The Jewish Ayatollahs

Jonathan Haidt notes that secular liberals are an anomaly in the non-Western world. Increasingly, this is true of Israel, often touted as “the only democracy in the Middle East.” The reality is that Israel is gravitating to its Middle Eastern Jewish roots, and that means a turn toward religious fanatics gathered around their charismatic rabbis—the guru phenomenon of Jewish social life. A good primer on this is Christiane Amanpour’s God’s Jewish Warriors.

Uri Avnery is an honest Jewish secular liberal, a remnant of the Jews who were influenced by Western thinking and a dwindling minority of Israeli Jews. He is a trenchant observer of the rise of religious fundamentalism in Israeli politics. His latest column, “The Jewish Ayatollahs“) discusses the controversy over recent rabbinic rulings, beginning with pointed examples showing how such things go completely against the grain of contemporary Western culture: “The Archbishop of New York announces that any Catholic who rents out an apartment to a Jew commits a mortal sin and runs the risk of excommunication.” But in Israel, “The rabbi of Safed, a government employee, has decreed that it is strictly forbidden to let apartments to Arabs— including the Arab students at the local medical school. Twenty other town rabbis—whose salaries are paid by the taxpayers, mostly secular, including Arab citizens—have publicly supported this edict.”


The latest controversy is about a book by Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, “perhaps, the most extreme inhabitant of Yitzhar, which is perhaps the most extreme settlement in the West Bank. Its members are frequently accused of carrying out pogroms in the nearby Palestinian villages, generally in “retaliation” for army actions against structures that have been built without official consent.” The book advocates the killing of non-Jews in time of war, and, since Israel is constantly at war, that means it’s okay to kill non-Jews, even if they are not threatening Jews and have no responsibility for the situation.

It’s interesting that the book reiterates the idea, central to Jewish ethics, that prohibition against killing in the Ten Commandments applies only to Jews. The moral universalism so central to Western ethics is completely missing here. (Indeed, some Orthodox rabbis distanced themselves from the book, not for any principled reasons, but “if only on the ground that it violated the religious rule that forbids ‘provoking the Goyim’”.)

Righteous non-Jews who behave according to the Noachide laws, thus have some moral value, but they are not morally equivalent to Jews. Being a righteous non-Jew gives no protection if Jews are at war. Avnery suggests that this was the implicit logic in Operation Cast Lead in Gaza when “to protect the life of a single Israeli soldier, it is permissible to kill as many Palestinians as necessary. The result: some 1300 dead Palestinians, half of them non-combatants, as against five soldiers killed by hostile action.”

The ruling applies to all non-Jews, including children if there is a possibility that they could be a threat to Jews when they grow up.

Shapira’s book was endorsed by four leading rabbis, including Rabbi Dov Lior, “the rabbi of Kiryat Arba, the settlement on the fringes of Hebron that cultivates the teachings of Meir Kahane and that produced the mass-murderer Baruch Goldstein.” Lior was questioned by police investigating the possibility that he had violated Israel’s laws against incitement (which resulted in a riot by his followers). Such laws are clearly antithetical to free speech. Interestingly, the Israeli law is being advocated by some as a way to curb the First Amendment free speech rights in the U.S.. The organized Jewish community has vigorously pursued attempts to curb free speech throughout the West.

There is an irony here. In Israel, the action against incitement represents an attempt by a dwindling liberalism to prevent the dominance of an intolerant anti-democratic religious majority:

For Israelis, this is not just an academic question. The entire religious community, with all its diverse factions, now belongs to the rightist, ultra-nationalist camp (except for pitiful little outposts like Reform and Conservative Jewry, who are the majority among American Jews [i.e., these movements are best seen as ways of blending into Diaspora societies by downplaying the aspects of Judaism likely to lead to hostility from non-Jews]. Transforming Israel into a Halakha state means castrating the democratic system and turning Israel into a second Iran governed by Jewish ayatollahs.

Tell that to Michele Bachmann and the rest of the American political class (see also this comment by Observerx on the recent blog on Bachmann). And also notify them that the rising political class in Israel intends to be at war far into the future:

It will also make peace impossible for all time, since according to the rabbis all of the Holy Land between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River belongs solely to the Jews, and giving the Goyim even an inch of it is a mortal sin, punishable by death. For this sin, Yitzhak Rabin was executed by the student of a religious university, a former settler.

Actually, not a few of these rabbis take seriously God’s pledge to Abraham in Genesis promising all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates to Israel—a point made by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky in their Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. It’s no wonder that Pres. Obama’s suggestion of land swaps for a peace deal was so anathema to the Israeli right. The following quote references God’s promise to Israel in the context of a discussion of an earlier rabbinical ruling on the permissibility of killing non-Jews:

Many Jews, especially religious Jews today in Israel and their supporters abroad, continue to adhere to traditional Jewish ethics that other Jews would like to ignore or explain away. For example, Rabbi Yitzhak Ginzburg of Joseph’s Tomb in Nablus/Shechem, after several of his students were remanded on suspicion of murdering a teenage Arab girl: “Jewish blood is not the same as the blood of a goy.” Rabbi Ido Elba: “According to the Torah, we are in a situation of pikuah nefesh (saving a life) in time of war, and in such a situation one may kill any Gentile.” Rabbi Yisrael Ariel writes in 1982 that “Beirut is part of the Land of Israel. [This is a reference to the boundaries of Israel as stated in the Covenant between God and Abraham in Genesis 15: 18–20 and Joshua 1 3–4; Genesis 15:18: On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates] . . . our leaders should have entered Lebanon and Beirut without hesitation, and killed every single one of them. Not a memory should have remained.” It is usually yeshiva students who chant “Death to the Arabs” on CNN. The stealing and corruption by religious leaders that has recently been documented in trials in Israel and abroad continues to raise the question of the relationship between Judaism and ethics. (Adelman, T. Z.1999. Jewish ethics: Are they ethical? Are they Jewish?  The Jewish Agency for Israel, Department for Jewish Zionist Education, August 22.; quoted here, pp. 9-10)

Avnery concludes ominously:

Not the whole religious camp subscribes to the unrelenting extremism of Rabbi Lior and his ilk. There are many other trends. But all of these keep quiet. It is Lior, the rabbi who Possesses the Light, and his like-minded colleagues, who chart the course.

