew hating storm troopers” refers to hundreds of thugs plastered with swastikas who stormed Horowitz’s table at the CPAC conference and viciously beat up the presenters.

Oh wait. That’s how the scene played out in Horowitz’s diseased mind. In the real world, the people manning Horowitz’s table were confronted by a whole lot of young conservatives who have gotten the message that Israel is an apartheid state bent on ethnic cleansing and oppression of the Palestinians. They seem to be aware of the hypocrisy of Jewish activist organizations that preach multiculturalism for non-Jews and aggressive ethnonationalism for Jews.

One of Horowitz’s operatives, David Swindle (who really should think about changing his name), recounts the avalanche of indifference and hostility that he and the others manning the booth faced. There was a paleoconservative fan of “the infamous anti-Semite Pat Buchanan” and a great many others who confronted the Horowitz group:

We heard it all — some points nakedly anti-Semitic, others nonsensical, and some emanating from the talking points of Ron Paul. Was this really that important of an issue? Israel doesn’t have a right to exist. Israel is a “Nazi state.” It’s hard to be sympathetic for Israel when they oppress the Palestinians so much. People are starving in Gaza….

Swindle says he was “drained” by the experience (probably like I’d feel manning an anti-immigration, pro-White booth at an ADL conference), reviving only at a Shabbat dinner with people who were completely on page with his pro-Israel views.

It’s nice to see a pro-Israel activist beaten down like that, finding refuge only among his Jewish friends. Perhaps the Israel Lobby really is on the defensive now in a way it hasn’t been for years, as the people at Mondoweiss keep saying.

And the really encouraging thing is that a great many young conservatives are turning away from neocon Israelocentrism as a paradigm for what it means to be conservative, and that’s all to the good.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

77 Comments to "David Horowitz: “Ron Paul is a Vicious Anti-Semite”"

  1. Frank's Gravatar Frank
    March 13, 2011 - 4:22 am | Permalink

    White people who care about the plight of Palestinians are liberals, pinkos, leftists and communists. There’s no shortage of Jews pimping that line. Opposing Israel is one thing. Doing it on the basis of their treatment of Palestinians (which isn’t any worse than White nations used to treat non Whites) is bleeding heart humanistic hypocrisy at it’s worst.

  2. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    March 3, 2011 - 9:00 am | Permalink

    Good news for David Horowitz – one less anti-Semite in the West. Zionism’s poodle, Pope Benedict XVI in his latest book ‘Jesus of Nazareth-Part II’ has claimed that biblical narration of Jesus’ death is based on a lie and the Jews did not killed Christ.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/benedict-xvi-jews-did-not-kill-jesus/

  3. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    February 25, 2011 - 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Jews don’t accept Jesus as the promised Messiah because they were expecting the ‘promised Messiah’ to help them gain power and wealth, which Jesus was not interested in. However, George Soro has the money, connections and he is interested in establishing ‘One World Government’ under Jewish domination. Jerry Rabow in his book entitled 50 Jewish Messiahs tells the stories of 50 Jews who had claimed to be the ‘promised Messiah’ and how they effected the Jewish, Christian and Muslim worlds. The most famous among them happened to be Sabbatai Zevi (born 1626), whose followers still hold important positions in modern Turkey.

    George Soro: The 51st. Jewish Messiah’
    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/george-soro-the-51st-jewish-messiah/

  4. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    February 24, 2011 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

    If any of you doubt my claim that Ron Paul works for the Jewish gold cartel, then feast your eyes on this:

    The Case for Gold
    This landmark book was the minority report from the U.S. Gold Commission in 1982, which evaluated the role of gold in the monetary system. It covers the history of gold in the United States, explains how the breakdown in its use as a financial standard was caused by government, and details the critical need for sound money.

    By Rep. Ron Paul and Lewis Lehrman(Jew)

    http://www.cato.org/case-for-gold/

  5. dan neil's Gravatar dan neil
    February 24, 2011 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    I see there is a large explicit white awakening among young whites and we are getting are message out. I think continuing to work outside the conservative pool in the A3P and inside the republcian party at our unawakened kin folk is having an impact. Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo do more good than harm for our cause at the moment.
    We need to continue to explain the mantra, and carry Kmacs volumes and push traffic to the site..

  6. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    February 24, 2011 - 2:53 am | Permalink

    Ron Paul works for the Jewish gold cartel. And he promotes the Jewish ideology of Libertarianism. Controlled opposition.

  7. Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
    February 23, 2011 - 9:13 pm | Permalink

    I don’t recommend this article but I liked this comment.

    “It is a linguistic and political fantasy to describe Jewish New Yorkers (or Jews anywhere) as white. In common-use American English, white only connotes Christian. Jews are not Christian, and vice-versa.

    As a New York born and raised Jew I would never describe myself (or any other Jew) as white.

    (“White ethnic politics…” is not the first NY Times article to promote this fiction and it probably won’t be the last either).

    Shalom.”

    — Akiva Kenny Segan
    http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/25/white-ethnic-politics-irish-and-italian-catholics-and-jews-oh-my/

  8. February 23, 2011 - 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Look up Horowitz in London in the 60s, (Ralph) Miliband, Deutcher, and Ken Coates (who died last year).

  9. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    February 23, 2011 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Jason

    Severus, now that made me really suspicious of him, him denying access to his site unless you give up your unique identifier – IP. May as well give him your name and address. True white advocates are concerned with protecting their fellow nationalists. Like here at TOO. TOO doesn’t collect information on anyone, neither does it store or sell that info. They need to link your IP with your username only so you can’t thumb up your own comments. I go to lots of white advocacy sites and only did Severus’s site collect info on us.

    I proxied into Sev’s site and lo-and-behold, he wasn’t just collecting IPs, he was advertising on his earth map what country and IP you came from – lol

    TT

  10. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    February 23, 2011 - 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Jason

    Yes!

    It’s easy to capture information fron any inbound PC. All the information is contained within your browser. Things like IP, country, even your post code/zip code. Your browser gives you away. But if you use an IP hider, like the one above, then you are invisible on any website. :) You should also run a good cleaner ’cause your browser like firefox/Internet explorer also stores info on your habits – builds a profile on you. http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner :)

    Also, the best programs are free – written by coders who believe in privacy. Don’t pay for nothin’

  11. Ryan K's Gravatar Ryan K
    February 23, 2011 - 8:11 am | Permalink

    And “I” , You are right. Most ‘conservatives’ are wankers.They hold daddy’s blow-hole view , its their identity. The really believe in this or that because , well , they really believe it! They are a danger to our political movement because they are dead wood that have to have their ego’s assuaged for stupid ideas or else they engage in sabotage by mule stubborn stupidity. They are a real problem in the Conservative ranks in Australia.

