Vladimir Putin mourning the dying sailors trapped in a foundered submarine
Recently a London acquaintance sent me the link to a piece in Takimag.
And wow! I thought. What a marvellously meaningful heading! Particularly the US Dollar in Gangsta is so amazingly original, elegantly emphasized by a subdued touch of irony since Mr. Putin would most likely prefer Russian roubles as they are backed up with real gold and not Bernanke’s printing machines. The Gangsta itself struck me as an impressive bit of literary bravado, indicating that its author must be a man of consequence who has absolved some earnest gutter sniffing while feeling the pulse of the time. As for the KGB, once a highly obscure institution and about as transparent as the CIA, it is now defunct and thus a historically accurate metaphor of the first magnitude.
The piece as such turns out to be the usual bit of defamation backed up with nothing but innuendos and conjectures, an increasingly foolish routine already discussed in this journal. We learn that Mr. Putin owns assets to the tune of forty billion dollars, an estimate brought forward by some flatulent political scientist in an interview with the flatfooted German newspaper DIE WELT. Now German newspapers are a particularly reliable source of information, partly because they are largely in the hands of the enemy like everywhere else in the Western World, partly because there exists a secret treaty stipulated in the year 1949 that gives the Allied victors a de-facto control over the entire German media landscape until the end of this century. The same treaty decrees, by the way, that Germany’s gold reserves are kept in Fort Knox as a kind of ransom for the same length of time, an interesting fact if one remembers that the Rep. Ron Paul thinks a few latter-day Goldfingers may have robbed it and sent long since somewhere else. Perhaps, and this is a strictly personal guess, to Peking and Tel Aviv.
Furthermore are we informed of an ominous dossier milked from a dubious website of undefined ownership that states Mr. Putin’s quest for personal enrichment and absence of any moral barriers became obvious at the very onset of his career. We learn from the same source that the Russian president traded young children abroad, converted a military port into a Black Market terminal, sold whole submarines to never identified buyers, had a large number of opposition figures wiped out that stood more or less in his way, blew up a few apartments in Moscow to consolidate his presidency by starting the Second Chechen war, whacked the poor Chechens to kingdom come, scared a vodka producer first out of his pants and then out of his money, and did lots of other nasty things we better don’t talk about.
A shred of reliable collateral is never given, of course.
The author of this sorry concoction was born in Russia but calls himself Boot, most likely because that is what he got before settling in the West. Just as the BBC’s Moscow correspondent who thought he could insult the Russians forever, yet was taken one day by his dirty ears and sent back home without prior notice. As to Boot, near the end of his piece he comes to the point. Russia’s press has been reined in, he tells us indignantly, meaning that giant media squids like Rupert Turd Murdoch and his Zionist backers weren’t able to corrupt it yet. Business gets increasingly de-liberated, he laments, implying that vultures like Soros or Goldman Sachs aren’t allowed to sink their claws into the national economy. And of course he sheds a crocodile tear for that saintly Jewish martyr Michail Khodorkovsky who is smarting in a Siberian jail, allegedly on Putin’s orders. A terrible injustice that has effected the shrill indignation of Zion’s satraps, be it Mr. Obama, Frau Merkel or whoever else is on the payroll. Particularly the German chancelloress should be seen in this context as a heroic defender of democratic principles, since it was her kowtows that subjected poor John Demjanjuk, ninety years old and stricken with cancer, to a hideous show trial that had nothing to do with justice but merely tried to rehash one of Zion’s stale old canards. This with the intent to squeeze yet a few more billions out of the increasingly reluctant Germans. Mr. Demjanjuk was condemned without a grain of evidence — even the old trollop BBC had to admit that not one witness saw Demjanjuk injure anybody, which shows indeed where nowadays the true tyrants hold sway.
And in case you don’t remember Khodorkowsky (see here, here, and here), he was that youthful prodigy who tricked old man Yeltzin out of YUKOS, Russia’s national oil company worth billions of dollars, by paying him a pittance borrowed from Lord Rothschild. He recently had his greedy claws slapped with a few more years in the cooler, and a lenient verdict it is if you consider that the crazy bugger tried to grab the country’s presidency himself by buying every Duma member in reach. And, needless to say, after pledging most of his expected booty to the aforementioned Lord and his American chums.
What makes the wretched little piece so ironic is that it was launched by a lackey who serves masters with moral barriers about as high as a cockroach can jump. And who long since are gnashing their teeth in anger because there is one man in the world, perhaps the most powerful at this moment, who refuses to be corrupted like everybody else. Who has vowed to protect his country against foreign invaders, knowing full well that those are just a bunch of global mobsters who care about nothing except the reckless and limitless enrichment of their clan.
And if Mr. Putin keeps a few billions under the bed, well… great!
Because in that case he doesn’t have to go hat in hand to the AIPAC gangstas and mooch for election contributions. And pay them back by doing their bidding, which as a rule is entirely detrimental to his country’s interests. Like getting gangbanged into illegal and utterly ruinous proxy wars. Or stand idle by while, to use Robert Fuld’s famous phrase, the national economy gets wrecked and the leftovers are picked up by us for a song. He doesn’t have to comply with the dictate of Hollywood and the media bosses, all part of the same cupola, for fear of getting toppled with a pack of lies if he ever contemplates dissent. He needn’t watch with dumb consternation how our great Christian-European culture is systematically destroyed and replaced by Modern Art, Rap or pornography.
And so on.
I have little understanding of Mr. Putin beyond his official exterior. He is doubtlessly a man with an extremely forceful character. Educated, highly intelligent, shrewd. Ruthless too, because otherwise he wouldn’t be where he is today. But I also believe him to have vision, a rare quality that compels him to serve his people not only with iron determination but also compassion, a timeless and incomparable gift unknown among our own dozen-a-dime leaders. A gift I believe to have noticed when he shed a tear for those dying mariners. Which makes me hope that he will stick to his guns and go down into history as a great ruler who safeguarded his country against the woes that today beset the Western World. A world that would be wise to lay its fate into the hands of a man like him and thus be spared a slow but relentless slide into expropriation, bankruptcy and social upheaval.
Therefore, and if this has made some sense, you may light a candle and repeat the little prayer I have murmured a few days ago in Odessa while standing in one of those beautiful new churches resplendent with golden roofs topping a multitude of turquoise and aquamarine towers, all superb testimony of the resurgent Russian Orthodox Church that shepherds an intact and homogenous flock.
God save Mr. Putin, and may he never fold in at the knees…
Vladimir Putin inspecting the Russian gold reserves
Facing the Future as a Minority
Very, very interesting piece. Our rulers are discomfited by men in power who have integrity and a sense of loyalty to their people. I can’t help but believe that the constant agitation against Putin and Ahmadinejad shares a common motivation.
Please consider doing a piece on Iran’s president–he’s another who is not easily suborned.
To call Putin a “gangsta” is a typical example of Jewish accusatory inversion. The reality is that Putin has liberated Russia from its JEWISH GANGSTAS (oligarchs) who had plundered the country almost completely.Atfer the removal of its mega-parasites,the country recovered remarkably under the strong arm of its wise leader.Putin also understands that a revitalized Orthodox Church can play a salutary role in the moral life of the people.Thus he is universally hated by international Jewry,who as we all understand, never only try to rob “goyim” of their wealth but also try to corrupt them morally.The accusation of the theft of billions of rubles must in all probability be ascribed to the same projection of own Jewish vices combined with the habitual shameless propensity to tell a Big Lie.I have great admiration for this man and wish all Western nations – not in the last place the USA – would have such a great leader.Heil Putin!
