“Never let the facts get in the way of a good story” – Mark Twain
On the 22nd of July 2011, shortly before Anders Behring Breivik murdered 77 people in Norway, I became one of the ‘fortunate’ four Dutch persons to have unsolicitedly received Breivik’s manifesto. It was his ‘Declaration of Independence’, which he had forwarded to thousands of people; the Dutch media claim there were only 1001 addressees, but there were several thousand).
The following 9 months I was unable to explain why I received this increasingly extremist, aggressively neoconservative manifesto. It is true that, since 1991 I had been writing anti-immigration and pro-Afrikaner articles and essays. But my articles were rather paleoconservative and mainly written in Dutch and Afrikaans. Did Breivik read Dutch? Afrikaans? I had never heard of this person, who also went by the pseudonym Andrew Berwick. Until the moment when Norwegian newspapers started sending me e-mails, I did not realise that the enigmatic Norwegian mass murderer had sent me the e-mail.
Only recently, when I finally felt emotionally capable of paying more attention to his lengthy compendium, did I read in the Preface that I must be a Facebook friend of his, or a friend of a Facebook friend of his, if I received it from himself. The latter must have been the case. Thank you.
At the same time, when on the 27th of July 2011 Breivik’s list of 1003 addressees was going viral, Dutch and Norwegian journalists started writing articles about four Dutch recipients, including me. Most journalists never contacted me. The handful of journalists that had actually gone to the trouble of calling or e-mailing me before they started writing newspaper articles about me, wanted explanations from me: “Why did you receive it?” “Surely you must agree with what he writes.” Although I had told them that I had only been able to read two pages of the manifesto (a section about the Frankfurt School caught my attention), one journalist from a local paper called me on the phone and repeatedly asked me what I thought of the manifesto, and if I agreed with Breivik’s analyses. He sounded irritated when I told him that I had yet not found any particular paragraph that I endorsed.
Instead, he asked me whether I would hypothetically endorse Breivik’s statements about Islam if I had read them. I replied that it is logically impossible to answer such a question, and added that I am in favour of an assimilation policy with regard to Muslims—certainly a moderate position (and one not at all in line with many anti-immigration organizations and publications, including TOO, that advocate repatriation and question the feasibility and desirability of assimilation of Muslims and other non-White immigrants). He then asked me whether I am a proponent of Apartheid, since an anti-fascist group had told him that I had joined a pro-Apartheid organisation in the 1990s. I replied that I have never been a proponent of Apartheid, even though I am interested in Afrikaners, and I added that I had joined the organisation when Apartheid was already abolished, so I could read and write articles which would mainly stressed the Dutch-Afrikaans link.
Those were too many nuances. The next day I read that I am a member of a pro-Apartheid organisation, that I am a right-wing extremist, and that the Dutch Anti-Fascist Collective knows a lot about me.
Guilt by association attempted.
My e-mail addresses are all over the internet, and on my web-site people can find my phone number. People can even read lots of articles written by me, in order to find out what my thoughts are on subjects like immigration and our heritage. Nevertheless, most of the newspaper articles about my having received this email were not about my ideas or articles, but were full of speculation that could easily have been prevented if they’d just have consulted me.
The journalists would instead consult antifascist research groups, whose members would operate under pseudonyms. I don’t like operating under a pseudonym, because I think you have to stand for your ideas. Besides, it’s a free country, or at least I thought it was. I never thought that people would make up things in order to make you fit into their worldviews about what right-wing extremists are supposed to be like. Freedom of speech is nice, but at your own risk.
That same morning I read in the national Trouw newspaper that I had recently been converted to Roman Catholicism. What’s more: I am a “bloody fanatic catholic” (verbatim), too, as one might expect from many converts. The article also claimed that I had been a Protestant, and I had threatened and offended Catholic priests. No wonder Breivik selected me as an addressee.
‘So you asked for it’, a logical conclusion would be: this is why Breivik chose you. After all, the idea that Breivik was motivated by Christian fanaticism fits very well into their world view.
I have always tried to remain considerate and fair to my opponents. I have been particularly worried about the increasingly indecent way that people treat each other in discussions on the Internet and in daily situations in the public domain. With abhorrence I notice how an increasing number of Dutch people are behaving in a hot-tempered fashion. In the privacy of their keyboards, people seem to forget about courtesy when they don’t immediately get what they want. So where did this false image of Marcel Bas as a hateful religious fanatic come from?
The answer is: guilt by association. In America, a good example when supporters of Israel emphasized that that David Duke and the Muslim Brotherhood supported Mearsheimer and Walt’s essay on the Israel Lobby.
In my case, the Trouw article also discussed two other Dutch recipients, who had – two years before – been converted to Catholicism. One of them had, indeed, been rough – not threatening – to a liberal Catholic priest on Twitter. They both wrote for a conservative Catholic magazine, and two years before that, all three of us were writing for a paleoconservative review.
This is how guilt by association works: you know two people and they know you; therefore all of you share exactly the same attitudes and opinions. Hence, you deserve to receive the manifesto of a Norwegian mass murderer.
I angrily wrote a letter to the editor-in-chief, and I demanded he publish it as a rectification. He refused to do that. Instead, he made the journalist — who had written the article anonymously — write me a reply in which she admitted her mistakes, albeit without any excuse from her side. The next day a brief rectification was published: “Marcel Bas is a self-confessed atheist, and he has not threatened priests.” Why “self-confessed”? Was it so hard to believe? Meanwhile I found out that one of the offended priests had copied and pasted the entire article on his web-site, without the correction. I had to ask him to at least include the rectification: I had never heard of the man before. And he had never heard of me, I presume. I thought it would be a good idea to cut these undesirable ties, to put it mildly.
That same day, the journalist who had written the article, offered to write an article about me that both of us would feel comfortable about. I refused: I wanted to have my letter to the editor published. She refused, and so did I. I was not inclined to supply her with information for another sensational article. It may have been a missed opportunity, but I was fed up with it all, and all I needed was peace of mind. I was too stressed and too appalled to work; I reported sick and I spent the afternoon writing my defence, hoping for the bad times to pass.
They did not. That afternoon, I received an e-mail from a journalist who had to finish writing an article about three of the recipients. The deadline was set … that same afternoon. The article would be printed the next day in all the county newspapers. I replied too late, as I was busy defending myself against earlier assertions.
The next day the county newspapers stated that I am a “self-confessed” atheist (that must have been taken from the Trouw newspaper). “’He is the most radical one of the three’, Jaap van Beek (a pseudonym) of the Antifascist Research Group says.” Then they mentioned my website, continuing to cite the Antifascist Research Group throughout the article: “Bas has ties with the radical right-wing Voorpost group and with the Orania Movement, which tries to establish autonomy for white Africans in South Africa.”
I was wondering why the ‘antifascists’ would make such a statement about me. Had they read my articles? Consequently, I asked the collective in an email why I was deemed most radical. The reply was: “Simply because you have been active for many years; longer than Breivik’s other two addressees had been active.” And he added: “Sometimes there is just not enough time to bring a nuance to a story.” I am sure I could have added some nuances. Really. There were some statements that are untrue or half-true. But I had to acknowledge that the ‘antifascists’ were representing the facts more exact way than the hack at the Trouw.
After that I heard on the radio a correspondent stating that of the three addressees of Breivik’s e-mail, I am the most radical one of the three, that I have ties with the radical right-wing Voorpost Group and with the Orania Movement, which tries to establish autonomy for White Africans in South Africa. Well copied!
I wrote a long email to the journalist of the county newspapers, stating that I don’t have ties with Voorpost: I happen to know two people who are involved in Voorpost. “But”, I wrote, “I always considered some elements within Voorpost too radical to my taste, and once I have delivered a speech on their congress about South Africa.”
I also wrote to the journalist that I don’t find Afrikaner autonomy important because Afrikaners are White; I find it important because the Dutch and Afrikaans languages and peoples are closely related. The Dutch and Afrikaners have many common ancestors, and we have a great part of our national history in common. The fact that Afrikaners are White is undeniable, and it is inherent to the definition of the ethnological definition of Afrikaner. But the colour of their skin doesn’t make their plight less alarming.
This version of the story was not interesting enough to the journalist. He needed another version. I was, however, exhausted and I left it for what it was.
These were but three cases of exaggeration, lies and half-truths that I have encountered in this short while. Friends, associates and colleagues were either not informed, indifferent or very understanding about the news reports and the effect they had on me.
The following week I was given the opportunity on national TV to tell about my impressions of Breivik as a person, about some of the ideas he has advocated and how I feel towards multiculturalism and whether I think that our civilisation is about to collapse.
After the interview was aired, some people in my direct vicinity — people who were not at all into politics or debates of that kind — wanted to hear my side of the story. Some even complimented me on the interview. There were people who told me that they appreciated that over the past years I had been writing and saying what they considered true but dangerous to express.
My family also supported me, although some were shocked about the way guilt by association works, and how the present politically charged climate could endanger me. Since 2003, our nation is severely polarised and overtly so. This is being caused and exacerbated by ongoing multicultural conflicts, loss of traditional units of society, lack of solidarity and lack of civility — the predictable costs of multiculturalism. Some people, family included, decided they no longer wanted to be ‘friends’ with me on social networks. They were afraid of being found ‘guilty’ too.
Both then and last year I was afraid: is my job still safe? I was even starting to feel guilty, so I thought it would be better to keep quiet about the whole incident. This was impossible, as it was in all the newspapers. Luckily, my boss at the time was a staunch supporter of freedom of speech — which is a less absolute right here than in the US — and to this day I am grateful to him for his support. Still, if I were to apply for a job elsewhere, I will surely hope that employers-to-be will trust my CV, and not use Google to find out about my “background” and find all these negative articles. Employers know: a search on Google might be more useful than a CV. Nevertheless, the calumnious articles about me no longer rank in the first seven places. It may only be a matter of time until the first Google page will not display such an article any longer.
True friends, family and colleagues were, overall, very supportive. In times like these, one gets to appreciate true friends. Even political opponents, who must have appreciated me for who I am, supported me and told me that I did not deserve this.
I must say that it seems to me that things are back to normal now. But for half a year after the Breivik-affair, fellow conservatives — people who must know what it is like to be a moral pariah — were the ones who let me down most. For a while I noticed that I had been shunned by people, even by those whom I would consider more radical than I. I decided to not be bothered by this and to continue what I had always done: read and write about things that I find important. Prior to the affair I had found a New Right (Nouvelle Droite) magazine in which my articles would be published. These people did not let me down.
Our paleoconservative reading group fell apart due to individuals being afraid of being under state scrutiny from now on, and I decided to not to ‘embarrass’ the others.
Five months after the events, a large Dutch conservative meeting was held, where conservatives were invited to discuss the effects of Breivik on the conservative discourse. The other two addressees and I were also invited. Later on, I was told that the meeting was partly organised to accuse me and the two other addressees of having extremist ideas. The plan was that one of the speakers would demonstrate that Breivik is the most extreme stage on the sliding scale of radical conservatism; we three were supposed to be at the penultimate stage on this sliding scale. With our articles we would lure healthy yet susceptible conservatives into Breivik’s lair. However, the speaker who was designated for this chore turned out to be appalled by this scenario and instead, defended us by denouncing ugly statements about us in a recently published pro-immigration book. After the meeting, we mainly chatted with this person, who must have wanted to get to know us better without assuming we were guilty by association.
Also, shortly after the events, I noticed that I was unable to discuss immigration or cultural issues with people whom I had not yet met, without being reminded of this ‘honour’ of receiving Breivik’s manifesto. Opponents on the Internet would notice that a good — yet always polite — discussion with me would focus on facts and arguments, so they would try to look for my name on Google to find out who I am. And then the Breivik link would be mentioned. That would be the end of the discussion, unless I really wanted it to continue.
There may be another media onslaught in December because of my latest initiative, which is connected to an allegedly racist detail of a custom associated with Saint Nicholas that is part of Dutch folklore. On the 5th of December we celebrate Saint Nicholas’ Day. According to Dutch (and French, Belgian, Luxemburg, German, Swiss) folklore Saint Nicholas is accompanied by one or more dark or black persons: Black Pete is his name. Only in the Netherlands and Belgium do these black persons resemble 17th-century Moors. According to Dutch activists and immigrants from the Antilles and Africa, the Black Pete character and the subordinate role he plays is a remnant of slavery days. Therefore, Black Pete should be coloured yellow, green or blue, or he should disappear. Some activists even claim that Black Pete is a sort of Blackface Minstrel: a character which people without expertise in transatlantic history have never heard of. My statement, however, is that Black Pete is much older than slavery days, and that he — like other black helpers of Saint Nicholas — dates back to pre-Christian times. Consequently, I give arguments for keeping this character in our folklore.
Clearly, as the Netherlands becomes increasingly multicultural there may be negative effects on the celebrations connected to this piece of folklore just as, in America, remembrances of Columbus Day are routinely used as vehicles for anti-White propaganda. If the media exposure focuses mainly on the contents of what I have written, there is a chance that the campaign against Saint Nicholas would be damaged. However, if media exposure focuses on me and the connection to Breivik, chances are that the St. Nicholas custom will be further blemished in the minds of the public. I suspect the latter alternative is far more likely.
