The Fall issue of The Occidental Quarterly is now available. Yearly subscriptions (4 issues) can be obtained at the TOQ website—hardcopy: $60,00, including postage in the U.S.; online: $30.00.
TOO readers will be very interested in this material. In addition to the intellectual stimulation provided by these articles (and a handsome addition to your coffee table if you purchase the hardcopy subscription), subscribing to TOQ is an excellent way to support media that presents intellectually honest perspectives on Western peoples and culture that simply cannot be published in the mainstream intellectual media in today’s climate of political correctness. We complain endlessly about the stranglehold on the media enjoyed by our enemies. Subscribing to TOQ helps change all that.
The Spring issue of TOQ will be on the topic of “Collapse: Perspectives on the Impending Crisis of the West.” Thinkers on the political right have been prophesying the collapse of our current political and economic system for some time, but recent developments seem to make this a realistic possibility. The problems leading to the this crisis are daunting and quite possibly insoluble without a political cataclysm: Exploding and unsustainable debt at all levels of government; unsustainable levels of immigration requiring unrealistic levels of economic growth to prevent chronic high unemployment; endless costly foreign wars fought to appease the Israel Lobby; a corrupt financial elite that has plunged the Western world into its worst economic crisis since the Great Depression; rapidly expanding populations of low-IQ non-Whites requiring unsustainably high levels of social support; large numbers of Whites inchoately angry about their impending displacement and the fact that they are being forced to adjust to a multicultural world they do not desire. This multicultural world promises increased racial conflict (a characteristic of all multicultural societies) and diminished political and cultural influence for Whites.

Our position as White racial communitarians is weak at this time, but we should certainly plan for possible future scenarios, including the possibility that such a cataclysm would speed up the triumph of an explicitly anti-White regime and all the dangers that that would entail.
Appropriate papers deal with any aspect of this possible cataclysm, including the possibility that the present regime will prevail without major changes.
The deadline for submission of papers is January 15, 2012. Authors are paid $250.00 for accepted articles.
Fall, 2011 Issue of TOQ
“How America Helped to Bolshevize Russia,“ by Kerry R. Bolton
Bolton is a prolific writer on a wide range of subjects. He is a Fellow of the Academy of Social and Political Research, Athens, and a Contributing Writer for The Foreign Policy Journal. He concludes his article as follows:
The White forces were literally stabbed in the back by the machinations of the Allied politicians, and the “vested interests,” to use Wilson’s term, that saw bright prospects for business dealings with their supposed arch-enemies.
The lessons of US duplicity in regard to aiding supposed friends, and particularly those in conflict with communism, could have been a warning to those finding themselves in similar circumstances and who succumbed because of American betrayal, from China to Cuba to Nicaragua to Tibet, where on each occasion the USA scuttled at the crucial juncture. The tendency towards treachery that remains a factor of American foreign relations, which continues the Wilsonian doctrine for “world order,” is something that still needs learning by those who would “sup with the devil.“
“Going against the Tide: Ricardo Duchesne’s Intellectual Defense of the West,” by Kevin MacDonald
I had an a condensed version of this article posted at VDARE.com; the TOQ version is considerably more detailed and includes a presentation of an alternative theory that supplements Duchesne’s perspective. I conclude my review as follows:
The Uniqueness of Western Civilization
is a brilliant critical review of an incredibly wide range of scholarship covering the entire span of Western history. It is a book that is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding the vitality and creativity of Western civilization—and for understanding its current malaise as it struggles for survival against the forces of darkness.
Eternal Strangers: Anti-Jewish Musings History (Part II of III), by Thomas Dalton
Dalton continues his three-part scholarly review of anti-Jewish comments throughout history. Part 1 dealt with anti-Jewish writing in the ancient world. Part 2 deals with anti-Jewish writing beginning in 4th century with the rise of the Catholic Church (e.g., St. John Chrysostom, St. Augustine) , the Middle Ages (e.g., St. Thomas Aquinas), the Reformation (e.g., Martin Luther), the Enlightenment (e.g., Voltaire), and concluding in the 19th century with German commentators, including Kant and Schopenhauer. This is a very informative review. Dalton notes:
More broadly we can infer that the critics are citing objective, concrete characteristics of the Jewish people, ones that are largely independent of the Jewish religion per se. These negative qualities may well be rooted in the genetic (i.e. racial) constitution of the Jews, and this suggests an explanation for their persistence across cultures and over time.
Free to Lose: Jews, Whites, and Libertarianism, by Brenton Sanderson
TOO writer Brenton Sanderson provides a chilling conclusion:
Thus, it is this very libertarian individualist agenda favoring the free global movement of people, in conjunction with the openly anti-White and anti-Western agendas of the cultural Marxists that have facilitated the demographic transformation of Western nations in the past few decades. Because of their denial of the significance of race, libertarians are never going to be allies in the fight to save White populations from demographic and political eclipse. The growth in popularity of libertarian ideas among Whites is as likely to undermine White racial solidarity as effectively as any of the more openly anti-White nostrums of the left. As White racial nationalists and activists we urgently need to convey to patriotic White libertarians that racial collectivism is the only effective means to promote our group interests now and into the future. It is lesson that was learned many centuries ago by those that have worked tirelessly to promote their own group evolutionary interests at our expense — with Judaism being the classic example.





Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?




I am really interested in TOQ-Mag, but my life as a husband and father is so crowded that I just don’t have the time to sit and read in a printed medium. I just took a trial subscription on a weekly newspaper and I am already lagging behind because lack of time. An internetblog on the other hand is more easily accessible to read during spare time, more digestable and reaches out to millions.
I get ‘untrusted connection’ in my firefox browser whenever I try to access the TOQ website. Just the last week or so before that it was fine. Anyway, here are two good documentaries on Jews from the BBC if any of you guys have yet to see them.
BBC: A Hasidic Guide to Love, Marriage and Finding a Bride 1/4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I00Em_R2uU
BBC: The Hasidic Drugdealer Part 1/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BfWWDBndI4
“Our position as White racial communitarians…”
This must be the last straw that broke the camels back… Is this what we’re working here for? Communitarianism? Only White? Err.. If that is so.. then this a waste of time.. So we now learn that the movement is part of the dialectic.. YOU’RE STILL IN THE BOX… ever so unknowingly moving towards the final synthesis.. and that will never be White America or Europe for that matter.. You’re energy is being tapped for the purpose of diluting it, rendering it useless.. If you truly know what Communitarianism is, than you know it is a new Jewish bag of tricks, and Whiteness is not in the cards. If you were to achieve your utopian White Communitarianism, it would be a community of White slaves.. COUNT ME OUT!!!
Kerry Bolton is an idiot..as are the cold war enthusiasts in general. Nicaragua,Cuba and Vietnam posed 0 threat to America. The ruling elites always need a boogy man to scare the White domestic population into supporitng what are essentialy mafiosa-gangster rackets of the White American ruling elites. And with all these interventions there was a corresponding massive population transfer of nonwhites into America..this is the economic logic of White race-replacement.
Kevin McDonald, if you go along with this Cold War nonesense you were-and continue to be-actively involved in the very race-replacement process that you are suppose to be against. The Cold War was a massive lie. Russia posed no threat to America.
The issue is whether the U.S. follows through on policies framed as helping the country involved rather than leaving them in the lurch. Bolton’s article is exceptionally well-researched, and certainly no one would say that America and the West were right to leave Russia to the Bolsheviks which is the main point of the article. One of the points that really struck me was that the main U.S. general in Russia, William S. Graves, was hostile toward the Whites and did all he could to prevent the American forces from being effective. Here’s a quote from the article:
@Facio Libre:
I don’t know about all that crap — it seems like quibbling to me — but I have subscribed to TOQ for a couple of years and it is a great magazine with quite compelling articles. I always look forward to reading it when a copy arrives. Because TOQ only comes out four times a year, it is not that hard to keep up with, even if you are a busy person! Also it is a way of showing respect for the important and inspired work of a very courageous man: Dr. Kevin MacDonald!
I see the libertarian movement as a small reactionary movement. Statism is still the only cult in town, despite its failure on every level to deliver anything more than infantilization of the electorate and hence dependence and subservience. It’s the State that both disallows association and enforces association, and even worse, selectively. Reduce its role and people will make up their own mind with who they wish to frequent. It’s not as though “birds of a feather flock together” is a recent aphorism.
“No man is an island” either, outside of Ayn Rand novels. The State sucks oxygen out of civil life. Welfare devalues the role of genuine charity, rewarding sloth and dissoluteness, whilst punishing thrift and diligence. Is there anyone prepared to argue that the family as an institution is far weaker now that one century ago, when it was the primary welfare institution?
@thm: Even if I disagree vehemently with some of the positions expressed by contributors, this site infuses me with hope. I never fail to learn something, and that goes for the comments, too. A great credit to Kevin Macdonald.
@Trenchant:
“this site infuses me with hope. I never fail to learn something, and that goes for the comments, too. A great credit to Kevin Macdonald. ”
Well said.
This site, with its intelligent discussions and admirable authors and visitors, has given me great hope. Much of what I read here is over my head, which is encouraging; it means that this movement is in good hands. And I’m very grateful for that.
(By the way, I’m not the same Richard as the one above.)
Not “as likely” – far more so. The main obstacle to a revolution against the Jewish domination of America will be opposition from conservatives and libertarians. Just look at what’s going on. The left is currently raging against the world center of Jewish power: Wall Street. If the conservatives and libertarians got on board, you might have something serious. But no, they remain extremely loyal to their Jewish financial overlords.
Forget multiculturalism. It is the ideologies of the right – Christian philo-Semitism and libertarianism – that are killing us.
@Facio Libre:
I don’t have any heartburn with the word “communitarian”. You do have communities of shared interest & shared history, and you do have a community organizer in the White House. ;)
How many “White” community organizers do you know?
