If the mantra ‘worse is better’ represents the benign end of the negativity spectrum within the far reaches of the Right, the naysayer represents its malignant counterpart. In this article I will discuss naysaying as a pathology, its characteristics, possible causes, and analogical relationship to White liberal ethnomasochism. I will also make suggestions for treatment and eradication within the community.
Diagnosis
The naysayer does not have a mantra, like his apparently (but really not) more cheerful peer, who claims to hope things will get worse because somehow that will make them better in the end; but he is identifiable by his attitude of utter despair: for him, when it comes to the future of the White race and any ideas or efforts to secure one, everything is hopeless, nothing will work, we are doomed no matter what we try, the enemy will always be stronger. As if by a compulsion, he shoots down every idea, and prefers frowns to smiles, depression to joy, the apocalyptic scenario to the way forward. He is essentially a morbid character, who enjoys his morbidity.
Occasionally, he masquerades as a realist. Thus, anything that does not involve the imagining of a bleak future, or the lamenting of a worsening present, or, at most, the bemoaning of an idealised past, is symptomatic of a head in the clouds.
During the financial crash that began in 2008 they were the ones on a high when the stock markets plummeted, when the dollar index fell, when bankruptcies and foreclosures soared. They salivated at the prospect of hyperinflation, food riots, and racial wars. They were also the ones disappointed when none occurred.
Epidemiology, Etiology, and Pathogenesis
The naysayer’s presence in the White racialist subculture is not surprising, as he is essentially a misanthrope. Racialism involves a certain elitism and elitism involves a degree of misanthropy. It is perhaps no coincidence that human groups at the far end of the ethnocentric spectrum are also most often described as misanthropic. To this species of man, the idea of holding hands under the rainbow with a human race united in friendship and singing Kumbayah is viscerally repugnant.
His presence in the subculture is also not surprising because a substratum of the subculture itself is permeated with an unwholesome atmosphere of anger, frustration, despair, pessimism, isolation, paranoia, and depression. And being essentially a ghetto, a self-contained linguistic universe, with its own norms and codes and patters, many of those who enter it, if of a malleable type, if having a tendency to be shaped by their surroundings rather than being shapers of it, in time converge with, conform to, and internalise the negativity that surrounds them. This ‘inner universe’ phenomenon only reinforces negative attitudes developed through exposure to the hostile ‘outer universe’ of mainstream society, where they have faced an ideology they find instinctively repellent and / or where they suffered its consequences.
Symptomatology
Within the racialist Right, the term ‘ethnomasochist’ is commonly applied to White liberals who celebrate and are actively complicit in the destruction of their race.
Yet the naysayer is also afflicted by ethnomasochism, only in his case it is a variant, characterised by an emotional inversion. While the White liberal derives a perverse personal satisfaction from what he regards as his own superior virtue, the naysayer derives a perverse personal satisfaction from what he regards as his own superior knowledge. In both cases, this satisfaction comes in spite of the negative consequences that accrue from maintaining this attitude of superiority.
The consequences of White liberal ‘virtue’ are evident to readers of this website, but the consequences of naysayer ‘knowledge’ (or ‘realism’) are less so: they are the perpetuation of a state of paralysis. After all, if we are doomed, why bother?
The naysayer is at the negative end of the depressive spectrum, then, because at least the ones who say ‘worse is better’ are still pretending there is hope. The naysayer has none, and wants none, because he thinks he knows best. In both cases the attitude is a justification for inaction.
Prognosis
It is next to impossible to persuade the naysayer that things can be done to turn the tide.
And perhaps that is because he does not want the tide to be turned. Those who are naysayers because they are idiopathic pessimists like being proven right: it makes them feel superior to their peers, whom they dismiss as befuddled and naïve. Those who become naysayers through exposure to a pathological medium are just as likely to do a complete volte face and join in the euphoria of a prosperity bubble.
In all cases naysaying for the naysayer is like an addiction.
Prevention
Evidently, naysayers constitute a virus—what in primitive societies is often interpreted as a curse. They act as pathogens that, in sufficient density, infest the air and infect the minds of those around them, lowering morale, inspiring despair, justifying inaction, and inducing collective paralysis. They are the anti-leaders, the anti-Prometheans. They always work against, and never for.
They drain energy, and they never energise.
The Left, of course, loves it when naysayers are Right-wingers, and they no doubt enjoy provoking their enemies with ever-greater feats of egalitarian chutzpah.
There is no question that there are reasons for White folk to be depressed in 2011, and anger against the establishment order is justifiable. It is no small matter that said order has created conditions that have systematically disadvantaged Whites on the basis of their race, invidious theorising in universities, slandering in textbooks, depredation via the tax system, and muzzling, intimidating, and displacing Whites via the legislature. It is no small matter either that the ultimate consequence is spiritual destruction, cultural erasure, and biological extinction within a few generations. And, understandably, this makes them susceptible to the virus.
Yet just because an emotional state is reasonable and justifiable, it is neither reasonable nor justifiable to remain in that state indefinitely, nor for it to become for all practical purposes an end in itself. Aristotle’s golden mean applies here: anger is the correct emotion if it is for the right reasons, of the right intensity, towards the right party, and maintained for the right length of time.
Beyond the initial anger and depression, there needs to be action—effective action. And no effective action can take place without positive energy, without belief in possibility.
In some ways it was easier for the Left to cause the virus than it is for their victims to fight it because what we ended up with in the West was their project, their initiative.
They were not reacting against change, as conservatives find themselves doing, but were acting for change. Moreover, they had all the time in the world to accomplish their goals, whereas for a race in demographic decline time is finite. All the same, it is obvious that the Left understood the value of a positive approach because, even though their ideology is very negative, in as much as it is a force of destruction and uglification, on the whole they presented themselves, their message, and their project in positive terms, couching their language in enlightened terminology and attracting potential victims with the possibility of wellbeing (utopia) rather than scaring them away with the prospect of a plague (dystopia).
The same principle is reflected in private enterprise. Successful entrepreneurs may at times have several failures behind them, but not for that reason do they ever cease to believe in themselves. By nature they are can-do personalities, who enjoy proving naysayers wrong. They are realists, but they are more concerned with the reasons why something can be done, rather than the reasons why it cannot.
