The Perfect Media Storm: Speilberg’s Lincoln, Ken Burns, David Brooks, and Al Sharpton on Race Relations in the Age of Obama

Last Sunday’s “roundtable discussion” on “Meet the Press” contained the “perfect storm” of guests to match the topics under discussion in the show’s final segment. Speilberg’s Lincoln, that fountain of historical accuracy from Jewish gay screenwriter Tony Kushner, and Ken Burns’ The Central Park Five, a “documentary” on the highly publicized Central Park “wilding” rape case, were just some of the featured racial topics chatted about in this “post-racial,” post-reelection era of Obama. Weighing in on all of this was that insightful bastion of wisdom: the Rev. Al Sharpton. (Where the hell was Doris Kearns Goodwin, the show’s resident “historian/expert” on Lincoln when you need her?) The segment wouldn’t be balanced without the input of resident “conservative” New York Times columnist David Brooks.

Members of the so-called “hive” (media and political elites in the words of the late Joe Sobran) seem to have flocked to movie theaters this past weekend to sponge-up the Speilberg/Kushner production of Lincoln as if this fictional portrayal is historically flawless. Between Lincoln and The Central Park Five, at least “progressives” had something to be thankful for on Thanksgiving weekend!

Advertisement - We Need You

The incredible omission when discussing the injustice of the falsely accused in a New York-based, high profile criminal incident is the silence over Sharpton’s role in the Tawana Brawley case. How supposedly unbiased journalists could sit around the same table with a convicted slanderer and not raise the point in a broader discussion of race, crime, and false accusations is astounding! One outcome of the Brawley hoax was Sharpton’s conviction for slandering Steven Pagones, an innocent Dutchess County prosecutor falsely accused of being one of the perpetrators, and $345,000 judgment against Sharpton and two “civil rights attorneys (Alton Maddox and C. Vernon Mason). According to Wikipedia,

In 2007 Sharpton said he would have accepted the case the same as he does today. The only difference would be he would not have made it so personal with Pagones, but he still felt Brawley had a good case to go to trial. “I disagreed with the grand jury on Brawley,” said Sharpton in an interview. “I believed there was enough evidence to go to trial. Grand jury said there wasn’t. Okay, fine. Do I have a right to disagree with the grand jury? Many Americans believe O.J. Simpson was guilty. A jury said he wasn’t. So I have as much right to question a jury as they do. Does it make somebody a racist? No! They just disagreed with the jury. So did I.”

Amazingly, none this was brought up from our so-called “Best and Brightest” in the “news” profession.

Near the end of the segment, Ken Burns makes a pitch for extending the Thirteenth Amendment “in sort of spirit as well as in fact,”

You can’t take your foot off the accelerator here…. And that means there’s still work to do and whenever we take the eye off the ball, then you get birther movements.

Lincoln is a propaganda piece that has little to do with what happened in 1865 but much to do with reaffirming the culture of Western suicide. Spielberg says that he intentionally released Lincoln after the election because he “didn’t want it to become political fodder.” But of course, his movie is yet another political statement reaffirming the cultural status quo.

And this segment of Meet the Press is a perfect example of elite media promulgating these messages, completely in lock step with Hollywood, the New York Times and the rest of the elite media. One can hardly blame the average educated White person who is exposed to these mantras 24/7 for simply believing that there really is no other alternative than to submit to the moral imperative of their own displacement and disempowerment.

Someone once astutely observed, “We are living in the world Madison Grant warned us against.” Proof of this maxim is the MSM portrayal of two extraordinarily divisive figures (Lincoln and Sharpton) as presumably insightful leaders and learned elders on race relations.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

64 Comments to "The Perfect Media Storm: Speilberg’s Lincoln, Ken Burns, David Brooks, and Al Sharpton on Race Relations in the Age of Obama"

  1. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 12, 2012 - 2:15 am | Permalink


    There is a public street (or, actually, a section of a public street) named after the former Speaker, in Baltimore’s Little Italy, where she grew up. There is a bench dedicated to her father, located outside of their old parish, Saint Leo the Great. Nearby, you may enjoy watching the older generation (mostly) playing bocce ball. I suggest that you make the trip during the summer, when you may enjoy a free Friday-night movie, out of doors, at the annual Little Italy Open Air Film Festival– arguably the best time to be had, these days, in what is left of old-time (White) Baltimore.

