Trump in West Palm Beach

Kevin MacDonald

Donald Trump’s West Palm Beach speech has gotten a lot of attention (see Lawrence Murray’s comments, at The Right Stuff). There does seem to be a ramping up of tone apparent here — a sense that this election is an apocalyptic moment, as indeed it is. Trump understands, as the Alt Right has been saying, that the establishment is corrupt from top to bottom, that we live in a sham democracy, a sham republic:

This election will determine whether we are a free nation or whether we have only the illusion of democracy, but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the system, and our system is rigged. This is reality, you know it, they know it, I know it, and pretty much the whole world knows it.

As Angelo Codevilla noted, “Because Republicans largely agree with Democrats that they need not take seriously the founders’ Constitution, today’s American regime is now what Max Weber had called the Tsarist regime on the eve of the Revolution: ‘fake constitutionalism.’”

Trump is aware of the special role of the media:

The establishment and their media enablers will control over this nation through means that are very well known. Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed.

As we have emphasized repeatedly on TOO, the media indictment is always fundamentally a moral indictment, as in Clinton’s “basket of deplorables.” Media messages in favor of massive immigration and the displacement of traditional populations have typically been couched in moral terms. If you oppose the transformation of European societies by immigration, you are a bad person. It’s not just that you are mistaken about the practical effects of massive non-White migration in terms of a decline in social cohesion, increase in social conflict, crime, terrorism, etc., you are morally evil. It’s so simple that there’s no need to get into the social science research.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Moral indictments are also par for the course in Germany. A recent New Yorker article quoted Frauke Petry, leader of Alternative for Deutschland, referring to immigrant crime and mass sex attacks:

“It’s so moral to allow these attacks to happen,” she said sarcastically. “It’s so moral to promise to people around the world that they can come to Germany and find paradise. … Reducing the entire Enlightenment and all of the successes of European history down to this need to be morally good: I find that extremely dangerous. There’s this saying of Nietzsche”—she took out her phone and pulled up the quote almost instantly. …“In ‘Zarathustra’: ‘The good have always been the beginning of the end.’ ”

The good have always been the beginning of the end.” Let that sink in. White people going like sheep to the slaughter, but feeling morally superior about doing so.

The sad reality is that the suicide of the West has become a moral imperative in elite circles, a testimony to the enduring and unique appeal of moral principle that has been so characteristic of the West, at least since the 19th century—apparent, for example, in the anti-slavery movement in the U.S. and England where anti-slavery activists were successful by highlighting the suffering of Africans, and in the recent outpouring of empathy in response to the photos of the migrant child washed up on the beach in Turkey, whereas the French child killed by the Muslim terrorist in Cannes, France lying on the street with her teddy bear got almost no coverage.


Right now, these moral sentiments and proneness to empathy are being cynically manipulated by the media in the service of displacing White America and destroying any ethnic basis of European nations; and we at TOO have made no secret on the role of Jews in the media (summarized briefly here and more extensively here, pp. xlvi-lvi).

This didn’t just happen, folks. It’s never been more apparent that we are ruled by a hostile elite.

As many of us have experienced first hand, this ruling class is absolutely ruthless in destroying its enemies. Trump:

They will attack you, they will slander you, they will seek to destroy your career and your family, they will seek to destroy everything about you, including your reputation. They will lie, lie, lie, and then again they will do worse than that, they will do whatever is necessary. The Clintons are criminals, remember that. They’re criminals. … Honestly, she should be locked up. Should be locked up.

There is a messianic tone to Trump’s speech — a sense that he is a lonely warrior fighting the forces of evil out to destroy him, but pursuing a noble, morally pure dream.

I take all of these slings and arrows gladly for you. I take them for our movement so that we can have our country back.

trump-vs-worldI am not aware of people commenting on these lines, but I suspect they resonated with many of Trump’s enemies who want to see him as a new Hitler. Trump is presenting himself as on a moral crusade against those who have corrupted our system and sold out the country. Trump thus turns the tables on the media’s tactic of controlling dissent by presenting critics of the system as fundamentally immoral — as “sexist, racist, xenophobic and morally deformed” — while ignoring the monumental corruption of the “criminal Clintons” and, as Trump phrased it, the “disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry.”

It’s a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities. …

The central base of world political power is right here in America, and it is our corrupt political establishment that is the greatest power behind the efforts at radical globalization and the disenfranchisement of working people. Their financial resources are virtually unlimited, their political resources are unlimited, their media resources are unmatched, and most importantly, the depths of their immorality is absolutely unlimited.

