“Child refugees” are coming to the UK. Why is the Jewish community so determined to bring them in?

Francis Carr Begbie

Citizens UK Private Sponsorship Chanukah Video from Charlotte Fischer on Vimeo.

The dismantling of the Calais “Jungle” refugee camp has been marked by huge scenes of disorder with rioting, at least one gang rape, and much of the camp going up in flames. But there has been uproar in Britain too since the realisation that most of the thousands of “child refugees”, which the Prime Minister had agreed to accept, were neither children nor refugees.

From the moment these healthy, strapping adult male migrants stepped off the bus in London it was obvious that the British people had been subjected to yet another massive immigration deception. Those who enabled and organised this “child refugee” scam are brazening it out, safe in the knowledge there will be no comebacks for them.

First they attempted to prevent any more embarrassing pictures by throwing blankets over the arrivals so they resembled state witnesses at a Mafia trial. Then a screened walkway from the bus alighting point to the door of the reception centre was erected overnight for the same purpose. Dental tests to determine the real age of these youths were ruled out as an “invasion of privacy.” And there is no question of having them deported, so nothing can be done now. They’re here. Get over it.

But of course, it all works better if there is no clamour from the public. So the powers-that-be have resorted to the tried and tested method of stifling dissent. Anyone who sticks his head above the parapet to raise doubts is subjected to stern lectures about their moral shortcomings. BBC TV presenter Gary Lineker chastised his fellow British for their “shameful” attitudes, while Labour shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott attacked those who wanted to carry out dental tests to assess their age as “racist.” Pop singer Lily Allen became a media darling when, on behalf of the people of Britain, she made a tearful apology to the refugees for causing their plight.

Let that sink in. Britain caused the plight of the refugees.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

After voting for Brexit, for ordinary British people, who have seen their schools, hospitals and welfare services strained to breaking point, a fresh influx of immigrants was not exactly what they had been looking forward to. After all, Britain has no legal or moral obligation to take these people. They were supposed to be the responsibility of the first country they arrived at in the EU. And why are they coming to racist Europe anyway? It’s incredibly short-sighted of them. Why not go to some Asian or African country? Or Israel?

This fresh burden will be placed squarely on the local authorities that receive the immigrants, and they are going to have to dig deeply. While the government is providing £40,000 ($48,000) per annum for each young refugee, the total annual cost is around £133,000 ($162,000). So tax increases — or reduced services in other areas — are predicted.

Naturally little of this will fall on the prosperous London boroughs filled with BBC-watching, morally uplifted Whites. Instead many migrants are being located in far-flung areas such as Devon or poorer northern communities already thronging with refugees, such as Bradford.

The tipping point in the long battle to admit these bogus “child refugees” seems to have been a multi-faith initiative in which more than 200 religious leaders led by the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Williams and senior representatives from the Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim and Sikh faiths — signed a letter urging the Prime Minister to admit 3,000.

In a speech at a London synagogue, Lord Williams described the Calais camp as “a stain” on the British conscience. But in fact, this alleged multi-faith support was not what it appeared to be.  It was largely organised by dozens of Jewish activists working through an organisation called Citizens UK that organised the casework and poured substantial resources into ensuring that the necessary amendments to the law would make it through Parliament.

The Calais “Jungle” crisis has brought the Jewish community together in a unity of purpose rarely seen outside the occasion of Israel’s various wars. From the highest communal levels to the smallest youth groups, it seems everyone Jewish has been mobilised in the cause of getting uneducated, unassimilable Muslim economic migrants into Britain.

It is a campaign they have chosen to frame in entirely moral terms. The Jewish community’s loud insistence has been that not only is Britain under a strict moral obligation to take these migrants but that there should be no upper limit. To do otherwise would be to undermine our reputation as a humanitarian country that wishes to describe itself as civilised.

Their arguments have been formed around highly emotional anecdotes and images. Time and again we have been treated to stories of children struggling in the squalor at the Calais “Jungle” camp. The iconic photographs of the lifeless body of three-year-old Syrian boy Aylan Kurdi washed up on a Turkish beach are frequently invoked.

You will notice that nowhere is there any consideration of the stress this is causing on existing British communities, especially those in the poorer areas where refugees are invariably housed. Nor is there any recognition of the profound unfairness this imposes on the native White community who will be required to support these strangers via the welfare system, health and housing services. Such a process is not only unaffordable, it makes a mockery of the basic idea that help from the welfare state is in return from previous tax contributions.

There is a largely unspoken reason for this:  resentment over Britain’s perceived inadequacy in admitting Jewish refugees before World War II. In fact, Britain admitted many tens of thousands of Jews in the 1930s, but it is an article of faith amongst many Jews that Britain could and should have admitted many more.

Typical of this attitude was the speech of Rabbi Herschel Gluck, founder of the Muslim-Jewish Forum. He says he lost over 100 relatives in the Holocaust and implied that Britain’s wartime attitudes to refugees were to blame for this. “I feel obliged to ensure we don’t make the same mistakes,” he said.

