Playing the White Option: The Electoral Math for How Trump Can Win

Richard McCulloch


I think Trump’s candidacy came at the eleventh hour, or the last minute, for any possible electoral hope for the White cause in this country. Jared Taylor expressed this thought right after Trump joined the race. The reason for this is that it is really getting to be crunch time on the immigration issue (in Europe as well as the U.S.). The GOP establishment has so far been repeatedly blocked by the grass roots in its efforts to give amnesty to illegal immigrants as part of its Hispanic strategy (i.e., the browning of the Republican party) but this resistance would probably have been overcome with a Bush, Rubio, Graham or Kasich victory, and will be irrelevant with a Hillary victory that includes a Democratic takeover of Congress.

Trump came along in the nick of time to give our people a chance to prevent this from happening. But his success depends on a major triumph based on the “White option.”

During the past decades of massive immigration-driven demographic change it has become clear that the GOP has only two options or strategies for electoral victory – the Brown option based on winning a larger share of the non-White (especially Hispanic) vote or the White option based on winning a larger share of the White vote. The MSM, pundits, think tanks and other organs of the establishment only talked about the Brown option, so that it became a given assumption of the conventional wisdom that couldn’t be questioned. For them the White option didn’t exist. The White option was only discussed in White advocate circles and by outliers such as Steve Sailer and Pat Buchanan at VDare.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

But it seems Trump somehow knew about the White option, and from the beginning clearly based his strategy on it, burning all his bridges to the Brown option behind him, despite his protestations to the contrary. In fact, you could describe his opening salvos as the White option on steroids, which predictably sent the MSM, et. al., into paroxysms of apoplectic indignation.

Trump’s White option strategy was a massive success in the primaries, winning him the nomination, and it looks like he should go into the convention with enough strength and momentum behind him to stymie plans by Paul Ryan and the establishment to control the party platform (especially the immigration and trade planks) and the VP pick. But the ultimate test of the White option will come in the general election, and will succeed or fail based on the extent to which Whites turn out to vote for Trump and the rest of the GOP ticket.

The theory behind the White option is that there are many millions of disaffected White voters who have been waiting for a candidate like Trump to either get them to vote, or get them to switch from the Democrats to the Republicans. There are plenty of signs that this is happening. The question is whether it is happening, or will happen, enough to cause a major political realignment that will transform the electoral landscape.

Clinton’s strategy is to repeat Obama’s 2008 performance by winning 43% of the White vote and 81% of the non-White vote. Trump’s White option strategy is to mobilize a massive White turnout, possibly matching or exceeding the 70% White turnout stimulated by Perot’s candidacy in 1992, and winning a record share of that record White turnout, exceeding Reagan’s 66% record share in 1984. Such numbers should be enough to win the popular vote, and would effectively establish a de facto pro-White coalition that is implicitly opposed to non-White immigration as the dominant force in the GOP.

This issue, non-White immigration, is the primary fault line defining the fracture in the GOP. Economic nationalism or trade policy is a secondary issue, as is military interventionism, but it is non-White immigration, a racial issue, that explains the intensity and invective tone of the establishment’s opposition to Trump. The establishment wants it. The great majority of Whites are in varying degrees opposed to it, and were not supposed to ever have a chance to express that opposition, but then Trump came along and finally gave them that chance, and has ridden the wave of that opposition to the nomination.

But victory in the general election is of course ultimately determined by electoral votes, not the popular vote. Trump would have to win 64 more electoral votes than Romney did in 2012 to get to the winning number of 270. Assuming he won all the states Romney won, he would have to add enough additional states to get to that number from the states Obama won, listed below in order of how much Trump would need to increase his share of the vote to win each state based on the 2012 results, when Romney won 61% of the White vote with a 64.1% White voter turnout.

  1. Florida – 0.9% increase, 29 electoral votes
  2. Ohio – 2.4% increase, 18 electoral votes
  3. Virginia – 2.8% increase, 13 electoral votes
  4. Pennsylvania – 3.5% increase, 20 electoral votes
  5. New Hampshire – 3.6% increase, 4 electoral votes
  6. Colorado – 3.9% increase, 9 electoral votes
  7. Iowa – 3.9% increase, 6 electoral votes
  8. Wisconsin – 4.2% increase, 10 electoral votes
  9. Nevada – 4.4% increase, 6 electoral votes
  10. Minnesota – 5.1% increase, 10 electoral votes
  11. Michigan – 5.3% increase, 16 electoral votes
  12. New Mexico – 7.2% increase, 5 electoral votes
  13. Oregon – 7.9% increase, 7 electoral votes
  14. Washington – 8.7% increase, 12 electoral votes
  15. Maine – 9.1% increase, 4 electoral votes
  16. Illinois – 9.3% increase, 20 electoral votes
  17. Connecticut – 9.3% increase, 7 electoral votes
  18. New Jersey – 9.4% increase, 14 electoral votes
  19. Delaware – 10.1% increase, 3 electoral votes
  20. Massachusetts – 12.5% increase, 11 electoral votes
  21. California – 12.9% increase, 55 electoral votes
  22. Maryland – 14.1% increase, 10 electoral votes
  23. Rhode Island – 14.8% increase, 4 electoral votes
  24. New York – 14.9% increase, 29 electoral votes
  25. Vermont – 19.1% increase, 3 electoral votes
  26. Hawaii – 22.9% increase, 4 electoral votes

Trump claims that the northeast states are in play for him, even his home state of New York where non-Hispanic Whites are now only 58% of the population, and at least a quarter of those are Jewish. With any candidate other than Trump this would seem to be fanciful, but playing the White option Trump has been an over-achiever, constantly exceeding my expectations, and everyone else’s, by a wide margin. A more conventional politician, following expert advice, would probably concentrate all his effort, time and money on the first eleven states where the swing would be less than 5.4%, which have enough votes (141) to give Trump a landslide of 347 and demographics that would make the White option very feasible. If he added just the 80 electoral votes of the first four on the list that would still put him over the top with 286 votes, but it is advisable to play more states than this to leave some margin for possible defeats.

It is clear where we should expect Trump to be doing most of his campaigning, but he has consistently played the White option bigger and bolder than all expectations.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

71 Comments to "Playing the White Option: The Electoral Math for How Trump Can Win"

  1. May 18, 2016 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    I hope you don’t mind but this group of Fine Ladies & Gentlemen deserve a plug for their efforts,( I’ve noticed they don’t get mentioned a whole lot and I roam the net) so maybe it would be okay?

    White students undergo weekly ‘deconstructing whiteness’ program at Northwestern University

    http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/26279/
    http://www.thecollegefix.com/

    My “”Pals”” at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) already have in their own special way endorsed “thecollegefix” as the ” real thing” so to Speak, just like the O.O. has been endorsed as the “real thing”.

    Search : splc jewish ( if you are one of the last to know)
    Search: adl splc Dual-Citizen Israelis
    search: ADL SPLC whiteness
    search: ADL SPLC whiteness studies
    search: adl splc white privilege

    SEARCH: teaching white privilege to elementary students
    About 457,000 results (0.54 seconds)

    Public schools teaching ‘white privilege’ to your kids – WND.com School Apologizes For Teaching About White Privilege | Bossip Public School Teaches “White Privilege” Class | Todd Starnes on Radio

    OUR CHILDREN UNDER ATTACK, I AM SURE THEY WILL BE TEACHING JOHNNY AND JILL ALL ABOUT GENDER AND HOW THEY SHOULD EXPLORE THEIR INNER GENDERNESS!!!!!!!!!!