Because of the power of the media, being a Breivik addressee will always be a blemish in the minds of most Dutch people. I am glad that I am involved with the New Right magazine TeKoS: which gives me the opportunity to publish my articles and essays in print.
A journalist, who wrote for the newspaper in my village, asked me if I lost faith in conservatism. “No, not at all”, I replied. And will I stop writing? “No. And if I notice that people are writing things about me that are incorrect, I will just object to it again.”
Today I can add, as a lesson, that if one wants to write things the left doesn’t like well and freely, I should continue doing what I did. Assuming that you can keep your job, things eventually blow over and you and your ideas are stronger for it.
But I have learned that I should not rely too much on people: maybe that is an even more conservative lesson than all my articles and essays together.
M.R. Bas (b. The Hague, 1970) lives in Voorschoten, the Netherlands and works at a vocational education centre. He reads linguistics at the English Language & Culture Department at Leiden University, expecting to receive a Master’s degree in 2015. Since 1991 he has been an editor and copywriter for various conservative magazines. His South African and Dutch web-site can be visited at http://www.roepstem.net.
Facing the Future as a Minority
This happened in Britain, too. The editor/ owner of theBritishResistance.co.uk was approached in a similar manner. This was some time ago and nothing more appeared on that site about it. It’s obviously just another smear tactic of the same type as publishing names and addresses of people.
If you can be bothered, maybe you should post replies to every single one of these people, brief and to the point.
@ Marcel
I can empathize with your plight. As we all know (or should) Breivik was yet another in a long list of MK ultra type event orchestrated by the traditional enemies of the truth so as to demonize anyone who might hold any pro white- anti cultural Marxist views.
I wonder, you said you had read the portion about the Frankfort School in his manifesto. I personally have not read it or that section, although I have studied them quite a bit having argued until I was blue with certain professors of mine. Can you share your views on them with us?
I hope things continue to get better for you.
I am saddened but not shocked at your tale. I congratulate you on your courage and perseverance. Here in America we are seeing how ugly the left can be for all their claims of love, tolerance and kindness. Rahm Emmanuel runs a city with a warlike murder rate, but his most important task is to insure that no businessman who is not in favor of gay marriage is permitted to do business is Chicago. Tolerance for thee but not for me.
I have drawn a couple of people into a debate at the following site:
http://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/mikhail-zakharov/russias-multicultural-myth
In case you want to stop by and have your say. They are resisting ferociously but I think they are experiencing some dissonance.
@JustaWhiteMom: Interestingly, my opponents over there are using the exact same Jew tactic used against the author of this article.
The anti-whites simply have no argument on the merits. There is no answer to white nationalism other than guilt by association.
@Alice Teller: I know the Chick Fil A thing is so absurd isn’t it? Also, I read an article today that said that Britain is now going to use “blind marking” so that “ethnic pupils” do not suffer lower grades because of prejudiced teachers. The fact is that you cannot have a civilization when our priorities are determined by these politically correct obsessions.
The anti-white crew is basically…crazy. They took pics of Ron Paul and the owner of Stormfront and had a field day with the pics. Not that there’s anything wrong with SF.
I pretty much agreed with what Breivik wrote, although I did not go over the entire manifesto. I mean, I agree with white nationalist philosophy, that we have the right to self-determination.
If more people would speak out boldly, then our views would not seem so outlandish.
The question that bothers me the most is why do white people want to be slaves of the Jews? The silence from the majority of whites is basically an assent to being Jew slaves.
@JustaWhiteMom:
I think the Chick-fil-a drama will work to our benefit. Once the mask slips it is hard to put it back in place.
Sadly, we need not go to Briton for such foolishness. Our own dear leader wants equal outcome for discipline problems.
http://nation.foxnews.com/obama/2012/07/27/president-obama-backs-race-based-school-discipline-policies
Keep up the good work! Cognitive dissonance can be the beginning of enlightenment. Well done!
@Alice Teller: Thank you, Sister. I believe in the next few years we are going to see political correctness really start to burn itself out. These crusaders simply must be on the hunt for injustices to rectify. They know that politics is like a tide. As soon as the inertia runs out, it turns. I believe they are terrified of this. Their ridiculousness will become ever more apparent.
@Alice Teller: @JustaWhiteMom:
I’m making sure to stop by Chick-Fil-A. I think this has backfired on the PC crowd. A good development would be companies that cater to more traditional/conservative people (say like Fox News, if Fox News was better).
But even after these big social “movements” burn themselves out, the Anti-Whites and the Left regroup with some new nonsense to traumatize us with.
@JustaWhiteMom: @Jason Speaks:
We must be unrelenting. Obama is the public personification of affirmative action and it consequences. He is clear proof that competence really does require more than the good manners and the ability to speak standard English. We are in trouble and folks are looking hard at a lot of things that we thought we could afford to overlook. Generation Screwed may be very confused and disillusioned but they want answers. They are so ill-educated that they may see more of a cause and effect relationship than actually exists between Obama’s election and the mess we are in. They are a generation long overdue for some serious rebellion. There is no longer anything else to rebel against than Political Correctness. I live in hope………
@Alice Teller:
Rahm Emmanuel served in the Israel Defense Forces in 1991 during the first Gulf War. In Israel there are no civil marriages and every legal Jewish marriage is performed by a rabbi. It is illegal for for a Jew to marry a non-Jew in Israel. There are no Israeli rabbis willing to perform same sex marriages between Jews and thus same sex marriages are not legal in Israel. Apparently Rahm Emmanuel is only disturbed by White goys objecting to same sex marriage but does not object to Israel restricting them. One more case of do as we say, not as we do!
from Wikipedia:
@Alice Teller:
Apologies – it seems that I can neither speak nor type standard English.
@thm:
Two corrections: Rahm Emmanuel volunteered at an Israeli military base during the first Gulf War but was not actually formally in the IDF. It is the Chief Rabbinate of Israel that has the authority to and does forbid same sex marriages (under force of law) — not individual rabbis.
@thm:
Great point – I would add that it is odd how little we hear from our feminist friends that in Israel a women must obtain “a get” permission from her husband to get a divorce. If he chooses not to grant it she can never remarry. Even the wife of a man convicted of child molestation and serving a lengthy sentence is tied to him. And we are reminded daily how many values we share with Israel. The lies just keep getting bigger and bigger.
“I never thought that people would make up things in order to make you fit into their worldviews about what right-wing extremists are supposed to be like.”
Um, er, I’m not sure where you have been living, Polyanna, but welcome to the real world, where vicious lies and mendacious spindoctors are the norm and truth is a scarce commodity. You deserve accolades for standing firm though.
From your article, it sounds like there is a great deal more freedom of speech in your nation than here in the U.S., where a single politically correct comment may spell the end of a career for a well-known person. This is a nation where if you had called someone a “nappy haired hoe” or said the word “niggardly”, you might very well have found yourself in the unemployment line. Our censorship is mainly private sector businesses forced to toe the line of political correctness of course, while in Europe you can get the slammer for using ill-chosen words of truth.
” I was even starting to feel guilty”
I cannot conceive how White Nationalists can feel guilty for the deeds of Breivik. If you were not an accomplice, and didn’t suggest he murder innocents, then you have absolutely no guilt in any way, shape or form. If there is any feeling of guilt, then it is the result of maladaptive tendencies in the European mind for being susceptible to guilt trips, “artificial, toxic guilt syndrome”.
Breivik is a sick psychopath. He targetted the innocent, and there is no excuse for his diabolical rampage. Had he targetted the guilty, the traitorous leaders that were responsible for immigration, then he would have been justified, and his actions would have been heroic, self-sacrificing deeds to punish the wicked, those f’ers who truly deserved the death penalty for the gross harm they have caused, and made other political figures think twice before following similar destructive policies.
Let us WN’s get off the guilt trips, and go forth with supreme confidence that our cause is just, good and right.
“I am in favour of an assimilation policy with regard to Muslims—certainly a moderate position”
What the f’ing hell? Yes, its a moderate position, all right, but its also insane.
@Alice Teller:
The Jewish supremacists want religious morals, values and culture for Jews in Israel but secular, corrosively hedonistic, sexualized values and culture in all European ethnic countries.
White leftists say they aren’t anti-White…and in a way, they’re being honest. These people legitimately do not see race, so it’s not possible for them have a particular dislike of Whites as a race.
What they truly are, are spriritual Christians. They hate the strong, powerful, and beautiful; in essence, anyone that aspires to power and greatness. It just so happens that it’s White people who have greatness in their blood, and not blacks or arabs, who are largely ignoble, poorly-bred people.
Therefore when the Jews flood Europe with their fellow untermenschen, the White spiritual Christians automatically take the side of weak, ugly, dysfunctional and dispossessed, and crusade against the proud, noble, and strong.
It takes strength and pride for a people to want to maintain their character, if only for its own sake. The White spiritual Christians believe that “pride comes before the fall,” so they see pride and strength as evil.
The funniest part about all this is that White leftists don’t even understand where their values come from. They claim to hate Christianity but they are the biggest Christians in the world, because ALL of their values and ideas come from Christ and his followers. Just goes to show how stupid leftists are.
In order to defeat the White left you have to defeat morality, or at least, redefine it so that it favors the building up of power instead of the levelling of it. Essentially 2,000 years of post-Roman European moral thought needs to be destroyed. Not as easy task– Nietzsche tried it and went crazy– but it needs to be done if Whites are to regain a racial consciousness before they’re wiped out.
It sounds to me like you were set up. Glad you’re still writing, this incident underlines the importance of continuing.
Mr Bas,
Leftists don’t think in degrees when it comes to Rightists, Paleocons, Traditional Catholics, Nationalists, White Advocates, Anti-Abortionists, etc. We’re all NAUGHTZEES!!!!! ™ to them. Sexist racist fascists hell bent killing or raping their brown pets (we simultaneously hate and sexually desire them, eh?).
Sadly most of us are reasonable people and fanaticism to the point of dishonesty comes with a heavy burden. Enlightened fanaticism takes years to cultivate. The politics of ressentiment breed cheap cannon fodder with no scruples.
Playing the “respectable conservative” just doesn’t generate victory for Western Man anymore. No matter how strong a man’s shield, his arm will eventually tire. Then it behooves him to use his axe! Not in Breivik’s sense by any means….but fighting intrigue and GBA with intrigue and GBA. Verbally attacking with wit and a wink!
It looks like you’re starting down that road now with conviction…gods bless!
@JustaWhiteMom:
I can’t wait to see their faces when the “ethnic students” start doing worse than they were before.
Teachers inflate these kids’ marks to avoid accusations of racism. With that protection gone, the discrepancy should only become more apparent.
@Alice Teller:
From the article you cited:
“President Barack Obama is backing a controversial campaign by progressives to regulate schools’ disciplinary actions so that members of major racial and ethnic groups are penalized at equal rates, regardless of individuals’ behavior.”
– What that really means is that he wants no consequences for black “students” who are disruptive (that is most of them) in public schools. Obongo’s presidency resembles a dictatorship more with each passing day. This is especially evident with what he did to Arizona. If he is reelected (and he will be) his next move will surely be to rescind the 2nd amendment. He wants us to be defenseless like South African and British Whites. You heard (well, read) it here first!
@George:
The only silver lining is that he is overplaying his hand. After Romney’s disgraceful romp on Sheldon Adelson’s leash in Israel it is difficult to see which is the lesser evil. I don’t know how we dare show our faces in public when our politicians are so blatant in their corruptions.
@Marcel Bas
Before you name the journalists and the newspapers, I have a hard time feeling sorry you.
How can we apply pressure to somebody we don’t know who are? If you had named them here, people googling their name, would have found this article, as the Occ.Obs. have a high page rank. Not naming names, also makes people doubt that you are telling the truth.
One a side note, you should learn “value based communication”, something I picked up from Breivik’s defense lawyer.
On questions as to why he chose the mission, he answered that he asked his wife who is a nurse, and got the answer that nurses and doctors, will treat anybody, regardless of personal opinions or what the patient have done. She further said as nurses do this, defense lawyers should too.
We don’t know if this is true or not, but by coming up with a short justification claiming the moral high ground, you don’t give the media material they can spin, and you also get your message across.
Some rightist politicians in Norway also got his compendium, and answered like this: Breivik most likely got my mail address through Facebook, as I accept all invitations for friendship requests.
On question if they supported Breivik, they refused to answer, and rather asked back if the journalist was an idiot, as they should know better than to ask so stupid questions.
From having observed how this played out in Norwegian media, refusing to admit that you have done anything wrong, and rather attack the journalists for playing the guilt by association game, seems to have worked the best.
@fender:
‘In order to defeat the White left you have to defeat morality, or at least, redefine it so that it favors the building up of power instead of the levelling of it.”
In order to defeat the left, you have to make them realize how much they have been brainwashed to think they are “rebels” in a system which uses them like the “sans-culottes” of the French Revolution.