  2. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 11, 2012 - 10:35 pm | Permalink


    Here is another little fact that you will never, never find on the internet. Ultra liberal anti White racist house minority leader Nancy Pelosi’s father, long time Maryland congresscritter and Mayor of Baltimore was a life long honorary member of the Klu Klux Klan?

    Honorary because at the time Catholics were not allowed full membership and a member because there were still White voters in Baltimore.

    You won’t find this on the internet of course, but strangely, there are other sources of information than wikepedia.

  3. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 11, 2012 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

    GOOD NEWS!!!!!!!

    Central park five is doing badly at the box office. last week #52 out of 55. It was due to show for 2 weeks at a los Angeles art house, the Sawtelle and SMBLVD Nuart, but they only ran it over the weekend of Dec 8,9 & 10 because not even the Nuart art movie loving liberals went to see it.

    Usual procedure is if a movie tanks the first few weeks, it disappears. Hopefully Central park Five will disappear only to be shown on history channel.

  4. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 10, 2012 - 4:40 pm | Permalink


    No, Mari, not being a neo-Nazi, I would check with neither Stormfront nor Vanguard. The basic reality of “The Color of Crime” (a la the publication from American Renaissance) is quite discernible from official government statistics collected, collated and reported by the F.B.I.– and make a far more powerful argument against someone’s counterfactual beliefs than one’s having to say, “I know that you are wrong, because I read the true facts on Stormfront!”

    That you actually take offense that someone would check your factual claims, rather than merely accept them, at face value, based upon your unsupported comments here, is utterly laughable! “Let me see, the IMDb and a thorough Bing search, or Mari’s recollection of a news item, in an unspecified edition of ‘Daily Variety’…?!?” Gee, where is old Tom Hobson, when you need him?

  5. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 8, 2012 - 3:42 pm | Permalink


    The announcement was in daily variety, week of monday nov 26 to friday nov 3o. I think it was in the monday or tuesday edition. As you may or may not know, online publications only include articles, not tiny little ads or 7 line 1 column announcements. Daily variet has many of these tiny announcements, such as “principal photography scheduled for
    a certain date.”

    Not all information is on the internet. I have learned more about such subjects as armenian, russian, arab, asian, persian, israeli and indian crooked business practices just from liviing in Los Angeles than will ever be published on the internet. For instance, I’m just glad I am not surrounded by armenian gas station owners but persian corrupt businesses and can actually buy gas with a credit card without fearing that the armenian gas station owner and his co-conspirators don’t steal every bank and investment account I have.

    I live in west los angeles, the belly of the beast and i only post things I know about, such as a tiny announcement I read in daily variety nov 26 to nov 30.

    Any, what is the purpose of fact checking every little sentence written by commentators on this site? Especially when your only source of information is the internet. You wouldn’t check facts about black on White crime on the mainstream news or goverment sites would you? No you would go to stormfront or vanguard. So why check facts about movies when you have no access to information other than the internet which does not publish tiny announcements about movies that may or may not get made 10 years from now.

  6. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 8, 2012 - 3:22 pm | Permalink


    Some new england puritans and feminazis actually raised the money for a couple ships to send some freed blacks to Haiti.
    I believe the number was only about 2,000, lucky for the blacks who stayed in America.

    The Haitian slave dealers met the ships and sold the American blacks right back into slavery. Their unfortunate descendents are still in that sewer of the western hemisphere, Haiti.

  7. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: God, I’m sorry. Too damn much merlot is at fault in my last post. I meant “to get on Americans”, …. Not, you get on Americans,etc. Also, not I should “now” better, I meant, I should “know” better. I solemnly swear to check my posts from now on. Apologies.

