Romantic Commitments, Part 1

Michael Colhaze


The Accolade, E. Blair Leighton (1853 – 1922)

Thou art my life, my love, my heart
The very eyes of me
And hast command of every part
To live and die for Thee.

His Queen who may Command him Anything Robert Herrick (1591 – 1674)

Imagine you had an Ideal!

A vision of allegiance, an indissoluble covenant, and with it the profound satisfaction that is the reward for serving your Queen unconditionally. As her protector in any kind of weather. As a knight whose humaneness has been steeled by fire and agony. As a man who saw it all, yet grew stronger instead of giving in to despair. As a champion who has sworn an oath of courage, decency, fairness, goodness, honesty, modesty, morality, probity, purity, rectitude, righteousness, trustworthiness, truthfulness, uprightness and virtue on his flag of convenience, namely her flaming red mane. In short, as a man who has ditched his selfish individualism for a larger design. Could that appeal to you?

Oh come now, I hear you say. Stuff this sort of utter nonsense! Because we aren’t living in the times of the Round Table anymore. Today’s ideals are greed, graft, lies, deception, blackmail, assassination and pornography, and those who get a deep satisfaction out of it are the ones who rule the world.

Giving in to despair, then?

Advertisement

Not yet, I hope. Let’s look indeed at what we have now, and what we had once, and why it got lost. Though lost is a relative term, as you will agree. Because even if it has been forced by the Pharisees and their combined media onslaught below the surface of our benumbed and befuddled minds, it is still there. And with it a whole range of dormant emotions. Like the intense joy of having been able to fulfil a vow. Or the elation to be cheered by burghers and peasants whose turf you have defended. Or the bliss of hearing a poem written in your commendation. Or the delight to be called a man of some consequence. Or the enchantment of listening to a lovely maiden singing a song in your praise. Or the ecstasy on receiving an accolade from your most beautiful Queen.

What has struck me always as extraordinary, or absolutely enthralling, is the extent to which we Christian men have gone in the worship of our women. The ease and certainty of how we elevated them to a status of near divinity, knowing full well that all our swords and hellebores and daggers combined stood not the faintest chance against a slight touch of their slim hands, a fleeting kiss from their rosy lips.

And if the hands weren’t so very slim, or the lips a bit less rosy, it made not much of a difference either. Because most likely the knight in question didn’t look always as handsome as the one in the lovely painting on top of this piece, but had grown a bit bow-legged from all that horse-riding, or potbellied from all the wine before and after a battle, or bald from wearing a heavy iron helmet most of the time and in any kind of weather. Thus, as we say in Germany, on every pot the proper lid. Which doesn’t diminish the emotional impact of my argument in any way.

The adoration for the eternal Female has come down to us from our Indo-Aryan forebears as a largely undefined primeval impulse, but received a tremendous boost with the invention of Love as a system of thought and, in consequence, an all-compassing and imperative sentiment.

With few exceptions, this sentiment is missing in most societies. Meaning those where women are historically treated as inferior, due to the simple fact that they can’t hit back with equal force if attacked or abused by a man. And who are thus looked upon as second-rate creatures whose God-commanded duty it is to serve their male masters in any way ordered. There are whole tribes in Africa where the women till the fields, feed the kids, cook the food, and do in fact every bit of work necessary to sustain the family, while the men lay about and get high and giggle or beat them to kingdom come if they object. With regard to a general workload, the same is true of any docile lass married to an Orthodox Jew. The latter who thanks his heathen god every morning for having been created a man and not a woman, while he struggles into his scarecrow outfit and then takes off to submerge himself all day long in the intricacies of the Talmud where it is probably stated on every second or third page that cleaning so much as a teaspoon is against Yahweh’s divine intentions. All this with the exception of popping now and then into a cathouse and the devout aim to divert some of the household money onto a fallen Ukrainian angel.

As to Muslim women living in the classic Islamic countries, I can’t help but thinking of one of the saddest proverbs I’ve ever heard during my journeys, namely one they whisper to each other when their supremo isn’t around: Life is just a Veil and a Grave

Or to quote a somewhat tougher stance I’ve come across in a recent novel:

© The Stoning of Soraya M.

They have killed Love. They treat their women like subhuman beings. They marry without love, they breed without love, they pamper their grubby sons like kings and abuse their daughters like dogs. They beat the living shit out of their wives, strangle them or stone them to death if their pride demands it. They have deprived themselves of God’s greatest gift, the free and happy love between a man and a woman. They live in terrible barrenness, because over the ages this lack of love has killed their souls. That is why they are dumb, cruel and near mad. With us Christians they see what love can be, and it drives them crazy. The only remedy they can find is hate, because their sick honour forbids anything else. That is why they long so much for their silly paradise. That is why they hate life and worship death, their own death included. That is why they kill their animals and enemies and women so barbarously, because it pleases them to see someone suffering more than themselves.

Very strong stuff, admittedly, though it needs just one look at the photos of a present-day stoning to make it stick. Which could lead to the assumption that only primitive people treat their women in this vicious way. But that isn’t true. Take the Chinese, for example, a highly cultured bunch who could elevate the mere drinking of a cup of tea to an endless ceremony of the highest sententious significance, yet forced their girls at an early age into shoes that crippled their feet and made them hobble painfully for the rest of their lives. Which had the advantage of a tighter vagina when grown up, but most likely lacked any deeper emotional remuneration for both sides involved.

I could go on, sadly enough, for a few more pages stating similar horrors, but they aren’t really the issue here. Let us therefore, and with a sigh of relief, return to the Christian men. Or, by giving chronology its due, to their forebears first, namely the old Greeks.

One of those, most likely the greatest of them all, but unfortunately not known by name, was the glorious hopper who conceived the hitherto unheard of idea that one might get an infinitely greater kick out of life if it were to be shared with an intelligent, warm-hearted, self-assured, witty, happy and sexy consort, instead of an illiterate harem moll who knew a few tricks in bed but nothing else, or a downtrodden colleen who hardly said a word for fear of catching a swipe. It can be assumed with near certainty that the idea was divinely inspired, most likely by Zeus Himself, King of Gods, who had a predilection for exceptionally beautiful women and sired such stupendous dishes as the Muses or peerless Aphrodite Herself.

All this happened long before the great Homer roamed our sacred earth. Because when he was up and about, the social status of a fine woman had reached already such eminence that it could trigger a long and costly war. Talk is here of course about the lovely face that launched a thousand ships, Helen of Troy. Who offered a cold shoulder to her husband-king and eloped with fetching young Paris, thereby unleashing nine long years of bloodshed, but also one of mankind’s most magnificent literary monuments.

Which doesn’t mean that cuckolding was a generally accepted pastime in ancient Greece. Quite the opposite. Women were on the whole expected to be loyal to their hubbies and keep a cool eye on house and hearth. But they didn’t get pushed about, meaning that all hell could break loose if they had reason for serious discontent. Just think of Lysistrata, heroine of Aristophanes’ irreverent and sometimes ribald comedy, who locked herself and her fellow plotters into the acropolis of Athens and Sparta respectively, in this way refusing any sexual favours until their brutish husbands refrained from cutting each others throats and behaved for a change like decent human beings.

Or take Socrates’ wife Xanthippe, who wasn’t too impressed by his flights of fancy or the tea she had to serve his disciples all day long, but kept telling everyone within earshot that a new dress and perhaps help in the kitchen would be a lot more tangible than all those ethics and epistemologies and Zeus help her. Though it is also said that she cried bitterly when the Athenian Neocons forced him to drink his deadly poison.

As to the purely visual development, it reached a veneration so sublime that we still stand stunned whenever we have the great good luck to come face to face with it in one of the greater museums. Take, for example, the Aphrodite of Rhodos.

Or Arsinoe II, a Greco-Egyptian queen who lived some two hundred years before Cleopatra, and who dressed herself into robes of epic delicacy that defy any human imagination.

The mood continued through Roman times, excellently expressed in poetry but somewhat less so in the Fine Arts. It was during this era that God’s blueprint for the Human Race received an important thrust towards its distant perfection, namely with the arrival of another glorious hopper. One who didn’t only say Love Thy Spouse like Thyself, but extended the admonition to his neighbours as well. Meaning that whereas the former might contain some rather egoistic overtones, the latter per definition could not.

Now this was of course a piece of cake so large that the world needed nearly a millennium to digest it. But then: Eureka! Almost out of the blue a cultural Golden Age began to blossom that lasted nearly another thousand years. And it soared and expanded and reached celestial heights that are without equal in the entire History of Man, and will never be attained, let alone surpassed again, by anybody but its inventors.

Our problem is that we took it for granted.

But I mustn’t forestall myself, and need to remind you that I’m talking about our great art and our great women. Allow me therefore to take you to France, namely the city of Autun. Here we find one of the first wondrous examples of a Greco-Roman renaissance that grew beyond itself and culminated in Botticelli’s Venus or Lord Leighton’s Flaming June.


Eternal Eve she is, and Romanesque in style.

She reclines her splendid figure in a garden with many trees and a thousand flowers. Her skin has the texture of polished alabaster, her lovely bosom is small but firm. Her gorgeous long hair flows freely. Her delicate head is supported by an exquisitely long hand. The enchanting lips are pursed in thoughtful contemplation, tempered with the faintest touch of mischievousness. Her enchanting eyes are half-closed and have a dreamy expression. She tentatively reaches out for the forbidden fruit with another deliciously long hand.

No serpent, mind you.

Just look at her, lo and behold, and tremble! This is the quintessential Female Evil, the wicked temptress and sinful seducer who brought upon us all the world’s woes. Because of her we got kicked out of paradise and have regretted it ever since! Damn the Bitch!

Can you believe that?

Well, don’t! It is Judaism’s most ugly and vicious invention, and was from the very beginning intended to smother any female dissent. Because what really happened must be obvious for anyone with open eyes and a grain of sensitive feeling, namely that Eve tasted the mysterious apple, and as a result saw with breathless wonder that she lived in an earthly Paradise of such incomparable splendour as could never be more beautifully imagined. And that she did what every loving wife would do, namely offer her man a bite as well.

And if they hadn’t noticed until then that they were naked, they knew it now, and my spirited guess is that they didn’t mind it at all.

This interpretation of Eve was clearly intended by Ghislebertus, the man who carved her so beautifully around 1140 AD, and who gave us the clue to any future reading of the marvellous epoch that had just begun to unfold itself.

End of Part One of Three.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

96 Comments to "Romantic Commitments, Part 1"

  1. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 10, 2011 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Thank you. I’m having a rotten, soul-killing day; you’ve reminded me of who and what my Volk are.

