Statue of El Cid Campeador, Palace of the Legion of Honour, San Francisco
He which has no stomach to this fight
Let him depart, his passport shall be made
And crowns for convoy put into his purse.
We would not die in that man’s company
That fears his fellowship, to die with us…
Shakespeare Henry V
The Magnificent Millennium came to an abrupt end when Duchamp’s Pissoir was declared as the logical continuation of Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa and, as is widely but falsely believed, the industrial age hastened its demise. Beautiful Art, once a daily fare and immutable part of life, from marvellous paintings or sculptures to simple household embroidery, disappeared and deformity and squalor took their place. In Hitler’s Third Empire an attempt was made to stem the tide, but we know of course what became of it. Though it may be interesting to see the tens of thousands of paintings still hidden away in Munich’s official cellars, once generously sponsored to guarantee their creators, no matter how gifted, at least a decent existence.
What is more, the great philanthropists of the past, from the Medici to those European or American connoisseurs who paid fortunes for one of Lord Leighton’s masterpieces, or those of Delacroix or Caspar David Friedrich, began to disappear and made room for a new brand of benefactors, namely the Saatchis and the Wall Street sharks. As a result, the once glorious Female began to look as hideous as the above piece, or worse.
Now you may say that all this sounds a bit too far-fetched and highfalutin, too nostalgic by half, too much in defence of a past long since gone down the drain. But this is simply not true. If you dig through the garbage that is modern life and shove aside the materialism, the terrible crudeness as promulgated on television, in the movies, literature and elsewhere, you will still find layers of pure gold which the tempters and gangsters have so far been unable to destroy.
I have lived for a while near Verona, a typical Italian city complete with the classic mediaeval centre surrounded by an ever growing cancer of noisy modernist suburbs. It has one unique feature, namely the Arena and its marvellous summer staging of Verdi operas, a treat any cultured person should enjoy at least once in a lifetime. The city’s lovely old quarter is largely uninhabited since the owners of the houses, mostly the Catholic Church or the bank or both, leave them empty to avoid disputes with tenants. The bank in question, very powerful in the region and beyond, sports as its ingenious insignia three letters that can be read either in Italian and mean Bank of Verona, or in Hebrew and mean shekel. As to the layers of gold, we may recall that Christendom’s most tragic heroine, Juliet, was born in this very city. Her native house, small but complete with balcony and a pretty statue, hides not far from the Piazza delle Erbe, Verona’s medieval heart. The edifice has a colourful past, including stints as the local brothel, and is in no way related to the entirely fictive Capulets, Juliet’s family. It owns its present mythical status to a clever mayor who, short of money and even shorter of moral restraints, declared it some ninety years ago to be what it is to this day, and basta!
Should we blame him? Or the hundreds of thousands who come every year and believe this nonsense, among them many young lovers who scratch their names into the regularly re-painted archway as a heartfelt token of kinship with Shakespeare’s lovers while fervently hoping for a happier fate?
Of course not. Or better, the opposite is true. We should be thankful that the little thief has unwittingly fashioned one of the world’s loveliest shrines. Because it is the dream that matters, and not the questionable reality. Here we can observe every day sentiments not unlike those that gave mediaeval Europe its deeply humane texture. With the one difference that today love is not encouraged anymore, but under a state of siege and in danger to be destroyed altogether. Because there are people afoot, very powerful indeed, who have never grasped the concept and therefore exploit and pollute it wherever they can. People who may feel instinctively that God’s greatest gift has been denied to them, and therefore hate us like hell.
Or how could it otherwise be possible that those who control the media, as once did the painters, poets and novelists, have so utterly destroyed our romantic and adoring conception of the female? What happened that love has been replaced by porn, that beauty could turn into utter repulsiveness? How can it be that these people are not only debasing our womenfolk, but do it at the earliest possible age while effectively ruining their bodies and minds as well?
The most base and barbarous videos imaginable, either animated or real, are freely available on the Internet for anyone big enough to reach a keyboard. Because that is really part of the scheme, namely to corrupt and to brutalize our children. You and I grew up reading or listening to fairytales of everlasting literary beauty, with morally sound connotations and a wisdom accumulated since the beginning of time. Whereas today the tale is senseless and mainly a recurrent display of the most perverse fornication possible. The little princesses look all like those above, namely five years old and rising, very sweet and very vulnerable. And all are expert cock-suckers who get invariably raped, flogged, buggered or, most chilling, worked over by an exquisitely designed deer.
