In the spring of 2011, while living in Rome, I met the Israeli Ambassador to the Vatican. I was attending a speech he was giving in a Franciscan monastery overlooking the ruins of the ancient Forum. Earlier in the day, he had given a similar speech before Pope Benedict XVI and his advisors. Then, that evening, he appeared before a group of about one hundred Catholic guests and clerical members of the Franciscans, an Order historically associated with the Spanish Inquisition. Ambassador Mordachay Lewy was presenting his government’s position on creating peace in the Middle East, which would come through its plan for a two state solution. Although the final plan could not yet be made public, he promoted its inevitability with words backed by the full weight of Tel Aviv, a world power more formidable than the Vatican, even if not defended by its vaunted Swiss Guards. Everyone, he said, in the Israeli and Palestinian governments interested in peace had come to understand that there was no other alternative than to have two separate states – one for the Jews and one for the Palestinians.
In order to bring this about, he said, there were many political obstacles to overcome. But, first it was necessary to distinguish between the possible and the impossible. Everyone must realize that the ideas of “peace” and of “justice” are two separate ideals. The Ambassador invoked various philosophical arguments to support his and his government’s belief that the two words must be considered in two different ways and in two separate spheres. Peace, he said, is for humans and was meant for this world. Justice, he said, is God’s alone and meant only for the next. Behind his presentation, for those aware of the Palestinian side of the equation, were the unspoken and regularly smothered words – “Right of Return.”
Ambassador Lewy, a rotund, bespectacled man in his sixties, who speaks Italian almost as badly as I do, gave his speech in English. All the Italians in the audience followed it only by reading Italian version copies of the document that he was reading from. When he finished his thirty-minute reading, he invited questions from the audience while his three Israeli bodyguards, plugs in ears, stood strategically placed around the room. The questions asked in Italian were spoken to the Franciscan’s translator who then gave them in English to the Ambassador. His responses were long winded and without pause, forcing the translator to feverishly take notes before repeating his words to the audience. After ten minutes and with the Ambassador’s call for any last questions, I raised my hand. “Yes” he said, and I stood and slowly in English asked the following (phrased to highlight the hypocrisy I had in mind):
Ambassador Lewy, your people endured terrible sufferings during the Second World War. They struggled for many years to return to their homeland, a place where they could live in peace and live with their God. Through their difficult struggles, they not only obtained justice for themselves – justice in the form of land as well as in the form financial reparations, they also fought and died in the cause of justice for other people, as in my country’s Civil Right’s movement. In view of this history, Ambassador Lewy, how can you and your people, in good conscience, ask us to ignore the call for justice for the Palestinians?
When the translator finished speaking my words to the Italians, there was no movement in the room. Ambassador Lewy, whose eyes had grown larger during my question, looked down at the table and then responded. Unsurprisingly, his response was slightly less longwinded than his earlier responses, though with far more pauses. As the group filed out of the room to the nearby reception hall, one of the Franciscan priests came along and thanked me for asking the question. “How can he think that peace and justice can be separated” he said. “We can’t think that way. We are Catholics.” It was one of the rare moments that I believed that perhaps injustice would not always triumph.
During the reception, it happened that I was standing beside two of the security men who flanked the Ambassador. He recognized me and in a friendly way asked me about America, saying he had been there some years before. While we chatted, he told me that he loved American comedies, especially Laurel and Hardy. We laughed together about them and other things and he soon went on to another guest.
The strange thing is that, in those minutes of his speaking to me, I felt a genuine rapport with him. I rather liked him; in fact, I felt a kind of closeness to him, one that I did not feel when speaking earlier with the priest. The Ambassador’s belief system is alien to mine. His speech, both before us and the Pope, was obviously little more than a tactical exercise in an ongoing Israeli disinformation campaign – the Netanyahu government was not then and is not now interested in giving the Palestinians a state next to their own, much less making them full members of their own. Yet, I felt nothing less than a genuine liking for that government’s official representative to my tribe.
Why should I have felt more of a rapport with that man than with the priest who shares my beliefs about this world and the next? Is it due to the oft-repeated claims of cultural similarities between Americans and Israelis? Or to the idea of a religious brotherhood that so many Christians are trained to feel for Judaism as being the roots of their faith? (This, and not the launch pad toward another, less separationist, one?) I would be naïve to think so. For while I spoke to the Ambassador, his friendly face smiling and his body language drawing me into his love for Laurel and Hardy, I noticed that part of my feeling of liking him was, yes, feeling a little sorry for him. He seemed likeable and vulnerable, unlike any Arab I had ever spoken to. I was as warmed to his manner as I was chilled by that of the three security guards in the room, their suit jackets concealing their right to self defense. Together they created an aura, more tangible than the halos around the figures in the monastery’s wall paintings. That aura seemed to draw me into the strange cloud in which so many Westerners live, induced to identify, emotionally and psychically, with the past suffering of the Jews and disposed almost not at all to consider worthy the present suffering of the Palestinians, the Iraqis, the Afghanis, the Libyans, and the Syrians.
“I can’t think that way, I am a Catholic.” And yet, millions and millions of us do.
Mike Robeson (email him) is a middleaged ex-pat living in Italy.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Funny picture! I want Randy Newman to do a song mocking the Israeli people for not electing a Palestinian Prime Minister for Israel. Come on, Jews, teach us about tolerance!
Mr. Robeson, I was waiting for you to answer why but you ended your article, abruptly. Why Westerners affiliate more with the “suffering” of jews but not with the suffering of the Palestinians, even though, the Palestinian suffering is very alive and continues to live, where the jewish suffering is, at best, historical and highly magnified. What is it about them that gives you a soft spot but not the Palestinians?