The best way to avoid paralysis, then, is to prevent it: to know when it is time to accept the situation and move forward.
Necessary to remember is that nature is cyclical, and that after winter there is spring, after death a rebirth.
Experimental Treament
Restoring health begins from inside, with a ‘revolt’ against the pathogens that paralyse, induce lethargy, and exacerbate depression, that favour retrenchment and inaction, and prevent forward motion. And that includes naysaying and naysayers.
Like beating an addiction, defeating a ruling order is admittedly one of the most difficult enterprises that can be attempted, not only because resources are controlled by the pathogen, but also because the pathogenic system reformats everything for its own benefit, including cognition.
Cognition falls thus prey to an induced false consciousness, predicated on the values and ideals that most take for granted, and whose self-serving nature is invisible to the majority. This false consciousness defies reason and is protected by a web of circular reasoning, catch-22s, and mystified dogma. That is why, today, no amount of scientific data cures top scientists of egalitarian misconceptions, for the system rewards their orthodoxy while duping them into believing that they are objective scientists rather court theologians.
Expressed another way: the addicts do not know they are addicted, and have no motivation to beat the addiction even when it is identified to them because it is so personally rewarding in the short term.
There is no single, reliable treatment for this condition, because the nature and character of the false consciousness is a function of the nature and character of the ruling order, and thus each time a ruling order arises it is different ideologically from the previous one. The pathogen is not only mutagenic, it is also mutant.
Therefore, changing the public consciousness, making it receptive to ideas that are put beyond the pale by the ruling ideology necessarily involves an experimental approach, and, inevitably, repeated failure.
This does not mean that the task is futile. For, in fact, within living memory the Left proved that a change in consciousness is perfectly possible and achievable, even in a modern information society.
Aggressive Treatment
Whether it is because the White race has lost control of it or because the race itself has become diseased, or because of both, we can easily accept Yockey’s characterisation of Western culture after World War II as diseased.
For a movement that seeks to cure the disease and secure the continued prosperity of the White race, naysaying is counter-indicated. Naysaying is, in fact, aside from a viral infection, also symptomatic of the wider disease.
Eradicating the cause of the disease calls for aggressive treatment.
Firstly, naysaying needs to be isolated and purged (or encouraged to migrate) so that it may not cause further damage. My suggested method is manifest boredom and non-responsiveness. After all, naysayers are parasitical organisms, and attention constitutes their food supply. Naysayers need to be cut off from their food supply.
Secondly, naysaying breeders (i.e., the culture-distorting or -destroying pathogen that triggers negativity) need to be neutralised and destroyed. Since the presence of naysayers has proven that negativity is an effective neutralising and destructive agent, like-for-like treatment is indicated.
By like-for-like treatment I do not mean going to Leftist websites and plaguing them with naysaying. Some Leftists no doubt monitor websites like this one in order to post as naysayers, knowing they will trigger further negativity and seeing this as a form of activism, but this is a low-level internet guerrilla tactic.
By like-for-like treatment I am referring to pursuing a critique strategy: critiquing individual initiatives in the egalitarian project when they occur, fighting them on individual winnable issues, using egalitarian terminology, and in the capacity of ostensible egalitarians, yet doing so not to advance egalitarianism, but to paralyse it with hair-splitting, self-doubt, and fragmentation.
In the Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald highlighted how successful twentieth-century Jewish intellectual movements in the West adopted the pre-existing Enlightenment ideas of the West and deployed them against the West in pursuit of an ethnic agenda. They ostensibly used a language and concepts that were already familiar and accepted by Westerners, and appropriated the underlying Enlightenment logic in order to push in a pre-determined direction; within their own community, however, many of the proponents of these movements did not practice what they preached.
For example, studies were made about the so-called ‘authoritarian personality’—claimed to be a psychopathology in the West. Yet many of the abovementioned movements were fundamentally authoritarian, zealous to enforce an orthodoxy, and centred round charismatic leaders.
While some of these movements also involved a creative process, whereby alternative narratives were developed to replace the established narrative, they were to a large extent movements predicated on naysaying.
A culture of critique is a culture of naysayers.
In our present case, and very visibly in the multiculturalist ideology, the naysaying is directed against anything of European origin.
Evidently, I would not be able to pursue this strategy myself, as I am a known and public opponent of egalitarianism. Neither would anyone else who publishes under their real names on this and similar websites and publications.
Instead, this strategy would be ideal for academics and professionals who recognise the evil of egalitarianism (its negation of excellence), but who have chosen, for practical reasons, to keep their thoughts to themselves.
As assumed egalitarians, familiar with the system’s norms and codes, as well as with its weaknesses and contradictions, they are in a position to critique egalitarianism from the inside. In other words, they can operate as ostensibly ‘well-meaning’ naysayers.
Their mission would be to respond to every new idea or initiative originating from the enemy camp with detailed critiques that explode assumptions, identify contradictions, disprove arguments, destabilise categories, provide counter-examples, expose ‘essentialisms’, and supply inconvenient data from the enemy’s own approved sources. Leftists are empathetic with this process because they have engaged in it scientifically since Marx, and have encouraged and developed, despite anything we may say about them, sharp analytical minds. The aim would be to stop them in their tracks by bogging them down with endless discussion, controversy, cavilling, and nitpicking, encouraging division, disagreement, faction, and acrimonious schisms.
In other words, I propose neutralising or destroying the pathogen through a tactical deployment of naysaying in order to trigger in the hostile organism a form of autoimmune disease—an intellectual autoimmune disease, whereby the system attacks its own ideas the way that a body with such a disease would attack its own cells.
Concluding Remarks
In addressing naysayerism one must advise against giving in to paranoia. As already stated, not every naysayer is necessarily a pathogenic infiltrator; some may well be, and it is indeed tempting to suspect naysayers of being activists or individuals temporarily under the control of the pathogen, but many suffer from this condition idiopathically or are victims of a contagion found in the environment. Patients susceptible to treatment must be segregated from terminal cases.