Numerous references were made to the Kindertransport programme by which Jewish children from Europe were smuggled into Britain. (The TOO has already debunked much of this greatly mythologised episode.)

A veteran of that same Kindertransport is the figurehead for the Calais refugee crusade. eighty-four year old Lord Alf Dubs , a veteran Labour politician. He has  tirelessly campaigned for mass immigration all his life. A former director of the Refugee Council, he somehow arrived in Britain aged six in 1939 despite Britain’s horrendous attitudes at the time, and was shown much Christian charity. Since then, he has chosen to repay this kindness by devoting his life to opening Britain’s borders to non-Whites from around the globe.

According to EU law, refugees should have been processed at the first country they arrived at, so some ruse had to dreamed up whereby Britain could allow their entry. This was done through a device known as the EU’s Dublin III regulation, whereby lone refugee children could be taken to any European country where they have a relative.

This was not enough for Lord Dubs.  He wanted the “child refugees” in the Calais “Jungle” admitted to Britain without any “family reunion” qualification and pushed his own amendment which would oblige the British government to transfer to the UK any unaccompanied refugee children from Europe.

To this end Lord Dubs was able to count on wholesale establishment support. Not just the Archbishop of Canterbury but charities, NGOs and even economists all rallied round.

TOO has already shown the hugely disproportionate Jewish influence on a similar letter from senior lawyers. The same disproportionately Jewish influence can be seen in the plea from the 126 economists. One of the signatories was Jonathan Portes, who can be fairly regarded as the architect of Tony Blair’s mass immigration disaster.

So it seemed as if the passing of the Dubs amendment to an immigration bill was a foregone conclusion.  But then at the vote in the House of Commons there was a problem. For Conservative politicians had not long finished fighting a general election campaign in which their voters had left them in no doubt how they felt about the never-ending waves of mass immigration.

In the House of Commons the Dubs amendment was defeated.  Jewish campaigners could barely contain their anger. The nagging, scolding words of Dr. Edie Friedman, director of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality, were characteristic.

As a result, children across Europe will remain cold, alone and at risk over the coming months. This was an opportunity to stand on the right side of history, to bring relief to just 3,000 of the 95,000 unaccompanied children who applied for asylum in Europe last year.

We wake up this morning on the wrong side of history and on the wrong side of compassion.The Immigration Bill has shown the UK at its worst, uncaring about the suffering of children a mere 30 miles away in places like Calais, but it has also shown us (sic!) at our best.

Rabbi Harry Jacobi too was beside himself with anger at MPs voting in accordance with their electorate’s wishes. For him loomed the shadow of 1938, when Britain decided to stop the flood of Jewish refugees.

Too many MPs with hardened hearts, just like the biblical story of Pharaoh. To close their eyes and hearts to unaccompanied children, to insist that it is alright to detain pregnant women, and that refugees can still be detained indefinitely simply on the say so of an immigration official. These are not the actions of a world-leading moral civilisation.

Then, in one of his last acts as Prime Minister, David Cameron did a U-turn and announced he would allow the amendment to go through unopposed. Now Britain could admit the bogus 3,000 “refugee children” unilaterally.

Citizens UK’s main task seems to be getting migrants or “refugees” into Britain and dispersed around the country. It describes itself as a “community organiser’s hub,” but is in fact an arm of the state with deep pockets and a nationwide network of affiliated organisations. It has fought many legal battles for refugees and succeeded in getting migrant “child asylum seekers” released from detention centres and housed in the wider community.

So how Jewish is it?  At letterhead level it seems to be drawn from a cross-section of the community, but at organiser level, the Citizens UK appears to be disproportionately Jewish. (This tactic of recruiting sympathetic non-Jews and giving them highly visible position in Jewish-dominated causes has a very long history, going back at least to immigration battles in the early twentieth century, as recounted in Chapter 6 of SAID [p. 192ff] and Chapter 7 of Culture of Critique [e.g., pp. 249-250].) They include the Citizens UK spokeswoman, Rabbi Janet Darley, who, of course, has a tear-jerking story to tell. She said it was when a 15-year-old migrant fell under the wheels of a truck he was trying to board that she felt that she had to get involved.

For me, that was the deal breaker — I knew I couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t do everything I could to make sure there were no more dead children. … The Torah warns us against the wronging of a stranger. For us, this is core teaching and not an optional extra.

Another Jewish Citizens UK activist is senior organiser Charlotte Fischer, who is lobbying for Britain to increase the total number of “Syrian” refugees it has agreed to take  from 20,000 to 50,000. “We are doing shamefully compared to Canada” she chides.

But the UK is doing awesomely compared to Israel. Doesn’t that count for anything?