It is easy to imagine what devastating effect a cartoon like that has on a boy or girl of six or seven years old. Because that is usually the age, even earlier, when they start surfing the Internet. Now you may mention precautions like blocking pornography on a computer, but that is nonsensical. When I tried to grasp a few basics of Photoshop, the son of my neighbour patiently explained matters again and again until the penny finally dropped. He was about eight years old. In other words, they’ll always find ways to see what they want to see.
And that is the problem. Because what is forbidden makes us doubly curious, an old proverb that fittingly describes a simple but powerful human trait. It has positive sides, like nosing into cupboards with skeletons the mighty do not want to be rattled. The holocaust, for example, or 9/11. But it can be also dangerous, particularly when you are young and inquisitive.
During my own early teens, moral perceptions were still intact. The opposite sex wasn’t regarded as such, but looked upon benignly as a weaker part of humanity and thus eligible for protection. We, the boys, had in any case more important matters on our minds, like the tedious daily battle for higher knowledge or, as Boy Scouts and in lederhosen, the next marvellous outing. Until the day when a fleeting smile, a charged sideward glance, a teasing joke kindled a sudden and very bright flame in our entirely unprotected hearts.
And not only there.
I remember to this day an episode that triggered my sexual desires almost over night. In my mother’s room stood a small and prettily inlaid cupboard that was always locked. The only inaccessible piece of furniture, its secrets were a temptation as long as I can consciously think. With the passing years it developed an almost mythical fascination, and one day, when about thirteen or fourteen, I contrived to open it with a picklock. What I found was the family silver, love letters of my father, jewellery my mother never wore anymore, and two books. One Dostoevsky’s Idiot, a masterpiece that made me only a few years later fall head-over-heels in love with Russian literature. Why it was locked away I don’t know, perhaps because Nastasya was a fallen woman. As to the other book, Emile Zola’s Nana, I had no doubts whatsoever. While I was reading breathlessly about a gorgeous harlot beholding her totally naked person approvingly in a tall mirror, the shimmering skin aglow with a faint golden tuft, I felt my face heating up and my heart beating faster. In short, it knocked me right off my feet.
Whereas if today a boy of the same age could be prompted to read the lines, he wouldn’t even manage a tired shrug. This because he’s been treated since earliest childhood to whatever sexual perversions the human brain can conceive, with the sad result that he saw it all and now has nothing left anymore to get exited about. As for the girls, it is even worse. Not too long ago it took them some sincere introspection before giving themselves, as it was then called so very gallantly. Whereas today the act of making love has been degraded to a moment of base fornication, as thrilling and intimate as a leak in the public toilet. Girls as young as ten years old get the contraceptive pill prescribed without their parents’ knowledge, most likely to avoid an abortion. The terrible intervention itself is common fare among teenagers, quite often far into the pregnancy. And if all these liberal and politically correct attitudes make them a wee-bit confused and down-trodden, they get some Prozac to lift them up again. For a while at least, and until they are thirty and done with.
I am of course not stating that this is symptomatic for our society as a whole. But it is rampant, and clearly expanding. It is also downright and premeditated murder.
So what to do? If I would find out one day that my daughter had been prescribed the pill while eleven years old or undergone an abortion while fourteen, I’d go and zap the bastard who did it right between the eyes. And accept the consequences. Because it is probably better to rot away in jail than watching your beloved girl going slowly to pieces. But this is of course no solution. A moral revival only works if a majority of people think it necessary, even paramount.
“Sexual morality is contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life….” said the great Sigmund Freud, and added contentedly: “If only the Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!”
Plague indeed. Recently I came across another quote containing the affliction. “People who are moved by love avoid politics like the Black Plague. That’s why mankind is always in a mess.”