And, since those who are charting the course are the ones having the children, these trends will become far more pronounced in the future than they are now.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

86 Comments to "The Jewish Ayatollahs"

  1. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    July 17, 2011 - 8:04 am | Permalink

    Occupation of Palestine was meant to provide a safe heaven for the Jewish mafia leaders who if caught in crimes (9/11, 7/7, etc.) or bringing financial banruptcy can either escape to Israel unharmed or protected by western governments on behalf of Israel (Russia, Greece, Ukraine, Poland, etc.).

    The Americans Jeffrey Sachs, Andrei Schleifer, Robert Rubin, Larry Summers and the Russians Yegor Gaidar, Anatoly Chubais who played a major part in introducing capitalism in the USSR were all Jewish.

  2. Baltasar Nordstrom's Gravatar Baltasar Nordstrom
    July 16, 2011 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    “The reality is that Israel is gravitating to its Middle Eastern Jewish roots, and that means a turn toward religious fanatics gathered around their charismatic rabbis—the guru phenomenon of Jewish social life.”

    I have also felt that religious or secularized religious fanaticism is at the root of many Jewish phenomena after years of trying to understand why many Jews are the way they are. Obviously religious fanaticism runs an enormous risk of being wrong, harmful, and irrational simply because it is based on a radically blind belief. Aside from that, I think we should be careful about using the term “guru” in the negative sense it is intended. One could argue that Jesus and Buddha were also gurus but brought a lot of good into the world. Further, using this term creates a false assocation between the culture of India, where the term comes from, and Israel and the Jews. I do not think this association is warranted since, from what I understand, the spiritual tendencies in India are diametrically opposed to the materialist, immoral, and groupist tendencies in Jewish culture. Fanatic rabbis are more akin to bigots or demagogues than gurus with demonstrated spiritual abilities like Jesus or Buddha etc. IMO. Let us not insult the cultures of Asia because we have a problem with a Middle Eastern culture in the West.

  3. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    July 14, 2011 - 8:16 am | Permalink

    The so-called “God’s pledge to Abraham in Genesis promising all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates to Israel” is as much forgery as the so-called “Six Million Died” which has become the new Jewish religion. The said statement is a part of commentary added by Rev. Scofield who was paid handsomely by the Jews and Oxford Press for further corrupting Christian Bible to serve Jewish causes. Pope Benedict XVI is the latest incarnation of Scofield.

    Joe Ortiz in his book The End Times Passover says that Bible (Genesis 12:1-7) doesn’t speak solely in the Middle East, the Jews have believed to be promised to Abraham (not a Jew) and his next generations and is now occupied by European Jews as Israel.

    According to the author – “the true Promised Land is not the present-day Israel – but soon to-descend Holy City of God, New Jerusalem! They (Jews and Evangelists) fail to see that the true Promised Land is not a parcel of land in the Middle East, but the city from above, the one true faith-believing descendents of Abraham were looking forward to (Hebrews 11:10,16; 12:22; 13:14). They were not looking forward to resurrection unto life to dwell in earthly old Jerusalem. The patriarchs were looking forward to a spirit-infused resurrection from the grave to dwell inside New Jerusalem, the headquarters for the heavenly kingdom of God, which will dwell on earth for eternity.”

    These pro-Israel Christians should also study and try to understand Ezekiel 37 prophecies of “two sticks” and “valley of dry bones” – which were fulfilled on the Crucification of Christ at the hands of Jews – and not in 1948.

  4. iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
    July 13, 2011 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

    Professor, there’s this line in your book CofC that must give Jews sleepless nights, or maybe their self-deception allows them to ignore the obvious:

    “Mr. Arnold White tells the Russians that, if they would let Jewish intelligence have free course, Jews would soon fill all high employments and places of power to the exclusion of the natives, who now hold them. Russians are bidden to acquiesce and rather to rejoice in this by philosophers, who would perhaps not relish the cup if it were commended to their own lips. The law of evolution, it is said, prescribes the survival of the fittest. To which the Russian boor may reply, that if his force beats the fine intelligence of the Jew the fittest will survive and the law of evolution will be fulfilled. It was force rather than fine intelligence which decided on the field of Zama that the Latin, not the Semite, should rule the ancient and mould the modern world.”

    I wonder what the founding fathers would make of all this? I’m sure they would have taking up arms long before now. King George didn’t even want to displace WAmericans he only wanted to steal their profits and that was enough to stir them to action. It’s so strange what’s happened in the States It took me a while to fully understand. But your book answered all my questions. I read it last year when I first became aware of Jewish Interference but it was all Greek to me. But I read it properly over the last few days and I understand everything much better now. What a great book.

    Anyway, back to the force over IQ: If they want my nation then they had better be ready to fight for it.

  5. Jonathan's Gravatar Jonathan
    July 12, 2011 - 12:58 am | Permalink

    I’m not so sure about this one, isn’t Tel one of the most homosexual-friendly cities in the world? The very liberal western Jews may have a lower birthrate than the mideastern ones but they will always be wealthier i would guess.

  6. iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
    July 11, 2011 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

    “The moral universalism so central to Western ethics is completely missing here.”

    Not just here, Professor, but in most things they do. They preach multiculturalism, mass immigration and race mixing for we Aryans, and at the same time, they fanatically support Jewish group cohesion and a non-race mixing, Jewish only state. Hypocracy just isn’t a good enough word to describe these people

  7. Jim Bowie's Gravatar Jim Bowie
    July 9, 2011 - 1:09 am | Permalink

    Ahhh the fightng among the various groups in the Middle East. They are at war now … they will be at war 100 years from now … and 500 years from now. Probably the best thing for them would be to have White Europeans and White Americans reassert control over the region in a serious manner – Jews, Arabs, Iranians – they’d all be better off because they are not ready to rule themselves.

