Age of the Psychopaths

Michael Colhaze


The very same corporate psychopaths who caused the crisis by their greed and avarice, are now advising governments on how to get out of it.                                         Clive R. Boddy

 

 

When in my early teens, someone gave me a chessboard with pieces and someone else taught me the basic moves. After believing to have mastered its lesser intricacies, I accepted one day the challenge of a rather dim boy half my age. Who kept beating me repeatedly. Whereupon I decreed the noble game to be a flimsy pastime with downright repulsive components, and never touched it again.

It must have been the reason why I was, a few years later, fairly awed by a classmate who won at an uncommonly early age the regional chess championship. A natural prodigy, said everyone, blessed with a brilliant mind that augured an equally brilliant career in the nearest future—assumptions that were soon confirmed when his dad dropped dead from overweight and too much booze, and he, not yet twenty, took without a moment’s hesitation the helm of the paternal construction-and-road-building company. Which he soon turned into the largest such entity far and wide, mostly by aggressively expanding with always heavier machinery while ruining the local competitors one by one through cutthroat prices. Projects as far-flung as Belgium and North Africa stood on the agenda, and an ever growing workforce helped to realize them. Once a bribery scandal marred the fantastic success story, but this was the post-war boom and people soon forgot all about it. Until the whole house of cards collapsed one day. A multi-million bankruptcy, it soon appeared, slowly unravelled in its many garish and often criminal details. With the result that my former brilliant classmate got locked away for a few years in a dull grey prison cell. Once out again he found himself some dupes and concocted another huge stint, but with the same disastrous results. The last thing I heard of him was that he sold books and newspapers from door to door, and the banks and revenue sharks collecting every cent he made beyond the barest necessities of life.

So what happened?

Advertisement

What happened is what happens right now on a near global scale. Some aggressive passengers, super-bright in a single discipline only, have managed to take the helm of the ship and, in their feverish ambition to control it entirely, are running it aground. Capable to buy everything that is fast or loose on this earth, but unable to grasp the basics of prudent and morally sound navigation, they have long since charted a course that does not rely on the compass but an array of faulty landmarks. Unmitigated greed is one. Globalism or multiculturalism are others. Also extortion and bribery. Plus a few proxy wars thrown in as an extra. And all this with the ever more obvious intention to effectively yoke and enslave the established crew.

Clearly a proverbial Ship of Fools, you may say. And laugh, were it not that you yourself are sailing in it.

So what kind of flawed thinking made this disastrous state of affairs possible? For one, a disposition that seems to lack common sense as we know it. Second, and consequently, the certainty to be better than anybody else, by divine decree or with regard to one’s bank account. And lastly, a ruthless and reckless mentality that all but scoffs at the moral restrictions prevalent in our Christian European society.

The three rolled into one are a secure receipt for ruin.

Take the Boskies, Milkens, Fulds or Madoffs. Particularly the latter seems on the surface an intelligent man. Yet why did he believe that his massive criminal scheme could last forever and not land him one day in jail, a sad place to live out one’s final years, especially if accustomed to mountains of luxury?

Because he and his kind can’t look any further than the next street corner. Just think of the forty or so Mossad operatives who descended on Dubai to knock off one poor Palestinian, all with their photos and false passports copied, all with their covers blown for a long time to come. Or those thugs who boarded the Peace Flotilla in international waters and gunned down nine unarmed men. Did they anticipate the worldwide outcry that erupted only the next day?

Another fine example is the recent defeat of that saintly crook Michail Khordokowsky and his illustrious backers, among them Mr. Obama, Frau Merkel, the old trollop BBC and many others, all seething with indignation at Russia’s unashamedly inhuman and undemocratic behaviour. To tell you the truth, I was rather worried when a revision of the man’s sentence were to be considered during a new trial. Would Vladimir Putin and his friends stand firm and not fold in at the knees? Could Mother Russia continue to be one of the last Western countries ruled by free men and not some alien mammon moguls like everywhere else?

Well, we know the result. That youthful prodigy who tricked old man Yeltzin out of YUKOS, the national oil company worth billions of dollars, by paying him a pittance borrowed from Lord Rothschild, had his greedy claws slapped with a few more years in the cooler. And a lenient verdict it is if you consider that the crazy bugger had tried to grab the country’s presidency himself by buying every Duma member in reach, and after selling off nearly half of the expected booty to the aforementioned Lord and his American chums.

In short, another enormous miscalculation that backfired badly and thus underlines the general argument.

To this day I remember my consternation when reading many years ago in the NYTimes a column by one Roger Cohen, a rambling schmuck styling himself a Globalist of all things, who tried to convince everyone that making China rich was good for America. Even then, and naïve as I still was, I still thought that the silly man must be out of his mind. Well, he wasn’t, as we know now. Instead he and his kind paved the ground for the Warren Buffets of this world, and so deprived millions of decent Americans and Europeans of their jobs and their income.

The exercise was fittingly called globalism, a suicidal carte blanche to fabricate merchandise not in Europe or the US anymore, but in the lands of the Yellow Peril where it could be had for a fraction of the costs at home. Thus vastly underpaid coolies began to produce anything from Goodyear tires to Apple computers, and that China-outlet down the road, as Patrick Buchanan has called Wal-Mart so fittingly, sold the whole lot. Which nicely satisfied Mr. Buffet’s pathological addiction to billions and billions of dollars. And which, needless to say, took not the faintest notice of the closing-down of whole factories and the sacking of its largely white Christian workforce. The stunt was explained as an unfortunate but healthy capitalist phenomenon, yet held little solace for the victims who patted their empty pockets in stunned consternation while making for the next welfare office.

What we have witnessed, though mostly without realizing it, is a large-scale robbery of the American and European citizens that has escalated into a clandestine civil war waged by a small gang of pathological and super-rich criminals who payroll every important politician. A situation so toxic that the patient had to come down sooner or later with a heavy flu.

Just as a first creak in the rigging can be the harbinger of an approaching squall, so signs in Europe and America are increasingly set on storm. Wherever one looks, whatever one reads, the general feeling is sombre if not downright panicky. And as the Western economies are developing serious hiccups, with America virtually bankrupt and Europe facing the demise of its Euro, the suspicion grows that the whole ruckus is a planned one, just as the Wall Street crash of 1929 and other debacles like it.

A foretaste of what is coming was the mini-crash of 2008, an economic collapse triggered by the Lehman bros. bankruptcy where its investors lost billions of dollars while CEO Richard Fuld, mastermind of the giant flop, pocketed hundreds of millions of dollars in ‘compensation’.

As Prof. Robert Hare coined it so simply yet fittingly: Serial killer psychopaths ruin families. Corporate psychopaths ruin societies.

Particularly if the latter have aligned themselves, due to bonds of blood and faith, with the political psychopaths. Which means in fact that a whole country has fallen into the hands of men who normally would be locked away in a mental hospital. What is more, under the cover of an imaginary terrorist threat illegal laws have been promulgated that have curtailed the guaranteed democratic liberties. Crowned by the so-called NDAA, a Christmas present signed by the Neocon lackey, does the whole body signify a legal garrotte that has turned the USA into a virtual police state.

Do men like Bernie Madoff believe their schemes and crimes can be sustained forever? Are they impervious to the disgust and hate that slowly builds up where they are concerned? Do they, like every decent crackpot, have no fear?

If yes, they may have suffered a blow that could prove mortal. Because today the rarest of all commodities, namely the Truth, is available. On the Internet, and often haphazard or distorted, but nevertheless far more digestible than the official lies we have been fed too often. It is as if an avalanche has been kicked loose and begins slowly to gain momentum—a momentum as of yet undefined and unorganised, but powerful within the subconscious realm.

When and how this new awareness will translate into decisive action remains to be seen. As long as times are socially and economically secure, it is a safe bet that the silent majority won’t lift a hand, not even in the face of obvious crimes committed by those in power. But if recent historical paradigms are reliable, this attitude will significantly change once the affairs of state have been so badly mismanaged that millions of hardworking people are faced with unemployment and ruin. Or deem civil liberties so radically curtailed that their country doesn’t resemble a democracy anymore, but an Orwellian nightmare.

As happens right now.

Which must be the reason why this year Santa Claus has dropped a very particular Christmas present down the chimney of roughly one and a half million Americans. Namely artillery in record numbers, anything from heavy handguns to high-velocity assault rifles, plus over a billion rounds of ammunition. The past December has seen, prior to the acquisitions, the highest number of criminal background checks in the history of the USA. By now about 300 million weapons are privately owned, de facto representing an army larger than those of China and India combined. As for the exercise fields, you may try to find a parking lot in front of the many shooting ranges.

It will be difficult.

Because of overcrowding.

It is as if your ship lays becalmed in a moonlit night and you observe a few ripples on the mirror-like sea. And know that something huge and dangerous has just passed close to the surface, taking a look at you…

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

123 Comments to "Age of the Psychopaths"

  1. teutonic1's Gravatar teutonic1
    January 22, 2012 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    I am of the thought that smaller countries are more decent than large nations. Hence, our demise. Hence, more crazy leaders. There have been more and more insane politicians.

  2. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    January 21, 2012 - 10:56 am | Permalink

    “Did their “eugenic” discrimination against other Europeans deprive them of help and buffering against non-Whites? I would not be surprised. Would other Europeans living adjacently, in simulation of how they had evolved in Europe perhaps help to avoid fraternal war and have provided buffering? Perhaps it may just have provided genetic channels and outlets.”

    White leaders have never thought along the lines of racial but class strategy in their planning. They have always been inclined to dismiss non-Whites as racial inferiors that serve as nothing but cheap labor to use. Then they are the most surprised people on earth when the law of demographics overtakes them and they end up in a South African situation.

    Why are they so willing to repeatedly roll the dice when a casual look at history — especially recent history — would tell them that this strategy is so stupid as to be suicidal? They are very competitive with other Whites and those in power fear a true meritocracy, because they won’t remain in power past a generation or two.

    The first century and a half of this country was so productive because political offices changed hands and were not hereditary.

    There were a flurry of articles surrounding “The Year Without A Kennedy” where it was noted that there had not been a Kennedy in public office for 64 years and one commentator who grew up under FDR and reached adulthood during the Eisenhower years implied that the country was a lot better run when corporate and political elites used to allow their mediocre children to fail. They would simply give them a sizable trust fund and let them live out their lives as dilettantes and hire and promote smarter, hungrier, more ambitious White males. Many times, if they had marriageable daughters, they acquired brilliant sons-in-laws.

    Now, perhaps that was because our more successful leaders were familiar with Darwin’s concepts and recognized the importance of putting ego aside when it came to their own sons’ defects to acquire some superior genes to keep their bloodline, even if it did not retain the family surname, strong.

    Had King Henry VIII been so trained, he would have realized he was the anomaly in a family of sickly men who died young and acquired a healthy grandson through marrying his daughter, Mary, to the healthiest, most intelligent husband he could find.

    What I cannot get over is how Northern anti-slavery people were too much in love with the plight of the poor African slave and preferred to blather about them rather than not using the opportunity to never stop reminding the slave-holding states of how the future they were facing had already played out with the French plantocracy in Haiti, and urging them to get replace their African slave labor with White European sharecroppers and tenant farmers.