Successfully eradicating the problem will require an etiological approach—one that addressed the causes rather than the symptoms.
The etiology of naysayerism is well known. Optimal methods for eliminating the originating pathogen remain, however, open to investigation. The latter will remain a growth area in the years to come.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Alex,
A first reaction to your article; I will elaborate latter. I can see that the comment I wrote at counter-currents on homoerotism and narcissism latent in fascism really touched a chord. Yet, this current article of yours only attempts to hide your incapacity to face your own choices, and look at them with a distance.
You try to hide, in sophisticated intellectualism, a rant and anger that demonstrates you cannot accept criticism.
My position is that white nationalism cannot be based on such sub-group niches as feminism, gay and lesbian activism or judaism even in a white approach. That white people using white nationalism as a way to promote these niche ideologies as a universal basis for a new moral order are in contradiction of much of the work of this site. I do not mind reading people of different opinions; but I am saying this because I denote a directed reaction from my commentaries which appear unbalanced and lacking frankness.
My own intuition is telling me that many canadians must be rewarding you in adopting this attitude because I have had crowds of corrupt canadian feminists, gays and lesbians and jews, with the help of my ISP spying all of my internet habits, adopting this attitude everywhere I decide to post comments on the internet. Canada has really turned sodomizer on me!
My biggest argument as white nationalist culture is concerned is that reviving the middle class is the most important thing in giving white culture its due place. In this regard, I have greatly appreciated the set of articles by Kerry Bolton on Usury on the counter-current website.
And glad to learn about the work of Henry C K Liu, which I was not familiar with.
Sincerely,
Denys
In early June 2010 – it was reported that a prominent Israeli psychiatrist (shrink), Moshe Yatom, committed suicide. He left a note which said that Israeli Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been his patient for the last nine years, had “sucked the life right out of me”….. “I can’t take anymore”.
One week after Moshe Yalton’s suicide – Yigol Peleg, who had been treating Israeli Defense Minister, Ehud Barak, also committed suicide from an overdose of valium. His suicide note stated that Yalton’s failure to cure Netanyahu has provoked widespread despair in Israel’s psychiatric community, which fears a therapeutic remedy for doublethink is much more remote than previously believed.
http://rehmat2.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/study-is-mental-illness-a-jewish-disease/
Mr Kurtgic,
Your on to something here.
I soon weary of doom-sayers on some WN sites but my
understanding of such comments is that they are
cathartic.
Once articulated a great release is felt and no further
action is required. The organism is spent.
The trick is to release this energy slowly in a constructive
manner.
Coming from the great unwashed, it is beyond my knowledge how to go about this. I only see the necessity
for using this energy in a positive way.
The how and why is up to someone with more wisdom
than me.
Maybe those academics/professionals can turn the trick.
Good luck and I’ll be hovering around from time to time.
I have been trying to reimagine Mr. Kurtagic’s article as, say, a halftime address by a small high school’s football coach to a dispirited but very talented team that, despite its many excellences, finds itself down by two touchdowns to its traditional crosstown rival. Clearly, any such article’s imagery, tone, and length would have to have been quite different from what they actually are. Rather more to the present point, such an article would have made a far different impression—a far less creepy one—on at least this reader.
What is to be gained, Mr. Kurtagic, by adoption of the medical/psychiatric model of intramural argument and, especially, of intramovement retribution? Specifically, how do your proposed methods and, more still, your mind-set differ from those of (1) the Judaeo-communists of the Khrushchev era who made Soviet hospitals the new gulags for both genuine and faux dissidents, and (2) their lineal and sometimes biological successors, the movers and shakers of present-day Euro-American societies, who stigmatize as “denialism” any disagreement with the regnant orthodoxy on matters as (apparently) unrelated as feminism, the Holocaust™, AIDS, oppression of minorities, and 9/11 and insist on dealing with this scourge either by means of enforced exposure to correct thinking in re-education facilities or with compulsory treatment employing any of various medical and pseudo-medical modalities?
To put the matter plainly, in medicalizing naysaying, you might be accused of practicing medicine without a license, were it not for the fact that psychiatry and psychoanalysis are less aptly described as true branches of medical science than as hypersophisticated forms of bullying. In light of their brutal past and present uses, one might be forgiven for considering a bullet through the base of the skull a less repellent mode of dealing with folks you may not even be correct in regarding as a serious problem.
You are one of this cause’s headliners, Mr. Kurtagic, and not without reason. This one of your many fans hopes that your next appearance on stage will spur his wonted applause.
The article raises a good point, but lacks alot of nuance.
1) The highest standard /Ideal attitude: is when one guides his actions solely on the basis of principle, regardless of the odds to succeed. This is the definition of a HERO, one who would fight for what (in his perception) is right even if he knew for certain that he cannot succeed. That of course doesn’t mean that one has to act recklessly, trying bang his head through the wall. The resolve to fight for ones principles regardless of the odds has to be accompanied by a sense of responsibility to these principles by acting in the most effective way possible.
2) Of course most people are not heroes, but they are no cowards either. They are prepared to make sacrifices fighting for their principles, but they first need to see a realistic chance of succeeding. It is this group that is being most negatively influenced by the naysayers. Absolutely crucial in this case is a strong leader who will instill confidence within them. That is the essential characteristic of a strong leader: people are willing to follow him because he instills in them the belief to succeed.
3) The enemy is aware of the nature of the group discussed under 2) and will therefore work to demoralize them. Alot of the naysayers are really ‘infiltrators’ trying to reach this very goal. One of their most effective ways to demoralize the ‘pro-white’ movement is to damage the trust in many of it’s ‘leaders’. This is for example why so many historical figures who were/are critical of the jews are claimed to be (partly) jewish themselves.
4) To give my honest forecast myself: I’m very optimistic about the renaissance of the European People.
|
The Advantages of Pessimism
|
Creepy and bizzare might be the right words for this essay. Isn’t questioning a person’s sanity, ascribing mental illness to people, and trafficking in mental illness metaphors a classic Bolshevik technique?