“When we meet for lunch, Webber orders a pastrami Reuben, slathered it with deli mustard and gives the bread a deep, long sniff. (“It’s Jewish rye too, I can tell.”) Next to his plate he places a copy of the national directory of Alpha Epsilon Pi, the nation’s best-known Jewish fraternity. There—surrounded by dozens of Wassermanns, Weinsteins, Weinstocks, Weinbergs and Weisenthals—is Webber, William. In 1973, as a freshman at Emory, Bill (who did not know they were a Jewish frat) accidentally rushed for AEPi, and AEPi (who did not know Bill was a Methodist) accidentally accepted him. (A misprint had listed him on the campus rush list as “Weber,” a common German-Jewish surname.) The truth came out during the first Friday night meal after he received his bid. The house was serving bagels with cream cheese and lox. Being from a farm town in Kentucky, Bill had never seen anything like it. Everyone was just eating away. Bill watched them. He sniffed the lox. He looked around. He couldn’t figure it out. Finally he blurted, “What are these hard donuts with the funny-looking white icing and the smelly sprinkledly things on the top?” All 90 brothers froze. After a few moments of silence, someone at his table ventured, “You aren’t Jewish, are you?” “I said, ‘No, I’m a Methodist, does it matter?’ They just roared. They said, ‘Oh my God, we have a fucking goy in the frat!’ And then I had to ask them what a goy was.””
Illustrative of the Roman Hannities and Oreilys Shabbos Goy function in the dreacination and decay of the America of Ford and Edison, Wharton and Eliot.
@Jason Speaks: Well, this article is sure going to get the anti-catholics on this forum fired up again.
Idk about “anti-catholic” but the idea that educated people really think world jewry is more powerful than the vatican, with its various sects, orders, foundations, longevity, finances, overseas embassies and offices, including in the u.s., is simply…naive?
@Jason Speaks:
Jason, I once met Newmans roomie and I had a friend who knew ‘Randall’, and says hes a nice guy.
Read his lyrics to ‘roll w the punches’ and contrast that with
‘DESMOND HATCHETT MAY HAVE 30 KIDS’.
Then get back to me.
Thanks diversityischaos:
On 9/14/12, 1,200 rabbis appealed to Barack Obama to release long-imprisoned Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard
The request came during a conference call Obama held with rabbis and Jewish community leaders in advance of the High Holy Days of Rosh Hashannah – the Jewish New Year. At the start of the call, a delegation of the rabbis presented to Obama a joint request for Pollard’s release. He is currently completing his 27th year in prison for the crime of passing classified information to a foreign country. Pollard was sentenced to life in prison in the 1980s for passing classified information to Israel.
@Jason Speaks:
When Bono [of late seen with Rianna, getting more green money for blacks] does a song about Rudy Guede [?], and the afreekan pet syndrome, maybe RN will do a song about racist blacks.
It is really admirable, that our Franciscan friend Michael, had the courage to ask a Jew a tough question in Italy. Here in the United States, Michael would still be pulling the knives out of his back that the Catholic politicians had stuck there for asking a Jew a tough question. That’s the way it is kids.
@Palestinian: Mr Robeson didn’t ask why he identified more with the Israeli than he does with Palestinians (though I have an answer for that), he asked:
Why should I have felt more of a rapport with that man than with the priest who shares my beliefs about this world and the next?
Only Mr Robeson can answer that, though he is purporting to be representative of the American “everyman”, and it is confusing as to what exactly is Mr Robeson asking here at all, given the closing expansion to identifying with purported Jewish suffering contrasted with the suffering of other races.
I’d like to hear more detail of the discussion with the Franciscan priest, since that is the point of comparison with Ambassador Lewy. Did the Franciscan not discuss American TV and movies with Mr Robeson and instead discuss Catholic principles?
Without knowing anymore, it seems that what beguiled Mr Robeson was Ambassador Lewy’s appeal to the mundane mindset of American culture. Ambassador Lewy comes across as a foreigner in love with Mr Robeson’s culture, admiring and jolly, not threatening to engage with any depth or challenge to thought. It sounded like Ambassador Lewy knew how to do a slapstick routine where he would offer himself up as the pratfall to the American straightman.
Perhaps the Franciscan assumed a commonality where there is none, and instead gone into raptures over the Liberty Bell, or some such other anachronistic symbology of American Independence and Free Will.
I can generally do that as well in conversation, if moved to do so. When the conversation gets heavy, throw out a jocular reference that appeals to the other party’s personality, and then follow up with admiring enquiries. If you want to get your way, better to pretend to listen and take an interest in the other person’s personality, rather than in anything pertinent.
Salesmen do it all the time, though I can only do it in short bursts, which is why I’m not a salesman.
@Pat Hannagan: Correction: “and should have instead gone into raptures over the Liberty Bell”
The psychology of rapport and persuasion is well known and is a teachable skill.
As Pat Hannagan notes, salesmen are skilled in the methodology.
There are courses available for salesmen on how to bamboozle customers.
I’m sure the Israeli ambassador was very well trained.
Jews are responsible for at least four Holocausts in just the last hundred years:
1.) The Armenian Genocide [the Young Turks were jews]
2.) The Ukrainian Holodomor [the Communists were jews]
3.) The Palestinian Nakba [the Zionists are jews]
4.) The Occupation of Iraq [the Neocons are jews]
Oh my goodness, it is insidious. Their ingratiating way. Being played has got to be one of their most onerous tricks.
Off topic.
I am listening to the dreaded Ian Masters/NPR.
He interviews writer of ‘Born on 3rd Base’ [Moriarity].
She says Zuckerberg ‘went to an exclusive prep school and college, and is a White male [gosh,dang]‘.
Ian concurs. No mention that MZ is Jewish, hahah.
