The Jewish Origins of the Open Borders Movement

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.


In a 2015 essay on ‘Whiteness studies’ I attempted to lay the groundwork and contextualization for a more developed study of the scale and devastating impact of contemporary Jewish intellectual activism in our colleges, universities, and wider culture. In that essay I noted the importance of Jewish activists including Noel Ignatiev, Ruth Frankenberg, Ricky Marcuse, and Terry Berman, who between the mid-1970s and late 1990s engaged in an effort to develop an academic discipline known as ‘Whiteness studies.’ Since its inception, Whiteness studies has occupied a unique space in an increasingly multicultural disciplinary landscape. Unlike Black studies, Jewish studies, or Asian studies, this sphere of academia is not intended to constructively explore the achievements, history, and culture of its scrutinized ethnic group. Rather, the genre exists to subject ‘Whiteness,’ and by implication White people, to a uniquely hostile dialectic consisting of the debasement of White culture, the degradation of White history, and the delegitimization of the European claim to existence. As such, the discipline may be regarded as an act of ethnic warfare, based as it is on the intended conquest of minds and consciences, and eventually, resources and territory.

In all Western countries, Whiteness studies, in both its academic and social justice expressions, remains disproportionately directed by Jews. This is an empirically observable fact. A book could be written on Jewish involvement in this academic “discipline” alone, but it should suffice here for a brief survey of some key examples. These include Syracuse University’s Barbara Applebaum, who has made a career out of advancing notions of ‘White guilt’ and ending what she describes as “White moral innocence.” In a similar vein is Leeds University’s Say Burgin, who teaches a course titled “Why is my curriculum White?,” while University of California’s George Lipsitz, author of How Racism Takes Place, has also written several books on ‘Whiteness’ and White guilt. Jewish feminist Michelle Fine, based at City University of New York, has produced numerous works on “White privilege,” including her book Witnessing Whiteness. Other Jewish academics highly active in the Whiteness Studies field include Lois Weis, David Theo Goldberg, Maurice Berger, Lawrence Grossberg, Jennifer Roth-Gordon, Cynthia Levine-Rasky, Laura S. Abrams, Judith Katz, Melissa Steyn, Paula Rothenberg, and Amy Eshleman.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Jewish involvement is perhaps even more intense in the sphere of so-called social justice activism. One of the foremost operators of “Whiteness workshops” in the United States is Dara Silverman. Silverman is a “consultant, organizer and trainer who has been building movements for economic, racial, gender and social justice for over 20 years. From January 2015 to July 2016, Dara was the founding Director of Showing up for Racial Justice (SURJ). As a consultant, Dara works with small and mid-sized groups to build their organizing skills, fundraising and organizational capacity. Dara was the Executive Director of Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (JFREJ) in New York City from 2003–2009.”

Notorious Jewish acitivist Tim Wise has praised Silverman as “a critical voice in the newly-invigorated movement of anti-racist white allies. A relentless co-conspirator with leaders of color in the struggle against white supremacy and racial inequity, Silverman’s grasp of movement building strategy is second to none.” Regarding the actual content of her work, Silverman offers to ‘cure’ Whites of their “toxic Whiteness” via workshops and ‘webinars.’ In essence, these efforts are programs of deracination, executed via psychological abuse centered on guilt inducement. This effort at separating a people from their identity is more than a little hypocritical given that Silverman has stated in at least one interview that “I’m Jewish and I have a pretty strong connection to Judaism.”

Dara Silverman

Dara Silverman

In addition to Silverman, many more Jews have been attracted to the despairingly lucrative and fashionable business of convincing Whites to abandon their identity. Among them are Jon Greenberg, author of “10 examples that prove White privilege protects White people in every aspect imaginable,” and “Talking to Kids about Whiteness.” Other prominent figures in the social justice sphere of the assault on Whiteness include Debbie Zucker and Robin Nussbaum. When New York’s Vassar College decided to hold a series of Whiteness workshops last October, the two workshop leaders were Diane Eshelman and Michael Drucker, both of whom are Jewish. While the weakening of the internal or psychological supports of White identity is sufficiently problematic in itself, the problem is compounded by intensive Jewish activism in other spheres of academic and ‘social justice’ activity. The most damaging in these respects are the Jewish dominance in ‘critical race theory,’ and its correspondent political expression in the form of the open borders movement.

Readers who have been observing the ongoing ‘refugee crisis’ over the last couple of years will most likely have come across the phrase “No one is illegal” at some point. The refrain is particularly popular in Germany, where Kein mensch ist illegal became the rallying cry of tens of thousands of successfully deracinated German liberals, and thus was a key feature of the migrant tsunami that would engulf that unfortunate nation.

And indeed, it was Germany that first gave birth to the term and the movement it would encapsulate. It was at the documenta X art exhibition in Kassel in 1997 that this particular ‘anti-racist’ movement is largely considered to have been formally founded. That year’s exhibition and the movement it spawned were organized by French-Jewish ‘Artistic Director’ Catherine David. David was keen to turn the entire exhibition into a political statement, something that didn’t endear her to some of Germany’s more conservative art critics. Undeterred, she turned the city of Kassel itself into a ‘lesson’ for gallery visitors, and one of her artist associates and fellow Jews, Lois Weinberger, even planted ‘flourishing weeds’ from southern and southeastern Europe along the disused tracks at Kassel’s main railway station as a metaphor for migration and a ‘post-national’ world. Amidst the flagrant promotion of fellow Jews Eva Hesse and Chantal Ackerman, it was the fervid Jewish intellectual atmosphere of documenta X, and its abstract theories about migration and ‘post-national’ identity, that gave rise to Kein Mensch ist Illegal, a phrase that those present borrowed from the writings of Elie Wiesel.

Although the formal origins of the movement may be traced to Kassel 1997, this was arguably only the spiritual birth of the group and its specific ideology. More formal codification of its theory would arrive in the early 2000s with the publication of British-Jewish intellectual Steve Cohen’s No One Is Illegal: Asylum and Immigration Control, Past and Present (2003). Cohen, who died in 2009, had by then worked for three decades as an immigration lawyer in Manchester, where he set up the Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit, and participated in Anti-Deportation Campaigns. He was a member of the International Marxist Group (IMG) from 1968 until the end of 1974, though he appears to have been very publicly engaged in Far Left politics until he was beaten unconscious by British Nationalists who broke up one of his meetings in 1976. Thereafter his public involvement appears to have lessened and took on a more reclusive aspect. Cohen was a member of the Jewish Socialist Group for most of his life, and he was a quintessential Jewish intellectual in that he was both prolific and intense, writing books, manifestos, and pamphlets about anti-Semitism, socialism, immigration, borders and the welfare state.

