World War II is often referred to as the war against racism, as if it were fought to prevent future racial discrimination. This is far from the truth. In fact there are numerous accounts which show explicit White consciousness. This piece does not pretend to give a complete picture, but rather points out some illustrative examples.
Pearl Harbor and war in the Pacific
The editorial of Life magazine in May 1945 included the following remarks: “Americans had to learn to hate Germans, but hating Japs comes natural—as natural as fighting Indian wars once was.” This is in a nutshell is the difference between the average American attitudes towards the enemy during World War II: the Japanese were a different race. Besides this, the Americans felt treacherously attacked by Japan in Pearl Harbor, but they did not feel any need for revenge or hatred against the Germans. In the government propaganda the emphasize in the war against Germany was placed on the National Socialist (commonly referred as Nazi) regime rather than the Germans, preventing the feeling among second-generation German-Americans that they were fighting their own kind.

Another distinctive difference between the approach towards Japanese-Americans and German-Americans was that the distrust against the former was much greater than against the latter. All 120,000 Japanese-Americans were rounded up in the beginning of 1942 and detained in concentration camps in the most remote and inhospitable places of America. They were not drafted (although there existed small volunteer units), nor were they deployed as laborers in the war-industry. On the other hand, there was no official distrust of any kind towards Americans originating from European Axis countries which were drafted and employed in the war industry without restrictions.
The Americans were very negative towards Japanese who were labeled as aggressive, savage, brutal and treacherous. They were even considered as a subhuman menace. War commentator Ernie Pyle described it by stating that “the Japanese were looked upon as something subhuman and repulsive; the way some people feel about cockroaches or mice.” Historian Allen Nevins explicitly touched the race factor: “Probably in all our history no foe has been so detested as were the Japanese. Emotions forgotten since our most savage Indian wars were reawakened.” When the government did a questionnaire among the American population about the proper fate of the Japanese, roughly one out of eight replied they should be exterminated. This option was not included in a similar questionnaire on the fate of the German people (although U.S. Secretary of State Henry Morganthau, Jr. certainly would have wanted it).
Race relations in the American army
The American army was completely segregated at the beginning of the war. It was not until well after the war that the U.S. Armed Forces were slowly desegregated by Executive Order 9981 of President Truman in July 1948. The segregation not only meant separate units, but also distinctive duties. Frontline duty was preserved for Whites, while Blacks were delegated to labour units and performed supply tasks, which gave them the name of ‘cantine commando’s’ among the frontline troops. As the war progressed American losses mounted and late in the war Black frontline units were grudgingly created to compensate for White manpower shortages in the frontline. Even when deployed as fighting troops, Blacks were preferably assigned to supportive branches, like the artillery.
The creation of Black frontline units did not mean that they were always deployed accordingly. The all-Black 555th Parachute Infantry Battalion was a daring experiment at the time, because parachute troops had élite status (together with Rangers and Marines) and was accordingly a bulwark of Whites. When the Black battalion was offered to the commanders in Western Europe they replied that “simply had no use” for it despite the horrific losses among American parachute troops as a result of extensive use in the Italian and French campaign of 1943/1944, not to speak of the setbacks at Arnhem and bearing the brunt of the German Ardennes-offensive (Bastogne). Ultimately they were wasted fighting forest fires in Oregon as a result of Japanese balloon attacks with incendiary bombs. Another larger Black unit, the 93th Division, was only assigned to guard duty in the Pacific.
In the end Blacks never made up more than 10% of the armed forces and more than 90% of the Blacks were assigned to physical labour behind the frontline. One of the reasons for the lukewarm reception of Blacks in the army was the low test results of Blacks on the Army General Classification Test (AGCT). Only 8.5% of all White recruits ended up in the lowest level V compared to 49.2% of all Black recruits. When we take into account the three highest levels (I, II and III), the gap between White and Black is even bigger: 66.7% to 16.1%. It meant that the great majority of Blacks (83.9%) scored at the two lowest levels, while the majority of Whites (66.7%) scored in the highest three levels. These results were backed up by the experience in both World Wars of underperforming Black units, like the 92nd Division. During the Italian campaign this division was repeatly pushed back by inferior Axis forces, even by the puny Italian troops during the battle of Garfagnana in December 1944.
