Martin Hewson reviews Ricardo Duchesne’s “The Uniqueness of Western Civilization”

Kevin MacDonald

We at TOO have cheered the publication of Ricardo Duchesne’s The Uniqueness of Western Civilization as a major step forward in defending the West against the academic tide of multiculturalism. I call attention here to a very positive review by Martin Hewson, a political scientist at the University of Regina. Hewson notes that Duchesne’s work is “the most significant and comprehensive contribution to a post-multicultural world history.” “A book that asks great questions and offers bold answers deserves itself to be called great. The Uniqueness of Western Civilization is one of those not unflawed but rare books.”  

What I found most heartening is that Duchesne’s book is central to an emerging wide-ranging critique of the current academic regime in which politically and ethnically motivated attacks on the West are dominant. The purpose of these attacks is to denigrate Western accomplishment, inevitably with the assumption that all peoples are the same. Western dominance is therefore analyzed either as the result of good fortune or because the West was uniquely predisposed to predatory exploitation of other peoples. Hewson writes of the “affirmative action” whereby China is elevated to an exalted position whereas the West is viewed as nothing special. But as he notes, “Multicultural world history attacks Eurocentrism as the summum malum, but it tends to find no problem with Sinocentrism or Eurasiacentrism”—a statement that lays bare the anti-Western animus underlying the entire project.


Hewson cites several other works that are compatible with Duchesne’s account. For example,  

Toby Huff’s Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution: A Global Perspective (2011) lays out the comparative tracks of scientific development in Europe, China, Mughal India, and the Ottoman Empire. He cites the example of the telescope. Invented in Holland in 1608, it was soon taken by European travelers to the courts of Asia. But only in Europe was it used to make new discoveries about the heavens. Huff explains that both European institutions as well as Europe’s human capital made for such a divergence. 

This points to the emergence of a group of scholars who are willing to challenge the multicultural zeitgeist that is so dominant in the university. There is no question that multicultural history has arisen as an intellectual support for the transformation of Western societies as they head into the utopian multicultural future where White people are properly respectful of every other culture but their own—where White people have been brainwashed into thinking that, if the West has any uniqueness at all, it is the result of dumb luck or moral turpitude.

Just as multicultural history emerged as intellectual support for multiculturalism, the reaction against multicultural history is a reaction to the failure of multiculturalism: 

But now, in response, post-multiculturalism is becoming a force. It arises from a sense that multiculturalism has been a failure. Post-multiculturalism charges that multiculturalism, whatever its intentions, has failed to help its supposed beneficiaries; it has failed to openly address the real sources of their situation; it has allowed various forms of illiberalism, religious suprematism, caste, ethnic, and tribal exclusion to flourish without effective censure; it has suppressed free speech and criticism in the name of respecting diversity; and it has encouraged or turned a blind eye towards the denigration and devaluation of the West and its secular, liberal ethos. Now, too, multicultural world history faces its own post-multicultural critique. Multicultural world history on this account is marginalizing the West and its accomplishments; it is preventing criticism of the deficiencies of non-Western cultures; and it is allowing the value of diversity to trump the equally valid values of liberty, critical reason, and creativity. 

Hewson is essentially stating that multiculturalism means the death of the West, and he is quite right in that regard.  Further, he and Duchesne are asserting that the culture of the university is deeply complicit in this assault on the West. 

Ultimately, given that multiculturalism is a failure, the only way to prevent the disasters mentioned by Hewson from completely displacing Western culture is to prevent immigration of other cultures into the West and to begin the process of repatriation. The nascent intellectual counter movement centered around Duchesne’s work will give heart to politicians, to conservatives in the media, and to others who wish to challenge the ongoing suicide of the West.  

Despite heaping praise on The Uniqueness of Western Civilization and Duchesne’s theory that aristocratic striving and competition are central to understanding the West, Hewson has some reservations and notes some unanswered questions. I am sympathetic with Hewson’s comments on the need for a complete theory to include data on the uniqueness of Western family structure that, in my view, is the consequence of evolution as northern hunter-gatherers—monogamy, exogamy, the nuclear family, de-emphasis on extended kinship, and the creation of high-trust societies based on egalitarian individualism (see my review, Discussion section).  

Hewson closes by asking several fundamental question: “what would a Westless world have looked like? Posing this question gets to the heart of what difference the West has made, how central it has been in history, and how ‘Eurocentric’ world history actually is.” I entirely agree. The West invented the modern world. As Duchesne emphasizes, there is a dynamism and revolutionary tension in Western history that is missing from the rest of the world.

Hewson also asks:

What caused the rise of the two northern regions of Eurasia? Why did the rise of the North eclipse the more southerly regions? In the twenty-first century, Northeast Asia (with its offshoots such as Hong Kong and Singapore), is once again alongside the West as the leading region of industrial growth and technical progress. Why have NW Eurasia and NE Eurasia been so prominent for the last millennium or so? This particular great divergence, the rise of the North, has yet to receive sustained attention. 

Continuing this general topic, Hewson notes, based on a recent review article, that “relative levels of economic development today in different regions are predicted by relative levels a millennium and more ago. Economic conditions appear to be affected by traits that have been transmitted across generations over the very long run.”  

Attributing present differences to traits transmitted across generations over millennia immediately suggests biological differences. The phenomena mentioned here are exactly what an IQ realist would expect. IQ realists such as J. Philippe Rushton (Race, Evolution and Behavior [abridged version]) and Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen (IQ and the Wealth of Nations; IQ and Global Inequality) have emphasized the higher IQ of northern Eurasian societies—Europe, China, and Japan. They propose that the north-south gradient in world IQ  ultimately resulted from the need to confront harsh Northern environments. Such environments pull for the ability to engage in long-term planning (e.g., preparing for the winter by building sturdy shelters and making warm clothing) and by solving novel problems by means-end reasoning. Such cultures also pull for impulse control which is related to the personality trait of conscientiousness.   

Thus, as the emerging body of post-multicultural history is showing, the West is culturally quite different from China. But these culture areas are quite similar in IQ, with China and Japan actually having a slight edge, most notably in what psychologists call performance IQ (e.g., spatial reasoning associated with aptitude in engineering and certain types of mathematics). IQ is a trait that is transmitted across generations over the very long run and thus must be considered when attempting to explain the persistence of differences in economic development over the last millennium and persisting today. While IQ is likely being maximized in current environments of good nutrition and health care, there is little doubt that  there is strong genetic influence on differences in IQ, so that racial/ethnic group differences in IQ will continue far into the foreseeable future. 

I suspect that the search for answers in post-multicultural history will ultimately lead to an appreciation of the importance of IQ as well as an understanding of the uniqueness of the West in ethnic/racial terms. In the end, a thorough understanding of the West will inevitably lead to an appreciation of the irretrievable loss that will occur if present trends for the displacement of Whites in Europe and elsewhere continue. Multiculturalism rests on a fundamental lie—that people are completely interchangeable so that admitting the rest of the world into Western societies is unproblematic and will lead to a glorious and harmonious multicultural future—a view that completely ignores the research on the well-known costs of multiculturalism in addition to those mentioned by Hewson: political alienation, lack of trust, racial/ethnic conflict, and lack of willingness to contribute to public goods. The rise of post-multicultural history will be an important corrective in exposing this lie and in developing a confident intellectual elite that is able to combat the suicide of the West.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

201 Comments to "Martin Hewson reviews Ricardo Duchesne’s “The Uniqueness of Western Civilization”"

  1. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    January 18, 2013 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    Jason Speaks

    January 16, 2013 – 12:25 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    We must not, however, ignore the substantial contribution and support of the gun industry.

    Good question and I don’t know. The more I think of it though, I certainly believe the heart of the Gun Lobby is the average person (almost always White).

    As to how various implicitly pro-White groups come to be explicitly pro-White, I don’t know what form it will take. As you said somewhere else, when the time is right, leaders emerge. Our goal should be preparing the battlefield, so to speak. Getting certain memes in the public mind, even if they aren’t embraced at the moment.

    Once it finally becomes clear to the average White conservative (who doesn’t think in racial terms), that they can never win the White House again using the same old GOP playbook, then I feel certain they will start looking around for a new approach

    End quote

    Good point about what leaders will emerge. If you look at red state America it will be a Neoconish White Nationalism. It won’t be an intellectual one because Nationalist have no outlet to reach these people. They will wake up but the people who will be leading them at the time could be former Neocons. This is the problem when they wake up without the Nationalist direction. Perhaps many former neocon republicans will simply adopt the same attitude but change their target from Liberal to Blacks and Latinos and from Muslims and Arabs to Jews. The problem for Nationalist is they have not been able to change White attitudes and mindset because they are not able to reach them. Its very difficult to change attitudes and mentality. Jewish activist have managed to change White culture and modes and thinking. But this will back fire when they face their own demise as the Islam bashing culture they nurtured turn to Jew bashing with the same vigor. Their interventionist culture they nurtured turns to war with Israel. What goes around comes around. I don’t see Whites turn to the American Third Position. That requires a change in mindset. A mindset that Whites have been adopting for nearly 4 decades. Its a mindset that many Whites cherished. The interventionist “kicking ass” mindset. Its going to be easier for Whites to continue that mindset rather than go through intellectual change. What they might end up doing is simply to change the target.

  2. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 16, 2013 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: @John hearns:
    It is important to recognize the adversary, not what we call them. Here is an interesting look at groups who should be working together but don’t.

  3. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 16, 2013 - 1:16 pm | Permalink

    Yeah “conservatives” would do well to look at South Africa where a majority black vote meant the end to conservative rule.
    In America, the majority black vote is being imported.

  4. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 16, 2013 - 12:25 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    We must not, however, ignore the substantial contribution and support of the gun industry.

    Good question and I don’t know. The more I think of it though, I certainly believe the heart of the Gun Lobby is the average person (almost always White).

    As to how various implicitly pro-White groups come to be explicitly pro-White, I don’t know what form it will take. As you said somewhere else, when the time is right, leaders emerge. Our goal should be preparing the battlefield, so to speak. Getting certain memes in the public mind, even if they aren’t embraced at the moment.

    Once it finally becomes clear to the average White conservative (who doesn’t think in racial terms), that they can never win the White House again using the same old GOP playbook, then I feel certain they will start looking around for a new approach.

  5. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 16, 2013 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    Do you, or anyone here, know how to download the current issue of TOQ? I log on, the screen says howdy and I enlarge the current issue. I forget how to download it. Sorry to be so technically inept. I have emailed the editor with no reply. Thanks.

  6. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 16, 2013 - 10:29 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    I certainly agree that it is not yet time for a showdown in the streets. We must not, however, ignore the substantial contribution and support of the gun industry. What portion do they contribute?

    No one wants the mess and bother of taking on the government – it is always a nasty business. However, as the consequences of endless government interferences in what should be the in the domain of the private sector continue to fail perhaps we can form alliances. Right now the groups are scattered and each works alone. Mens and father’s right groups, religious groups, gun rights groups, home schoolers, and above all the young men and women who will be weighed down with debt for the rest of their lives – all have a common foe.

    The current party alignment is hopeless. Any glance at these comment pages will show that we prefer to pick at each other rather than actually do something that might work. I have real hope, sadly, it is not in the WN movement as it currently stands.

  7. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 16, 2013 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    I hope pro-Whites will take solace in the success of gun rights’ victories over the last few decades. It can be done. Things that Jews, White liberals, anti-Whites, elites and non-Whites absolutely hate do happen every single day.

    We are not totally helpless. But note, the victories that the gun lobby has had were not brought about by a glorious, dramatic showdown in the street, so much as run-of-the-mill practical politics. We need more of that on the pro-White side.

    How about simple programs like demanding an end to affirmative action, an end to fair housing laws, and the right to freely associate with whomever you want. Can that be done? Well, if we had 4 million Whites paying dues every year to a pro-White group (like the NRA does), we would make things better. Imagine politicians speaking as passionately about the rights of free White citizens as they do about the Second Amendment.

  8. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 16, 2013 - 9:45 am | Permalink


    No, I haven’t read the Frum piece, but that is typical of his type. Up and down the line most of the factors we score badly on as a nation – poverty, abuse, crime, drop out rates – stem directly from having a large non-White population.

    To deny this obvious fact is to engage in straight up lying, which of course, Frum knows he is doing. Notice how they panic as soon as anyone with access to a TV camera states the truth in even the mildest tone. At least this shows how fragile the Politically Correct system is.

  9. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    January 16, 2013 - 5:11 am | Permalink

    Sorry i meant while Jewish issues unite Nationalist as you can see in this forum, Black issues bring about divisions with some regarding them as a threat while other see them as a mere nuisance and some see them as irrelevant etc. Its in the Jews interest to connect Jews and Blacks together to give the indication that Nationalist just don’t like whoever is not a White European and that the attacks against Jews are made up excuses.

  10. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    January 16, 2013 - 1:25 am | Permalink


    Its not treachery and hypocrisy. Frum knows as long as he remains in the Black V White issues he has ammo. Its a subject Jewish actvist are very comfortable talking about. Its Jewish issues they fear. Often White advocates talk about Jewish issues alongside Black issues and the response usually comes from a Black perspective since Jewish actvist know they can counter Black issues easier than White issues. I have said here that Black issues is the weak link for Nationlaist. White Jews unite Nationalist , Blacks divide them. Jewish activist main goal is to connect anti Jewish rhetoric with anti Black one. Another words they want to promote the idea that anti Jewish attitudes are shared by the same poeple who have anti Black attitudes. Of course Nationalist can’t claim Blacks control media and are pushing America to wars and dual loyalties and banking scandals and promoting anti White immigration policies etc. So the idea here, which is actually a smart one, is that those who hold such views about Jews do not hold so because of any merit about their accusations of Jews, but is due to the Jews being different since these people have similar hostilitis to Blacks who can not be accused of the same charges that Jews are being charged it. Another words, these guys hate Jews because of who they are and not what they do since Blacks can not be accused of the same acts yet still face hostilities from this same group.

    Its a very smart move and usually works.

  11. Pavel's Gravatar Pavel
    January 15, 2013 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    Jason, interestingly enough, the always reprehensible David Frum just wrote a rebuttal to Coulter’s piece on CNN, in which he argues that the gun problem is not about race. I don’t know if you’ve read it yet, but it’s quite entertaining. Frum reaches new levels of treachery and hypocrisy that I didn’t even think were possible. The passage that really got me was:

    “If you ignore America’s poor, you can make all kinds of problems disappear from view. Not counting the poor and minorities, the country does not have an obesity epidemic. Not counting the poor and minorities, the United States has perfectly adequate schools. Not counting the poor and minorities, America would have a higher average income.
    Likewise, not counting hurricanes, America would not have so many natural disasters. Not counting divorces, America would have more intact families. Not counting wars, America would have a smaller public debt. ”

    This, of course, coming from a guy that lives in an all-white neighborhood and served as one of Bush’s Jew puppetmasters. Absolutely incredible.

  12. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2013 - 7:03 pm | Permalink

    Exactly! There are a lot of people out there who are wondering if it can be entirely coincidental that as Washington falls in respect to near contempt levels Homeland Security grows exponentially and stockpiles guns and ammo but it is urgent that law abiding people be disarmed? We are not all quiet as dumb as we look.

  13. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 15, 2013 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Another positive sign of how people can change things is what gun rights groups have accomplished over the last 30 years. The NRA is far from perfect, but look what’s been done. (I will ignore whatever legislation comes up in the next few months).

    We have strong concealed carry laws in a majority of states. This is drastic improvement over the situation in the 70s and 80s. I remember the mood being that handguns might be banned soon. Well, the pro-gun people engaged in real world politics and guess what? We won.