In 2003, Cohen capped thirty years of activism with the publication of his opus, No One Is Illegal. While the slogan-title was perfectly fitted to Cohen’s own ideological trajectory, he was also keenly aware of its resonance on the Continent, where it was the main statement of the Jewish-inspired transnational European open borders network which formed in the late 1990s. This network had by 2000 developed into the main grassroots grouping of radical migration-related politics on a European level. One of its primary tactics was the maintenance of an ongoing visible presence in border camps such as the notorious camp at Calais, along with political campaigns against migration control, and Europe-wide action days. Cohen’s contribution to such ‘direct action’ politics, via the publication of his book and an accompanying manifesto, was to provide both rarefied theory and abstract ‘moral’ justification.

Cohen’s theories were, and remain, extremely basic. They draw heavily from his Jewish background, in the sense that Cohen has a highly fluid, abstract, and nomadic attitude to the nation state and nationality in general. Having been wanderers upon the earth since pre-history, one can hardly be surprised that, Zionist distractions aside, Jews would continue to possess an aversion to “soil” nationalism, even if they maintain the absurd pretense that “blood” nationalism matters as little to them. The central issue here resides in the fact that Jews have been remarkably, and very problematically, insistent on corroding the soil-attachment of the settled peoples among whom they dwell. Steve Cohen was a perfect example of this highly corrosive force. In his 2003 No One Is Illegal manifesto he asserted that immigration controls “are inherently racist in that they are based on the crudest of all nationalisms — namely the assertion that the British have a franchise on Britain.”

In Cohen’s worldview the British, and Whites wherever they are, are mere squatters on land they can be rightfully dispossessed of. Their resources are free for the taking in the course of “competition.” Cohen, the apparent life-long Communist universalist, thus reveals a startlingly capitalist/social Darwinist view of land and territory, even to the extent of employing Capitalist language (‘franchise’) in order to make his point. This struck me at first reading as a vindication of Yockey’s idea that Marxism has an unshakeable “Capitalistic provenance,” but even stronger was the echo of the familiar socio-political position of ‘the Jew’ as both arch Communist and Capitalist.

Like that of many Jews, Cohen’s political ideology was itself fluid and lacking borders, characterized chiefly by racial opportunism. For instance, we know that Cohen would never say that the British were entitled to colonize Africa in the nineteenth century because of the absurdity of the “Africans having a franchise on Africa.” The reason for this is that Cohen’s theory, like anything derivative of Jewish Bolshevism, isn’t really about open borders, or Socialism, at all. It is instead about White dispossession. Cohen’s formulations and arguments all focus on non-White migrants seeking entry to historically White nations. His argument about the “franchise” on land is little more than a blueprint for dispossession, inspired by his own archaic Jewish grievances, real or imagined.

Cohen’s ‘theory’ progresses to the statement that immigration controls “are only explicable by racism. Their imposition is a result of and is a victory for racist, proto-fascist and actual fascist organizations. It is impossible to see how legislation brought into being by such means, legislation accompanied by the most vile racist imagery and assumptions, can ever be reconfigured and rendered ‘fair’.” It is difficult to imagine that anyone with a reasonable level of intelligence could ever accept arguments like these. Even setting aside racial prerogatives, the idea that immigration controls are “only explicable by racism” is incredibly weak given that it ignores the imperatives of national security, cultural preservation, and the protection of jobs, health, and wages. One assumes that Cohen would have seen “vile racist imagery” in even the most everyday concern of a British housewife that her child should have a place in the local school, or a bed in the local hospital. His argument relies on there being an “implicit Fascism” in these important facets of life in White nations. This was something that Cohen probably did perceive, but only because of the miasma of grievances, inadequacies, and psychological complexes implicit in his own ethnic background.

The third key argument of Cohen’s manifesto is that “the demand for ‘fair’ controls simply ignores the link between immigration controls and welfare entitlements. This link is itself intrinsically unfair — and racist.” Cohen’s preoccupations with ‘fairness’ and ‘racism’ are here employed again to obfuscate the genuine and necessary concern of citizens who have invested in a welfare system built and developed in a once ethnically-homogenous and high-trust society. Cohen viewed the desire of the British to stop immigrant non-investors from reaping disproportionate gains from their welfare state as ‘unfair’ and ‘racist.’ To paraphrase our Jewish theorist, Cohen refuses to accept that foreigners do not have a “franchise” on British money. Cohen also refuses to acknowledge that a state with no borders will in time cease to be a state at all. In such an environment a ‘welfare state’ becomes an impossibility.

The final facet of Cohen’s ‘Open Borders’ manifesto ends with the assertion that “controls can never be ‘fair’ to those who remain subject to them.” Cohen’s argument here is based on a putative entitlement of the foreigner. Cohen’s believes that the stranger is entitled to limitless acquiescence. ‘Fairness,’ in Cohen’s mind, is the opening of the gates of Britain, a tiny country already struggling with a population of 64 million, to a world holding 7.5 billion people. ‘Fairness’ in this calculation amounts to national suicide, not merely in the sense of the forfeiture of national borders and institutions, but the total annihilation of the organic nation in the form of the British people. In this sense, it is a manifesto for genocide.

This sinister document was the foundation stone of the ‘No One is Illegal’ movement in Britain, where a group adopting the same name was launched under the leadership and direction of Steve Cohen, his co-ethnic associate David Landau, and two women of unknown provenance. Over the last few years No One Is Illegal groups have been formed throughout Europe and the United States: Spain (Ninguna Persona Es Ilegal), Sweden (Ingen Manniska Ar Illegal), Poland (Zaden Czlowiek Nie Jest Nielegalny) and Holland (Geen Mens Is Illegaal). These groups have been allied to growing activist organizations calling themselves ‘No Borders.’

Far from declining with the death of Steve Cohen, the Jewish prominence in the Open Borders movement has perhaps become even more acute in recent years. The range of theory underpinning the effort has also slightly diversified. George Mason University professor Bryan Caplan is the founder of and is the most visible North American figure calling for an end to immigration control. Just last year Caplan wrote an article for TIME in which he argued that “instead of redoubling our efforts to curtail immigration, we should return to the historic American policy of open borders—admitting everyone eager to come build a better life for themselves.” Unlike Cohen’s arguments, Caplan relies on an exclusively capitalist appeal — the lie that open borders will mean the influx of immigrants who will make American’s richer. As far as lies go, this must rank somewhere alongside that of Menasseh Ben Israel (1604–1657), who not only told Oliver Cromwell that a readmission of Jews to England would make the nation richer, but that it would also lead to the imminent return of Jesus Christ.

