There is a lot of angst out there about the racialization of American politics and in particular that the GOP has become a White people’s party. As noted in “The Republicans’ Last Hurrah,” the basic racial politics of the election come down to Romney needing at least 61% of the White vote to win and for Whites to make up 74% of the electorate.
Then, in a New York Times article entitled, “Making the Election about Race,” Thomas Edsall noted that the Romney-Ryan campaign not only understands the need to appeal to Whites but is acting accordingly. “The Republican ticket is flooding the airwaves with commercials that develop two themes designed to turn the presidential contest into a racially freighted resource competition pitting middle class white voters against the minority poor.”
Of course, it’s not just the minority poor. Edsall still lives in a world where all non-Whites are poor, kept in poverty by those evil White folks. (Probably part of the job description at the NYTimes.) In fact, at least 80% of all non-Whites are expected to vote for Obama. It’s the non-Whites versus the Whites, with a lot of working class Whites voting Republican and a lot of well-off non-Whites voting for Obama (such as Jews, 80% of whom voted for Obama in 2008). In 2008, only 40% of Whites with less than a college education voted for Obama, whereas 83% of the non-White working class voted for Obama (see here).
According to Edsall, the two themes of Romney’s ads are:
- Accusing President Obama of gutting the work requirements enacted in the 1996 welfare reform legislation; and
- Alleging that Obama has taken $716 billion from Medicare.
Advertisement 
So why are these ads racial? First, Medicare (government supported medical care for senior citizens) is a program serving an overwhelmingly White (77 percent versus 10 percent Black, and 8 percent Hispanic) constituency, while “Obamacare” will provide health coverage to the uninsured who are disproportionately Black and Hispanic (16.3 percent Black; 30.7 percent, Hispanic; 5.2 percent, Asian-American; only 46.3 percent less than half is made up non-Hispanic White [many of whom are young people less concerned with health issues]).
And the GOP has got a heavy hitter in the lineup swinging their bat. The principal media consultant for the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future, which will be running many of these ads over the next ten weeks, is Larry McCarthy, who produced the original Willie Horton ad. One such TV ads says, “You paid into Medicare for years — every paycheck. Now when you need it, Obama has cut $716 billion from Medicare.” It then continues, “Why? To pay for Obamacare. The money you paid for your guaranteed health care is going to a massive new government program that is not for you” (emphasis added),
Edsall and others criticize Romney-Ryan and the GOP for playing dirty pool, bemoaning that, “the longer campaigns go on, the nastier they get. Once unthinkable methods become conventional.”
And they are correct. Because they aren’t honest enough to admit the dirty big secret that both domestic and foreign policy in America elections and politics are overwhelmingly about race and ethnicity. Everybody knows it, especially those that run the campaigns. Recall not only Wille Horton (which may have put G.H.W. Bush over the top against Michael Dukakis, especially when it was given substance by Black CNN moderator Bernie Shaw’s question), but also the Jesse Helms “White Hands” commercial, which depicted a White job applicant who “needed that job” but was rejected because “they had to give it to a minority.”
But then again, race is the truth whose name we dare not speak. A Los Angeles Times article “Republican National Convention puts a brown face on a white party” noted that, until Mitt’s very Nordic looking wife Ann followed New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (who looked a lot like fictional fellow New Jerseyean Tony Soprano), the stage at the Republican National Convention Tuesday night was dominated by a parade of very select members of racial and ethnic minorities. Among those who triumphally mounted and marched across the stage for the TV cameras on opening night were several Hispanics (Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval; Sher Valenzuela, the GOP candidate for lieutenant governor of Delaware; Ted Cruz, Tea Party candidate for the U.S. Senate in Texas; and the first lady of Puerto Rico, Lucé Vela Fortuño); then there was also South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (a Sikh) and the Black Democrat-turned-Republican Congressman Artur Davis, who seconded Barack Obama’s nomination four years ago and now delivered a stinging rebuke to the president he helped elect. During the roll call of the states, several Black delegates were trotted out and showcased so that they had the honor — and the spotlight — while surrounded by crowds of White faces in casting their state’s ballots for a very White candidate.
According to the LATimes article, this was the GOP’s way of telling the country that “These guys have chosen the Republican path and just look where it has gotten them!” But, of course, these are not the same Blacks and Hispanics that are the targets of the anti-Obamacare, anti-welfare ads. The difference is that conservative, Republican non-Whites are housebroken — you can invite them into your party, your business, or your home, and they won’t make a mess in the middle of the convention platform, the executive office, or the living room. The same can be said of some immigrants. But the joker in the deck is none other than Galton’s Law of Regression to the Mean — however high an individual rises, you can bet that his (or her) relatives will return towards the average for that group, whether in IQ, welfare dependence, criminality, or any other behavior.
No matter. Politics is not about truth – just about getting elected. Even if a record White turnout puts Mitt Romney in the White House, expect nothing on the part of him or his party to advance White interests (see “The case for Obama: Why four more years may be less disastrous than unrestrained GOP rule“).
Jack Beauregard is a writer living on the West Coast.
Facing the Future as a Minority
I wish the people that run the campaigns for the Democrats would get drunk one night and admit their racial ploys. It would be nice to expose their treacherous duplicity, so they could get tarred and feathered.
@Vlad Writes:
Funny thing is, the Democrats and Left tend to be a lot more open about demographically wiping White people out. I’ve seen Clinton smirk about how soon the Democrats won’t be able to lose due to changes from immigration. It’s just the GOP that seems to live in la-la land.
I have a feeling (which means it carries no weight) that this is the last of the old style elections we will have in America. Things will get much more racial by 2016. Whites will be an even smaller part of the electorate (although still big) and the voting patterns of each group will be obvious:
Blacks and browns all vote one way.
Whites the other way.
Asians don’t seem to care.
At some point the divergent interests of all these groups will just be too obvious to ignore. We won’t be talking about the “marketplace of ideas” as the Right loves to proclaim; instead we will be talking pure race politics. If you are black, brown, everyone knows how you will vote. If you are White (truly White, not Semitic White), at least 70% of you will vote another way.
What I’ve been saying ad infinitum, “Don’t expect anything from the Republican elite if your’e white, BUT ENOUGH HOT AIR TO HAVE FILLED THE HINDENBURG. PERIOD!!!
Leftists frequently, openly state that the Democrats will have a permanent majority when they get enough Hispanics in the country. Being constantly reminded of that is one reason I left the blue team.
Then I discovered that anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
@peppermint:
Then I discovered that anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. Go peppermint! This is the fastest growing phenom on the internet.
Surely, Mitt Romney is not another George Bush! Bush was one of the worse Presidents in American history.
This time, however, the election is about race. Whether Romney is good or bad is not the issue at this time. It is about whites sticking together. It’s about us becoming one unified body and looking to the future for our own kind and looking to white leadership. Leadership that is white and acts white.