Once they realize they have been fighting on the wrong side, they’ll become your allies. We have to show them that our point of view offers the real structure of an authoritarian regime : manipulation of information, propaganda (race-mixing, multiculturalism), a global finance which wants to eradicate solidarity between nations. These 3 elements (information control, propaganda, new world order) are the main reasons that attract the extreme-left to justify a fight against the “system”.
It’s the kind of people you’ll never win over with aggressive tactics, you’ll win them if you convince them they are being used as tools by the enemy (an enemy they have still not discovered because they have been brainwashed to target their own race).
@Aquilax:
Westerners spend their formative years learning embarassing nonsense in public school systems– it’s very hard to undo all those years of brainwashing and make them see the truth.
I’ve long since given up trying to reason with leftists. Intellectually, they are children. Their whole philosophy can be summed up in two words that every 6-year-old weakling shouts at the kids who get the better of him: “No fair!”
Why do “anti fascists” never actually oppose fascism, only Whites? Shouldn’t they call themselves “Anti White”, or “Hatemongers”?
One of the main problems is that the West no longer has an aristocracy to model and carry forth values such as strength, pride, and confidence. Like anything else worth having in life, you can’t just wake up one morning and become noble. It takes a long time — generations actually. Of course this is what we should be working towards, little by little. Perhaps we can achieve a second-growth aristocracy. Until then, the rebellion of the masses will go on unabated.
@Alice Teller: ….”for all their claims of love, tolerance, and kindness”.
Yes. I noticed how much love, tolerance and kindness the left has, everytime they organize a huge rally that supports illegal immigration, gay rights, and environmental issues. They diss American citizens and tell them it’s not their nation but it is illegal aliens,, they deface churches and become violent and phycially attacked people, as in California, when the majority voted against gay marriage,(I couldn’t care less but that’s not the issue, their violence is), and they really couldn’t give a crap about the environment, other than lip service.
The left is helping to usher in a dictatorship and open borders, and are too stupid to understand any of the consequences of their actions.
@honk!: Because they honestly believe that by opposing whites, they are opposing Fascism. These people believe whites to be fasicsts at heart.
Last night, I watched an episode of the old TV series, Route 66, with George Maharis and Martin Milner, two guys that travel across the U.S. in a now classic tear drop panel corvette sports car. In this particular episode, they ran into a guy that was apparently a super patriot, because he was for preserving historical American landmarks and respecting the founders of the nation. Of course, it took me about 2 minutes or less to figure out that he would be a “racist”, and against all the ” trash” that was allowed into the U.S. And sure enough this was the theme. He and his “group” were being monitored by the FBI, and the two stars of the show were brought in to pretend they agreed with him and wanted to join his groups “cause”. The super patriots were planning to set off plastic explosives, to create hate of foreigners and bring “good” Americans over to their side. Naturally, the attempt was foiled and the “good guys” won.
This was a serious that aired in 1960, so this stuff has been going on a long time–the distrust against tradional European-Americans. Now, to the writer of this article. Can you see how hard it is for a conservative nationalist to make his/her point, when American television has and is still showing these shows in Europe and other Western nations? Anyone that doubts the power of those that control the language and images is seriously deluded.
@JustaWhiteMom: Just a thought but wouldn’t the introduction of “blind marking” in Britain be hurtful towards the visually impaired? I certainly hope that the insensitive, prejudiced prone fascist that came up with the idea is sent off on some sensitivity courses to help him identify with the less fortunate.
@Rerevisionist: Thanks for your reply.
Which people? The recipients? The journalists?
@TyronRobertParsons: Thank you for your reply.
Since day one I have heard that this might be an orchestrated attempt to blemish people.
It would surely be an interesting development, if it were orchestrated by whoever would benefit from that. Once we take that to be plausible, we might be able to answer some questions like why didn’t he use Bcc (common practice, isn’t it?), why were the secret services aware of him but not of his plans, why did the police arrive so late, why were ambulances held up, and the like.
Some claim that the Western states needed a new enemy, as people grew tired of jihadis. So by allowing Breivik to do what he wanted to do, the white lone wolf (certainly a person with more networks in Western countries) should serve as a new enemy. Breivik as a fallguy. It is a grim idea.
I don’t know. All I know is that he had a hard time seeing the full picture, if he thought that the people in his list would regard him as a hero, who would forward his manifesto to others.
@TyronRobertParsons:
Thanks again. Yes, things are better. I must say that things are back to normal. I no longer notice that people are afraid of being affected by the guilt by association. But I will never know whether I have missed opportunities because of this.
After reading your question about the Frankfurt School, I was scanning the manifesto for the section that I had already found last year. I see that Breivik mentions these people very often: pp. 13, 16-22, 29-32, 33-37 are all about the Frankfurt School.
My views on the Frankfurt School? I must say that I have always been fascinated by scholars who expose ideas that are controversial in our times. One of these ideas is the way modernist people like Wilhelm Reich and Theodor Adorno talk about breaking down cultural elites, while at the same time they loathe mass movements. Having a Marxist background, they should have embraced mass movements. But I guess that their instinctive dislike for majoritarianism prompted them to distrust masses. So they would need a new elite (that would be people like them).
Nowadays, it is so controversial to think in terms of elites or aristocracies for that matter, so today even deconstructionist people like Reich c.s. would be considered elitist.
That is the typical modernist dilemma, which I have also found in Virginia Woolf and present-day leftist intellectuals.
@Alice Teller: Nice rhyme! ‘Tolerance for thee, but not for me’. In France I heard the expression (I believe it was Alain de Benoist) ‘La tolérance qui ne tolère qu’elle même’. So ‘Tolerance that only tolerates itself’. So we are again subject to people’s whims.
If extremely leftist people, in all their zeal for humanity and care for people, are being thwarted by people who have other interests, they will start viewing their opponents not as people who may deserve their empathy too, but as adversaries. That is a human reaction. The far left is also human, it seems.
Especially in groups they are so convinced of being right, and about doing the good thing for the world, that they no longer see the entire picture. It is pure self-overestimation…
@JustaWhiteMom: I’ll look!
@JustaWhiteMom:
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
Until you guys mend your ways, ie pull the rug from beneath the Jewish Juggernaut, you will continue to be run over”
Example, when and for years now, we in the UK have had to complete so called race equality forms when seeking employment, or access to amenities and issues.
The form for a long time went; White, Afro Caribbean, Asian, Oriental, African…variables and up dates apply now.
The form was designed to ensure that the children of Caribbean parents who were invited to the UK were given equal access to employment, as caucasians were suitably primed by the Enoch Powell mythos and would discriminate against those blacks who would turn up for interview.
Of course, on paper those blacks qualified and their parents having beeb UK citizens had Anglo surnames, these interviewers were continuously having to think on their feet how not to show disappointment at seeing a smartly dressed black man apply for the local office job, or enginnering apprenticship.
So when thses forms were brought in, of course all the employer need do, once reading the equality form is to bin it, once the applicant indicated he is of colour, hence high unemployment rates etc.
Thum thur days were good for the knuckle draggers, who would never read Enoch Powell’s speech themselves….i did, i wanted to know what all the hubbub was!
It was then i realised how under educated the majority of whites were and because of that they cling to myth, rumour and racist rhetoric, the perfect Jew tool.
You bring up the “Blind marking” issue, so i say to you, as one of the posters asserts, if blacks are unintelligent, or not studying properly, it will show up, proving your point no?
Or could it be, that removing a screen may show a truer picture? Incidentally those infernal ethnic forms are still being used and sent to all who wish to receive a job app…in fact it’s morphed online and ONE DOES NOT GET AN EMAIL ACKNOWLEDGING APPLICATION COMPLETED AND RECEIVED.
Same ol same ol.
It is these realities that Jews use to throw in your faces, then they use that ground gained, propose to speak on behalf of the blackman, using one or two black lackeys.
When the dust settles, ink dries and the reality of race equality new savannah is surveyed, we see the blackman worse off, marginalised even more than he was prior to the Jewish Superman with you as his trusted helper.
Oddly what we do see as beneficiaries of equality programmes is women, white women in the main and yeeeees your Soddomite bestest fwen!
It’s usually sod the white dude and double sod the nagger!
The media is controlled by the Talmudists and they tell their lackey how and who to give bad press to.
In the UK Jews hacking phones, getting their paparazzi at the scene to catch a celeb out, or blackmale a sodomite is called spying in some countries…bad press?
Get a Jew to oversee the crime and term it something else, allowing Jew Murdoch to flee the scene.
THIS IS A WORLD OF DECEPTION, IF YOU CHERRY PICK WHICH PARTS YOULIKE, YOU ACCEPT IT CONSCIOUSLY!
@Andrew:
What I actually meant, was that when I started publishing under my own name, I didn’t believe that people would make up things about adversaries. We have been raised and almost indoctrinated with the notion that democracy and freedom of speech are one, and that this system works great, in this country. Later on I noticed that so many things were actually being made up about dissenters, but perhaps not deliberately. I still thought that with leftist empathy and a sense of honour leftist activists would try to report about others in an honest way. After all, you have to use arguments in a debate, right? Nope.
But this was all before the internet age. Since internet, I found out how incredibly impolite and intentionally besides the facts people can operate. So I may be a bit naïve, but at the same time I am stubborn and I wonder if starting smear campaigns actually makes these people feel happy about themselves. I guess I am being a Calvinist here, which is consistent with the way we were raised, in the Netherlands. ;-)
I believe that in America freedom of speech is better protected. I mean, here you can get fired for the same reasons as you mention here above. Recently, stage artist Rihanna told a Dutch glossy magazine editor that she was offended by her using the term ‘niggabitch’ in an article about Rihanna’s clothing style. She wanted to present the singer as a ghetto-style icon. She resigned, after that, due to, what she calls, loss of credibility.
But on the other hand, web forums like Stormfront would be impossible in the Netherlands. It would be banned due to the first article of our constitution, which had been added to rule out any form of racial, sexual or religious discrimination.
It was not that I felt guilty for his deeds; I felt guilty for the fact that people I liked may be linked to me in a negative way. That is why I also wrote that I didn’t want to ‘embarrass’ them further. It is an irrational reaction, I agree. I think this form of guilt is based on a sense of being ashamed, which you also see in people who have been traumatized by others. They’d rather not talk about it, feel embarrassed, and often feel guilty for what others did to them. I must say that in my case it was a very short phase.
The attempts of the left to make me feel guilty for what Breivik did, failed. The far left wrote an article about us, the three addressees, starting off with: “What you sow is what you reap.” This was such a clear smear tactic that I was just not taking it seriously.
I am also in favour of repatriation, but if you are faced with people who were born here, it will be hard to repatriate them. I may be even cruel, in my view.
@Helvena: I have more cases of media closely working together with ‘antifascists’.
If things have been set up, and if it is true that governments are increasingly afraid of the so-called lone wolves who start operating in secret, I guess the guilt by association mechanism will only further isolate activists, and foster more lone wolves.
@Snake: Thanks!
Thinkers have handed me strategies: Nietzsche, when he warned people not to become monsters when fighting with monsters; Evola, when he advised these lone aristocratic, antagonizing souls to join the theatre just as a theatre player (not with the heart!), and get successful.
But yesterday I was rererererereading Nietzche ;-) and I found this quote:
“To be one’s enemy’s equal — this is the first condition of an honorable duel. Where one despises one cannot wage war. When one commands, where one sees something beneath one, one ought not to wage war. My war tactics can be reduced to four principles: First, I attack only things that are triumphant — if necessary I wait until they become triumphant. Secondly, I attack only those things against which I find no allies, against which I stand alone — against which I compromise nobody but myself… Thirdly, I never make personal attacks — I use a personality merely as a magnifying-glass, by means of which I render a general, but elusive and scarcely noticeable evil, more apparent… Fourthly, I attack only those things from which all personal differences are excluded, in which any such thing as a background of disagreeable experiences is lacking.”
Not that these ‘antifascists’ are triumphant, but the indifference, in which they can thrive, is.
@Volksverhetzer:
I will mention the names, eventually. But for now, I wanted to limit myself to exposing the mechanisms of GBA. I initially wanted to present the story in an even more abstract manner.
Soon after I finished this article, I decided that I will translate it into Dutch, for a Dutch audience, with the hacks’ names. That will be the next stage. I don’t know when and where I will do that. I have saved all the names and e-mails, and as far as the phone calls are concerned, I think I have a good memory when it comes to quoting people. I hope you will be able to understand the fuller, Dutch account. There I will also include another blatant case of attempted GBA that happened to me in 2005.
Thanks for the “value based communication”. In Norway attack seemed to be the best defense. Politicians are better trained and supported. They have a secretary, a PR bureau, parliamentary immunity, etc.
@Bobby: Since I cannot stomach watching TV anymore – over the last few decades, I’ve switched to ordering or renting DVD sets of some of the older and popular TV shows from the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s or 1980s that I remembered liking when they first aired or that I saw as reruns as a kid.