Bryan Caplan

Bryan Caplan

Caplan boldly claims, without statistics or evidence, that “immigrants, like tourists, are normally paying customers, not beggars.” However, we know from statistics that they are beggars. It has been estimated that “40% of young Muslims in France and 50% in Germany are unemployed and in receipt of social benefits. For example, an estimated 40% of welfare outlays in Denmark go to the 5% of the population that is Muslim. According to Otto Schily, former German interior minister, speaking of immigrants in general: “Seventy percent of the newcomers [since 2002] land on welfare the day of their arrival.” In Sweden, perhaps the most acute case, immigrants are estimated at 1.5 million out of 10 million people; immigration is estimated to cost almost $14 billion per year.” Completely ignoring this reality, Caplan’s refrain is that “immigrants are rarely charity cases.” In fact, in Caplan’s argument immigrants will bring their nations “trillions of dollars of extra wealth creation, year after year.” This is the promise of the Second Coming for an atheistic and materialistic age.

Taking his cue from Steve Cohen, Caplan published his own manifesto on “Open Borders Day, March 16th 2015.” The manifesto is signed disproportionately by Jewish and non-White intellectuals from colleges across the United States, but also including some in Canada and Europe. A particularly interesting aspect of the manifesto is that it avoids the economic ploys raised by Caplan in his TIME article, and instead returns to the empty moralizing of Steve Cohen’s 2003 effort. Caplan argues that “freedom of movement is a basic liberty that governments should respect and protect unless justified by extenuating circumstances. This extends to movement across international boundaries.”

Caplan continues that “border controls predominantly restrict the movement of people who bear no ill intentions. Most of the people legally barred from moving across international borders today are fleeing persecution or poverty, desire a better job or home, or simply want to see the city lights.”

They simply want to see the city lights? Caplan and his supporters demand that “international borders should be open for all to cross, in both directions.” This refrain about traffic moving in “both directions,” is one of the more insidious and disingenuous ploys of the open borders advocates. Indeed, it is at the core of the effort to convince Whites that by abandoning their borders they too will be “set free.” But how long will be the line be for flights from New Hampshire to Mogadishu? From Copenhagen to Damascus? In the nightmarish realization of the dreams of Cohen, Caplan, and their swelling numbers of colleagues, there will be no traffic in “both directions.” There will be an almighty surge from all dark corners of the earth to those parts of it where the last dim light of civilization yet glows.


In Sun Tzu’s Art of War it is noted that it is a better offensive tactic to take your opponent’s forces whole rather than in piecemeal fashion. National borders, national identities, and the piecemeal nature of the White socio-political existence are obstacles to globalists of all descriptions seeking our defeat. Much better for them that we be united in economic bond-houses like the European Union, where diktats and immigration directives can be handed down to the great mass, leaving no stone unturned, no patch of land untouched. Much better for them that our borders be obliterated, absorbing us forever into the great chaos of dark humanity. But, as Sun Tzu said, knowing your enemy can be a first step to successful defense. And perhaps now we have a slightly clearer appreciation of his tactics and his methods.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

47 Comments to "The Jewish Origins of the Open Borders Movement"

  1. wiggins's Gravatar wiggins
    October 2, 2016 - 11:19 am | Permalink

    “‘You haven’t a real appreciation of Newspeak, Winston,’ he said almost sadly … ‘In your heart you’d prefer to stick to Oldspeak, with all its vagueness and its useless shades of meaning. You don’t grasp the beauty of the destruction of words. Do you know that Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year?’
    ‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it …’”

    O’Brien to Winston – 1984

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      October 2, 2016 - 1:10 pm | Permalink

      @ wiggins

      Newspeak = PC is the language of the Outer Party.

      Prolefeed = pornography, computer-addiction & trash-entertainment, so that “if there is hope” it does NOT “lie with the proles” or deplorables, let alone Odinists or Naziskins.

      The Inner Party is the real problem – in its banker nests, lawyer offices, media managements, computer control-centers, and gated communities, or on its yachts. Not ONLY “Them”.

      • Helvena's Gravatar Helvena
        October 4, 2016 - 5:30 am | Permalink

        Of course not only (((them))). As Prof. McDonald said, “necessary but not sufficient”. The jews see Whites as a hostile other (projection on their part which ends up a self-fulfilling prophecy) because it benefits them too. Our traitors use jews and the jews use our traitors for gain. Remove the jew from the equation and the traitors are exposed. Why remove the jew first? They are not us.

  2. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    October 2, 2016 - 11:35 am | Permalink

    Another excellent article Dr. Joyce! How can we overcome Jewish power? What strategies offer the best hope for success? Given Jewish control/domination of our monetary systems, economies, mass media, government, and, well, just about every important social institution, how are we to effectively deal with the Jewish question (which seems to me to be at the root of most of our problems)?

    I see only two basic possible outcomes that would free us of this scourge, separation (ie., expulsion or destruction of Jewish populations) or the de-emancipation of Jewry returning them to the status they held in the West prior to the Jewish emancipations of the 19th century. Clearly, after two thousand years of failing to assimilate, assimilation is not going to be the answer.

    But how do we get from here to there, before it is too late? Yes, we must educate our fellow Whites on the issues, but beyond that we must have some plan of action. I am reminded of the 9/11 truth movement. In a recent article it was pointed out that the 9/11 truth movement has been hugely successful in investigating the events of 9/11 and destroying the governments official story line.

    They have also been quite successful in educating Americans, a clear majority of Americans no longer believe the government’s official story. Yet, none of this has done anything to slow down, much less halt, the Jewish driven global war on terror. We are hurtling, as we speak, towards a military confrontation with a nuclear armed Russia…a confrontation that might destroy us all.

    Clearly knowledge of the issues is not in itself a solution (although it seems prerequisite to one). What do you see as our possible courses of action to halt and then reverse the demographic and cultural destruction of our people?


    • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
      October 2, 2016 - 1:56 pm | Permalink

      IMO, the first thing that has to change is the molly coddling attitude that men have allowed themselves to adopt at the insidious induction of the stealthy Jew:

      Let’s agree to disagree. Wrong!

      When it comes to my life…,
      and my life unfortunately depends in large measure upon a Racial Cohort that is willing to act like a Spartan Army..,
      taking an effeminate attitude of agreeing to disagree just does not cut it.
      Unfortunately my lack of knowledge of classical literature forces me to fall back on common examples of popular movies, but can you imagine King Leonidas telling the Persian messenger, “Well…, I am afraid we will have to agree to disagree on a few points.”,
      instead of kicking them all into that “bottomless pit..”?
      I can not.