Every white person is obligated to do his part, to the survival and well being of the white race. We cannot afford treason. Non-whites out-number us a million times to one. Our world is not safe, anymore, and every white person must understand the direness of our situation. We have stiff competition in our towns and cities. More and more barbarians are crowding in on us.
It is imperative to support our race in everything. It’s us – the White Race – against the world. That is the truth.
I get a kick out of reading the one sign in the graphic about the guy being a ” birther and a global warming denier”
These orwellian times have ways of announcing bad think in terms of the word “denial” in that it is used when a person disagrees with something that is good think.
The birther is kind of whatever. He may not have been born at all . He’s the bombo . He’s black magic, yes he is.
For the GOP, Turning Right Means Turning White—No Matter How It Looked on Tuesday Night
But try they will, to fit the bill, of having multculti on the sill.
Oh , when will they learn , that to make the turn , it’s the white vote they have to earn.
But, no they won’t , because the kosher crowd says don’t , and so it’s the same old b.s. for gawd know how much longer and they are a pathetic bunch of losers and to h*ll with them all anyway. Politics is a f’n joke and you might as well vote for the magic n*gro.
The last part didn’t rhyme but it was the best part, by far.
Its very difficult to imagine Romney winning this election. The Media masters abhor Romney. They instinctively hate him, he is of an alien race, a threat, a potential evildoer. Just a glance at his supporters tells them all they need to know: he is the captain of Haters, and thus dangerous, and he must not be permitted to win.
The “undecideds”, on which the election victory rests, are notoriously wishy-washy. They typically respond emotionally to issues (a large part of it is a gender thing), and are easily swayed by the latest electioneering broadcasted on the MSM. I would not be surprised if Romney takes the lead at some point, he is an intelligent campaigner, and there is much for people to grumble about with Obama. Yet the final weeks of the campaign will see the usual “October surprise” and a flurry of negative hits on Romney by the media masters, which usually tends to capture those erstwhile undecideds. I recall the GWB election v. Gore, where GWB commanded a strong lead, only to be ambushed by news that he had been arrested for a DUI in the past, and his lead evaporated.
I am voting for A3P if its on the ballot here in Utah, if not then I will go for the Constitution Party. Barring a semi-miracle by Romney, Obama will return, which although unwelcome, is the lesser of the two evils.
I live in Britain and one thing that always amazes me is the NHS.
It will pay for any treatments that benefit non-whites no matter how trivial. Yet if you are white, especially Irish, they refuse to treat you for anything. The amount of doctors who have refused to refer me to a dermatologists to treat my skin is just amazing. Yet if you look at how they bend over backwards to treat the non-whites that the daughter-of-a-doctor Harperson demands, it is just heart-breaking.
It is no wonder that the notoriously PC Frankie Boyle used that awful insipid Olympics opening Ceremony as anti-white, pro-NHS propaganda. Anyway WTF does the NHS have to do with sport anyway?
I’d say 10% of an NHS doctor’s work is medicine; most of it is bureaucracy in the service of the left, like jobs screening, funding for diseases that affect nonhwites etc…
Anti-Racist is code for Anti-WHite.
@Jason Speaks: It’s the white PC liberal non Jews that are the problem. Bribery, Blackmail and Brainwashing has done the trick in Congress. Guilt at being white works for the rest.
I found the appeal to generational accumulated wealth interesting. Everyone went back a few generations to tell about the immigrant ancestor who came here with nothing and built wealth which benefits their grandchildren. The repeated chant of “he did build this” speaks for the country at large. Our ancestors worked hard to give their children a better life, not to support new immigrants from Mexico.
I was also heartened by the respect for mothers which was on display. I would love to see a poll which asks women if they would prefer Ann Romney’s life or Hillary Clinton’s life.
Here’s what we are up against. Roman Catholic president of the AFLCIO Richie Trumka praises his fellow Roman Catholic and illegal alien Jose Vargas:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_RgsxJPP1A&feature=bf_next&list=PLD1BAA1F9DA2FDFCC
It is very difficult to articulate our concerns to the GOP, and demand they address our concerns, when the Big J has got us all convinced that any white person who asserts white interests and identity is either mentally ill or a failure in life. I am only now realizing, to my horror, how deep this programming runs.
If you say you oppose affirmative action, they say we are just blaming poor minorities for our own failures. This is of course outrageous, but it is also very difficult to refute because it is not factual. Can anyone suggest a snappy comeback?
@JustaWhiteMom:
I’m sorry, I do not follow the logic – objecting to affirmative action is blaming poor minorities for our own failures? Failure to do what?
I am not good at snappy comebacks, but I have and do question the justification for affirmative action. How is it justified to move the child of affluent blacks or other brown folks to the head of the line, when poor white boys are given no help at all? Why is it okay to promote a woman ahead of a better qualified man? Why does an immigrant receive preference over a child who was born here? What is the purpose of hard work, sacrifice, and saving if our own children are penalized for our efforts? Sounds like exactly what it has proven to be – a formula for failure and decline.
To become from a party of Whites to a party for Whites, the GOP has still a long way to go. The Jews have secured that only white traitors make it to the top in all institutions of most white countries. It requires nothing less than a concentrated white conspiracy to secure key positions in politics for pro-Whites. Such pro-Whites will have to infiltrate and capture the GOP like the Jewish neo-cons have done. But here they will confront an ethnic competitor that has experience in conpiracies for nearly 4000 years. A tough battle lies ahead.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Whites don’t need to conspire. We just need to name the jew and keep naming the jew until the masses catch on.
@JustaWhiteMom: Affirmative Action: Michael Jordan’s underpriviliged kids get to go to Harvard, your poor white kids get to go to hell.
Sounds snappy to me!
Anyone up for Occupy the EEOC?
I’ve often wondered when affirmative action would apply to airline pilots, most of whom still seem to be illegally white. Perhaps because they are union and vote Democrat, they get a pass. Not in South Africa any longer, though.
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=36033
Happy and safe flying, everyone.
@Vlad Writes: OMG Love it, Thanks!
““The case for Obama: Why four more years may be less disastrous than unrestrained GOP rule“”
Comment:
It would probably be better if Obama wins because both Romney and Obama get their money from the same “Jewish” source.
Like under Bush the younger- all went to hell because people mistakenly believed that Bush would be serving white-Constitutional-Republican interests whereas had Gore won, he wouldn’t have been able to get away with half of what Bush did against us.
Since we are hitting the final stretch and a dictatorship is inevitable at this point, it is better most likely that Obama does get a second term if for no other reason that it will facilitate white/Christian unity for the time that is coming when we will have to unite to stave off the “Jews” attempted physical genocide of as all.
If Romney wins, unless he pulls a JFK and the military backs him, he will be a total disaster. If Obama wins, we can count on organized resistance to their plans much more effective than had Romney won and the hammer falls.
