Back in June, the organisers of the Canadian Immigration Report (CIR) were invited to appear as witnesses before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration to present arguments in support of Bill C-31, also known as the Protecting Canada’s Immigration System Act. The bill, sponsored by the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration, and Multiculturalism, Jason Kenney, is aimed at introducing important changes in the refugee system in order to cut down the number of bogus claims. The CIR witnesses were scheduled to make a ten-minute opening presentation and answer questions from Committee members of the rest of the hour.
After being rescheduled six times, the meeting was finally to take place on Wednesday 26 September. The following day, the CIR reported:
We made the long drive to Parliament Hill and just a moment after entering the meeting room, a clerk informed us that our time had been given to someone else and that we were not to appear before the committee.
After leaving the room, journalists who were already apprised of the situation informed us that the topic of our presentation was deemed inappropriate and had several screen captures of our website on hand.
It seems the Liberal and New Democratic Party (NDP) members of the Committee acted to exclude the CIR witnesses from the debate. According to CBC News,
[a]t the meeting’s outset, NDP immigration critic Jinny Sims drew attention to some of the material on the site, including stories defending so-called white nationalism and video clips from Canadian white supremacist Paul Fromm, among others.
“Mr. Chair, I am quite shocked that government members have asked this group to testify before us,” she said. “I would hope that you would agree with me that these views don’t have any place at a parliamentary committee in one of the most diverse, open and accepting countries on Earth.”
The Conservatives requested the committee move in-camera to discuss the matter, and then agreed to drop the witnesses from the day’s proceedings.
Not satisfied, Conservative MP Chungsen Leung is reported to have declared afterwards in relation to the CIR:
“The views stated in their website are disgusting, and anti-Canadian, and I’m outraged by them. So as a result, I have asked the clerk that they be pulled [from the committee list].”
Needless to say that this should not surprise anyone who is aware of the politics of ‘immigration’ and multiculturalism in the modern West.
Topology of Hegemonic Egalitarianism in the Great White North
Jinny Jogindera Sims was born in India and Chungsen Leung was born in Taiwan, so we would expect them in all cases, even if unencumbered by ideology, to push for excluding an organisation like the CIR.
In turn, Sim’s party, the ironically named ‘New Democratic Party’, originated in 1961 through the merger of the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and the Co-Operative Common Wealth Federation (CCF). These constituent elements were themselves products of prior mergers.
The CLC was formed in 1956 through the merger of the country’s two major labour congresses: the Trades and Labour Congress of Canada (TLC) and the Canadian Congress of Labour (CCL). Unions affiliated with the CCL had been infiltrated by Communists; indeed, a labour central operated by the Communist Party of Canada, the Workers Unity League, had merged with the CCL in 1939.
The CCF originated in 1932 from the merger between the League of Social Reconstruction and various socialist, agrarian, cooperative, and labour groups; among those involved was the Ginger Group, a faction of radical socialist Members of Parliament from the Progressive and Labour parties. The League of Social Reconstruction was formed by 1930s socialist intellectuals, who organised themselves as an adaptation of the British Fabians. The CCF was also part of the Christian Left and the Social Gospel movement.
The NDP advocates, among other things, gender ‘equality’ and equal rights for LGBT citizens; aggressive human rights protection; aboriginal peoples’ treaty, land, and constitutional rights; a foreign policy emphasising diplomacy, peace-keeping, and humanitarian aid; and—this only from one wing—the legalisation of recreational drugs.
The Liberals can be said to have been the architects of modern Canada, having governed the country for nearly 70 years during the 20th century. They are the creators of Canada’s welfare state. Today, however, they are only the third largest party in the House of Commons by some margin, holding only a third of the seats held by the NDP, presently the second largest party.
The Conservatives, currently the largest (and also Chungsen Leung’s) party, controlling more than half the House of Commons, are, of course, ideologically liberal in the classical sense. They are all about economics and individualism. On the surface they claim to be socially conservative, but even in this area they are as flaccid as one could imagine. In the 2011 edition of the Discover Canada booklet for new immigrants they added the following line: ‘Canada’s diversity includes gay and lesbian Canadians, who enjoy the full protection of and equal treatment under the law, including access to civil marriage’. The line begs the question: what are these Conservatives, in fact, conserving? Their belief in equality automatically signals not only their uselessness, but also their utter turpitude.
Egalitarianism is a Closed Universe
Following their exclusion, the CIR, noting that ‘Canada proclaims itself a liberal country’, posed a rhetorical question: ‘Since when, we wonder, is it a liberal value to silence your opposition?’
Liberals have been acutely aware of the contradiction between their theory and their practice, the latter of which has governed necessarily by the need to protect liberalism from existential threats—or, as we perceive it, the need to maintain liberal hegemony for all time. Accordingly, while they believe in tolerance, on the basis that everyone should have equal rights and dignity, they have debated whether there should be limits to tolerance, aware that there are some groups are less equal that others. This represents the debate of wishy-washy liberalism (idealists) versus ‘muscular liberalism’ (pragmatists).
The blindness of both these factions is apparent in the fact that the idealists see the pragmatist position as a dangerous compromise, while the pragmatists see their position as a necessary compromise. In other words, placing limits to toleration is, by their admission, a contradiction of liberal theory.
Yet, there is no contradiction at all. In liberalism the historical subject is the individual; the individual is the measure of all things. The idea behind liberalism is to ‘liberate’ the individual from anything external or transcendent to the individual: faith, tradition, and authority. The latter all imply hierarchy. Stripped of these, an individual becomes like any other, an equal, replaceable, and interchangeable unit. What is more, what applies to one, applies to all equally, everywhere and always. Furthermore, all are equally entitled to a slice of the pie. Equality becomes, this way, an absolute moral good, which is taken for granted and cannot be assailed philosophically. The ideology of human rights rests on this moral-philosophical foundation.
The above applies in classical liberalism. Modern liberalism, practiced by all mainstream parties, incorporates Marxist critiques. Marxism, like liberalism, sees the world entirely in material terms. This derives from liberalism’s rejection of any transcendent dimension in life. In such a world, the only thing that matters are material conditions, which, for the Marxists, are linked inextricably to power relations between one group of individuals and another. The historical subject, therefore, is class. Marxism is about protecting a class perceived as powerless from a class perceived as powerful.
The influx of non-European settlers from all parts of the world into traditional White homelands and triumphant settler colonial projects like the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, have resulted, as we well know, from both liberalism and Marxism, and the interactions between the two. In this situation, settlers from the Third World (mislabelled ‘immigrants’) are treated as a class and Whites as another class. Most of the establishment politicians are Whites, and it is Whites who believe sincerely in these egalitarian ideologies, so settlers, because they arrive as appellants to the established authority, which is assumed to be White, are treated as powerless and in need of protection from the powerful Whites.
A White person who values his Whiteness signals his belief that Whiteness ought to have a privileged position and thereby signals his rejection of the absolute moral goodness of equality. We have seen that equality is fundamental, not only as a value, but also to the concept of human rights. Therefore, a White person who campaigns for White interests automatically puts his humanity into question, not only in terms of his capability for human fellowship, but also in terms of his eligibility for equality of rights and dignity. This is why a White advocate is never accorded the same rights and privileges as other citizens, and why it is perfectly normal and natural for individuals representing an organisation like CIR to be excluded from the democratic process. The exclusion is entirely unproblematic, both in theory and in practice. Egalitarianism is a closed universe where only egalitarians can exist. In this universe non-egalitarians are incomprehensible: surely, no sane, moral person would ever think equality is anything but good, right?
Conclusion
It is indeed a liberal value to silence opposition.
The Joys of Jihad: Islamentable, Isatrocious, Isbetrayal
Nordics versus Implicit Jews in "The Switch"
In this universe non-egalitarians are incomprehensible: surely, no sane, moral person would ever think equality is anything but good, right?
The sexes are not equal.
The races are not equal.
You can’t fool mother nature.
Equality is impossible. To try to force equality is very bad. No sane person should think otherwise. The slang term libtards is actually well founded.
Not merely a value a foundational principle.
And; the slang term “a rather large libtard” is actually well founded when used for Jinny Sims.
Let them take away any governmental recourse. Just like in the US they are doing a happy dance over making whites a minority.
Voting was sterile politics anyway. The (voting) power they are taking away from us was only symbolic power any way, just like their renaming of schools and streets after non-whites.
Deprived of all symbolic and sterilze power, Whites will turn to Spiritual and Cultural Power, which is Real Power.
I believe that James Kalb, Catholic bigot though he be, most clearly diagnosed the Liberal shell game in his book The Tyranny of Liberalism. The Liberal proposes that all societal decisions be made on the basis of open, rational, debate. Who could argue with that? Yet, even leaving aside the issue of debating opponents who want to end debate [the "Weimar Problem"] is the fact that the Liberal DEFINES a position as ‘rational’ and thus worthy of debate in terms of its, well, liberalism. “Faith-based,” traditional, revealed, etc. positions are irrational and ipso facto ruled out of order. There being no dissent, I rule this meeting adjourned.