Exactly right–well put.
Boy, “sorry concoction” is right. It sounds like an attempt to redeem communism and the old USSR. Of course, the author actually doesn’t live in communist country.
What’s perplexing is that he’s also written a book called “How the West was Lost” with a one line endorsement from Roger Scruton. What a contrast.
There’s a large number of differences between the communist system and Putin’s version.
1) Real nationalism. Russian national feelings are encouraged, no Soviet proposition nation.
2) Orthodox Church. Whoever has ever lived in a communist country, knows fully well that this is a big difference, for the government to actually support the national church instead of oppressing it.
3) Private property. Putin nationalized large sectors of the economy, but there’s no attempt to nationalize everything, and the wealth of the middle class or the peasantry is in no danger. Even those oligarchs who did fall in line could keep their wealth.
And then there’s the upside of communism – it’s easier to regulate immigration (because of the police state), pronatalist policies and a strong military.
Now there are some downsides – the police state in itself is not a positive thing, and neither is Russian nationalism good for everyone else. For example the Russians still have designs with the Baltic states (I think their natural zone of domination should be behind their 1937 borders, anything to the west is more western culturally and also ethnically), as well as Poland and Hungary. (In Hungary now there’s a huge scandal, a former government minister responsible for intelligence and counter-intelligence, and a number of former leaders of the counter-intelligence have been arrested over the last few days, they were allegedly spying for Russia…)
And of course in spite of the sometimes frightening police state-like features, his system is nowhere near real communism in terms of freedom. If the US of the 19th century is one end of a continuum, and the Soviet Union of the 1970s the other end, then present Russia is probably still closer to 19th century US than to the USSR. People in the west usually don’t quite appreciate how unfree that world had been. For example the government was the only employer, and you couldn’t really have money. At the workplace, the Party was present and they kept files on your behavior or any “hostile” remarks you might have made. It was difficult to learn western languages, although by the 80s it was generally an advantage (I’m describing Hungary which in general was much freer than the USSR). It was very difficult to reach western newspapers, especially in the countryside. Only the select few could have telephones (this part of the infrastructure was intentionally underdeveloped), so it was difficult for information to spread, and it was easy to control the few phone lines in service. (Every conversation was believed to be tapped by the secret police. Again, I’m talking about Hungary in the 80s, probably the freest Eastern Bloc country.) It was difficult to travel abroad, certain unreliable persons were not even allowed to travel to “friendly” countries, travelling to the West was a privilage, and only every third year – but of course extremely few people had the resources for more frequent travel anyway. There was no right to emigrate. People with family member defecting to the west were denied the possibility to travel abroad, and were subject to police harrassment. (The police harrassment part was more a 60s thing, by the 80s it got lighter.)
Now compare that to Putin’s state, where it’s possible to have employment outside the government, it’s possible to have wealth (so to be relatively independent of the government), it’s possible to learn languages, it’s possible to read western viewpoints both on the internet and elsewhere, it’s possible to leave the country (if you have the money), even permanently (if any country wishes to accept you), etc. etc. It’s incomparably freer than the USSR, and with the internet and the generally much less guarded (and for geographic reasons much less guardable) borders of Russia it’s unlikely that it will ever get to the point of a real communism. At least that’s my impression, although I could prove wrong. (I hope not.)
Is this article really written by Kevin MacDonald?
Sorry. It’s by Michael Colhaze. My bad.
It’s obviously not written by professor MacDonald. The writing style is completely different.
“My Bad”LOL Too funny Professor Mac… Goodtimes!
@Geiseric
I had the same question.
Same here–the tone was practically hysterical compared to the matter-of-fact Professor Macdonald.
I’m disappointed to find something of this ilk in TakiMag. I dare say Richard Spencer would have had no truck with something like this.
For a slightly different point of view, check out the ” Revolt Against Oligarchy” series on the Alternative Right. Perhaps it’s fun to cheerlead for Putin because he plays realpolitik. Such honesty is unknown to us in the West. But Putin allows non-Whites into Russia. I’ll cheer for Tesak with my clean conscience, keep Putin.
Putin is not the racial nationalist he is sometimes assumed to be, and neither is he such a great statesman. But he’s still much better than 90% of the leaders of European countries (including the likes of Australia and the US).
BTW no Russian government would be completely good for the West, since Russian and Western interests are not the same. The most obvious example is the case of the Baltic states, where these interests are almost diametrically opposed – what’s good for Estonia is bad for Russia, and vice versa. Of course if the West had nationalist governments with realpolitik, we could cut a deal with the Russians on an equal footage – they can have Belarus, Central Asia, maybe Ukraine and maybe the South Caucasus, but we would keep the rest, or something like that. Some Ukrainians (and Caucasians) might resent it. However, I don’t think it possible or desirable to give up the Baltic states, and that’s exactly what most Russian nationalists would want us to do.
Gabor
In respect of the Baltic states “deals” were already “cut”. It involved Western banks ripping them off. Many of these bankers had blond hair and blue eyes from Sweden. The Baltic people were really no worse off under the Soviets.
What is being missed at the moment is that asset price inflation is still being manipulated in the West through central banks. There is no action in property prices any more (at one point, Riga in Latvia had prices to rival the South of France) so they have moved into food price speculation
This is getting serious boyz.
Russia may be the only White Nation that has the potential to save the White Race. Russian Nationalism must be transformed into Pan Aryanism.
Bravo, Mr. Colhaze! It’s good to see you once again let your hair down and fly in the face of the dry and scholarly writing style that Professor MacDonald is compelled to employ in dealing with matters scientific. You have an obvious facility, indeed a virtuoso’s flair, for self-expression in the English language. Your prose positively sparkles.
You know, of all of the potential allies we could choose, the Russians are perhaps the most natural and promising candidates (provided we remain wary of their still-Bolshevistic political bent). I once had the misfortune – just kidding – of knowing a lead dancer with the Bolshoi Ballet … an older fellow, but still handsome and artistically capable. His English was comically bad, but that turned out to be OK, because his English vocabulary was fixated on just two words: “Jew” and “Nigger”. (I know that the Professor is not fond of the second of these terms, and for good reason, but I must respectfully claim my right to narrative accuracy.)
The same appeared to apply to most of the expatriate friends of old – we’ll call him “Oleg”. They were under no illusions regarding either of the groups to which the quoted terms apply. They would sit around guzzling Russian vodka, gobbling Russian caviar (good stuff of which they seemed to have an inexhaustible supply), and talking about what had to be done regarding certain problems that recurrently appear in this very forum.
Oleg, now deceased, danced for Soviet leaders from Stalin to Brezhnev and knew many old-guard members of the Soviet Politburo on a first-name basis (such were the perks of stardom). In short, it seems that the Russians – even those with elevated rank in the Soviet hierarchy – are very well aware of, and highly resistant to, the kind of problems we discuss here.
It’s refreshing to see that you understand this. Putin is no saint, but he’s probably no pushover either. Potential allies are right where you find them.
“You have an obvious facility, indeed a virtuoso’s flair, for self-expression in the English language. Your prose positively sparkles.”
-What?! Were we reading the same article? It wasn’t at all bad, but deserving of such praise? Really? The more personal quips and flowery language in a piece, the more it sense of scholarly objectivity is altered. But that’s just it: Would a reader rather be entertained or well-informed? Because rarely, if ever, are the two combined.
Style follows purpose.
I suspect that had Mr. Colhaze been writing for a scholarly journal – as opposed to, say, dashing off a somewhat lighthearted and sarcastic opinion piece for the Occidental Observer, with illustrations to match – the prose wouldn’t have been quite as flowery.