Colonial troops and the liberation of Paris, August 25, 1944
Colonial possessions proved a valuable—if not vital—supply of manpower for the British and French armies. The British-Indian forces alone comprised over 2.5 million men, making up roughly half of the forces under British command. In the Free French forces under De Gaulle Whites did not make up more than one third of all forces, as they were mostly comprised of Arabs and Blacks. The French forces were basically composed of mercenaries and their troops acted as such when they advanced in Italy, leaving a trail of rape, killing, pillage and plunder locally known as the Marocchinate. When Rome was taken by the Americans, the French colonial troops were not allowed in the city by order of general Mark Clark on request of Pope Pius XII, who was well informed and was appalled by what he had heard about the atrocities in the Italian countryside.
The only Free French unit who participated in the Normandy campaign that led to the liberation of Paris was the French 2nd Armoured Division, which was anything but French. It was a unit made up of Blacks, Arabs, French sailors and even Spanish communists, who were interned in France after the Spanish civil war and joined the Free French forces in 1940 rather than remain in occupied France. Only 25% of the division was made up of native French. This issue was addressed by Eisenhower’s Chief of Staff Walter Bedell Smith in January 1944 before the invasion of France: “It is more desirable that the division mentioned above consist of white personnel.”
Even when all other French divisions were stripped of their White personnel there were not enough Whites to make the division 100% White, which was an American precondition for allowing the French to liberate Paris. Even Eisenhower’s deputy Chief of Staff, the British general Frederick Morgan, was pressing for an all-White French division for the liberation of Paris: “I have told Colonel de Chevene that his chances of getting what he wants will be vastly improved if he can produce a White infantry division.” In the end there was a silent compromise among the Allies in which all Blacks were removed from the French 2nd Armoured Division and Meditterenean troops (Syrians, Algerians, etc.) were added to make the division look more White.





Facing the Future as a Minority




Americans did learn to hate the Germans rather quickly (just like in WW1) thanks to shameless Anglo-American propaganda that was blatantly anti-German, not just anti-
‘Nazi.’ German-Americans were indeed put into detention camps, though not nearly on the same scale as Japanese-Americans.
Even though Patton had a change of heart later, both he and Eisenhower were almost pathologically anti-German. This explains why the former unabashedly encouraged his soldiers to rape, loot and kill German civilians (which they proceeded to do on a large scale), and why the latter established massive outdoor starvation pens for disarmed German soldiers, and why he played a major role in getting the exaggerations, distortions and outright lies that became known as The Holocaust started.
Let us not fool ourselves. People like Patton and Eisenhower were hardly better than Henry Morganthau, Jr.. And the propaganda of the Allies, especially of the Anglo-American variety, made that of Goebbels look remarkably restrained and entirely truthful. I have a hard time caring about our leaders having been more honest about the differences in behavior and intelligence between whites and blacks.
The father of Emmitt Till, the teenage boy killed for “whistling at a white woman” (that’s not even close to what happened) was hanged in Italy during WWII for raping and murdering two or three Italian women.
If i remember correctly, the US 92nd was the ONLY all-black unit that saw significant action. The other Allies, and the Axis (Germany and Japan) made more significant use of “auxiliary” units from conquered territories or overseas colonies than the US did of blacks.
@John Sumner
Absolutely true!
Reading about the poor performance of black Us soldiers in WW2, one is perplexed as to why so many white Americans are literally shit-scared of blacks and make such easy meat in muggings etc.
The general meme that goes around today is that blacks are tough, violent, physically strong and courageous – this is helped by the existence of violent street gangs and the inadequacy of the police response to the same.
I believe it is true to say that a majority of white American men are frightened of blacks because they think that blacks are tougher, stronger and braver.But it appears that this meme is less than 70 years old, and during and before WW2, it wasn’t around.
