An Eagle soars alone, a Crow prefers the Flock
Friedrich Rückert (1788 – 1866)
If measured with a Christian yardstick, Pride isn’t a virtue but an affliction. It persuades people to despise lesser folks. It is strictly egoistic. It usually augurs a cold, cold heart. And it is a serious obstacle on the way to Paradise once you’ve kicked the bucket.
That is what our parish priest told me when I was a small boy, and I believe it to this day.
Yet we are all human, and therefore exceptions to the rule must be taken into consideration. You may, for example, be proud of a sportive victory because months of hard training resulted in a coveted trophy and the esteem of teachers and classmates alike. You may till a field and feel proud at the end of the day when you wipe the sweat from your brows. You may visit a famous art museum and are proud because one of the great masters on display was born centuries ago in your own country. You may travel across Europe and observe its incomparable marvels and be proud to be a member of the White Race.
You may, in short, feel a pride that isn’t in any way arrogant or supercilious, but a kind of reflective glow that warms the heart. And it does so because it isn’t caused by a vague and selfish emotion, but the lucid perception of an irrefutable Truth.
If someone would have told me a few years ago that one day I were to add my own mustard, as we say in Germany, to a devilish dish called TOO, I’d have laughed straight into his or her face. Because in those days I believed unconditionally what had been drummed into my poor head since earliest adolescence, namely that we Germans were the worst criminals on earth, that we fully deserved the devastation of our ancestral lands and its extensive dispossession, that our victims were angels without wings and business probity incarnate, that the acceptance of mass-immigration was a Christian obligation, that those who dared to utter the cursed non-words Race and Fatherland were blasted Fascists and damned Neo-Nazis and absolute scum and total offal and categorically bound to roast forever in Hell.
Until the moment when an icy little finger nipped at my spine. When the first minute seeds of dissent opened up and began to push through the fat tarmac of a lifelong indoctrination. When I cast, in uneasy self-reflection, a glimpse into my innermost being and realized with silent shock that the monstrous tale of death and destruction had suddenly developed some serious flaws.
Was it already then that accident, or perhaps Destiny, turned me into an intellectual pariah and social outcast?
In those days my acquaintances were still numerous. I had friends whose genuine affection I cherished much, among them a few academics of various vocations. Those were mostly good Christians, well mannered and widely read, and deeply enamoured of our unsurpassed cultural inheritance. They subscribed to highfalutin journals and swallowed the censored blather without hiccup or second thought. Their spacious houses seemed to overflow with wonderful books, classical paintings, a large collection of heavenly music, expensive carpets, a Steinway piano, Chinese vases on the window sill, and damask napkins and silver spoons whenever the occasion permitted. It was always a sublime treat when we sat down by the fireplace with a bottle of French wine and pondered an obscure philosophical statement, mused about the deeper meaning of a beautiful mediaeval canvas, admired the intricacies of an Italian Renaissance villa, found it near impossible to grasp the grandiose and mysterious second part of Goethe’s Faust.
This is now, with a few notable exemptions, stuff of the past.
Once the aforementioned seeds had blossomed into large and poisonous blooms, my perception of Modern History changed so much that it practically turned upside down. Which didn’t happen overnight, to be sure. More like the unhurried but incessant pollution of a guileless well. Because every appalling new fact that could be verified beyond doubt, each ironclad proof that gave in at the knees after a closer glance, every new law that tried to smother unwanted scrutiny, made it inescapably clear that there was something hideous afoot which didn’t tally at all with my benign assessment of mankind’s status quo.
I need not enter into details. If you read these lines, you do so because we are birds of the same feather. As to my re-education, it continues relentlessly. What it brought about is the belated loss of my rational innocence, the long overdue realization that I am not ruled by democratically elected representatives who try to do at least some good, but a bunch of would-be tyrants who entertain the harebrained delusion that Gold alone will eventually make them the undisputed masters of an enslaved world. If seen from a rodent’s perspective, their plan makes sense because they command an army of shoddy demons who sail in their wake. Politicians for example, or media bosses, movie makers, the plebs’ cream of the crop, hordes of liberal pseudo-intellectuals, every minority rep who can yell a slogan, the very poor who depend on pitiful handouts to keep the wolf from the door.
Yet one essential detail has been overlooked in this scheme, namely the fact that God’s blueprint of Creation does not permit the indefinite subjugation of His subjects at the hands of a few. That those who brazenly scorn His supremacy will be one day taken by the long ears and held accountable for their crimes.
While I was mulling over this piece, the Editor run a correlated article called Shame and Fear—The Two Emotions of White Self-Destruction, based on the fairly agonizing observations of a man who had seen the light but also understood its devastating social consequences. I for one can appreciate his sentiments. Because it’s happened to me already. Namely whenever I felt unable to keep my big mouth shut, whenever I could not but comment on a revoltingly distorted historical event, whenever I gnashed my teeth while some lisping pinko declared smugly that the White Man’s world must go multicultural to survive. But since I have, at least so far, the great privilege to be free-wheeling and thus don’t need to give a damn, it wasn’t shame or fear that beset me when I showed my true colours, but rather the opposite.
A cold and furious anger!
An anger that doesn’t seek revenge, but will not be quenched until the Truth has come to light or the Good Lord pleases to summon me unto His Presence. Which isn’t to say that I don’t regret at times the self-imposed exile. Because of my old friends few are left. Those who cancelled our bond did so in various ways. By mail, with earnest admonitions and the usual historical claptrap to back them up. By telephone, distressed but unequivocal. By not inviting me anymore to long-standing and very enjoyable social events. By threatening to denounce me as a dangerous hatemonger if I didn’t shut up. By simply ignoring me. By keeping, saddest of all, a superficial contact but growing cold and distant in their feelings.
So what to do? How to tackle a condition which you perceive as totally wrong and unhealthy, yet one that is officially enforced and widely accepted? How to move about in a society that will shun you or even turn on you once you declare it to be rotten through and through? How to protect yourself and those you love without becoming a traitor to your own beliefs?
Helpful is, as always, a glimpse into the past. Because this isn’t a novel situation. History has seen instances where the oppressed, particularly if morally and ethically well grounded, shook off their yoke. Take for example my favourite lot, the Early Christians of ancient Rome.
Their advent happened in an era that shows many parallels with our own. A corrupt and incompetent political caste which considered only marginally the welfare of the masses, but served a gang of so-called nobles who had concentrated most of the empire’s wealth in their hands. The staging of catastrophes, like burning down half of the city and blaming it on people who had nothing to do with it whatsoever. A once invincible army that got increasingly bogged down in costly border wars. Giant media events of the most revolting kind that were performed to keep the mob in line. A collapse of traditional mores and the permission of every sin under the sun, from a public display of the worst possible pornography to officially sanctioned assassinations. And a vacant priesthood that had lost itself in rigid dogmas and shallow formalities.