    Now, the Jews did not agree to this change. They were almost all against it. The elites certainly didn’t like it. But with several million regular people willing to chip in a few dollars a year, and using lobbying techniques that pushed hard, they not only stopped the movement to take away all handguns, they gave us even more freedom.

    In the 1970s even Lynard Skynard sang songs in favor of gun control! So, let’s not ever think that social/political/cultural change can’t happen if “THEY” don’t want it too. It can and does.

    This gif shows how concealed carry changed over the last 25 years. See the map turn blue (shall issue, meaning the state must issue concealed licenses), from only 8 states to 37.

    There is no reason why pro-White organizations cannot have similar success in the future.

  14. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2013 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Anne Coulter is a feather in the wind, very telling. I also hold the hope that all of those whites who are currently anti-white will swing around just as fast when the climate changes.

    There are interesting voices out there. The Thinking Housewife, a traditionalist Catholic blog has recently been quoted positively by Alt-Right. Strange bedfellows indeed.

  15. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 15, 2013 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

    By the way, Ann Coulter (yes I know what she is) made the point that our murder rate in the US is driven purely by demographics. She said if you just look at Whites, we have the same murder rate as Belgium. It’s just significant that an “establishment” figure would say such a thing. Please, don’t obsess over the fact that Ann said it, that is not the point, don’t get hung up on personalities! The important thing is what is actually being said.

  16. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 15, 2013 - 3:43 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    @Mickey Meadows: @Bigmo:

    If enough Whites “wake up” (which is a phrase I don’t really like but I don’t have a better one), they will find a way to secure a future for themselves and their posterity. What form it will take is unpredictable. It depends on so many factors – when it happens, how many become pro-White, what other events are happening in the world – the exact path forward just isn’t knowable.

    But, as far as I know, whenever any significant number of Whites has been determined to fight against any enemy, they have won. The only enemies that I know of who have truly thwarted Whites, once Whites were fully aware and determined, have been other Whites.

    It is likely that a fairly large number of Whites will never be on our side and may be quite hostile to us. And I mean Whites here, not Jews. I don’t mean anywhere near a majority of Whites, but fairly large number seem to be very hostile to other Whites. Whether it is from genes, culture, beliefs, personal trauma, or some mix, I have no clue. But I know they exist (more in some areas than others).

    I also know most of them are pretty pathetic and they won’t be a match for Whites with a normal sense of loyalty.

  17. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    January 15, 2013 - 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Ali against race mixing (BBC,1971)

  18. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2013 - 2:43 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Perhaps I misunderstood your position. I thought you were suggesting that we need a great white leader to rise and lead us all to freedom. While I certainly share your opinion of Dr. MacDonald and others, I also believe that a leader arises when the people are ready.

    American are a strange lot. It is very difficult to understand us if you go by the media, whose job is to misrepresent us. The vast majority of us are pretty easy going, willing to tolerate a lot of nonsense – as long as the living is good. That is no longer the case.

    All around us it has become inescapable that the implicit promises made by those in control have been lies. Jews are successful only because of their devotion to education. If you, too, will only go head over heels in debt to send your child to college you too will be permitted into the corridors of power. The world will be filled with peace and happiness as soon as we give power to more women. Blacks only act out because they have been brutally repressed. The list is too long to write. All lies.

    It is not just kids who were wrongly encouraged to go to college who are losing out. I know several very bright white guys, recent grads in technology, biology and math who are lucky to have jobs waiting tables. Where does that leave the poor single mother with no education? On welfare and those kids know that they will be expected to pick up the check for the rest of their lives.

    I cannot begin to explain Obama’s arrogance. I can only assure you that he has made it crystal clear that all those who hoped for an end to the politics of race have been slapped in the face. After years of being told that group guilt was a great injustice we learn that it is fine to take away the rights of countless law abiding people because of one mad man. Very little mention is made of the gang warfare in large cities like Chicago. We hear nothing about the need to explore the roots of rage which is trotted out whenever a black man commits an atrocity.

    Perhaps others do not understand our ‘clinging to God and guns’ I can only assure you that it does run deep.

  19. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 15, 2013 - 2:21 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    that phrase It Can Happen reminded me of this old rock song performed by the very Germanic Yes.

  20. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 15, 2013 - 2:06 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    It’s not even necessary to say I totally hope you are right.

    Great Man theory….whatever that is…..has an unrealistic ring to it. But let’s look backward. Where would be if Kevin Macdonald had not woken up? Where would we be if David Duke had not woken up?
    It’s true that neither of them were woken up by the determined efforts of already woken Whites, but that’s beside the point.
    Great men and women have already woken up and done great things. The people that run the radio stations, run A3P, the BNP…many great men and women among them. People have made huge personal sacrifices, lost friends and family and faced isolation FOR THEIR PEOPLE.

    It can happen. It does happen.

    But we need new kinds of great individual. One’s that know how to make a lot of money. Geniuses that have ideas for how to upturn the banking system AND ACTUALLY DO IT. Individuals with visions for idea that will wipe Facebook and Google off the map and reinvent the Western economy AND DO IT.

    Individuals that set up implicitly or explicitly White organizations that somehow don’t offend the enemy or PC so are allowed to grow and become powerful…and yet be White and naturally positioned to trigger realizations in their ranks of the plight of Whites.

  21. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    January 15, 2013 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Jason Speaks I agree with you. I think 2016 will be a huge shock. There is no way around it as reality hits hard.Mickey Meadows I hope you are right but if you go to any Republican forums you can see that foreign policy is not making an affect. They always talk about terrorism and how the Arabs want to destroy Israel and some even believe the land all belongs to Israel. For many Whites 40 years of hollywood brainwashing had taken its toll. They just despise Arabs and Muslims too much to worry about what Israel is doing with the Pals. Most of the counter argument is based on we need to mind our own business sort of thing. But even those see the Pals as more negative than Israel. Too much indoctrination from Holllywood where the Pals and even Arabs are always portrayed negatively. Europeans generally have negative perception of Muslims but it does not extend to the Pals because they see things based on the realities on the ground. Americans generally see things based on some movies they watched that they are not even aware of.

    But domestic politics will be a game changer.

    The question is will it be too late. If Hispanics can be convined to cross the border again back to Mexico then no. Take away the Mexicans and Whites can regain everything again. Other ethnic groups are pretty well educated and can find a way out if Whites raise hell. Hispanics have little to go back to so resistence will be strong from them. At the same time its tempting for them to escape by just crossing the border. But Whites need to raise hell. I see it as 50 – 50. This cessation nonsense is defeat. Its logitically impossible and won’t solve anything.

  22. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 15, 2013 - 12:20 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    I agree.

    One has to be ready to do something, not only talk about it.

    Anyway, in the meantime, why not list a few weaknesses of Jews ?

    Here goes, my friends, it is important to know the enemy.

    Jews are no heroes. None, never. For them a hero is a guy cheating with insider info. Or a guy, who bombs civilians. They are the lowest of low in that front.

    Jews do no sports. Never, no good. They try to behave in UK as they were genuinely interested in football, but it looks pitiful. They cannot drink a beer genuinely, it is as if they were aliens with a different constitution. Maybe they are?

    Jews never venture into an adventure. For them to go to Iowa is like visiting Mars. No, it has to be the home enclave, a lot of Jews close and no worries. They do not like mountains, they do no nature.

    They sit in cafes and pose.

    Summa summarum: They are Mommy’s boys. Red-blooded all-american boys die for them, while they loot Wall Street. Shame on you, my dear friends. :)

  23. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 15, 2013 - 12:17 pm | Permalink


    A lot of us don’t. We take the view it is important to do everything possible to wake as many whites as possible up. Not because we think anything like a critical mass can be accomplished that way, but in the hope EXCEPTIONAL/INGENIUS individuals are among the few that do wake up. These special people would then go on to do amazing things that we cannot anticipate the character of but that turn things around.

    The other thing we who are already awake must do is try to actually BE that individual.

    If it sounds like hope against hope, maybe it is. But that’s the direness of the true situation.

    If we were any other race it would be a truly hopeless thing, waiting around for great individuals. But we are THE EUROPEANS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

  24. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 15, 2013 - 12:07 pm | Permalink


    That is it.

    The Jews think it is SO funny to humiliate Palestinians. Those ever so humane and emphatic Jews… :)

  25. Pavel's Gravatar Pavel
    January 15, 2013 - 11:24 am | Permalink


    “The domestic agenda of Jewish activism will be exposed and then and only then Whites will awaken.”

    I don’t see how one can be so optimistic. White americans, in general, are at square one right now in terms of the Jewish question. They’re utterly clueless, dense, and are not “engaged intellectually” as George Carlin once said. Where do the commenters on TOO get this idea that somehow “whites will awaken”?

  26. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2013 - 10:16 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    You may be right. I am willing to cast my lot with reading my own people. Yes the great man theory and Jewish influence have all played their part. Money is one form of power. It is not surprising that many have lost all faith in the American people. Lord knows we have endured a lot. However, it all really does depend on our compliance. Even Obama was forced to get a cabinet full of white men to save his administration from the reality of complete ineptitude.

  27. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 15, 2013 - 10:05 am | Permalink


    The most important intellectual step that Israel helps people make, is that of realizing the double standards, and so ultimately the insincerity of Jews in the Diaspora.

    The next most important is that once people make that step Israel then supplies them with a mainstream source of reinforcement. So they ‘firm up’ with their new understanding.

    Two important contributions. On their own not enough. But we take what we can get.

  28. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 15, 2013 - 9:55 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    @Alice Teller:

    There’s lot’s of ways to be in denial, and my fear is that you guys are going into another kind of denial…that of false hope.

    It doesn’t help to have false hope. It makes things worse to have ideas along the lines of “we don’t have to do anything, the other side will screw things up eventually” or “once things get so-and-so bad in the future, our people will rise up and everything will change”.

    The only real hope for change is that special individuals, or ordinary individuals who are willing to become special, wake up……and commit their lives to making a major difference.

    That’s the only way it can ever happen that European extracted peoples turn things around. To get from here to the next stage up, it’ll have to be individuals that do great things. If those candidate individuals think things are going to change by the course of events already in play, maybe they bother making that commitment. Who would blame them….a commitment like that is awful thing to have to do.

    It’s living in a world of no hope, no true friends you can trust, intellectual isolation, broodingness…struggle with all sorts of psychological issues arising from the stress of seeing things as they are. But at least truth. At least that is there (and no where else)

  29. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2013 - 9:40 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    I agree. Conservative personalities have always been the controlled opposition. Hannity and O’Reilly exactly fit the Jewish stereotype of the dumb goy – brutal, not too bright and in constant danger of exploding. Rush had a few funny things to say decades ago before his trip down the drug route.

    What we really must face is that we have irreconcilable differences, Doesn’t matter how much we try to accept the other they always wind up spitting in our face.

    I am banking on the fact that no matter how we deaden our sensibilities our foes will overplay their hand. We have Villarosa explaining that there are no illegal people. Sounds like open boarders to me. Obama just may be foolish enough to try and take away our guns. You comment in another thread about being treated like abused spouses keeps resonating with me. We live in interesting times which will test us. May heaven grant that we still have the strength and the will to stand up.

  30. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 15, 2013 - 8:43 am | Permalink


    I suspect you are right about 2016 being key. I wish it would come earlier and goodness knows the writing is on the wall. But it looks like most are still in the last stages of denial.

    TV and Radio conservatives gig is up. They will rattle on for a few more years about how all we need to do is adjust the tax rates or some other trivial issue. Most of them are stunned. They knew this day could come, but they didn’t think it would come soon enough to derail their careers!

    So, GOP will probably have a small gain in the House in 2014, then another loss in 2016, making it clear to village idiots that the old GOP (and even traditional conservative approach) are dead. Then things start getting interesting!

  31. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    January 15, 2013 - 5:58 am | Permalink

    Its interesting how people here are trying to figure what is going to be the scenario that is going to make Whites “wake up” as they say. Judging from many activist of White advocacy unfortunantly Israel and Palestine won’t be the one. What Israel is doing may wake up Liberals who anyways have abandoned Israel some time ago. The latest poll from Pew poll shows how only Republicans now support Israel in the world we live in and not just in America. Only 2% of Republicans sympathize with the Palestinians while over 75% sympathize with Israel. Democrats tend to be more balanced with many supporting neither.

    “According to Pew, “There continue to be stark partisan differences in Middle East sympathies. Conservative Republicans maintain strong support for Israel with fully 75% saying they sympathize with Israel compared with just 2% who sympathize with the Palestinians. By contrast, liberal Democrats are much more divided: 33% sympathize more with Israel, 22% with the Palestinians”

    Many Democrats are probably Blacks and Hispanics who sympathize with the Pals and not Israel. So I don’t see foreign policy as the way out. Whites simply have a very negative image of Arabs and Muslims. Its hard for that to change. Whites have a strong vulnerability to see the darkest of Arabs and Muslims. People in this site may not let that influence them but Whites in general are easily influenced in that direction. Many White advocated were strong supporters of Israel even though they knew the Pals were being displaced though many will deny that now. Its mass immigration that turned everything around. So when 2016 comes and Whites realize that they have lost power, like 9-11 and the Iraq war exposed the Neocons and Aipacs, the 2016 will bring about the immgration lobbyist and multi-cultural activist in the open. The domestic agenda of Jewish activism will be exposed and then and only then Whites will awaken.

    Just my two cents.

  32. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2013 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

    @JPLex: Never watched the show, but here’s the prurient scene. Thanks for pointing it out.

  33. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2013 - 5:26 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon: I’m not fazed by sincere disagreements, so we’ll respectfully maintain different views about the legitimacy of intellectual monopoly (plagiarism is just poor taste, and easily identified with today’s software). It concerns me that genuine innovation is stifled by patent games, attorneys (another deplorable monopoly) and not creators driving strategy.

  34. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 5:05 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I may take reviews far less seriously than you and read them with a far less critical eye. Even on a second read it seemed entirely in keeping with goal of the site and its readers who are primarily interested in immigration. If it struck a false note, to me, it was in using Europe and Arabs rather than America and Mexicans. I attributed that to laziness and a lack of visual drama in most Mexican efforts. I defer to your more experienced eye.

  35. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 14, 2013 - 3:53 pm | Permalink


    Basically I agree with all your observations. Certainly resentment is rising to unprecedented levels, driven in large part by the Israel situation. Which is why I actually support the status quo continuing out there as well. It’s tough on the Palestinians whom I don’t think we have any quarrel with. But we need the way Israel treats them has immense power to wake people up, and we need all the help we can get.

    So it’s all happening. But at the same time they now have a powerful nation state, their power over the West has never been stronger, and they have successfully and possibly fatally undermined White peoples via 3rd world immigration.

    On balance I don’t think there is going to be an overstretch moment that results in a successful backlash along lines of what was seen in history. They did it right this time. They did the whole West at the same time, and instead of going for dominance they went for genocide.

    In terms of what is complicated and what is simple, I think we should all see a personal duty to make a life’s work in progressing whatever strategy that corresponds to our values and our abilities that we think could make a difference.

    What no woken up White has the right to do is nothing. It isn’t good enough to just comment for personal entertainment and a bit of social. Everyone needs to be working toward something.

    That’s what I’m doing. I urge that is what you be doing.

  36. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 14, 2013 - 3:11 pm | Permalink

    The path to victory requires the igniting of the Roman spirit in Europeans: a contempt for weakness, a hatred of the other, and a lust for power.

    Once upon a time, Whites marched through Jerusalem and brought it under their dominion. The temple was destroyed and turned into a temple of Jupiter. Jewish slaves were marched back to Rome and paraded through the streets, along with the temple’s menorah, which was kept as a spoil of war.