      I recently met a Korean female tourist who asked me how life in Iceland was.
      As a corollary to the “in-group out-group” phenomenon talked about by Hr. Prof. Dktr. K. MacDonald, I tried to convey the reality that as a White German working legally on a six year work visa in Korea,
      although I preformed my job with more efficacy and showed more loyalty to my employer than even the Korean staff,
      I was never fully accepted into Korean society as a Korean is.

      Instead of admitting to understand the obviousness of what I was saying, the Korean female, who “…lived in New York…”, chose to play stupid and abruptly ended the conversation.
      This is something a Jew would do to a White Nationalist who had intellectually cornered him/her.

      It also tells me that these dark hordes have learned well their lessons in stealth from the Jew.

      In the world of Ethnic Modern Spiritual Warfare, we are handicapping ourselves with our own civility and politeness…, towards our own people…, as well as the people who are taking us over!

      You can not fight a battle if your army insists on taking hair driers and fashion statements onto the battlefield.

      When liberal effeminate men in Iceland express the usual insanity when confronted with reality, I pull no punches and call them every name in the book!
      I invite a battle with them on the spot.
      If they were my own prodigy I would show them in no uncertain terms how instantly painful insanity can be.

  3. RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
    October 2, 2016 - 12:10 pm | Permalink

    “…though he appears to have been very publicly engaged in Far Left politics until he was beaten unconscious by British Nationalists who broke up one of his meetings in 1976. Thereafter his public involvement appears to have lessened and took on a more reclusive aspect. Cohen…”

    How gratifying to read that a subversive Jew was, “…beaten unconscious by British Nationalists…”. German Nationalists should take instruction from this. Notice also that Jews will learn to stop or at least curtail their War against Whites if Whites take them on in the one sphere that they have absolutely no chance of winning in, namely the traditional White way of teaching lying, treacherous and slimy Jews, or anyone for that matter, of how to behave.


    “…Having been wanderers upon the earth since pre-history, one can hardly be surprised that, Zionist distractions aside, Jews would continue to possess an aversion to “soil” nationalism, even if they maintain the absurd pretense that “blood” nationalism matters as little to them.”

    Jews have not only stolen White wealth underpin the metamorphosis of White nations into non-White cesspools of crime and dispossession in a collusive manner starting in the Spiritual Realm and moving rapidly to the financial world, they have further cashed in on every aspect of “White Flight” from industrial tourism to real estate ventures that cater to Whites who spend profitable energies that would have otherwise been channeled into creative and industrial avocations upon “their traditional White soil”.
    They have also invested heavily in the infrastructure that caters to the dark hordes invading White lands.
    They call that “…double enders…” in the real estate world only in this case we might call then “…multiple enders…”, since Jews are at the forefront of the dispossession of various peoples of their native lands and cashing in on the turmoil they produce.
    It is only natural that they should be best able to extrapolate where lucrative markets are “opening up” that they can then further cash in on since the Jews are the ones who are orchestrating the global movement of peoples through Spiritual Stealth and financial feeding frenzies.

    Here in Iceland one can find a plethora of Euro-Nationals who have escaped the dark cesspools that Jews have organized in their own native lands in the hopes of finding a better life. The unfortunate thing in all this is that Iceland is now also experiencing a slow death spiral to the extent that record numbers of Icelandic youth are fleeing their native land (many heading for Norway and Denmark) in the hopes of finding a more fair and just society.
    If only they read TOO, then they would realize that the same fate that is befalling Iceland awaits all corners of the planet…, unless Europeans and White Americans stop running and stand up to defend their right to exist by taking the example of British Nationalists.

    As the inner city Reykjavik sees more and more dark skinned “diversity enrichment” (violence, theft, substance abuse, etc…)…, –
    accompanied by sky rocketing housing costs and undercut wages by racially cohesive Asian and African economic illegals, many who claim refugee status upon landing.., –
    the “establishment media machine” is spewing colourful utopian ideals about Icelandic life and culture to “stop over” tourists, in the hopes that it will prevent these “short duration high spending” tourists from staying more than a week here so as not to pick up on the obvious realities that average Icelanders are being subjected to.
    The “…spiritually independent and physically strong..” Icelanders.., that the Jew driven mass media is keen to reinforce in the minds of Icelanders themselves, is precisely the weakness that the racially cohesive but individually less capable “…other Races…” rely upon in their conquest of this (once?) culturally unified land.


    “…Over the last few years No One Is Illegal groups have been formed throughout Europe and the United States: Spain (Ninguna Persona Es Ilegal), Sweden (Ingen Manniska Ar Illegal), Poland (Zaden Czlowiek Nie Jest Nielegalny) and Holland (Geen Mens Is Illegaal). These groups have been allied to growing activist organizations calling themselves ‘No Borders.’ “

    The World Press Freedom Index actually lists Iceland below Germany in press freedom! At first I thought it was a satirical website, but these people are actually serious. In Germany hundreds if not thousands of independent journalists are criminalized every year for telling the truth about what is happening like we here at TOO attempt to do.
    In Iceland I have yet to hear of a single writer ever being thrown into prison for telling the truth!
    Moreover, I have been given front page coverage in the largest daily newspaper that details the plight of “Holocaust lie of the Jew” Whistle-blowers in both Canada and Germany.

    This website;

    lead me to this one;

    Without bothering to check, due to “name that lying Jew” burn out, after reading this splendid article by Dr. Joyce, I can well surmise that this is just another one in the broader network of,
    “…growing activist organizations calling themselves ‘No Borders.’…”,
    that are funded by murderous Jews.


    “But, as Sun Tzu said, knowing your enemy can be a first step to successful defense.”

    In this case, IMO the enemy is actually Whites who do not know themselves.
    They have been swindled by the Jew into thinking they are less than they are,
    into believing that they are something that they are not and, acting as if the world around them will conform to something that is totally without precedent in earth history.

    Whites’ lack of awareness and insistence on willful ignorance will be the eventual undoing of European civilization and cast the globe into the dog eat dog existence of the Jew World Order.
    White children must be raised more strictly and rigorously if they are to forego their eventual own bloodletting.

    • A.Yell's Gravatar A.Yell
      October 2, 2016 - 7:48 pm | Permalink

      “In this case, IMO the enemy is actually Whites who do not know themselves.”
      I’m afraid you’re right. For most of my life I was one of the those White people. Until in 2012 I landed at a business in a heavily Jewish part of town. We dealt with the real estate business. Almost all of our clients were Jews(mostly Orthodox) and practically all of their tenants were immigrants. All of their handymen who did repairs on their buildings were illegal immigrants so they (and the business I worked for) were engaged in harboring illegal immigrants. That experience led me to where I discovered how bad off the White world truly was. I read articles by Kevin MacDonald about hostile Jewish influence and by John Derbyshire and Steve Sailer about Human Bio Diversity. And now I’m as vehement a White Nationalist as you could meet. And I feel liberated! I lost what remained of my Christian faith(Jan. 2016) as I came to understand the evolutionary nature of mankind which explains so much of the history of the last 50 years(I’m over 50) and the decline of the West in that period. But it also explains my life and my failures that have resulted from my acceptance of the ruling ideology of pathological altruism. In my case life began at 50!