  12. Ryan K's Gravatar Ryan K
    February 23, 2011 - 8:04 am | Permalink

    Omop , This sight should run some show trials of those dead Soviet genocide criminals .The Accused v’s the Prosecution.

  13. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    February 22, 2011 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    We Whites have to become as confrontational and nasty as the Jews who yell “antisemite” at every detractor. Why should we cower before them? To hell with their epithets – and them!

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      February 22, 2011 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

      I agree, Doug. Long past time to take the gloves off.

  14. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    February 21, 2011 - 9:54 pm | Permalink

    It’s really amazing that western goyim who persecuted and expelled Jews in past – cannot understand why Zionists call everyone ‘anti-Semite’ who dare to criticizes Israel or challenge the Holocaust myth.

    Former Israeli cabinet minister Shulamit Aloni (born 1928), during her August 14, 2002 interview with Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! said: “Well, it’s a trick, we always use it. When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel then we bring up the holocaust. When in this country (US) people are criticizing Israel then they are antisemitic. And the organization (Israel Lobby) is very strong and has lot of money. And the ties between Israel and American Jewish establishment are very strong – and they are strong in this country as you know. And they have power which is ok”.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/10/02/criticism-of-israel-is-not-anti-semitism-stupid/

    • B. Rahe's Gravatar B. Rahe
      February 26, 2011 - 9:04 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat, other peoples have historical feuds or had problems in the past with certain peoples. They don’t automatically fire off or go on the attack against those historical enemies today. However, the jews do this. Constantly and without fail.

      It’s more interesting that the Western Goyim, who were in fact persecuted and abused by the Jews in the past, which is why the tribe was expelled, eventually forget the lessons they learned and let them back in. Or more often it is treacherous leadership among the goyim who are bought off and they let the Jews in.

      Most of the persecution in the past came from the Jews, not the other way around. Get that straight.

  15. GT's Gravatar GT
    February 21, 2011 - 8:10 pm | Permalink

    I writes: “If a few conservatives are finally getting a clue about Jewish influence, that’s great, but the White conservative base still remains FAR behind the White liberal base on this most important of issues. Yet, somehow we’re supposed to think of White conservatives as our natural allies and White liberals as our natural enemies. Isn’t this totally backward? It seems to stem from a bizarre form of wishful thinking, where we look at crowds of White “Tea Party” demonstrators and imagine they are angry for the same reasons we are, when they obviously are not.”

    As a cynical baby boomer and national socialist I have to agree with you. The white conservative base is far behind white liberals on critical issues. This reality is not addressed by “white nationalism” because its shekels come from middle-aged and elderly male conservatives. The “movement” is simply following the same failed program of the John Birch Society from decades ago. Until that changes, nothing will change.

  16. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 21, 2011 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    Tic Tac,

    Technical question: Does every website log the IP addresses that surf over to it? For example, there have been people like Severis that created fake websites and were constantly linking to them. If we click on links like that, do we risk being “captured” by those sites?

  17. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    February 21, 2011 - 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Don’t use it when posting here on TOO. It creates for you a new ip every time you connect – be it every minute or every hour. You must use the same ip at TOO if you wish to post with your own user name. Yeah, it’s really good. If anyone’s monitoring you (white advocates should be careful) then they’ve no hope of tracking you. :)

  18. Bohemianh's Gravatar Bohemianh
    February 21, 2011 - 5:11 pm | Permalink

    When will we stop caring what the jew says? Let’s move forward, then we can settle the score! WPTTF

  19. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    February 21, 2011 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    nope. But when using windows you have to assume backdoors, trogens. It only chats on two modules – I opened them up to see what’s inside and found nothing. It’s pretty good. And you can always run it in a “sandbox” to limit it.

    Not that it’s a big deal, I just don’t like Microsoft snooping on my e-mails, or websites I visit. I’ve used this for 3 days -testing it, and it seems good. But I will go back to my linux OS. I hate all the “background traffic” that comes with windows – hogs all my memory.

    Once you finish surfing – I would terminate it tho. Don’t leave it running if you don’t need it. Like all programs.

  20. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    February 21, 2011 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Did you go to the company website to learn who the officers of the company are, TicTac? I wonder if there are any backdoors built into the program? hmmmm?

  21. omop's Gravatar omop
    February 21, 2011 - 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Many Jews, as we know, played an absolutely huge role in the Soviet tragedy 1917-1991 and the thirty million deaths that marked this era. Let us remember that Karl Marx was born into a Jewish family and that Lenin himself had a Jewish maternal grandfather, that Leon Trotsky, the Bolshevik founder and head of the Red Army, was born a Bronstein, while Kamenev (real name: Rosenfeld) and Zinoviev (real name: Apfelbaum) were running the two Bolshevik-conquered capitals of Moscow and St. Petersburg. But the list of Jews who stood out in the mega-crimes of Communism is endless. It must be said and it must be repeated: Jewish officials and Jewish torturers bore a very heavy responsibility in this tragedy. The “perfect” world they concocted and which was supposedly “historically inevitable” turned out from the very beginning to be a nightmare for the Russian population. It was not until 1948 when the Jewish intellectual elite Jewish began distancing
    itself from the Stalinist government, and this was only because Stalin had launched his “anti-Zionist” campaign, meant to purge pro-Israel Jews from senior leadership positions.
    This indisputable Jewish guilt for the gigantic crimes of Bolshevism is now systematically being shoved down the Memory Hole (the phrase from George Orwell’s 1984).

  22. I's Gravatar I
    February 21, 2011 - 2:04 pm | Permalink

    When I was in university five years ago, the resident “campus conservatives” practically worshipped David Horowitz. They were extremely pro-war, pro-Israel, and pro-immigration. The only issue where they took a stance that could at all be considered pro-White was opposing affirmative action. This seems to be pretty true of Republicans in general.

