Crypto-Judaism in the Catholic Church

An article in Haaretz (Israeli Jew turned Catholic priest named head of papal court”) describes one David Maria Jaeger who “converted” from Judaism to Catholicism and will now become a member of the highest court in the Vatican. The word ‘converted’ is in quotes because it’s apparent that Jaeger has in no sense ceased being a Jew. Jaeger was born in Tel Aviv and had a Jewish religious education before assuming his high position in the Church.

[A prominent Israeli professor comments:] “He is a special man. … He’s told me about his deep ties to Israel. We didn’t delve deeply into the reasons for his Christianity. He only gave hints.”

When Jaeger was asked yesterday whether he feels Israeli, he replied, “at least as much as you do,” adding, “I’m just like any Israeli citizen who works for an international organization situated outside the country – just like there are Israelis at the International Monetary Fund in Washington, the UN in New York or UNESCO in Paris. I am in a supra-national international body, that’s the only the difference.”

“I’m a loyal and patriotic son of our people and our country,” he said. “After all, that was the whole point of the Jewish people’s emancipation in the 19th century, that we would become a nation, not a religious minority among gentiles. A person can live according to his conscience, he can not believe in any religious faith or believe in one rather than another, all according to his own intellectual conscience.”

It is stunning that a very prominent Catholic has a deep Jewish identity and thinks of the Church as just another non-governmental international organization. The ceremony for his ascendancy in Rome will be attended by his sister Leah, an Israeli citizen, bringing a sculpture by Menashe Kadishman, a famous Israeli sculptor. He served as legal adviser to the delegation that negotiated the Vatican’s Fundamental Agreement with Israel–sort of like having Dennis Ross negotiate with the Israelis on behalf of the U.S.

Beginning in the 15th century in Spain, people like Jaeger were called Conversos or Marranos (pigs)—Jews who had the appearance but not the reality of having converted to Catholicism. The Inquisition was designed to ferret such people out and subject them to penalties.  Indeed, a major problem in the eyes of the Inquisition was that the Church itself had been infiltrated by Jews pretending to be Catholics (see here, p. 118; I deal with Jewish apologia on the Inquisition, including denials that crypto-Jews had infiltrated the Catholic Church here, p227ff).

During the centuries of the Inquisition, the Church acted as if it was much more than an international NGO. It was a community of faith where ethnic networking on behalf of non-believers was the ultimate betrayal. In the contemporary world, crypto-Judaism in the Church results in high office and, who knows, perhaps election as the next pope. (Jaeger is so upfront about identifying as a Jew that perhaps calling him a crypto-Jew is inaccurate. Making statements like Jaeger’s could only have been a death wish during the period of the Inquisition.)  Whatever the past successes of the Church in defense of our people, the appointment of a strongly identified Jew to a position in the Church hierarchy is certainly a bad sign indeed of the state of Catholicism in the contemporary world.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

200 Comments to "Crypto-Judaism in the Catholic Church"

  1. Vonbrucken's Gravatar Vonbrucken
    September 20, 2011 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Hello I wanted to know if you were aware of the excellent work by Charles BARTHÉLEMY on the Spanish Inquisition and its defence ?
    It can be found here ( French only):

  2. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    July 7, 2011 - 5:56 pm | Permalink

    Lancashire Lad
    “But the deeper question is, what if it is sincere? What’s the problem with it then? What does Macdonald want Jews to do?”

    Blood is thicker than water. This is the rule. There are always exceptions to that rule but the rule must come above the exceptions.

    Each nation could pick its genetic center-point expressible in some numeric way and define citizenship relative to that point, again in some numerically expressible way. Then you have certain restrictions based on that genetic distance.

    In simple terms you define what 1/2 French, 3/4 French, 7/8 French means numerically (or German or American or whatever) and then certain positions in politics, media, law, military etc are restricted accordingly.

    So someone 1/2 French could rise to Captain, 3/4 French to Colonel, 7/8 French to General etc.

    Someone ethnically Jewish who genuinely wanted to become French then their children and grand-children would become so but there’s no way to be crypto.

    Alternatively those who didn’t could go back to being explicitly Jewish as an ethnicity, freedom of religion, protection under the law etc but citizenship in a nation *has* to be about blood because a nation is blood and human nature completely revolves around that reality 95% of the time.

    Admittedly in a church context (outside of national churchs) i don’t know what you’d do.

  3. Julian's Gravatar Julian
    July 7, 2011 - 2:55 am | Permalink

    Catholicism, because what else is there?
    Truth does not care if you believe in it.
    You do not judge a religion by those that fail to practice it. How many bashers of Catholicism have studied it objectively sincerely seeking the truth? I have not met One.

  4. June 19, 2011 - 12:00 am | Permalink

    There is one God. His name is Ptah. He resides in Utah.

  5. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 18, 2011 - 11:48 pm | Permalink

    Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (28 August 1749 – 22 March 1832) is world-famous German poet, novelist, playwright and natural philosopher. He is one of the greatest figures in Western literature after whom countless institutes and associations have been named all over Europe and North America, namely Goethe Institute.

    Though born into a Christian family and raised as a follower of Church, von Goethe did not have a good opinion about his faith. He wrote: “There is much nonsense in the doctrines of the Church“. His beliefs about God were very close to Islamic belief of One Supreme Creator (Allah)……..

  6. June 17, 2011 - 5:17 am | Permalink

    Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best.
    Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves. – Menachem Begin

  7. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 16, 2011 - 5:58 pm | Permalink

    Bigmooo – I have still to meet one Islamophobe on internet who is brave and proud enough to accept the truth that he/she is Jewish – because that would destroy his/her credibility.

    Why the heck you think some Muslim will qoute verses from Holy Qur’an to some idiot? I will never. It’s the truth which has been proclaimed by thousands of Christians and Jewish scholars and historian. Can you show me a Revised Version (RV) of Holy Qur’an – as the Bible has?

    The original maniscript of Holy Qur’an can still be viewed in Mueseum in Istanbul and Tashkent. Tell be where I can find the original copy of your Bible or Talmud for that matter.

  8. Miriam S's Gravatar Miriam S
    June 16, 2011 - 3:41 am | Permalink

    I find it hilarious that professed followers of a religion which was started by a Jew and his Jewish friends and is based on their teachings are shocked and horrified by the thought of Jews joining the church. Really? It’s just so unbelievably (or perhaps not so unbelievably) stupid! Trust me, there aren’t hordes of people lining up to join anyway.

  9. Brandon's Gravatar Brandon
    June 15, 2011 - 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Pope Benedict recently showed his hand: He sided with Africans, against Europeans, in his adamant support for the African invasion of Europe:

    The Catholic Church is becoming an anti-Western institution.

  10. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 15, 2011 - 10:23 am | Permalink

    Christian literature for the last 2000 have been blaming Hebrews (Pharisees) for conspiring against Jesus (Isa) and played a major role in his Crucification. However, recently, Zionist double agent Pope Benedict XVI, had exonerated Jews for the death of his Lord Christ on the Cross in his book entitled Jesus of Nazareth-Part II. I think the Pope is right in saying so, because according to Jewish historian professor Shlomo Sand, Jews did not exist in Jesus’ time. They were “invented” only a century ago.

    Some Christian scholars have claimed that it was Judas, one of eleven apostles, who betrayed Jesus. Interestingly, Judas is considered a Jewish hero by many Jewish scholars who suggest the New Testament may have deceived us by vilifying Judas Iscariot. Far from being a traitor, they say, Judas may have been a slandered hero who delivered Jesus to the Pharisees at Jesus’ own request.

    Lately, Clark Eberly, has given a new twist to this story. In a column published in The Washington Times (June 13, 2011), he suggested that it was John the Baptist (Prophet Yahya) who betrayed Jesus by not following him.

  11. June 14, 2011 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

    You say pope John Paul’s mother was a Ukrainian not a Jew.There are Ukrainian Jews,don’t you know?He probably came fron the part of the Ukraine that belonged to Poland before the war.Anyhow, he thought of himself as an ethnic Pole.However what disturbs me is that his mothers’name was Katz.That’s unmistakenly a Jewish name.Though I am not particurlarly religious person,I was raised a Catholic,I realy hope that pope John Paul II was a sincere Christian.But I ‘m beginning to have doubts.Could it be that he thought of himself as Jewish and kind of “infiltrated” as such into the highest hierarchy of the Catholic church, as pope?That he was then a “traitor”I cannot even fathom such a vilainy!We know that during the war he went into hiding.Did he tried to escape German internment under the disguise of a seminarist/ priest.After all what happened to him in that period remains to a large extent a mistery.Why would he do that and to what purpose?Could it have to do with the “Holocaust”.
    Now I suddenly remembered an article by Ian Mosley about the still secret archives in the Vatican that contained the correspondance between the Holy See and the German government, before and during WWII.Mosley stated that the Catholic Hierarchy knew everything in detail about what happened in the concentration camps, amongst them Auschwitz.Mosley,very logicaly as usual,reasoned that if there were realy gaschambers in Auschwitz it would have been mentioned in the letters and that it wasn’t because there weren’t any and that it would once more,expose the Jewish lie of Auschwitz’s gaschambers.Of course the Catholic hierarchy knew what was going on in the camps if only because numerous Polish catholic POW’s had been interned in Auschwitz after the victory of Hitler’s army over Poland in 1939.Amongst these POW’s were also seminarists and even priests who served in the Polish army.Until now the archives are still not disclosed.Could it be that Jews want to infiltrate the Vatican to have a “peep” at these documents,who are in contradiction with the “official” Holocaust-story, to see what they unveil?Or worse to falsify them?After all I don’t remember there has been a Polish internee who testified, after the war, there were gaschambers in Auschwitz.And I don’t mean that ridiculous story by the the histrionic Hochhutt about the “relapse”SS Gerstein who had “witnessed” the gassings
    by peeping through a keyhole!I know it would be realy difficult to falsify documents in the Vatican archives, as copies of the letters must have been kept by the Germans.But we know the German archives were seized by the Allies and transferred to the US.And we know what the Ruskies (and the Polish communists)did after the war: they forged documents by the thousands.Am I the only one to see some connection between these facts and the smear campaign which has been started against the Catholic Church since february about the scandal of pedophile priests.The new pope,Benedict XVI anounced the santification of Pius XII, the pope the Jews hate for reasons we all know.A few months later the smear and fear campaign started in the press,TV all over Europe,for months on end.I am more and more convinced that it was the Jews who are behind it to “punish” and intimidate pope Benedict for his “insolence” for standing up against them in honouring Pius XII.Only the Jews have that much power in the media.Many of the articles were clearly “staged” or “incertated”.There are numerous Rabbis who were caught abusing children,but nobody eve attacked the Rabinate.Here it is clearly the Catholic Hierarchy as a whole that is targeted.In Belgium now lawyers trie to file lawsuits against the Church and extort money as they have done in the US,although most of the abuses were commited a long time ago.And it seems to work.Pope Benedict seems terrifiedHe recently stated about the problem of the illegal immigrants into Italy that Europe should accept the thousands of Northafrican illegals on its territory.Can you imagine the pope pleading for immigration of tens of thousands of non-catholic (often Muslim) immigrants into Italy!!What do you think?I I am being paranoid or do you also see any corroborations between al these going-on’s?Has the Jew in question infiltrated in the Vatican with a “mission”??

  12. remain's Gravatar remain
    June 14, 2011 - 5:01 am | Permalink

    I encourage anyone thinking of writing off Christianity to check out Christian Identity before you do. I was raised Catholic and speak from experience of my own confusion.

    No one can understand what and to whom the bible’s speaking until you know who’s who.

    Yahweh is 100% against race-mixing. The bible is all about race and was written exclusively to and for the white Adamic race as descended through our fathers (patriarchs) Noah, Abraham, Issac, and Jacob/Israel. Yahshua (Jesus) Christ was a pure Israelite who came for the ‘lost sheep’ of the ‘house’ (meaning family/race/tribe) of Israel.

    The bible is full of ‘begat’ lists which are geneological RACE lists. (note that just a few generations ago your family tree was kept in the family bible.)

    The commandment against adultry is against race-mixing. Adulturate means to mix.

    The shape-shifting race-mixing name-changing Edomite Jews have deceived the “whole world.” We are told that “even the elect” would be deceived.

    No mongrels (race mixers) will enter the kingdom of Yahweh. Those who follow Yahweh’s law will enter the kingdom and have everlasting life while race mixers who do not are doomed to ever lasting death.

    These are the last days when all that was hidden is being revealed (Revelation.) If you are of white European Christian heritage now is the time to check out Christian Identity while there is time.

  13. Northern Light's Gravatar Northern Light
    June 13, 2011 - 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Thankyou Z.O.G. for your research.Christianity is a virus.It has nothing to do with God,or spirituality.It platform was/is Jewish.It rules by intolerance,and pandering to the lowest instincts.It hates beauty and sees it as lust.Staffed by nothings who cannot make it in the ‘real world’,They seek to damage the strong.Control the ignorent,and corrupt the rest.The greatness of the West was/iswrecked by them.There ‘love;is conditional and they are controllers for the powerful(Jews-Upper Midddle Class,Finance).TheBible is a fraud,and but the rantings of backward cunning Jews.Compare it to the beauty,and peaceful wisdom of the philosophers of the Greco-Roman world and it is but contradicting conditional hate.Unorigininal to the extreme.With the Vatican,staffed by perverted -half-men and pathetic frenzied creatures called nuns, or as Frederick Nietchze called them’Abortions of human beings.’they care nothing for anyone but money,and promote mediocrity,and are indifferent to reality.The Jews through Rothchild(57% federal Reserve:City Of London)rule them.As they do the crazed Zionist Bible. thumpingFundementilists.As NIetchze wrote:”Whn the Christians took over they tolerated knowone,burned down and destroyed the tresures of antiquity,closed th Olympics,and shut down bathing.Than the world got dirty”.Christanity is intellectual cancer.Look around and see what they wrought.Praying for the Jews conversion.:Thats a sick sop to the traditionalists.With Catholics and the entire corrupt and boring Christian world its all ‘box office for th masses.’.There Jewish controllers know this.Ask Father Jaeger Jewish head Vatican judge.

  14. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    June 13, 2011 - 10:29 pm | Permalink

    Oh ye of little faith! Haven’t you read the declaration set forth in Matthew 16:18? And regarding Pope Benedict, he did manage to aggravate the jews when he rewrote the prayer calling for their conversion recited on Good Friday.

    Another little-known fact – additional prayers for the conversion of the jews were added to the Divine Office after, of all things, Vatican II. Catholics now pray ten times a year for the conversion of the jews. This is more than before Vatican II! I guess the cryptos haven’t totally succeeded yet! See the discussion here:

  15. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 13, 2011 - 2:50 am | Permalink

    There seems to be a mixing here between Christianity and the Gospel. Or the Church and Jesus. I think that the reason that many European and Christian organizations tried to encourage multi-culturalism has to do with European history and perhaps feeling of guilt or fear or extreme racial ideologies. Its hards to see what the Gospel has to do with either multi-cuturalism or racial isolation. In fact one of the conflict Jesus had with the Pharisees was about this extreme ethno-centrism where God has been confined to a single ethnic community at the expense of the other people of the Earth. Jesus wasn’t buying that. Jesus said that he was the tradition of Moses and David while the Pharisees claimed he was a traitor who was destroying the Jewish nation.

    Christianity is a universalist religion so its normal for the Church to take into account all the different racial and ethnic make up of Christianity. Plus the Church I think realized that the Bible was the most succesful ideology that came out of Europe. As Desmond Tutu said, “the whites took the land and we took the Bible”.

    So its not possible for the Church to oppose mixed marriages. Mixed marriages by itself do not change culture and traditions. Its MASS immigration that changes the demographics of nations. Especially if those migrating are not of the ethnic and cultural make up of the host nation. Here lies the problem.

  16. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    June 13, 2011 - 2:16 am | Permalink

    Heart of Darkness – The Criminal History of the Christian Church

    As it waited in the wings of pagan Rome, the Catholic Church was already marked by corruption, violence and sexual scandal. The fanatics of Christ proved useful to an ambitious prince who set his sights on absolute and undivided power.

    The Church expropriated the resources – both human and material – which might have defended Roman civilization. While an indolent army of clerics lived on the state, the impoverished legions degenerated into a peasant militia. Once a particular Christianity – hierarchical and authoritarian – became wedded to the Roman state, it became a force of brutal repression. The “Church Fathers” transformed Romano-Hellenic culture by bigotry, anti-Semitism, censorship and intolerance. This so-called ‘orthodoxy’ suppressed and persecuted its ‘heretical’ opposition. The barbarian tribes that overran the weakened Roman Empire were, for the most part, Christianised; the forces that opposed them, pagan.

  17. TruthSeekerHarrison's Gravatar TruthSeekerHarrison
    June 12, 2011 - 10:30 pm | Permalink

    The Catholic Faith is the most beautiful thing one can image, fostering a personal relationship with Christ. The Jew/Masonic influence is very apparent and a true Catholic must reject this influence in our religion. One must go back to traditional ways and make strides to have their churches changed back into proper sanctuaries, Eucharist in the mouth only, the true old mass must be revisited, veneration of relics, etc. etc. We can do this together. The Jews want to destroy our religion and have almost done so. This Masonic Jew in the Vatican is not a surprise. We must work to root out the perverts that have been deliberately let into our Church. We, the faithful must get our church back and our respective nations. The criminal Chosen Ones are the enemies of all races and nations. Sad but true. The time is now for real change, on every level. Do it now my fellow Catholics. Do it!