    It’s hard to imagine today’s Whites having this kind of spirit, but it’s exactly what’s needed if we’re going to survive as a people.

  37. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 14, 2013 - 2:42 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    It is not like you to insist that even the reviewer must bash one in the face with the explanation of the metaphor used.

    But I didn’t, Alice! What I said was that he deliberately misexplained the metaphor.

  38. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 2:11 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    P.P.S. No insult intended in stating the nature of owls. One really cannot be certain these days how much reality city folks encounter. Or anyone who says that gender is just a social construct has never met a rooster.

  39. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 1:56 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    Since my technical knowledge is as muddled as my typing I have no idea why my comment to you was in red, nor the significance if any. Can anyone enlighten me?

  40. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 1:52 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    It is not like you to insist that even the reviewer must bash one in the face with the explanation of the metaphor used.
    As for Arabs, perhaps I must reread the piece. My take was that they are simply the animals who do not hide their teeth who would naturally been excluded without the advice of the owl. I have not followed this fellow’s work nor am I familiar with Brenda Walker. Michelle Malkin seems simply a useful tool who can express grievances regarding immigration without risking the dreaded charge of racism. In short, I am entirely willing to use, if not actively support, anyone who seems to be pushing in our direction.

    I find much to horrify me in the writers in the men’s movement. Even F. Roger Devlin sometimes make my blood run cold. None the less, I have recommended him to many young women as the inevitably logical result the feminist cant. Simply a housewife making do with whatever is at hand.

  41. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 14, 2013 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: In his own defense, this city boy was not saying that the author of Cry Wolf had stepped back from the brink; the guilty party pointed at was Kirkpatrick. Nor do I quarrel with your assessment of the parasitically predatory nature of the barn owl. My “experience” of them comes entirely from book larnin’, of whose inherent deficiencies I am painfully aware.

    Anent what you wrote to MM, too—and as, again, I’ve frequently said—far from having a beef with VDARE, I regard the site very highly. Furthermore I consider PB a man of intellectual and moral heroism (I have written to him and told him so in just so many words).* Of course, given the desperately necessary albeit inherently limited focus of his enterprise, he perforce widens the spectrum of participation past my own comfort or approval point, but neither I nor anyone else is obliged to read Brenda Walker or (now) Kirkpatrick or [fill in the blank] or (Heaven help us all) the columns of Michelle Malkin. My focused gripe against Kirkpatrick is that he is plainly guilty of wittingly dispensing a major falsehood—that the Muslims are, not simply a weapon against us, but its wielder—when he had neither need nor excuse for misleading readers! He might have equivocated, euphemized, beaten about the bush … you name it; we’ve all done it now and again (I certainly have). He chose, rather, to deliberately misdirect. For that he is culpable, and people, for their own information and protection, ought to know about it.
    *Not being a reader of AR, it would be misleading for me to comment on it. As for Taylor, any friend of Sam Francis is a man I’m predisposed to think well of.

  42. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 14, 2013 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

    I must add this piece still, because this particular details shows how ultimately over the top the arrogant Jews are going nowadays. This may well have been discussed here, but I just have to say this, because many of my tolerant (far too tolerant) friends have got the message after I described this.

    In that lame and useless TV-series, Larry David (another big city hero) the man himself gets intimate with a Palestinian woman and in the middle of this encounter the woman gets very vocal and shouts (I censor this heavily): “Do it o me, like you do it to Palestinians in Israel”.

    Now, to Jews and their lackeys this must be hilarious. They have their way with the Palestinian and she begs for more.

    Let us put this into a different context: How quaint it would be if we had a TV-series “Horst Wessel”, where the urban hero from 1930’s would have his way with a Jewess, who would excitedly shout: “Do it to me as your brethren did in Aushwitz!”.

    Look, I agree, this is not nice to write about this, but this was mainstream TV, in the time of childen watching it. That is how far the Jews have gone. They make jokes about their victims, they humiliate them openly, they degrade them and oh, it is ever so funny.

    Once again, I apologize, if this hurts somebody’s feelings but I am describing a regular Jewish mainstream scene…

    Anyway, Good Night. :)

  43. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 14, 2013 - 12:28 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Quite frankly, that is just a bit too complicated to me, but I say that with respect.

    Just some everyday things that I have noticed since I “saw the light”. I have noticed that most of the people I share my thoughts surprisingly agree without any real arguments against. I mean if you start with the classic “Jews are greedy”, it hits a bell immediately. Nobody disagrees, not really.

    Then when you go to the matter of Israel, there is much more huffing and puffing, but not really disagreement, just doubt. The Jews have very well painted the picture of subhuman muslim, but you just have to insist on the matter and talk about fighters bombing civilians and you are again on the right track.

    Then banks. No worries, no arguments. Jews are linked with banks, well known. Regular guys are not fans of the banks and these flashy guys. You cannot lose in linking the Jews with the Power Of Money. Just insist and the people agree.

    You see, the people are not antisemitic, but they do not like Jews either. Very, very few like them. Hardly any, as they ARE arrogant, obsessed by money, obsessed by fame, simply full of themselves and they never, ever are heroes.

    So, we should start talking, everyday and all day (figuratively speaking, or God’s sake :) ) about them. In everyday situations, they command no respect.

    This answer is off topic, but what I am trying to say that their overreaction IS arrogance. They overreact, because they think they CAN overreact, because they have already won.

    My daughter, God bless her, is a liberal, well-meaning westerner, who would hate any implication of racism or such, but when I started making jokes about Jews in the context above, no reaction, just well-humoured agreement. I could not believe it… Jackpot… :)

    Believe me, they are not only winning, but they are opening too many fronts. And we know from the history that you can fool most of the peole most of the time, but not all people all the time. :)

  44. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 14, 2013 - 11:16 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:

    From my perspective because I think you’re sincere on the important matters, all is forgiven now each and every time going forward. People are going to fall out and argue and offend each other, but probably most people that end up here understand this isn’t like normal social situations where interpersonal feelings and preferences take primacy. This about much bigger things, this is the hills around us.

    That said, some people are naturally annoying/rude/boring/unintelligent or seem that way to some other person. Which may be how you see me or Alice or someone else, or all of us. And it may be how I or Alice or some other person or all of us tend to see you. If tha is the case then no doubt you and she, or me, or some other person will continue to periodically fall out.

    And that’s fine. It’s natural. I’m not saying let’s stop with that. I’m just saying, there isn’t going to be hard feelings in the intervals. Speak and interact normally as and when you want.

  45. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 14, 2013 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Hi Alice – what you’re saying could definitely make a big difference.

  46. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 10:49 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    Well, that is certainly classic. If you can’t outwit your opponents or run them off with sheer nastiness appeal to authority to silence them.

  47. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 14, 2013 - 10:48 am | Permalink


    What I’d say is that how we regard their power should shift depending on the context, in keeping with what is most powerful for us. If the context is devising an actual strategy then the most powerful assumption is that they have absolute/infinite power or tending to that limit, simply because (a) we don’t actually know how powerful they are or in what ways they are powerful and (b) this is fairly late in the day of our specific situation so it’s better to assume there will only be the one shot. In that situation the risk of going for something simplistic, like say, find a mechanism to create billions of dollars and then Bob’s your uncle, money will do the rest – which would probably amount to a fatal underestimation of their power – is a much bigger risk than the extra overhead of building multiple layers into a strategy with lots of redundancy.

    However, if the context is analysis of what their actual power is, then assuming they have absolute power is incredibly disempowering. It leads to futility and fatalism…you know the sort of thinking because it’s always humming away in the background on our scene. Whatever happens it’s a setup. Obama winning…a setup. Obama being hostile to war on Iran…a set up. Reading events this way robs us of the power to analyse and build falsifiable theories as to the extent and limits and frailties as well as strengths of their power.

    The right way to analyse – IMHO – which I wish our essay writers would begin to adopt, is to do less grand synthesis…still do it but do it less. And do more singular examinations of things like, as you say, the extent of Jewish power, or the tensions within the Jewish body. Doing this normally involves holding everything else constant. Or saying “all else being equal”…this is how serious I think the internal tension is and I think it’s going to have these consequences, so I’m making this prediction. Of course…holding everything else constant is never realistic, and so the trajectory of whatever you are analysing will be influenced by things that happen around it, and sometimes it’ll all become too interweaving and complex to make sense of in the future. But often enough it won’t, and the predictions made earlier will either happen or not happen and that will give us valuable objective information about the real world situation of whatever…our enemies.

    About the ME and debt. I don’t actually think they have much problem in the ME. They are the regional superpower and they are consistently settling the land under the feet of the Palestinains. Their strategy is to make the status quo look like something they desperately don’t want, but you only have to read JPost to see that actually the status quo is exactly where they want things to be, and that they put a lot of effort and resources into making sure it is maintained.

    About debt…I haven’t heard of a major hit on their collective financial power since Madoff.

  48. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: @JPLex:
    I will not argue about the ultimate form of victory. All of the power of Jews is dependent upon our compliance and tolerance. I am inclined to agree with JPlex, they always overreach. Any glance at the news will see them begging us to ignore everything they said last week and protect them from the Muslims. Expose the lies and hypocrisy, challenge all of the unexamined premises, remind people that we need not submit to this nonsense. If we build a sense of white loyalty and solidarity, quite a task in itself, we will be prepared to deal with all of the mess. Instead, we spend far too much time scoring petty points against each other and excoriating anyone who does not see the problem and the solution precisely as we do. Alas, we are still defined by the he-man woman haters, Uncle Adolph worshipers and worst of all, the defeatist who regularly announce that all that can be done has been done. We are our own worst enemies. No one can beat us except ourselves.

  49. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 14, 2013 - 10:39 am | Permalink

    Professor MacDonald:

    I’ve a hunch the majority of those visiting your website’s comments pages would truly appreciate the ability to collapse the comments of certain Commenters so they are rendered invisible. In other words, a show/hide button for each comment, or more preferably for each Commenter by name (block show/hide).

    I know such technical changes tend to cost money. But, any chance it could be arranged any time soon? Thanks.

  50. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 14, 2013 - 10:06 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Most interesting. And please do not let me interrupt. :)

    I do not expect any comments either, I may be out of my depth here.

    But here goes, anyway. Do you not think that the enemy has quite a lot of trouble in two fronts already: Middle East and at home, with the national debt ? Not that money would be a problem, they are immune themselves, whatwith owning FED and Wall Street.

    Butit looks to me that they are repeating what they have done countless times, meaning they have to (by nature) kill the host, before there is genuine satisfaction. Look at history. Germans had to beg in the streets, only then was there satisfaction, albeit short-lived.

    Do not underestimate arrogance. This lot represents it Par Excellence. That is a powerful, very powerful weapon if this in-built arrogance can be brought into the limelight. Major revolutions have been born by it.

    They never fail in the endgame: Host has to be destroyed. It is very satisfactory. And, boy, do they have some revenge in their minds…

    In Israel they represent the Epitomy of Arrogance. Just look at Bibi Netanyahu. I can hardly imagine more arrogant individual. Well, no wonder, you give them a cool 6000 USD/capita annually in military help alone. I mean, they do not have to do anything to manage very well, thank you very much. :)

    No, it looks to me that there is a good chance that they do it all themselves. It is a kind of genetic must. They cannot help it, it is ever so sweet.

  51. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 14, 2013 - 9:42 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    I would say there definitely has to be one true path to victory simply because of the extent of the stranglehold we’re held in. The sense that this is only about getting enough Whites to wake up and intellectually resist the demonization and bullying tactics, is an illusion deriving out of the fact our enemies don’t currently take harder action against us than ADL style demonization and other delegitimizing tactics.

    The reason they only do that, and only to the extent they do it, is not a reflection of limits of their power, ruthlessness and access to the means to do much worse. It’s just a case of, they don’t need to any worse because they’ve got us beat. We’re nothing. We were defeated a long while ago. They’ve got bigger fish to fry…their time has come, they are the elite, they brought down the Western civilization, and now they are setting the agenda and things are going to keep changing and we’re going to be wrong footed by that again in the near future if we carry on theorizing about the future based on things carrying on much the same (the ‘entropy’ model).

    They own a lot of organized crime for one thing. If we got serious traction, our leadership would be dead pretty quick unless they had their wits about them and some seriously good counter measures.

    So there does need to be single true solution out of which power, money, influence and large scale organizations emerge. There does need to be a leader or leaders. There needs to be geniuses and mind blowing paradigm shifting solutions that totally wrong foot the enemy and by the time the enemy realizes, too much of their power has ebbed away and our side is too powerful to stopped or assassinated, or bankrupted or outlawed in the courts.

    Just one thing those organizations would have to do would be to create careers for ex-soldiers and contribute large sums of money to military special forces in exchange for things like management/team building survival based training courses. Not for the value of that directly but for the links.

    A lot needs to happen. Taking power back is a mechanical/network thing based in the physical reality of time and extends outward across layers of real and conceptual landscapes that contain actual centres of power that were either taken over by our enemies or were created by our enemies. In either case, they all need to be taken.

    Nothing has changed in the basic rules of conflict. Rebels come down from the mountain and surprise attack the ruling elite, securing real objects like the radio station, the parliament, the bank and the airport, and the deposed elite make a run for the hills and become the rebels. The rebels, then have to come back down the mountain and surprise the elite and take over whatever the key objects are…maybe the radio station or maybe a concept…..maybe a concept like “white guilt”. It doesn’t matter what it is, only that it is a centre of power that is used to reinforce the position of the elite and keep the people under control and the rebels up in the hills.

    But there is nothing about a ‘single true path’ that is inconsistent with what you say should be done, which is to take ‘massive action’ anywhere and everywhere. Ultimately a single path would involve doing that. But the question is whether the reverse is true…whether just doing that, just taking massive action anywhere and everywhere, can lead to the structures and concentrations and networks of power that would be necessary to prevail.

  52. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 9:15 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    I am not a believer in the one true path to victory. I have little problem with sites like Vdare or American Renaissance who refuse to “name the Jew”. Fighting a fever may be sufficient to allow a patient to recover even when we don’t know the original source of the illness. I am all for fighting everywhere and everyone. We will win in the end – we are better than all the rest.

  53. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 14, 2013 - 9:06 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    We’ll need to reverse the tactics used against us, but that doesn’t mean we’ll need to actually mimic them. The struggle is to establish the legitimacy of white identity and then powerfully own, protect and promote it.
    With that in place, beyond legal challenge and out of reach of the power of any other group to coerce, demonize, instil disincentives or fear in Whites (i.e. that we can protect our conceptual/group borders and the people inside), everything else will follow pretty quick. Really quick if we’re still a numerical majority. Reasonably quick if not. Institutions – we’d do those Saturday afternoon kind of thing.

    But with that said, the struggle as defined as above still requires a comprehensive across the board victory, which still requires some sort of amazing rise to power of some individual or group of individuals. Which still requires that growth to pass some threshold right under the noses of the enemy without causing them too much alarm. Which still requires a pretty amazing strategy, several geniuses, a leader and a fair bit of luck.

  54. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 14, 2013 - 9:00 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Phew! What a relief…

  55. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 8:58 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Well said. I confess to giving fender a hard time because he is clearly intelligent and has good instincts. He is simply stuck on nihilism, a sad loss to his people. Well worth the effort to try and bring him to the light.

  56. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 14, 2013 - 8:55 am | Permalink


    Jew’s don’t control this one

  57. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 8:51 am | Permalink

    I don’t doubt that there are useful idiots in abundance. I simply find it odd that the publicity is so much louder than my own experience. After all, most Christians are “opposed” to divorce and sex outside of marriage- all to very little practical effect.

