Darren Scully, as of Tuesday night former mayor of the Irish town of Naas, has become yet another of those ‘respectable’ conservatives caught up with by the world they made possible with their appeasement of the Left.
On Tuesday morning, speaking live on the town’s Kildare radio station KFM, he candidly confessed to the frustrations that attend the performance of his duties in the multicultural society embraced by his party:
‘I have been met with aggressiveness, I have been met with bad manners,’ he said during the radio interview.
‘I have also been played the race card.
‘[They’ve] said: “Oh yeah you’ll help white people, but you don’t help black people.”’
Unfortunately, he made the mistake of also confessing to having had enough of the rude, aggressive, chip-in-the-shoulder Blacks in his constituency:
‘So after a while of this… I’ve been doing this now for six or seven years – I just made the decision, a conscious decision, earlier this year, that I just was not going to, myself personally, was not going to take on representations from black Africans.
‘I would be very courteous to them and I would pass on their queries to other representatives, who would take their concerns.’
Never missing an opportunity to gain political advantage, the reaction was swift. As reported by the Daily Mail,
Politicians and anti-racism groups . . . demanded Mr Scully’s expulsion, while a Labour MP . . . reported the father of two’s remarks to gardaí [Irish police] under the [Prohibition to] Incitement to Hatred Act.
And, like the ever-so-craven conservatives everywhere, Fine Gael, the party of which Scully is a member, threw him to the dogs within the hour:
‘The views expressed by Cllr Scully do not reflect the views of Fine Gael, and they are not party policy,’ the statement read.
‘Fine Gael is an inclusive party and we are trying to build a country that caters for all.’
Scully reacted by making the same mistake conservatives make in these situations: he issued an apology, complete with all the requisite clichés:
‘I realise now that my remarks were open to an interpretation that I did not intend,’ Mr Scully said in a statement.
‘I abhor racism in all its forms. I have been proud to be mayor of Naas and to represent all the people of the town.’
An apology was not enough, however, for by the time Scully issued it he had already caved in to pressure behind the scenes:
‘. . . as a result of the upset that I have caused, I feel it is appropriate that I step down from this position.’
Pious, ridiculous, opportunistic, hot-under-the-collar commentating and pontification poured in regardless. Note how much space the Daily Mail article is taken up by the reactions:
Former Labour MP Moosajee Bhamjee warned yesterday that comments such as those by Mr Scully would represent the ‘beginning of official racism’ in Ireland.
The country’s first Muslim MP, who served as a MP for Clare from 1992 to 1997, warned that such comments from a Government party councillor could lead to official State racism if left unchecked.
‘This is really, really frightening because it could be the beginning of State racism in this country,’ Dr Bhamjee said.
‘There is a small neo-Nazi following in this country you know, and this just adds to what they see as enlightenment. It’s important now more than ever that our racism laws be strengthened.’
The psychiatrist said he had been abused in the past himself and he called on the Government to introduce a new paper on racism as the law is clearly deficient in this area.
And even though Mr Scully resigned as mayor last night, Dr Bhamjee believes he should also be expelled from Fine Gael.
‘I’ve been abused myself in the past too, people feel they’re entitled to, but the law of the land says no.
‘Cllr Scully is still a public representative, he should be expelled from Fine Gael after this and I’m calling for that.’
The association campaigning for equality in sport, Show Racism The Red Card, was appalled by the comments and said it was clearly discrimination.
‘The qualification for Mr Scully’s comments that “I am not racist” is bizarre,’ Show Racism the Red Card co-ordinator Garrett Mullan said.
‘There cannot be an acceptance of racism within politics in Ireland.’
Sue Conlan, chief executive of the Irish Refugee Council, said: ‘Negative stereotypes create racism, and as we saw earlier this week when a Nigerian taxi driver was assaulted, this can lead to violence.
‘We all have a role to play in counteracting negative stereotypes and our elected officials have a special role to play in promoting tolerance and inclusion throughout the community. Cllr Scully’s comments are outrageous and not worthy of an elected representative.’
Catherine Murphy, an Independent MP for Mr Scully’s constituency, Kildare North, said the remarks were ‘outrageous’ and ‘totally unacceptable’. She described as ‘unfathomable’ the reasons why he felt the need to make such a statement.
‘While listening to Kildare FM this morning I could scarcely believe what I was hearing.
‘It’s right and proper that Cllr Scully step down as Mayor of Naas immediately and I welcome his decision to do so.
‘However, it’s essential that if he remains as a public representative he must undertake to represent all of the people, without qualification or prejudice.’
Taxi driver Ola Akinsete, who is originally from Nigeria, met Mr Scully last month after he drove him home to Kerdiff Park in Naas.
The 44-year-old, who has lived in Naas since 2000, said: ‘The racial issue in Naas is becoming so bad for the past three years – it’s becoming an epidemic.
But it’s a big shock to me to hear him say those comments as a young man, it’s unbelievable.
‘What’s happening in Naas are discussions about what the black community is doing to the town. For instance, some people say we are taking their jobs and taking over the place. This should not be the attitude of some of the public. We are in a different century.
‘I came to Ireland for a better life but now my wife, Kate, and I just make sure our children are safe and have a better upbringing.
‘If this situation continues, how are my children able to live in a country where they have been brought up with such racial issues?’
For his remarks, Mr. Scully now faces six months to two years in jail or fines ranging from €1000 – €10,000 ($1337.54 – $13,375.40). The police are already investigating him. Wikipedia meanwhile has been quickly updated with references in several articles to Mr. Scully’s misdeeds and infamy.