    But I couldn’t recommend White rule for the region just yet. Until we reinvigorate ourselves as Whites and recapture our belief in the supremacy of Western Civilization, it won’t work. Pity for the region, they need someone to run it for them.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 11, 2011 - 9:35 pm | Permalink

      Aha, aha…The fighting in the Middle East began mostly when the Jews provided funds to the western colonialists to occupy entire Middle East with the exception of Iran and break it into small tribal and ethnic nation-states to prepare the groundwork to expel their unwanted Jewish population.

      In the US, the Jews too have been planting fighting among Whites, Blacks, Hispanos and various Christian groups. Jews even funded KKK, too.

  8. Carmen's Gravatar Carmen
    July 8, 2011 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Look, a jew is a jew. It does not matter whether religion so called is involved. They cannot change their nature.

  9. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 7, 2011 - 11:56 pm | Permalink

    @Chris Moore

    You have put forward what appears to be the makings of an interesting theory, which I have excerpted below. I would like to understand it better. If you can spare some time and a few more sentences, would it be possible to elaborate on the factual premises and the causal dynamic you sort of allude to? I also had some diificulty with the terminology (what is “fascism”?), but if I had to choose, I’d really like to see you expand on the factual building blocks (more detail) and the causal mechanism (more explanation). If you can take it all on, great.

    And its tribalism (aka nationalism, which, as Jewry practices it, morphs quickly into fascism) transcends all Jewish secular politics, from Left to Right. Right-wing Jews of course are Zionists, but so are left-wing Jews, because most of them insist on keeping their Jewish identity, which due to the innate fascist character of Judaism, quickly puts them on the trajectory towards totalitarianism (ie the Jewish Bolsheviks) because it’s impossible for them to maintain their inevitably fascist clique without employing a totalitarian state to impose double standards that allow them to be their (fascist) selves while imposing left-wing universalism on others.

    • July 9, 2011 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

      What is fascism, irrespective of what we’re trained to think of when we hear the word “fascism” (“Political philosophy that became predominant in Italy and then Germany during the 1920s and 1930s…”)

      Here are some other definitions that pop of from a Google search:
      –“a political theory advocating an authoritarian hierarchical government (as opposed to democracy or liberalism)”

      –“a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology.”

      –“A political regime, having totalitarian aspirations, ideologically based on centralized government, government control of business, repression of criticism or opposition, a leader cult and exalting the state and/or religion above individual rights.”

      — “A political philosophy that advocates governance by a dictator, assisted by a hierarchically organized, strongly ideological party, in maintaining a totalitarian and regimented society through violence, intimidation, and the arbitrary use of power.”

      –“A social and political ideology with the primary guiding principle that the state or nation is the highest priority, rather than personal or individual freedoms.”

      So if you think of organized Jewry as a cohesive, racist nation moving in rough unison through space and time (which clearly it is), add in the ancient religious spiritual or mythological component and its essentially racialist, ongoing group-supremacist doctrine from the Old Testament through the Talmud, add in the Jewish belief of a coming Jewish messiah (dictator) that will rule the world from Jerusalem (which many now believe won’t be an individual at all but rather the Jewish collective), add in the clear authoritarian/totalitarian pattern (Jewish Bolshevism, Jewish Zionism, Jewish neoliberalism/neoconservatism), add in a belligerent militancy and compulsion for control, and a “faith” in perpetual war, add in a modus-operandi of essentially enslaving non-Jews to funnel money to organized Jewry and fight wars for organized Jewry using a powerful state controlled by organized Jewry as its mechanism (again, in both the Jewish Bolshevik and Jewish neolib-neocon formulations, including the diaspora “Israel lobby” and Jewish syndicate (Zionist) networks that advance both the Israeli interest and and ideological neoliberalism/neoconservatism, as well as indivudial “Chsenites”)…

      …doesn’t all of that make Judaism the original and oldest fascist ideology, the mold for all other fascism, even before the word was invented? Doesn’t that explain why Jewry has been perpetually “persecuted” in the same way that all other fascist or totalitarian formulations, or individuals with these noxious characteristics, have been “persecuted”?

      Only an utterly self-absorbed group or individual that has no compassion, empathy or sensitivity to other perspectives, so in love with itself and seeing itself as so supreme that it can’t fathom why other’s don’t see it that way as well (essentially, a sociopath or psychopath personality) could declare itself “persecuted” under such conditions.

      But that’s organized Jewry in a nutshell.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      July 9, 2011 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

      @Chris Moore: Judaism isn’t a religion. It’s a cult.

    • Jim Bowie's Gravatar Jim Bowie
      July 11, 2011 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

      Chris, a quick question. You said earlier that you were not a racialist, but here you are attributing a lot of traits to Jews that would almost have to be inborn (sociopathy is not learned, as far as I understand). You are also stating that they act in a consistent manner across space and time, again a sign of inborn personality traits. Doesn’t this give support to the idea that there are differences between groups – genetic differences? They may be subtle, but they seem to be there. Not every last member of the group acts the same way, but there are noticable traits we can count on.

  10. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 7, 2011 - 6:32 pm | Permalink

    @Chris Moore

    I want to state that I am one who believes that people of Jewish descent can be brought on board. Your qualified references to “Zionist Jews” indicate that you may believe that as well.

    If you don’t then let’s recognize there are differing views. I don’t think I am alone in my view in this forum. Several peoplle were receptive to my observations in the Secular Liberalism thread that Jewish Americans are subject to a massive scare campaign in the United States to coerce them into a tribal mindset that is fearful and distrusting of “non-Jews.”

    There are significant environmental factors in play–and even despite them, many Jews do assimilate. Thus, I would disagree with a position that Jews are necessarily at odds with others.

    • July 7, 2011 - 8:57 pm | Permalink

      I’m not a hard racialist, so I wouldn’t go so far as to say ALL Jews can never be assimilated. But I would say that the more tribal or clannish any given culture, the less likely it is to be successfully assimilated into the Western ethic.

      And the problem with Jewry is that it is the most intricately and complexly tribalistic of them all. And its tribalism (aka nationalism, which, as Jewry practices it, morphs quickly into fascism) transcends all Jewish secular politics, from Left to Right. Right-wing Jews of course are Zionists, but so are left-wing Jews, because most of them insist on keeping their Jewish identity, which due to the innate fascist character of Judaism, quickly puts them on the trajectory towards totalitarianism (ie the Jewish Bolsheviks) because it’s impossible for them to maintain their inevitably fascist clique without employing a totalitarian state to impose double standards that allow them to be their (fascist) selves while imposing left-wing universalism on others.