Citizens UK campaigner Rabbi Danny Rich is co-chair of yet another arm of the refugee industry, the National Refugee Welcome Board. He clearly has the magic touch when it comes to getting access on the BBC. Since the beginning of September he has graced at least half a dozen BBC outlets including the main BBC TV news and the BBC World Service and gets softball kidglove treatment from all of them. He blithely brushed aside the concerns of ordinary British people: “Look at the Kindertransport and the contribution made to Britain over the last 70 years by those who escaped the Nazis. Look at the contributions made today by doctors, nurses and care workers, many of who were not English born.”  Anyone doubting the distinctly Jewish flavour of Citizens UK would be advised to look at this promotional video, also featured at the beginning of this article.

Of course, no British refugee campaign would be complete without the presence of Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner who can be guaranteed to be at the forefront at any number of “multi faith” immigrant events including a Citizens UK vigil outside the House of Commons.

Citizens UK is an umbrella organisation overseeing local grass roots initiatives for refugees all over the country, many of which are Jewish-organised. One of the main ones is called Safe Passage UK. In an article for the Jewish Chronicle, the two Jewish organisers described their work as “fighting injustice.”  Apparently a group of synagogues had raised £200,000 for them in just a few weeks.

Rabbi Rebecca Birk was recently named by the Evening Standard as one of London’s most influential people for her fund raising for Safe Passage UK. Again, her entire rationale is bound up with her Jewish identity, framed, of course, as a moral imperative stemming from the inherently moral essence of Judaism. She says:

The Jewish identity is predicated on being a foreigner, relying on the kindness of strangers, it runs through our own theology really: doing good, mending the world. We talk of three pillars the world stands on — the Torah, divine service, and kind acts. It’s an anathema to be a Jew and only be concerned with oneself.

A clear sense of Jewish identity also informed the efforts of the three fashionable north London women who decided to put their media careers on hold to set up the Help Refugees charity in the Calais “Jungle.” The women, two of whom are Jewish, have tapped into a lucrative market indeed, and their outfit was one of the biggest players in Calais. It has been a massive, trendy, profile-raising success. After setting up, they were inundated with corporate contributions, and now they run 26 projects from Israel and on the migrant trail all the way across Europe. Articles about them focus on “child refugees.” And because Hollywood is well-known for its high moralism, it is not surprising that actors such as Benedict Cumberbatch and Lena Dunham have lent their support.

Help Refugees even has a mobile kitchen on to the shores of Greece where their volunteers are helping refugees from Turkey from their dinghies and then seeing them off on their long journey across Europe. One of these women, Dani Lawrence, insists her parents fled anti-Semitism in Morocco in the sixties.

The Jewish community has an extremely high opinion of its charitable efforts. Their strong Jewish identities and loyalty to their tribe are obvious, and it is wonderful that all that philanthropy makes them feel so good about themselves. But it might be worthwhile for the White British to ask what exactly is in it for them, apart from Kosher certification?

It is time to ask some searching questions about the real motives that lie behind all this Jewish selflessness.  After all, a charitable disposition towards Muslims is not exactly a characteristic of Jewish life anywhere else and certainly not in the Palestinian territories. And no question is guaranteed to infuriate Jewish activists more than asking why Israel doesn’t admit any refugees from Syria which is, after all, next door?

So what do they get out of this sudden influx of unassimilable immigrants who have neither the temperament nor inclination to fit into modern Britain? Sadly, as readers of TOO are all to familiar with (see, e.g., “Is immigration a Jewish value?“), the motivation is not compassion but veiled ethnic vindictiveness aimed at undermining and dispossessing ordinary British people.

One of the questions that British people might also ask themselves is this: If those British people in the 1930s who had admitted waves of Jewish refugees could see the fruits of what they had done, what would they think?

If those British people, who were to suffer so much in a war they were told was about “freedom”, if they were to see the streets of Peckham, Newham or any number of London boroughs or cities today overrun by Third-Worlders, what would they think?

And if they were to then told, in detail, about the role of Jewish activism, power and “philanthropy” in bringing about this transformation, what would their thoughts be then?Perhaps they would agree with so many of us.  That the Jewish invocation to “heal the world” seems to be code-words for eradicating White identity and eradicating the power of Whites to control their own destiny.

And perhaps, instead of admitting these “child refugees,” Britain would have been better off remembering the words of another Jewish sage, economist Milton Friedman, who said “You can have a welfare state or you can have open borders, but you cannot have both.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

30 Comments to "“Child refugees” are coming to the UK. Why is the Jewish community so determined to bring them in?"

  1. October 27, 2016 - 11:57 am | Permalink

    Massive Media Collusion with Clinton Campaign Revealed by Wikileaks
    -names the (((names)))

  2. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    October 27, 2016 - 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Who are these 25 year old ‘children’ more likely to drug, gang-rape and pimp out?