Political discourse is always delimited. The figure of Socrates is really the paradigm. Only within an homogenous demographic can relative political agreement manifest. Pluralism (ethnic, racial, cultural) is a always recipe for strife, and liberal contradictions (the expectation of both openness or freedom and equality) necessarily lead to an eventual exclusion of any ideology that points out these contradictions, and argues against them.
It would be better to abandon all pretense of liberalism, and view government in more traditional ways. However, a realistic and practical implementation of traditionalism within our current system is not possible.
Implicit in what Mr. K writes above is an important detail: it is the presence of large groups of immigrants or aboriginals in a society that motivates the Liberal consensus. Unless you kill them [Manifest Destiny], enslave them, or close the borders, you face the troubles of a “multi-cultural” society, thus Liberalism ["Every group deserves respect."] Thus, the UK Labour Party secret plan to flood Britain with immigrants to create a permanent Liberal majority; thus, the Democrats’ hysteria over “voter suppression” as well as ‘nativism.’
As Eliot wisely said, no society can tolerate too large a number of free-thinking Jews.
On aboriginals: notice how Injuns don’t get anywhere near the consideration that negroes do? That’s because the WASPS killed them all – almost – while merely freeing the slaves, thus saddling us with the need to constantly ‘negotiate’ with a bad tempered minority group. Say, was THAT why they weren’t resettled? In Canada, by contrast, the Injuns are as troublesome as the Asians and Africans.
This whole episode is a disgrace and a slap in the face for freedom of expression. I am ashamed as a Canadian citizen that in a democratic society an individual is not allowed to express their views. Stand strong Madi and Julien and gird your loins for battle and never let them shut you up.
The paragraph beginning “Yet, there is no contradiction at all,” in its precisely accurate focus on the destructive and alien nature of the regnant political philosophy of this age, may be the finest thing Mr. Kurtagic has ever written.
I look forward to reading reactions from Canadian commenters hereabouts, especially Curmudgeon. Their perspective could be most helpful.
Incisive proposition. Inevitable conclusion. Excellent article. But do members of the Kurtagic household really say cecity when they refer to blindness? If they do, they’ve read Cicero’s De amicitia a lot more recently than I have.
This is truly a great analysis of what is happening in our societies.
The chronic fear of being labeled with the well-known collection of antiisms et co. has been proven tremendously effective as they have been being used, systematically, to silence or try to silence any type of opposition.
The problem is that their tactics will turn against themselves as more and more people take the pacifier-labels and call them badges of honour, symbols of free thinking and civic courage.
Will the silencers come up with a new set of scarecrow-tactics, packed in glittery paper, decorated with a gargantuan ribbon? Probably yes.
But by that time, those who once used to shudder at the sound of those daunting words will smile with lenience and pretend to act frightened, like when toddlers try to scare the grown-ups.
Question: Is It a Liberal Value to Silence Opposition?
Answer: Herbert Marcuse’s “A Critique of Pure Tolerance”
These creeps planned everything it is almost ridiculous: Gramsci’s takeover of the institutions, Frankfurt School’s Cultural Marxism, Marcuse’s “repressive tolerance.”
@Elie:
Did I say “almost ridiculous?” I meant it is ridiculous.
Listen to “Cultural Communism” by Jonathan Bowden: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8tjGJ4eUdA
I remember him saying something like “They don’t even bother to ban books. Why? Because most people can’t read them anyway.”
That is also why they wrote with such heavy and complex vocabulary: So most people can’t read it.
John hearns wrote:
“The sexes are not equal.”
“The races are not equal. ”
“You can’t fool mother nature.”
Add to that:
Racial equality is not supported by science.
Here is my closed universe :
1) Politics should be decided only by superior people.
2) Liberals are inferior.
3) Therefore Liberals should be excluded from the political process.
My Grandfather was a member of the CCF. It was not a communist organization for him. It was a way of neighbour helping neighbour during the depression. Alot of farmers in Saskatchewan were from Europe and saw neighbours as kin. Call it the social gospel if you want, but there is a reason Tommy Douglas is revered in Canada. He brought people together. It is not their fault that it got infiltrated by the you know who’s.
@Kievsky:
Exactly, the belief in “nothing” in a Post-Modern, Liberal context means complete servitude to anyone coming along with “objective” beliefs i.e in a spiritual framework. Why are Muslims having such a easy job subverting European culture if the aforementioned is not true?LOL
In a debate with an Athiest the Christian apologist concluded: When we both walk out of this debate tonight, by your own admission you’re a talking monkey and I’m a child of the most high God…Now ask the audience, which identity is superior? Exactly…
@mark:
Morality, in general, cannot be supported by Science. The 20th century saw the biggest leap in Science ever yet was matched with the biggest slaughter of humanity in world history. Yes, Science has just given humanity cleaner means to dispose of unwanted thinkers who orchestrate their world via the moving of mid-sized objects.LOL
Another useful closed universe :
1) The demographic fate of a white country should only be decided by Whites who want to keep their country majority white.
2) Non-Whites and anti-White Whites don’t want to keep the country majority white.
3) Therefore such non-Whites and anti-White Whites should be excluded from the demographic decision process.
So good bye Mrs. Jinny Sims and Mr. Chungsen Leung go back to your own countries! And you know what? We will not insist you accept millions and millions of white immigrants into your countries, give them “equal rights” etc etc untill you are dispossessed. We will not call you “racists” for not wanting that, not even “supremacists”! Now that seems fair to me!
@rhondda:
Yep, the Jews & leftoids flock to any sort of genuine union movement, or peoples movement. Take for example the American AFL-CIO, it was a really wholesome American movement. Today the leftoids & radicals have really ruined it. It still has clout, but, every year grows weaker, and, weaker thanks to the leftoids & radicals. No White American wants a “Spanish” and/or Negro union movement.
The French Catholic Canadian labor leaders have played a bad role in Canada, and in the US too. An alliance with the Jews & leftoids ain’t smart politics in the long run.
“Egalitarianism is a closed universe where only egalitarians can exist. In this universe non-egalitarians are incomprehensible: surely, no sane, moral person would ever think equality is anything but good, right?
Alex,
I get the point of your irony. But as you must know, the philosophy of egalitarianism is a con trick. The Marxists in Bolshevik Russia, led by the half-Jew Lenin, were loudest in their proclamation that the Tsar’s regime of inequality was an unmitigated evil.
“Let’s smash the rich toffs and divide up their lands and wealth among the the honest working man. Let’s be fair and equal,” the Communists preached, pandering to the envy of the have-nots who wanted a greater slice of the proverbial cake.
And what happened? When the Jews got their Revolution by conning the proletariat into thinking that elagitarianism was on the cards, the proles got pole-axed. They ended up poorer than they were before. They ended up slaves.
It’s exactly the same in America. Affirmative action is not intended to benefit blacks, for example, so that more deserving blacks get into Ivy League universities or land better jobs. No, the point of affirmative action — a tool of so-called “egalitarianism” — is to use it as a weapon against Whites. The more dumb blacks you can shoehorn into well-paid and influential positions, the more smart Whites you can keep out!
The Jews at the top of the heap, do they who PREACH egalitarianism actually WANT it? Of course not! They make sure that they are always MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS! — just like the pigs in Orwell’s Animal Farm!
Consider: the richest 1 percent of America’s population own 35 percent of the country’s wealth, while the bottom 90 percent have to make do with only 25 percent of national wealth. According to Forbes List, 51 percent of America’s richest men are Jews. What does this tell you?
It tells you this: egalitarianism is the LAST thing these super-rich predators want. Good heavens, egalitarianism would mean the confiscation of their wealth! The rich would be poorer, the poor richer, if egalitarianism were ever got put into practice.
So have no fear. Egalitarianism is a con trick. Stricty for talking about, never for implementing!
The last thing the rich predators who rule America want is a more equal society. The same applies to Europe, Alex, where you live. If more money is going to the poor and chronically unemployed in handouts, this is not socialism rearing its ugly head. This is panem et circenses — bread and games to pacify the restless masses and prevent riots in the streets.
You have to throw the starving dog under the table an occasional bone, if only to stop the dog from biting your leg.
* * *
Some of these taxing problems are tackled in this new article by Lasha Darkmoon published yesterday on another site and reproduced here with its full complement of pictures:
http://www.darkmoon.me/2012/here-comes-evil-by-lasha-darkmoon/
As the predictions of a happy future under a multicultural regime have failed to materialize, it seems to me that repression of opponents has been stepped up. Education was supposed to be the great leveler for third world immigrants, getting them out of the underclass and into the middle class. It didn’t work, so the teachers, not bad students, are blamed. Opponents are told to keep their mouths shut.
Jinny Sims… good Christ, can you actually imagine waking up next to that thing in the morning?
One thing I notice about jews and their liberal lap-dogs is the absence of beauty in these people. Their desire is to make the world as ugly as they are.
The quintissential genetic jew:
http://catholicexchange.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Dan-Senor.jpg
Biological monstrosities and invalids like Michael Moore, Ted Kennedy, FDR, Rosie O’Donnell, Al Franken, Henry Waxman and others decide the political and cultural landscape of America. An aristocratic society would never place these genetic losers in front of the masses to lead and inspire them.
In regards to the article’s point about silencing opposition, it’s universal for every political group to silence its opponents. Like Spengler said, even pacifists want to kill the warmongerers they despise.