    THEY ATTACK OUR CHILDREN IN AN ORGANIZED METHODICAL MANNER

    FBI Outreach Partners

    African-American Outreach

    Alpha Phi Alpha
    NAACP
    National Urban Fellows
    National Urban League
    Steve Harvey Foundation
    Southern Poverty Law Center
    The Association for the Study of African American Life and History, Inc.
    Arab/Muslim/Sikh/South Asian-American Outreach

    All Dulles Area Muslim Society
    Allied Media Corp Multicultural Communication
    American-Arab Anti Discrimination Committee
    Arab American Institute
    Muslim Advocates
    Muslim Public Affairs Council
    Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund
    Sikh Coalition
    Asian-American Outreach

    Hmong National Development
    Korean American Coalition
    National Federation of Filipino American Associations
    Organization of Chinese Americans
    South Asian American Leaders of Tomorrow
    Jewish Outreach

    American Jewish Committee
    Anti-Defamation League
    B’Nai B’Rith
    Hillel
    Holocaust Museum
    National Council of Jewish Women
    National Council on Soviet Jewery
    Religious Action Center
    The Orthodox Union
    United Jewish Communities

    Latino Outreach

    Hispanic Federation
    League of United Latin American Citizens
    Native American Outreach

    National Congress of American Indians

    Saturday, September 4, 2010
    Jewish Militia in America: ADL says “It’s OK, They’re One of Us.”

    source: kennysideshow…

    Raised on the holocaust {HOLOCAUSTIANITY} narrative and the inundation of media fear mongering towards Muslims, young American jews who ‘say’ they are fearful of their own communities are forming militia training groups. Just exercising their 2nd amendment rights as all patriotic Americans should they proclaim.
    { I have no doubt they are training }

    I checked the ADL “militia movement” page to see if these jewish groups are listed but it looks as though they’re not. SPLC … ditto. Abe and his teammates are waiting for more information. Are the Uzi’s they have fully automatic?

    Unless these guys, some former IDF employees, begin to bulldoze their surrounding communities and drive out the locals to build their own settlements, I doubt if they’re in any danger.

  2. May 18, 2016 - 11:23 am | Permalink

    ATTN:!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    WISCONSIN’S 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT

    No, I do not know a whole lot about Paul Nehlen but I do know that if you can’t honestly give your Senator or Congressman a Solid ‘B’ Grade (at the least) then you owe it to yourself to vote for a Challenger in your State Primaries!!!
    Stop re-electing People that don’t serve your interests into Office, start processing them out.

    Endless yapping about ‘Principles’ while pushing and legislating for policies/agendas that are in opposition to us and our interests has gone on long enough!

    Wisconsin businessman Paul Nehlen announced Tuesday that he is the tea party-allied candidate who is challenging House Speaker Paul D. Ryan in the Republican primary, saying he’s “had it” with the speaker betraying conservatives.

    Sources first confirmed to The Washington Times earlier this week that a wealthy businessman was mounting a primary challenge to Mr. Ryan in Wisconsin’s 1st Congressional District, but Mr. Nehlen did not reveal his identity until now.

    “Paul Ryan’s embrace of big government spending, his continued support of illegal immigration and imported workers, and his championing of the job-killing trade deal known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership betrays me, this district, and this nation,” he said.

    side note- Bill Gates is very anti-White

    White Nationalism is about having a Future for our European-American
    Children and European Children!!!

    Cucks : Enemy looks likes us but has no Loyalty to us!
    Cucks are hostile to the Future of our European/European-American
    Children

    FOR V.P., Rubio,Cruz,Kasich,Christie,Gingrich are not acceptable.
    As far as being part of the Staff Gingrich &/or Christie might be useful in certain roles.

    Maybe we can get Donald Trump to Close Down/Abolish
    5 Federal Gov. Depts.
    For example the anti-white Fed Dept of education/indoctrination

    Dept. of Education: Appropriation 67.1 Billion!

    http://www.maciverinstitute.com/2014/06/dpi-used-special-education-federal-funding-to-pay-for-white-privilege-conference-registrations/

    http://www.propaganda.news/2016-02-25-exposing-the-source-of-white-privilege-education.html

    There is big money in white privilege education. Instead of spending this money on educational supplies however, Dr. Evers decided to invest in cultural sensitivity training to alleviate the alleged white privilege in his schools. Teachers would receive this training and they would essentially have to admit that being white makes them racist in order to move on. This also occurs in our universities in multicultural education programs. This author was personally targeted in a social work program for not going along with the white privilege curriculum.

    http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/24/wisconsin-spent-2000-in-federal-funds-to-send-bureaucrats-to-white-privilege-conference/

    SEARCH : Fed Dept of education white privilege whiteness

  3. Amasius's Gravatar Amasius
    May 12, 2016 - 12:52 am | Permalink

    Trump’s got this. The only way the Democrats can beat him is if they sub in Bernie. Hillary is too despicable and baggage-laden to win.

  4. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    May 11, 2016 - 11:16 pm | Permalink

    Progressive-Globalists or the PROGLOB say that the ‘culture war’ is over and that the ‘left won’. (Funny notion when the Left now represents the 1% and Goldman Sachs and the oligarchy and elitocracy.) But in truth, the Real Culture War is now only beginning. It is beginning because Culture has to be understood in relation to Race.
    Jews understood this all along. Jewish culture and Jewish race fought as one. Blacks understood this. Black culture and Black Race fought as one. Homos understood this. Homo culture and Homo identity fought as one.

    White race failed to fight the Culture War because white culture and white race were separate and couldn’t fight as one.

    So far, there was no real Culture War. Why? Because Jews, blacks, and homos(and La Raza Hispanics) fought the Culture War in terms of Our Race and Our Culture as a unity. In contrast, whites couldn’t properly fight the war since their culture and their race had to remain apart. Since white culture couldn’t reflect or serve the white race, it ended up cucking out to Jews, blacks, and homos.
    Only by fusing white culture(history, identity, consciousness, politics) with white race/biology can white people finally feel the soulful unity that allows confidence, pride, and courage to fight.

    Thus far, one side has been doing all the fighting while the other side just took the blows without counter-punching. In boxing, the left jab and right across must work together. Left jab is culture, the right across is race. Jews gained tremendous power cuz Jewish culture and Jewish race were coordinated to fight as one.
    Jews used media, academia, Hollywood, finance, and government to persuade whites to separate white culture from white race. But if white culture is cut off from white race, it can’t even be called white culture anymore. It turns into wussy Cuckture whereby white heritage, culture, and achievements are seen as existing only to serve other races since it cannot serve whites or be said to reflect the nature of the white race. It’s no wonder that so many white Europeans now think that the glorious achievements of Europe exist only to be shared with and serve non-whites than to serve whites whose ancestors built it.

    Because whites lacked the unity of race and culture, there was no real Culture War in the postwar era.
    War is where two or more sides fight each other It is not a war when only one side attacks and the other side stands defenseless and just takes all the blows. It’s been a Culture Battery with whites taking the drubbing without ever fighting back.

    But if Alt Right plays it right, white culture and white race can once again be fused into one. And then, white culture will be seen as existing to reflect, represent, and serve the white race. And then and only then will the REAL CULTURE WAR finally begin.

    So, what’s been called ‘the culture war’ was hardly that. It was a one-sided Culture Abuse where Jews, homos, and Negroes did all the fighting while whites stood helpless and took all the blows.

    Political consciousness is like electricity. The positive and negative charges must make contact to create power.
    Culture and Race must fuse into one in order to come alive, fight, and win.