I am working my way through the 76 episode DVD set of the old TV Western ‘The Deputy’, which had Henry Fonda as the top billed actor – but, his role was mostly of a reoccurring cameo nature, and his co-star Allen Case did the bulk of the heavy lifting for the series. Anyway, like Bobby mentions with his viewing of the old Route 66 TV show – I can now recognize all kinds of subversive jewish brainwashing material written into the scripts and story lines for The Deputy series. Primarily because of my awakening to the jewish menace and anti-white, anti-Freedom jewish agenda – these subversive themes now jump right out at me, whereas as a kid – they were subtle enough to fly over my head.
A recent episode on this DVD set depicted a poor mestizo being harassed and exploited by a group of ‘evil White men’, and of course, Allen Case’s character came to the rescue of the non-white minority and saved the day. This theme has been repeated over and over and over in TV shows and major motion pictures for going on 50 or more years – and I am convinced that this is why we see so many of our fellow Whites who’ve been indoctrinated with this kind of garbage reacting by (a) Refusing to ever take their own race’s side in any conflict that involves race, and (b) Believing that it is their duty to always work to help non-whites advance their interests, while never lifting a finger to advance the equally legitimate ethnic specific interests of their own race.
Also, Allen Case – as the character Clay McCord – was sort of an early gun-control promotion tool for the jews. While he was supposed to be very fast with his gun and an excellent marksman, he would be constantly sermonizing to the audience about how ‘evil’ guns were and there would be an occasional reference to how his town should ban anyone from having a firearm on their possession.
There was another old TV western that also followed this same anti-gun template – a show titled ‘Sugarfoot’, which starred Will Hutchins. Hutchin’s character tom Brewster was also a fast draw gunslinger, but constantly preached about how evil guns were.
So, its pretty clear that the jews have been pushing their anti-White, anti-Freedom, anti-American subversive agenda almost from the first day they took over Hollywood.
Dear Mr. Bas,
Your story I found most distressing and I deeply admire your courage!
If ever you needed proof that the attack on western man is real, that there really is a malicious intent at work, this is it. I say this because you seemed rather surprised that journalists would not give you a fair hearing. I am not. Our enemy is real. And you don’t pick him as an enemy, he picks you. You may not be interested in him, but he is always interested in you.
My own development has been from a PvdA-supporter to a libertarian (VVD) to an anti-Jihadist (PVV) to a white nationalist and antisemite. This seems a rather logical, even inevitable, path and I hope many will follow.
Sometimes I also feel guilty and question the validity of my views. Am I unjust? Am I a “hater”? Am I a paranoid conspiracy nut? Such is the power of enemy propaganda. But if I read such a story as yours, I feel certain again: I am fighting for a just cause.
Thank you very much for your story, and as the great Irish comedian Dave Allen always said: “May your god go with you”. ( youtube.com/watch?v=XRVX2wQIwWQ )
@Luke:
I like catching old Gunsmoke episodes. But even in these, you can see the “White man bad, Indian good” narrative in some episodes.
You can see full episodes on YouTube if your connection is fast enough. Do a search for Gunsmoke and add the name of a particular episode if you know it. Here is one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpdKIuHfY54
You can click on the bottom right of the screen to make it full screen.
@Donar van Holland:
Thank you!
They make a nice couple: the ‘antifascist’ and his useful hack. I just hope journalists will realise what they do to persons who are just following their principles, when they follow their hack need to bring ‘sensational’ news. Newspapers are experiencing a dramatic circulation loss, and they try to reconnect with their readers by writing such articles, chased by deadlines. It still works: sensation sells. Look at what our Dutch television stations have turned into. You will see that amusement and sensation are rampant. As I said: the level of debate is abominable, in this country. We have never been a country of thinkers, so our tradition of freedom of speech is more based on indifference than on hunger for information, I am afraid.
In such a climate a radically neoconservative political Party as the PVV – which you mentioned – can only survive when it uses soundbytes and when it presents politics as a fact-free game. I find it disgusting.
I have a friend, who wrote me an e-mail soon after the newspaper articles appeared. He told me that he was disgusted by the slander, also because he fears that people with unconventional opinions will cease to express them. As a freethinker he wouldn’t want to live in a country where people are muzzled, and so he asked me if he could tell his friend about my case. His friend is an ethics lecturer on a high school for journalism. So I wrote down what had happened, sent it to him and he forwarded my account to his friend, who would use it for education purposes: ‘Guys, this is NOT how you should do journalism.’
I find that encouraging.
So what? If you are a journalist, or in public relations, or publicity, getting your name in the paper happens.
C’mon, everyone here is not a kid playing under the street light.
@Andrew:
“From your article, it sounds like there is a great deal more freedom of speech in your nation than here in the U.S., where a single politically correct comment may spell the end of a career for a well-known person.”
Correct. Even though on paper the US may not be as constricted as Europe with its anti-racism laws, in practise free speech in the US is far more resticted. So much that even using the word ‘free’ is misleading. Such is the power of the lobby, you can be destroyed for just smiling at the wrong person let along opening your mouth.
@Noble Lord: “that the children of Caribbean parents who were invited to the UK” – They were invited by trecherous elite, not the people. It is natural for people to want to be by their own kind. As Ali said, bluebirds fly with bluebirds. The Jew have taken what is natural and twisted it into racist. Just as they took sex and twisted it into porn. I understand it’s complicated. Most people immigrate for economic reasons, they want to feed their families. I think the answer lies in economics and that is what we must sort out. However, that doesn’t mean that all will be equal. Genetics and culture will have an impact.
@Helvena:
Absolutely and hear hear. The European descendent people have never been consulted on mass immigration and for that reason the whole basis of multiculturalism is hostile and illegitimate. The Europeans have the moral right to reverse all of it, should they acquire the will and power.
@Jason Speaks: I went through a couple seasons of the old ‘Daniel Boone’ TV show on DVD about a year ago – a show which I remembered liking a lot as a kid – and Fess Parker’s character and his Indian sidekick, Ed Ames – were constantly criticizing Whites and that same theme, White man bad, Indian is good – was so pervasive that it made me sick to my stomach.
Of course, true to the jewish white genocide template – Daniel Boone was constantly taking the side of both Indians and a few of the blacks who were featured in the show over the side of any of his fellow White settlers.
I had intended to get all of the seasons of that show on DVD, but after watching the first two and seeing this kind of anti-white propaganda, I decided to save my money.
@Helvena:
Whilst i agree the problem is about economic terrorism/usury, which in turn dictates domestic and foreign policy, a great deal of the facts and benefits are not brought before the masses and if ever it is, it’s marginalised or dismissed.
I offer this, as a starter kit, for those who don’t know.
http://www.irespect.net/Untold%20Stories/Caribbean/Community%20History.htm
The Nottinghill Carnival should be a constant reminder of the strong war effort the peoples of the Caribbean contributed, (Out of sight and out of mind). The steel drums, you know the musical steel pans, were oil drums for ships refuelling and receiving foodstuffs.
Also what is not known, is that the very same Enoch Powell toured the Caribbean islands for workers to come to the UK!
It was only very recently black people werev allowed to take part in remembrance day! No doubt those who have no clue, would think PC gone mad, but as i’ve said before, at least 40% of Admial Nelson’s navy were black and other ethnics.
It is not as simple as you and Ali put it, if it were so, the Puritan Pilgrims would have stayed put in Europe.
As Bob Marley sang, in the song “Who the cap fits”;
“Man to man is so unjust, children:
Ya don’t know who to trust.
Your worst enemy could be your best friend,
And your best friend your worst enemy.”
I accept that a vast amount of people in the UK were not aware of government policy, but as you can see now, they are not interested. At the first opportunity they got they signed into the Jew EEC trick, turning their backs, once again upon the people who were their for them in their darkest hour.
It is what it is, such is the long painful path of moral and ethical evolution.
By and large the people of the UK are NOT racist towards blacks, but they are too ready to accept Jew indoctrination.
We, you and i have a responsibilty to inform those who are programmed. Freemasonry was the key for the Jew to control the Caucasian elite and with it the people.
I don’t have all the answers and blaiming will cure no ills.
DAY IS ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO TALK!
@Mickey Meadows:
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
Were Caucasian peoples of England consulted as to whether Queen Victoria had a right putting one foot in South Africa?
Were they consulted when they broke treaty and Vicotria’s nephew, Lord Chelmsford started a fight against the Zulus and got routed at the battle of Isandlwana, the major battle, as opposed to the later skirmish at Rorke’s Drift.
When General Gordon lost his head to the Mahdi in Sudan, were the the caucasian people asked whether it was moral or not?
You cannot always use that flimsy excuse, especially when you know full well what evil is being done abroad, but the short term benefits you enjoy.
By the way, multiculturalism began offshore in Africa, the Caribbean and read up on Clive of India!
Would you like to know how much Rothschild and Queen Vcky appreciates the lives sacrificed in her army for their profit?
Shrapnel melted down and awarded sparsely to its bravest….now look up shrapnel!
Think before you open your mouth, perhaps you are unaware of the entire story!
This is war, Sir.
Ideas expressed in relation to our Folk-community (i.e. world-wide) are salvo’s in a continuing drama which, for all intents and purposes, is a real war, and you are, willingly or not, part of it.
In America, the ‘conservative’ element has passed its hegemic role as the ‘protectors’ of Tradition. The modern White Nationalist has taken that mantle; this intellectual/public manifestation has all the ear-marks of a more polarized conception, and conservatives will either come on board, or will simply pass away as the detritus of the past.
Do not make the same mistake of your predecessors, and only ‘protest’ your maligning by mainstream journalists; you must be pro-active, like here, and name names, publishing sites and journalistic pieces so that the larger ‘folk-community’ might engage and provide more credence to your positions, and that of the larger issues of Race and sovereignty.
The different manifestations of this ‘world-wide’ reassertion of Tradition will, most assuredly, be seen more often as time goes by; it is our job to prepare the way with cogent and intelligent answers for us to move forward.
Good luck in your endeavors.
@Mickey Meadows: What you are saying here is absolutely key. In coming to grips with the idea of a “hostile elite”, many make the mistake of thinking the elite is not hostile but idealistic and misguided. However, even if the elite is merely idealistic and misguided, they are still hostile to the traditional people of white countries because they know we do not agree and have never agreed. Therefore, we are the enemy, in their way, to be overcome.
Moreover, egalitarianism is failing. Elites may concede they were wrong or blame whites. They are choosing the latter. It is becoming increasingly clear that NAMs cannot compete in white societies and that blacks destroy any city they dominate to the point that it looks as though it has been hit by an A bomb.
I believe this is a very important talking point that we can use with people in our every day lives. The time has come for us all to come out of the closet, and the idea of the hostile elite is a perfect issue to raise with friends and family. We do not even have to endorse race realism. We can simply point out that, for whatever reason, diversity is failing, and that the government and media elites are blaming whites for this, and furthermore that they will continue to blame whites. Indeed, the anti-white scapegoating will rapidly spiral out of control as elite schemes to promote equality continue to fail.
I believe whites will understand that this dynamic is a grave threat to their children. Like I said, we need not blame racial differences explicitly, though we may be doing so implicitly. We only need to point out that the elite is hostile to us and blames us for the failure of their grand experiment.
@Mickey Meadows: And another thing. We can point out to whites that the failure of diversity could result in subtle attempts to exterminate us by way of race-mixing.
William Saletan wrote an article in 2007 stating that he is reluctantly starting to think that racial differences in iq may exist, but that they can be eliminated by “re-uniting the human genome” through intermarriage, i.e. genocide of whites.
We need not say we agree with Saletan on race realism, but only that people may start to think racial inequality may have a genetic origin and that this may be related to the genocidal race-mixing propaganda we see on television every day.
I look at everything with an eye to advocacy, and I believe this idea of a hostile elite can be explained to average whites in a way they will take seriously.
Because I gave an explanation about black flash mobs attacking whites here in the USA, I was run out of a friend’s house! he stood up and threw his arms into the air and shouted, “THAT’S ENOUGH! I DON’T WANT TO HEAR ANYMORE OF THIS!” Then the next day he told the people in my circle that I am “prejudiced” and other horrible things. The public school brainwashing makes people impervious to the truth. i told this idiot that there are two hundred videos on Youtube for black flash mobs attacking whites. So, it doesn’t matter if you speak the gospel truth to the brainwashed, they will still often reject it. it was for this reason that Brevik did what he did. No doubt in his mind he felt that something horrible was the only way to cut through the mind control. I’m not saying that I agree but….I wouldn’t mind if the Breiviks and Holmes and Mcveighs were to target Goldman Sachs and the Federal Reserve. I don’t see why they go after innocent people who have nothing to do with our subjugation. I do think that if the elites continue to be tone deaf to the please of the normal citizens, more and more people are going to snap and go on rampages. You can’t operate a society where the majority people are ostracized and marginalized, while minorities are given all the perks. Naturally some people are going to go berserk in the face of such injustice.
Guilt-by-association such as this poster’s case is just the individualized case of White (Black, Jewish, Green) Nationalism. It’s a microcosm of the sort of guilt-by-association expressed by views such as, “We’ve got to get rid of [all of] the Jews.” The poster may not have deserved his Guilty verdicts, but insofar as WN is concerned, this just your own chickens coming home to roost.
