Thomas Huxley on Group Competition and Ethics: Part 2 of 2

Brenton Sanderson


non-conformity

Huxley’s Ethics and Western Individualism

Our sense of individuality is acquired by the recognition that there are differences between us and other people, but in a cohesive group ruled by a monolithic shaming code everyone is mentally in sync with each other. The question then presents itself: if a tribe can increase its chance of survival by suppressing the individual through the imposition of a group-oriented shaming code, then how did Western societies in which individualism has been encouraged and, indeed, has become the basis of law and custom, emerge in the first place? Or, to put it in Huxley’s terms: how could human beings be free as individuals, and still cooperate enough to survive?

DuchnesneThe political philosopher Michael Oakeshott stated the obvious when he observed that: “The disposition to regard a higher degree of individuality in conduct and in belief as the condition proper to mankind and as the main ingredient of human ‘happiness’, had become one the significant dispositions of the modern European character.”[i] Clearly, to emerge in the first place, Western individualism had to be adaptive at some level. In accounting for the historical emergence of the individualism and moral universalism of White people, some, like Kevin MacDonald, emphasize genetic factors (our unique evolutionary history as northern hunter-gatherers) while others, like Ricardo Duchesne, emphasize cultural factors. These genetic and cultural explanations are certainly not mutually exclusive. Regardless of its exact origins, Western individualism has undoubtedly been conducive to economic development, and the resultant boost in material living standards dramatically reduced child mortality and increased the human carrying capacity of Western nations by augmenting supplies of resources like clean water, food, clothing and housing.

In addition, Western individualism, acting in combination with the relatively high intelligence of White populations (the legacy of selection pressures imposed by the harsh European environment over millennia), facilitated an incredible explosion of creativity and invention in the arts and sciences. In his book Human Accomplishment Charles Murray makes the point that: “A major stream of human accomplishment is fostered by a culture that encourages the belief that individuals can act efficaciously as individuals, and enables them to do so.”[ii] This explosion of European creativity and invention from the Renaissance onwards provided the basis for the development of technologies that fuelled further economic development and dramatic improvements in material living standards. When the exclusive beneficiaries of this economic development were White populations in what were basically homogeneous White nations, Western individualism was highly adaptive and supportive of the group evolutionary interests of White populations.

Advertisement

Indeed, Western individualism has, throughout most of history, offered Whites an enormous advantage in facilitating the acquisition of resources and in aiding reproductive success. However, with the advent of mass third-world immigration and multiculturalism in the West over the last few decades, this is no longer the case. As I noted in my essay “Free to Lose” (The Occidental Quarterly Fall, 2011), the only time that Whites will be acting in their own evolutionary self-interest in embracing economic individualism will be when they either live in a racially homogeneous society where their group interests are not imperiled by the utility-maximizing behavior of individual Whites; or in a multi-racial society where competing racial groups do not exceed whites in their ethnocentrism; or they do exceed whites in their ethnocentrism, but lack the intelligence to capitalize on this by effectively employing altruistic group strategies in competition with individualistic whites. Unfortunately, the contemporary West corresponds to none of these scenarios.

While Western civilization as a whole has been strongly characterized by moral universalism and individualism, National Socialist Germany, during its brief existence, offered a prominent example of a European society that, like Judaism, employed a strong shaming code, and which imposed a set of practices aimed at socializing individuals into identifying strongly with the group. Noting the “eerie” parallels between National Socialist ideology and traditional Jewish ideology, Kevin MacDonald notes in Separation and Its Discontents that:

The National Socialist movement in Germany from 1933–1945 is a departure from Western tendencies toward universalism and muted individualism in the direction of racial nationalism and cohesive collectivism … characterized by several key features that mirrored Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy. Most basically, National Socialism aimed at developing a cohesive group. There was an emphasis on the inculcation of selfless behavior and within-group altruism combined with outgroup hostility. … These anti-individualist tendencies can be seen in the Hitler Youth movement. … After 1936, membership was compulsory for children after their tenth birthday. A primary emphasis was to mold children to accept a group strategy of within-group altruism combined with hostility and aggression toward outgroups, particularly Jews. Children were taught an ideology of nationalism, the organic unity of the state, blind faith in Hitler, and anti-Semitism. Physical courage, fighting skills, and a warlike mentality were encouraged, but the most important aspect of education was group loyalty: “Faithfulness and loyalty irrespective of the consequences were an article of faith shared among wide sections of Germany’s youth” (Koch, 1976, 119). Socialization for group competition was strongly stressed, “all the emphasis centering on obedience, duty to the group, and helping within the group” (Koch 1976, 128). The ideology of National Socialism viewed the entire society (excluding the Jews) as a large kinship group – a “Volksgemeinschaft transcending class and creed” (Rempel 1989, 5). [iii]

As with Judaism, the National Socialists were obsessed with socializing group members into accepting group goals and the importance of within-group altruism and cooperation in attaining these goals. In Mein Kampf, Hitler states that the greatest strength of the Aryan race is their willingness to sacrifice self-interest to group goals, and that in the Aryan “the instinct of self-preservation has reached its noblest form, since he willingly subordinates his own ego to the life of the community and, if the hour demands, even sacrifices it.”[iv] The success of the National Socialist inculcation of a group-oriented shaming code is indicated by the fact that, by some estimates, 95 per cent of young Germans remained committed to the war effort after the defeat at Stalingrad. The high level of selfless behavior among Germans during the war both as soldiers and support personnel clearly indicates that the indoctrination of young people with National Socialist ideology was quite successful and was causally responsible for self-sacrificing behavior.

German soldier

A German soldier in 1945

 While it is common for most White people to smugly assume that the ethnocentric tribal mindset is inferior to the individualism and moral universalism that has so characterized Western societies, this is a seriously mistaken assumption. The first law of the jungle states, that in the struggle for survival and supremacy, there are no rules. From a biological standpoint, anything that achieves victory is automatically self-justifying, and the reality is that the morally autonomous individualist stands little chance of surviving in the jungle. He who has neither tribe nor pack to defend him will perish. The idea that Western individualism is sophisticated and modern and represents a higher stage of social or psychological evolution is based on the naïve assumption that the White individualist lives, and will continue to live, in an environment where Huxley’s cosmic process (i.e. the law of the jungle) has been revoked. He does not have to struggle against bands of tribal fanatics. But what if mass non-White immigration and multiculturalism radically transform his society and he suddenly finds himself in the jungle once more?

Huxley’s Ethics and The Culture of Critique

Implicit in Huxley’s theory of ethics is that an effective form of group warfare would consist in subverting the shaming code of rival groups to fracture their cohesion and reduce their solidarity, and render them less effective competitors in the struggle for survival. The Jewish intellectual movements discussed in The Culture of Critique were centrally preoccupied with undermining the traditional ethical precepts (and shaming codes) of Western societies, thereby rendering them less effective competitors to Jews for access to resources and reproductive success. Each of the movements sought to overturn the established expectation whereby, as Huxley notes, each man “should be mindful of his debt to those who have laboriously constructed it [their society]; and shall take heed that no act of his weakens the fabric in which he has been permitted to live.”[v]

MacDonald makes the point that no evolutionist should be surprised that “intellectual activities of all types may at bottom involve ethnic warfare, any more than one should be surprised at the fact that political and religious ideologies typically reflect the interests of those holding them.”[vi]  Based on his evolutionary theory of ethics, Huxley would have undoubtedly accepted this proposition as self-evidently true.  According to the philosopher and writer, Bryan Magee, almost all the intelligent Jews of his acquaintance accepted that Judaism, while literally untrue, amounted to a highly effective group evolutionary strategy:

Of the religions I studied, the one I found least worthy of intellectual respect was Judaism. I have no desire to offend any of my readers, but the truth is that while reading foundational Jewish texts I often found myself thinking: “How can anyone possibly believe this?” When I put that question to Jewish friends they often said that no intelligent Jew did. To quote the precise words of one: “There’s not a single intelligent Jew in the country who believes the religion.” What they do believe, they tell me, is that it is desirable that traditional observances be kept by at least some Jews because it is these observances more than anything else that give the Jewish people its identity, and therefore its cohesion; but that the doctrinal content or implications of the observances are not expected to be taken with full intellectual seriousness by intelligent people.[vii]  

All of the Jewish intellectual movements featured in The Culture of Critique encouraged the subversion of the traditional Western socialization of children (i.e. its tribal shaming code). Boasian anthropology sought, for example, to overturn established notions regarding the importance of racial differences, and therefore the perceived need to maintain immigration restrictions, and to instil a strong racial identity in White children and a strong aversion to miscegenation as part of their socialisation. The subversive doctrines of Freudian psychoanalysis and the Frankfurt School likewise promoted the replacement of the traditional Western shaming code (based on racial pride and Christian values) with a new politically correct shaming code that amounts to a recipe for White suicide. Roger Scruton points out how this new ethical paradigm

while exhorting us to be as “inclusive” as we can, to discriminate neither in thought, word, nor deed against ethnic, sexual or behavioural minorities … encourages the denigration of what is felt to be especially ours. … The gentle advocacy of inclusion masks the far-from-gentle desire to exclude the old excluder: in other words to repudiate the cultural inheritance that defines us as something distinct from the rest. The “down with us” mentality is devoted to rooting out old and unsustainable loyalties. And when the old loyalties die, so does the old form of membership. … We who live in the amorphous and multicultural environment of the postmodern city must open our hearts and minds to all cultures, and be wedded to none.[viii]

This was undoubtedly the intended consequence of the promotion of radical individualism as the epitome of psychological health by the Jewish ethnic activists of the Frankfurt School. The psychologically healthy White person was held by them to be an individual who has broken free from traditional Western shaming code, and who realized their human potential without relying on membership in

Erich Fromm

Erich Fromm

collectivist groups. Frankfurt School theorist Erich Fromm argued, for instance, in his book The Sane Society (1956) that: “Mental health is characterized by the ability to love and create, by the emergence from incestuous ties to clan and soil, by a sense of identity based on one’s experience of self as the subject and agent of one’s powers, by the grasp of reality inside and outside of ourselves, that is, by the development of objectivity and reason.” [ix]According to Fromm’s criteria, virtually no Jew would be considered to be mentally healthy. The embrace of radical individualism among non-Jews, promoted by the likes of Fromm, was, not surprisingly, very conducive to the continuation of Judaism as a cohesive group.