Trump’s moral indictment of the ruling class is overwhelming, and should resonate with voters far more than being called a racist for supporting Trump — much less worrying about the allegations of Trump’s sexual impropriety. But of course the media will continue to push their charges of racism and xenophobia as long as it continues to be effective with so many White people.

Then, most explosively:

The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure. We’ve seen this first hand in the WikiLeaks documents, in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors.

This presumably refers to speeches she has given before international banks advocating free trade and open borders. Wikileaks released emails from John Podesta of a Clinton speech to Banco Itau, a large Brazilian bank, in May of 2013, in which she said:

“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.”


As Trump is implying, free trade and open borders would of course destroy US sovereignty and are quite central to the globalist agenda for the West. His statement is well-based on fact. The speeches to the banksters were indeed private affairs and she has refused to release transcripts.

When I first heard these remarks about Clinton meeting in secret with international banks, it didn’t register with me as anything more than a comment on the sad reality of Clinton’s two-faced life, which she acknowledges in another Wikileaks document, of saying one thing to the public but believing, and presumably promoting, something quite different in private. Despite what she says now, no one with half a brain could believe that she would oppose TPP and other globalist trade deals if elected.

But Jewish activists were horrified, claiming any mention of secret meetings with international banks should be banned because such talk is historically linked to anti-Semitism. A firestorm erupted on Twitter and elsewhere. Jonathan Taylor at Counterpunch has a nice compendium of the activist Jews in the media and the ADL (Stevens, Mensch, Kirchick, Joffe, Greenblatt) and cucks like Rick Wilson who were horrified that Trump would so obviously implicate Jews as the enemies of pre-great America.

This is an egregiously stupid tactic for Jews and cucks to take. Why call attention to Jewish involvement in international banking when their involvement and their general commitment to a globalist model for Western countries is well-known?

Apparently, criticizing globalism is like criticizing Israel: if you do so, you will be accused of anti-Semitism. It’s a great way to stifle legitimate discussion. As Taylor notes, “It’s as if someone responded to the Occupy movement that ‘the 1%” is a codeword for Jews, so we should stop talking about wealth disparity.’ The ramifications are obvious — leave the global elites out of this campaign or you’re a Jew-hating bigot and by the way here comes the ADL.” Taylor is remarkably candid about the reality of Jewish involvement in globalism:

For our tiny size, we are by far the most politically influential. The worlds of finance, media, journalism and law are home to extremely disproportionately high numbers of Jews. Leading globalist institutions like the World Bank, IMF, and WTO have high numbers of Jewish executives and staffers, as do organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, which one informal estimate claims is around 50% Jewish. Half of the US’s billionaires are Jewish. Jewish donors play an enormous role in funding Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The normally Republican and predominantly Jewish neoconservatives have thrown their support behind Hillary. … Bringing up anti-Semitism then just reminds people of how much influence and power Jews have.

Taylor then comes up with a standard Jewish response when Jewish overrepresentation is brought up by people who are critical of the policies this overrepresentation results in:

None of this is evidence of conspiracy. Jews are overrepresented in a many other fields as well, such as mathematics, physics, medicine, philosophy, etc. Jews like to argue with each other and with gentiles, and anybody positing a unified Jewish perspective on any issue has obviously never had Shabbat dinner with a typical Jewish extended family. But claims that Jews are using their disproportionate wealth and influence to support Hillary Clinton are, in fact, true.

Of course, that’s nonsense. What we are seeing now, as on many issues ranging from Israel to immigration and refugee policy, is a “virtually unanimous” Jewish hostility toward Trump. And for some reason, despite their overrepresentation among American elites, they are quite underrepresented among supporters of an identity politics for White people.

Gilad Atzmon remarks that “If [the ADL’s] Greenblatt was genuinely concerned with defamation and the safety of American Jews he should have lobbied the herd of Jewish international bankers to remove themselves from American politics. But for Greenblatt and others within his tribal milieu, Jewish power is the power to silence the very discussion of Jewish power!”

But of course, if the bankers got out of politics, those lucrative free trade deals would evaporate. Not good for the bottom line.


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

42 Comments to "Trump in West Palm Beach"

  1. kikz2's Gravatar kikz2
    October 18, 2016 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    the project veritas videos on breitbart are quite fascinating.. if not infuriating……………………………….the dem vote rigging is worse than i could’ve imagined…….