It’s not our chickens coming home to roost that has destroyed this country. The duplicity and deception and double dealing and bad faith of the elites is what has destroyed this country and the rest of the western world. Your comment is silly. For the most part, whites are decent and honest and have great integrity. It was our humanitarian impulses that the elites took advantage of. The “guilt by association” tactic is designed to smear any and all. Look at the stupid Chickafila protests. My God, you can’t even voice a normal opinion on marriage without being targeted for abuse! The Bolsheviks are on the move now and they’re moving VERY quickly, because they sense that some segments of the population are waking up. The gun grab is especially frightening. The irony is that they label us as “authoritarian” when they themselves are the bossiest fucks on the planet.
@Marcel:
Dear Marcel ( if I may call you that), I appreciate your views very much. However, politeness is not going to save the day, I am afraid. Whilst I very much agree that we should express ourselves in a thoughtful and polite manner, we can hardly expect this from opponents who think we are born again Nazi zombies.
If we stick to the rules of civilized debate it is more for our own benefit. By that I do not mean that outsiders might be more inclined to follow succinctly expressed views, though it might be encouraging to think that they would. I rather mean that we cannot defend western civilization unless we strive to set a personal example of western greatness ourselves. A true gentleman will treat someone with the decency he owes to himself.
As for television, I have refused to watch it for about fifteen years now. This saves me a lot of time, and annoyance too. It seems Westerners consume and amuse themselves to death, nowadays.
As far as the PVV is concerned, my feelings are ambivalent. Their tactics are uncouth, to say the least. They are a mouthpiece for the Neo-Cons, certainly. However, they do express some sentiments that the neo-liberal parties (all parties except SP and SGP) would like to suppress. As such, the PVV may have an unintended positive influence on the metapolitical struggle in the Netherlands, and even in Europe.
And this metapolitical struggle is the key. Like you, I find it encouraging that an ethics lecturer on a high school for journalism would be willing to use your story as an example how journalists should not go about their job. However, journalists have only limited influence. The powers that be will not grant them much freedom. Before people on the (true) right get a decent treatment, the atmosphere in society has to change a lot further. I am hoping and fighting to see that day.
@ Noble Lord. I first want to say I very much appreciate your taking the time to talk about this issue. People, all people, need to understand where the other guy is coming from. We have to accept though that understanding doesn’t mean agreement will follow. So it is in the spirit of respect that I will try to counter your argument.
Bob Marley is a poor example. His father was a British Jew who took next to no responsibility for the emotional support of his son; he did provide money (no surprise here). Bob Marley, as many half castes are, was used as the thin edge of the wedge. I won’t go into detail here but this article opened my eyes a bit. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2009/07/rastas-and-the-world-bank/
The link you give is a nice history and informative but because some Blacks were in Europe as early as the 15th century does not mean that they are a native population any more than because a few whites were in Africa hundreds of years ago means that Whites are native to Africa…yes, yes, I know about Lucy but we are talking races here not species.
As far as slavery goes, quite frankly I see it as a racist shakedown for the following reasons. I don’t know of any Blacks using slavery to gain privilege in the West Coast of Africa. Yet Blacks were sold by Blacks into slavery. Frobenius has photos as late as 1858 that shows Black slaves with chains around their necks while two Black woman stand in the fore ground not looking stressed at all. The first man to legally own a slave in the United States was a Black man named Anthony Johnson. Jews dominated the slave trade in the Americas. The hard reality is that slavery is a human institution that sucks but it is NOT race specific. Why is it that Blacks, Jews and ‘progressive Whites’ only hold white people to a higher moral standard? The only thing I can figure is money and control and so conclude it’s a race shakedown.
Interesting about Powell’s trip to recruit workers, did he offer them citizenship for coming or were they economic mercenaries?
As far as Blacks fighting for the Queen, Americans fought for and against Franco, no one expected Spanish citizenship for it. They fought because they chose to. Black were part of the British Empire, did they not recieve any benefit? We can argue the moral right of empire, we can exchange abuse stories until the cows come home but that doesn’t solve our problem.
Tell me this, Why do Blacks (or Mestizos, or Chinese or Asian Indians) want to live in White countries? I suspect it’s to make money or because life/culture is better here. And this begs the question Why?
White people want their corner or the world has much as other people. And yes this natural impulse is exploited by the Jews but that doesn’t make the impulse wrong.
@Blake Watts:
Pardon me for responding to your post, i found it interestin.
Often it’s not about what you say, but more about the way you say it.
Firstly and for argument sake, say i came out of the sewer smelling of —t, do you think anyone will even give me the time of day, even if it’s to warn them not to turn their taps on less they get the solids i reek off?
The truth is not colour coded and answers do not just appear, they are worked out!
Your second point as to why they don’t attack the real criminals, well the Norway shooter murdered his own because they were pro Palestinian, ie waking up!
That’s if you truly believe Breivik acted alone!
Caucasians and Negros fought the war of independence together and the civil war, yet Caucasians betrayed their ally, in preference to side with the Jew.( Betrayal of 1876/7 Rutherford B Hayes).
@Noble Lord: “Caucasians and Negros fought the war of independence together and the civil war, yet Caucasians betrayed their ally, in preference to side with the Jew.” – When the North put the Negros and carpet baggers incharge of reconstruction, the Negros took up arms against their Southern Brothers and aided in the fleecing of the South. The Tragic Era C.G. Bowers. Was that not betrayal?
We are different, it’s reality and so we will not be able to live together in large numbers without problems. The Austrian-Hugarian Empire couldn’t get the Slaves and the Germans to live peacefully. This is reality.
@Helvena:
I smiled when i saw the article you posted and thought, my you are informed.lol
I concur with your point about understanding a view not equating to a for ever and ever amen agreement, so it is with equal respect i turn to the issues at hand.
With regards to Bob Marley, i did not cite Bob Marley as an example for anything. However, i did draw your attention to one of his songs, namely, “Who the cap fits” and used an apt line of his lyric to enhance a point i had made.
The first time i found out that he may be Jewish, i had to sit down and think and consider the message he was portraying in his music.
I speak firmly on the Jewish problem we face, but i harbour no hatred for the Jew per se. It is his job to collectively to cheat, lie, murder and put emnity between the family of man and i consider it duty to speak against his foul play!
YOU SAID:
“As far as slavery goes, quite frankly I see it as a racist shakedown for the following reasons. I don’t know of any Blacks using slavery to gain privilege in the West Coast of Africa. Yet Blacks were sold by Blacks into slavery. Frobenius has photos as late as 1858 that shows Black slaves with chains around their necks while two Black woman stand in the fore ground not looking stressed at all”.
This comment does not convey any weight, as i did not mention reparations and in any case those who are living on the West Coast are hardly likely to ask each other for reparations if they did not sell each other into slavery… They live there….among their people!
I seen a chain gang once, in fact i see many in the US. They make documentaries and sometimes those prisoners tell us what they did to have to work for free, whilst Wakenhut makes millions on the stock market off their labors, albeit Wakenhut has changed its name, bad press not good for profit.
There is no evidence Africans sold each other as a commercial enterprise, there is quite a bit of hearsay, because it’s feel good hearsay. Even paid lackeys offer the same story.
Try asking a Ghanaian who told them to take down the star of David which emblazoned the gate of Elmira’s castle?
The point being, even an African will say and do anything, under threat of more economic terrorism.
With regards to Enoch Powell, he wanted cheap labour and prepared nither the white or blackman for what was to come. Skilled people having to work in factories for low pay, too late and expensive to turn back. Slum housing, none of this EU open door have some child benefit and council housing,noooooo.
What you fail to realise is The Caribbean, Africa and India held up the UK prior to and after the war. Furthermore the UK is the most powerful entity on the planet, in that it has over a 54 voting block at the UN!
There is no going back, there is saving the planet from a Jew world order and in order to do that, it’s forward thinking, trust in God, praise in Yesua’s name and diligence.
As to your question regarding why blacks and others want to live in white countries?lolol
Some were forced, others suffer economic terrorism,which has got worse since y’all let them trick you in 1913.
Uhmmm, cauasian puppets take Jew orders and carry out terrorist attacks in African countrieds to move people off profitable real eastate, caucasian puppet opens his border to allow the fall out to reside.
Oh also, many Africans served white nations when a white nation had a puppet in charge ripping off the mass. The people/patriots rise up and the lackeys flee into the arms of the Westren nation they served.
I could go on and on and on.
All people want their corner of the world, but dand it took you so long to share the feelin it’s too darn late!
Did you not see what they did to Sudan, Libya, or is that just n’s being their usual savage selves?lol
By the way, the US is a country of immigrants and the United Kingdom, i needn’t say more.
Lastly, you’d better look into that Anthony Johnson issue again.
TODAY MY CONCERN IS WITH THE FACTS, I HOPE I FIND THEM AND THEY ARE NOT TOO HURTFUL!
@Helvena:
I will look out for that book and consider the contents.
On the surface and especially as you brought up Anthony Johnson, it could be that some whites resented blacks being empowered, hence the KKK and the changing of laws to disenfrachise black people collectively.
@Noble Lord:
I agree with you on one very important matter. Both our peoples are being destroyed and we need to become allies and work together. Not just yours and mine but also the Muslims.
But we were, and are, coerced into mass immigration. It isn’t a legitimate agreement between peoples. This means we have the moral right to reverse it. What we don’t have is the power or will…for now. But the moral right only expires the day we agree in a fear-free non-cohersive, well-informed national debate.
@Donar van Holland:
Being nice and polite will no get us anywhere. This right-wing drive to be seen as “respectable” is nonsense; it’s not possible to be seen as respectable by hate-filled leftists and the masses of ignoble, non-thinking automatons that they rule over.
What the right needs is passion and emotion. We already have science and facts on our side, but since most people are borderline retards and don’t listen to facts, they need to be swayed by emotion.
@Mickey Meadows:
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
There is always much we can agree on and achieve, but i’m not sure you get it.
You the fable of they Monkey who had his hand stuck in the jar?
That’s the impression i get from quite a fw WN’s, your time is your own.
@Noble Lord:
Not sure what occurred there, so here it is again.
@Mickey Meadows:
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
There is always much we can agree on and achieve, but i’m not sure you get it.
You know the fable of they Monkey who had his hand stuck in the jar?
Well that’s the impression i get from quite a few WN’s, your time is your own.
@fender: “…they need to be swayed by emotion.” Absolutley. I once had two versions of the same song. One was played very mildly, while the other version was played in an almost strident, militaristic style. You wouldn’t even think it was two styles of the same song. Speaking is no different. My God, if a conservative ever gave a speech that actually got people hyped up and super excited, made them convinced that what they were saying is true, I’d fall on my ass. I haven’t yet heard such a speech by a Republican. Although I detest the man, Rush Limbaugh actually gave a speech like this once; it’s only too bad he’s a phony. Leftists believe in their ideology. They never back down. I agree with you completely here fender. Romney is as plastic as they come. Superficiality literally exudes from the mans very pores.
@Noble Lord:
As I have posted previously, I knew a man, now deceased, who was born in 1915 or 1916. He lived in Crewe, where Rolls Royce was centred. From childhood, he often went to London to visit his father’s family. He told me that he had never seen a black man, until the U.S. Army marched through the town in late 1942. His take on the immigration was that while there were Africans, Indians, Pakistanis, and Chinese in Britain for many years, their numbers were insignificant. Starting in WWII, their numbers increased with people across from the Empire, and there were many mixed race children born during that time. Virtually all were born of white mothers, and didn’t know who their fathers were. Post war, millions came to the UK from the Carribean and the Indian sub continent because they had British passports and no law prevented them from residence in Britain.
Churchill worried about it in the 50s, but he was a puppet of the usual suspects. Powell raised it in the mid 60s but was shouted down as a racist. Nothing happened until the mid 70s when the laws changed to include residence. Two UK students, with whom I was friends, had not been resident in the UK under the new definition. Although both were born their, and could trace their familes back more than 400 years, they were at risk of not receiving re-newed passports. They were not happy about it.
Your link is interesting, but statements like Queen Elizabeth I having a black page and entertainer are irrelevant. She also proclaimed that all people of colour should be banished from the realm.
@Curmudgeon:
“Although both were born their,”. I’m illiterate today “their” should be “there”.
The labels “left”, “right”, “conservative” or “liberal” are meaningless when it comes to the issue of immigration, the survivial of the white race, and white interests.
There is a former white Conservative Member of Parliament (not Jewish) in my city, who has worked helping and promoting immigration for close to 35 years, and begging for the admittance of more of the 3rd world.
There was a New Democratic Party MP (allegedly Socialists) who was removed from the party because she was opposed to abortion. Most abortions are performed on white women.
A friend’s son and his wife, who are middle of the road and have Asian acquaintances, moved from an area in the city, because they didn’t want their kids to be a minority at school. They moved to an area where they kids were virtually all white.
The labels “left”, “right”, “conservative” or “liberal” antagonize many who would be more supportive.