The whole idea of equality and fairness and egalitarianism is self-contradictory and, in a word, nonsensical. Everything comes down to power. Jews and their liberal water-carriers want power, so they do everything they can to get it and maintain it. That’s completely rational.
But liberal Whites don’t actually have any power, they’re just slaves for the jews…. moral slaves, as whatever the jews tell them is “good” (Whites becoming a minority, affirmative action, multiculturalism, etc.) they truly believe is “good.” They’re just too stupid to realize it’s only “good” for non-Whites.
And so the jew-led war against civilization continues unabated. These ugly, scrawny, physically defective and mentally unstable people are leading the charge against everything aristocratic, proud and beautiful, everything that would make the world actually worth living in.
@Kievsky: Excellent point. Who actually believes in the efficacy of voting, Jimmy Carter perhaps? Too bad he can never find the time to actually monitor elections in the U.S.!!
@fender: I agree with your post in general, but, these people are not the “leaders”. They’re nothing but the mouthpieces of the elite that power them, just as in the U.S. I often get into this argument with friends of mine, still stuck on the thought that voting, means something. Perhaps in a town like Mayberry,etc. LOL. But aside from podunk county, rich and influential people around the world, are not going to allow Joe or Jane Blow, dictate anything of importance to them,democracy or no democracy.
Liberals say race is a social construct (hence, there is no such a thing as race)
Liberals say all races are equal (isn’t race a social construct?)
Liberals say racism can be solved by miscegenation (mixture of different races)
Liberals believe all there at the same time.
Liberalism is a mental disorder…
Excellent point Lucy/Lasha? Egalitarianism is an anti-White, tool, and not an ideology. Political liberalism, furthermore, is a mold which is shaped to fit whatever direction the Jews and Freemasons want society to go in. If they can’t get away with calling the direction liberalism, then thy just have to come up with another slogan to fulfill their agenda. Communism is just another slogan, the people in charge the same.
@Tom:
Well you should read about the French Canadian Catholic priest
Lionel Adolphe Groulx.
Ugly truth- I recall seeing a pic of Miss Rand standing next to an Aryan good-looking actress. I thought- if Ayn had the looks of the other gal, all those novels never would have been written.
http://www.aynrandsociety.org/photo.jpg
This shows how fragile the Anti-White system is. Does this sound like the behavior of a confident group? They are treating any pro-White speech as if it were heresy. This is not how people secure in their beliefs act.
You could literally walk down the street in any European nation proclaiming the glory of Lucifer, and no authority, including any church, would care. Why? Because it is no threat. No one takes it seriously.
But just a whisper of pro-White sentiment sets off a panic among the elite. What does that tell you? They are that terrified of words.
@rhondda:
Well, Groulx has been dead since 1967, and a lot of water has gone over the dam since then. LOL. That’s the whole problem, too many people living in the past and not dealing with present reality in America or Canada.
This French Canadian Catholic, “Spanish”/Latino/Hispanic Catholic & Jew-leftoid alliance is heading for trouble with White Protestant America, and probably with White Protestant Canada too. Down the road this means big trouble.
@Tom:
One learns from the past.
@mudur:
Well, Liberals could solve their contradictions if they would say :
“All social constructs are equal, but since some social constructs still believe they are superior and discriminate other social constructs, discriminated against social constructs deserve special treatment, while discriminating social construct should be reigned in. The final solution of conflict between the various social constructs would be to mix them all. That would end any possibility of discrimination and Utopia on earth would be reached”.
That would solve their contradictions, but don’t tell them that.
@mudur: You seem to think liberalism is a left wing defect. Sorry, so is right wing liberalism.
Don’t you get it? Don’t ask me to explain. Bloody well think.
@rhondda:
Liberalism is self-destructive whether it’s left or right….
If you are a “right” (!) wing liberal, you suppose to be pro-immigration since it pushes down the wages, adds to your work (read: slave) force, counteract the aging population, etc… But hey, one day you will find people who are willing to work even for less. Vicious cycle.
In most cases, rich whites and jews in the gated communities are the biggest enemies of the whites since they are most likely to be liberal.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
How on earth can social constructs (upper and lower, rich and poor, intelligent and stupid, etc…) be equal? Liberalism even contradicts basic grammar rules. (Sarcasm off)
@mudur: Thank you. We agree. The bigger question is what on earth do we do about this? I do not think one person can answer that. However, if an agreement can be made on what the problem is, then intelligent minds can find and agree on the remedy. (scary as those might be)
@mudur:
“Liberals say race is a social construct (hence, there is no such a thing as race)
Liberals say all races are equal (isn’t race a social construct?)
Liberals say racism can be solved by miscegenation (mixture of different races)
Liberals believe all there at the same time.”
As a former leftist I can explain how it is that liberals can believe these seemingly contradictory things, as I can still remember my general thought process in regards to this stuff.
The basic idea is that, yes, all humans are equal and given the same basic parts by nature: eyes, ears, brain, feet, hands, etc. Since all humans are physically “the same” (leftists incorrectly see intelligence and psychology as non-physical) the only “rational” explanation for White success and non-White failure is that Whites set up a system to oppress non-Whites.
Basically, what liberals believe is that the “social construct” of race is a make-believe thing, like religion. They see racism as a religious/psychological thing, a scam used to divide people, and the idea of a superior race as being analogous to the idea of a superior religion.
To refute the “religion” of racism, leftists believe that the solution is the for the races to mix, so that they can “prove” there are no superior or inferior races. If the races mix that’ll be humanity’s final “enlightenment.” The end of all religious ideas.
Of course to us, that’s all anti-reality nonsense. We know the hard, gritty truth about nature: evolution creates hierarchies based on what genes have successfully been replicated through breeding. Naturally, certain peoples will have higher rates of genes that favor high intellect than other peoples. It is the left, in fact, that is deeply religious and anti-scientific.
But this how liberals think: from one lie to the next. Their ideas seem silly to us because reality never makes contact with their ideas. It’s not incorrect to say that liberals literally do not know how to think.
@Valerie Price:
This typical and disgusting episode of Soiet style despotism in Canada maybe the darkest point of the night, just before the break of dawn.
I say that because for two reasons.
First, a backlash is brewing and the the so-called Canadian Human Righrs Commission, an Orwellian Stalinist monstrosity had been defanged. See http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/06/canada_repeal_hate_speech_laws.html
Second, the dilemma facing the Boasist-Marxist tyrants is that in order to prevent speech by the opposition, they must somehow describe the views of the opposition they they want to prevent from being heard. This defeats their very purpose.
That Indian immigrant woman for example did a great job planting the seeds of the ideas of the banned group in the heads of the white conservatives who never heard of them before.
@Frank Edwin Stone: Sorry for the typos, I am in a hurry.
James O’Meara:
You know James I would much rather negotiate with Indians than zionist wasps who have betrayed every decent thing in white culture.
“In liberalism the historical subject is the individual; the individual is the measure of all things. The idea behind liberalism is to ‘liberate’ the individual from anything external or transcendent to the individual: faith, tradition, and authority.”
This is a non sequitur. A free individual can choose to associate with others along philosophical, racial, creedal, or affective lines. This used to be called society. “No Man is an Island” wasn’t penned by Gramsci.
This proves the failure of multiracial democracy. The budget deficits will eventually crash the system and we can start over. You’d better get ready now and start making alliances with you neighbors who have the most to lose from the Diversity Swarms who will take the opportunity of post-electricty to “enrich” the neighborhoods of Whiteness.
It looks like movies made in Hollywood now will be censored by filthy, dirty, slimy Arabs
Islamopproved: Hollywood Begins Hiring Muslim Clerics To Censor Movies Of Whatever They Deem Offensive To Islam
http://patdollard.com/2012/10/hollywood-begins-hiring-muslim-clerics-to-censor-movies-of-whatever-they-deem-offensive-to-islam/
@Trenchant: “Liberalism” I’ve understood to be classical liberalism, the European and historical meaning of the word, and not progressivism.
Modern liberalism stole the word. Old liberalism is anti statism- modern “liberalism” the reverse.
The twentieth century was the century of the State- the State being “higher” than the individual. It was also the century of unreason. Continuing this century. . .
Canada desperately wants to become a third world country. It will.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Who would want to move to China?
Google Images : most polluted places in China.
China is hell and many Chinese are hellish.
@mark:
The joos in Hollywood want to pacify the muslims?
Will it hurt the bottom line?
@fender:
I think we can explain liberal “thinking” this way :
1) First they deny unwelcome reality (” race doesn’t exist”).
2) But since reality doesn’t go away, they try to destroy it ( “mix the races out of existence”).
3) Then they will have “proved” their thesis ( “see I told you so, race doesn’t exist”).
Until that Utopia arrives there is an intermediate stage between 2) and 3) in which anyone who still notices the existence of race is persecuted as a criminal (“racist”). This is presently the official attitude, both in politics and “science”. ( you can find numerous examples of this fact ).
The whole thing is a fundamental reality problem, not much different from that of a psychotic.
@90404:
He-he, no, I’m sure it won’t.
All you need know about Lefties and Liberals is in Herbert Marcuse’s books, particularly “Repressive Tolerance.”