So the question ought to be, rather, How are Mr. Scully’s children to live in a country where they cannot even complain about obnoxious Blacks? Where a person cannot say he has had it up to here with their bad behaviour?
Note that these Blacks were not being denied representation, and neither were they being deprived of courtesy, even when their behaviour made them undeserving; Mr. Scully had, in fact, been referring them elsewhere so that their concerns would be addressed by a more suitable representative.
Note also that Mr. Scully had not been acting out of prejudice. He had had first-hand experience with Black Africans throughout most of his thirties. If there are negative stereotypes about Blacks, why is it never anything to do with their behaviour? I suppose the Left will attempt to psychologise Mr. Scully’s experiences, theorising that he imagined the bad behaviour because he harboured ‘subterranean prejudices’ against Blacks; or else by theorising that it was Mr. Scully who elicited the bad behaviour in some subtle way, through his posture or word choices.
It is difficult to sympathise with a member of a conservative political party, since conservatives are always cowards and doubly guilty of leading us to where we are. Yet it is not only the likes of Mr. Scully who are persecuted for publicly making a fair and honest statement. Thus, even if we conclude that Mr. Scully is enjoying just deserts as a conservative politician, it is worth mentioning that, as is usually with reports of these types of incident, the consequences to Mr. Scully’s family are passed in silence. The best-case scenario for this family is that it will be left poorer by €1000, not a trivial sum in relation to a councillor’s salary in these difficult times; absent luck, Mr. Scully’s children could be left without a father for up to two years. The burden will fall on them and his wife, as previously did the stress on her husband caused by his Black constituents. Should her husband be fined the larger amount, it will be she who may have have to apply for a loan, with no guarantees of obtaining one, thanks to the tight credit markets of these past few years.
Let us explore what it will mean for Mr. Scully to be convicted, besides debts, public humiliation, and having to find a new line of work.
Job applications ask about convictions and employers routinely conduct checks, so, if convicted, Mr. Scully will be legally required to mention his, which may make employment difficult. Some convictions are considered ‘spent’ after five years, but no conviction is ever spent for people in the following professions: doctors, dentists, nurses, midwives, layers, opticians, teachers, police officers, and child care. These professions will be barred to Mr. Scully.
And so would, potentially, retraining: convictions may lead to being refused a place at a university.
Convictions can also mean being excluded from a country, which means Mr. Scully may find future travel limited, particularly with the United States. Similarly, Mr. Scully would encounter difficulties obtaining a work or residential permit, since information about previous convictions and proof of good character are legally required.
Unless Mr. Scully already owns his house, he will be required to disclose his conviction when applying for a mortgage. Not doing so would cause problems as it would be considered a breach of the mortgage agreement.
A conviction will, in addition, make it almost impossible to get any kind of insurance. Unspent convictions must be disclosed and this may lead to his being refused or to sky-high premiums.
Again, perhaps just deserts for Mr. Scully, whose ‘centre-Right’ party, Fine Gael, governs in coalition with Labour, a party that made state-sponsored diversity an item in their 2011 election manifesto. But one has to wonder what kind of people do this to a man simply because he was honest and desired to do his job without being subjected to abuse. What is more, what kind of people do this to a family?
Still, for some this is insufficient, and the likes of Muslim Labour MP Moosajee Bhamjee still want even harsher punishments and penalties. I wonder how far he would like the laws to go? Life in prison? Cutting out the tongue?
Meanwhile, the likes of Mr. Ola Akinsete, who evidently was too happy to chip in and also kick Mr. Scully while he was down, does not want anyone to notice, think, or talk about the fact that Blacks are visibly altering the town and gaining housing and jobs at the expense of the natives, upon whom they have been imposed by politicians.
It is ironic for a country that fought a war of independence from Britain—still remembered by a few alive today—to create conditions that effectively put its own citizens at a disadvantage in the face of African and Muslim colonisation. Either liberty is a burden or else liberty means not liberty, but freedom to choose some form of slavery.
Ireland is not alone in this, of course, for the other Western nations have gone down the same route, with the enthusiastic support of many of its citizens as well—though not the majority.
This remains the unsolved X-file of the West as a whole.
Facing the Future as a Minority
All the essential aspects of today’s West of Kulturbolschewismus were forseen
by 1950:
http://bonald.wordpress.com/book-reviews-society/family-and-civilization/
And Spengler:
http://bonald.wordpress.com/book-reviews-history/the-decline-of-the-west/
What an unbelievable outrage, that such an innocuous statement should bring about such a gross injustice. The mayor had a belly full of outrageous Negro misbehavior and said so. So what, he was only acting as any sane White man would, after dealing with these primitive, simian-like thugs, up close and personal. He obviously had a racial awakening, implicitly or otherwise, and spoke his mind like one is expected to in an erstwhile free society. Freedom of speech, anybody?
The self-destructive ideological poison of race denial and racial masochism that infects the West, judging by what is happening today in the British Isles, is leading to a bloody anti-White tyranny. It’s surreal that Ireland is committing national and racial suicide, after having survived so much historically. The internalization of irrational, loony, abstract, ideological alchemy, that has the West so intellectually toxified, has let to this racial dilemma. The answer? Get motivated and support the racially aware nationalist organizations of your choice.
Darren Scully was naive not to know how to get to the hearts of the Jewish Lobby, which the Daily Mail represents.