  58. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 14, 2013 - 8:46 am | Permalink
  59. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 14, 2013 - 8:43 am | Permalink


    He’s allowed to go through his stages just like everyone else :O) Or maybe that’s where he’s sticking.

    I’m Anglo and I don’t mind what he says one bit. If it meant saving the race and that was the only way I’d willing authorize the murder of the appendage I’m on including myself. What is death? It is nothing. Everything dies. Only peoples can live for ever. Only peoples are worth living and dying for.

    That said, he isn’t right or it wouldn’t help any if he was. Fender’s a bit of a roller coaster. Bit up and down. A mood swinger. But I respect that about fender, because through it I can see how emotional this is for him. And that means and matters a lot more than words

  60. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 14, 2013 - 7:12 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:

    I know this one. Borderline weird. :)

    But compared to the psychopathological, narsisstic and on-going Jewish attack, nothing is too weird.

    I am a great believer in distributing and spreading the information. I myself did not realize this threat a coupe of years ago, but then I happened to read something about the Hollywood and Jews and I started watching the films with a critical eye and lo and behold ! I noticed that they simply sick, those Hollywood Jews. I mean, nowhere in the world, ever, has such garbage been taken as close to reality.

    Now they are trying to justify torture and drones etc. I mean, Stalin was a nice guy compared to these crazy zionists. Not to even mention the other guy from the times of Stalin…

    And they are so very, very cunning.

    Have you noticed this, or instance:

    All Hollywood films always and consistently portrait county people as stupid, backwards and downright evil. It is as a rule. Then, of course, people are encouraged to move to Big Cities, i.e. Jewish Citadels, where zionists can brainwash the newcomers into “multicultural” dreamland, provided you are not killed or raped before that… :)

    Never, not even once, have they made a film, where a Jew would be a bad guy. A zionist has never been seen in Hollywood. Israel does not exist, let alone Palestine.

    But bad muslims, boy, do they exist ? Oh, man, the world is full of them. In SpielbergLand Nazis are a plenty, but a bad Jew? It is more rare than a honest Jew… And that is much said. :)

    Oh yes, my eyes have opened and many thanks to these pages. They are brilliant, the people here are brilliant.

    So, no worries. It is 15 million against 6500 million and it has only started.:)

  61. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 14, 2013 - 6:56 am | Permalink

    @JPLex: My pleasure.

    A second reply to you (on this media topic) is still stuck in TOO Moderation. With luck, should be freed within 2 more hours. It contains another link to someone on-line I hope you will take seriously … despite the strange garb he wears (Orthodox Christian Monk). His pithy, analytical videos are consistently amongst the best to be found anywhere on the Web. He’s had over 2.5 million hits.

  62. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 14, 2013 - 6:28 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    Thank You, my friend. Most informative.

    I must say I am surprised about AlJazeera… I, on the other hand, do not much trust Russia Today, although, of course, it is much better than any U.S. media. Russia, as a country, is OK, it is very resilient against Jewsih influence, but media, one cannot be sure… There money talks, and we all know what that means.

    Iran. Agreed. – India. Very interesting.

    We really are living in darkness in the West… Unbelievable. They do it time after time. They never rest… But hey, there is still hope. My country is rather, if not totally clean. Small, but clean. Admittedly, under threat and so on, but our people are well educated and hence not so easy to lead into total darkness.

    Yes, I quite think that we will prevail. :)

  63. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 14, 2013 - 5:59 am | Permalink

    @JPLex: As you are (presumably) an American (I am not) then I think you will benefit immensely by learning of this remarkably brave and intelligent man (an ex-Jew but now an Orthodox Christian Monk). His name is Brother Nathanael Kapner.

    He operates his own website at:

    Here he is being interviewed in Times Square: in the bowels of the Devil’s Lair, during one of his publicity visits:

    You would do well to donate $10.00 (or more) to his noble cause. If more Americans had a backbone like Brother Nathanael’s, then there wouldn’t be much of a problem today with the likes of the Federal Reserve, and Goldman Sachs, and the ADL, et al.

  64. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 14, 2013 - 5:26 am | Permalink

    @JPLex: Yes, Japan. He initially arrived in-country to teach English. Then he had an epiphany following 2001, and after he “woke up” to the reality of the CIA/Mossad/MI6/NeoCon conceived WTC false-flag.

    No … no mainstream media publication or institution is now ‘clean’. Were they ever?? They all disseminate globalist ‘filth’. They exist to implement the Protocols of Zion. Nothing more. Corporate records confirm about 80 percent are owned, ultimately, by the Rothschild dynasty and their allies (the original authors or sponsors of the Protocols).

    The MSM’s remaining 20 percent presumably cower in fear of reprisal.

    The only remotely ‘clean’ + informative newspapers left are those published in Pakistan and India, for which you will need Urdu or Hindi. Al-Jazeera is NOT clean … most of its Editorial staff were trained by the BBC in London. Perhaps I can recommend you visit regularly the Times of India website, which is published in English. Aside from independent newsblogs such as the Corbett Report, the Times of India is about the closest you are going to get.

    Oh yes, and go to Russia Today is pretty damned good. is also excellent —- the English version of Iranian television —- but NATO countries have been trying to restrict their broadcasts of late because it was being too accurate and truthful. You may have difficulty connecting to from the USA. But try!

    Get yourself a VPN. If you don’t yet know what that is, then look it up!

    As regards your proposed list (David Horowitz — with his FrontPage Magazine — organized something similar to chart the spider’s web that is the ‘Hard Left’ in American politics) why don’t you attempt to organise one yourself? Just set up a Blog (using WordPress or Blogger) and set one up … slowly if necessary.

    Acquire a self-realizing purpose for your life: a reason for looking into your future.

    Be the change you want to see!

  65. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 14, 2013 - 3:41 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:


    Did I hear right, did this guy say that he is broadcasting from Japan? I must have heard wrong…

    Very interesting, must get to know this page.

    Still, I do insist: Why is it not worthwhile for some organization to collect genuine and precise information about the owners of media, Hollywood, banks etc. ? It looks to me that the data would be so one-sided that there would be no need to apologize after seeing it?

    I mean, it is really so, is it not, that all U.S. newspapers with any reasonable circulation are owned and controlled by Jews? Is there even one clean? Just one. Please. :)

  66. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 14, 2013 - 2:42 am | Permalink


    So tell me, where should I go in USA to get reliable information?

    Try this excellent Channel on JewTube operated by a Canadian:

  67. January 14, 2013 - 2:05 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    Alice, there are many “Christians”, whether born again, Protestant, or RC, who buy into the Zionist BS that Jews are special and the need to support Israel. It matters not to me what their religious beliefs are, and I am happy that they have a belief system that works for them. When it comes to supporting Israel, they are not following their religious beliefs, but a political doctrine, and they are unable to digest that Zionism has to do with religion.

    I do not believe that all, who are born again, are useful idiots, it is only that I can’t remember meeting one who wasn’t.

  68. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 14, 2013 - 1:22 am | Permalink

    Quite. Point taken.

    However, I do not mean to copy the texts of White Supremacists. Not at all.

    What I am asking is just a simple collection of information. We all here constantly talk about their “control”. Well, why not celebrate it, and list their achievements.

    Maybe you are so far enslaved already that you have no courage to do that? I mean, is it illegal in USA to make a list of, say, newspapers and their owners? TV-channels and their owners?

    If it is so, there is nothing to do.

    But if it is allowed, why then not to do it. Then one could discuss the situation openly and with no disinformation. If they then do not control the newspapers, why say so? On the other hand, if they do, then say so. They would say it, if they papers were controlled, by, say, White Supremacists.

    Tell me, for instance, is there a quality newspaper in USA, which is not owned by Jews? I am sincerely interested and so far I have not found one.

    In fact, nowadays the best source of truly independent information is “AlJazeera”. We have come so far.

    The Russian Today may be, but I have begun to wonder, the enemy has many, many tentacles and they are found in surprising places. German newspapers are high quality, but clearly supervised by the enemy.

    Neue Zurcher Zeitung is reliable (from Switzerland). Some Swedish papers are good, but most of them are controlled by Bonnier-family and hence stained.

    Finnish papers are clean, reliable.

    So tell me, where should I go in USA to get reliable information? These pages here hardly are a news source… Although much, much appreciated by me.

  69. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 14, 2013 - 1:19 am | Permalink

    @KT: KT, I assure you that as an American I wasn’t pretending to live in a nation superior to Canada when it comes to their leftist idiocy. I was basically asserting that Canada is as stupid as the U.S. is on said topic.

  70. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 14, 2013 - 12:24 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Yes, I know.

    I am wishing to avoid showing disagreement with you. Debating the fine details has a habit of descending into immoderation.

    My main critique of you is that (on this issue) I feel you are attempting to be too prescriptive. Otherwise, I accept (have accepted) almost all your points as they parallel what I believed at the outset!

    The glossy existence of some of those who might nowadays claim to be “authors”, such as James Patterson, Hillary Clinton, Oprah, and the Rowling dame … are in reality little more than one easily-identified facet of the gargantuan public relations machine, that gives purpose to Manhattan and its rotten, incestuous boroughs (no offence Pierre ~ for heaven’s sake cross over that bridge will yah?).

    We cannot and should not attempt to reconfigure normal/ordinary author remuneration mechanisms because of ‘our’ (meaning the average Joe’s or Joe-ess’) gormless consumption of schamltz served by Torah prostitutes.

    Copyright, patents, and plagiarism are all valid concepts that we should fight to retain. The real problem lies in the monopoly big money enjoys over those noble concepts, causing their gross distortion. That is the arrangement we need to attack … we want to see something closer to a level playing field. In other words, our biggest enemies (aside from the Talmudists and Usury) are Trusts / Monopolies.

    What lies at the root (of all this) is the total corruption of the entire political process in the [Corporate entity known as] United States, and the take-over of its Law and Governance by the Mafia. A corruption that only accelerated immediately following the gruesome assassination of John F. Kennedy.

    Einstein was a known plagiarist, and if the laws of copyright had been as vigorous then as they are now, then today we would not be needing to tolerate his silly image or name printed on every other article discussing physics, the atom, and much else besides.

  71. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 13, 2013 - 10:34 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Kirkpatrick is into palliative care, not radical reconstructive surgery.

  72. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 13, 2013 - 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Erratum corrige: “the only way to bypass the hurdles”.

  73. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 13, 2013 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:Some priceless things are also costless. Empathy, solidarity, and friendship – in my view these values can only be fostered if the authors actually reach a public which remains unaware of their presence, or whose perception thereof is tainted by the legion slanderers. The copyright system is currently, and for the foreseeable future, pitched against the Europeans peoples of all the world, and I believe that giving the material away (still leaving the option of pay versions) is the only to bypass the hurdles.

    The hook must be baited!

  74. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    January 13, 2013 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

    Exactly what it is today. . .

  75. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 13, 2013 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Yes, me too. I am heartened to see that fender is tending, at the very least, in the same direction.

    By any chance have you heard of or perhaps even read Cry Wolf, by Paul Lake, the book that the young and naive James Kirkpatrick writes about today over at VDARE? I’ll be amazed if it turns out to be even a tenth as good as Animal Farm, but any book studiously ignored by National Review and other organs of the suborned Right reflexively piques my interest.

    As for Kirkpatrick, he as usual delivers less than he promises. Faced with the opportunity to Name the Beast, whom does he lash out against? Why, the ragheads, of course! What would medicine have become, I wonder, had Hippocrates and Galen counseled their students to focus solely on symptoms and ignore the root cause?

  76. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 13, 2013 - 5:37 pm | Permalink


    Struggling writers often sign their rights over to the publisher (guess who, typically?) for an advance, and thereafter have no say in whether subsequent editions are published (Pierre de Craon confirm/deny, please) or the price points.

    Confirmed. With extreme prejudice. (That line was the only really good thing to come out of the original Apocalypse Now. Why did Coppola ever cut that great scene with the French people waiting for their world to end?).

    In truth, the situation’s not always quite so cut and dried as Trenchant puts it—only 95 percent of the time is it so—but it’s no coincidence that most of the authors who are routinely wined, dined, and otherwise cosseted by their publishers are characters in movies, plays, novels, and other works of fiction. James Patterson, Hillary Clinton, Oprah, and the Rowling dame can expect and will get the lips to the derriere treatment, but these swallows never spelled summer for the rest of the writing flock.

  77. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 13, 2013 - 5:24 pm | Permalink


    Read what I said again.

    “I would argue that Anglos are actually the best at governing across continents, but that’s ONLY when they’re not being corrupted by the usual suspects.”

    And what I said last year was:

    “They’re a downright dangerous race of people—basically the vicious bulldogs of the tribe, attacking anyone who stands up to them.”

    I stand by what I said: the Anglos are effective at ruling across continents when they’re not in thrall to the tribe.

    And furthermore I flat-out said that I wouldn’t support anyone controlling the entire world, and that goes for Anglos as well.

  78. January 13, 2013 - 4:37 pm | Permalink


    But last year, at another TOO thread you said:

    The Anglos are natural schemers and utopians, just like the tribe [the Jews]. That’s why they’ve been natural allies for the past four centuries. Along with the tribe, they feel they have a right to “improve” and rule over the world.

    This is why I’m starting to believe that the Anglos, and to a lesser extent, the Western Europeans, need to be miscegenated out of existence by the lower races. They’re a downright dangerous race of people—basically the vicious bulldogs of the tribe, attacking anyone who stands up to them.

    The Northern and Western European nations are hotbeds of Marxism, “antiracism,” and utopian thought. They’re a threat to Central and Eastern Europe, where many people have been immunized against Judaic nonsense due to their past histories with communism. We never, ever see studies like this [the search of an anti-racist psychiatric drug] coming from Russia, the Czech republic, Ukraine, etc. Estonia recently honored its SS heroes and its government actually prevented the dumb antifa from interfering. Tens of thousands of proud nationalists openly march the streets of Russia and Ukraine. The governments of Belarus and Hungary are explicitly pro-White. These are the governments and nations that the Anglo-Jewish power establishment wants to destroy.

    This may offend some, but if the European races hope to survive, its most infected limbs need to be amputated. In my mind, this means the Anglos and Nordics. Both tribes are fiercely Marxist, universalist, and suicidal, and they cannot be allowed to take the rest of Europe down with them.

  79. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 13, 2013 - 4:18 pm | Permalink


    That being said, I wouldn’t actually support global rule by anyone.

  80. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 13, 2013 - 4:16 pm | Permalink

    @Pavel: @Chechar:

    Germans never had aspirations of global rule. They don’t have the mentality. They’re great at (or were great at) running their own societies and keeping largely to themselves (WWII being an exception due to circumstances). Modern-day Switzerland is the most accurate example of how Germanics govern, they keep it as local as possible.

    I would argue that Anglos are actually the best at governing across continents, but that’s ONLY when they’re not being corrupted by the usual suspects. Anglos have the the mentality needed to govern many nations; they’re not as introverted as the Germans are.

  81. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 13, 2013 - 3:05 pm | Permalink

    To each his own. I prefer local not worldwide government.

  82. January 13, 2013 - 2:48 pm | Permalink


    That Germanic people ought to govern the world is the moral of Pierce’s story of the white race:

  83. Pavel's Gravatar Pavel
    January 13, 2013 - 2:39 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    I would love to live in a world governed by the Germans. They are superior to the white American in nearly every way: more imaginative, perceptive, punctual, logical, and intelligent.