    A. A bland MOR Guardianista celeb swarthy whose only claim to fame is her (((swarthy Cockney spiv))) father bribed all the music industry’s writers, marketers, djs, producers to get Silly a career.
    B. A thick northern chavette Rotherham donkey who has been brainwashed her whole life by msm/education systems of how great low IQ darkies are (her father has been unemployed by diversity quotas).

    C. If the Jews thought dental records woud prove their case, woud they be yentering against dental records. If I go to a country, I need a passport as proof of id; w/o a PP dental examination is essential.

    Real refugees would be gender-balanced or female-dominated (as men woould be killed fighting), so why are they all the cowardly male scum of Third World dumps? Why are these ‘Syrian’ rapefugees playing cricket (must be female journos)?

  3. kikz2's Gravatar kikz2
    October 27, 2016 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    Shave the Children. why indeed? ya have to wonder about a group that through their global efforts(and gov subsidies) imports 3rd world muzzgroid unassimilable hostiles into OTHER PEOPLE’S White COUNTRIES, then whine they feel unsafe……………………….why don’t they just hora on down to the nearest el al terminal and go TF home?

  4. Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
    October 27, 2016 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    (((They))) import them, not only for ideological reasons, but also, and especially, for money reasons. It’s an induatry, a big, big industry, with lots and lots of money. It’s the new slave trade and today, as it was then, the market is owned by (((them))).

    • October 27, 2016 - 7:50 pm | Permalink

      Hello Rosa, I think that you are Italian. In Germany the situation is as follows: That said group has a name (young refugees without parents, shortwort: MuFl). They are paid for by the German state. The costs are high. — Per one year and one person of this group the “caritative” organisations get 40.000 to 60.000 Euro paid from the German taxpayer. It is more than ten times the money that a German familiy has for its own child. This money is pressed out from the working parts of our folk. This puts the German churches (protestant as well as catholic) into the same group of money-grabbers and criminals as the big drug cartels of the world. In a time not too far away, this greed and German-folk-killing actions will break their neck. German families can now see easily to whom the money is given and to whom not. — In detail please see (in the German language):
      Sometimes they get 335,- Euro per day for one of those “MuFls”.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        October 28, 2016 - 10:21 am | Permalink

        For Karlfried- San Antonio Rose sung by German ladies

      • Christine's Gravatar Christine
        October 28, 2016 - 12:59 pm | Permalink

        Yes, Karlfried. In Vienna, Austria about 35% of the “Kinderbeihilfe” is now paid to children and families of migrants. This does not include the monies paid to Caritas the Catholic Charity for young people in the amount of 40,000 to 60,000 Euros by the Austrian taxpayers.

  5. Dan M.'s Gravatar Dan M.
    October 27, 2016 - 3:52 pm | Permalink

    Why doesn’t the great state of Israel take them in? Because they are Jew Supremecists. They hate all other White Christian Nations. They would rather watch your throat get slashed, because they know that they can escape to holy state of Israel. In others words, the rest of us are F’ed!

  6. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 27, 2016 - 7:01 pm | Permalink


    I’m encouraged that some of refugees have decamped to Paris, where their presence is harder to conceal or romanticize.

  7. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    October 27, 2016 - 8:01 pm | Permalink

    At first, the thought comes to mind, Winston, what hath thou wrought? Ahem, yes indeed, Winnie, and may you churn in your besotted grave! But upon deeper reflection, since these Afro-Asian aliens aren’t exactly going to Golder’s Green, or Israel, what in fact are these subversive, I mean ‘humanitarian’ “British” Jews, really up to? Could it be another kosher case of killing two ‘boids’ with one stone? But of course, silly, how can one miss such a big Jewish bingo as this? These brilliant Jewish sayanim have insidiously devised a way, using gullible proxies, to partially depopulate the Levant, (an area that Israel wishes to eventually expand into), and send the ethnically cleansed “refugees” to White countries, where they can cause mayhem, racially defile the Whites, and eventually act as foot soldiers in taking down a balkanized European Civilization. Pretty coy, these Kinderjuden are, and what a way to thank their “hosts”.

    • A Swain's Gravatar A Swain
      October 28, 2016 - 6:21 pm | Permalink

      What you outline regarding Jewish intent to kill two ‘boids’ with one stone, etc, I myself came to the same conclusion about two years ago after ongoing in depth research over approximately five years.

      I’ve also recommended that native White Europeans should take a leaf out of the Jewish ‘holy’ book and commence campaigning and pushing for the same Third World mass immigration agenda for Israel, utilizing humanitarian and moral duty arguments in precisely the same manner as do the Jews. Furthermore, there have been multiple atrocities committed against native White Europeans by Jews over the centuries which must also be brought out into the open and taught mainstream.

      The days of fear of retribution by Jews are rapidly decreasing as White historians find more effective ways of enlightening White Europeans across the world as to their own history concerning evil deeds done to them by alien hostile races, for a change.