On just strict National Security issues how exactly were Iran-pre-Sha-Vietnam,Cuba and Nicaragua a threat to America? What exactly did they do to America to deserve being violently attacked by the US? What did intervening in the Russian Civil War do other than increase Soviet fear of America..which could have resulted in a nuclear exchange in 1961? Isn’t interesting that JFK whose administration provoked the Cuban missle crisis by putting missles in Turkey was also the same JFK who wrote a book in the 1950s calling for the elimination of America’s National Origins ( pro-Native Born White American) immigration policy. This is not only a coincidence…the two-race-replacement and a Cold War foreign Policy that would have resulted in the carbonization of millions of Native Born White Americans-go hand-in-hand in terms of implementing the fundamental policy of robbing the world and Native Born White Americans of their wealth and transferring it to the Greedy Cheating Corporate White Liberal Class of mafiosa gangsters(NC67).
I submit that it is manfestly obvious that the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform had its roots deeply embeded in the toxic soil of the Cold War..which had its origins in US intervention in the Russian Civil War after WW2.
Larger Point:the Native Born White American Patriot Movement to halt race-replacement and reverse race-replacement must be massively anti-interventionist..and this includes rethinking the Cold War and the disgusting Ronnie Reagan worshipping that goes along with it.
hi, i am new to this movement. this is the bets site i have coen across so far.
can someone tell me where i can find the equalivant of the ADL only in supporty of ethnic europeans (white people) and not jews?
thanks.
Communitarianism 101
Niki Raapana is an expert in this field, so I’ll leave a link if you’re interested in finding out what’s Communitarianism all about..
http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/2010/10/niki-raapana-talks-to-herself-about.html
If you are American and you’re for this, then you should probably be prison for treason..
Community Policing and Local Agenda 21
http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/2008/08/community-policing-and-local-agenda-21.html
If there is one article that you are going to read about Communitarians than this is it:
http://www.newswithviews.com/community_policing/community_policing.htm
Alright, this will be the last I post.. but this one is really good too.. please check it out.
JOIN THE “QUIET REVOLUTION”
http://www.newswithviews.com/Raapana/niki118.htm
The information contained within those links gives light/explanation why the sudden influx of the third world peoples into the USA was so desired (tactical reasons explained).. I think they compliment what Prof MacDonald is saying.. that the Jews are behind the immigration policy, to look out for their ethnic group interests, etc.. This provides more detail to the story..
@wattylersrevolt:
“…the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform had its roots deeply embeded in the toxic soil of the Cold War….which had its origins in US intervention in the Russian Civil War after WW2.”
I suspect you are referring to the Russian Civil War soon after WW1. Then, of course, Lenin’s Bolsheviks (Communists) were fighting the loyalist White Russians. However your main point is well-taken. US interventionism has grown exponentially since that time.
The 1965 Immigration Act was sometimes justified as a Cold War measure, but that was a smokescreen at best. All the money and activism came from Jewish pressure groups, as discussed here:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7.pdf
I really don’t know how anyone could argue that it would not have been good to nip Bolshevism in the bud.
@wattylersrevolt: Agreed. Reagan traduced conservatism in the traditional sense of the word.
@Facio Libre:
It hasn’t been that many years ago, in almost all cities, and, towns that the ward chairman picked the police that worked in his ward. Today a ward chairman is lucky, if he can fix a parking ticket!
Politics is hard work, and if you run for even a small political office, it costs you money, and you get nothing, but aggravation & phone calls in return.
@vic: Start by clicking on the American Third Position link.
Bingo there, Kevin, where you cite Dalton’s very sentient observation that “These negative qualities may well be rooted in the genetic (i.e. racial) constitution of the Jews, and this suggests an explanation for their persistence across cultures and over time”. Yes indeed, my friend, race is the key to history !
@Junghans: Great point, genetics and race are key. I would add this line from the quote:
More broadly we can infer that the critics are citing objective, concrete characteristics of the Jewish people, ones that are largely independent of the Jewish religion per se.
Genes, genes, genes. They aren’t all powerful, but they are crucial. This is why hanging the analysis merely on some manifestations of Jewish culture (religion, banking, etc.) will not be sufficient. It’s not just the synagogue or the Fed.
@Jason Speaks:
It is the nature of the Jews that creates their culture,but surely because their culture reflexes their nature it only tends to reinforce that nature.It will not do to blame their behaviour on their culture alone (Zionism,Talmudism,Phariseism etc.).Jews are destructive parasites by nature.Why they have that nature is perhaps as impossible to answer as the question why certain life forms among animals and plants are parasites. They simply exist.
@Jason Speaks:
@ Kevin Macdonald. The argument is that communism, whilst inhuman and cruel to its own citizens, was too poor to pose any existential threat to the US (Afghanistan invasion a case in point).
Had the US not developed the bomb, where is the evidence that the USSR would have achieved the breakthrough unassisted? Were it not for WWII, Hitler and Stalin could well have sorted each other out, and no one can say with certainty that Stalin would have triumphed without American war-aid.