  84. European's Gravatar European
    January 13, 2013 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

    @michael colhaze:

    Christian ethics and the religion is focused on creativity. For God CREATED…..When all things perished, war after wars, it was always the Christian principals, faith and ethics that brought us back on our feet to start once more….after the dawn of man… to create a new future for ourself. Unfortunatly we are never left alone to do this due to a certain hate-group among us.
    But once we loose this religious creative motivation in our culture, then yes, we have little chance to recover since Europe made this leap to Christianity with the Roman occupation. The US is not that different.
    Michael Colhaze you are a keen observer and thinker and I appreciate you making open mention of this since so many of us get ridiculed by the mere mention of Christianities stories. But a belief in man, in you and me, or us, German or any other genuine intelligent human being, has the power (emotions included) to survive extreme hardships thru these strory tellings with the heros and principals described in these stories, that no mind or intellectual genius alone could endure. (you would go crazy) There is a German saying my mother always said after WWII. “Not macht erfinderisch”. in other words. in desperation and out of despair, provided you have a good head on your shoulder and an in tact faith, you become an inventor. You have faith in God and in a future with this creative impulse.. It is not done for you…we must create our future or perish. We can use some of this here.

  85. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 13, 2013 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps you are taking a very short term view. Germany has rebuilt both a destroyed nation and economy. It is once again the powerhouse of Europe. That said, I have no desire to live in a world governed by Germans.

  86. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 13, 2013 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    I have a more charitable view of those who feel born again as well as a very different definition of the experience. I live in the Bible Belt and know only one Christian Zionist. The vast majority of Protestants that I know are far more concerned with showing God’s love in their daily lives than in international politics. I sometimes wonder if the vast Christian Zionist movement is a fraud with very few actual adherents. ( I admit that we rarely discuss politics in the conventional sense.)

  87. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    January 13, 2013 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Almost all ‘material’ on jewery is associated with White/Black Supremacists or Muslims. No surprise that the average person is turned off by this.

    If you want to understand tactics, then read ‘The Protocols’ and take note of how little interest they have in ego-gratification (for themselves). Also this segment –
    5.5 FOR A TIME PERHAPS WE MIGHT BE SUCCESSFULLY DEALT WITH BY A COALITION OF THE “GOYIM” OF ALL THE WORLD: but from this danger we are secured by the discord existing among them whose roots are so deeply seated that they can never now be plucked up.

    One issue is that most whites come to these circles from a phase of disillusionment, so they need positive reinforcement hence the constant reminders of the ‘greatness of our ancestors’… but is a group therapy session really going to do any damage?

    Now contrast to the Protocols. Not only do they begin with a sense of optimism but they relish the multi-generational challenge.

  88. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 13, 2013 - 12:48 pm | Permalink


    “The law of the jungle, right, isn’t that your thing? Survivors are the winners, nature a moral vacuum.”

    Surviving isn’t synonymous with winning. None of us survive in the end. Where all the victories of the Romans pointless just because their civilization eventually ended? By the same token, were the works of every great artist pointless just because the artist eventually died?

    @Alice Teller:

    If Whites are ever going to take control of their civilization again, it won’t be Germans leading the charge. That’s all I’m saying.

  89. January 13, 2013 - 12:08 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    In my view, those “Christians”, Protestant or otherwise who buy into the Zionist entity, are not Christians. Most of the “born again” types, who preached at me, speak of God giving them signs or speaking to them to do certain things. Engaging them in rational discussions is prevented by God telling them to do something, which can’t be wrong, because God wouldn’t tell them to to things that were wrong. In other words, they are mentally ill.

    I have my fun with Zionism’s useful idiots by asking them why their Christian God would support Jews killing Palestinian Christians. I also have fun with the “anti-Semetic” canard by asking what a language group has to do with the topic at hand, or say that I have nothing against Arabs.

  90. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 13, 2013 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Yes, in several respects this issue can be a thorny ‘problem’ for authors and creators. It reminds me of the interesting (and thankfully productive) debate a group of us held about 12 months back, on these TOO pages, on the topic of Copyright.

    It is my personal belief Trenchant that we should elect to go with the flow and support a “horses for courses” approach. Don’t condemn and don’t try to enforce.

    Some authors should be supported directly thru direct purchase of their printed works, or the E-book versions. In the good old-fashioned way.

    Typical retail prices are usually well below what any reasonable person would deem high, and readers (purchasers) should IMHO really take a more mature approach and stop whining every time they can’t have something for free! Nothing worth a damn in this whacko world is free. Only junk, noise, and pollution is free.

    I have said (i.e., written) something like this already on these pages (I think?). Those wishing to regularly comment here under TOO published articles should be required to pay a regular fee/subscription, for which they are then given a log-on code. Something like $5.00 per 6 months, or $5.00 per year should work okay. If cash payments were allowed then that could alleviate the concerns some would have about privacy, and the misuse of databases.

    But, I also agree with your stated strategy. Indeed, some authors already give out a lot of copyrighted material gratis, and do receive contributions in return. But never enough!

    The target audiences are still not sophisticated and mature enough to remember that those who dedicate 6 months or 12 months (or much longer) of hard labour (and their own money) into researching and producing a book cannot be expected to just give it all away hoping to receive their due reward through donations. This is worse than being unrealistic. In an ideal world yes. But, you of all people won’t need reminding just how far away we are from living in anything close to the ideal.

    Sadly, few authors enjoy rewards that are commensurate with their honest and dedicated efforts. All mature-minded readers should keep that in mind, especially readers of non-fiction.

    And remember also; most book titles have a limited shelf life following publication … perhaps no more than 7 years. By which time they usually end up being discounted heavily, and/or bundled with other book titles.

    It is only academic or reference books, such as that written by Professor MacDonald, that get to enjoy healthy demand over the span of a decade.

    For example, if ALL readers and commenters of TOO could be reliably depended upon to contribute the miserly sum of just $2.00 per month to its fund, then such cash flows might well make it possible for Professor MacDonald to finance a small support team (for research and marketing purposes) or to dedicate himself full time to those extra-curricula “White Racial Identity” issues that fire his passions.

    Donating to the common cause is another area where the so-called ‘Jews’ enjoy an advantage over us.

    Ordinary folk still have an under-developed sense of what is good for them, their close relations, and their offspring over the medium to long term. Most people think nothing about paying $25.00 per month to some Jew-owned Corporation for cable TV subscriptions, etc. … for the misplaced ‘joy’ of being pumped full of NWO & Bankster friendly mind-poison.

    ‘Tis a truly weird world when Duchesne’s book (priced, so someone wrote earlier, at $150.00) is deemed too expensive when in fact it could be had for less than the cost of 6 months worth of cable TV subscriptions, or for less than the over-priced cost of 7 x KFC junk meals with Coca-Cola.

    Let us all get our freakin’ priorities sorted! All say … Aye!

  91. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 13, 2013 - 11:58 am | Permalink

    We are indeed being destroyed from within. Rather than take on the fight we all prefer to blame those “other” white folks. Sadly, far more time in spent in allocating blame and insults to others than in building white loyalty. The sad truth is that it has never existed. In good part, we have held each other in contempt for so many centuries that it seemed little harm was done in accepting non-whites if we must tolerate the white groups we dislike.

  92. Taras's Gravatar Taras
    January 13, 2013 - 11:56 am | Permalink

    I agree, their ingratitude knows no bounds. Moreover, to the darkie hordes, Jews and whites look, talk, think, and act alike. Do they really think the barbarians THEY have flooded our nations with are goind to distinguish between whites and Jews? They forget our downfall will also be theirs.

  93. January 13, 2013 - 11:54 am | Permalink

    ” There is a section which deals with the way Christians softened and elevated culturally the barbarian impulses of the Germanic peoples — redirecting their energies in the performance of civilized actions, “Christian Virtues and Aristocratic Expansionism”.”
    There is a constant theme that the Germanic peoples were “barbarians”. If they were so barbaric, why hadn’t they kicked Roman ass when their territory was originally invaded? They may not have had some of the Roman technology for building, aquaducts, and roads, they had no need for them. They lived in a relatively harmonious relationship with their own. Cultural events such as the Roman circus were abhorrent to them. Killing people or animals for the entertainment of others was not in their nature. Roman historians noted the relatively gentle treatment of slaves and their monagamy.
    The same argument is made about the original Britons. Were these people so barbaric and backward that they could build Stonehenge, Woodhenge, and Skara Brae, which in their own way are more technologically advanced than the Romans?
    The conversion to Christianity gave Christianity the higher Germanic moral. Luther was merely reflecting the Germanic perception of morals with his objection to what he saw as corruption. His intent was to remove corruption from the RC Church, not create a new branch of Christianity.

  94. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 13, 2013 - 11:49 am | Permalink

    The takeover of our institutions took decades of work so will recapturing them. I find the publication of this book very heartening – does Ricardo Duchesnes have grad students? Will they have the strength and tenacity of the Frankfurt School disciples? Do we have it in us to demand the right to to tell our own story? It really is up to us.

  95. Achaean's Gravatar Achaean
    January 13, 2013 - 11:48 am | Permalink


    The Closing of the American Mind — don’t know about the others — is a strong critique of PC in academia and the beginnings of multculturalism at the time published (1989, if I recall). But this book is not pro-Western and less so pro-White. Bloom was influenced by Leo Strauss, a firm defender of liberal democratic values and the rationalist, Enlightenment heritage, and to this extent he may seem to be pro-Western. He is really a defender of the idea that America is a propositional nation based on values which anyone can assimilate. Today, a high number of critics of multiculturalism such as Bruce Bawer (While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within), Melanie Phillips, (Londonistan) , Mark Steyn (After America) appear to be pro-Western, but none of them will come out against immigration per se, and all of them define the West in terms of the universal aspirations of the Enlightenment. The first two are Jewish (Steyn is not), and Phillips in particular is having a field day advancing the idea that the West is in essence a Judeo-Christian civilization, with a heavy emphasis on its Hebraic ethics. They are persuading young angry pro-Westerners that it is all about the menace of radical Islam, much as FrontPage magazine argues. I don’t deny that Islam is the number one problem in France, England and other cities in Europe. I sympathize (in part) with Paul Weston, and the goals of the British Freedom Party: The stated objectives of the British Freedom Party are “to defend and restore the freedoms, traditions, unity, identity, democracy and independence of the British people, to establish full sovereignty over all our national affairs by restoring the supremacy of the British Parliament, to withdraw from the European Union, to promote democratic British nationalist principles, to promote the social, economic, environmental and cultural interests of the British people and to preserve and promote the ancestral rights and liberties of the British people as defined in the British Constitution.”

    He has a clearer sense that Islam is the immediate danger and immigration generally. On the other hand, he has decided to avoid the question of race in the hope of doing better than the BNP, speaking in favor of “cultural nationalism”.
    “We can have one culture and it’s not important about what color or race you come from.”
    Well, it may not have been important if the non-white percentage had not grown so much over the last two decades, and if the entire political culture had not been playing up the identities of non-whites, their ancestries and history. But since the liberals in power are playing racial politics, and non-whites don’t care about British ancestries other than the ancestries of multicultural England, how can you defend old England without speaking about the whites who created England and who are currently disallowed from identifying themselves as such?

  96. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 13, 2013 - 11:40 am | Permalink


    Today’s “Germans” couldn’t care less. They’re the offspring of those who were either unfit or too weak to fight.

    A little intellectual honesty is called for here. If your statement quoted here is not slandering anyone’s ancestors what on earth do you mean by slander? I can understand the comfort offered by absolving yourself of all effort because it has been fore-told by your guru that all hope is lost. None of which will help us at all. No one wins for all time. Every generation must forge their own destiny. Sometimes the force is with us sometimes we must face harsh winds. We begin with far more on our side then countless generations of our ancestors did. Or is it hopeless because we may not get that nice corner office or tenured position if we do not play the game? Jews take advantage of our weaknesses – the proper response is to build our own strength. Our problem is not that our ancestors failed us, it is that they left us such a cushy nest that we cringe in fear because someone may disapprove if we say the wrong thing.

  97. KT's Gravatar KT
    January 13, 2013 - 11:21 am | Permalink

    @ Mary Thomas and Bobby
    You label Canadians “stupid” and “airheads”, reactionary and childish ad homini that say a lot about your reasoning abilities, and possibly explain the general world consensus on Americans, which like Israelis, is not flattering. It also brings into question your purported concern about Whites. Not that you’re interested, likely having a myopic, self-centered Judeo-American view of the world, Canada has 10 provinces, each as individual as countries. Only one, Alberta, shares your Judeo-American outlook, due to a high percentage of evangelicals. I believe Francis Yockey summed it up nicely “it is a tribute to the political skill of the leaders of Jewry that they were able in the 20th century to identify their Jewish beliefs with America”. That jews (I refuse to capitalize, believing them unworthy of that distinction) have ingratiated themselves into America’s Conservative and pro-White movements and like every movement they’ve infiltrated will, through obnoxious aggression, come to dominate it, making me all the more grateful to be Canadian, as we will still be standing after the jews have destroyed you from within, just as the commentary on this site is being destroyed from within.

  98. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 13, 2013 - 11:20 am | Permalink

    Thanks, I think. What an odd old world we live in where stating the obvious garners kudos instead of yawns.

  99. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 13, 2013 - 10:26 am | Permalink

    Like always here in these pages, it is all very dandy.

    But not much practical info on how to survive this Jewish attack on Western Civilization.

    Well, here goes.

    First, as we all can see when surfing the net: Jews are nowhere liked, or respected, except on their own pages. Otherwise, at best, they are tolerated.

    Why not start by listing all Jews in various professions? This cannot be illegal, or is it?

    For instance, open here a page (a kind of “Wikipedia”), which lists, totally neutral, mind you, all the “achievers”. Say, one list could be: Hollywood studios and owners. Second could be FED banks and owners, third could be U.S. Media and owners.

    The list can go on and on: The U.S. military help to Israel.

    Pure, clean info. No insult, only info, always updated. Then one can argue from the point of strength. And if it is true that the “Jews do not dominate media”, fine. Then it can be seen in those pages.

    So let us celebrate their achivements and let us know precisely what they have achieved.

    Also a list of authors, to confirm their spectalucar success in that front. Nothing hideous, just a list. At least one then knows, what books NOT TO READ. Or to read, suit yourselves.

    You must know your enemy. Do not be afraid. Get close, learn from him.

  100. January 13, 2013 - 9:59 am | Permalink

    @trenchant Paper editions for those who prefer the tactile experience of the book, or for gifts, alongside a free, downloadable edition. Maybe hardbacks could be autographed for added cachet as collection pieces.

    I still think there may be mileage in bulk email shots. So far as I know this hasn’t been tried, except for small political parties trying to get donations. There’s no obvious reason why millions of people shouldn’t be emailed at lowish cost. (I have no figures, though).

  101. celtthedog's Gravatar celtthedog
    January 13, 2013 - 7:31 am | Permalink

    “What I found most heartening is that Duchesne’s book is central to an emerging wide-ranging critique of the current academic regime in which politically and ethnically motivated attacks on the West are dominant.”

    Unfortunately, such books have been appearing regularly since at least John Ellis’s Literature Lost in 1997 (see, also, Culture of Complaint, Tenured Radicals, Closing of the American Mind — the last two of which having been written by the tribe need to be taken with a generous helping of salt…) . Thus far, they have had precisely no effect on the current academic climate which, if anything, is far worse now than it was even ten years ago.

    I certainly hope this time around it’s different…

  102. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 13, 2013 - 7:04 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon: Struggling writers often sign their rights over to the publisher (guess who, typically?) for an advance, and thereafter have no say in whether subsequent editions are published (Pierre de Craon confirm/deny, please) or the price points.