  2. Dan Hayes's Gravatar Dan Hayes
    October 18, 2016 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    It should be noted that in all likelihood the speech was crafted by Jason Miller. It should be noted that Miller is a Jew and one whom I hold in the highest regard!

    • Chris Edwards's Gravatar Chris Edwards
      October 18, 2016 - 5:42 pm | Permalink

      I agree about Steven Miller, but he appears to be “an individual” and he doesn’t appear to be a brainwashed jew.

      • JM's Gravatar JM
        October 19, 2016 - 3:07 am | Permalink

        @Dan Hayes @Chris Edwards
        There are plenty more where Jason Miller came from. I was shocked to see this collection, the scale of it, right at the centre of the Trump Campaign…

        • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
          October 19, 2016 - 1:48 pm | Permalink

          The info on this website is bloody sobering!!

          Okay…, let’s assume that White Nationalist Trump supporters have mostly all been hoodwinked AGAIN and that Trump really is a Straw-man, in-the pocket-of-the-Jews, opposition to Jew-owned, Hag-beast Hillary.

          The facts remain that Trump has openly and oft repeatedly made mainstream what We White Nationalists have been saying all along,
          (Mestizo invasion, media lies, rigged system, Globalists fuk-wit Retards [my words, not his], outsourcing, Obongo fraud, etc., etc… ),
          even though he has left out the Jew issue and seems to support the Criminal State of Israel with the Über-loyalty that most Shabbat Goyem do not even show.

          Avoiding the “…6 million pound mongrel Jew Gorilla in the room…” issue aside, can anyone deny that Trump’s action above has had a relatively huge and positive impact on advancing the global narrative for Whites and the bottom line with respect to White Advocacy Issues funding and support?

          If he really is in the pockets of the filthy K!kes, then it must be assumed that the Jews would not let Trump slip stuff into the narrative that they did not WANT to be there
          that they could not avoid letting out/denying anyway.

          If the above is the case, then it must be assumed that the vast majority of White and non-White Americans were already aware of the obvious issues (i.e. Mestizo invasion, media lies, rigged system, Globalists fuk-wit Retards [my words, not his], outsourcing, Obongo fraud, etc., etc… ).
          So allowing Trump to utter them in public is part of the plan to get the Goyem to “…believe…”.

          So maybe Americans also know that Jews are ruining their country and the world?
          Maybe Trump’s main job is to act as a relief valve to take the “…eye-ball pressure…” off Jews for a few more months while (((they))) are planning something bigger?
          Any thoughts on this?

          After all, every idiot knows by now that Jews control the central banks in most countries of the world (and by extension MOST large corporations) and those few that claim not to know can not be considered psychologically healthy and must on medical grounds be dismissed as functionally retarded or as Jewish trolls.

          So my next question is;
          What is Trump going to attempt to have done to people like us once when he gets elected?

        • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
          October 19, 2016 - 3:05 pm | Permalink

          Furthermore…, maybe Trump is part of the plan to give the main stream media credibility again…, after all…, most of us here would, on balance, consider Fox News to be at least neutral if not actually honest at times.
          this in effect has a partial rehabilitating effect for the main stream media.
          Moreover, judging by what Trump has said and the number of Jews who support him, all this may just be used as “…proof…” that not ALL Jews are bad or indeed dangerous!
          As the media, and the Jews who control it, are “…rehabilitated…” in the eyes of the Goyem,
          the Global Tool for Psychological Sympathy Extraction…,
          the Holocaust Lie of the Filthy Jew…,
          will continue to be kept alive and fed to the stupid Goyem.
          Trump has also stated that the 20 odd Trillion dollar debt to the FED must be repaid!…, so does that not mean that there will be no real change if Trump gets elected?
          To say nothing of the ratings bonanza that the media has enjoyed due to supposed dog and pony show.

          Bottom line: what will become of Whites?

        • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
          October 19, 2016 - 3:29 pm | Permalink

          Forgive my rambling on, but these days, not only on the web, and mostly on Fox Network, but increasingly on other networks, there is a constantly repeated assertion and rising crescendo that “…Hillary…” is a liar.

          It is almost as if we are being saturation bombed with the word “…liar…”.

          However, the irony in all this is that many of the Jewish mouthpieces who stand with Trump and are calling Hillary
          (to many “…minorities…”, symbolic of a White female no less)
          a liar are themselves part of a cabal of Über-liars that spans the globe.