    The lifestyles of the plantocracy would not have changed one iota, the smarter, more industrious European peasants would have created their own merchant and middle class and they would have an unending supply of cheap White labor. Not to mention, they would have had a large White demographic who would share their regional interests and vote with them in Congress, averting the War Between The States.

    Our present problem has a lot to do with the fact that there are a lot of White elites who WANT to build a Mestizo nation, believing that they will be living large for generations like the White elites of Latin America. They figure if they can have a Mestizo class with enough White blood that they can calm down the more violent elements of the non-Whites and generate a people who somewhat resemble them, but are still inferior to them.

    Thus they pander to the Hispanic mestizos they are letting in by hook or by crook, figuring that like the American Negro, they will automatically pull the lever for the party that can deliver them the most goodies and keep the White elites in power.

    The flaw in this logic is already being played out in California and places where Hispanic mestizos reach any demographic superiority to Whites. They run one of their own and then vote for them in favor of these White race traitors and take not only the goodies, but the power, too. Moreover, the Negros have noticed and do the same thing.

    Not to mention every Non-White in this country has been inflamed by the Jews against Whites for the past 60 years, so they are ripe to replace them even at the upper echelons of power even if that means that the country will no longer be run as competently or profitably.

    The Tea Party rattled a lot of cages in the Republican establishment, because it looked like the White working class had finally awakened and realized who their real enemies were – the White elite – and were about to systematically replace them. Unfortunately for the White Americans, they quickly sabotaged that effort by having the TP waste all its time dodging accusations of racism and purging its ranks of any real White patriots and nationalists.

    Unsurprisingly, we only have a bunch of establishment Neo-Con Israel-Firsters competing against the demonized Ron Paul for the Republican nomination. Sadly, the White voters are being told to do what they have had to do for the past 50 or 60 years, which is to hold their nose while voting. What a shame!

  3. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    January 18, 2012 - 11:26 pm | Permalink

    I have found this article a week late – but bless you Mr. Colhaze.

    I
    LOVE
    YOU.

    “Which must be the reason why this year Santa Claus has dropped a very particular Christmas present down the chimney of roughly one and a half million Americans. Namely artillery in record numbers, anything from heavy handguns to high-velocity assault rifles, plus over a billion rounds of ammunition. The past December has seen, prior to the acquisitions, the highest number of criminal background checks in the history of the USA. By now about 300 million weapons are privately owned, de facto representing an army larger than those of China and India combined. As for the exercise fields, you may try to find a parking lot in front of the many shooting ranges.

    It will be difficult.

    Because of overcrowding.

    It is as if your ship lays becalmed in a moonlit night and you observe a few ripples on the mirror-like sea. And know that something huge and dangerous has just passed close to the surface, taking a look at you…”

    That’s the finest prose poetry I have ever read. Bless you.

    There are times when I despair. When I fear l is lost. But then Time and Space – the Cosmos Itself, send me a Divine Gift. You gladden my Soul. You’ve lifted my Heart tonight.

    Bless you.

    I
    LOVE
    YOU.

  4. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 18, 2012 - 12:03 pm | Permalink
  5. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 18, 2012 - 4:08 am | Permalink

    @monte: As you say, I wouldn’t want to do without our “weakness” either. In the long run it’s been much more of a plus than a minus.

    As for the other matter, what’s an extra “sometimes” among friends and allies?

  6. monte's Gravatar monte
    January 18, 2012 - 3:43 am | Permalink

    Sorry, one SOMETIMES is sufficient.

  7. monte's Gravatar monte
    January 18, 2012 - 3:40 am | Permalink

    pierre de craon

    Well, yes, of course! Sometimes it’s probably OUR tribes weakness to be sometimes too trusting by half. Yet I wouldn’t want to do without it. In any case, I like your spirited and intelligent defence of our faith. Perhaps, with the time, we win a few more good Christians over to this site.

  8. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 17, 2012 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

    @monte: As you see, monte, Neville gave you his answer. With its spelling regularized and its words translated into English, he is explaining to you that he is either a marrano (a crypto-Jew) or a useful goy idiot who, like his hero Carlin, is doing the Tribe’s work, probably for nothing except the sheer pleasure of expressing his hate.

    There is another Tribal infiltrator lurking hereabouts; a fellow calling himself matthew. He came out of the woodwork again on the Lee Siegel thread. His poisonous style—including his inability to spell even simple words correctly—so resembles Neville’s that one is led to suspect that matthew and Neville are the same life-form.

  9. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 17, 2012 - 10:33 am | Permalink

    @monte:

    “this foulmouthed and obscene derision of Christ’s message and its adherents”

    Dear monte this is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

    People not entrapped into religion mumbo jumbo will not agree and will appreciate Carlin’s common sense , humor and commentary and maybe even his use of ‘Chaucerian’ English..

    Monte “the common enemy” are mainly interested in anything to “make a buck” .

    “do you really believe only fools and dunces are Christians?”

    I do believe Christians are fools and dunces but there are others outside that group who also are Christians.

    Jesus , God and Religion are the “Greatest Stories Ever Sold”.

  10. monte's Gravatar monte
    January 17, 2012 - 8:53 am | Permalink

    Neville
    Sorry to meddle in this one. But, dear Neville, can’t you see that this foulmouthed and obscene derision of Christ’s message and its adherents, myself included, is exactly the reason why the common enemy tolerated Carlin? It is so obvious, don’t you think? Or do you really believe only fools and dunces are Christians?

  11. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 17, 2012 - 7:15 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Pierre de Craon –January 16, 2012 – 4:34 pm
    A George Carlin video clip is your evidence?

    Poor Pierre de Craon has to now insult the amazing tallent of the great George Carlin.

    The world would be such a better place with Carlin’s masterpiece translated into every language and seen worldwide.

    Carlin one Cristian Catholic who discovered the obvious truth.

  12. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 17, 2012 - 2:40 am | Permalink

    @Heather Blue: Just curious: do you know whether Linder gives a source for the Stan Evans quote? I have two of Evans’s books and have heard him speak several times, but I have never seen or heard him say anything quite so refreshingly forthright. His usual mode is to tread very carefully.

  13. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    January 16, 2012 - 10:03 pm | Permalink

    @Farnham O’Reilly: Mr. O’Reilly, I was a little overwhelmed by your response to my post. I appreciate it.

    I have read your articles with much interest. You, at least, offer solutions. But getting people to actually follow through is the problem. I think people might be more inclined to be indignant about wrong-doings (when they know what those wrongs are) than going to a lot of trouble changing their lives. But that is only here and now. My opinion could change.

    I feel we need to create strategy sessions on how to get rid of the Jews. We need to take a positive approach. What will work to rid ourselves of this pestilence? There are ways to do anything we undertake. What are they? What course do we take? How do we get the people involved? How will we get our message out to the masses? How do we instigate a movement to set the whole thing in motion?

    Jews brazenly had their Frankfurt school and we need one like it. If Jews can come together to plot and plan how to plunder our treasury and get into powerful positions of government and media surely we can come together and figure out how to remove them. Our priority is to restore White authority.

    I am not forgetting the other ethnic groups. They will be a problem, but before we become all teary eyed over their pitiful plights let us bear in mind they have homelands of their own and that is where they belong. They came here because they want to feed like pigs on western wealth and luxury rather than produce their own. Psychologically, they are well aware of that and they know they have no ethnic or religious rights to white culture or white homelands. We take it from there.

  14. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    January 16, 2012 - 8:53 pm | Permalink

    @D.A. Quick: I don’t think a private email is possible, D. A. I would have to make my email public, I think, and I do not wish to.

    However, I appreciate that you would like to. Please don’t keep ideas to yourself. We need ideas.

  15. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 16, 2012 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

    @Neville: This is the best you can do? A George Carlin video clip is your evidence? Are you now going to tell us that Carlin’s career was spent fighting Jewish control of the stage that they allowed him to appear on?

    Couldn’t you at least include something from one of your openly Jewish friends—say, Maimonides or Stephen Jay Gould or Chris Hitchens?

    Good-bye, Neville. You may call yourself a messenger all you like, but you have no message worth listening or responding to.

  16. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 16, 2012 - 7:04 am | Permalink

    Pierre de Craon January 15, 2012 – 8:39 pm
    @Neville: I know the difference between indoctrination and teaching.

    Pierre de Craon actually believes that foot soldiers for Christianity in religious educational programs are “teachers”.

    Teaching what ? — Christian mumbo jumbo fairy tales etc. in Jewish & Christian Scriptures.

    I have posted links to information to support my views and “reach/teach” enquiring minds and Piere probably as a result of that early religious indoctrination defends his mumbo jumbo God beliefs by attacking the messenger and not the message.

    How lucky we are today that Piere can’t call on the Inquisition to defend this “Sky Wizard” nonsense.

    The educational link that Piere probably will dissapprove of.

  17. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2012 - 10:17 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    It is a fear I share, but even American Jews are speaking out against Israel. I think this is because the smartest Jews are here and they know that America is war weary and may turn against them.
    Perhaps thanks to the web, or Dr. MacDonald, for whatever reason they are getting scared. Remember that along with everything else they truly believe that we are dangerous animals that may erupt into violence at any moment.

  18. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2012 - 9:08 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: No, I don’t disagree. Given the seemingly inexhaustible Jewish capacity for megalomaniacal overreach, it would be foolish to exclude any possibility, one of them being another complete collapse of the Tribal house of cards. Indeed, past collapses, as often as not, have happened with little warning; so why not now, too?

    Nevertheless, I still think, to borrow Damon Runyon’s words, that it’s not the way to bet; not yet anyhow. I have begun to fear that the folks at the Tel Aviv storefront of international Jewry might really be so drunk on their own success that their exercising the Samson option is a genuine possibility, primarily because their perception that they could get away with murdering millions, without even economic reprisals from the Western countries that they run, could well be correct. And would the Russians or the Chinese give enough of a damn to risk their own populations to punish Israel and the monsters it represents?

  19. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2012 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

    @Neville: I know the difference between indoctrination and teaching. Do you know anything aside from how to place links in comboxes to nonsensical things other people say and write? That Minnesota is run by Jews and their ex-wrestler stooges doesn’t count as knowledge, incidentally.

  20. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2012 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: “At least in the south, where I have most experience, Protestants are nearly universally well versed in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments.” I wanted to comment separately on the entire paragraph that includes this sentence because everything in it strikes me as absolutely true. I was thus quite wrong to generalize about Protestants when northern Protestants—most of them Episcopalians, Congregationalists, Northern Baptists, and the better-dressed kind of Presbyterians—were the people I was really referring to. Thank you for the correction.

    It is of course no coincidence that many such looked at southern Protestants, largely but by no means entirely Southern Baptist folks, with emotions ranging from disdain to plain contempt. Even as a young man, I thought that the expression Bible Belt was curious, in that it scoffed at something that seemed at worst harmless and at best downright virtuous.