Small wonder therefore that the Decent Majority, namely those who are of good intentions and wish only to live and let live, began to feel disgusted or threatened and looked for a feasible alternative. Why exactly Christ’s Divine Message could take a foothold in the Greco-Roman world and nowhere else is a facet I want to illuminate with a future article. Right now it suffices to say that it did. Though slowly and painfully. Because the ruling classes were of course aware of the threat and did everything in their power to stem any dissent. Draconian measures were employed, beginning with ostracism and ending with dispossession, torture and execution. Which resulted in a simple countermeasure, namely to go underground. Silence was the catchword. Or just a whisper behind raised hands. Among friends that could be trusted. And who were, appalled by every new governmental blunder or outrage, slowly but steadily growing in number. Until the whole house of cards collapsed one day in a huge cloud of dust, and sanity returned unto the lands.
Sanity… and Love.
Though the road of the very first conspirators must have been a lonely one indeed. It takes great courage to swim against a muddy but mighty tide without clear bearings except the pride to be true to one’s beliefs. Yet it is a powerful sentiment if based on compassion and common sense, and no tyrant has so far been able to extinguish this sacred flame for good. As empires rise and slide back into the dust, the Vertical Man as an ideal remains unscathed.
And it is he, and he alone, who holds in his hands the chance for Mankind to survive.
The Joys of Jihad: Islamentable, Isatrocious, Isbetrayal
Nordics versus Implicit Jews in "The Switch"
The comment section has to be revised. It comes out in a little 1 inch box that reads line by line and is more trouble then its worth. As I’m typing, I can only see this sentence and the sentence above. That’s it.
Injecting Christianity into pro-White European causes just makes us look like religious fundamentalists. I’d wager good money that most WN’s are either agnostics or atheists, in fact. If for whatever reason WN’s want to maintain Christianity as a core White tenet then it’s best kept implicit, not explicit. It not only gives us an archaic image but it distances more science-minded Whites like myself.
Great article.
Injecting a little bit of Christendom into our message from time to time will make WN more appealing to the broader white world, in my opinion. A cathedral is lovely whether you believe in God or not. Michaelangelo is one of our greatest treasures as a race, and it would be a shame to leave his work behind as an “archaic” relic of a superstitious time.
Ave!
A beautiful essay. If the word “pride” becomes a stumbling block for newbies, try “the right to a decent sense of self-respect,” and that goes down well for people who over-interpret “pride,” especially for us.
“An anger that doesn’t seek revenge, but will not be quenched until the Truth has come to light or the Good Lord pleases to summon me unto His Presence. ”
Count me out on this wimp-out idea. My anger does want revenge and through the implementation of that revenge, we can guarantee that this enemy will never again be permitted to initiate the genocide of White European people. I want this enemy to be dealt with in a fashion that will forevermore resolve the threat that they pose to the continued existence of White European people and Western Civilization.
First choice: Madagascar. I suggest that the first choice be taken.
I thought that Christians-as opposed to cultural Marxist pseudo-Christians- had
become very rare in Germany.
I am a profoundly committed evangelical Christian that is essentially recently awakened to a “racialist” full-orbed point-of-view. Evangelicals are NOT immune to 45+ years of relentless, remorseless all-pervasive propaganda. Like anyone they require a frank, reasoned and persistent countering of the farrago of lies with speech that reflects REALITY and the truth–in-other-words, “deprogrammimg.” I for one am always gratified to hear in this venue others reflect a Christian world-view in their remarks.
“An anger that doesn’t seek revenge, but will not be quenched until the Truth has come to light or the Good Lord pleases to summon me unto His Presence”.
This is the correct way. Righteous indignation. It will win out, and it has often done so for me. The trick is finding the right way to go about it and not let anger explode. Stand back, cool down and pursue effective action to oppose what ever wrong has been/being committed. Maybe the wrong will not be righted in my generation, but perhaps what I do right today will be for my children tomorrow.
No instant gradification, satisfaction, or quick get rich sheme.
Science has boundries, it is faith, being in need, and imagination… of what could or would be, that propells invention, explorations, solutions etc. which may spell later into a science. I remember reading fiction cartoon magazines of going to the moon. Not so crazy now.
All things existing have their place, it is up to us to make sense, obtain meaning, and care for out planet and self for survival. Just as people are speaking different languages, so do the Sciences speak to us in different ways, or Religions inform us, tell moral tales of how people felt or thought about their life experiences and for coming generations to remember or live by. It too is mathematics, as Religion poses moral questions and norms, a quest to preserve life, a brain function, and those who are bend to destroy it. Life and Death cycle.
Religions
In additon I thought the essay was beautiful and haert warming. I can not criticize it, as it is so personal written, and as I understand it too well. Thank you, Michael Colhaze
@VikingManx:
“A cathedral is lovely whether you believe in God or not. Michaelangelo is one of our greatest treasures as a race, and it would be a shame to leave his work behind as an “archaic” relic of a superstitious time.”
Michaelangelo wasn’t a great painter because he was Christian, he was a great painter because he belonged to a race that was always artistically inclined. As such, we should recognize his work as great European art, not great Christian art.
By putting Christianity front and center all we do is give the reds and white liberals another target to attack. They can attack Christianity safely under the guise of being anti-religion, but if we made our philosophy revolve solely around genetics then we give the left no choice but attack us racially…and that will make it all the more clear that the left has it in for whitey, and that they are in fact anti-white racists.
WN’s need to control what targets they attack. WN’s need to give them no choice but to directly attack white people- when that happens, when the masses see that the left is not anti-Christian, anti-capitalist, or anti-authority but anti WHITE, then people will see their true agenda.
But as long as Christians keep bringing their religion front and center into what is primarily a genetic and evolutionary struggle, the battle will be lost, because religion is the easiest thing to attack and tear down.
They don’t already blatantly attack us for our race?
Where have you been?
YES – “Pride isn’t a virtue”, but humility is. However, the Padre made the rest of it. In Christianity there are two golden rules to enter Heaven; Salvation through the Church (Catholism) and Serving the Jews (Evangelism).
A religion which gives special status to a minority over majority and doesn’t allow a non-White to head the Church (Catholic, Protestant, Mormon, Evangelism, Presbysterian, etc.) can claim to believe in humality. Who could be a better judge of it than German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche?
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/nietzsche-on-christianity-jews-muslims-and-supremacy/
Christians are really just demi-jews and really should just get over the jew invented god.
I suggest the author join or befriend a 1%er MC. It is obvious to me that bikers terrify the jews with their total lack of poltical correctness. Outlaw bikers seem to be the only white men who consistently hold their heads high. Not like pussy KKK who hide behind masks.
My last kid is 18 soon so I will be joining a club soon thereafter. I understand some people do not have what it takes to run with real men and they should just stay on the porch.
BTW all the MC’s are experiencing massive new interest in membership so I am not the only one who is ready to go outlaw.
I enjoyed this article, I am far too scientific to be religious but I have a strong sense of it.
I think it is no suprise that those who would anihilate Whites have sought to pariahtise racial and civilisational pride. They knew excatly what to target and they knew the fear of excess pride would make it easy to pathologise this essential feeling. Of course excess pride might at some point turn into delusionism, insularity and arrogance but this kind of pathological excess pride, if it can still be regarded as pride, is I think really quite rare.