Why the change in attitude?
Previously it was the blacks who had a fear of whites.
WW2 was fought for the same (realist) reasons as WW1, it had nothing to do with the racial views of the Germans in 1939 any more than it had to do with militarism in 1914. Destroy this mad brute’ WWI propaganda poster.
The British Empire was totally uninterested in the Bengal famine of 1943 in which an estimated three million people died.
What is the Holocaust death toll set at these days (it seems to change and be revised weekly)? I was reading a Red Cross piece that said the jew death toll was between 275,000 to 300,000 during the Holohoax years and that many deaths were due to disease. Can anyone confirm this number? People have punch way too many holes through the 6 million number although it’s important to note that most white folks accept this number as fact (they never challenge or question it)….
During the Italian campaign this division was repeatly pushed back by inferior Axis forces…
Obviously the Axis forces weren’t inferior to the 92nd Division, considering that the Axis forces kept beating the 92nd division in spite of being greatly outnumbered and having far less in the way of heavy weaponry.
It was the choking off of German and Italian war production, combined with a freakish output of American war production and how this translated to air supremacy, which allowed American units (White American unites, anyway) to outfight Axis units.
even by the puny Italian troops during the battle of Garfagnana in December 1944.
The Italian troops in that battle were puny in number, but certainly not puny in spirit and bravery.
Even considering the inferiority of Black soldiers, for about 9,000 Axis soldiers with merely 100 pieces of artillery and no tanks to drive back 18,000 Allies troops armed with 120 tanks, 140 artillery batteries and backed up by 160 P-47 Thunderbolts was still a remarkable achievement.
@Old Glory:
Successful white advocacy has nothing to do with discussion of the Holocaust death toll.
@Old Glory: The Red Cross estimates you mentioned are very close to the numbers you wrote down. And, yes, The Red Cross, a widely respected body with no particular political axe to grind, noted that most of those deaths were due to disease, especially Typhus. Towards the end of the war, these outbreaks of disease, as well as the lack of adequate nourishment for the inmates, were extremely difficult for the Germans to deal with, as railways, roads, bridges, civilian targets and pretty much anything that moved were being mercilessly bombed. In short, they could hardly manage to feed their own soldiers and citizens.
Those figures were dismissed, and we were told that at least six million innocent people were murdered (in ways that are literally impossible) by those evil “Nazis”. One of the reasons we were given about how this number was arrived at had to do with the meticulous records the Germans kept. Well, the Germans did keep meticulous records, and they showed no such thing.
A huge portion of those documents were seized by the Soviets at war’s end. After the Soviet Union dissolved, several of those captured documents were released. And what do you know? The original German records conform to those old findings of The Red Cross. Whoops!
That was around two decades ago. Did we hear any discussion about it? Of course, not.
Someday…sure it does….the Holocaust is one of the primary reasons for Israel’s existence…lies regarding the Holocaust should be everyone’s concern…especially whites – white guilt has gotten us into this jewish black hole – the USA and a host of other countries fork over billions of dollars to the welfare “state” of Israel. Have you ever heard a speech by Netanyahu in which he doesn’t mention the Holohoax or how his people “suffered?” The Holocaust is grounded in lies – how is this not relevant? Don’t try to hide what is real and what is true by tell me that successful white advocacy has nothing to do with the Holocaust figures….
I’d hate to be candid here but I deal with rotten to the core jew monsters everyday (I work in the financial industry). As far as I am concerned, no jew is an American. They are merely parasites attached to the host (host country – USA).
I’m sure many people have already seen this film, but here it is in case you haven’t. The name of the film is Judea Declares War on Germany. There are some great facts and examples in it about the holocaust. Although I can’t prove everything that is said, one thing for sure is that we are not allowed to talk about what happened during those years, and that is clearly suspicious. Another thing is, we never hear about the Jewish led Bolshevik Revolution, or the Ukrainian Genocide, known as the Holodomor, or the expulsion of ethnic Germans from Russia, etc. The Jews want us to think that all through out history that Whites are the oppressors and never the victims.
http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=5952
For what it is worth, while I was a deckhand one summer for Bill who went to school in the Vancouver, BC area before the war he told me that the Japanese schoolboys were strutting around boasting about the changes they were going to bring in when they ran Canada after they had won the war. And Bill, may I add, was a Liberal with a capital L.