  2. European's Gravatar European
    February 10, 2011 - 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Incredibly beautiful and incredibly sad = the sum of our feminine existence. Like a coin of two sides, and given to a value. And from which side are we seen and judged, (a comodity) and from which side do we see and judge ourselfs (I am a Woman). If men can not see the beauty in us, we can not see the beauty in you. This writer is looking at the whole coin, and can appreciate what woman is, was and has become. Should be insighful to read part 2 & 3.

  3. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    February 10, 2011 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    The first picture is really something – that’s my idea of art.
    But the picture of the woman about to be stoned is pretty shocking. I hope she lived. If she didn’t, don’t tell me. I prefer to believe she lived.

    • Ilie's Gravatar Ilie
      February 10, 2011 - 3:50 pm | Permalink

      No, she didn’t.

      But most of the hundreds of thousands of alleged witches tied up and set on fire by Europeans throughout the years fared better. ;-)

    • Ilya K.'s Gravatar Ilya K.
      February 12, 2011 - 3:29 am | Permalink

      Ilie conveniently forgets that Jews and Middle Easterners in general to this day carry out large scale killings, executions. It is part and parcel of their cultures, period.

  4. monte's Gravatar monte
    February 10, 2011 - 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Ilie

    it weren’t HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS. It were a thousand, not many more. Don’t make it worse than it was.

    • Ilie's Gravatar Ilie
      February 10, 2011 - 5:49 pm | Permalink

      The general consensus seems to be that there were at least fifty thousand killings, with most of them having took place in German speaking countries between 1500 and 1700.

      My point was that maybe it’s indecent to point fingers at Arabs/Persians just because we stopped committing atrocities sooner, especially since they seem to carry them out on smaller scales.

    • February 11, 2011 - 8:08 am | Permalink

      The photo is a still from a movie, so I’m pretty sure the actress lived.

      Let me check.

      Yeah, Mozhan Marnò is still alive:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozhan_Marn%C3%B2

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 11, 2011 - 10:49 am | Permalink

      This is the actress’ personal website >> http://www.mozhan-marno.com/

      A beautiful and elegant woman, without a doubt.

      White Nationalists should oppose any attempt to create animosity towards Islam and Muslim people in general. A significant proportion of the Iranian population are Aryans and are therefore genetically ‘White’, as Ms. Marno’s photographs so beautifully attest.

  5. dan neil's Gravatar dan neil
    February 10, 2011 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

    Beautiful

  6. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    February 10, 2011 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

    And don’t you think that the authorities would burn that damn witch MacDonald if they could! Also, remember that the Reformation began on the 31st October 1517. In hind sight even this dumb old WASP can see that it was little more than a land grab and the killing of the witches would be in the same vein.

    • Rob's Gravatar Rob
      February 11, 2011 - 12:43 pm | Permalink

      @Alexander -
      “And don’t you think that the authorities would burn that damn witch MacDonald if they could!”

      He’s a warlock.
      FYI.

  7. Palestinian's Gravatar Palestinian
    February 10, 2011 - 7:10 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Colhaze,

    It seems like you are sucking up to Hollywood jew movies like the Stoning of Soraya. In all Arab countries (but with rare exceptions), stoning is never practiced and women are generally treated very well, at least, better than the feminist-infested societies of the West. Your women spend their lives begging their men to marry them and then they end up divorced with kids to take care of, while the father is completely absent from her life! Did you know that 45% of women who go to the emergency rooms are because of beating by a boyfriend or a husband? Did you know that 1 in 5 women here have been raped? What I am trying to say is that, worldwide, there is a general pathology against women. Regarding Arab and Muslim women, you need to understand that they get the bad reputation because the zionists want to create enemies. They want to you to hate the Arabs and Muslims in order for you to support their wars against them. Do you understand what I am saying? Maybe you need to look at what is happening in Egypt now-a-days to see how their women are playing a role in their revolution against the tyranny of their dictator who had been put and funded by the zionists and the americans. As a Palestinian, I totally support and sympathize what you are trying to achieve as a white nationalist. I completely understand your points of view and I truly believe that in the end, you will find that it is the Arabs (among other nations) who will support your cause much more than those strangers who live among you.

    • Paula's Gravatar Paula
      February 10, 2011 - 10:26 pm | Permalink

      Maybe you need to read the Koran (Qu’ran) where it expressly states that men should beat their women. And that women are less than half of men!!

    • Rafael K.'s Gravatar Rafael K.
      February 11, 2011 - 6:24 am | Permalink

      A Jew (David P. Goldman) wrote that “Nine out of ten Egyptian women suffer genital mutilation”. How much truth is there in his claims?
      http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MB02Ak01.html

  8. Cpt. DuCharme's Gravatar Cpt. DuCharme
    February 10, 2011 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

    What this writer is trying to convey is that absolutely no other race on earth comes close to even paralleling the white race’s reverence for all things just, true, beautiful and good. The white race is the literal embodiment of moral and physical beauty and passion. We are the guardians of civilization and we instinctively know that our women deserve to be treated like the walking goddesses on earth that they are. Nothing matters more on this earth then the propagation and refinement of the white race.

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      February 11, 2011 - 3:35 am | Permalink

      Nothing matters more on this earth then the propagation and refinement of the white race.

      Is that a factual statement or a mere subjective opinion?

  9. Ryan Oblivion's Gravatar Ryan Oblivion
    February 10, 2011 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    Kitsch.

  10. Rod Mckenzie's Gravatar Rod Mckenzie
    February 10, 2011 - 8:10 pm | Permalink

    I am not a Muslim or an apologist for it but I think that we need to stop speaking of all adherents of it as all being the same. They are a very diverse group. You have white Muslims from Bosnia where women might just wear a scarf. You have Ismaeli Muslims who generally are the most liberal of Muslims and except for the color of their skin you wouldn’t know what religion they practice. You have Muslims from Iran who I have found to hate the Muslim religion with venom and many I have met don’t want anything to do with any religion. You have many people in Turkey who are professionals and are Muslims in name only, they never attend Mosque and hate all the fundamentalist Muslim nonsense. All Muslims aren’t the female mutilating, wife beating primitives that we are led to believe they are. I am just saying that we shouldn’t make an uneducated assumption about many different types of people who happen to loosely fall under a diverse set of beliefs any more than we should about any other area of interest.

    • Paula's Gravatar Paula
      February 10, 2011 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

      You can’t pick and choose the good bits of a religion and still claim to be of that religion. The Islamic holy book, the Koran, says that a woman is less than half of a man. It also states that it’s OK to beat a woman into submission, and it also says that their god is the only god, and all those that don’t believe should be killed. The Christian bible, aint that much better either!! So, sorry, you’re either a muslim or you aren’t, you either adhere to the Koran, or you don’t. Enough said!!

  11. Palestinian's Gravatar Palestinian
    February 10, 2011 - 11:52 pm | Permalink

    Hello Paula,

    I have read your two comments above regarding Muslims and I can tell that you have never read the Koran. I am a Muslim myself, an ex-muslim to be exact but I do memorize almost 1/3 of the Koran and I have read it dozens of times over the years. I grew up in a Muslim country. There is nothing in the Koran that says that a woman is 1/2 the man, whatever that means. Yes, there is one verse that says to hit women but if you contrast this verse to what is mentioned about women, you will be surprised to conclude that the Koran actually respects women, especially, mothers, wives and sisters. Again, and just like Mr. Colhaze, you have been brainwashed with the Hollywood movies and how they portray women in Islam.

    • Paula's Gravatar Paula
      February 11, 2011 - 1:50 am | Permalink

      Regarding infidels: I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers.” Quran 8:12

      Regarding women: http://www.freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/217-islam-enslaves-women-period.html

    • Paula's Gravatar Paula
      February 11, 2011 - 1:55 am | Permalink

      So Palestinian, are you saying that there are no honor killings associated with Islam? While sure, the Koran may not expressley mention honour killings, but it does happen in the name of Islam!! I think it is you that is YOU that has been brainwashed! By the way, I would be interested to know why you are now an ex-Muslim, given that, as you claim, given that Islam is meant to be a religion of peace and very respectful of women…

    • February 11, 2011 - 10:22 am | Permalink

      Palestinian February 10, 2011 – 11:52 pm “I am a Muslim myself, an ex-muslim to be exact..”

      Devout Muslims are clearly bad for Libertarian-Democracies’ Financial ‘service’ sectors and thus their money supplies (as well as the political parties serving their interests) given that Islam proscribes interest based loans. So whilst people like yourself (and they do exist as ‘sucesses’) are no doubt welcomed by many as good Libertarians (of whatever party colour), they will probably be seen by a minority as a bad Muslims (but low risk Communitarians). Still, not to worry, Communitarians are very unpopular in the Liberal-Democracies these days and have been for years.

      But, take note: secularization comes with a Faustian price. The Liberal-Democratic populations are killing themselves off with their materialistic, below replacement level birth rates, and they are also dumbing themselves down too boot – no doubt in pursuit of equality. It’s their human rights.

  12. Whitey Whiterson's Gravatar Whitey Whiterson
    February 11, 2011 - 12:02 am | Permalink

    “You can’t pick and choose the good bits of a religion and still claim to be of that religion.”

    Why not?

    I have no fight with Muslims, as long as they are in Muslim-land. Why can’t I pick the “good parts” of my religion and discard the “bad parts”?

    Perhaps some Jew will call us “hypocrites” – but who cares what jews think?

    • Paula's Gravatar Paula
      February 12, 2011 - 3:58 am | Permalink

      Whitey, I’m not suggesting that you cant pick the good bits and live by them, just don’t claim to be one of them. If you pick all the good bits from all religions, they are basically saying the same thing just in different words….especially the abrahamic based religions.

  13. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 11, 2011 - 1:15 am | Permalink

    The sentiment is in many ways wonderful, but I object to the caricature of “selfish individualism” which is eternally being attacked by collectivists of every stripe. Note that individualism is equated with a lack of loyalty to values. I would submit that truly understanding what is in your self-interest and acting on it, requires the highest of devotion to values. The US has no lack of romantic heroes in its history, from the Revolution to the Alamo and beyond. Yet they did not see themselves as peasants kneeling before some mystical “volk”.

    Christian socialism appeals to me no more than secular socialism. I know that the culture is different on the Continent. I remember a German lady that had emigrated to the US telling my family (with a tone of deep awe) how they had all cleaned the streets together, one day a week, in her youth, literally everyone in the neighborhood going out and scrubbing the streets together. This seemed to have some deep, almost religious meaning for her. We could barely keep from rolling our eyes.