@Curmudgeon:
I truly wish WN’s would think things through before buying into the hype!
YOU SAID:
“Post war, millions came to the UK from the Carribean and the Indian sub continent because they had British passports and no law prevented them from residence in Britain.”
Firstly, according to the Office of National statistics 2010 calculations, the UK populous is 62.3 million!
Of that 62.3 million, approximately 500,000 are of Caribbean extract and just under 500,000 are of direct African descent, and just under 100,000 are of black other!
Asians are approximately 2 million in number!
Now that break down of stats it exposes your claim of millions coming from the Caribbean bogus, doesn’t it?
Also much of the Asian population arrived as a result of white people wanting to adopt an apartheid status in the UK, by virtue of allowing Asians to marry someone from the Asian continent and flying them and their families over!
Just stating the facts folks!
Incidentally there are approximately 500,000 mixed race people residing in the UK, which also does not mean black and white alone, there are many combinations that make up the demographic.
As for Enoch Powell, studiously read his speech, if your smart you’ll spot them… the lie and the glossed over issue.
Let’s face it, the Jews lead that campaign and the caucasian lackeys in the media played footsy with it, as if they cared about black people any way!
Your last comment re Lizzy the first and the alleged comment on blacks in her realm. The stupid B had a Jewish physician she later accused of treason and had him executed!
I suspect he over played his hand, bearing in mind his people were banished from England and still are today! A Jew would have resented blacks doing well in the UK, when his tried were kept out.
It only takes one and that one will find the ear of the highest power in the land and even a caucasian Queen will be swayed!
I cannot tell you how to feel, or who to like, or when and what issues to consider, i can be honest with you though.
@Noble Lord:
“Freemasonry was the key for the Jew to control the Caucasian elite and with it the people”
– Oh, Puuuhhlease! here we go with one of the most quoted conspiracy theories on the internet, right up there with HAARP and chemtrails (google them if you need a good laugh). There are also people who believe that cellular phone towers are actually “mind-control machines”! I am not kidding, and this “Freemasonry is the tool the Jews used to gain control of the world” is no different. The Jews have control of the world’s money- they do not need Masons to help them gain prominence. They have had 3000 years of experience rising to prominence and then destroying every empire and civilization they have ever been associated with from the Egyptians to the Greeks to the Roman Empire, and now the West. There were no Masons then. The Free and Accepted Masons are a “brotherhood”, like the Elks, the Moose organization and the Catholic Knights of Columbus- a social club. The Masons are usually the most outstanding businessmen in any city or town, they get together to associate with like-minded people, are fine citizens and are also a charitable institution. True, they can help a person who is a member to attain “connections” and network, but where is the evil in that? The latter, networking, is exactly what White people need to emulate where Jewry is concerned, as well as their racial cohesiveness, which I at this point strongly doubt that Whites are capable of, with the exception of their silly tribal loyalties (Irish for instance talking wistfully about “dear old Ireland” and Poles, Germans, Russians, Chechs and so on in much the same vein).
@Hooper:
That is an excellent summation of the problem, Hooper.
@Luke:
“I had intended to get all of the seasons of that show on DVD, but after watching the first two and seeing this kind of anti-white propaganda, I decided to save my money.”
Luke, the anti-White propaganda started right after WW2, as well as the disassembly of our manufacturing infrastructure when White Americans and their productivity as well as their sons, were no longer needed in order to kill their racial cousins in Germany. The propaganda started softly at first and seemed to be ratcheted upward in the late 1960′s. I recall distinctly that one of the magazines I read in the early 1970′s made the prediction that more “people of color” would be featured in tv shows, movies, and magazines in the near future and obviously the stage was being set long before these changes were implemented. The minds of Whites were being prepared for these changes and even to accept them. This work was being done in the public schools as well. For all the above reasons, and their imbecilic Ostrich-like, head-in-the-sand attitude of Tom Brokaw’s “Greatest Generation” were far from it- they were perhaps the greatest generation of fools for being Jewish tools, but there was no greatness other than that in those people.
@Bobby:
Ron Paul, despite his libertarian faults, has the ability to give speeches that genuinely get people excited, but of course Big Jew won’t let him get anywhere near the Oval Orifice.
Basically the whole thing is f*cked up, down, left, right, and sideways. There’s absolutely no reason why any WN should vote in this election, because neither candidate will make a damn bit of difference.
@Bobby: You’re quite right to go back and highlight the distant origins of the transformation wrought on the West. It’s quite shocking to view the older Hollywood material through a They Live prism.
@Luke: The Gun Grabbers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6-om5fHUIw
Usual suspects.
@fender:
I don’t agree. Second term presidents have a shot at speaking up about Israel and Obama has already demonstrated he is willing to at least try to resist their power in Washington.
Vote Obama. Stop applying an impossible standard such as ‘must not have grovelled AIPAC’. Everyone has to bend the knee, that’s the nature of hostile power.
@Noble Lord:
This isn’t ‘facts’…it is narrative.
Narrative is like the best-told lie…that weaves facts and times with interpretations, preferences, myth and propaganda.
Your narrative is nothing more than the common place explanation meted out to whites that they have been swamped because they asked for it, wanted it.
But never in fact consulted, so how does anyone know?
We have the moral right Noble Lord, and you remember this. You remember who we are and what we do.
@George:
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
YOU QUOTED ME, THEN MADE A STATEMENT:
“@Noble Lord:
“Freemasonry was the key for the Jew to control the Caucasian elite and with it the people”
– Oh, Puuuhhlease! here we go with one of the most quoted conspiracy theories on the internet, right up there with HAARP and chemtrails (google them if you need a good laugh). There are also people who believe that cellular phone towers are actually “mind-control machines”! I am not kidding, and this “Freemasonry is the tool the Jews used to gain control of the world” is no different.”
Excuse me, but i quoted no conspiracy theory, obviously you approving of evil Freemasonic influence wish to create an elaborate cover for their activities and associate me with all manner of what you term “conpiracy theory” out there on the internet, another Jew ploy!
Stick with the issues and what i have actually posited, because i shall and i stand by my quote, of which you sought to deride and dismiss!
Firstly, if YOU are a Freemason, then YOU and your ilk have taken a firm stance against God and Yesua, need i remind you of his Sermon on the Mount, Matthew CH5, Vrse 33-37?
READ IT again be sure of where you stand in this time.
You appear to be ignorant of who the Caucasian elite’s, or rather low lives in high places, are, so i shall not educate you on this for it is about time you began to work that easy peezy information out!
Everyone with a cursory look into Freemasonry knows full well it’s replete with Jewish/Talmudic symbolism and some state rootted in Kabbala.
Of course the Caucasian has always sought to cheat his own, so it is of no surprise he forgot about the precious words of Yesua and dived head first into an evil and secret cabal in which to cheat his own brother and aid his immediate lusts and desires for power, at the expense of his own family of man.
You will also know that the allegiance they swear oath to, is not only violent and on pain of death should they reveal such evil goings on, but they praise Lucifer.
In actual fact, the so called charitable deeds and “nice dinners” these masonic creeps keep giong on about, is merely an advertising tool and an attempt to painto over a rancid face!
I have no time to go into depth into the damage these evil cabals have done, but i tell you this, they have made our work that much more difficult, elongated and painful to overcome.
The Jew alone cannot hold sway, he always needs willing dupes and unfortunately the Caucasian man and woman have been it and every WN’s will have to admit to that this day, if they in deed wish to seek truth over the lie.
You may have even had a notion to peruse some of the debates that have taken place on this issue and without doubt, many WN’s are fuelled on mythos, misinformation and ultimately that desire for a slanted reality in their favour, just as those weak minded individuals who swore oath to evil, in order to have that slanted reality over his own WHITE brother!
I am not saying some black people have not joined such evil establishments at all, i am telling you who ultimately runs it and thus ensures they get what they want in this life.
So as for you saying they “are fine citizens” that’s your opinion and you think WN’s need another secret organisation in order to defeat the power of evil, that relies on secrecy to succeed……. Ooooh i see a tumble weed there, ooh and another, brrrrrh it’s sure windy out where you is!
I think the good WN’s and those seeking truth reading this will be able to make up their mind as to which of us is making the most truth here.
TODAY IS A GOOD DAY TO LEARN A NEW LESSON!
@Mickey Meadows:
Mickey Meadows, let it go, lest i suspect you have been drinkiing stupid juice!
The Monkey puts his hand in the jar and on seizing what he thinks is a nutricious peanut, begins to draw his fist back out, but the neck of the jar is too narrow for his fist and peanut. He so caught up withi is blood lust for that deliciuos peanut cannot see the obvious and he continues with his grip on what his desire says he must have.
Ours pass in your case and the obvious has not managed to penetrate your wooden top, so like the Monkey you remain pained and hungry and hurt and feeling almost successful in your quest.
At no time do you consider whether it is a trap to keep you quiet and less effective, at no time do you consider another method of being fed, just this peanut won’t come out and you have the right to get this peanut out.
The point is, your lust for peanuts is why you are where you are, not the peanut is incidental. If you didn’t love peanut so much you would hang on, ie if you didn’t harbour a hatred to who you do NOT understand, you would not be stuck and in my view, of no use to the WN’S movement, what ever that is.
As i’ve stated before the truth is not coloured coded, if you think your colour is of that importance, continue working with the Jew and kiss all ideas of freedom to the kerb, SLAVE!
@Noble Lord:
ROFL
Some times i make myself laugh with the amount of typos i leave here.
Hours pass, not Our pass and i blame the ease in which i find responding to the weak arguments posted.
From now on, if they are that ridiculous, i will not respond, even if i know they are Jew trolls spreading their germs.
I needn’t prove how much i am committed to exposing liars, i’ll allow others to do that.
I MUST REMEMBER IT IS NOT ABOUT ME, I MUST REMEMBER IT IS NOT ABOUT ME, I MUST REMEMBER IT IS NOT ABOUT ME!
@Noble Lord:
IMHO no need to worry about typos beyond what is reasonable given your background. Not everyone has benefited from the same access to education/changes etc. The important is the content of the ideas and also the motive and intent. With that said…everyone can make an effort to proof read and/or run their comment through MS Word or whatever.
Something you could consider is dropping the FWIW at the top of each post. It’s just an affectation if it is said to everyone. It should have an actual meaning in the context.
@Noble Lord. “ I agree with Mickey Meadows on this: Both our peoples are being destroyed and we need to become allies and work together. Not just yours and mine but also the Muslims.” We must keep our eye on the ball.
I mentioned Marley because of the influence on him his words must be taken with a grain of salt and it appears you have done this, so that’s cool
You said, ” This comment does not convey any weight, as i did not mention reparations and in any case those who are living on the West Coast are hardly likely to ask each other for reparations if they did not sell each other into slavery… They live there….among their people!” Blacks around the world expect White Westerners (and only White Westerners) to feel guilty about slavery that happened generations ago. This is a form of reparation. One out of every seven slave owners in the States was a Black yet no guilt is expected from them, hypocrisy in my view. Whether a slave owner is Black or White or whatever, he is still a slave owner. I see no reason other then tribalistic racism for Black descendents of slaves living in the West to not be just as upset with African Blacks for selling their forefathers as they are with Whites for buying their forefathers. Again this seems hypocritical to me.
I agree that the U.S. prison system is out of control, but Whites are put on chain gangs as well, so I’m not understanding your point.
You said,” There is no evidence Africans sold each other as a commercial enterprise” What kind of evidence are you looking for? There are ship records of rum traded for slaves. I suggest that what you believe is feel good hearsay.
You said, “The point being, even an African will say and do anything, under threat of more economic terrorism” Do you not believe that poor Whites were not under economic terrorism? Read The Lost German Slave Girl by John Bailey
You said, “What you fail to realise is The Caribbean, Africa and India held up the UK prior to and after the war.” – Then why did Britain borrow from the U.S? Here are the figures for just WWII: Even at the end of the war Britain needed American financial assistance, and in 1945 Britain took a loan for $586 million (about £145 million at 1945 exchange rates), and in addition a further $3,750 million line of credit (about £930m at 1945 exchange rates). The debt was to be paid off in 50 annual repayments commencing in 1950. Some of these loans have only recently been paid off. On 31 December 2006, Britain made a final payment of about $83m (£45.5m) and thereby discharged the last of its war loans from the USA
You said,” All people want their corner of the world, but dand it took you so long to share the feelin it’s too darn late!” – This disturbs me because it tells me that you are willing to be a jew puppet out of revenge. The field nigger getting back at the house nigger and London will be Johannesburg. My point is we are both niggers, but I guess it’s true that misery loves company. Blacks will be no better off and you will have lost any moral high ground. Tell me, where will you go to then?
You said, “US is a country of immigrants and the United Kingdom” European immigrants almost solidly with a bit of help from other. Most countries around the world had influence in their development from other then their majority populations.
BTW, do the Black Caribbeans ever consider giving back the islands to their native populations? After all the native populations didn’t bring Blacks there. Perhaps the Jewish Carnival Cruise Lines will give you free passage back home and this time first class.