    I’d wager that most who write on European mass euthanization do so not for money, as it’s clear they will pay a price for their temerity. If the ideas could only reach a broader public (and gratis is the most effective way so to do), then goodwill can be turned into financial reward in other ways. Donations, signed collectors’ versions, merchandising (!), as well as budget paper versions.

    The Grateful Dead used to allow pirate recordings of their live concerts, and they still made a buck, and kept a loyal fan base.

  103. Jim Summers's Gravatar Jim Summers
    January 13, 2013 - 5:42 am | Permalink


    Your point about NS Germany being too early is on target. For a White American growing up in the 1950’s it would have been inconceivable to achieve the insight that the defeat of the Third Reich in 1945 was a loss for Whites worldwide. Back then it would have been impossible to imagine a future President Obama.

  104. January 13, 2013 - 3:22 am | Permalink

    @Fender et al

    As far as the poor Germans are concerned, there is a glimmer of hope. People are getting slowly aware of why and to what extent they have been fooled, robbed and murdered. Today’s so-called Hate-laws are more and more seen as criminal tools used by an utterly immoral bunch of greedy Mafiosi. The German speaking internet is teeming with dissident websites, many which openly and unequivocally challenge the official credo. There’s a chap who calls himself Honeyman of all things and whose blog runs everything from the great hoax to the great new world order, and who hasn’t ended up yet in the slammer, most likely because only in the last month his site could boast more than two million clicks. While on the other hand the mainstream press is more and more folding in. And last not least, and on a more private note, I myself get suddenly mails again from old friends whom I had thought lost long since.

  105. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 13, 2013 - 1:56 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Too true Brother Curmudgeon. Coincidentally, I had just posted this comment in response to Pierre on same topic. Refer to penultimate para.

  106. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 13, 2013 - 1:50 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    Erratum: Remember, if you don’t pay a far fair price for your book, then …

  107. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 13, 2013 - 1:46 am | Permalink

    @Stogumber: Another and perhaps better (more honest) alternative is to contact the Author directly.

    These days, many book Authors are publishing independently. You can often contact authors directly through their own websites/blogs. If you state your case politely, perhaps you could make a direct purchase at a more affordable price, especially if you purchase in E-Pub format (readable on I-Pads, and almost any “Not-Amazon-Kindle” e-reader devices, such as the Kobo, Sony, and Samsung Tablets, etc.).

    Hard-backed books that are professionally printed cost lots of money to produce. If the quality of the writing and research is high, then $150.00 is a good and reasonable price to pay for something that will likely last a lifetime. Support friendly authors and they will be inspired to write again.

    Remember, if you don’t pay a far price for your book, then independent authors will simply not be able to write! You will starve them out of existence.

    Even a budget conscious author can easily spend $10,000 of his own money (rent, food, utilities, etc) while working through his manuscript! To recoup that kind of money requires above average sales. Please remember that.

    Authors who publish using the various Amazon services still have to pay a 30% global tax to the US Government on all Royalties received. That is one reason why you are being asked to pay a higher price than you would prefer to pay. Blame the IRS and Washington DC, and not the authors!!

  108. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    January 12, 2013 - 11:30 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: that was beautifully said Alice.

    Newfound respect for a person who states the obvious, unashamedly.

  109. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 12, 2013 - 10:11 pm | Permalink

    @michael colhaze:
    @michael colhaze:

    As Bobby and Trenchant did, I too applaud sans reservation.

  110. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2013 - 9:56 pm | Permalink

    @Peters: I agree that Dr. Mac Donald’s focus is academic. The use we make of the truth is up to us. We have been duped and seduced. What are we to do? Saying no is a good way to start. We must all find our own way to do so.

    Is there some new way to make use of technology to spread our ideas? Jews have controlled publishing for decades. That is changing. Do we know how to take advantage of getting good books writer before 1960 made available at reasonable prices via kindle or audiobooks? There must be dozens of new options. We need new thinking and the will to fight.

  111. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    January 12, 2013 - 9:39 pm | Permalink

    According to the video called “Muticultualism in the Life of a Society” it transpires that even South Korea has also apparently succumbed to the Ashkenazim twin malady of multiculuralism & diversity.

    I was of the impression that for some decades now the brand of multiculturalism/multiracialism the Koreans (and Chinese) practiced was inclined towards encouraging educated and qualified members of the Han to return to their lands of origin such as Korea, in order to enchance the native societies as opposed to opening the floodgates to non-Han peoples from across the whole of the globe.

    Where non-Han immigration was concerned, works visas tended to be granted rather than premanent leave of stay that would lead to citizenshp.

    Has this ruling changed and if so, how recently?

  112. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    January 12, 2013 - 8:57 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know enough about it. Here is some more info:

    The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield’s role was to re-write the King James Version of the Bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press used Scofield, a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed such as man for a front. The revised bible was called the Scofield Reference Bible, and with limitless advertising and promotion, it became a best-selling “bible” in America and has remained so for 90 years.

    The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation, subverting minor passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King James Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new worship icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet exist, but which was already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded authors of World Zionism.

  113. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2013 - 8:52 pm | Permalink

    @TabuLa Raza:
    That explains the corruption of leaders. That was my point, following the leader is not supposed to be the Protestant way.

  114. January 12, 2013 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    @michael colhaze:

    You are partly right. The violent Yang of the classical culture needed some balancing Yin. Alas, recently Christianity has swung the pendulum to the farthest Yin and both Christians and Neochristians (the secular humanists) consider a mortal sin the most elemental defense of one’s own ethny. We now need the pendulum to swing to the other, Yang extreme so that our nations may be reclaimed (and have an Aristotelian golden mean between the two extremes later in the future).

  115. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2013 - 8:29 pm | Permalink

    @TabuLa Raza: On Scofield, I’ve read the Canfield book, which was so so. Do you have any recommendations?

  116. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2013 - 8:23 pm | Permalink

    @fender: The law of the jungle, right, isn’t that your thing? Survivors are the winners, nature a moral vacuum.

  117. Pendrake's Gravatar Pendrake
    January 12, 2013 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

    @michael colhaze: Yes, and after Europe was “Christianized” the European peoples lived happily ever after in blissful peace and harmony.
    Get real!

  118. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 12, 2013 - 7:35 pm | Permalink


    “Or, could it be they are the offspring that has had their brains throughly “washed”, in the same way and by the same people that Americans have?”

    The ones who resisted the shame of denazification were either killed outright or sent to death camps in the USSR. Hundreds of thousands more, Germany’s best and brightest, were melted in the terror bombing of Dresden, Europe’s most beautiful city. Millions more died in the expulsions and forced starvations in the Allied camps.

    I’m sure there are still many creative and intelligent people in Germany, but I think what happened to them in 1945 was such a blow to their spirit that they won’t ever recover. I hope I’m wrong though.

    @Alice Teller:

    I’m not slandering my or anyone’s else’s ancestors. I don’t blame the Germans for losing. There was basically no way for them to win. Severeal years before the war broke out, Spengler himself said that he’d be surprised if the Reich was still standing in ten year’s time.

    In fact it’s amazing that 20th century men ever built such a civilization to begin with. It was so late in hour, to use a Spenglerian talking point again. When we look around ourselves today are we even capable of imagining an Albert Speer or Arno Breker? It’s as if they were spirits resurrected from a different century, a younger century.

    Or perhaps NS Germany was too early for history, not too late. Maybe the end of the current civilizational cycle will yield something close to it in the coming centuries. I’m not sure. What I will say though, was that Germany rose to heights no other modern society has ever risen to in that brief decade or so.

  119. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    January 12, 2013 - 6:51 pm | Permalink

    Joo David Brog controls Hagee’s church.

    Gifts like Lear jets have been given (Falwell. 1979).

    The pro-joo Scofield bible, financed by joo Samuel Untermeyer.

    Much infiltration and buying of influence.

  120. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2013 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    I have long since ceased to discuss religion with those close to me. I am a bit mystified by the Protestants, who so pride themselves on the individual’s right to judge for himself, following lockstep on Israel. Any hints?

  121. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2013 - 6:18 pm | Permalink

    What is this? The slander white folks page? First of all your statement is nonsense. Most of the German men who fought so gallantly that they won the admiration and respect of the men who fought them, had siblings and children who survived them. Have we now entered the whine at the warrior phase of our self-hatred? Will all of you children please grow up? Lots of white people, in lots of places did their best as it seemed to them at the time. You are whining because they didn’t bequeath you a perfect world. You and every generation ever born. We are alive, well fed, and have some change in our jeans.

    Intelligent analysis of history and attempts to understand errors is one thing. This slanderous rot is unworthy of your ancestors. It is enough to make me understand why some people don’t reproduce. There is something profoundly wrong with any group who allow mention of the glories of our ancestors to decay into this.

  122. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 12, 2013 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Or, could it be they are the offspring that has had their brains throughly “washed”, in the same way and by the same people that Americans have?

  123. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 12, 2013 - 5:51 pm | Permalink


    ‘Perhaps Germans should realize that they aren’t “free”, at all. Still occupied after 67 years!!”

    Today’s “Germans” couldn’t care less. They’re the offspring of those who were either unfit or too weak to fight.

  124. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 12, 2013 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

    @michael colhaze: Beautiful comment on Christian culture Mr. Colhaze. Those that denigrate it, simply haven’t given it suffcient thought, in my opinion, and are throwing away a powerfull weapon European-Americans used to possess. We have allowed Charlatans and governments, along with anti-Christian groups to abuse our culture.

  125. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 12, 2013 - 4:48 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: Same thing I’ve noticed about the “airhead” Canadians.

  126. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 12, 2013 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

    @Gerd Reinhard: Perhaps Germans should realize that they aren’t “free”, at all. Still occupied after 67 years!!

  127. Schoenbach's Gravatar Schoenbach
    January 12, 2013 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Sorry for interruption,
    I’m interested in that movie posted on TOO few days ago about imminence of “brownification” and with short interviews, in which author ask blacks about their stance on immigration. If someone could provide a link (last time I only catched a glimpse of it – was it a part of a larger material?), I would be much obliged.

  128. January 12, 2013 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:

    That’s my impression on the Chinese I have met too. What impressed me was their absolute capacity to grasp chess ideas quickly. But if you try to converse with them on politics they look like average people. Certainly IQ tests measure left hemisphere abilities.

    Oliver Sacks has made a valid point: neurologists have disregarded the right hemisphere of the brain. While I felt like light years ahead of my Asian friends as to judgment, I felt that they surpassed whites on the technical professions.

    All of this is anecdotal of course.

  129. Gerd Reinhard's Gravatar Gerd Reinhard
    January 12, 2013 - 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Hallo Fender,
    for me it is cristal clear, that Germany has no legitimate Goverment. I know about the restrictive covenants called Shaef and the Chancellor paper to sign by our ” head ” of Zionist Occupied Goverment in Washington .

  130. Stogumber's Gravatar Stogumber
    January 12, 2013 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Dear Prof. MacDonald,

    how do you account for the enormous difference between vibrant and stagnat periods in one and the same region?
    For example, Northwest Europe may have been on a good way since the Middle Ages, and Africa has never got much civilised. But China in the first century B.C. was vibrant, and also the Orient in the Middle Ages; and both regions lost speed and became stagnant afterwards.

  131. Stogumber's Gravatar Stogumber
    January 12, 2013 - 2:16 pm | Permalink

    As for books’ prices, I suppose that most authors just need the money as a recompensation for the time lost. I’d propose that some people join, buy the books together, share the cost and co-found a local library for the rightwing/nationalist public.
    It has been done before: first by “enlightened” communities in the 18th century, then by religious communities – and we can learn a lot from the techniques of religious communities!
    I know about such a library project in Germany, and I’m very interested to hear if there are any similar projects alsewhere.

  132. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 12, 2013 - 1:05 pm | Permalink


    But , it is just crazy that when someone writes about something that is blatantly obvious about a subject that is all important and it is some how “bold” or “rare”.

    Wacky world we live in.

  133. January 12, 2013 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    Henry Ford, in reference to the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is reported to have noted that, forgery or not, it fits what is happening today.

    This is even more true 800 years later.

  134. January 12, 2013 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes: Almost 60 years ago, my Sunday school teachers were more blunt: The Jews broke their covenant with God, therefore they are no longer chosen; God created a new covenant through Jesus, which makes Christians the chosen people.

    Can’t sat that now, the thought police may be on the lookout.

  135. January 12, 2013 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas:
    I would agree with you that most Canadians on the net are so inclined. However, there is a strong undercurrent in real life that sees that the more waves of Filipinos, Indians, Pakistanis, Chinese, Somalis, Ethiopians, Tamils, etc. have turned our once peaceful, safe cities into sewers full of vermin.

  136. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 12, 2013 - 12:04 pm | Permalink

    @Jim Summers:

    Blame the Romans for not ending their religion 2,000 years ago when Judea was fully conquered and occupied.

    @Gerd Reinhard:

    Hate to break it to you, but you have no country. The government ruling over ethnic Germans in the region called “Germany” today is no more legitimate than our government.

  137. January 12, 2013 - 11:10 am | Permalink

    @ Achaean

    “Medieval Christianity did not suppress the aggressive aristocratic instincts of Western man knowing how essential they were to the survival of Christendom. ”

    This is very well said! And the same agressive aristrocratic instincts, well tempered with a spot of Christian compassion, are needed right now to secure the survival of the White race. Who ever said a dedicated Christian can’t be a great warrior?

  138. Gerd Reinhard's Gravatar Gerd Reinhard
    January 12, 2013 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    I envy You !
    Your sentence, multiculturalism is an anti- European / anti – Aryan concept, designed to destroy our race and civilization outspoken in Germany in the presence of three people, will bring you to jail ! Paragraph 130 incitement of people, so to pass out this truth is quiet exhausting and most of my countrymen are afraid to speak out what they really think.

  139. Achaean's Gravatar Achaean
    January 12, 2013 - 8:09 am | Permalink

    I am with Colhaze on the immense importance of Christianity but will add that Uniqueness acknowledges this; in the Preface the Catholic world historian is mentioned as very influential in Duchesne’s thinking about the West as a Indo-European-Classical-Christian culture. There is a section which deals with the way Christians softened and elevated culturally the barbarian impulses of the Germanic peoples — redirecting their energies in the performance of civilized actions, “Christian Virtues and Aristocratic Expansionism”. Clearly, the emphasis of the book is on the role of the aristocratic IEs. No one talks about the IEs, Aryans, as the progenitors of the West; this books brings them into the center, and then argues that they were the primordial agents of Western greatness; very important and very disquieting to the Jews.

    I disagree with the use of the term “Judeo-Christian” in the Preface, but this book is not endorsing the current efforts of Neocons to elevate Judaism into a central component of the West. I know there are individuals here who view Christianity negatively, and they have legitimate reasons, but it is worth keeping in mind that Christianity has nothing to do with Judaism; the latter developed later with the Talmudic writings. The immense achievements of Medieval Christians, their invention of universities, autonomous cities, Canon law, and every other law we recognize as “modern,” the scholastic method, etc, etc, was not due to “JUDEO-Chistianity”. The Jews were not even participants in the West (except as money lenders) before the 1800s, but more importantly it was the specifically Christian ennoblement of the material world, nature and man and history, that gave Christians a belief that this-world was meaningful and that humans were here to make something of God’s creation. The image in the Sistine Ceiling, the Creation of Adam, is incomprehensible outside Christianity; it could not have been produced by a believer in Judaism or Islam; neither of these religions understands what Christians mean by the instillation of divine power in humans, the Incarnation. In this image the right hand of the Lord is revealed almost touching Adam’s, which symbolizes the link between the earthly humans and God, without denying the transcendental as a source of inspiration. Medieval Christianity did not suppress the aggressive aristocratic instincts of Western man knowing how essential they were to the survival of Christendom.