          Ironic that Jews financed and helped her murder and lie her way to the top but are…, just when America is waking up to the lying Jew…,
          calling a White female the consummate liar!

          I guess if someone is itching to out a liar it may as well

        • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
          October 22, 2016 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

          Just to add:

          The reverse is true when the media Jews and Hilary talk about Trump and his supposed sex scandals, tax avoidance, Mexican worker exploitation, etc…
          The Jews are the world’s ultimate perverts, thieves and usurers yet Trump (representative of a White male) is taking all the heat for being all that and more.

          In the end…, everybody hates everybody instead of everybody hating the Jews…, and are just about ready to kill each other while the Jews sit pretty in their hovels and wait till the bleeding has stopped before coming in to clean up the mess!

          Keep the eye on the ball…;

          IT’S THE JEWS STUPID!!!

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      October 19, 2016 - 6:55 am | Permalink

      If your suspicion is true, and (((Miller))) did write the speech – then, it would not surprise me in the least if it turns out that he had collaborated with the ADL and th jew lobby beforehand and he was coached to insert the ‘poison pills’ and ‘code words’ into the speech that the ADL and the jews were already prepared to screech about – in order to attack Trump even more viciously than they have been attacking him already.

      I once ran across a quote on the web from an anonymous source that went something like this:

      “Whites play checkers, while jews are playing chess.”

      It is high time that Whites understand and grasp that this enemy we face – who seeks our genocide and extermination – is not only diabolically devious and cunning, but the reason these rats have managed to always stay one or two moves ahead of us on the survival chessboard – is because they have continually shown an ability to out think us and out strategize us.

      This is why the Alex Linder philosophy of ‘No jews, Just Right’ has to become carved into granite stone within our alt-right movement. Even those jews who pretend to be on ‘our side’ cannot be trusted. Trump hires jews to write his speeches for him? Trump brings jews into his campaign organization?

      And, Trump has no awareness of how doing so is a formula that lets our mortal enemies put their moles into our camp, where they can work to derail, stymie, and ultimately thwart our movement’s objectives?

      I am reminded of Joe McCarthy and how that dumb SOB let (((Roy Cohn)) attach himself to his anti-Communist movement. And, I wonder just how many times does it take the White man to wise up to this enemy’s favorite tactic?

      • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
        October 19, 2016 - 10:27 am | Permalink

        Whites play chess while Jews;

        sit as chairmen of various governing bodies (affirmative action policies [subsidies], meet press [gain prestige], decide who gets to host tournaments in White countries and flood them with non-White players, allocate ratings, and god only knows what (((they))) smuggle up their filthy rectums, in their shampoo bottles and in their luggage in general…),
        sponsor tournaments through advertising,
        sell game equipment and paraphernalia,
        cut special deals and confer “official” hotel status,
        control network broadcasts for the goyim to watch but more recently…,
        they have taken to promoting the game among White youth to keep the same busy playing board games while Jews are busy planning and executing the destruction of their futures.

        How can we distract the goyim?…, let me count the ways…

        • JM's Gravatar JM
          October 20, 2016 - 3:25 am | Permalink

          A co-thinker expressed two pretty savvy, in some ways, at least on the surface, contradictory, views:
          (1) Only Yanks – given their ‘what’s he worrrrth’, ‘Land of Opportunity’ polyglot ethnic – history – where these lusts were the main unifiers, could (in very large numbers) think it possible and put up a billionaire as the savior of the common people (!!!!!!), an idea foreign to all other climes, excepting maybe the most backward parts of the Third World,
          (2) But at the same time, there is a deep split in the USA ruling class over the extent of globalisation within which there are absolute and relative winners and losers. We know the ‘winners’ and we have some pretty good ideas of who the ‘losers’ were/are!

          As to the throng around Trump, savvy Tribalists at their helm know how far it (globalisation) has gone and they know the reaction to it has well and truly set in. They see Trump as a living, viable, expression of this and he (in some respects has a life of his own, generates his own political discourse) as a voice of huge numbers of people.
          They always – instinctively, consciously too, play both sides as any cohesive group seeking to remain at the top, or just stay in the game, would do. Some fakin’ it (‘like in the movies’), others more ‘genuinely’ involved get behind a man on the way up. It’s an old ‘trick’: get in close in order to control.

      • S's Gravatar S
        October 20, 2016 - 1:18 am | Permalink

        The Jews are just cunning and deceitful to a point incomprehensible to Whites, so the latter are caught off guard.