I did refresh my memory on Anthony Johnson after your suggestion. He came as an indentured servant. Upon his release he “bought” indentured servants and then petitioned the court to make one a servant for life and won. What is your understanding?
I imagine you are familiar with Prof. Tony Martin, but just incase you’re not: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4eKL3osoL4
BTW Noble Lord, you are a good sport for putting up with all of us talking at you and being brutally honest with how we are thinking. Good on you mate.
@Helvena:
.”@Noble Lord. “ I agree with Mickey Meadows on this: Both our peoples are being destroyed and we need to become allies and work together. Not just yours and mine but also the Muslims.” We must keep our eye on the ball.”
Comment:
I believe we can work with peoples of other races who understand the “Jewish” threat and one might be able to make alliances with certain Muslim peoples, but to think that our people will be able to make an alliance with Muslims as a whole is nonsense. They are intentionally on the side of the elite Jews when it comes to white/Christian nations. Their game is a cultural war by forced conquest. If victorious, whites will be under Islamic law which by its nature encourages the mixing of the races. Our only hope is Christian/Common/Constitutional law which trumps the present Judaic legal fiction that gives room for Muslims to start taking over in our lands. As long as other races adhere to our law source, that is fine with me since I know their numbers will be a by a large percentage, a minority.
“Excuse me, but i quoted no conspiracy theory, obviously you approving of evil Freemasonic influence wish to create an elaborate cover for their activities and associate me with all manner of what you term “conpiracy theory” out there on the internet, another Jew ploy!”
So I take it you are insinuating that I am a Jew? Now that is amusing. As to your not having quoted a conspiracy theory, you as much as stated that Masonry is a tool employed by Jews to control the White elite. Since that cannot be proven, and this nonsense is all over the internet, you most certainly are quoting conspiracy theory. You can no more prove that “Freemasonry” (Masons, here in the US) are involved in any conspiracy with Jews any more than I can prove that the Protocols were in fact written by a Jew, you are engaging in and aiding the spread of this wild assumption/slander against the Masonic organization.
You are doing this site no favors by quoting such rubbish here and littering it with conspiracy theory which detracts from the credibility of the site which was the whole point of my comment.
You further stated:
“Firstly, if YOU are a Freemason, then YOU and your ilk have taken a firm stance against God and Yesua, need i remind you of his Sermon on the Mount, Matthew CH5, Vrse 33-37?
READ IT again be sure of where you stand in this time.”
- LOL! No, I am not a Mason. Secondly I have read the Sermon on the Mount “For What It Is Worth”! As to my stance on Christianity, I feel (like many WN’s, incidentally) that if there are any conspiracies whatsoever, then Christianity is the granddaddy of them all! Nothing has so weakened the White race as this pacifist, egalitarian drivel, and Saul of Tarsus went out of his way to spread this ill to the Roman Empire (the Athenians merely laughed at him). So you see “Noble Lord”, as I am disdainful of egalitarianism I am concerned only with the survival/promotion of my own race. Our problems today stem from our people’s meddling in the affairs of others in the past and the abandonment of a policy of isolationism (which of course includes keeping Jews away from our countries). Your problems are not our problems except where our ancestors having used your kin to do labor which they themselves should have done had brought Negros into our environment. Largely, Negros are by nature violent (witness Zimbabwe, South Africa, Liberia and all black run countries today-or the rioting recently in Britain or the flash mobs in the US). No, Whites need to live separately in a homeland of their own. You will call me racist and I do not care. I do not wish for harm to people “of color”, but I prefer my own kind. If that is being racist, then so be it! There can be no “alliances” between Blacks and Whites. That is nonsense and for that reason I wonder why you bother to post to this site, aptly entitled “Occidental Observer”.
Marcel Bas wrote:
“I replied that it is logically impossible to answer such a question, and added that I am in favour of an assimilation policy with regard to Muslims—certainly a moderate position (and one not at all in line with many anti-immigration organizations and publications, including TOO, that advocate repatriation and question the feasibility and desirability of assimilation of Muslims and other non-White immigrants).”
Another worthless race-traitorous White male conservative. Click on the link below to see what Mr. Bas wants the Muslims to assimilate with.
Dutch Women’s Field Hockey Team
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2012/07/dutch-field-hockey-team-poised-for-gold-in-the-2012-babe-games.html
@mark:
You were faster than I.
A typical pseudo-WN, “well-minded” (a “Gutmensch” as the Germans would say).
Continuously on the retreat, whining when he gets attacked. Excusing himself, distancing himself from other WN positions (including TOO).
Believing in a game the rules of which have rigged by the tribe a long time ago: “fair journalism”, “democracy”, “freedom of expression”.
This author still has to learn the basics. The best example ever published on TOO, how we get nowhere.
@Helvena:
Nice to hear back from you;
There is no doubt in my mind that we are in total agreement about the need for unity among all peoples of the world when it comes to this destructive, all controlling, criminal enterprise encapsulated in a lifestyle resembling that of a parasitic germ, hell bent on all those deemed legitimate targets, as encoded in that evil code, the Talmud.
It is also my view that Islam has never been the enemy and does his Christ/Messiah loving brother proud by resisting the evil practice of usury/fractional reserve banking!
Whilst I owe it to myself to honestly investigate the little known aspects of the enslaved negroes in the US and being suitably intrigued, so much so that I intend to follow up on what has been revealed to me of late, I am weary of drawing final conclusions at this stage.
I maintain that the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade was wrong and all who participated in it are guilty of the greatest crime against humanity. The enterprise/crime was never thought up by a Blackman, regardless of those blacks that managed to acquire slaves once they were on US shores and purchased from other, perhaps, brutal slave holders.
Having said that I do not intend to excuse any black man or woman for the crimes they commit, be that against whites, or blacks, a crime is a crime!
There definitely needs to be more honesty concerning the TAST and the subsequent trading in negroes, for free labour, that ensued. I am not an expert, but what I understand thus far, is that it was a private enterprise/crime that once reaching mainland US became a wholesale, complete with barbaric chains, whips and punishments for want away captives.
Now the Anthony Johnson case is rather an interesting prospect and one worthy of investigating, because at best it was a conspiracy and at its worst, a complete hoax!
There are several reasons why I come to this conclusion and they are as follows:
1/. Anthony Johnson is alleged to have been taken from Angola and indentured for a period of time and if this case is anything to go by, that’s the only type of slavery there is, Indentured!
However, this illiterate ex indentured servant, acquires a number of “slaves”, or indentured servants and it is alleged that one runs away to a fellow white slave owner, claiming he is being unjustly held over and above his indentured period. This white slave owner accepts him into slavery, thus begins Anthony Johnson’s legal battle for being wronged.
2/. It appears that there is no law in Virginia sanctioning slavery for life, yet this illiterate ex indentured servant argues his case to the courts, citing that he has rights to hold another man in permanent slavery and the courts, knowing of no law, agree with him and render the want away indentured negro back into the hands of Anthony Johnson!
3/. Wrongly, this case, even if it were true, is being cited by far to many with a vested interest in portraying white enslavers of being some victim of propaganda, when it truly was the black man all along who is the reason for his own plight.
It’s called blame the victim, just as many prefer to throw around the claim that blacks were part and parcel of a commercial enterprise in the selling of negroes on the African continent. Nothing new here folks!
What happened then, I suspect is what happens now, people live on profitable tracts of land and just as the white man moved the Native America off huge tracts of land, because “There’s gold in thum thur hills, it’s exactly the same theatre play, just as they recently did in Sudan, of which in this case, Rothschild merely got his lackeys to partition the country and now they are moving those people in the South of Sudan, off their land!
I digress, but sometimes it is necessary to show demonstrate a policy of “If it isn’t broke, don’t fix it” a modern twist on the biblical book Ecclesiastes Chapter 1 Verse 9 “The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is which shall be done and there is no new thing under the sun”.
In short, humans have a habit of blaming the victim, if she didn’t wear that short mini, or what did that black dude expect walking down here eyeballing that white woman, or “Yo we’s naggers and ma homies smoke that mf for walking up in here”, or just plain he looked at me!
4/. If the courts legitimised slavery some years after the Anthony Johnson affair, (If it isn’t a hoax),show me the evidence it was his case that formed the basis for this crime!
5/. If Virgina legalised life enslavement of negoes in it’s state, show me where that became the law up and down the land!
6/. Anthony Johnson was deemed not a citizen after his death and had much of his lands confiscated….funny that.
These are just a few of the reasons I asked you to look again into the Anthony Johnson issue, because just like blacks have been sold a pup that looks cute and justifies some moral superiority, I often discover they are being played, as I fear WN’s are in this case, not that I can claim I am correct either, I merely say, without further investigation, I hold my final conclusion in the AF affair.
YOU SAID:
“Blacks around the world expect White Westerners (and only White Westerners) to feel guilty about slavery that happened generations ago. This is a form of reparation.”
This is definitely not true!
The responsibility for the white involvement in slavery is seldom accepted by whites and even though Jews were the main players, whites were also major players, especially those in the UK, who build their empire off much of the wealth accrued from the Caribbean.
Whites have accepted the Jewish holohoax, which is fake, but balk at the truth of the TAST and what ensued as a result of the TAST, I speak of terrorism/KKK, Jim Croweism, Lynchhing, reneging on the reconstruction post Civil war and I’m sure Spike Lee has some issue about some 40 acres and a mule, I haven’t researched yet.
The Brutish Empire and this continued attack on Africa, currently being lead by Jewish puppet Obama!
I think if you knew black people, you would hear a different point of view than that which is tossed around WN’s circles. For example what would you say to a crack addict you loved?
That’s right, are you crazy or what?
Those black voices you hear, like the New Black Panther party jerk, who stands openly in the street advocating the killing of white babies, yet NEVER gets arrested?
When I listen to WN’s say see, all blacks this and they get that, I think ARE YOU CRAZY?
That is why I think without black help your movement is doomed, because you cannot suss a Jew out in your organizations and when an FBI/Jew troll stands up and says kill white babies and does not get arrested, you cannot see that he is a government stooge, created juuuust for you to buy into!
We have them in the UK also, as you did with that dude, Hal Turner, who used to host a radio show and stirred up the race bait game very well!
Believe me, anytime you hear a professor, or anyone advocate the murder of anyone and does not get arrested, he is either an FBI troll or a Jew puppet. Always look around to see what is being done on that day in the black community that is positive, or if blacks and whites are doing something that looks like a healing process is going on.
Personally I never change my moral standards, because an a hole says or does something stupid, unfortunately far to many whites do, which is a crying shame. That is what most black people are vexed about with whites, not just slavery.
Here we are having a decent discussion and you have brought valuable information to my attention and I have considered it and shall consider and investigate further, I dismiss nothing and I certainly do not hate or dislike you for standing your ground and expressing how you feel today.
I will take a look at the book you suggested and agree we all have been under economic terrorism.
However the Marshall Plan, which the UK signed up to was about fighting a Jewish war the UK could not afford, hence it was broke at wars end and only recently paid that war debt off.
My point about aiding the UK in war time was man power, oil, etc, but after the war foodstuffs from the Caribbean, eg a white bloke I used to work with told me that after wars end his dad came home and pulled out a banana and he said he ran, because he’d never seen one of those before!
As for the Islands in the Caribbean, well the original inhabitants of those islands were the victims of genocide, so they cannot return and furthermore, those peoples in the Caribbean have been placed there and know nothing of which part of Africa their ancestors came from. Neither do they speak the languages, because that privilege was extracted from them on pain of death.
Most of the Caribbean have either been Dutch, French, or English and have served those Nations off shore for hundreds of years, hence they are the citizens of those mother Nations and accepted as such.
My friend there are ignorant people of every nation, because they are ignorant of the facts, it does not mean they do not share a collective responsibility.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WBtyG2OJvw
Here’s another gem!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQdhMSEqhfg&feature=related
Come on have a laugh with me!lolol
I appreciate your posers and I believe in communicating and taking on board points never considered before and as I’ve said, I may not be correct in all my assessments and hope you receive my analysis in good heart.
I still believe we have common ground and see no reason to believe we can’t be robust in our discussion, but respectful of each other positions and with that, i bid you good morning, got a busy day ahead.
@sylvie:
He is a classical example of what William Pierce called the reason “why conservatives can’t win.” The only right attitude is to advocate the stopping of all non-White immigration and the repatriation of all resident non-Whites, no matter how long ( or even how many generations ) they are already in the country. Anything else is allowing a slow but certain genocide.
@George:
Really dude?lol
There is already an alliance between blacks and whites, it’s called divided we fall!
Take it from me, there is NO organisation a whie man can have that will not be infiltrated and eventhally controlled by Jews, because Jews know the caucasian penchant for all things colour, which is a modern Jewish trick.
It never was so, in ancient Greek and Roman times, just since the Jew introduced the “Curse of Ham”!
Even down to your Ku Klux Klan was infiltrated and run by Jews, you see secret organisation are of Satan, not of God!
Next minute you’ll be saying your are an atheist, like most infiltating Jews, or Jews who reject there nasty crede!