  18. Northern Light's Gravatar Northern Light
    June 12, 2011 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    I escaped the horror of Catholic Church long ago.So did my family.Christianity is corrupt,sick,and stupd(Original Sin blows the whole nonsense apart.Christainity destroyed Rome,divided the West and caused(causes)more hurt than anu other ideology in European humanities history.Its about the ygly,the weak,the close-minded,and the ill.against the beautiful,progess and the strong.Its succumbing to Jews proves this.It allows them to enchain us.

    • TruthSeekerHarrison's Gravatar TruthSeekerHarrison
      June 12, 2011 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

      The faith is not corrupt. You are blind. The Jew/Masonic scum have corrupted our Church. Wake up man! See the forest for the trees! You escaped to embrace the filth of the controllers? You escaped into delusion about God and Man? The Catholic Faith is pure and enlightening.

      • Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
        June 13, 2011 - 2:02 am | Permalink

        Christianity is a Jewish mind virus. And it is also a massive hoax.

      • Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
        June 13, 2011 - 2:18 am | Permalink

        The Christian Heaven may have been a vain folly but the Christian Hell has been real enough.

        Hell on Earth – A Brutal Superstition Spreads Across the World

        The priestly “protection racket” required the criminalizing of the whole of humanity through the doctrine of Sin. The Rackets – Seven “Sacraments” of the Church. The Rackets part 2 – Racketeering on an Imperial scale. In a world run by clerical gangsters, the writ of Holy Mother Church was enforced by sadism and torture. For more than a thousand years, the henchmen of Christ inflicted a cruel barbarism on every community they encountered. Law was replaced by Divine Right, scientific method criminalized, ancient medical knowledge lost for a millennium. Women, fortunate to be domestic slaves, might find themselves in enforced celibacy, joyless marriage or burnt as a witch. Roasting heretics became popular entertainment and a religious duty.

      • Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
        June 13, 2011 - 2:21 am | Permalink

        Raised to the status of State religion the Christian Church reigned over the destruction of civilization. As the centuries passed religious barbarism grew ever more vicious.

        Winter of the World – The Terrible Cost of “Christendom”

        In their struggle for power, Christians waged their own “civil war”. A Catholic trinitarian nonsense triumphed over Arianism. The intellectual centres of the empire were ruined by murder and prohibition and Europe sank into ignorance and superstition. The civilization that had stretched from the deserts of Arabia to the highlands of Scotland reverted to a primitive village subsistence. By aggressive warfare, Christianisation of the heathen tribes followed. In Spain, the German lands, Britain, and Ireland, the despots of the Church imposed their tyranny. Remarkably, the last pagan kingdom was eradicated as late as the 15th century.

      • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
        June 14, 2011 - 7:04 am | Permalink

        @ Z.O.G. june 13,2011- 2:18 am.

        {“…The priestly “protection racket” required the criminalizing of the whole of humanity through the doctrine of Sin…”}

        I do not share all of your bitterness towards Christianity – though I admit much criticism is justified – but I must say with the above mentioned remark you hit an essential point (this is especially true for the Catholic Church).If you want to “sell” a product to the public you first have to create a “need” for that product.The “product” the (Catholic) Church wants to sell is of course the remission of sins (by means of confession).But for that you must convince the people that they live in a permanent state of sin,hence the idea of Original Sin and a long list of “deadly” and other sins for which you need forgiveness if you do not want to burn in Hell for all eternity.Only the Church with its priests can forgive your sins ,so you need them.Thus a continuous dependency is created,a “racket” as you call it.It is a mega swindle based on superstition and fear.

      • Northern Light's Gravatar Northern Light
        June 13, 2011 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

        Filth?Like sex scandel after sex scandel of the most evil kind;Molesting and raping children,murdering the sick and the orphaned,and paying out millions of ‘extorted money’from the dues of those seeking’salvation’.I witnessed there brutality first hand in Catholic school.One nun made girls drink urine as punishment in front of the class.Another made a boy lick the floor. There crimes;One watched the clock to much,and the other was caught with a piece of hard candy!Imagine what they did when they destroyed Europe and sent civilization back to almost the stoneage.Jesus,that work of composite Judiasem,Buddisem,and Stoicesem,really created quite a legacy.All devout Christians are brainwashed early,so they can never see.All this so Jews can rule.

      • john sumner's Gravatar john sumner
        June 15, 2011 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

        I am very sorry to read about what you and your family experienced. I am glad that you escaped it. I agree with a lot of what you have written.

        Below is a song that I think you and others would appreciate.


        I travelled far and wide, through many different times.
        What did you see there?
        I saw the saints with their toys.
        What did you see there?
        I saw all knowledge destroyed.

        I travelled far and wide, through many different times.

        I travelled far and wide, through prisons of the cross.
        What did you see there?
        The power and glory of sin.
        What did you see there?
        The blood of Christ on their skins.

        I travelled far and wide, through many different times.

        I travelled far and wide, where unknown martyrs died.
        What did you see there?
        I saw the one-sided trials.
        What did you see there?
        I saw the tears as they cried.

        They had tears in their eyes.
        Tears in their eyes.

        — I. Curtis

      • Northern Light's Gravatar Northern Light
        June 15, 2011 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

        All should contemplate Mr Summers contribution here.Anyone who loves the mind,culture,beauty,health,and progress should contemplate the Curtiss work.The Catholic Church like all of Christianty is but a Jewish chain on the West,and the individual.I am not an athiest.I believe in the sublime essence of all life,and seek to inquire about its wonders.Life should be loved and for the free and healthy to be enjoyed fully.The Jews detest this,the Church enslaves this with the nonsense of THAT BOOK,and than ZOG rules. This movement will achieve nothing if it clings to conservatisem,mindless patriotisem,and the hoax and false hope of any revolt to liberate us through,’tradition,tax cuts,the gold standard,prayer in school,and all the superficial failed reactionary thoughts of the right/left polarity.Some might want to bering back that drunken monster BUSH 2!!!Oh we need that Jew tool, PALIN!!!I see this even on this site with attacks on ‘NAZI’s’and Germany!The leading nation of the Aryan world.The Jaeger appointment should be the last straw for anyone holding out hope in that destroyer;The Catholics.

  19. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    June 12, 2011 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Reading here the trashing of the Catholic Church by white protestants, secularists and even some Catholics (Kevin MacDonald is quite obviously a Catholic himself) , one can see why this movement will never get off the ground. It will fail with Jews and their white agents dragging the USA into more wars and eventual financial meltdown. I see no way back.

  20. June 12, 2011 - 2:53 pm | Permalink

    As a Catholic, this is extremely upsetting to me. I always prided myself in being a Catholic- fighter of the Weltenfeind- unlike those universalist self hating WASPs. I am embarrassed that we have also been infiltrated. The Catholics must get back to their core values, which include disdain and mistrust for the murderers of our Lord Jesus Christ.

  21. anne's Gravatar anne
    June 12, 2011 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

    finally —The real god has better things to do than finger point.

    Repent of your sin (trying to do in wasps b/c they were perceived as the “elite pahr of u.s.” which shows you wanted only petty power, which is all you really saw to get from them, and their money –which, in turn, exposes a real lack of vision and creativity– and then catholics will be better off.

    quit blaming protestants for Vat II, and pretending VAt II was about “liberalizing” theeee church (and liberalizing, in that weird mindset, means protestantizing your community).

    No one else agrees with you, not really, although some may pay lip service to make an alliance for some reason, but that’s just lying to you.

  22. Rob's Gravatar Rob
    June 12, 2011 - 12:17 pm | Permalink
  23. June 12, 2011 - 8:38 am | Permalink

    hi all

    a jew wil always be a jew no matter waht

    here in marocco are jews most of them are acting like muslims they dress like muslims going to mosque back at home they practise judaism this story comes out when a jew revealed his secret to a muslim friend they where for years friends going together to mosque en so on one day the jew had a convesion t make to his muslim friend he said well i got to tell you something the muslim said what the jew said well you know we are friends we go together to mosque en we pray well i am not a muslim he said i am a jew at home i practise my onw religion judaism en the muslim friend broke the friendly relilationshipp en never spoke to him again

  24. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    June 12, 2011 - 4:43 am | Permalink

    Christianity is a Jewish Hoax

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 12, 2011 - 8:24 am | Permalink

      Jesus did exist as a Messiah. Jewish Talmud needed an Osama Bin Laden to curse – and it found its Jesus and Holy Mary.

      In March 2011 – The Jewish Senator from Minnesota, Terri Bonoff (Democrat) has asked Republican Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch (a Catholic) to remove the words ‘Jesus’ and ‘Christianity’ from the opening session prayers….

    • Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
      June 13, 2011 - 2:04 am | Permalink

      No. “Jesus Christ” is a Jewish mythological character, just as “Mohammed” is an Arab mythological character.

  25. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    June 12, 2011 - 12:30 am | Permalink

    “Now it is true that Whites could get a sense of community and help on the birthrate issue from Islam, but there are two obvious problems with that idea:

    1. They wouldn’t be getting an authentic connection to Western Civilization.
    2. It would lead to a genetic melding of Europeans with Middle Easterners and North Africans.

    All in all, Christianity is much better for Whites …”

    Sorry, but I’m going to have to play “Devil’s Advocate” by a counter POV.

    You are worried about “a genetic melding” of Europeans with North Africans and Arabs. Considering how endogamous most Muslim tribes remain, where do you come to that notion? Most Berbers marry Berbers, most Persians marry Persians, Kurds marry Kurds, etc. Assuming that there are admixtures among Muslim populations, it is reasonable that these are the results of wars of conquest, not Islam itself actively interfering in the marital arrangements of its believers. Islam may be a universalist religion, but it still recognizes tribal, national, cultural, and racial boundaries. There is no push on the part of Islam to make all Muslims mix it up.

    I am worried about Judeo-Christianity’s success in packaging Christianity to Whites as a multicultural religion where the highest expression of faith in this dogma is to race-mix themselves into extinction. I am in my fifties, but the Catholic Church has been at the forefront of being a multicultural universal church and this has been going on since the early 70s. I can well remember attending a Catholic high school at 14 yoa where they had taken in a number of Negros in the area to educate and the nuns failing to convince my mother to allow me to attend dances where she heard from the other parents they were pushing White kids to pair off with the Negros and dance with them. I always puzzled over this behavior until I read Kevin McDonald’s essay about the Catholic Church’s role in encouraging exogamy and monogamy to break Europeans of any of the racial cohesion that tribalism afforded them. Clearly, any good that Christianity has done for White Europeans has been largely accidental, but there is no doubt in my mind that its current Judeo-Christianity is bad for Whites.

    Is Islam the answer? I don’t know. The only way we would know for sure is if Islam were to peacefully acquire acquire a large group of willing White European converts instead of its tried and true method of conversion at swordpoint. Then we would have to see how they and Islam influence each other. Would we see Easternized Europeans who are totally Arabist in their approach to all things or would we see Westernized Islamists who have been able to keep the best traditions that the Western Caucasian tradition has to offer yet also incorporate the best, most life-affirming aspects of Islam? I think the latter is what the Zionists are fighting so hard to avoid happening. I remember reading that of all the White occupants of the gulags, it was the Chechen Muslims who did not break under the Jewish Bolshevik yoke, not the Russian Christians. Clearly, Islam sustained the Chechens far more effectively than Christianity did the Russians.

    So, I have to be skeptical of the idea that Islam cannot provide an authentic connection or even a better fit with a Western Civilization which has still managed to survive in the face of a relentless Talmudic hostility for centuries. We should remember that Muslims, unlike Jews, hold Jesus Christ and His mother, Mary in high esteem. The Bible says that God’s mission to Jesus Christ and His apostles was to find and minister to the lost sheep of Israel. Who is to say that Mohammed was not sent by God to minister to the rest of us? If we can concede that Satan’s minions have been tampering with Christianity from jump street, then there is nothing to prove they aren’t tampering with Islam. IMO, the best thing to do is for the Christian and Muslim clerics to peacefully get together, study each other’s texts and compare notes. There is nothing to say that some sort of syncretism between Islam and Christianity is not possible where the end result comes closest to a Unitarianism which also recognizes Mohammed as a divine messenger of God. But the safest assumption that we Christians can make about Islam is that we don’t know everything; all we know is the bad stuff, thanks to a media controlled by folks who have an agenda that is hostile to both religions.

  26. Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
    June 11, 2011 - 11:02 pm | Permalink

    I have read many of the comments to this post with great interest, trying to figure what it is that I am missing about this subject matter and controversy. Some of them I have read more than a few times.

    Even so, I cannot stop myself from asking: Why are we spending so much energy and time arguing about an institution that has so thoroughly and repeatedly disgraced itself, even long beyond the point of the death of its relevance?

    How could any modern person of European heritage who is concerned about the welfare of the white race, and who has a decent amount of care, concern and compassion for the rest of humanity, take seriously, for one minute, an institution that STILL encourages the desperate people of poor countries, like Haiti, to view the use of contraception as a mortal sin, and that encourages the rest of us to believe that a woman who is impregnated by a rapist should be forced to endure pregnancy and giving birth because a collection of cells that has not even developed the means to feel and to be aware takes precedence over the health and welfare of a human being?

    And all of this “moral instruction” coming from an institution that repeatedly and undoubtedly tried to keep child rapists from justice.

    Really, why should any decent, reasonable person care about what The Vatican has to say about anything?

    And, really, so what if it still explicitly warned us about the machinations of the Jews? Thuggish Neo-Nazis and fundamentalist Muslims do the same thing. It does not mean that they are our friends.

  27. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    June 11, 2011 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    I am deeply disturbed by what the Church is doing. It makes me want to dump my Church. But where would I go?

    Evidently, the Church Fathers are persuaded that embracing the tenants of multiculturalism and electing a Jew is a moral imperative. In my view it is disastrous. Frankly, I think it is impossible for Jews to truly convert regardless how much brotherly love is lavished on them. It’s like my cat. I love my cat and think she is a cute, adorable little pet, but she is still a vicious little killer. A couple of dead rodents can attest to that. I think this act is a fast one the Jews are pulling on elderly men in the Church who are probably puffed up with satisfaction that they were able to bring an anti-Christ to Christian salvation.
    Since we are the highest culture on the planet, isn’t this action by the Church the height of foolishness? It can do nothing for the Church except destroy it from within. Our institutions, regardless what they are, should be pro cultural, standing firmly against any taint of multiculturalism. Culture and multiculturalism cannot exist together.

    We are not racists for being pro culture as Jews want the world to believe. Nor is multiculturalism (diversity) the moral imperative Jews want us to believe. White culture is about us as a unique people. It is not about race or class warfare. Jews will claim anything to dismantle our infrastructure. When have they ever done anything for the needy or downtrodden except make them worse off?

    We are a culture in our own right. Take that right. We are here. We exist. The entire body of Christendom should be staunchly pro culture. Every one of us should be staunchly pro culture. Every individual should have a staunchly pro-culture attitude. Every individual should take a pro culture position – ruthlessly. Every leader we have, every action we take and every law we pass should be pro culture. How are we going to survive against the violent aggression of the multiculturalists unless we are as determined and uncompromising as our enemies? It would solve a lot of our problems.
    Our case is this, if we are racists for being pro culture then multiculturalists are racists, too. The head of that snake needs to be stomped on.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 11, 2011 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

      Culture and multiculturalism cannot exist together.

      Great point, that’s key. We need to point out to others that multiculturalism is kind of anti-culture. It destroys every natural culture and replaces it with a stale, lifeless, bloodless artifice with about as much vibrancy as a government housing project.

  28. wayne pacific's Gravatar wayne pacific
    June 11, 2011 - 2:21 pm | Permalink

    After observing Yaser Arafat for decades, I concluded that he too was a crypto. It was even reported in the Israeli newspapers that he shared a 20 million dollar bank account with Ariel Sharon. It is standard operating procedure for Jews to infiltrate and control organization that they oppose. No better way for them to fight their opponents than to acquire total interior control of them. Jews have been doing this for thousands of years. It is even recorded as such in the Bible.

  29. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 11, 2011 - 10:39 am | Permalink

    Michael Cecil
    June 10, 2011 – 4:41 pm | Permalink
    I don’t see anything “crypto” about the Judaism in the Roman church at all.

    The Pharisaical doctrine of a physical raising of a dead body from the grave was expropriated nakedly and whole cloth from Judaism (by the Pharisee Paul), while Jesus taught the Doctrine of “resurrection” as a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’.

    That is not “hidden” or “secret” or “crypto” at all.

    That should be obvious to anyone with 2 active brain cells.”

    Paul WAS a Pharisee but he gave that up. To understand the difference between Paul and the other disciples you have to understand Paul’s background. The Pharisees differ from the other Jewish sects around Jesus like the Essenes and others by their belief that the Judaic oral traditions are binding. Thats what made the confrontation with Jesus. So in that the Pharisees are almost identical to the Sunni/Shia doctrine which also believed that the Islamic oral traditions are binding. Oral traditions can easily be manufactured to create the kind of religion a community wants. For the Jewish community it was an ethno-centric Judaism where Jews are the purpose of creation.