Memo to self: Wait just a second, Pierre. Could this whole article just be a gag? Look again at the first paragraph, where AK writes, “In this article I will discuss naysaying as a pathology, its characteristics, possible causes, and analogical relationship to White liberal ethnomasochism. I will also make suggestions for treatment and eradication within the community.” This APA-monograph boilerplate is not AK’s usual style at all. And the photos, especially that nauseating nekkid-from-the-waist-up-geezer opening shot. Why, all that’s missing is a six-pack of the King of Beers!
Heavens to Betsy, Alex, say it ain’t so!
Simon Shepphard went some way towards defining the social and pshycological problems the white man faces in Scientific terms. He is now in gaol. I appreciate this article, it is not my style to go on lefty sites to carry out sabotage, but I will have to read it again as it seems to have some idea’s and terminology regarding race traitors and black lovers which I find useful. I also believe there is too much negativity. Alex is one of us and is active, so God bless him and thankyou for your fine article that gets me thinking. Maybe you could write a shorter article giving a list of race traiters, such as your ethnomasochist, and defining their characteristics, motivation. Pychological stuff irritates me but I would like an idiots guide to race traitors that was believable and I could quote from.
“Worse is better” is a POSITIVE mantra.
Deteriorating conditions, the ensuing violence and chaos: these will create the loose conditions that will afford alert WNs many opportunities to act, to effect change, to seize power.
“Worse is better”, therefore, it is an expression of hope.
“Hope and change”, one might say.
Here’s the thing: liberalism, Marxism, and Judaic principles are based on optimism. They’re based on prophecies, half-truths, vague maxims, and feel-good rhetoric. Let’s be honest: doesn’t it feel good to say all humanity is equal? For two years now I’ve been de-programmed from cultural Marxism and yet I still feel self-righteous while thinking those words, even if I know it’s B.S.
Qhat happens when we discover the truth, and that all the things we believed in were lies? It’s like the main character in Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge, the POW who has a pleasant fantasy of escaping his execution only to suddenly wake up to reality and find himself being pushed off the bridge with a noose around his neck. That’s who were are.
So, I ask you…how can we not be cynics and pessimists? Cynicism is our natural state. Look at Schopenhauer, Celine, the Greek Stoics, Cioran, Mishima, Mencken, and many others who spoke out against liberal orthodoxy; none of them qualify as optimists.
The Jews are optimists; in fact they are the most optimistic people in the world (in regards to themselves, anyway). They seek to make everyone else optimistic about them as well, hence liberalism, Marxism, etc. Drugs, nothing more than drugs.
There is a time for optimism, though. For example we can be optimistic about the fact that this egalitarian, multiculturalist insanity is a recent invention. So is Jewish control of the mass media. They can’t last forever. The trouble is how brutally destructive they are; if Europeans are wiped out before the whole thing crumbles then their ephemeral nature really doesn’t matter.
Also, Alex is basically right about “worse is not necessarily better.” Better is better. Just because things may get tougher for the cultural marxists and zionists doesn’t mean that Europeans will benefit. We need to learn to how evaluate things from our perspective, not from their perspective. “Worse for the marxists” is not the same thing as “better for us.” For all we know the Marxists can be replaced by something worse. So what will be best for us? Not only the negative – i.e. the LOSS of marxist ideas, but the positive, i.e. the widespread adoption of ideas that benefit Europeans collectively.
“the Left understood the value of a positive approach because, even though their ideology is very negative, in as much as it is a force of destruction and uglification, on the whole they presented themselves, their message, and their project in positive terms”
Most workers and civil servants who used to vote for “the left” didn’t want to destroy society at all. They simply wanted higher wages.
The left is a mixed bag of different people. Those who own the media and the political machinery are manipulators and nation-wreckers. But most left-wing agitators probably don’t understand what they are doing. They thought they were defending the workers’ rights, and now, they find themselves defending the replacement of White people with third-world immigrants. It’s no use understanding the value of a positive approach if you are too stupid to see that you are destroying the lives of your own children.
As for the Jews, at the time they were organizing the workers revolution, about a hundred years ago, they could not possibly know that communism would eventually give way to the ideology of race-replacement. Even the Jews don’t know what they are doing.
The Jews don’t have an entirely positive approach. They tend to paint White people in negative light. But they own the media and have the power to say what is left-wing and what is not. For example: sea-surfing is left-wing, youth is left-wing, free-love is left-wing, opposition to war is left-wing, the contraceptive pill is left-wing, the ecology-movement is left-wing, everything that is cool is left-wing. All of that is used to sugarcoat the Jewish agenda : race-replacement, interracial sex, gay marriage, the abolition of free speech…
For example, in the real world, the ecology-movement is a conservative movement, not a Jewish thing at all. But the Judeo-left has the power to hijack any white movement and claim it as their own if it may be useful to build a positive image and attract people. Actually, the left-wing label is mainly an empty label managed by the media owners.
Like “beating an addition?”
Like “rather court?”
Yes, I’m naysaying, but in fact because I (otherwise) admire and enjoy the work of this poster. Best of all, even though it is late, these nits can be permanently and easily FIXED.
Nathaniel Bedford Forrest was probably the only true genius of the American Civil War. He managed to inflict a 10 to 1 casualty ratio on Union Army. Now imagine 6 million plus warriors with at least twice the IQ of Forrest, all operating in perfect unison like a perfectly choreographed ballet. That’s what you are up against. And I am trying to be optimistic here!
From a psychiatric viewpoint, a depressive personality will always see the glass as only half-full or less than half-full. Objectively (of course) our situation is whatever the low-water mark has been (about 2008?) our glass is filling.
Read this NYT article and see if that brightens your spirits. Worse is giving way to better. Things are getting Better, and Better in Every Way. Better includes repression, but it probably will not come to that. The Whitewashing of the London riots can only lead to more of what this report from Netherlands has for us. Multiculturists are about to be tarred and feathered and run out of town. see below.
Holland: “..now you’re suspect if you say anything positive about Multiculturalism.”Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:46 PM
From:w.
— On Sun, 8/14/11, joe webb wrote:
From: joe webb
Subject: ] Holland: “..now you’re suspect if you say anything positive about Multiculturalism.”