    I never saw much value in conservatism and I still don’t. I see conservatism as mostly being a masturbatory pseudo-nationalism for Whites with poor critical thinking ability. If a few conservatives are finally getting a clue about Jewish influence, that’s great, but the White conservative base still remains FAR behind the White liberal base on this most important of issues. Yet, somehow we’re supposed to think of White conservatives as our natural allies and White liberals as our natural enemies. Isn’t this totally backward? It seems to stem from a bizarre form of wishful thinking, where we look at crowds of White “Tea Party” demonstrators and imagine they are angry for the same reasons we are, when they obviously are not. It would be better to view the situation for what it is than continue engaging in these fantasies.

  23. Ex-Pro White Activist's Gravatar Ex-Pro White Activist
    February 21, 2011 - 11:21 am | Permalink

    If National Review was a CIA media-influence operation from the start (and given the evidence I have little doubt that it was)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

    Note the extensive use of MOCKINGBIRD assets to attack Joseph McCarthy in early 1954. And what do we find CIA Agent Buckley doing later in 1954? He (with L. Brent Bozell) are writing this book!

    “McCarthy and His Enemies”.

    Double Agent Buckley does not of course list the CIA and OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD among McCarthy’s primary enemies. But the faux “conservative-liberal” paradigm is well represented in this lying bastard’s disinformation.

    Here are the maggots that have thrived underneath Conservatism’s rock. “Conservatism” is Rush Limbaugh broadcasting from NYC over Jewish controlled networks, complete with his negro call screener “Snerdley”.

    There is 0.0 possibility of building any sort of real movement on the foundations of modern “conservatism”. It’s like trying to pour concrete foundation footings on top of a sanitary landfill.

    then that means long-term employees of the rag still in service on the right have a vested interest in controlling the form of opposition

    This is the real key point: today. What disinformation is being spread and what false flag cells are being promoted now to preempt and disrupt genuine grass roots opposition?

  24. February 20, 2011 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

    Jewish Zionist Israel-firster David Horowitz says “Bill Buckley drummed the anti-Semites out of the conservative movement, and the movement thrived as a result.”

    If by “anti-Semites,” Horowitz is referring to Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan, first of all, Buckley obviously didn’t completely succeed, as Ron Paul has been serving publicly in one capacity or another continuously more or less since the 70′s and is more popular today than ever. And of course, Buchanan has had an impact on conservative politics, mostly in mass media, for decades as well.

    Unfortunately, their impact hasn’t been greater, because if only the conservative movement had followed the advice and policies of Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul instead of the neocons, we probably never would have been attacked on 9/11, we wouldn’t have been lied into expensive and unwinnable Mideast wars for Israel and the national security welfare complex, we wouldn’t be mired there to this day, the country wouldn’t facing bankruptcy due to huge overspending on the national credit card to pay for it all, our industrial base wouldn’t have been plundered and shipped overseas, our borders would have been secured, and foreign countries wouldn’t have been granted free access to our mature markets without opening up their own markets in return.

    In short, the country wouldn’t have been used, exploited, manipulated and plundered by a neocon/neolib hostile elite, and wouldn’t be in the social, political, and economic toilet that we’re in as a result of their policies today.

    So clearly, those on the Right accused of “anti-Semitism” by the neocons are far wiser, more patriotic, and care more about the country and its future than the hordes of self-serving manipulators, exploiters, fools, and Israel-firsters on the necon Right.

    • Ex-Pro White Activist's Gravatar Ex-Pro White Activist
      February 21, 2011 - 7:59 am | Permalink

      Jewish Zionist Israel-firster David Horowitz says “Bill Buckley drummed the anti-Semites out of the conservative movement

      What he means is that as time went on Agent Buckley attacked with increasing vigor anyone the Jews designated as targets. This group included Willis Carto, George Lincoln Rockwell, Robert Welch and the entire John Birch Society and finally Joseph Sobran.

      Double Agent Buckley devoted infinitely more time to these duties than to eliminating the 1965 immigration act or codified anti-white racial discrimination (i.e. “affirmative action”).

      http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/02/godspeed/

      This entertaining little dust-up is a classic illustration of the bottomless swamp the faux “conservative-leftist” paradigm directs people into.

  25. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    February 20, 2011 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Tenrek Odine – I hate to burst your “white KKK baloon”, but are you aware that:

    It’s Jews and NOT Muslims who make fun of Jesus, Mary and Christians – and spit of priests and the Cross.

    No US American Presidential candidate has ever visit Ka’aba or gave a speech at CAIR’s meeting – but each and everyone of them have visited the Holy Wailing Wall (Jerusalem) and spoke at Israel Lobby’s (AIPAC) meetings. So who is destroying your western culture, Jews or Muslims or Arabs?

    There are 1.7 billion Muslims as compared to 12.7 million Jews – so you see – Jews need more White converts than Muslims. It’s not easy to convert to Islam. Just ask Islamophobe Tony Blair’s sister-in-law, Lauren Booth.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/booths-conversion-irks-lesbian-zionist/

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 21, 2011 - 2:08 am | Permalink

      ‘It’s not easy to convert to Islam.’

      1.) Am only advocating ‘thinking outside the box’ for ways to out-compete the Zionist Jew.

      2.) The fact is ALOT of German National Socialists took Uncle Adolfs Last Will and Testament to heart and went to the next frontline in the war against the Traditional Enemy and this was done by huge numbers of German National Socialists converting to Islam and working against Israel.

      Altern Erich Post-war name: Ali Bella Regional Chief SD (Himmler’s Security Services), Jewish Affairs in Galicia In Egypt during the 50’s, then instructor in Palestinian camps
      Appler Hans Post-war name: Sakah Chaffar Information services with Goebbels Egypt 1956: Minister of Information
      Bartel Franz Post-war name: El Hussein Assistant Chief of the Kattowitz Gestapo (Poland) Since 1959, Jewish Affairs of the Ministry of Information in Cairo.
      Bender Bernhardt Post-war name: Bechir Ben Salah Gestapo, Warsaw Consultant for Political Police in Cairo
      Bender Bernhardt Post-war name: Bechir Ben Salah Gestapo, Warsaw Consultant for Political Police in Cairo
      Birgel Werner Post-war name: El Gamin SS Officer Cairo, Egypt. Worked in Ministry of Information
      Boerner, Wilhelm Post-war name: Ali Ben Keshir. SS Untersturmfuhrer Guard at Mauthausen concentration camp Worked at Egyptian Interior Ministry. Also instructor of the FLP (Liberation Front of Palestine)
      ****Brunner Alois**** Post-war name: Georg Fisher and Ali Mohammed In charge of deportation of Jews in Austria, Tchecoslovakia, Greece. Chief of Drancy concentration camp in France. Damascus, Syria. Consultant for Special Services. Protected against extradition by Syrian government.
      Buble Friedrich Post-war name: Ben Amman, SS Obergruppenfuhrer Gestapo Director of Egyptian Public Relations Department -1952. Consultant for Egyptian police force.