In any event, Colhaze has a distinctive and enjoyable way of writing, and I daresay I’m not the only one who thinks so. So lighten up already.
Eurodele really, one can’t express one’s opinion in the “comments” section? Being honest is somehow taboo in this forum? Had Systemic embarked on some unfounded diatribe against the author, I would understand your stance. Morevoer, although some aspects projected dissonance, the author was congratulated as “not bad.” This of course means “good” eurodele. But that doesn’t mean the author is somehow above reproach. It’s as if you’re arguing for a criticism-free forum. Have fun with that one.
The article criticized in Colhaze’s article is far better researched than his own. Let’s take a closer look at some of its assumptions:
1) The KGB is “defunct and thus a historically accurate metaphor of the first magnitude.” In name only: The FSB is just an updated version of the KGB, and the new organization is more powerful than KGB ever was, at least in Russia proper.
2) Colhaze rejects the estimates of Mr. Putin’s assets for no plausible reason.
3) The “ominous dossier milked from a dubious website of undefined ownership” that Colhaze is referring to, is a well-known, reliable and often used non-governmental source in Russia. Of course, the “reliable collateral” is delivered in Russian only.
4) Colhaze portrays Putin as someone “who refuses to be corrupted like everybody else. Who has vowed to protect his country against foreign invaders, knowing full well that those are just a bunch of global mobsters who care about nothing except the reckless and limitless enrichment of their clan.” It is a well documented fact that Mr. Putin is far more (at least financially, perhaps even morally) corrupt than any Western leader in office.
5) Colhaze admits that he has “little understanding of Mr. Putin beyond his official exterior.” If Colhaze had gone beyond “his official exterior”, he might have avoided jumping to unfounded conclusions.
6) Colhaze makes a serious mistake when he assumes that Putin is a conservative ethno-nationalist. On the contrary, Putin was rejected by the tiny (now mostly imprisoned) minority of Russian ethno-nationalists long time ago. Colhaze dislikes Merkel. At least she has openly admitted the failure of multiculturalism. That’s more than Putin ever did. Russia has always been a multicultural empire, and will remain so.
Yea, I was wondering how the author could rail against conjecture criticising Putin while simultaneously using conjecture to prop him up in a fetishised manner. It seemed disingenous to say the least.
The term “multiculturalism” was invented in the US as code for multiracialism and advocacy of white dispossession. Contemporary Russia is *organically* multicultural like the old Austro-Hungarian Empire was-it has no Western-style policy of population replacement.
The reality is that Russia is (and has always been) multicultural and multiracial. In some respects, Putin’s Russia also copies elements from the Western version of multiculturalism, e.g. through hate speech laws. Putin has strong links to the organized Jewish community, and there are indications of philo-Semitism in his rhetoric and politics. People in the West tend to overemphasize the fact that he removed Khodorkovsky, Berezovsky et al., but many Jewish oligarchs remain influential in the Kremlin (Michael Friedman, Abramovitch, among others).
also Deripaska, Veckselberg, Han
One person whose name keeps popping up for sabotaging the Chechen resistance for his personal gains, is – Russian multi-billionaire Jewish media tycon and politician Boris Abramovich Berezovsky (born 1946), a critic of Russia’s ironman Vladmir Putin. Boris is wanted for arrest in both Russia and Brazil. Boris was a close friend of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko, who was poisoned with a lethal dose of radioactive Polonium-210 in a London sushi bar. Russian author, Paul Klebnikov has called Boris Berezovsky “Godfather of the Kremlin” in his 2000 book by the same name. Currently, Boris is reportedly backing the exiled Chechen politician Ahmed Zakayev, currently living in Britain.
Boris, who also holds Israeli citizenship – had boasted that he “caused the war in Chechnya”. A war which has killed tens of thousands of innocent Muslim men, women and children and devastated the entire Muslim-majority country.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/chechnya-the-israeli-connection/
Very emotional article in favor of Putin, but I hope everyone maintains a wee bit of sobriety when evaluating the situation.
For example, the author states the following in discussing Putin and those who oppose him:
And who long since are gnashing their teeth in anger because there is one man in the world, perhaps the most powerful at this moment, who refuses to be corrupted like everybody else.
and then a few lines later:
And if Mr. Putin keeps a few billions under the bed, well… great!
So, Putin is protecting himself from corruption by skimming a few billion for himself and stashing it under his bed? This is proof he can remain free of corruption?
I sense a lot of emotion being invested in Putin as a kind of savior, and while he does appear to have done some good things for Russia, I fail to understand the romantic lionizing of an authoritarian ex-KGB figure, who continues to use fairly heavy methods (often against Russians)to maintain his power.
Can’t we be grownups about it? Can’t we see Putin and his crew as they really are and not become swept up in Putin-fever like schoolgirls for the Beatles?
I wish the Russian people well in keeping a Jewish oligarchy from getting in control. It’s a very scary situation. I’m not sure Putin is up to the job. The Russians face a severe demographic decline as well.
Can we ever hope to make progress with average whites while TOO writers are discussing matters such as John Demjanjuk ‘s legal problems. This is a fight to the finish and the odds against us winning are long enough as it is. Please, have mercy on your race and shut up.
‘Some day an ape will pick up a human skull and wonder where it came from’ – Lenin
A great article! As an earlier respondent also asked, would you consider doing one on the President of Iran as well?
People who are hated by evil always bear looking into.
http://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/mikhail-zakharov/russias-multicultural-myth
The final paragraph:
“In this context, then, there is little need for Mr. Poltoranin to worry about the future of the “white race” in Russia. Despite the efforts and claims of the federal authorities, there is little chance of multiculturalism taking hold.”
Of course, the left-leaning author laments this, but I suppose it’s relatively good news for Slavic Russians. It seems as though Russia has the same problem every other European nation has; the government wants to enforce multiculturalism while the people are against it.
Nice link fender.
Indeed an odd defense of a man as honest while praising him if he did steal several billion! Perhaps it would have been better to say there is no proof he has stolen that money. If he is our savior, let’s hope the millions of people trained to hate Russia can overcome their brainwashing.
On another note, ask this of someone who thinks diversity is important: If diversity is sooooo important, shouldn’t we have laws against race mixing?
If diversity is sooooo important, shouldn’t we have laws against race mixing?
This is true. If it is valuable to have different ethnic groups around, then why are we miscegenating them out of existence?
By the way, I have known only a couple of Russians in my life, but they seemed like decent enough people. They were not boozers using ethnic slurs all the time either, just normal people. But I would say there are differences, whether cultural or biological, between Russians and other White groups. We aren’t all the same. So even though I want Whites everywhere to flourish, I don’t think they are all interchangeable. My sense is that Russians will always prefer a more authoritarian approach to social structure.
Stalin allegedly told a mistress that the Jews were trying to re-ingratiate themselves with him after the period of the show trials. He apparently thought he had mostly rid himself of them, but they were in the woodwork. Post Yeltsin, they were thick as ticks on an errant sow. Following historical precedent, after the killing of each sovereign goose, the tribe makes off for the next goose. Our American goose is in the stove cooking, as we speak.
Stalin, of course, was a ghastly human being, without a doubt a sociopath. This is the problem with dictatorships, they favor the rise of those who quite literally don’t experience any compassion for human beings.