This is why I am thinking that the “Jews” will make Romney win, because in this way, whatever unmitigated evil he forces on us, all the minorities will take it out on the whites/Christians of this nation.
That or Obama will be seen to have lost the election, but he becomes the offical dictator and chief due to another false flag by the “Jews” (blamed on whites and islamic extremists)
If this happens, whites will be in an uproar because of his new dictatorship. Whites will see this as a Coup and be enraged. Blacks and minorities will not see it that way because they think about race first and not principal and we will be greatly divided and angry- just what the “Jews” want.
If the Obama false flag scenario happens- expect the “Jews” to use the Fed against us to round us up. They are already secretly doing this to an extent to “threats” they see within white service members returning from overseas. Then expect Obama to disarm the southern border patrol as the “Jewish” media pushes the minorities and white liberal dupes into attacking white/Christian/Conservative/heterosexual/male (some female) Constitutionalists-Nationalists. The “race war” will be on then- unfortunately.
Either way- the Sh-t is about to the hit the fan so I would suggest stocking up (if you have not already) on food, supplies etc etc.
Stocking up on food, water, and self defense items is a prudent strategy. Living in the country is also a good idea, in a small, easy to maintain house with a back up generator.
@Vlad writes:
lol. I can just see dozens and dozens of South African jets, pimped out with spoilers and rims on their landing wheels which they don’t bother retracting, plummeting from the sky all over the world over the course of the next few years. And of course they’ll blame all these crashes on the White people who built the jets, not the black retards flying them.
“dey be crashin’ our panes on purpose an’ sheeyit. dey aint gluin’ da wings to da plane right.” lmao.
I am confident that Mitt Romney will not openly support assaulters of color the way Obama spoke in favor of thug Trayvon Martin. He would not speak out against a man’s right to defend his life or that of his family just because the criminal attacker happened to be black. I hope that he would not turn a blind eye to the current wave of black mobs assaulting, maiming, and killing whites all over the country. At least such mobs would not feel empowered to do what they wish.
At the very least, I imagine that the Romney Justice Department WILL prosecute any New Black Panther Party members who use clubs, insults, and threats at a polling place in order to drive whites away. I am confident that a Romney Justice Department WILL NOT INTERFERE with the prosecution of such criminals as criminal Eric Holder, criminal Barak Obama, and Holder’s criminal Justice Department have done. Even if Romney refuses to implement U.S. Immigration law as he should, he will be better for whites than anti-white racist and communist Obama. Obama’s anti-white racism has been shown through huge amounts of evidence, chiefly his own writings. His communist leanings and communist friends and mentors have been proven elsewhere.
No matter how lacking in such matters as advocacy for whites and U.S. Citizens, Romney will be far better for whites than white-hater Obama.
@Jason Speaks:
“Asians don’t seem to care”
Careful about underestimating asian aspirations to political power in western countries.
Once they reach a critical mass in a host population, they are not at all shy about throwing their weight around, and using block voting as a tool of ethnic power.
Here in Canada, most of our larger cities have large asian populations, especially chinese, and they have acquired a great deal of political power. The mainstream political parties here cater to them to get the block ethnic vote.
The chinese in western Canada have even started a chinese only political party. They don’t seem to have had any electoral success with it yet, but no doubt with time they will.
In fact, I believe that much of Prof. MacDonalds’ analysis of jewish ethnic power is equally applicable to the chinese. They are a high IQ group with very strong ethnic cohesiveness, and are not at all shy about gaming the system in a host country to gain advantage to their in-group. In addition, many of them maintain loyalty to their homeland despite long term residence in a western host country.
P.S. The GOP had better start advocating for whites or whites will stop supporting them and thus be forced to stop voting completly or only for 3rd party candidates. The GOP cannot survive WITHOUT advocating for white interests. In other words, make sure the GOP advocates for you and if they don’t, withdraw YOUR support.
@Mr Curious:
Very similar situation in Canada.
Our once excellent public health service is a shadow of what it once was. It has essentially been broken by a flood of non-white immigration straining the system. Walk into any emergency room in a major Canadian city, and it is packed with non-white “New Canadians” getting their free health care, for which they will most often have paid little or nothing towards by way of taxes.
@ Starets. Good point. Whites can learn a lesson from such groups: organize and demand advocacy!
Some authors and demographers have noted that conditions are such that in a severe crisis, Vancouver, B.C. could easily go over to Chinese control with the support of its Chinese population (ex. Russian Political Analyst Igor Panarin and Thomas Chittum, author).
My advise is: Don’t get too caught up in the IQ hierarchy, Europeans of the Nordic countries have an average IQ that is almost as high as Chinese and Jews. Then consider that a gifted European person has a much higher IQ than most Jews and Chinese. You can be sure, however, that the average Jew and the average Chinese person will assume that their IQ is higher than that of every White that they meet (they ARE cognizant of IQ results and ARE often thinking about the issue, I have heard them speak of it).
Also, IQs are not so high among all Asian Mongoloids, mainly certain northern ones. In fact, if you pay attention, you notice that the high IQs are mainly found among NORTHERNERS or those inhabiting a cool temperate continental climate. Another point is that the Mongoloids and the Jews are very intelligent in certain areas but they are not so high in certain areas (for example, Asians tend to have less language ability evidenced by Caucasians).
The Jews are the exception to the northern rule, perhaps (although their real ancestry is not settled in my book). The Jews may have acquired or improved their high IQs in that same climate zone and due to increased selective pressure and it is still in question, in my opinion, whether they mainly originated (the ancestors of modern Ashkhenazi Jews) in the Middle East or Central Asia+Europe (Mediterranean/Mongoloid hybrid Turks mixed with European people). They sure have a high incidence of blue eyes and blond hair and also of Mongoloid traits such as type B blood, known to have arisen among Central Asian Nomadic Pastoralists. Anthropologists are at a loss to explain the high B blood type based on a Middle Eastern ancestry.
I wonder how many Jews or Chinese are watching The Jersey Shore, Kardashians, Housewives of everywhere, not to mention Jerry Springer. The dumbing down of America is freighting.
The above comments pale when someone as the chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court is quoted as saying….
“The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes.”
Felix Frankfurter.
[no mention of whites, browns, asians or natives]
Moderator, please use the second of these to almost identical posts. I corrected errors in the first.
@Connor McNessa:
Presidents are sitting puppets of the Jews. If they don’t do as they are told, the end up like JFK and if they are lucky, Nixon and Clinton.
Here is one for you. The Romney Camp has declared Russia the top geo-political enemy. Gee, how come? Too many caucasian people left there? A–h—s.
@Starets: The people that have founded the white Western Nations, have been out to lunch now for a very very long time.
It’s about the economy, Stupid. The Democrats promote turning as much White Labor as possible into Black Consumption. Republicans believe Whites should be allowed to consume a bit more of the fruits of their labor.
@Bobby:
Definitely, I agree.