      But I also believe in free will, which means I believe everyone comes to a conscious point probably fairly early in their lives when they have a choice as to which direction they choose to go — and this applies to everyone, including the most indoctrinated Jew.

      Some choose right, most choose wrong, but it’s all under their control. It’s not like they’re too dumb to figure out right from wrong. But probably the most sentient aspect of organized Jewry is that it thinks it can have it all ways; it thinks it can finesse anything and everything.

      It can’t.

  11. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 7, 2011 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks

    Your grandstanding is getting old. Please enlighten us by divulging the basis of your claim that the Iranian leadership is “nuts.”

    Did Canadians Charles Krauthammer or David Frum say it was so? Did you hear it on Fox News? Or perhaps you read it in a journal like the New Republic or Commentary?

  12. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 7, 2011 - 1:48 pm | Permalink

    It is still astounding that a site like TOO, which is explicitly devoted to White Interests, Identity and Culture, attract so many posters who couldn’t care less about any of those things or about helping White people in general. I suspect we’ll reach a tipping point soon, when the pro-White posts outmatch the other posts by a wide margin.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 7, 2011 - 2:09 pm | Permalink

      Jason Speaks – Khazarian Jews are not White. They’re recognized by their pointed noses. Could you check yours in a mirror …… ha, ha, ha…..

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      July 7, 2011 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

      Yes, like I said, it is amazing that a site devoted to the interests of White Folks, gets so many people who want to talk about anything except that topic.

    • July 7, 2011 - 4:57 pm | Permalink

      @ JS,

      Do you object to MacDonald’s many posts about what’s going on in Israel, which by your standards has nothing to do with “the interests of White Folks”?

      In your view, how might documenting the fascism of Zionist Jewry in Israel be in the interests of White folks?

      Maybe I’m reading you wrong, but you seem to believe that Zionist Jewry can be assimilated into Western civilization, and “brought on board.” Do you?

      If so, you’re probably the one who doesn’t belong here, as MacDonald et al clearly do NOT believe this.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      July 13, 2011 - 8:01 pm | Permalink

      Chris, no I wasn’t talking about the articles on Israel, I was actually talking about some of the posters that talk about almost anything but White issues. You may have me confused with someone else, I didn’t say anything about Zionists.

      I don’t really understand why anyone who is not pro-White or concerned with the racial and ethnic dimension of Western Civilization would be posting here. It is a bit of a downer that even on a site devoted to White Culture, we get so many posts that talk about anything BUT that.

  13. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 7, 2011 - 12:42 pm | Permalink

    @Mark Hess

    I believe that patriotic Americans are going to need to confront these and other unpleasant facts about their behavior in order for us to extricate ourselves from this ruinous foreign policy predicament and take steps to rescue the country. (Addressing the ongoing immigration disaster is a separate challenge.)

    These facts, like the antecedents to the 9/11 raids and the Fort Hood shootings, are unpleasant because they threaten our self-image as the good guys. Nonetheless, it is a reassessment that must be done. We can then acknowledge our mistakes, change our behavior, and reclaim the moral high ground.

  14. July 7, 2011 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Kevin M should really listen to the audio recording of George Lincoln Rockwell’s 1965 speech at his alma-mater Brown University. He covers it all and has the Whites cheering and the Jewish War Veterans screeching.
    Among other gems he notes how the Arabs used to be our best friends until US policy for Israel drove the Arabs into the Soviet camp. The speech is available online free of charge.

  15. July 7, 2011 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    Jewish supremacist fanatics in Israel incite all manner of hatred against non-Jews, and are actually in the process of institutionalising their discrimination, all of which is de facto endorsed by the Jewish establishment there, yet in America, the free speech of condemning organized Jewry for its viscous Zionism and fascism is increasingly being castigated as “hate speech” as a consequence of lobbying by Jewish liberal fascist groups like the ADL.

    This is outrageous and simply untenable. The more glaring the double-standards become, the quicker the hopelessly corrupt, Zionist-occupied American establishment and its useful idiot liberal fascist and Judaized Christian Zionist facilitators across the U.S. will thankfully fall.

    These people and their supporters are a curse unto America.

  16. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 7, 2011 - 10:07 am | Permalink

    Rehmat is correct. Iran hasn’t invaded another country in over 100 years (I think the actual period may be much longer, something mind boggling like 500 or 2000 years).

    Jason Speaks, if he has any actual reasons for his claim that the Iranians are “nuts” beyond received wisdom from the Zionist media (“mad mullahs” blah blah blah), will probably hyperventilate about the hostage crisis 30 years ago. Well, that was conceived as a protest against US intervention in Iran: our CIA had engineered a coup to topple their democratically elected president (see Mossadeq for further reading) and the country was suffering under the dictator we imposed on them, the Shah. The US Embassy was basically being used as a command center for us to control their country.

    • Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
      July 7, 2011 - 11:32 am | Permalink


      Thank you for these comments, as well. Many of us should be reminded that Mossadeq was explicitly pro-West, and that his beliefs that more of that oil wealth should actually benefit the people of Iran were entirely reasonable. Of course, that man was presented as a ruthless ‘dictator,’ ‘communist’ and ‘Nazi.’

      If the British had been just a little less greedy, and if the US had declined their requests for help in toppling Mossadeq, I am sure the that world would be a bit more sane today, and that a far smaller percentage of Muslims would be adhering to aspects of their religion that are so blatantly

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 7, 2011 - 2:07 pm | Permalink

      Well, If Israelis can shoot to death western pro-Israeli activists in occupied Palestine – Iranian youth had every reason to occupy US embassy and keep the 52 foreign spies under house arrest.

      However, Washington did succeed in rescuing some of those spies via our Canadian Ambassador in Tehran, Kenneth Taylor, who had admitted to be CIA operation chief in Iran. Earlier, American failed to rescue them via military invasion loosing their nine slodiers without Iranian authorities even knowing the operation.