Most importantly, to effectively undermine the traditional shaming code that sustained the traditional White family, and Western civilization more broadly, movements like Freudian psychoanalysis and the Frankfurt School needed to  promote a revolution in the traditional Western family structure and in child-rearing practices. This revolution has occurred, and has had dire consequences for White group interests. MacDonald notes that: “Applied to gentile culture, the subversive program of psychoanalysis would have the expected effect of resulting in less-competitive children; in the long term, gentile culture would be increasingly characterised by low-investment parenting, and … there is evidence that the sexual revolution inaugurated, or at least greatly facilitated, by psychoanalysis has indeed had this effect.”[x]

Roger Scruton notes that the assault on the family from the 1960s onwards was part of a great cultural shift from the affirmation to the repudiation of inherited values. “Wilhelm Reich, R.D. Laing, Aaron Esterson, and radical psychotherapists of their persuasion see the family as a burden imposed by the past: a way in which parents encumber their offspring with an inheritance of defunct authority. Schizophrenia, in Laing’s view, arises because the Self is made Other by the parental imposition of dysfunctional norms.”[xi] Inevitably, these dysfunctional norms were the traditional family structure and regulative ideas of Western societies. Following the path laid out by these intellectuals, “radical feminism has set out to deconstruct the family entirely, exposing at as an instrument of male domination, and advocating new kinds of ‘negotiated’ union in its place.” This radical deconstruction of the traditional Western family structure was never accompanied by an analogous deconstruction and critique of the traditional Jewish family structure and its regulative ideas. Scruton observes how under the new politically correct shaming code

permission turns to prohibition, as the advocacy of alternatives gives way to a war against the former orthodoxy. The family, far from enjoying the status of a legitimate alternative to the various “transgressive” postures lauded by the elite, is dismissed out of hand as a form of oppression. … Like Marxism, feminism purports to show us the world without ideological masks or camouflage. Its repudiating zeal is not, as a rule, directed against Islam or the cultures of the East. It is directed against the West, and its message is “down with us.”[xii]

Given the existence of significant differences between Jews and non-Jews in mean IQ (and associated differential propensities toward high-investment parenting), there is, as MacDonald notes, every reason to suppose that Jews and non-Jews have very different interests in the construction of culture. This is because Jews are relatively less dependent on the preservation of cultural supports for high-investment parenting compared to non-Jews.

Accordingly, the consequences of the erosion of traditional Western shaming code which enforced constraints on sexuality (the result of the triumph of the psychoanalytic and radical critiques of Western culture since the 1960s) have been far more deleterious to those lower-IQ non-Jewish groups that are genetically predisposed to precocious sexuality than to diaspora Jews (greater intelligence being correlated with later age of marriage, lower levels of illegitimacy, and lower levels of divorce) (see also Charles Murray’s  Coming Apart: The State of White America 1960–2010and “The Dissolution of the family among non-elite Whites“). The result has been the establishment of a society controlled by a Jewish “cognitive elite” who politically, economically and socially dominate “a growing mass of individuals who are intellectually incompetent, irresponsible as parents, prone to requiring public assistance, and prone to criminal behavior, psychiatric disorders, and substance abuse.”[xiii]

Recruiting White Foot Soldiers

Meanwhile, at the other end of the social spectrum, Jewish ethnic activists have been able to recruit the most intellectually capable elements from within White populations and use them as foot soldiers in a relentless campaign against their own kind. The practice of using Europeans in this fratricidal way is not without historical precedent. Through their control of the dissemination of information in the West, Jews have reinstituted a version of the Devçirme practiced for centuries by the Ottoman Empire.  Devçirme is the Turkish word for the process of stealing the best, brightest, fittest, and handsomest boys from their non-Muslim subject populations. The Turks had no compunction in stealing European children, mostly from the Balkans, forcibly converting them, training them to be fanatical and ruthless warriors (the famous Janissaries), and employing them to suppress the communities of their biological origin.

Painting depicting children stolen from the Balkans under the Ottoman system of Devçirme

Painting depicting children stolen from the Balkans under the Ottoman system of Devçirme

 From the point of view of Huxley’s cosmic process, the system of Devçirme was a machine of ruthless efficiency in the struggle for survival and supremacy, and it was an important part of enormous power the Ottoman Empire was able to wield for centuries. In the modern Jewish version of Devçirme, the best and brightest White youth are brainwashed through the media and in educational establishments, and trained to be fanatical intellectual warriors to be used to suppress communities of their own biological origin. The ongoing loyalty of these elite intellectual warriors is then sustained through a perverted system of incentives in the world of academia that rewards White scholars who harm the interests of their own people. Similar processes occur in the media and politics.

For tribal groups with small populations like the Jews, there are big evolutionary advantages to creating artificial tribes based on ideology – providing these artificial tribes do not compromise the cohesiveness of the original ethnic group. The artificial tribe can be used to work for the interests of the biological tribe, and, as in the Ottoman example, the creation of artificial tribes allows the original tribe to tap into the biological reservoir of the peoples and tribes they have under their control. By stealing European boys and instilling in them the shaming code of the Janissary, the Ottomans could create an army that far surpassed the manpower that even the largest blood tribe could produce. Similarly, by intellectually capturing and mobilizing the cognitive elite of White societies, Jews — who are only a tiny fraction of Western populations — have created a vast intellectual army of Whites fighting aggressively for Jewish interests.

Conclusion

The demographic transformation of the West through displacement-level non-White immigration will bring Huxley’s cosmic process increasingly to the fore, and as the law of the jungle based on group competition becomes an ever more prominent feature of Western life, White people — despite the incessant multicultural propaganda, the legal strictures, and the perverted system of rewards and punishments in place — will inevitably begin to behave more like tribal actors once again. The increasing racialization of American politics is evidence that this process is already well under way.

The real danger is that White people do not make this transition quite quickly enough. Until Western societies cross a demographic threshold (perhaps the point where Whites are consigned to minority status) the majority of Whites will continue to try to minimise the threat posed by the steady return to the law of the jungle. They will try to explain it away, or simply deny it. They will continue to make concessions (economic, legal and cultural) to non-White groups in the hope of placating the ever-growing and increasingly emboldened non-White communities in their midst. They will continue to resist all efforts of White partisans to enlist them to their cause.

The London riots: a taste of what’s to come for Western societies?

The London riots: a taste of what’s to come for Western societies?

 Yet as the demographic crisis deepens, those White people who refuse to stop playing the role of the morally autonomous individualist will find themselves increasingly friendless in an world full of enemies, until the day comes when they too must choose sides and embrace the tribal ethos of Us versus Them. The inevitable consequence of the return to the law of the jungle — even for those Whites who have been brainwashed to regard their own demise as a moral imperative — is the reawakening of the tribal mind.

If there are other tribes in my vicinity that hate me because they see me a member of an enemy tribe, then my only hope of security lies in standing firmly with my own tribe. As the old adage goes, there is safety in numbers. What good would it do for me to assure those who hate my tribal identity that I am not really a member of my tribe, but an individual, capable of moral autonomy? The White person who insists on remaining a “rational” individualist when his world has reverted to the ways of the jungle is not, in fact, acting rationally. Rationality, at this point requires group solidarity. To survive in a dog-eat-dog world you must run in packs — and the tribe is your pack. Rationality therefore dictates the surrender of moral autonomy and the embrace of the tribe.



[i] Michael Oakeshott, “The masses in representative democracy,” In: Rationalism on politics and other essays (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991), 366.

[ii] Murray, Human Accomplishment, 394.

[iii] MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents, 161-162.

[iv] Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, trans. by James Murphy (Bottom of the Hill, 2010), 255.

[v] Huxley, “Evolution and Ethics,” 24.

[vi] MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, 18.

[vii] Bryan Magee, Confessions of a Philosopher: A Personal Journey Through Western Philosophy from Plato to Popper (New York: Randon House, 1999), 347.

[viii] Roger Scruton, The West and the Rest (London: Continuum, 2002), 72-73.

[ix] Erich Fromm, The Sane Society (London & New York: Routledge, 1956/1991), 67.

[x] MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, 151.

[xi] Scruton, The West and the Rest, 70-71.

[xii] Ibid.

[xiii] MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, 151.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

116 Comments to "Thomas Huxley on Group Competition and Ethics: Part 2 of 2"

  1. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    January 9, 2013 - 1:52 am | Permalink

    Brilliant analysis. Very recommendable.