    Paul also never seen Jesus and was his enemy when Jesus was on Earth. So Paul had more of a reason to relate to Jesus’s crucifxion and resurrection and to find a positive aspect for it. He emphasized the resurrection because of that. Paul struggled with the Law as they call it because of that background. Paul to me is a very important figure as he showed how a person can truly change from ethno-centrism to universalism. The Jews despise Paul with a passion for that reason. Paul spread the Gospel among the gentiles when he realized that the Israelites were not interested. Something Jesus warned them about.

    Christianity did not accept the Christian oral traditions probably because the Roman Emperror enjoyed authority. But they did introduce the Trinitarian doctrine that made Jesus almost godlike.

    In Islam the oral traditions was all about creating a theocracy probably to compete with the Romans. It emereged during the Abbasid Empire about 200 years after Muhammad’s death. It represents about 90% of Islamic law also known as Shariah law. Deeply sectraian and extermely legalistic and it gave all authority to the Muslim ruler (the Caliph). In fact the term Caliph is not found in the Koran and neither is Sharial law or even the 5 pillars of Islam. Judaism is exactly the same. In fact the term Judaism is not even in the Old Testament. Jews like Muslim rely on spin usually to back their doctrine with scriptures. The definition of who is a Jew is a good example of that spin. They tried to spin some verses concerning Ruth. So even though both Christians and Jews accept the Old Testament their religions are VERY different. Interestingly the Koran pointed to that.

    The Karaite Judaism which rejected the whole Judaic oral traditions can be a real reformation movement. At one point they were the most dominant. But they died of. In fact the Jews persuaded the Spaniards to send the Karaites into exile.

    The Mutaziltes also were a true reformation movement in Islam. They are making a come back but its still has not taken off. Maybe they will succeed, maybe not.

    Not that any of this matter but its a subject I researched and have interest with. One of the reason I believe Americans were easily manipulated by the Jewish activist is their ignorance about Judaism. If you think about it when is the last time anybody in the media ever talked about Judaism? Once you understand Judaism(talmud) you can see everything very clearly.

    • June 11, 2011 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

      June 11, 2011 10:39 A.M.

      Paul WAS a Pharisee but he gave that up.


      Paul never gave up the belief in the Egyptian-Pharisaical doctrine of a physical raising of a dead body from the grave.
      He was involved in murdering the original followers of Jesus because they, too, taught the Doctrine of “resurrection” as a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’.

      Paul’s doctrine of “vicarious atonement” resulted in the slaughter of Jews during the Holocaust.

      The Doctrine of “resurrection” as a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’ strikes very DIRECTLY at Jewish ethno-centrism inasmuch as a person born as a Gentile or a Jew in one life is not necessarily born as a Gentile or Jew in all subsequent lives; except according to certain racist Jewish sects which assert that there is a fundamental difference between a “goyim” ‘soul’ and a Jewish ‘soul’.

      Only the proper understanding of the Doctrine of “resurrection” can strike at the root of Jewish ethno-centrism.

    • Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
      June 12, 2011 - 4:48 am | Permalink

      There’s really no evidence that “Paul” existed. Oops!

      From religious policeman to grandee of the church, from beast fighter in Ephesus to beheading in Rome, Paul’s story has more holes than a swiss cheese. A detailed study of the great missionary that some say “founded Christianity”.

      St Paul the Apostle – Dead in the water?

  30. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    June 11, 2011 - 10:01 am | Permalink

    Thanks for posting. Objection withdrawn!

  31. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 11, 2011 - 9:49 am | Permalink


    What makes you think I am Jewish? I know about the hell fire will only touch Jews for a few days thing and u probably read that in the Koran, Plus Jesus also commented on that in the Gospel when he reminded the Israelites that God does not need geneology and can make an Abrahamic geneology from a rock.

    What I don’t like is when Muslims quote verses from the Koran in public even when they know these verses were abrogated. I think they are learning from the Jews the art of highlighting the scriptures but hiding the oral traditions. Its the oral traditions that shape Islam, not the Koran.

    Anyways all the Islam bashers have caught up on that and the Muslim oral traditions now have been a common staple for Ayyan Ali and Robert Spencer and company. I have said that Islami is harder to hide than Judaism and the Islamic agenda is far more exposed than Judaism which makes it very difficult for Muslims to penetrate societies. They usually rely on their huge numbers to force their agenda down people’s throat. As the case in Egypt with the Copts.

    Anyways, all this is just gathering of knowledge and an intellectual debate. In the end it is about ethnicity. Most Muslim in the West are not of European ethnicity so they will be seen as outsiders just like a Chinese in Africa. Plus Islam has an agenda which is to make societies live under their Shariah Law. But even without that agenda it won’t really change anything. I actually believe the Muslim immigration to Europe is exxagerated. European societies are led by Europeans and not Jews. So there is a limit to what immigration they will accept. look for more anti immigration jabs from Western politicians as the immigrants number become close to 10%. They won’t let it go beyond that. In America its a very different matter because the country is led by Jews.

    Thats my two cents.

  32. o-man's Gravatar o-man
    June 11, 2011 - 9:35 am | Permalink

    The RC Church was infiltrated by Jews before the time of Constantine, and has been repeatedly infiltrated ever since. So this is nothing new. Torquemada himself was a Jew, and the horrors of the Spanish and Mexican Inquisitions resulted from the Jewsuits’ self-hatred as a psychological phenomenon, much like Klansmen with a little black blood make the most racially prejudiced members.

    “Anti-Christ” can both “against” and “In place of”. The Jews take the first definition, and the Church takes the second. So, it should come as no surprise that we find Jews in the Roman Church

  33. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    June 11, 2011 - 9:27 am | Permalink

    Why allow Gibson Sedevacantist schism comments and not a brief response as i posted? That is hardly even-handed, very disappointing if allowed to stand. Free speech matters..

  34. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 11, 2011 - 8:36 am | Permalink

    bigmoo – The Hell fire may be for all the paranoid creeps like you but certainly not for the moral and pious people among any religion.

    However, for idiots like you – according to Talmud Hell-fire is not for Jews. It says that only pious Jews will be resurrected and sent to heaven – while no evil Jew will be resurrected. So, it’s good to be an evil Jew for people like you.

    Now, coming to your rant of assimmilation – which race (White, Brown, Yellow, black, etc.) has assimmilated with other race (s)? Jews are the best example. After living in the West and East, they still maintain their ghetto mintality and criminal nature.

  35. badah vingh's Gravatar badah vingh
    June 11, 2011 - 5:27 am | Permalink

    Jews secretly inhabit within every religion, nationality, race, and ethnic group on the face of this earth, and in each case they occupy key positions in key areas of thought, behaviour, economy, education, etc. etc. and this is why they are the masters of the world. There are japanese jews, chinese jews, muslim jews, hindu jews, black jews, mulatto jews, mestizo jews, native american jews, european jews, etc, and they all have the same goals, which is why they are such a formidable foe.

    Nothing new or interesting about jews in the catholic church…YAWWWWN!

  36. June 11, 2011 - 1:47 am | Permalink

    What surprises me is that they have, finally, come out of the closet and been open about what they are.

    They have been a form of Judaism at least since the Great Schism but possibly since the church was founded by Emperor Constantine, because, they push their parishioners down to the developmental level of an infant. That is Judaism, according to Saint Paul’s implicit definition of it: Specifically, he said that his mission was to raise the Gentiles to the level of the child but he almost exclusively preached to Jews. So, I assume that he said “Gentiles” so as not to offend those he was trying to raise to a higher level.

    As to the Catholic Church being an international organization, that was the purpose of the Vatican II Convention. Specifically, they agreed to adopt the form and structure of World Government and, also, to stop persecuting the members of other religions. Furthermore, Pope John Paul II said in the first speech he gave, that his mission was to bring the Church through the transition to that new structure. Today, they have essentially made that transition, but it is not clear to me whether they are better considered as an non-government organization or as branch of world government.

  37. Benjamin's Gravatar Benjamin
    June 11, 2011 - 12:06 am | Permalink

    Perhaps my fellow Catholics should understand the supernatural power of God and stop bickering over devilish details. If a man of ill will enters the heirarchy of the church he shall be introduced to the Second Death and Dehumanized, if you can understand what that means, which I pray for your sakes you do NOT. I’d like to think most of you sheep are still sheep and not wolves in disguise.
    I’m far more wary of the infiltration of Sons of Darkness into the church than Crypto Jews.
    Thankfully, the 144,000 are already here upon earth.
    Think you know what TIME it IS?
    Be always in prayer.

  38. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 10, 2011 - 11:38 pm | Permalink


    You said:
    And some other facts for the fools – There are 72 sects in Islam, as compared to 73 in Christianity and 71 in Judaism.”

    1.The concept of the Muslim nation separating into 73 sects is taken from authentic Ahadith such as the following related by Hazrat Abu Hurairah (radi Allahu anhu): “The Messenger of Allah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: ‘The Jews separated into 71 sects, and the Christians into 72, and my nation will divide into 73 sects.'” (Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah)

    2.The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: “Seventy-two (of the 73 sects of the Muslim nation) will be in the fire, and only one will be in Paradise; it is the Jama’ah (i.e. Ahle Sunnah WA Jamaah).”
    (Abi Dawud, Ad-Darimi, Ahmad)

    There is another narration which states: “The Companions asked: ‘which sect will triumph (i.e. achieve salvation)?’ The Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) replied: ‘the sect which adheres to that (set of beliefs and practices) which I and my Companions adhere to.'”

    All of them are hell fire except for ONE! Guess who that one is? Not anyone here I bet. Except for Rehmat I bet.

    So much for that pluralism thing.

    Muslim can’t assimilate man.

  39. Dolorosa's Gravatar Dolorosa
    June 10, 2011 - 11:19 pm | Permalink

    It was the one true Messiah, God made man, Jesus Christ who founded the Catholic Church and who warned there would be wolves in sheep’s clothing. The New Church of Vatican II was heavily infiltrated by the enemies of Christ and the battle continues today between Catholic Tradition and Vatican II Modernism (Novus Ordo) New Mass which St Pius X warned against. The late Chief Rabbi of Rome Zolli converted to the Catholic Church during the time of Pope Pius XII and no longer went to the Synagogue. He was still Jewish but no longer practiced that religion. His family was persecuted as are all Jews who convert to Jesus Christ. He greatly praised the late Pius XII for his help in protecting the jewish people. The truth will set us free.

  40. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    June 10, 2011 - 9:59 pm | Permalink

    To use the phrase ” Judeo-Christian” is a sign of these times of insanity .
    You might just as well say an ” Anti Christian – Christian ” .

  41. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    June 10, 2011 - 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Friend or foe ?
    It is very simple ; and the Gospels make this very clear …
    Judaism is the quintessential enemy of Christianity . There is no two ways about that .

    Anyone in the church who says says otherwise must be considered to be at odds with God himself and there for a crypto-jew .

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      June 11, 2011 - 2:01 pm | Permalink

      Talmudic Judaism, i.e. modern Judaism, developed to a large degree, as a refutation of Christianity’s dogmas. No other religion, not even Islam, does it specifically excoriate.

      Though no longer a believer myself, honest and intelligent Christians need to laugh derisively in the Pope’s face when he calls Jews their “older brothers in God.”

  42. bud's Gravatar bud
    June 10, 2011 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    It should not have come as surprise to anyone that a “crypto Jew” would reach the top of Catholic church.
    After all it was a real Jew who got the teachings of a fellow Jew (or Judean) Jesus going in Rome. Peter.
    Whether the “People of the Book” referred to themselves collectively as “Jews” at that time or Judeans, I am not sure. But what I do know is that the Christians have always had a love-hate relations with the Judaism. At times the Jews are blamed for everything; other times they are embraced for no matter what they (or the state of Israel does), as is the case with Palestinians today.
    There is no point getting all excited about who sits at the head or close to the head of the Catholic church ( or any other Church for that matter), since all religions, sects and other forms of philosophies (like democracy) are form of games and shams over which the fanatics of one belief find reasons to kill the fanatics of another.

  43. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 10, 2011 - 5:24 pm | Permalink

    In 2006, American Catholic writer and women’s right activist, Joanna Francis, posted on her blog, Benedict XVI: Zionist Double Agent, saying: “It should be obvious to everyone now, that we Catholics who have figured out that the Vatican is under Zionist control, have been right all along. They labeled us “extremists,” “sedevacantists,” “ultra right-wingers,” “fascists,” “Nazis,” etc. But when the Jews and their useful idiots have to resort to hurling those epithets at you, it usually means you’ve hit upon the truth. Well, we Catholic “extremists” have the Zionists’ number and we have been calling them on it for a long time. Now, maybe the rest of the brainwashed Christians will wake up.

    It’s really not difficult to understand why Benedict XVI is encouraging emnity between the Catholics and the Muslims. All you have to ask is: cui bono? (who benefits?). The Zionists, of course. The Catholic Church was always their biggest enemy. So naturally the Jews were going to do anything and everything to get it under their control. It took almost 2,000 years, but it finally happened in 1958. The Jews pulled off a coup d’eglise with the election of Freemason Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII) to the Papacy. Immediately upon his election, the media began calling Roncalli ”Good Pope John.” Be careful when the Jewish controlled media praises someone, especially a Catholic, that means that person is working for them. Contrast the media’s love affair with the post-1958 popes with their hatred of all pre-1958 popes, up to and including Pius XII (who died in 1958). They accuse Pope Pius XII of having been a Nazi, which really means that Pius XII actually thought he was the Pope of the Catholic people and did not realize that he was supposed to be working for the Jews! I have figured out that whoever the Jews hate, you can bet your bottom dollar, that person knows the truth about the Jewish agenda. The converse is also true: whoever the Jews love, that person is a traitor to the Christian people and is really a Zionist tool….”

    • Bruce Hayden's Gravatar Bruce Hayden
      June 10, 2011 - 11:49 pm | Permalink

      You got it rehmat! Maybe we should ask Tracy Morgan if it tastes like Mel Gibson and Charlie Sheen said it would. These Asheknazi/Khazarian types are brutal. The Israelis do the billing
      for 90% of the US. Company named AMDOCS. Do you think they don’t listen in on certain phone calls? Maybe they got the pope cheating on his boyfriend!

  44. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    June 10, 2011 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

    The relationship between Jews and the Vatican is really very simple.

    Because Jewish International Bankers are in charge of Vatican finances, any act of defiance by the Vatican against World Jewry could result in the Pope and his cardinals having their fancy diets restricted to the MacDonald’s dollar menu, with perhaps a bit of Friday splurging on MacFishburgers and chips. It could even result in their being evicted from the Vatican and reduced to living in their Italian loafers, or if they’re lucky, in guest houses on on the private estates of rich Catholics.

    The Rothschilds and their confederates were given control of Vatican finances some time ago, apparently through the offices of the Medici. Like every other great power in Europe, the Pope came to the Rothschilds in order to borrow money. They apparently hit it off, prompting one journalist to sarcastically say “Rothschild has kissed the hand of the Pope… Order has been reestablished.” As time passed, the Rothschilds were entrusted with the bulk of the Vatican’s wealth.

    According to the Jewish Encyclopedia (vol. 2, p. 497), this had occurred by the early 20th century: “It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Rothschilds that at the present time (1905) the latter are guardians of the papal treasure.” But according to Eustace Mullins, the (recently deceased) protege of Ezra Pound, the Rothschilds had taken over all of the financial operations of the worldwide Catholic Church much earlier, in 1823.

    The Medici apparently played a role in the Rothschild takeover. Kalman Rothschild was sent to Naples in 1821 to handle the financing for Metternich’s forces, who were being used to put down a rebellion. While in Italy, Kalman made a series of ingenious (i.e., crooked, and even worse, Rothschild-crooked) deals with the Italian government which in effect forced Naples to pay for its own occupation. Meanwhile, he helped Luigi de Medici of the Black Nobility to regain his position as finance minister of Naples.

    Due to Kalman’s spectacular success – the Rothschilds were not only cunning, but seemed to have the luck of the devil and exhibited a certain Faustian elan – he was kept in Naples in order to set up his own bank, one of many Rothschild banks throughout Europe. He eventually became Italy’s preeminent financier.

    In other words, the Catholic bureaucracy, and perhaps much else as well, is as thoroughly owned by Big Jew as is the US government. End of story.

  45. June 10, 2011 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

    I don’t see anything “crypto” about the Judaism in the Roman church at all.

    The Pharisaical doctrine of a physical raising of a dead body from the grave was expropriated nakedly and whole cloth from Judaism (by the Pharisee Paul), while Jesus taught the Doctrine of “resurrection” as a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’.

    That is not “hidden” or “secret” or “crypto” at all.

    That should be obvious to anyone with 2 active brain cells.

  46. gyigyi's Gravatar gyigyi
    June 10, 2011 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

    PS Joseph Ratzinger aka pope benny aka obstruction of justice, aka protector of molesters aka harbinger of death and apocalypse aka fake vile man working for the NWo and British, ex Nazi youth, also a khazar “jew” (like the “royal” house of the british Commonwealth, whose minions the freemasons sow evil in every corner of the globe.)

    • Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
      June 18, 2011 - 9:31 am | Permalink

      As for the endless (and all but exclusive) smears about the Catholic Church and sexual abuse, this man has put the coverage into some perspective:

  47. gyigyi's Gravatar gyigyi
    June 10, 2011 - 3:19 pm | Permalink

    sorry people the so-called catholic “church” is a MAJOR MAJOR part of the problem, and definitetly in the camp of those trying to enslave the world and bring in the antichrist

    look at your POPE, a vile corrupt man who covered up the systematic molestation of millions of children

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      June 11, 2011 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

      While I disagree with your characterization of B-16, I agree with your overall analysis.

      Now an ex-Catholic, I had grown tired of the church’s “philosopy of pussyhood,” wherein, all too often, people were told to meekly accept their fate, (like Jesus) instead of manfully fighting back.

  48. Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
    June 10, 2011 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

    Here, I am responding to the above comment made by “Spirit of ’76.”

    I am not quite sure how your comment was meant to be taken, so I apologize in advance if I have totally misunderstood it– sometimes, I am not too good at picking up on humor. As I do understand it, I definately have some problems with the comment.

    The US has to get over itself, especially the idealized notion of “rugged individualism,” which has been, for a long time now, maladaptive and harmful to the interests and well-being of European-Americans. And Americans need to stop believing that, at one time, all was well in their beloved country. While it is true that there were periods in America’s past when the lives of its citizens were better and more stable, it is ridiculous to believe that America, at one time, did everything right, and deserved to be called “The Best Country in the World.”

    I do not have a fetish for the Third Reich. I do not romanticize the Germany of that period, nor present-day Germany.

    That being said, I do think it is pretty remarkable that today’s Germany makes America look, by and large, like a junkyard populated by fat, willfully stupid creatures. Germany was destroyed twice during the last century (thanks, in large part, to America) and it has a ton of problems today– persecution of honest historians and politicians, a self-destructive immigration policy, a greater adherence to the Jewish/American/Internationalist ways of doing business, having to pay billions and billions of dollars to Israel and “survivors” because of alleged crimes that were supposedly committed more than six decades ago, etc., etc. …

    What is America’s excuse?

  49. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 10, 2011 - 10:55 am | Permalink

    June 10, 2011 – 7:36 am | Permalink
    “Bigmo – you proved again that your ‘know how’ comes from some Zionist crapy source.
    Now, if Judaism is more closer to Islam than Christianiaty, as your great ‘religious know how’ says – how come FOUR entire books of OT are part of NT – but no book of OT is in Holy Qur’an? How come Jewish Talmud curses Jesus, Mary and Christianity while Holy Qur’an has reserved an entire Chapter (Surah Mariyyam) in praise of Jesus and Mary? Both OT and NT has no book named after Jesus or Mary.And “interestingly” Talmud is NOT even mentioned in Holy Qur’an.”

    See for yourself:

    Its actually even scary. Macdonald once said that the best way to tackle Jewish influence is by creating a Judaism like ideology to counter it.

    So Sunni Islam is actually a counter Judaic group startegy. One is ethno-centric the othet sectarian. Both worship the Oral Law. Judaism and their Talmud and Islam and their Sunnah.

    You know what Sunnah is Rehmaat, don’t you?

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 10, 2011 - 6:40 pm | Permalink

      Bigmo, ignorants and Islamophobes never surprises me.

      Sunni Islam has over 1.2 billion followers while your 13.7 Jews I can put into your Zionazi pocket kid.

      And some other facts for the fools – There are 72 sects in Islam, as compared to 73 in Christianity and 71 in Judaism.

      Your link is the site known as racist and anti-Semitic within ADL and other Jewish groups. Why did not you used David Duke’s website to proved your stupidity? But, David Duke attended Tehran Holocaust Conference in December 2006, therefore, he cannot be a good source to praise Islam, right!!

      YES, I know what Sunnah is bigmoo…..

      “Anybody here today who has not accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior, I’m telling you, you’re not my brothers,” Robert Bentley, Governor of Alabama, January, 19, 2011. However, after being booted by the Jewish Lobby – Bentley apologized for his bigotry ahead of his scheduled meeting with Birmingham Jewish Federation. However, he has made it clear that he will work with the Jewish lobby groups like Center for Security Policy and others to get Islamic Sharia law banned in state courts”. Is that moral courage you are boasting, bigmoo?

  50. Truth's Gravatar Truth
    June 10, 2011 - 3:55 am | Permalink

    The Catholic Church has been corrupted since long ago. Take the advent of the first banking houses of Italy for example. The “impoverished & persecuted” Jews from the ghetto invented money lending, being the ONLY race permitted to profit from usury whist Islam and Christendom completely banned usury for its overt assault on ethics (making money from money, without any productive contribution to society) that remains glaringly immoral today.

    The truth is that Jews were exclusively allowed to commit acts of usury daily, which was APPROVED and allowed by the Catholic church.

    Can you imagine any other religion which has dominant control of a region, permitting a minority group to break all its religious laws?

    Can you imagine in a dominantly Islamic nation, a small group of people would be PERMITTED to practise homosexuality against the religious law; to set up an empire of gay nightclubs under the noses of the prevailing religion?

    I suggest it would only be possible if the dominant religion had been infiltrated to allow it’s religious laws to be bent.

  51. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 10, 2011 - 1:38 am | Permalink

    It always get interesting when religions gets involved in these kind of debates. I know actually quite a bit about this subject.

    There is nothing called Judeo-Christian. Now, if we are talking about faith, like God and Adam and Eve and Abraham and all that. Yes, there obviously is a link. But also with Islam in that matter.

    But, when we are talking about religion, then Judeo-Islamic is more accurate.

    What made the Phraisees so different from the other Jewish sects, is that they believed that the oral traditions were binding. The same position the Sunni/Shia sect took. The other Jewish sects in the past did not afford the Judaic oral traditions this authority. According to Judaism and Islam these oral traditions can actually abrogate the scriptures. The Muslims produced a whole science called the “science of abrogation”. This means that the Old Testament and the Koran have very little to do with Judaism or Islam.

    Christianity never accepted any revelations other than the scriptures although they did introduce a theology known as the Trinity. This is why Judaic reformation or Islamic reformation is very difficult to succeed. And this is why they are struggling to assimilate in Christian societies.

    Paul was one person in the Gospel who came from the Pharisaic sect of Judaism which is why Paul struggled with the question of the Law. The other disciples were not of the background. But Paul broke away from one of the main tenents of Pharisaic Judaism and thats ethno-centrism. Hence Paul is alway seen as the ultimate traitor by the Rabbis.

    The Old Testament we see Moses marrying an Ethipian Women and we see Abraham marrying a cannanite and we Solomon marrying Queen Sheba. The Old Testament prophets were not deeply ethno-centric. However the Pharisaic Judaism differed when it came to ethno-centrism. And so Jews became the purpose of creation.

    Interestingly the Koran also attacked the Talmud and its followers. But it gave authority to the Old Testament.

    So expect Jewish activist to highlight the OT but downplay the Talmud.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 10, 2011 - 7:36 am | Permalink

      Bigmo – you proved again that your ‘know how’ comes from some Zionist crapy source.

      Now, if Judaism is more closer to Islam than Christianiaty, as your great ‘religious know how’ says – how come FOUR entire books of OT are part of NT – but no book of OT is in Holy Qur’an? How come Jewish Talmud curses Jesus, Mary and Christianity while Holy Qur’an has reserved an entire Chapter (Surah Mariyyam) in praise of Jesus and Mary? Both OT and NT has no book named after Jesus or Mary.

      And “interestingly” Talmud is NOT even mentioned in Holy Qur’an. In addition, there is no mention of ‘Jews’ or ‘Christians’ in Holy Qur’an. It mentions ‘Yahud’, the followers of Moses Law and ‘Nasara’, the followers of Jesus Gospel which only the Pope Benedict XVI knows where it could be.

  52. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    June 9, 2011 - 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Question to the educated Traditional Catholic fellows (Pierre de Craon, Buckle, etc): What are your thoughts, if any, on St. Malachy’s coming Gloria Olivae Pope?

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 9, 2011 - 6:33 pm | Permalink

      Sorry, DH, I know nothing about St. Malachy’s prophecies except that he is credited with making them. If time permits, I’ll have a look-see and get back to you.

  53. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 9, 2011 - 6:16 pm | Permalink

    Until the early 8th century – the Jews and Christians working of royal and Church land were called ‘Serf (slaves)’. When Muslims from North Africa conquered Spain in 711 CE – the social and economic conditions of these Serf started improving. Muslims took the land from the royals and Church and distributed it among the Serf and provided free education to their children. The result was that during the next 100 years, a Jewish upper-class was established by Jewish doctors, scholars, physicians, bankers, accountants and royal court advisers. Dr. Bernard Lewis, to the surprise of his fellow Jewish Orientalist – has call Muslim Spain as “Jewish Golden Age”.

    “Let it be known to you, my Lord, that our land is called Sefarad in the Holy Tongue, while the Ishmalite citizens call it al-Andalus, and the kingdom is called Cordoba,” wrote Prince Hasdai ibn Shaprut, the Jew Grand Vazier (prime minister) under Caliph Abd al-Rehman III (912-961 CE).

    Samuel Ibn Nagrila (b. 993 CE), a prosperous Jewish merchant – was appointed Vazier of Sultanate of Grenada – the city which was known in Arabic as “Gharnatat al-Yahud (Grenada of the Jews)”.

  54. June 9, 2011 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Lustiger was another Marano.
    Christendom was deliberately infiltrated by such Conversos.
    I’ve met all sorts of “converted” jews and let me tell you when it comes down to it, they are just doing what they’ve done throughout history as depicted in KM’s Culture of Critique

    Of course you need the TRAITORS within to effectively surrender the Gate, this could not have been published today:

    How the Jews Changed Catholic Thinking
    By Joseph Roddy, Look Senior Editor.
    LOOK Magazine, January 25, 1966, Volume 30, No. 2.

    See also: Malachi Martin was indeed the infamous Vatican II “double agent,” but also that his duplicitous activities during the Council ran far deeper than had been previously thought.

  55. Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
    June 9, 2011 - 12:42 pm | Permalink


    Thank you for taking the time to critically respond to my comments. I do appreciate it.

    A couple of things:

    — I did not mean to give the impression that I believe that our relatively low birthrates would not be a problem at all if it were not for the Globalist/Internationalist order.

    — Also, when I mentioned “well-paying and long-term jobs,” overseas vacations and other expensive and selfish indulgences were the furthest things from my mind.

    I believe that it is a complete lie, and a stupid one, at that, spread by the likes of theThomas Friedmans of the world, that stable jobs with reasonable benefits lead to laziness, to a lack of productivity, creativity and competitivess, and to an irrational sense of entitlement. This idea is a fallacy, and a dangerous one. It is also anti-Nation, anti-Family and anti-Volk.

    Also, I do not think that we should dismiss the seriousness of the combination of our economy’s dismal state and the problem of irresponsible sexual reproduction.

    I live in a state that is struggling. However, it is far from being one of the least desirable states to live in. I also live in an area that is considered one of the better ones in terms of jobs, quality of life and public schools. Regardless of all of that, the area is still, by and large, an embarrassment. The signs of decay in our infrastructure and culture are unavoidable and blindingly obvious. And the thousands of “precious miracles” running around in trailer parks, homes, shelters and apartment buildings that are literally falling apart are certainly a sight to see. A large percentage of those unfortunate white kids dress, speak and behave like “gangsta” thugs and stars before they are in second grade.

    Seriously: What are these masses going to do when it comes time to get a job and become productive members of society?
    There are literally next to no stable jobs to be found here, even though this area is considered to be one of the better ones in this state. And what will this place look like if those masses reproduce as irresponsibly as their parents?

    Lastly, the world is, in so many ways, radically different from that of our ancestors. If a poor person cannot find a job, he cannot go out and create a sustainable living for himself and his family by plowing the earth, even if he had the bravery, skill-set and work ethic to do it.

    Thanks again.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 9, 2011 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

      At the end of the day, we agree in almost everything, maybe we put the emphasis on different points.

      You are right that these days one needs a relatively stable and relatively well-paying job, but given the same job, you’re more likely to have children if you’re Christian than if you aren’t. That’s the secular, profane usefulness of Christian religion, which was my point.

  56. Matthias's Gravatar Matthias
    June 9, 2011 - 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Jews are crypto-humans.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 9, 2011 - 3:39 pm | Permalink

      @ Matthias, 12:24 pm.

      [“Jews are crypto-humans”}

      I never heard a characterization of the Jews that is at the same time so funny and so accurate.Congratulations!

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      June 10, 2011 - 3:11 pm | Permalink

      “Jews are crypto humans”

      Jews are just like all peoples, and them wanting their group to be dominant seems pretty natural to me. And the problem with Jews is the problem with all peoples, our elites. There’s plenty decent Jewish people who stand against Zionist Jews, just like there’s plenty of decent Anglos who stand against Anglo-Zionists.

    • Matthias's Gravatar Matthias
      June 11, 2011 - 5:02 am | Permalink

      iboTTs said:

      “Jews are just like all peoples, and them wanting their group to be dominant seems pretty natural to me. And the problem with Jews is the problem with all peoples, our elites. There’s plenty decent Jewish people who stand against Zionist Jews, just like there’s plenty of decent Anglos who stand against Anglo-Zionists.”

      What an incredibly naive response. Are you the comment moderator at Amren? Way to sniff out anti-Semitism; good job. We don’t want any of that around here, do we?

      You do realize this is TOO, right? Right. So here we go.

      “Jews are just like all peoples”

      Of course they are! No difference at all between a yid and, say, an Eskimo! How ’bout a yahudi and a Chinaman? Hard to tell em apart, I know. Who can tell the difference between a Tutsi or a Jew-tsi, a Hutu or a Jew-tu? All the same to TOO writers and readers, especially regarding group behaviour, biology, or history – nothing to see here. Why on Earth would our esteemed editor Prof KMac ever write a trilogy on Jews when he could just have written “Everybody That Must Dwell Alone”? You should tell him his mistake. Everybody is just like everybody else! Hey, let’s disband TOO, all head over to Amren, and complain about the danged Muzzies.

      “… and them wanting their group to be dominant seems pretty natural to me.”

      You’re absolutely right. On this God-given Earth, like a baby’s cry, a morning rainbow, or a gentle summer breeze, there is absolutely nothing more beautiful, pristine, or natural than, say, deliberately starving to death millions of poor Ukranian peasants in an engineered famine. Or instituting sanctions that wretchedly kill half a million children to get at one man (“I think it’s worth it!” – Albright); how about invading a country for a known lie and wasting a million men, women and children on behalf of an ‘uncomfortable’ ME ‘democracy'; waging relentless war on Art, Beauty, and Morality; what about slaughtering in cold blood some 50 million innocents in a Bolshevik-Gulag Holocaust-Terror; how about releasing from the Kosher bottle the grim Marxist-commie Genie that pitilessly extinguished more than 100 million innocent souls worldwide; not to forget disgustingly burning to death wailing children indiscriminately with white phosphorous; how about mastering the art of terrorist false-flag tactics killing thousands of civilians while framing your enemies; beheading democracy; eviscerating free speech; how about bankrupting and raping the wealthiest nations in history; fomenting world wars that laid whole continents to waste and ruin and cost tens upon tens of millions of deaths; pursing one’s interests so bloodthirstily, stopping at absolutely nothing, no deceit or murder too cowardly, to achieve one’s utopian aims… I could go on and on, but h-e-double-hockey-sticks, what of even bringing about the conditions for the genocide of the entire White Race – worldwide – that’s THE GENOCIDE OF THE ENTIRE WHITE RACE FOREVER – all this, and more, to make ” their group to be dominant” – well, it seems PRETTY F#CKING NATURAL TO ME, TOO.

      “There’s plenty decent Jewish people who stand against Zionist Jews, just like there’s plenty of decent Anglos who stand against Anglo-Zionists.”

      Son, how you can think like this and still manage to type will be a mystery for the ages. Plenty of decent jewish people? Name some right now. A handful don’t count. Name ’em! One that I would call a decent jew is one you yourself slagged – Brother Netnanial Kapner – oh the irony! Freedmans, Shahaks, and Coles are pretty rare indeed. Buddy, the problem ain’t Zionism, it’s jews. It ain’t Anglo-Zionists, it’s jews. It ain’t any -ism: it’s jews! JEWS! Jews living among, and lording it over, us. Period.

      I’ll let some quotes from John Kaminski finish you off. I’m done. And BTW, the evidence shows, jews are crypto-humans.