Developing a vast military complex to pursue conflicts in multiple theatres has seen both a draining of US wealth (much of the dollar’s has been inflated away), foreign antagonism towards US citizens on account of their State’s interventions, and the present ease with which the various intelligence/military agences now can focus on internal enemies. Who constitutes an internal enemy being shaped in some measure by ADL & Co.
For good reason the Founding Fathers were wary of foreign entanglements.
Let’s put it this way: If I was president at the time and was aware that Russia had been taken over in a putsch that had become dominated by a fanatical Jewish elite that was bent on eradicating the previous elite as well as pretty much all Russians with an education, soon to be followed by mass murder against the rural population, I would have pulled out all the stops to prevent it. Jewish involvement and the brutal nature of the regime were widely known and discussed at the time. Russians are racial brothers and we had an ethnic interest in preventing their destruction. As Solzhenitsyn says, Russia still hasn’t recovered and may never recover. I would not have done the same thing to save non-White countries like Afghanistan or Viet Nam. But you have to remember that in the case of Viet Nam there was the belief that communism was on the march and would eventually encircle the U.S. and force the U.S. to be communist, etc. That could not be dismissed given that China, Eastern Europe, and Cuba had recently gone communist. Again, this is no reason for advocating race replacement. Fervent anti-communists like Senator McCarron were also very hostile to getting rid of the bias in favor of Europe in our immigration laws. The left, which loved immigration for other reasons, claimed that only getting rid of pro-European biases would allow the West to win the propaganda battle. In other words, the effectiveness of this argument was the result of the intellectual and media triumph of the left in the U.S.–itself a consequence of Jewish influence in these areas. And in the end, immigration laws were only changed by assuring people that the change was only window dressing–Teddy Kennedy’s famous statement that it would not change the ethnic balance of the country. Race replacement was definitely not on the minds of many of those who voted for the 1965 immigration law.
Perhaps the Jewish race is low on oxytocin, and that explains why they are the way they are..hmm??
Paul Zak: Trust, morality — and oxytocin
http://www.ted.com/talks/paul_zak_trust_morality_and_oxytocin.html
@Connor Dirk: You make some good points and I don’t mean to diminish the role played by culture. Your point is also correct that fighting the manifestations of Jewish behavior is a quite legitimate strategy. However, a few points on the issues you raised:
1. Ending the Fed is fine by me. However, it seems to me there are central banks in the world that are not under Jewish control (Japan, for example). In a society without Jews, I could see a central bank existing without it being a tool to undermine the society as a whole. In addition, I believe Jews are fully capable of exercising outsized financial power even without a central bank. It would probably help to end the Fed, but I think the majority of Jewish financial power would stay intact.
2. On outlawing the Talmud, in the foreseeable future, I would say the chances of that get as close to zero as possible. If we were at a point in which we could convince the general public of something so dramatic as outlawing a religion with millions of adherents, I believe we would already be in a position to pursue total expulsion anyway. Are you talking about making all of Judaism illegal, or just those parts that closely adhere to the Talmud?
3. Genetics is not limp or impotent. It grows in explanatory power every day and continues to gain public acceptance. The “taint of Nazism” is quickly wearing off genetic studies in the public’s mind. As far as the Khazar theory is concerned, it seems to lack evidence as MacDonald has said. In addition, the work analyzing Jewish genetics is not the sole preserve of Jewish scientists by the way (MacDonald would be an example of that). In fact, it seems to be mainly Leftist Jews who want to deny the genetic consistency of Jewish lineage.
So, continue to educate the public about the Fed and the Talmud, as well as all the other manifestations of Jewish culture. I would also strongly emphasize elements of Jewish culture that are more up to date then the Talmud; things such as Cultural Marxism, New York Intellectuals, and such critters as Critical Theory. I think they are more relevant than the Talmud, by the way. But expose all of it.
But every day, whether we like it or not, the role of genes are proving to play a bigger role in our life than anyone thought.
@Connor Dirk: Oh by the way, one caution: Modern Jews may enjoy casting our conflict with them as primarily a religious conflict, because it can be more easily dismissed as a form of religious bigotry in the public arena. I believe MacDonald may have made this point – Jews are eager to dismiss a serious critique of their behavior as mere religious bigotry. If he didn’t say it, my apologies, but someone did.
Jews love to say the only problem Christians have with them is some “outdated” idea that they killed Christ, or that they belong to a Synagogue of Satan. By keeping the discussion on that level, Jews are able to avoid answering more relevant and modern analyses of their behavior.
Kevin Mcdonald
I respectfully disagree with your claim that the Cold War justification for race-replacement was a smoke screen. I am not just taking off the top of my head about this. There has been serious scholarship on this matter. A professor of History at Hamilton College wrote a book using internal goverment dcumnents showing how the Cold War played an absolutely crucial role in integrating the “US” miltitary and the role the integration of the “US” military played in bringing about the passage of the 1964 Immigration Reform Act..which you and I know made the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform highly inevitable.
