Protest Farce

Michael Colhaze



Moscow, 24th Dec. 2011

The Passion for Destruction is also a creative Passion.
    Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin (1814 1876)

The last decade has spawned a number of revolutions that were anything but that. Some passed by unnoticed, like the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon (2004) or Tulip Revolution in Kirgisiya (2005). Others effected a bit of noise before loosing steam, like the Green Revolution in Iran (2009). And some produced the outcome intended by their instigators, like the Bulldozer Revolution of Serbia (2000) that resulted in the independence of Kosovo, first Islamic republic on European soil and springboard for an officially sanctioned Muslim infiltration.

Then there was the Orange Revolution in Ukraine (2004), victoriously concluded by two shady upstarts, Julia Tymoshenko and Viktor Juschtschenko respectively. It seemed to work for a while, even augured great riches through a possible membership in the European Union, but faltered sadly when none of the many promises began to materialize. This was not the case in tiny Georgia where another ruckus, sweetest of all because dubbed the Rose Revolution (2003), ushered a certified lunatic onto the political stage who still clings to power.

And now we have the White Revolution, launched against Mother Russia herself, with its ringleaders not disgruntled citizens but the same cutthroats who chaperoned the previous upheavals.

Advertisement

If seen from very close, the present attempt is merely a remake with different trappings. The first grab at Russia’s sovereignty and immense wealth was staged nearly a decade ago and failed miserably. On that occasion one Mikhail Khodorkovsky,  a youthful hyper-hoodlum who previously had managed to seize YUKOS, Russia’s national oil producer worth billions of dollars, by paying Boris Yeltsin a pittance, tried to bankrupt the Russian people with a ploy similar to those that are the trademark of our own Wall Street crooks. The expected booty, enormous if not monstrous, was to be shared with his eager associates, among them George Soros, Jacob Lord Rothschild and similar suspects. If successful, the move would have resulted in Russia’s de facto conquest by foreign powers and her certain ruin.

Yet matters didn’t turn out as planned, because the juvenile looter ran afoul of his own megalomaniac itch. It provoked him, most likely after encouragement from his equally barmy buddies, to challenge Vladimir Putin by snatching the presidency himself. This he tried to bring about with the help of every Duma member willing to accept a bag-full of dirty money. Needless to say, it would have undone Putin’s tortuous rebuild of the Russian economy and prevented an urgently needed improvement of his people’s paltry subsistence.

Well, we know the rest. Young Mikhail, with the help of God and the revenue sleuths, was thwarted. Instead of masterminding Russia’s demise from inside the Kremlin’s gilded halls, is he dirtying his delicate claws in a Siberian prison camp with an occupation utterly despicable to him, namely manual labour. And while eminent humanitarians like Mr. Obama, Frau Merkel, Elie Wiesel or Amnesty International bewail him as saintly Jewish martyr, is he also a welcome example of Russia’s terribly undemocratic behaviour.

If one looks at these machinations from a civilized perspective, the emotional abyss that opens before the very eyes is nauseating. Because it shows once more, by glaringly illuminating the clumsy deceptions staged to swathe the pathological greed and utter amorality of a very few, how big the rift has grown that separates decent citizens from those who are elected to ensure their safety and welfare.

George Soros

As to the renewed attempt at undermining and overpowering Russia, we find the same puppet-masters at work as before. Frontline tactician is again George Soros, a notorious villain so widely despised and abhorred that his ears must be ringing whenever a moment of awkward silence intrudes upon his frantic pursuits. An affliction he probably never heeded, except with a downer to keep the nightmares at bay. Yet the Divine mills turn slowly but turn, and if one looks at the above photo, it is a good guess that his tricks will come to naught fairly soon, namely when he must take up permanent residence in that dreadful citadel whose foundations are the sum of all human Evil. Which doesn’t mean that the world will be a safer place. Far from it! The Lernaean Hydra has many heads, and it is a Herculean task to cut them all off.

We need, in this context, not detail Mr. Soros’ criminal exploits or how he managed to achieve a net worth of 22 billion dollars. Looking through the Internet, an avalanche of informed commentary engulfs us that is mind-boggling.

We read that he actively undermines our Christian values by promoting abortion, gay rights, unlimited immigration and similar abominations. We read that he wants to legalize drugs, ostensibly for reasons on par with his liberal thinking, but more likely to hasten the ruin of our youth. We read that he presents himself as a latter-day Robin Hood who steals from the rich and gives to the poor, a statement so vainglorious and absurd that one wonders if the man hasn’t gone mad.

And we wonder why nobody has locked him away long ago.

As it is, he still knits his dirty schemes unhindered, albeit with increasingly shaky fingers. Which must be the reason why his recent assault on Putin and the Russian parliamentary elections appears badly staged if seen from a Western viewpoint. Because whoever is objective enough to take a closer look at the grassroots protests that flared up so very unexpectedly and spontaneously, will soon come to the conclusion that its key organizers, among them a well-known mystery writer and Soros protégé called Boris Akunin, have no leg to stand on. In other words, the accusations of rigged election results are such an obvious sham that it is almost laughable. Putin’s United Russia was widely expected to gain nearly 57 % of the vote, an estimate backed by various polls never seriously questioned. Yet when all counts were in, the party barely maintained an absolute majority while losing nearly a quarter of its seats in the Duma. Can that be called election rigging? If yes, it is only proof of the allegation that Soros and the U.S. State Department are meddling in Russia’s internal affairs. As to the latter, Putin has branded the fact himself, something very unusual in a man known to tread cautiously where international relations are concerned. He didn’t mention Soros, thinking him probably unmentionable. But since Soros owns Obama, and Obama owns Mrs. Clinton, the connection is obvious for anybody with a spot of common sense.

Take, for example, one of the principal rabble-rousers, the aforementioned B. Akunin. A Georgian Jew by birth, is his real name Grigory Shalvovitich Chkhartshvili, a veritable tongue twister that merits indeed a penname. Which has a distinctly notorious ring. Because try as you might, immediately to mind comes the Russian anarchist Bakunin, a dangerous lunatic who famously stated that the passion for destruction is also a creative passion. This wonderfully liberating instinct has been somewhat watered down by his present-day namesake who professes to follow only his own rules. What exactly those might be he didn’t say, but in their fuzzy thicket lurks surely the syphilitic bug of anarchism as well. Which explains why he yelled Do you want Putin as president? at the cheering crowds, and heard what he wanted to hear, namely NO!

If we look a little closer at the charming schmuck, familiar patterns fall into place. Born 1956 in Georgia, his parents took him early in life to Moscow where he studied and eventually joined the historical-philological branch of Moscow State University. After a stint as assistant to the editor of Foreign Literature, he changed tack and became a fiction writer. Around this time George Soros’ lavishly funded Open Society Foundation, a front about as attractive and constructive as Pandora’s Box, was sneaking its tentacles deep into the Russian educational system. It did this by way of the Pushkin Library, a 100 million dollar outfit that provided public universities with textbooks and internet access. It’s an easy guess what kind of textbook or internet access stood highest on the agenda, because in 2003 authorities finally got fed up, closed the shop and sent it packing. Yet while it flourished its chairman was Boris Akunin. Who, after his inglorious discharge, devoted time and effort to writing mystery potboilers that have sold so far a staggering twenty million copies.

Surprised?

Forget it. Because if you have found yourself a sponsor like George Soros and tread the line, success is automatically guaranteed. Personally I’ve never read any of the books, an assortment of detective stories set against historical backgrounds. They are, at least according to the servile spongers from the New York Times, well researched, witty and entertaining. Though not everyone shares this view.

Writes Andrew Martin in The Telegraph: There is no tension, no sense of anything whatsoever at stake, and Fandorin (the hero) obstinately persists in his wooden sub-Sherlock Holmes mode.

Or Andrew Taylor in The Spectator: The narrative is often swamped by the historical background. The intrigues confuse rather than intrigue. The cast is so large that first you lose track of who is who and then you stop caring.

Thus what we see most likely at work is another example of the Da Vinci Code Syndrome, namely a concerted push to inflate mediocre and rabidly anti-Christian literature out of all proportions. Since the giant publishing houses, and not only those, are firmly in Jewish hands, it can be safely assumed that Boris Akunin’s oeuvre, even if entertaining on the surface, has an underlying message as warped and destructive as the author’s namesake. And therefore pleases Mr. Soros and his shady associates who ensure that the noxious swill is slowly swamping every bookshop on earth.

Now you may ask why an emissary so transparently corrupt can tell a cheering crowd in Moscow that Mr. Putin has to go. The reason is Russia’s slowly emerging Middle Class, a body that ironically owes its appearance largely to Mr. Putin himself.

Journeying through the former USSR, the first thing you notice is a kind of general ingenuousness, even innocence, that characterizes most of the people. It is as if you have been transported back into an era when life, though much harder, was also a lot less convoluted and constricted. If sitting for the first time in a café on one of the larger thoroughfares, perhaps during a balmy summer afternoon while sipping Crimean fizz, a strange and pleasant sentiment stirs in your heart that takes a moment to define. Until you realize with quiet surprise that what you feel is peace. Or more precisely, a general absence of the usual tensions and apprehensions that beset you, consciously or subconsciously, in most Western cities with a multi-cultural background. Here nobody misbehaves. No-one whistles at the many ravishing beauties that wander by while pretending you aren’t there at all. No portable radios blare the latest rap at you. Nobody in wildly provocative clothing insists on your attention. No poofs or dykes advertise their otherness in vulgar detail. No hordes of smirking cocoanut bums act as if they own your country already. No troves of obvious knaves make you wish you’d carry a heater up your sleeve.

Here people flock about cool and relaxed. Many have blond hair and blue eyes, which adds even more to the illusion of being transported back into happier times.

Which doesn’t mean that there isn’t any crime. Of course there is, and it isn’t only limited to the dregs that form a natural component of any intact society. Russia too has to struggle with minorities inherited from its former empire, some of whom refuse, just as in Western Europe and the US, to integrate themselves in any way. Their languages sound guttural or harsh, their manners are often primitive if not downright offensive. Strangers to the mores and ethics of a largely Christian society, have they set up local Mafia clans that control some of the lesser trades almost entirely. Small wonder therefore that the insistence on a radical racial otherness has deepened the gulf that separates them from a generally well-behaved Indo-European populace.

Yet their presence, if compared to the multitudes that swamp our Western world, is much less felt. One reason is their relatively small numbers. Another is that each tribe dwells in clearly defined precincts. What is more, Russia hasn’t as of yet succumbed to the plague of Political Correctness. Rather the opposite is the case, namely a budding nationalism combined with the resurgence of a strong and strictly native Orthodox Church. It prompts alien offenders to tread more wearily, a precaution their Western counterparts have long since disposed of, mainly because they are pandered out of all proportions by an estranged and hostile elite bent on fostering civil war.

Which brings us once more to Russia’s slowly emerging Middle Class. As to its innocence, it most certainly shouldn’t be mistaken for ignorance. Because whatever shortcomings have beset Communism, its educational system was in many ways better than ours. And, after the weeding-out of Marxist ballast, it continues to be first-rate even today. If you ask, perhaps in Berlin or Boston, a flock of young people with college background if they have read Victor Hugo or Hermann Hesse, you’ll more often than not pull a blank. Whereas in Russia it is easy to meet someone who has not only read them, but even formed a sound opinion as to the author’s style and quality of writing. As it happened to me when lectured by a lovely young lady on Nana, a fin-de-siècle novel that was, in her opinion, psychologically unsound and too artificial by half. An assessment I could only confirm with an affirmative mumble, having long since forgotten what the sweet trollop were up to in the first place.

As it is, the great classics are still much en vogue, whereas most of the literary sewage that inundates Western readers for the last fifty years has yet to arrive. Hence perhaps the impression that the Russian mentality is in many ways plainer and purer than ours, that minds are not contaminated with destructive indoctrination wrapped into mediocre or downright obscene narrative. But it is also a reason why many misconceptions surround the once so free and affluent West. Old dreams die hard, particularly if one has never seen the place and depends largely on second-hand information. Like movies and TV serials that depict an intact world with happy people living in a consumerist paradise. Which is the reason why you’ll be hard put to find an ordinary Russian who wouldn’t love to race about in a brand-new BMW on roads without potholes, or exchange the sub-zero winter gales for a week of pampered vacation in a luxury hotel on the Maldives.

The average income has more than doubled since President Putin took the helm. As the standard of living begins to improve, some legroom for leisure and liberal fantasies form a natural component of the general advance, particularly where a moderately affluent student body is concerned. The latter, as usual totally inexperienced, bored or just ready for a spot of mischief, has a wide-open ear for the tired old Siren songs that are now replayed on improved gramophones by cheap tempters like B.Akunin and his criminal sponsors.

Isn’t it a moral imperative for any decent citizen to demand more openness, more individual liberties, more tolerance, more liberal education, more Modern art, more Western-orientated newspapers, more economic de-regulation, more international co-operation? Aren’t same-sex marriages and the anti-baby-pill for girls as young as twelve years old a humane and reasonable request? Mustn’t those in power heed the country’s intellectual elite and their recipes for a better world, instead of getting bogged down in the tedious day-to-day muddle of running the shop? Shouldn’t the brave democrats, those who denounced so enthusiastically the present political corruption, incompetence and fascist tendencies, be allowed to have a try instead?

We know from experience that this kind of nonsense has an impact on most decent human beings, and in particular on those who only recently emerged from a long period of authoritarian tutelage. Therefore a readjustment towards objective reality must be considered without delay. Helpful is, as always, a rigorous dose of common sense to curtail utopian expectations. Which can be best provided by a number of energetic countermoves.

A relentless and far-flung broadcasting of the true state of affairs in Europe and the US, enlivened perhaps with a guided tour of Birmingham or the Bronx for a first-hand impression.

A closer co-operation with Western dissidents, their publications and institutions who wage a spirited war-of-words against corrupt or downright criminal politicians and their financial backers, particularly those who try now on a world-wide scale to discredit Mr. Putin. Whereby the said co-operation might provide Russia in the near future with political counterparts who are honest and reliable and, furthermore, won’t forget a helping hand.

A rigorous exposure of those who openly meddle in Russia’s internal affairs, like Soros and his shady partners, Israel proper, the State department, Soros’ local creatures like Boris Akunin, including a severe scrutiny of the illicit money transfers that are funnelled via Georgia and other loopholes to the so-called protesters.

Suggestions that may help Mother Russia to brace the tempest that is already dispatching squalls into other, mostly unprotected lands.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

114 Comments to "Protest Farce"

  1. Neville's Gravatar Neville
    February 16, 2012 - 6:36 pm | Permalink

    We read that he actively undermines our Christian values by promoting abortion, gay rights, unlimited immigration and similar abominations. We read that he wants to legalize drugs, ostensibly for reasons on par with his liberal thinking, but more likely to hasten the ruin of our youth. We read that he presents himself as a latter-day Robin Hood who steals from the rich and gives to the poor, a statement so vainglorious and absurd that one wonders if the man hasn’t gone mad.

    What total nonsense avove.

    Any thinking person would agree with Sorros on abortion, drugs ,gay rights etc etc.

    Some Christians values are just retarded as are their promoters.

  2. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    February 9, 2012 - 12:49 am | Permalink

    @ I v a n

    Since I chose to skip the B’nai B’rith seminar on Moral Selectivism where the enrolled are taught that when Jews have a bowel movement the resulting odor – as opposed to the rest of mankind – is reminiscent of Chanel N°5, I shan’t endeavor to downplay the Russian thievery and gangsterism merely on account of the perps constituting a mostly non-kosher contingent.
    Moreover, scores of otherwise on-the-fence voters had their collective leg peed on by law professor Medvedev coming out with his half-arsed reasoning as to why he wouldn’t seek 2nd term. In that even a sedated hamster would’ve chuckled @ the declaration that Putin being a few points ahead of him in the ratings (with election day being 5-plus months away !) would prove a more formidable candidate (being yet again challenged by the predictable duo of washed up commie Zyuganov with his standard 10% chunk of votes and Waldemar Edelstein a.k.a. Vladimir Zhirinovsky grabbing his usual 8% from the disgruntled simpletons) to represent United Russia ticket.

    @ monte

    You suspect me of peddling propaganda, then proceed to post a link to the Russian government-financed news resource . Is there a joke in there somewhere ?

  3. monte's Gravatar monte
    February 1, 2012 - 10:59 am | Permalink

    ivan
    Very fine and spirited remarks. Thank you.

    jarvis d.d.
    Your facts seem either antiquated or just another bit of transparent propaganda. Take, for example, your fist point and compare it with the following link.

    http://rt.com/news/prime-time/russia-corruption-officials-cases-461/

    Fundamental changes as they happen in Russia will take time. Much has been done already, more needs to be done. Those who today demand a fast solution are either dangerously naive or simply paid provocators.