      “Those microscopic number of recovering Jews who have developed the
      concept of conscience, chosen to become human beings and expose their
      deadly heritage can be counted on virtually one hand — Benjamin Freedman, Jack Bernstein, and more recently our beloved Brother Nathanael Kapner, who is ostentatiously trying to warn us about the nihilistic Judaic madness that is sucking the world into its poison sewer — are just a few of the not very many more Jews who have seen
      the light, and decided to be decent neighbors rather than the rabbis’ killer robots…

      Of Jews who appear to have crossed the line into some kind of actual human form, most of those, sad to say, are stealthily posing to gain some advantage or awaiting an opportunity to commit sabotage on any project that opposes the savage sadism of the Israeli monster, which
      flaunts its pathological pride in the way it kills people and laughs about it…

      Judaism is a cynical criminal syndicate, not a religion. Any society that pretends Judaism is a legitimate religion soon develops the pallor of death as a nation, and shortly thereafter disintegrates, sometimes by revolution, sometimes by disease, often by starvation…

      Honest Jews? Name one. I’ll reveal him as a liar with just a few questions. Then you must forgive me as I laugh briefly at the breathtaking stupidity of your naívete, and then get very sad knowing that you have neither the tools nor the will to investigate the probable cause of your own upcoming death…

      P.S.: To all those good Jews out there, I have this piece of advice: make yourself known as soon as possible, denounce Judaism as the terrific evil it is, and rejoin the human race, which has always wanted you back. Already people don’t believe anything you say. So do it soon so you don’t get swept away with the rest of those criminals
      when the big light hits.”

  57. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    June 9, 2011 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    Oh for sure the church has been conquered territory from within for a century at least , and militantly so since vatican II .

    I think that one large aspect of the problem lies with the fact that the church leadership and many of the church goers really do not literally believe in Christianity .

  58. Barbara's Gravatar Barbara
    June 9, 2011 - 8:29 am | Permalink

    Check out Mel Gibson’s father’s website

    If you read his books that he has posted for free you can see that he has plenty to say about this topic. Is the Pope Catholic is one of his books which you can read.

    • Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
      June 11, 2011 - 6:16 am | Permalink

      A critique of the anti-Catholic “theology” of Mel Gibson’s father and other Sedevacntists can be found at this website:

      and follow / scroll Label / thread for “sedevacantism” for more articles

      “If someone’s conclusion is preposterous (e.g., “God does not exist” or “all the sacraments in the world are gone from the visible Church in consequence of “heresy” (ala Hutton Gibson), no Pope will come from Rome ever again”, etc.) then the reasoning which led to those conclusions must also be rejected a priori no matter how smartly they appear to write or how charismatic they are, or how well they say the Mass (Didn’t all the original Modernists in Pius X’s time say the Tridentine Mass?). The world has always been full of charismatic and even pious men led astray into the trap and theological knots of drawing false conclusions from difficult realities. “Liturgical correctness,” as the original Modernist’s showed, is no guarantee of orthodoxy.”

  59. JJT's Gravatar JJT
    June 8, 2011 - 10:47 pm | Permalink
  60. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    June 8, 2011 - 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Does he believe Jesus Christ is Israel’s true and only Messiah? Does he believe the Catholic Church is the Mystical Body bequeathed to mankind by the Messiah? If so…

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 8, 2011 - 10:42 pm | Permalink

      I sure David Maria Jaeger, like the 65 million American, could believe that Jews need to be herded into Holy Land paving the way for the second coming of Jesus – but he cannot believe that Jesus was the ‘Messiah’ promised in the Jewish Bible (OT) – because OT did not say that.

      “The significance of the Book of Isaiah is that it is Part of the Old Testament; it begins on P. 529 of my Bible. The New Testament begins on P. 756; 227 pages after the Book of Isaiah. Yet Isaiah’s Book introduces the coming of Christ and the rise of Christianity in terms which often differ materially from the Gospels of the New Testament written one hundred years after the fact. The Christian leadership took the thread provided by Isaiah and wove it into the so-called Gospels to suit their wildest imaginations,” wrote Kenneth G. Ramey, Salem-News.

  61. Christian M's Gravatar Christian M
    June 8, 2011 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Religious conversion of non-Whites is the same as non-White immigration: an irrational and idealistic believe in The Truth emanating from words and Wordism (see

    An African does not become a Frenchman by hopping on a plane and obtaining paperwork.

    A Chinaman does not become an American by riding a boat and getting a green card.

    A mestizo does not become an American by crossing a border. He does not become more productive (wage increase) by scaling a fence. The increased wage is due to the fact that he is now living in a prosperous White-built nation and is free to siphon off social benefits via White taxation and redistribution.

    Race and ethnicity matter more than words, professions of loyalty, geographical location, or any form of paperwork.

    For the greedy, money is more important than family, e.g. the Catholic or Evangelical churches running around looking for brown and black sources of collection plate money.

    This is why so many useful idiots think nothing strange of calling an African a Frenchman, a Paki a Briton, or a mestizo an American. Blood is thicker than any One True Faith or Final Academic Truth. Nationality cannot be separated from race and ethnicity.

  62. Christian M's Gravatar Christian M
    June 8, 2011 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Matthew 23: The Seven Woes (against the Pharisees)

    Next time you encounter an oxymoronic “Christian Zionist” tell him/her to read Matthew 23.

  63. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 8, 2011 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

    The Doenmeh were a heretical Jewish sect formed, after the conversion to Islam in the 17th century of the Turkish-Jewish messianic pretender Sabbetai Zevi, by those of his followers who continued to believe in him.

    Conducting themselves outwardly as Muslims in imitation of him, they lived secretly as Jews and continued to exist as a distinct, if shadowy, group well into the 20th century.

    The Hebrew journalist, Itamar Ben-Avi, in his autobiography, proves that the Father of secularist Turkey, Gen. Kemal Attaturk’s father was a Doenmeh and that Attaturk was never ashamed of his Jewish back-ground.

  64. John (The Warrior)'s Gravatar John (The Warrior)
    June 8, 2011 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

    Christianity and Judaism have nothing is common what-so-ever. The roots of Judaism emanate from Babylon, and they are not of the Israelites of the Old Testament.

    “It would be a mistake to assume that our roots of of the Israelites of the Old Testament, but, rather, our roots are in Phariseeism.” – 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia

    There is an entire chapter in the 1984 “Jewish Almanac” titled “Identity” where the same argument is made in great detail.

    The “Christian West” has been sold a lie, the most successful lie of all time by these creatures whom Jesus called the “Sons of Satan”and “are of your father the devil”. They are as was said in John 10:10, “The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.”

    These creatures are of the “Synagogue of Satan”, not biblical Israelites and their European/American progeny, but the descendents of Esau and Azazel, damned forever by God himself. (Ye shall know them by their fruits!)

    As Andrew Jackson so said, they are “vipers” and should be “rooted out” by whatever means, and I mean “whatever.” They are nothing but parasites and destroyers who leave nothing but ruin and desolation in their wake. No good has ever come from them nor can it, for they are the whole personification of the “Dark Side.”

  65. Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
    June 8, 2011 - 2:44 pm | Permalink

    I do not understand how any self-respecting man of European heritage would want to force upon the men and women of his beloved people this cruel and unreasonable choice: abstinence or joyless, fearful sex/livestock reproduction.

    For those who would be quick to point out that the reproduction rates of European peoples are far lower than those of Muslims, South Americans, Indians, etc., I would say that this would not be such a problem if it were not for the Globalists, Zionists, and their ultra-rich “Christian” allies (betrayers all) who opened the floodgates to “free trade” and Third World immigration, wrecking our stabilty and quality of life just to swell their already bulging pockets.

    Those who are seriously concerned about our birthrates would do well to look to some important aspects of National Socialism, rather than harping about the “evils” of contraception, family planning, and the greater opportunities that women enjoy. By that I mean think about (or better yet, work on) creating a prosperous and stable social and economic system in which greater numbers of sensitive, intelligent and thoughtful mothers and fathers really do want to have more children.

    Let’s face it: When a person can hardly take care of himself, and when well-paying and long-term jobs are becoming rather hard to find rarities, having babies is just about the last thing a person should be thinking about.

    • Don't Feed the Animals's Gravatar Don't Feed the Animals
      June 8, 2011 - 3:49 pm | Permalink

      When the whole situation bottoms out, the number of non-whites in the world will drop considerably. And rapidly. Whites will be busy trying to straighten out their own lands and the non-whites will not be enjoying “charity” via the confiscatory taxes put in place throughout the West (mostly by jews of course). Without white money and food pouring in, Latin America, Africa and other areas will see the populations drop to their natural levels.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 9, 2011 - 5:47 am | Permalink

      @Mark Hess: Currently atheist whites have fertility rates on the order of 1.0-1.5 worldwide. Do you think that they all can “hardly take care for themselves”, or just don’t want to miss their oversees vacations and want to “enjoy life a little bit more”..? I mean, if all your ancestors only thought of having babies when they had “well-paying and long-term jobs”, then you would not be here to write your thoughts to us.

      Moreover, a society will collapse anyway with below-replacement fertility levels, and with fertility rates below 1.5 the collapse will mean 25% or more decrease per generation, which will mean a halflife of half a century for newborn children, which – after a prolonged aging period – will mean a collapse of society in not much more than a century.

    • Spirit of '76's Gravatar Spirit of '76
      June 10, 2011 - 12:36 am | Permalink

      Quesiton: how is “deutschland uber alles” any better for authentic, true Americans than, “Is it good for the Jews?”

      Answer: It ain’t.

      (Irony in the comment pertaining to this thread fully noted.)

    • Northern Light's Gravatar Northern Light
      June 14, 2011 - 12:13 am | Permalink

      Wonderful comments by Mr Hess.

  66. born agin' redneck's Gravatar born agin' redneck
    June 8, 2011 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

    scooter says:

    Jews need a way out of their lost status.

    Let them be missionaries in Africa.
    For 500 years Christians have been trying to civilize Africa.
    Now that’s faith.

  67. Mike's Gravatar Mike
    June 8, 2011 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

    Even in the small corner of the world called Scandinavia, where most people are Protestants, one can easily identify at least one example of a Jewish convert to Catholicism. His name is Jahn Otto Johansen (born 1934), a Norwegian journalist, newspaper editor, foreign correspondent and non-ficiton writer. He has written a book with the title “Min jiddische mamma” (My Yiddishe Mama), and clearly identifies as a Jew. Catholicism is a minority faith in Norway, and the Jewish community in Norway is even tinier.

  68. June 8, 2011 - 11:38 am | Permalink

    The only Jew who has converted to Christianity that I can think of who is anywhere near trustworthy would be Brother Nathaniel Kapner. He is the standard that one should use for evaluating these other conversos.

    Here is a link for those unfamiliar with Brother Kapner:

    Beck Betrays ‘White Consciousness’ – Interview With Kevin MacDonald PhD

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      June 8, 2011 - 2:19 pm | Permalink


      Kapner’s good, but it’s impossible to judge his sincerity until the final call. Not wanting to down on him, but he’s always asking for money, 3 grand for a computer, 300 dollars to get his robe cleaned. What’s with all that? Can’t he buy his own stuff?

  69. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    June 8, 2011 - 10:52 am | Permalink

    Reading the non-catholics here one is struck by the moribund state of the enlightenment project. The Scottish philosopher Alisdair MacIntyre indicated this in his seminal work “After Virtue” back in 1981. MacIntyre, an oft married, left leaning (like Kevin) academic from protestant Glasgow is about as enlightened as you are going to get in post-war Europe. Yet he was able to recognise the moral predicament of Western man and in accepting the failure of enlightenment looked for alternative analytical tools. In many ways he WAS like OO’s non-catholics who turn to Macdonald to articulate their predicament but fails to offer a coherent and attainable solution. One of his specialities is Edith Stein – a convert from Judaism, canonised Saint, religious sister, casualty of WWII and Thomist philosopher!

  70. June 8, 2011 - 10:19 am | Permalink

    The cited statements from Fr. David-Maria Jaeger are strange, especially likening his faith and position as a Catholic to being nothing more or less than being a member of a “supra-national international body” like the UN etc. Perhaps he is attemtping to disarm his fellow Israelis but, that is not what he should be doing especially given his position in the Church.

    I agree with his statement ““I’m a loyal and patriotic son of our people and our country” and wish more Catholics would have the same attitude. It is a good thing that any Catholic remain loyal to his nation, his people. Our role is to bring our people to God and not to destroy our nations with “compassionate” immigration etc as many within the Catholic Church do.

    Nationalism is appropriate and good for all Catholics, under Christ.

    What concerns me more than the above comments from Fr. David-Maria Jaeger are comments from Fr. Jean-Baptiste Gourion (another Jewish convert). Gourion was seeking in 2003 to create a “…separate jurisdiction [in Israel] as part of a larger project of building a Christian community that reflects the early church of Jerusalem as described in the “Acts of the Apostles,” fully immersed in Jewish life and culture.”

    Gourion says: “Christianity arises from the Jewish people and should continue to be grafted on the true olive tree,”

    This position is completely at odds with Catholic doctrine and I hope Gaurion has been re-educated amended his ways or thrown out of the Church. The position of the Church as I learned it, and as far as I am aware is still the case, is that Israel is the Church and the Jews are no more the Chosen People as of Good Friday.

    For a Catholic priest to be stating that Judaism is the correct faith, and that Christianity is a graft on the root of Judaism is truly disgraceful. If anyone knows what has happened to this Gaurion then please let me know.

    One can certainly understand the necessity for the Inquisition given such bare faced heresy.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 8, 2011 - 11:17 am | Permalink

      @ Pat Hannagan, 10:19.

      {“…Christianity arises from the Jewish people and should continue to be grafted on the true olive tree…”}

      I have heard a Protestant vicar of Jewish descent saying exact the same thing about Christians needing to be “grafted on the true olive tree”(meaning Israel)
      When a Christian of non-Jewish descent protested saying that it is the Church that is the New Israel,that vicar exclamated with an expression of abhorrence on his face:”But that is a CHRISTIAN idea!”Can you imagine!
      These people are EXTREMELY ETHNOCENTRIC and can – under no circumstances – accept to play second fiddle.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      June 9, 2011 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

      It sounds as if Fr. Gourion disagrees with the decision of The Council of Jerusalem, as spelled out in the Act of The Apostles.

  71. Adolf's Golfball's Gravatar Adolf's Golfball
    June 8, 2011 - 9:03 am | Permalink

    Fascinating , Really Fascinating . This makes me think of two things and others.

    The first is what do Vatican officials do at the end of the day? Blue movies and guilty consciousness ?The internet must be a temptation that keeps them in confession .
    But Perhaps , tune into Zionist propaganda TV ? They may spend a lot of time watching satellite TV …And movie reviews…They get the message ; they GOT the message.
    Secondly , are these Vatican officials any different from our leaders who live in fear of the Zionist/Jewish menace (their scheming vindictive paranoia ).Its it not hard to make a person look sinister in the modern media , where the constant barrage of smiling happy faces of the good and loyal is the meter by which goodman/badman is judged.

    Ironically the guy might be sincere but one can’t help but think that if he were a sincere convert then he would realize his invidious position and stick to helping the poor and not climb the humble ladder to power and worldly glory !

    And why would someone convert to another religion and then spend their time hanging out with the old gang? Perhaps he’s just a screwball but the fact that the Catholic church has allowed him to climb into the establishment show either masterful cunning or complete foolishness and from what we see in the USA , it must be the latter.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      June 9, 2011 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

      I vote for complete foolishness on the part of the Church. Or, maybe BXVI thinks he has to show how enlightened he is by he, a German, appointing an Israeli to such a high position.

      (And whether this guy is a WILLING accomplice or not, we can all expect the mossad and the other intelliegence organizations of Israel to be using him.)

  72. ethnonationalism's Gravatar ethnonationalism
    June 8, 2011 - 8:57 am | Permalink

    I dont see whats the problem.
    Jews are an ethnic group.
    Religion cannot change one’s ethnicity.

    If there are Buddhist Jews (like Steven Seagal and Leonard Cohen), Muslim Jews (like Stephen Schwartz), why wouldn’t there be Christian Jews?

    Religion is religion, ethnicity is ethnicity… don’t confuse the two.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 8, 2011 - 10:49 am | Permalink

      @ ethnonationalism, 8:57 am.

      {“…I don’t see whats the problem…”}

      The problem is that their “ethnicity” is in reality an ETHNIC MAFIA bent on infiltration,manipulation,exploitation and destruction.This may not be true for each and every INDIVIDUAL Jew but COLLECTIVELY yes.

      {“…religion is religion,ethnicity is ethnicity…don’t confuse the two…”}

      With the Jews they are not confused,they are FUSED.

    • batboy's Gravatar batboy
      June 12, 2011 - 8:52 am | Permalink

      This is not in my view primarilly an ethnic issue.
      When the Bible speaks negatively of Jews, it is obviously not an ethnic slur, but rather identifies those Christ-rejecting Jews whe adhere to a “religion” that more resembles an orgagnized crime racket. “Judaism is not a religion, it’s a catastrophe.” In any truly informed and
      civilized society, i.e., in any Catholic nation, we would not give tax-exempt preferential treatment to a criminal
      cult — a cult which advocates sophisticated criminal behavior, supremacism, and genocide. We would rightly deny
      that they have any right to be treated preferentially under law because it is by nature lawlessness in action, and thus those who aid and abet felonious crimes and criminal attitudes practice lawlessness, regardless of whether they profess to be Christians. Perhaps, then, it is to the
      Zionist Christians, among others, to whom Jesus will say:
      “Depart from me I never knew you, you who practice lawlessness.” Judaism is widely despised by those who are aware of its true doctrines because they suppose not only that they ware above the laws of the various nations to which they attach, but above the laws of God, as taught in the Bible. See Michael A. Hoffman’s great book “Judaism’s Strnage Gods” if you haven’t.