To: “coalition iraq”
Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011, 2:38 PM
“There is a growing protest vote,” Mr. Nieuwenburg said. “People feel let down by the traditional parties.” And the traditional parties, reacting to the rise of Wilders, have all fled from the language of multiculturalism. “The taboos are gone, and now you’re suspect if you say anything positive about multiculturalism,” said Henk Overbeek, a political scientist at VU University.
You may have noticed that the opportunism of LIberals is registering in statements by the Gang of Three–Merkel, Cameron, and Sarkozy-with regard to multiculti, as the Liberals try to dodge the bullet from the nationalist right in Europe. They cannot dodge it.
The Tide of Liberal Totalitarianism has reached its high-water mark in Europe. Multiracialism and its more comfortable sounding “Multiculturalism,” has hit the Wall of Reality. That Reality is human nature.
Human Nature is such that Strangers are, have been, and always will be, suspect. Not only are all strangers suspect, but Strangers who appear even more strange upon closer inspection and experience, are shunned, and ultimately driven out of any particular racial community.
Whites have been far more generous and trusting of other races than Any Other Race. Period.
We have invented Liberalism and Socialism, etc. while no other race has done so. We have ,accordingly, been far more disposed to Surplus Trust of Others. There are Natural Genetic limits to Trust, even amongst Whites, and that limit appears to have been reached.
The Liberal media will continue to lie about these matters as long as they can, including the “Whitewashing” of the Caribbean Black rioters in London, by refusing to publish photos of Blacks in favor or publishing photos of single Whites in police custody. Pravda.
However, as part of what will be ultimately seen as a “rear guard” initiative to “understand” the underclass of blacks and browns and muslims, the LIberal media continue to use the language of oppression/deprivation and social determinations of crime, and so on.
This story shows that in Holland at least, even this rear guard action is failing, and that maybe even the liberal elites are experiencing that old “cognitive dissonance”, not to mention moral doubt.
The Great Depression in the US in the 30s brought with it about 25% unemployment and little or no State welfare/support for the unemployed. The result was not rioting, etc. but Whites behaved themselves, and expressed themselves thru politics.
This article represents a crack or Opening in the Liberal Media through which some genuine truth comes out. The NYT may see it as a clarion call for more Understanding, but the Dutch are actually starting to understand that Liberals are daffy, driven daffy intellectually by Abstractions which bear no relationship to biological reality. Biological reality includes huge racial differences in intelligence and temperments.
Liberals, historically, have recognized an opportunity when they saw it. To be Liberal has meant to position oneself for the Next Big Thing: Globalism and its Jobs. Because Whites have been the most trusting of Others (Races) as well as their co-ethnics (compared to other races) and have surmounted extended family, clan and tribe, the Next Big Thing intellectually is to become a World Citizen, and a World Businessman, all of which allows one entry into the Big Money. The Liberal upper-middle class can Do Well by Doing Good.
So, thru this unhappy combination of genetic traits toward Surplus Trust, and White genetic traits of Individualism, plus high intellectual capability for Abstraction, White LIberals have Thought their way into Cosmopolitanism, Multi-Racialism, and Multi Big Bucks, all the while puffing themselves up Morally with Badges of Honor. Love me , love me, lo-a-vive me, I’m a Li-ber-al (Phil Ochs from the 60s).
To suggest to them that they are race traitors, betrayers of their countries/peoples, one-dimensional money grubbers, and devoid of History, and let us not forget Status Seekers in the Great Family of Man/ Internationalism sweepstakes, can only elicit outraged screams of “Nazi” and so on.
So, the Tide has Turned. It was bound to happen in Europe before the US because Europeans are not Anglos, who have a couple cultural characteristics (which also may be genetically rooted) of Protestantism as opposed to Catholicism, which allows for more Jewish influence (OT and all), and more Individualism as opposed to the collectivism/corporatism in Europe (what there is left of it).
Secondly, it was bound to happen in Europe because Europe is more intellectually oriented, and has retained a right-nationalist tradition, which is unknown in the US, except for Populism, which has no intellectual heritage in the Anciene Regime because the US has no Anciene Regime for obvious reasons, and no intellectuality at all, which is not always a bad thing.
Thirdly, it was bound to happen in Europe because Muslims are far more Other than Mexicans are to American Whites. Also, Europeans do not have a Guilt complex over slavery. Finally, Europeans are generally aware of the several Muslim invasions and centuries long Occupations by Muslims of Europe.
In tandem with the economic problems of Debt, unemployment, stagnation (not collapse), American Whites also know that they got 100 million Third World folks here which are a net loss economically (45 million Blacks, 50 million Mexers, and a few more millions of odds and ends of human detritus washed up on our shores due to LIberalism and Jewish subversion (the 1965 Immigration Act, and their race equality books).
It is also fair to say, that White Americans are armed, compared to Europe. It is also fair to say that White Americans are probably more prone to shoot first and ask questions later than Europeans (if they were armed). Of course, all the questions have already been asked and the answers are slowly revealing themselves….there is no solution to the race problems. Mexers will be sent home, and Blacks will ultimately be re-segregated.
(Europeans have less of a commitment to birthright citizenship apparently…and in the US that also appears to be changing.)
So, prepare for the Next Big Thing right here: Counter-Revolution. It will be uneven, even incoherent (Tea Party), muddled, but it will come, especially as Europe sets the example.
And to reject Romanticism, prepare for elections…especially as most if not… “all [...] politics are local.”
Joe
Oh-oh, the NYT article does not show up. In brief, a social scientist from Netherlands says that nobody dares use the “multiculti” moniker any more. It is finished. Multiculti, multraci is finished as a popularly accepted discourse. So…here we go. Let the LIberals start shooting, they are finished, at least in Europe. Joe
— On Sun, 8/14/11, webfoote41@yahoo.com wrote:
From: webfoote41@yahoo.com
Subject: NYTimes.com: Amid Rise of Multiculturalism, Dutch Confront Their Questions of Identity
To: webfoote41@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011, 12:41 PM
This page was sent to you by: webfoote41@yahoo.com
INTERNATIONAL | August 14, 2011
Amid Rise of Multiculturalism, Dutch Confront Their Questions of Identity
BY STEVEN ERLANGER
Support for an anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim politician has given voice to those who fear multiculturalism.