    • European's Gravatar European
      February 11, 2011 - 11:39 am | Permalink

      @ Jason,
      no, it was not out of religious meaning. If she gave you this sentiment, it is because she probably was shocked how filthy the streets in the US are, the Ghettos, your Movie Theaters, Mc Donalds, various eating facilities and other public places. In many places America gets trashed. Kids and adults behave spoiled and unmannered, and care less. America the “Service”-Country indeed. Let someone else do the dirty work. It spilles over into the privat lifes and homes as well.
      Germany is a different culture, a people living on a small piece of land. If every German was like the majority here in the US, it would look like a third world country=slums. And they have them too now, due to so much immigration from third world countries who know no different. The US Soldiers where notorious for trashing the streets in Germany and made a very bad impression on the country. But then it was not theirs, so who cares. Germans would also iron the mens underwear in the old-days. So I was told. You can LOL
      But that is how mis-conceptions of other people and cultures, bias’s and misunderstandings, stereo-typing etc. gets in our minds.
      Also for man to be understanding woman, he must be free of all the mentioned above, to perceive her intelligently and fairly. The same goes for woman, as one poster already expressed. There is much beauty in both genders, and I sometimes do not understand why woman must indure so much degradation, unless man has become so degradent and sick in himself, (acting against his own nature), as woman have also become. (religions) Is this why youth is priced so much today, because of their innocence, untill they too become inflicted or infested with all the “social ills and Zeitgeist”. The young are killing themselfs in record numbers. Then growing old becomes a problem. Sixty Year old dress like 20 year old, the weight and obesity issues, health and depression in woman on the rise, the marketing and on and on. All these social ills, it can be disgusting and overwhelming just to think about them all. Best to take one issue at a time.
      So I hear you Miriam K. The answers and problems are many. A cycle of Life and Death in culture and politics, in an effort to ….where are we going…. to better our existens, our lot, alleviate pain, a better place, self and community?

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 11, 2011 - 4:49 pm | Permalink

      I would submit that truly understanding what is in your self-interest and acting on it, requires the highest of devotion to values.

      An individual came take years, if not decades, to come to a true understanding of what is in their self-interest though. Identifying with a group and accepting their values is the way most people settle on what they believe I think. But the group has to be of about the same age, there is something about being young that makes people reject the example of the older generation’s way of doing things.

      My father spent time in Germany and he remarked about how clean it was.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 11, 2011 - 5:05 pm | Permalink

      Well that is a good point about Germany being clean. Perhaps this is related to the high conscientiousness German have.

    • Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
      February 11, 2011 - 5:21 pm | Permalink

      Major cities in the U.S used to be very clean as well, look at pictures of row homes in Detroit or Baltimore from the 40′s and 50′s. Marble steps polished to a shine all the way down the street. Bring in integration and multiculturalism and in less then fifty years these areas are now slums with home values in the single thousands of dollars.

      How are those neighborhoods infested with Turks looking these days in Germany. Probably the same as Detroit, so spare us the elitist attitude. And don’t forget that the largest White ethnic group in the U.S are people of German descent.

  14. Paula's Gravatar Paula
    February 11, 2011 - 1:51 am | Permalink

    I say again, you cannot pick and choose parts of the Koran. You’re either a Muslim and accept the Koran, or you are not!!

  15. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    February 11, 2011 - 2:05 am | Permalink

    In this rather depressing world dominated by the ugliness of the Jew my spirits are lifted when I read that a man still sees the beauty in the fair species. Mr. Colhaze seems to find enchantment in the feminine mystique. I, too, appreciate the essence of the white male. His physical looks may not have much to do with it. It’s the aura of a man. It’s his countenance, his mind, his authority, his integrity. At any given time I may encounter this exceptional male essence. In unexpected places at unexpected times.

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      February 11, 2011 - 8:13 am | Permalink

      “Mr. Colhaze seems to find enchantment in the feminine mystique. I, too, appreciate the essence of the white male. His physical looks may not have much to do with it. It’s the aura of a man. It’s his countenance, his mind, his authority, his integrity. At any given time I may encounter this exceptional male essence. In unexpected places at unexpected times.

      Well, you won’t find it here, that’s for sure!

  16. AnalogMan's Gravatar AnalogMan
    February 11, 2011 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    Beautifully put. Now, how do we get our women to see themselves this way? How do we get from slutty, angry, venomous, self-centred feminists, back to beauty, virtue and romance?

    • AnalogMan's Gravatar AnalogMan
      February 11, 2011 - 3:21 am | Permalink

      Hasty addendum: Ladies, I don’t mean to imply that there are no beautiful, virtuous and romantic White women. But, you have to admit that we have a problem.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 11, 2011 - 9:21 am | Permalink

      Stop buying porn. Stop feeding the Jew Beast – and very unhealthy male lust. be kind ot the “sluts” – encourage them to not BE sluts – and to act like ladies. TREAT them like ladies. AND STAY WITH YOU OWN RACE. Punch out any White male you see with a Non-White woman.

    • Rob's Gravatar Rob
      February 11, 2011 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

      @AnalogMan -
      “How do we get from slutty, angry, venomous, self-centred feminists, back to beauty, virtue and romance?”

      Escape from New York.

  17. Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
    February 11, 2011 - 4:28 am | Permalink

    No hope for the goyim

    All women are sluts. Take it from me. Especially the goyim whoresluts who form the backbone of our Jewish-led porn industry.

    We pay these White sluts to strip off for the degenerate goyim masses: to parade their asses and tits for the systematic demoralization of their own menfolk. And yet, believe me, these women are willing to collude in the moral ruination of their own racefor nothing — as in Girls Gone Wild, another Jewish-led initiative.

    Judas sold his honor for thirty pieces of silver. These ‘Girls Gone Wild’ goyim sluts are willing to do it for a free T-shirt!

    And YOU lot are going to sort the Jews out and send them packing? and take back America and create a noble White Utopia for your children?

    Don’t make me laugh, sheeple!

    First teach your whoresluts to keep their clothes on and behave with honor and dignity.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 11, 2011 - 9:16 am | Permalink

      The men have to do it first. “Feminism” came approx 10 years after MEN abandoned their wives and families, to chase Jew fraud Hefner down the the Palyboy Bunny hole.

      Tell White men to regain their honor, and stop PAYING to see their women to behave like whores. Tell the MEN to appreciate modest women. White women are merely adapting to the things that men WANT. “Feminism” worked, re: women behaving like men, because SOME-ONE had to pick up the flag, All the men ran off to be little selfish boys.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 11, 2011 - 10:55 am | Permalink

      Bah!

      More prudish Jewish-Puritanical clap-trap meant to confuse and demoralize Whites in regards to sexuality whilst instilling alien semitic superstitions regarding sexuality.

      Aryan Sexuality is good. Ancient Aryans created the Kama Sutra!

      “Sexual lust the mother of battle lust, battle lust is the mother of Nations” – David Lane

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 11, 2011 - 11:14 am | Permalink

      Sorry Ciaran. I know what you are attempting to say, but you have it all the wrong way around.

      The corruption of our women came first. Those who tried to resist were called Male Chauvinist Pigs. Remember? Or aren’t you old enough to remember the early 1970s? Indeed, women of European descent who had disposable income, were corrupted during the Roaring Twenties, and the process was accelerated during World War Two.

      I understand Hefner’s role in corrupting white society, but let us not exaggerate his influence or his ability to alter behavioural patterns across a whole culture. Many white women had already adopted the habit of ‘acting wild’ before the late 1940s.

      For example. When British Tommys were overseas, fighting in uniform, a large number of white English girls were fornicating with Black American GIs, especially down in the South East of England.

      And as the loud-mouthed charlatan, calling itself “Miriam K” wrote earlier: These ‘Girls Gone Wild’ goyim sluts are willing to do it for a free T-shirt!

      Of course, the 60,000 dollar question is who went out of their way to corrupt our womenfolk? We ethnic European men did not, although we certainly acquiesced to the corruption, thinking it might benefit us (cheap kicks) in some way.

      If we are going to make real progress as an ethnic group, we will have to stop this nauseating “female worship” and get back to enforcing our male authority and imposing basic discipline on our unruly women. A social discipline that had essentially evaporated by the late 1970s.

    • Ilie's Gravatar Ilie
      February 11, 2011 - 12:13 pm | Permalink

      ^ In what way is ”Miriam K” a charlatan?

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 11, 2011 - 1:35 pm | Permalink

      @ Ilie …

      ^^ In what way is ”Miriam K” NOT a charlatan?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 11, 2011 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

      Aren’t you giving short shrift to Annie Sprinkle and Nina Hartley, both Jewish? But it is well known that porn is generally run by Jewish guys and most of the women are White Gentiles.

      But then … it’s an industry with a bias toward attractive women. Enough said.

    • Special K's Gravatar Special K
      February 12, 2011 - 3:31 am | Permalink

      Miriam, Jewesses make up the highest percentage of “white” performers in the porn game. Go ahead, look it up. The Jews themselves admit it and are proud of it. If the Goyim are bad what does this say about the tribe?

  18. MOB's Gravatar MOB
    February 11, 2011 - 8:35 am | Permalink
  19. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 11, 2011 - 9:12 am | Permalink

    OK – who are the pathetic RETARDS, who ar wreckign this thread, by giving Thumbs up to the Muzzie apologista, and Thumbs down to Paula – for QUOTING The Koran, and other Islamic writings?

    What is WRONG with you eunichs? Does Islam appeal due the inherent slavery of females? Slavery is the only way you can get a woman to “do you” in the first place?

    If you guys are the “best” Whites have to offer – we deserve to die off.

  20. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 11, 2011 - 11:25 am | Permalink

    Porn began before “feminism” did. Sorry. Get your dates right. White men did not particularly make any effort to STOP the corruption – did they? If you don’t want sluts – STOP REWARDING WOMEN FOR BEING SLUTS. You chase after sluts. You reward sluts.

    It’s YOU.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 11, 2011 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

      It surely depends how you define pornography, Ciaran. Woodcut blocks showing erotic couplings and intercourse were being produced in Japan many centuries ago. Long before anyone had heard of the word “Jew”.

      I get the impression you are just one angry female who indignantly refuses to accept any responsibility for what has happened.

      Those who are excused responsibility are normally defined, by law, as children. Ergo, if your flawed reasoning was deemed not so flawed, then to make it work we would all have to agree that the female gender has a collective developmental disorder, and remains an emotional infant throughout her physical adult life.

      On the other hand, if you indeed believe females can actually grow up to be fully developed and autonomous women, then by definition you will have to accept that they have full control of their own minds and therefore must share at least equal responsibility for how you are now seen throughout the world: as sluts, lacking any self-respect … or for that matter, respect for your menfolk.

      Sluts end up being “rewarded” when there are no alternatives. Right now, there are few alternatives. This is why European men fly to Asia … looking for alternatives.

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      February 11, 2011 - 3:52 pm | Permalink

      @ Anglo Saxon

      [To Ciaran]

      “I get the impression you are just one angry female who indignantly refuses to accept any responsibility for what has happened.”