  4. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 31, 2012 - 9:56 pm | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden

    Impressive body of observations, Jarvis. Congratulations in the work well done. One can make millions of correct observations and still come to the wrong conclusions. That can happen for two reasons: (a) poor reasoning skills; (b) the subject matter is a difficult one and what we always “see” is never what “is” (recall Mach’s principle mentioned earlier – only one person in Mach’s time was able to see the truth behind that principle). I believe that your case is not covered by these two options for: (a) you have a good reasoning skills; (b) the subject matter is not excessively difficult one.

    In your first post you’ve made the mistake of drawing the wrong conclusion yourself:

    the chief difference between the judeo-gangster kleptocracy that was the regime of ‘Benny Eltzin’ and colonel Putin whose cabinet is literally jammed with former KGB types, then it would have to boil down to the issue of who does the actual stealing

    .
    Your second move is not much subtler, but it is better – the wrong conclusion from your observations is to be made by the reader: All that took place on Putin’s watch, so he is not any different from Yeltsin, perhaps, he is even worse.

    It took Stalin two decades of walking on razor-sharp line of delicate balancing in order to clean up the mess created by the first Jewish takeover of Russia and turn things around. Why would you think it would be any different this time? Perhaps one could object to that by saying: Well it took Hitler only half that much to turn things around. But do we really want to do it the way Hitler did and end up the way he did?

  5. European's Gravatar European
    January 31, 2012 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    Ivan, I love the image of the Tree in the desert. Thanks for your thoughts.

  6. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 31, 2012 - 6:22 am | Permalink

    @I v a n“In natural science, analogs of these pseudo-stable trajectories are known as strange attractors”

    As humans unlike inanimate objects are gifted with volition, translating empirical, natural science methods into the social sciences is worse than useless. The contemporary economics profession is a case in point, but the same goes for politics. I don’t buy your intermediate sweet-spot, and there is no proof it exists.

  7. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    January 31, 2012 - 12:24 am | Permalink

    @ I v a n

    In the past 10 years (read: on Putin’s watch) the following has occurred in Russia:
    1. base level bribes have doubled to officially acknowledged $8K (read: $10K)
    2. since 1999 as much as ½ trillion dollars may have been siphoned off to off-shore accounts
    (Frequently under the nose of the Russian Central Bank which implies they were either in on it or completely inept. I guess we can surmise which was the case.)
    3. legal field continues to frequently resemble that of Equatorial Guinea, complete with a Soviet carryover known as ‘telephone precedent’ that supersedes the actual law whenever individuals with clout get involved on behalf of the perp.
    (The son of then secretary of defense Ivanov (another KGB general) runs over a granny, kills her – yet doesn’t get so much as a slap on the wrist. A Gazprom bigwig orders during rush hour that his driver move Mercedes S-Class into opposite lane, ends up colliding with econobox killing two. After extended dog & pony show, road police investigation finds the victims @ fault. Attorney General for the region of Moscow willingly gets himself photographed hobnobbing with mobbed up ‘entrepreneurs’ running a local chain of illegal casinos. Officers in the rank as high as lieutenant general from the Anti-Corruption Directorate of FSB are on record ordering illegal seizures of vulnerable businesses. That is, lacking mafia-style protection offered by rival law enforcement bodies or the local executive branch. Suspects in police custody continue to die prior to even seeing the judge.
    I could go on and on.)
    4. revenue from energy exports covers over 60% of state budget
    5. federal funds are widely embezzled via different semi-sophisticated schemes thus fueling the bulk of corruption.
    6. Soviet built infrastructure continues to crumble
    7. existing opposition forces could be grouped into 3 camps:
    a. foreign agents (or wannabes)
    b. partly kosher residue from the Benny Eltzin era (also see foreign agents)
    c. semi-official kind: re-flavored communists and ‘liberal-democrats’ originally spawned by KGB during the late 1980s and still headed by ‘Russian nationalist’ known to his mom as Waldemar Edelstein. (During his tenure in the Duma 14.5 million ethnic Russians departed toward the great beyond.)
    Going back to György Schwartz, I never suggested that he was the mastermind behind the demise of the USSR. His role is that of a capodecina (or capo as they say in N.J.) for the Rothschilds. Whether or not György was eventually screwed out of lucrative deals by his Russian-based fellow tribesmen is an issue peripheral to my bigger point concerning initial capital that had to come from somewhere to help catapult to prominence all those Judaic swindlers who later came to form Benny Eltzin’s posse. Even @ 97% discount being able to bid on a multi-billion dollar enterprise would require having plenty of cash on hand. György clearly wasn’t the only source of funding as I reckon the entire:
    New York
    City of London
    Tel Aviv
    network must’ve been engaged.
    Subsequently, when the “boys” learned to swim on their own, Gusinsky would work out (read: bribe his way) a deal where loans borrowed by his media holding (airing filth on Orthodox Easter) would be guaranteed by Gazprom. In other words, he’d be enjoying the windfall while the Russian taxpayers would be on the hook in the event of default.
    Wait, haven’t I seen this scheme somewhere else ???

  8. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 30, 2012 - 2:02 pm | Permalink

    You claim that your opponents have a “clear agenda” and thus are not interested in the “truth” (“they are not operating as scientists trying to understand what corresponds to reality, and what does not”). Do you regard yourself as a scientist without agendas or biases in search of objective truth? If so, can you explain in what sense fractals and strange attractors have anything to do with Putinism?

    Yes, Geiseric, I do have both agendas and biases – as everybody else. One of my agendas is to convince people that they can figure out “truths” for themselves if they are willing to put the mental effort it requires simply by comparing and trying to match up the conflicting bits of information they receive from reliable and not so reliable sources. And I would like to think that I have, at least partially, succeeded in that endeavor.

    S. Banach once remarked: Good mathematicians see analogies between theorems; great mathematicians
    see analogies between analogies.

    I do not regard myself as a good mathematician, much less as a great mathematician, but that does not prevent me from taking advantage of great mathematician’s insight into the nature of things.

  9. January 30, 2012 - 7:06 am | Permalink

    @Hooper:

    I don’t think that has anything to do with the mass of people who really are sick and tired of Putin.

    Just to get a sense of what the Russian middle classes are thinking in Moscow (I realize you mention you are an American ex-pat), may I just ask who do you favor in the upcoming Russian election?

  10. January 30, 2012 - 6:47 am | Permalink

    Oh I give up.

  11. Hooper's Gravatar Hooper
    January 30, 2012 - 5:57 am | Permalink

    I might be a little late to the party in my response to this article and I not going to attempt a thorough response here for lack of time and energy (I know, lame excuses). I only want to say that I live in Moscow (American expat) and my wife has participated in these protests and we have a number of friends in this newly-arisen “Moscow middle class” and I don’t feel like we are in any way puppets on a string pulled by the typical band of neo-cons, Tribal provocateurs or “straw men” oppositionists placed in the public view to mislead or confuse. The typical Moscow protester reminds me more of what I think the Decembrists were like than the neo-cons and their brethren. And I don’t think it’s naiveté.

    As for American influence, many of the people I know look at the actions of the American Empire more with a feeling of contempt, if anything. America’s standing abroad has fallen rather sharply in recent years. The Russian liberal elite was much more aligned with the West 10-15 years or so ago. While I certainly acknowledge the possibility that some opposition leaders may have some sort of ulterior motive, I don’t think that has anything to do with the mass of people who really are sick and tired of Putin.

    As for the elections, there is overwhelming evidence of fraud, including well documented demands by professors and employers that their students and employees vote for United Russia candidates. The low-ball tactics employed by United Russia are common knowledge here, as is the authorities’ patent refusal to look into them. I cannot emphasize enough how much a mistake it is to look at Putin as a friend to our movement. If nothing else, his unapologetic affiliation with the KGB should put that idea to rest.

    Mr. Colehaze says he lives in the former USSR. Perhaps things are different where he is. As I am attempting to lay these issues out based on an “on the ground” perspective, I would be interested if his view differs from mine in that respect. I say that not sarcastically or to question his credibility but as an honest invitation to share what he has actually observed.

  12. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 30, 2012 - 5:13 am | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    Yuri Andropov didn’t get enough time to develop his own ism – he was in charge only 15 months.

    I never said he developed “his own -ism”, I said that Putin recycles some of his ideas. Andropov was a prominent member of the Politbureau for 11 years and head of the KGB for 15 years.

    You claim that your opponents have a “clear agenda” and thus are not interested in the “truth” (“they are not operating as scientists trying to understand what corresponds to reality, and what does not”). Do you regard youself as a scientist without agendas or biases in search of objective truth? If so, can you explain in what sense fractals and strange attractors have anything to do with Putinism?

  13. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 30, 2012 - 1:14 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    I approve of your continuum; One World Order (Babel #2) at one extreme and (smaller) communities organized along lines of ethnicity/race at the other. As these extracts from KM’s TOQ article show, there is a hardwired bias for the latter.

    I agree that there is a hardwired bias for the latter. Nevertheless today we are closer to the former. How come? There are degenerate and destructive tendencies driving to the former, on one hand, and there are life-asserting forces driving to the latter, on the other. More or less stable dynamic balance is somewhere in between.

    In natural science, analogs of these pseudo-stable trajectories are known as strange attractors.

  14. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 30, 2012 - 12:42 am | Permalink

    @Geiseric:

    Putin is not a visionary leader, he lacks originality. His ideas are just recycled “Andropovisms” from the late Soviet period, when KGB played an increasingly important role.

    Not so. Yuri Andropov didn’t get enough time to develop his own ism – he was in charge only 15 months. If you want to understand what Putinism amounts to, you need to look into the legacy of General K.P. Petrov who developed the Concept of Societal Security.

  15. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 30, 2012 - 12:17 am | Permalink

    @http://toqonline.com/archives/v6n4/MacDonald.pdf

    Given the more robust foundations of the latter, I’m afraid I see no scientific basis in your assertion:
    “ I do not know how to prove it, but these extreme conditions are against the laws of nature – they are not feasible, except for a very brief period of time, if possible at all.”
    An intermediate position on the continuum doesn’t rid Russia of the same problems besetting the OWO; unruly tribes are fewer, and the differences less pronounced. The nature is the same, the degree, less.

  16. January 29, 2012 - 10:52 pm | Permalink

    @http://rt.com/politics/official-word/migration-national-question-putin-439/

    And you’re right: Colhaze did post about an 81%. Here is what Colhaze said:

    The last census (2010) defines 81 % of the population as ethnic Russians, another 4 % as Indo-Europeans, and only 15% as a conglomerate of about 160 different tribes, the largest being Tartars and the smallest a few hundred Aleute Eskimos

    I’m getting the impression, Geiseric, that nothing will satisfy you as to Putin and the Federation (given Curmudgeon and JamesUK’s replies). And you say:

    ‘Russian’ as as ethnonym, was seriously obscured in Soviet times, when children from ethnically mixed marriages were classified (registered) as ‘Russians’. In other words, those 81 per cent Mr. Colhaze keeps talking about do not constitute a homogeneous, ethnic group.

    But what do you expect? Russia isn’t like the rest of Western nations. Except for the Nazis, who looked into who was a ‘purebred German’, my bet is all the other Western nations, except for maybe Sweden and maybe Switzerland, all others probably are not pure ethno groups of their respective nations either (I mean probably mixed marriages with other whites, not counting marriages with non-whites). 81% ethnic Russians seems ethnic enough to me, mixed marriages or not.

    I really don’t know what more can be said. Except why should Putin kick out the rest of the 19% of the Federation? He shouldn’t. Why should he?

  17. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 29, 2012 - 9:49 pm | Permalink

    fender,

    Due to Gregor Mendel, we know that two closely related plants (say, red flower and white flower) can fertilize each other. The seeds resulting from such crossing develop into hybrid plants which have an intermediate character: the hybrids have pink flowers. If the hybrid plants are allowed to become self-fertilized, the resulting seeds develop into a third generation of plants in which all three kinds are present: there are plants with white, plants with pink, and plants with red flowers.

    I do not know precisely what Prokhorov’s genealogy is. But from his behavior I can tell that the interplay of chances has delivered “red” flowers to this plant.

  18. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 29, 2012 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    Thank you, Alice. That gives me an excuse to entertain a pleasant thought that my presence here wasn’t a complete waste of time.

    One can get pleasure from good food, or sex. There are people who can get pleasure from taking others for a ride, I suppose. Humans are intellectual beings, that’s why the process of thinking and figuring something out completely on your own can be more satisfying than even sex, which seemingly couldn’t be so for sex is the strongest drive given to us by Nature to propagate life.

    But humans are spiritual being as well. It is not far fetched to say that spiritual experience can be even more profound and fulfilling. I believe this guy knows what I am talking about: No, it wasn’t God’s will. It was my f***g order!

  19. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 29, 2012 - 8:37 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    Are you sure Prokhorov self-identifies as Jewish? Based on what I’ve read, he had a Jewish grandmother, which means he’s 3/4 Russian. Does he have ties with Israel like all the other oligarchs?

  20. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 29, 2012 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:
    Thanks, you have given me something to think about.

  21. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 29, 2012 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    I hope I can be excused, if I honestly state my impression about this exchange. My impression (which can be erroneous, of course) is that Geiseric and Trenchant are not interested in the “truth” (by that I mean that they are not operating as scientists trying to understand what corresponds to reality, and what does not); they are both well educated and smart people with a clear agenda. These guys understand very well what I am talking about, but they are not to be convinced by my arguments for they have an agenda which is not a scientific one. And, of course, I am not arguing with them in order to convince them, or to change their views – that is not possible. But impartial readers, I believe, can benefit from my observations.

    Despite some reservations, I tend to believe that Bluerose is one of those impartial readers, i.e. she (why do I think Bluerose is ‘she’?) is trying to be objective and she is genuinely interested in finding and understanding the “truth”.

    In the most generic terms, my belief is as follows: The new world order, with one world government envisioned and pushed very hard by the Jews, on one hand, and a set of independent “small and homogeneous” ethnic-nation states, on the other, are both impossibilities – these are extreme conditions which cannot present stable formations. I do not know how to prove it, but these extreme conditions are against the laws of nature – they are not feasible, except for a very brief period of time, if possible at all.

    The fist option (the new world order with one world government) would be utterly disgusting because that would mean a small group of cunning, but degenerate “Jews” controlling the homogenous rest of humanity as nothing more than a cattle. Not a stable condition – it cannot last long. Another extreme (a set of independent “small and homogeneous” ethnic-nation states) entails a very appealing and beautiful world, but I don’t believe it is feasible either: It does not have a hierarchy which is the basis of all manifestation of life.

    In a word, I believe that static equilibrium is not possible: (1) equilibrium in Nature can be only dynamic; (2) dynamic equilibrium is possible only if the laws of nature scale.

    What you see in this picture is not a tree, it is a river in the desert: Desert River

    Think fractals, think scaling. The overall structure of human organizations – empires, states, nations, territorial divisions, etc – must scale essentially in the same way.

  22. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 29, 2012 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

    My feeling is that it is this Russia that Ivan is thinking of, as it is the Russia I think of when I think of Russia — that is, the Russia before the Bolsheviks took over.

    Fair enough, but a few dilemmas then emerge. First, the term ‘Russian’ was originally more religious than ethnic in pre-Soviet times (anyone could become “Russian” through conversion). Second, ‘Russian’ as as ethnonym, was seriously obscured in Soviet times, when children from ethnically mixed marriages were classified (registered) as ‘Russians’. In other words, those 81 per cent Mr. Colhaze keeps talking about do not constitute a homogeneous, ethnic group.

  23. January 29, 2012 - 3:16 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, I forgot the link:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia

    1/4 of the way down, under ‘Political Divisions’. Where might the pre-Bolshevik Russia have been located? I’m thinking it’s the entire picture shown?

  24. January 29, 2012 - 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Hold the presses.

    About 1/4 of the way down at the link there is a diagram of what I think is the nation or country of Russia itself. Except for about 4 names on the list shown, the rest I don’t recognize at all. Is this the picture of the Russian Federation as it has come down via its past incarnations of Soviet Union, USSR, then Russian Federation?

    If so, then maybe Ivan has a point because all these names that I have never heard of (except for about 4), are not scattered around in different places on a land mass, but are situated next to each other as part of a given located, reminding me of the states in the U.S. There seems to be a similarity here that can be made. All these little names that make up the Federation, I imagine are some small little tribes, and perhaps the whole lot of them, taken together, are probably fairly homogeneous anyway.

    So while no one suggests the states in the US be allowed to break off (many in fact do suggest that these days), why should the Federation allow little unknown tribes located somewhere in some remote region be allowed to break off? I bet the average American could not tell one group from the other apart anyway. I imagine their histories would show they are connected one way or the other.

  25. January 29, 2012 - 2:37 pm | Permalink

    @Geiseric and @Trenchant

    OK I think I understand what you are both saying, and this problem you both have with the Russian Federation (“Big, fractious, heterogeneous versus small and homogeneous.”)

    This is going to be tricky figuring this one out, whether it’s good or bad.

    First of all, there seems to be a differentiation between whether a Soviet Socialist Republic is Autonomous (26 ASSRs) — or is part of the 15 Soviet Socialist Republics — the Russian SFSR being the largest in terms of size, that made up over half of the total USSR population, and dominated the union for its entire 69-year history.