      That he admits to being part of this international cross-cultural society that is predicated on lawlessness shows either that he is not a true convert, or less likely, that
      he is ignorant of the nefarious teachings of his own
      “supra-national” cabal — not uncommon, but less likely, I think.

  73. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 8, 2011 - 8:28 am | Permalink


    When a person of a certain ethnicity converts to a (universal) religion, it is only natural that he retains his sense of ethnic identity. We would not be upset if an Irishman becomes a high functionary in the Vatican and says: “I still feel Irish”.In principle this would also be true if a Jewish convert would say: “I still feel Jewish”.But is the Jewish ethnicity REALLY a normal one like the Irish,the German or the French?I think we all agree here that this is NOT the case.Rather we would consider the Jewish people as an ETHNIC MAFIA, always trying by hook and by crook to gain positions of power and influence in order to further its nefarious ethnic agenda.What would our reaction be if a member of the Italian Mafia would become bishop of the Catholic Church and say:”I still feel a member of the Mafia”?

    Besides,Jews have a reputation of infiltrating other people’s organizations in order to manipulate,exploit and ultimately destroy them.The infiltration and subversion of the Ford Foundation by Jews is a salient example of that. Numerous others could be given.

    The Catholic Church, considered by the Jews as one of their greatest historical enemies,is a prime target for their infiltration.The fact that this Jewish “convert” compares his membership of the Catholic Church with that of such profane organizations as the IMF,UN or UNESCO and even says: “I am in a supra-national international body,THAT’S THE ONLY DIFFERENCE”,should ring a bell.I would NOT give this Jew the benefit of the doubt.

  74. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 8, 2011 - 7:59 am | Permalink

    Who would know better, Catholism and White religious bigotary than a Catholic Nun with a PhD?

    Karen Armstrong never had a smooth ride with the Zionist mafia. After the screening of PBS documentary, ‘Muhammad: Legacy of Prophet’ in 2002 (watch video below) and her interview with PBS – Jewish Islamophobe Daniel Pipes on his website posted (December 23, 2002) an e-mail of his fan – calling Karen Armstrong: “This woman belongs on a psychiatrist’s coach, not in a “starring” role in a major documentary funded by American taxpayer”. This is the same idiot who defends the Israelis’ right to receive US$3 billion annual military aid funded by the American taxpayers.

    In 2006, Karen blasted Pope Benedict XVI for his bigotary and hatred toward the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) while reminding the Pope that “some of the first Christian Crusaders began their journey to the Holy Land by massacring the Jewish communities along the Rhine valley; expulsion of Jews from almost every European Christian country; persecutions and inquisitions and, under Pope Pius XII, tacitly condoned the Nazi Holocaust”.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 8, 2011 - 9:54 am | Permalink

      Rehmat, 7:59 am.

      Rehmat,everytime I hear a Muslim saying “peace be upon him” (pbuh) after mentioning the name of Muhammad, I feel inclined to say: “WAR be upon him” (wbuh).But I am only an unbeliever…

    • John Mortl's Gravatar John Mortl
      June 9, 2011 - 11:19 am | Permalink

      Pope Pius XII did not condone what was actually happening to the Jews which was what today is called ethnic cleansing. The reason he has been smeered is because he would not sign on to the allegation of homicidle gassigs. The best way to counter and obscure the inconvenient questions that would inevitably arise is to go on the attack and accuse him of condoning that which he seemingly didn’t believe happened.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 10, 2011 - 5:22 pm | Permalink

      Franklin Ryckaert – You’re not the only. Every Zionazi Jew say that – in his self-denial that the WW I and WW II which killed more than 100 million people – was not created by the Jewish foot-licker Christians and Atheists – but Muhammad, right!

      But, then everyone doesn’t have his brain at the top part of his/her body. Some people liky you, are blessed to have it between their legs.

  75. bokr's Gravatar bokr
    June 8, 2011 - 7:12 am | Permalink

    I think Professor MacDonald left out a word in his article heading. Isn’t it supposed to be, “The Catholic Church: Crypto-Judaism in Europe”?

  76. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 8, 2011 - 7:07 am | Permalink

    The issue may not be whether his conversion was real – it may very well have been. But this goes to a deeper issue: What is the deepest source of behaviors? Is it our professed ideology, philosophy or religion? Or is it the biological traits we were born with? Or, most likely, a mix that is weighted differently in each individual.

    So, in the case of one person, it is very hard to say, but I would argue that in large groups, Jewish behavior will always be Jewish behavior because it is based on group traits that are based in biology.

    Like the old saying, social science can tell you very little about a man, but a lot about a million men.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 8, 2011 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

      That’s the point. He is probably a very real convert, who genuinely sees nothing wrong (from a Catholic viewpoint) with his Jewish loyalties. But still we have no reason to believe that he will be ethnic networking and seeing things from a tribal viewpoint, warping theology and Church policy in a tribe-friendly direction.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 8, 2011 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

      Oops… I mean, we have EVERY reason to believe that he will be ethnic networking and seeing things from a tribal viewpoint, warping theology and Church policy in a tribe-friendly direction.

  77. med's Gravatar med
    June 8, 2011 - 6:59 am | Permalink

    If the catholic church wants me back, the leaders will have to grow a spine and defend us from the jew-monarchy that has infected the world. This is just another nail in the coffin. (pun intended)

  78. mm's Gravatar mm
    June 8, 2011 - 6:51 am | Permalink

    Put me in the Lancashire lad’s camp. This is a weak post. If you read the source article, you’ll see that there is a 40-50 year time difference between the ‘we didn’t talk about why he converted’ line to the reporter’s question about whether he still considers himself Israeli.

    Look, he was born and raised in a certain place. That place has, basically, a national religion. He’s an apostate to that religion, and a reporter from that place asked him, ‘hey, do you still think of yourself as one of us.’ What’s he going to say? No, I’ve rejected both the religion of my birth for a better one and a new nationhood? Like the reporter or any of her readers are going to helped by him delving into an exegesis on the Christian concepts of new nationhood. Give me a break. And how unchristian to take his words so uncharitably. What about the commandment to honor thy mother and father.

    Think of it this way: if I moved to France, people would ask, so, what, you don’t think you’re American anymore? I’d have to say, no, I’m till American –it’s not like I can undo history, turn back time and get born and raised somewhere else. Maybe, if it was the proper time and place, I could then get into why I rejected America and split, but as a preliminary matter, I’d reject any suggestion that I was being an ingrate.

    That said, sure, one must not stuff one’s head in the ground; there could be crypto jews.

    But that article and this post are weak on evidence against this guy.

    • Ryan K's Gravatar Ryan K
      June 8, 2011 - 9:17 am | Permalink

      What you say is ‘thats right , there f,,,ked , and I’ve thrown my lot in with you guys .Not , like , ‘this seems like a better place to live and I like the food a lot but its great if we can have too passports incase something goes wrong in which case I made a mistake and I’m sorrrrry and I want to go to a better place now.’
      What is religion about anyway? And what is being a Jew and religion about? The suspicion is here that this guy is in fact still a Jew on some sort of strange intellectual oddessy that will end up hulling our ship before he changes his mind.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 8, 2011 - 10:34 am | Permalink

      @ mm, 6:51.

      {“…How unchristian to take his words so uncharitably…”}

      Indeed,how unchristian!If you have read attentively the articles on this site and also the books of Prof. MacDonald you would understand that it is exactly this trusting attitude of ours and this Christain idea of “love thy neighbour” that makes us vulnerable to dispossession by the whole non-White,non-Christian world.

      {“…that article and this post are weak on evidence against this guy…”}

      You should take the words of “this guy” more seriously when he compares membership of the Catholic Church with that of the IMF,UN or UNESCO,saying:
      “I am in a supra-national international body,THAT’S THE ONLY DIFFERENCE”. What real convert would say such thing?

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 8, 2011 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

      @mm: “if I moved to France, people would ask, so, what, you don’t think you’re American anymore? I’d have to say, no, I’m till American”

      OK, and if you were a high-ranking French official? I mean, what would a French person make of this?

  79. Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
    June 8, 2011 - 2:02 am | Permalink

    Since my interest in matters of European Identity and nationalism began, I have found that there are certain highly troubling trains of thought within a large percentage of the people who apparently have the same cares and concerns that I have. One is the prominence of a nostalgia for “The Good Old” Catholic Church.

    Friends, with respect, I do not get it.

    The evidence is absolutely overwhelming that European societies and cultures, especially when thinking of science and Enlightenment thought, evolved, in large part, in spite of The Church, not because of it. Although, here, I would argue that there is enough reason and humanity (and beauty) in the teachings that we attribute to Jesus that would allow for things, like Enlightment thought, to grow in The West.

    Why, exactly, should we not be filled with horror and disgust when we think of the Inquisition?

    Why, exactly, should we not feel absolute revulsion when we think of Mother Theresa, along with countless others, encouraging multitudes of poor and starving people to avoid family planning?

    And why have such praise for an institution that inherited so much of its sadism and ugliness, like its misogyny and its warped, perverse and anti-human views of human sexuality, directly from The Chosen People and their Torah?

    So much of this, especially the misogyny, seems to disrespect much of our Germanic/European inheritance. It is my understanding that Roman historians could not help but notice that the tribes they encountered to the north of them treated women with respect and admiration, including them in nearly all parts of society.

    With all that, it may seem like I am anti-Christian. I am not. I am truly baffled at how Christian-Zionists and reactionary Catholics seem to romanticize that which would happily destroy so much of what is good about The West.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 8, 2011 - 2:53 am | Permalink

      Christian views of sexuality were at least until modern times actually highly adaptive.

      First, no sex outside marriage, and even inside marriage no recreational sex. This means higher birthrates in the first place, is one of the reasons why Catholics have higher birthrates than atheists, for example.

      Second, it is (was) eugenic, because poor males tended to lack the money to marry early on. This meant that they could only possibly have fewer children.

      Third, it was democratic, preventing powerful males from monopolizing women, making it possible for males to form large-scale alliances, with much less internal strife.

      Fourth, it was eugenic in another sense: not only did it prevent poor males (see above) from getting married early on, it also prevented poor females (because they couldn’t be sold into the harem of a powerful male). In Arab societies selection pressures on the poor were only half as strong, because although poor males couldn’t marry there (actually in Europe the situation was similar, with 5-20% of males AND females never marrying), poor females could.

      Fifth, Christian views on divorce helped create stable families, thereby facilitating high-investment parenting.

      The fact that it comes from the Jews, that it’s “Jewish religion for the Gentiles”, is actually not a bad thing: the Jewish religion contains things that are good for the Jews, so incorporating at least some of it into our religion will be good for us as well. In other words, if Jews eat spinach because it’s healthy, than us eating spinach could also be good for us. The Jews do understand that. When an Israeli general was asked whether they are not disturbed that their tactics in 1967 resembled that of Nazi Germany, he answered that only because Hitler wore trousers, he needn’t walk the streets in underwear only. I think the same applies for us: only because the Jews practice high-investment parenting, and are shunning recreational sex, doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t do the same.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 8, 2011 - 3:28 am | Permalink

      I am not anti-Christian or anti-Catholic either – I think both have done great things for Whites in the past. But both have hurt Whites as well, especially over the last century. It doesn’t seem likely the Catholic Church will become a defender of Europe or Whites anytime soon.

      I think we also have to accept the reality of the age in which we live. We are not in the Medieval period, we are living in a time when science has tremendous prestige, perhaps more than religion for most people. So, I suspect that any defense of Whites will have to be couched in scientific terms.

      In fact, if you look at scientific works about 100 years ago, just such an understanding of race was popular among scientists. They discussed racial and ethnic effects on behavior openly. That whole line of thought was undermined and was thoroughly destroyed following WWII for reasons MacDonald has examined.

      But just like psychology escaped Freud and is slowly crawling back to reality, we may be seeing some glimmers of hope that a scientific understanding of genes, race and culture will reemerge.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 8, 2011 - 3:37 am | Permalink

      @ Mark Hess, 2:02 am.

      [“Nostalgia for “The Good Old Catholic Church” is no solution”]

      All of this only illustrates that Europeans never have evolved a “higher” religion of their own, that both promotes their ethnic interests and offers moral and spiritual guidance. Going “back” to tribal religions such as those of Celts or Germanics will not do (they are not “higher”), neither will romanticizing Medieval Christianity (it does not promote “ethnic interests”). Thus we are left with only two alternatives: adopting another non-European relgion (like Buddhism or any other Oriental cult),but that will not serve our ethnic interests or create a new religion of our own and for our own ( a kind of “Euro-” New Age ?).Rejecting all things trancendental and relying only on biological considerations (a kind of “racial” Darwinism) will ultimately not satisfy.Man is no doubt a biological being,but also has spiritual needs.After all,all great cultures were based on religions.We could of course go on with our present civilization based only on material considerations,but see where that has brought us.Perhaps we should make a list of our specific ethnic, moral and spiritual needs and then “construct” a new religion to meet those needs.That however would be a highly artificial procedure. Viable religions are not made on the drawing-table,they appear out of the inspiration of a prophet.
      Only question: where do we find such a prophet?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 8, 2011 - 4:11 am | Permalink

      I agree that we can’t base a new culture for Whites soley on biology. I think the scientific aspect is very important but it isn’t sufficient. Perhaps this is where art can play a role.

      Art is basically dead right now, but paintings, sculpture and literature that create a “mythology” for our people are very important. Of course, we realize that the killing of our art was no accident.

      But Whites seem pretty creative and able to project all kinds of art and visions once they are psychologically free to do so.

    • Free Thinker's Gravatar Free Thinker
      June 8, 2011 - 8:51 am | Permalink

      Catholicism doesn’t mean much to me and it does seem that Christians on this sight have a serious problem with contradiction or could I say hypocrisy ,that is love thy brother like thy self but only if he’s ‘white’ and christian(?) .
      If you ask me all these Semitic religions have reached their–Used by date- time to hit the tidy bin peddle.
      All these religions have useful and intelligent philosophies yet unfortunately you humans always need to get a lolly for doing something good ; try just doing something good and then a random act of revenge to maintain Justice.

    • June 8, 2011 - 11:23 am | Permalink

      “I think the same applies for us: only because the Jews practice high-investment parenting, and are shunning recreational sex, doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t do the same.”

      You sure about that?

      Rep. Anthony Weiner and Dominique Strauss Kahn have not been shunning recreational sex!

      One wonders if Jewish perversity is increasing? Does the Tribe sense that the economy is about to tank (double dip recession) and come to the realization they better party it up while they still have time!?!? Always keep an eye on the enemy, the eternal Jew.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 8, 2011 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

      @Charles Von Farley: The Jewish religion is shunning recreational sex, that’s where Christianity got it from. Coitus interruptus is not permitted, masturbation is not permitted, homosexuality is not permitted, etc. The only sex that’s permitted is a full vaginal intercourse.

      Of course these Jews don’t follow their religion (and also it’s very likely that the Jewish religion itself didn’t care much for such transgressions with Gentile women in the first place), but the original description by Mark Hess was: “its warped, perverse and anti-human views of human sexuality, directly from The Chosen People and their Torah?”

      Well, the reason is, these warped, perverse and anti-human views are really adaptive.

    • June 8, 2011 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

      I am not anti-Christian or anti-Catholic either – I think both have done great things for Whites in the past.


      The different forms of Christianity are also doing some very important things for Whites right now in terms of providing a sense of community, providing a connection to the Western tradition, and keeping the White birthrate from collapsing to even worse levels.

      The demonstrate that last point: Consider that even in the country of Austria with its all too low birthrate, women who identified as Atheist in the Census were found to have a birthrate 50% lower than average.

      So even with its extremely low birthrate, Austria would have a far worse birthrate problem if it weren’t for some of their people being Christians.

      Now it is true that Whites could get a sense of community and help on the birthrate issue from Islam, but there are two obvious problems with that idea:

      1. They wouldn’t be getting an authentic connection to Western Civilization.
      2. It would lead to a genetic melding of Europeans with Middle Easterners and North Africans.

      All in all, Christianity is much better for Whites than either Atheism or Islam would be.

      The problem is that the Catholic and Protestant Churches are being used by liberals to promote anti-Traditionalist and racially masochistic concepts.

      Because religion impinges so directly on morality, this is profoundly damaging from the standpoint of making the success of racial nationalist ideas much less likely among the exact (relatively) tradition and community minded people who would make the best supporters for racial nationalism.

      It’s also very damaging in the sense that it undermines the appeal of Christianity for ethnic Europeans, thus increasing the strength of Atheism and Islam, two alternatives to Christianity which are both clearly worse for ethnic Europeans than Christianity (this being the case even when you consider that mainstream Catholicism was badly subverted with Vatican II and the vast majority of Protestant Churches have been subverted in a similar way).

      This is why the Left spend so much time and energy attacking and attempting to co-opt Christianity, they’re smart enough to know how central it is.

      Only the mass media and the political process itself are of comparable importance.

    • Spirit of '76's Gravatar Spirit of '76
      June 10, 2011 - 12:11 am | Permalink

      Free Thinker:

      First of all, the commandment is “Love thy neighbor as thyself.” You are confusing the “Summary of the Law” with various lessons on forgiveness of a brother.