      I think Ciaran is genuinely concerned about pornography. She is justifiably indignant that we degenerate Jews are the force behind all this filth. However, she wrongly blames the White male for being an integral part of the problem.

      In her eyes, the White male is complicit in this situation by being such an avid consumer of porngraphy. This White ne’er-do-well male lecher, she thinks, should stop consuming porn and try to exercise more self-control.

      Ciaran is of course right to say this, but I’m afraid her emphasis is all wrong.

      For starters, who are the whoresluts posing in all those porno magazines and videos?

      White women of course!

      Would there be any porn problem in the first place if Jenna Jameson and her White sisters in sin knew how to keep their clothes on?

      Stand by for my next post.

      Unfortunately, it’s a pretty long one. But bear with me, dimwitted and detested goyim, and your patience will be amply rewarded! :)

    • Paula's Gravatar Paula
      February 12, 2011 - 3:54 am | Permalink

      Totally agree with you!! If there is no demand, there’s no point in supplying!!

  21. weisser wolf's Gravatar weisser wolf
    February 11, 2011 - 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Great points all around; but as usual “Big Jew” has us fighting amongst ourselves as to who is to blame for the degredation! I think we can say that men and women share some blame eh?! Ok, so let’s move forward and fix it. Instead of paying for and partaking in “Girls Gone Wild”, men need to withhold the schekels and admonish women who act like that; we had it previously, it was known as the 1950′s. Women, you need to have more self-worth and quit listening to the Jews telling you that men are the enemy. Can you imagine someone trying to put on a “Girls Gone Wild” show in NS Germany?!…there would have been a riot.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 11, 2011 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

      And another troll comes on pretending to praise NS Germany. And let’s play that number one more time, boys …

  22. Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
    February 11, 2011 - 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Please delete former post and substitute this one which gets rid of the unnecessary italics.

  23. Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
    February 11, 2011 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

    On inter-racial sex: White women the problem

    Ciaran says:

    “STAY WITH YOU OWN RACE. Punch out any White male you see with a non-White woman.”

    Actually, Ciaran, It’s not the White males who are the problem. It’s the White females.

    Most interracial sex is between white women and black men. White men generally prefer women of their own race as sexual partners. The number of White men who rape black women is so low that in some states it’s computes as zero.

    It’s the White women who are almost always to blame for this invidious sexual situation.

    I have known more than one White women who actually prefer black men as lovers and who seek them out avidly in preference to the males of their own race.

    Consider this from an article entitled A White Woman Explains Why She Prefers Black Men

    The first time I caressed black skin, it felt like a luxury I shouldn’t be able to afford. I craved it more strongly than Carrie Bradshaw craved Manolo Blahnik shoes. That phrase, “Once you go black, you never go back” is all about the feeling of the skin.

    This 40-year-old White female, called Susan Crane Bakos, continues to wax eloquent on the merits of black men, thusly:

    I want black men. They want me. We look at one another and exchange a visible frisson of sexual energy in the lingering glances….The Internet has made it a lot easier for us to find each other now. Black men advertise: “Ebony seeks ivory.” White women write: “Seeking tall, dark, and handsome. VERY dark!”

    We learn from this white female connoisseur of black flesh that the interracial “hot sex” that takes place between black men and White women drives black women crazy with jealousy and rage. They want to kill their menfolk — and often in fact do in crimes passionnels that mostly go unreported. Bizarre as this may seem, a tremendous number of black men actually PREFER white women to black women. Hence the huge number of interracial porn sites that cater to their White women fantasies.

    I have researched this subject in some depth and I will tell you this: the number of white women who log onto these interracial porn sites for masturbatory purposes is surprisingly large. White men almost never frequent these sites. They find them disgusting. A complete turn-off.

    Sexy Susan has further startling revelations for us:

    Black men are two and a half times more likely to marry a white woman than a black woman is to marry a white man. Black women can point to that statistic in justifying their wrath. But in truth, black sisters, we’re after the sex, not the ring. Yes, the sex! ….Black men have more energy, style and edge than white men…..A black man is so damned sexy because he knows how to make a woman feel sexy.

    Here’s how 40-year-old Susan goes about picking up black men in bars:

    My current [black] lover seduced me via eye contact at a neighborhood bar while I was eating burgers with a friend. Without saying a word, he paid me compliments, asking questions with his expressive eyes. He didn’t move over to sit beside me and ask if he could buy me a drink until he knew the time was right. Soft-spoken and assertive, he had impeccable manners and charm.

    I was kissing him in a cab 30 minutes after that drink.

    On another night in that same bar, a different black man knelt and kissed my knees.

    The rest of the lady’s article is devoted to tearing the White male apart. The White male, we learn, is lousy in bed. His waistline is too large. He smells bad. He ejaculates prematurely. He’s pathetic. He’s a jerk-off artist.

    She concludes her chilling exposé with these words:

    I recently came out of my racial-preference closet and told my friends, “I love black men. I’m not attracted to white men over 40, and I’m not dating them anymore.” Nobody was surprised.

    http://www.nypress.com/article-12509-a-white-woman-explains-why-she-prefers-black-men.html

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Conclusion? It’s White women like this, not White men, who constitute a problem.

    Is there a solution?

    A remarkably well-informed poster here (Reginald) suggests a solution that would seem to fit the bill: The White male must reassert his authority over the White female and force her to mend her sluttish ways. Feminism, he suggests, sucks — and it is the root cause of all these problems. Women have got above themselves. A bit too uppity for their own good. And of course Reginald is perfectly right.

    The typical White slut, it seems, could do with a crash course in virtue. In modesty and good manners. She needs an alpha male to take charge of her and tell her how to behave.

    I shall end this long post by quoting with approval my favorite German philosopher:

    “Thou goest to Woman? — Remember thy whip!”
    (Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra)

    Never a truer word spoken!

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 12, 2011 - 5:12 am | Permalink

      Here is some factual evidence to back up the thesis put forward by Miriam K
      [February 11, 2011 - 4:08 pm]

      Most interracial sex is between white women and black men. White men generally prefer women of their own race as sexual partners. The number of White men who rape black women is so low that in some states it’s computes as zero. It’s the White women who are almost always to blame for this invidious sexual situation. I have known more than one White women who actually prefer black men as lovers and who seek them out avidly in preference to the males of their own race.

      I once worked as an Engineer in Jamaica (training the locals), and during my lengthy stay there I travelled to almost every nook and cranny on the island, including the capital, Kingston. What is revealed in these YouTube videos is only a fraction of what I witnessed during the early 1980s.

      Negril Hedonist Resort (on the southwest coast of Jamaica) where white ‘women’ fly to in droves to fornicate:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGXMvV_8mrk
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsAg_yodQtU&feature=related

      Highlights from a recent movie starring Charlotte Rampling, and titled Heading South:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TC8q5lSkp0&feature=related

      Half of All British-born Black Men Have a White Partner! A documentary about the women who led the way by falling in love with someone of another race. The “pioneers” of interracial relationships in Britain speak in this [sickening] video:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrrUXHbwZCc&feature=related

      Generally speaking, all White Women from every white nation strongly influenced by New York City propaganda, are out of control. And as far as Britain is concerned, the indigenous White Women are a basket case.

      I support Michael Colhaze’s general wish to idealize and romanticize ethnic-European women, but I reluctantly have to remind him there is no point in idealizing and romanticizing women who have been taught to hate their own kind. First, we must purge the madness from their minds and revere only those who can bring themselves to see the world through white eyes.

      We white males need to enforce (as Fathers, Brothers, Husbands, and Boyfriends) maximum discipline upon our drugged-up women. For they know not what they do!

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 12, 2011 - 8:18 am | Permalink

      One could take as inspiration the text ‘KD Rebel’ by the late David Lane.

      In it a group of White Nationalist men set about to ‘take back into custody’ several White Females who have been performing in Jewish created pornography. The White Females are then ‘escorted’ to a remote Pagan Odinist compound where they are impregnated and bear White Children. David Lane had some good idea.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 12, 2011 - 9:16 pm | Permalink

      LOL this is obvious concern troll activity by Anglo Saxon to demoralize Whites. This fake issue of White women “flocking” to black men has been debunked before. Needless to say, the black Jamaicans in this video have every incentive to brag about their conquests, as does any group of males when speaking in public. This is next to useless as evidence.

      Then the concern troll Anglo Saxon posts a video clip from a movie! As if that constitutes evidence of anything.

      Steve Sailer has addressed this issue from a quantitative perspective. Interracial relationships happen, but there are no signs White women want to go outside their race with any more frequency than they did in the past.

      As anyone with eyes can see, it is almost always the poor unattractive dregs of White womanhood that dates outside their race, most especially black men.

      I am reminded of a joke by the comedian Tosh O. He shows a video clip of a black man exercising ferociously and says, “yeah, if you wanna date fat white chicks, you have to work hard for it”.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 13, 2011 - 3:34 pm | Permalink

      White boy who calls himself ‘Miriam K’, get your hand out your pants and stop the prurient rambling forthwith.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 15, 2011 - 9:57 am | Permalink

      Good thing that the FBI hasn’t thought of getting informants/provocateurs to say the same kind of stuff as David Lane, eh?

  24. European's Gravatar European
    February 11, 2011 - 6:27 pm | Permalink

    Just an observation in reading these line of posts on “Romantic Commitments” – timing – near Valentines-Day.
    It is clear from these posts, and previous other subjects/titles, how far apart men and woman are from each other. There is at times no affinity what so ever for the other here, whether we are whites, or from another race.
    But I do Know this, that the issue of “white interest” can not be resolved, or come to a satisfactory solution, if white males and females can not find their common culture, their organic culture in which they can thrive with shared values. We may be all white, but share different social cultures and pasts. This is very evident here. We need to recognise this last war, the battle of the sexes, either killing one another in total destructive ways and manners, fit to be likend to an animal, or coming together in a respectful, communicative way to resolve our grievences and mis-understandings, our cultural ills and remedies, so as to find common ground among whites in the mids of this melting pot, or the abyss for us all, and hope to create a culture and politic which can remedy our current situation and alienation from one-another and to our community. Blaming and harping on feminism, or dominating mucho-masulinity of Authority, sub-ordination of any gender to the other will not move us out of the current path of destruction. Constructive Dialogue is an alternative. Perhaps if we can find commitment to one another, we then may also have a road map to deal with the jewish issue and race in a less self-destructive way. We have nothing to lose if we try, but everything if we don’t.

  25. February 11, 2011 - 6:34 pm | Permalink

    You are touching upon an enormously important point – the importance of womankind in the history of the West. All good except for the slander against Islam.

  26. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 11, 2011 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

    For the Nietzscheans out there: “You go to woman? Take your whip!