  8. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 8:25 pm | Permalink

    @90404: It somewhat disgusts me, and I should now better, than you get on Americans for watching Hollywood movies. I believe in freedom, as an overriding principle on most issues. It’s just that it almost pains me to think of how these Hollywood mongrels must be laughing at the thought of the very people whom they denigrate, as being the ones that are making them filthy rich. Yes, it pains me.

  9. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    December 7, 2012 - 2:52 pm | Permalink


    He will probably insert a bit in the beginning about the Pope giving Hitler a millions of marks from the “vast vatican traeasury” to get the anti jew movement going.

    Tom and Dixie will love it!

  10. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    December 7, 2012 - 12:29 am | Permalink

    I should hope so!
    Who goes to movies anymore? Last time I went [Easter, years ago] the nice theater was almost empty [10 people?] and I could not believe the prices of snacks!

  11. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    December 7, 2012 - 12:25 am | Permalink

    So Lincoln had a big war here, instead of a small one there?

  12. thunk's Gravatar thunk
    December 6, 2012 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article….excellent comments. It’s so refreshing to finally see people taking exception to the racial distortions of the TRUTH.

  13. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 6, 2012 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: D.K. I might concede that I did exaggerate Mari’s batting average somewhat, I don’t know for sure. However, on the topics I was interested in, California politics, Sacramento corruption, illegal immigration, affirmative action, minority politics, Hollywood lunacy, etc. Mari came through as accurate ,over and over.

  14. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 6, 2012 - 1:40 pm | Permalink


    “People keep writing about TOO. I have looked all over the internet for it. Is is a website or wha?. I would appreciate it is someone would let me know how I can find it.”

    What is the name of this Web site, Mari? Yes, we “ADL AJC SPLC mole[s] who wants to make White nationalists look ignorant” sure have our work cut out for us. Sigh….

  15. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 6, 2012 - 1:35 pm | Permalink


    You honestly appreciate commenters, Bobby, who get their facts wrong well over half of the time?!? Sigh….

  16. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 6, 2012 - 1:30 pm | Permalink


    Yes, Mari, as a trained lawyer, inter alia, I actually check factual assertions against credible evidence, rather than accept the unsupported assertions of anonymous commenters on the Internet. Can you even imagine such a crazy obsession?!? Unlike you, I posted a direct link, showing the film’s IMDb listing, including its producers– none of whom is Spielberg– and the prospective director who is in talks with those producers– Michel Hazanavicius (director of the Academy-Award-winning “The Artist”), not Spielberg. You, of course, provide no link, but merely a further claim that your claim is supported by an article in “last week’s Daily Variety”– absent even the precise date of that alleged article in that daily print publication! The on-line version of Variety shows exactly one article on the prospective film, from just over a year ago (11/28/11):


    Universal has optioned film rights to Erik Larson’s non-fiction novel “In the Garden of the Beasts” with Tom Hanks and Gary Goetzman on board to produce.

    Hanks and Goetzman would produce through their Playtone shingle. The pic is being developed as a possible starring vehicle for Hanks.

    The book revolves around the true story of William Dodd, United States Ambassador to Berlin and his daughter, Martha, who lived in Germany during the rise of the Nazi party. While initially dismissive of the darkness gathering in the country, the family soon became aware of the scope of the hostile environment surrounding them.

    No writer or director have yet been attached.

    Pic marks yet another Word War II effort for Playtone – the shingle produced the HBO mini-series “The Pacific.”



    Here is Spielberg’s own IMDb listing . . .

    . . . with nary a mention of “In the Garden of Beasts” to be found.

    It does not take “some sort of ADL AJC SPLC mole who wants to make White nationalists look ignorant” to do so, Mari. People just like you do it for them, here and elsewhere, countless times each day!

  17. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 5, 2012 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

    @mari: mari, I have checked some of your assertions, like I do to many people that claim certain things that sound far out to me, and I can honestly say you have been batting 400, sometimes sligthtly over when it comes to your facts. I greatly appreciate your posts.

