Historically, many of Biblical prophets were “radicals” for challenging the status quo and taught against the corrupt and racist ruling classes – such as Abraham, Lot, Moses, Jesus – and of course the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), who became “the living example of progressive, emancipatory radicalism,” – as decribed by Michael Hart in his book, ‘The 100″.

The western governments, Jewish lobby groups and Christian Zionist organizations are investing hundreds of millions dollars each year to find and project the so-called “moderate Muslims”; fund Islamophobe intellectuals and dozens of anti-Islam think tanks (Rand, Ford Foundation, Asia Foundation, etc.), and the Jewish-controlled mass-media of course. Interestingly, to be a “moderate Muslim” too, has some limitations.

For example, Dr. Tariq Ramadan 46, found it the hard way in 2004 when he was declared as threat to “the US security” for criticizing his fellow Jewish ‘liberal intellectuals’, Dr. Bernard Lewis, Dr. Bernard-Henry Levy, Dr. Daniel Pipes, and Dr. Bernard Kouchner – for defending Israel, right or wrong. The Geneva-born Tariq is the maternal grandson of the founder of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, Imam Hasan al-Bana (martyred in 1948). The “moderate Muslim” was on his way to take-up his teaching appointment at the University of Notre Dam (Indiana), begining August 25, 2004. Tariq Ramadan used to be a darling of Jewish media for saying: “The 7th century Medina model of Islamic State is not only a dream. It is a lie.” Tariq also consider Shari’ah’s capital punishments as “inhumane”! Tariq’s other distorted views of Islam can be read in the interview he gave to Rosemary Bechler, Open Democracy, July 14, 2004.

Dr. Tariq Ramadan also maintained a distance from his elder brother, Hani Ramadan, a French school teacher, who is known for his so-called “radical” Islamic views. Hani wrote an article in the major French newspaper, Le Monde, to explain why Islam has such a zero tolerance for adultery and that it followed the Jewish biblical punishments of stoning to death a woman found guilty of committing adultery, for which Hani was suspended for teaching in the school.

Islam clearly prohibits a ‘pre-planned’ violence against civilians and acts of terror. However, terrorism and radicalism are two completely different things. It all depends who is using these terms. For the foreign occupiers of Muslim lands – all resistance to their occupation is considered as terrorism. Similarly, every Muslim who is proud to be following the Islamic Shari’ah (which doesn’t divide Islam into two independent spheres, one for the mosque and the other for the State – as is the case in Judaism and Christianity), is labeled as a “radical” or “terrorist” or “Jihadi”.

Islam is the religion of “the middle way” – “Thus have We made you an Ummah of the middle way, that ye might be witness over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourself,” – Holy Qur’an 2:143. However, Islamic message do challenges the institutionalized injustices, inhumanity, immorality, greed, and other evils in the world by establishing a new social order built on bonds of ethics, justice and trust. Islam rejects all forms of racism, caste system, all forms of oppression, usury, abuse of laws for the ‘chosen ones’ and dehumanization of man on the basis of colour, nationality and religion. All these principles are considered “radical”, especially in the societies controlled by the Zionist-controlled-governments (ZOG).

So, in conclusion, the next time some jerk call you “a radical Muslim”; don’t apologize, be proud.

There can never be peace in the world without justice. Everyone, including Muslims, need justice. But justice cannot be achieved without effort, both intellectual and physical. It involves challenging the power of the corrupt and greedy world elites, who do see Islam as a “radical” threat to their political, economic and cultural domination.

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/nothing-wrong-being-a-radical-muslim/

When these Islamophobe talks about Muslim assimilation – they foget that Jewish communities who have lived in Europe for over 2,000 years – still refuses to assimmilate with the Christian majority nor they have changed their insulting view of Jesus and his mother Mary. This was one of the several reasons that Jewish communities were expelled from almost every European country in the past (from England for 350 years). However, now the tide has turned. Now the small Jewish minories control the destiny of almost entire West.

The Islamophobia is part of western history. when it comes to Islam, the Judeo-Christian fanatics and even Atheists like to bash Islam and Muslims. Karl Marx was Jewish so were Lenin and Stalin. They were not against all religions. Under Marxist rule, thousands of churches and mosques were destroyed but not a single Synagogue was destroyed.