    • October 19, 2016 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

      It’s interesting that Donald Trump has taken to using prompters, which he disdained before. He’s making sure all his points are accurate. (Though he fluffed one line, which came out as GDP being 1%).

      • Luke's Gravatar Luke
        October 20, 2016 - 3:59 am | Permalink

        I, for one, am glad that Trump has started using teleprompters.

        Listening to Trump ‘ad lib’ his way through an interview is an exercise that is, frankly, so infuriating and exasperating that I have long ago refused to engage in it. The guy is physically incapable of putting together a coherent and intelligible conversation in the English language. His ability to conform to proper sentence structure when attempting to make his points is almost non-existent. He will often start to discuss one topic, and then in the middle of his sentence, he will swerve to something entirely different and unrelated, wandering off into the weeds and then, he might eventually remember the original point he had started to make and then try to swerve back, but due to his topic-jumping habit – he winds up coming across as seriously disjointed and not all that knowledgeable about the subject he was discussing. And, the guy constantly repeats himself – over and over and over again, to the point of sounding like he is an LP record that has a scratch that makes the needle stick in the same spot on the vinyl.

        Speaking from a teleprompter means someone had to write the speech in advance, and hopefully, run it through the grammar checker – and then even do a peer review of it’s contents to make sure it would sound coherent when delivered by the candidate. That helps Trump tremendously, and he comes across as being far more professional and well informed about his issues.

        • October 20, 2016 - 10:02 am | Permalink

          Nobody has replied to this, a common event in TOO unfortunately. One of the weapons used to attack Trump is the claim he’s illiterate etc – coming from a country with Obongo as nominal President and with language debased into Jew-defined cliche, this has to be a bad joke.

        • JM's Gravatar JM
          October 20, 2016 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

          I think you’re exaggerating. Making a speech isn’t the same as written – formal – prose. Many people like an entertaining ramble around the main point, provided it’s made. He never fails to do that, nor to entertain and the real issue is that the masses love those points, cannot get enough: the drought on truth from the top of society has broken. Trump’s got the numbers.

  3. A.Yell's Gravatar A.Yell
    October 18, 2016 - 2:36 pm | Permalink

    ” White people going like sheep to the slaughter, but feeling morally superior about doing so.”

    It’s funny you should say that. About two years ago I got into a debate with a White SJW and I asked him if he realized that when the Left wins they will hang people like him and he said that would go to the gallows laughing! It’s at that point I realized that these SJW’s weren’t just evil or stupid. They were deranged!

  4. m's Gravatar m
    October 18, 2016 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

    I’ll vote for Trump. Not that I think he can do the things he talks about doing (“fix” inner cities and the problem of “black youth”–is Trump high, or just being cynically insincere for the sake of whatever borderline-cucked mainstream conservative supporters he has?).

    Certainly his his foreign policy is more realistic, and because of that he may likely keep us out of WW III for a little while longer.

    Even if it’s all an eminence front, the opportunity Trump’s given us to watch the Jewish hive mind in action, is worth something. Opportunities like that don’t come around too often.

  5. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    October 18, 2016 - 3:49 pm | Permalink

    At the risk of flogging a dead horse, 30 years ago, the majority of Canadians were opposed to the Canada/US trade deal. The Liberal party, then in opposition claimed to oppose to it. Shortly after it’s passage, national labour groups were reporting that there were rumours of NAFTA, with the message – if it’s being talked about, it’s already a done deal.
    Election time!!! The Liberals promise to require changes to NAFTA or not sign on. Post election, no changes and we signed on.
    The system is rigged, and is the same in all “Western liberal democracies”. With few exceptions, the political class is the enemy, irrespective of where they claim to be on the political spectrum. They will continue their whoring until the money stops rolling in.

    • S's Gravatar S
      October 19, 2016 - 1:24 am | Permalink

      And that’s why we need another Fascist movement. Democracy is a fraud controlled by the Money Power. Authoritarian rule is what we need; and that means Trump–not whores and incompetents in Congress.

  6. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    October 18, 2016 - 6:36 pm | Permalink

    “these moral sentiments and proneness to empathy are being cynically manipulated by the media”

    The media told us that we had been upset by the photos of the Kurdish kid on the beach. In fact, no one was upset. But that was their pretext to explain the sudden influx of Syrian refugee families made up of Afghan and Somali men. According to them, we were so upset that we decided to open the borders. Their pretexts don’t even need to look credible. They also showed pictures of three teenage girls holding a “refugee welcome” banner, as if teenage girls played any role in the third-world invasion.