This does not surprise me at all; and consider what it is that we will be left to deal with when the Jews finally leave the country completely devastated economically (not far off now) : a horde of various colored peoples who feel that we (Whites) are the root of all that troubles them and that we owe them everything that they want in life presented to them with a silk napkin on the proverbial silver platter, whilst we ourselves are worrying about where our next meal will come from. There is a good reason why Jews were expelled from so many countries throughout history, and some more than once. And that reason NEVER had anything to do with “persecution of Jewry”- they bring it on themselves.
On the pillaging of the ex-USSR, I can recommend this Institutional Investor article:
http://janinewedel.info/harvardinvestigative_InstInvestorMag.pdf
Hey Trenchant, great article. It seems that Lawrence Summers, ex President of Harvard, single-handedly manipulated Russian markets for his gain and put them on a fast track for economic ruin.
Moreover it seems that Lawrence Summers was the main architect behind our financial meltdown. How is this guy able to walk the streets? UNBELIeVABLE.
Is this a joke? Lets not all sell our farms and move to Russia.. The writer of this article clearly doesn’t have a clue what he’s talking about. Russia is controlled by ZOG from top to bottom, just as any Western society. If you are looking to Putin for salvation, you might as well hire a fox to guard the chicken roost.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG1yJg88hkY
Friedman’s account (gratis) of the Jewish crime syndicate that worked in parallel to the official Soviet state in delivering the workers’ paradise. Nowadays it’s called the Russian mafia, a misnomer if ever there were one.
http://robert-friedman-red-mafiya.blogspot.com/2007/09/robert-friedman-red-mafiya-jewish-mafia_4646.html
Back in 2003, the BBC ran an extraordinary three part documentary called “The Russian Godfathers” and blew the lid on the Jewish mafia that had almost bled Russia dry. It was an extraordinary expose and pulled no punches over the Jewish ethnicity of all the key players. Extraordinary because it revealed just how implicated the British Establishment is in these shenanigans.
It’s hard to source the vidoes now (they’ve been pulled from various sites, surprise, surprise) but this link gives you a flavour of what they contained. The key individual portrayed is Boris Berezovsky, a dwarfish hyperactive Jew who looks and acts uncannily like Wagner’s Mime in the Ring of the Nibelung.
Let’s not forget that Putin was Berezovsky’s candidate. Without Berezovsky & co, Putin would have remained the anonymous KGB bureaucrat he still resembles.
The Russian people, with their culture destroyed by the tribe, has looked to recapture their past via a Romanav feeding frenzy where they have bought up anything with the Royal families image as a means to re-capture their past. It is quite sad that the Russian’s have to go back to a time before tribe rule in order to find pride within their culture and people.
So tribe rule= destruction of the host populations culture, history, and relevant symbols. Who wants tribe rule!??LMAO
Here is the link:
http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=3221
@Geiseric
Indeed, Putin was Berezovsky’s protegé, and his cunning in deceiving Berezovsky until he had taken over from Yeltsin was a bravura performance and an important example to whites who want to take on the Jewish elite using the traditional democratic/electoral routes to power.
Watching that BBC documentary you could sense Berezovksy’s outrage that he, a smart jew, had been completely duped by a Goy. It was delicious to watch.
Even back then however, other Russian Jewish oligarchs (Abramovich, Deripaska, Fridman) had become noticeably wary of Berezovsky. Watching his performance in the BBC series indicated he may have issues with mental stability and in any case, his openly declared thirst for revenge against his humiliator Putin, is simply bad for business.
What remains remarkable however, and places the Anglo-Russian tensions of recent years into a different relief, is the degree to which these Russian Jewish oligarchs have inserted themselves into prominent positions among the elite of the British Establishment, presumably via the Rothschild connection. Abramovich owns Chelsea Football Club. Deripaska was embroiled in a scandal involving the current Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne who, it was revealed had solicited donations for the Conservative Party. He had been introduced to Deripaska by Peter Mandelson, a jewish homosexual, former cabinet minister, and Tony Blair’s right hand man. And let’s not forget that it was Jack Straw (half-jewish), as Labour Foreign Secretary who originally agreed to Berezovsky’s asylum request.
Just as in Churchill’s day, the aroma of Jewish infiltration into the highest echelons of British government is there for anyone with the nose to sense it.
@HSC.
Good points. You describe normal power struggles in the Kremlin from an ethnic point of view. There’s no evidence that Putin was motivated by an “ethnic” or “anti-Semitic” bias. He removed powerful Jews with political influence. He has done exactly the same with politically ambitious non-Jews. His regime is supported by many financially (if not politically) influential Jews. Putin’s rhetoric is nationalistic in the traditional Russian sense (imperialism, not ethno-nationalism or WN) and therefore anti-Western (regardless of hegemonic ideologies in the West). Let’s not forget Russia’s heavy legacy of anti-Westernism – the natural instinct of a profoundly non-European nation.
@ Farnham O’Reilly
I just read this link from Rehmat that collects a few perspectives on Ahmadinejad that you won’t likely hear in the mainstream press.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/islamic-republic-beyond-israeli-hasbara/
I cannot claim to know all that much about Mr. Putin. The evidence that I am aware of indicates that he supports the nationalist interests of the Russian people, and that he is, indeed, going after the gangsters, who are, yet again, overwhelmingly Jewish (there they are– surprise!). If this is the case, my best wishes to him, and to the Russian people, who have suffered more than most of us can imagine.
@HSC
Can you recommend some reading relating to any influence the Zionists may have had on Churchill or in the British press?
There is a Wikipedia page that describes the life of the swine who dreamt up the carpet bombing campaign of residential areas in Germany during the Second World War.
Winston Churchill used to obediently sit on this swine’s lap in order to receive orders on what to do next to the brave and decent German people. The horror of Dresden was the ultimate outcome of their perverse relationship.
To read, open Wikipedia and key in “Frederick Lindemann”.
There are others, Anon2, but this is where you should begin your quest.
Putin was KGB.
Once KGB, always KGB.
If that’s what it takes to deal with the “chosen,” so what?
@Geiseric
I think you need to distinguish two phases of Putin’s rule in Russia. The first phase, up to his delegation of the Presidency to Medvedev was certainly characterised by the pursuit of “perpetrators of economic crimes”, Russian code for moving against jewish oligarchs. Russia was aligned with Iran and embroiled in a really serious diplomatic spat with the UK which culminated in the Litvinenko Affair.
After Medvedev ascended to the Presidency (and he is just Putin’s stooge) the tone changed and Russia became noticeably more pro-Israel and halted the supply of key anti-aircraft weapons to Iran. Medvedev had a hamburger with Obama and the UK greatly softened its rhetoric.
Just remember, Putin is pulling all the strings. You are witnessing a master strategist at work who has the full measure of the jew, both domestic and international, and can play them like a violin. What Putin understands is that the jew is not a homogeneous force, but can be divided and conquered and ultimately, used. He knows how to flatter their vanity and stimulate their atavistic greed.
I disagree with your assessment of Russia as incompatible with Europe. Ever since Peter the Great, Russia has understood that its destiny lies with Europeans. It was one of the great mistakes of the Third Reich that they identified the Slavic nations as inferior. They are a magnificent people with a fine record of cultural and technological achievement, and importantly they have long experience of persecution at the hands of jews both domestic and international. They have an instinctive understanding of the menace and know how to combat it. And in Putin they may possibly have a modern day Peter the Great. Once he reclaims to the Presidency he will be fascinating to watch.
@Anon2
A recent collection of essays entitled “Varieties of Anti-Fascism – Britain in the Inter-War Years” published by Palgrave-Macmillan is worth looking at, as it provides a scholarly analysis of how the British establishment reacted to the emergence of the British Union of Fascists in the early and mid-thirties. For jewish behind the scenes manipulation in Britain prior to the onset of WW2 you will find some very well-researched articles at the Institute for Historical Research. And Pat Buchanan’s recent book “Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War” provides additional insight into Churchill’s relations with jewish interests, especially post 1936 when he suddenly changed tack having been a confirmed and vocal anti-semite in previous years.