A certain amount of pride is neccesary: Having it ecourages us to maintain our appearance, the humble woman to present herself in an admirable light, to maintain our car and maintain and protect our society, to encourage, protect our children in their endevaours and to protect and nurture our race. Perhaps pride is a rare momment of the appreciation of our own beauty that is a counter to the negative self critique and low self esteem many of us internalise.
Put simply pride is not hubris. We need pride but we must avoid hubris.
In my momments of alienation and struggle it helped me to know that I shared some of the same herritage that Isaac Newton and Rudolf Diesel had; these men inspired me, I am proud that their achievements were pert of my civilisation not only by their natures but by the fact we shared something.
Having racial pride does not mean being dismissive and unappreciative of the achievements of the Japanese, Ancient Egyptians, Chinese or the bushcraft of native peoples or begrudging them their pride.
The problem is that Christianity and particularly Catholicism have become cradles of double standard. But if one reads old teachings of the Church will find a much more realistic view regarding race, eugenics etc. Consult the entries in the Catholic Encyclopedia (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/ which was finished in 1912) to confirm this fact. The late Bishop Fulton Sheen’s speech on false compassion is also highly interesting (http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=Ip7pKqfhWeo).
@Luke: First choice: Half-way to Madagascar. :-D
@Luke: My opinion is rather like yours, Luke, I want White Christians to want to stomp the Jews and their evil into the ground. I think that would be very robust and healthy. Take a stand like this “you liars, swindlers and murderers ain’t gonna mess with us! Ha
For all the prattling about everybody having a right to their faith (which is alright I suppose), we need to get one thing straight – not all religions are equal. Anybody can have a belief system, but Michael Coldhaze speaks of a divine religion because Christianity represents the Body of Christ. Christianity is not just your everyday garden variety belief system. Christ was the divine Son of God. His divinity is why we are Christian. (Whether we realize it or not.) To hate Christians just because we Christians is, in my opinion, hatred for the divinity of God.
Certainly none of us likes misguided or corrupt church leaders. We oppose weakness, indifference, stupidity, greed, dishonesty and hypocrisy. But not the divinity of Christianity. All things that are good and beautiful and fine and noble and highly intelligent (like science) come from a divine source. Michael Coldhaze seems to grasp this better than most people. Wonderful article.
@VikingManx:
Where did I say they weren’t? My point is that there’s no reason to give White-haters another reason to attack us. Religion can be easily ridiculed and squashed; science can’t. If science says that Whites are smarter on average than blacks, then there’s really no way for the left to counter that except by ignoring it and making themselves look stupid.
I can’t for the life of me figure out why any WN would want to follow a Jewish religion…a Jewish religion, which, by the way, is also followed by millions of blacks and mestizos. Being a WN Christian just looks silly and illogical when so many of your co-religionists aren’t Whites, and the religion ITSELF isn’t even White.
@Heather Blue: “All things that are good and beautiful and fine and noble and highly intelligent (like science) come from a divine source.” Very, very ably put, HB. The notion, plainly stated by Bear, that the scientific mentality supersedes and trumps the religious mentality is, may I say without malice, daylight madness, be it ever so widespread.
Mr. Colhaze, the portrait you paint of late antiquity is a remarkably accurate one, and your recalling of it comes as reminder that the consistent testimony of the doctors of the Church for at least its first nineteen hundred years was that the timing of the Incarnation was anything but random, that it happened when it did precisely because the Roman imperial world—with all its cultural and economic virtues and all its private, public, social, and political vices—was, ironically, the ideal ground for the proclamation of the new and eternal testament. Indeed, your description serves as a brilliant exemplar of the difference between the frivolity of baseless optimism and the profundity and power of true Christian hope.
You have taken an articulate and very thoughtful public stand, one that acknowledges the not occasional conflicts and tensions between white men’s understandable frustrations and yearnings and their Creator’s not always so understandable demands and requirements. That it has already drawn unenlightened criticism, even dismissal, doesn’t surprise you, I am sure, but it certainly can’t cheer you much either. Please don’t ever think you stand alone, however.
@Pierre de Craon:
I have lost friends, but reading a comment like yours warms my heart and makes me see that I have found better ones instead. Thanks to you, European, Heather Blue and everybody else who agrees, fully or at least in part, with my stumbling endeavours.
Very nice article. Our Christianity as well as our Liberty or so intertwined, that to even begin to separate them is dangerous. Here is a very interesting article that talks about how Dominionism is demonized while Zionism goes unscathed. Provocative article, I think the folks here will enjoy it. Michele Bachmann’s Religion
@ fender:
Your remarks are a stunning piece of ignorance. Apart from the insipid references to “science” vis-a-vis religion (Christianity), your disposition is utterly destructive of hopes for a working white solidarity. Your blind ideological caste-of-mind disables you in at least respecting the the great majority of us who adhere to the Christian faith or are agreeable towards it. Can you not peer through the haze of your insolence and concede that more than any other construct Christianity has shaped for two millenia the western mind–indeed, has been the bedrock of essentially all his cultural distinctives?
This is one of the best blogs I have ever read! I understand this clearly and can relate to this plight. Thank God some of us still understand the truth.
I’ve been reading about what amounts to the Greek invention of science, logic, and rationalism, and I’m increasingly convinced that Jesus, having been exposed to Greek thought via the Romans, was trying to bring components of the Greek ethos to the Jewish people, only attempting to do it in a language that they understood.
Large segments of the Greeks that pioneered so many Western disciplines were incredibly airy, absorbed, intellectual people that some might call navel-gazers, others might call flakes. It is this culture of abstract airiness that provided them the creative and intellectual breathing room to accomplish what they did.
On the other hand, this “head in the clouds” characteristic ultimately resulted in their downfall, as they were conquered by the more practical, more disciplined Romans. But it’s no accident that the Romans used Greeks as educators and intellectuals throughout the Empire, and themselves became huge fans of Greek Gods and Greek thought.
But it’s also no accident that the confluence of Greek thought + Christian morality + Roman discipline became the glorious Western civilization. In other words, each component brought an essential ingredient to what became greatness, what became a sort of grace and Godliness on earth that, absent the other components, would never have succeeded to the extent it once did, and can again.
Christianity is crucial, but need not be the fixation or the entire central focal point, just as Greek thought is crucial, but we need not pine away for the enslaved Greeks at the expense of the future.
Our obligation is to see that their spirit and essence aren’t systematically destroyed by hostiles and treasonous, Jewry-collaborating, internal moral and ethical weaklings, careerists, money-worshippers and soul-sellers, and to build upon Western magic into something even better, perhaps with a Roman-like discipline and ruthlessness as the bodyguard of it all.
I’ve goen through the same process, Mr. Colhaze. The exact same trajectory. I cannot and WILL NOT stop truth-telling – and have been derided and rejected for doing so. Generally be the very same people that ought to be most interested in proclaiming truth.
@HarryO:
I don’t care if the majority of you are Christians. My point is that Christianity should not be part of any kind of WN philosophy because its tenets are diametrically opposed to ethnocentrism. Furthermore it is not European in origin, its semitic.