    Why did Italian Fascism and National Socialism win the culture war in the first half of the 20th century? They fused race and culture. Tragically of course, National Socialism went off the rail and eventually destroyed itself because it messed with the nationalism of other nations. German nationalism betrayed the ideal of nationalism by violating the sovereignty of other nations.
    If National Socialists had been more respectful of other nations, their movement would have been a great success. The fusion of race and culture of the Modern Right could fight and destroy the Left.
    Indeed, even FDR’s regime was popular because it fused race, culture, and economics into one. It was a form of Liberal Fascism.
    The New Deal was mostly for whites. And US entered WWII as a race war against the ‘Japs’.

    Anyway, Alt Right’s signature achievement so far has been the fusion of white culture with white race. The positive charge and negative charge have been joined, and the power is finally ON. The light-bulb is finally glowing.

    The main enemies are Jews, homos, and blacks. And traitor whites who have it so good. The globo-affluent whites in big cities and college towns enjoy all the privileges of globalism and hobnobbing with the elites around the world. They got theirs and are conceited with their fancy degrees. They turn up their noses at the other whites who have less.

    So, Alt Right must go to the poor, working class, and middle class to mobilize the masses of have-nots and have-lesses. In doing so, it will gain moral advantage over the privileged class of Jews, homos, mulattoes, and cuck-traitor white elites.

    Anyway, the Culture War is not over. What the ‘left’ won was a phony culture war in which the white race didn’t fight and indeed couldn’t fight because it had no juice in its electrical line. There was no juice cuz white culture and white race were not joined together to create the spark, the power.
    Jews want to fool us that the ‘culture war’ is over and that there is nothing to fight about anymore. The ‘left’ won, the ‘right’ lost, and so, the ‘right’ should just hand over all the guns and bow its head and obey.
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/10/harvard-prof-urges-liberals-treat-evangelical-christians-like-nazis/

    To such arrogance, we say “LISTEN JEW, THE REAL CULTURE WAR IS ONLY NOW BEGINNING. AND YOU AINT SEEN NOTHING YET.”

    So, the Culture War finally begins for real. Alt Right must lead the fight because it stands for the unity of race and culture, of plus and negative charges that make the electricity come alive.

    It’s like the opening of GREASE. Sandy wonders if this is the end. And Danny says, no, this is only the beginning.
    Let the REAL CULTURE WAR begin. Alt Right must be race-and-culture-warriors.
    https://youtu.be/6YiYJS5kgJ0?t=1m32s

    It’s like the ending of KIDS RETURN when one guy muses if it’s all over, and the other guy says, “It hasn’t even started yet.”

  5. May 11, 2016 - 11:14 pm | Permalink

    He needs a V.P. that the establishment hates even more than him.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      May 16, 2016 - 10:03 am | Permalink

      This idea of yours is interesting and well worth closer consideration.

      Whether such a move would serve to get the media barons off Trump’s back is by no means clear. But it does no harm to recall that for all his power, the enemy’s intelligence tends to be overestimated. Also, distracting the media is desirable on its face, given the unfortunate fact that there are still a great many well-meaning but overly meek and highly influenceable white people whose reluctance to do something “unapproved,” even in the relative secrecy of the polling booth, couldn’t survive a full-court press on Trump.

      Trump’s people and interested deep-pocket observers really ought to examine this possibility before dismissing it. Indeed, that’s why God created pollsters and statistical analysts—two jobs that even the social justice warriors might admit Americans are still willing to do.

      • May 18, 2016 - 11:46 am | Permalink

        What I want or would like to see is for Donald Trump to select a V.P. who would follow through with his platform and His Intent in case that a scenario would arise. A proper V.P. would act as a FAIL SAFE for Donald Trump and quite possibly make him a bit safer from certain scenarios!
        I agree he is not really “our guy” but it is refreshing that he is not anti-white.
        There are certainly lots of Cucks Extraordinaire in D.C

        side note – Fred Reed on BLM composed ( perfectly or close to perfect)
        http://www.unz.com/freed/questions-for-black-lives-matter-the-case-for-separation/

  6. May 11, 2016 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

    Paul Ryan is a useless creep!
    Replace Him!!!

  7. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    May 11, 2016 - 11:06 pm | Permalink

    The Paki is no mayor but a puppet. He is just following the script. Trashing Trump is standard practice but the Tribe is a no-go area.

    Trump is a must have. Anything else is worse for us. I too am appalled by the many petty objections here to Trump.

  8. Mari's Gravatar Mari
    May 11, 2016 - 9:42 pm | Permalink

    Anthony
    By the exchange 1814 do you mean how the Rothschilds had observers at the battle of Waterloo and perpetrated a massive stock market fraud by spreading word that the French won and the allies lost?

    It was standard tactics and completely immoral, sinful and criminal but I don’t quite see what that had to do with our constitution

    What do you think of the fact that the founders borrowed the money to pay for the revolution and our first gold and silver reserves and then forced the frontier settlers to pay the cost of the revolution through the Whiskey tax?

    That money ultimately came from the Grand Duke of Hesse and old Nathan Rothschild who lent the money to the French government who lent it to us

  9. Mari's Gravatar Mari
    May 11, 2016 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

    The discussion about the possible cooperation of Canada and the rebellious American colonies took place in 1774 long after Pennsylvania became a colony of Britian

  10. May 11, 2016 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    But it seems Trump somehow knew about the White option, and from the beginning clearly based his strategy on it . . .

    He read Adios America by Ann Coulter. In it, she explicitly advises to go for the White vote, and to do it by opposing illegal immigration.

  11. Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
    May 11, 2016 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    I don’t trust any politician anymore, but in Europe we NEED Trump as American President.
    The new London mayor did two things the day after his confirmation: he went to the London Shoah Museum and then he attacked Trump.
    The mayor has no big powers, however he feels compelled to whine And attack The Donald.
    So if he attacks Trump, I’ am with him.

  12. silviosilver's Gravatar silviosilver
    May 11, 2016 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

    An important factor not mentioned by McCulloch is the perhaps surprising appeal of Trump’s civic nationalism to assimilated non-whites (and some blacks). This may not mean much to WNs, for whom the goals of civic nationalism are considered to be wholly incompatible with their own, but in terms of electoral politics this may contribute to the needed boost in key states.

    In the much longer term, it seem reasonable that it is non-whites such as these with whom WNs ought to make political pacts in order to win badly needed support for pro-white policies, including the all-important policy of racial separation. If that seems unlikely, it should be remembered that the possibility of whites alone electorally enacting such policies will very soon be completely out of the question; if pacts are eschewed, the only remaining option then being a revolutionary scenario which today – and, I predict, for decades yet – resides totally in the realms of fantasy.

  13. May 11, 2016 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    The incredible thing that Trump can do is what he has already done, namely blow apart the “rules” for what may be discussed in America by our oligarchs. I realize that future benefits may be desired, but the “neocons” and the “cuckservatives” and the “SJWs” and even wars for “democracy” will never be the same. He has single-handedly pushed the next war in Southwest Asia into the future at least for a decade. He did it in his inimitable style, but it has been an enormous gift for him to unveil the inner workings of the presidential nominating process and to attack Hillary frontally. Whether he amounts to anything in the future, we must not forget how much his presence and style have rocked the world already.

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      May 12, 2016 - 7:33 am | Permalink

      Only a revolution will solve the Jewish Plague. That Trump has given vent to White anger just gives the Jews more time to keep screwing Whites and using their resources to take over the parts of the planet they do not already control.

  14. tadzio308's Gravatar tadzio308
    May 11, 2016 - 10:49 am | Permalink

    It used to be said that presidential elections were either nickels or dimes. The nickels were those in which voters changed up to 5% and dimes were those in agitated times were the electorate switched 10%. In the first scenario Trump adds 9 states to Romney’s bucket and in the second, he adds 18. Things are looking good.