  8. FranksandBeans's Gravatar FranksandBeans
    October 27, 2016 - 9:10 pm | Permalink

    I strongly urge everyone to read this story

    You will see how foolish white gentiles actually did a lot to help these Jewish kids escape the so called Hitler persecution of the Jews. Well like typical of them, Jews took all the credit.

    Stupid actors like ‘Benedict Cumberbatch and Lena Dunham have lent their support.’

    Well I hope they keep these so called adult kids in their home and lead by example.

  9. Gaylord Retclyffe's Gravatar Gaylord Retclyffe
    October 27, 2016 - 10:54 pm | Permalink

    The Church of England is dead, has been dead for a long time. Their archbishops are useless clowns, dressed up in frilly outfits that make real men shiver. They are without any theological core, haven’t had a decent theologian in hundreds of years, and now they are fishing for a new raison d’etre: bleeding heart immigration advocacy. It’s not the CofE, but the CagE. Disestablishment is the answer with its concomitant end of the equally parasitic monarchy. When Throne and Altar are corrupt and united against the people, it’s time for both to go and for the people to rise up. Any old-fashioned Druid has more sense than the whole clerical class combined. They love to show up in these multi-faith events, don their different robes, and sing kumbaya. Goodness, these people make me sick. I have a right to say all this: I am an Anglican in Holy Orders (don’t hold that against me, please)

    • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
      October 28, 2016 - 6:19 am | Permalink

      Well said Sir! But aren’t all the various Christian Churches if not quite dead are in intensive care on life support.

      • October 28, 2016 - 1:19 pm | Permalink

        Christian churches have for all their existence been dependent on the original Jewish hostile takeover of early Christians – so much so, that the beliefs of the first enlightened ones (from ‘christos’) are not known. Although churches have occasionally fought their own national corners, there have always been Jewish hidden forces tugging in their own direction. The ‘New Testament’ Jewish fake took centuries to get into circulation; anyone watching the religion of ‘holocaustianity’ being foisted on whites should be able to see the parallel. Time to erase the whole fake tradition.

  10. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 28, 2016 - 3:43 am | Permalink

    I was listening to Rush Limbaugh yesterday and he got a call from White guy who had the temerity to bring up the fact that, if our borders are not secured – as Trump has promised to do – his home state of Texas was 100 percent certain to turn bright blue, as will every other state that is currently ‘red’ and once that happens – never again would the GOP be able to win ANY elections. This White guy even went a step further – and came very close to naming the jews – but tiptoed very carefully down the line and asked why it is that the very same people, here in America, who shower all kinds of praise and idol worship on Bibi Netanyahu when he talks tough and enacts laws in Israel which protect Israel from being invaded and swamped under an avalanche of third world aliens, but when Donald Trump uses that very same kind of language and promises to follow the lead of Israel in protecting the borders of the USA – he catches all kinds of hate and incredibly toxic and vitriolic boat loads of venom?

    The White guy then asked Rush why it is that tribalism is okay for some nations (Israel) but not for the USA?

    Limbaugh had to know the proper answer to give to this guy’s question, because I’ve heard him tiptoe around it quite often over the last year or so. He is terrified of naming the jews as being behind this White genocide agenda – so, he substitutes the ‘left’ or ‘liberals’ in place of the word ‘jew’. But, this caller’s question must have caught Rush with both halves of his brain tied behind his back, because all Rush could do was to stutter, and mumble and prevaricate and get tongue tied and then finally stall giving an answer until he could escape answering by going to a commercial break.

    This is the kind of spinelessness and vomit inducing White racial cowardice that needs to be permanently retired, folks.

    We need to call out these jews – by name and by racial and ethnic identity – shine the spotlight on them, and openly accuse them of conspiring to genocide White European people in every historic White European created nation on this planet.

    Heck, these jews like Soros, Lerner, Schumer and the rest – have reached a point of arrogance that they are now openly exposing their role in the ongoing third world non-white invasions of every historic White nation and boasting about how they intend to reduce Whites to minorities inside their own native homelands.

    So, if these jews can BOAST about the evil they are up to – when are White men going to grow a pair between their legs and NAME their enemy and expose what they are scheming to do to our race of humans?

    • Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
      October 28, 2016 - 11:08 pm | Permalink

      This behavior of white radio hosts had been going on for eons. It finally got to the point where sometime Los Angeles Times columnist Joel Stein, who is Jewish couldn’t take it any longer. He wrote an editorial piece in which he chided these foolish radio talk show hosts for constantly cutting off or calling those callers racists or anti-semites who believed that Hollywood is controled by Jews. Stein went on to say that everyone knows Jews control the media and Hollywood. He wrote that not only do Jews control Hollywood but added that, thank God they do. He seemed to absolutely enjoy his explanation with an almost malicious glee. So, those radio talk show hosts and media people who are still apologists for certain harmful activities Jewish groups are involved in like Open Borders, defending illegal immigration, help to keep it going, advocate for illegal aliens and use tax payer money of U.S. citizens to support those here illegally, etc., no longer have an excuse. These radio media clowns are not only apologists for those who do harm to Main St. America’s people and immigration laws, but are just plain COWARDS without the slightest integrity.

    • HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
      October 30, 2016 - 9:39 am | Permalink

      Yes, it was quite remarkable. The caller struck me as a TOO reader: the terms “tribalism”, “dispossession” and the reference to hypocritical Netanyahu/Israel are markers. This was the first time I have heard a caller like this.

      I listen to Rush regularly and keep count of the execrable leftists ( mostly Jews) he discusses while noting the time, e. g. Rahm Emanuel at 9:12 AM, Jennifer Rubin 9:54 AM, Charles Krauthammer 10:37 AM. All the while wishing Rush would connect the dots. Maybe he does but fears losing his microphone if he says anything about it.

  11. Montefrío's Gravatar Montefrío
    October 28, 2016 - 4:55 am | Permalink

    Crude comments per the above delegitimize the worthy posture of the publication. Instead of resorting to invective, commenters might consider using reason to make their points, as do the editors and writers of TOO. Direct your wrath against the betrayers of your country in ways that may actually accomplish something!

  12. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    October 28, 2016 - 7:11 am | Permalink

    I have spent considerable time in Asia since I was in high school. Whites could do well by studying Asian cultures in their self preservation and CENTRIPETAL force of civilization. They don’t fund “the children” in Africa for 60 years. The Black population explosion on the Dark Continent has boiled over-and they are coming to the Western White countries by the millions, with more to come.

    If we do not place racial White solidarity at the zenith of our attention and focus, and socially/culturally commit to producing an average of 3 or more children per family, then we are finished. Destined to be slaves, flotsam jetsam on the turbulent waters of the world milieu. No rudder and no propulsion. Dependent, at the mercy of the elements.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      October 29, 2016 - 8:21 am | Permalink

      “commit to producing an average of 3 or more children per family”

      That would take a very strong will. So the question is as always, do the European people want to live?

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        October 29, 2016 - 10:42 am | Permalink

        As well: do WE? There is no skirting or deferring the issue. Without this commitment and execution, we are finished as a people, NO MATTER WHAT ELSE HAPPENS.

        • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
          October 30, 2016 - 11:27 am | Permalink

          We need a European male of a new kind in the homeland and our Diasporas. An individual with a clear vision of what he wants for his children and the will to make it happen.

          In the Untied States his first question would be, “do I want a person like Tim Kaine as an example of my son?”

  13. October 28, 2016 - 7:56 am | Permalink

    Apparently foreign lobbyists also used the Clintonemail.com account on the illegal server. Imagine for a moment e-mails of this type being generated by a white nationalist group. What would the Jews do with the information? Perhaps its time to turn the table.

    Re: Israel and Iran: Jewish People’s Policy Institute of Jerusalem (JPPI). Wikileaks, October 12, 2016.

    From:[email protected] To: [email protected]

    Date: 2015-05-22 17:58

    Subject: Re: Israel and Iran: Jewish People’s Policy Institute of Jerusalem (JPPI)

    Thanks Stu – Corey will find a time that works.

    On May 22, 2015, at 8:37 AM, Eizenstat, Stuart ([email protected]) wrote:

    Jake, Thanks. With my hat-on as Special Adviser to the Secretary of State for Holocaust Issues, I am co-chair of the European Shoah Legacy Institute conference in Prague Tuesday and Wednesday and then have a speech in Vienna for a deceased Austrian diplomat with whom I negotiated the 2001 Washington Agreement. I return to DC on Thursday afternoon and will be in the office by 4 pm. I am also available Friday. If you want to talk on this coming Monday, Memorial Day, I am open until my flight leaves for Prague around 5 pm. Best wishes, Stu

    From: Jake Sullivan [mailto:[email protected]]

    Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:57 AM

    To: Eizenstat, Stuart

    Cc: Huma M. Abedin ([email protected]); Huma M. Abedin ([email protected]); John D. Podesta ([email protected]); Corey Ciorciari ([email protected])

    Subject: Re: Israel and Iran: Jewish People’s Policy Institute of Jerusalem (JPPI)

    Stu – there is much to discuss in here. Let’s try to touch base early next week?