    One might say to women: “You go to men? Take your tranquilizers!

    After many decades as a White male, not dead yet, I have concluded that what women want and what men want can best be understood in a biological context. I noticed an article a few days ago that described the differences in how men and women encounter one-another in the mating/marriage game. Leaving aside drug induced or stupidity induced disinhibition, men tend to fall in love fast and women tend to hang back and observe the male and wait. That accounts for Pursuer and Pursued. This is profoundly Darwinian.

    Falling in love is largely sexual, although not completely , at least for observant and thoughtful folks. Men of course are driven far more by testosterone and god-knows what other chemicals, and women are driven by their biological requirement to protect the womb from home invasion. Women must think about likely outcomes to sex, and especially about the quality of the sperm deposit. This includes the likelihood of the donor sticking around to help change diapers and bring home meat for the baby and herself. This is obvious and yet many cannot see it, overcome by their emotions of either positive or negative nature, associated with the struggle to mate and reproduce successfully.

    As for Woman, she lacks the higher IQs of men, especially when IQs of over 120 are reached, and is otherwise wired differently. Suffice it that women are wired for nurturance and sociability and men are wired for battle and political association and , of course, single-tasking as opposed to multi-tasking which again is biologically based. The male singles out one antelope, just like a lioness, and forgets the herd. The female feeds the kids, thinks about her friends, her women’s magazines, and if smart, her career, her management of her husband, the shopping, and carries a handbag with which to gather while the male hunts. Women indeed are intuitive, meaning feeling -based which includes both intelligent observation and less than intelligent narcissistic reactions. Men are less socially aware because their eyes and brains are fixated on the antelope or the Enemy.

    All of this in natural and therefore Good.

    Beauty is not simple. White women are the most beautiful women, racially. Why? Because White men, dominant, have selected sexually (Darwin) for beauty more than other races. Black men are better looking than black women because black women historically (Africa) have had the Power to do the Selecting because Black men are dumber than black women and more importantly, perhaps lack an eye for beauty. Asian men select for beauty as well, and they too have had the Power. Since White men are the most beautiful of the various races, one can only conclude that White women have had more Power than any other women of other races.

    Let me posit that somehow Whites have developed their sense of Beauty more than other races. Blacks and Arabs have little sense of Nature beauty, in my experience, and North East Asians have a fair amount of appreciation of Nature’s beauty, but less than Whites. Whites have invented parks, etc.

    So, there is the human body, there is Nature, and then there is beauty, great beauty in my view, in children. This is not just physical beauty, which gets us to appreciation of mental health, to put it clinically. Joy is beautiful and grimness is not…in the human face, etc.

    Moral Beauty is therefore visible as well. This gets more complicated, but it is true.

    Coming back to the beauty of White women, the evidence of restraint in sexual presentation, sociability, presence, grace, the female virtues of Inclusion, and intelligence , are all part of the equation. Sheer sexual beauty is easily lost and turned to revulsion/repulsion…for at least White men above the age of , say, 30, and earlier if the white male is “sensitive” (Gawd).

    So, we here Whites are pretty romantic, but it is grounded in biology. We are also easily made fools by our gonads, particularly males. So, in going to Woman, take your romance, and your wits. If only sexual beauty fills your belly or chest, you are missing out. Hope that your brain is still maturing, or at least, that your gonads are shrinking.

    Finally, it is possible that Whites appreciate individual personality more than other races. I recall the words of a Chinese gal I talked to about White men with northeast Asian women. She reported that “White guys treat you better.”

    Joe

    • Ilie's Gravatar Ilie
      February 11, 2011 - 10:21 pm | Permalink

      ”Whites have invented parks”
      Whites have also invented butt-plugs. Just so you know.

  27. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 12, 2011 - 1:21 am | Permalink

    above, another eloquent speech from the probable Jewish sewers, or resenters.

    Getting back to Eve, my understanding of Genesis is that the apple is from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which is forbidden by God…for man and womb-man. God knows, but man doesn’t. In other words, do what God says. Not a bad idea generally, given the slavishness of most folks.

    As for woman as Temptress in this regard one can ( project?) all sorts of things onto Eve in the way of subversion of Authority, Distraction, Hostility to the male’s prerogatives and leadership. From a pure Thought point of view, mostly, or most women, don’t think very well. Then there is female narcissism with regard to sexual selection: select me! Beauty and fashion magazines are mythic in their revealing of the psychology of women.

    Males have their narcissism traps but they involve power. Men gladly eat the apple (Faust legend). Both sexes are human, all too animal. Christianity and Buddhism tell us to point the accusatory finger at ourselves, not others.

    So, humility, or, mutuality is the key. Reason, tethered to biological realism, is the apparent way. Joe

  28. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 12, 2011 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

    And the original quote is from an outed troll, Anglo Saxon. This is the same kind of stunt Der Weenerschnitzel and others pulled a while back.

  29. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    February 13, 2011 - 6:45 am | Permalink

    @ Jason Speaks

    “And the original quote is from an outed troll, Anglo Saxon.”

    That’s rich, coming from YOU, troll numero uno! Why don’t you go and drool your spittle somewhere else, you pathetic little Zionist Jew Untermensch?

  30. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 13, 2011 - 7:03 am | Permalink

    Anonyma is another name the troll goes by. Strange tactic. What on earth does the troll called variously Anglo Saxon, Severis, Der Weenerschnizler, Adam, Anonyma, Caleb, etc, hope to accomplish?

    Everyone knows he/they are a troll, so I fail to see the plan. Perhaps the plan is to simply distract. But it only distracts interested bystanders like me, at most. It has no effect on the major writers on this site, and certainly none on Dr. MacDonald. So what is the point of these trolls?

    One good thing, it lets us see the kind of tactics that will be used against White Advocacy, except this is being done by junior league buffoons.

    And nothing these trolls do can stop the coming avalanche of evidence that scholars like Jonathan Haidt are talking about. Scientists, both Jewish and Gentile, are turning up one study after the other that support genetic differences among the various races.

    The old Leftist/Jewish paradigm is about to collapse, and all these clowns can do is play silly games that involve writing comments that no one takes seriously. Perhaps, the our opponents are not that smart after all, if this is all they can muster.

    Sad.

  31. Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
    February 13, 2011 - 7:06 am | Permalink

    Hateful trolls, desist!

    I am favorably impressed by Anglo saxon’s posts, even though my saying so will probably be an embarrassment to him and lose him a few points.

    I would like to take this opportunity to urge my fellow Jews, “Someday” and “Jason Speaks”, to desist making fools of themselves and bringing good Jews like me into disrepute.

    They should speak like me, fearlessly, an up-front Jew. They should reveal their Jewishness with pride and candor. Sneaking onto this site and posing as concerned White Nationalists is a pretty contemptible ploy. It’s dishonorable. It’s trollish. It sucks.

    I am deeply ashamed of the shameful, devious, and cowardly conduct of my co-ethnics on this site.

    The superior Jew, such as I represent, does not need to skulk in corners like wriggly little maggots under dark rocks.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 13, 2011 - 7:30 am | Permalink

      It’s posts like this by Miriam that make me wonder if the trolls are just college kids, because the tactics are so amateurish ( no offense). I would invite you to stop being so afraid and open your minds. Nothing bad is going to come from White people realizing they have interests that need to be protected and certainly nothing bad will come from Whites working to save Western Civilization.

      In a sense, White Advocacy is good for the Jews. If the US and Europe succumb to the multicultural onslaught, the Jews would quickly find their power dramatically reduced in the world. Without a healthy Western nations as a base, Jews worldwide would be in jeopardy. Jews will not be able to navigate as successfully in Asian powers, if those nations become ascendant.

      I would suggest reading the works of Haidt and Pinker if it makes you more comfortable – they are Jewish thinkers in the liberal tradition. Although they would never embrace MacDonald’s work for political reasons, clearly their own work dovetails with it nicely. They agree that Man is indeed not born a blank slate and that there is an underlying reality to ethnic differences.

      A grudge is a horrible thing to hold on to, it eats a person up, and in this case it is misguided. Whites in the US have befriended Jews, given them a home, supported Israel and provided an environment for them to thrive in – so why so much hatred of White Advocacy? Jewish leaders, no matter how successful, have always miscalculated and put their own people in terrible jeopardy by overreaching. That is when resentment by the native population boils over.

      Having a critique of Jewish power and influence is not some boogey man to be feared. If you open your minds, you might learn something.

      So join us, open your hearts, and let love – not hate – lead the way.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 14, 2011 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

      There was no reason for my post to be marked down … this was done by the little bevy of closed minded trolls. I must have hit a nerve. Just to summarize:

      I wonder if the trolls are just college kids, because the tactics are so amateurish. I would invite you trolls to stop being so afraid and open your minds. Nothing bad is going to come from White people realizing they have interests that need to be protected and certainly nothing bad will come from Whites working to save Western Civilization.

      In a sense, White Advocacy is good for the Jews. If the US and Europe succumb to the multicultural onslaught, the Jews would quickly find their power dramatically reduced in the world. Without a healthy Western nations as a base, Jews worldwide would be in jeopardy. Jews will not be able to navigate as successfully in Asian powers, if those nations become ascendant.

      I would suggest reading the works of Haidt and Pinker if it makes you more comfortable – they are Jewish thinkers in the liberal tradition. Although they would never embrace MacDonald’s work for political reasons, clearly their own work dovetails with it nicely. They agree that Man is indeed not born a blank slate and that there is an underlying reality to ethnic differences.

      A grudge is a horrible thing to hold on to, it eats a person up, and in this case it is misguided. Jewish leaders, no matter how successful, have always miscalculated and put their own people in terrible jeopardy by overreaching. That is when resentment by the native population boils over.

      Having a critique of Jewish power and influence is not some boogey man to be feared. If you open your minds, you might learn something.

      So join us, open your hearts, and let love – not hate – lead the way.

  32. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    February 13, 2011 - 8:38 am | Permalink

    Jason Speaks:

    “So join us, open your hearts, and let love – not hate – lead the way.”

    Good try, troll! It won’t wash. The number of down ticks you keep getting is a sure proof that most of the genuine posters here are wise to your sly little tricks.

    One of your more obvious tactics — and that of your Jew girlfriend “Someday” — is to wait until Kevin MacDonald posts something and then grovel at his feet with fawning compliments.

    Thus you hope to convince us all that you are a devout White Nationalist rather than the slimy little Jew you are.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 13, 2011 - 2:46 pm | Permalink

      @ Anonyma …
      You are a genuine sleuth. I couldn’t have put it better myself if I’d pondered first for an hour. Well done.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 15, 2011 - 9:01 am | Permalink

      Guess who is Jewish HERE

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 15, 2011 - 9:13 am | Permalink

      Can this one get under your Jewdar ?