Their word definitions do not have the same meanings as ours. As example, “peace” doesn’t mean no war. To them it means the absence of fascism. And fascism is anything on their perceived right.
Ask them what “racism” means…eff all about colour, only about power.
I always refer to Obama as the US first bi-racial President — which he is. For some reason, that drives Lefties up a wall. Yet it is certainly true about the cafe-au-lait guy.
@Elie:
Maurice Cowling also wrote on Liberal intolerance in his work on John Stuart Mill.
Having come upon the back link to this article by chance, reading it and the comments that followed; it is patently obvious why the presentation to be made by CIR was objected to and cancelled. That CIR came so close… One can only say, what could the government have been thinking to have made the initial invitation?
Not to nitpick too much, but the author’s context is out of whack. The “Imperfect Union” ( http://www.onf-nfb.gc.ca/eng/collection/film/?id=18305 ) of the CCF and the CLC was not so much a merger, as an act of inclusion. J. S. Woodsworth, a Methodist, and T. C. Douglas, a Baptist, the longtime leaders of the CCF were ministers. As stated by rhondda, they were primarily agrarian. They saw no hope of influencing the federal government without widening their scope. Historically, labour organizations in Canada were conservative in nature. Yes, they were interested in getting, for their members, a fair share irrespective of the ethnic background, but they also opposed “cheap labour” immigration from Asia. African and Hispanic immigration was virtually nil.
The CCF was not unique in its outlook. The Social Credit Party had similar goals, but different thoughts on how to acheive them. “Bible Bill” Aberhart, an outspoken Baptist, formed the SC’s first government in 1936. The SoCreds ran Alberta for 35 years.
The Progessive Conservative Party was a merger of the Progressive and Conservative Parties. It was a PC Prime Ministers that first attempted a national welfare type of programme in the 1930s, and a PC Prime Minister that called for a Royal Commission to study (make the case for) our universal health care system. Prior to Reagan’s buddy, PM Mulroney, most of the party were called Red Tories.
These parties were all conservative in nature. Eliminating unemployment and raising the living standards of all Canadians were the goals. They understood unbridled immigration, and unbridled 3rd world immigration in particular, was not the way to get there.
The Liberal Party in Canada had a history of campaigning from the “left”, but governing from the “right”, thereby naming itself as centrist or middle of the road. That, to a great extent, changed with Pierre Trudeau, who in an effort to shed his label as a draft dodging anti-semite during WWII (he rode a motorcycle around Montreal, wearing a Prussian uniform), listened to the ever increasing number of Jews in the Party. The rest is history. Immigration from the 3rd world increased under Trudeau, but exploded under Mulroney in the 1980s, and has continued unabated since.
Our current “Conservative” government is headed by a crypto Jew, or if he isn’t he is a Zionist sychophant. The party is now a Republican Party that uses reference to its historical roots to pretend it isn’t. The interim leader of the Liberals is a crypto and Zionist sychophant. The leader of the NDP, which is now the real Liberal Party is just a Zionist sychophant. In short, all of the political parties have no relation to their origins, except the name. The Jewish MPs from all parties network extensively. Journalist Greg Felton has labled them “the little Knesset”.
That the CIR was prevented from testifying is no surprise. Our elected MPs are not allowed to think for themselves or speak what is on their constituants minds. They are prisoners of the Party leaders. If they do speak out, they are banished. Once common “backbench revolts”, where MPs oppose government initiatives that are unpopular at home, haven’t been seen for decades.
Believe me, most thinking Canadians are extremely cynical about our politicical parties and immigration. Unfortunately, most Canadians, like Americans, aren’t thinking.
@mudur:
Liberals say race is a social construct (hence, there is no such a thing as race)
Liberals say all races are equal (isn’t race a social construct?)
Liberals say racism can be solved by miscegenation (mixture of different races)
Liberals believe all there at the same time.
Liberalism is a mental disorder…
===
British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative, famously stated that there is no such thing as society, only people.
You and your ilk have fallen into the Jewish trap. Societies are organic. Jews have a common self interest – self promotion of the tribe. That is a society.
The vast majority of the settlers in the Faroe Islands and Iceland came from Norway and Denmark. Their languages are similar. There are similarities in their customs. They do, however, have a markedly different sense of what it means to be a citizen of their respective countries. That is a society.
I distance myself from Kevin MacDonald where it comes to his views of Northern European individualism. It has always been individualism within a context of societal norms. What was “normal” in the Scottish Lowlands was not necessarily “normal” in the Highlands. What was “normal” in the South of Norway was not necessarily “normal” in the North of Norway. “Normal” in Schwabia was not “normal” in Saxony. What individualistic behaviour may be acceptable in one of the areas may not be acceptable in another. In my view, Northern European individualism comes from the pagan past, where honesty, accepting responsibility for one’s actions, and gaining honour were and are all individual actions. Family and community were extremely important, but no one can be responsible for another’s conscious actions.
This article has some of the best comments I have ever read here at TOO. Especially those regarding the situation in Canada and how the leftist mind works.
I have 2 observations.
Most of our enemies seem to be physically ugly indeed. My whole life I have learned the truth of the phrase “you can’t judge a book by its cover”, yet there does seem to be truth behind the old (European) fairy tales where the bad guys are very ugly. It’s like they want to destroy beauty.
The Taiwanese have betrayed Whites. We have supported them against the crushing behemoth that is the People’s Republic of China, and they pay us back by demonizing us in the strongest terms possible today (racist, bigot).
I encourage all Whites who read this to re-evaluate the situation in Taiwan and what it has got us. Also to remember that the nicer we are no non-Whites as a whole, the more they hate us and demand more of us.
Curmudgeon, there was an interesting period between the implosion of the old “Progressive Conservative” party in 1993 [my history teacher would tell us that the name is a contradiction in terms] and the present “Conservative Party”. This included the Reform Party and the Canadian Alliance, headed by Stockwell Day, both parties being considered too right wing or “extreme” to ever become ruling party in Canuckistan. “Stockboy” lost the leadership to Harper, the present dictator.
I woud appreciate critique and comments on the followint treatise. This treatise was promptly removed from a number of pro-white advocacy sites even after being reposted. Here goes . . .
Germany is the only country in the world where the “sins of the father” have been “visited on the children (and grandchildren)”. WHY?
Nazism pales in comparison with communism yet people of the “tribe” STILL make excuses for communism, stating that “communism was not properly applied” and that “mistakes were made”. . .
I, for one, am tired of seeing Germany being made an example of, when it comes to totalitarian governments. The political situation in pre-WW2 Germany was volatile (to say the least). Outside agitators made it easier to marginalize certain groups of German citizens with questionable loyalties. This made it possible for Adolph Hitler to gain power . . .
However, the demonization of Germany has a much greater purpose–to deflect criticism from that great “invention” of the “tribe”–communism.
The “tribe” took a relatively minor event in world history (the jewish “holocaust”) and turned it into a “cash cow” that “keeps on giving”. Influential leaders of the “tribe” were willing participants in the destruction of their own people and did so to force the creation of a “homeland”. . .
It is no secret that members of the “tribe” who wielded power in communist-dominated countries were hated (with good reason). Domination by Germany was seen as preferable to living under the boot heels of their communist oppressors. This was the reason why so many oppressed people volunteered to “help” the Germans “take care of business”. . .
. . . those that lived under the artificially induced “famines” (non-jewish “holocausts” perpetrated by communist jews) in the Ukraine come to mind. It is only natural to want to destroy your oppressors when the opportunity presents itself.
To this day, events that led up to WW2 Germany are conveniently “dismissed” while the self-inflicted “troubles” that the “tribe” endured are displayed as if they happened yesterday . . .
Canada oh Canada..the Zionists sure have they’re hooks into you. Isn’t this the Canada where the open discussion of the holocaust is illegal & you broke off relations with Iran under Israeli pressure..
I always thought our neighbor to the north was a bulwork against the unfair..land of the draft dodger & all that.
I’m on vacation using a different service…
When I come back to Canada I want to start up a group of White people, as I am sick of my multi-cult friends and their disgusting “culture” they’ve made. I tried explaining the cancer that is liberalism that is choking the West, and I just get called a lunatic and racist. Oh well just trying to spread the world.
It will be a group that will discuss White identity, Zionist (Jewish) subversion of education, media, and politics.
It will be based in Edmonton, Alberta, and I’m thinking of posting it on Craigslist or a dating site looking for male members. My fear is that I will attract White homosexuals using those methods. So, does anyone know a meet-up site where we can find other people who are sympathetic to a National-Socialist model of society?
@Barkingmad:
I am insulted by terms like Canuckistan. This was a great, progressive, well to do country, including the Trudeau years. Even he had some notion of nationalism. That was destroyed by the corporate zealot Prime Ministers since Mulroney. The standard of living has plummeted as we have adopted an ever more classic liberal economic platform.
Like most history teachers, yours was a liar. John A. McDonald was a nationalist. R. B. Bennett was a friend of the banks to be sure, but he was more progressive than the Liberal Party. It is only recently that one of his successes, the Canadian Wheat Board, which was opposed by international agribusiness since its inception in 1935, was dismantled by the Republicans-lite. That, in itself, was nationalist.