    Perhaps the saddest thing that can be said about northern Protestants is that they themselves frequently include Unitarians when they speak or write of other Protestants. Given that Unitarians, like Mormons, are by definition not Christians—since they reject the doctrine, even the idea, of the Trinity—what does it suggest about the actual beliefs of nominal Christians who regard non-Christians as co-religionists?

  21. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 15, 2012 - 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Pierre de Craon –January 15, 2012 – 12:16 am
    “I was taught in grammar school by completely orthodox Ursuline nuns (fifties), in high school by an Irish-origin order of brothers” who were then”

    Pierre de Craon maybe you mean indoctrinated not taught ?

    FYI the Jewish Diaspora like the Exodus is yet another fairy tale.
    http://consortiumnews.com/2011/12/13/israeli-scholar-disputes-founding-myth/

    European Jews descend for the Kazhar Empire, a west asian empire that was established in the eighth century and converted the population to Judaism to avoid taking sides in the Islam vs Christianity battle. In the 13th century the mongols rolled in and shut the empire down and the Kazahrs fled into Europe & established Jewish communities throughout Europe & their Israelite descent is more Jewish mythology.

    Another top Israeli archaeologist Israel Finkelstein has denied the existence of Jewish roots in the city of Jerusalem, contrary to Israel’s claims that have prompted continued Judaization of the city.
    http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2011/08/08/top-israeli-archaeologists-contest-jewish-ties-to-jerusalem/

    Finkelstein, a professor at Tel Aviv University, said Jewish archaeologists have failed to unearth historic sites to support some of the stories in the Torah. Among those stories are the Jewish Exodus, the forty-year wandering in the Sinai desert, and Joshua’s victory over the Canaanites.
    He also said there was no archaeological evidence that concludes that the alleged Temple of Solomon EVER existed.

    http://occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com/2011/08/08/top-israeli-archaeologists-contest-jewish-ties-to-jerusalem/

  22. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2012 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Of course I got the joke and enjoyed it. One of the first hints I ever had of the fact that Jews live in a different universal was when a very bright woman, a Smith grad, expressed amazement that in a interfaith panel on TV the Jesuit provided an intellectually respectable argument!

    I am sorry to hear that Jesuits have joined the dark side. That is sad news indeed. Any chance that we can depend on sheer intelligence to bring them back to our side?

  23. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2012 - 2:33 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I was counting on your seeing that I was having a bit of fun, Mrs. Teller; I hope you did, and I apologize for seeming abrupt if you didn’t. It was habitual practice during my youth for those educated by the Jesuits to sneer more or less goodnaturedly at those of us who weren’t, and of course we sneered right back at them. You won’t be surprised to hear that as a rule things got out of hand only at sporting events and then only on rare occasions, because the consequences of bad public behavior, at Jesuit and non-Jesuit schools alike, were suspension or even expulsion. Indeed, as late as the late fifties one of the things that all Catholic educators agreed on was epitomized in the reply of a teacher to an unserious but sassy question from one of my own classmates. Q.: “Why am I better off here than at a public high school, Brother?” A.: “Because I’m working to transform you from a vulgar ruffian to a Christian gentleman. I may even succeed if you give me half a chance.”

    In this country and indeed in most of northern and western Europe, the Jesuits were among the very first of the orders to buy into conciliarism lock, stock, and barrel. They thus quickly became extremely unreliable guides to the faith, and it is not a coincidence that the order suffered an even higher and more rapid dropout rate than any other of the great teaching, preaching, and contemplative orders. In fairness, however, I ought to add that your experience of Jesuits as principled, even exemplary teachers was the norm till at least the eighties. Nowadays, it’s a crap shoot—as it is with almost everything else in our worsened society.

    Since you meant to compliment me, I shall belatedly say thank you, tug at my forelock(at least at where it would be if I still had hair there), and leave it at that—but do see my note to monte, just above, too.

  24. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 15, 2012 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Athanasius —–January 14, 2012 – 11:40 pm |

    @Neville: they also elected white secularist Jesse Ventura–and what did he do for us?

    Athanasius —– I presume you are rellying to mine “Neville January 13, 2012 – 3:45 pm and IMHOP your question is a nonsencical distraction that has no connection to my comment.

    FYI Jesse Ventura is to be congratulated on a splendid job.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Ventura

    He is one Patriotic American Goy who amongst other things does not believe the nonsencical Oficial 9/11 fairy tale.

  25. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2012 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

    @Joe Webb:
    I am afraid that I do not agree. Please do not be fooled by public evangelicals like Sarah Palin. They are merely kowtowing to the powers that be. Many Southerners have never met a Jew, or known that they were Jews if they met. Jews have such a horror of all things rural that they have avoided all but the largest cities.
    With no disrespect intended, I would liken the attitude of many Southern Protestants to folks who grew up immersed in The Lord of the Rings trilogy. No one is going to believe that The Shire is a threat to goodness. Even the words of Jesus are assumed to be a message to all mankind, not just to the Jews.

    This does not mean they support American Jews today. Do not mention Jews, but Wall St or Hollywood, or the forces in Washington and they will be as angry as you and I. The difference is far more superficial than it seems. Public Professional Protestants like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson merely sold out rather than endure the usual Jewish media pressure. It was the price they paid for legitimacy in Wasington and New York.

    I promise you that if things get as tough as you sometimes suggest, southern protestant men will be the first you call on. Many have military experience, and hunting and fishing skills and the most intense sense in America of being dispossessed.
    These are the descendents of the men and women who initially settled and cleared this land, and wrestled with the race problem the longest. The are born understanding Thomas Jefferson’s quip about holding a wolf by the ears.

  26. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2012 - 2:11 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    I must defer to Mr. de Craon, I have no recent experience with Jesuits. If, however, we could win them over to our side they would be allies as formidable as he.

  27. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2012 - 2:05 pm | Permalink

    @monte: I wasn’t incensed at all, monte; I was just kidding. Had I not been certain that Mrs. Teller would understand, I would never have taken such a tone.

    The sad fact, however, is that it has been fifty years since even one Jesuit in ten wasn’t making war on the Catholic faith and betraying Loyola, Xavier, and the other saintly founders of the order.

  28. monte's Gravatar monte
    January 15, 2012 - 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Alice

    I agree that Pierre’s rather incensed reply belies his usually even-handed and thoughtful comments. I had dealings with Jesuits, commercial and otherwise, and was deeply impressed by their highly educated manners and clear-minded understanding of the ways of the world. If there were a modern Loyola among them, it would help our crusade considerably.

  29. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 15, 2012 - 12:54 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: tell us (me) more. I am growing more and more persuaded that the core problem with regard to the jews in the US and elsewhere is the Protestant jew-luv.

    What percentage of these Protestant folks is in-luv with the jews?

    When one is in luv, enthralled, whatever, one can hear no criticism. Even War After War, Amen is Good.

  30. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 15, 2012 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: not an argument, just sarcasm and vehemence. j

  31. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2012 - 12:36 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    Thanks for the link to Cantor. To prove your point, on my honeymoon in Greece, back in the last century, I learned of the Greek custom of gifting brides with gold. One young bride I met has several dozen slim gold bangles. I felt so superior to any poor people who could not trust their money. Nothing seemed stronger than the US dollar. Shortly thereafter, Nixon took us off the gold standard. Is it entirely coincidence that I may be one of the last generation of women who reared our own children and cared for our own old folks?

  32. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2012 - 8:24 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Now, now, is that any way to respond to a compliment? I went to a Jesuit grad school and was immediately impressed by the clarity of thought, faultless logic and ability to get to the heart of the matter, complete with chapter and verse so to speak. This was in stark contrast to by often Jewish profs in college who were far better at obfuscation than clarity. It was these admirable qualities that I see in you.

    I would disagree with one point you have made. At least in the south, where I have most experience, Protestants are nearly universally well versed in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments. For some, it may be the only book they have read, but they have read it, repeatedly, since early childhood. It is precisely their affection for the Psalms and Prophets, combined with a nearly total lack of real world experience of modern Jews, that underlies their support for Israel.

  33. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 15, 2012 - 3:41 am | Permalink

    Oh, and thanks for the thoughtfulness of your reply. High social time preference really is the order of the day, and so one gets used to its fruit – glibness.

  34. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 15, 2012 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    @ Pierre de Craon:
    Yes it’s hard to see anything but the enormous success, so far, of this weird mix of diaspora and state. But I was thinking ahead, the war drums are beating over Iran; what if the unthinkable happened and things didn’t work as per the likudnik plan? Would not then the many eggs, many baskets option look better? I’m mindful of the Sicarii example.

  35. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2012 - 2:39 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I really didn’t give you a very good answer, and for that I apologize. Your question is quite provocative and deserves a fuller, better-informed engagement (as I said above) than I feel equipped to give it. Yet even so, my inexpert inclination would be to say that, however much a failure the kingdom period was (and it was an immense failure), ancient Israel had far more in common with kingdoms past and (almost) present than the state of Israel has with the United Kingdom of Judah and Israel or the two kingdoms into which it split before first Israel and then Judah came to its deservedly ignominious end.

    I would hesitate to say that the rapid decay of the form of government pioneered in the United States—an aristocratic republican confederation with well-controlled democratic and oligarchic tendencies—into, first, a centralizing “democratic republic” with demotic centripetal and centrifugal elements held in precarious (im)balance; then, a forcibly imperialized construct wherein the once-independent components held onto the shards of independence with increasingly less success (this period ended with the horror of the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment); and finally a plutocratic managerial unitary state largely run by Jews for their own benefit—can with justice be blamed on Jewish subversion. But I have no doubt that it is now the form they have embraced and put their proud stamp on, and indeed they have made it the emblematic form of government in our time. Thus, it is hardly surprising that it is the form that can be seen in its most Platonic manifestation at the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The differences between the Jewish state and the managerial “democracies” of the once-Christian West can be counted on one finger: the absence of covertness in the former.

    The Hebrew kingdoms, as the OT frequently notes, represent the Jews’ (unholy) desire to be like everyone else: to have a king who would make them feel important by having a splendid court and make them prosperous by killing their neighbors and stealing their land. If this isn’t a near-universal state of mind, damned if I know what is. Interesting to note is that the Hebrew kings, their kingdoms, and their increasingly worldly subjects got such a bad press from the biblical prophets and chroniclers that even now, at the historic high point of Jewish power, the organs of Tribal propaganda still virtually never make mention of them (aside from David and Solomon, of course). After all, Christians, especially the rapturo-fundamentalists and evangelicals who devote themselves wholeheartedly to the Jews’ service, still read the OT and might conceivably be inspired to recite chapter and verse in response to attempts to make such folks as Uzziah, Jezebel, and Abijam into the former-day equivalents of such “giants” as Ariel Sharon and Bibi Netanyahu.

  36. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2012 - 1:35 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I have the impression that the existence of Israel makes things worse for the rest of us, but I have absolutely no well-founded arguments to support it. Obviously, any international enterprise, whether it’s legit or a racket, profits from having a home base, especially when times get tough—but have times ever been less tough for the Tribe?

    Sad to say, the best I can offer is the completely anecdotal information that the Jews I have admired the most—most of them musicians—have been indifferent to Israel or openly hostile to it. The poster boy for the latter state of mind was Yehudi Menuhin, who was treated like crap by the Zionist establishment for decades. His friendliness toward Christians and Christianity didn’t help him with that crowd, either.