  18. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 5, 2012 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

    D. K.

    December 5, 2012 – 12:00 pm | Permalink


    As of now, it appears that Spielberg has nothing to do with the movie, which is, instead, a Tom Hanks project. If you look at Spielberg’s IMDb listing, he has several current and planned projects listed, both as a producer and as a director, and this is simply not one of them.

    Read last week’s Daily Variety if it is available to you. What are you, some sort of fact checker? Do you think I would just make it up? Are you some sort of ADL AJC SPLC mole who wants to make White nationalists look ignorant?

  19. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 5, 2012 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    People keep writing about TOO. I have looked all over the internet for it. Is is a website or wha?. I would appreciate it is someone would let me know how I can find it.

    According to Daily Variety, Spielberg is committed to doing the Martha Dodd movie. Who knows if it will ever get made.
    Takes 10 years and sometimes more. Remember, Spielberg is also a producer. That means he comes up with the money.
    He does not have to write or direct.

    Plan B has been working on a pro black anti White version of the San Francisco zebra killings for at least 7 years and nothing has come of it. The story is a brave black officer working alone all the while being discriminated against by White officers solved the Zebra killings. In reality, it was White officers who solved the crimes and black officers
    worked as double agents letting the Zebra killings and the mosque know exactly what the White detectives were doing. Thank you Jesus though, that Plan B has forgotten this version of the Zebra killings, but what with Obama’s overwhelming re election, many Whites are so brainwashed and moronic that a pro black anti White version of the Zebra killings might get made after all.

  20. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 5, 2012 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

    @fender: If Jewish strategy to “never forget”, is to keep making Nazi movies and movies about Hitler, than they aren’t as smart as they and others imagine them to be. It’s amazing. Jewish Hollywood agents are the ones that discovered the fact that ” there is no bad publicity”, yet they won’t follow this advice.

  21. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 5, 2012 - 1:29 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Ironically the jews themselves have ensured that Hitler and the Nazis will live forever. Every film they make, every book they write further solidifies Hitler as one of the most important men who ever lived. The worst thing the jews could possibly do is stop making movies about him.

  22. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 5, 2012 - 12:00 pm | Permalink


    As of now, it appears that Spielberg has nothing to do with the movie, which is, instead, a Tom Hanks project. If you look at Spielberg’s IMDb listing, he has several current and planned projects listed, both as a producer and as a director, and this is simply not one of them. The book, which was only released this past spring, has gotten glowing reviews from the Establishment mass media; but, many on Amazon, including fans of Erik Larson’s “Devil in the White City” (which I loved!), found this new book (“In the Garden of Beasts”) to be both boring and pointless!?!

  23. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 4, 2012 - 4:55 pm | Permalink

    @mari: Of course, everything and anything Spielberg is concerned with, is always filtered through his Jewish viewpoint. He couldn’t be objective about anything if his soul depended on it. I discount anything coming from him, including his Hollywood hangers on and sycophants, whether they’re Jewish or not.

  24. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 4, 2012 - 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Los Angeles Jewish journal had a recent article that Lincoln was actually jewish and that the reason he fomented the civil war was just part of his jewish concern with justice and right and concern for the underdog and all the rest of the justifications jews use to account for their destruction of every society they have controlled.

    Given the destruction Lincoln wreaked on America and the south, the 20th century destruction of America’s cities by the blacks, death of 750 thousand White men etc, etc, the jews might have something there. Lincoln in the north, judah benjamin and the jewish slave dealers in the south,rothschild banks in Europe a perfect jewish type combination to destroy a nation.

  25. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 4, 2012 - 4:06 pm | Permalink


    The reason Lincoln’s central american plan failed is that the goverments of central america and columbia flatly refused to take in the blacks despite the S. american tradition of bribery.

  26. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 4, 2012 - 4:03 pm | Permalink


    If you don’t believe my post about Dan Sickles and Lincoln’s plan to deport freed slaves to central America go right ahead and disbelieve me.