      ^^^ This is a small list of these brave men, Some White Advocates, not all, may wish to follow them!

  26. GT's Gravatar GT
    February 20, 2011 - 4:21 pm | Permalink

    “The takeover by “neocons” was implicit from the start in **Double Agent Buckley’s formulation.” – XPWA

    If National Review was a CIA media-influence operation from the start (and given the evidence I have little doubt that it was), then that means long-term employees of the rag still in service on the right have a vested interest in controlling the form of opposition the right takes to the jew-Anglo alliance and finance capitalism in the tea party mainstream, and to matters of race and immigration on the racialist fringe. I would be especially concerned about the effect of these former employees on the fringe, for that is where novel ideas and genuine opposition is more likely to come from.

  27. Edgardus de la Vega's Gravatar Edgardus de la Vega
    February 20, 2011 - 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Since Jews tend to use wordplay as part of their agenda (i.e. ‘racist’, ‘hate monger’… et cetera): no one is more ‘genetically’ anti-Semitic than Israel as they ethnically clean out the truly Semitic Palestinians. Our pan-European world is gradually waking up to the Jewish group strategy of manipulation for their supremacist ends.

  28. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 20, 2011 - 10:56 am | Permalink

    Read the comments on Horowitz’s screed. Read Comments on other Jew Worship articles. The ice is starting to crack….

  29. Tom Brown's Gravatar Tom Brown
    February 20, 2011 - 2:57 am | Permalink

    Arthurdecco is right, Horowitz is a nothing vomit bag.

  30. Mister White's Gravatar Mister White
    February 20, 2011 - 12:07 am | Permalink

    KMac:”One of Horowitz’s operatives, David Swindle ( who really should think about changing his name)…”

    Yeah right.Most white gentiles are slow learners,but I think we’ve finally caught on to that dirty little Jew trick! I mean,how many times can you be fooled by the same trick before you finally catch on?

    Jewish schemers like Horowitz and Swindle have a new trick up their sleeve and it works like this:When in doubt,we scheming,parasitic,nation wrecking little Jews always have Israel as an out !.

  31. Philip's Gravatar Philip
    February 19, 2011 - 11:30 pm | Permalink

    What? You don’t want to pay for Zionist expansionism? You vicious anti-Semite!

  32. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    February 19, 2011 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Last year, Hollywood filmmaker, Oliver Stone, in an interview with British daily Sunday Times – in response to why there was “such a focus on the Holocaust”, had replied: “The Jewish domination of the media. They stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington. Israel has f***** up United States foreign policy for years.”

    Now, Mark Bruzonsky, a Jewish, American Scholar and Journalist, who had been a prominent player during the Camp David peace accord (September 17, 1978 – says that Obama cannot stand-up to Jewish Lobby.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/washington-cannot-say-no-to-jewish-lobby/

    • February 20, 2011 - 7:00 am | Permalink

      “Now, Mark Bruzonsky, a Jewish, American Scholar and Journalist, who had been a prominent player during the Camp David peace accord (September 17, 1978 – says that Obama cannot stand-up to Jewish Lobby.”

      One should remember that Israel is the USA’s and EU’s Libertarian front-line and major ally in the Great Game/Cold War in the Middle East, and all this becomes a lot clearer.

      The land (called Israel since 1948) was originally created by the allies, at least in part, to put a thorn in the side of the German ally the Ottoman Empire in WWI, just at the time that the Germans sent Lenin and his anarchists into Russia in 1917 to get Russia (an ally of Britain etc) out of WWI. Just over a decade or so later, Russia began purging those anarchists.

      More recently, recall Putin’s remarks to Bush about the export of Libertarian ‘democracy’ by the USA e.g. to Iraq?

      This is some nations’ resistance to ‘Human Rights’ and the NGOs promoting it (see Churchill’s description above of the band sent into Russia back in 1917). See N. Africa and the Middle East today. Now, what happens back home? On the domestic front? At what cost? How is ‘freedom’ sustained?

    • February 20, 2011 - 7:08 am | Permalink
    • Jim's Gravatar Jim
      February 21, 2011 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat, that’s a great video of Bruzonsky that you’ve linked to. I’d advise everyone to watch it. A very brave man among the jews.

      Will it ultimately be jews who think like Bruzonsky who will resolve the international mess brought on by Zionism? It seems only jews can state the obvious about Israel without automatically becoming a “nazi.” Still, once they do, the are politically “excommunicated” from Judaism, and no longer have much influence.

  33. February 19, 2011 - 8:27 pm | Permalink

    Long ago Bill Buckley drummed the anti-Semites out of the conservative movement, and the movement thrived as a result.

    If you call that thriving.

    I mean, even Horowitz’s fellow Jew Auster realizes how utterly useless Buckleyite conservatism was at taking on the left in a meaningful way:

    James N. writes: I have often said, meditating on the stupid and foolish Republicans, that they have yet to show, post 1945, that elections are capable of changing the status quo. No elected body, in any state, at any time, has reduced spending globally so that the size and scope of government has been reduced. The Congress has never even attempted to do so.

    Lawrence Auster: And even Ronald Reagan never attempted to do so.

    http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/018690.html

    Even on the most non-racial and least controversial issue of real importance, the size of government, Buckleyite conservatism failed to even try to do anything positive during the time period it had control of the Executive Branch of the United States Federal Government.

    That’s not thriving, certainly, unless you’re a madman who views power as an end in itself.

    Conservatism didn’t thrive, only Jewish influence over the Republican Party did.

    For years the Texas crackpot, Ron Paul, has been attacking America and Israel as imperialist powers — the Great Satan and the Little Satan…

    Ron Paul of course has never used the terms Great Satan or Little Satan.