    Apropos the Diaspora, it ought to be recalled that it had already become a problem for Europe and North Africa by Alexander the Great’s time. I have insufficient historical knowledge to offer an opinion as to why, after the Babylonian Captivity was terminated by Cyrus, the desire to see and settle in foreign parts became all the rage. The famous psalm 137, “By the waters of Babylon,” with its cri de coeur “may my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth if I forget you, if I do not count Jerusalem the greatest of my joys” evidently became transmogrified in a century or less into something more closely resembling “say hi to Jerusalem for me; I’ll write when I get work.” The later prophets had nary a good word to say about the cosmopolites, of course, and to their sentiments few around here wouldn’t say amen. It is perfectly clear that by the time of Christ, the transformation of the Hebrews from the people who had been entrusted with the knowledge of the one true God (unlike the Greeks of Socrates and Plato’s time, they clearly didn’t have the brains to figure it out for themselves) into a society where the Schumers, Madoffs, and Bloombergs were the heavy hitters was complete.

  37. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 15, 2012 - 12:39 am | Permalink

    @ Joe Webb:
    I’ll leave you to get back to Krugman & the NYT for sound economics.

    I stand corrected on Mann, his children were Jewish, he was not.

    On hyperinflations, you can go back to ancient China if you want episodes with the fiat, but not the Jew. Or Google “Zimbabwe”.

    And don’t believe me about those silly legal tender laws, try printing some yourself.

  38. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2012 - 12:16 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Wash your mouth out with soap, Mrs. Teller!

    I was taught in grammar school by completely orthodox Ursuline nuns (fifties), in high school by an Irish-origin order of brothers who were then also straight-arrow (late fifties-early sixties), and finally, starting in 1962 (a month before Vatican II began), in a Catholic college where belief in the Faith was already well on the wane, except among a few of the older theology teachers (none of whom, significantly, were ever given class assignments in the arts and sciences program), and where all the “advanced” spirits knew precisely what the core Bolshevik cadre of council fathers and their theological experts (called periti) were going to do to the Church. I fell in with the cool set, of course, and it took me thirty years to realize the gravity of my error.

    Reading the Bible is something any educated adult can do (yes, I know I have just excluded 87 percent of American college grads) without much assistance. It doesn’t take a lot of time, especially if, in the Old Testament, you skip all the lists in Numbers and the two books of Chronicles and the many pages of what old Prots with a sense of humor used to call the “begats.” The New Testament, preeminently, is much easier to read than the Old, as people have known and said for about nineteen centuries. Not everything in either testament is easy to comprehend in anything resembling a full sense, of course, but those who don’t read it at all will never even have a chance of understanding what it says.

  39. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 15, 2012 - 12:09 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: The Catholic Church came up with the 7Deadly Sins, as far as I know. Also, I got the rank order a bit wrong. Avarice is before lust, and so is Anger.

    As for your defense of Greed, I totally disagree. Caring for your family first is not greed. etc. Greed shows up after you have adequately fed and housed and educated your family, and you want not a 3 bedroom house for your family, but a 10 bedroom house, etc. Secondly, it is possible to make a lot of money without being greedy. This is what Talent and Hard Work can produce. A great deal of money can then seen as surplus and contributed to the Common Good, which in our case is WN.

    One dimensionality includes Greed. The aristocratic and Old Money view includes not talking about money. Manners have it that one should be well-bred enough to talk about important matters like, for us, WN, White History and Culture, Jewish subversion, literature, etc, etc. Money is boorish.

    Further, getting obsessed with economic single-factor analysis is not only boorish, it is…well, obsessive. LIke the bumble-bees that have been proven incapable of flight…but they fly.

    As for a central bank in China or the US having some part of determining a price, that is good. My central bank would support prices that are good for Whites. Period.

    You seem to approve of wage slavery in China, the Bottom of the bottom line. You also appear to be economistic. White Nationalists are not economistic, they are concerned with the Whole of our situation. The Gestalt if you will.

    If you want to be a Sovereign Individual, fine, but that is not the stuff of a WNist. Join the Repugnicans and so on. Intersting, that Ron Paul, while a libertarian, seems to be concerned not with sovereign individuals but with the common weal. Of course, intellectual contradictions can live side by side with a temperment that is relatively healthy…Healthy meaning an individual who recognizes his sociobility and is willing to forego filthy lucre for the sake of a socioble civil society.

    It is like this. A while back I talked with a soccer mom in Menlo Park, CA. an upper middle class town. I talked mexers and low wages. She said, you mean I would have to pay ten dollars for a hamburger? I pointed out the mexer danger, espec right next door in Redwood City. She didn’t appear to understand.

    So, maybe you should tell us what an economics for WN would look like. I have done this. The left was correct in terming economics, Political Economy.

    It is always partly political. Our politics includes removing the “psychopaths” from our economy. One-dimensionality in anything, is nigh to psychopathology.

  40. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 14, 2012 - 11:44 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Thomas Mann was not a jew. His parents were Lutheran and Catholic. He also looks about as Aryan as one can get. I recall a great couple lines in Dr. Faustus, wherein he warns a jew that their present behavior is going to get them into “real Jewish trouble.” Dr. Faustus was a geat read, one of my favorites. I ultimately gave up on Magic Mountain…too much talk, too much Philosophy.

    He also wrote a book, forget the title, which later embarrassed him because of its Germanism…the German looking somberly out to sea, Faustain German, etc. This was shortly after ww1 as I recall.

    I read some of this Cantor thing and I must say I think it is more or less silly, and economistic. People can get stressed by any number of factors…start with hunger. What Weimar Inflation did was light years away from what we have now, and what it did contribute to was a rejection of Liberal capitalism.

    As for this thin air money and so on, it is total hogwash. I have argued the case several times, and will not do it again. REad Useless Mullins if you want, and the libertarian economists, and you are free to lose at every stage of the game.

    A central bank, not run by jews, is part of the answer. The other part is a central bank run by technocrats with no ties to Finance.

    Leave it to a jew libertarian like this guy Cantor, to further deceive the goyim.
    I am amazed at the gullibility of people on this list to believe these johnny-one-note libertarians, and jews to boot.

    Take your dollar anywhere in the world and see what it will buy…everything at about the cheapest price. A fiat money is in no way, fiat. It is worth what it will buy. It is backed by Productivity, Confidence in the economy that it rests on, and common sense.

    When “printed money” needs to be withdrawn from an overheated economy, it is taken back by the Fed and burned in the incinerator, thereby cooling off an economy.

    The entire world runs on this principle. I suppose that the world economy, O yes, is going over the cliff…right. And, Right Now! How convenient for the oracles to be alive Right Now…like the Rapturists…going to heaven, going to heaven…right now!

    Or the histrionics of Not with a bang, but a wimper….hysterical emotion.

    Of course the Christ is Coming crowd, like the jews who have had at least a dozen false prophets, is never going to tire of the thing. It is an emotional release from the lack of Meaning and Pleasure in this world. The Catholic church, as I understand it, has God commanding us to love this world, with all its imperfections. That sounds like pretty good advice to me.

    World Without End, Amen.

    By the way, one of the reasons the Jews are so insufferable, per one critic, is that at least the non-orthodox and seculars have decided that They are God. Since the Messiahs have not materialized, and jews have been made fools of by many fakers, it is now the Jewish People who will fulfill the Mission of bringing jewish light to the world. That is why they own almost all the media. The media is the successor to the Talmud, or, the vulgate (?) for the goyim. They got the In the Begining was the Word, down pat. They own the Word.

    Of course, what they do no own is our genes. Evolution has the last word, not some rabbi from NPR..All Jews Considered.

    Joe

  41. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    January 14, 2012 - 11:40 pm | Permalink

    @Neville: they also elected white secularist Jesse Ventura–and what did he do for us?

  42. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2012 - 11:34 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: This is more your bailiwick than mine, but I’m convinced that the Jews’ casting out to wander was both a curse and a blessing for them. It created the fluid, Hydra-headed diaspora, the paranoia and sense of not belonging that both created their problems with the locals, but also made for an easy departure to more welcoming climes.

    When the Zionists got their country, in a sense, Jews became a more identifiable and less ethereal presence. In biblical times, they’d insisted on getting a king, and that didn’t work out so well for them, so I wonder what your thoughts are about the parallels to their nation-state of today. Far from being a safe-haven, it seems to me that State-worship might prove the anti-Zionist Jews correct all along.

  43. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2012 - 10:51 pm | Permalink
  44. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2012 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Jesuit trained?

  45. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2012 - 10:19 pm | Permalink

    @pessimist:”So-called free traders”. Yep, I’d agree with that. How much damage was done by NAFTA? Destroyed lots of small Mexican peasant farmers (compete against US agri-business with its rich subsidies), who now run for the cartels instead, or else moved north with family and now enrich American life.

    And what sort of “free-trade” compact runs to thousands of pages of legislation, anyway? It’s an Orwellian world.

  46. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 14, 2012 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    @Farnham O’Reilly: The advice that previous commenters offered on how best to address Christians in your midst was well-meant and by and large quite sound. Yet my sense is that their advice overlooked the primary and principal line of approach to Protestants especially—and they are the Christian people you mean, aren’t they?

    The foundation of all Protestant belief is the Bible. Though you appear to think that the Bible (presumably you mean the Old Testament) is a great mass of Jewish self-congratulation, it is, taken all in all, anything but. To Protestants, of course, whatever their denomination, it is the sole source of Revelation, the only sure way to God, to an understanding of God’s will for man, and to the meaning of God’s actions in the temporal world. A very great many American Protestants do not, of course, know anything about the Bible from firsthand reading—they take some Judaizing preacher’s word for virtually everything—but they are immensely susceptible to Scripture-based argumentation because they can be readily shamed when reproached that their religious orientation is unbiblical. When, as here, their belief is unbiblical and when in the argumentation, as follows, Scripture is being quoted for God’s purposes rather than Satan’s (cf. Mt 4:1-11), at least a dent and perhaps much more can almost certainly be made. They will feel compelled to examine their own copy of the Bible (1) to verify the accuracy of the matter proposed to them and (2) to see whether they can find passages that clearly refute your contentions.

    To get down to brass tacks, the basic fact is this: the Old Testament declares time and again that the covenant made with Israel, the Old Covenant, is provisional and will be superseded by the New and Eternal Covenant. Any decent concordance—a Protestant will be most impressed by reference to any of the many Protestant ones, of course—will provide a long list of “covenant” citations, though note that the ones to concern yourself with are citations to the so-called Mosaic covenant, which refers exclusively to the “children of israel”; contrast this with the “rainbow covenant” with Noah, which applies to all men at all times, or the Abrahamic covenant, which applies to all Abe’s descendants.

    You could hardly do better than begin with Jeremiah 31:31-34, which spells the situation out as clearly as possible. This passage is also the basis for what is written in chapters 8, 9, and 10 of the Epistle to the Hebrews, wherein the passage from Jeremiah is quoted in its entirety and directed at a Jewish audience to convince them that their religion, now fulfilled in Jesus Christ, is an empty husk and their covenant has been terminated. Any good Bible will also contain marginal references to parallel passages, and in Hebrews these will point you to the appropriate verses in Matthew, Luke, and 1 Corinthians. The citation in the last-named book is important for convincing any Vatican II neo-Catholics you encounter, as these are the very words used in the Consecration of the Mass.