Look, the role of Jews in the passsage of the 1965 Immigration Refrom Act was enormous. But the Cold War crusade was interacting with the Jewish race-replacement agenda..which just goes to show you how racially suicidal the Cold War was for millions of Native Born White Americans.
It is absolutely criucial for those of us in the battle to reverse race-replacement to rethink the “wisdom of the Cold War crusade. One of the horiffic consequences of the war against Bolshevism is that it resulted in the colonization of Southern Florida by an utterly corrupt and depraved Cuban Elite. Peter Brimelow insists on calling them “White”. I wouldn’t. I want them out of my America. I don’t recognize them as White Americans.
Th intervention of the US and Britain in the Russian Civil has had horrific demographic consequences for both Nations. There should be no doubt there is a direct road from this intervention and post-1965 race-replacement policy.
And I don’t think for one minute that US intentions towards the Russian people back during the Russian Revolution was benign..it was thoroughly malignant….it was a attempted gang rape of Russia’s resources and people. There is complete continuity from todays gangster-mafiaosa Hilary Clinton foreign policy…right back to US-British intervention in the Russian Revoltuion:different boogy man…same racket..the one General Smedley Butler exposed in his biography 70 years ago.
Vic
Check out American Renassaince,Alternative Right and Mangan’s for unapologetic pro-Native Born White American advocay.
If you read my chapter on the immigration law of 1965, you will see that Jewish organizations made a variety of ad hoc alliances. Their goal was always race replacement but they rationalized it differently to different groups. On the face of it, there is no reason why opposition to communism entails a need to import millions of non-Whites. From Chapter 7 of CofC:
The goal was racial displacement, and they achieved it.
And I am really disgusted by Fulford over at vdare.com who incessantly promotes the Cold War nonesense on vdare.com’s website…the very ideological framework and massive lie about the noble intention’s of US foreign policy planners in the past.
The ultimate consequence of the Cold War will be the massive race-replacement of the Native Born White American Majority to a very small percentage of the post-White America “America”..finally finished off for good in a ecological collapse..direct consequence of importing very high fertility hispanics,asians,muslims,african, and carribeans into America….the stupidity of the Cold was and stil is monumental.
The pin-up boy for young conservtives in the 80′s and Cold War icon-Ronnie “shoe polish in the hair”-Reagan was a corporate whore who provided the psychopathic Corporations with high fertility scab labor from the Latin America, Asia and the Muslim World….9/11-and the earlier attempt on the TT in 1993-was a direct consequence of Ronnie Reagans’-the oxford black shoe polish in his hair no doubt induced his dementia- enormous Treason(justified by “our noble” intentions in fighting the war against Bolshevism)….that Fulford over at vdare.com celebrated the treasonous Reagan’s birthday over at vdare.com is truely disgusting.
@Kevin Macdonald.
I dare say Switzerland has a better chance of maintaining its identity over time than America, and part of that has to be minding its own business and keeping out of others’ wars, however well-intentioned interventions may be. Even after the conflict is long over, the taxes and imposts and loss of freedom remain, never returning to the antebellum level. This is the history of America, where the institutional framework that enabled intervention in foreign wars, costly like almost nothing else, stayed on to finance the myriad schemes that make life a misery today.
I never did buy the Domino Theory. And it seems to me in retrospect that the real big winners in Vietnam were the Meyer Lansky heroin ring, and the defense industry. That exercise cost America the last vestiges of the gold standard, with the subsequent precipitous drop in the dollar’s purchasing power.
I didn’t buy the domino theory either–although I probably did after hearing a lecture in grade school which featured a map of the world becoming increasingly Red until the U.S. was the only non-Red country. In the Catholic schools we often heard about persecution of Catholics in Eastern Europe. Certainly the domino theory wasn’t completely unreasonable.
@Jason Speaks: You miss the point on the Fed. It’s not whether the Fed is a Jewish institution or not.
The fact is it presides over an inherently inflationary monetary system, primary beneficiaries of which are the State and commercial banks, and the finance sector generally. No cigar for guessing the ownership of much of the banking and finance industry in the Western world.
@Jason Speaks:
However, it seems to me there are central banks in the world that are not under Jewish control (Japan, for example).
-How do you know this?
@Facio Libre:
Oxy sounds likes the tribe’s wonder drug. Just think of the implications in regard to mind-control. I can just see our govt initiating forced pill popping sessions in order to “fix” people’s “trustworthyness.” Now instead of the masses catching on to tribe subversion, they become “more trusting” and more naive. Imagine the deceit that would follow. Its a dream come true for top-down architects and marxist social engineers.
@St@r Scre@m:
The Plaza and Louvre Accords, amongst others, show that the Fed is perfectly able to work in league with foreign central banks.
@wattylersrevolt: But the Soviet Union was a serious threat on the world scene that had to be considered. For decades they had thousands of nuclear weapons and held an explicitly anti-capitalist, anti-American ideology. I don’t know who we could avoid taking them seriously as as threat.