HSC: Most of his political biographers present a completely different scheme of things (including the suggested phases of his rule). The great majority of the “perpetrators of economic crimes” are still in business, including the Jewish oligarchs.
Your train of thought is interesting, but you do not present any facts corroborating that Putin is an anti-Jewish ethno-nationalist.
I disagree with your assessment that Putin is a 21st century version of Peter the Great – a man clearly not in his weight class. The Slavic nations have often been regarded as inferior in a (Western) European context – long before the Third Reich, for a number of reasons, but that’s not the point here.
Putin is bad news – both for us and his own country. Well-informed articles should be more critical than Colhaze’s unfounded hagiography.
“… there exists a secret treaty stipulated in the year 1949 that gives the Allied victors a de-facto control over the entire German media landscape until the end of this century”
Can somebody pleae explain/expand this? I heard similar stories about the German PM being picked by the USA, or having to literally sign a treaty that would subjugate him to the will of the USA gov, etc, etc. I mean it would not surprise me at at all considering what happen after WWII, but never could find anything concreate to read about it. If true, it is time to end that s**t. Hopefully this awful tyranical USA will not last till the end of this century.
I believe the ex German head of intelligence wrote a book back in 2002 that revealed the existence of these secret parts of the German/USBritish surrender deal.
It is to remain this way until 2099. Total BS on our part.
Just jealousy on the part of the US/British of GErmany
Dark Henry [July 7, 2011 - 3:17 pm] …
Yes, Germany’s so called “Basic Law” Constitution was drawn up by American, British, and French ‘advisors’ … many (if not most) of whom were Jewish or partly Jewish in ancestry. Konrad Adenauer was the man picked to sell this political straight-jacket to the defenceless German people: only a couple of years after the threat of starvation had been ameliorated, and while factories throughout Germany were still be dismantled (and shipped back to the USA and Russia) as one key part of the evil and racist Morgenthau Plan.
But the state of our ignorance is far worse than you can imagine. Today, the Third Reich still exists, at least from a legal standpoint. The Third Reich (the legal governing entity controlling Germany at the time of VE Day) never surrendered, nor was any peace treaty signed by them or their representatives. The Jewish court convened at Nuremberg [the organization and timing of this Kangaroo Court fulfilled and honoured many Talmudic precepts] made sure that the bulk of the Third Reich’s senior representatives were quickly put to death for crimes invented only after the dates of the alleged offences (i.e., backdated transgressions). Worse, in most cases, false confessions were beaten out of the accused … including the faux mythology surrounding Auschwitz [in truth, a sprawling, well-equipped work-camp complete with its own cinema, theatre, brothel, football teams, hospital, and morgue (+ incinerators), and NEVER a 'death' camp ... until the Allies had bombed its food and medical supplies to kingdom come, then Typhoid did the damage].
Those who negotiated with the so-called ‘Allies’ at the end were a hotchpotch of Wehrmacht Generals desperate to put an end to the total, wilful, and ravaging destruction of Germany (the real ‘holocaust’!).
When Germany signed the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), which later morphed into the European Community (E.C.) and then later into the European Union (E.U.), it was still an occupied state with an externally imposed Constitution written by non-Germans. Thus, it signed its consent to membership of a ‘unified Europe’ under duress. Normally, under law properly applied, such agreements are automatically voided once that territory regains its independence. Put another way, only independent and sovereign states have the authority to sign their membership to supranational entities!!!
The upshot of this rational logic, is simply this. The European Union is a legal fraud and has no legal basis, simply because of the nature of its false and fraudulent origins that are rooted in the ECSC.
But to this day, Germany remains a militarily occupied State. Those of you visiting Frankfurt Airport on a regular basis, over recent decades, would have seen circumstantial evidence for this.
From 1945 onwards, the British Army (at least until the outset of the first Iraq War) has maintained the bulk of its Armoured Corp on German territory. I believe it still does. This strategic placement helps to thwart any possibility of a military intervention in British politics (a possibility actually discussed as recently as the 1970s).
But, it is of course the United States (the Pentagon) who really rules the roost in Germany. I have already posted here at TOO, accurate details of American military bases located on German territory. I don’t wish to spend too much time on this comment in order to repeat that earlier feat, which would require that I research this topic over again. Suffice to say that the total number of US Army and USAF bases still being staffed and deployed to by American soldiers and airmen is something like 6 or 7, and that at least 3 of these base facilities are vast in size and scope: with a major concentration in an area close to Frankfurt.
This helps explain why Frankfurt has since become so important in the financial world. It was of course the origin of Jewish banking hegemony in central Europe, the birthplace of the Rothschild dynasty, and the original political base for the American Occupying Forces going forward from late 1945.
If you wish to learn more about the awful truth that is Germany today, then I can do no better than refer you to the passionate writings of a brave and honest Englishman, named Michael James, who has lived for many years in Germany (or for what passes as ‘Germany’). You can follow these links, and then pay close attention to what Mr. James is telling us. Be patient with his passionate explanations, as this man understands what is really going on under the surface:
http://www.rense.com/general82/grm.htm
http://www.rense.com/general82/goy.htm
http://www.rense.com/general88/alamo.htm
Dear Dark Henry. Once you have completed your mammoth reading assignment … swear to me (or better, to all your Ancestors) that you will not get angry … but swear that you WILL get even and help bring the sword of justice upon those who have long tormented you and us, simply because we are bona fide European people.
This is how Russian nationalists see Putin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHfTIr9aJq0
This one is better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9muy0PnLEc&feature=related
“Those who carry slogans saying ‘Russia for Russians’ are simply idiots.”
@Geiseric,
“The Slavic nations have often been regarded as inferior in a (Western) European context”
Yes, by Jewish intellectuals such as Ludwig Gumplowicz and Karl Marx.
You don’t need Jews to tell the radical differences between Germans and Poles, Scandinavians and Russians, etc. In an American context, of course, these differences have been forgotten because of the term “White” – a term you have stated that you dislike, reject or despise. But in Europe, whiteness is nonsense.
By the way, too many people equate all Slavs with Russians.
Russians are just one of the 16 Slavic ethnic groups in Europe.
They don’t have a monopoly on Slavdom.
amazing how even ‘respectable’ papers like the WSJ defend the jewish oligarchs despite more than evident connections with organized crime and murder- same goes for Larry Summers and Harvard. It shows just how rotten and corrupt our elite have become. it’s definitely post-weimer
The savage judeo-kleptocracy that was the Yeltsin regime started to unwind in earnest not until Putin assumed the actual presidency. By conservative estimates, upwards of $200 billion had been looted and transferred out of Russia. Mind you, that was back when in much of America a gallon of 89 grade gasoline used to cost under $1.
The so-called Harvard Boys a.k.a. Tel-Aviv-on-the-Charles were dispatched by America’s original Afro president Bill Clinton to help Yeltsin’s kosher “reformers” (Gaidar, Chubais etc.) administer shock therapy. How many hundreds of thousands of lives that ended up costing Russia is anybody’s guess.
L’Affaire Khodorkovsky is a whole other subject. Predictably, American piss-stream media never fail to omit 2 delicious nuggets about him: A) that there is a trail of 72 dead bodies which one way or another are linked to Khodorkovsky and B) that this communist youth functionary-cum-oligarch from a family of bolshevik Jews (ah, the irony) was overseeing Project Russia (read: rape) for the Rothschilds.