And since he didnt [to my knowledge] inherit $ [the contention of her book, some are born on 3rd], how does
his family matter? She says the Forbes 400 glamorizes wealth
and the ‘average person’ cant get there.
They both wonder ‘why there arent more Blacks on the Forbes 400′.
Did they count the Jewish Hedge Fund managers? NO!
The site: faireconomy.org
In America, the Jews control the media, which means our culture is Jewish. The media determines our culture. Is it any wonder that most Americans feel kindly towards Israel? The Jewish media in America tells us nothing about Muslim suffering. There is more freedom of the press in Israel than in America, land of ZOG and Jewish culture.
@Pat Hannagan: Not only is all you say true; it’s also entirely apropos to the present circumstances. In addition, the matter of your last sentence—the reference to salesmen—adds the appropriate diagnostic wrinkle to your description of the symptoms.
Nor should it be forgotten, especially by Yanks—who as residents of the New and Improved Roman Empire have grown so inured to seeing their government casually disregard customs and codes held inviolable by civilized societies for twenty-five centuries that little surprises and even less appalls them—that a requirement for a successful career in the diplomatic service has always been an ability to charm the rattles off a snake and sell ice to an Eskimo. Though the Israeli ambassador’s Italian was apparently of such an insultingly poor quality as to disqualify anyone but an American or an Israeli from getting an appointment to the chief ministerial post in question, I am not all surprised that he had the ability to win over someone disinclined to like him. That, after all, is what he’s paid to do.
@Bobby: The only thing that surprises me about your comment is that you managed to get it posted before Tom and dixie underscored its accuracy!
The holocaust has become the religion of the west and certainly the USA. Moreover to me itvseems that for so called Christians even Christianity has been deeply but subtly deranged into being a branch of the holohype religion. Christmass, Easter and traditional notion of redemption are all sidelined.
I am highly conscious of the Jewish strategy. A Jewish writer, journalist, newsreader, spokesman, lawyer, musician, public figure or musical journalist will almost always take an opportunity to promote the Jewish perspective in some way even when he or she should be neutral. They just slip it in.
Mr. Robeson, I am going to look at this event with a different perspective, I hope it does not come across as insulting, as that is not my intent, and I respect your willingness to stand up for your principles.
As humans, we are creations of nature, and we are subject to a large degree to our natural instincts, impulses and all of that inherent stuff. Part of this is our awareness of and deference to power. We have a strong tendency to respect individuals and groups with power, and have a low estimation for those with little.
The vatican has very little power in any real sense in comparison with Jews as a group. Of course the vatican has little military or economic strength, but there also negligible moral influence, it has debased itself, apologized for itself, backed down and shown weakness continually in its dealings with Jewry. As we perceive this, our natural impulse is to regard this lamed, feeble group with disdain and even contempt.
The Israelis, on the other hand, have power, which includes their little country’s military and economic power, as well as the moral power Jewry has established via their public relations networks. More important is their massive political and media influence, interwoven through fabric of the West. If a prominent individual speaks out against Jewry, his career is destroyed soon after. If a group acts against Jewish interests, a thousand media outlets, including the most influential newspapers, magazines, tv programs and radio shows will lambast and denounce it unceasingly. If a nation acts against Jewry, it will find the United States, Britain and others allied against it. That is power, and we humans hold it in awe.
In your experience with the Israeli ambassador, no doubt his friendly and charismatic demeanor influenced you. But I would argue that more important was the fact that those enfeebled Catholic leaders had no standing, no influence, nothing to respect. The ambassador, on the other hand, guarded by men of strength, with a serious nation full of resolve standing behind him, commanded your respect.
“The strange thing is that, in those minutes of his speaking to me, I felt a genuine rapport with him. I rather liked him; in fact, I felt a kind of closeness to him, one that I did not feel when speaking earlier with the priest.”
I would argue that one of the signs of decay in the West is our acting according to our feelings. This is more typically feminine behavior, what nature has geared women to do. In the heyday of our Western Civilization, European men were hardened, products of a hard life, and made hard decisions. Westerners now experience little hardship, we compare embarrassingly with our forebears in the weakness of our bodies and our spirits, and are found wanting in our courage, our willpower and our steadfastness. If a friendly smile from a wily ambassador can sway us from our principles, we are in sorry shape indeed. So many of us have become so soft, so distanced from the necessities of survival, that we are like the feeble Catholic leaders, prostrate old women without the will or capacity to act to pursue our interests.
There’s a reason why all the acting teachers are Jewish.
That’s why he got the job from the Israeli government. I doubt you’d get that lovin’ feeling from say Netanyahu, and those are the guys that really matter.
Remember it’s an army, and each army has flanks with certain specialties.
Superficial Friendship is the least important commonality, relationship in the world.
SIgh, yes it is fun to point out the hypocrisy of the Jewish community with regards to its stance on immigration in the Western world vis-a-vis Israel’s ethnonationalism, but I really am not interested in Palestinians or the Arab-Israeli conflict except when it affects our own civilization.
Speaking of Israel,
On 9/14/12, 1,200 rabbis appealed to Barack Obama to release long-imprisoned Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard
The request came during a conference call Obama held with rabbis and Jewish community leaders in advance of the High Holy Days of Rosh Hashannah – the Jewish New Year.
@ Andrew: A great response that explains a lot.
I may add another point (please excuse my poor English) : About a year ago at the Thiazi forum which has by now been shut down by the “German” government there was an interesting and competent discussion about the different impressions that different racial and sub-racial types make.
It started with the question whether Cro-Magnon-types or Aurignac-Types look more dangerous.