And this is really the dilemma. With very few exceptions, professional politicians are held in contempt or worse. A recent poll in Germany rendered, within this context, some devastating results. Conducted for a scientific magazine by the renowned EMNID Institute, it stated to my profound delight that the once so docile Krauts are finally getting fed up. Nearly 40% believe that there exists some sort of secret world government. An even higher percentage thinks the German government is criminal. 50% are convinced that they are completely under surveillance. Almost 90% believe that the US government is not telling us the truth about the attacks of 9/11. And two thirds think the German government gets blackmailed.
The pollsters and the editors called it, clearly shocked by the results, “very scary.” And by God, it is! If I were that Neoncon-Nelly and her assorted klepto- and cryptocrats who presently run the shop, I’d avoid highly visible criminal stunts like slapping people into jail simply because they publicly doubt all those historical fantasies. This because one day someone might come back and take me by the long ears and demand a revenge.
A few days ago I read, at Counter-Currents, Greg Johnson’s interview with Dr. David Duke and his Guidelines for Political Success. The latter, in my simplistic though enthusiastic opinion, should be distributed across the Western world like Mao’s Red Book among those affluent would-be revolutionaries. Because Dr. Duke’s ideas, clearly the result of a long and honourable struggle, might help us to overcome our abhorrence of matters political. Allow me to enlarge on the theme a moment and cite the time when that cursed Red Book paved the way for a success story.
During the late Sixties a small business venture brought me to West Berlin, just at the time when all those so-called student protests were in full swing. Germany’s former capital was a consumerist oasis amidst the communist badlands and boasted an army of thirty thousand policemen, since the allied sanctions didn’t allow any German military presence. Thus while I was dining one day in a restaurant on the main thoroughfare, outside a demonstration got out of hand. There were thousands of highly agitated young people rallying around a few screaming and yelling ringleaders, and suddenly police swarmed all over the place, knocking everybody on the head with batons, young girls included. It was a ghastly sight and upset me deeply. Long since out of tune with my native country’s mood, I decided to take a look at the protest’s instigators, to get an idea of what on earth upset them so much. They had sequestered the Free University, sending the profs packing, and used the great auditorium as a meeting place. Every now and then a scruffy champion of the masses, hoarse long since, bellowed some overwhelming maxims into the mike, mostly Marx and Mao, while the crowd yelled Ho Ho Ho Chi Minh, The NLF is going to win to give it substance. It was an even ghastlier sight, with clear connotations of lawlessness, violence and heads rolling, and I knew after five minutes all I needed to know. Namely that if this kind of rabble were ever to hold power, people like me had to get out very fast indeed.
They couldn’t topple the government, of course. So they decided to do it the other way round, namely from down below. They called it, in honour of their revered chairman, the LONG MARCH through the instances. And by God, they succeeded. Because after patiently worming their way through universities while toning down their act, cutting their hair and shining their shoes, they became teachers, dons, journalists, television personalities, novelists, judges, policemen and politicians, the latter anything from deputy in a small town council to a faceless delegate in Strasbourg or a federal minister. They and their successors. And they gladly embraced political correctness, multiculturalism, globalism and whatever else had been invented to keep the population in a state of constant befuddlement, while being themselves subservient to their secret masters. It worked perfectly well as long as people could buy themselves a new BMW every year, or whatever else the booming economy had on offer. But lately matters have soured a little, just as you have seen in the above poll. And since serious economic troubles are in the offing, matters might even get worse for our adversaries.
Good for us, the upright and honest defenders.
So where does EL CID enter the equation? The great knight who initiated the Reconquista by beating Christendom’s heathen attackers back home again? The man who was instrumental in setting off the world’s most glorious millennium? He’s here just as an example, because we need to look out urgently for someone like him if they come and confiscate our weapons or carry our own ringleaders off to Guantanamo and similar detention camps. Which will be also the moment, have no illusions, when King Henry’s famous dictum will come into play.
But we aren’t there yet, and hopefully never will. And why? Because our adversaries, even though obscenely rich, are very few. They can beat us only with the help of our own people.
But not every sheriff, soldier or police officer is corrupt. Far from it!
As to your most beautiful Queen, the one with the flaming red hair, well… she can be anybody. Your mother, your wife, your daughter, the girl next door, the Statue of Liberty, the Goddess of Love, the Holy Virgin Herself. Or all seven rolled into one. So why not embrace an ideal and swear an oath of allegiance to protect them, restore their honour, rescue them from the claws of their abductors?