The Mulroney PCs were decimated because they out liberalled the Liberals. Campaigned to the left of them then governed to the right of them.
The Reform Party of Preston Manning, who pretended Reform was like his father’s Aberhart-style SoCred government, wasn’t extreme enough for the corporations. That is why the Alliance Party was created and Manning squeezed out.
Traitors like Peter McKay lied to real nationalist Red Tories like David Orchard to complete the sell-out to the corporations.
The “new” Conservative Party gets the old parties’s old people vote, because they have always voted “Conservative” and the younger immigrant vote which has only the interest of the immigrant group in mind. They have infiltrated all of the parties and vote with whom they believe will: 1) form the government; or 2) be elected, even if in opposition.
The Jews, of course, do the same thing. In some cases Jews will run against Jews, if they think they can be on the government side.
@Curmudgeon:
Trudeau’s version of nationalism was the civic, not ethno-racial variety.
@fender:
(This comment is for anyone who reads it, not just Fender)
The first several people you mentioned are merely overweight and somewhat “old”, in my opinion. (Though, I haven’t studied their physical appearance.) I definitely agree with you about the last two — Al Franken and Henry Waxman. Especially Henry Waxman.
Physical appearance is important.
(And I’m not the handsomest, or most handsome, man.)
If the current trends continue, I wouldn’t be surprised if American society eventually starts phasing out beauty contests and other things like that.
I’ve been seeing more and more “feel good” stories in the news lately, where unattractive people are showing the “bullies” the “true meaning of beauty”, or something like that.
There was a t.v. commercial a while back that featured a disfigured (and mentally retarded) girl winning a pageant or homecoming title. The commercial, which was fictional (and maybe inspired by real events), was part of the “pass it on” series paid for by the Ad Council.
I’m not making fun of unattractive (or retarded) people. But our society is full of untruth. It’s woven into… everything, maybe.
I think our society is becoming uglier. And I believe that goes hand-in-hand with the increasing amount of untruth.
Aren’t goodness/truth/beauty three parts or angles of the same thing? (I know relatively little about philosophy.)
I consider cosmetic surgery (which includes some dental work) a physical lie. Same goes with other things like makeup and hair coloring and toupees and hair transplants and unnatural teeth whiteners, etc. All those things are ways we lie to other people, without saying a word.
Michael Jackson is a classic example — most of his physical appearance was a lie.
And I think these physical lies lead to an uglier future. Especially since some kids qualify for tax-payer funded dental work and maybe other things like that.
(I’m not blaming the kids/parents who take advantage of those programs.)
Also, I want to mention that I have had dental work done. And, it’s worth repeating, I’m not the handsomest man — I’m not looking down on others. I just want to live in a world where real beauty is held up and honored and protected.
Anyway, I hope my comment doesn’t sound too harsh or rude. It’s not that I enjoy writing it. I feel like I have to.
@Curmudgeon:
Are you referring to Thatcher and her “ilk” or am I the one who is supposed to be fallen into jewish trap?
It is foolish indeed for any regime to permit criticism of its policies, which creates dissatisfaction and dissent, and a threat to maintaining power. The intelligent regime does what it can to marginalize, stifle and squelch dissident voices, like China does. I would not go so far as to describe the Canadian political leadership as intelligent, but they do understand the value of shutting down opposing views. Fortunately for the dissidents, there is still some degree of free speech in Canada, and other venues from which to sound off.
Yes all the rhetoric about tolerance is hollow at best, fears of a powerful, 1930′s Germany type backlash are always lurking in the back of the left wing/globalist anti-white consciousness, which is why they’re constantly erecting barriers against any movement that might harness the seething resentment. Consequently, there is tremendous emphasis on speeding up the process of displacement but they’re not out of the woods just yet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZyNPEqGrMM&feature=related
I agree with your description. In Germany our pupils must hear about one event in history with maybe several million victims a dozen times in school whereas much larger crimes like the genocide in the Ukraine, the Gulag system in Russia, the deeds of Mao in China, are not mentioned at all.
But this decades-enduring propaganda from government and press and television has not convinced the Germans. The usual reaction is: “Ja, das war ist schon eine schlimme Sache”.
Literally translated. „Yes, that has been a bad thing“. Translated by the in-lying sense of the words: “Tell it to whom you want, I am not interested in it”.
Or if a German gives the answer: “Ja, ja” with a special pronounciation (literally: “Yes, yes”) that has the in-lying sense: “Leck mich am Arsch” (=“Lick my ass”).
So we Germans live quite happily and if there comes propaganda, we say “Ja, ja, ist gut”.
My comment above is an answer to anarchyst October 7, 2012 – 1:04 pm
“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.
We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever”
Note the claim that the “constraints” against “bigotry,” i.e. European identity politics, can be traced to the US Constitution, when in reality the Europeans who wrote that document didn’t want equal status for blacks or non-European immigration, much less the displacement of their people. Doubtless similar tactics are employed in Canada and elsewhere, as the Jewish dominated left has the audacity to call its opponents “anti-Canadian”!
Can one conclude that race traitors and liberals are co- dependent or one in the same?
Pils,
soweit ich weiß, haben die Mittelklasse-Türken in Istanbul nur ein oder zwei Kinder: teure Miete, teure Lebenshaltung, hohe Steuern, teure Ausbildung der Kinder,
mehr als zwei Kinder können sie sich im Schnitt nicht leisten, alles wie in Europa
Aus Anatolien ziehen aber ständig kurdische Familien mit 6 bis 8 Kindern in die Slums nach Istanbul. Die Mittelklasse-Türken sehen das und sie können sich ausrechnen, was in zehn bis zwanzig Jahren in Istanbul sein wird.
Wir europäischen Völker wie auch die Mittelklasse-Türken treffen zusammen mit sehr armen Völkerschaften, die je Familie aber 8-12 Kinder haben (oder 3 bis 7, suche dir eine Zahl aus).
So einen Vermehrungwettbewerb können wir nicht gewinnen, weder wir Europäer in unseren Ländern noch die Mittelklasse-Türken in ihrem Land.
Die Folgerung daraus ist die, daß wir verhindern müssen, daß viele Zehnmillionen dieser armen Menschen in unsere Länder und Landschaften hineinkommen. Alles andere ist in der Auswirkung Völkermord an unseren Völkern. Auch wenn diese Auswirkung abgeleugnet wird, sie ist dennoch da, wie schon eine sehr einfache Rechnung zeigt wie auch der Anblick auf den Straßen unserer Großstädte.
Die derzeitige Überschwemmung mit Negern, wie ich gehört habe in Hamburg, wie ich selbst weiß in Frankfurt und im Elsaß, ist ein Teil eines Geschehens, das in der Auswirkung ein vielfacher Völkermord an den Völkern der Weißen Rasse ist.
Please excuse me,
I wanted to post my comment above in a German blog but by not paying attention I have put it here. I am sorry for unnecessarily filling your blog.
Nonetheless, having made the mistake, now I have to give the (rough) English translation to you.
As far as I know, the middle-class-Turks in Istanbul have only one or two children: expensive housing costs, high taxes, high education costs, more than two children they can not afford on average, same as in Europe. But from Anatolia (East-Turkey) all the time Kurdish Families are coming with 6 to 8 or 3 to7 children. Middle-calls Turks watch this and they can foresee what will be in ten or twenty years.
We Europeans same as the Turks clash with peoples that have 3 to 12 children. Such a population-growing-contest we can not win, neither we Europeans nor the Turks in Istanbul
The only solution is, that we must prevent that many-tens-of-milliones of these poor people come into our landscape. Anything else would mean genocide to our peoples.
Even if it would be denied, the facts are obvious either by a mathematical calculation or by a look at the streets of our cities.
The flooding with negroes, I have heard about Hamburg, and I know about Frankfurt and the Alsace (Elsass), is part of that genocide.
Sorry again for these two unnecessary postings.
Letter from Sweden
It is very true that libertarianism, liberalism and Marxism focus on materialism, but it’s also very true to point out that these ideologies were created in another time. These ideologies were exclusively for Whites in a White and Christian context. These discourses sometimes included Jews, but seldom non-White races.
In fact, mainstream social-democracy in Europe was more similar to National Socialism in Germany then this “post-Marxism” we see today. Before the 1930s in United States, ideologies like libertarianism and liberalism were often pro-White. The idea of ethnic, cultural, racial and religious conservatism was often embedded in these radical liberal, libertarian or Marxist ideologies. In the Third World we still see ethnic or racial versions of Marxism.
Often libertarianism, liberalism and Marxism were exported to the Third World, but that was rather a way for the first and second world to control different civilizations – not to create a paradise. It was after WWII that these old ideologies took a turn toward open borders and criticism of White culture and Christianity.
Libertarianism, Liberalism and Marxism are today just shells and are disconnected from their roots. What we see today is something we should call post-Marxism, post-liberalism or post-libertarianism. Let me give you some examples of how their arguments are used:
1) Post-liberals use liberal rhetoric and arguments, but their agenda is different from that of the old liberals. Post-liberals claim that White people do not exist when Whites claim emancipation and nationhood. In another context, Whites do exist for the post-liberals but and are responsible for oppression and racism. They also claim that Whites should not talk in terms of “We vs. them” because such thinking is racist, sexist and “fascist.” This argument is taken from French post-modernism and the Frankfurt school. But this is only the case when Whites criticize non-White behavior. When the opposite is done by minorities or the post-liberals, the dichotomy “we vs. them” is no longer immoral.