Europe’s most successful anti-immigration politicians who long ago realised that backing Israel was a clever way to guarantee respectability for a cause that risked being framed as extremist or racist…..
In June 2011, the chief of the English Defence League (EDL), Tommy Robinson, accused being a Nazi, wrote: “The English Defence League was formed two years ago. One of the fundamental beliefs that this movement was built on was its support for Israel’s right to defend itself. In our first demonstrations, we went to Birmingham, and we flew the flag of Israel, the Star of David. In the first public speech I ever gave, I wore the Star of David in Leeds. The reason for this is because Israel is a shining star of democracy. If Israel falls, we all fall. This is what our movement has been built on for two years“.
@icr, Thanks for the great link. We have become a people without honor. So sad.
@Rehmat:
The so-called patriots who champion Israel are leading us down the wrong path. It has been documented to my satisfaction on this site, by Prof. McDonald among many others, that they are simply playing us off against Muslims for the benefit of increasing sympathy for Israel.
The EDL are an embarassment to us Brits and do more harm than good. Their view of Israel as a “beacon of democracy”, despite it’s decades of treachery, espionage and terrorism against us, shows how ignorant they are… or then again, is their leadership made up of Shabbats Goy, WILFLLY leading us down that path? Either way, groups like that will get us nowhere and won’t win an ounce of reprieve by praising Israel (it certainly didn’t work for Nick Griffin and his mob).
Ireland is clearly slated for racial destruction.That this once proud Celtic nation that survived so much oppression and finally gained its freedom will now be rapidly replaced by Third Worlders is immensely saddening.The country has a population of slightly over 6 million,so it can easily be overrun by the ever overflowing sewers of the Third World.Nigerian and Chinese immigrants are flooding its shores and the character of its cities is rapidly changing.A few decades more and the Irish will be a minority in their own country.Then no amount of “voting” can save them.
I remember having seen on the Internet the picture of a Jewish minister in the Irish governement having something to do with immigration and I immediately understood the implications.Mark how cunningly these serpents do their work.First they install all kinds of “Hate Speech Laws” in order to stifle resistance,then it is a matter of infiltrating the big political parties,bribe key figures or install your own puppets,initiate “immigration reforms” and the Great Work of White Genocide can begin.Anyone who only slightly protests is severely punished to set an example and freighten the people.This case of Darren Scully and the artificial created racial panic around his totally innocent remarks with the prospect of an absurdly disproportionate punishment is the way they work.There are of course also White race traitors involved with the inevitable number of useful idiots but there is no doubt in my mind that Jahweh’s Eternal Mafia is behind it all.God,i am angry!
PS.I have found some more information about that Jewish minister.His name is Alan Shatter,60, a member of the Fine Gael party.In march 2011 he was appointed minister of Justice,Equality and Defence.
Below the report on his nomination I found this revealing comment by a certain Kofi Kankam, obviously an African immigrant:
Another case of not understanding that the unofficial rules dictate that diverse white Irishmen speak in an Irish- or white-centric way. His problem wasn’t his describing the problem, it was remarking on the conduct of a specific demographic. It is unfair to modify our speech patterns, but in fact one can easily speak out on every issue there is without leaving white- or Irish-centricity.
Bemoaning this problem doesn’t help. Wetting your precious pillow with tears of rage doesn’t help. And by ignoring the need to teach how to talk in this new wilderness, we regularly throw good men and women into the trap set for them by the current speech police.
In fact, we can do the same. Mentions of our name, label, definition, or description allow us to bring a storm of abuse on the malefactors. On the West Coast we do just that.
It’s a new war, a new age, we must adapt. But we mustn’t be silenced and there is no reason to do that.
@Bo: Your comment offers some down-to-earth, practical advice for coping. This attitude is a clear-headed, fresh approach to some of the problems. With regard to the following quote I have a question.
When you say, “…our name, label, definition or description” are you referring to White Nationalism? If you could elaborate on this, perhaps giving examples, it would be helpful.
Christine Bohan, writing for the Manchester Guardian, brings out the bright side for us:
“More worrying was the reaction: the idea that Scully had said what lots of Irish people were secretly thinking. Internet commenters praised him for having the courage to speak out. His party may have distanced itself from the remarks, but as of this morning he is still a town councillor – and Fine Gael has said nothing about kicking him out. A Labour MP who reported the comments to the police says he received many tweets, emails and phone calls criticising his own actions and supporting Scully.
“Ireland has many positive developments in fighting racism – even a small town like Naas has an annual Multicultural Day. But as the country already battle-weary from three years of austerity, the setting is ripe for sowing seeds of social tension and unrest.”
Let’s not be so negative. Scully did good by speaking up and the system cannot undo that. With any luck at all, he should be receiving donations to compensate whatever fine might be imposed. If they put him in prison he will be a martyr.
“the country already battle-weary from three years of austerity, the setting is ripe for sowing seeds of social tension and unrest.” THe left loves to think that the only reason people are opposed to multiculturalism is economics. As the recent report from Demos showed, it’s not about economics, but about identity.
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/11/an-encouraging-report-on-populist-attitudes-in-europe/
@icr: Your quote from Spengler affords a view of civilization I have not run across. In my own reflections on this subject I have come to associate cultural degeneration with the development of urban centers. Ironically, a lot of “achievements” we have associated with civilization have developed in such centers.