As for your comments about Christianity being the bedrock of the West for 2,000 years, I agree…and that’s a bad thing. Christianity is what turned us into altruistic do-gooders. It was just another trick by Jews to disarm Whites. But whatever, you can go to church and learn all about Jewish heroes and historical figures. I’ll stick with Epicurus, Homer, and Virgil.
There is one small element I need to quibble with, or point out, for oyur consideration, Mr. Cohaze – the first followers of the Christ were targeted for their beliefs. Not their physiology.
We are being genocided because of our DNA. We cannot hide our skin.
Fender, why has Science failed to take the place of Christianity?LOL Is it because Science has failed to cure man’s historical need to worship a higher being? Look around you, Science will NEVER kill the worship of a “God figure” but will actually embolden his followers. And how can one believe in “Science” as their “protector” and thus give up “God” worship if Science keeps changing consensus theory and perceived truth?LOL Popular Science and “consensus science” has a primary function of propaganda for the masses, by the elites, and you’ve been caught hook, line and sinker. What was “truth” in Science 30 years ago is now patently false. So putting your faith in Science actually takes more faith than believing in a “God” figure. You believe in Science because that’s what you’re told to do by academia, who is also bought and paid for by the elites. And let’s be honest, truth is relative in this human context and the world is pretty terrible. So you, void of truth, have the nerve to tell someone else what they should believe in, even though it adds peace and happiness to their dreary lives? You’re pathetic in myriad dimensions. I don’t believe in Rehmat’s God, but I’m not going to insult him. Because from a pragmatic stance, this approach achieves nothing but hostility. You’re not changing any minds and there is no way to prove yourself right or wrong. So why inject negativity and nihilism into the argument and thereby attempt to destroy someone’s beliefs when you can offer nothing better? And why does the tribe hate Christianity so much if it serves their end game so well? Sounds paradoxical in nature if you ask me.
There is no implication that the image is from Ruckert. It is simply a caption. I very much doubt that any reader would be confused by this. Kevin M
@ Kevin MacDonald.
Considering that professional publication of an image typically bears some sort of identification – if only credits – I would not agree. There is ample room for confusion. Otherwise the photo just floated in from nowhere and the article ends up with two headers.
@Marcus:
Marcus, do you realize that the reason why you’re on this website is because an intelligent, scientifically-minded man wrote three books on Judaism that analyzed it from an evolutionary perspective? Do you think it’d be half as effective if Prof. MacDonald had only used religious arguments in his writing?
“Fender, why has Science failed to take the place of Christianity?LOL Is it because Science has failed to cure man’s historical need to worship a higher being?”
That doesn’t mean that that higher being exists. Like E.O. Wilson said, humans were evolved to believe in Gods, not biology. Humans have a predisposition to believe in an external agent that can change and alter things for them; that doesn’t mean there actually IS an external agent.
“Popular Science and “consensus science” has a primary function of propaganda for the masses, by the elites, and you’ve been caught hook, line and sinker.”
It’s a consensus that the earth is round. This isn’t about popular science, it’s about science period.
“What was “truth” in Science 30 years ago is now patently false.”
If I drop an apple it’ll fall to the ground because of the laws of gravity. I’m pretty sure that hasn’t changed in quite a while.
“So putting your faith in Science actually takes more faith than believing in a “God” figure.”
I don’t have “faith” in science. When a claim is supported by empirical evidence, I accept it. I don’t have “faith” in it.
” You believe in Science because that’s what you’re told to do by academia, who is also bought and paid for by the elites.”
Elites tell us to believe in certain sciences and not others. Are you not aware of all the geneticists who are silenced and shunned by elites (read: moralists) because they do quantifiable, empirical work into genetic differences between the races?
“And let’s be honest, truth is relative in this human context and the world is pretty terrible.”
Truth is relative? So if I say you’re a Chinese comic book artist that’s a true statement?
“So why inject negativity and nihilism into the argument and thereby attempt to destroy someone’s beliefs when you can offer nothing better? ”
I’m not being nihilistic. You’re the one who said truth is relative.
“And why does the tribe hate Christianity so much if it serves their end game so well? ”
The tribe hates Christianity because it’s adhered to by White people. They don’t hate Jesus or Christianity in and of themselves. If most Whites were Buddhist, the tribe would hate Buddhism. If most Whites were Hindu, they’d demolish Hinduism. Anything that organizes Whites together they want to smash. The ideology itself is irrelevant.
Believe me, I greaty appreciate the organizational power of Christianity and I accept the fact that it unified Europe agaisnt outside aggression…but we also need to accept that it is not a European faith, and that it has many negative consequences for us, not the least of which is a predisposition towards altruism and egalitarianism.
If Whites want to create a high-functioning society they’re going to need to utilize the laws of reality. Jews use these laws well, and that’s why they’re in power. If we continue to be faithfull instead of realistic, we’re going to fail. Like Francis Galton said, ‘The nation which first subjects itself to a rational eugenical discipline is bound to inherit the earth.”
Re Rückert and the photo, KM wrote, “I very much doubt that any reader would be confused by this.”
One swallow does not a summer make, nor one apple an orchard. Likewise, one swindling mischief-maker, even one claiming to be an entire list, isn’t equatable with an actual reader.
Now can we get back to the real topic of this thread!
@fender
“I don’t care if the majority of you are Christians…” That is the problem – you don’t care. I don’t particularly care that you are irreligious – but I will allow that you are without hectoring you. You cite a few pagan “heroes” – Epicurus, Virgil, Homer. How about Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Pascal, Kelvin (just a sampling) – are they not heroes to you as well? Though these believed in the inspiration and authority of the Bible, are they then nugatory for you? My intention in this back and forth is to appeal to your REASONABLENESS. That you should observe a modicum of respect for those of a religious (especially Christian) perspective. The essential purpose of this site (I presume) is to inform in order to UNITE – this your rhetoric serves to demolish.
@HarryO:
“How about Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Pascal, Kelvin (just a sampling) – are they not heroes to you as well? Though these believed in the inspiration and authority of the Bible, are they then nugatory for you? ”
This goes back to my point about Michaelangelo. Jesus did not give Michaelangelo the ability to paint, nor did it give these men their scientific talent.
Furthermore who’s to say that the advancements these men brought about couldn’t have happened centuries earlier if Europe had remained philosophically pure instead of being inundated wth mystical eastern nonsense?
“That you should observe a modicum of respect for those of a religious (especially Christian) perspective. ”
Unless you aren’t aware of this, organized Christianity is fully in line with the Jewish liberal/multiculturalist/white-hating agenda. Even as you post on this site, you argue not from a Christian perspective, but from a racial perspective.
“The essential purpose of this site (I presume) is to inform in order to UNITE – this your rhetoric serves to demolish.”
Yes, Whites should be united as Whites. Not as Christians, atheists, socialists, or capitalists, but as Whites. The less division the better. The bottom line is ethnicity, and as long as some Whites explicity argue for a certain KIND of Whiteness (i.e. Christian Whiteness) there’s going to be inner strife.
Leader walk alone, Nietzsche knew this and so his übermensch. No guilt, no shame, just live life to its fullest with truth and grace.
You write very well.
@fender: “The tribe hates Christianity because it’s adhered to by White people. They don’t hate Jesus or Christianity in and of themselves.”