Copyright 2011 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy
__._,_.___
This article seems to take a gratuitous swipe at those who (correctly) anticipated a severe melt-down, and hoped (naïvely) that the crisis would see asset prices reflect reality, and risk-takers would be obliged to absorb their losses. Trillions of taxpayer dollars to prop up housing and share markets have dashed those hopes, whilst these very same interventions assure that the next chapter in the financial disaster will be even more severe.
The naysayers are right about the economy. Whether or not one is optimistic in the face of a pessimistic scenario is purely a character trait. To adopt a Panglossian view is dangerous.
In any case, half-glass-fullers are born, not made, so I fail to see the point of this article, except to make the obvious point that political movements, like companies, are built by optimists.
My own personal voyage out of naysayer-dom, by an ultra misanthropic black metal aficionado:
1. Our race is not like Pokemon. We can’t catch them all. Don’t destroy your sanity trying.
2. Let it go. When you see a perfect Aryan female specimen at the grocery store with two niglets in tow, let it go. It’s not our job OR our responsibility to save her. She made her choices. Don’t let it make you sad, just keep on going forward.
3. Don’t let the Sisyphean efforts of trying to wake people up get you depressed. Some will wake up, many won’t. No one ever awoke unto racial realism from reading a flyer. Experience will teach them where they belong, or they’ll simply fall by the side of the genetic road and die there. Either way, not your problem.
4. The current jewish system will collapse on it’s own. It was built to do so. It was never designed for long term usage. Don’t worry about how difficult it is to bring zog down; zog will bring it’s self down.
5. Do whatever YOU can personally do. Even if you’re alone or with only a handful of comrades, buying up some acreage and starting a self sufficient small farm is a BIG success and a wonderful step in the right direction. Maybe our people will join in, maybe they won’t. Either way, rest assured that YOU are doing your part.
6. Fix the 14 words in front of you like tunnel vision. YOU must preserve what you can for your race and for YOUR children. Other people’s children are not your problem or your responsibility. Creating a giant homeland for everyone is also not your personal responsibility.
7. We are a race within a race. Not all whites will make it to a white homeland. Let those who choose the lies go. They would have made terrible comrades anyway.
8. Maybe we can’t regain our nations as we once knew them, BUT, the planet still contains a hell of a lot of land, and there are a near endless amount of possibilities for a dedicated group of whites to exploit. Let go of the old nations. Concentrate on building the new ones.
9. Inner peace. It’s super tough to invoke, but it will save you from swinging from your garage rafters. Aim for it and don’t let others destroy it!
10. Speak your peace and move on! Don’t spend endless hours arguing with the multicults. That’s one of their tactics to wear you down to the nub and tire you out. You know what’s right. Say it once, firmly, and then move on. Don’t get caught in the quicksand of circular arguments that serve no other purpose than to upset you and make you lose track of your course.
@Gray Prince:
Right,and isn’t it a typical characteristic of this “people of the 6 million” to boast all the time of their high IQ and isn’t it an indication that Mr.Gray Prince himself who does the same, is also one of them?Engaged in demoralization here: we are too smart,give up fighting?
Nice and very helpful article. I think it’s important to keep busy, and do healthy things for yourself and make those things a priority. But we need to ethnically network like the Jews do and support each other as much as possible. I often leave encouraging messages on the BNP’s website and other sites to keep the flame alive and thriving. Maybe because I’m young, but the more I discover about the Jews, their history in the West and so on, I get angry, overwhelmed, and then motivated to do something, anything. What we need to do is completely take over the media. This sounds impossible; Well, I bet the Bolshevik Revolution sounded impossible to some Jews and to White Russians that didn’t know there was a threat to their existence. White Power Forever!!!!!
“During the financial crash that began in 2008 they were the ones on a high when the stock markets plummeted, when the dollar index fell, when bankruptcies and foreclosures soared. They salivated at the prospect of hyperinflation, food riots, and racial wars. They were also the ones disappointed when none occurred.”
Are these guys the naysayers or the optimists?
One thing I notice in both the Left (in which I was a maverick and once accused of being a spy…great story with folks who wanted to kill me) and now on the Right, is the tendency to grasp at straws. This emotion-driven impulse is not analysis. A large part of the Left in the 60s and 70s thought Revolution was around the corner; this when workers had pick-up trucks in their driveways of homes that they owned, and the corners were paved with lawns alongside. Ta ta.
Today, it is a different story. Leftists have given -up on Revolution but retain their ressentiment which is focused on blonde and blue eyed folks especially. Hence their shrieks of “scientific racism!” and so on. They have lost their “scientific socialism” and are now reduced to the Howls of jews like Alan Ginsberg (the ol’ beatnik hippie jew) and a host of adjectives utterly lacking in logic, science, or even credibility thru their promiscuous Crying Wolf for decades now.
What is the point?
The point is that we are at the start of the Counter-Revolution. Now, personally, at almost 70 years old, I can foresee counter-revolution. It is already beginning in Europe over immigration. It is not distant thunder for us, it is on the way. Things, when they reach a certain point, gain momentum rapidly, like the Left becoming anti-semitic now, or the breakdown od commmunism in Eastern Europe, which folks who travelled there could see way before Poland and then the Wall.
Our elites are blind as bats, and that is good for us. Everything is coming up roses. Joe
For those who have suffered much longer than I (in my ignorance of racial truth), I can understand their negativity and depression. Oppression wears one down, that is a psychiatric truth…as in PTSD which affects about 20% of combat vets I have recently read..
However, if the news of the last couple of years both here and in Europe does not perk up your spirits, maybe you need a pill. Everything is going our way, including the Liberal Desperation of lies, lies, lies.
Have a nice day. Joe
PS, I forgot to say that Alan Ginzberg was also a fag (not that there is anything wrong with that) and a bum-poet. j
This naysayerism is just part of “growing up”, as it were, after the proverbial awakening. Somewhat similar to adolescence. The point is that people must become adults and climb above the emotional damage done by the system.