  15. Mari's Gravatar Mari
    May 11, 2016 - 9:26 am | Permalink

    I agree with Luke, vote for Trump, maybe work in his campaign but don’t expect he will do anything for Whites.

    But he might, might not do anything bad for Whites as Regean did with eliminating the civil service exam and amnesty.

  16. Richard McCulloch's Gravatar Richard McCulloch
    May 11, 2016 - 8:56 am | Permalink

    The new Quinnipiac poll shows Trump and Clinton dead even in Florida and Pennsylvania and Trump with a slight lead in Ohio. If he adds just those three states to those Romney won in 2012 he would be over the top with 273 electoral votes.

  17. Leaven of the Jews's Gravatar Leaven of the Jews
    May 11, 2016 - 8:50 am | Permalink

    This is what @Paul is talking about the no so great Reagan.

    http://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/10/us/us-set-to-replace-a-civil-service-test.html

    Passrates Used to Be:
    Whites 42%
    Hispanics 13%
    Blacks 5%

    Somehow Reagan thought this was “racist.” Trump is another affirmative action president.

    Press Hillary for instant destruction
    Press Donald for a slow burn.

  18. Jimmie's Gravatar Jimmie
    May 11, 2016 - 7:57 am | Permalink

    “half a loaf is better than none, even if it looks a bit like a bagel and tastes a bit like a matzo.”

    Indeed.

    Trump is clearly vain but still very useful in reaching the end.

  19. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    May 11, 2016 - 7:32 am | Permalink

    Trump is our last chance to remain the great nation we once were. Our alternative is a low-IQ polyglot country with a mass of warring minorities descending into the Third World.

  20. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    May 11, 2016 - 6:49 am | Permalink

    AnthonyH,

    “Every man has the right of self-preservation. It is the law of every living organism; neither man nor beast would survive without it. It is a natural right.”

    No doubt your ideas have considerable merit, but the enemy has thousands and thousands of lawyers who would low you down and than tie you (note the immediate questioning even on this website).

    We all know that the Judaeo-Bolsheviks portrayal of homosexuality and transgenders is just “shock and awe and bread and circuses” on the road the to genetic control.

    So let’s say to the European male, “know thyself genetically. If you carry genes for the homosexual or the transgender cast them off. You have a natural right to do so.”

    • May 11, 2016 - 10:25 am | Permalink

      “No doubt your ideas have considerable merit, but the enemy has thousands… of lawyers to low (sic) you down…”
      Well, that’s expressing it modestly. At the time they prosecuted me, they also prosecuted several other so-called “tax freedom” activists. All the others got a jury trial or had charges withdrawn. I was the only one that had no jury trial; instead, they violated every right, procedure and rule to ‘lay me low’. There was no discovery, no evidence, no witnesses, no opportunity to examine witnesses or evidence (obviously), no jury selection, and all my resources were seized during the charade (rendering me unable to defend). At the same time the DoJ was prosecuting a MAFIA hit man: they never touched his millions and they spent $75 million prosecuting AND DEFENDING this MAFIA character.
      WHAT, dear reader, are they trying to tell you?
      At the time I was a relatively well-known person in the freedom movement. If my law was a collection of non-sequitors, wishful thinking or bad law, the DoJ would have carried my case to a full-blown jury trial and made a three-ring circus of it and a damn fool of me.
      It didn’t happen.
      They are trying to tell you that, of all the so-called dissidents in the country, I’m the only one with the knowledge and procedures that can put an end to their scam. A short bio, http://redressone.wordpress.com/about/

  21. Punjab Bob Chapati's Gravatar Punjab Bob Chapati
    May 10, 2016 - 9:24 pm | Permalink

    With all due respect to Richard McCulloch, Donald Trump is highly deceptive and not our salvation.

    Trump is way in deep with Jews and just keeps posturing to get votes to add one more trophy to his shelf. He is saying things that shock the establishment to garner publicity like his Apprentice shows not that he believes in our ideals. His allegiance to Israel proves he is just a snake oil salesman.

    I see an over-ambitious man who lacks morals and principles. Trump has helped with the demise of whites in this country by his million dollar support for Hillary in the past. His attacks on the evil one are phony. I see lots of disappointed folks if he even makes president.

    • Flossie's Gravatar Flossie
      May 11, 2016 - 10:04 am | Permalink

      Exactly. He’s an amoral businessman, greasing any palm he needs to to close his next deal. The Oval Office is just another trophy property to him.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      May 11, 2016 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

      Per Punjab Bob,

      I see an over-ambitious man who lacks morals and principles.

      One has to be suffering from a severe case of moral tunnel vision to think that the quoted sentence ID’s Trump’s principal characteristic or besetting vice. I have been looking at politicians for fifty-five years, and in the disproportional-ambition category he’s smack in the center of the curve. What’s more, if he fails to betray his friends and supporters, he will be the first Republican elected king president in recorded history to have done so. Put it this way: if you want someone who’ll keep his word to the voters, vote for Hillary or Bernie.

      Now comes Flossie to say,

      The Oval Office is just another trophy property to him …

      whereas, I suppose, everyone else who has sought the office in the past two hundred years has had his fellow man’s welfare at heart.

      I am on record as being anything but a Trump loyalist, but treating as an insight what is merely a crude sneer from someone whose bona fides are unexamined and whose understanding of electoral politics is nugatory is productive of precisely nothing.

      Recall, too, that a predisposition to venality and the lust for power is a human failing that history’s least desirable form of political self-deception, democracy, holds fast at its core and exploits to the nth degree.

  22. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    May 10, 2016 - 9:18 pm | Permalink

    The dirty secret of Neocons and white nationalism.

    Neocons are now bitching about how Trump has the support of ‘white nationalists’.

    Given the bitching-kavetching, one would think ‘white nationalism’ is a bad thing and that Neocons don’t want to have anything to do with people who espouse such feelings.

    But in fact, neocons would have no problem with white nationalists as long as white nationalists kept their white nationalism at home and channeled their repressed passions toward Israel.

    Neocons are not really upset with white nationalism per se. They are upset with white nationalism going public. Coming out of the closet and coming out of the house… as white nationalism.

    Neocons had no problem with white nationalism as long as it remained in the home and stepped outdoors as pro-Zionist or pro-Jewish-nationalist.

    In a way, Neoconservatism had depended on the very existence of white nationalism or white nationalist passions. Why? Because despite all the shibboleths about ‘spreading democracy’, ‘universalism’, ‘proposition nation’, ‘color blind society’, and etc, Neoconservatism is really about support of Jewish identity, Jewish interests, and Jewish nationalism.

    Neoconservatism will have little appeal to white people who are REALLY and TRULY committed to universalism and global identity. After all, the truly ‘progressive’ white Liberals are increasingly critical of Israel and Zionism. Why would white Libs who are truly obsessed with commitment to pure universalism be attracted to Jewish identity, interests, and nationalism, esp when it’s doing much harm to Palestinians?

    For the true agenda of Neoconservatism to be served, it has to harness the repressed nationalism of gentiles, especially white gentiles.

    Neoconservatism invoke ‘universality’, ‘equality’, and ‘diversity’ to the extent of suppressing and taming white nationalism, but it doesn’t want to totally extinguish white nationalism because white nationalism has to be repressed, reshaped, and channeled to serving Jewish nationalism.

    When a people’s nationalism is repressed and forbidden, it seeks release through approved outlets. And the approved outlet for repressed white nationalism has been Zionism, Jewish identity, and Jewish interests. By rooting for Jewish power and Jewish nationalism, repressed white nationalist passions found an outlet.

    THAT has been the dirty secret of Neoconservatism.

    Though it now rails against white nationalism that supports Trump, it has thrived over the yrs by feeding off repressed white nationalist passions that were channeled toward Zionism.