On the part of the majority of the population we see the results of ignorance, apathy and decades of mass propaganda. All inter-related, and a bit of a chicken and egg problem as to which of the three led to the others.
Even worse, on the part of our white elites, we see large scale treason against their own people, merely to secure their own wealth and power.
@Starets:
Good points about the Asians. They definitely do believe in gaming the system. They start giving the kids test preps for SAT early.
@Starets: About the elite, I definelty agree. In the event a radical nationalist party siezed control of the U.S. someday, the airports would be full of traitors trying to desperately leave the country, before they are simply put to the firing squad, as the former vile leader of Romania and his wife were.
@Jason Speaks: If I recounted the things I’ve seen that some Asians have done with regard to their business practices and tax responsibilities, I would no doubt simply be labeled a typical racist. Multiculturalism is a great millstone around a nations neck, no matter how you cut it. Even a leftist college professor Putnam, came to this conclusion after a 10year or so study. He concluded it fragments and distances cultures, rather than bring them together. Of course anyone simply observing the typical college scene would have come to the same conclusion without a 10 year study.
Here’s what ticks me off about that cartoon and it implications.
That picture IS diverse, with many different people. The fact that they are all white is because well, whites are a racial group with common interests in their race.
The push for diversity always means fewer whites and the destruction of white societies. Funny that.
@TyronRobertParsons
True to a degree. Non Jewish elitists at the top are also to blame (Council on Foreign Ralations, Royal Insititute of International Affairs, etc.). Complicit whites make it all possible. None of these things would happen without them. I am against everyone who imposes massive immigration and minority jihads on whites.
Obviously there is some variation even amongst the marionettes. Obama is different and even worse than most. Why are black mobs committing atrocities against whites with impunity more than ever before? There is some variation in the presidents, puppetmasters or no puppetmasters. I do not look kindly on white people being assaulted. I will blame EVERYONE causing it! I will put a lot of emphasis on the thugs doing it, too.
An 85 IQ is no excuse for commtting atrocities on behalf of a puppetmaster.
We must learn to recognize good news when it comes our way. Even given all of the restrictions which are imposed on our system the narrative has changed. Romney comes from, has lived, and encouraged his children to live traditional patriarchal, family oriented system. They are calling Obama out as equals, and Obama can only whine and blame whitey. If they pull it off, it will be a huge hit on the traditional media who had bestowed all of their best blessings on Obama. He was the One they had been waiting for and he is useless.
I will be the first to admit that poor Obama was as snookered as his fans, I don’t think he even wants the job again. That does not mean that I will refuse to take advantage of this moment.
The essence of the liberal takeover of this country was the premise that the only difference between the old WASP establishment and and the local garbage man was timing, racism, social advantages and education. Turns out that even a man who is light, bright, damn near white, who can benefit from whatever the Ivy League offers today, with good tables manners, a nice family and all the social support our elite can offer still isn’t effective.
This time….for heaven’s sake, this time vote for Mitt Romney! Not voting at all – or voting for someone other than Mitt Romeny is a vote for Obama and all the non-whites in this country. (Who have sense enought to stick together.)
Our future is at stake, Houston!
The Jews own Romney (same as the own BO) but at least Romney doesn’t hate us.
@Bobby:
Yeah, I can just picture the panic to get out.
And the white traitors are everywhere. Political elite, business elite, media elite, academic elite, educational elite, labour movement elite. Above a certain level in western societies, it becomes hard to find any white who is not a traitor to his own people. All like pigs at the trough, revelling in their filth to get their rewards.
Is not a coincidence that Romney knew Netanyahoo before he entered politics, Sarkozy also knew Netanyahoo before getting elected President.
The NWO is real, people need to wake up.
Obama is owned by a particular and particularly pernicious Jew of a particular faction and named George Soros. There are factions and they do matter. If you think that there is no difference, show me the Justice department head in the last administration who protected black thugs practicing voter intimidation with clubs. Will Eric Holder still rule Zimbabwe… I mean the Justice Department with an Iron Anti-White fist if Romney gets in. Will Romney openly back black violence and atrocities against whites and cover up a black race-war on whites like this administration. I doubt it. As a wise commenter above noted, Romney does not hate us (like Obama et. al.).
You can Google images of White girls being marched into schools with Africans at bayonet point, Google a list of the FORCED integration of schools; anti-Whites forcing non-White immigration into every White country, making it illegal to have a White town or business, force integrating Marin country, CA. Mandating that every White business hire a minimum number of non-Whites. Constantly implementing “diversity” policies to get more non-Whites into every White country, school, business and organization etc…
There is an unanswered race war against whites taking place now. Soros-owned Obama and his henchmen wink at it.
The dynamic is this: There is massive immigration forced on the people of the U.S.A. and other western nations. Jobs are given preferentially to foreigners at all levels (clear up to green-card Engineers and Scientists on temporary visas). Other jobs are sent overseas by corporations who have made their fortune off of Americans.
In addition, a blind eye is turned (regulatory capture) so that there is no enforcement on existing laws regulating trading of derivatives. A financial coup d’etat is thus performed which further harms the actual U.S. citizens and further enslaves the workforce (those who are not put out of work).
The actions of the immigration Quislings put intense pressure on the lowest strata of American society and especially the American black.
Instead of blaming foreign invaders who are ethnically cleansing blacks, they blame whitey. But not the whitey who is putting intense pressure on them through immigration, just the whitey who is also opposed to the immigration. They are afraid to challenge the Hispanic gangs that are ethnically cleansing them because the Hispanic gangs are smarter and tougher and instead they support the immigration Quislings (Obama, for example).
When you have an IQ of 85 and the smartest and most cunning, clever, crafty, and manipulative people in the world serve you propaganda, you swallow it hook, line, and sinker. That does not by any means excuse the atrocities that these black mobs are committing against our people but that is the dynamic at work.
@fender: How about nice shiny chrome spinners on the newly oversized wheels!
@Jason Speaks: It is sad to see the things you are referring to, but the country is indeed going to hell. Although I am not now nor have I ever been an advocate of violence, I can see the point now of people who have concluded they need to defend themselves with force if needed.
@Vlad Writes:
I think the key thing is to get the concept of White Genocide out there, along with the term “Anti-White”. Most Whites are utterly unaware that every single White country faces destruction in the next few decades. If enough Whites wake up, we at least opposition to the program eroding all White countries, which we don’t have now.
How will it all play out in the future? I have no clue. I do believe we have to be perceived as having the moral high ground among Whites. This is not difficult, once White Genocide is seen as real. In all likelihood, Whites will finally demand some reasonable policies to protect their countries, and the other side will go bonkers and commit violence. What happens after that, I have no idea.
I just want to want Whites to survive.
@Heather Blue: You are absolutely right. It’s obvious Republicans will not help us since they made it very clear during the convention they think immigrants are important. The audience, mostly White, cheered!!! We are doomed unless more Whites support our cause.