That’s simply not true. Jewry has been trying to snuff out Christianity starting with its founder and namesake himself, and ever since. The Talmud actually later folded cursing Jesus and Christianity into formal Jewish doctrine.
Why? It’s because the essence of Christianity is the opposite of the essence of Judaism, the generous, good-will Christian ethos is the opposite of the selfish, greedy, bad-will Jewish one.
As for Whites successfully unifying under monolithic White nationalism, it’s simply never going to happen. Jewry may be the most clever at opportunistically leveraging their “persecuted minority” status into profitable swindles, cohesive networking and the cultivation of a culture of entitlement, but had Hitler won WWII and wiped out every Jew on earth (which may or may not have even been his agenda) factions of opportunistic, money-hungry Whites would have slipped right into Jewry’s “victim” swindle.
Probably manipulative, money-hungry Anglo elites, for example, would have taken up the racket and run with it the way Jewry has.
The point is that large factions of Whites are simply too individualistic, money-hungry, opportunistic or haughtily conceited vis-à-vis other Whites to ever get on board White collectivism. Plenty would happily sell other Whites into Islamic dhimmitude, for example, if it ever came down to that and there was a buck in it.
The larger point is that the best, and really only hope for the White race is to make collective subordination to the Western ethic paramount, along with ruthless punishment of those who refuse to play by the rules of Western civilization by, for example, opportunistically pursuing Zionism, Globalism, international corporatism, international communism, etc.
I predict that submitting to a general Western identity is about as collectivist and submissive as Whites will ever be willing to get, which means its either that, or ultimate extinction as self-serving, infighting factions are picked off one after the other.
Chris Moore’s interpretation, blending the contributions of Greek, Roman, and Christian thought into the whole of Western civilization, sounds pretty near perfect to me. So obvious, once it’s put into words.
I’m in the dark about the “Ruckert” matter; I see KM’s response, but not the original reference. I had right-clicked the photo to get the photo-info, and when I saw Michael’s name, assumed it was the name of the file, not the artist, since the work was not named, either. Whatever the case, the image is perfect for the article (in my opinion).
@Chris Moore:
“Why? It’s because the essence of Christianity is the opposite of the essence of Judaism, the generous, good-will Christian ethos is the opposite of the selfish, greedy, bad-will Jewish one.”
*Sigh.* Yes, and that’s why the Jews cream Whites every time. Jews care about power and devote all their attention to its acquisition while Whites care about “goodness,” “fairness,” or whatever other nonsense their moralist masters tell them to care about.
“The point is that large factions of Whites are simply too individualistic, money-hungry, opportunistic or haughtily conceited vis-à-vis other Whites to ever get on board White collectivism.”
Collectivism is a political ideology, and therefore, arbitrary. All Whites need to do is accept the science of heredity and the importance of genes. That’s my whole point: politics, ideology, and religion are the past. Material reality is the future. Whites may be individualistic but they are also scientifically-minded; if more Whites wake up to race reality then everything will fall naturally in place. Whites will look at low-IQ non-whites and see nothing but a genetic dead-end. They will understand that their genes will be knocked out, their children will be dumb, and their families will be fractured.
@fender: “politics, ideology, and religion are the past. Material reality is the future…They will understand that their genes will be knocked out, their children will be dumb, and their families will be fractured.”
News flash: America has followed the “material reality” model, and families are more fractured, children dumber, society more shallow and superficial than ever. It’s what’s led to our loss of Western identity and our social disintegration.
We live in a country that has lost its spirit and its soul, and that has as much or more to do with White materialism than anything else.
Soulless materialism kills, in no small part because it leads to collaboration with Jewry or other Jewish-like hyper materialists, and even a Jewish-lite identity itself via Zionism.
Last time I checked, Jews were a miniscule demographic, and only successful because they exist as a cohesive culture parasitically living off of a larger (formerly) great civilization. That civilization is crashing and burning, and Jewry will crash and burn with it.
If Western civilization doesn’t re-assert itself, some other civilization will overrun it. Major history, nearly in its entirety, boils down to clashes of civilizations. Racial conflict historically amounts to mere skirmishes within civilizations or races being folded into larger civilizations willingly or unwillingly.
Or are you trying to claim that civilizations are the past, as well?
We need to throw Jewry and other self-serving, trouble-making, polarizing particularists under the bus right now before some other civilization comes along and swallows us whole.
@Chris Moore:
By material reality I don’t mean greed, selfishness, and consumerism. ‘Materialism,’ if you look it up, simply means that everything that exists is material. It’s a philosophical/scientific concept. I’m not talking about materialism in the commonly-used sense.
I’m arguing for a philosophy whose basis is in science. It is science, not religion, that explains to us the nature of people and power. Science can be used to back up the importance of good parenting, strong family bonds, reading to your children, etc.
Before Marxism and all the silly Jewish social theories, westerners had a good (not great) grasp on how societies function. It was mostly instinctive; whites simply do nto mate with blacks. Now in our post-Marxist phase we need to use science to our advantage. Not ideology, not BS about ids and egos and Oedipux complexes and proletariat dictatorship, but real, actual things: genes, IQ, and heredity.
I am not arguing for a soulless, mechanical society. Get all those dopey Hollywood images out of your mind; eugenics makes perfect sense from a biological standpoint. Humans will always be emotional, creative beings. Nothing can stop that. But our emotions and our creativity are the result of our genes. They’re not magical. A society based on science, which promotes the reproduction of the most positive genes, will be a stable, happy, healthy society.
Intolerance for other views is a recurring theme in this thread. MacDonald sets the pace by deleting comments, however accurate, which call into question his judgment or authenticity. Had everyone this license doubtless the board would be blank. Is it threat of critique which has made Comments so difficult to access? Don’t be heartened by de Craon’s fluff, my friend; it belies an all-too-facile vitriol.
After considered opinions are in, and conflict has abated, this brief quote from fender holds the key for defeating forces aligned against European Americans.
blockquote
fender
“Whites may be individualistic but they are also scientifically-minded; if more Whites wake up to race reality then everything will fall naturally in place. Whites will look at low-IQ non-whites and see nothing but a genetic dead-end. They will understand that their genes will be knocked out, their children will be dumb, and their families will be fractured.” blockquote
This is a sharp, common-sense argument which should waken the sleeping. Follow this with White Nationalist Voter Bloc and we should be able to reform Washington. A monolithic bloc would be in position to make hard-and-fast demands of government and have them met. This means a clean-sweep of ZOG, nationalizing The Fed, outlawing Judaism, etc.
What a pathetic and weak essay. It’s no wonder Whites are losing at the moment.
@ fender:
1789: Protestant – 98.3%; R. Catholic – 1.5%; Jewish – .2%. The nation at its founding was essentially absolute in a unity of world-view – Christianity. This demographic in stunning short-order formed the most powerful, prosperous country in human history. Their “goodness” and “fairness” were the core of this great enterprise. For all those cogent formative years these progeny of Europe were thoroughly racialist in their outlook. It has been since the recent advent of secularism and a post-Christian America that mindless materialism and moral relativism have wrecked this soil. And here you prescribe more of the same (with a naked emphasis on genetics) for reformation – astonishing illogic!