      1. “Neighbor” means “one that is near to you”. Jesus was a smart man even to those that do not believe his claim to Divinity. He chose his words with precision and did not mince them. I don’t know where “neighbor” came to mean “everyone” but Jesus did not teach it. Neither did my church (Episcopalian) until the 1980s +/-.
      2. A brother in the bible is the same as a brother to you or me: a son to one’s own parents. Period. Again, Jesus chose his words with precision. Had he meant “everyone” he would have simply said “everyone”. He did not.
      3. A Brother or Sister in Christ presupposes familial and national discrimination and distinction. When Jesus said to his his followers they are brothers, it was self-evidently not literal, no more than the doctrine of the second birth. Insofar as God is concerned, all mankind are his children. But all mankind are not literal brothers and sisters and we are to treat them with the same respect and dignity we would offer our flesh-and-blood brother. Period. Nowhere are we told to endlessly forgive our brothers, or ignore their sins, or tolerate their ways not in accordance to God’s law. Quite the contrary, there is a specific method for chastising and even excommunicating a “brother” that sins, including bio-brothers.

      The same holds for “There is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, male nor female… in Christ”

      These are metaphors to describe the relationship of the LORD God Almighty to his children. It is not a statement of genetic transmutation or transubstantiation (another non-biblical misnomer).

      To deliberately characterize these spiritual doctrines as somehow heavenly homogenization, advocacy for the mongrelization of the Creator’s ***painstakingly*** CREATED races of man is … well … disrespectful of the object of your derision. Tautologically, if God wanted us to be pureed into home boys and Mexicans, HE WOULD HAVE MADE US THAT WAY IN THE FIRST PLACE.

      Don’t even get me going on the Bible’s explicit hierarchy from Old to the end of the New Testament. In God’s green earth, all men are most certainly NOT created equal. Especially those sons of the devil, the Pharisees and their pals.

  80. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    June 8, 2011 - 2:01 am | Permalink

    “The Inquisition was designed to ferret such people out and subject them to penalties.”

    MacDonald for Grand Inquisitor! He’ll “ferret out” those heretics if he has to put His Holiness himself on the rack.

  81. Walter Lewkowski's Gravatar Walter Lewkowski
    June 8, 2011 - 1:43 am | Permalink

    There is a special problem with Jews that become Catholics. Judaism is not like paganism. Paganism is neutral. It is not anti-Catholic. The Church has never had trouble with crypto-pagans.

    But Judaism is anti-Catholic. In fact Judaism is correctly defined as an organization that is opposed to Christ as the Messiah.

    Because of the fundamental anti-Catholic nature of Judaism any Jew that converts to Catholicism is suspect. He cannot be trusted if he puts Jews’ material well being above Jews’ spiritual well being.

    The position of the Catholic Church is that Jews should come into the Church and accept Christ as their salvation. The question about David Maria Jaeger is does his allegiance to the Jewish nation mean that the material well being of Jews is more important to him than their spiritual well being.

    In other words who is he working for, Christ or Israel?

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 4:05 pm | Permalink

      If I had to choose, I’d say Israel.

  82. Hans's Gravatar Hans
    June 7, 2011 - 10:31 pm | Permalink

    As despondent as some of you are getting at this article, let’s remember that Paul encountered it repeatedly. This is just from Galatians:

    1:6-7: I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you…and are turning to a different gospel–which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.”

    3:1-2: You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes, Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by observing the law, or by believing what you heard?

    And then this, probably one of greatest anti-Judaic statements in the New Testament:

    5:12: As for those agitators [who are advocating circumcision], I wish they would go the whole way and emasculate themselves!

    Indeed! It sure would have spared us a lot of grief if most of them had done that.

    If this is what Paul encountered, why do we think we’ll be spared? We have to take the fight to them just as he did.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 10, 2011 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

      This is an impressive collection of 24-karat-gold nuggets of truth and heart-lifting good sense.

      Hans, you have an obvious talent for this kind of thing. If you ever decide to leave data mining and become an old-fashioned prospector, drop me a line. I’d get rich just from dogging your heels and scooping up your leavings!

  83. Mari's Gravatar Mari
    June 7, 2011 - 10:11 pm | Permalink

    I urge everyone to read the book “Supermob” by gus Russo. It is the true story of the Jewish White collar crime mafia and how it controls the US.

  84. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    June 7, 2011 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Any ideology that doesn’t take race and ethnicity into account should be avoided. This goes for Christianity, capitalism, communism, liberalism, conservatism, libertarianiasm, anything. Christianity is an especially lost cause.

    • bokr's Gravatar bokr
      June 8, 2011 - 7:10 am | Permalink


      “Christianity is an especially lost cause.”

      Of course, but try telling that to these people here. KMac continues to censor comments that in any way denigrate his increasingly whiny conservative position. He continues to see “the Church” as some monolithic organization that has, and always had, as its raison d’etre the protection and advancement of the genetic European community. To paraphrase the Germans, “Even if we succeeded in ridding our society of ethnic Jews, we’d still have millions of Catholics and Protestants living out a Jewish lifestyle.”

      I’ve asked before, but how old are you (just give me a range)?

    • Spirit of '76's Gravatar Spirit of '76
      June 9, 2011 - 11:54 pm | Permalink

      It is difficult to take you seriously fender_strat. I don’t mean this disrespectfully but, especially for a Boomer, you need to get out more often. If you had even a moderately broad personal familiarity (internet screeds don’t count) with any of those institutions you would realize the utter foolishness of your simplistic dismissal.

      Christianity ***is*** a national religion. You would know that if you wanted to know it: Church of England, Church of Scotland, Church of Ireland, Church of Sweden, Church of Rome, Polish Catholic Church, Lithuanian Catholic Church, Protestant Episcopal Church of the United States of America, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Alaskan Orthodox, Hungarian Catholic, Hungarian Orthodox, Serbian Orthodox, Southern Baptists … shall I go on?

      You make the most basic error of the keyboard commando: mistaking the headlines (“man bites dog”) for the general case (“dog bites man”).

      That and Nietzsche (your presumed influence) was a loser – a weak, pathetic, likely criminal invalid with a morose, almost macabre outlook perhaps justified by his personal experience but nothing but a dead-end for our time and place. Even his criticism of Christianity was solipsistic to his central European experience of the Church of Rome and its corrupt political influence over corrupt politicians. To assume that experience applicable to any other time or place is an unrecoverable error in your thought process.

      I have a second thought: What you propose sounds suspiciously like the typical nonce of the Star Trekkies, which is itself John Lennon in Space. Please tell me you do not fantasize over Captain Picco of the USS Enterprise!

      God help us.

      Spirit of ’76
      Protestant and no lover of Rome but I won’t stand for libel.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 10, 2011 - 3:56 am | Permalink

      @ Spirit’76, 11:54.

      {“Christianity is a national religion”} reaction to fender_strat:”Christianity is an especially lost case”.

      Many Christian churches may indeed be organized on a national basis ( such as are all Eastern Orthodox ones),but the Catholic Church is really international.Besides,the concept of “nation” only IMPLICITLY means race.In our modern globalized world with its ideas that race does not exist,or if it exists it should be ignored or that nations should only be “propositional”,no Christian church, no matter how “national”,can be a bulwark against non-White immigration or miscegenation.I think that is what fender_strat means.

  85. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    June 7, 2011 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps Professor MacDonald should pray for more sincere converts to the Church like the Ratisbonne brothers if he feels that the Church is under siege by crypto jews.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 8, 2011 - 4:19 am | Permalink

      Amen, Dave, save that everyone should pray for sincere conversions, not simply KM.

      Les frères Ratisbonnes were model converts, the model in this case being Saint Paul.

    • Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
      June 9, 2011 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

      We abandoned the church as we did so many other institutions. How can we be surprised that Jews are taking them over? Yet, foolishly I am. History repeats and repeats and we never learn. Maybe they deserve to run the world.

  86. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 7, 2011 - 9:38 pm | Permalink

    There is no ‘conversion’ in Talmudic Judaism. According to Rabbanic law, only who is born to a born-Jewish mother is JEWISH (like Pope John Paul II and Nicolas Sarkozy). If the father happens to be non-Jewish, the child has to CONVERT to Judaism when he reaches age of 12 and the process usually takes several years.

    Most Crypto-Jews are among the Muslim nation with largest community in Turkey.

    • ethnonationalism's Gravatar ethnonationalism
      June 8, 2011 - 9:04 am | Permalink

      John Paul IIs mother was Ukrainian, not Jewish.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      June 8, 2011 - 9:06 am | Permalink


      I have known Islamic converts to Christianity. You should give up your false religion and fake prophet Mohammed, and convert.
      By the way, how does it not count as burning the Koran when a Muslim blows up a mosque full of Koran’s and other Muslims?

    • Liberte's Gravatar Liberte
      June 8, 2011 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat I think I just figured out how you guys could get your Caliphate back.

      Select a Jew for the Caliph.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 8, 2011 - 7:52 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat I think I just figured out how you guys could get your Caliphate back.

      Select a Jew for the Caliph.

      This reminds me of a joke I heard about how the Palestinians could advance their cause: Get some smart Jews to represent them.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 14, 2011 - 8:24 am | Permalink

      ethnonationalism – who the hell you think would be telling the truth – my Polish Catholic junior engineer or you?

      Now tell me why the Pope would say Porn, an industry monopolized by Jews, being kosher?

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 29, 2011 - 11:42 am | Permalink

      Scooter – There are more converts to Islam among Christians and Jews, especially women – than the other way around.

      Even Israel-Firster, Sen. Hillary Clinton admitted in 2003 that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West with 10,000 Americans converting to Islam each year.

      Which religion you suggest me to convert -the Holocaust, which has replaced the old Jewish religion or Evangelism which survives on Jewish funds??

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 29, 2011 - 11:45 am | Permalink

      Liberte – Jews have already given a ‘Muslim Khalifa’ to United States. His ‘middle name’ happens to be ‘Hussein’.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 29, 2011 - 11:53 am | Permalink

      Jason Speaks – you smell a Zionazi skunk behind every ID of yours.

      I got a better joke from Jewish-owned ‘Reader’s Digest’.

      An American visitor sees an old Jew whining in front of the Wailing Wall: “Lord take me to my people, please”. When the Jew finished his whining – the shocked American approached him and asked: “Excuse me sir, but you’re among your people (in Israel)”. The old man gave him a dirty look and said: “Nyeth stupid, these parasite Jews are not my people. My people are in Monte Carlo”.

  87. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    June 7, 2011 - 9:28 pm | Permalink

    In contrast to the posters above, I’m pretty clear that this is one of Kevin’s weaker positions. Jewishness obviously cuts across our boundaries that keep apart secular nationality and universal religion, as it is in effect a national religion.

    My point is, you have to have people who identify as Jews some way out. One is to convert to Christianity and retain a purely secular Jewish identity. I suppose Kevin would say only the first half is acceptable, but as he accepts and advocates ethnic identity for whites, why should he deprive Jews of it as a residual and seondary loyalty? According to the Darwinian position, it’s written into human nature at some level.

    His get out is to suggest that Jaeger’s conversion is insincere or not to be trusted as such. The only evidence he presents is the Israeli professor who he quotes saying that Jaeger’s co-ethnics had not discussed the reasons for his conversion with him. But that would be consistent with their wishing to remain as Jews and feeling they would get the worst of any argument.

    But the deeper question is, what if it is sincere? What’s the problem with it then? What does Macdonald want Jews to do?

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 8, 2011 - 1:38 am | Permalink

      I agree Lad. I recall at least 2 priests from my youth who were ethnically Jewish. There remains a small but healthy tradition of converts to the Catholic faith.

      It must be said that most of the problems in the Catholic Church today stem from the abandonment of an inquisition type mechanisms to protect orthodoxy. For example, the sex scandals arose when bishops started using treatment centres without any audit of who was working in them both in terms of their theological, “scientific” opinions and personal morality.

      As an aside, what Kevin proposes is not scientific and yet many people here think it is.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 8, 2011 - 5:38 am | Permalink

      @Lancashire Lad: I think it’s quite adaptive not to accept a member of an enemy tribe (and few would disagree Jews are just such a tribe) into our midst, at least not immediately into a leadership position. As to your question what Jews should do: they should keep a low profile, full stop. It’s fine if he converts to Catholicism, and remains a loyal Israeli citizen, but why does he immediately want to become a leader? How many fresh converts hold positions in the Vatican? Does anyone have any statistics on that? I guess very few.

      On the other hand, I agree it’s not scientifically proven that this particular Jew does anything wrong. (Being member of an ethnic group AND a leader of the Catholic Church is a description of ALL leaders of the Church.) But I think it’s a reasonable guess after taking a look at the activities of all those Jewish converts (marranos, Lustiger, etc.), that this particular one is most likely to be the same as the rest.

      Jean-Marie Lustiger talked about Jews not being responsible for the death of Christ, because it was only the Romans who did the killing, and some of the Jewish elite were complicit, but “the people remained silent”. Now he might be correct in the historical sense (it’s impossible for a whole people to say anything in a matter like that, and obviously there was no popular vote), however, that contradicts the New Testament. Now the question is, if he doesn’t believe in the New Testament, why the hell did he join the Church? And of course, his deviation from the Testament was favorable to his tribe. So the charge that Lustiger remained (maybe unconsciously) loyal to his tribe, even if it contradicts Church doctrine, is a reasonable charge. It’s also reasonable to think the same thing of this Israeli guy. I bet you this “sincere” convert is already busy ethnic networking, maybe not at a conscious level.

    • Razvan's Gravatar Razvan
      June 8, 2011 - 6:58 am | Permalink

      A Jew is a Jew and will take any needed mask and garb reciting Kol Neidre. They will cry: I am a Christian and also a Jew. What’s the problem? And start immediately to blow up the foundations of the Church. That people really should dwell alone.

      You can not just be mesmerized by the miracle of the Jewish conversion. It’s pure naiveté.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 8, 2011 - 7:01 am | Permalink


      Benedict XVI is more or less saying the same thing as Lustiger. No modern bishop would say otherwise as he risks arrest. The prayer for the “perfidious” Jews has been changed in the Easter liturgy for example. Of course by late antiquity and the early Middle Ages, perfides and perfidia simply meant the opposite of fides and fidelis. Thus perfides in medieval Latin is best translated as “faithless” or “unbelieving”, meaning lacking the Christian faith.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      June 8, 2011 - 9:03 am | Permalink

      Quite true, Lancashire Lad. If someone converts and professes Jesus as his savior, and by his actions over the years attends the church and follows Jesus teachings in the bible, he must be given the benefit of the doubt. If at some point he appears to be fashioning a career to further a non Christian goal, he and anybody else doing it should be a candidate for ex-communication.
      I have known friendly converted jews who practice Christianity, and as neither a priest or a particularly scholarly parishioner, it was my duty to accept them. It is ultimately up to God to decide who is a real Christian. Jews need a way out of their lost status.

    • remain's Gravatar remain
      June 8, 2011 - 10:58 am | Permalink

      WoW!! Such a deal!

      A Catholic AND a Jew for the price of one.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 8, 2011 - 1:27 pm | Permalink

      @buckle: Lustiger said that in the early 1980s, I’m not sure how linear the deterioration of the situation is, but I guess things might actually have been better back then. I know some catholic bishops who wouldn’t say this outright even now, so it’s clear that Lustiger was part of the left-wing of the Church. Even Benedict stated recently, that according to Luke, the Jews were caught up in a kind of mass-psychosis, which caused them to demand Jesus’ death. Now this is a kind of philo-Semitic explanation, which I don’t like that much, but it’s fine. However, Lustiger said that according to Luke, the people stayed silent. That’s not true. Luke explicitly mentions, that the people were more than complicit.

      The problem is, it’s possible Lustiger, or this other guy (how profane it is to compare the Church to the UN!), or any other Jewish convert is a genuine convert. But on average they will drift upwards in the hierarchy, will tend to defend tribal interests inside it, and will tend to be more reform-minded than others. It doesn’t really matter if they do it consciously or subconsciously. I would tend to think the latter.

      On the other hand, I agree that in principle there’s nothing wrong with an Israeli converting to Catholicism and still staying a loyal Israeli citizen. I also agree it’s not proven there’s anything wrong with him. And yet the phenomenon does exist, of Jews converting to (Catholicism, conservatism, you name it), and then ethnic networking and changing the character of the community from the inside.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 8, 2011 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

      @Gabor – thanks for your response. No, things were not better then as in the 1980’s – they were worse. The left right paradigm doesn’t really work in the Catholic Church. Lustiger is not a biblical scholar but he could read New Testament Greek, Hebrew, Latin in addition to speaking a shed load of languages including English, German, Polish, French, Italian and Spanish. Trying to expose him as a cypto jew is one thing but to question his intellectual grasp of theology and the New Testament strikes me as problematic. I for one would be reluctant to take him on in that area if he were alive today.

      My experience of him was that he was very warm and kind. His genuine and child-like awe at the papal conclave was charming. He further challenged liberal journalists who questioned BXVI’s suitability as pope.

      Many years previously I heard him speak movingly of offering the last rites to an old woman who sold papers on the street corner in his working class Parisian parish. His eyes would light up say when speaking of her: “She had a death …”

      Generally JPII did not appoint “liberals” or “reformers” to the conclave. That might expalin why they elected BXVI in under 36 hours. According to Julian Assange even the Americans were astonised at the choice. It was pretty obvious to me that the retired “Jew” voted for the Bavarian.