The etiology of naysayerism is well known. Optimal methods for eliminating the originating pathogen remain, however, open to investigation.
Pathologizing and psyhologizing strikes me as Bolshevik.
I’ve just been immensley cheared by finding out that Coco Chanel was “fiercely” anti-Semitic. So much for naysing and negativity for the day.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/anti-semitic-coco-chanel-a-nazi-spy-says-book/story-e6frg6so-1226115855588
Exellent article, Mr. Kurtagic! Well balanced, and realistic. If we were to distill it, perhaps we could say that, while courage is contagious, so is pessimism.
And, thank you for the photos of the naysayers! I am always blessed with an overabundance of them myself whenever one of my articles get posted; I always wondered what they looked like, and now I know!
What I love about Alex’s articles is that buried in his exuberant use of language are practical ideas about what will work. I’ve done time in academia and my guess is that there are more than a few “undercover lovers” with tenure. I hope some of them will find this article.
Another approach that works is Bob Whitaker’s Mantra. BUGS Swarm is a heck of a lot of fun. Try it.
Thanks also to Fenria’s Top 10 above. I appreciate your helpful optimism.
@ Fenria,
Let it go. When you see a perfect Aryan female specimen at the grocery store with two niglets in tow, let it go. It’s not our job OR our responsibility to save her. She made her choices. Don’t let it make you sad, just keep on going forward.
My antidote in that case is purchasing a copy of William Pierce’s Hunter and… start to think seriously.
@ The current jewish system will collapse on it’s own. It was built to do so.
If these economists are right, it looks like the dollar will crash much sooner than expected. The rest is silence.
I think an important root of the worse-is-better mindset may be hellfire-and-damnation Christianity.
Kurtagic’s essay seems to be short on concrete examples, perhaps to avoid the wrath of some Nabob of Negativity and his minions.
One of the widespread negative assumptions seems to be that the government and all its processes are completely controlled by the Jews (hence “ZOG”) and that they can railroad people anytime they want.
George Lincoln Rockwell had a brush with a psychiatric institution, about which the same kind of defeatist assumption prevailed, and he said this about it:
“Here is the secret which is worth life itself to my fellow battlers for America and the White Race when the enemy attempts to lock you up and shut you up as a lunatic: MOST OF THE PEOPLE YOU FACE WILL BE SINCERE, EVEN IF MISGUIDED. The jews cannot afford to let everybody in on what they are trying to do….” (This Time the World, p. 176)
The same observation is applicable to the processes of the justice system. A likely consequence of the assumption that “ZOG courts” will always railroad a racist, is armed confrontation. That of course means a dead defendant and no trial needed.
i’ve tried to read this for several days. I just can’t. What is he talking about?
This reminds me of a parody article published by one of the scholarly academic journals. The author simply made it up. He used the standard 50 word sentences and 20 letter academic words that meant nothing.
After it was published he outed the scholarly publication for printing the nonsense.
@ Henry,
you are on the right track. A couple of days ago I watch Diane Saywers ABC World News. I could not believe who she chose for “Person of the Week” Or it was chosen for her? The person of the Week, don’t remember her real name, but she had a Code Name “White Mouse”. She rescued 100 + english men during WWII. She died at 93, but the News showed a clip of a speech she gave in her old age stating: “The only good German is a dead German and that is all I have to say”. I was shocked by her statement, and thought this being said on 8:00 o’clockWorld News is outrages and Racist. She did not say the only good Nazi is a dead Nazi, but the only good German, and thereby defaming a whole Nation and People. Where is the outrage I thought.? I wrote to ABC News attn: Attn: Diane Sawyer, but the outrage should be National with a volume the Media Owners can register in their Brains as unacceptable “Person of the Week Example”, though the rescue of her countrymen is honorable, but not her statement today regarding the war in WWII. I’ve read this in Jewish Books, as they would like to see All Germans wiped off the face of the earth, but to hear it in the News a few days ago Aug 2011? Unbelievable!!!!!!!, they must be cleaming with satisfaction! A disease for sure, no common humanity of good and evil, just a jewish response. Did anyone else hear or saw the broadcast?
@ Admin: The comments are hard to access. Is there no way to revert to the previous format, where they were appended to the main article?
Thanks.
@Alex Kurtagic
“Within the racialist Right, the term ‘ethnomasochist’ is commonly applied to White liberals who celebrate and are actively complicit in the destruction of their race.”
Commonly used???
Maybe among ivory tower intellectuals who only talk to each other, because I haven’t seen anyone use it anywhere.
People that combat anti-whites in the field on a daily basis, use the term anti-white, because anti-whites are against the continued existence of white people and anti-whites hate being called anti-white.
Let us know when the ivory tower intellectuals in the pro white movement, get sick of talking to each other and being perennial losers.
Ethnomasochist you say??? You insult me sir. If only the anti-whites were harming themselves, instead of me and my children.
If you believe that whites are such suckers as that they will allow themselves to be bred out of existence , then , you must believe that whites are not worth fighting for .
I would say that “naysaying” also has an opposite disorder called “positive only.” (Is the “positive only” impulse what led to the suppression of any hint of which “naysayers” Kurtagic had in mind?) Between the extremes of “naysaying” and “positive only,” there are those who analyze specific instances and thus grapple with reality.
It seems to me that getting down to brass tacks can be the cure for an excessively negative outlook on some particular matter. This is at least true in the case of people that have been misinformed and are not pathologically negative themselves.
For example, a notion has been propagated that it is futile to buy property and settle because if you are a racial activist the SPLC will just sue and take it away from you. This is really a crippling belief because it is hard to raise a family and impossible to have a community without homesteads.
This belief is an overgeneralization of the case of Tom Metzger, who had the misfortune to live in a state (California) that allowed liens to be applied to his home and offered a homestead exemption less than the value of it. In a number of other states he would have had better protection.
So, you give people that information about protection for homesteads that varies from state to state, and if they aren’t just pathologically, irrationally defeatist, they will plan accordingly (and maybe be more skeptical in the future toward the one who had misinformed them).
Great article.