    In Horowitz’s fury he’s starting to see a composite enemy. A Kentuckian Iranian who burns crosses in the woods while shouting Allah Akbar and promoting the return of the gold standard.

    Isn’t it weird enough that Neocons feel a compulsion to call Muslims Islamofascists without them also trying to insinuate that Ron Paul is some kind of Shiite Mullah?

    They really are starting to lose it after what happening in Egypt… I’m guessing that’s what drove David to such lofty heights of rhetorical insanity.

    • Ex-Pro White Activist's Gravatar Ex-Pro White Activist
      February 20, 2011 - 8:52 am | Permalink

      Conservatism didn’t thrive, only Jewish influence over the Republican Party did.

      Exactly. Modern “conservatism” of the kind advocated by WFB is meaningless. In truth WFB’s brand of “conservatism” itself was a post WWII invention. The reason it was impotent to confront “liberalism” is it was a small off-shoot of the very “liberalism” that WFB purported to oppose.

      The takeover by “neocons” was implicit from the start in **Double Agent Buckley’s formulation. “Liberalism” and “conservatism” are intentionally ill-defined abstractions. Think of them as intellectual analogs to the racial “diversity” the Jews have intentionally inflicted as a way to secure themselves.

      The “conservatism” of National Review (and Russell Kirk) has amazingly shallow roots in the real America of the Founding Fathers. Among the signers of the Declaration of Independence I’ve only discovered one Catholic; Charles Carroll of Maryland. There were only two Catholics at the Constitutional Convention. And no Jews or Moslems anywhere.

      http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html

      Among other things I think the above list is an excellent proxy for race and “national origin” among the Founders. That list screams “Northern Europe”.

      Now look at WFB and NR from the start. Roman Catholics, Jews, assorted atheists, ex-Communists and homosexuals dominated. Not being a discernible racial member of America’s founding stock appears to have been an unstated requirement for WFB’s brand of “Conservatism”.

      Once we examine the real situation it’s really fantastic that Russell Kirk was able to erect Edmund Burke into a conservative totem fetish. There is no evidence that Burke (a probable crypto Catholic and Jesuit agent) exerted any influence on the “Founding Fathers”. Intellectual influence in fact ran the opposite direction. It was Burke who reproduced and distributed in England essays written by Thomas Jefferson!

      How was that reptile WFB able to sell his drivel (operating from his Manhattan apartment at East 79th St and Park Avenue)? In the pre-internet era he was a good example of two aphorisms:

      “In the valley of the blind a one-eyed man will be king”.

      and Nietzsche’s observation that men believe strongly in the truth of things seen to be strongly believed. iow most people are followers, not leaders.

      “Conservative”, “liberal”, “leftist” (and the new old-modern label “progressive”) are meaningless words. They have always been meaningless words. They are used precisely because they are fungible abstractions. They elicit pre-determined conditioned responses. It is just like Pavlov’s conditioned dogs drooling upon hearing a ringing bell.

      No progress is possible until one first gets deprogrammed from these functional post-hypnotic suggestions.

      XPWA

      ** ex-CIA agent Buckley’s case officer was E.Howard Hunt. Hunt is well-known to have later been heavily involved in the media influence and disinformation unit OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD. This was in the late 1950s and early 1960s. iow exactly at the time of WFB’s and NR’s original rise.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 21, 2011 - 1:57 am | Permalink

      “…of all those who consciously or unconsciously oppose the Majority cause, the modern conservative is the most dangerous.” — Wilmot Robertson

    • Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
      February 23, 2011 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

      What is the use of lumping Catholics in with Jews? Its just as easy to lump Protestants in with Christian-Zionists. Catholics are no friends of the Jews as proven by 2000 years of history.

  34. February 19, 2011 - 7:38 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Jay Lefkowitz is a graduate of Columbia University and Columbia Law School and a good friend of David Horowitz and worked in the GW Bush White House from 2001-2006:

    “Deep down, I believe that a little anti-Semitism is a good thing for the Jews – reminds them who they are.” (New York Times Magazine. Feb.12, 1995. Page 65).

    Wikipedia LINK:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Lefkowitz

    • European's Gravatar European
      February 19, 2011 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

      They can not know who they are without hating the Gentile, and thereby creating anti-semitism? Sick, mind-boggling, insane, destructive people with a total loss of reality. You can not win over insanity with reason, or any type of logic. They are the worst kind of sick people. They live, speak, and parade among us, as intelligent, with an above average IQ. And with this concept of theirs, and whites bought into it and compete with them, they become untouchable, **and our irritation**. Something has to give, somewhere, sometime, somebody, and turn this country and politics around. We need more people like Ron Paul who focus on those who build this country, happens to be white Europeans, not on those who come to feed off the labor, their fuits, exploit it, opportunists who work to send their money to their country, (Israel, Mexico etc.) and do not support those who’ve feed them for decades. After WWI, jews did not contribute to the rebuilding of Germany, they took their assets and run, sent to Israel, Switzerland and elsewhere. The US needs to wake up to the fact, that when the US crashes, after they have made their fortune, they will not engage to rebuild it, but a few.
      I guarantee it. Look at History! The players will come out of the closet with new “schmeicheleinen” and deceive you.

  35. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    February 19, 2011 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    The term “anti-semite” doesn’t mean -as it should- someone who violates the human rights of Jews,it simply means anyone who stands in the way of Jewish interests or even the proper pursuit of those interests.When Ron Paul or his son Rand propose to stop aid to Israel,they stand in the way of Jewish interests-THEREFORE they are “anti-semites”.In a debate on FOX with Ben Stein, Ron Paul called for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq.The occupation of Iraq (and the war in the first place) is a Jewish interest,THERE-
    FORE Ben Stein called Ron Paul an “anti-semite”.Once you understand it ,it becomes quite simple.This is a better explanation than the now fairly current one,which says:
    “An anti-semite used to be someone who hates the Jews,
    nowadays it means someone whom the Jews hate”.
    You have to ask yourself WHY the jews hate you.The proper answer is: because you stand in the way of their interests.When Jews quarrel among themselves-as they do a lot-about the proper way to pursue their interests
    they even call each other “anti-semite” if they think a certain proposal is not the best way to realize those interests.In the Knesset,the Israeli parliament , the term “anti-semite” (or even “nazi”) is one of the most used slurs.You have to understand how these people think.The Jews-certainly the most selfish and most ethnocentric people of all humanity-see the world essentially as a “field”
    in which Jewish interests have to be fulfilled(In the words of the rabbis:”The world was created for the Jews”).Anyone who stands in its way is a wicked man or in Jewish terms-an “anti-semite”.