And btw, Putin didn’t nationalize anything. Some of the state assets acquired by members of Team Yitzhak (Gusinsky, Berezovsky, Khodorkovsky) under Yeltsin in the course of rigged auctions for, oftentimes, 1/10 of a fair market price ended up getting re-possessed for tax evasion and/or defaulting on government-guaranteed loans. Just in the case of Yukos alone, tax transfers into the State treasury would shoot up by several hundred percent.
Taki must be enjoying some off time away in Lugano; otherwise such piece of primitive Judaic propaganda drivel won’t appear on his site.
Outstanding Article! Exceptional style.
Great leaders are now measured by how compatible they are with Israeli intransigence. Thus, Bibi Nutandyahoo gets 29 standing ovations before a supine and corrupt Capitol where all of America’s highest paid prostitutes routinely gather. Other ‘great’ leaders include the usual Who’s Who of Washington insiders, financiers, media pundits, and the establishment glitterati inhabiting NY, LA, Chicago, London, Paris and the so-called civilized Western World.
The Empire is going Down Down Down. And none too soon.
HSC’s short assessment of Putin’s calibre is probably correct, and is more trustworthy than Geiseric’s intemperate anti-Putin comments.
Someone who knows far more about Vladimir Putin than all of us here put together is Brother Nathanael Kapner over at his RealZionistNews-dot-com website.
His own assessment of Putin, Putin’s record, and Putin’s motives, are quite similar to HSC’s. Remember that as a devout Orthodox Monk, Brother Nathanael is receiving insider information directly from contacts in Russia, and elsewhere in Eastern Europe.
Here is the link to Brother Nathanael’s article summary page on Putin:
http://www.realzionistnews.com/?cat=97
Those North Americans who are able to assist Brother Nathanael financially, by providing donations, should do so. This man is an internet star and a true hero. For a short video, text, and reader comments on his personal background and quest, go to: http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=643
“Angels are a light to monks, and monks are a light to those living in the world.”
~~ The Ladder of Divine Ascent
Finally, Michael Colhaze shows up . I was wondering about him. I love his articles. He makes me feel better.
If only the United States had a leader like Vladimir Putin. Our political leaders can’t touch him with a ten foot pole. They are more loyal to Israel and to the Jews than America and Americans. They have no idea what to do about the strangle hold the Jewish agenda has on our government, economy and media. Nor do they care. Rep. Ron Paul knows what is going on, but he does not have the ruthlessness to do what America needs. Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann are good for a laugh.
It will take a will of iron and nerves of steel to straighten out America. Anything can be done if one sets his mind to it. But Jews won’t like anyone tampering with their agenda. An accident could conveniently happen. Even Jesus Christ had to be surrounded most of the time by His lieutenants or He probably would have been assassinated in the dead of night.
Karl Marx seems to have been the founder of the Jewish agenda. Yesterday I looked up Friedrich Hegel trying to understand exactly what he wrote that Karl Marx latched onto and inverted into a formula for destroying the west. Hegel’s writing was a bit complex for me, but I am not sure ole Karl Marx understood Hegel any better than I do. Jews can only think like Jews. They are not white. More than anything Marx hated Hegel.
I wonder if Hegel’s ontology for systematically organizing information was what caught Marx‘s attention? The main components of the Jewish agenda seems to be its organizational and systematic strategies. Success is virtually guaranteed if a campaign is organized and systematic.
Young Jews flocked to classrooms at the Frankfurt School and Harvard, and only heaven knows where else, squirming with excitement over Marx’s formula and worked on blue prints for dismantling white culture, scribbling their notes on ruled paper and three ring notebooks. I am surprised that brash young white intellectuals did not stuff those plans in a brief case, light a match to them and burn them to ashes.
The Jew’s agenda (or one world government or globalism or whatever you want to call it) is filled with lunacy. Take multiculturalism. Jews have made it a biggie. They know perfectly well multiculturalism is non-existent. It’s part of the campaign for white genocide. It’s goal is interracial breeding. White people function like white people because we are white people. That’s what white culture is. A biracial creature like Obama is not white nor is he capable of functioning as a white. Consequently, white culture takes a severe hit. White culture is different than most cultures. Our culture is so advanced it is a High Culture. That’s why the Jews hate us.
I wonder if we will ever come up with a formula to defeat the Jews. A formula that calls for a plan that is highly organized and systematic? We would certainly be successful. Jews have proved that. I am sure smart young whites would jump on the opportunity and create a program so brilliant the heavens would light up. One idea leads to another. Like the Jews, such an agenda wouldn’t take that many. After that, everything else would fall in place.
It can’t come too soon.
“If only the United States had a leader like Vladimir Putin. Our political leaders can’t touch him with a ten foot pole.”
Actually, Putin’s old-style patriotism (or imperial nationalism) resembles GWB II (minus the latter’s obsession with religion and Israel). None of them are ethno-nationalists or WNs. Both lack the intelligence and vision necessary in regard to 21st-century challenges. Putin is a boring, non-charismatic KGB bureaucrat whose second name is cynical pragmatism. His goal is not a “Russia for Russians”, but a new (multicultural) Russian empire.
While my earlier comment languishes, awaiting TOO Moderation — suffering from large time zone differences — here is another powerful and visual insight into Russia’s bloody, 20th century history and the ongoing efforts of Vladimir Putin to restore dignity and a sense of national identity to his people.
http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=644
The publication date of Brother Nathanael’s latest, self-made video nicely coincides with Michael Colhaze’s excellent article. Putin makes his appearance at 3:26 into the 4:12 duration video.
Enjoy, and be inspired!
My earlier comment (currently awaiting moderation) is date/time stamped: July 8, 2011 – 1:23 am.
I bet Ron Paul knows that criticism of Federal Reserve is as much case of anti-Semitism as is criticism of Bildeberg and Henery Kissinger.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/06/09/bilderberg-kissinger-and-jewish-hatred/
I adore Colhaze. I’ve had a very bad week – and this article is a little tonic.
Dear Geiseric,
I am Eastern European, more specifically Slavic. For years, however, I have lived in what we call a Western country. I can only say that whatever shorcomings are there in the Slavic lands, they are in every respect more European than France, Holland, Denmark etc. Sorry, but that’s a fact. When I was staying or simply travelled in Eastern Europe (Poland, Czech Rep., Lithuania, even Romania or Ukraine) I felt I was in Europe, poorer Europe but Europe nevertheless. When I go to France, Germany, UK I don’t feel like I am in Europe. Streets are full of Muslims, churches are empty. The truth is, and it is a sad truth that, Sukhumi, the capital of Abkhazia (once a Muslim territory but today predominantly Christian) looks more European or, for that matter, Western than most European/Western cities and towns. Incredible but true.
As for Putin, he is great politician and great person. He made Russia a normal country again. Under Yeltsin Russia was in a worse crisis than Germany in the late 20s. It was a total ruin. Putin made it normal again, not a paradise but at least NORMAL. The very fact that the Western elites, the media and most academics hate him so much speaks for itself. The fact that the so-called Opposition, dominated mainly by people of Jewish background, hates him so much and looks for every opportunity to discredit him shows how positive Putin has been for Russia and how negative for those who wanted ( and still want) to destroy Russia. He is someone who stands in their way just like Lukashenka, like Milosevic, like Ahmadinedjad.
Who cares what Putin did before, who cares if he has a couple of billions under his pillow? At least he is committed to his country. He is not perfect but can anyone show me any politician in the West who is capable of doing for his country at least half of what Putin has done for his?