    It’s like the phony outcry over Trump’s locker room talk. People don’t care. They would like the media to start talking about something else. When the media keep repeating that Trump is a horrible person, that’s probably effective, but the pretext is phony.

    What works well is the intimidation method: “Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe”. There is both intimidation and incentivization, both the carrot and the stick. That’s why some people will pretend they care about the rapefugees. And they may think they are sincere and not realize they are moved by fear, profit, and conformism.

    I think some of the leftists are moved by a kind of manipulated empathy that has nothing to do with their personal interest, but they are a small minority. On the whole, the invasion is imposed by the government against popular opinion. They use coercion.

    If Trump is elected, he will have to find ways to disincentivize anti-White attitudes. It’s going to be funny to watch.

    • Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
      October 19, 2016 - 2:22 am | Permalink

      When Trump said, “Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe”…

      … the Greenblatt types must have been bitterly disappointed he didn’t add “antisemitic.”

      I often encounter Israel’s “hasbara” trolls online. When they call me “antisemitic” I thoroughly enjoy telling them:

      “To be called ‘antisemitic’ by the likes of you is a Badge of Honor.”

      …or I define the term for them:

      “Antisemitic” (definition):
      A term endlessly brandished by Israel’s war criminals (& their apologists) with the intention of suppressing all questioning of their long criminal history; lately losing much of its oomph.

      Feel free to do the same.

  7. October 18, 2016 - 9:05 pm | Permalink

    (((Globalists))) must make up their mind whether we are overpopulated and don’t need refugees, or are underpopulated and need more evil White babies. Maybe we are overpopulated with evil White people and underpopulated with progressive savages.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      October 19, 2016 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

      We are overpopulated with (((globalists))).

  8. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    October 19, 2016 - 1:43 am | Permalink

    No need to speak in code when The Jewish Daily Forward is kvetching that Trump’s use of the term ‘global power structure’ is an anti-Semitic trope.

    The ethnopolitics of the ‘global power structure’ , the global power elite, the plutocracy is now such common knowledge that descriptive, evidence based terms are now anti-Semitic ‘tropes’ and ‘dogwhistles’.

    The Jewish shitstorm over the use of these terms merely confirms the truth that the global power structure and its plutocracy / the Jews are one and the same.

  9. October 19, 2016 - 6:42 am | Permalink
  10. Ronnie's Gravatar Ronnie
    October 19, 2016 - 10:13 am | Permalink

    Taylor wrote “None of this is evidence of conspiracy. Jews are overrepresented in a many other fields as well, such as mathematics, physics, medicine, philosophy, etc.” That is like saying “Jews are just smarter and better at everything”. This sounds like a natural meritocratic process but is a fake argument that sounds convincing to non-thinkers. The over-representation is itself a conspiracy because the Jews conspire together to get other Jews into the club. When the selections are made, Jews select other jews for a variety of irrational reasons, and it is definitely not a rational meritocratic process. You are often excluded if you are not a Jew. It is that bad. They will say that my statement is anti-semitic and the jewish press will agree. The label of anti-semitism is just a commonly agreed way among Jews to suppress and punish those who criticize their racket. But the 20-30 times over-representation of Jews in all these areas proves my point. It has now risen to a percentage that is simple far over-the-top even for the most optimistic sycophant.

  11. Joey Virgo's Gravatar Joey Virgo
    October 19, 2016 - 10:52 am | Permalink

    Great article, great video. This is it. This is everything any American needs to understand and come to grips with.