Most of your critique centers on the “Right” during that period — Reagan, Cuban exiles, “psychopathic” corporate America, etc. You sound almost regretful that the Soviet Union fell, but I can’t imagine the world situation would be better with a Soviet triumph or a Soviet continuation.
Maybe you felt betrayed by the Right, or maybe you are a Leftist WN, but the I don’t see how any US President, of either party, could fail to take the Soviet Union seriously and develop counter strategies to deal with their expansion around the world.
“The Cold War was a massive lie. Russia posed no threat to America.”
Yes it did. It already had a huge and powerful fifth column in America, the children and grandchildren of the russian communist jews who arrived between 1880 and 1920.
All the anti White activity of the last 70 years, from affirmative action, to school busing, to massive non White immigration is in accordance with the program created in russia and implemented by russian american jews.
Lenin and company planned to take over the entire world including the USA. In the US, jews were a subversive group that carried out the comintern plans.
Now that the cold war is ended, the jews are still destroying the US.
@wattylersrevolt:
Harvard’s Larry Summers and Andrei Shleifer still enjoy star status in academic circles, despite their disgraceful part in the privatizations of the former Soviet industrial groups. If you’re interested, Institutional Investor had a good paper on the pillage of Yeltsin’s Russia:
http://janinewedel.info/harvardinvestigative_InstInvestorMag.pdf
Wat Tyler
I am very familiar with everything you say. But I do not see how in the world the cold wars influenced immigration policy.
Vietnam did bring in a lot of vietnamese. But they did not arrive until 1974 and after when we retreated. The non White invasion immigration act was in 1965, much earlier.
The communist takeover of Cuba did result in the corrupt mostly White cubans turning S. Florida into the corrupt capitalist cuba they left. We had many E. German, Hungarian and Polish refugees from 1945 to 1990.
I agree with most of what you say. Maybe you could explain why you link the cold war with non White immigration. After all, if we had won Vietnam, we probably would have enriched it like we did Korea and Japan.
Kevin MacDonald
November 9, 2011 – 11:03 am | Permalink
I didn’t buy the domino theory either–
Western Europe was full of very influential pro communists in goverment, labor unions, the universities and the media. The European peace movement was designed to get American troops out of W. Europe so the Russians and the E. Europeans could invade.
Many Brits think that Prime Minister Harold Wilson was a russian agent. They cite his nationalization of so many factories and then closing them down. Scargill, head of the Trades Union Assoc was a proud communist.
There was a plan by British communists that involved Russian or E. European invasion and buses. Bus drivers would go to certain buildings. Water and cement were stored by communists in these buildings. They would load up and drive to military bases.
They would block the gates and nearby motorway entrances with the buses, take off the tires and wheels and mix the cement and water so the buses would be cemented to the road.
This would be done the night before the invasion when the military had no idea an invasion was scheduled.
So the military would be blocked.
That 1970′s winter of discontent in Britian when heat and electricity were shut off by Sargill’s unions was a prelude to russian invasion with the cooperation of the unions and the intellectuals of the universities and Guardian newspaper. There were still a lot of russian agents in the
british secret services at the time.
European unions were very marxist. Most workers really did not know the difference between socialism and marxism. Many union leaders were sleeper agents. They had millions of electricians, engineers, transport and communications workers at their disposal.
A few key communist agents could have destroyed radio, Tv, phone and telegraph communications. The American IBEW electricians union was very marxist although electricians are well paid bourgeosie. Remember, commie Betty Freidan worked for the IBEW. The russians targetted
electricians’ unions because electricians can do so much damage during an invasion.
Remember what the old time revolutionaries manuals said
“first the radio station, then the presidential palace”
The russians infiltrated the French air force in the 1930′s.
It was a very communist organization at the time.
Virtually all the anti White activities were created in russia.
The great grandchildren of the people who were the first members of the communist party in 1919 are still doing their best to destroy American Whites.
They are far more successful than their parents were in the 1960′s and grandparents in the 1930′s when they infiltrated FDR’s administration
The russians could have conquered W Europe easily. With so many communists in powerful positions in Europe it could have happened.
@MajikFireHornet:
hi, thanks for the link. i had a look and its not quite what i am looking for. this organisation seems to be abit defensive. for example, it says that it believes that white americans are the victims of racism. the ADL would never say this. also, if i can be clearer in my request, on the front page of the third position website it has alink to a story about anti white discrimination in a university. so, may i ask where the organisation is that is bringing legal action against the university in support of the white european american majority. if a university was discriminating against non whites the adl or splc would be bringing law suits. so where can i contact the white equalivant.
(sorry of my grammer and english spelling is not perfect)
sorry, i must explain that the adl would never say that they believe the jew are victims or blacks are victims of racism. they woudl state ot as a fact.
“Jewish involvement and the brutal nature of the regime were widely known and discussed at the time. ” Kevin wrote.
There are many pages in the congressional record 1917 on about Jewish involvement. There are many statements that many of the leaders were Trotsky’s brooklyn jews.