  33. Flavia's Gravatar Flavia
    February 13, 2011 - 9:21 am | Permalink

    Regarding the mudshark Susan…

    I don’t believe that she actually preferes black men. It is all about incentives.

    Now that she is washed up and 40 (a time to be celebrating a long term anniversary with a husband and be raising older kids) she cannot get the same quality of men that she once did when she was a 20 year old slut. Because black men seem to have a preference for white women over black women, she is able to get a better quality black man or get a black man’s interest much quicker than she would a white man. Therefore she now “prefers” black men. Maybe it’s true, but she prefers them not because they are black men, but because they pay attention to her.

    For the most part, the only type of white women you see with (non rich) black men are fat and gross.

    Further, I don’t see this as much of a problem. Ugly fat white women who on top of everything else have the maladaptive gene of mudsharking should be commended for dropping out of the white race.

    And really guys, you ever been to LA, Portland, Vancouver or Hawaii? Yellow fever is at an epidemic in a lot of places. I know white women are partly at fault, however, it is both parties here that are guilty of race-traiting.

  34. Flavia's Gravatar Flavia
    February 13, 2011 - 10:44 am | Permalink

    And I wanted to add that this was a lovely post- a great testament to the uniqueness of Europeans and our aesthetics and morals.

  35. mark's Gravatar mark
    February 13, 2011 - 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Finding suitable White women

    It has been noted here and elsewhere that White men travel to foreign countries to seek out Asian and other non-white women. Generally, the reason given for this is to avoid the, scowling, bitchy, slutty, feminist, barren, back talking career twats. They are wise in seeking to avoid these women, however, there are plenty of suitable White women outside of North America and Europe.

    Consider the beautiful White women in Latin America, in Argentina and places like Blumenau, Brazil. Germans founded this Brazilian city in the 1800s. It has a distinctly German character. It is in the province of Santa Catarina in southern Brazil. There are a lot of Germans in that province including some descendents of German patriots who escaped from Europe at the end of WWII.

    I have a friend who goes to Fortaleza, Brazil and also down south to Santa Catarina and Porto Alegre provinces a couple times a year. The women are very feminine and a pleasure to be around. He claims that you never hear any feminist sentiment—and he’s talking about women who can express themselves well in English. There are plenty of White women there.

    http://www.v-brazil.com/tourism/foreigner/blumenau.html
    http://www.blumenau.sc.gov.br/gxpsites/hgxpp001.aspx

  36. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 13, 2011 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

    HI Mark, First , I am not non-violent although, per our White “Humanity” I went thru a pacifist stage during the Vietnam War, a stage which was age-appropriate maybe. In this regard I simply argue, like Hitler’s generals, not to fight (violently) unless you can win.

    Second, Maybe the recent election in which “we” won means nothing. I think it means a lot. Also recent events in Europe with Cameron and Merkel and Sarkozy attempting to steal the thunder of WN means something, maybe.

    Europe and N. America are experiencing delegitmizing of liberal institutions. The polls continue to track this descent. The elites are far removed from the citizenry. Time is on our side.

    I wrote a couple days ago a long piece, somewhat humorous, on the Arab World going political Islamic. If that occurs, everything is speeded-up, Jews/Israel are in deep trouble. American foreign policy and neocons are in deep trouble. Europe’s Muslims will stir the pot, thus creating more WN backlash. I comically, but seriously proposed a new Peace Plan, the dismantling of Israel for the dismantling of Muslims in Europe. We get rid of Israel and They take back their Muslims. I also nominated myself for a Nobel, thereby.

    Mexicans returned to Mexico, all of them. Blacks resegregated in a couple southern states, Jews resegregated when politically that can be done. Queers left alone and told to shut-up (it is just biological crossed wires).

    Point: Politics are moving rapidly in our direction (don’t screw it up). The world is disgusted by stoning of women in the Arab world. Do you want to lose all sympathy and inclination by doing the same thing to our extremely few white women who cross the sexual line? Women ARE the weaker sex, and need to be protected from their emotional weaknesses. As somebody suggested, the young girls should be taught to stay away from monsters before they hit puberty.

    Pornography should be outlawed. That would send a strong message about cultural values.

    Young White men are understandably and commendably outraged and ready to fight. (I am 69 but still physically tough and get into situations with commies, Jews and cops…my berzerker viking component is still there and I thus understand you young guys ( I assume your youth) and salute your vigor.

    Time is on our side and it is moving rapidly. Polarization, both racial and in our political parties, is likewise swiftly moving. The coming fiscal cuts are going to hit the blacks and mexers hard… thus ..more fuel for the fire that is coming.

    I have a big mouth and use it locally (no job to lose). Several times a week I engage folks I don’t really know, and there is usually sympathetic response in my ultra- liberal area. Locally, folks are getting a practical lesson from the mexers. I met last week with Menlo Park PD over a recent cop incident. Did no get too far with my personal complaint (circled wagons) but managed to turn the conversation to matters in general, mexers and blacks. Clear sympathetic agreement with my racial views. I left racialist materials with them. Cops know.

    All politics are local, goes the cliche, which is partly true. Any local work that presents itself…do it. Immigration is THE issue and American Whites up to about 80% are sympathetic. Keep smiling, let your interlocutor Talk, don’t do a monologue. Fear is the greatest motivator. Let White folks fear the mexers, not you/us.

    I am reading a couple books written by Jews (recommended by Mark Weber) on the social climate of Germany in the 20s and 30s. Leaving aside some of the idiocies of these Jews, what is most interesting is the relatively TOTAL revulsion of Germans to the Weimar Republic/Liberalism/Jews.

    I am not necessarily proposing that this is a direct parallel with our times, but it is interesting to compare and contrast…

    By the way, England’s Cameron used the term “Muscular Liberalism” recently to describe the way forward, to assert muscularly, liberal values. I guess that means knocking heads together of Muslims AND Whites in new Programs of Sensitivity Training. This is both funny and illustrative. Liberals have not given up on their credos of Human Rights, they are just going to get more muscular, like the commies. However, as the guy in the currently running video on this site points out, Americans identify 20% liberal, and 40% conservative. Our task is to improve those numbers.

    Joe

  37. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    February 13, 2011 - 4:04 pm | Permalink

    TOO contributer Joe Webb comments

    Mark, is this a joke? The beheading will actually be of White Nationalism if such a thing were to occur.Am I on a WN list or what? Where is a moderator anyway?

    And he gets hidden (13 thumbs down).

  38. mark's Gravatar mark
    February 14, 2011 - 4:22 pm | Permalink

    First, Joe, I am not a young man, but thanks anyway.

    There is and has been a misunderstanding in the use of the term “White Nationalist”. What you mean by that term is very different than what I mean by it. You’re using the term to mean something similar to paleo-conservatism or perhaps just a little bit stronger. I’m using the term to mean something that might be considered a twenty-first century version of National Socialism—a non-uniform or insignia wearing folkish society based on racial kinship, racial appreciation and racial values, controlled individual economic enterprise, limited democracy, a global sense of White racial mission. Except for the enhanced racial atmosphere that will exist in this future White society, it could look much like White society in America during the 1930s and 1940s.

    My definition of “White living space” in the western hemisphere is: all land masses and all bodies of water from Hudson Bay to at least as far south as 5° N. Latitude (we’ll be needing the Panama Canal). That includes all of Canada, the USA, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean.

    All points north of 5° N. Latitude will be occupied only by people of wholly northwestern European ancestry. South of that location there will be a buffer extending several hundred miles that is uninhabitable by humans.

    In Europe they will have to do likewise, but go southward to about 35° N. Latitude.

    Joe wrote:
    “Second, Maybe the recent election in which “we” won means nothing. I think it means a lot. Also recent events in Europe with Cameron and Merkel and Sarkozy attempting to steal the thunder of WN means something, maybe.”

    Mark replies:
    The recent “win” for conservatives means nothing because the conservatives have no intention of implementing any racially-oriented programs. When conservatives win, Whites lose. The conservatives will continue to fellate the Jews and the other non-whites and continue to deceive the White population by pretending to be on their side, just like they’ve been doing for many decades. The conservatives will continue to try to bring many non-whites into the Republican Party. Should we expect anything different from a bunch of pussy-ass conservatives? No.

    In any case, that’s putting the cart before the horse. No thought should be given to building a White society in North America until the existing social, political and economics orders have been completely torn to the ground, the guerrilla war wrapped up, and the last of the non-whites moved out of White living space. None of this will be legal by current U. S. law and they’re not going to go peacefully or willingly. That means that the guerrilla war is unavoidable and will have to be waged to force them out. That guerrilla war is now in its embryonic stage.

    Joe wrote:
    “I wrote a couple days ago a long piece, somewhat humorous, on the Arab World going political Islamic. If that occurs, everything is speeded-up, Jews/Israel are in deep trouble. American foreign policy and neocons are in deep trouble. Europe’s Muslims will stir the pot, thus creating more WN backlash. I comically, but seriously proposed a new Peace Plan, the dismantling of Israel for the dismantling of Muslims in Europe. We get rid of Israel and They take back their Muslims. I also nominated myself for a Nobel, thereby.

    Mark replies:
    So you want to negotiate with them. I don’t. The White world will issue the orders; what’s left of the non-white world after this global guerrilla war will obey those orders—no negotiating!

    Yes, it will be great when the Muslims in the USA and in Europe start using the same tactics successfully and daily that they have been using in Fallujah and elsewhere in the Middle East.

    Joe wrote:
    “Mexicans returned to Mexico, all of them. Blacks resegregated in a couple southern states, Jews resegregated when politically that can be done. Queers left alone and told to shut-up (it is just biological crossed wires).

    Mark replies:
    The plan you’ve outlined above isn’t going to happen peacefully. It will require an ocean of blood. It’s a conservative plan nonetheless. You are content to leave the Jews and all other non-whites inside White living space so that they can easily strike at our descendents a hundred years or so hence. The Jews will still be breathing and will be free to attack us at any point in the future that they choose. And there lies the racially suicidal program of the conservatives and the reason why conservatism is a road to White racial death.

    The Jews should be immediately declared enemy combatants, placed under house arrest and removed from all influence-wielding positions. That means, specifically, they will be removed from all media positions including television and radio broadcasting, motion picture production and direction; all teaching positions; all of the medical professions, all positions in the economic and financial professions; all positions of administration and any other economic or professional niche where they could inflict damage on White society. In effect, that means that they won’t be allowed to work.

    Like the Jews, the Negroes and all other non-whites will be stripped of their U. S. citizenship (more likely the USA will no longer exist and in the new country they will not be given citizenship). Property ownership will be illegal for them and the understanding will be that they are awaiting deportation.