  140. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2013 - 6:40 am | Permalink

    @michael colhaze: Amen.

  141. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 5:05 am | Permalink

    @Richard: “Liberal” … aka Limp Wristed.

  142. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 5:05 am | Permalink

    @Richard: “Liberal” … aka Limp Wristed.

  143. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 5:01 am | Permalink

    @Chechar: Can’t comment accurately about Chinese engineers, but I have worked with Japanese, Filipino, Indian, Singaporean, Korean, and Thai ‘engineers’.

    Nothing special! Nothing special at all. For example, after working for a Japanese Oil Company my assessment of Japanese intelligence plummeted. The Japanese are great to work with, and really fine people. But they have more than their fair share of idiots. They are really skilled at “keeping their heads down” so to speak.

    And as far as Indian ‘engineers’ are concerned, they are almost universally a corrupt joke. They get by, by stealing information from the Internet, and banding together via e-mail. To attempt to call any Indian an ‘Engineer’ is to transgress the “Trade Descriptions Act”.

  144. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 4:46 am | Permalink

    @fender: True indeed. I hope your insights will be appreciated by more of those too busy to think.

    Here is some background support info:

    REF: “A Racial Program for the 20th Century” (pub. 1912) by Israel Cohen.

    “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

    Rep. Thomas Abernathy read this passage into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957 (Vol. 103, p. 8559, top of page).

    Wikipedia tells you Abernathy read the quotation in a Letter to the Editor of the Washington Star, and the newspaper subsequently determined it was a hoax and apologized. “The quotation has retained some popularity among racists and anti-Semites to this day,” Wikipedia chortles.

    I [Henry Makow] have subsequently added this line to the Wiki entry:

    “However, the author fits the description of Israel Cohen (1879-1961) a prolific Zionist author who wrote the Foreword to Israel Zangwill’s “The Schnorrers” as well as 30 other books. Like many purported “hoaxes,” the quotation does describe events as they subsequently unfolded and the operations of the US Communist Party.”

    Cohen was the General Secretary of the World Zionist Organization.

    Hat Tip: Henry Makow ::

  145. Jim Summers's Gravatar Jim Summers
    January 12, 2013 - 3:26 am | Permalink


    America didn’t have to permit the Frankfurt School to enter this country. The government could have sent them packing once again. The same thing can be said for the massive flood of Jewish immigration from 1881-1920 into the United States. Why did the U.S. government allow this? Should we blame the Russian Tsars for allowing the Jews in Russia to emigrate?

  146. January 12, 2013 - 2:08 am | Permalink

    What I find somewhat half-baked if not inept is that all these highly sophisticated observations about the Western (or Northern) cultural achievements refuse to recognize, or rather tiptoe around it, the enormous impetus of Christian ethics that spawned our uniqueness and grandeur as a race. Without an exalted vision of the great humaneness at the heart of things we would have remained sophisticated barbarians like the Old Greeks who gave us Aristotle, but were perfectly at ease with sacking and looting the next city state, murdering the males and infirm while selling the rest into slavery.

  147. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 12, 2013 - 12:30 am | Permalink

    Bam!! Salters speech should be played in every school system in the U.S. But of course, a snowflake would have a better chance in hell than that happeining.

  148. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 12, 2013 - 12:28 am | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: Yeah, maybe I’m being pessimistic, but I think we’re already past the point of no return in North America and Europe, consequently I resign myself to hoping for some schadenfreude when Jews and Leftists are turned on by their non-European allies of convenience.

  149. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 12, 2013 - 12:02 am | Permalink


    ‘The National Socialists who took power in the 1930s in Germany threw a temporary monkey wrench into their well made plans. The School was closed down and its members forced to flee to the US.”

    And if there’s one reason to criticize the N*zis, it’s for letting them emigrate.

  150. Mannstein's Gravatar Mannstein
    January 11, 2013 - 11:15 pm | Permalink

    The entire PC enterprise with the the trappings of Multi is a conspiracy by the Frankfurt School whose mission it was to destroy the cultue as well as the value system of Western nations thereby bringing about the world communist revolution. After WWI communist revolutions failed to materialize in Europe and North America which earlier communist theoreticians had predicted would occur. The workers however did not rise up to throw off the yoke of capitalism. In Hungary as well as Bavaria there were communist take overs but these attempts quickly died a natural death.

    The Frankfurt School was set up after WWI by leading European communists mostly from Germany, Hungary, and Italy to lay bare the underlying reasons for this failure so as to come up with a new strategy. Their master plan was to engineer a cultural revolution which would destroy traditional values of natioanlism, music, the arts, the church, history, the family, traditional morality etc. This destruction and resulting social chaos, they believed, would lead to the eventual communization of the West.

    The National Socialists who took power in the 1930s in Germany threw a temporary monkey wrench into their well made plans. The School was closed down and its members forced to flee to the US. There they set up shop at certain American Ivy League universities to poison young American minds.

    After WWII some of these same clowns made their way back to Germany with the help of the occupying powers, principally the US. Their primary goal was to take a leading role in the post war re education that is, brainwashing, of young German students. More bile more mind poisoning.

    The result was a new post war generation of Germans epitomized by the famous 68er. Former German Foreign Minister Joschka Fisher is a typical product of this effort. His career began as a street terrorist throwing Molotov Cocktails at the Police, of all places, in Frankfurt. He is your prime example of a Multi Culti promoter and self hating German all rolled into one. His stated mission is to replace the indigenous German population with foreigners. In practical terms, as Foreign Minister, he ordered consulates to hand out German visas to non resident aliens sight unseen.

    Naturally, the cultural revolution did not stop in Germany but subsequently spread to the rest of Europe as well as North America. We are now in fact witnessing the culmination of the fruits of the labor of the Frankfurt School in the West.

  151. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    January 11, 2013 - 9:42 pm | Permalink



    My impression of Canadians is similar to Mary’s.

    (But I’ve never visited that country…)

    A lot of Americans see Canadians as ultra-liberal and pro-multicultural etc.

    (I’m not sure “liberal” is the most accurate term, but most people here probably know what I mean by it.)

  152. Mannstein's Gravatar Mannstein
    January 11, 2013 - 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Try looking cross eyed at a protected minority in Canada. You’ll find yourself in front of The Human Rights Commission where truth is no defense faster than you can say “The True North Strong and Free”. Been there done that.

  153. Mannstein's Gravatar Mannstein
    January 11, 2013 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    @kilroy: Being called an anti semite no longer is the scourge it once was. One is now in good company of other anti semites such as, President Jimmy Carter, Dr. Norman Finkelstein, President John F. Kennedy, Nelson Mandela, Bishop Tutu, Richard Wagner, President Richard Mulhouse Nixon, former Louisiana politician David Duke, the list is endless.

  154. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    January 11, 2013 - 9:08 pm | Permalink

    Yes, it’s bad to imply that multiculturalism was a good idea that somehow went wrong instead of a successful method of our death. I guess that’s why no citizen was ever asked to vote for or against it. I can just hear the leftist arguments which will equate talk of Western uniqueness with supremacism. They always do you know….But bottom lining this, I do agree with Professor MacDonald when he talks about the book giving heart to a “nascent intellectual counter movement in the media and government who want to resist the ongoing suicide of the West.”… Especially so when issues like immigration and repatriation are discussed. OK, the language in this book doesn’t sound as strong and unambiguous as I’d like. And we don’t need to prove our usefulness and right to exist through debate. But it will likely help more than not….Everyone was so happy when Angela Merkle said that “multiculturalism has failed completely.” It would have been better if she said it was never a good idea and can’t work in the future. Makes a big difference because she never said if she wants to scrap the idea or try it again. So I guess I’m saying that the “uniqueness of the West” approach is Ok so long as it’s an aid to and not a substitute for the “multiculturalism can never work” approach. Because the enemy already envisions a post-White brain drain being quickly filled by Asians and Indians,etc. This material won’t move them.

  155. Mannstein's Gravatar Mannstein
    January 11, 2013 - 9:01 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas:

    Sounds like a description of present day Germany and the Germans.

  156. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    January 11, 2013 - 9:01 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas:
    Both communist Russia and communist China have killed the most of their own populations after they disarmed them (estimates : Russia 66 million, China 70 million). The possession of arms for Americans stands literally between survival or genocide by their own government. Keep in mind the FEMA camps already in place and the absurd amount of ammunition DHS has stockpiled. They clearly have sinister intentions. The various “shooting incidents” such as Sandy Hook are nothing but PSY-OPs to promote gun control. Fortunately average Americans still have healthy survival instincts and refuse to surrender their arms.

  157. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    January 11, 2013 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

    Please correct me if I’m wrong but Dr. MacDonald appears to have a solely academic interest in the decline of the Western world. He observes and analyzes and writes (and writes well for I immensely enjoyed his trilogy), but I cannot remember a single practical advice on how to improve the future for those like us.

  158. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    January 11, 2013 - 8:32 pm | Permalink

    Uh…their downfall just might be the fury of white retaliation if they keep up their crap. After watching the Salter speech it struck me that we are not so alone in having an awareness of what the Jews have done, and what needs to be done to fix the mess they’ve caused. Salter nails it by saying that ALL groups should be protected, including the white majority. The man speaks clearly and in simple terms that everyone can understand. I have a feeling that things are starting to turn simply because these issues have become too obvious to be ignored. If they continue to pretend that we don’t exist, then they can expect a well deserved revolution. People are not buying guns to have them taken away. Even if 90% of the gun owners roll over, that still leaves a good twenty million angry rednecks for them to deal with! And no doubt a good many of those rednecks are in law enforcement and the military. I have to chuckle when I read that both Russia and China are calling for American citizens to be disarmed! Too funny! Hey Russia and China….you want my guns? COME AND GET THEM!

  159. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 11, 2013 - 7:43 pm | Permalink

    @Chechar: Yeah it seems that roughly 95% of Jewsare entirely ungrateful and have no idea how good they have it in their symbiotic relationship with their Western hosts: they are blind to the reality that white displacement will be their own downfall. Muslim North Africans, for example, would produce far less for them to leech off of and are also very conscious of keeping minorities in their place.

  160. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2013 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

    It saddens me too that the prices of many works are so high. Even if price is not a barrier per se, few buy books without reading a review or leafing through the pages. There’s going to be considerable effort and money expended to slam the works via the review process. Vendors can be wary of stocking the material.

    If the idea is to get the genie out of the bottle post haste, it seems to me that the Holocaust revisionists’ model is worth emulating. Paper editions for those who prefer the tactile experience of the book, or for gifts, alongside a free, downloadable edition. Maybe hardbacks could be autographed for added cachet as collection pieces. Notoriety, however undeserved, beats oblivion.

    Nine Inch Nails understood the new paradigm, Metallica clearly did not.

  161. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 11, 2013 - 7:00 pm | Permalink


    Yup, the most intelligent Whites get turned into jewish foot soldiers while the dumb Whites are placated by sports and entertainment.

  162. January 11, 2013 - 6:10 pm | Permalink


    The mean IQs give Eastern Asians a slight edge. They can be very good engineers but no more. It’s the larger standard deviation that counts here: a few whites sometimes reach IQs of 152 -160, where cutting-edge science, philosophy and Western artistic creation have been done; and also the deviation that can make a political difference. My research on psychiatry shows that precisely these whites are being targeted by the System in the West (just as intelligent Soviet dissidents were psychiatrically targeted during Brezhnev’s regime).

    The System intuitively knows that very intelligent whites, especially intelligent white males are potentially their most serious enemy. That’s why smart kids are being drugged into submission through licit “stimulants” (e.g., Ritalin): drugs of social control.

  163. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    January 11, 2013 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

    @fender: I’ve noticed the same thing about engineers whenever the press gets on another kick about how we need more STEM graduates. I tell my friends that what we need are just a few talented engineers, scientists, technologists, etc., because how many people do you need on the team designing the next iPhone to be brilliant? They would just get in each others way. Most of the engineers on the iPhone team probably just do average tasks that don’t really need an official so-called engineer.
    Considering all the crap products out there, the business world doesn’t know how to pick out decent engineers, anyway.

  164. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 11, 2013 - 5:09 pm | Permalink


    Hear hear!

  165. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 11, 2013 - 5:01 pm | Permalink


    East Asians have higher average IQs, but remember that civilizations are not defined by their average people, but by their exceptional people. Europeans have more outliers, more really smart and really dumb people than East Asians do. That’s why 97% of the outstanding scientists were European.

  166. Achaean's Gravatar Achaean
    January 11, 2013 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

    There is a softcover version of Uniqueness of Western Civilization at $60 something, but you may have to contact the publisher directly for it, as I did. The publisher of this book, Brill, is not very good at selling their books beyond the strictly academic-university market.

    RE the slightly higher IQ results of East Asians, I wonder how much we should make of this fact, in light of the book Uniqueness, which shows that Europeans were far more creative in all spheres of human life, music, painting, philosophy, literature, science, innovation, warfare. Duchesne cites Charles Murray to the effect that 97% of the most outstanding scientists were European.

    Not that I am well read in IQ papers and the meaning of SAT test scores, but, as I understand it, the Verbal SAT section is a more accurate measure of ability than the Math at “analyzing, synthesizing, and manipulating information”. Verbal ability is a better measure of general intelligence than Mathematical ability. Whites tend to score higher in the Verbal Section than Asians. Therefore, Whites have a higher IQ in those tests which measure general intelligence. I have also read that there are more whites in the genius side of the bell curve.

    There is a paper by Richard Lynn, “Race Differences in Intelligence, Creativity and Creative Achievement,” in Mankind Quarterly (2008), of which I have only been able to read the abstract (if anyone has the link to the full article, I would appreciate it) which says:
    “Race differences in intelligence are generally consistent with differences in the historical record of creative achievement in the arts and sciences. The North East Asians (classical Mongoloids) and the European Caucasoids have the highest intelligence and the greatest creative achievements, while other races have lower IQs and lesser creative achievements. There is however an anomaly: North East Asians have a higher IQ than Europeans, but their creative achievements have been less. Evidence is presented showing that the North East Asians have lower creativity measured by openness to experience. It is proposed that this explains their lower creative achievement.”

    I find the idea of “openness to experience” somewhat inadequate, and I also sense that Lynn is not cognizant of the dramatic difference in high cultural achievements between Europeans and East Asians. According to Uniqueness, the Europeans were far more creative, not just moderately so.

  167. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    January 11, 2013 - 4:04 pm | Permalink


    It’s the same deal with Africans. During the Olympics, a German journalist published a story wherein he informed the reader of how he had purchased EPO over the counter in a Nairobi sports shop. Those ‘smiley’ Kenyans never cheat, of course, only whites are clever enough to do that. Mulitculturalism is the real racism – against whites for sure but ultimately against blacks also.

  168. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 11, 2013 - 3:55 pm | Permalink


    Yeah, one thing the jewish-run left does very well is define words and set the parameters of the debate, and the mainstream right always plays along and never attempts to develop their own vocabulary.

    When someone says “multiculturalism” is a failure they’re insinuating that it’s a good, noble concept but the way it’s been implemented has been incorrect, and so therefore we need to keep working at it.

    No. Multiculturalism is an anti-European/anti-Aryan concept designed to destroy our race and our civilization. Saying multiculturalism hasn’t worked is like saying, “I shot my foot off this morning but it’s been a failure because it’s now causing me pain.”

  169. KT's Gravatar KT
    January 11, 2013 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Unfortunately, yes. However, a spark of hope still flickers in my heart.