    Please note, my dear friends, that the Europe East from the River Oder until The Easternmost Siberia facing Japan is practically White Only.

    It is a vast area with untold riches and a proud history of healthy suspicion against other races, particularly The Enemy, The Jew.

    You should not fight the Russians and the eastern europeans, you should embrace them. Leave the Jews to rot and stop paying thei wars and sending your young men to die for the Talmud.

    Russians are right. They are the Last Hope. It just is a fact, you, my dear friends, sold your country to Judas for 30 silver coins. The pelosis are parading in front of AIPAC with pockets full of blood money… Well, it is their decision, their loss.

  2. tadzio's Gravatar tadzio
    January 9, 2013 - 5:04 am | Permalink

    The devcirme analogy is a brilliant insight into the American university as it is today. The concept needs development and propagation.

  3. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    January 9, 2013 - 6:13 am | Permalink

    @tadzio:
    Translate “devcirme” with shabbos goy and you get the point. Most key positions in Western societies are now occupied by such shabbos goys, who are puppets of the Jews, either voluntarily because they naively believe in their ideologies (“useful idiots”) or because they are opportunists in search of wealth, power and prestige, or involuntarily because they are being blackmailed (mostly for sexual reasons). Being a small minority everywhere Jews need such ethnic traitors to execute their destructive agenda. An additional advantage is that they always can hide behind such gentiles when things go wrong. As “invisible advisors” in the background they will not be the target of popular discontent.

    Jews have been masters of this form of elite manipulation for thousands of years. Think of the story of Joseph in Egypte, how he manipulated the pharao to exploit his own people for the sake of Joseph’s family. Elite manipulation is the most successful modus operandi of this criminal tribe, whereby a smal minority can control, exploit and destroy whole nations.

  4. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 9, 2013 - 9:21 am | Permalink

    @tadzio:
    Good point, you may find this article from Front Porch Republic interesting.

    http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=3038

  5. January 9, 2013 - 10:11 am | Permalink

    Interesting point about Janissaries. (NB I do wonder if they were as ferocious as is made out; full-blooded viciousness, as in the Moghul invasion of India by Moslems, sounds more extreme to me; it’s arguable that Janissaries were more like alien police than invaders).

    I remember reading that some African tribes specialised in kidnapping boys of I’d guess 10-12 from other tribes, thus bypassing years of growing up. And there was the press gang system in Britain; and the use of Russian peasant males in the Jewish USSR.

    One of the defining characteristics of human beings as opposed to animals – in addition to ideas and communication – is the lateness of adulthood, so it’s to be expected that there are biological advantages in age-related kidnappings, and related phenomena in females. Again of course in a healthy community this sort of thing is taken care of.

  6. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 9, 2013 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    Good analogy, but I don’t think the janissaries were technically used against their blood relatives: suppressing rebellions was probably considered a waste of their talents. It should also be noted that the janissaries became so powerful in their own right that they became kingmakers and a state within the state, acting on their own interests and not thkse of the Turk.

  7. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 9, 2013 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    @Marcus: You are quite right on the history, certainly as it played out in some if not all generations. Still, whatever limitations ought to be imposed upon the parallel, in its essence as an insight into the Jewish mind and Jewish conduct, it is brilliant.

    Although I have reservations about some few aspects of the admired Mr. Sanderson’s analysis and what I presume are his implicit prescriptions, I am mightily relieved that he does not call upon us, the Gentile many, to respond in unspeakably debased kind to those who seek to generate and reward fraternal strife and murder in our ranks. The example of the Spanish Reconquista is terrific and highly admirable in many ways. When after seven centuries it realized its goal, it gave the iniquitous Tribal criminals and saboteurs chance after chance to live in peace before the latter’s moral inability to act honorably compelled the Spanish to treat them as the obdurate enemies they were. Surely Spain’s refusal to sink to the Tribe’s level was one reason for its memorable material, moral, and cultural success of the following century. All things, alas, whether good or ill, come to an end.

    Permit me, Marcus, to add to your list of disclaimers yet another one. The janissaries were disallowed from contracting marriage. Thus, nothing they owned or acquired was heritable, since under Turkish law only a legitimate child could inherit parental wealth. Thus, the orientation of the victim of devshirme tended, with even greater reason, to focus on the sultan whose slave he legally remained his entire life. Whether the Tribe, which has had unimagined success in eliminating the stigma of illegitimacy in once-Christian Western societies, will be able to make hay, mutatis mutandis, from a similar application (presumably metaphorical or otherwise ideational) of this aspect of janissary life—if indeed it even needs to—is still unclear. It certainly is to me at any rate.

  8. Joseph Pinkerton's Gravatar Joseph Pinkerton
    January 9, 2013 - 3:34 pm | Permalink

    In the article there is a statement that basically says that like the Janissaries of the Ottoman Empire the Jews have used our best and brightest to be used against us. If the white individuals that make up the “anti-hate-groups” are used as examples of our own people who are being used against us; rhey are a pretty sorry looking bunch of losers generally.

  9. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    January 9, 2013 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

    The demographic transformation of the West through displacement-level non-White immigration will bring Huxley’s cosmic process increasingly to the fore…

    The European peoples are being pushed against the wall everywhere they are. The southern cone of South America is no exception to the rule.
    There are forces agitating for the mapuches (indians originarily from a small area in southern Chile who have in the last 100 years expanded to other lands in Patagonia on both sides of the Andes) to rise and rebel against the white Chilean and Argentines”oppresors”. A few days ago an old white couple was murdered by an indian mob in what is increasingly looking as a land-grab conflict:
    http://news.yahoo.com/chile-couple-dies-defending-home-against-indians-161833704.html
    Who is behind this? I would bet the usual suspects because a) the are ultra-left groups encouraging the indians and b) the mapuches have already set up “non-profit organizations” in the UK parroting the classic anti-white speech.
    http://www.mapuche-nation.org/
    Deja vu in South Africa?

  10. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 9, 2013 - 4:22 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Yes Spain was a vigorous and confident martial powerhouse by 1500 to be able to open up the New World and hold off the Muslims simultaneously for over a century (with help from future dynastic cousin Austria). It’s too bad the religious and doctrinal disputes led to so many wars with fellow Europeans, draining the kingdom’s strength. I remember hearing that Spain was at peace for a total of two years during the entire 17th century! France, Austria, etc. probably were not much different.

  11. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 9, 2013 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

    I cannot say if the author is right that white will begin to unify before it is too late. That part I don’t know. But what I can feel sure of is that this business of white genocide , is definitely going to result in genocide

  12. Fatboy's Gravatar Fatboy
    January 9, 2013 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @Joseph Pinkerton: I agree. I don’t care for the janisaries analogy. Janisaries we’re taken while infants and schooled in an alien ideology. While not very familiar with Ottoman culture, I suspect the Ottomans came to understand that white Europeans had higher intelligence on average, and learned to steal our best to lead their own armies. That put them leagues ahead of their neighbors in strategy. What we see with the current traitorous White European elite is a group of opportunists and dupes being promoted past better men and women for advancing the interests of an outgroup. Our traitors are worse because they have made a choice of the heart, while the janisaries had been programmed from young.

  13. January 9, 2013 - 6:29 pm | Permalink

    “Wilhelm Reich, R.D. Laing, Aaron Esterson, and radical psychotherapists of their persuasion see the family as a burden imposed by the past: a way in which parents encumber their offspring with an inheritance of defunct authority. Schizophrenia, in Laing’s view, arises because the Self is made Other by the parental imposition of dysfunctional norms.”

    I cannot defend the Jews you mention. But you are misrepresenting Laing’s views on the etiology schizophrenia. His thesis in his brilliant essay The Divided Self, and in Schizophrenia and the Family was that a fraction of parents (say 1 percent) are engulfing or abusive enough to devastate a child’s mind. Laing exemplifies this with concrete cases of parents, and especially mothers who cannot differentiate their psyches from the psyches of their offspring.

    If you want to become familiar with another non-Jewish author that accepts this thesis, and who has published much more recently, read How to Become a Schizophrenic: The Case Against Biological Psychiatry by John Modrow.

  14. Iron Helm's Gravatar Iron Helm
    January 9, 2013 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

    @Rerevisionist:

    More ridiculous anti-Englishness from this site. The press gang only impressed men aged 18-45, usually fishermen, to serve in the navy during war. It was similar to conscription and in no way like those other examples you use. This is the second time I’ve seen this ridiculous comparison on this site.

    A more apt comparison would be Shanghaiing, which included children being forced in involuntary servitude by Irish Americans.

  15. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 9, 2013 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    @Fatboy: Devshirme was in fact a far more complex crime than you appear to believe it was. The specifically military aspect had little or nothing to do with any imagined battlefield superiority. The point was to create a military force that was hard to get at or corrupt because its members were utterly deracinated—their very appearance branded them as foreigners and slaves—and loyal of necessity to their one and only patron, the sultan, who gave them whatever earthly goods they possessed and at the same time denied them any societal legitimacy. (He also had the power to execute them at will for any reason or none at all. He frequently did so.) Ottoman society being a warren of sexual and dynastic confusion, the obvious advantage to the sultan of a janissary force was that it largely—rather, entirely—freed him from the need to rely on native Turkish troops, all of whom were as corrupt and degenerate as the sultan was.