I’m not condoning Japanese imperialism by saying that I no longer believe the official story on the Nanking massacre. America saw emergent Japan as a threat to its Pacific hegemony and was casting around for reasons to clip her wings. The KMT seems to have been unaware of any massacre attributable by the Japanese invaders!
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/64_S4.pdf
Unless Holocaust ® ‘survivors’ somehow managed to multiply by division, I don’t see how else one reconciles the reality of up to 40 thousand Jewish inmates of concentration camps liberated by allies during winter-spring 1945 campaign, eventually exploding into seemingly a never dwindling army of hundreds of thousands decades after the event in question.
Under the courageous leadership of representatives Ileana ‘Israel Is One Of My Passions’ Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) and Debbie “Illegal Aliens Aren’t Illegal’ Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) a bill was drafted earlier this month aimed @ adding
Holocaust ® ‘survivors’ to the list of preferred senior citizens eligible for extra federal funds to pay for their home care.
In fairness though, tossing and turning in the humid slums of Palm Beach and Boca Raton @ such advanced age is no joke.
Evidently, America is home to as many as – hang on to your seat – ’127,000 Holocaust survivors ‘ !
An impressive figure that is separate from Holocaust ® ‘survivor’ community of Israel said to be 207,000 strong.
P.S. @ Peter Stuyvesant
I think you meant to say ‘emphasis’ rather than ‘emphasize’.
@Someday:
Successful White advocacy – as defined by Jews – has nothing to do with discussion of any subjects Jews find threatening such as:crimes of Israel,9/11 as a Mossad job,Jewish machinations during WWl (Balfour Declaration),WWll,crimes of Jews in general throughout history and of course the Holocaust mythology.Everytime one of the above mentioned subjects arises you and your collegue Caleb try to intervene.How fine you are doing your job so well!The ADL and the Mossad will be proud of you!But why being so obvious?Still thinking we goyim are stupid?Have you still not realized your game is over?
@Andrew Neather: When Napoleon had to find the Mameluke armies in Egypt, he described them as ferocious and fearless warriors of supreme quality. However, he beat them with ease, even though he was greatly outnumbered. How? Well, he quipped that one Mameluke is worth five Frenchmen, but one hundred Frenchmen are worth five hundred Mamelukes.
I think the same goes for Blacks: they might be relatively brave, but they cannot work together, because IQ is needed at the higher levels (NCOs and commissioned officers), which they are lacking.
Checked out how many African Americans were killed in WW2-does 708 sound right? As far as Jewish deaths in the WW2 era goes I’ve heard the 300,000 number also but you must add the number of Jews who escaped to the Soviet Union and died either to the harsh conditions or cobat in the Red Army. So the total must be around 1 million to 1.2 million. A good source for details on this is “The Dissolution Of Eastern European Jewry” by W. Sanning. To to those interested it is claimed in the book ” Other Losses” that more German soldiers died in allied concentration camps than died in combat in the European theater.
@Andrew Neather:
Because you are not allowed to defend yourself, because police personnel is weaker and weaker (demilitarization of police had a disastrous impact), because they can not arrest a gypsy or a black too easily (without some ngo’s and newspapers to cry racism, human rights, police brutality and so on; if you are a small country a plethora of “western” ambassadors to menace with retaliations).
I bet that a good infantry battalion would pacify anything from Detroit to Coeur d’Allene in France to Ferentari (Bucharest, Romania).
But most of all because your fellow whites will not take your side, but pass hurriedly if you are in trouble. Usually these gypsies or blacks are backing down if the whites are gathering. I have observed this behavior a number of times in different countries.