  170. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 11, 2013 - 3:05 pm | Permalink


    … and our gullibility on par with the Americans I’ve known.

    What, that bad?

    Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch’entrate!

  171. KT's Gravatar KT
    January 11, 2013 - 2:33 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas…you’re obviously on the wrong sites and in contact with the wrong people. Speaking for the Canadians I know personally, our self-esteem is intact, our intelligence in the upper half of the bell curve, and our gullibility on par with the Americans I’ve known.

  172. rhondda's Gravatar rhondda
    January 11, 2013 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas:
    Try elliot lake news and views. darling.
    You don’t know where to look, because we have laws here you know.
    Only left liberals who have degrees in postmodern multiculturalism have the right to express their views without censor.
    Typical American who knows nothing about other countries.

  173. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    January 11, 2013 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    The basic fault of feminism is not that it wants to give equal rights to women but that it wants to give women equal functions as men. If we accept that women and men are equal but different in a complementary way (the Chinese symbol of Yin and Yang comes to mind), then it stands to reason that women and men should also fulfil different functions in society that reflect their different natures. But feminism wants to give women masculine functions (“career”) in society. This not only destroys women but also men, hence the whole of society. But that was the purpose of feminism all along. It has been reported that Rockefeller admitted as much. Most destructive feminists were/are Jewish anyway. Confucius has said that you have a healthy society if you have healthy families. Destructive feminism understands that you can destroy society if you first destroy the family. Perhaps a special “Culture of Critique” should be written about this aspect of the New World Order.

  174. Karlfried's Gravatar Karlfried
    January 11, 2013 - 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Also, multiculturalism is not a failure.
    The action that is right now in progress all over the world (= the extermination of the white race by flooding the white countries with many ten milliones of third world people) needs all our skills and knowledges for the counterfight. — One “tool” or “instrument” or “means-of-fight” (=”Kampfmittel, Werkzeug”) of the other side is the play with the words, the word-twisting. – – – We must always pay attention to this und we must not give away even the slightest part of our own countries.

    Multiculturalism is … an absolutely devastating weapon that has succeeded everywhere its been pushed. That is absolutely true. Our power of counterfight comes from the “sucess” of the tool itself (=“sucess” in the eyes of the other side, “nearly deadly wound” seen from our side). Because the deadly consequences can be seen openly now, and we still have some time. There is a time span of 40 years, and within this time span people can be told lies, but after this time they are awakening. And (I hope so), this very time of awakening is today.

    I am a German man with school-English. That means limited knowledge of the English language. There are some advantages going with this. I am forced to write a very simple and basic English and this fits to the very basic and simple process of our ongoing extermination.
    Also I can see, when reading some of the the too much complicated letters from American people, how some are catched by the complexivitiy of the English language. That is the advantage if you know two or more languages. This knowing gives some information about the nature, the possibilities and the limits of “language as such” (and the use of language is part of our struggle for survival).
    — Please do not see this as an offence to the Americans. I and many Germans like the US very much, maybe a one-sided love, but we do not care about this. I think that we must work together as we (=USA and Europe) are the two biggest parts of the white race. And that the USA should make use of every help that comes from Europe, and vice versa of course. Together we shall suceed.

  175. kilroy's Gravatar kilroy
    January 11, 2013 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    As a stauch Canadian also, I’m glad to see so much interest in our land. There really is a very sickly and cloying PC atmosphere up here, which I had been infected with. But I couldn’t help asking myself why we europeans have no right to exist as a group, while we must support hyperethnocentric zionism on pain of being called an antisemite. This is the position of our current prime minister.
    This site has helped show me that I have a lot in common with many americans. I send you my goodwill.

  176. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 11, 2013 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    While it saddens me to admit it, we must not overlook the artificial elevation of women’s sentiments to national policy. From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs is a very good policy for a family, quite disastrous for a nation.

    Women’s expertise has been, throughout the history of the West, a method of softening the effets of the hard warrior ethic on the family and local level. It is a wonderful effort when in its proper place and balanced by a robust masculine role in the public sphere. We may insist that the family make extraordinary efforts to protect the most vulnerable among us from insult – we do not hand over control of the family finances to them.

    I am constantly amazed at the continuing efforts to celebrate the fact that more and more women are in positions of power without any glance at the indisputable fact that it corresponds with our national and social decline.

  177. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    January 11, 2013 - 11:54 am | Permalink


    January 10, 2013 – 4:45 pm | Permalink

    “But now, in response, post-multiculturalism is becoming a force. It arises from a sense that multiculturalism has been a failure.”

    How was it possible that our instincts were so deadened that we thought importing Africans into our countries was a good thing to begin with?

    Also, multiculturalism is not a failure. Calling it a failure presumes that it was meant to enrich and improve the West, but we know that’s not the case.

    Multiculturalism is a weapon of the jews and their unthinking minions, and it’s an absolutely devastating weapon that has succeeded everywhere its been pushed.

    Multiculturailsm is a spectacular success the way the atom bomb was a spectacular success. We need to use precise arguments here.
    End quote

    Good point. The Africans were brought for free labor however. I like the part where you said multi-culturalism was brought to America to bring it down. So it was not a failure. Very well said.

    I see a trap here where only Westerners are required to find some uniqueness about Western culture. Where the West has to always justify itself. No other nations have to do this. They take defending their culture as a given. All cultures are unique anyways. Thats why culture needs defending. Cause once its lost there is no going back.

  178. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    January 11, 2013 - 11:49 am | Permalink

    “We at TOO have cheered the publication of Ricardo Duchesne’s The Uniqueness of Western Civilization as a major step forward in defending the West against the academic tide of multiculturalism.”

    The problem here is this puts the burden on Nationalist to find a justification for defending their culture by searching for a uniqueness. Its a trap.

  179. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 11, 2013 - 11:28 am | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes:
    The truth shall set us free – John 8:32. Well done!

  180. Scott's Gravatar Scott
    January 11, 2013 - 11:28 am | Permalink

    “I’m Canadian; my impression is that Canadian society is more PC, anti-white and pro multi-cult than most other western societies”

    I got that impression too, until I read comments in Canada’s papers about Theresa Spence and the native Canadian people’s demands. Suddenly, Canada’s pro multi-cult ideology disappears like a fart in the wind. How about that?

  181. January 11, 2013 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    I agree with Kilroy and (in effect) Luke, that many books are overpriced or made hard to get (cf. David Irving’s more recent books). May I suggest that academics make some effort to ensure their books are made available more cheaply? Print-on-demand is a relatively cheap technology (tho’ admittedly illustrations need more expensive paper).

    Interesting to muse over this sort of material. (NB Darlington’s hefty volume ‘The Evolution of Man and Society’ is good in many ways). There seems to be problem, though, that Duchesne says nothing about theoretical science: what about Euclid? What about Newton? What about Lavoisier? — The west seems to have had a corner with people who collected knowledge in the manner of the encyclopaedists, but technical; as a result there were often people who had specialised knowledge which they could feed to others. (Compass, maps, depths of water; chemistry, fertilisers, nitrogen-fixers; glassware, distillation, sterilisation; etc etc), ‘Social scientists’ don’t seem to know much science. And Duchense praises Jewish achievements; imho this is projecting modern self-praise and lies backward. I think they acheved almost nothing.

  182. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    January 11, 2013 - 9:51 am | Permalink

    Canadians, for the most part, are a lost cause. I go round and round with them on the net, and it’s a brick wall of PC lunacy. They hate themselves, they hate other white people, and they agree with the Jews that whites should be exterminated. Non-whites can do no wrong. Of course, the reason they feel this way is because they have virtually no exposure to non-whites, and also the Jews have labored for decades brainwashing the very dumb and gullible populace. Canadians take ethno-masochism to new levels of idiocy, I’m sorry to say.

  183. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    January 11, 2013 - 9:32 am | Permalink

    Alice, I did another short comment to my Sunday School class which pointed out the confusion reigning in the area of jews and their place in God’s kingdom. I asked the class, after we came across a verse (John 3:36 talking about the wrath of God abiding on those that do not obey the son ) about accepting Jesus, ” How can we call the jews God’s chosen people after they have rejected his only son for 2000 years? Do they get a secret free pass to heaven without Jesus?”
    Once they realized it makes no sense for those who deny the Son to be the chosen of the Father, they at least quit rejecting the thought that the jews were no longer God’s favorites anymore, and after class, some even told me that they loved it when I brought up that topic!

  184. tombarnes's Gravatar tombarnes
    January 11, 2013 - 6:41 am | Permalink

    Here are some Tribal members bemoaning our present mixed up, over intellectualized and thoroughly nonpragmatic state.
    First Jonathan Sacks, Chief Rabbi of England, criticizing multiculturalism in his new book,The Home We Build Together.
    Second, David Gerlernter, criticizing intellectuals in the US and the confused and contradictory programs they have effected, in his book, America-Lite.

  185. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    January 11, 2013 - 6:40 am | Permalink

    @kilroy: I remember when Dr. William L. Pierce first made me aware of the outstanding book ‘Culture of Critique’ by Professor MacDonald – it was only available at the time through Praeger publishing in hardback and it carried the hefty price tag of a little over $70. Far too rich for my budget, but I was determined to get a copy of the book – so, I waited for several long and torturous years until a paperback edition finally became available at a more affordable price.

    I am now convinced that the jews who own and control most of the major book publishing companies are assigning painfully expensive price tags on certain books that they would rather not have the gentiles reading, as a clever means of trying to reduce their distribution and help keep the information in them out of the public awareness.

  186. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    January 11, 2013 - 6:31 am | Permalink

    @fender: Brother Fender hit a home-run with all bases loaded. Outstanding comment, and 100 percent on the money.

    I suspect that a well-worn copy of Culture of Critique occupies a place of prominence on Brother Fender’s bookshelf.

  187. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    January 11, 2013 - 12:24 am | Permalink

    The greatest problem for idealists is reality itself. The greatest problem for egalitarians is the reality of inequality. Thus both inferiority and superiority have to be “explained away”. Those who are inferior must be so because of oppression, while those who are superior must be so because of their exploitation of others or by mere “chance”. Europe’s cultural superiority has to be explained away as the result of the mere chance of a favorable environment (Jared Diamond!) or as the result of the plunder of the rest of the world (but how would that explain its cultural flourishing before it conquered the rest of the world, i.e. its Greco-Roman, Medieval and Renaissance periods?). God forbid Europe’s cultural superiority would be ascribed to some inherent superiority of its peoples that is mainly genetic!

    Those who see inequality as the most basic form of injustice that has to be addressed can achieve their ideal of equality only by the “Procrustes method” of handicapping the superior and artificially elevating the inferior, which would lead to general mediocrity at best or to the destruction of civilization itself at worst. But that is exactly the purpose of those who cynically use institutionalized egalitarianism as a weapon to destroy the West. Westerners who want to save their civilization should both resist race-replacement by mass non-White immigration and the trend (mainly in education) to “equalize” the West with the rest of the world.

  188. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 10, 2013 - 11:21 pm | Permalink

    @Starets: Well JP Rushton spent most of his life in Canada IIRC. Every country has its dissidents, I think Sweden and the UK have the strictest thought controls on restless natives.

  189. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    January 10, 2013 - 11:18 pm | Permalink

    @Matthew Anderson:

    “He said that the core of their belief is the inability to discriminate or to assign values. Very simple, yet cogent.”

    And that reluctance to judge is sort of a judgment itself. It’s like saying that non-judgment is better than judgment… which is a judgment.

  190. Starets's Gravatar Starets
    January 10, 2013 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Interesting that the review was published by a Canadian academic. I’m Canadian; my impression is that Canadian society is more PC, anti-white and pro multi-cult than most other western societies. I would have thought that would apply also to academia in Canada as well.

    Perhaps I’m wrong in my impression. Either way, it is a good sign that Prof. Hewson’s review was published.

  191. Matthew Anderson's Gravatar Matthew Anderson
    January 10, 2013 - 9:49 pm | Permalink

    I was listening to a very smart neo-con Jew giving a lecture on the left and how their ideology is structured.

    He said that the core of their belief is the inability to discriminate or to assign values. Very simple, yet cogent.

    We have to emphasize distinction in the academic world to counter their ideology.

    They have been doing the same thing to us: attacking our foundation — morality and discernment.

    But we have science and logic on our side, as well as human nature, which they will never have.

  192. kilroy's Gravatar kilroy
    January 10, 2013 - 9:04 pm | Permalink

    I was sad to see just now that Duschesnes’ book is only available as a “print on demand” for 155$.

  193. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    January 10, 2013 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

    Sadism is not quite right as a name for cruelty. The viciousness of what the cannibals have in store for us is going to shock. Addio Africa spells it out.

  194. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    January 10, 2013 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

    Hewson closes by asking several fundamental question: “what would a Westless world have looked like?”

    Some people believe that, without White people, the world would be more harmonious and natural.

    A lot of people have an image of non-Whites as being closer to nature, and that’s true in some sense.

    But several months ago I was watching a documentary on YouTube, about a couple of White people who venture into the Amazon to find a shaman and use a very strong psychedelic plant-based drug.

    They showed the tribal people shooting arrows at a pig or some kind of hog, and they (the tribal people) were laughing at it as it was running around with arrows stuck in its body. It appeared to be some kind of game or entertainment. My memory is not perfect, but I think the documentary showed them beating it to death, too.

    I remember being shocked. And a lot of the people who commented under the video felt the same way.

    I’m definitely not blaming them for killing an animal and eating meat, but there was something unsettling about the way they killed that hog/pig. (I’m not familiar with their customs… Maybe they did have respect for that hog, but it didn’t appear that way to me.)

    My point is, what I saw in that documentary didn’t line up with the stereotype of tribal people being very sensitive and nature-friendly.

  195. Robert Pinkerton's Gravatar Robert Pinkerton
    January 10, 2013 - 7:13 pm | Permalink

    What would a West-less world look like? The science fiction writer, Kim Stanley Robinson, hypothecated an answer to that question in his novel, Years of Rice and Salt.

  196. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 10, 2013 - 6:40 pm | Permalink

    Seems like they are telling us to reply the next envious fool who says “You didn’t build that” with “The hell we didn’t”: Truth is always a good place to start. It is really a radical notion, scholars who actually suggest we consult reality. Sure can’t hurt, Vlad.

  197. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 10, 2013 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

    “But now, in response, post-multiculturalism is becoming a force. It arises from a sense that multiculturalism has been a failure.”

    How was it possible that our instincts were so deadened that we thought importing Africans into our countries was a good thing to begin with?

    Also, multiculturalism is not a failure. Calling it a failure presumes that it was meant to enrich and improve the West, but we know that’s not the case.

    Multiculturalism is a weapon of the jews and their unthinking minions, and it’s an absolutely devastating weapon that has succeeded everywhere its been pushed.

    Multiculturailsm is a spectacular success the way the atom bomb was a spectacular success. We need to use precise arguments here.

  198. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 10, 2013 - 4:23 pm | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes: I would wager that you are’nt alone, on your attitude. In fact, I’d wager a lot. These two main stream political parties in the Senate and Congress, are so deluded on what millions of Americans think that it’s breath taking.

  199. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    January 10, 2013 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

    It would be great if those men mentioned are able to provide a “confident intellectual elite” to combat the suicide of the West. I personally have declined to contribute to my community anymore as a result of the feeling of alienation from the US government I have experienced. I also will stand in front of a train to keep my boys out of the armed forces.

1 Trackback to "Martin Hewson reviews Ricardo Duchesne’s “The Uniqueness of Western Civilization”"

  1. on January 11, 2013 at 1:14 pm

Comments are closed.