  27. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 4, 2012 - 4:02 pm | Permalink


    I misspell because of the air conditioning and also because I don’t waste time looking up spelling. If you don’t believe that Columbia was the head of a regional organization during the time of the civil war go right ahead. If you don’t believe that Lincoln sent Sickles to Nicarauga to try to convince the local goverments to take in the blacks go right ahead.

    Brazil was still a colony of Portugual at the time. Lincoln would have had to ask Portugual to take in the blacks.

  28. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 4, 2012 - 3:57 pm | Permalink


    I know perfectly well where Columbia is located. At the time DAn Sickles was there, central American nations were united in some sort of regional customs and economic community and Columbia, located south and west of central America was
    the head of the central american organization because Columbia was bigger, wealthier and better organized than the tiny nations such as Honduras. Remember, what is now Panama was a province of Columbia when America fomented a little revolution that split Panama from Columbia and built the canal as an American territory in Panama.

  29. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 4, 2012 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Here is Spielberg’s latest movie. It is basically a hagiography of American communists William and Martha Dodd. Both were communists in the late 1920’s. William was naturally a fellow aristocrat and friend of FDR. William was appointed ambassaador to Germany in 1933. Daughter Martha was aa party girl as women like were known in those days and already a comitted communist. She was quickly seduced by a KGB operative named Boris. Boris had recieved special training in sex and so enthralled Martha.

    Martha began spying for Russia while still in Germany. On the family’s return she continued spying for Russia. She had little to offer except in her widespread social and sexual contacts. She and her husband were finally under investigation so they fled to Prague, Cuba and spent the rest of their lives living in various sov bloc countries.

    Spielberg’s script has it that the Dodd’s were political innocents, morderate new deal democrats until they got to berlin and were aghast and appalled by Hitler and his anti Jewish agenda. Underlying of course is the jewish view that WW2 had only one issue, extermination of jews by eeeviill nazis with the whole hearted cooperation of the rest of Europe, FDR and the US state department.

    That’s his latest project. Another pro communist(jewish) soviet union anti american White propaganda piece. He will probably insert a bit in the beginning about the Pope giving Hitler a millions of marks from the “vast vatican traeasury” to get the anti jew movement going.

    Stay tuned. It takes about 8 years to get a movie actually on screens, but this one, like most jewish propaganda films will get fast tracked.

    Gag barf, yuck,

  30. Sargeant Edelweiss's Gravatar Sargeant Edelweiss
    December 3, 2012 - 9:06 pm | Permalink

    Diversity for for your ANGLO-EUROPEAN CHILDREN
    But not the Chosen

  31. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 1, 2012 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

    @buckle: Oh, yes. Not that it isn’t good to be reminded of it!

  32. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    December 1, 2012 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    “abandon all hope (all ye who enter here)”

    Which always reminds me of a great Joe Sobran joke about AIDS, homosexuals and tattoed buttocks but I guess you know that one already …

  33. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 1, 2012 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

    @buckle: As indeed she has on virtually every thread but this one. (Nor is it too late to abandon all hope here, I think.)

    Thanks for the much-needed laugh.

  34. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 1, 2012 - 1:49 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: Mari, to put it concisely, Jewish people beat our a–es up, down, sideways,and in every other conceivable dimension one can think of. That is why we now have them calling the shots. PERIOD!! If we had more integrity, we might actually go and shake their hands!!!…………………………

  35. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 1, 2012 - 1:44 am | Permalink

    @mari: Mari, whites stupidly mishandled the black people in this nation the moment they saw that they were being used to f–k white society up and DIDN’T DO A DAMN THING ABOUT IT. I blame no one but our stupid as a box of rocks white leaders of yesteryear. There was a million ways to treat black people in such a way that they never would have become a burden or be used as a weapon against us, but I can’t help but believe whites were not up to the task, just as they weren’t up to the task of all of the Jewish shenanigans that went on for years and years.

  36. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    November 30, 2012 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Mari, you managed to misspell all 3 Central American countries names!

  37. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    November 30, 2012 - 9:42 pm | Permalink

    White privilege is code for Black under-performance!