  36. Grim up North's Gravatar Grim up North
    February 19, 2011 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Jason please humor me and read these two articles I link.

    http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/gercke.htm

    There were some revoloutionary ideas floqting about before the war regarding the Jewish Question. Most not as extreme as the ones that ended up being implemented but as the second article points out the Palistine soloution was the worst as it serves as a mere enabler for the parasitic element of Jewrey.

    Israel has proved Jews able to farm, build and create communities but has failed to reign in the parasitic element.

    As has been pointed out it is the institutions in your society, banks, media, advertising, lobbying that attravt the worst type of people and often contain enviroments that promote the worst behaviour that are the problem.

    They may be full of Jews but they are also full of whites, blacks, latinos etc. doing the same thing. If Jews are overrepresented could ot be that Jews not attracted to this are living in west bank settlements exhibiting healthy (the creating communities part not ethnic cleansing part) behaviour but in someone elses homeland.

  37. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    February 19, 2011 - 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Venona – Jews has no historical rights to the Holy Land. As Gandhi told Dr. Chaim Weissman, president of World Zionist Congress in the 1930s: “France is for the French, England for the English and Palestine for the Arabs”.

    The two-week Synod of Bishops conference on Middle East at the Vatican in October 2010 had declared: “The biblical concept of the “Promised Land nor the Chosen People” justify the building of new illegal Jewish settlements nor the occupation of the Holy Land”.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/vatican-bible-doesnt-promise-palestine-to-jews/

  38. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 19, 2011 - 6:34 pm | Permalink

    It’s a shame to see Horowitz play the anti-Semitic card. In the past he had done some good work exposing the networks on the Left. He should know that cutting off foreign aid is part of a libertarian platform and has nothing to do with “anti-Semitism”. Apparently ethnocentrism is a more powerful force than many of us realized.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      February 19, 2011 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

      David Horowitz is a fraud, Jason. He has added Nothing constructive to political discourse.

      Ever.

      Cite one positive contribution he has made.

      The fact is he’s a not-very-bright, self-centred racist ass, bankrolled by equally not-very-bright, self-centred racist asses who only think of themselves, surrounded by a not-very-bright group of sycophantic self-centred racist asses like Swindle who believe they’re protecting him with their delusional rebuttals to legitimate criticisms of his disingenuous hypocrisy.

      Losers, everyone of them. Even if they haven’t fully realized it yet…

  39. Grim up North's Gravatar Grim up North
    February 19, 2011 - 6:31 pm | Permalink

    Jason have you read my ppst above and thought about what I meant.

    It would appear that your issue is Dual nationals and other Jewish Americans may have a conflict of interests as to where there loyalty lies.

    It seems ther are two soloutions.

    1. Deport all dual nationals to Israel thus sending a message to Jewish Americans that you are Americans first Jewish second.

    2. Settle the Israel Palestine issue

    What you’re advocating is kind of Geert Wilders/EDL lite.

    Like I said we have a different situation in Europe that makes it easier for NATIVES to revert to NATIONAL identity.

    I don’t envey your position.

  40. felipeb's Gravatar felipeb
    February 19, 2011 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

    Back in the day the first political group I joined was YAF shortly after its foundation. This statement by the present management is sad. Ron Paul’s positions have held steady for several decades. Now they are subjected to this lying history and utterly mean spirited, over-the-top, denunciation.

    This is vile. It is also typical of neocons. It would not surprise if the assault on Ron Paul is coordinated between Horowitz and Jordan Marks, who I take to be a fellow Jew. The agenda of these people is always the same. It involves takeover, expulsion of the original organizers and the subservience of everything to racist Israeli interests.

    Any gentleman would be ashamed to issue this press release. When a parting ways comes, you thank someone for their services and wish them well. These people are incapable of civil discourse.

    http://www.yaf.com/blog_post/show/57

  41. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 19, 2011 - 5:43 pm | Permalink

    Frankly, I can understand why the arabs hate us. What if they dumped 6 million jews in the middle of america, and sent them 6 billion a year to agitate us?

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      February 19, 2011 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

      That’s it in a nutshell, isn’t it?

    • February 20, 2011 - 10:15 am | Permalink

      It appears that someone did exactly that at the end of the C19th. Except, it wasn’t Arabs. There was a mass migration from the Pale of Settlement in Eastern Europe/West Russia, via London and Liverpool, to NYC at the end of the 19th and beginning of the C20th, was there not?

      What sort of behaviours (considered as a critical mass) were these?

      Did you ever look into the NYC demographics links (comment 5 etc)?

    • Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
      February 23, 2011 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

      NYC demographics, comment #5.
      This data (of the whites who account for 35% of NYC’s population, 24% are Jews, 11% white), supports the thesis that Jews run the U.S.. I’m sure I’m missing something.

  42. Grim up North's Gravatar Grim up North
    February 19, 2011 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

    Someday, what you are describing is the paradox of American White Nationalism with regards Israel and Jewish Americans.

    The Zionists believe and I have seen them argue that if they can stay there long enough they will never be moved.

    In this sense Zionism could be seen as Jewish Manifest Destiny.

    Of course Europeans don’t have that problem. I am quite able to show my utter disgust for the Zionist States expansionist policies whilst being able to hold my own ethnocentric veiws.

    To the article this is normal Zid behaviour. Look at the Carter book situation.

    Expect it to get worse as Zidland continues to implode.

  43. February 19, 2011 - 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Has everyone seen the deliberate Fox News deception of Ron Paul winning the 2011 CPAC straw poll – amazing.

    short version – Fox apology

    actual footage

    Accident my g maximus.

  44. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    February 19, 2011 - 4:28 pm | Permalink

    The people who are concerned that the Palestinians are being subjected to apartheid, ethnic cleansing and oppression are idealistic whites who are the furthest thing from anti Semites imaginable.

    However, I think it ought to be remembered that almost all the whites protesting about Palestinian suffering under Israel’s ethnostate policies are idealists, not hypocrites. These WASPy one world human rights enthusiasts have a problem with Palestinians being discriminated against in Israel but they would also have a problem with immigration into the US being restricted. It is a bad thing that they are becoming more influential; if there was a movement to restrict immigration they would be lining up with the neocons as a major part of the opposition.