  4. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    October 2, 2016 - 12:52 pm | Permalink

    It is hardly surprising that a community that for many centuries has straddled national borders, or been accorded separate areas within them, should support and promote a world without borders; this is the basic reason for friction and resource-competition (i.e. so-called “antisemitism”).

    In the unique Jewish case, there is a specific cultural baggage that has persisted through successive historical and regional circumstances. Whereas European colonization was largely directed towards overseas “virgin” lands, Jewish colonization has focused mainly on urban centers in the western world.

    In that process, Jewish groups and activities have had diverse impacts, negative and positive; see e.g. Richard Lynn, Norman Cantor, Paul Johnson, Shlomo Sand. Whether this entails an primary dominant drive towards global control, and if so, what precisely are its motivations and methods, and likely purposes and outcomes, are a matter of important but accurate and thorough research and debate, which should be freely discussed but preferably not clouded by hysteria or disinformation.

    In my view, subject to rational refutation, most self-identified Jews are not conscious participants in a world-domination conspiracy, and they act collectively only when, rightly or wrongly, they feel threatened collectively.

    The various arguments proposed by e.g. Adolf Hitler, Georges Batault or Herve Ryssen needed to be weighed honestly and carefully, especially in respect of the more recent Never Again and Israel Survival themes within Jewish circles and in their Gentile outreach.

    Our nations are fully entitled to protect and advance our own identities and interests against damage, whether by Jews or any other groups, and there is no need to defend ourselves in a manner that contravenes our sense of decency and effective proportion.

    • PPight1931's Gravatar PPight1931
      October 2, 2016 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

      “they act collectively only when, rightly or wrongly, they feel threatened collectively”

      — would that were so, the silent majority seems to me all too circumspect on this and so many other subjects inimical to Whites:

      Wolfsbane to No one is illegal

      • Luke's Gravatar Luke
        October 3, 2016 - 4:18 am | Permalink

        Here is an analogy that I think can perfectly illustrate the jewish-White conflict.

        Imagine if a White family were to live in a large home that had a couple of extra bedrooms that were empty. So, being kind and generous – that White family decided to offer one of the empty bedrooms to a homeless jew. However, once that homeless and wandering jew had moved in – they decide, on their own, and without bothering to consult the White family who were the owners of the large house – to invite a couple of blacks or mestizos or muslims to move into the second empty bedroom. Whereupon, both the jew and his imported guests began to feast off of the resources of the White family.

        In conclusion – the question is one of ownership. White Europeans founded this nation and they created this nation. Whites are therefore the rightful owners of America. Non-whites, and in particular, jews – the vast majority of whom only flooded into America in the late 1890s and early 1900s after the nation had already been created – are guests living inside a White nation. But, these guests think they have the right to (a) deny that Whites own America, and (b) that jews have the right to import every third world loser into America and work to maliciously reduce Whites to a minority inside the nation that they created.

        • Armor's Gravatar Armor
          October 3, 2016 - 9:05 am | Permalink

          “In conclusion – the question is one of ownership. White Europeans founded this nation and they created this nation. Whites are therefore the rightful owners of America.”

          The question is about ownership of ourselves, not just of our house or country. The migrants are here for the money, not for the territory. They want to live off White people. And they are not just occupying our territory, they are destroying us.

          The Jewish idea is that non-Whites have rights over White people, not just over White countries. The Jews think it’s unfair that White people would take care of their children and their own nation instead of taking care of third-world interlopers.

          What White Nationalists want for themselves is racial separation much more than control over a particular territory. Control over a particular territory is simply a way to get racial separation. But the Jewish anti-White proposition (as defined by Horus) doesn’t only say there can be no all-White countries anywhere; it says there can be no all-White areas within the confines of those formerly all-White countries. No all-White streets, no all-White schools, no all-White classrooms, and eventually, no White people. So, the Jewish claim is not only on our territory.

          In practice, White people are being replaced by non-Whites. But in the Jewish narrative, White people are the ones taking the place of the non-Whites: it’s unfair that there still remains Whites where there could be Blacks instead. It’s racial oppression!

          According to the Jews, no distinction should be drawn between third-world interlopers and White people who keep their nation going and existing. People are all the same, which means it is immoral for Whites to resist race-replacement. But that doesn’t make any sense: if the Jews really thought Whites and non-Whites were the same, they wouldn’t push race replacement and wouldn’t blame us for resisting.

          In the real world, not all people are the same, and non-White immigration is killing us.

        • Jay's Gravatar Jay
          October 4, 2016 - 7:07 am | Permalink

          As one whose ancestors drove the British Army out of the upcountry of the Carolinas in 1780-1781 and then proceeded to create farms, businesses and schools that made this country what it is, I could not agree more.

    • Bob's Gravatar Bob
      October 2, 2016 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

      “they act collectively only when, rightly or wrongly, they feel threatened collectively”

      I don’t believe I agree with this assertion. It seems to me that those jews who strongly self-identify as jewish tend to support what they see as “jewish interests” whenever they have the opportunity to do so. I agree that most do not see themselves involved in any kind of quest for global domination, but are simply advancing what they see as their own interests. What makes this so effective for jews is they enjoy a far greater degree of group cohesiveness than most Whites.

      Unfortunately, the undermining and destruction of homogeneous societies is a fundamental Jewish interest. Given the parasitical nature of their existence how could it be otherwise? Right now they are hell bent upon the destruction of White nations, but is there really any doubt that once that is accomplished they will not seek to penetrate Asian societies and bring to them this same program?

      Much has been said about the weaknesses of White culture that make us vulnerable to Jewish penetration, but at the end of the day the problem always comes back to the Jewish question…What are we to do with the Jews? The answer to me is plain enough. We simply cannot allow Jewish populations to dwell within White nations. The end result of this mixing is always the same…

      The Jewish question has been asked, and answered dozens of times through our history. We all know the only answers that work, we just need to muster the courage to come out and advocate for them. No White nation has ever been able to recover from Jewish domination without expelling the offending Jewish population, either physically from their territory or from their societies through the implementation of special laws limiting the free movement and activities of Jews.