“I See The Jew”
When I see the filth my children watch on TV and in the movies, I see the work of the jew
When I see the murder of millions from communism and two world wars I see the jew
When I see the coming of a third world war I see the jew
When I see our monetary system hijacked by the Federal Reserve I see the jew
When I see the majority of the Democrats’ funds and the majority of the Republicans’ funds are both being received from AIPAC I see the jew
When I see my people portrayed as evil and idiotic on sitcoms, and movies, and commercials, I see the jew
When I see 30 million illegal aliens from Mexico crossing our unguarded borders, and driving wages down, and bankrupting our hospitals, and creating ganglands in our cities, I see the jew
When I see the tremendous tax burden on my people I see the jew
When I see the looming Federal deficit I see the jew
When I see the murder of innocent Americans in false flag attacks in the Lavon Affair, and the King David Hotel, and the USS Liberty, and the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, I see the jew
When I see the banishment of nativity scenes, the Ten Commandments removed from courthouses, the word “Christmas” replaced by “Holiday,” Washington and Lincolns’ birthday combined into President’s Day, and the enactment of a Federal holiday for Martin Luther King, a communist, I see the jew
When I see my children taught to honor anti-heroes and being told falsehoods about their own history and being made to feel guilty for it I see the jew
You should too
According to IRC, less than 300.000 people died in German camps alltogether, from various reasons, mostly due to Typhus. About a third of them were Jews. Nobody died in Treblinka-Sobibor-Belzec-Chelmno. These camps were invented after WW2 fo propaganda purposes. Treblinka was a gravel pit and Sobibor was a storage for useless ammunition.
Anyway, Holocaust Fraud is very important indeed!
@Jarvis Dingle-Daden:
There is a Jewess at work I was speaking with. She is applying for some sort of German benefit allowed to Holocaust survivors. I asked her about it, and she said it was on behalf of her father. I then asked what camp he was interned?, and without batting an eye she told me that he was in the US during the war. Evidently the benefit, whatever it is, included “holocaust era” Jews. For the sake of the German people, I really hope she is mistaken about it, but regardless of whether the benefit is real, or only in her mind, it highlights the hubris and lack of shame on the part of some of these people.
“All 120,000 Japanese-Americans were rounded up in the beginning of 1942 and detained in concentration camps in the most remote and inhospitable places of America.”
At the risk of offending the writer, I have to say that the quote above is the Japanese ethnic grievance version of what happened during WWII, not even remotely true either explicitly or implicitly.
There were two categories (evacuation & internment) applied equally to German nationals, Italian nationals, and Japanese nationals. The first category is that they were required to evacuate the West Coast as a military measure. The Japanese nationals who ended up in the evacuation camps were always free to keep on going east, and many did. It is instructive to read the obituaries of prominent Japanese nationals who did just that. Their children received full scholarships & housing costs at colleges in the mid-west if they chose to take them upon completing high school in the small cities near the evacuation camps.
The other category (internment) applied to the three foreign national categories mentioned above as well as US citizens of a number of national origins, and they were sorted out as “criminal aliens” and there were far more European-origin suspects than Japanese-origin suspects who were interned in internment camps which were far different in nature from the evacuation camps. No leaving until well after the war ended.
The word “all” is particularly inappropriate…no Japanese in Hawaii were evacuated or interned, and no one outside the West Coast military area was evacuated. There were many, many tens of thousands of Japanese who were not touched by the war at all.
In short, the quoted sentence is an important component of the Anti-White Narrative such that it is used to silence the diverse white Americans from resisting slander, stereotypes, special treatment, and demands for reparations by saucy Japanese ethnic grievance spokespeople.
I would like to recommend the Eric Hunt documentary titled ‘The Last Days of the Big Lie’ to the readers of Occidental Observer Online. A particularly comical segment shows a collection of WW2 black veterans waxing on and on about how they remember helping to ‘liberate’ the poor captives at one or more of the concentration camps, and then the narrator provides factual proof that no negro unit was stationed or deployed anywhere near any of the camps which were cited. Spielberg was effectively exposed as a lying, jew fool and propaganda spewing blowhard in this excellent documentary.