Spengler’s position seems to suggest what many here believe, that the simple, agrarian life, maintaining the human scale, lived-out in intimacy with Nature, is best. The ideal “town,” no doubt, must be one’s extended family, or tribe. My own life experiences have confirmed this: from the bucolic, to the urban, to the metropolitan, and – with desperate haste – back to the bucolic. Even the thought of visiting a sprawling city has become anathema, as have six or eight-lane highways. The Tube is long gone, as is the racket of my beloved music. My last dependency is this computer, which I will doubtless divest at some time in the future.
When I discovered the lands of the South Seas, purely by chance, contact with my true self was regained. My first two years were passed without a thought for the busy-ness, the clamor, the welter of ideas associated with “civilization.” The mind, cleared of such trash, was enraptured to relax in simplicity, content to consider at peace the splendors around me, surrendering to the catharsis of non-thought, of simply being. Today my best conveyance is my own bare feet or a simple canoe.
Paradise lost, Paradise found. But world population and the complexity of nuclear society would suggest that the Specie, itself, cannot go home again. How profound the subject…the future of mankind. These are the ideas, I believe, behind Globalism: to bring the whole shooting-match under one governance, so cattle may be removed, and a diabolical few return to the human scale.
If I were in Scully’s position this would be my proudest moment.
@Connor Dirk
You ask an important question about Bo’s important comment.
Before we are “White Nationalists” (what IS that, besides a couple of words?), we are members of a people, a people with interests, especially in our current dilemma. Before we go around defining ourselves as “Whites”, “White Nationalists”, “European Americans” and such, we must first of all “clear a safe space” in which and from which to speak our minds.
This requires that we speak from an unassailable vantage point. As Bo said, that is accomplished by speaking with our own White voice, and from a position of White Centricity. Any public language we use which assaults, attacks, condemns any “other” as a member of a group (ie. “the jews”), or as a group itself … is counter-productive. It’s the exact opposite of speaking in White Voice and from White Centricity.
Most people here know that Bo runs a group and has a website, http://www.resistingdefamation.org. That website is an extended “syllabus” laying out how all this works. There are many many examples on that site about how WE, US and OURS are constantly slurred, caricatured and stereotyped. There are also some examples of how to ATTACKBACK at these attacks on us and our people, and how to do it without attacking the “other” as a group.
It’s definitely encouraged to ATTACKBACK anyone or any group which engages in defaming us, naming us, or asserting supremacy over us. But this isn’t accomplished by focusing on the identity of the attacker. It’s accomplished with some pretty slick verbal tactics which use passive-aggressive techniques to spank the attacker using their own “morality”.
I think Bo will be back soon with more on this. At least I hope so. In the meantime, do yourself a favor and go to that site, bookmark it, and start learning how to do it.
Getting together on a forum like this and spending a rainy afternoon discussing the definition of “White Nationalism”, or what the inner essence of “The Jews” is … while entertaining … isn’t going to lead to any change. The tactics of Resisting Defamation already ARE causing change.
I’ve always wondered why people in these always apologize when it never does any good. This article suggests an answer: they apologize to try and make things a little less bad for their families.
They throw the book in cases like this one to send a message to conservatives and everyone else privately harboring second thoughts about diversity. The message is keep it to yourself or face public humiliation, bankruptcy and jail.
Connor, here’s an example of a white-centric attackback we sent to CounterPunch on 11/5/11 criticizing the use of “cracker” by Occupy San Jose. Some of these attackbacks we do are to flaunt “white American” in the face of haters, some to force them to recognize the variety of white Americans, some to demonstrate to more timid white Americans how to speak in a white voice and in a white-centric way, and some to spread the term “anti-white narrative.”
“Anti-White Narrative” is our “Anti-Semitic” term. We do this kind of attackback two to five times a day against labels as different as goyim, shiksa, gringo, and round-eyes, as well as against negative stereotypes against blue-collar white American workers and white American women in films like “The Help,” a scatological hate film.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/11/04/the-iron-heel-and-the-resistance/
TO: CounterPunch
Enjoyed your piece this weekend on the Occupy Movement, but it is already taking on an anti-white taint here in San Jose. The assembled occupiers three or four days ago chanted “Viva Cracker” as a way to demonstrate their embrace of the anti-white narrative. Their claimed purpose was to cheer a self-hating white Irish-American who called himself “Cracker.” The local daily paper picked it up and flaunted it as a way to promote the term.
Note that the diverse white Americans residing in San Jose add up to just 28% of the population.
The anti-white narrative almost always emerges in peace rallies and marches, and now we see it spreading in the Occupy Movement. When, oh when, will so-called progressives end the practice of pushing self-respecting white Americans away?
Bo Sears
http://www.ResistingDefamation.org
@Gregor: Your gracious and pacific manner endows your suggestion with persuasion. After a visit to the scullery I intend to hop over to the link you’ve provided. Thanks for the feedback, Greg.
“Appeasement of the left”
Never was a truer phrase created, when it comes to what so-called conservatives have been about, for the last, what, sixty years?
From Belfast to Jerusalem – the story of western ingorance of European history….
The settlers in Ulster were Scots, who like the natives were both westerners and Christians, though of different denomination. In contrast to that – the settlers in Palestine are Europeans and Jewish – toally different from the native, who are Arabs and Muslims or Christians…..
A good blood-boiling article. Typos: “underserving” “just deserts”.
When will these so-called Conservatives who are in a place of power, who also make pro-White descisions publicly, stand proudly by their actions and words they say. Instead, they “back-peddle”, cower and apologise whenever the finger points to racist. It’s always one step forward and three steps back.