    By the way, boys were not as a rule taken in infancy. Most were five to nine years old when they were enslaved.

    Devshirme served major political and psychological purposes in the imperial sphere, too. Since people with wealth and position in the Balkans could get themselves (i.e., their precious sons) exempted from devshirme by paying off Ottoman officials—guess how many of them were Jews?—a very great many of those who could did so. What a recipe for instant division among the conquered!

    Incidentally, it’s hardly surprising, given the present state of the Balkans, that those who caved first and most frequently to the Turks were the Albanians. Their neighbors, sad to say, have had awfully good reason to hate them for four hundred years.

  16. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 9, 2013 - 8:51 pm | Permalink

    NS must be judged as a Darwinian failure. Was there more German genetic material at the end of their stewardship, or before? Rationalizations of failure count for nothing; it is the law of the jungle.

  17. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 9, 2013 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

    There seems to be no explanation offered here as to why the Renaissance occurred in Western Europe alone, and not in other high IQ zones like China. The power struggle between the Church and State allowed for a personal liberty unknown in other epochs and localities (certainly not today where the State is at its zenith).

  18. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 9, 2013 - 9:18 pm | Permalink

    Who is the Darwinian champ, the billion Chinese or the twenty million (?) Jews, and on the basis of what criteria?

  19. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 9, 2013 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    As usual, I agree with the points that you make. I have strong libertarian instincts myself. It is the power of the state which has been used to distort our own best values. We must, however, admit that we, and our celebration of the individual, have permitted this nonsense to continue. It seems clear that we must have a more balanced approach and some new thinking. My husband and I opted for an unconventional approach, our primary concern was to protect our own autonomy and that of our children. Beyond that we were fairly willing to live and let live. We fell for the notion that children would learn what they live and rarely felt the need to speak out, even to our children, about the essential irresponsibility and selfishness of those who divorced causally or reproduced carelessly. We need more than a free market to return to a healthy society which encourages, not forces, healthy behavior. How do we begin?

  20. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 9, 2013 - 9:47 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Well argued! Turnabout is fair play.

  21. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    January 9, 2013 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know what it takes for us to bring our race to their senses; indeed, I am shocked that we have been so easily conquered by Jewish Thought Doctors. But if anything on this earth enrages me it is the mistreatment of children. It makes my blood boil. If anything could make me kill, that’s it - my child or not. A good mother will instinctively fight like a lioness.

    The very idea that Jews deliberately victimize little white children justifies any ruthless actions taken against them. Negligent parents should be jailed. No mother should allow anybody to tamper with her child’s mind and well being. A child is innocent and defenseless and deserving of protection. A good woman will fight the enemies of her children. Protecting our children should be a national movement among white women.

  22. Fatboy's Gravatar Fatboy
    January 9, 2013 - 10:57 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: According to Wikipedia, Jews were exempt from being janissarised. Thank God the Ottomans can’t be accused of antisemitism!

  23. 91's Gravatar 91
    January 9, 2013 - 10:58 pm | Permalink

    What about Jews? Young ones dont care about Israel? do they?
    1 in 4 marriages is to goy?
    Where does this lead them?

  24. January 9, 2013 - 11:05 pm | Permalink

    A excellent analysis of what must be a revolutionary expose of global mass hypnosis and a grab for global domination. Much thanks to you Mr. Sanderson for bringing such clarity to my confusion of circumstance.

    Yes, our individuality identifies our differences and yet we engage, trade, and innovate with those of similar talents with a natural group affinity. I get it.

    I believe I better understand now why the adaptive character of European individualism that shares its universal moralism within its tribal group structure has been so successful in creating productive and exemplary economic excellence.

    Truly, this stream of human accomplishment is based on these attributes of western culture and for me it is an affirmation of our inherited values.

    To be able to recognize and identify this ethnic group warfare that surrounds me is enlightening and it now becomes obvious that this is what has fractured traditional Americans cohesion and subverted our solidarity, this false shame code.

    Also, I now understand the opposition’s use of these fratricidal foot soldiers (white, anti-whites) and how and why they are being deployed. This “Manchurian” mission to denigrate one’s own group cultural and racial identity through diversity, multi-culturalism, and policies of “inclusion”, diluting and repudiating our cultural inheritance is likely unbeknownst to their brainwashed minds. Their single traitorous focus is on the 30 pieces of silver they receive as reward for a perverted self destruction.

    A massively wicked, cunning, and insidious plot that most would never accept. I hold more pity than anger for these Shabbos Goy, for most, they know not which they do?

    I have read many such articles recently from varying perspectives and some also believe in a sudden tipping point, “The Ceausescu Moment”, or the “hundredth monkey effect”, but it seems most agree that time is of the essence if this cosmic process should in fact occur.

    Thanks again for a most profound reading experience and to your many insightful posters as well.

  25. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 9, 2013 - 11:17 pm | Permalink

    @Fatboy: Just so. I can’t imagine them being anyone’s first choice for an army. Despite the media propaganda, perhaps not even the Israelis’ first choice.

  26. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 9, 2013 - 11:53 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Skanderbeg was quite a thorn in the Turk’s side though. The places that collaborated with the Ottomans the most (transylvania, Bosnia, Macedonia) seem to have had the highest concentration of heretics: Bogomils and the like.

  27. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 10, 2013 - 12:50 am | Permalink

    @Marcus: A pity that there weren’t more like him and that more assistance didn’t come from western Europe!

    Thinking of that period always calls to mind the treacherous Venetians, who betrayed their fellow European Christians to the Turks time and time again.

  28. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 10, 2013 - 12:56 am | Permalink

    It’s incredible that a black woman actually understands the effect of latino immigration on blacks and the U.S., as the one in the video does!!

  29. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 10, 2013 - 12:59 am | Permalink

    The big black guy in the video understands Mexico quite accurately also!! He even goes so far as to call Mexicans more arrogant than whites!! It seems that muliticulturalisms fruits are ripening it seems.

  30. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 10, 2013 - 12:59 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: sorry for the repeating myself.

  31. European's Gravatar European
    January 10, 2013 - 1:36 am | Permalink

    @Mstr Rick:

    Mrst Rick, I could not have expressed my profound reading experience and thankfulness for this articulate article, so well and eloquent as you did. Thank you and Brenton Anderson. Just brilliant!

  32. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 10, 2013 - 1:40 am | Permalink

    I could maintain that it serves my particular genes better to throw the kith under the bus to better the kin. Reversing the argument, it would be profoundly un-Darwinian (and perverse) to sacrifice my kin to preserve kith. There’s all too much tension inherent in this trade-off; I find other arguments more convincing.

  33. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 10, 2013 - 1:54 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Jews gravitate to force-multipliers, of which the State is the most formidable exemplar (regardless of particular complexion). Brooking no competition, family, Church, society, all must be hobbled for its hegemony to prevail. If all had done as you, there’s no way we’d be agonizing over our destiny.

  34. The Goy Chevalier's Gravatar The Goy Chevalier
    January 10, 2013 - 2:48 am | Permalink

    Wonderful piece.

    And I second the thought that occidental Whites should look toward and respect the existence, history, and actions of Russia and eastern Whites. Isn’t Dostoievsky’s Diary enough evidence of this? From start to finish if you haven’t already. Scribner’s, ’49, Tr. Boris Brasol. Original. No abridged re-translated Jew bullshit. Shit, here’s a copy for you (’54 edition, one solid thousand-page chunk of book): http://www.abebooks.com/Diary-Writer-Translated-Annotated-Boris-Brasol/7251362739/bd

  35. Brenton Sanderson's Gravatar Brenton Sanderson
    January 10, 2013 - 5:41 am | Permalink

    @Marcus:

    “Good analogy, but I don’t think the janissaries were technically used against their blood relatives: suppressing rebellions was probably considered a waste of their talents.”

    In a paper entitled “The Impact of Devshirme on Greek Society,” the Greek historian Vasiliki Papoulia points out that: “Those who refused to surrender their sons – the healthiest, the handsomest, and the most intelligent – were on the spot put to death by hanging. Nevertheless we have examples of armed resistance. In 1565 an armed revolt took place in Epirus and Albania. The inhabitants killed the recruiting officers and the revolt was put down only after the sultan sent five hundred janissaries in support of the local sanjakbey.”

    So not only were the janissaries used to quell all challenges to the authority of the sultan, they were used to suppress rebellions against Ottoman rule, including rebellions against the system of Devshirme itself among their populations of origin. Papoulia notes that the life of every janissary “was at the disposal of his master who had the power to kill him without justification, load him down with all the burdens of everyday life and with all the tasks necessary for the preservation of order in the reaya [Christian] society as well as with the defense of the sovereign from every enemy.”

    Papoulia describes the system of Devshirme as “a bleeding for the Greek, and more generally, for the Christian community of the Ottoman Empire. … The methods that were used for child recruitment as well as its results regarding the loss of a vital segment of the population constitute the elements which define it within the frame of political theory as a de facto state of war.”

  36. Tommy's Gravatar Tommy
    January 10, 2013 - 9:13 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    How to begin?
    The beast isn’t going away so make it ours.
    A concerted effort across class lines within
    a fairly broad right left band of Political thought
    and nuances to have our own Television Network.
    What if we actually had our own Network back
    in 1970 or 1960?
    Yes tv is crap but at least it would of been our
    version

  37. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 10, 2013 - 9:22 am | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    I seriously think women have a better set of instincts for fighting the first key battles that would be necessary for the legitimacy of White Identity to get a significant foothold.