2) Post-libertarians claims that they are only for individual rights. But when it comes to Israel, they suddenly are all for ethnic nationalism. When it comes to illiberal Jewish practices like circumcision and Kosher slaughter, libertarians are supportive. In such contexts post-libertarians have no problem accepting a libertarianism that is connected to communitarian philosophy. The right to property is one of the key notions in libertarianism but when it stands between free immigration and people’s property (e.g., higher taxes to support public goods for immigrants), they claim they are rather for free immigration. In fact, many libertarians would rather live in a socialist society then have national borders. When Christians want to baptize their children, these atheist libertarians call it an act of religious cruelty. To cut body parts of Jewish children is “okay” but to flush a few drops of blessed water on an infant’s head is “pushing religion on individuals.”
3) Look at the post-Marxists way for arguing. They reason the same way. They rather live in a libertarian or a liberal state then changing the immigration policy or outlaw Jewish (and Muslim) practices. Many post-Marxists go even further and are all okay with the most barbaric cultural practices that minorities do – just to push for “tolerance for diversity”. Now, many of the most extreme post-Marxists are marginalized. They are so because they sometimes push Israel in a corner and the establishment does not like that.
These three political elitist groups have other agendas alongside their open border and multicultural ideology. Often it boils downs to LGBT rights, abortion, polygamy and feminism. This is an “old” agenda that was and still is used as a tool to deconstruct Western culture and to socialize Whites in weakness, self-deception and self-hate. What we can see now is a shift. Feminism is now dominated by post-colonialist feminism critique instead of Western feminism. Years ago, the veil was looked at as oppression. Today’s feminists have little problem with Muslim conservative faith, even if it from a Western view it is quite the opposite to what these feminists fought to push on White women. Today, liberal and socialist feminists are still aiming their message at White women but not on non-White women. The reason is quite obvious. If Western feminism was applied and non-White women were forced to assimilate into this Western feminism, there would be a clash with the “Other” and maybe even lowering the immigration numbers.
Muslims, Africans, Arabs and people from the Third World are not keen on abortion, feminism and LGBT-rights. Nevertheless, multicultural elites have said and continue to say “We are all the same and all people share the same fundamental norms.”
They project their own ideas on the rest of the world. When you read the academic literature you quite clearly understand that this is a political tactic rather than anything else. In fact, they all realize that people are different but that if they would “talk about the differences” that would lead to racism, so we must not talk about it. It is quite extra-ordinary that they remain in the mode of critiquing the bourgeois power structure but use this tactic to further their political goals. Still, there is a reality out there and all these ethnic minority groups are not very keen on liberalism, Marxism and Libertarianism. These minorities are also not very keen on the multicultural utopias they are presented.
Some of these protected groups or ideals need to be dropped to ensure open borders. The first protected group that the elites drop is children. If some of the ethnic minorities want to keep children from school, beat them or practice barbaric customs on them (e.g., female genital mutilation), the multicultural elites are perfectly happy with it. This is seen quite clearly in Europe where children’s rights have been undermined so that the Muslim, Jewish and African communities do not feel offended and leave. In the circumcision debate in Germany, Jewish identity organizations said quite clearly that if Europe wants to continue to be multicultural and not chase away minorities, this ban on circumcision need to be rescinded.
Of course, politicians were afraid and obeyed the pressure groups. It also shows us that politicians care more for foreign norms then northern European norms. Soon, these protected groups will have more political power and not be so dependent on terrified politicians of European descent to promote multiculturalism.
Interesting enough, the elites do not change any laws to satisfy ethnic minority groups in Europe. Just as in the United States when dealing with illegal aliens, European states instead undermine existing laws by refusing to enforce them.
There is one issue which I see as quite interesting is that there is a rising tide of aggressive anti-Semitism in Europe. This primarily comes from Muslim youth. In cities like Malmo, Paris and London, Jewish religious life is coming under attack by Muslim youth. I do not think this is acute conflict, but at least Jews are not as well-protected as before.
The Jewish establishment have always pushed for new laws to protect their interests but now, when there millions of Muslims and Africans in Europe it is not as easy as before. Muslims and Africans are quite difficult to blame, because that would undermine the elitist notion that immigration is “always good and always provides economic and cultural value” to the West. The only way for the politicians to protect the society is to establish new departments that control public opinion and increase surveillance and law enforcement. Their hope is that the conflicts arising from multiculturalism are manageable. They will not change immigration policy.
Last night there was a large debate between the leaders of the eight parties in the Swedish Parliament. It was only the Swedish Democrats that wanted to lower the immigration levels (by 90 percent). The conservative, liberals and socialist parties wanted no change in policy and the Green Party said they wanted a policy of more open borders. The key argument from the establishment was “humanism”, “anti-racism”, “human rights” and that these immigrants will soon show that they are an asset to the Sweden. They also told stories about poor Somali children. It was quite extraordinary that they could not put forth any empirical argument, but relied instead on moral exhortations.
But much more are on stake now. Sweden has taken in two million immigrants since 1975 and now at least twenty percent of the population is non-European. Crime rates are rising and whole municipalities are now at least partly controlled by foreigners. The state spends billions just to keep things running smoothly on the surface but schools, hospitals and police are on their knees. The conservative government ran on a pledge to lower taxes in the elections of 2006 and 2010. Now they must indirectly raise taxes just to keep up with the failed immigration policy. Some scholars have pointed out that one fourth of the public budget goes straight into the immigration industry. Immigrants are using hospitals, committing crimes at higher rates, live fully or partly on welfare (half of them if not more), are unemployed, and are addicted to a variety of other social programs.
A couple of years ago, the Swedish government lowered immigration from Somalia. Somalis have a 90 percent unemployment rate and the crime rate it off the charts. They are very difficult to assimilate or “integrate” (to use the term favored by the Swedish establishment). After heavy lobbying from the media and identity politics organizations, has now decided to grant all Somalis asylum or residency. That means that Sweden has a completely open border policy when it comes to Somalia.
Many people are getting worried. Even the Prime Minister observed it at the debate last night that “it all will just be fine.” Two or three months ago some municipalities (financing of welfare is decentralized to municipalities) stated that they were not able to take in more refugees, especially not Somalis. They cannot afford it without saying to the voters in the upcoming election in 2014 that they have to cut down libraries, swimming pools, school teachers and municipal government workers. The State sent some money – but it will not be enough. Financial issues related to the costs of immigration are on the minds of the elites and the people. The municipality of Borlänge noted in a policy document that at least 50 percent of adult Somalis are illiterate. They also concluded that most of the Somalis in Borlänge will never enter the workforce. Nevertheless, these and many more municipalities will continue to take all these people. Because of the burden of immigration the more well-off municipalities use every way possible not take any responsibility for these immigrants. The conservatives refuse to change the law to force them to – why? They would quickly lose all support. Now, the socialists who run the municipalities are buying up castles (not a joke), large estates (not a joke) in order to remake them into apartments for immigrants. They also buy large private homes in well-off communities for large immigrant families to live there rent free.
The Swedish elites are afraid. The mainstream media have made it impossible to put comments under online articles. They use all their powers and there a lot of propaganda for multiculturalism and free immigration. The largest media companies are also lobbying heavily for abolishing civil rights.
But something is happening pretty rapidly now. The middle class are waking up. You see it at the University and at private and public institutions. You notice it in your family and among your friends. There are actually normal people who are quite critical of current immigration policy. Before it was the working class that first protested immigration and multiculturalism. Now it has become more common among the middle class. What I have also seen is that people working for the government are worried. Before it has been social workers, nurses, teachers, police and doctors — people on the frontline that have seen all the mess. Now, even the statisticians, investigators, public officers, clerks and other administrators see what is going on. People in the private sector are also wondering what is going on just by looking out the window.
Stockholm, Oslo and Helsinki are now infested by gypsy beggars from Romania and Bulgaria. You see Africans taking over the drug trade, exploiting White misery. You see Yugoslavian, Russian, Albanian and Syrian Mafia control restaurants. You see Muslim fundamentalism taking place right on the streets of Stockholm, Oslo and Helsinki, at currency exchange offices and small banks. You see organized crime on the street and the police do nothing. In the upcoming election, the Green Party will run on a platform of lower funding for police. They are the third largest party in Sweden and are rising.
Currently part of the elites has tried to direct public anger on Muslims. This neo-conservative tactic has been reasonably successful. A couple of years ago a lot of nationalists in Europe seem to have taken it to heart and pushed for support for Israel and American intervention. This has been the case for the Swedish Democrats – where two Jewish brothers together with a couple of Christian Zionists have pushed the discourse into hating Muslims because of their religion. The terrorist act of Anders Breivik changed things; it is not as easy anymore to be Islamophobic. The elites have also discovered that they will gain little support for it. Sweden had a version of EDL, but it never grew beyond a few members.