For example, there is a certain physiological type, common in all races that looks brutish, impressive, bear-like, full of primitive physical strength. In the European races this is represented by the Cro-Magnon specimen. Their bodies and faces tell you: “Careful, I am strong!”. But there is also a type that looks more elegant, cunning, wolf-like. This is represented by the Aurignac type. Their message is: “Be careful, I am fast!” Whenever a tribe would conquer another one the representatives of both this Alpha male grpups would recognize, battle, exterminate or respect each other.
In contrast, subdominant types like the Alpinoid that arose from the cleansed rests of conquered and enslaved early Cro-Magnon people (in Europe) or conquered and enslaved other groups in the rest of the world) look totally different. They have this “I am harmless, do not hurt me”-feminine, round, fatty, small appearance, together with a cyclotyme temper (emotional, social, multi-tasking etc.) in contrast to shizotyme or viscous temper of Alpha males (shizotyme~fanatical, intellectual, ingenious~Aurignac; viscous~pain-resistant,unbreakable~Cro-Magnon).
Typically, whole races that have been driven to the edges of extinction or the fringe by stronger ethnicities tend to appear subdominant. Just take South American jungle indios in contrast to the highly developed Plains Indians (although they represent yet another Alpha type, the Dinaric one, which is in European peoples represented by certain types from the Balcans or in ancient Rome: a good example would be Julius Caesar. Dinaric ~ “mature,old” – comparable to the impression that for example birds and reptiles make).
But in the area of the fertile crecent, the middle East, the place where for the longest time in observable history humans lived together in city-civilizations, yet another, third grup, could develop. The specimen of this group tend to look like beta-males (take Henry Kissinger, does he not look cute and harmless?) where they in fact are parasitic and aggressive. Of course they need to DECEIVE their counterparts, they do not want to let them see their true nature. Their every physical characteristic was selected for this purpose. Their eyes are without any clarity, pale and cloudy, so that you cannot guess their intentions. Their body language is deceitful, the voice intonation and language talent is programmed to hide, instead of reveal their true intentions.
In this respectit is utterly wrong to say that Jews are semitic in the sense of an anthropologic group. In fact, what we identify as typical Jewish features is anthropologically known as the “reduced Armenian or Armenoid type”. True semitic people on the other hand, if they are not degenerated tend to look strongly Dinaric (mature, deep and harsh facial structures, hawk-like noses); if reduced or degenerated Levantine, they look like Beta-males of the more unpleasant sort (but not “cute” = likable, friendly). This explains to some extend the authors instinctive reactions, instincts that were to his own surprise misguiding him; just like the cocoo misguides his adoptive parents.
One last thought: Why did our ancestors let the Jews come and live among them? Why did they not conquer, destroy or repell them? why did they not integrate them? Because the Jews were neither really a subordinated or conquered race like for example the blacks in India, but they appeared just as harmless as any of these. And because the were not looking like Alpha males (at least after their ethnogenesis was completed in Babylon and they ceased to be Semites in the sense of “the scum of Egypt”) but even more of a threat
of a threat as any Alpha-appearing group.
The same is true with gypsies, although to a lesser degree of perfection since they came from a younger city-civilization and their selection process is not finished.
@Pierre de Craon: I shouldn’t have said it Pierre, since it really contributes nothing, but as the double talking philosopher Martin Heidegger would say, “there is more behind nothing than nothing.”
Funny … when I think of Laurel & Hardy, I always notice that Oliver Hardy had a brush mustache, same as Adolf Hitler. It must have been a common mustache style in the early 20th century. I wonder how an Israeli could watch Oliver Hardy and fail to notice the resemblance to Hitler.
@Graham Wellington:
That’s a kind of disgusting list in that it omits the far greater massacres of
1. ordinary, innocent, decent Russians
2. ordinary, innocent, decent Chinese
3. ordinary, innocent, decent Germans
@Andrew: very well said.
While reading your comment, especially this:
“The strange thing is that, in those minutes of his speaking to me, I felt a genuine rapport with him. I rather liked him; in fact, I felt a kind of closeness to him, one that I did not feel when speaking earlier with the priest.””
the words
Stockholm Syndrome entered my mind.
I read on, and the strength of my hunch just grew.
Humility is one of the hallmarks of Christianity, not to be confused with feeble, pathetic meekness.
There is great strength in true humility;
staying true to Principle is what Christ is all about teaching us,
and as you say,
“If a friendly smile from a wily ambassador can sway us from our principles, we are in sorry shape indeed”
demonstrating just how the same ‘wily’ Energy destroys Principle and Truth, time and time again.
We know we are in sorry shape; how did that happen and how does the world recover?
Two state solution hahaha..He said (read) that bs infront of those decent Catholics. The fat Zionist stooge may even believe it.
Nobody but nobody is ever going to see the Jew State even in their next life be fair. As long as their big gun the USA is under control they have carte blanche.
Plus they make effective use of the so called holocaust as a crugel.
2 states yeah.. east Isreal & west Israel Zionist world capital…
Great signs but she should have said Israel will pay me in U.S. tax dollars.
@Andrew:
But, sir, people everywhere act and have always acted according to their feelings, at the very least from time to time! How many unathletic high school boys drawn to literature have asked a cheerleader out on a date, knowing all the while they have nothing in common? Or think about the jock attracted to the bookish girl, specifically because her modesty and reserve are unlike anything he’s familiar with, who does the same thing.
In other words, this is simply an insufficient explanation of Mr. Robeson’s situation or, what is worse, an overdiagnosis of it. Indeed, I gravely doubt whether there is any useful lesson to be learned from this story—unless it is that we are to question whether getting along with an Israeli—any Israeli or any Jew for that matter—is proof positive of “our” corruption. If that is the point, I’m not buying it.