You probably know this Kevin.
Remember everybody, there were 2 revolutions. One in March 1917 and one in November. The imperial family participated in the first. It looked like the standard abdication with or without bloodshed and another Czar from the royal family. Or if the Kerensky provisional govt succeeded some kind of republic. Does anyone know if Kerensky was a jew?
Lenin arrived and there were all sorts of rent a mob riots and mobs. The national guard was appointed by the Duma to help the Moscow police and guard the Duma, other goverment buildlings, railroads, bridges, coal, gas and electricity hospitals, everything needed to run the city and country.
Extremist liberal influence led to women joining the national guard. They were not confined to clerical and support work. They were firearms trained and allegedly capable of fighting the mobs.
The national guard units that guarded the Duma rotated every week. That night of glorious jewish triumph when Lenin and the rent a mob stormed the Duma and took over russia was a typical jewish plot.
The national guards that guarded the Duma that night were an all woman, all jewish group. They just let Lenin and the rent a mob in without a fight.
When the feminazis and jewish liberal groups started agitating for American military women in combat I could not help but think of the night jewish women national guards let Lenin and the mobs into the Duma building.
Of course the entire national guard of Moscow must have been infiltrated with jewish communists to arrange for an all jewish women guard on that particular night.
Or else the jewish women told Lenin when they would be guarding the Duma so he would be ready.
Since the jewish woman unit let the mob and Lenin in, there was no fighting.
Wat Tyler
As far as Cuba goes, it was no threat to us until Castro took over. Look at a map of the Atlantic. Those caribbean islands are in a key position. From those islands N and S America, Europe and Africa can be controlled.
That is why the Europeans held on to those islands so long. As soon as he took over, Castro sent revolutionaries to Central America and Mexico.
It was not us, but the Russians who made Cuba a hot spot in the cold war.
Wat Tyler “I submit that it is manfestly obvious that the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform had its roots deeply embeded in the toxic soil of the Cold War..which had its origins in US intervention in the Russian Civil War after WW2.”
The 1965 race replacement act was the culmination of jewish communist efforts since 1925. It was communist influence in America that got that act voted into law.
The only influence the cold war had on the 1965 immigration act was that is was a triumph of russian jewish communist subversion of america.
@Jason Speaks: This is begging the question. The Soviets obtained much of their nuclear weapon technology from spies within the US. If there were no US bomb project, who’s to say the USSR would have been able to develop theirs autonomously?
@Trenchant: The US was going to have some kind of weapons technology that the Soviets could steal, unless we were going to lay prostrate before the world in anarchist, government-less bliss, which I wouldn’t recommend.
@mari:
The Russian Jews living in America were surely a problem, but the USSR itself was far to poor to have any territorial ambitions on the US. The solution – become like the Soviet Union to combat it – was a losing one, as today’s parlous economic situation and nascent domestic police state shows.
@Jason Speaks: Well prostrating yourself might be your sort of thing, but I hardly think that sort of behaviour would wash with the millions of private gun owners.
The Swiss seem to have avoided invasion or devastation and are wealthier to boot.
@Trenchant: You seriously think the proper response to the Soviet Union was to rely on people with shotguns for home defense? Could those mountain boys shoot an ICBM out of the sky before it hit?
Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba were pointed at US cities at one point. The Soviets hardly needed to physically occupy the US in order to extract huge concessions from us.
A few separate thoughts:
Considering America’s mistake (IMO) of not having allied with Germany in WW2, perhaps the best way to have nipped Bolshevism in the bud would’ve been to stop funding it after the war. See YouTube for Eustace Mullins on the NWO. He describes how America propped-up the Soviet Union until the oligarchs took over in 1990. Naturally, neither the global bankers nor the defense industry minded the extra profits from a drawn out Cold War. For that matter, I don’t doubt that “western” oligarchs received the full bounty produced by Soviet Russia’s gold and diamond mines.
Japan’s central bank not under Jewish control? Maybe not directly, but that’s almost irrelevant since Japan’s currency is linked to the global system by SDRs. The zionists/marxists/globalists didn’t goad Japan into war for nothing! However, given her ethnic unity and history, Japan might emerge among the first to withdraw from the system.
I don’t know about Germany. Perhaps she’ll play it smart this time and wait for everyone else to collapse before embarking on yet another dash for freedom. Getting defeated by the communist NWO in WW2 has taught Germany the important lesson of patience. But the spirit is still alive, especially in the eastern parts — their East is like our South.
I wish people would stop slamming libertarianism. Keep in mind that there are different factions within the movement: The pseudo-conservative so-called “libertarians” of the neocon ilk have very little in common with Ron Paul’s people. Moreover, instead of viewing libertarianism in the hyper-individualist Randian/Freedmanian sense, see it as freedom to associate in the communitarian sense.