There is a new star on the Swedish Internet scene. A couple of years ago, Widar Nord, a former IT consultant, established his own online paper. He came from the libertarian camp but was quite critical of typical libertarian attitudes on immigration policy, their pro-Israeli views, and their lack of nationalism. His idea was to present an anti-establishment nationalist, paleo-libertarian and paleo-conservative fast-paced news site. Until his arrival on the scene, most of the anti-establishment opinion came from Politically Incorrect, a site close to the Swedish Democrats. It was strictly a counter-Jihad blog. Later it turned into Avpixlat. Both Avpixlat and Politically Incorrect are quite similar to the American Jihad Watch blog run by Robert Spencer.
Widar named his site Fria Tider (Free Times). It quickly became a success, rising to among the 200–300 most visited sites in Sweden. Because of not following the Counter-Jihad ideology it was pushed out – though it continued to grow. Now it is the 56th most popular site in Sweden (approximately as popular as Avpixlat and the 9th largest newspaper in Sweden on the Internet).
Fria Tider is successful because
1) They publish fast pace news;
2) They report what the MSM does not report, especially on the costs of multiculturalism. For example, this article deals with claims of sexual harassment of girls by immigrant youth. There are many articles on immigrant crime.
3) They post articles from famous paleo-conservatives, libertarians, and classical Marxists. Paul Gottfried has appeared there.
4) They are critical of Israel and the establishment;
5) They publish their own material. Just an hour ago they published an article about 9/11 and its connection to Israel;
6) They write about culture, economics, society, technology and many other things.
This is done with a quite low budget and freelance writers that do much for free or for a very low fee. These guys have no problems writing about race, traditionalism and many other subjects that are taboo. The difference between Fria Tider and “White nationalist”, “traditionalist” or “Counter-Jihad” sites is that Fria Tider does not “work” for anything. They have no explicit political agenda other than to publish free news from alternative perspectives. This explains also how difficult it will be for the establishments to push Fria Tider down. Media and anti-racist organizations have tried to do so, but have poured most of their energy into attacking Avpixlat because of its connection to the Swedish Democrats.
A couple of weeks ago – The nationalists took control over the Swedish Democratic Youth – so things are changing here.
http://youtu.be/i9FGHtfnYWY
Genetic differences. Rushton vs Suzuki
@Barkingmad:
In the beginning, there was no mention of tinkering with immigration. It was overwhelmingly European. Multiculturalism was invented for “English” Canada to minimize the criticism for his bilingual and biculturalism policy toward Quebec. The change started in the early to mid 70s with his so-called “North-South Dialogue” which flooded the country with English and French speaking blacks from the Caribbean, then Asians.
@mudur:
Both of you, I suspect.
Any family, tribe, hamlet, village, town, city, or country cannot exist in any form of harmony unless there are rules of the collective majority, which define that which is acceptable. That is a society. Yes, they are constructed, but within a context. The alternative is anarchy.
“Is it a liberal value to silence opposition?”
OK, first off, liberals don’t silence their opposition, they CRUSH and CRIMINALIZE their opposition.
Second, forget this Saul Alinsky BS about making our enemies live up to their own stated ideals.
Liberal rhetoric has nothing to do with liberal “reality.” That’s one of the core ideological features of liberalism.
What indeed is worth preserving in these countries? You take away a man’s right to speak to his government, you silence his voice and sincerly held beliefs, and tell him to shut up and pay taxes. What is he left with to support?
America’s government sux, it truly does, but we at least still have free speech. I use it to denounce this government of ours at every opportunity. I am not sure how much longer we will have the right.
“O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
God keep our land glorious and free!”
Obviously, God doesn’t take orders from man, does he?
@Vlad Writes:
Thank Goodness, He does not take orders from man, however, He often gives us those things which we truly ask for. If there is one lesson I have learned in reading the last few threads at this site is it that we don’t really want freedom, we want someone to blame. We are like the man caught in adultery with a rather nasty STD who blames first the woman who seduced him, then his wife for not keeping him happy, followed by his mother for not rearing him to be a better man. He cannot change the role played by any of these women, he can only control himself.
The sad truth is that we all know what it will take to change our plight, it is simply that we all want someone else to make the sacrifice involved. I came to this site as a proud white woman, concerned about our future. I hoped to find friends and allies, all too often I leave it wondering if we should be saved.
I once read an account by a Roman (I think), describing how German women urged their men onto greatest ferocity by warning them that the fate of their wives and children was at stake. I admit to my own, personal bias, but I am convinced that unless and until white woman accept that we have an irreplaceable function in society which we cannot delegate, not to fathers or government or social workers. We have tried and our culture, society, families and children are falling apart as a result. May not be fair but it is true. May God have mercy on us, our descendents will not.
@Lucy Skipping: You are correct. Egalitarianism is just a smokescreen. The real issue is displacement–of Christians, whites, and non-Jews in that order. Non-whites displace whites. Among whites, Freemasons and secularists displace Christians. Among Christians, the phony and lukewarm displace the fervent.
Non-whites and non-Christians are promoted according to their effectiveness at displacing whites and Christians.
@Christian: Libertarianism, Liberalism and Marxism were never anything more than well-disguised Jewish fronts. Prior to the “Enlightenment,” economic and cultural barriers to Jewish involvement were strictly enforced by secular and ecclesiastical authority and were universally understood to be an absolute necessity for avoiding Jewish domination.
@Alice Teller: I completely agree with you, Alice. As long as white men and women fight each other, neither one of us will do the most good for our own families, nor will we be happy. Perhaps these last 50 years of discontent were needed so that both sexes valued women’s traditional contributions to a life worth living, to families and good memories, rather than chasing worldly power, prestige, and filthy lucre.
What has happened in& to Canada has me heartsick beyond words. Sock it to ‘em, Kurtagic. Hard.
“It is indeed a liberal value to silence opposition.”
Anyone presenting a rock solid argument will be silenced by these ill equipped and barely functioning puppets. Even as a “sleeper” I endured such desperate tactics anytime I so much as inquired of the truth! Their obvious fear of all challenges, lacking any ability to logically defend what the spew, is one major key in forcing me to reject the lies..in fact, using this tool, I easily used their own techniques against them, engaging these trolls in topics I began to doubt. Yahtzee. What fools..
I wanted to quickly add that I am a Christian, a former Zionist Christian (newborn freedom-6 months) and I have read many posts here on the topic of reaching fellow Christians. It is possible! Hell, I stand before you as proof and I welcome any and all inquiries of my awakening and wish to work with everyone to reach my siblings in Christ who remain in darkness and chains..
@Filthy Goyim:
Welcome on this site brother! Please tell us briefly how you awakened from Zionist Christianity. What experiences, what new information changed your mind?
I’m sorry but I am afraid I’ll have to warn you some people here are hostile to Christianity itself. They see Christianity with its morals of “love your enemy” etc as a major source of our problems. But don’t let yourself be discouraged by that. We can learn from your story.
@Filthy Goyim: An article would be nice, if you please.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Thank you, Mr Ryckaert! I’m grateful to be among you and have already learned much. While I appreciate you advising me of possible hostility, however after a decade of Christian Apologetics in (as you’re well aware) the current extremely volatile and aggressive environment, this should be a walk in the park. Especially as I am here to learn and learn quickly. I was shocked to read so many discouraged and hopeless posts here referring to Christian’s and our awakening.. I am the first to say that the revelation of the identity of our enemies was debilitating, and left me in a dysfunctional state for weeks. The fact that it came only 8 weeks after I discovered the acquisition of every form of media I have been exposed to for years and the implications that followed was an insidious experience. I am still battling depression and disorientation, to be frank. As far the experiences and information that led me to awake, I only recently discovered a key that I believe to be paramount- I was NOT in America on 9/11, viewed almost no coverage, and did not return until the following decade. I lacked the strategic trauma needed and used on Americans during that span of time in order to use in conjunction with propaganda that has collectively brainwashed an entire nation. Upon returning to the States, I subconsciously, I believe, rejected what was introduced to me in a late stage. However, this did nothing to break the spiritual enslavement I was in. While the spiritual abuse and indoctrination I suffered admittedly held me in bondage to the psychopathic and demonic group falsely calling themselves Jews, it was my faith in Christ that brought me out of the darkness, calling me to freedom from a place where so many of my brothers and sisters still are. I will not willingly leave them there. I am seeking help and I need training but I don’t know how to start..
I’m sorry but I am afraid I’ll have to warn you some people here are hostile to Christianity itself. They see Christianity with its morals of “love your enemy” etc as a major source of our problems. But don’t let yourself be discouraged by that. We can learn from your story.
“Vlad Writes” might be someone off whom to bounce ideas about de-programming the converted.
@Filthy Goyim:
May I add my voice to the welcome? Reality and truth can be disordering at first, we all adjust. It is important to hear lots of voices, we need all the allies we can gain.
@Alice Teller:
Thank you, Alice! I’m Amy. Disorientation is the most accurate word I could think of to describe what I feel, though the word is lacking in so many ways.. Thank you all for your kindness, I felt extremely intimidated to join your community of so many highly intelligent, articulate and wise members. But I felt certain that you’d all forgive what I lack due to my eagerness to learn and grow :)
@Filthy Goyim:
Thanks for your reaction, sister ( because that’s what you are, I understand).