@Hadding Scott: I would say that the economic and the idealistic are both in play as antagonistic motives. Material prosperity and comfort reward the economic motive and reinforce the tendency to pretend that nothing is wrong.
@TAKING ON OCCUPY SAN JOSEThanks, Bo, for following through on my post. Your remarks are appreciated. Counterpunch was known to me; Resisting Defamation was not. Attackback is an excellent form of resistance. I’m glad you’re seeing its success. I have added this weaponry to my armory and will be putting it to good use. Once again, your reply is appreciated.
@D.P: @D.P:
Implicit or explicit threats are probably being made against their families. Such threats would explain why people apologize and grovel knowing it will do no good.
Apologizing never works with the Left being the intolerant, authoritarian thugs that they are. You deviate from their agenda/ideology and you are history. Just look how the Left treats ordinary people who stray from the agenda once they achieve absolute power – killings and torture are the norm.
Or even our colleges where the oppressive Left reigns supreme. For example, a Conservative white student questions some Leftist professor’s sewer spew – he will get a failing grade should he persist. And God help the student should he say something unPC/unMC on campus he may face expulsion or re-education.
Mr. Scully should have taken a a page out of the Sheriff Joe Arpio playbook and don’t apologize for speaking the truth – ever. At least if you get fired, you go out with your dignity and manhood intact.
Looking at the EDL from the U.S. It’s fatal flaw was to align itself with Jewish interests and not seeing that the Jews are against Islamization to some extent but they are also virulently open-borders, anti-populist and anti-nationalist which makes them antithetical to any nationalist movement.
We have the same problem here in the U.S. with the anti-Jihad/Shariah movement. Many groups have aligned with the Jews/Israel, thinking it would give them gravitas or believing they have common cause with them. But in the end has given them nothing but grief and internal censoring and purges. The ADL, SPLC and ADLC still label them as “hate groups”, etc.
The anti-Jihad movement would do well to read up on the religious education of Jews in Israel, even the so-called state schools. These people are friends and allies of no one. Their religion mandates it.
@pessimist: “For example, a Conservative white student questions some Leftist professor’s sewer spew – he will get a failing grade should he persist. And God help the student should he say something unPC/unMC on campus he may face expulsion or re-education.”
Your moniker is well chosen. I think your generalizations are much less than completely accurate.
Have you tried taking a dissenting position in a college course or on a university campus? I happen to have had some experience in that. The most obvious problem for somebody advocating a dissenting position is that he will be required to advance a more rigorous proof than those that parrot the standard view. This is only natural, not a matter of malevolence per se. Certainly you will become a target of scrutiny and possibly some treachery if you become outspoken as a dissident, but there are limits to the persecution of that behavior at a university, especially a state university. You just have to make sure that you exemplify civility and don’t give them any legitimate reason to take action against you.
If you haven’t actually had this kind of experience then you probably shouldn’t be talking about it. This is just like people saying that courts will always find against a racist: WRONG. A little bit of searching of news-stories will show you that. Such negative assumptions are a form of self-terrorization.
Resisting Defamation, can you give an example how Darren Scully could get his point across about the problem of rude demanding immigrants, which in this case were Africans, without identifying them as such?
If people like Scully who take the risk of talking honestly about immigration get support from their white countrymen, it will embolden others to speak out.
Ireland’s Jewish Minister for Justice and Equality (oh yes, the title includes the latter paean to the ultimate credo of the left) is also the richest member of the Irish Parliament (Dáil). The will come as a major surprise to readers here, no doubt.
He is also hated by his fellow party members, regarded as obnoxious and arrogant, and is only tolerated because he helped rescue the career of the current Prime Minister End Kenny during a power struggle just over a year ago.
Ireland as a country is utterly humiliated and debased, and is now the prey of institutional parasites, home-grown and foreign alike.
West and the Jewish power…
The Norway mass killer, Anders Behring Breivik, had mentioned in his 1500-page bible two prominent American pro-Israel ‘Islamophobes’ – Pamela Geller of ‘Atlas Shrugs’ and Robert Spencer of ‘Jihad Watch’ – who inspired him hating Muslims.
Now, Pamela has appealed to her fellow Judeo-Christians to boycott Butterball’s “stealth halal turkeys” and write to the company to register their disapproval…..
To Remain: Scully could have re-cast his remarks into a proposal demanding the Irish national government create classes in communications among and between racial groups to facilitate good-will in the great Irish tradition.
He could have viewed with alarm a growing tendency to defame indigenous Irish people, and call for its ending, and promise to collect examples to submit to the Irish national government to fix. And then do it.
He could have blamed the Irish national government for ignoring the need for civility within the multi-racial society the government seemed to be constructing. [We all need to refer to the so-called "multi-cultural" phenomenon as a "multi-racial" phenomenon...it opens new room for deconstructing the anti-white narrative now present in all the diverse white societies.]
But what he did was name “black Africans” and claim to have “made the decision, a conscious decision, earlier this year, that I just was not going to, myself personally, was not going to take on representations from black Africans.” That sound you just heard was the hiss of the guillotine under today’s rules. Let’s face it, he stated publicly that he would not carry out his constituent duties to one class of constituents.
By focusing on one group of immigrants, however true it was and however true it was to his feelings, he opened himself up to this attack which was as predictable as the sun coming up in the morning.