    I think it is best for nationalists to avoid harping on the treatment of the Palestinians; no one thinks we are really concerned with nonwhites like the Palestinians and it makes us look like band-wagoning hypocrites. Coming from us it is totally ineffective anyway.

    The most important reason not to talk about the plight of the Palestinians is that it is a diversion from the main effort. If Israel was to withdraw from the occupied territories and give the Palestinians virtually all they are asking for how would that help us? It wouldn’t.

    The objective is to get mass immigration ended and unwhite immigrants returning to their homelands; banging on about Israel’s inhumane policies is a waste of precious resources. It is only useful to point to Israel when opponents say white nationalism is a variety of nazism. In that case a nationalist could respond – ‘Israel controls who enters its territory and has ethnically orientated policies but its policies are not nazism, neither are ours.’

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 19, 2011 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

      I agree, great points.

      Now, I think it’s good to point out the hypocrisy of the Israel Lobby with regard to Israel’s behavior (and how the same people excoriate the US for much less). And I think it is good to de-romanticize Israel and stop treating it like a little princess that deserves special treatment and defense by America.

      However, it is also obvious that White Advocates would not be that interested in the Palestinians as a cause, so it could across as simply bashing Israel for the sake of bashing Israel, if taken too far. As Michael Scheuer has pointed out, no state has a “right” to exist in the final analysis, states exist if they have the power and cohesion to exist. This is true for both the Israelis and the Palestinians. For me, this is ultimately their problem, not mine. Seeing Israel face trouble doesn’t help me preserve a White country.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      February 19, 2011 - 6:22 pm | Permalink

      Someday said: ”These WASPy one world human rights enthusiasts have a problem with Palestinians being discriminated against in Israel but they would also have a problem with immigration into the US being restricted.”

      As is usual, you’re spouting aggravating, stupid drivel, Someday.

      I’m not remotely a “WASPy one world human rights enthusiast” and I don’t have a problem supporting full rights for the actual legal owners of the land claimed by the Jews occupying Palestine. Why shouldn’t they, the Palestinians who actually own the land, enjoy full and equal rights along with the murderous, psychopathological thieves who are stealing that very land out from under the feet of those who actually own it?!? Can you explain that to me without having your head explode, Someday?

      In any case, why would “WASPy one world human rights enthusiasts” (what a bullshit phrase that is, by the way!) have a problem with recognizing the threat uneven immigration levels represent for them any more or less than any other sub-group of white European (WE) people? I’m including the Pre-Cro-Magnon sub-group you obviously belong to in my question…even though I have decided you are DECIDEDLY Not part of our WE heritage because, in my opinion, you don’t deserve to be.

      Are you even minimally aware of how evil you are? YES, EVIL!!!! Your spin on the Palestinian’s plight sickens me:

      Someday said: “The most important reason not to talk about the plight of the Palestinians is that it is a diversion from the main effort. If Israel was to withdraw from the occupied territories and give the Palestinians virtually all they are asking for how would that help us? It wouldn’t.”

      Really? Financially and politically disengaging from Fascist Israel and the other Monsters oppressing the citizens of the Middle East wouldn’t help America evade the legitimate charge that it unfairly subsidizes the MURDER of the Palestinians and anyone else who has what they want?!?

      You’re not JUST an idiot, are you, Someday?

      Your quote that I reproduced above contains the words and the opinion of a sociopath. In all likelihood a Jewish Zionist Sociopath. I don’t know how you ended up spouting them, but for your own benefit ask someone who knows about such things…they’ll set you straight about your precarious psychological condition. To me – it’s as plain as the nose on your face – you’re in deep doo doo.

    • Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
      February 20, 2011 - 10:47 am | Permalink

      Someday,

      You made a good point. Macdonald himself was a great admirer of Jews even when he knew what they were doing to Plaestinians. Its only when he came across Jewish actvism with regards to mass immigration in the US and the attempt to displace Whites as the majroity ethnicity and culture did he turn against Jewish actvism and began to look differently at them. This is a good point you brought. Its no use to pretend that White Nationalist really give a hoot about the Palestinians.

      Also White Nationalist need to stop trying to justify defending America’s culture by casting mass immigration of non Whites as something bad or evil or problematic. Its not about it being bad or good. Its about defending a culture and identity and it has nothing to do with whether immigration is “good or bad”. Thats another thing that White Nationalist have that other ethnic Nationalist do not. Many African nations complained to the Chinese that Chines investment in Africa should not be accompanied by large Chinese migration to these countries as China often ships its workers overseas to give them joobs in areas they invest in. We do not call that bogorty but people who believe that jobs should be reserved to their own ethnic brethren. White nationalist should stop trying to justify their Nationalism by portraying African or Arab immigrants as dangerous or bad. Even if it would boost the economy this should not be done at the expense of a nation’s identity and culture. Japan has been advised by many economist to open their country for immigration but they have not. Maintaining their homogenious culture is more important to them than bread and butter.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 20, 2011 - 11:20 am | Permalink

      ‘I think it is best for nationalists to avoid harping on the treatment of the Palestinians; no one thinks we are really concerned with nonwhites like the Palestinians and it makes us look like band-wagoning hypocrites.’

      The Arabs themselves has a phrase that I oft use: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend!”

      The anti-Zionist Arab and the White Advocate have so many things in common. Our culture is being taken from us and we are both being Dispossessed.

      Many Arabs even deeply admire one of the greatest White Leaders of all time: Adolf Hitler!

      Heck I would even go so far as say it may even be appropriate for some (not all) White Advocates to fully embrace Islam like Johann von Leers (aka Omar Amin) and David Myatt (Abdul-Aziz ibn Myatt) have.

    • Incitatus's Gravatar Incitatus
      February 20, 2011 - 1:12 pm | Permalink

      ‘Israel controls who enters its territory and has ethnically orientated policies but its policies are not nazism, neither are ours.’ Iagree.

      “The most important reason not to talk about the plight of the Palestinians is that it is a diversion from the main effort” I agree too.

      What we need to talk about a lot is the diversion of billions of dollars to Israel and the rest of the world. Let’s keep our money in America.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 20, 2011 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

      There would be nothing wrong in supporting Israel if doing so was in the national interest of the United States. But it isn’t – John Mearsheimer on US Support for Israel.