    On May 21, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Eizenstat, Stuart ([email protected]) wrote:

    Dear Jake, I thought it might be useful for the campaign to give you a quick summary of some of the points that were made at the JPPI conference we had on Monday and Tuesday of this week at Glen Cove, New York. Dennis Ross and I co-chair JPPI, which is based in Jerusalem, and was created by the Jewish Agency of Israel ten years ago to be a think tank for strategic issues facing Israel, the Diaspora, and USG-Israel relations. We have a group of fellows, like retired General Michael Herzog (brother of the opposition leader), Avi Gil and others. At the conference, we had Natan Sharansky, who heads the Jewish Agency; leading Jewish organizational leaders (e.g. heads of major UJA Federations around the country); leading rabbis (e.g. Norman Kurtz in Chicago, and Eric Yoffie); academics from Harvard to UCLA; a Member of the Canadian Parliament and former Cabinet Minister (Irwin Cotler)l Middle East experts like David Makovsky, Martin Indyk, and, of course, Dennis Ross, as well as Henry Kissinger and Eric Schmidt of Google, who talked about high tech in Israel. Moreover, Malcolm Honlein, the president of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations (who I put together with Hillary through you and Huma), was there for the whole two day conference. and spoke on several occasions. We had a signficant number of Israelis there, as well.

    [1] ISRAEL: (1) The new Netanyahu government has very little flexibility on the peace process, given its right-wing tilt. (2) While solid majorities of the Israeli public (over 60%) continue to support the two state solution, only a minority believe it is feasible, given Palestinian intransigence. (3) A number of people, including, interestingly, Malcolm Honlein, felt the Prime Minister should now accept the last Kerry offer as a basis for resuming negotiations. Evidently, the last version given to Bibi did not contain language on Jerusalem (which he cannot accept), while the last version given to Abbas contained the language (but they still rejected it). (4) There was a clear consensus that the BDS/anti-delegitimization movement against Israel was growing in Europe, and was an increasing threat. (5) There was a grave concern that the Obama Administration, once the Iran nuclear negotiations are out of the way, will support some form of the French proposal for a new UN Resolution to supplant UN Resolution 242, endorsing the two-state solution, with 1967 borders, and with Jerusalem as the capital of both Israel and a Palestinian state. Several people felt that given the impasse in the peace process, Israel’s argument that this should be left to negotiations, had a hollow ring to it. If this is going to happen, then it should be framed in ways that force the Palestinians to make tough choices, like ending claims to the “right of return”. But the safest political position is to oppose what will be seen as an effort to “impose” a solution both sides will reject. (6) There was a feeling on the part of some that Gaza was likely to blow-up again, a combination of Hamas rearming and rebuilding their tunnels, and the impact of the embargo, which has not been loosened. (7) Israel needed to be more creative to take advantage of the open window for cooperating with the Sunni states (Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Egypt, Jordan) against their common enemy, Iran. (8) Most troubling was the pervasive feeling that the US has withdrawn from a leadership position in the Middle East, leaving our allies in the Arab world, and Israel, to fend for themselves. The level of vitriol against the President was striking, to such a degree that one participant urged that he was being unfairly demonized.

    [2] ANTI-SEMITISM/ANTI-ZIONISM: (1) There was genuine belief that there is a substantial rise in anti-Semitism in Europe (a topic I addressed at some length). This is most evident in France (where 7000 French Jews left in 2014 for Israel, with almost double that amount expected this year); Belgium; parts of Sweden (Malmo); the Netherlands; Greece; Hungary; Ukraine; but even in the UK. Roger Cukierman, the long-time head of the CRIF, French Jewry’s central organization, cited several examples of the growth of anti-Semitism during my negotiations with the French government for payments for people deported on the French railway during World War II, as Secretary Kerry’s Special Adviser on Holocaust Issues. Thus, in 2001, when his first term began, 90% of school-age French Jews attended public schools; now only 30% do so, because of the intimidation in schools. It is dangerous to wear a kipot (head-covering) on the Metro. Argentine Jews are also increasingly fearful, in part because of their government’s close relations with Iran, which is widely seen as having planned and funded the Hezbollah attacks in the 1990s against the Jewish community center (AMIA), and the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires. (2) Modern-day anti-Semitism is a product of a combination of factors: (a) Neo-Nazi/right wing parties, which have long had an anti-Semitic strain, like Le Pen’s National Front in France. (b) Left-wing parties/academics, who oppose Israel’s settlement policy and occupation and import their opposition on Jews, who are seen (wrongly) as surrogates for Israel. (c) Angry, disaffected, unintegrated Muslim young people, who identify with the Palestinians as the underdogs and address their anger for their plight and that of the Palestinians at Jews in their countries. (3) French Prime Minister Valls estimates there are some 3000 European-born Muslims fighting in Syria and Iraq, 1000 from France, who come back to Europe, armed and trained jihadists. This was precisely the profile of the suspect in the Brussels Jewish Museum attack last year. (4) The growth in anti-Semitism, and anti-Zionism is not limited to Europe. There is a greater security fear among Jews in both the U.S., Europe, and key Latin American countries. It was reported that 14 AEPi fraternity houses on American campuses were subject to some form of desecration. Several people said that “American campuses were our Europe”. (5) Malcolm Honlein placed special emphasis on the rise of anti-Semitism in his remarks. He said that the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations was catalyzing efforts to create a Global Forum to deal with this phenomenon, to track it, exchange information about it, and develop new ways to combat it. He said that Israel had a role to play, as well.