    If you will forgive my adding a personal remark, may I say that I still find it difficult to think of someone with so striking a Celtic name as yours having seemingly so little knowledge of the faith of his ancestors.

    Anyway, good luck with your anti-Judaizing work, Mr. O’Reilly.

  47. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2012 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

    @http://goo.gl/t4Iy6
    I should also say that bankers well know that hyperinflation kills the goose, and liking omelettes, they will do everything possible to prolong the trust. Their desire to steal my money’s value from my pocket via inflation is tempered by fear that people en masse will wake up to the ruse. Many USD are in foreign hands; if there were a change in foreigners’ trust towards the currency, they might reduce their dollar-denominated holdings, impacting on local prices in a way we’ve not yet seen.

    Long term, to paraphrase Voltaire, paper money always ends up being worth …well, paper. Granted that the entire world has an exclusively paper regime, the end-game could be a drawn-out affair, though I do expect 2012 will be the year that Italy mortally wounds the Euro (already started).

    As for hackers, have a look at which criminal is pursued more seriously, the murderer, rapist, or pederast, or the counterfeiter. Only one of these criminal categories represents an existential threat to the system, and the sentences doled out should make it clear which one that is.

  48. pessimist's Gravatar pessimist
    January 14, 2012 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    John
    Both are evil. The second one is just more obvious.

    The first one, destroys our industrial/technical infrastructure along with associated jobs and towns for short term profits for himself and few others. He is literally destroying our collective endowment for future generations for easy money.

    This so-called free-trader is no different than Osama Bin Laden except he doesn’t use bombs but money and crooked trade agreements to wreck havoc in our society and impoverish us in his goal to become rich.

    These free-trading creatures needs to be sent to Hades as far as I’m concerned because of the damage they are doing to us is killing us.

  49. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2012 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    I would like to hear your thoughts on the complete failure of trust. I know almost nothing about economics, but what good is a fiat currency that no one trusts? What will happen if a hacker is able to make a significant assault on the system? Wouldn’t it all fall apart? How much wealth do they have in the real world and how much is all electronic?

  50. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2012 - 7:51 pm | Permalink

    @ John Hearns:
    The average Chinese punter has been shafted by his government, too, in a different way. He’s enjoying air-polluted cities and toxic water, expropriation from his country land, hard work and all to subsidize the US flat-screen-TV and gizmo market, as well as having his money funneled into Las Vegas condos. The whole system is sick and destined to end badly.

  51. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2012 - 7:43 pm | Permalink

    @ John Hearns: I agree with your comparison. However I don’t want to act an apologist for mercantilism; outsourcing as we see it today is no side-effect of laissez faire. Asian governments have suppressed their currencies’ upward bias by amassing US government and GSE paper. Had this subsidy from the Far East not existed, interest rates would have been higher, and less money would have flowed into the housing and related bubbles.

    None of this gutting of manufacturing occurred under the gold exchange regime, where convertibility meant currency mispricing was short-lived.

    Protectionism is no solution either, as it doesn’t address the core problem, the absolute money monopoly and who benefits therefrom.

  52. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2012 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns:
    He certainly costs us a lot more. It is causing a lot of folks to wake up. As times get tougher, anyone can see that we can’t afford both open boarders and a welfare state.

  53. Bohemianh's Gravatar Bohemianh
    January 14, 2012 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article! A

  54. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 14, 2012 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

    Having chinese work their behinds off to make us cheap stuff is not the problem .
    Our economy , as it has become socialized with more than 50% of the economy going down the money pit- big gov -multi cult -endless foreign wars- social control freak -stagnated – NWO plantation society , is the real problem.

  55. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 14, 2012 - 11:55 am | Permalink

    Let’s take two different guys and their actions as an illustration :

    1 One guy works to change trade arrangements so that he can make a fortune on importing cheap chinese goods in order to satisfy his greed . He gets very rich and we get cheaper goods .

    2 Another guy works to change immigration policy as to flood the nation with multi-cult peoples and then goes on to create all the social policies and laws to make multi-cult
    “work”.

    I am certain that the second guy is , by far, the bad-er guy .

  56. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 14, 2012 - 7:22 am | Permalink

    HarryO January 13, 2012 – 9:37 pm @Neville:

    So what is it Neville?

    Nothing much HarryO only that US neocons mainly Jewish Americans started illegal wars that have caused over 7,000,000 dead ,diseased ,displaced ,homeless crippled human beings of ALL “kinds” .
    The only beneficiary from this mayhem is Zionism.

    http://nowarforisrael.com/

  57. pessimist's Gravatar pessimist
    January 14, 2012 - 2:49 am | Permalink

    @Lancashire lad

    Don’t need a theory, we have reality and it paints a ugly picture. 8-10 million Americans have lost their jobs due to so-called Free Trade(and it isn’t) and we are a poorer nation as result.

    But on the bright side, it’s made a lot of corporate executives and investors quite rich in the process and that what matters.

    Who cares if the price has been stagnant wages for the last 20+ years, loss of heavy manufacturing, technology and even textiles to foreign nations whose trade practices border on the criminal.

    Who cares if the final price will be violent social upheavals against the fat cat business executives and their apologists in academia and in politics.

  58. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 13, 2012 - 9:38 pm | Permalink

    @ Joe Webb:
    Avarice certainly is a vice, but the seven deadly sins weren’t invented the last century, nor are they even a Western invention, rather a constant, inherent part of the human condition. Their part in the current and extraordinary malaise cannot, therefore, have any explanatory value. (As an aside, everyone is self-interested, as John Hearns said. If you don’t care for yourself, your family and friends above all others, what sort of a person are you? Would you starve them to feed your neighbour? I doubt it.)

    Now back to your shopping trip. Nobody is in a better position than you to decide what you want to trade for your hard-earned. You may steer away from Tsingtao, or San Miguel, or even Budweiser now they’re part Belgian-Brazilian, or you may go for a local micro-brewer. You execute your own particular agenda when it comes to your shopping trolley, and would resent someone telling you which beer to include.

    Where neither you, nor the vendor from whom you freely purchase, have any discretion, is the money you both use to transact. Only Dr. Bernanke and his commercial bank colleagues have that privilege; only they can control the supply of money. Their counterparts at the Bank of Japan and the People’s Bank of China are in the same happy position. Now, these parties can work together in a way that their interests are promoted ahead of yours or mine. The Asian banks indulge their exporters, intertwined with their political class as they are, to the detriment of importers who can sell less foreign goods than otherwise. The mechanism is via the Asian central banks’ aggressive bidding of US government securities. This has a nice payoff for Washington, too. The interest burden of US government debt is lower than it would otherwise be, so more government spending can occur, and the dollar remains higher than it would otherwise.

    So you can and do choose freely amongst products that are on the shelf, but it’s Dr. Bernanke and Dr. Zhou Xiaochuan who largely decide which products appear on the shelf in the first place. If they weren’t artfully tilting the currency game, maybe the shelf would have more local brews and less Heinekens, Kirins, Asahis…

    When Adam Smith and David Ricardo were buying beer, the price-specie flow mechanism of the classical gold regime ensured they didn’t have to worry about currency misalignments making local brews prohibitively expensive.

  59. HarryO's Gravatar HarryO
    January 13, 2012 - 9:37 pm | Permalink

    @Neville:

    So what is it Neville? Are you white? If so, too bad – for Whites that is. Frustration and disappointment with your own kind is one thing. That they are still your own kind is paramount. But yours is a venomous antipathy. Where will you go then for your society or are you just the sullen misanthrope you give evidence of being? In any case – good luck to you – in spite of yourself.

  60. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    January 13, 2012 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

    @Farnham O’Reilly: It is a strange issue among Christians, almost like a litmus test. I have encountered hostility and condemnation from some jew lovers. Among more rational types, I find I can only take the criticism route initially, pointing out numerous Jewish transgressions, and pointing out to poorer Christians that Israel gets 4 billion a year from us for some reason. When I finally get them to listen, I ask them to reconcile their love of jews with
    John 14:6 -Jesus answered, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.
    There is no way around that verse, and there is nothing in the bible letting them off the hook for rejecting Jesus. They were God’s chosen people until they rejected God’s only son!
    The best reason I can think of is that the church member is scared of being racist and going to hell, that they must embrace universalism. I tell them that I hope God strikes me down in front of them for rejecting the jews, anytime he wants to. I’m still here!

  61. January 13, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    @Neville:
    Small potatoes. Sarkozy, Strauss Kahn, who was his main opposition before the set up, as well as 2007 defeated French Presidental candidate Ségolène Royal, whose parner is a Jew show the depth of political control.

    The same could be said for the leaders of the political parties in the last British elections.

  62. January 13, 2012 - 5:42 pm | Permalink

    In nature oppotunistic pathogens are a reality. http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Opportunistic_pathogen

    Ticks, while being a complex organism, are opportunistic in nature, as are intestinal and other parasites.

    Why is it not possible that a yet higher form of a complex organism that has a strong sense of self preservation (immune system) could not in itself be an opportunistic pathogen or oppotunistic parasite with a different form of entry into the body?

    It is evident to me that a significant portion of the Caucasion population in the Northern Hemisphere are symptomatic of Toxoplasmosis.

  63. Farnham O'Reilly's Gravatar Farnham O'Reilly
    January 13, 2012 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

    @European: @ApocalypseAnarch: Thank you all. I am going to print this out and ruminate over it this weekend. You’ve all given me some good thoughts.

    Have a great weekend, and Northwest Best to you all. F.O.

  64. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 13, 2012 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Athanasius— January 13, 2012 – 12:39 pm
    Give me a break.

    Don’t you mean the lucky voters in the Minnesota Senate race ?

    With a Jewish population of about 1 % intelligence challenged white Christians had to choose between a Jewish Republican or a Jewish Democrat .
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/24383.html

  65. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 13, 2012 - 3:29 pm | Permalink

    Greed is Good. this is nonsense. Greed does not make for diligence, objectivity, Reason, and in short, good investment decisions. The last decade or so amply demonstrates this.

    What White traits of work ethic, honesty, and community responsibility do is foster a Good Free Enterprise economics. Everything we know about Finance and Globalizaton of the last few decades is antithetical to the psycho-logic of an older capitalism , especially before the rise of the corporation which brought with it abstract social relations, which is to say, no social relations at all. It used to be that investors invested in local enterprises, that these enterprises were local and responsible to their towns. So owners, workers, and community folks had a relationship. This does not mean it was all peachy. But it was a relationship that by virtue of folks having to live together, produced relative peace and harmony. That is largely gone now.

    Ethics are rooted not in philosophy, but in everyday social relations. That might be considered as not really ethics, but just enlightened self-interest. That is true. Mutual relationships are emotional relationships. When positive emotion is gone, then it is tempting to start treating even your own people as Things. A great line from No Country for Old Men, the movie…”when Sir and M’am are gone, it is all over.”