      Now let’s move on to Edith Stein.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 9, 2011 - 5:30 am | Permalink

      @buckle: OK, I’m out of my depth here, having relied on what other people wrote or explained to me. You could very well be right.

    • Bear's Gravatar Bear
      June 9, 2011 - 9:37 pm | Permalink

      “My point is, you have to have people who identify as Jews some way out.” I think this is an extremely important point. Not all other ethnies and races are malevolent towards Whites and White nationalism and many are quite postive (I have no desire to see Whites assimilate the Japanese for instance). We need to encourage that situation. We do need to give those jews who are not captured by their history and who are of goodwill some way of accomondation, if we don’t we mearly fertilise the cultivation of resentments that bind jews into action against us. The fear of course is the co-option of our institutions (eg the neoconservative movement in the Republican party and the (hopefull temporary) loss of academic commanding heights.

      Perhaps ‘gentiles’ need to start infiltrating Jewish organisations: attack is the best defense.

  88. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    June 7, 2011 - 9:26 pm | Permalink

    KM: (Jaeger is so upfront about identifying as a Jew that perhaps calling him a crypto-Jew is inaccurate. Making statements like Jaeger’s could only have been a death wish during the period of the Inquisition.)

    Jaeger could be a conscious traitor or he might sincerely believe in the philo-semitic Modernist heresy that become prevalent in the Church since at least the 1960’s.

    KM: Whatever the past successes of the Church in defense of our people, the appointment of a strongly identified Jew to a position in the Church hierarchy is certainly a bad sign indeed of the state of Catholicism in the contemporary world.

    The Church has repeatedly appeared crushed under widely accepted heresies instigated by Jews. For 2000 years, the Church always eventually rebounded to counterattack the Jews and restore a large portion of Christian society. Old fashioned inquisitional suppression of Judeo-Masonic (and homosexual) Church infiltrators is the most direct route to restoration of White society.

  89. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    June 7, 2011 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    Judaism 101

    Judaism teaches Jews to worship above all else, not God, but the Jewish people themselves. That’s why 90% of Jews are atheists and still remain being Jews. Get this into your thick skulls!! Judaism is not a Religion.. It’s a crime syndicate-sect! In twisted Jewish minds, Jews are walking Gods on this earth and all non-Jews, if they should be so lucky and be allowed to live, are here to serve them…. hence, the “Chosen People.” Some Jews believe that they were chosen by God to organize societies across the globe and rule over them.. the rest of the Judaics (the atheists), don’t necessarily believe that this was God’s doing, but don’t mind indulging and taking advantage of this position for their benefit nonetheless.. This explains the idiotic, racist boasting by a Jews claiming that all the best doctors, lawyers, accountants are Jews.. not because Jews are smarter than every other being on this planet.. this is because Jewish Freemasonry is in play.. So let Jews chew on this for a minute! There is a large numbers of Whites that know what’s up!!! It’s time to design strategies to reverse the tide and the ultimate goal of removing Jews from position of power.. If we succeed in removing Jews out of our lives all other things will fall into place.. Ron Paul and the Tea Party is a good start! We need to get around that movement and back every REAL Tea party candidate there is..

    • Northern Light's Gravatar Northern Light
      June 12, 2011 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

      Alll the Tea Party people I see and unfortunaltely met are typical neoconservatives.The love Churchill and WW2,hate any collective action to save the White race,and LOVE Britain(Rothchild)and above all HOLY ISREAL as our dear ally.The keep there eyes glued to FIXED NEWS,and that hateful fat pig Limbaugh(Puppit of WESTSTAR NEWS JEWS,and those swines Hannity and Savage.Conservatives are the enemy today.The Jew Left/right polarity is and always was a fraud.That system is what Adolf Hitler brilliantly overcame in Germany,along with his allies in othercountries.Thats what th Jews had to break in WW2.Thats why so many arre fooled by Christanity.Its a disuniter and a copoter, to inpower the Jew.

  90. Mike's Gravatar Mike
    June 7, 2011 - 8:10 pm | Permalink

    Jean-Marie Lustiger (1926-2007), born to Polish Jews, rose to become a French cardinal and an adviser to Pope John Paul II. His cousin, Arno Lustiger, is famous for his resistance to the efforts to demystify the Holocaust.

    The possible existence of modern crypto-Jews seems well worth a closer look.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 8, 2011 - 1:23 am | Permalink

      I saw no evidence of Jean-Marie’s insincerity – it seemed a standard conversion. His behaviour was one of a typical post-Vatican II bishop. One memory I have of him was of an interview after the papal conclave in 2005 shortly before his death. He was awestruck by the experience and spoke very warmly and even with humor of Benedict XVI which not many were doing at the time.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 8, 2011 - 4:15 am | Permalink

      buckle: Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the great Catholic Traditionalist and founder of the SSPX (Society of Saint Pius X), actively opposed Lustiger’s appointment, but Lefebvre subsequently got along relatively well with him. Lustiger, though no friend of Tradition, was far less hostile to it than were many other French bishops, including his successor in the Paris see, Cardinal Vingt-Trois.

      Nonetheless, it is clear that Cardinal Lustiger was a Judaizer through and through. At the Maurice Pinay blog, one can assemble what I like to think of as a rap sheet of His Eminence’s offenses against the Faith. It makes for depressing but salutary reading.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 8, 2011 - 5:05 am | Permalink

      Pierre ~ “His behaviour was one of a typical post-Vatican II bishop” as I pointed out.

      I haven’t read the rap sheet but I imagine the same charges could be levelled at any bishop from the era. Lefebrve opposed every appointment.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 8, 2011 - 5:04 pm | Permalink

      With respect, buckle, it is not helpful to generalize about or simplify things that do not profit from generalization or simplification, even when one is doing so with the best will in the world. Lustiger and Lefebvre are two such things. Yes, postconciliar Catholicism may justly be (and has been) called a weed planted to strangle the wheat of the Faith, but the central problem with the simple weed is the complexity of its root structure.

      Likewise, the “typicality” of post-Vatican II bishops is different now from what it was in 1975, and it is different now, and was in 1975, in, say, France (which once proudly called itself the eldest daughter of the Church) and the United States (where schismatic and Americanist tendencies can without much difficulty be traced all the way back to Bishop John Carroll [think the sower and the seed parable, either the rocky ground or the thorn part; take your pick]). Least of all is Marcel Lefebvre simplifiable, except in his cleaving to the Faith handed down to him from his predecessors going back to the Twelve.

      Anent Lefebvre and indeed any other aspect of the postconciliar rot (including Judaizers and dubious conversos), once can do no better than start with the truly vast body of resources available on the several SSPX websites, especially SSPX Asia, which has posted online almost a hundred learned articles from the English edition ofSi Si No No. There is also the website, which has many, many articles of a more journalistic nature on conciliar church atrocities, whether old, new, or ongoing, from the orthodox Traditional perspective.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 8, 2011 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

      Pierre – we are heading off in several different tangents here. I am a keen apologist for tradition and want the pre-55 liturgy restored which is what B16 has effectively done. Archbishop L signed up to all documents of the Second Vatican Council but I guess the liturgical changes were the final straw. My fervent wish is that the SSPX can reach an agreement. There are many reasons why the Archbishop might have objected to Lustiger’s appointment but I find it difficult to believe he did so because of the latter’s Jewish background. In my view Lefebvre, whose father like Lustiger’s mother died in concentration camps, was a greater man than that.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 9, 2011 - 4:01 am | Permalink

      I am happy, indeed gratified, to meet and interact with a fellow Trad, buckle. I ask your forgiveness for my addressing you as if you were someone largely ignorant of the Faith.

      I certainly agree about the restoration of the pre-Bugnini liturgy, but we must agree to disagree about the accomplishments and goals of the present Holy Father, who, I believe, is not on Tradition’s side (though I did rejoice at his election). I, too, pray to see a reconciliation between the SSPX and Rome, but frankly, I would have it happen only on the society’s terms, which are those of the Church’s immemorial teaching, since I see little evidence of the Faith anywhere in the conciliar Vatican. As Msgr. Lefebvre said and wrote, Rome must be converted.

      You are quite right that Lefebvre opposed Lustiger on grounds other than the latter’s Jewishness, but Lefebvre rather sharply mentions Lustiger several times in An Open Letter to Confused Catholics with regard to incidents in which the latter speaks and acts in the manner of a conciliarist, not of a Traditional Catholic. Of course, the cardinal is by no means the only object of Lefebvre’s reproofs.

      You are also completely correct in saying that Lefebvre signed all the Vatican II documents, though in later years he mistakenly asserted and believed that he hadn’t signed Dignitatis Humanae and Gaudium et Spes. Since checking the record would have been a simple matter for friend or foe alike, for Lefebvre to lie about what he had or hadn’t signed would have been self-defeating, to say the very least. He seems just to have misremembered.

      As for the other conciliar documents, he afterwards repeatedly said (as, e.g., Bishop Tissier de Mallerais reports in his biography of ML), “I signed the others out of respect for the Holy Father.” He was clearly not alone in acting thus (cf. the famed Ottaviani Intervention), though sad to say he was virtually so in later acting upon the realization that the grave danger to the Church and to the Faith required that a choice be made between respect for authority and unswerving loyalty to capital-T Truth. Once it was evident that the aims of Paul VI, Bugnini, and the conciliar revolutionaries were being reified, he of course repudiated the council and all its works. As I am sure you know, however, Lefebvre was never a sedevacantist and expelled from the SSPX any priest or seminarian who adopted that outlook.

      Incidentally, although I stand wholeheartedly with the SSPX and its position, the Mass I attend is a parish TLM, since the state of my health does not permit me to be away from home long enough to get to and from the nearest SSPX mass. I have not, however, attended a Novus Ordo mass in almost eight years, nor do I expect I will ever again.

      Pax tibi, buckle.

    • John Mortl's Gravatar John Mortl
      June 9, 2011 - 5:53 am | Permalink

      If I am not mistaken Lustiger converted back to Judiaism befor he died.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 9, 2011 - 6:24 am | Permalink

      I have no evidence for him converting back, however, I know he thought of himself as a Jew, which makes him an odd choice for the leadership of the French Church – how often does it happen in traditionally Catholic countries that someone from another nationality leads the Church of that country, like a Hungarian Archbishop in Romania?

      Lustiger also supported Israel (contradicting the neutral stance of the Vatican), and a rabbi claimed to have seen him saying a Kaddish prayer in a synagogue after his mother’s death.

      He also supported the view that the Church was complicit in the holocaust by inactivity (which is a questionable view).

      None of these is proof of his insincerity, but all of these could very well mean that (probably subconsciously) he was furthering at least some Jewish ethnic interests.

    • Gabor's Gravatar Gabor
      June 9, 2011 - 6:33 am | Permalink

      Romania is not even a traditionally catholic country, and the majority of her catholics are of Hungarian ethnicity. And yet the Romanian Church is headed by an ethnic Romanian.

      But for some strange reason an ethnic Jew would become head of the French Church.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      June 13, 2011 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

      Buckle – Jews are ALWAYS Jews.

  91. Dan Kurt's Gravatar Dan Kurt
    June 7, 2011 - 7:28 pm | Permalink

    re: “Crypto-Judaism in the Catholic Church”

    What Church? The Roman Catholic Church was taken over by Vatican !!. If one is interested in the topic see HERE

  92. Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
    June 7, 2011 - 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Actually, this phenom is not unusual in my experience. I live in a part of the US where the church is still a prominent social force. There are many ethnic Jews who profess Christianity, going so far as to sport large conspicuous crosses, reading the bible while walking, etc., while appearing to the discerning eye to maintain their Jewish associations and loyalties. For example, they primarily patronize Jewish owned restaurants and places of business. One gets the sneaking suspicion that their behavior is an elaborate ploy to win political influence, possibly to promote Christian Zionism or some other ulterior motive.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 8, 2011 - 12:51 am | Permalink

      @ Gray Prince, 6:23 pm.

      [“Do Jews who publicly profess Christianity have an ulterior motive?”]

      When Jews act publicly in a Gentile society it is ALWAYS with an ulterior motive.

  93. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    June 7, 2011 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Kevin – no less alarming was the state of European theology in the 1950’s in general and German theology in particular after 15 years of denazification. The result was the disastrous Second Vatican Council whose apologists continue to dominate the Vatican and the entire Church.

    It was fascinating to read the autobiography of the British Cardinal Heenan (who was really ethnically Irish) who found himself bafffled by the weird German Jesuits present at the Council in 1962. He wrote of their complete disconnect from reality. One wonders if it crossed his mind that it was not the fault of the Irish that they were bombed to bits so why are you doing this to us? In fact the Irish primeminister even signed the book of condolence of the German embassy in Dublin at the news of Hitler’s death in 1945.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      June 8, 2011 - 9:27 am | Permalink

      I have not been a believer for years, but at least the church has started to recognize its desperate need for reform of the reform (2nd Vatican Council).

  94. standing's Gravatar standing
    June 7, 2011 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

    Is this a surprise? I would’ve thought the Pope’s yarmulke to be a dead giveaway.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      June 8, 2011 - 9:46 am | Permalink

      I’m more concerned about the Roman Catholic crypto Jews in the US Congress. LOL. Particularly the Roman Catholic politicians who consistently vote the Jew agenda in Congress.

      This appointment by the Pope will only make the Roman Catholics in Congress more brazen in their pursuit of an anti-White American agenda. I can just hear some Catholic blowhard saying, “I can fix that for you in Rome. Wink. Wink.”

    • June 15, 2011 - 5:30 am | Permalink

      Freedom from AIPAC’s manipulative control over US foreign policies and its politicians could mean freedom for all. One need only observe an American election to see the time-honored method of furthering an agenda.

  95. Scotsman's Gravatar Scotsman
    June 7, 2011 - 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Dr. MacDonald,

    It is even worse than that. Now there is a Jewish pressure group within the Church, the Association of Hebrew ‘Catholics’. Here’s a zinger from their website:

    “What is the goal of your organization, the Association of Hebrew Catholics?

    Our goal is to preserve the identity and heritage of Israelites within the Catholic Church, through the establishment of a Hebrew Catholic Community juridically approved by the Holy See.”

    Incredible! They want to become ‘Catholics’ while really remaining Jews. This is nearly the same problem the Spanish Church found herself in the 15th century.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      June 8, 2011 - 9:26 am | Permalink

      What would the pope say if the American Catholic hierarchy began campaigning on behalf of American Catholic interests?

      This proves that once someone is a Jew, he is always a Jew first and so can never be fully loyal to any other group. It makes as little sense to put someone “once” jewish in a position of high authority in the church as it does to have someone jewish hold high office in the government of any country other than Israel.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 3:44 pm | Permalink

      The infiltration of the Catholic Cuurch is so outrageous as to defy belief! Corrupt stupidity doesn’t begin to describe those in the Church heirarchy who permitted it.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      June 13, 2011 - 12:15 pm | Permalink

      We need to raise HELL over this.

  96. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    June 7, 2011 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    The hits just keep on coming.

    • Northern Light's Gravatar Northern Light
      June 12, 2011 - 1:47 am | Permalink

      Christianity is now totally in the hands of the Jews. It has become more dangerous to our survival than Bolshevicks ever were.It is hopeless to believe in Christianity today. Leave the church.If you stay your supporting the enemy:The Jew!

    • Henry Ford's Gravatar Henry Ford
      June 15, 2011 - 7:29 am | Permalink

      Yes I agree with you Northern Light I gave up on the church a long time ago.The jews have to control everything ! The jews controlled the Bolsheviks.Their greedy little hands are in every pie.

  97. Mimir's Well's Gravatar Mimir's Well
    June 7, 2011 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

    One can only hope the church is holding to the rule, “keep your friends close and your enemies closer.” Otherwise, wow, just f’ing wow!

    • June 11, 2011 - 4:44 am | Permalink

      Hah! If you think this is shocking, may I suggest…

      The rabbit hole is deep indeed.


    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      June 13, 2011 - 12:15 pm | Permalink

      That’s wishful thinking on your part, M’sW.

    • Northern Light's Gravatar Northern Light
      June 13, 2011 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

      Jews are always Jews but those who cling to Christianity and the Catholic Chuec despite its total capitlation to the Jews should realize that even Lefebre’s group threw out and denounced Bishop Williamnson.The courageous tradionalist and that queer cretin Cardinal Mahoney of LA ordered that Williamson be banned from all of his churches!Personally’theologicaly and politically;Catholics offend me.I attended there schools,and have associates who cling t this. They were and are sick people.Our enemies.Housten Stewert Chamberlain wrote in THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE 19th Century that the Catholics were ‘The Sword And Shield bearers aginst the Aryan world.And he did not only mean Germany,but all of Europe.The Rennaissance Church had some merit,which was just a rising of Neo-Platonist and Stoic thought.And the Churches banning of Usury revived the Middle Ages.But since the Counter-Reformation and much later Vatican 2 they are the enemy of all things great,progress and the beautiful.There organization staffed by fools,loosers in life,mentally ill,and perverted creeps.So appointing a nasty crypto-Jew to the Vatican court angers me,but shouldnt surprise us either.

Comments are closed.