It’s easy if you’re a Man.
The Birth of Venus (Detail) © von pentz 2010
The Joys of Jihad: Islamentable, Isatrocious, Isbetrayal
Nordics versus Implicit Jews in "The Switch"
When Heidi went to Heaven 
Wow.
Was this written by Kmac or Colhaze? It reads like Colhaze.
I appreciated the 1968-part, but Colhaze seems to exaggerate the pornography-effect.
Cohaze, of ocurse, He is summoning his knights.
Yeah, they fixed the auth
Yeah, they fixed the author listing. First said Mac.
It is an outstanding piece. Thanks Colhaze.
Excellent article!
We need to protect “our” women and children. The problem is, in order to be “a man” as he so eloquently states, one has to regain the power once legally held by husbands and fathers to do so. With force, when necessary. Remember the “Shotgun wedding”?
The hard fact is, in 2011 it is ILLEGAL to be a man…especially a white one. But to a lessor degree, any man has capitulated (through the vote) to the state, so instead of a man protecting his daughter, wife, or son for that matter he is obliged to call the police. Thus if you come home to find your new 18 year-old bride having “concensual” sex with two 30 year-old line-backers… thats tough! You voted your rights away long ago.
And sacrificed your manhood on the alter of so-called equality. So….Hows that democracy working for ya!
Romance. I recall someone saying some time ago that we are all Romantics these days. Classic , Romantic, Modern, and now Post-Modern have been the big classifiers for different ages, zeitgeists, cultural and political movements.
Was the French Revolution Romantic? Was the Bolshevik Revolution Modern? Was National Socialism Classic? Surely NS and WN today was and is more Classic than Romantic, and both are certainly anti-Modern. Some WNs argue for using post-Modernist relative Relativism for staking-out our Claim amongst Other claims as just as legitimate as any other claim.
That po-mo argument to me is a grand dud. It is the abandonment of Reason.
Our return to Evolution, Genetics, Science is certainly Classic and not Romantic. Also, our rejection of unscientific Romance (All God’s chillun can all just git along) is therefore Classic.
Our rejection of childish dreaming of Universalism which is LIberalism, is Classic. LIberalism is both Romantic and Modern, Romantic because of childishness, and Modern because of its rational strategies for realizing the Impossible Dream. Modernism is Instrumentalist in the service of Romance. (In this regard, Capitalism is usually seen as Modern, but I doubt it. Capitalism is just Technics which runs alongside our foolishness, political and social. The Statist Capitalisms of the East may prove more rational than our free-enterprize model…they are certainly demonstrating more success right now.)
An interesting question is how much German Romanticism contributed to fascism. I pose that question without having an informed answer.
Then the question of Emotionality enters the picture. Robust Emotion is generally conceded to be Romantic. Calm emotion is Classic. Modern Emotion is what?: Emotion harnessed to political correctness and therefore considered to be universally manipulable. Post-Modern Emotion is considered absurd on its face.
All of which gets me to us. Whenever images are introduced to otherwise rational discourse, there is (outside of mere documentation of events) a bid for emotional response. Photographs are particularly suspect because what ever they claim to represent can be worth a thousand verbal lies.)
Colhaze’s images summon us (honestly) to consider women as goddesses. There is nothing particularly wrong with that, but it is Romantic. Images of White males as heroic figures is also Romantic, and useful. However, I guess I am more bent toward Classicism, although I love Romantic music..
WN is Classic, not Romantic. It is Realism: racially, culturally, politically, Scientifically, intellectually. Our Emotion is realistic, not romantic. Romantic emotion is impulsive, reactive, hysterical even. I recall that Charles Martel kept his infantry holed-up in a wood for several days before starting combat. This was Classic Restraint.
Sex, by the way is Romantic, often frenzied, and often ridiculous. Love is calmer, Classic. Classic love includes appreciation, in the WN context that means appreciation of our race, not just in the abstract, but in the people we meet every day. Calm produces a smile. Calm produces realistic thinking. Calm produces not anger (when the fight comes) but courage, skill, and will to kill the Enemy. Emotional engagement in any situation should stem from realistic assessment of all factors. If that sounds absract, it is.
Images are fundamentally Emotional bids, and should be treated Classically, not Romantically.