  17. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 7, 2011 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    Mark Hess asks:

    Did the US have serious enemies in the Middle East before Truman recognized the state of Israel?

    The answer is no, it did not. The fact is that the United States was once admired in the Muslim Middle East for its egalitarianism, which had an affinity with some Islamic principles. Then the Zionists came along at the start of the 20th Century (many people don’t realize that Zionism was going strong 50 years before WWII) and upset the cart. Patriots in the State Department repeatedly warned US Presidents, from Wilson to Truman, that backing the Jewish expropriation of Palestine was not in America’s interests and would create enemies across the Middle East. But the behind-the-scenes ethnic lobbying in the end proved too strong for the politicians to resist.

    • Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
      July 7, 2011 - 10:21 am | Permalink


      Thanks you for your response. I was very well aware of those things, and I believe that everyone should be. That is why I wrote those questions in response to “Mr. Track,” whose comments were upsetting my stomach.

  18. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    July 7, 2011 - 8:35 am | Permalink


    Very good point and a scary point. They may find themselves with a large White population in America glaring at them and a large Arab population glaring at them in Israel, all at the same time.

    Thats hoody hoo for you.

    Interesting this eye for a thousand eye and a tooth for a thousand tooth is mentioned in the Koran. The story of Cain and Abel.

    Koran – 5.32. On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.

    The Talmudic spin apparently left that tradition for Israelites only. Hence, who kills an Israelites it is as if he killed the whole world. So a Jewish blood is worth all of mankind.
    Michael Hoffman in his “Truth about the Talmud” speaks on this tradition:

    “The Talmud (i.e., the Babylonian Talmud) text of Sanhedrin 37a restricts the duty to save life to saving only Jewish lives.

    The book on Hebrew censorship, written by Jews themselves (Hesronot Ha-shas), notes that some Talmud texts use the universalist phrase:

    “Whoever destroys the life of a single human being…it is as if he had destroyed an entire world; and whoever preserves the life of a single human being …it is as if he had preserved an entire world.”

    However, Hesronot Ha-shas points out that these are not the authentic words of the original Talmud.

    In other words, the preceding universalist rendering is not the authentic text of the Talmud and thus, for example, this universalist version which Steven Spielberg in his famous movie, Schindler’s List attributed to the Talmud (and which became the motto of the movie on posters and in advertisements), is a hoax and constitutes propaganda intended to give a humanistic gloss to a Talmud which is, in its essence, racist and chauvinist hate literature.

    In the authentic, original Talmud text it states that “whoever preserves a single soul of Israel, it is as if he had preserved an entire world” (emphasis supplied). The authentic Talmud text sanctions only the saving of Jewish lives. ”

    So Stephen Spielberg gave us actually a KORANIC version of that tradition, not Judaic.

  19. HSC's Gravatar HSC
    July 7, 2011 - 7:36 am | Permalink

    Actually, one of the key vulnerabilities of jews is often overlooked in modern discussions: their propensity to huddle together in ethnic communities. If you consider New York, Israel, North-West Los Angeles and Philadelphia you have covered approx. 90% of the world Jewish population. By my calculations, three or four 5 megaton thermonuclear warheads would be sufficient to completely wipe out the current population of Israel. Another three would deal with New York and its suburbs, and just one would be sufficient for North-West LA. This would make the actions of the Third Reich look like an irritation by comparison.

    If I was a jew I would be very concerned about Arab or Persian states acquiring nuclear capability. It is, admittedly a bit of a step to go from simple fission devices to thermonuclear (fusion) weapons, but espionage being what it is, quite achievable I would think, especially seeing as the technology is over fifty years old.

    Although it’s impossible to be sure, jews probably lost about a third of their global population in WWII. They could easily lose 90% under the above scenario. And it could happen overnight. This, along with the fact that they are tiny minorities in their host countries but major players in the elites of those same countries renders them uniquely vulnerable. And any retaliation they might mount would be a mere pinprick, population wise.

    They are by no means unstoppable.

    • Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
      July 7, 2011 - 10:31 pm | Permalink

      Almost every time I have read or heard something about the actual numbers of Jews in the US, it is advanced that they make up between two and three percent of the population. Does anybody reading this know of other studies that indicate a higher percentage?

      I ask because, even in areas that are far away from cities, and that would never be considered ‘cosmopolitan,’ I see enough Jews to suggest that their population is much larger.

  20. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 6, 2011 - 11:54 pm | Permalink

    Christians are being driven out of Iraq.

    After Christians invaded Iraq.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      July 7, 2011 - 9:30 pm | Permalink

      That our invasion of Iraq would destabilize its ancient Christian community and lead to violence against it never seemed to bother Bush or the pseudo-Christian televangelists.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 8, 2011 - 9:49 pm | Permalink

      Christians, in fact, played the part of ‘dog’ in the invasion of Iraq – the master being the Jewish Lobby – and winner, according to Dubya Bush: “It’s goodh for Israel”.

      The 5% Iraqi Christian minority is deep-rooted and very powerful. Their leaders have good relations with both Iraq Sunni and the majority Shia communities. Under Saddam Hussien, there were six Christian cabinet ministers including the Vice-president Tariq Aziz.

      Oliver Miles, former Ambassador to Libya, writing in the Independent on November 22, 2009 – raised the doubts that the presence of two pro-Israeli members on the 5-member Iraq Inquiry would most probably hide the pro-Israel Jewish Lobby’s role in Britain’s joining the invasion of Iraq. The Jewish-owned TIME magazine called Oliver Miles’ comment as “disgraceful”. On January 28, 2010 – BBC was quoted Martin Gilbert, whom it described as a “proud practicing Jew and Zionist” saying he feels “deep unease” at Oliver Miles comments.

  21. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 6, 2011 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

    Just give us your three best pieces of evidence for why you believe the Iranian leadership is “nuts.”

    And your three best reasons for why the Saudi leadership is “nuts.”

    Because your claims happen to advance the Zionist narrative on the Middle East, at the expense of attitudes that may more aligned with American interests, it is important for those espousing such claims in this forum to offer reasons, so that we can evaluate the claims. If you are interested in white advocacy, that is.