Another lie may have been unintentionally exposed in this article. Vichy France had few, if any restrictions on the movement of the population. If the French were so opposed to the Germans, why wouldn’t there have been enough additional Frenchmen from Vichy France travelling through Spain to make up a batallion for the “Free French” army?
@john sumner:
It is surprising to me that, according to what you write, Patton was virulently anti-German. I believe it was he who said right after the war that the Germans were the “best race in Europe.” He was also, I believe, a voice of resistance against the Morgenthau push to destroy German as a people-nation following the war. He took a lot of flak for that, didn’t he?
Patton’s relatively positive sentiment toward the Germans, as close to the war as he was (actually administered Bavaria I believe), has always been difficult for me to reconcile with the story that the Germans deliberately gassed and starved people to death in concentration camps during the war. How could he have held that opinion given what the Germans did?
@Old Glory:
Regarding the Red Cross, can someone provide a citation to a reliable source that substantiates these claims about Jewish deaths. I have to believe that if those numbers were actually reported by the Red Cross, we would have seen it reported already. That’s a respected organization I believe and the numbers of dead are so drastically divergent from the 6 million that it would have surely been something people would have been interested in.
Many of the above comments only show that WW ll is one of the most lied about events of modern history.Propaganda lies,exaggerations,suppression of inconvenient facts,they still form the “official story” that is taught to the public.An official revision still has to happen.For a healthy dosis of historical revisionism go to : http://www.ihr.org
Nothing good about the Good War. Including the stupid anti-Jap racism here that brought concentration camps and the unnecessary a-bombings.
Jordan – look into this figure yourself – there’s plenty of materials (books, websites, etc.) at your disposal that reference this 275,000 death toll number…I merely brought it up for discussion, that’s all – I am no WWII expert but probably know more than the average person.
I’ve also come across readings that claimed jews served in Hitler’s army – approximately 150,000, some officers, others soldiers.
The Frenchman I am is not very proud of the idea of Blacks and Muslims raping European sisters in the name of France… How redeem or country after that ?
The amount
The amount of horseshyt spewed by allied propaganda was sufficient to fertilize the Sinai desert many times over.
Why do you reckon Judaic tribal dogma enforces operating out of western European ‘democracies’ saw to it that any unauthorized interpretation of events in question becomes a punishable offense ?
This issue, though, oughta be separated from the war crimes perpetrated by occupying German forces from France to Western Russia.
In the Ukrainian example, domestic nationalists who initially greeted the advancing Wehrmacht as liberators from the reign of murderous Judaic kommissars (Holodomor; sovietization of newly annexed western territories) unleashed against them by Uncle Joe – ended up targeting communists as well as the Germans.
And to the great dismay of strategists over in Berlin, who could exercise little control over excessive acts of moronic generals who seemed to have gone off the rails following the capture of Ukraine.
@Old Glory: That’s priceless. I’m saving that to pass around, it’s so on point.
@Old Glory (red Cross)
The short anwer is, yes, the Red Cross in Arolsen has these numbers and yes, these are deaths from all causes, and yes, they are dramatically lower than the 6 million (invented in Nuremberg and never checked by the tribunal).
The exterminationists (i.e. the Holocaust believers) say, those, who were directly sent to the ‘gas chambers’, were not registered and came up with four million dead in Auschwitz alone. After 1990, this 4 million number has been lowered to 1.5 – without giving reasons and without lowering the total of 6 million, of course.
Among the many facts that make the ‘Holocaust’ narrative suspicious, is that not one single obduction of the concentration camp cadavers – and the allies examined thousands of dead bodies – found any traces of gassing.
Whaddya know, Schwartz György too is listed in the Holocaust ® ‘survivor’ registry !