  38. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    November 30, 2012 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    Actually Columbia is in South America, at the top of the continent. I wonder why this ‘genius plan’ failed?
    Was Brazil asked to take the Blacks?

  39. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    November 30, 2012 - 9:38 pm | Permalink

    Mari, tell us more! Did Abe want to ship the Blacks somewhere?
    If so, why did they remain, free of chains, in the now reunited USA?

  40. mari's Gravatar mari
    November 30, 2012 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

    I click to another channel when the endless ads for Spielberg’s Lincoln comes on. Obviously I will never go to see it. But I can safely assume that the movie does not onclude Lincoln’s appointing civil war general and family friend Dan Sickles ambassador to Nicarauga specifically to explore, convince and bribe Cental American countries like Columbia, Nicarauga, Guatamela, Hondurus etc into accepting the slaves as soon as the civil war ended?

    Those countries were horrified at the prospect of an invasion of American blacks and turned down the offer despite the prospect of substantial bribes to high ranking officials. The Cental American countries at the time were unified into some sort of confederation headed by Columbia so they had enough clout to withstand America’s offer of dumping our always problem population on them.

  41. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    November 30, 2012 - 12:00 pm | Permalink


    Although some people assume that Purdue is a high-class private institution, simply because of its name, it is merely a land-grant public university, being Indiana’s main agricultural and engineering school, whereas I.U. is the state’s main liberal arts and professional school. As a native son, and a double alumnus of the former (albeit in its School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education– as it was then known, in those antidiluvian days of yore), I may assure you that we did not consider ours to be a Northeastern school, nor Indiana to be a Northeastern state.

  42. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    November 30, 2012 - 9:33 am | Permalink

    The Democrats are gleeful about their asian 72% vote percentage, but that doesn’t prevent them from insulting their Asian voters in this actual quote from a NJ party hack with a reprehensible slur toward orientals:

    [Yet riding a bounce of approval for his response to Sandy, Christie led his nearest potential Democratic challenger, Newark Mayor Cory Booker, by 18 percentage points, a survey by Quinnipiac University shows.

    “It’s a rally-around-the-flag syndrome right now,” said Brigid Harrison, who teaches law and government at Montclair State University. “Over the next days, weeks and even months, you’ll see a Democrat emerge and start to look for chinks.” ]

  43. Johan's Gravatar Johan
    November 30, 2012 - 3:59 am | Permalink

    There is a great review of the anti-White “Lincoln” movie over at

  44. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    November 30, 2012 - 1:31 am | Permalink

    @Edmund Connelly:
    Purdue? Their Diversity Officer gets 200k a year!

  45. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    November 29, 2012 - 4:49 pm | Permalink

    As Dixie would say the Catholic Church is to blame for all of this …

  46. Molly's Gravatar Molly
    November 29, 2012 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    @Molly: Never mind. I must have left out the forward slash in setting up the blockquote.

  47. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    November 29, 2012 - 10:54 am | Permalink

    Well said! I fear it is the inevitable result of the decay of democracy. The government cannot do the simplest task which are its true responsibility such as maintaining roads and bridges. Instead, they rely on promising nonsense like marriage for gays and honoring the transgendered of history. It seems, to our shame, to work. Once again,the ancient Greeks got it right.

  48. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    November 29, 2012 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    To expound on my first post, think of the gorgeous, Nordic-looking reporter who interviewed KM recently: she seems totally dispassionate about all the issues he is discussing (at least from what I saw), but I have no doubt that if she did some basic research and realized that her phenotype is being basically pushed further and further toward extinction by the day there would be a tinge of tribal consciousness beneath the layers of repression.

  49. Molly's Gravatar Molly
    November 29, 2012 - 8:38 am | Permalink

    I set up only the first line of my post as a block quote, yet the entire post appears that way. What caused that to happen?

  50. Molly's Gravatar Molly
    November 29, 2012 - 7:23 am | Permalink

    I think women probably have less of a primordial sense of loyalty

    Women have a sense of loyalty to their children. Unfortunately, young mothers have little, if any, time to spend on the internet, where well informed Whites get their news analysis. To make matters worse for them, many are being pushed out the door into the workforce by husbands salivating at the prospect of an additional paycheck.