@Swindlers List:
Washington is not the right direction. That’s why we’re in this mess.
To the extent that the church and other social institutions challenge the hegemony of the state, it’s all good.
We would do well to stay clear of romanticizing Christianity, especially that which is blatantly hostile to reason and the well-being of humanity. If we do not do this, we have little right to criticize what is irrational, destructive, narcissistic, infantile, threatening, stupid and cruel in terms of other religions and cultures.
@Scott Mollett:
Scott, you know you just made your son ashamed of his dad, right? “Real men join biker gangs!?”LOL!! Only a complete naive douche would say that. You know that right? What a Man-Bitch you are. There’s no bigger target than a douchy biker wearing his patch, for law enforcement as well as rivals. Stop watching GANGLAND on SPIKE TV poser! GEEZ that is too pathetic, BUT FUNNY!! Make sure you post pics of your initiation and your gay patch thats going to cost you your family and your freedom!! If ya give some people enough rope, they will hang themselves! Turn off the TV people or Scott Mollett will happen to you.
@fender:”I am not arguing for a soulless, mechanical society. Get all those dopey Hollywood images out of your mind”
Those aren’t dopey Hollywood images; they’re images from Soviet history, images articulated by Orwell.
If you’re not arguing for a soulless, mechanical society, then define how the society you envision would define soul. What woud be its conception of God, because you have to know that sooner or later, the subject would come up.
@john sumner:
Utterly no need to “romanticize.” Christianity has itself been a universe of the beneficial to human-kind. I am not pleading here for a pristine historical accounting of the faith. No rational mind would demand unexceptionable perfection. Why can some of you of a secular mind not with a particle of respect defer to the REALITY that Christianity has been part and parcel of a white ethos, culture and history for these past two millenia? Or are we, it, to “go away” in order for the entering of that “brave new world?”
PRIDE – Have many definitions. One of those is West’s favorite hobby “The Gay Pride”. Jewish groups are in the front row to support annual “Pride Parade” in New York, Toronto, London and Tel Aviv. Frnakly I don’t see a problem with that – as both Jews and gays have been persecuted in the west for centuries.
However, recently, the Gay movements have been divided into two groups – one who support Israel, they claim that Tehran and Hizbullah kill gays and lesbians. However, the gay groups which criticize Israel – are called anti-Semites and loose their government funding – as happened to Toronto gay parade last year for allowing an anti-Zionist Jewish gay group from Israel.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/09/11/us-report-iran-executes-gays-and-lesbians/
@HarryO:
“Their “goodness” and “fairness” were the core of this great enterprise.”
Yes, and this “goodness” and “fairness” is what brought us the Tribe. How long is it going to take for Christian WN’s to realize that their very own ideology is what protects hostiles in the first place?
“It has been since the recent advent of secularism and a post-Christian America that mindless materialism and moral relativism have wrecked this soil. And here you prescribe more of the same (with a naked emphasis on genetics) for reformation – astonishing illogic!”
You clearly haven’t understood anything I’ve written. Look up what materialism actually is and then get back to me.
@HarryO: I agree completely. If we start judging Christianity’s accomplishments and contributions to Western civilization the way we judge, for example, Greek accomplishments and contributions, they are unquestionably comparable. Only an idiot would deny the crucial Greek contributions, only an idiot would deny the crucial Christian contributions.
The problem that Christians bring upon themselves, and what makes them easily mocked, stereotyped and ridiculed, is that some of them insist that Christianity is the ENTIRE answer and the ENTIRE reason for Western exceptionalism and the only perspective anyone ever needs to subscribe to.
In addition to being factually incorrect, there is something innately totalitarian about that assertion.
And really, totalitarianism is completely contrary to the intended message and spirit of Christianity, as I understand them.
@Chris Moore:
“Those aren’t dopey Hollywood images; they’re images from Soviet history, images articulated by Orwell.”
The USSR was a Tribe-run totalitarian state. It has nothing to do with what I’m talking about. When did the USSR ever care about the health and well-being of the Slavic majority?
“If you’re not arguing for a soulless, mechanical society, then define how the society you envision would define soul.”
Are you insinuating that our society- or ANY society for that matter- has an agreed-upon definition of a soul? But to answer your question, this society wouldn’t have a set definition of a soul. How would I personally define a soul? An emergent property of our genes and neural activity (sentience). That doesn’t mean the soul doesn’t exist, it means that it’s biological in nature.
“What woud be its conception of God, because you have to know that sooner or later, the subject would come up”
I prefer the Goethian concept of a “living nature” as opposed to a Godhead. Again, believing that an external agent will do things for you separates part of your will from yourself.
@michael:
That is realy too bad that you consider Cirian and myself to have lost as friends, just because we have a deep-rooted DNA print for Christianity. I do not go to Church, American Christianity I can not relate to, nor do I agree with everything that Christianity does, has done or believes. I am rather closer to a C.G Jung Christian, I respect and accept the presence of 2000 years evelutionary Christianity in my ancestors, my country of origins, and my psyche. I have done alot of weeding, but I will not sever, since neither science, nor any other Religion has had any better to offer. Life is chaos and a mess around me, and Christianity (my home) keeps me stable and ankered in spiritual Laws and principles, while everything around me, laws and norms change, and when I think my world has gone Banana. I grew up with Christianity, it is who I am, so go ahead and hate us, be indifferent to us, if not your friend then your foe. Revenge is futile and perpetuates a cycle of destruction. And who sets the standards when you have paid enough for a perceived wrong?. Look at Germany, you are paying and paying, working harder and harder, and will you ever have paid enough? For some only a dead German People, economicly, etc. etc. Self-honesty and being able to look at yourself in the face every day must be very hard for some. Have you lost your Way? By the way, Christianity is not Judaism. There are some shared values as we have with other Religions. So why hate all Christians. We are not all alike. Science is wonderful, amazing what we can discover. But who is the one that is discovering? Who is you, just H2O Science, What is life and what is death, has Science answered that question? Fill me in.
@fender:
I understood you completely. You want to separate a “commercial” materialism from a “philosophic” one. I got it. You don’t seem to get that it is a distinction without a difference. I will recapitulate my last post for you which described the present result of YOUR OWN scheme – an up-for-grabs secular and amoral state-of-affairs – and a near psychotic society.
@fender:
BTW I suspect that you are a decent and conscientious person. Surely you have a firm regard for the “fair” and “good” broadly defined. As for the “Tribe” and related matters let me say that it is true, there has been a novel (20th cent.) eschatology introduced into the church (Protestant – evangelical) that has taken it by storm – though far from completely. It has been pernicious and tragic but as I say has scant history. It will pass like many previous corruptions. People are fallible – Christ and His Word are immutable – and restorative. I know these things are inconsequential to your thinking but I merely confabulate.
@HarryO:
I had a longer post here but I’m going to just ask you a simple question which I believe sums up my point entirely.
When you contract a serious illness are you going to go to a Shaman or to a doctor?
@European: Sir, you seem to have misread Michael Colhaze’s comment (i.e., the one you were replying to). He wrote of you as a friend gained, not lost, and thanked you for your words.