    (Thanks to the jews and greedy Whites…the LIberal Order is falling apart.)

    This has always been the socio-biological truth of Small communities v. Large anonymity producing “communities.” When I hear liberals talking about the Black community, or the whatever community…I wince.

    The City is always the logcial place for corruption. The Town is always the place for mutual relationships. Yes, the Town can impose strictures on folks.
    That is Good… from Money, to Sex.

    Greed never works for any economic or social situation. It will produce breakdown because of irrational economic decisions, and the poisoning of personal relationships. 7 Deadly Sins: Pride, Envy, Avarice, Lust, Anger, Gluttony , and Sloth…. in rank order of importance.

  66. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    January 13, 2012 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    @Neville: You meant he people who vote for Charles Schumer? Or Diane Feinstein? Or Carl Levin?

    Give me a break.

  67. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    January 13, 2012 - 10:31 am | Permalink

    Michael Colhaze says it was “largely white Christian workforce” that lost out from Globalization but fails to connect the dots.

    Mentally challenged white Christians are Israel’s main support within the US.

    Amazingly these same mentally challenged white Christians seem unaware or even welcome the control of the U.S. by a small band of neocons , AIPAC & a foreign country.
    http://tinyurl.com/6wxtgvz

  68. January 13, 2012 - 9:54 am | Permalink
  69. January 13, 2012 - 9:52 am | Permalink

    USrael has assassinated four Iranian nuclear scientist in the last 24 months in order to sabotage Iran’s civilian nuclear program. USrael’s latest victim is young Dr. Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan Behdast 32. Mostafa, an Iranian university professor and deputy director of Natanz enrichment facility who was killed in a terrorist bomb blast in Northern Tehran on Wednesday morning. The other three nuclear scientists were bombed to death in 2010 and 2011. Tehran had blamed Israeli Mossad for all three assassinations.

    Finian Cunningham, a senior political analyst has blamed US, Mossad, MI6 and MKO for the assassination of Dr. Mostafa. “Ultimately the author must have been Washington” as “none of the groups would dare carry out this high-profile hit without clearance from handlers in Washington,” wrote Finian Cunningham in the Global Research.

    Canadian war reporter and author, Eric Margolis told RT that the latest assassination, which he describes as an international crime, will not seriously affect Iran’s nuclear program. “It may slow things down, but it won’t end them because Iran is a big country, it has a large cadre of scientists. It will continue to work.”

    Margolis said he is surprised that no retaliation from Iran been directed against Israeli or American scientific figures or diplomats in the region in the past. “The Iranians are very anxious to get revenge, but they are being cautious because war seems not so far away in the Gulf,” added Margolis

    Jewish blogger, Richard Silverstein, posting at Tikun Olam has claimed that according to his Israeli military source – Mossad and Iranian terrorist group MEK were behind the assassination of Dr. Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan Behdast.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/usrael-assassinates-4th-iranian-nuclear-scientist/

  70. ApocalypseAnarch's Gravatar ApocalypseAnarch
    January 13, 2012 - 8:15 am | Permalink

    @Farnham O’Reilly
    I find when taking to my Catholic friends that mellow, yet unending remarks about their Talmudic hate of Christ, Europa, and all other things Christian works. Pointing out articles written by the tribe themselves, or that video above work well. It can take a little time. Never get overly angry when presenting these facts, and be unrelenting. I always find a little humility goes along way such as… “Yeah it sucks but…”Yeah or “Yeah I hate that this us how it is but…”Yeah then go into what you’ve learned, and provide quotes, and links that are not related to the movement at first. I’ve convinced 10 people in a year of endless talking. They’ll get it eventually.

  71. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 13, 2012 - 2:52 am | Permalink

    @George: the psychopath has no empathic or sympathetic emotional capacity or function. The standard libertarian line on economics is that Greed is actually Good because, per the Invisible Hand, individual self-seeking works for the greater Good.

    This position is not psychopathic, strictly speaking. The argument then becomes, and let us leave Greed ( a deadly sin) behind and call it individualist work-ethic, etc, whether this Invisible Hand is true.

    To some large degree it is true. Otoh, monopoly and lies subvert the Invisible Hand, which posits Competition. Greed can now be brought back into the equation. Greed kills. It overwhelms honest competition, etc.

    The last few years has shown us a crippled invisible hand, mashed by Finance Capital, and the intrusion of foreign semi-slave labor which stands outside the virtuous circle of an historically developed economy in one country, in which various skills have found their true price. International trade queers the organic/natural historically developed equilibrium of an economy…to repeat.

    I think Adam Smith or Ricardo wrote about this and stated that international trade is thus destructive of a balanced and smoothly functioning competitive capitalism. Trenchant can probably find this piece of info in Smith, etc.

  72. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 13, 2012 - 2:35 am | Permalink

    @Rehmat: you probably have missed the fact that Pallast is a jew, a zionist, a commie of sorts, and a very devilish character. I crossed swords with this cretin a few years ago at a leftish gathering. He said, “there it is folks, the nazi (more or less).. I was urging the War-for-Israel thesis. Pallast is pure excrement….

  73. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 13, 2012 - 2:30 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: well Trenchant, the fundamental issue is who wins? Is the White race winning in the International Capitalism Sweepstakes? Leave the technical analysis aside for a moment.

    Globalism seems to enrich a global elite. I know this sounds like a cliche, but is it true or not? The Global Elite, such as it is, includes lots of White actors but these White globalists have abandoned their White peoples.

    THe logic of International Capitalism dissolves borders, deracinates, and “equalizes” as in a race to the bottom, or as the older cliche had it, the lowest common denominator. The lowest denominator or bottom is money.

    One dimensionality is the logic of capitalism. Those who are “psychopathic” enough to put aside what most normal folks would call, the “human factor” …win. Then they throw their money at more money, and the whole dismal one-dimensional less-than-human cycle repeats itself. This is a standard line from the older Left with which I concur. (of course, the current Left in its degeneration from agent of protecting White workers and middle class folks, to its current assault on Whites, is strange but another story. It is in league with the Capitalist Pigs International.

    The current development of Occupy is a leftish popular phenomenon which has caught the Jew Left flatfooted. The Jew Left will probably denounce it as nativism and populism, and a “dark” force indeed…as the jytimes usage goes these days.

    So, please reply to this comment on my terms, i.e. Is it Good for Whites? Also, what is wrong with national capitalism? What would be wrong with a council of WN economists passing on any and all international capital flows?

  74. HarryO's Gravatar HarryO
    January 13, 2012 - 1:12 am | Permalink

    @Farnham O’Reilly:

    It is a thorny issue, though I suppose you are already at a psychological disadvantage vis-a-vis the evangelical (presumed) you are talking to inasmuch as you are not a professed believer yourself. I am talking about their psychology, of course. Getting through to the dispensationalist is tough because the numinous Jew notion is so pervasive in their religious atmosphere – especially in the case of fundamentalists such as my in-laws. I did notice (or so it seemed to me) that in a lively debate with my two brothers-in-law during a recent holiday get-together that though they are both pastors, a forceful and reasonably informed deconstructing of their Jew-enshrining theology through a little logic, some history, and broader and far more cogent Christian doctrinal addressing of the matter seemed to give them some pause and a lessening of certitude in their thinking. This is a beginning. Deprogramming a lifetime of foolish and miserably erroneous theological constructs takes time – not the least barrier being a coming to grips with an “I’ve been terribly wrong all this time” ego busting epiphany. Just for your edification I think it may be interesting to see what the “Granddaddy of all Protestant Confessions” (The Westminster Confession of Faith) has to say on this subject:
    “Beside this law, commonly called moral, God was pleased to give to the people of Israel, as a church underage, ceremonial laws, containing several typical ordinances, partly of worship, prefiguring Christ, his graces, actions, sufferings, and benefits; and partly, holding forth divers instructions of moral duties. All which ceremonial laws are now ABROGATED, under the new testament.
    To them also, as a body politic, he gave sundry judicial laws, which EXPIRED TOGETHER WITH THE STATE OF THAT PEOPLE; NOT OBLIGING ANY OTHER NOW….(WCF cp XVIII art. III, IV)

  75. Sanjay's Gravatar Sanjay
    January 13, 2012 - 12:07 am | Permalink

    Evangelical Christians are indoctrinated zombies, controlled by the Jewish media.

    I am so disappointed the way they demonize and ignore Ron Paul.

    Evangelicals are just like cattle being taken to slaughter by the Jews.

  76. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 12, 2012 - 11:29 pm | Permalink

    I’m greedy. I want the most and the best for myself, my family and my people.
    I’m so greedy that I don’t want to be made to share everything I have with everyone and anyone.

  77. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2012 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott:
    Sorry, my Yeshu recommendation was for Farnham O’Reilly, who raised the problem of talking to Christians about Jews.

  78. European's Gravatar European
    January 12, 2012 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    @Farnham O’Reilly:

    I also have this concern about Christians. I think the best approach is to ask Christians to spend a few months or a year with Jews on Sabbath, take some of their introductory classes into Judaism and have their kids spend some time with Jewish kids and their holidays for educational purposes. Of course unscheduled and not as a group you let them learn for them selves, how great and wide the love for them is among Jews.
    They either will be convinced that Judaism is the right Religion for them and convert, then let them join, or they will come out feeling totally bewildered on how come and why they are not welcomed in the synagogue or hated so much. (this later was my experience)
    Once they learn how Judaism is different then what they think the bible tells them, and is constantly changing, an in depth study about how Judaism views Christianity and Gentiles from past to present, from all their branches (orthodoxy etc.) since they don’t let Christianity off the hook, they will then have to make up their mind if this Jewish race “choseness” (and to what) really still applies, because Judaism will downright reject them, and put all blame on Christianity and the Gentiles for their sufferings of the past to present. The innocent Gentile Christian by then will feel all the blame, and 2000 years of History being dumped on them, by their interpretation of History. Here too, they either buy into it, or sense that something is wacky/psycho, (one-sided) is being taught here, and hopefully leave with a better understanding while raising a few question or eyebrows themselfs in seeking answers to the long historic question of anti-Christianity by Jews as well as anti-Semitism. One can not understand anti-Semitism (which historically only related to Jews and Judaism) without understanding anti-Christianity by Jews. And the war still goes on, but slightly different today.

    I know Jews say righteous Gentiles have a share in the world to come. Of course who says and defines a righteous Gentile? Is it only the Jews recipe obeying and studying their various books and disciplines and their understanding of the Torah? They don’t live by Torah; they live by the Talmud, other books and oral traditions, or what the Rabbis dictate to them in the Synagogue.

    On second thought, I think you may have to let them go until they come to the realization themselves. Some are just not mentally changeable. Only their/a divine intervention, or hard knocks, can do this. The same goes for the Jewish Tribe. They are too far gone for reasoning. I’ve tried it with both. No need to post this, but I’ll do it anyway to let you know that I too find the answer or approach very hard.