I know this sounds like a retreat, but it is only a retreat if we count one-step-back as a loss when it enables two-steps-forward. And it is certainly better in a logo-centric world with flame-throwers at every corner ready to destroy good men for a single sentence.
And remember: always attackback at specific individuals, not whole demographic groups. That’s the new rules, but anything we need to say, we can say in our white voice in a white centric way. Scully could have attacked one specific person for a practice and pattern of public abuse and defamation, and been unscathed.
Well done darren thank’s for speaking the truth,also thank’s to you kevin for brining light to our problem’s here in eire.
@Bo:
Are you serious?
Mass immigration of non-Whites into White countries means genocide of those Whites.I thought everyone here “already understood” that,therefore “nobody needs Bob Whitaker’s mantra anymore”. But you seem not to understand or not to care.All you care for is that this genocide happens smoothly and above all in a civilized manner. Is that your idea of WN?
Ireland’s non-White minority is still comparatively small but it is rapidly growing (that is also the plan).At this stage it is still possible to save the country but the principle should be clear: no more non-White immigration and repatriation of all non-Whites already in the country.
Begging for “better race-relations” will not avert racial death,it will only facilitate it.
The real tragedy of Ireland today is not that a mere politician rolled over but that the hard men of the Ulster Loyalists and the IRA have rolled over. These organizations are way beyond meta politics and actually have the infrastructure and public support to defend their country from today’s colonizers. All the blood shed, sacrifice and heartache since the Easter Rebellion has been for nothing.
@Sandy:
To fight other Whites in the name of nationalism and then invite non-Whites to colonize your nation is the height of insanity.
@Franklin R.
Franklin, I don’t think you are “getting” the deeper levels of what Bo is doing.
Bo is working WITHIN the currently dominant constraints on acceptable discourse, but at the same time ATTACKING the system. Everybody knows that there’s hell to pay for attacking a group directly (except White groups), so Bo is showing a workaround.
Bo’s goal (imho) isn’t to advocate or go along with Genocide in a “civilized manner”. He’s working INSIDE the current rules in order to destabilize the anti-white system and the anti-white narrative.
Don’t know if you are a follower of FTWR and Horus, but what I just wrote will resonate if you understand the idea of “Practical Politics”. One of the first things to understand about “Practical Politics” is that you don’t play basketball when the rules say you are playing baseball.
Inside the current “baseball” rules of discourse, you get your head handed to you if you are a White and you attack any non-White demographic DIRECTLY, especially if you list their “bad” qualities from a white-centric perspective. Anyone who does that, and gets his head handed to him for doing it, thinks the game being played is basketball, and he tries sliding into an “impossible base”, ie. telling Blacks “what they are” and why he doesn’t like them.
Dumb! If he had followed one of Bo’s suggested strategies above, he would have taken a step toward white-centricity, making the discourse about what’s “Good for Whites” rather than “What’s bad about Blacks”.
It’s only on the surface that this kind of discourse style appears to be ONLY about “better race relations” … that’s only the camel’s nose in the tent, the ability to GET INTO the multi-racial “tent” and speak FOR Whites. It’s a necessary first step. The end goal is self-deportation of anti-whites and non-whites who self-decide that to REALLY measure up to the culture of the land they’ve “invaded”, they’ll have to change themselves for more than they’re willing to do. The goal is to put them in the self-recognized position that they are hostile invaders in someone elses land. Words can do that.
I suggest that before critiquing Bo’s techniques, you spend some time at his website. It took me a couple of years to “get it” regarding the power of this passive-aggressive technique, even with his coaching. For some reason, this is neither obvious nor natural to many White advocates, but it does work. Don’t attack directly, only attackback to their attacks, and guilt trip and shame them based on their own ideology.
PS: How many definitions of “WN” do you think there are floating around? If there are more than one, how can this term even be used without deadly ambiguity seeping in a wrecking discourse here?
@Bo: “Scully could have re-cast his remarks into a proposal demanding the Irish national government create classes in communications among and between racial groups to facilitate good-will in the great Irish tradition. [...]
He could have blamed the Irish national government for ignoring the need for civility within the multi-racial society the government seemed to be constructing.”
I don’t suppose that you realize how transparently insincere this is. This is a game that “conservatives” have been playing for decades now — basically adopting a more-liberal-than-thou pose — and what has it accomplished? You must be a real greenhorn not to realize that.
“By focusing on one group of immigrants, however true it was and however true it was to his feelings, he opened himself up to this attack which was as predictable as the sun coming up in the morning.”
I guess the fact that a lot of people are agreeing with him doesn’t matter? Surely even other non-White immigrant groups would agree with Scully’s statements about the Blacks. Indians, for example, have no use for Blacks.
If the system makes a martyr of Scully for saying something that pretty much everybody knows, does the system win or lose?
It just amazes me to see people still proposing that it might be possible to undermine the system by avoiding contradiction on fundamental principles and demanding that it be more consistent in its liberalism.
Quote: “Note that these Blacks were not being denied representation, and neither were they being deprived of courtesy, even when their behaviour made them undeserving; Mr. Scully had, in fact, been referring them elsewhere so that their concerns would be addressed by a more suitable representative.”
I’m afraid this is unconvincing. Mr. Scully strategically overreached. So this is the Realpolitik price he pays at the moment.
@Sandy:
Seems like they are more willing to kill each other, die, watch their nation die, than be called ‘racist’.