Joe
Very well stated Henry B,
I always taught my kids, mind over matter, retrained, take a deep breath, think about it, and when you’ve made the best decision with the knowledge you have, you can back it up with your emotion too. My oldest son became a Navy-Seal and served in Iraq and Afganistan. And he was once a mama’s boy and I taught him it is OK to cry.
With my youngest son still in college…he told me once that I could not do this or that, and that I would go to jail for the spanking he got. I told him I love you enough to go gladly to jail, if I can keep you from going to jail, and have you grow upright and straight. He never again complaint, and I think that was the only spanking he ever got. Don’t let fear hinder you from becoming the best man and father you can be. My oldest son hated me at one time because I made him study for better grades. Later he thanked me, and commented that he never would have become who he was, had I not shown him that discipline and restrained are powerful tools. He is also a great father and husband.
Take it all back, your woman will love you for it.
oops, I responded to Henry B – instead of JOE WEBB, Sorry Joe, . It all kind of run/scrolled together.
I see a little in that essay why I left Germany. There was someting sick developing over there too, but still to young to give it vocabulary. I was hoping I would come to something better here in the US. Oh well, I didnt. I have my kids and grandkids here, so I fight for their future. And yes M. Colhaze,….it is easy if you are a “Man”.
I do understand why Germans have lost trust in their Government. The Holocaust, and the politics surrounding it has a huge effect on the people. You only talk about it in private among family and friends. The Watchdogs are the Jew’s, who will use Politics and the German Government, the Holocaust whip and their interests and sensibilities, errect one Museum after another, never forget, with pressures to put you in line (jail) and under their control. Jews will use the media or what ever to defame, degrade, and make sure the whole world will see Germans as evil and hostile to immigrants. They must be annihilated. If we can not kill them openly, lets use the backdoor, swamp and overflood them out of existence. And since the US is an allied to Israel, (past guilt and whipped too) European countries follow suit and pay their dues. For a while America was seen as the moral high ground. But not anymore. Germans can not walk with their heads up high. The problem is, Germany’s people first, other European Countries second, Australia has some severe laws already, the US is next, but not without a price for those who will oppose and not betray their own kind.
Another reason why the German Generation of WWII became materialistic, (BMW) is that this Generation was straved, they never had a life. My mother was born at the end of WWI and went thru the great Depression and then WWII. The death rate of her community and within the family was enormous and painful. I can not imagine what her life was like. I can complain about mine, but to live in constant fear and a landscape of bombs and war ? I can understand that they wanted to live after WWII and have a home, safety and some comfort. It is always so easy to judge, when you are not the injured party. I try not to be too nasty on the Jews, they were unquestionably severely injured too. But there are Jews now who are not injured and use the past as a whip. No one is learning anything from their methods. They react from the victim mentality, instead of asking themselves what they had contributed to the political landscape that made the Holocaust possible. It is terribly difficult to stand in the MIDDLE and see it from both sides.
But a very good essay by Colhaze, outspoken and honest to say the least.
Well they NEED to stand UP. Grab thgat whip right outta the Jew’s claws. Why have my people become SO submissive, so concerned with propriety? Will it take thousands of years, like it has with the Egyptians?
White people don’t HAVE thousands of years.
The very homogeneous Japanese are very big into, if not the inventors of the perverted types of cartoon sexuality that Colhaze describes.
Of course you all know why the Japanese have buck teeth and squinty eyes. LOL.
Sire! Just name the day and the hour. I’ll be there.
I feel much of the problem we have is with parents. Far too many send their children to the public schools to be indoctrinated with Communist ideology and race-mixing, let them come home and spend more hours being indoctrinated with Communism and race-mixing, and often allow them to bring their black friends home; then act shocked when their daughter gets a black boyfriend. Then when the mixed breed child comes along, well, it’s “family”, so they have to accept that too.
In my opinion, the very first thing should be, throw out the TV. Children without it will spend much more time reading and other useful activities. Treat children with dignity and respect and demand they treat others that way and that includes other races. Explain how races are different.
Second, if one can’t afford private schools_and increasingly, even if he can, then homeschool.