I think a possitive person will make a bad idea work, and a negative person will fail to make a good idea work.
Two types of “naysayers”: agents; patriotic negatives.
Naysayers are most likely agents. But the patriotic naysayers–the pathalogical negatives–probably have no confidence in their own abilities so they vomit their doubts over the creatives.
Both of them are negatives so TOO should percentagize their comments so they don’t outnumber the creative/optimistic patriots.
More Negro on White crime
http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/news/local_news/new-video-shows-philly-teen-attack-081711
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2011/08/17/food-deliveryman-robbed-beaten-unconscious-in-delaware/
http://www.wric.com/story/15281345/fredericksburg-cancer-patient-beaten-robbed
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/08/17/nypd-seeks-pack-of-thugs-who-beat-rob-fordham-heights-man-of-his-bible/
This is all very good news. Things are looking up, Gentlemen, and there is every reason to believe that this will result in a White awakening.
The Southern Poverty Law Center ($PLC) has lamented that these attacks will undo several decades of “progress” in race relations. Well, they’re right, it will. We need to do everything we can to encourage more of them. Perhaps some clever White Nationalists can go onto negro websites, as a negro, and start encouraging these attacks.
Things are looking up!
Thanks. Have you got a link for the SPLC statement?
Hadding,
I have some files that I want to send to you for your http://www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com/ website.
I don’t like Google and I don’t want to open a Gmail account. Also, what is that “source ID” thing that one has to use in order to contract you? Do you have just a regular email address, like Yahoo, that one can use?
Thanks.
Noncounterproductive@gmail.com
Dr. MacDonald:
No, I don’t have URL for the $PLC statement concerning the Negro flash mobs. I think I heard it on TV, but I’ll try to search around and find something. Perhaps they’ll be something in their next “Intelligence Report” about it.
Here are a few links concerning the negro flash mobs. One of the links is from the $PLC.
from Godlike Productions forum
Thread title: “It’s hard not to be racist when these flash mobs are popping up.”
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1595988/pg1
Black ‘Flash Mobs’: Anti-White or Destructive Self-Hatred?
http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/08/12/black-flash-mobs-anti-white-or-destructive-self-hatred/
The Drudge Report, Flash Mobs, and Race
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/The-312/June-2011/The-Drudge-Report-Wilding-Flash-Mobs-and-Cultural-Telephony/
Black Mobs Attack Whites, But No Hate Crime Charges, Again
http://www.sullivan-county.com/racism/black_mob.htm
from Yahoo! answers forum
Thread title: “Have you begun to worry that your kids could suffer the fate of Carter Strange, a victim of a black flash mob?”
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110805112039AATuARO
Negroes get asses kicked in brawl by Chinese team at ‘goodwill’ basketball tour
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/blog/the_dagger/post/Wild-brawl-ends-Georgetown-8217-s-exhibition-ga?urn=ncaab-wp4252
Check this out!!
Dear Professor MacDonald: Here’s an apropos link. The SPLC’s “worry” about flash mobs is well contained, as you’ll note, and the odds of them being traceable to hatred of whites is distinctly pooh-poohed. In addition, I can’t help suspecting that the article’s author, one Robert Steinback, is rather more concerned about the welfare of the disproportionately Jewish property and store owners than about the mere Gentile cattle who suffer loss of life, limb, or wallet.
mark: I haven’t looked at your link to the Bible-theft story, but you are sadly mistaken if you think that a sensu stricto white victim is involved. For my sins I am a New Yorker, and even one such as I that turns on the radio only five minutes a day and only for the weather has been unable to escape the seemingly ceaseless repetition of interviews with the victim, who sounds as if he is a just-off-the-plane Dominican or Puerto Rican. Notable too is the fact that the neighborhood that the MSM is invariably calling Fordham Heights is nothing of the sort. It was until the last decade the Bronx’s own Little Italy, a haven for fans of fabulous Italian pasticcierie (Dio mio, the cannolis!), trattorie, and pizzerie and one of the last places in the city where the thuggish element was still largely white! Diversely glorious Hispanic imports and their undesirable and illegitimate offspring now outnumber the Italian and Italian-descent residents, but at least the Italian shop owners remain. The fact that their patrons include Mob figures accords the owners a degree of protection that New York’s Foniest would never bother to supply.
@Pierre de Craon: I need to correct an unwitting misstatement. The CBS link given by mark (thank you!) identifies the address of the Bible-theft victim as Creston Avenue, whereas the barely articulate radio newsreaders I have heard for days have invariably given the address as Crescent Avenue. While the latter street is in the Bronx’s Little Italy, the former is indeed in Fordham Heights, a once shabby-genteel and very hospitable community of modest private homes and low-rise apartment blocks that many a white Christian Bronx family aspired to move to. Need I add that it has become an overflowing septic tank of human waste, one where a respectable white person of either sex is at risk even in broad daylight?
White Noise
http://www.whitenoisemusical.com/awareness/
It looks like this might be an outfit operated by the $outhern Poverty Law
Center that is analogous to Resistance Records.
Carol Swain
http://www.carolmswain.net/
A few words from the Negress academician herself.
“Annual report cites rise in hate groups, but some ask: What is hate?”
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2011/0223/Annual-report-cites-rise-in-hate-groups-but-some-ask-What-is-hate
From the Christian Science Monitor with a few words of wisdom from the authority of all authorities: Mr. Mark Potok.
“Black Youth Flash Mobs”: Are Police Downplaying Anti-White Hate Crimes?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110624164603AAFjbyd
There are a few links here to YouTube videos.
Flash mobs: A growing menace
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2011/08/09/flash-mobs-a-growing-menace/
Quite a few reader comments after the article.
Yes one has to recognize we are up against a formidable machine.
I guess staying on topic is not really a consideration here.
It would be nice if some adjustment were made so that the permalinks to individual posts functioned again.
Those of us who are using Bob Whitaker`s mantra and the mantra thinking that comes with it are very happy chappies.
All the anti-whites who oppose us get creamed and our fellow white citizens lap up our militant pro-white advocacy.
It`s an open door out there with our people,you just need the right key.The mantra is that key.