    What I did is not recommended for everyone.
    This very first approach I took my self, because I could not stand going to Church or relate to American Christianity, too much Bologna and emotionalism being served here (maybe I suffered culture shock or they were all the wrong churches, don’t know), although I was raised Baptist in Germany, but there with “too” much Theology and intellect, and soon found myself learning more in the Synagogue then I had bargained for. Curiosity got me to check out Judaism, the “Origins of Christianity”) I am still trying to make sense of it all as I take it down to pieces, and not choke on it to death. You’ll be doing a lot of homework for while. I could not see them chosen, and they did not seem to rank so high in esteem or intellect to me either, although some seem knowledgeable, in their own field of course.
    By the way, I hope many get this sentence you wrote:
    “You either have a high opinion of Jews or a low opinion of God”,
    Thank you!

  79. January 12, 2012 - 10:07 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Not sure what that has to do with anything.

  80. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2012 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: “The crucifixion of Yeshu”, featured by TOO a while back, might help.

  81. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2012 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

    @Farnham O’Reilly:
    You may find good stories in Chutzpah by Alan Dershowitz. He basically decided that there was no longer a need to worry about disgrace before the Gentiles and took off the mask. It is dripping with sneers at people who were good to him, deep seated rage at Christianity…. If you read his book you grasp that given the story as they see and tell it, it is no wonder they hate us. It was an eye-opener for me.

  82. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2012 - 7:30 pm | Permalink

    @Lancashire lad:
    I think you’re quite right on the one-child policy as a major problem. Indeed, I think that this is one of the main reasons for the cadres frantically wasting money on wealth-destroying projects (Ordos the ghost city, etc.). Imagine – hordes of young, unemployed men, a shortage of available women, no hope and plenty of testosterone – sounds like a good recipe for a 1949 redux!

  83. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2012 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    @Farnham O’Reilly:
    If the Christians have little or no interaction with Jews it is difficult indeed. I have found that even people who wonder are unwilling to explicitly agree. I have had some success with planting seeds. I mention something like the Tebow incident with the rabbi followed by Bill Marr’s remarks. Or the assault on Christianity in the public sphere, Jews spitting on Christians in Israel. It often helps to let someone complain about some current event and draw the connection with Jews. If they have no personal experience it is a tough job. Good luck!

  84. January 12, 2012 - 6:09 pm | Permalink

    @aubreyfarmer: The authenticity of that alleged Franklin quote is highly dubious. Consequently it is unhelpful to repeat it.

  85. aubreyfarmer's Gravatar aubreyfarmer
    January 12, 2012 - 5:30 pm | Permalink

    http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/436quote1.html
    “IN WHATEVER COUNTRY JEWS HAVE SETTLED IN ANY GREAT
    NUMBERS, THEY HAVE LOWERED ITS MORAL TONE; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; HAVE SNEERED AT AND TRIED TO UNDERMINE THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION UPON WHICH THAT NATION IS FOUNDED by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within a state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.
    For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad
    fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, they
    call Palestine. But, Gentlemen, SHOULD THE WORLD TODAY GIVE IT TO THEM IN FEE SIMPLE, THEY WOULD AT ONCE FIND SOME COGENT REASON FOR NOT RETURNING. Why? BECAUSE THEY ARE VAMPIRES, AND VAMPIRES DO NOT LIVE ON VAMPIRES. THEY CANNOT LIVE ONLY AMONG THEMSELVES. THEY MUST SUBSIST ON CHRISTIANS AND OTHER PEOPLE NOT OF THEIR RACE.
    If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years OUR
    DESCENDANTS WILL BE WORKING IN THE FIELDS TO FURNISH THEM SUSTENANCE, WHILE THEY WILL BE IN THE COUNTING HOUSES RUBBING THEIR HANDS. I warn you, Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, Gentlemen, are Asiatics; let them be born where they will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. THEIR IDEAS DO NOT CONFORM TO AN AMERICAN’S, AND WILL NOT EVEN THOUGH THEY LIVE AMONG US TEN GENERATIONS. A LEOPARD CANNOT CHANGE ITS SPOTS. JEWS ARE ASIATICS, THEY ARE A MENACE TO THIS COUNTRY IF PERMITTED ENTRANCE and should be excluded by this Constitution.” (by Benjamin Franklin, who was one of the six founding fathers designated to draw up The Declaration of Independence. He spoke before the Constitutional Congress in May 1787, and asked that Jews be barred from immigrating to America. The above are his exact words as quoted from the diary of General Charles Pickney of Charleston, S.C.).

  86. January 12, 2012 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    I wonder who chose that image to accompany this essay about reckless capitalism. The image of Charlie Chaplin mocking Adolf Hitler could not be more inappropriate given the theme.

    I am afraid that we tend to fall into certain modes of presentation just because they are familiar and easy, even though they have been given to us by our enemies and are really poison to us.

  87. January 12, 2012 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

    @Heather: Excellent!

  88. Old Glory's Gravatar Old Glory
    January 12, 2012 - 3:40 pm | Permalink

    Jewish intelligence – a myth….most of those studies comparing gentile intelligence to that of the jew were seriously flawed….

  89. Farnham O'Reilly's Gravatar Farnham O'Reilly
    January 12, 2012 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue: Dear Heather:

    I empathize with you completely on the Jews. One area though in which I continually encounter a stumbling block is with my Christian friends (excluding some CI & Mormon Fundamentalists) who can’t seem to connect the dots; they are really sold on the perception that the Jews are God’s Chosen People, Amen, end of discussion. They just don’t get it.

    One is tempted to quip such barbs as “You either have a high opinion of Jews or a low opinion of God”, or “You can’t have your kike and eat it too”, but that of course only alienates them. Citing history does not seem to help, and of course suggesting the Book’s (Bible’s) citation is a Jewish self-endorsement does not do much good, either. I’ve had a little bit of luck with the Khazar/Sephardic argument, but not much as it is hard to fit into a nutshell and confuses a lot of people.

    If you (or anybody else reading this) knows of any better approach to Christians on the Jewish issue (and I sincerely value our Christian kinfolk) I’d love to hear it.

    Mr. Colhaze has written a great article here, and once again touches on a weakness of the Enemy we really need to study in depth, which is his inability to know when to quit while he is ahead; i.e. – his insatiable appetite that, over and over again throughout history, has been his undoing.

  90. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    January 12, 2012 - 3:19 pm | Permalink

    @Luke: Yes, Luke, I’m in agreement with you. I was pointing out the monstrous hypocrisy of the psychopathic Jews denouncing US racism whilst practising it themselves. I’m sure jews think that Ethiopians and other non-whites are just fine for everyone but them, who consider themselves the true master race.

  91. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    January 12, 2012 - 2:46 pm | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes: Come on, Vlad. Nobody with a brain bigger than a marble wants to allow Ethiopians to invade your territory. I am not a fan or defender of Israel, but I am a racial nationalist across the board. And, I am consistent in my support for Nationalism for all races. Unlike these hypocritical jews who want it only for themselves.

  92. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2012 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

    @Michael Santomauro:

    I do begin to think that we really are incapable of dealing with chutzpah. Today, C-span will honor Jack Abramoff as he lectures us on Lobbying and Corruption in Washington! It sounds like a bad joke but it is true.

  93. D.A. Quick's Gravatar D.A. Quick
    January 12, 2012 - 12:09 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue: Hello Heather. I want to reply to your comment, but I want it to be just between you and me, not for general (website wide readability). Private, so to speak. Is that possible? If it is my next email to you will explain how I feel. Thanks, D.A. Quick

  94. Koprarott's Gravatar Koprarott
    January 12, 2012 - 10:53 am | Permalink

    @Michael Santomauro:

    “”….Madoff wife says “Gentiles Are Responsible For This…….””

    Unfortunately, she is right. White people’s inability to organize and enforce
    society based on christian moral and common sense has given any kind of freaks free hands to do whatever they want. Including mr. Madoff and the guys mentioned in article.

  95. January 12, 2012 - 10:03 am | Permalink
  96. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    January 12, 2012 - 8:46 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    One salient long-term trend in China will be the demographic effects of the one-child policy that will not click in for a few years yet – they are saving for that. There is talk of it being abandoned, but it demonstrates the social responsibility of that nation, in stark contrast to India and Pakistan who are still breeding like rabbits and seeking to export their surplus populations.

    On the trade point, one thing I don’t think Profesor Macdonald has commented on is we Europeans’ ability to navigate the oceans that goes back to the ancient Greeks. We share this with the Phoeniceans and Jews of course and you might argue it’s a domain-general human ability. Perhaps the global sense of things has had some psychologcal effects on us over the millenia though, as the scattering of the Jews and the Phoenicians after the sacking of Carthage and Jerusalem by Rome was involuntary and so maybe not comparable?

  97. January 12, 2012 - 8:35 am | Permalink

    Mind boggoling ABC News YouTube Clip:

    Madoff wife says “Gentiles Are Responsible For This”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je67KlCpV84

    Peace.
    Michael Santomauro
    ReporterNotebook@gmail.com

  98. January 12, 2012 - 3:46 am | Permalink

    at least in the us you have your constitution which guarantees a free press and your sacred right to bear arms and defend yourselves and your families. here in in italy we actually are at this moment under a real “managerial dictatorship” made of goldman sachs banksters, ex-communists turned liberal and U.S. -related high civil servants sprinkled with professors and financial experts coming from “bocconi university” the most americanized of italian cultural institutions and last, but not least, a few other experts coming from vatican circles… in italy we have a saying: il diavolo e l’acqua santa ( the devil and holy water)

  99. Wiggy's Gravatar Wiggy
    January 12, 2012 - 2:25 am | Permalink

    Oh, Greece is fast becoming a third-world country, next to fall will be Italy, now run by an (ex?) -Gldmansachs stud.
    Pope is right there with em!
    Does it ever end?

  100. Wiggy's Gravatar Wiggy
    January 12, 2012 - 2:23 am | Permalink

    LOL, reminds me of “Reilly Ace of Spies”- Actually a great PBS miniseries about, yet again, another arogant Jewish uhm, gentilman. Sam Niel got his start on this series, did it justice, but no mention of his religion as I recall, and it was different from the book. the REal one was much more gritty in real life.

  101. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    January 12, 2012 - 2:07 am | Permalink

    Mr. Colhaze has written another splendid article. Thank you.
    I do hope Michael is right about something stirring among white Christians. Actually, I hope it is righteous anger. Unlike the Jews we are not a malicious people – we put up with hideous treatment from Jewish malice. But when the white man’s righteous anger is aroused and on the brink of violence the Jews sweat. Both Jews and Blacks sweat. Suddenly, they become very careful what they say and do. I’ve seen that with my own eyes.

    I long for something to spur the white man’s righteous anger. I long for all white nations to rise up in righteous anger and unite in a mass movement to expel the Jews. That would take care of this disease of Jewism forced on us….racism, hate, prejudice, unfairness – political correctness. We would not be plagued with Jews in government (and the White House), no more Jews controlling our financial system and stealing our ideas and savings, no Jewish minds and mouths assaulting us in our communications system, no more non-white immigration and hence genocide of the white race, no more Jewish hate laws destroying our liberties, etc. Jewish expulsion would take care of a multitude of problems.