    That said, next, we have the problem with Leon Trotsky vs. Stalin’s point of view, with Trotsky being exiled from the Soviet Union in 1929. He was the main proponent of the world revolution (concept of overthrowing capitalism in all countries through the conscious revolutionary action of the organized working class).

    At this point, one is impressed that ‘ In 1957 the Soviet Union launched the world’s first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, thus starting the Space Age. Russian cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin became the first human to orbit the Earth aboard Vostok 1 manned spacecraft on 12 April 1961.’

    The nation’s history began with that of the East Slavs (the East Slavs are Slavic peoples speaking East Slavic languages. Formerly the main population of the medieval state of Kievan Rus, by the seventeenth century they evolved into the Russian, Ukrainian, and Belarusian people, who emerged as a recognizable group in Europe between the 3rd and 8th centuries AD. Founded and ruled by a Varangian warrior elite and their descendants, the medieval state of Rus arose in the 9th century. In 988 it adopted Orthodox Christianity from the Byzantine Empire, beginning the synthesis of Byzantine and Slavic cultures that defined Russian culture for the next millennium. … By the 18th century, the nation had greatly expanded through conquest, annexation, and exploration to become the Russian Empire, which was the third largest empire in history, stretching from Poland in Europe to Alaska in North America.

    My feeling is that it is this Russia that Ivan is thinking of, as it is the Russia I think of when I think of Russia — that is, the Russia before the Bolsheviks took over. Just saying.

    Now comes the tricky part.

    The Russian Federation comprises 83 federal subjects and 8 federal districts. Among the federal SUBJECTS we have terms:

    46 oblasts (provinces): most common type of federal subjects

    21 republics: nominally autonomous; each has its own constitution, president or a similar post, and parliament. Republics are allowed to establish their own official language alongside Russian but are represented by the federal government in international affairs. Republics are meant to be home to specific ethnic minorities. [My emphasis]

    9 krais (territories): essentially the same as oblasts.

    4 autonomous okrugs (autonomous districts):

    1 autonomous oblast (the Jewish Autonomous Oblast); historically, autonomous oblasts were administrative units subordinated to krais. In 1990, all of them except for the Jewish AO were elevated in status to that of a republic.

    2 federal cities (Moscow and St. Petersburg): major cities that function as separate regions.

    And 8 Federal districts

    Now — the idea is some are unhappy with the idea of a Russian Federation, that it’s an empire/nation-state that beats out ethnicities, that ‘ethno-nationalism in Russia is nonsense’, that ‘empire and statism were based on brutal assimilation [Blame the Communists on this -- not Old Russia prior to the Bolsheviks ], and have swallowed the concepts of ethnicity and nation for centuries.

    Finale.

    IMO Trenchant and Geiseric have a point. The Russian Federation appears to me to be static, if only because the Commies are running it, and the Commies have a problem with Orthodox Christianity. If a given republic wanted to have its own Christian republic, I expect that would never do.

    It also seems to me all the other republics would be up against the Federation if it wanted out. Just like the division between North and South in the U.S. When the South wanted to secede, the South was thoroughly thrashed and punished.

    I think maybe Trenchant and Geiseric are right.

    Hope I haven’t bored everyone with this long post. It’s just I need the entire picture before I come to any kind of conclusion, and even then I’m not sure.

  26. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 29, 2012 - 9:49 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    I believe Ivan has made little more than emotional arguments as to why empire/nation-state beats ethnicity. Big, fractious, heterogeneous versus small and homogeneous.

    Exactly. Good points. Important information is lost to those unaware of the basic fact that in the Russian case, empire and statism (based on brutal assimilation) have swallowed the concepts of ethnicity and nation for centuries. Hence, ethno-nationalism (in the European sense) in Russia is nonsense, i.e. impossible. Putin may well be a savior of Russian imperialism and statism, but ethno-nationalism has no part in his grand strategies. Putin is not a visionary leader, he lacks originality. His ideas are just recycled “Andropovisms” from the late Soviet period, when KGB played an increasingly important role.

  27. Marvellous spirit's Gravatar Marvellous spirit
    January 29, 2012 - 8:21 am | Permalink

    @JQ: The detritus of western society are actually the powers that be . That fits with Makow theory that the Illuminarti philosophical garbage are the ones in control .What an absurd state of affairs , our dreams have run aground .

  28. monte's Gravatar monte
    January 29, 2012 - 4:17 am | Permalink

    Sorry. DEVIL, of course!

  29. monte's Gravatar monte
    January 29, 2012 - 4:15 am | Permalink

    The English protest posters are of course meant exclusively for foreign viewers. Which gives you an idea who has paid for them. Silly, isn’t it?
    The West’s only hope not to slide into Third World chaos are leaders like Putin. We in Europe still stand a chance to find honest and strong polititians like him for a peaceful transition. In the US it probably has to get a lot worse before it gets better. If at all.
    As for Switzerland, look at JC and Wiliam Engholm’s article. It appears that country’s financial elite has long since signed a pact with the devi. Just like the Dutch in Curacao.

  30. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 29, 2012 - 3:49 am | Permalink

    @http://www.lemonadefreedom.com/), though the corruption is generally regulatory capture, at higher and not popular levels. Companies or lobby groups in bed with politicians to get a perfectly legal work-around.

    And as regards feasibility of small over large, that’s purely a contingent question. Empires come and go, and as often as not they are outlived by their constituent ethnic groups. I’d say trying to Russianize Chechens or Chechenize Russians is far more the herculean ask than envisioning separation.

  31. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 28, 2012 - 10:44 pm | Permalink

    One cannot consider Switzerland isolated from the rest of the world and pronounce far-reaching judgments based on that. The world, nay, the entire universe, is intertwined, interconnected, interlinked.

    If you will, that’s the essence of the most fascinating scientific concept of all time called Mach’s principle: The property of any body, what we familiarly call inertia, is not something inherent in the body per se – it is a manifestation of the interaction of that body with the universe in its entirety. In other words, remove the universe and the body will be left with no inertia of its own.

    Einstein was absolutely mesmerized by this principle, but he failed to incorporate it into his theory of general relativity. I firmly believe that the theory of general relativity will have to be abandoned for that very reason. The special theory of relativity is another one which is fleeced with contradictions and weird paradoxes. It is twisted as Jewish mind. This theory, which is an artificial ad-hoc patch for Maxwell’s electrodynamics, will have to be abandoned as well. Trust me, I know what I am talking about.

  32. January 28, 2012 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

    This is off the thread, but I thought some would like to see it. I understand that the Mexicans hate the Jews (these kinds of Jews), so that’s one point for the Mexicans:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0Glf7bAnFg&feature=uploademail

    Jewish Zionist Millionaire, Moises Sacal Smeke, Beating and Humiliating a Mexican Teen Valet

  33. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 28, 2012 - 9:59 pm | Permalink

    Communism entrenched corruption in all parts of Soviet society, precisely because it’s such an unworkable concept.

    Trenchant, could you explain to us, please, what (or shall we say, who?) entrenched corruption in all parts of modern American society. Surely you don’t think it was communism do you. Perhaps, one could argue that fascism is the appropriate name for today’s American system of government. Indeed, according to Mussolini, fascism is the fusion of state and corporate powers, which is exactly what we observe today in America. On the other hand, we do not find that type of political corruption, which is rampant today in America, in Hitler’s fascism.

    Personally, I don’t think that fascism, or even plutocracy for that matter, does correctly reflect the essence of the political system of government that prevailed in America. It is a new type of government the most concise and revealing definition of which would be judeocracy.

    Big, fractious, heterogeneous versus small and homogeneous. Switzerland has managed its heterogeneity by devolution of much power to local level; I see little evidence of that in Russia.

    A world that is made of small and homogeneous nation-states sounds very appealing. I would love to live in that kind of world, but, unfortunately, that’s an ideal world which is not feasible. One cannot prove that by scholastic argumentation, but the whole history of mankind attests to that.

  34. January 28, 2012 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

    Putting it another way:

    The concept of ‘white nationalists’ itself includes different white ethnicities all with different customs and languages.

    Though no WN party is allowed to exist in the US, if it hypothetically did, and got into power and running the country, it would need someone to pull the different white ethnic groups together as one. This still leaves having to deal with non-whites and The Tribe and keeping them peaceful within the framework of a new white nation of America. Seems to me all this is analogous to the Russian Federation and what Federation presidents and prime ministers must diplomatically deal with. America is not Switzerland either.

  35. January 28, 2012 - 9:21 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    I believe Ivan has made little more than emotional arguments as to why empire/nation-state beats ethnicity. Big, fractious, heterogeneous versus small and homogeneous. Switzerland has managed its heterogeneity by devolution of much power to local level; I see little evidence of that in Russia. The weaker the political enterprise, the stronger the measures needed to keep the structure together.

    Absolutely wrong. Ivan has deep insight into the entire history of Russia and I have already gained a great deal of understanding by reading his posts. No where in his posts have I observed ‘emotional appeals’ to anything. Just the reverse. I get FACTS. You just don’t understand the Russian mind. They are not great chess players for nothing.

    Compare this to Americans who don’t seem to know how to analyze anything. All must be within the framework of sound bytes, lies, distortions, propaganda, hate, spreading fear, this and that, to where it doesn’t even pay for me to expend my energy listening to the Left, Right, or Independent because all have their hidden agendas that do not include a better life for anyone other than themselves.

    Everyone knows — whoso more than so many of the Russians themselves — that Communism is failed ideology? What gets me is why there still exists a Communist Party in America. That’s the Question. Vladimir Putin is running on a United Russia Party. Without opening yet another web window and doing a wiki, my guess is that it is not another Communist Party. I believe Putin is doing his very best to move Russia to a more democratic way of life. When he was President, things began looking up. And I didn’t even know what Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev looked like until I just did a wiki (yeowsirr), the third President of the Russian Federation. asked Putin to run for President. Putin immediately offered Medvedev to stand on the United Russia ticket in the parliamentary elections in December and becoming Prime Minister of Russia at the end of his presidential term. Nice move :)

    My feeling is that is is possible with leaders like Medvedev and Putin, these are the ones with the best interest of the Russian people at heart. This is what it appears. And if so, then little by little, the Bolsheviks and the Communist Party and their corruptions can be countered and taken out.

    Bear in mind, each country in the world has a different history, demographics, and whatever. Each is special in its own way. Saying what Russia (empire/nation-state ) should do as compared to Switzerland (heterogeneity) does not seem fruitful or even reasonable. Russia became an empire when it had the Tsars. Even though it’s called a Federation today, I don’t see this as an empire. Digging up the distant past and then putting Putin and Russia down because of this or that thing is the usual re-living of history and digging up of hatreds and everything else. Russia needs to get on with it already, and Putin when President seemed to started the ball rolling.

    Americans have no one — absolutely no one — of the calibur of Putin. Look at the line-up for Americans. What a total joke, and what a total joke America has become. Not a real, decent, honest man can be found for miles and miles around. Put Ron Paul in, if some think he’s the man. I’m just curious what damage *he’ll* do. Such is America.

    I’m looking very much forward to Russia’s election this December. At this point I am just wondering who the protestors with the English signs were protesting against about a ‘rigged election’ as shown at the beginning of this article? I don’t think the article said.

  36. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 28, 2012 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

    Communism entrenched corruption in all parts of Soviet society, precisely because it’s such an unworkable concept. To get achieve production targets, promotions, exemptions, etc., deals had to be made and the slack was taken up by the informal market. The KGB was as much affected as any other organ, and probably more than most, given its power.

    I believe Ivan has made little more than emotional arguments as to why empire/nation-state beats ethnicity. Big, fractious, heterogeneous versus small and homogeneous. Switzerland has managed its heterogeneity by devolution of much power to local level; I see little evidence of that in Russia. The weaker the political enterprise, the stronger the measures needed to keep the structure together. Iraq’s another classic. Saddam the great patriot.

  37. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 28, 2012 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

    @Bluerose:

    A good-looking man named Mikhail Prokhorov is a Jewish oligarch. Zhirinovsky is Jewish on his father’s side. Zhirinovsky prefers to put it this way: “my mother was Russian, and my father was a lawyer”. A Russian general was about to beat the shit out of this asshole who called the general a coward, but the moderator, Soloviev – another kike, wouldn’t let it happen (@1.35 into the video):

    General vs Zhirinovsky

  38. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 28, 2012 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    @Geiseric:

    I assume, then, that you would be familiar with the names of Sheikh Mansour and Imam Shamil? They had civil wars going with the Russians for decades in the 19th century.

    Yes, Geiseric, I am familiar with the names of Sheikh Mansour and Imam Shamil. The closest counterpart of Sheikh Mansour in today’s world is the President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. But I bet you wouldn’t agree with that. You would rather use the memory of a Chechen hero Sheikh Mansour to provoke the modern Caucasians and have them to fight your dirty wars against your enemies, just the way you use American power to fight your dirty wars for Israel.

    Here is how it works: A Strategy of Resistance: Sheikh Mansour Aldinsky and Sheikh Abdul-Khalim Argunsky (Sadulaev)

    I am sure educated people @TOC are well aware of what the Jamestown Foundation is. The chutzpa of this “source of information” is breathtaking: It states its mission as INFORMATION WITHOUT POLITICAL AGENDA, FROM EURASIA, CHINA AND THE WORLD OF TERRORISM.

    About Imam Shamil – another great man and hero of Avars. Do you know that all Murids, including the protagonist of Leo Tolstoy’s novel “Hadji Murat”, abandoned him after the realization that this fight is futile sank in. Only after the last Murid left him, Imam Shamil surrendered to the Russians. And the Russians didn’t humiliate him by hanging him, like Jews did with Saddam Hussein. They respected him as a hero he was. Later on, the Russian Char even gave him a permission to make Haj (pilgrimage) to Mecca and Medina where he died.

    Only after Imam Shamil was defeated in South-East Caucasus, and he surrendered to the Russians, the final defeat of the Circassians in the North-West was materialized in 1859-1864. And when that happened, Imam Shamil congratulated the Russian Czar and expressed his great hope that his people will see the light at the end of the tunnel, and they will learn how to live in peace with their Northern neighbor. That was kind of creepy, but I believe I understand what Imam Shamil was saying.

  39. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 28, 2012 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

    A minor correction, if you indulge me. G.W. Bush II is not Putin of America, G.W. Bush II is Yeltsin of America – a puppet of the Jews, a sellout, and an idiot. Can you see the difference, Geiseric?

    In terms of patriotism, chauvinism, militarism and imperiailsm they have a lot in common. I repeat: the pro-Russian lobby here has never presented any facts substantiating the claim that Putinism is anti-Jewish. There are no political parallels between GWB II and Yeltsin. Apples and oranges.

  40. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 28, 2012 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    @Geiseric:

    A minor correction, if you indulge me. G.W. Bush II is not Putin of America, G.W. Bush II is Yeltsin of America – a puppet of the Jews, a sellout, and an idiot. Can you see the difference, Geiseric?

    Politically he most significant difference between Bush II and Boris was, perhaps, the amount of alcohol they consumed – our Borya beating your Georgy boy in that competition with his tongue glued to his palate.

  41. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 28, 2012 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    I was born in mountains next door to Chechnya. And my own people resisted the Russian imperialism for 101 years before the final blow and defeat in 1859-1864.

    I assume, then, that you would be familiar with the names of Sheikh Mansour and Imam Shamil? They had civil wars going with the Russians for decades in the 19th century. I’m not sure what happened in 1944, but in general, if the warlike Chechens have guns they will to fight. Operation Lentil approximated a genocide. The goal of the civil war of the 1990s was to keep Chechnya (and its population) within the Russian “empire”.

  42. January 28, 2012 - 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Interesting conversation between Ivan and Geiseric. Reading the posts led me to the 2012 Russian elections, and now I feel a bit more oriented.

    Looking over the candidates, we have a good-looking man named Mikhail Prokhorov, an Independent. Overall, he looks a bit too well-groomed and monied. Turns out, yes, he’s a Russian billionaire oligarch and owner of the American basketball team, the New Jersey Nets. One might say he’s a Capitalist, but wait, I read this:

    “At a Christmas party for the Russian rich at the French Alpine resort of Courchevel in January 2007, he was arrested for allegedly arranging prostitutes for his guests.”

    Figures. And there’s the corruption angle (sex, probably drugs).

    The next two — Gennady Zyuganov (Communist Party) and Vladimir Zhirinovsky (Liberal Democrat Party) — both appear too Commie-looking. But looking a little closer at Zhirinovsky, I see he’s a kind of counter-part to the Right, and talks of certain things one would hear from WNs:

    “During the 1992 visit to the United States, Zhirinovsky called on television “for the preservation of the white race” and warned that the white Americans were in danger of turning their country over to black and Hispanic people.”

    Really? He said that? Lolll And he mentions The Tribe in a negative light. So…what to think? The only problem (actually a Big problem) with him that I see is that, skimming over the wiki page, he sounds very violent and more than a bit unbalanced. He’s no Geert Wilders, that’s for sure.