Don’t understand what is so special about immigrants, particularly those from Third-World countries. What we need are White immigrants.
We could yell discrimination because the 1965 Immigration law does discriminate White Europeans. Last year only 100,000 Whites of European ancestry were permitted into the country. Over 1,000,000 non-Whites from Third-World countries. That has been going on for a long time.
We must scream “DISCRIMINATION,” like the minorities.
You want to save the white world?
Concentrate all our efforts on the JEW.
It is so clear I don’t understand how it escapes us.
Yes we all have read the artucles about racial differences in intelligence.
What racial group has been the most easily manipulated by jews for the past 1800 years?
WHITE EUROPEAN CHRISTIANS.
So it would seem that beingsmarter than everyone else does not shield us from jews.
The situation for the white world is hopeless. Why?
Jews. Whites are at the same time sending their kids to die for jews and complaining about illegals.
Teaparty whites love jews. Talk about the victim loving his tormenter. Sick.
@norman S: That is certainly the ‘extended problem’ of our gradual demise; this manufactured culture (most of it not of our European mindset) has all the more increased the power of these egalitarian creatures. Hence — Modernity at its worst yet.
Without a doubt, the white egalitarian is the added sum of destruction against our spirit & traditions.
@Jason Speaks:
You said:
How will it all play out in the future? I have no clue. I do believe we have to be perceived as having the moral high ground among Whites. This is not difficult, once White Genocide is seen as real. In all likelihood, Whites will finally demand some reasonable policies to protect their countries, and the other side will go bonkers and commit violence. What happens after that, I have no idea.
Answer
EXACTLY- Morality is a major key hence the reason I speak about what I do. Unexplainable to many here, there is a source to what makes the white man’s inherent morality (in his heart) what it is. How is it that we have this innate morality that was imperative toward all the great things we have done over the years? Is morality a social construct like the “Jews” and those who think like them believe, or is it inherent, self evident? While it is obvious that morality can be programmed from external sources (the “Jews” the masters of) morality is also inherent, genetic and spiritual which is outside the realm of trying to discuss here. What I am saying is, we must focus on our inherent morality because regardless if we don’t have the same exact belief systems, what sets us apart is that we all know deep down inside that this goodness our inherent and basic morality is what we are all attempting to save in this world- this is why we fight. I also suggest that as Christ said- he is who is in us is greater than the world. Take heart!
I thought folks here might like this new article at American Renaissance.
It is a long article and actually argues for what I am trying to get people to realize. It speak in depth from an evolutionary and atheistic mindset and presents some interesting conclusions.
Here is a small portion of it.
“Prof. Haidt makes another bold foray into heterodoxy in recognizing the importance of religion in holding societies together. He thinks religion arose as a mechanism to set the rules for a smooth-running moral community and to bind people to its values. If people believe in omniscient gods they are less likely to cheat when no one is looking, and a common set of rules creates trust—what psychologists call “social capital.” This is the key to getting large numbers of people to cooperate with others who are not immediate kin. Prof. Haidt quotes David Wilson, a biologist at Binghamton University: “Religions exist primarily for people to achieve together what they cannot achieve on their own.”
http://www.amren.com/features/2012/08/why-everyone-else-is-wrong/
@Jason Speaks: If the other side would go bonkers and commit mayhem right now, it would all be excused by racism and be blamed upon white men. Hopefully, it will change someday, but for now, I feel like I need to wear a t-shirt that sez, “I formally apologize for being a white man.”
Since I don’t want to do that – what is left but to defend myself? I’m glad the professor is making the effort with this site to give us a moral underpinning, we need it also, but the quicksand is starting to get above the waist, at the least.
@Bobby: Here is one for you. The Romney Camp has declared Russia the top geo-political enemy. Gee, how come? Too many caucasian people left there? A–h—s.
It probably has something to do with Russia’s support of Iran which presents an obstacle to Israel getting us into the war they want with Iran. Romney is as aware of Jewish power as any politician. What he and his team should be thinking about is finding a way to weaken Jewish control over the American main stream media. It’s not right for one race of people like the Jews – an anti-white race at that – to control the MSM. Get rid of it as a corporate media and make it public accessible. It should be more like the Internet – open to everybody.
@Heather Blue:
I wavered for a moment but I am now back to where I was – hoping Obama will win.
It’s better to have an explicitly anti-white guy who is resisting Israeli power, than an implicitly pro-white guy is on his knees
Resisting Israel power? who do you think put him in’ they own him. but your right Romney isn’t much better. Ron Paul was the threat and we know how they cheated and blocked news coverage of him.
@Mickey Meadows:
Maybe the view from Jerusalem will persuade you to take another look. The Jerusalem Times debates the pros and cons of pre or post election and Obama vs Romney. If Israel strikes alone and Iran retaliates, Jews will be blamed not only for the destruction of the Holy Land, but the havoc wreaked on the price of oil.
America will not do it for them, at least not now. Since there are at least as many Jews in America as in Israel, they cannot even claim the threat of being wiped out. The best they can do is to claim the magic number of 6 million. No one is really buying it.
@Alice Teller:
There are two reasons Israel hasn’t had its way. The US military brass, and the Obama administration.
The lobby own both houses, so the resistence to iran has to be coming from these two sources.
If Obama goes, then you are betting on Romney being willing to put up the same resistence despite the Republicans being totally sodden with neo-conservatives.
It’s risky thinking.
Nothing matters more than avoiding Iran being bombed because if Israel get their way on Iran, Israel will suddenly become a lot more powerful. And that has ramifications for you and I. Imagine the full force of the lobby and its agents turned on us instead of just a small couple of departments.
@Mickey Meadows:
Sorry, Her is the link: http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-most-fateful-decision-of-all-iran-israel-air-strike-nuclear/
I’ll bet you a yankee dime – no strike by Americans no matter who is president for the next year?
@Alice Teller:
ok sounds good and hope you win!
@Mickey Meadows:
Bless your little heart! How can you say the lobby doesn’t own Obama????? Do the names Rahm Emmanuel, David Axlerod or George Soros get abroad?
Mickey,
You are very silly to believe that BO is really anti-Israel. I’ve explained this before on this site. BO gets most of his money from Jews, as does Romney. BO will do what the Jews want him to do, push come to shove. His speech at AIPAC made this very clear. They tell him what to say and what to do. He has tried to appear to be more diplomatic as a result of Bush’s cowboy diplomacy that caused such blowback. But in the end, BO is the Jew’s boy, and a simple search can prove where his money comes from. I’m not making this up. If you really are a white nationalist, no way can you justify a vote for Obama. Obama HATES white people as much as the Jews do. At least Romney is white and doesn’t appear to have self loathing.
I loved it when Clint Eastwood said, “We own this country.” He’s right, and we have to start showing who’s boss.