I don’t think this was a reaction of ‘the people’ it was the reaction of ‘the system’ on a very easy target, a loan white male who said something on his own, kind of like if an army was holed up in trenches and one soldier stuck his head out too long…
James Watson, and countless other white males have suffered similar fates merely by stating truth.
and that is the most important thing to remember here. This is how the cultural marxist globalist elite reacts to Truth. Truth is the enemy of the globalist state.
TO: Franklin Ryckaert & Hadding Scott
Thanks for your comments. Resisting Defamation is in the business of resisting defamation directed against the white American peoples. In particular, we denounce any element of the Anti-White Narrative we find and the person or entity making the remarks.
We do not have the mandate of providing deep analysis except in the area of hate speech and hate caricatures directed against us. All of us should specialize to increase our effectiveness.
We do what ADL does, but for our people. We don’t pretend to do everything that needs to be done. Our slogan: pick an area and promote it wherever you like, we picked resisting defamation.
@Bo:
It would be good to hear more from you Bo. You seem to have an intuitive understanding of our enemies. Would you consider contibuting to TOO??
Kevin MacDonald:
THe left loves to think that the only reason people are opposed to multiculturalism is economics. As the recent report from Demos showed, it’s not about economics, but about identity.”
Come on Dr MacDonald: for working people it’s BOTH – as the video you posted above on Enoch Powell proves. Pushing the nonsensical contrary view closes off potential support from that quarter.
Watch this….and today in bankrupt Ireland it ain’t just cultural…
This is Dublin Today
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb4m-dm-Wv8
Kevin MacDonald:
THe left loves to think that the only reason people are opposed to multiculturalism is economics. As the recent report from Demos showed, it’s not about economics, but about identity.”
Not only that, but are you suggesting that there is something lower in working people worrying about their jobs, conditions, security, pay (no real wage increases in USA for decades), compared with “higher” questions of national identity? If so you disappoint me: I have far more respect for you than that. Surely both are vital and – given the out-of-control quantitative aspect of Open Doors Bank-Transnational Corporation – driven immigration, inseparable.
As I see it, any continuation of the long standing, painful and just struggle of the Irish for National unity is DEAD. It died on the Big Bank altar of the free movement of everything, not least, of the culturally totally disparate and – Irish labour displacing – hordes. The Protestant Ulstermen, 300 hundred years in their new – once illegitimate home – perhaps have likely stood up to this invasion better, being free of the hypocritical and devious Vatican yoke.
As an off chance, only THAT may result in a – deeply paradoxical – re-union.
@JA:
Watching the video “This is Dublin Today” leaves you absolutely speechless.
Immigration=genocide,that’s all I can say.
@JA:
Watching the video “This is Dublin Today” leaves you absolutely speechless.
Immigration=genocide,that’s all I can say.
A man wit’ a heart, wit’ a heart…
This thread should be revived as it epitomises the substance of ALL the issues, given the vulnerable size of Ireland and the extent of the immigration. The core problem is what dominates the World today…Jew Big Wheelers’ dominated Finance Capital. In that 95% of Jews, almost all petty bourgeois, are – sometimes blind – followers. And, given their cosmopolitan history, tend to do it with zeal. There is nothing new in that, the middle class of even real national groups tend to follow their dominant rulers – two genocidal World Wars are testimony to that.
The Irish Times today reports on an interview with Scully in the aftermath of his remarks.
Read it and weep.
“I have made a huge mistake,” he says. “I want to apologise profusely and say it was wrong. I am a human being. Human beings sometimes do things and say things that are wrong, and I hope that all of the people who live in this country can look into their hearts and find it in them to forgive me and give me a second chance.”
He describes himself as “on the edge”, and there is no doubt that he is. Pausing for long moments, choking on words, eyes brimming, he says, “This, for me, has been the worst week of my life, the worst week of my family’s life. At stages I have been retching because . . . because I have put my family’s safety in jeopardy, I have put my career in jeopardy, I have put my livelihood in jeopardy. I have said things that have greatly offended people, which is something that I will never do again . . . because it is not me.”
And people wonder why whites are terrified of speaking out.
Looks like he is mainly concerned that his career has gone to hell–the power of the left.
Here is today’s Irish Times article referred to in my comment above:
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/weekend/2011/1126/1224308164751.html
@Kevin MacDonald
He evidently never learnt that it’s not just living, but living well, that counts.
He would feel a lot better if he had taken control of the situation and hit back. People would have at least respected him if he had left his party in disgust at its lack of support, berated its leaders’ cowardice in the media, held on to his post as an independent, and announced his intention to found an anti-immigration party.
Much of the power of the Left among conservatives comes from the fact that they care about what Leftists think.
Scully’s pathetic grovelling in the Irish Times confirms he’s getting what he deserves.
The Left will keep kicking until they get concessions.
@Alex Kurtagic: I can’t help thinking that you’re overstating the case, Mr. Kurtagic. Scully’s groveling is certainly pathetic (= “worthy of disdain”), but it’s also pathetic in the word’s older sense: “expressive of or prompting compassion.” At least, it ought to be.
No one here, including me, thinks he’s brought credit upon himself in any way, morally or politically or otherwise. Yet society’s Tribal overlords being the vengeful savages that they are, he has good reason to fear that his family, not he alone, will suffer the consequences of his running his mouth. If concern for one’s family’s well-being—even culpably belated concern—is now to be stigmatized as an identifiably Jewish trait, what does that say about the stigmatizers?