    Even on the internet, little attention is paid to the many aspects of the abuse that White students endure right up through college and graduate school. For example, Stormfront has relegated its Education forum to a place down below topics such as homemaking (recipes mostly) and physical exercise.

    Dr. William Pierce commissioned an article on “Educational Sabotage” that appeared in his National Vanguard magazine almost ten years ago. Since then, I haven’t seen anything comparable written on this topic. Although, there are innumerable complaints that too few Whites are allowed into these bastions of anti-White discrimination and hostility.

  51. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    November 29, 2012 - 5:55 am | Permalink

    From the OP, “Lincoln is a propaganda piece that has little to do with what happened in 1865 but much to do with reaffirming the culture of Western suicide.”

    Kushner and Spielberg are westerners committing ethnic suicide? I thought they were Asians trying to destroy us and advance their own group interests.

  52. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 29, 2012 - 3:55 am | Permalink

    @Headstrong: Headstrong, what you are describing, is the philosophy that was once uniquely American, that of the individual standing alone and free to create his own destiny. That is now described as a myth by marxist philosophers and socialist thinkers. They will say that it is impossible for an individual to have this kind of independence create a viable life in todays United States. And they should know, since they do everything in their power to trip up the average American that wants to take personal resonsibility. This is what you are feeling when you say that the country has lost its mind. For example, recently organic milk producers that produced unpasteurized milk were interfered with by the government. Ostensibly the reason given for this interference, was that it was for consumer protection. Yet, there have always been diary farms that produced unpasteurized milk at the request of consumers who believed that pasteurization somewhat destroys the value of milk. Farms that produced unpasteurized milk were almost never dangerous to consumers, because the cows were inspected regularly and samples taken to assure non-contamination of milk. Millions of our ancestors always drank milk that way and hardly any of them ever became ill,etc. But now we have huge agencies, totally unconstitutional, that “protect” us from harm,etc. So we lose various degrees of freedom in various areas every day in this nation and that truly is the sign of a nation that is changing, not for the better.

  53. Headstrong's Gravatar Headstrong
    November 29, 2012 - 1:16 am | Permalink


    I am from Europe and immigrated many years ago to the US.
    I think the country has lost its mind. We were told NOT to see people in terms of colour. Right? Yet, now we are supposed to see people only in terms of colour. It has come full circle. Now we are supposed to see people of colour as better or more deserving than anyone else. But wait, it is about accountability. People won’t take accountability. Everyone in the US was given a fair shot. Anyone can go to school or work without coloured partitions. So who should take the accountability for those of colour not performing? They need more rights than others? Its racist to give one class of people extra because they aren’t succeeding on their own. In this country it was intended that people can make their way. If you fail, no one but you is to blame and I am tired of the government telling people it is not their own fault. Now I will be punished because I succeeded. This reminds me of home. However now my country of origin is doing better than when I left maybe I should go…

  54. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    November 28, 2012 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    Sharpton is despicable, truly one of the scummiest individuals who ever walked the face of the earth. He was also busted bigtime for trying to work a big drug deal, and they even had it on tape. Coulter devotes quite a bit of ink to this degenerate in “Mugged.”

  55. Mulegino's Gravatar Mulegino
    November 28, 2012 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

    It was said that Thomas Carlyle wrote history in “flashes of lightning”, and most Americans imbibe their official history as if they had been struck by it.
    Spielberg and his ilk get away with their outright distortions because Americans don’t want their history to be factual, they want it to conform to some kind of a moral template, as if the Almighty altered the course of history in order to ratify the concept of American exceptionalism. They do not realize that American “exceptionalism” is due almost exclusively to the much more venerable and firmly grounded European variety.

  56. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 28, 2012 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

    @Marcus: Marcus, I’ll bet millions of European-Americans relate to the phrase you used, “but deep down it never felt right”. No further comment from me. How can there be, when your observation is so elemental?