    Zionism is a nationalism(based on imperialism), so it isn’t easy to convince sincere universalists to support it. The Holocaust-guilt stuff isn’t as effective anymore because the Occupation has been going on for so long, Israel has turned more right-wing and religious, and Zionism forged close ties with the GOP. Also, the ‘left’ has run out of great causes and sees the Palestinian one as the last great one left.

    So, when Neocons now bitch about white nationalism, they aren’t really upset over its nature and existence. They are upset that it’s no longer repressed and taboo. If white nationalism is no longer repressed, it is more difficult to tame, irrigate, and channel toward serving Israel and Zionism. White nationalism unleashed and unchained will serve its own interests.

    It’s like a horse. A horse is a powerful and dangerous animal. Suppose someone wants to use the horse in battle. The horse must be tamed but it must remain powerful and dangerous. It just mustn’t be dangerous to the rider. The rider channels the horse’s aggression and explosiveness against his chosen enemies.

    So, not only does the rider have no problem with the horse’s power & dangerousness but he depends on those very qualities. Taming the horse doesn’t mean getting rid of its power and dangerousness. A war horse is useless if not powerful and dangerous. Taming the horse means directing its power and dangerousness at the enemy of the rider.

    But suppose the horse were to waken from its enslavement. Suppose it were to realize that it’s being exploited by the rider. Suppose it throws off the rider and tries to kick him.

    The rider might then revile the horse for being powerful and dangerous… BUT the dirty secret is that the rider had no problem with the horse’s power and dangerousness AS LONG AS it had served his interest.

    Indeed, he valued the horse for its power and dangerousness because they could be directed at his chosen enemies.

    So, it is disingenuous for him to bitch about how the horse is bad for being powerful and dangerous. He is really upset that the horse is now being powerful and dangerous for its own interest than being used as war horse by the rider.

    As long as Neocons could ride the repressed passion of white nationalism to serve Israel and Zionism, they were perfectly fine with white nationalism(as long as it took orders from Neocons). Indeed, they not only tolerated white nationalism but depended on it(as long as it could be repressed and channeled).

    But now that white nationalism has thrown off the neocon rider and is running wild and free, the neocon is kavetching that white nationalism is a terrible, terrible thing.

    Neocons told white nationalism to throw away or burn the Confederate Flag but raise high and wave the Zionist Flag. And that was like the last straw for many white nationalists. Enough was enough.

    Just think. Suppose all the white nationalists in this election cycle had decided to keep their white nationalism at home and come outside as Zionists willing to support anything Jews to do Palestinians, Russians, Syrians, and Iranians.

    Suppose this repressed white nationalism shouted hurrah to Jewish nationalist aggression against the Middle East and Ukraine. Do you think Neocons would be complaining? No. Indeed, Neocons loved people like Ann Coulter as long as their aggressive repressed-white-nationalism had been channeled to waving the Zionist flag 24/7.

    The whole trick of Neoconism was the science of repressing and channeling white nationalism to serve Jewish nationalism. From a psycho-political point of view, only repressed rightism can serve the rightism of another people.

    After all, it’s getting harder for Liberal Zionists to channel sincere universalist white Liberals passion toward supporting Zionist occupation/oppression of Palestinians.

    By conventional standards, what is happening in Israel is ‘racism’ and ‘imperialism’, the kind that European nations once used to carry out around the world.

    White Liberals do support Israel(due to Holocaust guilt and coolness factor of smart Jews), but they feel increasingly uneasy about Zionists kicking Palestinian butt.

    In contrast, white nationalism is for identity, racial consciousness, and pride. In some cases, it can be hostile, aggressive, and even imperialist-minded. While such feelings about whites is taboo under PC, those are precisely the kind of passions that can be channeled toward serving the nationalism and imperialism of Jews that goes by the name of Zionism. White nationalists who can’t bitch about blacks and illegals in the US are likely to channel those passions toward cheering for Jews to kick Palestinian butt.

    So, when Neocons bitch about ‘white nationalism’, just tell them, ‘you had no problem with it when it was channeled to serving Jewish imperialism’.

    Neocons are just bitching about a horse that threw them off and ran off on its own to be free and serve its own horsey interest.

    White nationalism without Neocon masters = white horse without a rider.

    But then, Jews need not worry because for all his bluster, Donald Trump is totally owned by Jews and will just do as they tell him.
    Politicians are never to be trusted. “humble foreign policy” Bush II turned out to be a war-monger.
    Obama the ‘socialist’ and ‘nobel peace winner’ turned out to be a godsend to wall street and destroyer of nations hated by Jews.

    Why would Trump turn out any different? Just look at the men around him. Jewish.

    ——————–

    At any rate, elections are of secondary importance. Jews are only 2% of the population but they’ve been winning and winning and winning and winning for a long time regardless of which party won.

    Why? Because Jews win and gain in so many non-political areas and then politicize them. Jews created Hollywood and then used entertainment to politicize their agenda.

    So, we need to win OUTSIDE politics. We need to learn from Jews.
    Jews are driven, united, aggressive, relentless, resentful, and never complacent.

    So, regardless of who wins the election this year, we have to work in every area just like the Jews do.

    • harvey's Gravatar harvey
      May 11, 2016 - 9:25 am | Permalink

      Interesting rationale — leads to a sort of bipolar scenario of; The King’s Jew, or the Jew’s King. One collecting the King’s tax while offending the soul of work with usury, and the other expropriating populist votes to serve the nation wrecking ends of ethnic Judea. On “learning” from Jews, IMO, we have already learned too much — the ethno-biology of our groups and cultural structures operate differently and deserve selfsame demographics. Who we should learn from is our ancestors, and make firm strategies to expel them briskly: preferably in concert, across all the white dominions and nations of the world. The rest, the black, brown, red, yellow and degenerate will follow.

  23. May 10, 2016 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    Generally just thought of another strategy. Lie to the pollsters. That would create problems to the elites in allocating the resources for the various aspects of the election.

    And yes, they are exterminating us. We were 90%, are 60%, and they are celebrating it.

  24. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    May 10, 2016 - 4:40 pm | Permalink
  25. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    May 10, 2016 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    While “White” nationalists have pinned their hopes on Trump, I have yet to hear him say anything that equates to a “White” America.
    – Illegal immigration must be stopped, and current laws (deportation) enforced, does not equate to no immigration of non-Whites.
    – Temporary ban on Muslims (a religion) does not equate to no non-White Christians, Zoroastrians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, or others being banned.

    Trump will win more of the Black vote than Romney. In returning jobs, and promoting tariffs, while obliquely referencing the auto industry, many Blacks will believe all of those well paying jobs they had in the auto industry will be returning if they vote for him. The Black Lives Matter crowd panders to the parasites who really don’t care if they work.
    Trump will get some of the Latino vote, because he loves the spirit of the Mexican people, who work hard for less. Some who came legally, and who want no part of the scum crossing the border, will understand that the mass immigration is driving down their wages.

    I see his statements as general objectives that are apple pie and motherhood. Are the Democrats really going to argue that the country’s laws shouldn’t be enforced? How about the TTP and TTIP? If they are not passed before election time, are they going to argue that NAFTA on steroids will bring well paying jobs home? No more foreign wars (for Israel) means your kids, regardless of colour, won’t be sacrificed for “spreading democracy” or is it democratcy? Will Clinton really make the pitch for more dead kids?

    I see an electoral choice between The Donald and Billary as his to lose, assuming (a big one) the voting machines haven’t been adjusted. I don’t see a promise for a “White” America.