If we disagree, then fair enough, we have nothing more to say!
@Donar van Holland:
Sure, fellow Dutchman, you can call me Marcel. You know, as I do, that in the Netherlands people call each other ‘mijnheer’ (mister) more than in the US, where people call each other by the name much sooner.
I realize that politeness is not going to save the day. Maybe it hardly worked for me, but maybe it did. I also know that this is the way I am: trying to be reasonable and polite to others. So yes, you are right when you say that if we stick to the rules of civilized debate it is more for our own benefit; both for your own personality and for our rightful place in the national debate.
I also think that politeness and civility is purely practical: good conduct is a lingua franca for people who don’t know each other. Our societies are made up of people who may have never met before. People can have extremely different ideas about issues like the survival of our culture, people, values and what have you. Our country would turn into an even bigger chaos if everyone who thinks he is right, will start ranting and lying and cheating just to prove he is right. We should not turn into creatures like the abovementioned ‘antifascists’. I know that in America some lobby organisations like the ADL and the SPLW, and political parties, talk show hosts and others, tend to shout to their opponents, display plain unfair behaviour, and their opponents will retort likewise. I notice that Geert Wilders’ PVV has adopted this fashion. I think he has watched too many American talk shows, and he has learned too much from people like Rush Limbaugh and Pamela Geller. I think that there should be no place for this sort of debate in the Netherlands. We could suffice with wit and winks, as Snake says up here.
I fully agree with what you say here:
Yes, I also think that the PVV may have an unintended positive influence on the metapolitical struggle in the Netherlands in the long run. After all, the PVV (Freedom Party) is standing up for the indigenous/native Dutch people, and that is just great. All we hear from the left is that the PVV is excluding people (i.e. Muslims). Martin Bosma, while quoting old Dutch socialists who were aware of the historical rights and the ethnic interests of their people, shows that standing up for your own people is neither left nor right. And his overt support for the Afrikaners stresses that these interests also hold for your ethnic brethren abroad. Can one get even more metapolitical?
Still I am afraid of what the future may hold: what sort of society will the Netherlands turn into? In the nineties I warned for multicultopia, in which we would find a disrupted, polarized nation, with native people even further displaced from their old areas; with an EU which will demand even more open borders which will lead to more high concentrations of non-Dutch people in certain areas, leading to further polarization and disintegration of our nation and of good manners and traditions… At some point the social fabric cannot stretch any further. And what strikes me: 15 years later it is actually happening! I notice that being aware of things and ventilating them will not stop developments. Instead, people who were already saying these things in the nineties, were blemished and muzzled, and continue to be blemished. At the same time, liberals who have wisely kept quiet in the nineties are now applying the anti-immigrationist agenda. It is a strange world.
@mark:
The alternative for assimilation will be the continuation of this multicultural society, with an eternal ethnic battle for power, polarization, parliamentary representation of other cultures, opposing interests, etc. But I agree, assimilation is far from ideal. One way or the other, we’re lost.
@Marcel Bas:
You wrote:
“The alternative for assimilation will be the continuation of this multicultural society, with an eternal ethnic battle for power, polarization, parliamentary representation of other cultures, opposing interests, etc. But I agree, assimilation is far from ideal. One way or the other, we’re lost.”
No, you’re not lost, you just need to summon some courage. You need to do everything possible to collapse the economy and promote racial discord.
The alternative is to understand that all of the non-whites will have to be removed by force not only from Holland but from all of Europe and from all of the Whitelands. That means decades of civil war/conflict.
The leadership of all of the European countries is illegitimate and their liquidation could begin any time. It will be guerrilla warfare.
If necessary, every one of the non-whites will have to be killed no matter what or how long it takes.
@George:
Incidentally, which one are you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOzDaW07eRM
You know nothing of the riots in the UK, only what your Jew media gave you to run with and you’re still running?
You shoud have represented It’s ra w hell in their Olympics.lolol
SOME DAYS SOME PEOPLE JUST DON’T HAVE IT IN THEM TO GET UP,ZZZZZZZZZZZ
Don’t let me disturb your sleep.
@Noble Lord:
I know what my senses tell me, and I live with and see black violence here in the US every day. As you said:
“If we disagree, then fair enough, we have nothing more to say!”
So why not drop the written exchange now? We have nothing in common.
@Noble Lord:
You have your own agenda, friend. You obviously don’t get the concept of labels. I am white. Politically I am a Nationalist, and have been for more than 30 years. Nationalism removes financial control of the tribe. The GATT and WTA are organizations that play into the control of the tribe.
My opposition to immigration, whether white, black, yollow, or polka-dot, has always been the same: 1) it is a tool used to supress wages and living standards; 2) it is evvironmentally unfriendly, causing a strain on land and water resources; 3) excuses about needing immigants with special skills i) absolves the governments from providing education to its own citizens, and ii) deprives the country or origin of a valuable asset; 4) causes an increase in housing and other costs for the native population; and 5) it is unnecessary. I won’t touch on the cultural issues – the un-intended consequences to which Enoch Powell referred, or the cost to governments to support the new immigrants.
Read my post more carefully. I stated what the old man that I knew had to say. Post war simply means after the war. You completely miss my point, he said that he had never seen a black man until the US Army came.
As for the “official” population statistics, they misrepresent reality. They only tally citizens, not who is living there. My childhood friend, who is white, was living in a bed sit in the 70s when the cencus was done. He wasn’t included, even though he had been living there for 2 years.
The first time I visited the UK was in 1972. By that time Wolverhampton was more than 50% black. Areas of London, like Brixton, were fast becoming majority black. The friend I was visiting, a true Cockney, lived near Regent’s Park. He referred to the area as “darkest Africa”. As for the Asians, particularly from the Indian sub continent, they were literally coming by plane load on a daily basis from the late 60s until the residency requirements changed. That situation was made worse when they were expelled by from Uganda, which apparently was OK. It is this event that gives “White Nationalists” the ability to ask for the same.
Meanwhile, back to the Asians, by the late 70s there was a Pakistani family living on Lewis that had learned Erse and had taken over the mobile green grocer business. Those things don’t happen over night. There are, and have been for decades, hundreds of thousands and likely more than a million illegal non white people living in the UK. During my last, and probably final visit, in 2007, I could not identify London as an “English” city by the people on the street.
The fact that you refer to Queen Elizabeth I, a person that you never met, and of whom you have no contemporary knowledge, in such a derogatory manner indicates to me that you are less than noble, certainly not a Lord, and openly anti white.
@Curmudgeon:
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
I thank you for engaging me in this cordial debate, as it takes two to conflict, or agree on issues small, or great.
My “agenda” if you will, is to attempt to awaken that which is within you, but has been “blind spotted”, thus the obvious appears to you to be most unlikely, or the wooden top amongst your ranks an act of war, or treason.
It appears from your comments that you are aware of much, yet your conclusions yield a paltry return and you are not alone in this regard, the family of man in has this problem….it is not colour coded!
YOU SAID:
“My opposition to immigration, whether white, black, yollow, or polka-dot, has always been the same:”
1) it is a tool used to supress wages and living standards;
I agree in part, but only in so far as MODERN IMMIGRATION as ascribed by Caucasian governments that have ALLOWED the Jew to demand and get his world policy!
Consider this; When the Caucasian left Europe to set up home in America, was it to suppress wages and did he have prior knowledge that allegedly he had been there before?
Nope? Well let’s just move on to your next point!
2) it is evvironmentally unfriendly, causing a strain on land and water resources;
All Western/Caucasian governments have allowed the Jew policy of privatization, to buy up their water supply, policy and resources. You, not Havier/Abdul/Yang/ Derone have allowed big corporations to destroy your Infrastructure, immigrants meet the playing field you actually allowed to exist!
Were the Greeks and Romans colour prejudiced, or is this a new phenom, you tell me what you know?
3) excuses about needing immigants with special skills i) absolves the gove rnments from providing education to its own citizens, and ii) deprives the country or origin of a valuable asset;
No Blackman created any such policy of invade other nations, or to debase their own, look to your self for reasons for that stupidity!
Seems to me your entire post is about finding excuses, that mirror sure hurts your feelings!
4) causes an increase in housing and other costs for the native population; and
In the late 19th century, you know past 1865 when the civil war had been fought and past 1878 when Zulu’s routed Rothschild & Queen Victoria’s well equipped army at the battle of Isandlwana, the UK allowed a band of Jews to escape the wrath of Russia and allowed them to occupy the East End of London.
Whitechapel was a long time neglected area, so much so that a Jew found it an easy huntin ground to slaughter the local prostitutes and finf cover from on high places, but that’s another story!
The point being, Caucasian governments have NEVER cared for their poor, but heck they make great cannon fodder, what a resource!
5) it is unnecessary. I won’t touch on the cultural issues – the un-intended consequences to which Enoch Powell referred, or the cost to governments to support the new immigrants.
Enoch Powell was wrong FOOL!
Tell me when he spoke out against the Jews who have no right residing in the UK let alone swindle control of the Bank of England and enter par- liar- ment in 1858!
As for the rest of your post, it’s akin to the black Jew controlled stooges we have in the UK!
For example Brixton has always been a majority white borough,FACT!
At best it had a population of 40% non white, which means a majority 60% non black!
Go on, fetch!
The stats will not run away, they are NOT colour coded. Just because there is a high percent of ethnics in your locale, it doesn’t mean your tiny wooden top should exaggerate.lolol
Uhm, when Essex was expanded nd new towns were built, many whites moved out, because they new their governments were not caring for where they lived. Blacks were happy to have anywhere to live, ie NO CHOICE!
Fancy living in Detroit? Naaah didn’t think so! Aaand who do you think moved business’s away destroying the local communities?
YOU SAID:
“The friend I was visiting, a true Cockney, lived near Regent’s Park. He referred to the area as “darkest Africa”.
What relevance is that? Surely you jest?
Ooh you are sooo credible!
Whilst I harbour no hatred to my Asian brethren, it is true, they were given a free pass, but whites allowed the policy of Asians marrying Asians from their continent and being allowed to fly their extended families over to the UK.
Sikh’s who by and large are a peaceful bunch are allowed to carry knives on their person, yet the fact that many fought for Hitler is airbrushed from the pages of history.
YOU SAID:
“The fact that you refer to Queen Elizabeth I, a person that you never met, and of whom you have no contemporary knowledge, in such a derogatory manner indicates to me that you are less than noble, certainly not a Lord, and openly anti white.”
Hmmm, did she execute her sister?
Did she sanction the robbing of Spanish ships….they who expelled the JEW?
Did she eventually get wise to her Jew physician and have him executed?
Uhmmm I think she executed quite few peeps no?
Queen Liz I and who she was is there for all to peruse, are you related?
FOR THE RECORD I AM NEITHER ANTI WHITE OR PRO BLACK!
I hope you do not take great offence to my response to your posers, I habour no grudge, or dislike for good honest decent people, albeit none of us is perfect.
TRUTH IS NOT COLOUR CODED!
@Marcel: Dear Marcel, I agree that it is a difficult choice for a considerate man, but assimilation is not at all a solution in my opinion. And I say that as someone who has met quite a lot of nice non-white people, and even has some non-white friends.
But we are talking politics here, i.e. it is nothing personal. We concern ourselves with groups and their conflicts of interests. And from a political view, as a conscious white man, I want non-white immigrants to leave for non-white countries. By peaceful means if possible.
Until that is feasible, unofficial apartheid must be encouraged. In fact, this is happening already, with whites fleeing the large cities.
This unofficial apartheid will create ethnic tensions, I agree. But these tensions are not necessarily all bad. They can also be a chance for white awakening. After all, the Jews could force non-white immigration on us because whites are ethnically quite unconscious, many times willfully so. Conflicts may wake them up, rather like the saying: “A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality.” You see this already in PVV circles, and even somewhat in society at large you see a return of the idea of Dutch-ness.
Of course we want our country back, but without white consciousness we cannot even start. Maybe we cannot influence society enough to repatriate the non-whites yet, but we can already stimulate white consciousness. And we must strive for conscious whites to control as much of the country’s policy as possible. I am afraid we have to become “Jews” in our own country, which means: ethnic networking.
I welcome the head scarf as a means that will separate US from THEM. But more importantly, it hopefully makes whites wake up to the fact that they are an ethnic group themselves, with their own way of life that needs defending. Every time I see the scary figure of a woman in a black niqab, I know that I am different and wànt to be different. It would not surprise me if many whites feel the same.
I believe Wilders has said something like that race riots would not necessarily be a bad thing. He may secretly like us more than he could admit in public. To my personal experience at least, people with an Indonesian background, and especially people from Ambon, are both ethnically proud of their own group AND are very appreciative of whites.
All in all, we might even try to view this awful immigration in a positive light: if it makes whites wake up. Then white consciousness might prove to be “The Gold in the Furnace” of these dreadful times.
Wanna a PhD?
Write a thesis on the links between social media and Far Right groups.
It’s a Zio scam. They got their agents all over academia. Shabaz Goi and sayanim are trolling social media and infiltrating Far Right groups.
That’s the only link we need to know about!