    The White population in Argentina, southern Brazil and a few other isolated pockets in Latin America can be evacuated from those locations and relocated into the former United States of America, if they choose.

    A guerrilla war on American soil will ensue and last for years. We need to prepare ourselves for that now. We can’t just isolate the Jews, Negroes and other non-whites as you’ve outlined above and think that we solved the problem. That solution is nothing more than sweeping dirt under the carpet.

    Things are going to get very messy, very soon. You are right about that, Joe.

    I can see the wholesome elements of the White population being sequestered into a few of the states of the former United States of America. Once that has been accomplished we might anticipate the assistance of several of our kinsmen who have specialized training in the molecular biosciences to provide certain items and teams of martyrs to carry the White-race-saving cargo outside of the protected White area and deep into enemy territory for dispersion. Perhaps these martyrs will have terminal diseases making their missions easier for them. Perhaps there will be martyrs who are healthy. We can’t think of our situation any longer as a political or even a racial problem. We need to think of it as a biological problem and we need to deal with it on a biological basis. What do you do when you have an infestation at your home? You call the Orkin® man. We’re being overwhelmed by the non-white world. Many of our own people are betraying us. We cannot be squeamish when it comes to our survival. All protective measures are moral.

    Joe wrote:
    “Point: Politics are moving rapidly in our direction (don’t screw it up). The world is disgusted by stoning of women in the Arab world. Do you want to lose all sympathy and inclination by doing the same thing to our extremely few white women who cross the sexual line? Women ARE the weaker sex, and need to be protected from their emotional weaknesses. As somebody suggested, the young girls should be taught to stay away from monsters before they hit puberty.”

    Mark replies:
    I’m not concerned with losing their sympathy. I’m concerned with losing their fear! I don’t care what Joe Sixpack thinks. I don’t seek his permission or approval. If he gets in the way he’ll get squashed and that’s the point I want to make sure he understands.

    I’m afraid that these women, and other race traitors, need to be punished publicly. The images of these proceedings need to be seared into the memory of every White person living at the time these sanctions are issued. History books will be written about that time and they will include descriptions and images of the nature of the punishment. They will serve as a deterrent to any future race-mixing.

    BTW, Joe, there are more than “a few” White women who have crossed the color line. There are something like 250,000 or so White women married to Negro men just in the USA. That’s just Negro men and just in the USA! We’ll need a lot of rope and whetstones.

    Women will be completely disenfranchised. Except for training as nurses, school teachers, child development specialists and training in Home Economics, there is no need for women to proceed past high school. Their most important job will be to give birth to several White babies. A strong, centralized, racially-oriented White government will provide generous stipends to these women and secure jobs to their husbands so that financial concerns have been eliminated.

    It should be clear now to any White man that allowing women to vote and granting them the other “rights” they now have was a complete mistake. Contemporary American and western European White women are nothing more than a pack of in-heat, rabid dogs running around without a leash.

    I don’t care what the Arab world does with its women. That’s none of our concern.

    Joe wrote:
    “The coming fiscal cuts are going to hit the blacks and mexers hard… thus ..more fuel for the fire that is coming.”

    Mark replies:
    I don’t think that the coming budget cuts are going to hurt the Negroes or Mexicans in this country one bit. At least I hope they don’t. I want to see them living high on the hog. I want any budget cuts to hurt the White population really, really, bad. I want to see the White population hurting so bad that they have no idea where they are going to get their next meal; so bad that they don’t even know for sure if they will be alive an hour from now or not. I want their hearts and minds in the palm of my hand—and that’s the surest way to get it—not by making them feel comfortable, not by trying to educate them or reason with them. When a White man has lost his job, his kids are assaulted in the public schools, he loses his house, his wife gets hit on and/or assaulted at the local supermarket by non-whites, you’ve got his attention, you’ve got his heart and mind. Take it and use it, Joe. Don’t try to appeal to his reason—he doesn’t have any.

    The politicians know that the White population isn’t going to get out of line at this point and so they’ll be making every kind of economic gesture to the non-white population to keep them from rioting or otherwise tearing up the country.

    Joe wrote:
    “I am reading a couple books written by Jews (recommended by Mark Weber) on the social climate of Germany in the 20s and 30s. Leaving aside some of the idiocies of these Jews, what is most interesting is the relatively TOTAL revulsion of Germans to the Weimar Republic/Liberalism/Jews.”

    Mark replies:
    Our social climate here now in the USA and in Europe is so much worse that unless we use the most extreme measures imaginable we don’t have a chance. See TOO writer Dr. Lasha Darkmoon’s essays at the two links below on how bad things are for us in America, Europe and the other Whitelands and how much worse they are here for us now compared to the Weimar Republic:

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/04/goodbye-america-part-1/
    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/08/goodbye-america-part-2/

    Other links:
    The Future of Islamic Ireland
    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/weekend/2011/0212/1224289614194.html

    Bono supports ‘shoot the farmer’ lyrics
    http://www.optuszoo.com.au/news/top/news-com-au/bono-supports-shoot-the-farmer-lyrics/299033

    • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
      February 15, 2011 - 3:05 pm | Permalink

      Hi Mark, with regard to WN harboring paleocons…that is not my impression but there is a generational factor here. I know an eldery gentleman (that would be older than me) who helped turn me around a few years ago. He regrets his libertarian period, and certainly is now also past his paleo period and thus, is a WNist. As for your general identification with NS, I can agree that that is a period that we have to keep in mind both positively and negatively.

      (Do I sound like a liberal? ) The main problems with NS was its narrow German nationalism and thus its predatory attitude toward the East, and its Fuhreprinzip which ultimately lodged “Law” in Fuhrer-law, L’Etat ces moi. This is not in keeping with White northern European history of elected chiefs (not elected- for- life).

      Also your “have them in the palm of your hand” is problematic. The question is how to get to the point politically that WN has ANY political power, nevermind in the palm of your hand (that formulation is also psychologically suspect).

      Re budget cuts not hurting the unter types, of course it is going to hurt them real bad. The problem is how to get from where we are to where we want to be. Fantasy aside (Covington), Times are on our side, do what we can, do the work in front of you, no mistakes, no, as we used to say in the 60s, turning people off. Turn them on…
      Joe

  39. February 15, 2011 - 9:36 am | Permalink

    “With few exceptions, this sentiment is missing in most societies. Meaning those where women are historically treated as inferior, due to the simple fact that they can’t hit back with equal force if attacked or abused by a man.”

    No. This series of articles appears to reinforce narcissism and thus the follies of destructive Libertarianism.

    First females are shorter because of their estrogen (which arrests bone growth i.e development (in the legs especially – but probably cerebrally/intellectually too), which in turn is down the important biological fact that they do not express have genes which only males have in every one of their cells. This also explains females’ reduced muscle mass (weakness), and very probably their higher verbal than spatial IQ (the reverse of males), and thus their general lack of interest/ability in engineering and the hard sciences in favour of verbal/solipsistic subjects. It is the former behaviours which are required for any civilization. The sex differences show up mainly at the upper and lower end of the curve, a point which I brought home to Lynn in the earlier noughties (2004) in the context of demographic implications for the other end of the curve which he urged I published. I pointed out that as the data were already in the public domain in all our school test results, and had been for years if anyone looked closely, (see also US SATs etc), it would be akin to bringing coals to Newcastle. That is why we began work together, work which resulted in the Ashkenaizm Jews paper.

    There appears to be a major cost to ignoring this sex difference in terms of groundedness in spatial reality/logic, and thus its bearing on our economies i.e workforce.

    Not recognizing these important mean sex differences (which show up in some males also who are brain-feminized as pointed out elsewhere. Some females may be slightly adnrogenized through changes to steroid metabolism, as estrogen is metabolised from testosterone via aromatase albeit from a different source, namely the adrenals mainly).

    I have repeatedly urged readers here look at the data which I have been drawing attention to, and to stop putting females on pedestals. It’s part of the endemic narcissism/Axis II Cluster B pandemic. Articles like this, however well intended, just reinforce the problem, i.e by making out it”s OK, even desirable. Narcissism is arrested development. It goes with anarchism (Left-Communism).

    It’s a bit like neoteny. Conjecture: males probably find females attractive because they tend to be child-like.

    Children need protection and discipline in their own best interests. One doesn’t want children running one’s society. If one does, it collapses. See birth-rates and dysgenesis across the Libertarian-Democracies.

  40. February 15, 2011 - 9:51 am | Permalink

    “Not recognizing these important mean sex differences …… and the ranges and impact at the tails, the upper especially, is a major problem for us all today.”

    It is why I wrote directly to the body responsible for our UK schools curricula and testing rather than publish an academic paper with Lynn in 2005/6.

  41. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 15, 2011 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

    Hi David, I appreciate your criticisms of this romance by Colhaze. I tried to gently do likewise by my several remarks on Classic, Romantic, Modern, and Post-Modern, elsewhere on the three part Colhaze piece.

    Women are Romantic, men are or should be Classic. This also gets us to our WN politics. Are we Romantic? I hope not. WN is a return to Classic Male dominance, rationality, science, objectivity and above all…Calmness. With regard to Calmness, sexual attraction is a major disruptor of male Calmness.
    The seductive images of women, not necessarily pornographic images, are a case in point. Also interesting is the neotony you mentioned.

    Babies/children are, and ought to be, attractive. The dimorphism which is large in Whites (very different body, face, etc. (betweeen the sexes) as opposed to , say, Asians, is fascinating. We White men are perhaps seduced as much by our attraction to the “Child” in our women, as we are by simple sexual attraction.

    This reminds of the fashionable “Desire”. A whole essay could be written about the word “Desire”.
    Joe

  42. mark's Gravatar mark
    February 15, 2011 - 7:35 pm | Permalink

    Joe Webb wrote on February 15, 2011 at 3:05 pm:

    “As for your general identification with NS, I can agree that that is a period that we have to keep in mind both positively and negatively.”

    mark replies:
    The only negative aspect of it that I can see is National Socialist Germany’s defeat. That can in part be laid at the feet of Hitler for not paying enough attention to his generals and heeding their advice. The main cause of it, I feel, was the Jewish effort to instigate war with Germany and incite the governments of the allied forces against Germany.

    Joe Webb wrote:
    The main problems with NS was its narrow German nationalism and thus its predatory attitude toward the East, and its Fuhreprinzip which ultimately lodged “Law” in Fuhrer-law, L’Etat ces moi. This is not in keeping with White northern European history of elected chiefs (not elected- for- life).

    mark replies:
    I don’t see that as a problem. In any case, you may recall that on January 30, 1933 the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) was elected and that Hitler was its candidate. Yes, he later declared himself to be the leader and no other elections were held. I am, however, talking about something for the future that is a little bit different than NS Germany but just as racially militant and something that would take on a local flavor wherever in the White world it was established. We are in danger of becoming extinct as a race. Our number one goal should be to ensure our peoples’ survival, however that has to be accomplished. I also don’t have a real big problem with the leadership principle as long as racial idealism is at the fore. The problem with democracy is that it leaves the door open a little too wide for scoundrels like the Jews to manipulate the masses—another reason we mustn’t permit the Jews to escape the guillotine.