    • JM's Gravatar JM
      May 11, 2016 - 4:06 am | Permalink

      @Curmudgeon
      There isn’t and it is wise that he doesn’t. The Negro and earlier Latinos should be part of your “constituency” even if you are only looking – at present – at a tiny minority who would support you. The better category (than the banality of “white”) is “founder American (includes Negroes) and their allies”. Then develop policies around that. These wouldn’t be all that different to what you have now, would look after “white interests” but would have a far more unifying and winning – prospect. I speak from afar – there are advantages as well as disadvantages in that, but I speak with good will and there isn’t an ounce of PC in my thinking. What is needed from you is a party that is “Trump on steroids”.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      May 11, 2016 - 6:14 am | Permalink

      True, and reading the comments in msm it’s initially heartening that so many people are against immigration, but it soon becomes apparent that the focus is on muslims, ignoring the fact, at least here in Canada, that entire cities have been colonized. Vancouver has the moniker Hongcouver and Brampton, Bramladesh. Similar to Paris, suburbs outside of Toronto are almost entirely browned, and Whites who can afford to are moving back into the city where house prices and rents are astronomical and the quality of life depressing, or escaping to small towns. In a few decades there will be nowhere to run and nowhere to hide, we need to take a stand now. Personally, I’d rather see the entire structure collapse, come what may, than have our offspring live in the future that’s planned for them.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        May 11, 2016 - 8:53 am | Permalink

        @Karen T
        I can still remember Toronto from the late 50s. Chinatown was there, as was common in other larger Canadian cities, and about the only Blacks were the handful that played for the Argos, or the porters at the train station. A decade later, it wasn’t noticeably different. In the mid 70s, I went to visit friends who had moved there, and I was floored by the number of Indians and Pakistanis. It seemed they were everywhere.
        Greater Vancouver in the late 60s was still 95+% White. The last time I was there, 3 years ago, Richmond had as many signs in Chinese as English.
        We have been never been allowed to debate, much less vote on, immigration policies.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          May 16, 2016 - 9:38 am | Permalink

          We have been never been allowed to debate, much less vote on, immigration policies.

          My knee-jerk reaction to the above sentence was to write “that’s true for you and us both,” but it took only several moments’ reflection to realize that, yes, the machinery of societal transformation was in place and the intellectual lockdown on any discussion of what was going on came earlier, swifter, and much harder in your country than mine.

          I recall clearly, too, that around 1990, a woman I know signed up at a travel agency for a cross-Canada group tour via rail from New York to Montreal then west to the Pacific. As her tongue-in-cheek postcard to me read, she thought that Victoria and Vancouver were beautiful Chinese cities. She later said that the feeling she got there was analogous to being in an upmarket version of the no. 7 subway from Manhattan to Flushing. (I wouldn’t expect you to be familiar with that parochial reference unless you recall the media scandal of the late nineties wherein the Atlanta Braves pitcher John Rocker saw his career and his livelihood destroyed because he truthfully told some Establishment sports “reporter” why he’d never want to be traded to a New York team.)

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        May 11, 2016 - 10:11 am | Permalink

        Personally, I’d rather see the entire structure collapse, come what may, than have our offspring live in the future that’s planned for them.

        Indeed. When a giant structure collapses (not like the twin towers, whose neat ‘n’ tidy straight-down trajectory could have been predicted), all bets are off. You simply don’t know how it will pan out. Therefore, the only real preparation is flexibility and a spirit of adventure.

  26. PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
    May 10, 2016 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    Whatever the electoral result we must be prepared to redouble all our efforts on all available fronts. The pressure is mounting both in the US and in Europe. Events are slowly starting to move our way, we must be prepared for all eventualities when the dam finally bursts.

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      May 11, 2016 - 3:35 am | Permalink

      If you are suggesting that Whites load up on firearms and ammunition and other ‘prepper’ and ‘survivalist oriented’ supplies, then I agree with you 100 percent. New sales records are being recorded almost every month for the sales of firearms, and I see that as an indication that – at some level of their subconsciousness, Whites do have a sense of dread and a premonition of the nightmarish future that the jews and our white race traitorous politicians have been planning for them.

      I found an interesting article the other day on The Right Stuff’s website, and here is an excerpt:

      Retribution

      Muhsogynist Chomsky
      The Right Stuff
      May 10, 2016

      “But remember most of all that the problem isn’t the minorities, the foreigners, or even the Jews. The problem is the traitors among our own people who for the sake of social approval have turned a blind eye to the real-world effects of their destructive policies. If we’re going to survive as a people, the traitors have to be purged without mercy. Anyone who holds leftist beliefs needs to have the same fear of expressing them as we’ve held for so long. Using the word “homophobe” should be as dangerous to them as saying “different races have different average IQs” has been to us.

      Allow enough of the Left to survive intact as a movement and we’ll be right back where we are now in 50 years. Destroy the Left completely and we can have our countries back again. It’s that simple. Are you ready?”

  27. May 10, 2016 - 11:32 am | Permalink

    Judeo-Bolsheviks employ their females as spies or assassins. Their duty is to marry powerful goyim and monitor his obedience to JB influence. If she witnesses any action or words by her goy husband, she reports it to her priest/rabbi. He, she, or it will then decide whether to have the wife or a regular JB assassin administer the appropriate dosage.
    The first evidence of this policy can be found in the book of Esther (Old Testament). Historical examples that I’ve noted are the JB wife of Nero (as long as he danced in local plays, he was safe), Stalin’s wife (when he became alarmed at JB’s who wanted to migrate to Israel, his JB doctors put him down). In modern times, I’ve noticed only a few; for instance, Ron Paul and his son (Rand), along with Trump had better remain ineffective and ignorant or follow directions from their Judeo-Bolshevik political officers or doctors – or they, too, will be silenced.
    My essay, Exodus #23 deals with topic. http://redressone.wordpress.com/exodus-pt1/

    • harvey's Gravatar harvey
      May 11, 2016 - 9:52 am | Permalink

      I believe it! As a stand in for a cultural referent, it is slightly discouraging to be reduced to referring to the 1971 Polanski dir., Hugh Hefner funded production of MacBeth; but holding one’s nose, the role and purpose of Lady MacBeth really takes off — I am quite poorly educated due to our general condition, so maybe it is otherwise known to be the fact among my betters — with a sense outside or mindful of, the “whiteface” of her casting as a non-jewish woman behaving as a Jewess planted, or sold into, in a monarchy.

      MacBeth returns successful from battle with an elevation in rank; yet she doesn’t reciprocate with a pregnancy in customary conscience, and proceeds into a disease minded bi-polar hunger for power, making a hash of a largely stand-up guy, criminalizing a system she is fundamentally dysfuctional within. Her latter mad reflections aloud intuit as an alienated language and intention directed more at a rabbi in the depths of her cultural distance, than any Europid audience which might carry regard, racial or otherwise, for MacBeth’s earliest achievements in war. Hail, Thane of Cawdor!