    One example of the gravity of your statements: the claim that Iran is nuts is being used to push us toward war with Iran.

    So please tell us what about the leadership of the those countries leafs you to view them as irrational.

  22. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 6, 2011 - 11:15 pm | Permalink
  23. rockingham race track's Gravatar rockingham race track
    July 6, 2011 - 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Thanks and the best I can say is too many Jews have love affair with leftism. It makes them feel better to support the oppressed of the 3rd world. This is totally stupid and against the best interests of Jews who should pay utmost respect to this Christian European founded nation. That has been so good to them. Of course you are correct that a whiter America is “better for the Jews” than a darker America. I much prefer the 90% white America of 1965 to the chaos of today. Many liberal Jews also think this if only subconsciously. Proof is they strive to live in neighborhoods with decent public schools meaning few minorities excepting high income Asians.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      July 7, 2011 - 9:28 pm | Permalink

      I don’t think Jews especially love the left. I think they, in reality, love whatever will undermine the dominant culture of the country in which they happen to be squatting.

      This would explain why they have one distinctly different standard for Israel and another for every other country on earth.

  24. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 6, 2011 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

    @ Jason Speaks

    What evidence supports your claim that the leadership of Iran is “nuts”?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      July 6, 2011 - 11:23 pm | Permalink

      Anon2, If I gave the litany of the last 30 years of Iranian history you would simply explain all away in an disingenuous manner. Your remarks earlier already showed that you will excuse any action taking by Muslims against the West, no matter how horrific. So there is no point in the discussion.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 7, 2011 - 7:29 am | Permalink

      Iranphobia is for the anti-Christ loving idiots.

      Iran has not attacked any of its neighboring countries for the last 100 years while Israel has attacked and occupied some parts of all of its neighboring countries.

      Israel is a parasite entity which has sucked $3000 billion out of American taxpayers since 1970s while Iran has been under four UNSC sanctions for supporting Arab victims of Judeo-fascism.

  25. rockingham race track's Gravatar rockingham race track
    July 6, 2011 - 10:05 pm | Permalink

    The religious Jews of Israel have a very high birthrate so more power to them. For defensive reasons Israel needs as many Jews as it can get. The Muslims never use birth control so the Israeli Jews shouldn’t. Demographics is destiny and you can check out the Muslim invasion of Europe in that respect. Or the Mexican mestizo+ Central American invasion of America. These days you can invade a country peacefully via immigration.

    Muslim fundamentalists are a much bigger threat to the world than Jewish fundamentalists. Just wait until the Iranian fundamentalists get nuclear weapons. Must be 100x more Muslim fundamentalists worldwide. Jews have little power compared to Muslim wackos. They don’t even have any oil wells.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      July 6, 2011 - 10:16 pm | Permalink

      Rockingham, you sound pretty reasonable. So why do the jews support the multiculturalism that is going to kill their one most supportive host nation?

      I know not every jew but MOST of them – surely you people know you can make alot more money off of hard working white people (many of whom you look almost like, and you must admit, treat you and your country pretty well) than a bunch of Mestizos and African Americans who will steal from you and/or want handouts.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      July 6, 2011 - 11:14 pm | Permalink

      Yes, but if the religious Jews beat out more secular Jews, how is that good for Israel? Shouldn’t you prefer the more sane and rational Jews to the deeply religious types that are likely to be a bit nutty? I understand you wanting the Israeli population to grow, but don’t you want the more stable higher IQ portion of the population to be selected?

    • Mark Hess's Gravatar Mark Hess
      July 7, 2011 - 12:49 am | Permalink

      Did the US have serious enemies in the Middle East before Truman recognized the state of Israel?

      Would Europeans have to worry so much about their relatively low birthrates, as well as their physical safety and cultural integrity, if it were not for the deliberate imposition of massive non-European immigration, which brought with it large numbers of people who were, because of certain religious dogmas, very likely to behave in rather disrespectful and destructive ways towards their host countries?

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      July 7, 2011 - 5:54 pm | Permalink

      “For defensive reasons Israel needs as many Jews as it can get.”

      Please, take ours, and leave the United States in peace. (I’m sure large numbers of Canadians, Russians, Europeans and Australians would also be happy to let you have theirs.)

      It is time to cut the apron strings, for Israel to grow up and to learn how to work and play well with her neighbors. It is time America and her citizens to stop suffering for the problems Israel creates.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 11, 2011 - 11:01 am | Permalink

      rockingham race track – Why your Zionist pants are getting wet on the thought of Iran getting a nuclear bomb? Is not your darling Israel already has 240-400 nukes and the US 9,000 nukes?

  26. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    July 6, 2011 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

    David Duke PhD, a former leader of KKK is the most vilified White American politician and anti-war activist by the Zionist-controlled mainstream media. He has been called ‘Neo-Nazi’ and ‘Jew-hater’ for attending the Holocaust conference in December 2006 in Tehran which was attended by 67 researchers from 30 countries. David Duke told his audience: “Depicting Jews as the overwhelming victims of the Holocaust gave the moral high ground to the Allies as victors of the war, and allowed Jews to establish a state on the occupied land of Palestine”.

    Evan Hughes in his June 28, 2011 article in The AWL says that the Jewish inventer of Sea-Monkeys, Harold von Braunhut (d. 2003), helped Klansman buy 83 guns in 1980.

    Pro-Israeli Ziocon groups, such as, ADL, JDL, JDO, AJC, etc., along with their extended arm, Southern Poverty Law Center, call non-Jewish supremacist groups ‘NeoNazis’. Interestingly, both JDO and JDL are considered ‘terrorist groups’ by US law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, many Israeli Rabbis (Meir Kahane, Ovadia Josef, Yaakov Josef, Dov Lior, etc.) have given ‘fatwas’ that mass killing of non-Jews (Muslims, Christians, Arabs, etc.) is commanded in the teachings of the Jewish Bible.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 7, 2011 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

      @ Rehmat,july7,2011-7:22 am.