    Next is Sergey Mironov — certainly a dignified-looking man with quite a few medals, honors, and such, who seems to be in favor of Vladimir Putin. Mironov is not considered a serious candidate, with 1%. He’s probably a professor of something.

    And this leaves Vladimir Putin. I don’t see where his ‘imperialistic tendencies’ are, but so far Putin seems the only truly viable candidate for the next presidency.

  43. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 28, 2012 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

    People of Western European ancestry don’t have to support Putinism, rather, they need to find their own “Putin” among themselves and support him to flesh out their own “Putinism”.

    The closest I could think of would be G.W. Bush II. Also a patriot, imperialist, who wanted to dominate large parts of the world militarily, economically, etc. I don’t think we need anymore of that.

  44. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 28, 2012 - 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Ivan:

    But to imply that the difference between Eltzin and Putin regime boils down to the issue of who does the actual stealing is not only a gross simplification – it is a distortion of monumental proportions. Eltzin was a puppet of a foreign and hostile power, hell bent and determined to destroy Russia; Putin is a shrewd statesman and a Russian patriot who is doing his best to preserve the Russian civilization and its vehicle – the Russian Federation.

    It seems you’re not so innocent yourself when it comes to “gross simplifications”. How would you define the “Russian civilization” that Mr. Putin the Patriot allegedly tries to preserve? If he succeeds in his neo-imperialist project, there will be a new Russian empire minus the Baltic republics and some of the former Russian/Soviet territories in the Caucasus. So what? What’s in it for us in the West?

  45. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 28, 2012 - 4:05 pm | Permalink

    @Geiseric:

    Ever heard about Afghanistan, Ivan? Lots of mountains, like Chechnya. Difficult terrain for Russians (and NATO, for that matter).

    Yes, Geiseric, I heard about Afghanistan. I was born in mountains next door to Chechnya. And my own people resisted the Russian imperialism for 101 years before the final blow and defeat in 1859-1864.

    But those mountains existed during the deportation of Chechens in 1944 which took just few days to wrap-up, didn’t they. Those mountains could not help the Chechens to win the Second Chechen war, either. Why? That was my question.

    After the Chechens “won” the war in 1996, Grozny – the capital of Chechnya – looked like Stalingrad in 1943. Today – after the Chechens “lost” the war – Grozny looks better than it ever looked before. Think about it.

    People of Western European ancestry don’t have to support Putinism, rather, they need to find their own “Putin” among themselves and support him to flesh out their own “Putinism”.

  46. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 28, 2012 - 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Ever heard about Afghanistan, Ivan? Lots of mountains, like Chechnya. Difficult terrain for Russians (and NATO, for that matter).

    Sure, Mr. Putin is, as you say, a patriot. In a Russian context that means imperialism. Can you give me 2-3 good reasons why people of Western European ancestry should support Putinism?

  47. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 28, 2012 - 12:00 pm | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:

    Without trying to simplify a complex and enduring problem of corruption in Russia, if I were to summarize the chief difference between the judeo-gangster kleptocracy that was the regime of ‘Benny Eltzin’ and colonel Putin whose cabinet is literally jammed with former KGB types, then it would have to boil down to the issue of who does the actual stealing.

    Very crafty statement there, Mr. Jarvis Dingle-Daden. Underneath the superficially correct sounding statement you have planted a bomb of mass distortion. It is certainly true that corruption was, and still is, a complex and enduring problem in Russia. But to imply that the difference between Eltzin and Putin regime boils down to the issue of who does the actual stealing is not only a gross simplification – it is a distortion of monumental proportions.

    Eltzin was a puppet of a foreign and hostile power, hell bent and determined to destroy Russia; Putin is a shrewd statesman and a Russian patriot who is doing his best to preserve the Russian civilization and its vehicle – the Russian Federation. That’s why Eltzin with his ‘democracy’ was the darling of Jewdised West, while Putin is hated and vilified by it.

    Giving György Schwartz too much credit for what happened to the USSR is another gross distortion. It is certainly true that his role and participation in the destruction of the great superpower wasn’t a minor one, but the tendency to push the childish view that Soros is the ultimate and main source of Jewish deviousness is alarming. Even in the US there is an attempt to make out of Soros a scapegoat and push the idea that he is to blame for what is happening to America. I’m talking about Glen Beck’s series about George. The idea is: let’s get rid of Soros, and maybe a few other prominent and evil Jews, then we can go on doing business as usual – very dangerous and misleading idea. In fact, smart George has never made money out of his machinations in Russia – just the opposite – he was taken for a ride there by his more crafty tribesmen like Berezovsky.

    I’ll give you a profound hint demonstrating the difference between Eltzin and Putin regimes, if you can grasp it. We all know that Chechnya has de-facto won independence from Russia in the so-called First Chechen war at the apex of Eltzin frenzy of looting and destruction. How is it possible that a tiny Chechnya could defeat a mighty Russia? Do you know how long it took Stalin to uproot and deport Chechen people in its entirety (they have been suspected of collaboration with the Nazis – not because they liked the Nazis, but because they hated the Soviet regime) from the mountains of Caucasus to the steppes of Kazakhstan in 1944? The answer is staggering – just few days! So how is it possible for a Chechnya to fight a war for a few years against Russia and ultimately win that war in 1996? It does not make any sense, unless you know why did this happen. On the other hand, how long did it take to regain control of Chechnya and arrest the destruction and collapse of the Russian Federation shortly after Putin came to power?

    Think about it, Mr. Jarvis Dingle-Daden.

  48. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    January 28, 2012 - 1:36 am | Permalink

    Without trying to simplify a complex and enduring problem of corruption in Russia, if I were to summarize the chief difference between the judeo-gangster kleptocracy that was the regime of ‘Benny Eltzin’ and colonel Putin whose cabinet is literally jammed with former KGB types, then it would have to boil down to the issue of who does the actual stealing.
    In that the thieving elites in post-Yeltsin Russia tend, for the most part , to be non-kosher.
    In contrast to the 1990s when the entire country was witnessing a practically runaway Judaic train of graft; rigged auctions; stolen elections; huge scale money laundering; contract murder; jihadi financing and virtual takeover of what until very recently used to be state media.
    Bottom-of-the-septic-tank dwellers like Berezovsky or Gusinsky didn’t just appear out of nowhere with ability to plank down 7-figure sums to acquire government assets @ 97% discount rate. How do you reckon a former black market dealer Gusinsky who in Soviet times stayed afloat by ratting out his competition to the KGB, one day woke up a media baron ? How did the twitchy hustler Berezovsky with all of his scholarly pretensions manage to become an oil tycoon ?
    I’ll drop a hint: György Schwartz started to slither his way into various, then Soviet territories way back in the late 1980s.
    Fronting for the Rothschild clan, ol’ György was also scouting for future local overseers to take charge when the opportunity presents itself. (Which it certainly did.)
    Go ahead and figure out the rest.

  49. January 27, 2012 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

    Regarding Robert Friedman’s article on the Red Mafiya, which I am about 1/4th into it, that in the list of areas in which they operate he leaves out the most obvious — Hollywood — and also the music industry (the moguls in the music industry might be mostly blacks promoting rap and hip hop, but it’s still the entertainment industry, so somewhere in there the Red Mafiya probably has a hand).

    Friedman is Jewish, so I wonder if this is why he side-steps the film and entertainment industry in Hollywood, or maybe he just isn’t aware Hollywood is run by mostly Jews. Friedman might not have investigated why all the cultural and moral decadence that Hollywood puts out because maybe all this is just not his forte, so I wouldn’t go off ‘blaming’ him just because he’s Jewish, for not covering Hollywood and television.

    Interesting article and insight into the underworld.

  50. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 27, 2012 - 9:19 pm | Permalink

    Central planning, unable as it is to coordinate the myriad desires of individuals in any rational sense, always gives rise to florid black markets, which do deliver the goods, but at a heavy moral cost. Guess which ethnic group did best from the black market that kept the USSR afloat for so long? No doubt the increasing bureaucracy in the US will also see a parallel rise in the grey/black market, too.

  51. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 27, 2012 - 8:52 pm | Permalink
  52. January 27, 2012 - 4:42 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    That was interesting. I was getting a little confused what, if any, difference there was between a ‘patriot’ and a ‘nationalist’. I’m glad you explained that. I also intuitively have always felt the term white nationalist , certainly as applied in the U.S., was meaningless (and they were going to be doomed to failure), but I could never put my finger on the reasons why. You just explained it wonderfully why the term is meaningless.

    Next, you explained the Russian Federation — something in the past I could never understand what was going on over there, like when all those countries broke up into various ‘-istan’ countries, and that whole thing about changing the name of the capital from St. Petersburg then something else then back again. lolll I’m sure glad you’re here to sort things out!

  53. January 27, 2012 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    @Geiseric:

    You had posted this about Putin before, about no evidence for his being ethno-nationalistic, pro-White and/or anti-Jewish. Sometimes I don’t understand how White Nationalists think.

    Putin walks in the rarefied corridors of Power, along with all other Elites from every other country, and so forth. He cannot go willy-nilly talking pro-White and/or anti-Jewish and ethono-nationalistic things even if he had a mind to, unless he was suicidal.

    The TOO Mission Statement mentions the reasons why WN — let alone Putin (not to mention Geert Wilders and a host of others in countries that DO have amazing nationalist parties and can speak their minds and potential, though they, too, are up against it also) — cannot just do or say as they please:

    Our opponents have erected an intellectual milieu that is scientifically indefensible and that can only be supported by increasingly heavy-handed methods, such as ostracism, removal from employment, and vilification by the cultural and media establishment.

    Running a presidency one has to have a feeling for diplomacy. Another tool the opponents have is, if a country becomes too disagreeable to the Rulers of other countries, those Rulers would find any justification for starting wars with the offending country, destabilize them, then who knows but via Soros, the CIA, and MI-6 whatever, then put in their own puppet leaders.

    I never really gave much thought to Vladimir Putin before, one way or the other, except to think he had this fine sexuality about him and probably was a good chess player, but my interest in the current Russian situation has been piqued, especially by Ivan, who has shed a lot of useful light into the psyche and history of Russia and all. Not to mention the Circassians — fascinating history — made up of about 12 tribes of people called the ‘Adyghe people’, who even had a nobility class and ‘The Adyghe people originate in the North Caucasus region and they are considered to be one of the most ancient nations in the world’. Just as astounding is this from wiki: ‘The Caucasus was occupied by the Adyghe people as early as the Stone Age period and traces of them date back as far as 8000 BC. ‘

  54. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 27, 2012 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    @Geiseric:

    Putin is not a white nationalist, or even a Russian nationalist – he is a Russian patriot. What is the difference between these notions? White nationalism is nonsense to begin with. It is a juxtaposition of two words: white and nationalism which has no political substance in it. One can be a French nationalist, or a German nationalist, etc. But one cannot be a white nationalist. Russian nationalists are those who believe that it is not only desirable, but it is FEASIBLE to have a state populated with Russians only, or, at least, a state where the overwhelming Russian population dominates and controls the other ethnic groups in the same state. Russian patriot is one who not only wishes the best for his own ethnic group, and strives to that end, but also understands clearly what needs to be done, and how it can be done, to achieve that goal. Putin is a Russian patriot.

    Russia is not a state, the Russian Federation is. Russia is a civilization which cannot exist without its heart and mind – the Russian people. This unique civilization cannot be preserved without the preservation of its carrier – the Russian Federation.

  55. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 27, 2012 - 5:27 am | Permalink

    The main problem of the pro-Putinist lobby here is to substantiate their claim that contemporary Russia is somehow ethno-nationalistic, pro-White and/or anti-Jewish. Since these claims have never been substantiated, there is no reason for the majority of mankind to take them seriously. Where is the evidence that Putin’s regime is anti-Jewish? It is certainly anti-Western, primarily from a geopolitical point of view. Any evidence of pro-White ethno-nationalism in the Kremlin? Where are the Indo-European characteristics of Russian culture and mentality, Mr. Colhaze? Please name a few.

    Regarding statistics and demography: a huge part of those 81 per cent Russians are children of mixed marriages with non-Europeans. If we follow Frank Salter’s point of view, most Russians (rossiane) have mixed ancestry (including non-European, non-White), and therefore have mixed genetic interests, not necessarily in common with those of Western European ancestry.

  56. monte's Gravatar monte
    January 27, 2012 - 4:41 am | Permalink

    JQ

    This is great additional reading.Thank you. As said in the article: truly MINDBLOWING!

  57. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 27, 2012 - 4:13 am | Permalink

    Correction: good and decent people

  58. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 27, 2012 - 4:08 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    Well, if the West’s best hope against Jewish-driven multiculturalism is Russian multiculturalism, riven by similar tensions and fragilities as other multiethnic enterprises, then I have good cause to be despair. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend, with respect to Islam.

    Yes, but making enemy out of the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your best policy. As of hope, our best hope is that Jewish way of life is against the nature – it cannot be sustained. Life has mysterious ways to assert itself.

    But that does not mean that good and descent people in the West can just sit around in despair and hope that Islam and Russia will save the world.

  59. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 26, 2012 - 11:48 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n: Well, if the West’s best hope against Jewish-driven multiculturalism is Russian multiculturalism, riven by similar tensions and fragilities as other multiethnic enterprises, then I have good cause to be despair. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend, with respect to Islam.

    That said, I despise international meddlers like Soros and their confected revolutions. And I view anti-Putin propaganda with a leery eye, on account of the Jewish factor.

  60. WP.Tepes's Gravatar WP.Tepes
    January 26, 2012 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

    @michael colhaze:

    Michael,

    Please write a comment here, or a future blog post for this site, on the average Russian “man/woman-on-the-street” opinion of the reputed efforts underway by the Putin Kremlin to deal very harshly (i.e., “we find you, we kill you, no trial, just justice”) with the networks exporting illegal heroin/opium out of Afghanistan, with the approval of the American military and NATO.

    Also, do they, as others, suspect a jew hand in this drug trafficking? And what about the jew role in supplying white women, especially from East and Central Europe, for the international whore markets.

    I think the readers of this site need to be made aware of what their country is facilitating in Central Asia and elsewhere across the globe, and the negative “blow-back” likely to consume us and our children and grandchildren.

  61. January 26, 2012 - 9:59 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    Thank you. I was hoping you would say that. It’s one thing reading about the historical past. It’s quite another having to re-live it over and over in the present. In the final analysis, now I know Vladimir Putin is one of the good guys. ( I always thought he was a handsome man myself.) And now I can go and read about the Russian-Circassian War in peace.

  62. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 26, 2012 - 9:54 pm | Permalink

    @ps79:
    Thanks for the links, I found them very helpful.

  63. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 26, 2012 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    @Bluerose:

    If you are in favor of Circassian nationalism (as a Circassian-American), then I guess I would go along a Circassian independent state, or whatever they want.

    How does it go … fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me? We have been pawns in big games in the past and learned a few hard lessons. Shooting for Circassian independent state in today’s world is a sure suicide. We have a state – it’s called the Russian Federation – and we’ll defend its independence. That’s what I’m doing right here, right now. And I will not hesitate to go back to my country if I have to.

  64. January 26, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    There is no doubt that Russia and Putin are not perfect. It appears, however, that Putin and others, e.g. Lavrov, in the Russian government read the Zionist/Satanist/One World Government puppets like a book. Russia is recovering from not only the rape of the Zionist Jewish Commissars, but the Zionist Jewish funded oligarch rape, post USSR collapse. The Orthodox Church, unlike the RC Church, never pussyfooted around the Jews. That is why it was so viciously attacked by Communists.

    While there are several ethnic groups within the Russian Federation, there are also “mixed race” whites. The Goths and Visigoths spread all over Europe, including Russia, Ukraine and the Caucasus. The Mongol hoards wiped out many tribes and left their genes in tens of thousands of women that were raped. Even Greece and Italy became darker over time due to “race mixing”.
    Whiteness itself cannot be pigeon-holed. Bosnians and Albanians are white, but predominantly Muslim.

    At the end of the day, what we seek to preserve is our genes from which is our culture is produced. It just so happens that many whites deny the culture due to brainwashing, and by doing so deny their genes. A flaw that whites have developed is “saving” the dark masses from themselves to the detriment of whites as a whole.

    I view Russia as an ally in opposing those of the Zionist/Satanist/One World Government who would enslave us.

  65. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 26, 2012 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    … but remember that the tribe has its sights set on East Asia when they’re done ravaging the west

    Bad news for all of us, if true. Indeed, it seems obvious that the recent Chinese rapid ascent to power would be utterly impossible without transfer of technological know-how from the West to the Orient orchestrated by the Jews. It probably wasn’t the result of unbridled and uncontrolled greed only – most probably it was done with a long strategic view in mind. Therefore the Jews definitely have control over what the Chinese can or cannot do.

    There are some indication though that the Chinese are worried what Jewish control can do to their culture.

    President Hu Jintao warned of the influence of Western culture

    After Putin has announced recently that he will run in this year’s presidential elections, his first visit was to China. Maybe he is trying to forge some alliance and mutual understanding as of what is the real danger facing both China and Russia. These kind of things give me some comfort and hope.