Do not allow black friends, black music, black literature. Create an atmosphere where it’s understood without even saying that mixed race dating will result in instant and permanent expulsion from the family. If it’s been properly done a parent will never have to act on it. But if it does he should act quickly and decisively.
Remember, the rule is, whatever is accepted becomes acceptable. This is a matter where one must think not only of his child but also of his grandchildren and his race. We have let this go very much too far and it will take extreme measures to turn it around.
Colhaze has touched my heart. I wouldn’t mind a date with this guy. Trouble is, I’m Jewish…so he may not bite! :)
Whiteawake:
“I feel the problem we have is with the parents”
What parents?? are you aware that the traditional nuclear family no longer exists as a cultural norm? And the 5,000 year-old institution of marriage has been dead for fifty years?
(Declared dead OFFICIALLY with the consenting adult law)
Marriages today are merely excuses to get drunk and act the fool…oh, and take pictures!
most people today don’t even bother. fyi The government (Big Brother) IS the parent. Not only of your child, but of YOU! And the society you live in is your play-pen. and you can’t get out of it, mostly because you don’t know your in it
Henry, there’s certainly a lot of truth in what you say. But even where there’s only one parent involved, even with the horrible situation we’re in, the things I said can and should be done.
When I get really pessimistic about things I always think of what Hitler said about it: “If we’re dumb enough to let them get rid of us, they probably should.”
How about it folks, are we that dumb?
To all:
The hard fact is this:
There is no such thing as equality.
Ergo, some must be on top and some must be on bottom.
That leaves the eternal struggle of…whos it gonna be?
The God of Nature has decreed that men will be on top and women will be on bottom. this system worked more or less well for 5,000 years “civilization”
In the last hundred years machines have upset this natural balence, hence the social degeneration you see around you. (artificial polarization, ie. men And women on top…men AND women on bottom…note that there is STILL a top and a bottom. The crucial difference is, it is no longer a NATURAL POLARIZATION, but an artificial, Un-natural one.
Thus you have quite literally, a …new type of human!… one that is robotic, sonambulistic, etc. Whose only allegiance is to “Big Brother” such a person values not their offspring except as possesions and for the last hundred years the “mothers” of such a Frankensteinian cult society have not cared enough about their offspring to breastfeed the little ones (thankfully thats beginning to change) see; attachment parenting.
And what of the so-called fathers of this cult of “equality” When they find it convenient to zip up their pants they are involved in the ceremonial mutilation of their own male children, and see the degradation of young virgen girls as some kind of national sport
I hear you Henry and you are right.
How do you teach your children the Natural affection to the opposite sex. Male or female. Listen less to the millions of voices coming from the outside. It takes effort, awareness of self and the world around you to make sound judgements.
I did not raise my kid religious, because I had too much of it. But I kept on top of what they viewed on TV, the toys they had, I was engaged in their feelings and intellectual development. My oldest son speaks of himself sometimes like being the “Hunter”. A kind of an old fashioned role model in the way he describes his family commitment, protection and obligation in feeding and caring for his family. ( he detests his father) Being a Hunter may sound primitive, but he learned how to survive in the desert, land and sea with nothing. No modern mechanical tools available for survival. Maybe a Survivor course for men, a back country experience, to ground yourself in your inner Nature might help bring out the “natural man” in men. I don’t realy have the answer. I just wanted my boys to have a happy life, find love, sex and family enjoyable, and raised them as natural as I could, and left the rest to their own development. But being grounded, and to have at least one caring parent with good beginnings in life helps.
In an adult relationship I think you alternate in domination. Woman can not be mindless, and man can not be emotionless. Each have their day, time and role’s to fulfill in which they alternate in their dominance. And I am not talking about top and bottom-sex functions.
I liked being married the old-fashioned way, but those days disappeared. I was introduced to this new modern way of womanhood, and I spend most of my life rebelling against it alone, being called a square, too straight, but a natural high, never on drugs or alcohol as a positive. Liberalism was in and “Dirty woman was in – conservatism and clean girls were out”. That is the way it was.
another thought on Romanticism , etc.. The return to the much Jewish, derided “organicism” of society both thought and experienced as “harmonious hierarchy” , a term used by KM would surely be Classic. Form, formalism, rank, a corporatist– as in estates, with some form of constitutionalism and authority clearly delineated, and no man above the law…that is Classic. The wrecking of National Socialism started with the Fuhreprinzip, that in effect, German law was Fuhrer-law. Fuhrer-law is the equivalent of the ancienne (French) regime’s “L’Etat, c’est moi.”(…at its worst.)