There are simply too many unknowns or at least dubieties in Mr. Robeson’s article to raise it from the “interesting anecdote” level to the “lessons to be learned” level. Put otherwise, just because lots of people found Bill Clinton a clubbable drinking companion doesn’t mean they reflexively approved his ideas, his morals, or his godawful presidency.
Sometimes an enjoyable afternoon among articulate people at a posh reception is, well, just that and no more than that. I hope Mr. Robeson himself doesn’t think it’s more.
@Bobby: Could he have been applying for a post as Zen master when he wrote that?
@dc: Just so! Their weapons of choice, figuratively speaking, are sawed-off shotguns, not sniper rifles.
Then, that evening, he appeared before a group of about one hundred Catholic guests and clerical members of the Franciscans, an Order historically associated with the Spanish Inquisition.
I had thought it was The Dominicans historically associated with the Spanish Inquisition.
@Felix: Yes, it was. Another point against Mr. Robeson.
@Pierre de Craon: If he gets such an important and checkable fact of history wrong, I am inclined to take what he’s written cum grano (magno) salis.
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWE3sSm25Mc&feature=relmfu
Now here this!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPO7BXjKJbw&NR=1&feature=endscreen
Of course thinking beings do not accept every idea, but he makes a decent point.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eUY7WGLoLg&feature=related
We all bring something to the table, but trust in God, Yesua & pray, thus trust no man.
For the ignorant and arrogant amongst you, you will not listen to all, in order to see.
By the way God did not approve of a monarchy, but such is our life!
@Pat Hannagan:
You have identified a large hole in Mr. Robeson’s thought processes. I believe the answer lies in his statement:
“Ambassador Lewy, your people endured terrible sufferings during the Second World War.”
Any person buying the “sufferings during the Second World War” fairy tale is unlikely to have sufficient cognition to answer his own question.
Russia Today: “Catholics call for Israeli hate-crime crackdown”
http://rt.com/news/catholics-christian-vandalism-hate-598/
“In February this year, a Jerusalem monastery was tagged with the phrase ‘death to Christians,’ painted in Hebrew, as part of what is now known as the ‘price tag campaign.’ In July, an Israeli lawmaker ripped the New Testament out of a Bible and threw it into the garbage, later claiming that ‘millions of Jews were murdered in the name of the New Testament,’ and calling the book ‘revolting.’”
CHECK IT OUT!
@Elie: The Catholic church sold out on Israel years ago. I’m sorry, being a Catholic myself, I know it’s true.
@Pierre de Craon: A propos of the affable, did you ever get to watch Bill Clinton, His Life? Macbeth and his lady.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6107885031407830500
@Pat Hannagan:
Your post was brilliant. It is a wonder to me that people do not understand why they feel “drawn” to certain people. Oftentimes, those people are intentionally buttering them up. Why might someone trust their heart over their brain, even when they don’t understand the meaning of their emotions?
It should have been all the more obvious, since the ambassador appeared “more vulnerable than any Palestinian” the author had ever seen. He wrote the answer right into his description. It is truly a wonder to me that people never question whether such an act can be performed intentionally, especially when people called “actors” exist.
And if this skillset exists, which politician does not possess it!
If someone makes a face that tells me “feel sorry for me,” I question it just the same as if someone had stated, “feel sorry for me.” I suppose it is rarer for someone to be a good emotion liar, but it is far from non-existent. Heck, what is propaganda?
@RightAnswerFactor: @RightAnswerFactor:
Another good example is the little girl who cries to get her way. Should I believe that the girl must be sad because she is crying? And this is a child I am talking about. A stupid little girl. How much better might a fully grown and professional adult be at acting?
:((
Christianity has a 2,000-year track record of failures when it comes to defending Whites against semitic aggression. When are you people going to ditch this dusty old philosophy and embrace something that’s real?
Jews are all about rapport; it’s how they negotiate a gentile world.
Michael Robeson did not say he fell for Mordachay Lewy’s charm. He was merely stating how Lewy made him feel. Or perhaps I should say how Lewy was able to make him feel.
Jews think they are smarter than we are. He thought Robeson was too gullible to see through him. Most people are. Jews know how to speak in tones to make you feel special and gain your trust. I’ve experienced it a few times myself. But knowing what liars Jews are I only felt on guard. Was this a con job. What was he up to? What’s he covering up? What does he want out of me? What’s the real motive? All the honey in the world doesn’t make an enemy a friend.
@fender: Real like moving to Russia without speaking Russian or knowing anything about the place? Isn’t that your favourite riff?
@fender: ZOG is a 20th century phenomenon. Perhaps you should look at Statism as the religion that failed, as that better matches cause and effect.
@dc:
why, who killed them?
@dixie:
Every once in a while you get a comment on here that you wonder if it is a joke or something because it is so completely clueless as to the reality of the world we live in? I had to read that one twice because I thought the writer was talking about Jews, not catholics, as having power — yet they said it the other way round. Maybe this person has never heard that AIPAC is the most powerful lobby in Washington? Maybe they have never heard of “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” –a book by John Mearsheimer, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen Walt, Professor of International Relations at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, published in late August 2007. Maybe they have never read Kevin MacDonald’s books about Jewish influences in 20th century political and academic movements? There is nothing even remotely comparable in the catholic sector. Jews are overrepresented in every power position in the country — most recently forming Google which is now taking over the internet and becoming another Jewish media monster like Hollywood (see the A&E channel documentary “Hollywood: An Empire of Their Own, for example). Media control is real power in mass democracy — maybe the only real power. Also read the writings of Kevin MacDonald on their influence in academia. Almost everything happening politically for over 100 years has gone in favor of Jews in the long run –according to their will and interests. Groups get handouts and nations get Pyrrhic victories while behind the scenes the Jews are winning the war to destroy western civilization. Ever wonder why there was a memorial to the “holocaust” for what happened to foreign Jews in a foreign country in Washington DC before there was talk about a memorial to our own fallen soldiers? (There is no memorial to Catholics persecuted by communists) It is even taboo now in our own countries to speak out for our own survival, to even mention that we might have our own interests as a people. It is illegal to associate with who we want, and our borders have been flung open to genocidal immigration — all directly and unequivocally due to jewish influences (see the works I reference above). We are as a people with our hands tied behind our backs with our heads in the guillotine. It is breathtaking to see someone so ignorant of all this. It shows the real power of the Jews.