  66. January 26, 2012 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    That is an amazing insight. I looked up ‘Sochi’ and see it is Russia’s largest resort city. On the face of it, I would have thought nothing about it’s hosting the 2014 Winter Olympics, if it weren’t for the fact I had already read about that Georgia sponsored conference, with CIA, Soros, and MI-6 funds, ‘Hidden Nations, Enduring Crimes: The Circassians and the People of the North Caucasus Between Past and Future.’ The words ‘Enduring Crimes’ in the title seemed calculated to keep old hatreds and grudges going.

    Now there is talk of a Circassian ‘disaspora’, environmental issues, and ‘illegal occuption of Georgian lands':

    :

    Georgian intellectual Giorgi Kvelashvilli submitted an opinion piece urging Georgians to support recognition of the Circassian genocide and for the gov’t in Tbilisi to pass the bill.[11] In his last paragraph, he states that…. Georgia should act in concert with other nations, most importantly those where Circassian diasporas reside; mass deportations of Chechens and Ingush as well as other ethnicities by Soviet dictator Stalin in the 1940s and ethnic cleansings of Georgians from Abkhazia and Tskhinvali must be closely linked to the Tsarist atrocities in the 19th century since they constitute virtually the same imperialist policy; and lastly, the scheduled Sochi Olympics must be closely tied to the Circassian and environmental issues as well as to the illegal Russian occupation of Georgian lands.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_Nations,_Enduring_Crimes_conference

    One wonders where does all this end? There is mention of both Stalin and ‘Tsarist atrocities’. I read the Circassian people are mostly Sunni Muslims, so I guess they term it the ‘Tsarist atrocities’ specifically for that reason (somewhere I was reading Russia in the past attempted to rid itself of Muslims (that is, if Muslims were a threat of some sort) and be what it should be which is Orthodox Christian. At least imo. (And of course where there were wars in the past people got hurt. So what else is new?)

    These sorts of conferences, I always thought, were of interest to historians and any of the public who were interested. Now, they seem to go with a political aim.

    I don’t know how you feel about Circassian nationalism. There seems to be not a few Circassian organizations who “view the event of the conference having occurred at all as a victory.” If you are in favor of Circassian nationalism (as a Circassian-American), then I guess I would go along a Circassian independent state, or whatever they want. It just sounds to me like conferences like that are these days more political than of simply historical interest. Anyway, you did point out the overall connection, what with the Winter Olympics.

    So I guess Georgia will be the next big player some time soon, and the means for more fightings and bloodbaths over there.

  67. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 26, 2012 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    ” Islam and the multicultural Russian empire, to a lesser degree, are the two most formidable forces left in the world today capable of resisting, more or less successfully, to the propagation of Jewish filth and degeneracy all over the world, and hopefully arresting it.”

    I agree…but remember that the tribe has its sights set on East Asia when they’re done ravaging the west. In the coming decades it’s very possible that the tribe will have a billion Chinese at their command, not to mention Japan, Korea, and possibly India. Russia and Islam won’t be able to counter that kind of power.

  68. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 26, 2012 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

    Pardon my poor English: It’s divide and conquer, not divide-and-concur

  69. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 26, 2012 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    If the leitmotif of this site be that racial homogeneity minimizes social tensions, with which I agree, then why I should worry about maintaining the integrity of the multicultural Russian empire is beyond me

    It is not too complicated, Trenchant. Islam and the multicultural Russian empire, to a lesser degree, are the two most formidable forces left in the world today capable of resisting, more or less successfully, to the propagation of Jewish filth and degeneracy all over the world, and hopefully arresting it.

  70. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 26, 2012 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

    @Bluerose

    These talks about Circassian “genocide” will accelerate as we approach 2014 which is the year of the next Winter Olympics games. The timing is no accident here: the Olympics is to be hosted by Sochi – the heartland of what used to be Circassia – and, coincidentally, 2014 is the 150th anniversary of the Circassian exodus:

    Russian-Circassian War

    The masters of divide-and-concur strategy are taking a long shot at playing the Circassian card in the ongoing war against Russia. Evidently, they haven’t abandoned their hopes and plans to dissolve the Russian Federation yet. After all, they’ve succeeded with dissolving the USSR, haven’t they.

  71. jamesUK's Gravatar jamesUK
    January 26, 2012 - 6:41 pm | Permalink
  72. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 26, 2012 - 6:25 pm | Permalink

    The worst part of Soros is that he has five children to carry on his legacy of international parasitism and levelling.

  73. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 26, 2012 - 6:23 pm | Permalink

    If the leitmotif of this site be that racial homogeneity minimizes social tensions, with which I agree, then why I should worry about maintaining the integrity of the multicultural Russian empire is beyond me (even though it is a far smaller risk to world peace than the US hegemon).

    I wonder what would have been tsarist Russia’s history if it hadn’t taken the Pale of Settlement from Poland; maybe the Jewish problem would still have arisen, who knows?

  74. January 26, 2012 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    @ps79:

    That’s a timely article for me by Buchanan in explaining what all these color, trees, and flower revolutions are all about. Between that and Madsen’s insight, I think the case is clinched.

    I know this Soros is suppose to be hugely rich, but watching the Soros-Zakaria video, I am wondering, did someone appoint Soros as Kissinger’s replacement? Where does Soros get off going about like a politician to all sorts of different countries and meddling in all their affairs via ‘NGOs’ (I know the Jews are the biggest workers within these organizations, or support them with donations), and causing, really, all this bloodshed, turmoil, and chaos we see everywhere, while telling us ‘the people’ want ‘democracy’ (and we know how well ‘democracy’ is going right here in the USA), and then only to see the Muslim Brotherhood gain power in these countries? What is the best way to tackle the hooked-nosed element with its tentacles everywhere? Given all in all, I have no idea. Their megalomania and their machinations are beginning to back-fire here and there in different ways. I’ve noticed that much from some recent events on the local news also.

    Perhaps the Force is with you after all?

  75. JQ's Gravatar JQ
    January 26, 2012 - 4:05 pm | Permalink

    George Soros’ amazing business success is probably more the result of him having ties to the Mossad and organized crime than being a brilliant investor.

    ———————————–

    The Secret Financial Network Behind “Wizard” George Soros by William Engdahl

    EIR Investigation Executive Intelligence Review (EIR), November 1, 1996

    The dossier that follows is based upon a report released on Oct. 1 by EIR’s bureau in Wiesbaden, Germany, titled “A Profile of Mega-Speculator George Soros.” Research was contributed by Mark Burdman, Elisabeth Hellenbroich, Paolo Raimondi, and Scott Thompson.

    …………………………………………………

    Time magazine has characterized financier George Soros as a “modern-day Robin Hood,” who robs from the rich to give to the poor countries of eastern Europe and Russia. It claimed that Soros makes huge financial gains by speculating against western central banks, in order to use his profits to help the emerging post-communist economies of eastern Europe and former Soviet Union, to assist them to create what he calls an “Open Society.” The Time statement is entirely accurate in the first part, and entirely inaccurate in the second. He robs from rich western countries, and uses his profits to rob even more savagely from the East, under the cloak of “philanthropy.” His goal is to loot wherever and however he can. Soros has been called the master manipulator of “hit-and-run capitalism.”

    As we shall see, what Soros means by “open,” is a society that allows him and his financial predator friends to loot the resources and precious assets of former Warsaw Pact economies. By bringing people like Jeffrey Sachs or Sweden’s Anders Aslund and their economic shock therapy into these economies, Soros lays the groundwork for buying up the assets of whole regions of the world at dirt-cheap prices.

    The man who broke the Bank of England?

    An examination of Soros’s secretive financial network is vital to understand the true dimension of the “Soros problem” in eastern Europe and other nations.

    Following the crisis of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism of September 1992, when the Bank of England was forced to abandon efforts to stabilize the pound sterling, a little-known financial figure emerged from the shadows, to boast that he had personally made over $1 billion in speculation against the British pound. The speculator was the Hungarian-born George Soros, who spent the war in Hungary under false papers working for the Nazi government, identifying and expropriating the property of wealthy fellow Jews. Soros left Hungary after the war, and established American citizenship after some years in London. Today, Soros is based in New York, but that tells little, if anything, of who and what he is.

    Following his impressive claims to possession of a “Midas touch,” Soros has let his name be publicly used in a blatant attempt to influence world financial markets—an out-of-character act for most financial investors, who prefer to take advantage of situations not yet discovered by rivals, and keep them secret. Soros the financier is as much a political animal, as a financial speculator.

    Soros proclaimed in March 1993, with great publicity, that the price of gold was about to rise sharply; he said that he had just gotten “inside information” that China was about to buy huge sums of gold for its booming economy. Soros was able to trigger a rush into buying gold, which caused prices to rise more than 20% over four months, to the highest level since 1991. Typically for Soros, once the fools rushed in to push prices higher, Soros and his friend Sir James Goldsmith secretly began selling their gold at a huge profit.

    Then, in early June 1993, Soros proclaimed his intent to force a sell-off in German government bonds in favor of the French, in an open letter to London Times Financial Editor Anatole Kaletsky, in which Soros proclaimed, “Down with the D-Mark!” Soros has at various times attacked the currencies of Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Mexico, coming into newly opened financial markets which have little experience with foreign investors, let alone ones with large funds like Soros. Soros begins buying stocks or bonds in the local market, leading others to naively suppose that he knows something they do not. As with gold, when the smaller investors begin to follow Soros, driving prices of stocks or whatever higher, Soros begins to sell to the eager new buyers, cashing in his 40% or 100% profits, then exiting the market, and often, the entire country, to seek another target for his speculation. This technique gave rise to the term “hit and run.” What Soros always leaves behind, is a collapsed local market and financial ruin of national investors.

    The secret of the Quantum Fund NV

    Soros is the visible side of a vast and nasty secret network of private financial interests, controlled by the leading aristocratic and royal families of Europe, centered in the British House of Windsor. This network, called by its members the Club of Isles, was built upon the wreckage of the British Empire after World War II.

    Rather than use the powers of the state to achieve their geopolitical goals, a secret cross-linked holding of private financial interests, tied to the old aristocratic oligarchy of western Europe, was developed. It was in many ways modeled on the 17th-century British and Dutch East India Companies. The heart of this Club of the Isles is the financial center of the old British Empire, the City of London. Soros is one of what in medieval days were called Hofjuden, the “Court Jews,” who were deployed by the aristocratic families.

    The most important of such “Jews who are not Jews,” are the Rothschilds, who launched Soros’s career. They are members of the Club of the Isles and retainers of the British royal family. This has been true since Amschel Rothschild sold the British Hessian troops to fight against George Washington during the American Revolution.

    Soros is American only in his passport. He is a global financial operator, who happens to be in New York, simply because “that’s where the money is,” as the bank robber Willy Sutton once quipped, when asked why he always robbed banks. Soros speculates in world financial markets through his offshore company, Quantum Fund NV, a private investment fund, or “hedge fund.” His hedge fund reportedly manages some $11-14 billion of funds on behalf of its clients, or investors—one of the most prominent of whom is, according to Soros, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, the wealthiest person in Europe.

    The Quantum Fund is registered in the tax haven of the Netherlands Antilles, in the Caribbean. This is to avoid paying taxes, as well as to hide the true nature of his investors and what he does with their money.

    In order to avoid U.S. government supervision of his financial activities, something normal U.S.-based investment funds must by law agree to in order to operate, Soros moved his legal headquarters to the Caribbean tax haven of Curacao. The Netherlands Antilles has repeatedly been cited by the Task Force on Money Laundering of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as one of the world’s most important centers for laundering illegal proceeds of the Latin American cocaine and other drug traffic. It is a possession of the Netherlands.

    Soros has taken care that the none of the 99 individual investors who participate in his various funds is an American national. By U.S. securities law, a hedge fund is limited to no more than 99 highly wealthy individuals, so-called “sophisticated investors.” By structuring his investment company as an offshore hedge fund, Soros avoids public scrutiny.

    Soros himself is not even on the board of Quantum Fund. Instead, for legal reasons, he serves the Quantum Fund as official “investment adviser,” through another company, Soros Fund Management, of New York City. If any demand were to be made of Soros to reveal the details of Quantum Fund’s operations, he is able to claim he is “merely its investment adviser.” Any competent police investigator looking at the complex legal structure of Soros’s businesses would conclude that there is prima facie evidence of either vast money laundering of illicit funds, or massive illegal tax evasion. Both may be true.

    To make it impossible for U.S. tax authorities or other officials to look into the financial dealings of his web of businesses, the board of directors of Quantum Fund NV also includes no American citizens. His directors are Swiss, Italian, and British financiers.

    George Soros is part of a tightly knit financial mafia—“mafia,” in the sense of a closed masonic-like fraternity of families pursuing common aims. Anyone who dares to criticize Soros or any of his associates, is immediately hit with the charge of being “anti-Semitic”—-a criticism which often silences or intimidates genuine critics of Soros’s unscrupulous operations. The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith considers it a top priority to “protect” Soros from the charges of “anti-Semites” in Hungary and elsewhere in Central Europe, according to ADL National Director Abraham Foxman. The ADL’s record of service to the British oligarchy has been amply documented by EIR (e.g. The Ugly Truth About the Anti-Defamation League [Washington, D.C., Executive Intelligence Review: 1992]).

    According to knowledgeable U.S. and European investigators, Soros’s circle includes indicted metals and commodity speculator and fugitive Marc Rich of Zug, Switzerland and Tel Aviv; secretive Israeli arms and commodity dealer Shaul Eisenberg, and “Dirty Rafi” Eytan, both linked to the financial side of the Israeli Mossad; and, the family of Jacob Lord Rothschild.

    Understandably, Soros and the Rothschild interests prefer to keep their connection hidden far from public view, so as to obscure the well-connected friends Soros enjoys in the City of London, the British Foreign Office, Israel, and the U.S. financial establishment. The myth, therefore, has been created, that Soros is a lone financial investment “genius” who, through his sheer personal brilliance in detecting shifts in markets, has become one of the world’s most successful speculators. According to those who have done business with him, Soros never makes a major investment move without sensitive insider information.

    On the board of directors of Soros’s Quantum Fund N.V. is Richard Katz, a Rothschild man who is also on the board of the London N.M. Rothschild and Sons merchant bank, and the head of Rothschild Italia S.p.A. of Milan. Another Rothschild family link to Soros’s Quantum Fund is Quantum board member Nils O. Taube, the partner of the London investment group St. James Place Capital, whose major partner is Lord Rothschild. London Times columnist Lord William Rees-Mogg is also on the board of Rothschild’s St. James Place Capital.

    A frequent business partner of Soros in various speculative deals, including in the 1993 gold manipulation, although not on the Quantum Fund directly, is the Anglo-French speculator Sir James Goldsmith, a cousin of the Rothschild family.

    >From the very first days when Soros created his own investment fund in 1969, he owed his success to his relation to the Rothschild family banking network. Soros worked in New York in the 1960s for a small private bank close to the Rothschilds, Arnhold & S. Bleichroeder, Inc., a banking family which represented Rothschild interests in Germany during Bismarck’s time. To this day, A. & S. Bleichroeder, Inc. remains the Principal Custodian, along with Citibank, of funds of Soros’s Quantum Fund. George C. Karlweiss, of Edmond de Rothschild’s Switzerland-based Banque Privee SA in Lugano, as well as of the scandal-tainted Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich, gave Soros financial backing. Karlweiss provided some of the vital initial capital and investors for Soros’s Quantum Fund.

    Union Banque Privee and the ‘Swiss connection’

    Another member of the board of Soros’s Quantum Fund is the head of one of the most controversial Swiss private banks, Edgar de Picciotto, who has been called “one of the cleverest bankers in Geneva”—and is one of the most scandal-tainted. De Picciotto, from an old Portuguese Jewish trading family, who was born in Lebanon, is head of the Geneva private bank CBI-TDB Union Bancaire Privee, a major player in the gold and offshore hedge funds business. Hedge funds have been identified by international police agencies as the fastest-growing outlet for illegal money laundering today.

    De Picciotto is a longtime friend and business associate of banker Edmond Safra, also born in Lebanon, whose family came from Aleppo, Syria, and who now controls the Republic Bank of New York. Republic Bank has been identified in U.S. investigations into Russian organized crime, as the bank involved in transferring billions of U.S. Federal Reserve notes from New York to organized crime-controlled Moscow banks, on behalf of Russian organized crime figures. Safra is under investigation by U.S. and Swiss authorities for laundering Turkish and Columbian drug money. In 1990, Safra’s Trade Development Bank (TDB) of Geneva was merged with de Picciotto’s CBI to create the CBI-TDB Union Banque Privee. The details of the merger are shrouded in secrecy to this day. As part of the deal, de Picciotto became a board member of American Express Bank (Switzerland) SA of Geneva, and two American Express Bank of New York executives sit on the board of de Picciotto’s Union Banque Privee. Safra had sold his Trade Development Bank to American Express, Inc. in the 1980s. Henry Kissinger sits on the board of American Express, Inc., which has repeatedly been implicated in international money-laundering scandals.