Not all non-Whites are predisposed to being anti-White. Asians, in particular, seem like natural political allies to us due to their own communitarian tendencies. The same can be said for certain enclaves within other non-White groups. What’s more, they’ve all been enslaved or exploited by the chosenite tribe at some points in their respective ancestral histories — e.g., via the Opium Wars, Atlantic Slave Trade, etc.. True libertarianism would facilitate political alliances with the enlightened among them.
Jews are the pimps of the modern world. They use milieu control via excessive bureaucraticisation and affirmative action programmes (the same way a mack daddy practices milieu control by isolating his ho from her familiar family and friend network). All these things are anti-natural perversions which prevent white people forming natural bonds at home at work or in the media. Being Jews they don’t need a pimp stick, as that is blue collar – beneath them, but use their media like Yentob, Grade, Abrahams etc. to destroy natural bonds and growth.
Remember what Koppel said in ‘On the Genealogy of Morals’ – pre-dating Professor MacDonald’s amazing work: The Jews are an ANTI-NATURAL RACE. Hence psychoanalysis, Boas, Harperson, Marxism, Feminism etc. All perverse. All hate nature. All Jewish!!!
Mari
It is not as simple as that. The Cold War had an ideological life independent of Jewish ethnic warfare against the Native Born White American Majority. If you and other Cold War Enthusiasts bothered to pay attetnion, the Cold War and the vicious war crimes committed in its names had the ideology of “our benign and noble intentions” as a cover. In 2012, we have a new boogy man-Muslim Terrorists-with the same ideological cover about “our noble intenetions”..post-1965 race-replacement immigration policy is the openly stated implementation of the ideology of “our noble intentions”.
Kevin McDonald
What you would have done over eighty years ago is completetly irrelevant. The US Goverment had completely different intent than yours. Stalin’s brutality towards the Russian people wasn’t even on US Goverments “morality” radar screen. Deal with the world the way it is.
Jason Speaks
JFK triggered the Cuban missle crisis when he ordered ICBMS to be put into Turkey aimed at the heart of Mother Russia. It is now well documented that we came within….30 seconds..of nuclear WW3…the only reason it was adverted was because of a decision of a lone Russian Captain who was given the authority by the Russian Military as to whether or not to nuke US Naval Ships heading towards Cuba. It wasn’t Russia that was a threat to the racial survival of America…it was manifestly the over-sexed degenerate Irish Catholic Cold Warrior JFK who posed the greatest threat the continued racial survival of White America and White Russia…the only thing that has changed since the end of the Cold War is the official boogy man.
@Dirk: You need to learn how to “speed read” Dirk. It is very easy to learn once you have grasped the basic theory and methodology. With speed reading you can triple the amount of written articles/books digested, and understood.
@Richard: It is not Firefox that is giving you that false “untrusted” message when visiting the TOO website … it is an extension that you or somebody in your orbit has downloaded and installed into Firefox.
r.e. Call For Papers.
This strikes me as a two-part theme. The first part is to make an analysis of potential outcomes for the Ancient Regime in the near and mid-terms. The second part is an analysis of viable strategies and tactics open to white people under each of the contingencies identified in part one.
@Trenchant:
I agree, and well said
@Facio Libre:
She means one thing by the term Communitarianism. I suspect to others it could mean something entirely different.
I don’t have a clue what it means as yet. But if it means the community fighting crime by boarding up windows..I’m against it..If it means whites banding together as a community..I’m for it.
@Mr Curious:
I mostly agree.
@wattylersrevolt: I’m not defending JFK as such by the way, I think his image has been way overblown. But it still seems like you are giving the Soviet Union a virtual pass on all its behavior and putting all blame on the US. This seems one-sided in light of history. Surely, you can’t defend Soviet actions in Eastern Germany and Poland? Or beyond that, Soviet treatment of the Russian and Ukrainian people, which may take generations to recover from.
@Jason Speaks: @Jason Speaks:
“Could those mountain boys shoot an ICBM out of the sky before it hit?”
A continuation of your earlier question begging. The US developed the better part of the ICMB technology stolen by spies and Soviet sympathizers. If it weren’t for the imperial ambitions of the US, no arms race would have occurred in the first place. Chicken – egg.
Jason Speaks
No, I’m not giving the Russians a free pass. What I am doing is detoxifying the Native Born White American brain of the boogy- man hysteria. Let us be honest: neither every-post-WW2 US president and the Native Born White American population gave a hoot about Soviet repression in Eastern Europe..complete crocodile tears..moreover, the Soviet record in Eastern Europe looks quite benign compared to what the US was doing in Vietnam and Latin America. Remember, its the relative comparison that matters.
By the way, the larger issue in the Penn State pedaphile scandal is this:pedaphilia and pre-teen female prostitution have always been and still is a fact of life for the domestic populations of nations that the US invades and occupies. This is the reason why the Taliban is offering fierce resistance to the US occupation of Aganistan and why the Taliban has enomous support among the Afghanis. They know exactly what the US military has in store for them.
Iam of the opinion that TOQ will be the first serious journal to have financial pundits factor race into the impending financial crisis. I can’t wait to read TOQ’s conclusion this coming spring.