“(There is no memorial to Catholics persecuted by communists) ”
They probably deserved it. Weren’ the first commies catholic priests: Proudhon and Blanqui.
I don’t have a problem with commies only with catholics and their multicultural City of God agenda they want to implement and when the SHTF blame it all on their co-conspirators, djoorie.
@90404: I believe dc means that the same people who committed the horrid but relatively limited genocides listed by GW also committed the far larger and virtually unlimited crimes dc lists.
He’s right, of course; they did.
Jews really can be, for the lack of a better word, charming. Like many politicians and con artists, they really can make you feel special. In case any of you have read Isaac Asimov, the Jews have always reminded me the people of the Second Foundation who could play on the emotions of others. And I have always thought that non-Jewish negotiators in any matter should never agree to anything without “sleeping on it”, to remove the emotional influence. Better yet, all negotiations with Jews should be done via email to reduce psychological pressure.
(On the topic of Asimov, I should note that the Jews also remind me of the First Foundation in their certainty that their fate has been predetermined and that they cannot fail.)
Dr. MacDonald should consider making electronic versions of his books freely available. The relatively high cost of the paper copies stops many people from purchasing them, and it prevents us from massbuying and distributing to others.
I consider the lack of easily accessible and well-compiled information one of the greatest problems facing Whites. There should be a goal of having Dr. MacDonald’s trilogy in every home. Presently, the people independently coming to an understanding how the world functions are in their 30s. We should think of ways to accelerate this process. Like, home-schooling :) Of course, being informed is only one step.
Professor Watson
September 20, 2012 – 8:29 pm | Permalink
In America, the Jews control the media, which means our culture is Jewish. The media determines our culture. Is it any wonder that most Americans feel kindly towards Israel? The Jewish media in America tells us nothing about Muslim suffering. There is more freedom of the press in Israel than in America, land of ZOG and Jewish culture.
End quote
Very well said. In fact Dr Kevin Macdonald talked about Jack Shaheen and his book “real bad arabs” on how holywood demonizes a people.
There is a very good documentary about Jack Shahhen’s book. It was truly amazing how Arabs and palestinians are portrayed in holywood.
Here is a link to Jack Shaheen interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1-Bbz_TBMc
@Peters:
I’m nearing my mid-twenties and I know about Jewish influence in the world and have read for 1000s of hours since I was 18. I think people start to unravel the mystery at 30 because they’ve stopped fornicating and being in drug induced stupors. They then wake up from the madness and wonder “what’s wrong with the world”.
@Stuciinbetween
There certainly are exceptions. Some wake up earlier, others – never. I am glad you were a fast learner. But we should never generalize our personal experiences.
@Stuckinbetween
There certainly are exceptions. Some wake up earlier, some – never. I am glad you were a fast learner. But we should never generalize our personal experiences.
Media control? Yes. Church control? Yes.
People have been turning away from Christianity for years, even mocking Christ. It has not occurred to them that the problem is not Christian, but Jewish. The voice of the Jew has replaced the Voice of Christ. Jewish insanity masquerades as Christianity.
Instinctively, people turn against alien influence. They don’t know what is turning them off. Jews know. They know Christians are turning against our own faith because it has been distorted by Jewish influence although we don’t know that. They don’t us to guess that secret.
People lose interest in religion and Church. Many turn to an earlier Pagan religion. Christianity may be seen as an out-dated relic. Or racially destructive. Many question the motives of the man Jesus – if He existed, at all. There’s a detachment from God and religious belief in the Intellectual Community. The sad plight of the Christian condition has not been examined to my knowledge. Christianity gets blamed for the sins of the Jews. That’s like condemning an innocent man of a crime he did not commit. The sad truth is that Jewish influence, not Christ, controls our world.
@Peters:
I’m only 20. The process for me went like this: 1) feeling of uneasiness and disgust over the environment of a liberal university 2) identifying the culprit as liberalism 3) becoming a Republican 4) finding the relationship between Marxism and liberalism 5) obsessively reading about every single Marxist intellectual 6) realizing that there was a HUGE correlation between being Jewish and being a Marxist intellectual
That pretty much got me started
@Peters:
I can actually remember being in my school’s library till 3 a.m. because I couldn’t get over the fact that every time I clicked on a name in Wikipedia articles on Marxism, about 1/2 would be Jewish. That was my epiphany. I sat there for hours just soaking up thousands of Jewish names.
The problem for us though is that the majority of whites, especially young ones, have a short attention span. How many people would care so much about reading and finding patterns on ethnicity and political motivations? How many people would even figure out, after 50 years on their own without Glenn Beck, that Marxism is actually today’s liberalism?
Most people with an average IQ and personality just accept things the way they are and don’t question them. Or if they wanna feel like a rebel they become a “rebel for the establishment” (a liberal). Or if they wanna sound like an expert, they read someone else’s book, steal their opinions, and then spout them as their own (most young people who are political–whether they be conservative, liberal, etc).
Other people with with high IQs just don’t have a suspicious personality.
Those of us who figure it out on our own with out someone trying to convert us are really odd balls.