      {“…if Mohammad killed 700 Jews-how come his TWO Jewish wives did not ask for divorce…”}

      I can help you: when they saw his extreme bloodthirstyness they FEARED FOR THEIR OWN LIVES.
      We must also not forget that Allah’s merciless prophet had sent his men to MURDER POETS who had made mocking poems about him.When you know a man’s character…

    • Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
      July 9, 2011 - 4:28 am | Permalink

      Where’s the evidence that Mohammed even existed?

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 22, 2011 - 12:20 pm | Permalink

      Franklin Ryckaert – you mean his two wives were as much coward as you Jews are even today?

      Last year Israeli Gen. Eiland told the coward Jews – ‘Israel doesn’t know how to defeat Hizbullah’.

  27. rockingham race track's Gravatar rockingham race track
    July 6, 2011 - 9:22 pm | Permalink

    “Uri Avnery is an honest Jewish secular liberal”

    He is a commie freak who you like only because he is a saboteur of Israel. The religious are nowhere close to governing Israel. But Muslim fanatics govern Iran and Saudi Arabia. No nonMuslim is allowed in Mecca. Look up Iran’s 12th Imam Shiite end times scenario which is a mirror image of the Christian end times. A nuked up Iran will be the world’s problem not the Jews problem. Iran will be dictating to Saudi and other Sunni oil producers. Telling them how much to limit production in order to jack up prices. Telling who to sell to and for how much.

    In the tussle between Jew and Muslim only fools and atheists take the Muslim side. Muhammad got his start by murdering 700 males of a Jewish tribe and enslaving the women (making them into Muslim baby factories) and the children

    Let’s look at “secular” Egypt. Coptic Catholics being massacred and their churches being burned down. Islam is on an eternal Jihad. An eternal rampage of Jihad conquest and forcible conversion by the sword. Christians are being driven out of Iraq. Islam is 1.5 billion strong. Roughly 2 billion Christians. The eternal war is between these two worlds. Jews can only be spectators.

    My advice is read up the life of Muhammad and compare it to the life of Jesus Christ. Those of Christian heritage who take the Muslim side in anything are idiots. Trendy PC leftists who fall for anything from the 3rd world.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      July 6, 2011 - 9:26 pm | Permalink

      I agree that nuts run Iran and Saudi Arabia, but aren’t you concerned about the demographic trends in Israel? I mean, for a generation from now.

    • me's Gravatar me
      July 7, 2011 - 6:22 am | Permalink

      side note: Coptics are not Catholic. Iran has never been a threat. they have, by constitution, set asides for jews in their parliment.

      As long as muslims are in the muslim world and not aided by our tech and not immigrating here, they are not a threat. Israel is an unnecessary and unsustainable burden at this point. the main point about jews is accurate – they are shedding western rationalism and embracing their charasmatic leader power structure. I wonder if the same will occur here- if one looks at the birth rates of hassids vs secular jews.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 7, 2011 - 7:22 am | Permalink

      Pity – If Mohammad killed 700 Jews – how come his TWO Jewish wives did not ask for divorce??

      Just curious.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      July 7, 2011 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

      “He is a commie freak who you like only because he is a saboteur of Israel.”

      Fine by me. Israel has cost America too much already. She is a failed experiment.

      I have no love for Islam, but seeing my own country made Israel’s bitch and her needs made secondary to Israel’s is sickening and disgusting.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 10, 2011 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

      Calm down anti-Christ. Christian and Jews are allowed to visit Makkah and Medinnah – only if they sleep in bed with Saudi ‘royals’.

      The Iranian story of the arrival of their 12th Imam is more human than the Christian story of the second-coming of Jesus, who is expected convert Jews to Christianity or shoot them. The 12th Imam is not even mentioned to visit occupied Palestine.

      Iran is not ruled by nuts like Palestine ruled by Zionazi fascists. In fact, the 30,000 Iranian Jews are far better treated by Mullahs than the Palestinian Muslims and Christians treated by Israeli Jewish nuts. Three year ago, when Iranian Jews were offered a bribe of $10,000 plus a piece of land stolen land from native Arabs – only a dozen took the bribe and immigrated to Israel.

      Jewish and Christian Zionists’ ‘Iranophobia’ is based on their faith that Iran is threatening their ‘prophesized’ scheme of Christ’s second-coming.

  28. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 6, 2011 - 8:37 pm | Permalink

    Israel’s demographic shift away from relatively secular Jews toward a bunch of religious zealots spells trouble for the future. We are talking about a nuclear armed country here – imagine people with nuclear bombs looking to a mystical Rabbi for guidance. Scary future, that.

    If Iran gets nukes, the chance of Israel taking some crazy preemptive action seems even more likely.

  29. July 6, 2011 - 8:18 pm | Permalink


    We need a Freedom Flotilla to go up the Potomac.


    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      July 8, 2011 - 10:55 am | Permalink

      Graham says: “We need a Freedom Flotilla to go up the Potomac”. I’ll second that motion. Do we ever!

  30. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    July 6, 2011 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

    @ Franklin-

    I don’t think we are in such a strong position to critique Iran for alleged brutality. We in the West have murdered hundreds of thousands of people in the last ten years because they happened to be born in Muslim lands. Barry Obama on a weekly basis executes Muslims via predator drones without any due process whatsoever. I trust that those allegedly executed in Iran were at least given a hearing.

  31. Harkness's Gravatar Harkness
    July 6, 2011 - 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Israeli lawmaker says that Australia should take in Israel’s African immigrants.

    • July 7, 2011 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

      Miriam Faine, an editorial committee member of the Australian Jewish Democrat, as quoted in CoC:

      The strengthening of multicultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      July 7, 2011 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

      Miriam Faine needs to make Aliyah to Israel if she’s not comfortable living in a country the way it is. If she doesn’t like it, instead of changing the country, she needs to leave.

  32. observerx's Gravatar observerx
    July 6, 2011 - 3:16 pm | Permalink

    Israel indeed has a theocratic nature, which is often concealed. Israel is not a regular “secular Western” country, far from it. It is closer to Teheran than to Washington.