And enjoy your daily barf alert, while you’re @ it.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/26/idUS78663255320110826
@Criticus:
How to redeem your country from raping Blacks and Moslims?Simple answer: join the Front National of Marine le Pen and become an active member.The party should not only insist on a total stop of immigration but also adopt remigration as a second goal.Stopping immigration is not enough,as the immigrants with their higher birth rate would soon make the real French a minority in their own country.In order to survive the French will have to make courageous decisions.But for that they also need to give up long cherished illusions such as the naive slogan of the French revolution: liberté,égalité,fraternité. The reality of life is not abstract idealism but ethnic realism.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
If successful white advocacy involved mentioning the Holocaust – Jews would never mention it.
“Whatever you do,” cried Brer Rabbit, “Don’t throw me into the briar patch”
@Jarvis Dingle-Daden:
The definition of “Holocaust” survivor has been expanded to include anyone who might have been rounded up and interned in the relocation camps if he hadn’t left Germany or any of the occupied countries before he might have been interned.
Henry Kissinger is now considered a “holocaust” survivor, despite his and his family’s having left Germany unscathed.
@Someday:
So your piece of “Aristotelian” logic is:
1) Jews mention the Holocaust all the time (right).
2) Jews hate White advocacy (you clearly imply that).
3) If mentioning the Holocaust would support White advocacy,Jews would stop mentioning it (because they hate Whites more than they love themselves).
4) Jews don’t stop mentioning the Holocaust (right).
5) Therefore mentioning the Holocaust does not support White advocacy.
First off,this implies that what Jews think is right,therefore is right.Even if we accept that,there is a LIE smuggled in your reasoning.You use the term “mentioning the Holocaust” – consciously – in two ways.1) Mentioning the Holocaust – by Jews – means the official Holocaust story (6 million Jews gassed in gas chambers).2) Mentioning the Holocaust – by White advocates – means Holocaust Revisionism ( no extermination plan,no gas chambers,no 6 million Jewish victims).Both are opposites,but you pretend they are the same.Clearly a form of deception.Are you sure you can convince us you think like an Aristotelian Aryan or rather like a Talmudic Jew?
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Addendum: Ad 5) Therefore mentioning the Holocaust does not support White advocacy.
The suggestion is of course that we White advocates shouldn’t mention the Holocaust because that would be counter productive. We should learn that from our Jewish Masters.If your reasoning is meant to protect Jews then that is counter productive in itself.It clearly implies: Jews hate Whites. Not very smart my Jew boy!
@Trenchant: A friendly question: apropos Nanking, do you discount what seems to me the well-documented testimony of John Rabe? (I don’t.) I read the pdf file you link to, and I must say that I find it stronger on argumentation than substantiation. One needn’t accept Iris Chang’s largely anecdotal numbers, of course, but surely the military murder of between fifty and seventy thousand civilians (Rabe’s numbers) and the rape of that many (or more) women and girls is a crime worthy of recollection and condemnation, wouldn’t you agree?
If, as may well be the case, you know more about this matter than I do, please enlighten me.
Incidentally, I spent two (drafted) years in the army (Vietnam vet), and during my time in uniform, I became painfully aware of what horrors my fellow GIs were capable of when command-level discipline, with the lively threat of severe sanctions, was not imposed upon them. My own inclination (or bias, if you will) with regard to soldiers, therefore, is to expect, if not the worst, then far from the best, especially when those soldiers are on the loose.
Dirty Little Secrets
The hidden, awkward origins of World War 2
The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events:
Just consider the following:
Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).
Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)
Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).
Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).
etc etc etc
http://www.rense.com/general92/dirty.htm
It’s now official – there’s no actual shortage of Holocaust Survivors :
Quote from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso in the year 2000:
‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million.’ (page 83)
We have the strange situation that homosexuality, pornography, anti-Christian Hollywood, financial-catastrophe-creating Wall Street, radical feminism, pro-abortionism, Neocon-warmaking, political-correctness-enforcement, mainstream media-control-and-management, anti-democratic money-based political lobbying with related ethnically-biased campaign financing, support for violently racist, Nazi-like ‘Israel’ and other unsavory phenomena are all notable for a dramatically higher rate of Jewish involvement and support than should be the case according to demographic share. On the other hand, in the case of enrollment and service in the US military, which has been used to put Neocon-Jewish warmaking policy into practice, Jews are heavily under-represented.