    Men shouldn’t beat themselves up about this. What is, is.

  38. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 10, 2013 - 10:01 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: The Venetians were probably most responsible for the situation in the first place, with Dandolo convincing the 4th Crusade to help him loot Constantinople. Also monarchs like Francis I and Elizabeth I were all too eager to ally with the Porte against their Habsburg enemies.

  39. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 10, 2013 - 11:00 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    Ahhh yes, if only everyone would do as I do…… No wonder I admire you so. But they don’t and will not. My question is what do we owe to the lower half of the bell curve? I am moved by the argument that rather stern social sanctions did help keep those who lack clear foresight on a path more conducive to happiness and health. It is a tough issue for me.

  40. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 10, 2013 - 11:15 am | Permalink

    @Tommy:
    I fear that ship has sailed. Does the new media offer options?

  41. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    January 10, 2013 - 11:16 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Hey Hey, Ho Ho, Anti-Whites have got to go.

    Hey Hey, Ho Ho, Anti-Whites have got to go.

    Hey Hey, Ho Ho, Anti-Whites have got to go.

  42. January 10, 2013 - 11:24 am | Permalink

    As regards press-gangs, I’m not being anti-English (I’m half-English half-Swiss) just pointing out the biological similarity with janissaries. I’ve seen estimates that 2 million Britons died of scurvy over the time the Navy was powerful. I suspectbeing pressed was in fact oftne a death sentence; but I don’t know.

    There’s some impressive material here. Can I add another item to the stew: the idea of unpredictability as a strategy (or maybe apparent strategy)? If nobody knows what the boss will do next, there’s permanent stress:– Stalin, the Ottoman leaders (Sultan?), the north west African Muslim Moulay Ismail, seem to have kept what order there was by erratic and violent behaviour plus a smallish clique which itself was at risk. Maybe European genetics favoured long term planning and a more settled outlook?

  43. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 10, 2013 - 1:31 pm | Permalink

    That Obama even tries to explore the Hollywood link to gun violence is outstanding given the disapproval of the lobby.

    Obama deserves another round of respect for this.

    Tarantino is mentioned in the piece….that guy is such a worm, such a collaborator. Inglorius Bestards right up his rear end.

    http://www.channel4.com/news/hollywood-bosses-at-white-house-for-gun-violence-talks

  44. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 10, 2013 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Notice in the above video, the typically stupid comment of the white woman, on the subject of white genocide. Bill, zionist toe sucker O’Reilly’s comments can be disregarded with the simple realization that old Billy boy, knows what side his bread is buttered on. PEACE.

  45. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 10, 2013 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Good article. I’d like to know when the concept of “ethics” came into play in Western Civilization. Probably had something to do with that hideous degenerate Socrates and his pupil Plato.

    It’s amazing when you think of how barbaric, cruel and unmerciful peoples like the Mongols, Turks, and Moors have been to Whites throughout the centuries, and we never reciprocated that cruelty towards them.

    Turkey invaded Europe constantly over the course of three centuries and not once did we ever try and conquer Turkey. Why not? Where was our vengeful spirit? We didn’t Russia try and conquer Mongolia as payback for centuries of rape and murder at the hands of illiterate Asiatics?

    What are these historical “crimes” that jews and other low peoples are always whining about? American enslavement of Africans was summer camp compared to what the Arabs did. The Crusades? What was evil about Europe wanting to maintain its presence in a region that the Romans once controlled?

    I can only laugh when non-Whites criticize us for being mean. If anything, we’ve been overly kind to those who aren’t like us. We’ve given people privileges and rights they would never have given us. Unless our race ditches “ethics” and morality and re-attains its Olympian, Spartan spirit, we’re never going to defeat our enemies.

  46. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 10, 2013 - 4:20 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: One of the most excellent comments ever made on the subject, in my opinion.

  47. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 10, 2013 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    “NS must be judged as a Darwinian failure. Was there more German genetic material at the end of their stewardship, or before? Rationalizations of failure count for nothing; it is the law of the jungle.’

    Screw that. NS gave us a vision of greatness, power, vitality, and nobility that the West (and the world) had not seen since Rome. It was short-lived, but all good things are. Evolution is simply gene replication; the Turks still plague the earth but they’re weak and stupid, a shadow of their former selves. Same as the Mongols. At least NS Germany met a proper end.

    Yes, it was destroyed. The sculptures of Breker, the buildings of Speer, the beauty of Dresden, the dream of World-Capital Germania, all of it bombed into oblivion by the pig-ignorant jew-orcs of the USSR, UK, and USA. All the inferior and the jealous can do is destroy, so it shouldn’t surprise us that superior civilizations meet their end at the hands of barbarians.

    NS Germany couldn’t survive, it was doomed from the start. The fat, beer-drinking peasants of the Russian steppe and midwestern America and their jew masters looked at NS Germany and all it reminded them of was their inferiority and their incapability of creating anything beautiful, anything that could inspire their fellow men to greatness.

    If NS Germany was an “evolutionary failure” then was Rome? Sparta? Athens? They all met their ends as well. Like I said, nothing good lasts. I’d rather have a short but brilliant civilization towering over the rest than a mediocre civilization lasting for millennia.

  48. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 10, 2013 - 5:26 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Germany was probably more likely to win than lose the war. They had invented the 20th century military, streets ahead of everyone else. They had technology streets ahead. They were like a superpower. And all in just 10 years in so many ways.
    It was because of decisions they made that they lost. So that narrow section of your theory that speaks of being short lived as a virtue…a sign of greatness…depends on those wrong decisions themselves being of that greatness.
    I don’t think they were. I think H lost it…the NS power structure was inherently flawed and unable to set things onto an even keel. There was no inevitability…it was bad decisions lost that war. It could have been very different.

  49. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 10, 2013 - 6:38 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: They had no chance, there was no cohesion or sense of direction in the massive Nazi bureaucratic machine, just competing fiefdoms ruled by ruthless political types. Combine that with an aloof but erratic and omnipotent dictator and you have a recipe for disaster.

  50. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 10, 2013 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Rationalization. Nature is not listening to Tyrannosaurus Rex’s thoughts on extinction.

  51. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 10, 2013 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    Every soldier waving a white flag has made the choice to preserve his genes in preference to some more abstract appeal to a larger body. Try arguing that this behaviour is anti-Darwinian.

  52. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 10, 2013 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Even if there hadn’t been a war, the jews would have developed their atomic bombs and eventually convinced the governments under their rule to nuke Germany.

    NS Germany drove the jews nuts. They couldn’t stand the idea of a powerful, beautiful, advanced Aryan society that was free of their criminality. Sooner or later they’d find a way to obliterate it.

    @Trenchant:

    Like those German soldiers who waved white flags only to be executed anyway in the dark basements of Berlin after the war? Like the officers who were hanged in public showtrials for all the world to see?

  53. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 10, 2013 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    A return to the Darwinian jungle would be a blessing for the peoples of European extraction. It’s the decidedly non-Darwinian bureaucratic and institutional jungle that presents the danger. Jews can navigate it more easily, and aliens either circumvent it entirely or get to walk already cleared paths.

  54. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 10, 2013 - 8:21 pm | Permalink

    @fender: You’ve got too much intelligence not to acknowledge that every decision to surrender involves a probabilistic assessment of risk/reward.

  55. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 10, 2013 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    You can’t surrender to people who want to genocide your race.

  56. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 10, 2013 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Does anyone doubt that those who surrendered only to be executed didn’t rue the decision? Perfect hindsight, pity it can’t be bottled.

  57. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 10, 2013 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Are you selling bottles?

  58. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    January 10, 2013 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: This change had much to do with both moveable-type printing (later stages), and the very nature of alphabetic writing itself, as a system which enables quick learning and spread of ideas. The exact opposite of Chinese, which would be one of those “high IQ” eastern groups.

    Many of the amazing things that occurred in the West were due to not merely genetics, but the structures enabled and sourced in the structure(s) of our languages themselves. It really “took off” about a century after Gutenberg.

    It wasn’t the “content” of the language so much as the nature of the medium itself. In other words, look for why “the medium is the message”, if you want to drill down into “causality” in this realm.

  59. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 10, 2013 - 11:15 pm | Permalink

    @Gregor: Yeah the Latin alphabet and Arabic numerals (actually Indian, most Arabs don’t use it) were huge advantages for Europe.

  60. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 10, 2013 - 11:22 pm | Permalink

    The Renaissance began in Italy—and probably not coincidentally reached never-surpassed heights there—a full 150 years before the invention of mechanized moving type. The work of Gutenberg and his fellow printers in truly revolutionizing learning—there are some 6,000 books in the Bodleian’s collection alone printed before 1500—has almost incomprehensible significance as a world historical event, but its impact on the specific phenomenon of the Renaissance came very late in that remarkable day.

  61. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2013 - 12:01 am | Permalink

    @Gregor: I have different formulation, to wit: “The message is the message!” Necessarily, the idea precedes its diffusion.

    The Chinese political system rewarded a particular type of aptitude (“mandarin”) and punished or excluded others. I think KM makes that point here: http://is.gd/426WdZ
    They have proved able imitators, less so innovators.