    Jews have outwitted us; they are smart and clever, but somehow, it never seems to flow over into benefiting humankind. Instead, they bring down life-benefitting cultures. Alex Linder of VNN posted a great quote by M. Stanton Evans “any organization not overtly anti Jewish will in time be taken over by the Jews.” That is true. And bad things happen.

    The Jews have done exactly that to the greatest scientific culture ever to exist – our own beloved western culture. We have the right to be angry and I am glad Americans are armed to the teeth.

  102. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2012 - 11:05 pm | Permalink

    @http://search.4shared.com/q/1/fiat%20money%20inflation%20in%20france?view=ls

    If fiat money in Imperial France produced the same wild jobbing, loose morals, and destruction of the productive class, idem for Weimar Germany, then perhaps that is the proximate cause of the malaise afflicting the world, and not some metaphysical phenomenon like a greed epidemic. Price distortion affects international not just local trade, so one can expect damaging and unproductive shifts on the forex market, and the competitive devaluations that we see on the world stage now.

    Final point: Far from becoming the new US, China is heading for a big Keynesian bust, despite the frenetic infrastructure and real estate activity. I defer to hedge-funder Jim Chanos on this call:

  103. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 11, 2012 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

    @Lookaroundu:
    It is an intriguing question. Does their eternal cycle of short term gain, at any cost, resulting in predictable consequences say something about these people? One understands why in a different time and place, people simply assumed they were cursed.
    I sometimes view the history of antisemitism as a long attempt to answer the question you pose. What is wrong with these people? The answers have varied from religious, to cultural, to biological. All seem to have some truth to them. Prior to the sanctification of the holocaust, even Jews asked this question. Let me know if you figure it out.

  104. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    January 11, 2012 - 10:08 pm | Permalink

    The political whores of the financial psychopaths will do nothing effective to solve the economic problems they created. Many seem bound and determined that the US attack Iran. Imagine what a war with that country will do for the world’s teetering economy. Is it really insanity, or gross stupidity? Is it a deliberate attempt to bring us another step closer to one world government? The filthy rich can always find a distant mountain or island where they can live out their pampered lives. Everyone else will be sucked into the maelstrom.

  105. George's Gravatar George
    January 11, 2012 - 9:43 pm | Permalink

    Im not sure whether men such as these described in this article are psycopaths or sociopaths; they have no conscience and thus have no problem in firing hundreds of long-time American employees in order to realize a profit for the company (and their huge annual bonus) by hiring 3rd world Indian H1-B employees at 1/3 the annual salary of the American.

  106. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 11, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    @Rehmat: Yeah it is only the Jewish world that has psychopaths. Mao Tse Tung was totally balanced. Arafat was a peach. Charles Manson never used anybody. Mohammed was an impressive dude with all his killing and conquest. Oops, hope the Hard Men of White Nationalism don’t get mad at me for making fun of The Prophet.

  107. Rudel's Gravatar Rudel
    January 11, 2012 - 8:53 pm | Permalink

    Colhaze, you are either dumb or lazy. Chess is totally cool and if you put in even a modicum of effort you should be able to beat the average player *if* you have any decent amount of native intelligence.

  108. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 11, 2012 - 8:52 pm | Permalink

    300 million guns in a country of 300 million is not that weird. Of course, it is Good and WN folks should own at least a good revolver like a .357 and a good rifle, like a .223 semi and/or a bigger one, like an M1A. Springfield Arms markets a Socom 1 or 2, as I recall.

    A year or so ago, a video of a Texas maid addressing some committee with a Schumer in it: she said the Second Amendment was not about hunting. It is about giving us folks some protection against guys like you. She was looking at Schumer.

    Yup, the big underwater thing is right there and surfacing . good piece. J

  109. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    January 11, 2012 - 8:47 pm | Permalink

    @Lancashire lad: libertarian silliness…as some writer put it, you libertarians have the right to lose…your country and your countrymen.

  110. January 11, 2012 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Talking of psychopaths – I see many of them holding the highest powers in the Jewish-controlled world – from Angela Markel, Nicolas Sarkozy, John MaCain, Netanyahu and William Hague to name a few.

    The members of the Friends of Israel lobby occupy some of the most sensitive positions in the British government, political parties, intelligence (MI5 and MI6), Christian groups and the mainstream media…..

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/05/13/hague-i-will-fight-iran-for-israel/

  111. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 11, 2012 - 7:52 pm | Permalink

    @ps79:
    The rigging is the set of ropes and such used to control the sails on a boat. The creak is the sound they make when they rub against the mast when the wind rustles them.

  112. ps79's Gravatar ps79
    January 11, 2012 - 7:26 pm | Permalink

    What’s a “creak in the rigging” ?

  113. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 11, 2012 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    @daniel:
    Okay, okay, maybe not ALL the money.

  114. daniel's Gravatar daniel
    January 11, 2012 - 6:38 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Interesting remarks, Alice. You’ve offered some good counterpoints – the “pragmatism” of slavery is not something that I’d considered. I was only seeing its hubris.

    I think that the only point that I might disagree with is that Bill Gates necessarily deserves that much money, especially when he gives so much to Africans. Talk about bad judgment – that is obscene!

    Yes, I agree that male female are better looked at in a complementary fashion

    I’ll have more to say about the equalitarian thing..

  115. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 11, 2012 - 6:23 pm | Permalink

    @daniel:
    You have raised some very interesting questions. Yes, I believe that there are different kinds of intelligence. In an ideal world, we would all recognize this and seek to maximize our efforts by cooperating. This is behind the idea that men and women are complementary.
    It stands to reason that this is a benefit, because varied human experience calls for different responses. The problem we are currently experiencing is that due to their history, cleverness, and innovation, Jews have skewered the system, to reward all people with those skills even when they offer no value. Too many lawyers are a good example.
    We have the highest gap between the rich and the poor that ever, but we do not have a better life in any way. I think we would all agree, since we are not strict egalitarians, that Bill Gates deserves all his wealth because he has improved life for so many people. The big boys on Wall St have not improved many lives, but they are well rewarded.

    I can not attest to the quality of all immigrants before the Civil War, but I am fairly certain that those who did not or could not adapt quickly didn’t live long.

    White people may be superior in some ways, but we are all fallen creatures and often make foolish mistakes. Undoubtedly slavery was one we are still paying for. It was done for pragmatic reasons. Conditions were so harsh then, that all worker were hard to come by. In addition, white men did not fair well in the southern heat and sun, nor did they have any protection from malaria. Indians could not be enslaved, if forced, they would simply will themselves to die, one of the reasons they were traditionally held in higher esteem than blacks, despite all our conflicts.

  116. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    January 11, 2012 - 6:22 pm | Permalink

    Yes indeed, the sociopathic inmates are now running the asylum. Naked greed and criminal malfeasance are their calling cards. How did it happen? Well, as they say, it’s the best “democracy” that money can buy. And did the Anglo-Judeo plutocracy ever do just exactly that!

  117. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    January 11, 2012 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

    This article needs a proper theory of international trade, assuming we are not to return to some version of Fichte’s geschlossene Handelstaat – closed business state. You don’t convince me that transactions voluntarily entered into by parties across national borders are not advantageous to both nations. They sometimes are, where there are competitive advantages. So you need to distinguish when they are from when they are not – and you haven’t done that. Perhaps TOO needs an economics section between Dual Loyalty and Elena Kagan (whoever she is).

  118. daniel's Gravatar daniel
    January 11, 2012 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

    That there can be different kinds of valuable intelligence is a point that I have been trying to make in various places now. So many are investing so much in i.q., logic, scientific and mechanical thinking, business and number crunching.

    …”and these kinds of people are so much better, look at the numbers”…

    After the Civil War, a lower form was let into the US. Well, after the Civil War a lower form of sorts was let in yes, – Jews, but not because they fail on these logical criteria, but because these logical criteria do not compromise the full complement of wisdom.

    Moreover, I would not rely too heavily on Darwinian evolution to make the case for Americans prior to the Civil War.

    Is being susceptible to such a stupid war (Pickett’s charge!) that led to the slaughter of 600,000 evident of superiority across the board? Or a susceptibility, perhaps stemming from a lack of balance.

    Refrain from the war altogether would have made a lot of sense. Guerrilla tactics the proper means, if any. I know, I know the Jews financing had much to do with it.. can we be spared a repeat of all those details please?

    As it turned out, they became more vulnerable to miscegenation than ever. And why did they allow Blacks in America in the first place if they were such flawless Darwinian beings in their judgment?

    Did their “eugenic” discrimination against other Europeans deprive them of help and buffering against non-Whites? I would not be surprised. Would other Europeans living adjacently, in simulation of how they had evolved in Europe perhaps help to avoid fraternal war and have provided buffering? Perhaps it may just have provided genetic channels and outlets.

    It is very plausible that by going into these logical operations of thought, as discussed in the article as sociopathic, some have lost sight and regard for other aspects of important thinking and concern.

    However, this is really a good place for the inquiry of a scientist, such as MacDonald: how it is that some “higher operations of thought” block out other, important facets of reason and judgment.

  119. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    January 11, 2012 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

    The psychopaths believe they can get away with anything, including kicking Ethiopians out of Israel!

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/israeli-lawmakers-approve-harsh-penalties-for-illegal-migrants/2012/01/10/gIQAFt6LnP_story.html

  120. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 11, 2012 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    They believe they can get away with it because most of the time they do. So they got Madoff and Khodorovsky– and what about all the rest? How many people like them are still out there? How many communist mass murderers live safely in Israel?

  121. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    January 11, 2012 - 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Consider the words of Warren Buffett:
    There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.
    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett
    Note that Buffett’s mentor was Ben Graham (born Grossbaum) and that Buffett supports Obama. What does it all mean? I’m afraid we know all too well.

  122. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 11, 2012 - 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Wonderful article, thank you. There is something stirring in the air out there, which makes it imperative that we get our act together, and provide a mature and civilized place for the confused seeker to turn.

    There are many decent, respectable, responsible folks that are waking up and are confused and angry. It can be disorienting to see that what you have been told to believe were viscous anti-Semitic lies reenacted in your daily paper.

    We have a chance to form alliances with many implicitly white groups – environmentalist, home-schoolers, survivalists and so on. The Chinese symbol for crisis is made of two pictographs, danger and opportunity. We ought to be ready to take advantage of the opportunities coming our way. We already face the danger.

  123. james's Gravatar james
    January 11, 2012 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    re: Hare & psychopaths… it may be true that the behaviors of the latest bunch of corporate “leaders” may resemble clinical psychopathology, it is difficult to tell whether or not if they are in fact clinically psychopathic… hare’s diagnostic list is certainly helpful, but getting a real diagnosis would be difficult without a real interview (“the psychopath test” by ronson goes into “the list” and how polite society gets it wrong)… but actions speak louder than words I guess. as for that exclusive set of corporate gangsters (Boesky, Milkin, Winnick, Fuld et al.) perhaps they have different levels of Big Five Personality traits than a psychopathology per se.

3 Trackbacks to "Age of the Psychopaths"

  1. on January 15, 2012 at 5:04 am
  2. on January 11, 2012 at 2:10 pm
  3. on January 11, 2012 at 2:02 pm

Comments are closed.