The US is over-Edomed:
In fact Edom is over-represented in Hollywood, Wall Street, US war-making foreign policy, the Supreme Court, the legal system generally, mainstream media-management, the universities and the radical feminist and pro-abortion and pro-gay movements. A century before the birth of Christ, a people utterly condemned by all the major prophets, the Edomites, were converted as a group to become ‘Jews’. According to Josephus the early Jewish historian, ‘They (Edom) were hereafter no other than Jews’ (Antiquities, XIII ix 1; XV vii 9). Roth’s Concise Jewish Encyclopedia says ‘Hyrcanus forcibly converted [Edom]. From then on they were part of the Jewish people..’ (p 154). The Jewish Encyclopedia says ‘Edom is in Jewry’ (Volume5 p41). The evil Herods were Edomites. Jesus twice says ‘those who say they are Jews and are not’ are a ‘synagogue of Satan’ (Rev2:9, 3:9); ‘Because you are not sheep of my flock you do not believe’ (Jn10:24-27). True Israel is hidden within the true Church (Jn14:21 Mt7:14).
According to the book “Jesus in the Talmud” published by Princeton University Press, written by Peter Schaefer who heads up Princeton’s Judaic studies program, the Jewish Talmud speaks of Jesus being “punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement”..
The Bible itself describes how the Creator of the Universe will respond to this Insult above all Insults, in Isaiah 63:1-6 ‘Who is this who comes from Edom with garments spattered (with blood)’, “I have trodden the winepress.. their blood spattered my garments..”. Marginal references link this with Rev 19:11-16: ‘Behold a white horse.. the one sitting on it.. is clothed in a garment dipped in blood.. He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of the Almighty. On His robe.. he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords.”
Christ Himself will destroy Edom. Obadiah verse 4: ‘Though you soar like the eagle and set your nest among the stars [referring to Edom’s power at the end of the age - see the US President's official crest with occult, non-biblical, so-called 'Star of David' formed with stars], I will bring you down from there, says the Lord.’ ‘There shall be no survivor from the house of Esau, for the Lord has spoken’ (verse 18). If you study the subject of ‘Babylon’ (Revelation 17 and 18, Isaiah 47, Jeremiah 50 and 51), it clearly refers to the sordid, rotten, sick, corrupt anti-Christian money-power so visible today, manipulating politicians and controlling the media. Edom is linked to this Babylon (compare Isaiah 34:5-15 and Isaiah 13:19-22 with Revelation 19:3).
@Aprilia:
Aprilia may I remind you that yes that puny Axis force did manage to push back overwhelming US black troops. Don’t forget that even these Black units were lead by ‘White boys’ officers and NCOs. I think that leadership in Axis units was overbearing and if not superior than that of the Allies.
Not hateful of Germans? Why Germans weren’t rounded up and put in camps too? I beg to differ. Plenty were, and today the US government refuses reparations to those Germans while lavishing plenty on those Japanese prisoners.
Here is a website dedicated to their plight: http://www.gaic.info/internment_camp.html
Gee, I thought the nazis were the bad, racist, evil guys. Victors always writes the history books. The racist attitudes of our country military/political leadership during the big war keeps me from proudly waving our flag.
WW2 was another Jew inspired war we should’ve never fought.Organized Jewry and the Jew owned media declared war on Germany, Italy and Japan.Just like the wars the US is fighting today in the Middle East for Israel.
@Luke: the perversion of history continues with the upcoming film “Red Tails” the story of the tuskeegee airmen. Blacks to be portrayed as self-less, brave and loyal (and possibly oh-so-sensitive) Americans, much better than White Americans and even more so than those “vile” Germans…
@Cary: for more details see: DD Murphey “The dispossession of the American Indians & other key issues in American history,”(scott-townsend, 1995);
http://dwightmurphey-collectedwritings.info/B7-Ch2-Webm.htm