    The point about logogram versus phoneme is well taken, but I believe that the printing press can only be an adjunct (Cyrillic characters aren’t logograms, so why wasn’t high IQ Russia the epicentre?). Also, one could argue that the Gutenberg’s invention itself was a product of the peculiar coincidence of heightened personal freedom encouraging new ways of thinking and high mean intelligence.

    A little like the Industrial Revolution, it seems to have been a happy confluence of elements, each of which was necessary but insufficient.

  62. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2013 - 12:08 am | Permalink

    One only has to look at the curricula vitae of many of the great artists and innovators of the Renaissance. They are full of moves from one jurisdiction to another, as their favour with patrons waxed and waned.

  63. 91's Gravatar 91
    January 11, 2013 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    @fender:
    The fat, beer-drinking peasants of the midwestern ..
    WERE GERMAN AMERICANS, OFTEN.

  64. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2013 - 4:19 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: I think also Lex mercatoria, facilitating extensive cross-border commerce and transnational division of labour and hence accumulation of capital has a voice in the story of Europe’s Renaissance glory. Ideas are great, but without money…

  65. January 11, 2013 - 5:33 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant – NS must be judged as a Darwinian failure. Was there more German genetic material at the end of their stewardship, or before? …
    Without the Germans, the whole of Europe would have been taken over by Jews under Stalin (using western technology). Any group of people that fights risks death for some of their members. But they may have no option.

  66. January 11, 2013 - 5:36 am | Permalink

    It interests me that Jews didn’t invent the modern number system. I wonder whether they did calculations involving interest – or just simply charged as much as they could and multiplying by 2 or 3 on top.

  67. January 11, 2013 - 5:40 am | Permalink

    Should Hitler have bombed the British forces at Dunkirk? What would have happened?

  68. January 11, 2013 - 5:51 am | Permalink

    (Apologies for yet another posting).

    Why is it so very rare that what seem obviously cruel and damaging dictators are murdered by person(s) who then could suicide themselves to avoid a worse fate? Why didn’t someone murder Moulay Ismael, Lenin, or Dzerzhinsky, or Stalin or Begin or [fill in huge list of candidates]?

  69. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 11, 2013 - 6:24 am | Permalink

    @Marcus:

    I would agree losing became inevitable as a result of choices/decisions….including some relating to organizational structure.
    But by the same coin one has to acknowledge just how hard it was to beat Germany despite all of those bad decisions Germany made. It took America and the Soviets, and the British (British contribution is still up there because of contributions like Radar and Bletchley Park)
    Germany could have won. If they had invaded Britain there probably wouldn’t have been a Western Front at all. America would have had nowhere to pitch its forces. The Atlantic was BIG in those days.

  70. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 11, 2013 - 6:37 am | Permalink

    This is why we need to have a balanced look at WWI and WWII while honoring all who served. We should demythologize the whole thing. Why?

    So we don’t get suckered into fighting some land war with Russia in the future. I don’t know how many times people told me we fought a war so we wouldn’t have to speak German. I mean good God people, this is embarrassing. Then these same “great heroes” turn a blind eye while their children are taught Cultural Marxism and we are all literally forced to speak Spanish and pay deep respect to Islam.

  71. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 11, 2013 - 6:51 am | Permalink

    I just googled the art. Never done that before. Some of it is beautiful. I really like it. It’s just so…almost alien….to see white people portrayed so positively. Doesn’t happen in the world we’ve been brought up in.

  72. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 11, 2013 - 7:29 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Which art work? I am intrigued.

  73. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 11, 2013 - 11:47 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I never doubted it, nor would I ever question it. I have been an adherent of Henri Pirenne’s views since college days.

    One of the prime characteristics of the intellectual and cultural dimensions of the High Middle Ages and the Italian Renaissance was their pan-(western)Europeanism, fostered most egregiously by the renewed openness (hence, use) of land and sea trade routes (thanks to the virtual end of the Viking threat through conversion) and the universal use of Latin as a learned language.

    Meanwhile, farther east, Greeks, Hungarians, Bulgars, Crusaders, and numerous others were helping make all this possible by taking and resisting the Turks’ heat …

  74. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 11, 2013 - 11:51 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I saw this remark only after I posted my prior comment. Dead right, of course.

  75. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 11, 2013 - 11:53 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Drollest comment of the New Year.

  76. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 11, 2013 - 12:57 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Difficult for most to believe, but the Third Reich still exists … de jure. The Third Reich never surrendered in 1945, and as best as I know was never legally disbanded or dissolved.

    In May of 1945 there was no legal representative to accede to such an act. Hitler was dead and Goring was already captured and detained.

    Consequently, most of the treaties West Germany was obliged to sign between 1949 and 1953 are illegal, as the country was not given a modicum of “independence” until 1953. Ergo, the European Union is based on a fraud.

    Furthermore, remember that Germany is still militarily occupied by Amerikan Forces. As is Japan. Until those scumbags are ejected, we cannot really say that Germany and Japan are capable of acting independently and/or in accordance with their respective cultural mores and consciences.

    This helps to explain why the Japanese accepted (under duress) very badly engineered nuclear reactor designs from GE that, 50 years later, helped bring about the Fukushima disaster.

    Talmudic Amerika is the enemy of mankind, and the sooner the world turns on it with a vengeance the better off we’d all be … including, may I emphasize … citizens of the United States of America (i.e., the bone fide Constitutionalized version).

  77. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 11, 2013 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    @Rerevisionist: Yes, this is a much misunderstood fact that too many people prefer to contest for reasons unknown.

    In truth, Operation Barbarrossa thwarted an intended Soviet invasion of not only Germany, but of the entire landmass we call Western Europe. The Germans who were killed in action on the Eastern Front sacrificed their lives so that we may now pontificate about “White Genocide” on fine websites such as this.

    The resulting, pitiful irony is rather too much to stomach.

  78. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 11, 2013 - 1:15 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    “We should demythologize the whole thing.”

    No, we should remythologize WWII in the opposite direction. NS Germany as the heroes, the jew-run USSR, UK, and USA as the villains. People don’t respond to reason or rational arguments, they respond to emotion.

  79. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 11, 2013 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:

    This helps to explain why the Japanese accepted (under duress) very badly engineered nuclear reactor designs from GE …

    Most interesting. Can you tell us more? I know absolutely nothing about this—which is not to say that I find it surprising.

    Apropos the last days of the war, do you know anything about the so-called Flensburg government; specifically about its juridical status? I heard of it only within the past year and have been able to learn little about it, certainly from any source I’d describe as trustworthy.

  80. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 11, 2013 - 2:07 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    Right, let us all listen and attend to the noble warrior who hides behind a screen name to hurl vile insults at real men. Just as soon as the someone???, certainly not Anglo Saxon, ejects the victors all will be well and the Third Reich will rise again – pathetic!

    I would dearly love to see you man up and try insulting a Marine to his face – even the girls would make mince meat out of you.

  81. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2013 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    @Rerevisionist: He who lives by the sword…NS adopted policies which could reasonably have been expected to create antagonists. Militarization, race laws, strategic alliances, these could have been expected to elicit a hostile response from both Jewry and rival nations.

    If NS underestimated the power of its enemies, this in no way lessens its failure.

    From a strictly Darwinian stance, better to be a live vassal than a dead freeman. The jungle rewards survivors not heroes.

  82. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2013 - 11:06 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: p.51 on covers the Germany sovereignty question in the aftermath of the Potsdam Agreement.
    http://is.gd/d3vO7F
    It’s shocking.

  83. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 11, 2013 - 11:28 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    “From a strictly Darwinian stance, better to be a live vassal than a dead freeman. The jungle rewards survivors not heroes.”

    Slavery is not a reward.

  84. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2013 - 12:10 am | Permalink

    @fender: Says you, alive.

  85. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 12:34 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Hello my loud-mouthed child.

    Are you referring to US Marines like these two?

    I’ve said something like this before. You are full of vile emotions, ignorance, ad hominems, and untruths. It’s too easy for me to make an example of you.

    But, your toxic ‘ever-presence’ here on these comment pages diminishes all that TOO stands for. And I am certainly not the only one who believes that. Not by a long chalk.

  86. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 12, 2013 - 12:36 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I don’t think we can consider Nazism an entity unto itself like communism or fascism: without Hitler’s aura of authority his underlings, cunning and power hungry schemers, would turn on each other in an instant.

  87. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 12, 2013 - 1:07 am | Permalink

    You are full of vile emotions, ignorance, ad hominems, and untruths.

    Funny how certain commenters project so much. This is the reason TOO has become self-limiting. So much of this trash is allowed in the comments section, along with silly-ass conspiracy theories and goofball Hitler worship.

    I guess TOO has decided it wants to never go any further as an organization. To allow decent people to be savagely treated over years, and not hear one word from the editors or moderators says all you need to hear.

  88. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2013 - 1:10 am | Permalink

    @Marcus: Regardless of definition, in the terms described in this article, ie. survival of the fittest, prevalence of the strong over the weak, the NS exercise failed.

    It may well be that Tyrannosaurus Rex was the finest guy who ever walked the earth, with a noble and loving heart, but it is the filthy vermin cockroach who can trace his family tree back to the dawn of time and still read bedtime stories to his kids.