      There have been at least two territorial homelands set aside for the Jewish people, one in Palestine and the other in the Russian far east. The existence of these homelands has not only NOT resolved the Jewish question, in the case of Israel, it has made the situation worse as it gives Jewish power direct control over its own nuclear weapons and a sort of refuge for Jews should they wear their welcome out elsewhere.

      My question remains, how do we get from here to there? Time is short and if we do not resolve this issue within the current generation it will be too late to save our own culture and identity.

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        October 3, 2016 - 12:31 am | Permalink

        The existence of these homelands has not only NOT resolved the Jewish question, in the case of Israel, it has made the situation worse as it gives Jewish power direct control over its own nuclear weapons and a sort of refuge for Jews should they wear their welcome out elsewhere.

        I really think that Jewish behavior is genetically driven— and for all the Jews to live together in a “normal nation” is utterly contrary to their nature. If we ever manage to get them out, it is certain they’ll want back in.

        The only real solution would be to either genetically modify them, or to exterminate them.

        My question remains, how do we get from here to there? Time is short and if we do not resolve this issue within the current generation it will be too late to save our own culture and identity.

        At this point in time too much is unclear (Trump, Europe, etc.). In the near future, we may have a better understanding of where things are headed. For now, just keep doing what we are doing.

    • HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
      October 2, 2016 - 7:12 pm | Permalink

      It is probable the Jew acts not with a conspiratorial global objective but rather out of an reactive and visceral dislike of the “other”. A timeless, almost reflexive, response to other tribes perceived to be intrinsically antagonistic towards the Jews. And the Jew cannot imagine another state of affairs – hostility being necessary to the maintenance of separateness. Combine this with an almost impulsive drive to mold whatever society he may find himself in to maximize the interest of the Jews – a view with a firm biological basis; beavers come to mind. The large scale control of institutions/nations is explicable as an emergent property of their collective behavior without the awareness of individuals.

      No conspiracy is necessary: just a confluence of racial interests.

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        October 3, 2016 - 2:18 am | Permalink

        You said it so very well!

        I don’t think there is any way to reason or bargain with the Jews (which doesn’t give us very many options.)

  5. October 2, 2016 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Dara Silverman needs a toothbrush :)

    Greetings from zog-Germany.

    • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
      October 3, 2016 - 3:06 am | Permalink

      A toothbrush!?!

      With a face like that I was thinking more along the lines of mercy in the form of Dr. assisted suicide.

  6. PPight1931's Gravatar PPight1931
    October 2, 2016 - 2:09 pm | Permalink

    “Disputes among groups, classes and nations can and should be settled by free discussion, negotiation and compromise when — but only when — the disputes range within some common framework of shared ideas and interests. When the disputes arise out of a clash of basic interests and an opposition of basic ideas, as is from time to time inevitably the case, then they cannot be settled by negotiation and compromise but must be resolved by power, coercion and, sometimes, war.”
    James Burnham, “Suicide of the West” (New York: John Day, 1964), p. 130.
    [unverified by me]

  7. Sir Charles Pipkins's Gravatar Sir Charles Pipkins
    October 2, 2016 - 3:32 pm | Permalink

    A nation w/o borders is like a house w/o a roof.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      October 3, 2016 - 12:16 am | Permalink

      Without walls. The walls are the “borders” of a house.

      • Jay's Gravatar Jay
        October 4, 2016 - 6:55 am | Permalink

        Obviously you do not camp out. The most rudimentary structure for camping is a poncho suspended above one’s sleeping bag, in order to keep out the most obnoxious intrusion: rain. Walls are secondary to keep out mosquitos, cold, wind. The west needs defended borders because it is raining illegal invaders with sub-90 IQs and mores that are incompatible with Western Civilization. They are the most obnoxious intrusion, more so than shoddy imports or illegal drugs.

  8. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    October 2, 2016 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    @Andrew Joyce

    “For example, an estimated 40% of welfare outlays in Denmark go to the 5% of the population that is Muslim.”

    Do you have an exact source for that?

    There’s a young Danish woman on the net (who favors immigration) that I’d love to pass that on to.

    P.S. Fantastic article!

  9. HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
    October 2, 2016 - 7:43 pm | Permalink

    Fine article. Caplan reminds me the Jews are masters of sophistry. A sense of balance: people from both societies can immigrate. An appeal to self-interest: America will be enriched; immigrants are a fount of wealth for their recipients. An appeal to fair play: they harbor no ill intentions ( I guess he’s not familiar with ISIS). An appeal to pity: they are fleeing persecution or poverty.

    • JM's Gravatar JM
      October 3, 2016 - 3:25 am | Permalink

      @HK Wills
      “…masters of sophistry.”
      Like Eastern carpet salesmen selling shoddy goods: “feel the quality!”. And it doesn’t stop no matter what the “station” in life.

    • Armor's Gravatar Armor
      October 3, 2016 - 9:13 am | Permalink

      “Caplan reminds me the Jews are masters of sophistry.”

      They are the masters of impudent BS, but their BS isn’t persuasive.

      They have taken over the universities and the media, and our elites have been silenced. And now, the Jews are filling the void with BS. But they didn’t conquer the universities thanks to the strength of their BS. They used the usual methods: crypsis, networking, ethnic solidarity, intense activism, bribing, buying up support from the politicians, buying up newspapers, defamation campaigns, strategic marriages, phony intellectual work, and so on. Only then were they able to push their impudent BS with no resistance.

      The government’s race replacement program is not proof that Jewish BS is persuasive. It simply shows that the government too has been bought up and hijacked, just like the universities and the media. The government has been organizing the third-world invasion, against the will of the people.

  10. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    October 2, 2016 - 10:40 pm | Permalink

    The native Scots, Irish, English, Welsh have been ethnically cleansed from their land since before the War of the Succession when Cromwell’s debts to the Synagogue of Mulheim were settled. Allodial title of all estates was the collateral on those loans.

    This story is only told in the ballads and songs of the people who were cleared out the Highlands, taxed onto the transports to the penal colonies, impressed into the navy or who were driven out of the Commons when the Bank of England took over the monetisation of the national debt to the Synagogue.
    The Braes of Killiekrankie
    ‘You’d better kiss king willie’s loof than cam bye Killiekrankie-o”

  11. October 3, 2016 - 2:10 am | Permalink

    August 29 to August 31, 1897 the First Zionist Congress the inaugural congress of the Zionist Organization (to become the World Zionist Organization in 1960) held in Basel , Switzerland took place. It was convened and chaired by Theodor Herzl. Most JEWISH Organisations showed up ! The Congress formulated a Zionist platform, known as the Basel program, and founded the Zionist Organization.
    WHEN .. I dare to ask .. do WE .. of Western European Descent have the Organisational Skill and Determination to MEET , PLAN and CREATE apropriate Organisations who can DEFEND our People and Culture .. Public and Clandestine ? I am an intellectual Vielfrass by Nature .. and i peruse daily many many excellent websites presenting aspects of the real situation as well as true History ( as I am able to Judge ) … Many many good People.. out there! There are Millions who desperately yearn for a PLATFORM from where to FIGHT BACK . Do WE have so little Intellectual Capacity , so little Willpower to survive left .. are we so Corrupted .. that we cannot achieve this ?