The Anglo-Saxon-Viking tradition is elected chiefs who are accountable to their folks, or Volk. This is the natural bio-cultural /genetic social order of Whites.
Now, to the extent that National Socialism became Romantic with the romance of Hitler, to that extent it was doomed. It was not just HItler, it would be any single individual who became Too Big to Fail, if I can put it that way. Everybody fails in some way as an individual. But, the King’s Court/College of Electors, cannot fail as disastrously as any Dictator will fail. Any Dictator must fail because he is human, all too human. National Socialism arguably set out to achieve ancient governmental, societal, cultural, and economic forms. Unfortunately, the swerve was to the Romantic Hero, hero worship, and so on. This Romance led to the failure of recovery of ancient tried and true forms.
The State is another problem. We may be forced into a kind of Statism which tends to defy Classic, Romantic, Modern, and post-Modern formulations. And yet, maybe not. After we win the battle against Modernism and its preposterous claims for racial equality, Equality in general, and so on, it is conceivable that Devolution could happen. There are many signs of it happening right now, whether it is in “Great Britain”, Belgium, Canada, or the probably imminent failure of the European Union (and Brussels’ amateur tyrants). It could even happen in the U.S., not along White Nationalist lines exactly, but including WN ideas, but also simple Regional Differences leading to Devolution.. If this were to occur, we would be on our way all the way back to Athens. Talk about Classic!
We are in an Age that is starting to reject LIberalism, and all the Big Ideas of Modernism. What follows is common sense recognition of large Differences in race and consequent Separation of the Races for the sake of social peace.
Then White ethnys can separate from one-another to some degree, if that is what they want. Individuation is also a social process. Nobody enjoys being in a “mass”, something the communists seem to have missed (although the “masses” could be seen as just another Jewish (communist) attack on White gentiles…just a herd of cattle, especially since the USSR allowed special arrangements, geographical, and social, for Jews. (And yes, other ethnic minorities were theoretically given some autonomy but Whites were massified…by the Jews…”They all look alike Moishe. they look like Germans.”)
So, just my attempt to clarify the issue of Romanticism. WN is not Romantic. Emotion is not Romantic. Colhaze’s images may or may not be Romantic. But if these images stimulate calm, and not passion, they are Classic. Joe
If Europeans are this stupid and weak are they even worth saving, as a people? This is a question I’ve asked myself recently; if most Europeans are hopelessly Marxist in nature, and they pass on their self-defeating ideologies to their kids, then I can’t honestly say I care what happens to them. I have little respect for the third world, but I have less respect for idiots and cowards, and Europeans repeatedly prove themselves to be both.
If they want to commit cultural and racial suicide, then I say let them. Their genetic predispositions and insane political devotions have proven them to be unfit for survival, so I say let nature take its course. Maybe an Arabic Europe would be worthy of some respect; at least the Muslims aren’t cowards.
I’m not sure providing an actual link to a pornographic website was either prudent or necessary. We all know what pornography is.
You’re right. I will remove it. Kevin M
Whiteawake:
I agree that Home-schooling is vital if we are to protect our kids from the Zombies. But Zombies are called fourth from their lairs with the magic words “equality” “diversity” To stop them, we must break the spell of these words by exposing them as lies
European:
A few nights alone in the deep woods would do wonders for the average football fan :)
Fender_strat:
“Maybe an Arabic Europe would be better, at least the Muslims aren’t cowards”
As much as I detest the muslim religion you have to give them that. And they are fighting tooth and nail to keep the Jews (and their American grunts) from flooding their culture with western “values”…divorce, drugs, porn, etc. and destroying their strong families
Interesting that Frau Merkel’s only comment with regard to the Egyptian revolution is her hope that the peace treaty with Israel will be maintained . This was after travelling to Israel for a trip where all German cabinet ministers attended a joint German Israeli government meeting. The German government is as independent from US/Israeli control as East Germany was from the SU before 1989.
Merkel came from East Germany. That should tell you something.