  89. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 12, 2013 - 1:17 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:

    Not surprising you would have images of men kissing at the ready. Queens like you always talk tough online. And I am ever so sorry if my punching back at this bully bothers some of the ever so sensitive posters (who suddenly show up from nowhere), who will claim they are ever so upset NOW that someone is punching back.

    But notice, they have NOTHING to say while this queer bully is attacking women, or do his butch-talk routine.

  90. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 12, 2013 - 1:27 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: It’s sickening. How odd [heavy-handed irony alert!] that the Times and WSJ didn’t write about all this twenty years ago.

    Evidently not being satisfied at having used Versailles to lay the foundation of World War II, the French and the Brits decided to use the fall of the Soviet Union and Germany’s desire for reunification as the basis for a prospective World War III. I’m sure that rumbling noise they heard in the background was Uncle Sam/Shmuel cheering them on.

  91. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 1:39 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Here is a short extract from an MSM news report following the 11 March 2011 tsunami that devastated large sections of Japan’s eastern coastal area, including littoral regions. It was published by ABC News [MATTHEW MOSK] on March 15, 2011:

    Thirty-five years ago, Dale G. Bridenbaugh and two of his colleagues at General Electric resigned from their jobs after becoming increasingly convinced that the nuclear reactor design they were reviewing — the Mark 1 — was so flawed it could lead to a devastating accident.

    Questions persisted for decades about the ability of the Mark 1 to handle the immense pressures that would result if the reactor lost cooling power, and today that design is being put to the ultimate test in Japan. Five of the six reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, which has been wracked since Friday’s earthquake with explosions and radiation leaks, are Mark 1s.

    “The problems we identified in 1975 were that, in doing the design of the containment, they did not take into account the dynamic loads that could be experienced with a loss of coolant,” Bridenbaugh told ABC News in an interview.

    All American nuclear reactor designs are inherently problematic, because they were driven solely by the profit motive after being conceived by the military. Half of those responsible for them should have gone to jail decades ago.

    The safest design (globally) is the Canadian Candu reactor. You can look it up to confirm. The British AGR type reactors were also a more inherently safe design (almost as safe as the Candu) but these were discarded for commercial reasons. The AGRs were so much more expensive to construct and were replaced (commercially) by the junk American PWR model, which has now become widespread. Unsurprisingly, the British adopted the American PWR during the decade of Thatcherism.

    PWR means Pressurized Water Reactor. Essentially, in a PWR, the water used to keep the reactors cool does not boil because it is kept contained under immense pressures (and I mean, IMMENSE pressures!). Then, a second water system that is heated by this pressurized reactor-cooling water via heat exchangers, is kept under much lower pressure in order to turn the generators.

    If you remember Boyle’s Law you will know that Gas Cooling should be inherently safer for very high temperature systems. Hence the British AGR design. In an AGR, a gas blanket cools the reactor. This gas blanket is cooled by a circulating water system. Then a third water system drives the generators.

    There are also geo-political and enrichment capacity reasons for the different design paradigms, which complicates the issue greatly. But essentially (and I know your deep knowledge will resonate with this) during the 1950s, the USA wanted to lead the world at everything, even if it had to “play dirty” to grab that military and commercial lead.

    FYI, it was the Nautilus nuclear submarine, launched in 1954, that established the PWR (light water) reactor design for use on terra firma. There’s an obvious (cause & effect) moral in that story … right?

    The WWW contains many articles on this issue. So, just devote a couple of hours to searching. Try this string to start your trek with a strong scent in your nostrils: “reactors at Fukushima Daiichi inferior US design”.

    There is no question or doubt, Pierre. That cheap, easy, unsophisticated GE design is a delayed crime against humanity, and its inherent flaws contributed massively to the unfortunate way the entire Fukushima disaster unfolded. I say entire, because something like 4 or 5 reactors went into melt-down. It is not just one at one location!! There was an entire string of reactors that went into emergency failure mode following the Level 9 earthquake followed by that tsunami. The “Fukushima Disaster” is more serious than Chernobyl by a factor of 10. I don’t exaggerate! It’s just that the MSM have kept a lid on the entire affair. You have to go looking to learn the truth … as usual, eh?

    Those who live in Hawaii are now being exposed to serious radiation contamination, as are people living all along the northwest coast of the North American landmass. I would not live in Hawaii now if someone paid me to stay there. So, a kind of poetic justice is at play, even though I don’t wish to celebrate the fact.

    ================================

    No, I know nothing (yet) of the “Flensburg” government, and its juridical status. But, I shall certainly hope to look into this matter in some depth as some future time. Perhaps the link already provided by Trenchant will shed some early light onto that matter?

    The poster Aminius (I hope I remember his moniker correctly) who used to frequent the TOO comments pages during its earlier manifestations (pre-2011) was a gold-mine of accurate information on all Third Reich stuff, from battles and strategies, to documentation, the truth behind Nuremberg, and post-1945 juridical shenanigans. They were great debating days here at TOO! I don’t know what happened to him. He suddenly stopped posting, never to be heard of again. His dedicated website was taken off-line at about the same time. He was a genuine US Patriot and a true champion of ethno-European people’s everywhere. I think Chechar remembers him better than I have done (to my shame).

    FYI, the disappearance of Arminius (or Aminus) has been frequently and loudly celebrated here at TOO, by the ADL’s ubiquitous comment-freak who signs him/herself, Jason Squeaks.

    I have not studied West German juridical history for the years 1945 to circa 1956 to any great depth, but what I have uncovered has been truly shocking and somewhat at odds with all our smug assumptions. I would have liked to persist, but other pressures obliged me to move on to more ‘lucrative’ topics.

    What I can say is simply this. Because Germany was not a sovereign territory (and still a militarily occupied country) at the time it signed the initial document that set in motion the slow birth of the European Union, then the legal foundation of the entire EU project must be suspect. In other words, the legal basis for the EU project is little more than a globalist fraud. If I remember correctly, the inaugural Bilderberg meeting was held very soon after that initial signing.

  92. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 1:43 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: My lengthy reply to you has just gotten stuck in moderation (time stamp 1:39 am). Perhaps 7 more hours will free it.

    beste Grüße
    Angelsächsischen

  93. The Goy Chevalier's Gravatar The Goy Chevalier
    January 12, 2013 - 1:53 am | Permalink
  94. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 12, 2013 - 2:42 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon: Fingers crossed.

  95. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2013 - 7:42 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    I have no doubt that gay marines, lesbian marines, even sweet little girl marines would could make short work of you. None of us expect you to come through in real life, how about here? I will challenge you, again, to provide one quote from me to back up your endless insults.

    I am a white loyalist which means that I will not silently abide insults to my kin or kith. We have all yet to discern what you are for, only the various whites you are against. Isn’t it about time you put up or shut up shut up?

  96. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 12, 2013 - 8:02 am | Permalink

    @The Goy Chevalier:
    No,they are simply following the old plan of taking careful notice of our emotional state and insuring that one of them jumps to the front to control the outbreak.

  97. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 10:52 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon: Memory recall! I think I’ve identified correctly. Chechar … if you are reading this, perhaps you’d like to confirm or otherwise?

    That TOO Commenter from 2 or 3 years back I was attempting to recall earlier used the moniker Severus.

    Having just checked, it would appear that archived articles from that distant period have since been marked “Comments Closed” … making it impossible to scan the old comments. Pity!

  98. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 12, 2013 - 11:18 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    P.S. That Commenter’s moniker from circa 2009/10 period, I was straining to recall in my earlier post: Severus.

    Having checked back in the TOO Archives, it would appear articles from that era have since been marked “Comments Closed” making it impossible to revisit what Severus once contributed. Pity!

  99. January 12, 2013 - 11:41 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    The document is patently false. Trade unions in Germany were, and are stronger than in the Latin countries. The difference is that in Germany, they often had representation on boards of the companies to inject a sense of reality into the thin air of the boardrooms. German industry worked with the workers, not against them. In the 1980s, 90s and into the first decade of this century, Germany, along with Japan, had the world’s highest industrial wages.
    As for the Latin countries, there is no country in Europe, including the UK raised the standard of living of its citizens post WWII to 2000, more than Italy.

    The issue for Germany is that its economy is overwhelmingly export dependant, as compared to other Euro countries.

  100. January 12, 2013 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    Darwinism doesn’t play a part in the destruction of NS Germany. Had it been NS Germany against the USSR with no intervention from the UK and the US, NS would have been the survivor. Soviet weaponry and training were inferior. Tens of thousands of Russians defected to fight with Germany to overthrow the Jews.

    Similarly, had Germany not been tied up by the Soviets, Churchill would have been a proverbial grease spot, had Germany so desired.

    One reason the post D-Day invasion was slowed, was that there were large numbers of French, who had benefitted from the benign invasion, who took up arms with the Germans.

    Without the UK as a base, the US would have been unable to play a part in WWII.

  101. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 12, 2013 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    “Tens of thousands of Russians defected to fight with Germany to overthrow the Jews.”

    Almost a million, actually.

    “Without the UK as a base, the US would have been unable to play a part in WWII.”

    Don’t forget that America was developing nukes with the intention of vaporizing Germany. War against Germany was bound to happen one way or other.

  102. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 12, 2013 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Those “defectors” (desperate Soviet prisoners who didnt want to be executed by the NKVD) were usually shunned until the Germans finally became desperate enough to use them, for garrison duty. At that point they tried to surrender to the Western allies en masse. Little did they know the allies planned to repatriate them to the USSR afterwards!