  12. kikz's Gravatar kikz
    October 3, 2016 - 3:46 am | Permalink

    a tad surprised some of the ‘old guard’ wasn’t mentioned in barbara spectre and her paideia org of orcs, which is simply yet another of medusa’s coif. under the cultural appropriation meme of a Greek concept, they now as then, dagger us in our own streets, w/short blades. paideia in Europe/US is funded in part by Soros’ org, and Bill Gates.

  13. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    October 3, 2016 - 5:46 am | Permalink

    HK Wills: “No conspiracy is necessary: just a confluence of racial interests.”

    When you have Jewish organizations, networks, political and religious sects, with names, addresses, websites, newsletters, newspapers, magazines, books, TV and radio stations, think tanks, institutes, “white studies” college courses, and so on, and when those things are headed, staffed and funded by Jews who recruit other Jews and pursue Jewish anti-White interests, it’s stupid to argue that their members don’t realize they are working on a common project together with other Jews.

    HK Wills: “beavers come to mind”

    I’ve never heard of activist beavers heading a TV station or a “white studies” college course.

    David Ashton: “most self-identified Jews are not conscious participants in a world-domination conspiracy”

    They are just zombie beavers beaving away!

    Wikipedia: Zombeavers is a 2014 (((American))) horror comedy film directed by Jordan Rubin, based on a script by Al Kaplan, Jordan Rubin, and Jon Kaplan.

  14. October 3, 2016 - 7:26 am | Permalink

    To my co-commenters:
    — RoyAlbrecht, your comments are very interesting und you are right.
    — Bob: “…My question remains, how do we get from here to there? Time is short and if we do not resolve this issue within the current generation it will be too late to save our own culture and identity. …”
    The regaining of our countries will come in the kind of an avalanche, at first slowly, later quickly and irrestible. We shall win. We shall survive.

    How can we act:
    With a multitude of actions, both planned and unplanned, long-time aims and ad-hoc measures. One thing is to get more information. But we have information enough for every day action. In Germany we have an addional stress with the time-factor: In the year 2015 came more than a million young non-European men but from our side only about 300,000 male German babies were born. In every small town you see negroes in the streets. It is a bad thing. — But this has awakened the German folk. There will be coming a new start from Germany in the future. The multikultipropaganda looses ground day by day. Those Germans who are awakened loose their fear to speak out clearly. Those Germans who are awakened will never help the white-race-killers with their work. “Gefahr erkannt, Gefahr gebannt” (=”If you have noticed the danger, you will rescue yourself”)

    Another thing is the personal behaviour: Now that I see that my fatherland is in danger, that my folk and the whole white race is at the edge of extinction, now body strength and inner power rise to a higher level. Both in business as well as in private life everything goes faster and harder. Decisions are made clearly. I take calculated risks. —If I go sometimes for twelve hours by car through rural Germany in Mittelhessen or Nordhessen and I see this wonderful country and folk (my folk) then I gain even more inner power. Life is fine.

  15. John's Gravatar John
    October 3, 2016 - 8:09 am | Permalink

    Not directly related to the article but still informative. Supreme Court is not meeting today as they normally would because it’s a Jew holiday. Article also talks about the separation of Church and State. Soto is also jew

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court Monday opened an unusual term in an unusual way.

    The justices met in public session for the first time since June, with one seat on the nine-member court empty as a result of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. It was the first time in 25 years the court has been at less than full strength at the start of a term, which occurs on the first Monday in October as prescribed by federal law.

    The court also diverged from its usual practice of hearing cases on its first day because of the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah. Three of the eight justices are Jewish, and the chairs of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan were empty as the court convened.

    As it gathered, the court rejected hundreds of appeals that accumulated over its long summer recess. Last week, the justices accepted eight new cases.

    by TaboolaMore from AP
    Trump’s habit of fuming over slights comes at political cost
    Moderator Lester Holt works to keep control of debate
    Arguments are scheduled to begin on Tuesday.

    But the justices will have to wait for the presidential election on Nov. 8 to have a sense of who might join them as the ninth justice. President Barack Obama has nominated Judge Merrick Garland, but Senate Republicans have refused to take any action, saying the next president should fill the Scalia seat.

    The court’s calendar so far has no blockbuster cases like those of recent years dealing with health care, gay marriage and abortion rights. It does have a church’s challenge to its exclusion from a Missouri state program to provide rubberized surfaces in playgrounds, a dispute over whether disparaging names can receive trademark protection from the government, two redistricting cases involving the rights of minority voters and two appeals from death row inmates in Texas.

    The Missouri case about the separation of church and state was granted while Scalia was still alive and has yet to be scheduled for argument, possibly because the justices think they may divide 4-4. Tie votes leave the lower court decision in place, but set no national legal rule and essentially waste the justices’ time.

  16. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    October 3, 2016 - 8:27 am | Permalink

    The great majority of people – men as well as women – are today integrated through seduction rather than policing, advertising rather than indoctrinating, need-creation rather than normative regulation. Most of us are socially and culturally trained and shaped as sensation-seekers and gatherers, rather than producers and soldiers.

    Zygmunt Bauman (1925-)

    So, it would take quite an ideology to confront the above reality. Up to this point the Alt-Right has only a rough outline and more importantly the European male remains passive.

    • silviosilver's Gravatar silviosilver
      October 3, 2016 - 9:51 pm | Permalink

      I find cultural critics like Buaman utterly worthless. Pray tell, what irreconcilable tension is there between being a sensation-seeker and a producer, a gatherer and a soldier? None that I can see, therefore there’s nothing to resolve.

  17. soro's Gravatar soro
    October 3, 2016 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

    I live in Hungary and you would not believe how agressively the local jews have been promoting open borders since Orban had that wall built. They clearly hate everything hungarian and want us ethnically cleansed.

    • JM's Gravatar JM
      October 4, 2016 - 6:00 am | Permalink

      In which case, 1) given your popular patriotic government you appear to have a situation of dual power. That has to be unstable. And 2) word seems to have gone out internationally as to the implementation of this agenda, rather like the boycott of German goods after 1934.

  18. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    October 3, 2016 - 4:25 pm | Permalink

    It is always worth noting that only the nations of the White European peoples and/or nations founded upon this heritage with a large White demographic are being made to justify having borders and border / immigration controls.