@ European …
I assume what you really mean is that Frau Merkel lived through her most formative years under the Stasi (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit). And that the last head of the Stasi was a Jew!
Stasi Supported West German Neo-Nazi Groups
“The more it changes, the more it’s the same thing.”
One in seven of Germany’s top neo-Nazis is a secret service agent
That’s “long march through the institutions”!
Fine series, great art.
This is a realistic assessment of the evil that awaits us, what our precious heritage is, and what we have to lose. I do not believe he has overstepped the line on anything – apologies to no one! I hope I may see the day when every pornographer’s head is thrust into the milemarker posts on every interstate highway.
I almost felt like I was listening to David Lane once again. There are indeed very, very few real White men left in this world. On the other hand, we only need to galvanize perhaps a thousand to prevail – as the Good Mentor said, “world history is made by minorities when that minority embodies the majority of will and determination”.
In “The Birth of Venus” by von penz, there is an anatomical mistake.
I assume that the painter had a reason for making it, as the rest of the painting is very good.
That mistake is this: The nipples do not stare straight at you, like a person’s eyes. They actually point away from the person at about a 20 degree angle or so, especially, and frequently more so, on a woman.
As regards the article: Nice, if you have time to read it, la-ti-da. But, it could have been pared down quite a bit. I would also like to know the novel from which Colhaze got his quotation, in the first segment.
I would also like to say that, in today’s world, a woman needs to learn to fend for herself. Pornographic influences and modern trends have led to multitudes of acquaintance rapes, and even a decent man can become an internet porno-addict. Plus, the naivete of young women today about “how men work” is appalling, and something their grandmothers would not tolerate.
This may sound out of place here, but I strongly believe in the equality of the sexes and it’s what my children were taught. Why?. Because typically while men are far stronger physically than women, typically in the emotional sphere it’s just the opposite. A woman who knows how to be a woman and understands her power can go toe to toe with a man any day. But unfortunately that fundamentally can and today has been severely corrupted; so many women today have been trained to give up their natural power they are unappealing with nothing to offer but flesh. Men have given up their natural and most fulfilling role as protector. I have to believe if our children were taught to appreciate their natural strengths they’d be much happier in their natural roles.
I notice every single comment here has gotten a “thumbs down”. Should we construe that as blanket approval, since there’s obviously a ——around?
Oh drat! To be rejected by a chosen one!
@ Whiteawake + Henry …
It is my observation that these “first thumbs down” are nearly all being applied by “Jason Speaks”. I have been observing this blog closely for some weeks trying to work out who it is, and that little Jew-bitch looks the most likely candidate. Furthermore, this ‘she-male’ appears to be returning to post multiple “thumbs downs” against the same commenters. The rating system is not perfect. The owner of this Website will likely soon have to decide if he is going to take more robust action.
Look at this thread, it will turn your stomach’
A commenterMiriam K (self identified as Jewish) talked about the “typical White slut” who the ” White male must force to “mend her sluttish ways”.
This started a thread which I reproduce here. Note that Anglo Saxon does not defend white women he joins in Miriam K’s attack on white women
Finally Anglo Saxon complains about the thread getting any thumbs down
As you have been observing things so closely Anglo Saxon you could not have missed Mark’s loathsome comments at Romantic Commitments, Part 1. Indeed you commented on the thread they were in. Furthermore you agreed with Miriam K about white women being sluts, adding your own epithet “drugged up”. That is going to make a very nice impression on the interested white visitor to the site.
Don’t take it personally, Henry. He just likes RED.
I pay no attention to “ratings” My words will sink or float according to their merit. This is not “myspace”
Well, I don’t know yet what I think about the ratings system; there very often doesn’t seem to be much rhyme or reason for the ratings posts get. I’m sure KM has something worked out in his own mind to make use of it; maybe sometimes he’ll choose to enlighten us.
One problem I have with it is this: I feel one of the prime objectives of a site like this should be to discuss and develop a consensus about what we are and where we want to go. As it seems to be working now I can’t see the ratings are helping much; there is entirely too much quibbling and digression away from the point. Maybe it will help if we all just try to be a little more positive in proposing our own ideas and less arguing against others.
Another issue is that there is a concerted little band of trolls that are deliberately causing trouble.