    De Picciotto’s start as a Geneva banker came from Nicholas Baring of the London Barings Bank, who tapped de Picciotto to run the bank’s secret Swiss bank business. Barings has for centuries been private banker to the British royal family, and since the bank’s collapse in March 1995, has been overhauled by the Dutch ING Bank, which is reported to be a major money-laundering institution.

    De Picciotto is also a longtime business partner of Venetian businessman Carlo De Benedetti, who recently was forced to resign as head of Olivetti Corp. Both persons sit on the board of the Societe Financiere de Geneve investment holding company in Geneva. De Benedetti is under investigation in Italy for suspicion of triggering the collapse of Italy’s Banco Ambrosiano in the early 1980s.The head of that bank, Roberto Calvi, was later found hanging from the London Blackfriar’s Bridge, in what police believe was a masonic ritual murder.

    De Picciotto and his Union Banque Privee have been implicated in numerous drug and illegal money-laundering operations. In November 1994, U.S. federal agents arrested a senior official of de Picciotto’s Geneva bank, Jean-Jacques Handali, along with two other UBP officials, on charges of leading a multimillion-dollar drug-money-laundering ring. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami, Handali and Union Banque Privee were the “Swiss connection” in an international drug-money-laundering ring tied to Colombian and Turkish cocaine and heroin organizations. A close business and political associate of de Picciotto is a mysterious arm dealer, Helmut Raiser, who is linked in business dealings with reputed Russian organized crime kingpin Grigori Luchansky, who controls the Russian and Swiss holding company Nordex Group.

    Another director of Soros’s Quantum Fund is Isodoro Albertini, owner of the Milan stock brokerage firm Albertini and Co. Beat Notz of the Geneva Banque Worms is another private banker on the board of Soros’s Quantum Fund, as is Alberto Foglia, who is chief of the Lugano, Switzerland Banca del Ceresio. Lugano, just across the Swiss border from Milan, is notorious as the financial secret bank haven for Italian organized crime families, including the heroin mafia behind the 1980s “Pizza Connection” case. The Banca del Ceresio has been one of the secret Swiss banks identified in the recent Italian political corruption scandals as the repository of bribe funds of several Italian politicians now in prison.

    The sponsorship of the Rothschilds

    Soros’s relation to the Rothschild finance circle represents no ordinary or casual banking connection. It goes a long way to explain the extraordinary success of a mere private speculator, and Soros’s uncanny ability to “gamble right” so many times in such high-risk markets. Soros has access to the “insider track” in some of the most important government and private channels in the world.

    Since World War II, the Rothschild family, at the heart of the financial apparatus of the Club of the Isles, has gone to great lengths to create a public myth about its own insignificance. The family has spent significant sums cultivating a public image as a family of wealthy, but quiet, “gentlemen,” some of whom prefer to cultivate fine French wines, some of whom are devoted to charity.

    Since British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour wrote his famous November 1917 letter to Lord Rothschild, expressing official British government backing for establishment of a Palestinian national home for the Jewish people, the Rothschilds were intimately involved in the creation of Israel. But behind their public facade of a family donating money for projects such as planting trees in the deserts of Israel, N.M. Rothschild of London is at the center of various intelligence operations, and more than once has been linked to the more unsavory elements of international organized crime. The family prefers to keep such links at arm’s length, and away from its London headquarters, via its lesser-known outposts such as their Zurich Rothschild Bank AG and Rothschild Italia of Milan, the bank of Soros partner Richard Katz.

    N.M. Rothschild is considered by City of London sources to be one of the most influential parts of the British intelligence establishment, tied to the Thatcher “free market” wing of the Tory Party. Rothschild and Sons made huge sums managing for Thatcher the privatization of billions of dollars of British state industry holdings during the 1980s, and today, for John Major’s government. Rothschilds is also at the very heart of the world gold trade, being the bank at which twice daily the London Gold Fix is struck by a group of the five most influential gold trade banks. Gold constitutes a major part of the economy of drug dealings globally.

    N.M. Rothschild and Sons is also implicated in some of the filthiest drugs-for-weapons secret intelligence operations. Because it is connected to the highest levels of the British intelligence establishment, Rothschilds managed to evade any prominent mention of its complicity in one of the more sordid black covert intelligence networks, that of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). Rothschilds was at the center of the international web of money-laundering banks used during the 1970s and 1980s by Britain’s MI-6 and the networks of Col. Oliver North and George Bush, to finance such projects as the Nicaraguan Contras.

    On June 8, 1993 the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Banking, Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D-Tex.), made a speech charging that the U.S. government, under the previous Bush and Reagan administrations, had systematically refused to prosecute the BCCI, and that the Department of Justice had repeatedly refused to cooperate with Congressional investigations of both the BCCI scandal and what Gonzalez claims is the closely related scandal of the Atlanta, Georgia Banca Nationale del Lavoro, which was alleged to have secured billions in loans from the Bush administration to Saddam Hussein, just prior to the Gulf War of 1990-91.

    Gonzalez charged that the Bush administration had “a Justice Department that I say, and I repeat, has been the most corrupt, most unbelievably corrupt justice system that I have seen in the 32 years I have been in the Congress.”

    The BCCI violated countless laws, including laundering drug money, financing illegal arms traffic, and falsifying bank records. In July 1991, New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau announced a grand jury indictment against BCCI, charging it with having committed “the largest bank fraud in world financial history. BCCI operated as a corrupt criminal organization throughout its entire 19-year history.”

    The BCCI had links directly into the Bush White House. Saudi Sheik Kamal Adham, a BCCI director and former head of Saudi Arabian intelligence when George Bush was head of the CIA, was one of the BCCI shareholders indicted in the United States. Days after his indictment, former top Bush White House aide Edward Rogers went to Saudi Arabia as a private citizen to sign a contract to represent Sheikh Adham in the United States.

    — continued in part 2 — — continued from part 1 —

    But, what has never been identified in a single major Western press investigation, was that the Rothschild group was at the heart of the vast illegal web of BCCI. The key figure was Dr. Alfred Hartmann, the managing director of the BCCI Swiss subsidiary, Banque de Commerce et de Placement SA; at the same time, he ran the Zurich Rothschild Bank AG, and sat in London as a member of the board of N.M. Rothschild and Sons, Hartmann was also a business partner of Helmut Raiser, friend of de Picciotto, and linked to Nordex.

    Hartmann was also chairman of the Swiss affiliate of the Italian BNL bank, which was implicated in the Bush administration illegal transfers to Iraq prior to the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. The Atlanta branch of BNL, with the knowledge of George Bush when he was vice president, conduited funds to Helmut Raiser’s Zug, Switzerland company, Consen, for development of the CondorII missile program by Iraq, Egypt, and Argentina, during the Iran-Iraq War. Hartmann was vice-chairman of another secretive private Geneva bank, the Bank of NY-Inter-Maritime Bank, a bank whose chairman, Bruce Rappaport, was one of the illegal financial conduits for Col. Oliver North’s Contra drugs-for-weapons network during the late 1980. North also used the BCCI as one of his preferred banks to hide his illegal funds.

    Rich, Reichmann, and Soros’s Israeli links

    According to reports of former U.S. State Department intelligence officers familiar with the Soros case, Soros’s Quantum Fund amassed a war chest of well over $10 billion, with the help of a powerful group of “silent” investors who let Soros deploy the capital to demolish European monetary stability in September 1992.

    Among Soros’s silent investors, these sources say, are the fugitive metals and oil trader Marc Rich, based in Zug, Switzerland; and Shaul Eisenberg, a decades-long member of Israeli Mossad intelligence, who functions as a major arms merchant throughout Asia and the Near East. Eisenberg was recently banned from doing business in Uzbekistan, where he had been accused by the government of massive fraud and corruption. A third Soros partner is Israel’s “Dirty Rafi” Eytan, who served in London previously as Mossad liaison to British intelligence.

    Rich was one of the most active western traders in oil, aluminum, and other commodities in the Soviet Union and Russia between 1989 and 1993. This, not coincidentally, is just the period when Grigori Luchansky’s Nordex Group became a multibillion-dollar company selling Russian oil, aluminum, and other commodities.

    Canadian real estate entrepreneur Paul Reichmann, formerly of Olympia and York notoriety, a Hungarian-born Jew like Soros, is a business partner in Soros’s Quantum Realty, a $525-million real estate investment fund.

    The Reichmann tie links Soros as well with Henry Kissinger and former Tory Foreign Minister Lord Carrington (who is also a member of Kissinger Associates, Inc. of New York). Reichmann sits with both Kissinger and Carrington on the board of the influential British-Canadian publishing group, Hollinger, Inc. Hollinger owns a large number of newspapers in Canada and the United States, the London Daily Telegraph, and the largest English-language daily in Israel, the Jerusalem Post. Hollinger has been attacking President Clinton and the Middle East peace process ever since Clinton’s election in November 1992.

    Soros and geopolitics

    Soros is little more than one of several significant vehicles for economic and financial warfare by the Club of the Isles faction. Because his affiliations to these interests have not previously been spotlighted, he serves extremely useful functions for the oligarchy, as in 1992 and 1993, when he launched his attack on the European Rate Mechanism.

    Although Soros’s speculation played a role in finally taking the British pound out of the ERM currency group entirely, it would be a mistake to view that action as “anti-British.” Soros went for the first time to London, where he studied under Karl Popper and Friedrich von Hayek at the London School of Economics.

    Soros’s business ties to Sir James Goldsmith and Lord Rothschild place him in the inner circles of the Thatcher wing of the British establishment. By helping the “anti-Europe” Thatcherites pull Britain out of the ERM in September 1992 (and making more than $1 billion in the process at British taxpayer expense), Soros helped the long-term goal of the Thatcherites in weakening continental Europe’s economic stability. Since 1904 , it has been British geopolitical strategy to prevent by all means any successful economic linkage between western continental European economies, especially that of Germany, with Russia and the countries of eastern Europe.

    Soros’s personal outlook is consonant with that of the Thatcher wing of the Tory Party, those who three years ago launched the “Germany, the Fourth Reich” hate campaign against unified Germany, comparing Chancellor Helmut Kohl with Adolf Hitler. Soros is personally extremely anti-German. In his 191 autobiography, Underwriting Democracy, Soros warned that a reunited Germany would “upset the balance of Europe …. It is easy to see how the interwar scenario could be replayed. A united Germany becomes the strongest economic power and develops Eastern Europe as its Lebensraum … a potent witches’ brew.” Soros’s recent public attacks on the German economy and the deutsche mark are fundamentally motivated by this geopolitical view.

    Soros is quite close to the circles of George Bush in the U.S. intelligence community and finance. His principal bank custodian, and reputed major lender in the 1992 assault on Europe’s ERM, is Citicorp NA, the nation’s largest bank. Citicorp is more than a lending institution; it is a core part of the American liberal establishment. In 1989, as it became clear that German unification was a real possibility, a senior official at Citicorp, a former adviser to Michael Dukakis’s Presidential campaign, told a European business associate that “German unity will be a disaster for our interests; we must take measures to ensure a sharp D-Mark collapse on the order of 30%, so that she will not have the capability to reconstruct East Germany into the economic engine of a new Europe.”

    While Soros was calling on world investors to pull down the deutsche mark in 1993, he had been making a strong play in the French media, since late 1992, to portray himself as a “friend of French interests.” Soros is reported to be close to senior figures of the French establishment, the Treasury, and in particular, Bank of France head Jean-Claude Trichet. In effect, Soros is echoing the old Entente Cordiale alliance against Germany, which helped precipitate World War 1.

    Soros admits that he survived in Nazi Hungary during the war, as a Jew, by adopting what he calls a double personality. “I have lived with a double personality practically all my life,” Soros recently stated. “It started at age fourteen in Hungary, when I assumed a false identity in order to escape persecution as a Jew.” Soros admitted in a radio interview that his father gave him Nazi credentials in Hungary during the war, and he looted wealthy Jewish estates. Further research showed that this operation was probably run by the SS.

    Soros did not leave the country until two years after the war. Though he and his friends in the media are quick to attack any policy opponent of Soros, especially in eastern Europe, as being “anti-Semitic,” Soros’s Jewish identity apparently has only utilitarian value for him, rather than providing moral foundations. In short, the young Soros was a cynical, ambitious person, the ideal recruit for the British postwar intelligence network.

    Soros savages eastern Europe

    Soros has established no fewer than 19 “charitable” foundations across eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. He has sponsored “peace” concerts in former Yugoslavia with such performers as Joan Baez. He is helping send young east Europeans to Oxford University. A model citizen, is the image he broadcasts.

    The reality is something else. Soros has been personally responsible for introducing shock therapy into the emerging economies of eastern Europe since 1989. He has deliberately fostered on fragile new governments in the east the most draconian economic madness, policies which have allowed Soros and his financial predator friends, such as Marc Rich and Shaul Eisenberg, to loot the resources of large parts of eastern Europe at dirt-cheap prices. Here are illustrative case histories of Soros’s eastern “charity”:

    Poland: In late 1989, Soros organized a secret meeting between the “reform” communist government of Prime Minister Mieczyslaw Rakowski and the leaders of the then-illegal Solidarnosc trade union organization. According to well-informed Polish sources, at that 1989 meeting, Soros unveiled his “plan” for Poland: The communists must let Solidarnosc take over the government, so as to gain the confidence of the population. Then, said Soros, the state must act to bankrupt its own industrial and agricultural enterprises, using astronomical interest rates, withholding state credits, and burdening firms with unpayable debt. Once thie were done, Soros promised that he would encourage his wealthy international business friends to come into Poland, as prospective buyers of the privatized state enterprises. A recent example of this privatization plan is the case of the large steel facility Huta Warsawa. According to steel experts, this modern complex would cost $3-4 billion for a western company to build new. Several months ago, the Polish government agreed to assume the debts of Huta Warsawa, and to sell the debt-free enterprise to a Milan company, Lucchini, for $30 million!.

    Soros recruited his friend, Harvard University economist Jeffery Sachs, who had previously advised the Bolivian government in economic policy, leading to the takeover of that nation’s economy by the cocaine trade. To further his plan in Poland, Soros set up one of his numerous foundations, the Stefan Batory Foundation, the official sponsor of Sach’s work in Poland in 1989-90.

    Soros boasts, “I established close personal contact with Walesa’s chief adviser, Bronislaw Geremek. I was also received by [President Gen Wojciech] Jaruzelski, the head of State, to obtain his blessing for my foundation.” He worked closely with the eminence gris of Polish shock therapy, Witold Trzeciakowski, a shadow adviser to Finance Minister Leszek Balcerowicz. Soros also cultivated relations with Balcerowicz, the man who would first impose Sach’s shock therapy on Poland. Soros says when Walesa was elected President, that “largely because of western pressure, Walesa retained Balcerowicz as minister.” Balcerowicz imposed a freeze on wages while industry was to be bankrupted by a cutoff of state credits. Industrial output fell by more than 30% over two years.

    Soros admits he knew in advance that his shock therapy would cause huge unemployment, closing of factories, and social unrest. For this reason, he insisted that Solidarnosc be brought into the government, to help deal with the unrest. Through the Batory Foundation, Soros coopted key media opinion makers such as Adam Michnik, and through cooperation with the U.S. Embassy in Warsaw, imposed a media censorship favorable to Soros’s shock therapy, and hostile to all critics.

    Russia and the Community of Independent States (CIS): Soros headed a delegation to Russia, where he had worked together with Raisa Gorbachova since the late 1980s, to establish the Cultural Initiative Foundation. As with his other “charitable foundations,” this was a tax-free vehicle for Soros and his influential Western friends to enter the top policymaking levels of the country, and for tiny sums of scarce hard currency, but up important political and intellectual figures. After a false start under Mikhail Gorbachov in 1988-91, Soros shifted to the new Yeltsin circle. It was Soros who introduced Jeffery Sachs and shock therapy into Russia, in late 1991. Soros describes his effort: “I started mobilizing a group of economists to take to the Soviet Union (July 1990). Professor Jeffery Sachs, with whom I had worked in Poland, was ready and eager to participate. He suggested a number of other participants: Romano Prodi from Italy; David Finch, a retired official from the IMF [International Monetary Fund]. I wanted to include Stanley Fischer and Jacob Frenkel, heads of research of the World Bank and IMF, respectively; Larry Summers from Harvard and Michael Bruno of the Central Bank of Israel.”

    Since Jan. 2, 1992, shock therapy has introduced chaos and hyperinflation into Russia. Irreplaceable groups from advanced scientific research institutes have fled in pursuit of jobs in the West. Yegor Gaidar and the Yeltsin government imposed draconian cuts in state spending to industry and agriculture, even though the entire economy was state-owned. A goal of a zero deficit budget within three months was announced. Credit to industry was ended, and enterprises piled up astronomical debts, as inflation of the ruble went out of control.