Secularism is not “a direct product of Christian traditions and openness towards an independent civic existence” but a rebellion against Church’s dictorial dogma. Church taught racism against women, Jews and other non-Christians and was totally against scientific knowledge. The Western scholars were jealous of the free public education system and civil liberties being practiced in Muslim spain and Sicily. Islamic world played a major role in the western Renaissance.

In Islam, there is no separation between Church and the State. Moses received the Ten Commandments, which were based on religious morality and faith and nothing on governance. Jesus followed Moses Law with a few revealed interpretations – and left no code of governance or a family role model to be followed. He never married and had no children. Bible quotes Jesus (Mark 12:17) having said: “Give to Cessar what belongs to Cessar, and give to God what belongs to God”.

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/no-left-or-right-just-islam/

Now, the truly EPIC irony is this situation is that this very man started a TV channel devoted to dispelling stereotypes about Muslims.

And then he beheads his own wife, cutting her head off with a knife. I mean really, who else beheads people? That is SUCH a Muslim thing to do! I mean, who didn’t read this story and go, “Yup, here we go, another Muslim sawing someone’s head off with a big knife… yawn, just like always….”

The only odd part was that it wasn’t to some Jewish captive, it was his WIFE!

Which just goes to prove my point about divorce: it always makes things worse:

–If you were a meek submissive beta to your wife, after she divorces you, you will probably scream at her.
–If you regularly screamed at her, after the divorce papers have been served, you will probably push her into a wall.
–If you were already shoving her around, after being served you will punch her daylights out.

And if you are already punching her, where else is there to go? That is the dilema this man faced.

So he did what is apparently the next natural step in Islamic escalation, I suppose: he cut off her head with a knife. (yeah, not a pleasant act… sheesh, he left cut marks in the tile floor where he did it…)

Athanasius February 6, 2011 – 1:28 pm “Jason- He goes on and on (and on) no matter what I, or anyone else writes. If he is actually a troll, he is pretty ineffective because no one here has a tendency toward marxism, and few here are doctrinaire libertarians.”

Are you so silly/dumbed down that you can’t see that it doesn’t matter a jot what any of you call yourselves (or think)? What matters is what’s actually happening, most of which is a) evidently completely beyond most of your grasp and b) can’t even be drawn to your attention now, despite repeated efforts, as you just won’t do as you are advised it seems. Watch the video at least.

“There’s none so blind who will not see”.

Athanasius February 6, 2011 – 4:06 am When you say anarchist, do you mean like Kropotkin? Ayn Rand? How do they differ in your mind?”

Stick to what’s been practical policy over recent decades, and especially the last decade or so. Anarchists are the Neoconservatives: Reagan’s administration, Thatcher’s government, Clinton’s administration (think the 1999 Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act), Bush’s and Blair’s terms in office etc. These governments have continued to deregulate, i.e they have continued to privatise. They have rolled-back the public-sector, i.e. the state across Europe. It’s a political process best examined in terms of consequences. It is not theory, it’s what’s been done and it is continuing as many politically awake Europeans, especially Britons, will tell you. Many people don’t see it because they have no conception of the state anymore. To see statism at work one has to look to Islam, or to China. That is rendered verboten to most in the West via the ‘War on Terror’ (‘you’re with us, or you’re against us’) or by demonising National Socialism (aka ‘Socialism in One Country’ aka Stalinism – cf China) via terms like ‘Holocaust Denier’, or just ignoring it in the case of China. How many people in the USA know how the Chinese Constitution is written or how their elections and Government operate? Why is there this fear/ignorance? What function does it serve domestically?

It reminded me of the passage from “A Tale of Two Cities” in which Monsiuer Le Marquis, the Uncle of Charles Darnay, runs over a child with his coach in the slums of Paris.

It is no coincidence that the people who demanded/are demanding the bankruptingly expensive wars in the
Middle East have names like Kristol, Krauthammer, Frum, Wolfowitz and Perle; and yet the overwhelming majority of those killed or wounded have names like Washington, Smith, Schultz, Sanchez, Kowalski and O’Ryan.