From your reaction I gather that you were rather confused to learn that behind much that is wrong in the US (and the world) are Jewish manipulations. You probably were taught the usual stuff about the Jews : that they are “God’s Chosen People”, holy and innocent, always persecuted for no reason etc etc.
I don’t know how far you have come in your understanding, but if you still have some problem seeing the total picture I can recommend as a quick and good introduction David Duke’s Jewish Supremacism.
You can read this book free on line at :
Solar General.com. Click in the upper banner on “Library” and go to : Jewish-supremacism-david-duke.pdf
Or if you want to listen to the audio book ( spoken by David Duke himself), go to : Jewish Supremacism, my awakening to the Jewish Question. Archive.org/
Good luck.
PS. Many people here use pseudonyms. You are of course free to choose any you want, but why the humiliating “Filthy Goyim”, even if it is only meant facetiously? If I may make a suggestion, why not call yourself “Awakened Christian” or something?
@Franklin Ryckaert:
“From your reaction I gather that you were rather confused to learn that behind much that is wrong in the US (and the world) are Jewish manipulations.”
Confusion was what I felt before the discovery. Words to describe what I felt, how the discovery effected me in every way, are literally insufficient. Yet another deficient I have due to these psychopathic animals- poor vocabulary or at least the ability to conceive of the idea I wish to convey. What I can tell you is that the discovery left me almost unable to function altogether. The psychological damages were and are not only debilitating but extremely painful and disorientating. Depression and paranoia was almost instantaneous as was shock. And I no longer refer to them as jews, although this group claims that title, but rather a group of psychopaths that have hidden behind that fictitious name.
“You probably were taught the usual stuff about the Jews : that they are “God’s Chosen People”, holy and innocent, always persecuted for no reason etc etc.”
Yes, but not only indoctrinated (not merely taught, this is much more insidious) but acted as a pawn, indoctrinating others. I’d also add that even questioning the spiritual superiority and holiness of said group was taught as an ultimate sin, one possibly causing damnation.
“PS. Many people here use pseudonyms. You are of course free to choose any you want, but why the humiliating “Filthy Goyim”, even if it is only meant facetiously? If I may make a suggestion, why not call yourself “Awakened Christian” or something? ”
I chose the pseudonym in defiance, and admittedly in anger many months ago. I feel no humiliation whatsoever using it but I do not wish to bring any upon anyone here..if it does I will change it gladly.
@Filthy Goyim:
Your change is interesting. Would you call yourself pro-White now?
@kyle:
Thought provoking question..
I never accepted the propaganda used to cause whites to hate themselves and I believe that is due to the late introduction of it. (having lived in another country for a decade, I was not subject the formation stage of this doctrine)
My adherence to this group, the motive to even seek acceptance of it, was due to it’s knowledge and promotion of truth. I did not discover the atrocities that had been committed on my own people until afterwards.
Pro-white? You may refer to it that way, and i do not reject the title, but i see it as pro-truth. The fact that our race is the race that has embraced the truth says more than I currently understand, even though I recognize this as certain truth.
@Trenchant: As it happens, I was thinking the same thing. Indeed, I’ve occasionally thought that if VW were to enter electoral politics, my interest in that field would be reborn. (For that very reason, I selfishly and secretly hope he won’t!)
Vlad Writes has fully open and functioning eyes and ears, and a functioning brain to go along with them. In that sense he resembles Ron Paul. But in lacking Paul’s residual sentimental attachment to constitutionalism, he has an even greater potential capacity to do us, his people, good. His success as an entrepreneur also guarantees that he has a practical awareness of ordinary folks’ capacity for both decency and venality. It is impossible ever to have too much moral realism or too many men who never seem to stop learning.
@Pierre de Craon:
I second that opinion, although I much prefer Vlad write a good book for young men who want to retain some freedom and raise a family. I am also pleased and proud to say that good, solid, sensible men like Vlad are not scare here in the South, but there are not generally a talkative lot. They also don’t waste words on fools.
If we spend a little more time devising ways and means to spread truth and making allies in every circle we can think of we can tip this boat. Perhaps not all the way back to monarchy, as you prefer, my good friend, but in the right direction. Instead every thread has some comment guaranteed to alienated some significant group of whites, who come here feeling as disoriented as Amy, hoping for a little light and truth. And we call others dumb????? It is good that we are forbidden despair.
@Filthy Goyim:
Relax, Amy, I think many of us have gone through those feelings when we don’t know who or what to trust. It can be scary just to see how blind we were. After a while you realize that we were up against pro’s. I prefer to think that we are just the early riser’s, putting the coffee on. Truth will out.
Trenchant
“Vlad Writes” might be someone off whom to bounce ideas about de-programming the converted. ”
Forgive me, I only now caught your post! I will immediately seek Vlad’s help, and thank you for your help!
Alice
Your kind words are comforting and I appreciate your acceptance. (or at least tolerance lol) I do, however, doubt that anyone who hasn’t spent most of their life completely brain washed, propagandized, and worse still used as a pawn, assisting in the indoctrination of others, can possible understand what I endured when awakening. In fact, I’m tempted to believe that sleepers subconsciously suspect the ramifications I’ve endured, the costs of awakening, and simply chose to remain in darkness. Naturally, this is but a hypothesis I have and by no means am I, personally, capable of doing much with it, though I suspect some here might.
I’d like to add a personal account of a counter argument to critical race theory that says that race is a social construct. In my life I’ve met very few blacks, say about 6 blacks total. This is anecdotal evidence but I’ve been robbed by a random Somalian at a party, robbed in my own home from a high-school friend who was black, and finally this black guy’s brother from high-school who I kind of knew raped one of my friends at another party. I don’t know about you guys, but they sound pretty criminal to me. Where I live in Edmonton, Canada, I believe 28 Somali immigrants have been killed in the span of about 5 years. That’s pretty high for Canada where our homicide rate is so low, but I really believe these guys deserved it, and when I saw one of the photos of the many unsolved Somali murder cases I’m pretty sure I saw the guy who robbed me in the list.
ATTENTION: A TRUMAN SHOW LIKE INTERNET COULD SOON BE A REALITY!
Just so this is not considered spam I’d like to add my comment before you read the article. I’m not sure if I’m paranoid but I see the same 4 or 5 posters in every comments section all conversing with each other and for the most part agreeing. Yes, there is nothing wrong with agreeing but these same 4 or 5 people post incessantly and I wonder if these people are bots or something. However I must give this site credit as I have increased my knowledge base to some degree just by reading the articles alone. One must hope that the articles themselves are enough to spread knowledge and end the liberal hegemony and mind control.
There is no permalink to the article so I’ve cut and pasted it as follows, the article can be read at http://www.jimstonefreelance.com
If you think your posting to forums is getting seen all the time, you are wrong. If you think what you do on the web is AS IT APPEARS, you are wrong. The ability to totally fake an internet based specifically around you, your accounts, your processor, IP, etc is fully in place. The end game is to get everyone surfing the web in their own little Truman show, so that people really are not connecting when they think they are, and their voice is forever silenced, though for all appearances online, it looks like all is well.
They are in the first phases of this right now. It started in earnest about a year ago as far as I can perceive, with the test runs starting about three years ago. It is time to speak up about this, and get an awareness of it out there because if they manage to pull this off there will be no way to fight it.
The deleted Youtube video scam is one aspect of this, where Youtube claims the video was removed by the user to anyone who hits a site that linked it, all the while whoever runs the site sees it acting perfectly normal on their own screen even though to others it is totally screwed. This is not the same as a locally cached file causing the problem, it is a genuine video switch on Youtube’s server that has recorded everyone’s IP and will identify the original individual who embedded the video, and serve him the video as he intended, while either showing a deleted video or one that has been switched for anyone with a different IP. This is a serious and sinister development which MUST BE ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY
Alternate internet? How about 1.7 billion alternates, all tracked by an NSA supercomputer that we have All been told gets all of our trafic put through it and recorded already. It’s child’s play to have a system like that play switcharoo and create for everyone their own little internet universe, and THIS is how they are going to destroy free speech.
The new NSA data center going into Utah, right at the point of the mountain where parasailers drift lazily in the breeze, is the beginning of the end of freedom on the web. It will be equipped with multiple yottabytes of data storage, enough to cache the entire internet well over 100 times, and far more than enough to create a fake little online shell world for every man woman and child on earth. Within your little world, you will be posting to forums, setting up web sites, living your life, and if you are a dissenter, it will not be seen by anyone. You will be posting to and receiving responses from shills and bots, and not even know it. All will be fine as far as you can see, and all will be irrelevant, totally unbeknownst to you.
Even my forum can take a plug in module that remembers a poster’s IP and system configuration, and MY SERVER, not even an NSA server, can keep track of an individual, and let their posts be seen by them mixed right in with everyone else’s post, yet NO ONE other than the poster can see it. This is happening far more frequently than people realize, and I believe the attacks on my forum are using a system of this type to keep posters in the dark about what they have posted not being visible to anyone, yet being visible to themselves. They would probably wonder why NOTHING they post generates any response from anyone, and heck, there are probably shills at the ready and battles getting fought right on my own forum that I cannot see myself. This is the future we face, it is already here.