    The friends of Soros lost no time in capitalizing on this situation. Marc Rich began buying Russian aluminum at absurdly cheap prices, with his hard currency. Rich then dumped the aluminum onto western industrial markets last year, causing a 30% collapse in the price of the metal, as western industry had no way to compete. There was such an outflow of aluminum last year from Russia, that there were shortages of aluminum for Russian fish canneries. At the same time, Rich reportedly moved in to secure export control over the supply of most West Siberian crude oil to western markets. Rich’s companies have been under investigation for fraud in Russia, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal of May 13, 1993.

    Another Soros silent partner who has moved in to exploit the chaos in the former Soviet Union, is Shaul Eisenberg. Eisenberg, reportedly with a letter of introduction from then-European Bank chief Jacques Attali, managed to secure an exclusive concession for textiles and other trade in Uzbekistan. When Uzbek officials confirmed defrauding of the government by Eisenberg, his concessions were summarily abrogated. The incident has reportedly caused a major loss for Israeli Mossad strategic interests throughout the Central Asian republics.

    Soros has extensive influence in Hungary. When nationalist opposition parliamentarian Istvan Csurka tried to protest what was being done to ruin the Hungarian economy, under the policies of Soros and friends, Csurka was labeled an “anti-Semite,” and in June 1993, he was forced out of the governing Democratic Forum, as a result of pressure from Soros-linked circles in Hungary and abroad, including Soros’s close friend, U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos.

    Lighting the Balkan Fuse

    In early 1990, in what was then still Yugoslavia, Soros’s intervention with shock therapy, in cooperation with the IMF, helped light the economic fuse that led to the outbreak of war in June 1991. Soros boasted at that time, “Yugoslavia is a particularly interesting case. Even as national rivalries have brought the country to the verge of a breakup, a radical monetary stabilization program, which was introduced on the same date as in Poland—January 1, 1990—–has begun to change the political landscape. The program is very much along the Polish lines, and it had greater initial success. By the middle of the year, people were beginning to think Yugoslav again.”

    Soros is friends with former Deputy Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger, the former U.S. ambassador to Belgrade and the patron of Serbian Communist leader Slobodan Milosevic. Eagleburger is a past president of Kissinger Associates, on whose board sits Lord Carrington, whose Balkan mediations supported Serbian aggression into Croatia and Bosnia.

    Today, Soros has established his Foundation centers in Bosnia, Croatia, Slovenia, and a Soros Yugoslavia Foundation in Belgrade, Serbia. In Croatia, he has tried to use his foundation monies to woo influential journalists or to slander opponents of his shock therapy, by labeling them variously “anti-Semitic” or “neo-Nazi.” The head of Soros’s Open Society Fund—Croatia, Prof. Zarko Puhovski, is a man who has reportedly made a recent dramatic conversion from orthodox Marxism to Soros’s radical free market. Only seven years ago, according to one of his former students, as professor of philosophy at the University of Zagreb, Puhovski attacked students trying to articulate a critique of communism, by insisting, “It is unprincipled to criticize Marxism from a liberal standpoint.” His work for the Soros Foundation in Zagreb has promoted an anti-nationalist “global culture,” hiring a network of anti-Croatian journalists to propagandize, in effect, for the Serbian cause.

    These examples can be elaborated for each of the other 19 locations across eastern Europe where George Soros operates. The political agenda of Soros and this group of financial “globalists” will create the conditions for a new outbreak of war, even world war, if it continues to be tolerated.

    freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2626002/posts

    ———————————–

    Soros Makes a Move to Control Global Police Forces
    This is off the charts. It looks like billionaire George Soros is getting serious about controlling current global turmoil. It appears he is getting ready to influence, if not control, global police forces. NYT reports:

    On Wednesday, George Soros, the billionaire investor, is expected to name Christopher Stone, a well-known expert on criminal justice, the new leader of his unconventional philanthropic empire.

    Mr. Stone, a professor at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, will fully take the helm in July of the Open Society Foundations, a sprawling constellation of more than 30 organizations that operate in places as diverse as Baltimore, Jakarta, the Kremlin and Congress.
    Just what does “expert on criminal justice” mean? Get a load of this, from NYT (my emphasis):

    Mr. Stone built National Defender while at the Vera Institute for Justice, a nonprofit group that works to improve justice systems, where he eventually rose to become chief executive for 10 years. He expanded Vera’s international programs, working with national governments in South Africa, Russia and Chile and developing a reputation as an expert on the professionalization of police forces.

    “Police chiefs will confide in him, and at the same time, he can convene meetings of people from the grass-roots civil-rights community and command the same kind of respect,” said Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for civil rights in the Justice Department and an old friend.
    Yikes. How much does Soros spend on his hobby of trying to control the world? NYT provides an answer:

    Mr. Soros has never endowed his collection of foundations, but he often gives away enough money in a year to make Open Society the most generous philanthropy in the country after the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This year, for example, it is on track to give away about $860 million.

    economicpolicyjournal.com/2011/12/soros-makes-move-to-control-global.html

    ———————————–

    Another billionaire Mossad agent in the news:

    Billionaire Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan exposed as a Mossad agent – smuggled nuclear trigger devices and other equipment to Israel.

    From Yahoo News:
    New biography says Hollywood producer worked as Israeli spy, arms dealer

    The Hollywood producer of such films as “Pretty Woman,” “Fight Club,” and the flick that brought Brangelina together “Mr. & Mrs. Smith,” also helped send nuclear trigger devices and other equipment to aid Israel’s nuclear program, according to a new biography.

    Milchan was a longtime weapons dealer and Israeli intelligence agent who purchased equipment for the alleged Israeli nuclear program, a new biography –["Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon Arnon Milchan"] — claims. [...]

    Milchan’s services to the Israeli security services have been made public before, but he has always denied or refused to acknowledge them. This is the first time Milchan confirms these claims, albeit indirectly.

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/confidential-biography-says-hollywood-producer-worked-israeli-spy-194534619.html

  76. michael colhaze's Gravatar michael colhaze
    January 26, 2012 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Sorry: another 4 % ALSO as Indo-Europeans

  77. January 26, 2012 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    oops sorry about the repeating sentences about the SOCO Foundation. I should have taken a moment and looked the post over.

  78. January 26, 2012 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    That is one eye-opening article by Madsen in putting the pieces together. What clinches it for me is the explanation why the protestors call themselves the ‘White Revolution’. Having more web windows open from leads by posters, I came upon a mention of a White Army, a counter-Bolshevik army that were czarist loyalists. I think this was also called the White Revolution, though I’d have to go back and re-check. In any event, the case is made for me from Madsen’s analysis that what is going on with ‘protests’ about ‘rigged elections’ (and his insight into what Putin was *really* saying when he first saw the color) is first of all a ‘themed’ revolution, and second of all the hidden links to, of all places, the Republic of Georgia via an HIV/AIDS prevention thing (is there a big HIV/AIDS problem in Russia and the Northern Caucasus[ region. I really have no idea), and Georgia’s First Lady Sandra Roloefs (Dutch), along with a women’s reproductive rights foundation (The SOCO Foundation in Tbilisi), founded by Roloefs and receives funding from Soros, and SOCOs bank account located in Roloefs’ home town in the Netherlands.

    Conveniently, SOCO’s bank account is at the ABN AMRO Bank in Terneuzen, Netherlands, Roloef’s hometown.

    The SOCO Foundation in Tbilisi, which claims to champion women’s reproductive rights, was founded by Roloefs and receives funding from Soros.

    Conveniently, SOCO’s bank account is at the ABN AMRO Bank in Terneuzen, Netherlands, Roloef’s hometown.

    Apparently, the Soros end of these entirely Machiavellian twists and turns has deluded the youth of Circassian descent (someone mentioned being Circassian-American, so I opened yet another window) into following another Western thing of ‘recognizing genocides’ with goal – what? – apologies? — in this case the genocide of the Circassiasn people way back when by the Russians. Madsen mentions the name of the conference: ” Georgia sponsored, with CIA, Soros, and MI-6 funds, a conference titled ‘Hidden Nations, Enduring Crimes: The Circassians and the People of the North Caucasus Between Past and Future.’ ”

    This whole phenomena of digging up distant past wars and who did what to who and demanding apologies and probably ‘reparations’ always struck me as suspicious. But I would trust your word on it, Ivan, to set me straight on this one. It just strikes me this is how young people are diverted from things that are REALLY GOING ON in this world, as none of them seem to notice how mind-controlled they often appear, meaning everywhere.

  79. michael colhaze's Gravatar michael colhaze
    January 26, 2012 - 3:17 pm | Permalink

    As a sensible precaution the accuracy of my piece, or my credibility in general, should be swallowed with a pinch of the proverbial salt. A slightly redeming titbit might be the fact that I live in the former USSR, though not in Moscow proper. My Russian is indeed rudimentary, but since my lovely Russian wife holds an MA in English, I manage to get by. As to Russia being a multi-tribal federation, I have never denied it. Yet we should keep an eye on proportionalities. The last census (2010) defines 81 % of the population as ethnic Rusians, another 4 % as Indo-Europeans, and only 15% as a conglomerat of about 160 different tribes, the largest being Tartars and the smallest a few hundred Aleute Eskimos who probably think that the Kremlin is situated somewhere on the moon.
    Furthermore, if it were true that this journal’s raison d’etre is a subtle but undifferentiated Anti-semitism, as sometimes insinuated, I wouldn’t write for it. The Editor’s Mission Statement makes unequivocally clear what our objectives exactly entail. There are firebrands like Cirian who profess, as so many decent people, to be generally and profoundly disgusted by Jewish machinations. Yet I believe her to have a good heart, and thus be capable to separate the chaff from the wheat if ever the need should arise.
    The essential drift of my piece is, I think, quite easy to make out for anybody with a clear mind and honest intentions.

  80. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 26, 2012 - 1:41 pm | Permalink

    Wayne Madsen has a plausible, in my view, explanation of why Putin has dubbed the organizers of the protest “condom revolutionaries”

    Putin : Protesters Are Receiving Their Funding From The West

  81. ps79's Gravatar ps79
    January 26, 2012 - 12:10 pm | Permalink

    Our Innocents Abroad? By Patrick J. Buchanan

    “In December, Vladimir Putin claimed that hundreds of millions of dollars, mostly from U.S. sources, was funneled into his country to influence the recent election, and that Hillary Clinton’s denunciation of the results was a signal for anti-Putin demonstrators to take to Moscow’s streets.”

    IRAN / GEORGE SOROS / FAREED ZAKARIA !

  82. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 26, 2012 - 11:17 am | Permalink

    Geiseric,

    There is no doubt in my mind that you are a smart fellow, but I don’t like the way you twist things around. I could be wrong, but it looks to me as a deliberate effort.

    I did not claim that the Russians have not participated in that ride. Yes, they did – some of them, a tiny minority, shared the looting of the country with the Jews (how many Russian oligarchs can you name, as opposed to Jewish ones?), and the vast majority of the rest participated in that ride as dupes. It was no accident that Gogol famously remarked: Russia has two problems: fools and bad roads

  83. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 26, 2012 - 10:41 am | Permalink

    Ivan writes:

    There is a growing realization in Russia than they have been taken for a ride.

    There is some truth in your comments, but it is a grotesque exaggeration to claim that the Russians have not participated in that ride. Sure, much of organized crime has been associated with ethnic minorities. But this fact does not change the fundamentals, i.e. the complicity of Russians in their own history – from bottom up. The average Russian is not a law abiding citizen in the Weberian sense, as suggested by Colhaze. This has also been a recurring issue in Russian literature, at least since the days of Gogol.

  84. Less IQ than a Jew's Gravatar Less IQ than a Jew
    January 26, 2012 - 10:25 am | Permalink

    At all levels — global consciousness, governments, societies, and especially every person within himself — the question is asked belatedly what’s to be done – Jean Raspail
    http://www.mnforsustain.org/camp_of_the_saints_bookreview_taylor_sj.htm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Raspail
    All of Europe marches to its death. – Jean Raspail
    http://foster.20megsfree.com/542.htm ”The Fatherland Betrayed by The Republic” by Jean Raspail in “Le Figaro” magazine (France, June 17, 2004)
    Programmed Christian guilt and clever anti-White baying of the hounds has cast its web over all the European races. If White racists do not somehow create a million virulent White racists with an IQ of 140, IMHO the game is over. If you are less intelligent than your enemies and parasites, then your future is bleak.

  85. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 26, 2012 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    Geiseric writes:

    First, Russia is, and has always been, multicultural. Second, crime rates have skyrocketed since the late 1980s.

    This is true as far as it goes. But, first, multiculturalism of Russia is not the same thing as multiculturalism of America. In Russia you have multiculturalism of NATIVE peoples who lived there for thousands of years. In America, there is no single culture older than few hundred years; the only NATIVE culture – that of American NATIVE people’s – has been destroyed with the carriers of that culture. Second, crime rates have skyrocketed since, and because of, the Jewish takeover of the country – not because of criminal nature of the Russian or any other native peoples of the land.

    Marianne has a point when she writes:

    The biggest criminal superpower power at the moment is a Judeo-Anglo-American (USA) Empire with its main centres in New York and City of London and, of course, Israel. It is this entity that is waging wars on all fronts and spreading moral filth, degradation and Godlessness through its corrupt media and totally decadent culture.

    There is a growing realization in Russia than they have been taken for a ride. Those here who speak Russian, listen what General K.P.Petrov, former deputy director of the Baikonur Cosmodrome, had to say about that:

    What is happening to our country

  86. January 26, 2012 - 8:12 am | Permalink

    Geiseric, you have written a lot of non-sense. By the way, do you know Russian?

    The biggest criminal superpower power at the moment is a Judeo-Anglo-American (USA) Empire with its main centres in New York and City of London and, of course, Israel. It is this entity that is waging wars on all fronts and spreading moral filth, degradation and Godlessness through its corrupt media and totally decadent culture. Someone has to be completely stupid or brainwashed or the Judeo-Anglo-American Empire’s secret agent to ignore this obvious reality

  87. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 26, 2012 - 6:19 am | Permalink

    Colhaze writes:

    Until you realize with quiet surprise that what you feel is peace. Or more precisely, a general absence of the usual tensions and apprehensions that beset you, consciously or subconsciously, in most Western cities with a multi-cultural background. Here nobody misbehaves.

    This is one of several misleading reports from Mr. Colhaze. First, Russia is, and has always been, multicultural. Second, crime rates have skyrocketed since the late 1980s. Russia is a criminal superpower, exporting organized crime to all Western European countries. Russia is the homeland of political terrorism and anarchism, phenomena that have deep roots in the Russian mindset. In Mr. Colhaze’s version, Russia consists of millions of law abiding citizens. In the real world, Russia is profoundly anarchistic, amoral and degenerate in its own way.

  88. January 26, 2012 - 5:51 am | Permalink

    @Ciaran:

    I was going to give you an answer about why a ‘Jewess’ was teaching Latin at a Catholic boys academy. But from your repugnant sneers and questioning ‘why’ I am here (which I have already explained), and I certainly have NOT been rhapsodizing about ‘poor innocent Jews’, but you chose to frame it that way, that I decided you are not worth a response as to why a “Jewess” taught Latin at a Catholic boys academy in your attempt to begin leading me around by the nose.

    I am not going to get into a childish name-calling contest with you. I can see by your posts you are the epitome of closed-mindedness anyway. If I am to listen to you and be forced to hate this group or that, I need sound reasons for hating and ones that don’t contradict my personal experiences. OTOH, I have posted that I understand FULLY the nature of organized Jewry and how that works and the current ideas about Holocaustianity. So don’t go twisting things I am ‘rhapsodizing’ about the Jews.

    I suggest you give a listen to Kevin MacDonald’s interview a couple of times. He’s a Professor of Psychology and hence understands the concept of Balance.

    This conversation with you is ended.

  89. Free Thinker's Gravatar Free Thinker
    January 26, 2012 - 3:09 am | Permalink

    Thanks for this interesting article . Being a liberal conservative I can’t agree with a few of your points but in these desperate times lets us not quibble (please) .
    What the ‘Jews’ did to Russia is so evil and so amazing in its stupendous hypocrisy that for all the gentiles of the world , it registers as a blank (maintained by the MSM) . How can people be so dishonest ? So throughly throughly dishonest ? I think as Bro Kapper (I donated $100 to his cause) has described from his own youth , it starts at Jewish Schools–but I suppose its a circular affair .
    ‘When Victims Rule’ they rule with utter intolerance , and that intolerance is being imposed enforce and monitored by the SS , the Surveillance State . Who else could have driven society into this narrow corner (with the help of the useful idiots of course )? If its good for us it must be honest and true ! For gods chosen people only want whats good for all of humanity and if it doesn’t work out (USSR ) , then there must be something wrong with YOU ! Sociopathic it sounds like .