  28. May 10, 2016 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    As long as members of the white race rely on Judeo-Bolsheviks to save their skins, nothing will change: the program to eliminate the white race will proceed apace.
    When Trump allied with Goldman-Sachs (a central Judeo-Bolshevik org), guess what?
    Trump is nothing more than a Judeo-Bolshevik (JB) pawn, or foot soldier. Their aim was to sponsor a pawn to draw attention and support away from those who might be favorable to saving the white race; to make sure they would get no coverage by the JB-controlled media.
    If whites are to make any progress at countering the policy of their extermination, they will have to do it themselves.
    But there is a major problem here, there is only a few hundred whites (readers of my writings) who have a moderate understanding (maybe that much) of HOW and WHAT to aim at.
    A great majority of Americans (something like 99.999%) have no knowledge of the powers, rights and procedures won by the American Revolution.
    Take, for example, ONE: the right of consent and its logical consequent, TWO, the right to withhold taxes until government redresses grievances.
    ONE: American Founders repeatedly declared that “no man is obligated to obey any law or pay any tax unless he has given consent to it”. Did they mean this literally? Of course they did. From the first English settlement to the Revolution this was how affairs of the colonies were managed. Every “law” and every “tax” had its origin in contracts between colonial assemblies and those who petitioned for redress of grievances. The terms of the contract were sometimes referred to as “laws” of the contract, while its money payments were treated as “taxes”. And only petitioners were obligated to obey such “laws” and pay such “taxes”. When redress was completed, related “laws” and “taxes” expired. (http://redressone.wordpress.com/)
    This right of consent has powerful implications today: it means that only those who petition (submit proposed legislation to Congress) are obligated to obey terms (“laws”) and needed money payments “(taxes)” related to such petition. This means, for example, when munitions-makers and Judeo-Bolshevik money lenders bribe congressmen to authorize establishment of rule by death squads in, say, Iraq, those “petitioners” would have to pay taxes needed to subsidize such death squads.
    All non-petitioners would have no such obligation.
    This sounds fair to me.
    TWO: In 1774, the Continental Congress issued the “Appeal to the Inhabitants of Quebec”. Its purpose was to encourage Canadians to join the American Revolution. This Appeal, listed three grand rights Americans intended to win with the Revolution: a) right of consent, b) redress BEFORE taxes and c) due process of law. Americans have heard of one and three and, of course, have no or little understanding of either. As to the second right, “redress before taxes”, it has almost been completely erased from our history and law books.
    The most comprehensive treatment of this right of “redress before taxes” is contained in my book, The Lost Right, edition 3.5. (http://redressone.wordpress.com/the-lost-right/)
    There, in four paragraphs I conveyed to you more real history than you learned in 12 years of elementary and high schools, and 4-6 years of university indoctrination. You won’t learn this and other lessons from professors, or judges, or lawyers; the first two depend on continued grievances for their pensions, the third never learned such history, or law – except those who have read and validated my writings.
    Until a few Americans learn – and use – these lessons of American/English history, there will be no redress, no accountability, no stopping Judeo-Bolsheviks’ destruction of America; and, if anyone sets out to correct existing grievances, he will not know HOW to do it – nor will he know WHAT to aim at, or WHAT rights to establish or confirm.
    Without the benefit of my writings, all whites have to look forward to are extermination and missions of suicide.

    • mari's Gravatar mari
      May 10, 2016 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

      Anthony H

      Trump is nothing more than a Judeo-Bolshevik (JB) pawn, or foot soldier. Their aim was to sponsor a pawn to draw attention and support away from those who might be favorable to saving the white race;”

      So Rubio, Cruz and Mexican identity Jeb Bush were pro White advocates? As far as Trump goes, he has stated several times he is in favor of affirmative action which is the major problems Whites face. We can survive 12 years of attending school with black and brown savages. We can survive a crime committed against us by a black or brown criminal. But its the no Whites need apply laws that affect us every day of our adult lives.

      I read your comments about the constitution. It’s obvious you have never heard of Marbury vs Madison 1804 or know anything about constitutional law.

      • May 11, 2016 - 10:47 am | Permalink

        Mari,
        What is contained in my comments or writings is not the limit of my knowledge.
        Further, I’ve had several of my findings examined by a half dozen or dozen lawyers; they admit to knowing little or nothing about constitutional law, and they found my works intriguing or most interesting – and, they all eventually validated my writings (one took two years of study).
        And, yes, I know about Marbury v Madison 1804. Do you know about ‘The Exchange’, 1814? ‘The Exchange’ is even more significant than Marbury. You see, Judeo-Bolsheviks and their pawns will only let you discuss Marbury – and attempt to bury ‘The Exchange’.

    • mari's Gravatar mari
      May 10, 2016 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

      Anthony
      “TWO: In 1774, the Continental Congress issued the “Appeal to the Inhabitants of Quebec”. Its purpose was to encourage Canadians to join the American Revolution. ”

      If you are such a great historian you probably know why the Quebecois rejected the invitation to join the revolution and form a united Canada/ American nation. The catholic religion which virtually all French Canadiens belonged was illegal in all the American colonies except for Pennsylvania and there were few Catholics in Pennsylvania. Catholicism had been legal in Maryland but the Catholic churches had been burnt down when Catholicism became illegal in Maryland in the late 17th century.

      The Quebecois representatives asked the American revolutionaries about that. The Americans replied that of course if you join us and we win we will outlaw Catholicism and you will have to convert to some form of looney tune puritanism.

      Why is is that constitutional conservatives are not attorneys or judges, never went to law school, never read a constitutional law book, never read a Gilbert’s Summary or other constitutional law exam prep book never even read the Wikepedia article or heard of Marbury vs Madison.

      I wish I could find a White Nationalist movement. But all there is is Buchanan’s anti abortion, constitutional ignoramuses, anglo saxon fantasies, bible thumpers free traders, and other people who have no interest in restoring the rights of Whites,

      • t's Gravatar t
        May 10, 2016 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

        Buchanan is Catholic.

      • blake121666's Gravatar blake121666
        May 10, 2016 - 8:41 pm | Permalink

        The MD Toleration Act was re-instituted after kicking out the Puritan mob in 1658. MD then continued to be the Catholic colony (unofficially of course – you are correct about the anti-Catholic sentiments of most colonists and their colonies).

        Pennsylvania, btw, was not even a colony until about 1680 and so you can’t claim that their religious toleration predates Maryland’s.

        The first Cathedral in the USA was the Baltimore Basilica. The makeup of MD continued to remain highly Catholic even with the religious scuffles.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      May 10, 2016 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

      “If whites are to make any progress at countering the policy of their extermination, they will have to do it themselves.”

      Since everything is genetics for the Judeo-Bolsheviks (JB) and ourselves things would change much quicker if the European male controlled his reproductive life.

      A first step is to insure that his has the right to choose the sex of his offspring.

    • Atomic_Pope's Gravatar Atomic_Pope
      May 11, 2016 - 12:27 am | Permalink

      “Trump is nothing more than a Judeo-Bolshevik (JB) pawn, or foot soldier.”

      This is beyond stupid. I stopped reading after that mental retardation.

  29. Paul's Gravatar Paul
    May 10, 2016 - 10:47 am | Permalink

    All this depends.

    For one Trumpkin has already started to backpedal on tax. If he softens on more issues that will again put off the base. The Jews will keep putting pressure.

    Then Irish shoeshine boy Ryan and the cabal haven’t given up on wrecking things. There is talk of reviving the copse of Romney to run like Perot or even insane McCain aka Son of Cain.

    I wouldn’t glorify Ronnie Reagan. For one he allowed 8 million aliens in and helped brown this country long before the Bushes and all these others. His idol Cal Coolidge was pro-Blacks. Ronnie wasn’t even a pure Irish underdog either. He was part Scots and English on his mother’s side.

    Stopping Hillary is easy. She is a crook and I know lots of Democrats who are lukewarm and distrustful especially her $xxx,xxx speaking fees for banksters plus the dismal Obama legacy is another handicap – Bill the Dog has already started to distance her from this but she needs Blacks to have a chance so that is a risky move like Bill condemning Sista Souljah back in 1992.

    Unfortunately, the establishment is set on crowning her queen. The ammo is just being loaded.

    • mari's Gravatar mari
      May 10, 2016 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

      It was first Nixon and then Reagan who were the affirmative action presidents. In addition to amnesty which not only provided amnesty for illegals but more importantly set the precedent for more Presidential amnesties, Reagan eliminated federal service exams which opened the flood gates to the present black brown and Asian federal civil service.

      • Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
        May 10, 2016 - 10:29 pm | Permalink

        Correct. Yet, to many whites, Reagan is some kind of demi-god and Nixon was a “real” conservative. I don’t know where these people get their beliefs from. A true white advocate, would have never supported the Vietnam war, making Kennedy more of a white advocate than Nixon or Reagan..LOL

      • Luke's Gravatar Luke
        May 11, 2016 - 3:41 am | Permalink

        He eliminated those exams, which, if I recall were called ‘PACE’ exams, because blacks and browns could not pass them. Hence, in those days – the vast majority of US Government civil service positions were held by Whites who WERE able to pass them, and who had the skills, talent, and work ethic necessary to perform their duties efficiently.

  30. May 10, 2016 - 8:47 am | Permalink

    The figures, notably at the top of the table, make it look easily possible. Less than about 5% isn’t much. Presumably the opposition will press hard (no doubt including voting fraud) so I hope you’ve allowed for enhanced efforts by Jews and antiwhites.

  31. Greek Guy's Gravatar Greek Guy
    May 10, 2016 - 8:35 am | Permalink

    I think white nationalists should temper their support for Trump. Remember, all of his children have significant others who are Jewish. Hes son Donald’s wife is half-Jewish, Eric’s wife is Jewish, Ivanka converted to Judaism, and even his daughter with Marla Maples is dating a Jewish man, and will probably marry one. Isn’t this troubling?

    • Brian's Gravatar Brian
      May 10, 2016 - 9:30 am | Permalink

      Trump was probably selected to run as some kind of
      diversion to what we should really be focusing on. I certainly hope I’m wrong but I doubt Trump will do much for our white people.

      • mari's Gravatar mari
        May 10, 2016 - 1:10 pm | Permalink

        I agree. He said he favors affirmative action several times. That says it all.
        “Don’t listen to what he says, watch what he does”

        Old French saying.

        • Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
          May 11, 2016 - 4:12 pm | Permalink

          Yes, but see it always comes back to European-Americans. Of course Trump will be asked to compromise greatly, on all kinds of issues that put European-Americans back to square one. That’s a forgone conclusion. But just like with the immigration issue, where so called conservatives kept trying to effect amnesty after amnesty, it was the will of the grass roots voters, that stopped it. Neither Trump, or anyone else, can do it alone. Having said this and having some very definite beliefs about the character of millions of Americans, I conclude that the outlook is DIM…LOL Sorry, but I’ve seen it over and over on issues that should be a no brainer for whites, but ………etc. PEACE

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        May 10, 2016 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

        If Trump is a diabolus clandestinus ex machina, what practicable alternative winning strategy would you, and other readers of similar outlook, propose before the demographic cut-off point 30 years or so from now? And if Clinton is installed?

        • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
          May 11, 2016 - 4:13 am | Permalink

          There isn’t an electoral solution, the corrupt system won’t allow it. But there is a proven biological solution, namely for White men and women to produce more children. Forget about that vacation in Cancun, produce your arrow to the future as a healthy White child.

        • JM's Gravatar JM
          May 11, 2016 - 5:17 am | Permalink

          @David Ashton
          Says it all.

        • May 11, 2016 - 6:58 am | Permalink

          To avoid the sequence of, soap box, ballot box and finally the ammo box from taking place, there needs to be a major effort by Whites to educate themselves that the current rigged system is controlled and run by an alien elite, namely organized jewry.

          A lot can happen when enough Whites wake up to the fact that there’s a vampire squid-like parasite in control of their country.

    • May 10, 2016 - 10:44 am | Permalink

      If non-Hispanic Whites are 58% of New York’s pop, and 25%+ of them are Jewish, it’s conceivable that 50-75% of Trump’s kids’ rich-kid social circle had/have some degree of Jewish ancestry. I’m not defending them, but these were the fish in their pool.

      • mari's Gravatar mari
        May 10, 2016 - 1:11 pm | Permalink

        Steven, you are right. If one lives in a wealthy area of a big city, most of your neighbors, friends and school mates will be jewish.

    • Antillectual's Gravatar Antillectual
      May 10, 2016 - 11:30 am | Permalink

      No.

      You are missing the bigger picture big time.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      May 10, 2016 - 11:33 am | Permalink

      This Englishman dares to voice the opinion across the Atlantic that half a loaf is better than none, even if it looks a bit like a bagel and tastes a bit like a matzo.

      Not all Jews are happy about the Global South eventually inundating the northern hemisphere; see e.g. the May 2016 issue of “Standpoint”.

      The proof of this American pudding will be in the post-election eating, which should be a first course to something better still if the “70 % turn out” then gets its act together.

      • JM's Gravatar JM
        May 11, 2016 - 5:26 am | Permalink

        @David Ashton
        In my brief perusal of the latest “Standpoint” (thanks for that), am I right to get the impression that it is all about “push” factors rather than the “pull” of the NWO elites? Don’t get me wrong, I’m not contradicting your point about their stance, but they seem to be in denial about the core, effective, cause.

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          May 11, 2016 - 11:25 am | Permalink

          Try also Judith Bergman & other anti-immigration voices at the anti-Antisemitic and anti-Palestinian, “Gatestone Institute” on-line, or Zionists like Melanie Phillips and Gisele Littman. Jews generally will look at the situation with the outlook, “What’s good for us?”, but are always divided about “What to do.” Incidentally, don’t overlook the review by Jonathan Neumann in the magazine on US foreign policy.

          The full understanding of their various positions includes but must go further than (say) Kevin MacDonald’s, and it can be a lifetime labor, but scurrilous generalized demonisation serves no good purpose, any more than an obsequious sycophancy. There are historic lessons from both.

          I support those who help to defend our civilization, whoever they are, and oppose those who undermine it, whoever they are, whatever the numbers involved.

    • Atomic_Pope's Gravatar Atomic_Pope
      May 11, 2016 - 12:32 am | Permalink

      WTF does it matter?

      At this point Whites have no other option but Trump. Who are you going to turn to? Churches? What about Veteran’s organizations? Seriously, WTF are you going to do otherwise besides vote Trump?

      Don’t think sitting at home and doing nothing will help White people. That’s one of the reasons we got into this mess.

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      May 11, 2016 - 3:54 am | Permalink

      It needs to be troubling. And, I agree. This over-the-top idol worship that I’ve been hearing out of the pro-White, alternative media is bordering upon complete irrationality. The Political Cesspool gang – James Edwards and Keith Alexander were gushing some of the most scary and pathetic sounding blind worship of Trump last weekend that I’ve ever heard. Keith kept harping on how Trump was a man of destiny, sent by GAWD ALMIGHTY to rescue America and, by default, the White race from extinction at the hands of the jews and Satan’s children.

      Holy smokes, people. Where is this kind of mentally delusional thinking coming from? The Cesspool team sounded like they have been drinking from the James Jones Kool-Aid Jug.

      At BEST – all we on the pro-white side can hitch our wagons to is to proceed with extremely cautious and RESERVED optimism. Nothing more. Trump is NOT some kind of Messiah, people. He is an elitist who cannot possibly share our views and experiences, dealing with feral blacks and feral mestizos and soon, feral and dangerous muslims.

      Realistically, voting for Trump is our only option – but, STOP this idol worship and this baseless attempt to turn Trump into some kind of Great White Knight who’s riding to our rescue.

      I can guarantee to every individual in the pro-white movement that, 1 or 2 years from now – if Trump gets to the White House – we are going to cursing this guy for having reneged on at least some of his campaign promises. So, do NOT set yourself up with unrealistic expectations.

Comments are closed.