  57. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    November 28, 2012 - 7:17 pm | Permalink


    Well said.

  58. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    November 28, 2012 - 7:03 pm | Permalink

    I’m pretty sure most “statistical whites” have a very negative gut reaction to the displacement programme, they simply have no desire to rock the boat at the social level, or they will actively assist the enemy as a way of channeling their anxiety into self-righteous hate. I fit both descriptions at different times, but deep down it never felt right. I think women probably have less of a primordial sense of loyalty, since dealing with outsiders in war and peace has always been the man’s responsibility.

  59. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 28, 2012 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: Thank you for the observation on hypocrits like Ken Burns and how they invariably live in communities that are essentially, well, according to them, EVIL.(a.k.a. WHITE!) I think these leftists should be pounded on this point mercilessly, since literally all of them live in those “evil” white communities. Hypocritical A–HO-ES.

  60. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 28, 2012 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: I apologize for citing Dr. MacDonald on this piece when I meant to reference the author Cooper Sterling.

  61. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 28, 2012 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    I disagree with Dr. MacDonald on the point that,
    One can hardly blame the average educated white person who is exposed to these mantras 24/7 for simply believing that there is no other alternative then to submit to the moral imperative of their own displacement and disempowerment.”
    My view, maybe it is naive, is that it is exactly the average educated white person that should be aware of the ongoing dynamic that is so corrosive towards them, their friends and families. Otherwise, what good is education anyway, or at least the type of education they have been exposed to? Maybe they should rethink their situation, or at least try and expose themselves more to what is going on, get down and dirty so to speak, and then it won’t be a matter of “thinking” at all, as B.F. Skinner would have suggested.

  62. Edmund Connelly's Gravatar Edmund Connelly
    November 28, 2012 - 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Ken Burns’ comment that “You can’t take your foot off the
    accelerator” is apt. So many Americans feel and act that way today. For instance, my alumni magazine from a Northeast university has been gettring progressively more and more pro-minority, despite the fact that it was heavily White, at least when I was there. Recent issues almost read like farce.

    Or notice how advertising is now getting progressively browner. See Andrew Hamiliton’s account of how Gerber Baby Foods has ditched their White baby in favor of a brown one:

  63. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    November 28, 2012 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

    I assume that David Gregory, the (Jewish) host of “Meet the Press”, did not ask Brooklyn native Ken Burns, that lover of all things Black, why he happened to choose to make his own home in a place that is a notably long commute from a major media capital, like New York City? Ken Burns, instead, lives in faraway Walpole, New Hampshire:

    “The racial makeup of the town was 98.30% White, 0.14% African American, 0.25% Native American, 0.17% Asian, 0.08% from other races, and 1.06% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 0.47% of the population.”


    “Diversity for thee, but not for me!”

    By the way, Dr. Doris Kearns Goodwin, although a confessed plagiarist, is not a professional historian. Her Ph.D. from Harvard was earned in Government, not in History. (Likewise, David McCullough, the noted biographer of many American historical figures, like Presidents Harry Truman and John Adams, has only a bachelor’s degree in English Literature, from Yale, while well-known “presidential historian” Michael Beschloss has a bachelor’s degree in Political Science, from Williams College, and an M.B.A., from Harvard. This is not to denigrate their respective works, but merely to point out that many of the people that the Establishment mass media most prefer to present to us as historical experts are not, in fact, professionally trained historians, at all.)

    As for the equally unctuous and loathsome Reverend Al:

    “Sharpton was licensed and ordained a Pentecostal minister by Bishop F.D. Washington at the age of nine[75] or ten.[76] After Bishop Washington’s death in the late 1980s, Sharpton became a Baptist. He was re-baptized as a member of the Bethany Baptist Church in 1994 by the Reverend William Jones[30] and became a Baptist minister.[75][77]”


  64. Ritchard's Gravatar Ritchard
    November 28, 2012 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

    I caught this Meet the Press show last Sunday and thought it worthy of a skit on Saturday Night Live with the same cast of characters and script, no parody needed. My, how far we have come.

Comments are closed.