Putin cannot say: “Russia only for Russians” because Russia has never been a mono-ethnic state. Russia as well as many other Easten European countries were always, so-to-say, geographically exposed. Right from the very beginning of their existence Russian states had other populations such as Volga Bulgars ( Muslim Tatars), Turkic Petchenegs, Finnic peoples and, of course, Khazars. For this reason Russia has always been multi-ethnic but not really multicultural. The so-called ethnic groups in Russia are natives and not outsiders. In imperial Russia the dominant religion was Orthodox Christianity, of course (and it is the case in modern times as well). However, other religions were tolerated. Therefore, historically, it would make little sense to demand Russia for Russians only. Poland used to be like that too, predominantly Roman Catholic but with large mainly native ethnic groups. The WW2 and drastic border changes made it one of the most mono-ethnic countries in Europe. The situation was however different, in most West European countries: Great Britian, Denmark, Holland, France etc. They have been, more or less, mono-ethnic for a long time, for centuries in fact. They had few, if any, native ethnic groups. They are in a better position to demand Denmark for the Danes or France for the French. The question though is – when will they do it?
I mentioned empty churches and I think I should comment on this before I finish. As a person who lived in a Communist country and is well familiar with official atheism I find it amazing that the situation has been reversed so much. The West has become completely irreligious.
All over Russia churches are beeing built and rebuilt. Those that were completely destroyed have been rebuilt exactly the way they were. It must have cost the governement an enormous amount of money. Nothing is as expensive as a restauration of old buildings, especially buildings that were flattened to the ground. So far 23 000 churches and monasteries have been built and rebuilt in Russia. Russians are building churches also beyond Russia, in Europe as well as in the Middle East. A large Orthodox cathedral is to be built in Paris near the Eiffel Tower. Another Orthodox cathedral is to be built in Strasbourg, in Madrid and other capital cities. An Orthodox church is to be built in Reykjavik. I saw massive church building all over Romania. A gigantic cathedral is to be built in Bucharest. There is a real religion awakening in the Christian Orthodox world. It might be a good sign.
“I can only say that whatever shorcomings are there in the Slavic lands, they are in every respect more European than France, Holland, Denmark etc. Sorry, but that’s a fact.”
Depends, of course, what you mean by “European” and also what part of Eastern Europe you’re talking about. In the case of the Czech Republic, for example, I would tend to agree. Georgia has never been particularly European in any reasonable sense.
If Putin is what the Russian people wants, that’s okay with me. However, I strongly disagree with Yeltsin’s reference to (in 1999) the “surprising wisdom of the Russian people”. I do not see him as something positive – neither from a Western nor from a Russian (long term) point of view.
In many ways, I guess you’re right when you say that Putin represent “normality” in a Russian context. Any connoisseur of Russian history knows what that means…
I agree with your resume of Russian vs northwestern European history, but I’m not so sure about the alleged religious awakening in Russia. The building of churches has less to do with religion per se, than with the traditional power alliance between the authoritarian state and the Orthodox church.
@Marianne
“The situation was however different, in most West European countries: Great Britian, Denmark, Holland, France etc. They have been, more or less, mono-ethnic for a long time, for centuries in fact. They had few, if any, native ethnic groups.”
None of the above mentioned countries has ever been mono-ethnic.
The difference between those countries and Slavic lands was that in Slavic lands non-Slavs (Germans, Vlachs, Hungarians, Jews etc.) were given a special status.
Different laws applied to Slavs and non-Slavs.
Assimilation was discouraged.
For instance, the Serbian Czar Dušan banned mixed marriages between Serbs and Vlachs in 1349.
Germans in Eastern Europe lived under their own laws for centuries, in their own towns…
In France, for example, there was an opposite process – Franks, Bretons, the descendants of the Romans etc. all merged into a single French nation.
You’re starting to sound like doc Sunic. Anyone talking about ethnic or racial homogeneity in Eastern Europe, and especially the Balkans, is either a fool or a liar.
I never said that Eastern Europe was homogenous.
It was heterogenous precisely because the local Slavic rulers permitted foreign ethnic groups to settle on their land and gave them special privileges.
My point is that there was virtualy no assimilation of these foreigners into the Slavic communities (unlike in France were you have masses of assimilated Italians, Basques, Normans etc.).
For instance, the vast majority of ethnic Germans and Jews living in Eastern Europe didnt even understand the language of the local Slavic populations.
Well done, Michael. This is amusingly written as well as informative. I don’t think style and content are mutually exclusive, as one writer here has suggested. “What oft was thought, but ne’er so well expressed” is something academic writers would do well to bear in mind.
I wish the Russian people well and hope they find a path that is healhy for them and their people. It is amusing to see Putin throw a monkey wrench in the general schemes of anti-White elites.
But if it’s alright, I think I’ll keep a cautious eye on Mr. Putin. I’ve seen anything that makes me think he has the slightest interest in helping out White people in Western Europe, the US or even the Ukraine for that matter. I’m not sure he’s all that benevolent toward some of his fellow Russians.
You can trust, but be sure to verfity. You can admire but don’t get substitute romance for reality.
Great Article . Wasn’t the Russian roll by Jewish Bangsters a disgrace ,one more unconfessed crime .When one looks at the state of the world at the moment it really DOES appear that the West is run by cunning Gangster , and to me it appears that their only motive can be to extend ‘territory’ . Just like animals.Like animals they don’t lead by example but by brute force and diabolical cunning.
Hitler was accused of being a “gangster” by FDR and Chrurchill all the time.
Hitler replied simply that they should know being that they live in places in which the term “gangster” was invented and part of everyday life.
Paul Hausser,
Das ist wunderbar!
Never heard this Hitler’s quote before. Sounds very reasonable to me
@Marianne. I agree with much or what you write, and while I don’t think the building of Orthodox Christianity in Russia is a useful long-term strategy it is certainly an important defensive short-term bulwark against hostile elites and is a useful tool to unite ordinary folk.
You mention South-Ossetia and of course, this brings me to what must be Putin’s crowning achievement in geopolitical strategy and yet another abject humiliation for the Jewish-led forces arraigned against him.
There were two components to the Jewish strategy to topple Putin. Firstly, the Orange revolution in the Ukraine, which was to a large extent financed by Berezovsky. This succeeded in toppling pro-Russian and pro-Putin Victor Yanukhovich and installing Victor Yushchenko and subsequently Julia Timoschenko. At the time this was seen as a great victory against Putin and encouraged plotters to activate the next stage of the plan – Georgia’s assault on the Russian province of South Ossettia. At the same time Yuschenko was threatening to revoke Russia’s rights to station its naval fleet at Sebastapol in the Crimean Peninsula. If carried through, this would have seriously undermined Putin’s credibility in the eyes of the military.
In order to bring the Americans on side with this Jewish-inspired and funded plan, the prospect of oil was dangled in front of their noses – the building of the Nabucco pipeline which would help undermine Russia’s dominance in the area of oil production and supply to Europe. Note the name of the pipeline: Nabucco, the title of Verdi’s first successful opera about the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar (you’ve all heard the famous Chorus of the Hebrew Slaves) who tried and failed to defeat the Jews and at the end of the opera ends up begging fogiveness from the God of the Jews.
The Americans then played their part: they persuaded Nato to push for Ukraine’s early entry into the alliance which again would have gravely damaged Putin. Finally, the Georgian part of the plan was activated (Georgia had had its own Jewish-funded Rose revolution back in 2003): Georgia would be crucial to the Nabucco pipeline, it would also seek early Nato entry, and to further rub Putin’s nose in it, they decided to launch an attack on South Ossetia.