@fender:
Uh…a SHAMAN…of course! Now you should concede I won this wrangle.LOL
@Pierre de Craon:
and to: MICHAEL. I thought there were more then one MICHAEL posting.
oops, you are right, I guess I have misunderstood. That happens sometimes. Too many attackes make one so defensive. Sorry, please except my apology for the misinterpretation of your comment. And “thank you” Pierre for correcting me.
@michael:
Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. My apology! I very seldom, if ever, write or say anything about my spiritual roots. We Germans/I have always considered this to be a “very privat matter” and not open to discussion, unless we were among friends or similar minded, to sharpen, clarify for better understanding of our foundations. This is new for me as this blog is public, and not all are your friends here. Anyone I may have offended, my apology!
And to all those who love the Sciences, I love them too. I just watched Nova again last night and thought of all of you. The human brain is phenomenal, neurons, and how we can influence and alter behaviour.
@European: You are welcome, my friend.
@fender: What’s the point of that question? Did medieval people pray for manna or did they plant crops?
Nothing in Christianity teaches the rejection of materialistic causation. It isn’t a God of the gaps argument to merely point out that we will never completely control the material world.
In any event, this isn’t the appropriate forum for theology. For our purposes, Christianity is the European’s religion and the basis of our former (now undermined by those who hope to see us wither away) moral consensus.
@fender:
fender you just don’t get it. Why does theory exist? Does empirical data really explain our human context?LOL Why does Tom Cruise and a host of other celebrities piously follow Scientology? Why does Rehmat believe in Islam? What is the foundation of theory? Once you understand these concepts you might be able to grasp why its pointless to deconstruct religion unless your doing it for politicized reasons. Until then, you have your faith and I have mine. But it does make you look foolish to criticize others when your own philosophical house is built from the same subjective material. Cmon, figure it out pal.
@Athanasius:
The point of the question is to illustrate the difference between a society of belief and a society of knowledge. Look at the current situation: Whites believe they’re evil because that’s what they’ve been told all throughout their lives. Imagine if the dumb White masses knew what we here know?
“Nothing in Christianity teaches the rejection of materialistic causation. ”
So why are Christians in this thread so hostile to it?
“It isn’t a God of the gaps argument to merely point out that we will never completely control the material world.”
It’s not about controlling the material world, it’s about shaping human destiny. For centuries humans practiced eugenics unconsciously; we knew we were attracted to someone because they were good-looking or because they were smart. We didn’t know WHY they were good-looking or smart, just that they were, and it seemed like a good idea to have children with them.
Now that we understand genes, we understand what makes people beautiful and/or smart, and we can shape societies in such a way that they are as healthy and happy as possible. I’m not a utopian, mind you. Societies will always have crime, unhappiness, and degradation…but at the same time there’s no reason why any city should look like Detroit or Bridgeport. Both are the result of dysgenic, self-destructive ideology.
“Christianity is the European’s religion and the basis of our former (now undermined by those who hope to see us wither away) moral consensus.”
Well it’s not this European’s religion, and furthermore, it’s precisely your moral consensus that led to the current European tragedy. A Europe that had retained its orginal values of virility and competition would never have allowed millions of alien peoples into their lands. Never.
@Trenchant: It might be better to forget about him, Trenchant, and save the sound counsel for someone who might actually listen—someone, that is, able to tell a caption from a credit line when it’s as plain as the nose on his face.
Mr. Colhaze is entitled to the comforts of his religious beliefs, no matter how untenable. He is not entitled, however, to devise his own Christianized history of the Roman Empire by asserting hysterical fictions as historical facts.
The Christianizing of the empire was the result of the imperial power of one man– Constantine I (a.k.a. “the Great”). His successors to the throne in the former Byzantium then made de jure what Constantine had made de facto.
Like political correctness in the post-World War II West, Christianizing was a top-down process, imposed upon the masses and society-at-large by fiat. After nearly three centuries of evangelizing and proselytizing, prior to the reign of Constantine, perhaps ten percent of the empire had come to profess Christianity. There was nothing either inevitable or democratic about the Christianizing of the West!
Between his moving the center of the Roman world from Rome itself to Byzantium, and his rejection of “paganism” for Christianity, Constantine caused the Western Empire to collapse within a hundred years. The power that the Catholic Church amassed was a direct result of the vacuum left in Western Europe by the creation of what came to be recognized as a distinct empire. The result was both a
@Jake: . . . a disaster for the West– what we today refer to as “the Dark Ages”– and a disaster for Christianity itself, due to its bastardization under a Papacy that took worldliness to new depths.
[N.B. Apologies for a slip of the mouse, which posted my original message before I had quite finished it!]
Scarcely a month goes by without there being a newcomer to TOO who seeks to make his mark by posting a 2 percent rewording of the same vulgar Christophobic calumnies masquerading as history that a hundred other hip, Enlightened, blasé worldlings have posted a thousand times before. September’s Gibbon-for-dunces recycler is Jake.
I won’t say that I look forward eagerly to the hyperlink blitz, but I’ll bet the ranch it will soon follow. Brace yourselves.
@Marcus:
“Why does theory exist? ”
Theories that turn out to be correct become facts. Theories that turn out to be false get discarded.
“Does empirical data really explain our human context?”
Yes, it does. Or would you argue that, in spite of all the data which shows blacks being impressively unintelligent, it’s possible that blacks are actually secret geniuses?
” Why does Tom Cruise and a host of other celebrities piously follow Scientology? Why does Rehmat believe in Islam?”
Celebrities follow scientology because fame and constant exposure to the masses makes people emotionally unstable and Scientology offers them pseudo-scientific relief. Rhemat follows Islam because he was raised to.
” What is the foundation of theory?”
Observation.
“Once you understand these concepts you might be able to grasp why its pointless to deconstruct religion unless your doing it for politicized reasons.”
Whos’ the one deconstructing here? You’re arguing that empiricism and knowledge don’t really exist.
Look at the technology you use; your car, your computer, your phone. Those instruments work because scientists figured out the laws of physics, electricity, and a host of other things. If these scientists had been wrong then technology wouldn’t work.
“Until then, you have your faith and I have mine. But it does make you look foolish to criticize others when your own philosophical house is built from the same subjective material. Cmon, figure it out pal.”
Subjective material, eh? So if someone came onto this site and said that Jewish political groups have the interests of Europeans at heart, you’d defend him by saying that it could be true?
Frankly, I don’t get the posters here who focus on denigrating Christianity. Clearly there is a chemistry between Christanity and European derived people which has created Western success. I personally respect a Christian sensibility interwoven with tradtional white, European respect for our latitudinal natural environment and ecological niche. These do not have to be mutually exclusive. Christianity is the religion of our fathers going back around a thousand years, and contained our moral structure leading to our greatest heights. I simpIy do not see the scientific advancement without the backdrop of that moral structure. I have no problem with Christianity incorporating the more instinctive nature of Europeans to show a ritual apprecition of the natural world. Until science can predict what happens inside a black hole among other phenomena I am comfortable with a Christian religious belief.
