Christian ideas were so familiar to first century egyptians that
they converted enmasse long before christianity was legalized.

An even bigger influence on Christianity is the old persian religions of zoraster and manicheaism I can’t spell it. Even the nativity story acknowledges that, the magi from the east
(persia). Christian art, especially the haloes are straight from persian. The pope’s tiara and the bishops mitres are exact copies of ancient persian priests uniforms.

About all that is jewish about christianity is monogamy and burial in the ground instead of cremation which is also egyptian

Jesus did exist. He was some sort of rabbi whose heritical cult developped into the largest religion in the world and helped create western civilization which rules the world.

3 reputable roman historians, Tacitus, seronius and one of the plinys writing as early as 30 years after Jesus’s death all confirm the basic christian story which is:

In the reign of emperor tiberius, I think ad 14 to around ad 35, when pontius pilate was governer of judea, a man named Jesus was executed by the romans. Jesus was the leader of a heritcal jewish group. His followers came to Rome and caused all sorts of trouble. All these historians confirm the story of Nero massacring the christians in 64 ad, just 31 years after Jesus was crucified.

But really, all that is jewish about christianity is monogamy, burial in the ground and the fact that its founder was a jew.
Even during Jesus’s lifetime some of his converts were romans.

Modern jews claim that jesus and the entire new testament was a myth although the old testament is absolute truth and historical fact even if no evidence exists.

But the talmud confirms the existence of jesus. Of course the writers hated jesus. But they have an excellent explaination for the miracles. His mother was a low level skank prostitute, so ugly and diseased that her only customers were blue collar workers such as carpenters.

Since Mary could not afford to raise him, she sold him into a 30 year indentured servitude when he was about 2. His owners were an egyptian circus. He became a magician and came back to judea when his indenture was ended, at age 32 or 33, just like the new testament says.

He was a magician and a charlatan. He used his miracles to entice the ignorant. That makes a lot of sense. For instance, the loaves and fishes. His followers could have hidden wagon loads of dried fish and bread and brought it out.
Walking on water is a classic magicians trick. Just put some sort of raft under the water and walk on the raft. Curing the sick and dying is simple, done all the time. Just put one of your followers in a wheel chair or crutches and viola!!! he can walk again.

It was really Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Knox, etc who created the idea that christianity owed everything to the jews and the OT. The medieval RCs and eastern orthodox paid little attention to the OT. The early protestants were enthralled by the OT not so much because of the religious message but because the OT is basically a saga of sex and war and violence, like Beowulf with more sex.

Who wants to read all that goody goody New testament stuff with no mention of sex whatsover when the OT is full of sex and violence. In my opinion, from 1500 to 1800 when books were very expensive and rare, the OT was soft core porn for the masses.

BBC America a new series, “Copper” It is the story of a NYC police detective in 1864. I watched a few minutes of a few episodes. It is unbelievably and historically inaccurately PC.
The second male lead is a black man,
Allegedly the chief medical examiner of NYC in 1864 was a black Dr. Not only that but he must have time travelled to the 20th century for med school and his medical examiner training. He of course makes instant diagnosis of cause of death and who did it. He pretty much figures out who the murderer is. The white detective just follows the directions of the black genius. There are constant references to the anti draft riots of course The good Dr and his family are constantly going into hiding because a mob of eeeevil Whites threaten them.

I couldn’t watch for more than a few minutes.

Yeah right. He apparently time travelled to the 20th century for med school and his training as a medical examiner. His diagnoses are all far in advance of 1864 medicine.

Pretty soon we will have a Pres Van Buren was really black series.

Hi Trenchant

Thanks for the simple, thoughtful response.

You’re right, I’m sure, about which property the élite would prefer to sacrifice, the villa at Settignano or the apartment at Tel Aviv.

Israelis themselves are, obviously, a wild card—a wild card with nukes. Whether in the medium or long term they will turn out to be as much of a liability for the Jews themselves as they clearly already are for the rest of the world is anyone’s guess. Seeing the Diaspora Jews getting their comeuppance from their Frankenstein monster might theoretically be an occasion for Schadenfreude but in practice will be so only for human seed colonies observing a devastated earth from the more hospitable moons of Saturn and Jupiter.

Of course, no society has long survived without the passion for knowledge being directed—knowledge for its own sake, like art for its own sake, can easily become an indugence too far—but the Jews’ seemingly inherent intellectual limitations and disdain for moral aspiration, which they have had remarkable success in inflicting upon the rest of us, shouldn’t be divorced from any strategic analysis of how they got their hands on our throat and how best to shatter their grip before they destroy us utterly.

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm
As the above indicates, Jewish non-assimilation and diffidence or animosity towards the host population (reciprocated, and resulting in periodic expulsion) is a feature of the Diaspora history that goes back millennia.

I personally believe that Zionism will prove to be a massive political miscalculation and that Jews were better served in the Diaspora (notwithstanding the hostile reaction their behaviour engendered in the local population).

No Jews are behind John Law’s Mississippi bubble, nor the massive bubble in Japan in the 80′s. (I can remember when the land value on paper of the Imperial Palace in Tokyo exceeded the GDP of Canada, and similar follies).

That said, I can’t think of any Wall St. player who could possibly desire the end of fractionally-reserved commercial banks with a lender of last resort in the Fed. Likewise, bar the odd Ron Paul, no politician would wish to see the covert tax of monetary inflation (not just dishonest, but harmfully directing investments into the wrong sectors by corrupting money prices) replaced by overt taxes, with the popular dissent that would elicit.

“The Jewish Question long predates Zionism.”

I think that is a very important point, though I don’t claim to be an expert on this issue.

My concern is that I constantly see people trying to get others to stop using the word “Jews” and instead use the word “Zionists”.

They say that Zionists are the problem, and that Jews are just like everyone else.

“A lot of Jews aren’t Zionists and a lot of Zionists aren’t Jews.” Comments like that. I’ve even seen some commenters claim that most Zionists aren’t Jews.

Maybe that’s true. I don’t know. Honestly, I’m not 100% certain what a Zionist is.

But from what I’ve learned on this site and elsewhere, Jews in general have caused serious problems in White nations for a long time.