      If Obama opposes Israeli settlement activity, why did US veto UN vote? The simple answer is that the Israel lobby causes the government of the United States to act against the national interest of the United States.

  45. Venona's Gravatar Venona
    February 19, 2011 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

    I disagree with David Horowitz that Israel is a loyal ally of the United States. It would be more accurate to say that most members of Congress are loyal lapdogs to AIPAC.

    As far as I’m concerned, both Arabs and Jews have legitimate historical claims to the “holy land.” The US should institute a policy of strict neutrality, and not give a nickel to either side. The $6 billion yearly hand-out directly funds the Israeli policy of lebensraum on the West Bank and Gaza, which in turn fuels a savage hatred of the US throughout the Arab/Muslim world.

    One would be hard-pressed to find a more self-destructive use of $6 billion dollars.

    • Frank Messmann's Gravatar Frank Messmann
      February 19, 2011 - 4:30 pm | Permalink

      As far as the Jews’ claim to Palestine — after the first century I do not believe that many Jews remained there. Before that they only briefly controlled part of the land under the Maccabees. Today’s Palestinians have continuously occupied the land for milennia and are genetically related to first-century Jews.

  46. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    February 19, 2011 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if David Horowitz has a t-shirt that says: “What Would Moses Do?”

    That seems to be the code he lives by and his general approach to everything.

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      February 20, 2011 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

      If Moses were alive today, we would have had the good sense to lock him up and treat him with anti-psychotic’s.

  47. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    February 19, 2011 - 2:46 pm | Permalink

    David Horowitz is not a Semite himself (he is Khazarian Turkish Jew) but certaily a warmongering Zionazi. As an Israel-Firster, he has to call ‘anti-Semite’ to everyone who criticizes the Zionist-regime in occupied Palestine – from Jimmy Carter to Helen Thomas.

    Both Ron Paul and Rand Paul are not anti-Israel. They both want US administration to give priority to American interests over Israeli interests – and none of them support the Palestinian cause – to recover their country from the European Jewish robbers.

    Rand Paul irks the Jewish Lobby
    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/01/30/ron-paul-irks-jewish-lobby/

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      February 20, 2011 - 4:57 pm | Permalink

      Anti-semite: Someone whom the Jews hate.

      This is the true meaning of the word. Never forget it.

      (With a tip of the hat to Joe Sobran, the late political genius and “anti-semite.”)

  48. chad's Gravatar chad
    February 19, 2011 - 2:41 pm | Permalink

    ron paul is the only politician that i’ve ever supported financially, and to hear these treasonous morons equate him and pat buchanan to nazi’s is absolutely ridiculous.

    it blows my mind that the irs can criminally steal the fruits of our labor by unconstitutionally taxing our dollars, that have already lost 95% percent of their value because of the manipulations of the equally unconstitutional federal reserve, only to send the billions to foreign governments like israel, and people are cool with that. i feel like i’m in the twilight zone.

    • Optimistic Truther's Gravatar Optimistic Truther
      February 22, 2011 - 3:18 am | Permalink

      “and people are cool with that. i feel like i’m in the twilight zone.”

      Welcome to the club, brother.

  49. European's Gravatar European
    February 19, 2011 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Unfortunately they continue to work, like today’s newspaper revealed again; University launches Jewish Studies, an Association with 1800 members, on varies topics: Anti-Semitism, history, culture, holocaust, religion, history of Israel, an appreciation for their comics created by Jews (directed to our youngest) etc. (in my city) At the end of the article, very interestingly: ***Jewish Studies Association is interested in working with the university’s Africana Studies and Chicano/Latino Studies groups to hold future events***.
    They will partner with them to get Numbers on their side, (a one sided perspective will be taught, guaranteed) if it should ever come to a vote from the public, whether buying foreign friends should be supported. They have no interest in “White History and Studies”, as they, and we already know; some can not be bought, but the ignorant. Our heads may be focused in the political arena (sometimes in clouds, and clouded), all the while they keep working in the lower ranks, in our schools, education, and our kids etc. for their support. Politics, as we can see is fickle; the lower masses carry more weight (Revolution, seen in the moslem regions).
    We know who will be in numbers here in the future, and Jews are responding to it.
    Ron Paul is reasonable in his position, and in the best interest of the American People and survival. When too many feed off of us, or your land, your home, you just become bankrupt. What is so hard about this to understand. Maybe I need an IQ of 150 like the Jews, or the Politicians.

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      February 20, 2011 - 4:53 pm | Permalink

      Horowitz, an American, [sic] and the Israel lobby, also Americans [sic], show yet again where their primary allegiance lies. When there are so many people in positions of power whose primary allegiance belongs to a country other than American, the one they’ve sworn to uphold and defend, and which grants them honor, privelege and success, is it any wonder the country is going down the crapper so quickly?

      With the number of Jews in authority who give primary allegiance to Israel, I seriously doubt there was this much treachery and two-facedness in our government even during the extensive communist infiltration in the 1930′s, 1940′s and 1950′s.

      Horowitz and his disciples should do us all a favor by manning up, admitting who they really are and what they really stand for and make aliyah ASAP.

  50. NadePaulKuciGravMcKi's Gravatar NadePaulKuciGravMcKi
    February 19, 2011 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    Pam Geller
    Gary Bauer
    John Hagee
    David Horowitz
    play dumb re 9/11
    no questions re 9/11

    What you have done will be the saving of Israel
    You’ll be remembered forever for this
    Not only that you’ve been paid for your efforts
    Pretty good wages for one little kiss

    • Any's Gravatar Any
      March 7, 2011 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

      Stopping all the billions going out in Foreign Aid is a most justifiable solution to our deficit spending of money created out of nothing for which we pay interest on to international bankers who control our Federal Reserve System…How stupid do they think most people are to want to stop such a giveaway of money we don’t have while our country is in dire need for many programs and projects, This has nothing to do with racism or anti-Semitism…but plan common sense.

3 Trackbacks to "David Horowitz: “Ron Paul is a Vicious Anti-Semite”"

  1. on April 16, 2011 at 11:22 am
  2. on April 8, 2011 at 11:20 pm
  3. on April 4, 2011 at 2:58 pm

Comments are closed.