    “Between Stockholm and Tehran, Israel of 2009 is much closer to Tehran. From birth to death, from circumcision to funeral, from the establishment of the state to the establishment of the last of the illegal outposts in the West Bank – we are operating in the shadow of the commandments of religion. We should be honest with ourselves and admit it already: The country is too religious. It begins, of course, with the fact of our presence here. Among other things, it is based on theological reasoning. Abraham the Patriarch was here, so we are, too. He bought the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron, so we, too, are in Palestinian Hebron. People who are entirely secular also cite religious and biblical explanations for the connection between the Jewish people and the Land of Israel. We can’t even say whether Judaism is a religion or a nationality – and in any event, there is no other country in the Western world where religion has its holy iron grip on the state as it does in Israel […] There are no civil marriages or divorces, and there are almost no secular funerals. The Law of Return and the definition of who is a Jew – the most fundamental and significant of Israeli precepts – are based on halakha, even without our religious justice minister […] Torah sages of various kinds make decisions on fateful political issues – at the homes of miracle workers, magicians and those passing out amulets – and the lines outside their doors are growing, made up mostly of those who argue they are fervently secular. They are lying to themselves and to others. Expressions of racism and arrogance, too, based on the concept of the “chosen people,” are uttered”.

    • Felix Grubel's Gravatar Felix Grubel
      July 7, 2011 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

      “It[Israel] is closer to Teheran than to Washington.”

      – That’s it in a nutshell. It also explains the insane ferocity with which her supporters attack everyone who doesn’t agree with them.

      “We can’t even say whether Judaism is a religion or a nationality…”

      – In reality, Judaism is a cult. Like any other cult, it seeks to exclude the influence of outsiders and brainwashes its adherents into an inability to see the world in a way other than the one in which they were raised.

      “Expressions of racism and arrogance, too, based on the concept of the “chosen people,” are uttered”. ”

      – And the Nazis and Communist nomenklatura also were a “chosen” people. The idea of a “chosen” people is the funadementally ugliest ever dreamt up by humans. ALL other crimes, all genocides spring from that idea. It is an evil idea, and even if it’s mandated by “God,” decent people need to begin calling it evil.

  33. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    July 6, 2011 - 1:25 pm | Permalink

    I have read that article before. Uri Avnery is a liberal, non-practicing Zionist Jew. The title of his article proves that while womitting on his rabbis – he shows his hatred toward Israel’s perceived enemy No.1, the Islamic Republic of Iran.

    No Ayatullah has ever preached ‘death to Jews’ or ‘death to Goyim’. There are 30,000 Jews live in Iran and no one has been killed for his/her faith. The Ayatullahs don’t even agree with the Pope and Archbishop of Canterbury that Jews ‘hanged Jesus on tree’.

    Imam Komeini, however, did say: “Zionism has a much uglier face than fascism and its biggest supporters and abettors are America, Britain, France and other European countries. All of them would one day have to be answerable for their deeds”.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 6, 2011 - 2:02 pm | Permalink

      Well Rehmat,we would really be willing to believe in the innocence of the Iranian ayatollahs,if only we had not the picture in our mind of hanged Iranian homosexuals,hanging from modern cranes,mind you! (ah the “modernization” of Islam!).Perhaps Uri Avneri’s comparison of the fanatical Israeli rabbis with Iranian ayatollahs is not so inappropriate after all.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 6, 2011 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

      Franklin Ryckaert – I am sorry to learn that your homosexual Jewish brother was hanged in Iran. However, the fact is that only two crimes carry death penality under Iranian Consitution; treason against the state and drugs peddling – which incidently, are both controlled by the Russian Jews in both the US and Israel.

      However, like the Israeli Rabbinical courts, Iranian do stoning of Muslims involved in adultery which is no crime in Israel.

      Last year, Iranian court rejected Jewish Bernard-Henri Levi and Sarkozy’s appeal to forgive Sakineh for murdering her husband with help of her boyfriend, which of course considered a barbaric Islamic punishment in Israel.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      July 6, 2011 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

      No Ayatollah has ever preached “death to the Jews”? LOL
      I remember when Egypt Air crashed, Muslims said you boys didn’t commit suicide, either.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 7, 2011 - 7:18 am | Permalink

      Scooter – You forgot to mention those five Ayatullahs found dancing on the day of 9/11 – Lol….

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 7, 2011 - 5:21 pm | Permalink

      @ Rehmat july6,2011-3:26 pm.

      Well Rehmat,thank you for your information about wonderful Islamic Iran.
      You say:”…the fact is that only two crimes carry death penalty under Iranian constitution; treason against the state and drug peddling…”.Then you contradict yourself THREE TIMES:
      1) Homosexuals are hanged.
      2) “…Iranian do stoning of Muslims involved in adultery…”
      3) Death penalty for Sakineh for murdering her husband.

      Well I will give you one last chance.Roll out your prayer rug (in the direction of Mecca of course) and pray:”Oh allmighty allknowing Allah!Please enlighten my mind that you don’t exist”.If you can detect a little contradiction here you pass my test,if not,I advise you never to post here again.Khuda hafez.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      July 8, 2011 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

      Franklin Ryckaert – I believe Professor Daniel Bar-Tal (Tel Aviv University) had idiots like you in mind when he summed-up his study by saying: “Israeli Jews like to live in self-denial”.

  34. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:42 pm | Permalink
  35. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:41 pm | Permalink
  36. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:41 pm | Permalink
  37. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    According to the Jewish Cabalah, Talmud and Torah, Gentiles Are the Slaves of the Jews

  38. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink
  39. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    How the Jews Have Employed Torah Doctrines to Destroy the Goyim

  40. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    The Universal Enslavement of the Non-Jew, Part 4: The Genocidal Jewish Prophets

  41. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    The Universal Enslavement of the Non-Jew, Part 3: The Genocidal Jewish God Commands the Jews to Exterminate the Goyim

  42. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

    The Universal Enslavement of the Non-Jew, Part 2: Jewish Supremacism in the Torah Proper

  43. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

    The Universal Enslavement of the Non-Jew, Part 1: The Ancient Jewish Plan for World Domination Found in the Old Testament

  44. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:38 pm | Permalink
  45. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    July 6, 2011 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

    #1 Bestseller Proves that Usury Is an Ancient Jewish Plan for World Conquest

Comments are closed.