@Mickey Meadows:
Israel has been attempting false flags on America here and overseas since they set their target on Iran. The US military and a good portion of our intelligence communities have been resisting.
The Israelis want the US to attack Iran. If they cannot get this, then they will do it themselves and hope this will lead to US intervention. Either scenario means a massive hike in gas prices, Intervention by Russia and/or China which will precipitate the drop of the dollar by both nations- crashing the US market.
Obama cannot be reelected without the American Public knowing the system is totally corrupt and fixed. The Jews would rather have Obama in the white house because fundamentally speaking, he is a Communist- trained by the Jewish Soviets long ago, having a seething hatred for whites/Christians and anything traditionally American.
Romney on the other hand, could be a loose cannon. Even though he is getting funds from the “Jews” to run, supports Jerusalem as their capital and would be the perfect poster boy to blame their upcoming nefarious deeds on, his religion is a wildcard for the “Jews” when the SHTF.
Honestly, I am not sure which one they want to win. There are advantages and disadvantages to their cause with either one.
From a white Christian perspective, it would be good if Romney wins but ONLY if he turns on the “Jews” and pulls a JFK. If this does not happen it would be good if Obama wins because this will solidify our resistance while also awakening more whites/Christians.
I think the Jews sense Romney could pull a JFK and want Obama but in order to secure Obama, they have to have the conditions to justify open Martial Law and suspend elections.
There is a big desire within the “Jews” ranks to attack Iran now. Because of this I think we will see a false flag or an Israeli attack on Iran between Oct and Dec. Earlier the better for them because it takes a little time for markets to free fall and the closer this would happen to the actual election date, the more it becomes apparent this is all being manufactured from the top.
@Alice Teller:
The lobby owns everyone in that sense. Everyone has to grovel. But obama has passively resisted Israel massively. He and Netanyahu hate eachother. Just look at what Israel want…they hate Obama. Netanyahu started yelling at the American ambassador the other day. The US Military brass is allowed to go around saying they don’t want any part of a strike on Iran.
You’ll lose all of that if you lose Obama. This has nothing to do with how Obama feels about whites…it’s about what is good for the whites. Obama is good at this moment. IMHO.
@TyronRobertParsons:
OK…well look…we don’t exactly influence the outcome so the context of this discussion is “what is good for the whites”. It’s a good discussion for white people to be having, whatever your particular calculus.
It’s good to have white people thinking abiout what is good for white people.
@Naomi Wilson:
Naomi…you’re thinking what is good for us and that’s good enough for me. I think Obama is better…but believe me I wanted to believe all that eastwood stuff as much as you. But my instinct tells me that the reason we are feeling like we just got a little bit back into the driving seat is because the jewish lobby wants romney so bad they are willing to let a bit of white ethno-centrism out of the box.
But that…can still play our way. Letting anything out of the box is a risky business. Genie can be hard to get back in.
In US politics, the race card is the distraction. The real issues are which Zionist/Jewish group – Sheldon Adelson’s or George Soros’s – will be running the country, and which way Americans will be robbed and enslaved. Either way, Israel wins.
@Alice Teller: Is that yankee dime, that you are betting Mickey Meadows, the same one George Wallace used to compare the Republicans and Democrats?
@Mickey Meadows:
I don’t want to be argumentative, but you do not know the kabuki dance that is American racial politics. Obama has to appear to stand up to the Jews in order to retain his street creds. Blacks are far and away the most antisemitic Americans. I daresay they are more visceral then we, far, far too many have ugly personal experiences from slum landlords to ill treatment from small time employers. In addition they feel no guilt, for anything, much less the holocaust. Add in the Nation of Islam influence and Mohammed Ali and it cinches the deal. On the other hand, this is dampened and controlled by the political alliance that makes up the Rainbow coalition. A clear cut trade of votes for government money and support which makes for some very strange bedfellows.
Until the George W, Bush administration, republicans were the non-jewish if not anti-jewish party. The neo-cons made gains ( and did terrible damage) but the rank and file, even the Christian Zionists , think of them as exceptions to the jewish, liberal,democratic, atheists who got rid of prayer in school. The reality is always different that the stuff that makes the papers.
@Curmudgeon:
I agree that there is not much difference between the party pros but there a big differences in the rank and file. Party is not relevant here.
George Washington said “Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” The same might be said of the mob. Jews are always afraid of the mob.
There are factions among the elitists (so-called elites). Obama is in the Soros-Brzezinski faction. The Soros-Brzezinski faction has been in favor of concentrating on surrounding and eventually defeating Russia and China (as in the Brzezinski book The Grand Chessboard and the Project For A New American Century Paper “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”). To see how terrible the danger of that faction is, see Brzezinski’s old book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era.
The Soros-Brzezinski faction has long opposed war with Iran in favor of concentrating more directly on Russia and China. That is not to say that they will not eventually succumb to the tremendous pressure of the other factions. But that is why our country has not yet been forced into a Zionist war on Iran. It antedates the recent election manipulation politics by a longshot. It relates directly to the plans of the Brzezinski-Soros faction. The Brzezinski-Soros faction has groomed and controlled Obama for years. The Brzezinski-Soros faction controls and owns Obama.
That doesn’t mean that Obama might not have his own nasty predilections like supporting Pavement Ape Race War, Kaffer Krieg, monkey moron mayhem.
@Alice Teller:
Sure sure…I’m only saying what looks right to me from where I am standing. But fair do’s I am standing rather a long way off. It’s your country girl!
Alice nailed it. Mickey is way to gullible. Obama APPEARS to stand up to the Jews-it’s political theater. Obama EXPANDED our presence in the ME. Obama has made MASSIVE numbers of drone kills! C’mon Mickey, put on your thinking cap. Obama didn’t do ANY of the things he promised he would do in relation to the ME, because he does whatever the Jews tell him to do. i don’t CARE about the media spin; the JEWS own the media for Christsakes! In the end, the Jews win because they OWN our entire government, period. Read “The Israel Lobby to get a sense of how they buy off everyone in the government.” I also agree that the Jews would slightly prefer Obama because he’s an anti-white communist a-hole, but they allowed Romney to get the nom because they also sense that BO is angering whites and it might be time to relieve some of that pressure before the pograms start. They are thinking about ten moves ahead of us and have been doing so for the last 80 years. Don’t worry Mickey, the Jews do what is good for the Jews, ALWAYS.
@Naomi Wilson:
To be fair to Mickey, he doesn’t live here and the media doesn’t spell the story out. Mickey is right that they want Romney, but it is not because they are protecting Israel, they are protecting wealth. I expect Romney is just what he appears, an honorable man who does his best not to hurt anymore people then necessary. He is to become the face of the rich capitalist, and the Jewish bankers will be hiding behind him. They know how angry people are about the financial system. It is in their best interests to give a lot both on Israel’s timing and white freedom. If there is one thing they are good at is taking our emotional temperature. We should make the most of this moment and keep the pressure up. We won’t win the war, but we can regain territory.