Where are we now? Victor Yanukhovich is back in power in Ukraine. Russia has signed a new long term lease on the Sebastapol facilities. Timoschenko is on trial. Nato has ruled out the accession of Ukraine and Georgia to the alliance in the foreseeable future. The Nabucco pipeline is up in the air. President Sakashvilli of Georgia was humiliated by Putin and is now a figure of fun. His Minister of Defence at the time of the invasion of South Ossetia, Davit Kezerashvili, a jew, decided to permanently move to Israel last year. Rony Fuchs and Ze’ev Frankiel, a pair of Israeli criminals were recently sentenced to long prison terms in Georgia for attempting to bribe the Finance Minister, as Georgia publicly attempts to rid itself of the jewish plague which has so damaged its international standing.
Through all of this Putin showed commendable restraint and secured a complete and astonishing victory over the forces arraigned against him. As I say, he is a master strategist who has the full measure of the jew, domestic and international.
Berezovsky must be screaming in his bunker.
I’ve known 5 Russians over the last 5 years. They were all very friendly and liked America and Americans. The last Russian woman I knew was quite adamant that things in the US are much better than in Russia, in terms of wealth and opportunity. She also said Americans were much more patriotic than the Russians (whom she described as cynical about such things).
So the feedback I’ve received from Russians is fairy pro-US from the actual people themselves. Of course, these were all people looking for opportunity outside Russia and they tended to be fairly well educated.
I did get a sense of competitiveness from one Russian guy (worked in finance). He would say the North Pole was their property and that Santa Clause was Russian. It was said tongue-in-cheek but it was amusing. He would also say, in the same semi-serious tone, that being dictator is always the best position in life. I suspect the Russians will always be different from the Western Europeans.
HSC,
Berezovsky is an odious character and I think he is definitely mentally unstable. He doesn’t act like a normal person. He’s been, however, very quiet recently. Probably doesn’t know what next move to make.
You are right – here I am referring to your earlier comment – Russia is in many ways a European country. One French scholar I know – and who is strongly opposed to Turkey in the EU – said something interesting assessing Turkey and Russia vis a vis Europe. He said that the expansion of Russia into Asia led to the Europeanization of that part of Asia. The best examples are Neo-Classical buildings in its cities but not only. We also find there European theatre, ballet, the way of life there is very similar to that in Europe. The expansion of Turkey into Europe, on the other hand, led to the Orientalization of that part.
However, what is European and what is not depends really on the criteria we use. Sweden and Italy are both European but they are also very different, aren’t they? And what about Malta? Its language, its architecture and many other things are reminiscent of North Africa but it is not a North African society. The Maltese always identified themselves with Europe and defended themselves agaisnt the Turks like no other European state. Was the Byzantine Empire European? It was a little bit like Russia, European but also something else. Yet it is mainly to the Byzantines that we owe the Renaissance in Italy and in other parts of Europe.
Many people do not know that the Moscow Kremlin (s well as other places in Russia) was built by Italian architects. One only needs to look closely at the building to see Italian features and structures there.
You are right, most East Europeans, Slavs or non-Slavs have a greater awareness of who is turning the wheel, so-to-say. We have always known about the Talmud. We are not necessarily anti-Semitic (this word has been so much used and abused that sometimes it is hard to say what it means) but we are anti-Talmudic. Not all Jews are strict Talmud followers but many grow up with that mentality and that explains why they act the way they do.
I agree with Marianne
Russia is a European Country. Any country can adjust it’s lifestyle and become either European or Asian in that region. Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan decided to be the part of Europe (thus, they were acknowledged as such by UEFA for example). Regardless, that they are part of the Asia-Minor. Kazakhstan is an UEFA member as well, while it’s neighbors: China, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and others are not.
The people of all countries can decide for themselves, who they want to be. The Kazakhs, who appears to be looking more like Chinese, wanted to be considered as Europeans, while the Uzbeks decided to go the Asian way. Let them be, whoever they want.
By the way, for you Russian experts, have the tensions between Russia and Georgia settled down? Is that skirmish over?
I don’t mind Putin’s immoral methods, only the ruthless can stay at the top of Russian politics for long, but he has set Russia down a path to disaster IMO. Eurasianism and promoting the idea that the West and America are the real enemies, not the Turkic hordes in their backyard, is not going to help their situation. Great Russians are becoming a smaller and smaller majority.
I don’t have an opinion as to whether Putin is good or not simply because I have not spent the time to research him and there are so many mixed signals .
But , I would not think that many pro whites would be offended by a white leader who took back the nation for white gentiles by ruthless methods and also dipped into the cookie jar for a few billion$ as a ” fee”.
Did a quick search on Amazon for books on Putin. (I’m one of his fans.)
Here’s one title: Putin’s Labyrinth: Spies, Murder, and the Dark Heart of the New Russia
Can you guess the ethnicity of the author?
As the article by Mr. Colhaze notes, Jews are adept at projection. It’s more likely that the “dark heart” really refers to the machinery of Zionism as it operates in the West. In a twist, Putin is invested with all the charges of murder and mayhem.
Murder and “heart of darkness” stuff more accurately describes the tools and temperament of American neoconservatism. I’m sure that there are plenty more hack jobs that have been penned by scribbling Jews regarding Putin.
More will come if Russians insist on being Russian.
Храни нас Господи!
“As the article by Mr. Colhaze notes, Jews are adept at projection.”
Most people base their estimation of others on what they know of themselves. So, of course, a swindler and crook, even if he were an author, would see in Putin a fellow swindler and crook.
It’s a rare individual who recognizes that few others think as he does.
I hope Putin don’t push that currency to destablize $ and euro – otherwise, he will be hunted by IMF and Wall Street’s Jews as they’re doing to Qaddafi now.
Qaddafi has establish three African Banking Institutes at the cost of $60 billion to help African countries to save them from the fate of IMF. Furthermore, he also proposed the old gold Dinnar for the Muslim countries to do business with.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/sarkozy-%e2%80%98how-to-get-out-of-libyan-mess%e2%80%99/
I think many of you have too high expectations of Putin.
First, he’s not an explicit Russian ethnic/racial nationalist, and he cannot be one. He needs to keep the country together without starting a civil war, and that’s the Russian ethnic group’s interest as well. He doesn’t really welcome Chinese immigrants (for fear of Chinese territorial claims), and he has strong pronatalist policies. Russian leaders usually understand and have understood most of their history (with the possible exception of the two decades following the October Revolution) that Russia needs Russian babies, because nationalities are not really reliable when it comes to warfare. Of course it would be better if they were more ethnically conscious, but they are still light-years ahead of many of the Western leaders, because at the very least Putin is implicitly standing up for Russian ethnic interests.
As for Putin’s and the Russians supposed anti-Western sentiments, that’s true to an extent. First, much of it is understandable given the West’s predisposition to support Muslims (like Turks, Central Asians, Chechens, etc.) and other peoples against the Russians. Second, as I already mentioned, our interests are not the same, and they are clearly opposed in the case of the Baltic states, which should belong to Europe, and not to Russia. So some hostility would remain even if Putin was a genuine ethnic nationalist.
And finally, Putin does support some anti-Western powers (like the Iranians), but actually these powers are only anti-Western because of the West’s support for Israel.
So Putin is not so bad (BTW I think Medvedev is worse, he has a Yeltsin inside of him), but not a perfect leader either, and Russia is not the same thing as the rest of Europe. Russia is different, and her interests sometimes are opposed to European interests, but they are largely still white European.