    Yes, the program of the NSDAP was basically German nationalism. It will be different in the future. It will be something that could be called pan-Aryanism, i.e., militant, global White racial socialism with some limited economic enterprise. It will encompass at least the ethnically cleansed White living space in North America, which I’ve described in my post above, together with Australia, New Zealand, all of western and eastern Europe and any parts of Africa Europeans wish to ethnically cleanse and repopulated with White people, an ethnically cleansed Russian and its former satellites, parts of southern South America unless they choose to be relocated into one of the above-mentioned White population centers, and any other pockets of White people around the globe.

    You have to keep in mind that the reign of the NSDAP was only twelve years. Hitler was 56 years old at the time of his death and if Germany had won the war the political structure of the country may well have changed somewhat (without compromising any of their racial ideas, of course) once the atmosphere of war had subsided and the goals of the revolution became permanently entrenched.

    I’ll also add that in a future White society, that nation’s entire media, and that includes all print media, all broadcast media, the entire educational establishment, and any cultural apparatus like the performing arts, must forever remain in the hands of the racially idealistic government and must never be permitted to be transferred into the private sector.

    Joe Webb wrote:
    Also your “have them in the palm of your hand” is problematic. The question is how to get to the point politically that WN has ANY political power, nevermind in the palm of your hand (that formulation is also psychologically suspect).

    mark replies:
    Well, what I mean by that, of course, is that we create conditions that provide us with their undivided attention and that because of those conditions they have become 100% amenable to our ideas. That point is reached by making them very afraid and very hungry for an extended period of time. We can get to that point by doing everything we can to destroy the U. S. economy. It has been suggested that Whites not patronize White-owned businesses, thereby driving them out of business and making them bitter, upset and more willing to join us in our revolutionary efforts and take chances that they would not have taken before. There are a lot of other ideas on the Internet about how to do this so I won’t go into that here.

    One possible way we can gain political power would be for one or a combination of a few of the U. S. states to secede a establish a sovereign nation on North American soil. That new nation could then be used as a staging area for more revolutionary activity in the rest of North America later once this new nation has become stable politically and economically.

    However things develop, we simply cannot leave the Jews and other non-whites breathing, as you have indicated you are willing to do, because they will always be there and at some point able to strike at our descendents. We just can’t permit that.

    mark

  43. mark's Gravatar mark
    February 15, 2011 - 8:41 pm | Permalink

    Finding suitable White women – Part 2

    Photo of the 2010 Oktoberfest Queen and Princesses from Blumneau, Brazil (must see)
    http://www.blumenau.sc.gov.br/gxpsites/hgxpp001.aspx?1,1,416,O,P,0,PAG;CONC;415;1;D;3008;1;PAG;MNU;E;3;4;MNU;,

    2009 Oktoberfest in Blumenau, Brazil
    http://www.blumenau.sc.gov.br/gxpsites/hgxpp001.aspx?1,1,416,O,P,0,PAG;CONC;415;1;D;3663;1;PAG;MNU;E;3;4;MNU;,

    Oktoberfest Parade – Blumenau, Brazil (scroll down for more links)
    http://gobrazil.about.com/od/festivalsevents/ig/Oktoberfest-Blumenau-/Oktoberfest-Blumenau-Parade.htm

    Oktoberfest 2008 Queen and Princesses from Blumenau, Brazil (must see)
    http://gobrazil.about.com/od/festivalsevents/ig/Oktoberfest-Blumenau-/Oktoberfest-Queen.htm

    Brazilian women at Octoberfest
    http://brazil4tour.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/oktoberfest-womans-beer.jpg

    The point of this link is not that you will necessarily meet a young female Argentine soccer player, but that there are plenty of available White women in that country as well as Uruguay, southern Brazil and parts of Chile. While elements of feminism may have reached those areas, it is overshadowed by the local culture and practically harmless—unlike its metastatic form we see here in the USA. http://connect.in.com/argentina-women/photos-argentina-5e9d02ca490ed1aa.html

  44. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 21, 2011 - 12:30 am | Permalink

    Please do not let yourself be caught in the snare of being hateful towards fat white women. Please remember they are daughters, mothers, aunts, sisters, and wives. They would probably be less inclined to debase themselves with negroes if other white men were kind to them. I myself have been aware of the propensity of fat white women to dysgenically mate with the negro for some time. They do it for the attention we deprive them of, so we are partially to blame.
    Perhaps we could find ways to help them lose weight and be more attractive. Help them out, and feel good about yourself.

  45. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 21, 2011 - 12:40 am | Permalink

    Miriam:

    Sometimes you are just hilarious. You cannot possibly be who you say you are. You are good, but not that good. I’m betting you are a young teenage jew boy. You have a sort of juvenile Larry David type mentality. Come out of the closet!

    • February 21, 2011 - 7:41 am | Permalink

      “Scooter February 21, 2011 – 12:40 am

      Miriam:

      Sometimes you are just hilarious. You cannot possibly be who you say you are. You are good, but not that good. I’m betting you are a young teenage jew boy. You have a sort of juvenile Larry David type mentality. Come out of the closet!”

      Note how you continue to be distracted by irrelevancies?

      It is a general disposition revealed in your posts. It is part of the impetuous Libertarian foot-soldier’s malaise. You can/do not see what is relevant from what is not. You fail to discriminate.

      It is just like the ad hominem and ad populum – but you can not see how.

      To spell it out, why do you keep chasing chimera? Why do you want to know who anonymous posters really are….”Scooter”? Why would you ever want to know personal things at all? Is that the only way you know how to judge the truth or falsewhood of what you are told? It is why they field celebrities and PR people as leaders you know….

      It is <b<what is said/posted which matters (or in your case, doesn’t).

      You don’t get it, and you never will so long as you look to the majority (of not so smart people) for guidance. cf. ad populum and Libertarian Democracy. Why do you think China censors? It is so its people are not misled by this nonsense.

  46. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 21, 2011 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    Warden Comrade Longley:

    Quit being so feminine brained, Longley. You are becoming too emotionally attached to this subject. Your hormones are raging again. Lets be logical here.
    As US government control has increased, the US has declined. It was the federal government that forced immigration down our throats. If we were Libertarian, which you are too ignorant/ill-informed/willfully opaque/obtuse to see, they would not have had the power. Are you too emotionally attached to your thesis to abandon it when you are wrong? That is a highly feminine trait.
    Oh… I’m sorry, please don’t cry…there there

    • February 21, 2011 - 12:44 pm | Permalink

      Scooter February 21, 2011 – 9:58 am

      “As US government control has increased, the US has declined. It was the federal government that forced immigration down our throats. If we were Libertarian, which you are too ignorant/ill-informed/willfully opaque/obtuse to see, they would not have had the power.”

      No. You do not see how this works. Libertarians deregulate. Privatise. They pass laws which deregulate and privatise the existing state. They establish government which ensures there’s progressively less regulation by imparing Public Sector regulation (Freedom of Information, Human Rights etc). You just don’t see how this is insidiously done. It is subversive and surreptitious.

      One can have lots of people working in government to effect this process.

      Big Government elsewhere means lots of employees in the means of production, communication and exchange (as in the former USSR and current PRC). This is what Reagan, Thatcher, and Cameron today reverse. Big Government means the state provides the jobs which drive the economy, not ones which ensure there’s minimal interference in the Private Sector and the markets (cf. the weak regulators – SEC and FSA).

      Look at what is happening in the UK.

      This is right-wing Libertarianism (anarchism) at work. Privatisation means competition. You are feeding that. Individualism feeds that. Class/conflict feeds that. It is just competition. Think business.

      You are being had, a ‘useful idiot’ or – an accomplice.

  47. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 21, 2011 - 5:52 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been calling you Comrade Longley for a reason. You obviously think communism is better that capitalism. I’ll grant you that some privatization has allowed theft of public sector assets, which is bad. Hopefully, those thieves are caught and punished. But communism has theft and privilege, also. In addition, it fails to compete effectively against competitive capitalism. So, while you have a point about some privatization lowering the size of government, you completely ignore all the other ways government takes over things, and far more than it ever gives up. The net effect is growth of govt. It is because you are damn hard headed you either don’t see or fail to acknowdge it.
    China doesn’t succeed because it is run by engineers, as much as I would like that to be true. It runs because they have the worlds most productive 5 dollar a day labor force with no benefits. If I could get Americans to work for 5 dollars a day with no benefits, I could produce more consumer goods than the world could use, cheaper than any competitor. How “communitarian” is it to enslave people in communist China in a 200 square foot apartment and then they can only afford a bowl of bug infested rice and filthy water after working six days a week making beads for Mardi Gras at 5 dollars a day for the benefit of a privileged elite there Comrade Longley?
    Competition generates fabulous innovation and improvement, and if we had stayed 90 percent white, even with the dumb whites, we would live in a much better nation than we do now.
    I’m guessing your jail got privatized and the guys who took over realized you were an overpaid crackpot who liked to argue, hang out on the internet all day instead of work, and they simply fired your ass. The govt couldn’t do that as easily, hence your relentless pro government bias.

  48. MS's Gravatar MS
    May 24, 2011 - 7:50 pm | Permalink

    <>

    I was puzzled by the above quoted passage. Chinese tea ceremony? Endless… of the highest sententious significance?
    I would appreciate a referral to a book or writing where I could look up such Chinese tea ceremony. Thanks in advance.

  49. Mary Anne's Gravatar Mary Anne
    July 11, 2011 - 4:42 am | Permalink

    What!! I love this article but then I read a post like this by “mark”

    After a couple of White female race-traitors have been beheaded in this country, and the whole event videotaped and archived, so to speak, by sending the video file to every White Nationalist website and to fora frequented by Whites so that it’s available to view 24/7, you will see an immediate and marked decrease in White female race-treason.

    This is the remark of a lunatic.

    And “Anglo Saxon” says

    We white males need to enforce (as Fathers, Brothers, Husbands, and Boyfriends) maximum discipline upon our drugged-up women. For they know not what they do!”

    What kind of “white man” talks like that? That’s the talk of a loser. I have brothers, a father, and uncles, and if you ever talked to me that way in front of them, you would meet their shotgun. Losers.

1 Trackback to "Romantic Commitments, Part 1"

  1. on July 4, 2011 at 6:20 pm

Comments are closed.