  12. Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
    October 19, 2016 - 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Professor Carroll Quigley’s deja vue in his 1966, 1300 pp. opus TRAGEDY AND HOPE; p. 74 ff :
    ” The inability of the plutocracy to control the Democratic Party as it had demonstrated it could control the Republican Party, made it advisable for them to adopt a one-party outlook on political affairs, although they continued to contribute to some extent to both parties and did not cease their efforts to control both. In fact on two occasions, in 1904 and in 1924, J.P. Morgan was able to sit back with a feeling of satisfaction to watch a presidential election in which the candidates of both parties were in the sphere of his influence. In 1924 the Democratic candidate was one of his chief lawyers, while the Republican candidate was the classmate and handpicked choice of his partner, Dwight Morrow. Usually, Morgan had to share this political influence with other sectors of the business oligarchy, especially with the Rockefeller interest, as was done, for example, by dividing the ticket between them in 1900 and 1920.
    The agrarian discontent, the growth of monopolies, the oppression of labor, and the excesses of Wall Street financiers made the country very restless in the period 1890-1900. All this could have been alleviated merely by increasing the supply of money sufficiently to raise prices somewhat, but the financiers in this period, just as thirty years later, were determined to defend the gold standard no matter what happened. In looking about for some issue which would distract public discontent from domestic economic issues, what better solution than a crisis in foreign affairs ? ”
    Quigley then cites the ensuing Spanish-American war, popularized by Hearst’s ” yellow press “. References to overlapping, current situation are redundant.

  13. Viva Trump's Gravatar Viva Trump
    October 20, 2016 - 7:06 am | Permalink

    Ecuador Admits They Silenced Assange Because Clinton Leaks Were ‘interfering’ with US election

    must read

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      October 20, 2016 - 1:56 pm | Permalink

      The Ecuadoran government’s announcement is so masterfully written in English and Legalese, that one is obliged to wonder whether it originated in Quito or was written by the State Department and merely handed to them for publication, along with the notice of their next, overdue installment payment to the WB or IMF, highlighting their penalty provisions.
      Emails are black on white: not mere verbal chatter and, unless a proven fabrication or alteration, they are fact. These leaks/facts concern Hillary, not Trump. If they were not incriminatory they would be irrelevant. The leaks do not interfere with US elections, but solely with the election of Hillary. They disclose lies, misrepresentations, double-speak, hypocrisy, etc., vis-a-vis the electorate. It follows, that truth/fact is detrimental to the Hillary clique: sufficiently so to warrant an inter-governmental, undoubtedly threatening intercession by us.
      Thanks for your ” must read “.

  14. Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
    October 20, 2016 - 11:59 am | Permalink

    Elections, regrettably, are indeed rigged. Starting before they are called: the rigging is a bag-full of stagecraft; not limited to the resurrection of the dead. The deliberately dumbed-down and disinformed American voters could train their canary to vote electronically. Pick-pick.
    Yet the many millions of canaries would not know, that their collective effort and consequences are as nothing compared to the handful who determine the nominees.
    None less than the ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT published the fact, in June, 1991, that Clinton attended the Bilderberger conclave in Baden-Baden [ Black Forest ] earlier in that month, and flew directly to Moscow to meet, for two hours, with Vladimir Bakatin, who was himself pre-occupied with his Russian September election, running as former Minister of the Interior [ KGB ].
    Since, unsurprisingly, nothing was ever published about that meeting or its content, and Putin never replied to my query on his personal web-site [lol], one is left to conjecture:
    Vernon Jordan, the Washington lawyer/powerbroker, had dragged Clinton to Baden-Baden. Purely coincidentally of course, many former Bilderberger-attendees found themselves nominated and elected heads of states or Brussels Commissars. . Their organization resembles a plane with both a puller and rear-mounted pusher propeller. The puller propeller is the international banker consortium while their lower-ranked top media attendees are the vital pushers; where ” the rubber hits the road “.
    I fantasized going to Moscow to seduce some secretary/archivist to obtain the minutes or a transcript of the Clinton-Bakatin meeting. Unlimited friendship
    hospitality in a former ministerial-level private apartment was available: the fare, at that time, was not.
    My conjecture, in lieu of missing disclosure and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, is this:
    It is amply documented, that Clinton used his Rhodes attendance at Oxford as a ploy to avoid the draft. During this attendance he visited Moscow more than once. On the last such occasion, he visited friends, students at the Patrice Lumumba Friendship University in Moscow, who, upon departure, funded his train fare to Prague. There, he stayed for several days with the son of a senior functionary of the Communist Party.
    Given the KGB’s methodology, they would have a record of each time he went to a urinal. In my view, Clinton asked/warned Bakatin, that the Bilderbergers had determined him to be the next Democratic nominee, and for Bakatin to suppress any desire to publicize Clinton’s Russian activities, during which he had roundly criticized the US. There was another woman in that mix, who, two years later, worked for Hillary. Clinton probably threatened Bakatin with discontinuance of all scientific and cultural co-operation, if his coronation were to be disrupted by Bakatin’s unflattering disclosures.
    That, of course, is all irrelevant today, Democratically-looked-at. Instead, Trump’s fundamental understanding, that one does not push a powerful animal into a corner, is mendaciously portrayed as weakness, admiration for Putin and the willingness to become his puppet. One need merely peruse a map of Russia, indicating the innumerable, US, NATO, or US-backed bases surrounding it.
    Unquestionably, Hillary got As in social engineering courses and missed that one History class which identified military encirclement as the traditional, particularly European, casus belli.
    Trump knows that: so, Hillary, stop blabbering about his connection with Putin, and tell us all about Bill’s as yet unreported additional infidelity vis-à-vis Bakatin: you may also direct the return to the net, of Bill’s photograph, beard and all, holding a sign emblazoned with DOWN WITH AMERICA.