@Alice Teller:
@Naomi Wilson:
I am open to the idea I am gullible…and worse!
Not being American I definitely don’t have the on-the-ground insights…and I do recognize such insights are hugely important.
However, by the same coin, I don’t have the ‘baggage’, ingrained political partisan animosities, and *wrong* assumptions that can also result from that on-the-ground awareness.
I am not trying to persuade you or anyone. What I love about this place is not the agreement on all these matters, but the agreement on the central guiding principle on *all* matters, which is “what is best for our people?”.
On the gullibility front, all I can offer is that for a long time now – and because of other projects I am working on – I extensively read Jewish and Israeli opinion and news, and that my insight about Obama derives largely out of their extreme hostility toward him…which may not be totally obvious.
However..these past few weeks as and when it has come up, I have definitely been taking on board the views of you, Alice, and Jason and also Luke.
While your collective views haven’t change my frontline position on this. What you have made me see much more clearly, is the newly emerging racial voting structure in America and how this can be an opportunity for White folk to start getting back on their feet.
I can tell you that if you are right about *that* – even half right…then that would be good enough to make you right about who should win the election.
It’s not that I think you are wrong. It’s more a case of I just don’t have the on-the-ground insights, to be able to know one way or the other. But if Romney wins, then I’ll definitely be thinking “Oh well….it isn’t all bad for white folk….for all the reasons those guys on TOO have said”
@Mickey Meadows:
It is less a case of whites choosing a white only party as much as a self forming conspiracy which holds little appeal to blacks. Some of it is also based on pragmatism. Most white people do not hate black people. They are just tired of being dragged down. Many willingly made sacrifices and agreed to higher taxes to help them over the hump, a fresh start. Even the most kindhearted people can not continue to pretend that anything has worked. Integration has not lifted black people up, it has dragged white people down. Everyone knows this and no one ever says so. Instead they talk about family values and hard work and common decency and respect for faith and tradition. These things truly do help and orient many people’s lives and they believe that it would help black folks too. Mostly they have given up and will no longer support it.
The real question depends on Romney. Is he as smart as he seems? Will he cut a good deal for us? My guess is that there is cause for hope. I think he may be a decent man. He has worked in circles which guarantee that you come to hate Jews. Mormans sometimes play for the long term, they get married for eternity. He knows the financial game. I can dream…….
Now there is a new article in the Daily Mail about what a great Negrophile Ryan is. Apparently Ryan had an epiphany and saw the light about how horrible whites are and what a bunch of innocent victims blacks are. Apparently support for white genocide is a prerequisite for any political position.
Get ready for more pavement ape jihad and hope that you and your children are not targeted by a mob of monkey youths who are “mischievous.” That is what anti-white mainstream media calls it when “youths” go wilding on human’s heads. So what if they break eye sockets, cause severe brain damage, and kill!
Even those opposed are apparently complete pacifists and deny the right to self-defense. You must practice pacifism in the face of a race war.
Apparently, “white” “leaders” are completely on board.
You think they want Romney? I don’t. I think they want Obama. Isn’t it obvious given today’s nasty media coverage of the RNC? They love Obama because he is anti-white, because he will give millions of mexicans amnesty and further dilute this white nation, and because no matter what the banks do he will look the other way. He will make taxpayers pay for abortions that genocide white people. He will continue the uncanny agenda that seems to follow the Protocols.
Romney also will allow the banks to do whatever they want, but at least he wouldn’t approve of black flash mob attacks on whites.
So, Romney looks like a better deal to me.
@Mark White: Sarkozy “the fourth man” and Netanyahu worked for the same employer, according to Le Figaro. A right-wing newspaper, so not obviously an accusation along partisan lines.
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/4280
Not only turning “white” but also towards the Sheldon Adelsons, Macaons, Chinese….?
http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/the-gop-china-sheldon-adelson-7407
@Mickey Meadows: England has got to use America as an example of what not to do. You are are still 90% white and need to fight immigration tooth and nail. America used to be 90% white, now we are only 66% white and it is a disaster. More are coming in and no one can stop it. Many families have a brown skinned relative now – what do you think that does? If you utter anything remotely racist you are then insulting your own family – it is impossible. Jews may be the cause of all the problems but their are many fronts in the war. You are protected by the English channel and should shut down immigration before it becomes a total hell hole like the USA.
I look around at the formerly white country of my youth and repeatedly wonder – who the hell thought bringing in the poor third world was a good idea?
@Tyrant Robert Parsons
You have said that you are not a cult leader. Yet you continue to insist that we follow your Near Eastern Semitic Psychological Operation against European people.
Your continued harping and interest in the Occidental Observer are at odds with your reverence for those two Near Eastern psychological operations books of subjugation. Your wish to actually be a Semite and a Jew are ridiculous!
Europeans who succumb to psychological operations invented by Semites in the form of the Near Eastern “Religions” are fools indeed.
I can only conclude that you are insane.
@Vlad
With all due respect, I think that you have got it reversed. England or the UK is even worse than the U.S. concerning “hate crimes” laws, immigration Quisling sponsored invasions, Political Correctness and imprisoning those who do not adhere to its draconian code, surveillance, and double standards against whites. Look at the case of the white woman who was imprisoned for complaining about immigration on a bus. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, is one of the organizations giving the orders about the implementation of Cultural Marxism and anti-white and anti-western operations. The idea of England, the UK, or whatever you want to call it following U.S. orders about anything is ludicrous. It is a psyop perpetrated by the controllers.
Mohammed is the most popular name in the UK. Is Mohammed the most popular name for babies in the U.S.? I doubt that even Juan or a Spanish name is the most popular (common) name for babies in the U.S.
The UK is way ahead of the U.S.A. in all of the anti-white and nation destroying draconian totalitarianism and immigration Quisling activity, not to mention political correctness, than the U.S.A. This is an indictment of what a hellhole the U.K. has become because its pretty extreme even in the U.S.A.
As an added argument: Which is the lesser of two evils?: 1)an invasion of Christians who speak and Indo-European language and have a related Western Culture imported from Spain (which granted, is arguably influenced by Berbers and Arabs from North Africa due to the hell that the Spaniards endured during a 700 year occupation by Muslim aggressors), or 2) Mobs of non-Christian Muslims of Arabic, Pakistani, Afghan,Persian, and other descent (whos religion calls for mistreatment and murder of non Muslims, harsh Sharia law which includes cutting off the hands of one accused of being a thief and the stoning of one accused of being an adulterer, for proof read the Koran itself and the Haditha, as well as non-sharia folk-culture gems like honor killings) who speak a Semitic language or Urdu (well, at least it is Indo-European but not western) and have no version of western culture and who feel aggrieved at “British Imperialism” due to having once been a part of the British Empire and now have a chance at vengeance in the country of origin? Of course these are not the only imports sponsored by the British Quisling traitors, they also import angry mobs of Blacks from British Empire outposts in the Carribean and Africa who are anthropologically speaking far less similar to the British peoples than Pakistanis and Arabs and whos violent hatred for the real British peoples has been recently demonstrated in violent riots.