There is no doubt that Scully’s frantic backpedaling has done more harm than good, perhaps even to himself. He should have thought at least twice before speaking once, not least because only a damn fool couldn’t predict that his comments would inevitably be met with a thermonuclear response. In failing to do so, he’s done what I myself have done—perhaps you, too, Mr. Kurtagic?—more times than I count. Thus, whatever “he’s getting what he deserves” means, it ought to be said more in pity than contempt. After all, he isn’t the only one who has gotten or will continue to get his “deserts.”
@Trenchant: I fear that “just desserts” is passing into the same American English Illiteracy Zone that has suffered the disastrous effects of uncontrolled Third Mental World immigration for several decades. Upon entering the zone, whose toll barrier is an industrial-sized spell-check robotic gate, one hears “alot” of things described as “too small of a” this or “too big of a” that and well-meaning but irrelevant arguments or details dismissed as “mute” points. If you stop in a gift shop, you can buy a “momento” of your outing. The adventurous can even drop by the local travel agent, where tickets to Memeville and Mantra City can be bought at a discount . . . but those are journeys for another day, I think.
To doff the cloak of depressive, heavy-handed irony for a moment (but otherwise apropos of nothing at all), I have a new favorite malapropism: “much to his demise,” “demise” being the unexpected stand-in for “dismay.” Ron Darling was the utterer of the locution, which concerned yet another baseball player who made a damn fool of himself in public and quickly came to regret it (hence, his “demise”), during a “color comment” filling one of those numberless forty-five-second pauses between pitches that now characterize the former national pastime.
Of course, were we to hear “much to their demise” used of our Tribal puppeteers, our own dismay might be reduced quite, uh, alot.
@Alex K.
The one thing Scully said that jumps out at me is:
“I HAVE PUT MY FAMILIES SAFETY IN JEOPARDY”
Remember, there is an organized group of left wing thugs in Ireland with plenty of practice shooting off people’s knee-caps.
The IRA is like a watermellon, green on the outside, red on the inside. They feign Irish partiotism to get financial support from gullible Irish-Americans, but they have a far left platform and they mean business.
#1. Moosajee Bhamjee, #2. Ola Akinsete, #3. Darren Scully. Will the real Irishman please stand up? Actually he did and in today’s oh so fine “Irish” multicultural world, had his head handed to him. In reality, perhaps Fine Gael is really a Gaelic-sounding distortion of words actually based on Feingold or find gold. In other words, maybe it’s indicative of Jewish control of just another European “conservative” political party (in the US it’s called the GOP.) Is there any hope for the Irish? It appears their luck may have run out.
@Lookaroundu: “In reality, perhaps Fine Gael is really …” (My apologies for the redundant term)
This is a self created problem. Whites have done this to ourselves. We have sussed and tut tutted ourselves into cowardice and compliance. We have censored those among us who would speak out, and have exiled those from public life who would champion our own cause. WE did this to our nations, not anyone else. We only have ourselves to blame.
Anytime there is an accusation of racism, whites are first and loudest to chime in, condemning one of their own. Whites have succumbed to the jewish agenda by willingly playing the jewish game. What if we DIDN’T embrace jews in everything we did? What then? Would we all just drop dead on the spot? But yet, there is this rabid fear that if we don’t pay the jew his homage, something terrible will happen to us. We have willingly adopted this fear into our own social paradigm. We could have said no anytime.
The whites of Ireland could very easily say to their new black neighbors, “STFU or go home.” Indeed, if you emigrate to ANY non white country in the world, you will be told that in no uncertain terms. But here in the west, whites fall all over themselves and each other to lick the arses of non whites clean, so scared of being accused of thinking of their own self interest.
This nonsense will continue until whites regrow their spines and their balls and put a stop to it. Maybe it will take what it took for Eastern Europe to figure it out; decades of grinding poverty and oppression under a dictator’s thumb. It’z coming, whites of the west, it’z coming. You brought it on yourselves, and now we will all be outbred and out maneuvered in our own nations thanks to your ebullient self effacement and tireless campaigning against your own kind.
And you know what? The saddest and most ironic part of it all is that in the end, when we stand outside our own societies and nations, an outgroup in the very lands our ancestors fought and died for, not ONE single non white invader will say “thank you”. It will truly be all for naught. Thousands of years of blood, sweat, and tears all given for nothing, nothing at all.
But hey, at least you’re not speaking German, eh?
“For his remarks, Mr. Scully now faces six months to two years in jail or fines ranging from €1000 – €10,000 ($1337.54 – $13,375.40). The police are already investigating him. “
In Europe’s efforts to prevent the rise of the next Adolf Hitler, they’re becoming more like him every day. (Brigitte Bardot fined $14,000 in the last few months.)
@hsc:
The fact that this slips through MSM without condemnation of the latent threat of violence is not an accident.
@Junghans:
Ah yes, but in an insane system.
“Regarding Darren Scully’s X-File” by Alex Kurtagic
Mr. Kurtagic, this article is the finest piece of your writing I have read.
…So far.
What a horrible punishment for what was a candid and truthful indiscretion! This man’s whole world is about to come tumbling down, bringing his wife and his children with him. And all because he spoke truly…
You framed this unfortunate man’s situation perfectly.
Now, who is actually responsible for his predicament? These evil bastards have to have names. And bios. Who started this mess?
Thanks
@Gregor: “In the meantime, do yourself a favor and go to that site, bookmark it, and start learning how to do it.”
I have. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction.
@Bo: Brilliant. I mean it. Brilliant.