    I watch the PBS of USA, anti-Putin big ‘production’ yesterday , making one of Soro’s worms out to be an underground hero : Sleeping on camp beds in abandoned buildings with his gizmo’s and techno-savvy , fighting the good fight ” Yes , it’s frightening , but freedoms worth it ” as he furtively looks out the window with infra red googles . The host had a look of doubt after ” But now onto issues in the News….” The same none-sense is puked up on Australia television if I watched it .(PBs was just a curiosity ; recorded for editing at my discretion .) Interesting to have a look at the American Zeitgeist psyche in the faces of the people . Wow , you Yanks never looked pissed off and always so polite , except ofcouse at latest MSM bogey man . And the Presidental Candidates : gee , its like a quiz contest ! Which looser will ‘they’ choose ? A puffed up mannequin to be trampled on by the Black Puppet :-) . [No offence intended friends , little Australia also has a list of fools and actors strutting their hour apon the stage ( if I was looking ) . The MSM the problems and why I don’t feed it with my attention . Did that make sense ?
    These schemes of our wicked masters grows week by week , with the inversion of reality and truth .

  90. kyle's Gravatar kyle
    January 26, 2012 - 12:59 am | Permalink

    @Ciaran: Well it’s a fair point that not every last Jew is some terrible person. How could they be? In populations of millions of people, you have variation, some better, some worse. This doesn’t change the fact that when Jews join a society, they tend to be bad for it, overall. But everyone who has been around Jews will know some pleasant ones, as you yourself have. I think it gives us more credibility when we express ourselves in ways that are consistent with the experiences everyone has.

    Most people know there are some Jews who are decent people, but at the same time they know that as an ethnic group, they have acted against our interests. It’s just the truth.

    They used to say something similar about blacks in the South: Southerners actually tended to like blacks as individuals, but feared/distrusted them as a group, due to crime and violence.

  91. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    January 26, 2012 - 12:45 am | Permalink

    @Bluerose: Why is a Jewess teachng in a Catholic school?

  92. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    January 26, 2012 - 12:13 am | Permalink

    @Bluerose: Jews are ALWAYS Jews. Your bosses – BOSSES – did oyu ever boss them – may have been kind to you, and pleasant. I’ve known and liked many individual Jews in my lifelime – but being Jewish comes first for Jews.

    Being WHITE comes FIRST for me. I an not bloody interested in being “fair to Jews” at ALL. . My ONLY concern is what is Good for the White.

    Got it?

    Why are you here rhapsodizing about the poor, sweet innocent Jews?

  93. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 25, 2012 - 11:48 pm | Permalink

    Slavic nucleus of the Russian Federation will not go extinct, if it upholds the Russian state, arrests degenerative Jewish influence in mass media, revives its religious roots, and lives in peace and harmony with all other native peoples of the federation.

  94. Henry Bath's Gravatar Henry Bath
    January 25, 2012 - 10:59 pm | Permalink

    The protest signs are in English. Are they photoshopped or is this only a protest in the trendy and gentrified English part of Moscow?

  95. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 25, 2012 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

    @I v a n:

    What’s going to become of the Russian Federation when its Slavic nucleus goes extinct?

  96. I v a n's Gravatar I v a n
    January 25, 2012 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

    There is one very important thing that the author of this article, and those who call themselves white nationalists (a meaningless notion) do not seem to understand: There is no Russia. There is The Russian Federation. Before that was The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Before that was The Russian Empire. “Russia” was, and still is, a big chunk of land, populated with over a hundred of NATIVE peoples who form a NATION. Vladimir Putin, a Russian patriot, understands that very well, you don’t. Alexander Prokhanov, a well-known Russian writer and patriot who said: Dagestanis saved Russian statehood when they refused to join forces with fooled Chechens and fought them back during the years of great chaos of the second Jewish takeover of Russian state known as Perestroika, understands that very well, you don’t. Rasul Gamzatov, a Dagestani poet who said: Dagestan did not join the Russian Empire voluntarily and it will not leave Russian state of it’s own accord, understands that very well, you don’t. I, a Circassian-American, understand that very well, you don’t.

    “Russia for Russians”, “Caucasus for Caucasians” are an explosive slogans that have the potential of demolishing the Russian statehood. That’s why you see the black-yellow-white Russian nationalist flags flying in that protest farce which was organized by local Jewish activists and funded by Jew-controled Western powers.

    The former KGBist Putin understands all that very well, you don’t.

    Btw, KGB means State Security Committee: Putin’s job is to secure the state of the Russian Federation. And he is doing a good job.

  97. January 25, 2012 - 9:13 pm | Permalink

    @Ciaran:

    Incidentally, Ciaran, a quick lesson for the white gentiles in regard to child-rearing.

    The secretary in my position before me was a Jewish lady who formerly taught Latin at a Catholic academy, before Latin sort of phased out (unfortunately imo). Such a position sounded totally idyllic.

    But she was telling me of her childhood that she never, never, ever had a toy to play with, but was always given an abundance of love and affection. I said surely not, surely you had a least a doll? She said, no, not even a doll. I said, my experience was the opposite: I had all the toys I wanted, but no love, no shows of affection.

    Do you think there’s a lesson in the story of her upbringing? She was, by the way, a top-notch secretary for the little group, and try however as I might, could never hold a candle to her secretarial skills. And I don’t know Latin.

  98. January 25, 2012 - 8:52 pm | Permalink

    @Ciaran:

    Um, yes I Capiche. And I understand what you are saying about the Jews.

    Since you ask, no, I am not Jewish, but brought up Roman Catholic and went to a Roman Catholic elementary school with the Sisters of St. Joseph (with the black habits), during the time when the Mass was The Mass, with alter, and not the pick-nick tables that replaced them. Non-practicing, but I’ve always loved the mystical end of what once was the Faith.

    As to the Jews, without giving you my life story, I can only say it’s not so easy for me to simply hate ‘all Jews’. I worked with Jews for 30 years — scientists. My Jewish boss and another professor were always concerned why I didn’t go to Church, and the prof once even made me call a priest at a church to ask him how the Church calculated what day Easter would come on. I totally balked, but did it. It’s based on the position of the Moon, a similar thing the Jews do with their holidays. Anyway, I felt the prof wanted me to call the priest just to get me to talk to one. It was touching, you know? The Jewish prof always asked me questions about Catholicism, and he never hesitated to answer my questions about Judaism. All in all, my experiences with working with Jewish scientists and intellectuals — well, I could not but help seeing them as decent people, refined and cultured, good sense of humor, etc. So it’s difficult for me to simply hate ‘all Jews’.

    I always felt something surely must be lacking in the gentile and/or white world if, as it appears in these times, Jews ‘run the world’. I always thought why blame the Jews because they place a very high value on education and bring up their children to go into professions and live decent lives? If the Jews managed to climb to such a high status that the gentiles say they are ‘running the world’, where was the white gentile world at the time? Asleep? Or watching football games, hanging out in bars, or what? Why could not the white gentile world LEARN SOMETHING about child-rearing at least, to where nothing but a value of higher education is inculcated in their offspring?

    Now, when I speak of these sorts of Jews, I do not mean the Marxist/Communist/Bolshevik Jews. But bear in mind, all young people, gentile or not, go through stages of rebellion against the System. These leftist Jews simply took it seriously, as opposed to gentiles who rebel by taking drugs and running after frivolous things and wasting their youth.

    I simply never saw my ex-Jewish boss and the various scientific Jewish professors all seeking to tear down the Cross and whatever else they are accused of. IMO people that hate ‘all Jews’ simply never had the opportunity to work with highly intellectual ones, and dialog with them. They were always very open and balanced in their views. I really think people that go about hating ‘all Jews’ are simply doing themselves a disservice. Since apparently the ‘gentile world’ is so inept and ‘lost control of the world’, the gentile world could at least learn something from at least some Jews. Hell, gentiles don’t even see each other as ‘brothers, and even the blacks call each other that, and ‘sisters’ too. But countering the Jewish survival strategy, my observation is not all Jews go along with the pack. Some are very individualistic themselves, who are not practicing Jews by any means, and believe in the right to bear arms, and to simply lead their lives. Some of these people could well be your neighbors and you might talk with them daily and not be aware they happen to be Jews.

    I don’t know. I’m just in a quandary when it comes to the Jewish question. However I have learned much about the ‘hidden tentacles’ and all. And I do see their survival strategy in their entire system of interlocking Jewish organizations. I can’t help but wonder why the gentiles and/or whites could not have done the same all along.

    Now it seems just a little too late, but that is why I read TOO, to see if it isn’t too late.

  99. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 25, 2012 - 7:48 pm | Permalink

    I find it a bit rich that Russians complain of non-assimilation of ethnic minorities when they will not abide secession of Chechnya, etc. It seems forgotten that over one third of that ethnic group lost their lives at Stalin’s hands.

    And what is it with this Putin love? I mean the guy’s ex-KGB, and like Bush Senior, has got blood splattered all over him.

    You can either have your people or empire, but not both.

  100. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 25, 2012 - 7:30 pm | Permalink

    Bakunin:
    “The State has always been the patrimony of some privileged class or other; a priestly class, an aristocratic class, a bourgeois class, and finally a bureaucratic class…. But in the People’s State of Marx, there will be, we are told, no privileged class at all … but there will be a government, which will not content itself with governing and administering the masses politically, as all governments do today, but which will also administer them economically, concentrating in its own hands the production and the just division of wealth, the cultivation of land, the establishment and development of factories, the organization and direction of commerce, finally the application of capital to production by the only banker, the State. All that will demand an immense knowledge and many “heads overflowing with brains” in this government. It will be the reign of scientific intelligence, the most aristocratic, despotic, arrogant, and contemptuous of all regimes. There will be a new class, a new hierarchy of real and pretended scientists and scholars.”

    I’m with Fender, here. And what is syphilitic about anarchism or opposition to the State, anyway? It is statism/parasitism that has no moral defense.

  101. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    January 25, 2012 - 7:20 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Colhaze – I love you. I just adore your writing style. It’s bliss to read your articles.

    Regarding the content of this article – I have no idea what is happening in Russia – Russia is a mytery within a mystery. I was informed, years ago, that the Matryoshka dolls are eblemetic of the nature of Russia.

    I will hold to the wisdom of the Christ; ye shall know them by their fruits.

    Putin is not perfect – but who is? As Edward noted, Putin seems far more Nationalistic than any other European (but I’ll subsitute “White”) leader. And I did wonder why all the “Russian” protest signs are in English….

  102. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    January 25, 2012 - 7:11 pm | Permalink

    @Bluerose: I think it’s way past time to contemplate, or chide the “hating of all Jews” – but rather to have agreat big wide-open, HONESY discussion, as to why Jewsish leadership so consistently fosters hatred, malice, and malevolence against every Gentile host population Jews have ever subverted. No other ethny has this consistent record. Human groups war constantly, but Jews are absolutely singular in generating animosity and loathing everywhere they go.

    Speaking as a White Gentile – I think my people and culture, have ben critiqued, as well as been insulted, slandered, demonized and persecuted enough by Jews, and the minions, to last for a thousand years. Are you Jewish, Blue Rose? The so-called Conservative Jews, that think along the same lines as the writers and possters here-in, NEVER seen to weild any influence what-so-ever, amongt the powerful and influential Jews that seem to be Hell-bent and I do mean HELL BENT on exterminating the White Race.

    I am not going to spend on single second worrying aobut the decent Conservative Jews, until I SEE and EXPERIENCE what they can do for ME, and MY RACE.

    Capiche?

  103. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    January 25, 2012 - 6:45 pm | Permalink

    I agree with Russian Correspondent above: Mr. Colhaze’s article is misleading. Mr. Colhaze has misunderstood the whole situation in Russia, not to mention certain peculiarities associated with Russian mentality and culture. Colhaze needs to sober up, learn the Russian language and go native for a while. Then we’ll see what he has to say…

  104. Mike's Gravatar Mike
    January 25, 2012 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    Bakunin the Russian anarchist was no lunatic. Maybe he was a dreamer, fantast or out of this world. In his book “God and the state” he said there are two things that spoils men completely: Money and power. So he proposed to remove power and money. During all his life he was fighting for his ideas. There was no revolution all over Europe he wouldn’t take part. As long we was not serving prison terms. He soon realized that the ideas of Karl Marx would bring a new system of suppression and said so. He anticipated what Marxism would bring to the world. That’ s why the communists still hate him this very day.

    I basically agree with this article, but leave Bakunin out. He’s got nothing to do with George Soros and his likeminded.

  105. Redcorona's Gravatar Redcorona
    January 25, 2012 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

    Yes. Yes and Yes. I like all three of your Colhaze’s proactive strategies.

    And on our end we would be wise to encourage our awakened to learn Russian.

  106. Russian Correspondent's Gravatar Russian Correspondent
    January 25, 2012 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

    @GREZCM:
    Its a damn long story. I will try to write an article on that.

  107. eugen's Gravatar eugen
    January 25, 2012 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    I feel the same way as Bluenose about the article. However, one point in the always literate and incisive Mr. Colhaze’s piece I can personally attest to. When I was in Russia some years ago I spent time with two young Russians, Yuri and Igor. Their English was better than that of many of my American college students, especially Yuri’s, who also spoke German. They showed off a bit, arguing in front of me as to whether Hemingway or Faulkner was the greater writer–a discussion that would have been totally unintelligible to most all American college students. I came away with great respect for the Russian educational system, and even for Soviet education, ideology aside.

  108. GREZCM's Gravatar GREZCM
    January 25, 2012 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

    @Russian Correspondent:
    How sad to meet a correspondent who has no time to write, or post links either.

  109. January 25, 2012 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Ah. Bakunin was a gentile. Wish that post had come in before I sent mine. I would have omitted my entire Jewish thing, as not relevant. Oh well. Whatever.

  110. January 25, 2012 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    The writing style of this article is very good, nice use of turns of phrases and all. At first I was inclined to believe every word of it. But after reading the first two comments, now I’m not sure.

    I was puzzled by the recent protests and cries of ‘election fraud’ that seemed to now have come to Russia, the last place I thought I’d see that combination, if only because it is such a ‘Western thing’ these days. I don’t have time to investigate minutely the politics of every country on Earth (one gets sick of it all at times), so I’ll be very interested in reading the comments to see what’s what.

    I never heard of Bakunin the Russian anarchist or the other, Boris Akunin, the mystery writer. and I know there is a great deal of animosity towards ‘all Jews’ on TOO, but I’d like to just humbly point out that there are conservative Jews who think along the very same lines as nationalists here, who write thoughtful and insightful articles against immigration, the destruction of mores and ethics in the culture, against Obama, Soros and the entire Left. It seems to me that blindly hating ‘all Jews’, in the manner that so many seem to do, is self-destructive and a hindrance that leads to alienating people (conservative, rightist-leaning Jews) who share the exact same views of the state of Society and the causes of all its ills — meaning mass immigration, the Left, the gays, abortion and the whole ball of wax. I realize, of course, behind it all is this major issue of ‘Holocaustianity’, and the bombings of Dresden and the other city, certainly deplorable and a good enough reason for the hatred (by the TOO crowd and others) along with their expressed reasons behind why it happened.

    Well, I guess I said my two cents, and will probably wish I hadn’t, but I will look forward to all the comments regarding the article and the situation in Russia.

  111. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    January 25, 2012 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Bakunin was the gentile Atheist true believer in communism who unsuccessfully contested for control of the movement with Karl Marx, whom Bakunin considered an agent of Jewish capitalism. He was sometimes supported by non-capitalist Jews who ostensibly shared his views.

    Putin certainly plays the PC game, but he is more nationalist than almost any other European leader.

  112. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    January 25, 2012 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Great article, shame you couldn’t report on the crowds of happy children and the replacement level birth rate.

  113. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 25, 2012 - 1:41 pm | Permalink

    Mikhail Bakunin was no lunatic. He was one of the few high-profile Russian political thinkers to outright say that communism was a Jewish plot to subjugate Russia with the help of their capitalist pals on Wall Street. While many Russian intellectuals were duped by the tribe, Bakunin saw right through them.

    “”I feel myself always the patriot of all oppressed fatherlands. . . Nationality. . . is a historic, local fact which, like all real and harmless facts, has the right to claim general acceptance. . . Every people, like every person, is involuntarily that which it is and therefore has a right to be itself. . . Nationality is not a principle; it is a legitimate fact, just as individuality is. Every nationality, great or small, has the incontestable right to be itself, to live according to its own nature. This right is simply the corollary of the general principal of freedom.”

    Does that sound like a lunatic?

    Also, Vladimir Putin is no friend of the Russian people. Under his leadership, Muslims have accounted for about a quarter of the Russian army, and the number is increasing rapidly. He has done nothing to halt non-Slavic immigration into Russia and he has repeatedly denounced “racism” and nationalism.

  114. Russian Correspondent's Gravatar Russian Correspondent
    January 25, 2012 - 12:20 pm | Permalink

    I am very sorry to say this, but the article is woefully uninformed and misleading about the December events and about the personalities of importance. Unfortunately I have no time to write a detailed article but I can provide a verbal account for someone really interested in details of the situation in Russian opposition and about political affairs in Russia in general. Ask Kevin for my contacts.

1 Trackback to "Protest Farce"

  1. on January 25, 2012 at 4:04 pm

Comments are closed.