  15. AntiYuppie's Gravatar AntiYuppie
    October 21, 2016 - 12:40 am | Permalink

    Post-election is going to be interesting. Trump sounds like he plans to continue building his movement even if he loses, either into a third party or into a Republican party 2.0. His comments about not accepting the election outcome have to be seen in this context. He fully understands he can’t just let go. If he succeeds to build a stable movement, he could marshal a sizable voting block (at least 30/35%) and continue to influence the political process in perpetuity. In this scenario, he could block or push any congress, governor or even White House candidate for years to come. They just couldn’t ignore him. However, I also fully expect Hillary and the hostile elites to unleash the repression on him and his supporters once she’s firmly in power (IRS, judiciary/supreme court, FBI etc.). We’ll see how this plays out.

  16. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 21, 2016 - 12:52 am | Permalink

    It’s a pity Michael Colhaze hasn’t penned an article about (((Wikileaks)))’s contribution to the campaign noise.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      October 21, 2016 - 9:52 am | Permalink

      Amen. Indeed, reading Michael Colhaze on anything is time well spent. You don’t know, do you, whether he has a blog (auf englische Sprache) of his own?

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      October 22, 2016 - 9:07 am | Permalink

      Trenchant, I’m adrift on your parentheses around Wikileaks, or unaware of yet another layer of facts. Even the usually-readable Haaretz, on most internal issues, is vehemently opposed to Trump, as is the greatest remainder of them.
      Hillary alleges Putin-Wikileaks-Trump collusion in Trump’s favor. Why does a Jewish/influenced Wikileaks then publish material detrimental to her ?
      I hope to pass away never having owned a cell-phone and not knowing how to text: am I missing something else here ?
      [ My greetings as well, to Pierre ].

  17. October 21, 2016 - 4:53 am | Permalink

    May I draw attention to the voting system in the USA. There’s an overview here
    (that site is not connected with me). The bottom-line message is that it will be close. Whites must get out and vote.
    Trump can therefore still win—but only if there is a massively increased white voter turnout, and he takes at least two-thirds of the entire white turnout.

  18. limestone's Gravatar limestone
    October 24, 2016 - 5:11 am | Permalink

    “Taking everything onto consideration, immigration has benefited the W est” – or words to that effect is the stock justification that establishment politicians reach for when talking about immigration. Ask them for the cost-benefit analysis they employed in reaching their conclusion and they’ll call you a racist.

  19. Director's Gravatar Director
    October 24, 2016 - 7:34 am | Permalink

    Even if Trump is surrounded by Jews who have decided to coopt Nationalism, so what? We are still winning.

  20. Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
    October 24, 2016 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Ask yourselves whether this is poll-rigging. You will recall the question, immediately after the three debates, on CNN, “Who won the Debate ?” The answer to the first debate, was ca. 60% Clinton to ca. 30% Trump. This answer/fact came with the CAVEAT, that the majority of those polled were Democrats. The same applies to the second debate. The third debate was rated as roughly equal.
    However, the two initial Caveats were simply disappeared, when our illustrious presstitutes announced, ever after, that all three debates were won by “her”.
    I was reminded of a comedian, who spoke of prostitutes as selling ” their money-maker “. By comparison, presstitutes are selling their better judgment, civil courage, journalistic imperative, integrity and residual public trust. Incalculably worse.
    Since the Pentagon, ostensibly, is forbidden further water-boarding as an interrogation enhancement, I recommend they use the forcible viewing of the so-called election coverage by CNN instead. If I personally were not to crack after viewing a day’s worth, I would certainly crack after repeated exposure to Blitzer, Tapper, even Borger. I would readily surrender all state secrets in my possession and then fabricate a few to boot to be relieved of this grotesque garbage.

Comments are closed.