In short Britain is even worse off concerning the subjects which interest us here at this site than is the U.S.A. The U.K. is a sign of what they have in store for us here but the most massive immigration flow in Britain is even more harmfful, being primarily composed of Pakistani, Afghan, and other Muslims.
Maybe this is naive but wouldn’t it be a major victory for White Nationalists everywhere if just one European nation wrote a clause into their Constitution that the native ethnic group and culture must not be put in jeopardy through immigration? What does Israel do as far as laws are concerned? They openly say “it must be a Jewish state.” So why can’t a country like Finland do the same? Don’t tell me that Jews totally run Finland. Or Iceland. What about Hungary? They have made solid progress with Jobik. Orthodox priests dismantaled a large menorah in Moldova and people openly supported them. OK, I don’t have a magic want to make it happen, but you’d think someone would be trying a constitutional angle as I imagine Israel has done. What would stop a small Baltic country from doing so, international banks? Seems to me that it would be well worth the backlash that might follow…..As far as the Romney vs. Obama thing, I might as well chime in. Yes, they’re both rancid and I no longer believe in the two party system. A lot of good points made here and I nearly decided not to vote at all. And the whole Sheldon Adelson money thing has got to make you think he’s buying another Israeli war. But here’s my logic- Obama simply has to go for openly anti-White behaviour, and if Whites are still too stupid to see Israel behind all these wars, maybe they need some more blood letting. You can’t fix stupid so let them learn the hard way. At least they’ll learn something through pain and serve as an example to people catching on. And maybe young Whites aren’t going to be manipulated by Jewish war cheerleaders this time like after 9/11. Something tells me that the whole reflexive “let’s go kick some butt” thing is playing out. As for the “minorities,” they’ll find a reason to hate us no matter what, and maybe,just maybe Whites can have a little influence on border control that you’d never get from Barry. Romney’s a crumb, but I’ll vote for him over the hate driven racist.
@Starets: Of course Chinese have a strong ethnic awareness, and may try to influence our country for their group interests. However, they do not have a visceral hatred for non-Chinese. In other words: they are not like Jews, who want to destroy the white peoples. The Chinese seem to respect us. In fact, you will see that in a multiracial situation, whites and Chinese, Japanese or Koreans get along best.
See also the example of the countries in South-East Asia, where the Chinese are significant minorities. You will see that the Chinese just contend themselves with making money, and let the host population be.
While I would not encourage more Chinese immigration, I do not think that they are a real problem to us.
@Bobby:
“Here is one for you. The Romney Camp has declared Russia the top geo-political enemy. Gee, how come? Too many caucasian people left there? A–h—s. ”
Not worried at all.
God bless ‘em both, but Russia and China are preventing the Jews from dragging the into a war with Iran. (I suspect that the Russians have always had a soft spot for Americans). For these reasons, our military AND our intelligence will NOT allow Romney and Ryan to do much more than rattle sabers, talk tough and look the other way while the rest of the world quietly steps around any of the sanctions we put against Iran.
In the meantime, the left will be pissed off over losing the election and mount a loud anti-war pacifist movement. Hee hee, it will be like perimenopausal Code Pink PMSing and overdosing on estrogen.
Obama may promise to invade Iran, but he will tell OJ to kiss his lovely black ass the moment he is reelected. I imagine all they can do with their false flags is to have Mossad assassinate him by using some White Neo-Nutzi as the fall guy. But then the Democrat administration will be too busy dealing with chimpouts at home to worry about invading Iran any time soon.
I think was listening to Michael Savage on his radio talk show. His take on Obama was that Obama was a malevolent narcissist who was so used to having his behind kissed by DWLs that he would end up being a loose cannon. Savage was very prescient when he warned that the people who think they can control him are in for a rude awakening.
OJ may have outsmarted themselves … again. Obama may hate White people and their alleged White privilege, but like other people of color, he sees Jews as the most privileged of all White people.
@Connor McNessa:
“Now there is a new article in the Daily Mail about what a great Negrophile Ryan is. Apparently Ryan had an epiphany and saw the light about how horrible whites are and what a bunch of innocent victims blacks are. Apparently support for white genocide is a prerequisite for any political position.
Even those opposed are apparently complete pacifists and deny the right to self-defense. You must practice pacifism in the face of a race war.
Apparently, “white” “leaders” are completely on board.”
You are right and you are wrong.
I agree that White politicians have to support a White genocide position if they are to get elected.
But I respectfully disagree that White leaders are completely on board. I imagine many of them are doing what a lot of the rest of us are doing; giving lip service to Anti-White Marxism while implicitly leading as White a life as they can.
A big fuss was made about Paul Ryan’s college girlfriend. Well he took John Derbyshire’s “socialized black friend” theme and bumped it up a notch to indemnify himself against charges of racism. He used to date a black girl.
Past tense. He didn’t marry her and he didn’t miscegenate with her, producing mongrel children. He married a White woman and had White children. But he can dust his ex-girlfriend off to prove he’s not a racist. Due to the double standard still being alive and well, I would not recommend this course of action to White female politicians.
Now, IMO what is going to decide the future of White people in this country is their reaction to the MSM’s inevitable charges of White racism if Obama loses. Because the Republicans are going to take their lead from us.
If Whites do their customary drop-and-roll-into-a-little-ball of whiny denial and defensive appeasement, then the Republican Whiggers will be out in force to do it in steroids.
But if Whites take a page from Saul Alinsky and grow a spine, do NOT deny or try to disprove charges of White racism. Do their best to convince BOTH parties that they voted for their own interests as a racial collective that swung the vote from the Negro to the Anglo Saxon candidate then we are going to see BOTH parties get interested in White causes to woo this White vote.
Never mind that the differences between Romney and Obama are literally skin-deep. Kindly remember that the candidates for the 2000 election, Algore and Dubya had virtually IDENTICAL resumes. Their fathers were high-ranking politicians, they both went to the same type of schools, etc. ad nauseum ad infinitum. However the election outcome was momentous.
For White people, the biggest tragedy about Gore losing the electoral vote in 2000 is that a handful of Cuban Hispanic voters in one precinct – Dade County – decided the outcome of this election. This resulted in Karl “The Architect” Rove’s STATEGERY of ignoring Whites in favor of shamelessly pandering to Hispanics, because “family values don’t stop at the Rio Grande!” Now we have two parties competing for the future votes of illegal aliens.
Vote WHITE and make no apologies about it.
@Connor McNessa: Well, OK, but they are still 90% white, so they should use code phrases such as,”We don’t want to become like the US!