    Endless yada yada on this topic from the J-stream and all media.

    This defensive position is being imposed upon us by a bought and paid for political elite / traitor class – the ZOG. All bought and paid for through the Jew Bank Inc.

    All bases of national life: government, law, the judiciary, banking, economic production media, academia/the schools, culture, entertainment, sports are controlled by the Jewish power and its Masonry for the ruin of the White demographic and our interests.

    In the following vid, KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov lays out the science and method of ideological subversion – the ‘how to’ take down a nation from the inside and instrumentalise its apparatus for an alien interest. This is a science. Its methods were pioneered by the JudeoBolsphevik Revolution in Russia through sovietisation.

    Our present catastrophe ticks all the boxes.
    Yuri Bezmenov: Deception was my job

    In this video, Bezmenov does not name the Jew. He is talking about the science of subversion – which must be controlled by a central organisation. He does however designate the controllers of this operation as ‘ the Schmucks’. Who knew?

    • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
      October 4, 2016 - 3:28 am | Permalink

      “All bases of national life”, very true, also the churches, all of them, support the jew NWO agenda.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        October 4, 2016 - 1:11 pm | Permalink

        All due to threats and bribes, and (((information monopoly))).

        “We succeed because we know how to exert political pressure.”

        Who is Hagee’s handler? (((David Brog))). What is Hagee’s net worth?

        Who is Scofield’s handler? (((Samuel Untermyer))).

        What is Hagee’s moral net worth?

        • October 11, 2016 - 5:31 am | Permalink

          Many people still don’t understand any of this. I made a video of people (in England) being asked if they’ve heard the ‘holocaust’ is a fraud. Hardly any have heard this, and even if they have few make any effort to investigate.

          I haven’t tried sampling people for Jew awareness, no doubt a depressing thing to attempt in any case. But as an example, I found Youtubes by Joe Owens, in Liverpool, whose videos show he hasn’t the remotest clue of the extent of Jewish influence or how it is wielded.

  19. October 3, 2016 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

    The jew agenda is the extermination of the White (gentile) Race, if not through miscegenation and over whelming mud migrations, then they will finally bomb us out of existence like they tried to do to Germany in WW II. We are out of time.

  20. Forever guilty's Gravatar Forever guilty
    October 4, 2016 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    What is impressive, it is world class (((hypocrisy and double standards ))) . So far, as I know, there is not one single Syrian refuge in Israel. Israel could take same quantity migrants, as Sweden for example.

    “No one is Illegal” What about Palestinians displaced and kept In ghettos behind walls and barbed wire.

    Do what we say, not what we do.

  21. Roy Flynn's Gravatar Roy Flynn
    October 4, 2016 - 9:26 am | Permalink

    The Jews, who are extremely “racist”, want us to believe that White racialism is evil.

    When one of our fellow Whites “charges” us with “racism”, we should not be defensive. We should say:

    “If you are not a racialist, if you are a traitor to your own kind, then God wants you dead, and Nature wants you dead.”

    • Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
      October 5, 2016 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

      Whites are heavily programed with both racial and semitic correctness. It is best not go at the programming directly with logical argument or you will activate the blockers.

      The dirty secret of racial correctness and racial shaming (racism) is that only Whites can be racist. A good way to get around the program blockers is to comment on some example (must be factual) of racism’ against Whites.

      A Black screaming ‘kill the Whites’ as he murders a White woman holding a baby, would never be regarded as a racist committing a racist crime on the Jew media. The news muppet schlepping the script (aka ‘report’) will carefully get the white of the story out in the wash and refer to the Black in careful terms like ‘youth’ or a psychiatric disability or allude to his grievances.

      The White victim of a Black on White racial attack will never be reported just as a victim. Their ‘white privilege’ will always be referenced

      When you talk to your fellow Whites don’t go after racism as such. Go after the hard data on Black crime eg the colour of crime; go after the anomalies in how Black on White crime is reported. Once they get the idea that racism is a term that can only apply to Whites they have gone a long way in de-programming themselves.

  22. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    October 5, 2016 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    “The reason for this is that Cohen’s theory, like anything derivative of Jewish Bolshevism, isn’t really about open borders, or Socialism, at all. It is instead about White dispossession.”

    Growing up in the 1960’s and 70’s I believed WW II was primarily between Germany and Japan on one side and Great Britain, USSR, USA and France on the other. I think most people have heard about Jewish influence, perhaps from a parent or someone else or reading it somewhere, but most of the time they won’t hear about it again except to have it debunked as “anti-Semitic”. At least, that is how I think things go in much of the west.

    Around 2007 I became acquainted with David Irving’s writings on WW II and the Jewish role in starting, or spreading WW II. I also became aware of Charles Lindbergh’s and Henry Ford’s claims regarding Jews. Then I read what Solzhenitsyn said about Jews role in communism on this website. Then I saw a part of Russian President Putin’s speech to a group of Jews (still on youtube) in which he said the Soviet gov’t was 80 to 85% Jewish. While this education was going on for me, I commented to a colleague that Jews played a big role in communism. He said “that’s what the NAZIS said” and at some point, if not then already, I think I was aware that these things were said in isolated conversations since WW II or before already.

    When I heard about Hitler being for whites and how some post WW II “white racists” or “neo-NAZIS” viewed Hitler as being for “whites” I never really understood that. I’m becoming better acquainted with communism but I haven’t read enough that I could make the judgment “anything derivative of Jewish Bolshevism, isn’t really about open borders, or Socialism, at all. It is instead about White dispossession” on my own, but it now makes sense when I read it.

    Considering all this and what I have learned over they years, despite powerful Jewish efforts at hiding facts to distort history, the following statement is starting to make more sense.

    “Lord God, give us the strength that we may retain our liberty for our children and our children’s children, not only for ourselves but also for the other peoples of Europe, for this is a war which we all wage, this time, not for our German people alone, it is a war for all of Europe and with it, in the long run, for all of mankind.”

    -Adolf Hitler, Jan. 30, 1942

    That statement was made seven months after Germany attacked the USSR.

  23. seafordti's Gravatar seafordti
    October 10, 2016 - 8:26 am | Permalink

    This is brilliant at micro-analyzing a specific problem.

    Is there any specific book or website that analyzes the bigger picture of means of Jewish control in the UK? Names, organizations, history, links etc, how they fit in with cultural marxism, neoconservatism, banks, Israel, Gentile allies, globalism etc.

    (I am trying to see the bigger picture against a backdrop of censorship in the MSM and a huge variety of shills making me not know who to trust. I believe Nick Griffin is genuine. I am working from there, so far).

Comments are closed.