@Peters: One thing about Isaac Asimov. I was an Asimov fan when I was a kid. I read The Stars Like Dust, The Realm of Numbers, I Robot, and dozens of books involving science, like his Understanding Physics series and others. Asimov was a very strange guy. He wasn’t generally like much by large segements of the Jewish community. Some of the things he said, irked other Jews. When one Jewish writer suggested how badly Jews were treated in the U.S. during the forties, thirties, etc. Asimov amswered him by saying that he never noticed it. No one every kept him back from anything he wanted to do in the U.S. Maybe because he served in the military and knocked around with regular guys on occassion, did he have a more balanced view.
@Peters:
Thank-you for the compliment. However I am not really generalizing a personal experience. I never fornicated and always believed in finding a long-term girlfriend and hoping her to become my wife if we both felt that way. I am a White person who grew up in Canada and went to a white-washed Christian school for most of my life and spent a couple years in Turkey going to elementary school there. However, I was in for a rude awakening as I graduated from high school I got a job at a warehouse and became friends with a co-worker. He was a drug dealer and I got exposed to the greater society which was way more multicultural than my 95%+ White school. I experienced a huge sense of nihilism, a glorification of gang culture through rap music, fornication as the single most important goal in life, and anomie. Pure dysfunction as a bunch of racially unrelated people who have been brainwashed by our Satanic system of the West with no memory of their past and heritage. I got involved in drugs. It started with a marijuana and ecstasy addiction and then I went on to try ketamine, heroine, and mushrooms. I have definitely experienced different states of awareness and came to come pretty enlightening conclusions. Perhaps that is why I awoke sooner?
@Bobby: Asimov was a genuine character; a real hoot and authentically smart (not just smart per the kosher mafia).
There’s a great anecdote concerning the time he was being feted by a gathering of Nobel physics laureates. During the course of dinner, someone used the word alfalfa. The fellow sitting next to Asimov commented to him that alfalfa was a very curious word, consisting as it did of a three-letter group that was repeated and then followed by the group’s first letter. He wondered aloud if there were other English words of that unusual construction. Asimov thought for about three seconds and then said, “entente.”
That is one of my ultimate “I wish I’d said that” moments.
@Pierre de Craon: Yes, Pierre. The mans knowledge was encyclopedic. One of my friends in Junior high school, Rick Montegomery, shared this interest in Asimov books with me, and we always traded books with each other. Life is truly strange. When Peters brought up Asimov, it realeased a whole bunch of memories of my adolescent years and even of my friend Ricky Montgomery , who was klled in a sky diving accident when his parachute failed. He was one of those boys with an infectious smile/grin, that endeared himself to almost everyone who came in contact with him.
@Peters:Second the motion. What about a audiobook narration of The Culture of Critique released into the ether?
I cannot stand the use of the American “Civil Rights” movement as some kind of great and just thing, in order to show Jews as hypocrites.
The US Civil Rights movement was a hate-based power play, and a smear on Whites by letting blacks dominate us. The Jews have never answered for their role in this, and I think using it, when it was plainly evil, as a sort of leverage to get Jews to “back off” on Palestinians is a huge mistake, for it is basically an admission that the CR (bowel) movement was righteous.
@Heather Blue:
I think you are contradicting yourself. Lewy made Robeson feel a certain way; he made Robeson feel sympathetic and caring. And the central conflict of the essay was that Robeson did not know why he felt that way! I found this ironic, since he writes the reason pretty clearly. Lewy was acting vulnerable and creating similarities between himself and Robeson.
I do not believe, but correct me if I am wrong, that Robeson ever found closure over this discrepancy between his feelings and his understanding. In my opinion, that internal conflict is a victory for Lewy. He successfully screwed with his opponent’s mind.
Don’t forget that while Hitler was rising to power, Jews were murdering millions of Christians in Russia. Jews created Communism (Jewish Bolshevism) in Russia, then murdered 60 million Christians in the greatest Holocaust in World History.
Never again!
“The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish planning and Jewish dissatisfaction.
Our plan is to have a New World Order. What worked so wonderfully in Russia is going to become reality for the whole world.”
The American Hebrew Magazine September 10,1920
“By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence…
At the moment, our young men in their leather jackets, who are the sons of watchmakers from Odessa, Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa, know how to hate everything Russian!
What pleasure they take in physically destroying the Russian intelligentsia — officers, academics and writers!…”
Leon Trotsky (Jew)
In the 1920s, Winston Churchill wrote a long newspaper article regarding the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia. After praising what he called the “national Jews” of Russia, he said:
“In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders… In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.
(“Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.” Illustrated Sunday Herald, London, February 8, 1920.)
This is what jews think of us “goyim” . . .
“…The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists…
…Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”
— Noel Ignatiev, Jew Harvard professor and founder of Race Traitor.
- “We are Jews and nothing else. A nation within a nation.”
(Dr. Chaim Weisman, Jewish Zionist leader in his pamphlet, (“Great Britain, Palestine and the Jews.”)
- When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it.
Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156
“We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.”
— Goldwin Smith, Jewish Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, October, 1981
“We Jews have spoiled the blood of all the races of Europe. Taken as a whole, everything is Jewdified. Our ideas animate everything. Our spirit reigns over the world. We are the Lords.”
Dr. Kurt Munzer, “The Way to Zion.”
- “We are neither German, English or French. We are Jews and your Christian mentality is not ours.”
(Max Nordau, a German Zionist Leader, in The Jewish World)
- “When only Jews are present we admit that Satan is our god.”
(Harold Rosenthal, former administrative aide to Sen. Jacob Javits, in a recorded interview)
- “Some call it Marxism – I call it Judaism.”
Rabbi S. Wise (The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935).“
- “The Bolshevist revolution [the 1917 Russian Revolution] was largely the outcome of Jewish idealism.”