  103. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2013 - 9:42 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: “The first law of the jungle states, that in the struggle for survival and supremacy, there are no rules. From a biological standpoint, anything that achieves victory is automatically self-justifying, and the reality is that the morally autonomous individualist stands little chance of surviving in the jungle.”

    Why NS Germany lost is irrelevant in the light of the above framing of the question. To argue that the wartime casualties, devastation of the country, and postwar ravages are a Darwinian success for Germans is unsustainable. (Not to mention that the gene pool of the Allies was also drained in the struggle, another Darwinian disaster).

  104. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 12, 2013 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon: Extremely helpful answer. I now know where to begin looking with regard to the Japanese nuclear disaster—and that’s half the battle, of course.

    On several occasions during my high school and college education (1958+) when the matter of the post-WWII realignment of the world came up, I innocently asked history teachers why no peace treaty with Germany had ever been signed. No one had an informed answer, but everyone pretty much agreed that it hardly mattered, given the fact that Germany was now the bulwark against Soviet expansion. I am certain that it occurred to my teachers as little as to me that our own government was cynically manipulating world affairs for its own vulgar profit. Of course, neither I nor any of my teachers was a Jew, and so it may safely be said that utter naïveté was the regnant characteristic of our dialogues.

    Trenchant’s link doesn’t address immediate postwar juridical matters. One might say, however, that it does far worse, in laying out the perfectly plain yet perfectly concealed move by the Tribal money power to use currency manipulation to enrich itself at the expense of, in essence, all the world’s white Christian/post-Christian nations in the immediate aftermath of the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union. It also explains, almost as an obiter dictum, the point of the absence of a peace treaty with Germany.

    P.S. I too recall Severus, though more dimly than you. I recall thinking of him and Helvena as something of an allied pair—or was it an antagonistic pair? Ah, memory!

  105. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 13, 2013 - 1:17 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: The TOO Website was somewhat “sticky” at times yesterday. I ended up double posting under two article headings!

    Yes, those Severus vs. Helvena duels were magic. I am frustrated and somewhat aggrieved that the comments from those earlier articles have been deleted: an act of vandalism. Exchanges from the pre-2011 period were often held at a higher intellectual level, and lower emotional level, than I am seeing in more recent times: and no offence or insult intended there! There again, this could just be me being sentimental, or me forgetting to factor-in non-linear external influences, and the gradual subversion of TOO commentary by certain & known Trolls.

    On the nuclear issue, I could have written 1,000 or more words, so only gave you some bare bones. The other key difference (specification) I did not highlight earlier was the seemingly ‘contradictory’ reactor moderators employed by the various designs. The Americans went for “Light Water”; the Canadians “Heavy Water”; and the British (mostly) and Russians, Graphite. The challenge of understanding that terminology and their operational consequences is best left to you as it would be rude of me to assume you would be. From a technical standpoint, the basics of Nuclear Reactors are not that complicated; but the entire topic soon gets very complicated indeed; just as soon as one starts to appraise the competing designs, different fuel types, and commercial imperatives subscribed to.

    Vis-a-vis the mistreatment of Germany … yes, what goes on behind the veil of secrecy is more than the ordinary mind can imagine, let alone comprehend after the fact.

    As regards the entire post-war period leading up to circa 1960, one can safely assume most political events had been anticipated and/or initiated long before 1939. One can find many prescient pointers in globalist literature from the 1920s. Amongst us here, Fender appears to have the most accurate grasp of the conspirator’s true intent: the Spider in the centre of the Web. There are no accidents in politics, and so-called ‘economics’.

    And of course, if I were to be pedantic — a condition that commenting at other’s websites seems to encourage — then I would say just get yourself a neat & tidy copy of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion before carefully reading {again?} and re-assessing its declared intent. You will find Germany’s fate predicted right there, 70 or so years earlier, in that [allegedly] forged or ‘plagiarised’ {ho-ho-ho} document.

    And never underestimate the wrath of a mentally deficient, high-born woman. In some ways, much in our present predicament could be traced back to the communist busy-body named Eleanor Roosevelt.

  106. Jim Summers's Gravatar Jim Summers
    January 13, 2013 - 4:22 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    Hitler took a risk and lost, if he had won Germany would have dominated Europe for 1,000 years. In Hitler’s view it was better to make the attempt than to do nothing and to allow Germany’s role in the world to decline every decade in comparison to the increasing power of the Soviet Union and the United States.

  107. Jim Summers's Gravatar Jim Summers
    January 13, 2013 - 4:31 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    Stalin was planning to attack Central Europe in the Summer of 1941. Read Suvorov’s book The Icebreaker or Constantine Pleshakov’s Stalin’s Folly. At least 10 Russian historians/authors agree with this theory.

  108. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 13, 2013 - 6:18 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon: You’re correct in thinking that I’m not scientifically illiterate or semiliterate, but on the other hand I am not even close to being au courant on these matters. E.g., I had no idea that anyone still used heavy water as a moderating and control element in nuclear reactors. Yet you also indicate that the Canadian reactor designs are the best, and it is the Canadians that use the heavy water! I have catching up to do, clearly.

    You also write,

    Exchanges from the pre-2011 period were often held at a higher intellectual level, and lower emotional level, than I am seeing in more recent times: and no offence or insult intended there!

    Having myself ruefully written much the same thing on several occasions, I can hardly dispute your claim, even though we do not apply the “troll” label to the same folks. Still, I do have the admittedly unverified suspicion that the quality of the very best comments is as high now as it was then, but with today’s comment threads going not infrequently past the 400 and 500 and even 600 mark, finding the gold strands among the straw is often more trouble than it’s worth. The vector points in the wrong direction.

    Do you ever think Peter Brimelow is wise to restrict comment to letters, which he alone then decides whether or not to publish? Lots of days I do.

    As for Eleanor Roosevelt, history’s most deplorable First Lesbo Lady, I think the only matter concerning her still subject to debate is whether she was contemptible or beneath contempt.

  109. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2013 - 12:31 am | Permalink

    @Jim Summers: Losing is all that counts on a strictly Darwinian plane (not my preferred argument, but as per the author’s framing). The entirety of the NS programme and the reaction it provoked in its antagonists has to judged against the what might have happened had the Nuremberg Laws, re-militarization (eliciting a mirror response in Germany’s strategic rivals), etc. not been implemented.

    Allow me to disagree that even an hypothetical, defensive war fought on German soil would have been infinitely preferable to worldwide conflagration.

  110. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 14, 2013 - 12:47 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Adeptus sum legerem tuas responsum.

    P.S. Some Clues …

    “Heavy Water” enjoys a higher moderating effect on the core (than in Light Water reactors) and is a more efficient carrier of heat, thus making the heat transfer process (to the turbine system) more fuel efficient. Light Water reactor designs work well when constructed small (i.e., for nuclear powered submarines) but become statistically very dangerous when scaled up to distribution grid size.

    Had the Japanese reactors in Fukushima been of the CANDU design … there would have been NO MELTDOWN! Even with the same loss of emergency/backup generator power, no matter! There would have been no meltdown.

  111. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2013 - 12:57 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Or whether she first made contact with Satan via the ouija board or had to wait till 1964.

  112. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2013 - 12:58 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Sorry Satan, 1962.

  113. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 14, 2013 - 1:00 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Your points are well taken and on the surface, appear logical and correct. Unfortunately, they are highly flawed because they lack a large slice of additional and key information.

    In reality, throughout the 1930s Adolf Hitler sought peace, invited peace, urged peace, and lobbied for peace. There is an excellent documentary posted on YouTube that proves this. It exposes the previously hidden truth surrounding the entire period. World War Two was Churchill’s War (and Stalins). It was not or never of Hitler’s making.

    I urge you to watch this video through and to ensure you download a copy onto your hard-drive for archive purposes. It is too valuable to be left in the hands of JewTube.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCTi0N7Cmys

    Never again will you say that Germany (The Third Reich) caused World War Two.

    Nuremberg 1945/46 was a Kangaroo Court convened under the auspices of the Talmud: an obscenity that shall stain the conscience of normal men for evermore.

  114. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 14, 2013 - 1:17 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:The credibility of the € is nicely tracked by the ECB presidency: First, a Dutchman, then Frenchman, now an Italian.

  115. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 14, 2013 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Correction (re debatable points chez Eleanor) noted and humbly accepted.

  116. A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
    January 14, 2013 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

    @Fatboy:

    Highly salient points, the same points that I intended to draw attention to, but you beat me to it.

    However, the Ashkenazim as has been established by those in the know so to speak, finally developed a unified and highly effective psychological warfare strategy against the White Gentile ethnicity emanating from the Frankfurt School, through which only those Gentiles willing to play ball with Jew-inspired programmes would succeed beyond the limits of the Gentile peasantry (working class), evidence of which can be seen in the selective higher education admissions gameplan which is designed to select the least bright and then mentally mould them to Marxist Liberal ideology, the result being the never-ending stream of so-called ‘professors’ streaming out of higher education establishments year on year.

    No, the truth is that those with high examination score results are not necessarily the scholars that gain admission at all although a certain number do, but rather it’s those of mediocre and even lower achievement status who are, in fact, given priority.

1 Trackback to "Thomas Huxley on Group Competition and Ethics: Part 2 of 2"

  1. on January 9, 2013 at 8:21 pm

Comments are closed.