@fender:
Sorry fender, you believe in your own objectivity. There really is no hope for you.
fender states: Whos’ the one deconstructing here? You’re arguing that empiricism and knowledge don’t really exist.
Wrong, you’re arguing that empiricism, a methodology, should take the place of metaphysics and man’s historical need to worship a God figure. This is hilarious on so many levels. In actuality, even academia has begun to question empiricism as an authoritative methodology, let alone replacing religion with it. For sake of argument, check out BEYOND EMPIRICISM: POLICY INQUIRY IN POSTPOSITIVIST PERSPECTIVE
By Frank Fischer, a Professor of Poli Sci at Rutgers University. A working bibliography can be provided on this topic.LOL
fender, take a lesson from Voltaire: “Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.”
@Marcus:
I understand that man has a historical need to worship a God figure. Man also has a historical need to believe he is good. That doesn’t mean there’s a God, and that doesn’t mean all men are good. Emotional needs hold no sway over science.
You say academia is turning its back on empiricism– the same academia that teaches us how evil Whites are and how awesome blacks are. It doesn’t surprise me that Jewish and White Liberal sophists don’t want empiricism, especially now that geneticists are realizing the truth about genes, race, and heredity.
Help me understand what perspective you’re arguing from. Are you saying that you literally believe in the tenets of Christianity or are you saying that we need to preserve Christianity purely for utilitarian/societal reasons, even if they aren’t true?
My entire argument boils down to this: the people that organize according to the laws of nature will succeed, and the ones that don’t will fail. Whites can follow Christianity all they want but unless they recognize the importance of preserving their genes and breeding in such a way that produces intelligent and healthy people, it’s all for nothing.
I think it was Wilhelm Marr who said that the Jews conquered Germany because the Jews were strict realists while Germans were idealists who thought they could alter reality with their minds–no doubt a Christian/Platonic/Hegelian hangover. Until we disregard our idealism we’re going to be a doomed people.
To Michael Colhaze and everyone,
This was a good essay, and I have an idea for you.
Like you say, far from the demonization in the mainstream, we have truth, history and reason on our side. Because it is all those things, it can withstand massive scrutiny. In fact the only way to knock that truth down is using nefarious tactics such as demonization.
This is our strongest asset and we should be building strategies directly off its back.
For example, other objectives we have would be to influence more influential, more middleclassed people. Also, people who are likely to be more influential, either now or in the future.
A further requirement is that, because the resistance to ‘hearing’ the truth is so very high, and the penalties so great, another objective is to somehow focus our efforts on not just on groups more likely to be from influential affluent/middleclassed backgrounds, but also on groups more likely to contain committed truth seekers. People for whom deep truth has exceptional significance. People like that, once they’ve seen it, will find it very painful to live a lie, will find it harder to bury their heads and look the other way.
We don’t need complex opinion polls to identify such groups. Simple reasoning will do the job. I’ll give you an example. Don’t laugh, but one example would be Philosophy academics, students and/or lay followers.
Philosphers are more likely to have a deep commitement to truth seeking. Thus less likely to be able to wear a veneer and live a lie.
But much more besides:
At the academic level, Philosophy is still overwhelmingly White.
Because times are hard, everyone except those from money, is having to choose an education stream that improves our earning ability. Philosophy students are much more likely to be middleclassed and from money.
Finally – philosophers want to talk, are available to talk, and can easily be located in specialist lists. .
So people, please start thinking in ways like this, looking for angles and strategies (or use one that you hear about), and then starting acting out. You could be the difference. The line of history could literally flip over because of the knock-on consequences of things you say and do.
@Marcus:
Your ignorance shows as soon as you wrote biker gang. They are clubs. You are the one who watches TV as I have never heard of the programs you mentioned.
Is it a real suprise that you believe everything the media says about the proud white men who ride with 1% MC’s? Are they all criminals because the jewvision TV says they are? Get a clue brother. The fearless white men with a patch terrify the jew mob that has usurped our nation. That is why they are so villified.
I bet you would never spout what you wrote here in the presence of a man with a patch.
@fender:
I read this whole thread and I understood your point on the first post.
Your patience is astounding.
Mr. Colhaze writes what I feel but am unable to express in words. I hope his work can be gathered together and published in physical form because I would buy his book to give away to friends capable of waking up.
Is there even a website where his writing is all gathered together?
@fender,
This is stated in the most respectful way – you cannot argue with Christlings. As has been said here many a time, it’s bizarre that so many of them flock to the site of an evolutionary psychologist. You can do better things with your time.
Look up Richard Burton’s “Kasidah” online. Chapter VII. It pretty much sums up the way he, you, I, and millions of non-truckling Europeans half a century ago look at Chris Moore’s magic “soul”. If you believe in evolution, you don’t believe in souls.
Christlings and evolutionists view the world differently, and thus are on two different paths.
The Kasidah
By Sir Richard Francis Burton
@fender: No one is hostile to materialism as such. But the notion that consciousness is an epiphenomenon is far too much for many of us to swallow.
We all accept material causation, as well as evolution, but that just isn’t a complete explanation.
I think that the problem is that at some point, most whites have come to the conclusion that virtue means not pursing one’s ethnic or family interests. To some extent, this is honestly rooted in Christianity. However, it is also found in Indo-European paganism (Zeus Xenios, etc.). Regardless, Christianity has an parallel current that emphasizes justice and love of family–this ideology served Europeans well for over a thousand years, and there is no reason that it cannot again. Even you have to admit that the majority of the whites who are furthering our destruction have nothing more than a shadow of Christian morality imbued in their souls (brains, if you prefer). Most of them are outright hostile toward traditional Christianity, precisely because it has for so long preserved European identity.
@Scott Mollett:
Hey Scott,
You sound like a misled child. You are not part of a biker gang, you’re not a prospect and you aren’t a patch carrying member. So how you can tell someone else that “they don’t know what its like to be in a biker gang” makes you a complete WANNA-B and a moron. I understand you feel weak and therefore feel the need to supplement this weakness by joining a bigger group that “offers safety,” but your just setting yourself up to get used like a bi*** and then tossed. You don’t understand the nature of the beast. Don’t be so eager to lose your own autonomy at the hands of drunken fools who are comfortable in jail settings. If you place such low value on yourself, what will your children think of themselves, in turn?
There is no way out of this mess. The Jews both political parties and the media, They say what is the truth.
Until we have freedom of speech to discuss the Jews freely, we will continue to sink into the Multicultural Dictatorship. Whites are being closed out of America, we will eventually have the status of peasants.
There is no hope.
Christianity is the greatest strategy of the Jews, white Christians are the pawns of the Zionist Jews.
@Robert Paul Maune:
You are very kind, thanks a lot. As it happens I have an offer to collect my stuff into a book. I’m looking into it. Perhaps by the end of next year, when there is a bit more to show. As for a website, there isn’t any. It’s just TOO.
Magnificent work, Michael. Thanks. It is great to realize that the maturing of white racial consciousness involves such truth and hope.
Our movement awaits its Chesterton. Chesterton was too often a shill for the British Empire, even though he had his better moments. We Christians need to learn from past mistakes–our leader was/is not defeated even when tortured to death.