(American Hebrew, Sept. 10, 1920)
- “We intend to remake the Gentiles what the Communists are doing in Russia.”
(Rabbi Lewish Brown in How Odd of God, New York, 1924)
- “What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.”
-Karl Marx
- “I hardly exaggerate. Jewish life consists of two elements: Extracting money and protesting.”
-Nahum Goldmann “The Jewish Paradox” 1978 (Nahum Goldmann was a leading Zionist and the founder and longtime president of the World Jewish Congress)
- “It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism. All that is in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.”
(Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to all AntiSemites, p. 148, 1939)
- “The Bolshevist officials of Russia are Jews. The Russian Revolution with all its ghastly horrors was a Jewish movement.”
(The Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 22, 1922)
“Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
- “A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.”
Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17
-* “Jews may use subterfuges to circumvent a ‘goy.’” (Baba Kamma 113a)
-* What a Jew steals from a ‘goy’ he may keep.” (Sanhedrin 57a)
-* “If a Jew finds an object lost by a ‘goy’ it does not have to be returned.” (Baba Mezia 24a)
-* “If a ‘goy’ (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed.” (Sanhedrin 58b)
-* “If a Jew murders a ‘goy’ there will be no death penalty.” (Sanhedrin 57a)
- “Jews may adopt the customs and language of the countries where they live; but they will never become part of the native population.”
(The Jewish Courier, January 17, 1924).
- “Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity.”
(The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918).
- “The memory of the Holocaust ™ is central to the New World Order.” —
Ian J. Kagedan (Director of government relations for B’nai B’rith Canada, Toronto Star, Nov. 26, 1991, p. A17.)
Jews control the Federal Government and are at war with White America. Jews are behind the Immigration Act of 1965 that mandates that 95% of all new immigrants coming to the U.S. must be non-White and come from a Third World country.
- The United States of Israel: “I am aware how almost impossible it is in this country to carry out a foreign policy [in the Middle East] not approved by the Jews….. terrific control the Jews have over the news media and the barrage the Jews have built up on congressmen. I am very much concerned over the fact that the Jewish influence here is completely dominating the scene and making it almost impossible to get congress to do anything
they don’t approve of. The Israeli embassy is practically dictating to the congress through influential Jewish people in the country”
- Sec. of State John Foster Dulles quoted on p.99 of Fallen Pillars by Donald Neff
- “You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel.” Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache 2009
- “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . .. I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.
The Jews changed all the immigration laws in all the White countries by the mid-sixties and won’t allow the Federal Government to stop illegals. The Jews want to brown America and Europe (genocide – destruction of the genes).
Of course, Jews control 96% of the mass media including book publishing, newspapers, and the movie and TV business. They promote race-mixing endlessly.
In an extraordinary gathering of nearly 60,000 ultra-Orthodox Jews, leading rabbis of the yeshiva and Hassidic world all but banned the Internet.
A halachic decision rendered by Rabbi Shmuel Halevi Wosner, one of the senior rabbis in the Orthodox world, said the Internet could be used for work purposes in an office — but only if absolutely necessary, and with the use of a filter. There was no justification for Internet use at home under any circumstances.
And you people thought the Muslims were at war with the West. LMFAO!
-”We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.” (Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983)
-”We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel… Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours.” (Rafael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces – Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 13 April 1983, New York Times 14 April 1983)
By the time the Jews get done with you, your descendants will look like Tiger Woods.
“The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the white man, our most dangerous enemy will become a memory. We shall embark upon an era of 10,000 years of peace and plenty, Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples.”
-Rabbi Rabinovich, 1958
-* “All children of the ‘goyim’ (Gentiles) are animals.” (Yebamoth 98a)
-* “Sexual intercourse between the ‘goyim’ is like intercourse between animals.” (Sanhedrin 74b)
-* “Girls born of the ‘goyim’ are in a state of ‘niddah’ (menstrual uncleanness!) from birth.” (Abodah Zarah 36b)
-* “Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.” (Soferim 15)
-* “If you eat with a ‘goy’ it is the same as eating with a dog.” (Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b)
-* “The ‘goyim’ are not humans. They are beasts.” (Baba Mezia 114b)
“The Revolution won’t happen with guns, rather it will happen incrementally, year by year, generation by generation. We will gradually infiltrate their educational institutions and their political offices, transforming them slowly into Marxist entities as we move towards universal egalitarianism.”
— Max Horkheimer, Marxist Jew of the Frankfurt School
-”It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands.” (Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972)
-”Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment… Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.” (Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine, Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry)
-”I’m a peacemaker, but the current Israeli government does not know how to make peace. We move from war to war, and this will never stop. I think Zionism has run its course.” -Widow of Israeli General Moshe Dayan (Newsweek 11/7/11)
“The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.”
— The Chicago Jewish Sentinel, October 8, 1942.
“World War II was a Zionist plot to make way for the foundation of the Jewish State in Palestine.”
— Joseph Burg, an anti-Zionist Jew
-* “When it comes to a Gentile in peace times, one may harm him indirectly, for instance, by removing a ladder after he had fallen into a crevice.” (Shulkan Arukh, Yoreh De ‘ah, 158, Hebrew Edition only)
“The US shouldn’t give high clearances to Jews, because when asked to help, we’re willing to do anything for the love of our country, Israel.”
— Jew Spy Jonathan Pollard during interrogation by the FBI.
“The role of the President of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel.”
— Ann Lewis, speaking for Hillary Clinton, at the meeting for Jewish Leadership sponsored by the United Jewish Communities on March 18, 2008
“My opinion of Christian Zionists? They’re scum. But don’t tell them that. We need all the useful idiots we can get right now.”
–Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel. Present in New York City on 9/11 and London during the 7/7 subway bombings.