    [3] DIVISIONS WITH THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMUNITY OVER ISRAEL POLICY. (1) There are increasingly sharp left-right divisions (J Street vs. AIPAC) within the American Jewish community over Israel. Remarkably, rabbis are reluctant to discuss Israel in their sermons for fear of alienating one faction or another. (2) There was now a big debate over which groups can march in the annual New York City Israeli Independence Day parade, which take more liberal positions (e.g., New Israel Fund, J Street). It was generally felt best to have a “big tent” so the Democratic Party left-leaning people were not excluded. (3) The kind of robust debate that occurs in Israel over Israeli policy, is blunted here by attacks against those who oppose the current government’s policies in the West Bank. (4) There was a clearly established (Pew and Gallup polls) drop in support for Israel among self-identified Democrats (now under 50%, with over 80% for Republicans). This could feed into making Israel a partisan issue (one of the problems with Bibi’s speech to Congress) for the first time in its history, a dangerous situation.

    [4] IRAN NUCLEAR NEGOTIATIONS AND BEYOND: (1) This was the most emotional issue. Most of the participants who spoke on the topic (Sharansky, Kissinger, Honlein, Makovsky, Ross) were deeply skeptical of the Iranian nuclear negotiations. Clearly, Honlein and AIPAC will mount a major effort to block the agreement. There was a real foreboding (one participant called it a “panic”) that the American Jewish community was going to be involved in a confrontation with the Administration, that the Republicans would use to try to drive a further wedge with Jewish voters over Israel-related issues. (2) At the same time, there was a recognition (e.g. Kissinger) that the President would be able to overcome a veto override fight, although just barely. (3) It was important to reassure Israel and Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States that any nuclear deal with Iran did not presage broader cooperation with Iran on regional issues. (Kissinger agreed, but felt it was inevitable over time, because Iran is a real country, with a long history) (3) Several speakers (e.g. Ross) suggested that Israel should now begin to talk with the White House about ways to repair the damage to the relationship over the nuclear talks (if there is an agreement). Indeed, the President proposed to Bibi, in his call after the formation of the government, just that, but was rebuffed, seeing any cooperation as signaling he was giving up the fight against the deal. (4) The options for a post-agreement reassurance included: (a) Reassurance that the agreement would not lead to a new U.S.-Iranian alliance in the region, at the expense of our traditional alliances. (b) Sophisticated military weapons to defend themselves against a resurgent Iran. (c) Defense treaties, that an attack by Iran would be considered an attack against the U.S. (But this was fraught with difficulty; would it be all forms of attack or only a nuclear attack) (d) Development of a common agenda with Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Gulf States. This has not been initiated. (5) The “snap-back” of sanctions was felt to be impractical. What would constitute a violation? Who would make the determination? Which sanctions would be re-imposed (US, EU, UN)? (6) There needed to be a clear declaration after the 10/15 year period of the agreement, that a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable, and the U.S. would every means to stop it. Likewise, the U.S. could not afford to disengage from the region, and had to lead the coalition against Iran. (7) There was almost no one who subscribed to the Administration’s hope that over the 10/15 year period of the agreement, the Iranian regime would moderate. Far from it, the end of sanctions and the massive amount of money that would flow to Iran would strengthen the regime, provide more funds to support terrorist groups, and embolden them in the region.

    I hope this is helpful in shaping Hillary’s positions on these difficult issues. But more broadly, she needs to understand the great angst in the Jewish community over the cascade of challenges I have described. The empathy and appreciation she can demonstrate, would itself be important and reassuring. Best wishes, Stu Eizenstat.

  14. October 28, 2016 - 8:46 am | Permalink

    White Britishers and other European white people should begin a continental campaign to bring these refugee children into Israel. After all Israel is one of the richest states in the Middle East, would it not be charitable for them to support these refugee children?

    Consider the advantage for the refugees who will receive their needed assistance much more quickly if they can simply emigrate to Israel. After all doesn’t the Torah warn Jews against the wronging of a stranger? Is that not the core teaching of Judaism and and not an optional extra?

    Israeli ministers have hardened hearts, just like the biblical story of Pharaoh. They close their eyes and hearts to unaccompanied refugee children, while turning a blind eye to the enslavement of gentile women, allowing them to be returned to their masters simply on the say so of an immigration official. These are not the actions of a world-leading moral civilisation that believes in Tikkun Olam.

    As a result, children across the Middle East will remain cold, alone and at risk over the coming months. Here is an opportunity for Israel to stand on the right side of history, to bring immediate relief to thousands of unaccompanied refugee children who felt compelled to apply for asylum in Europe last year because Israel refused to allow them to immigrate.

    Will Israel wake up tomorrow morning on the wrong side of history and on the wrong side of compassion? The Immigration policies of Israel has shown the Jews at their worst, uncaring about the suffering of children a mere border line away. Remember Madeline Albright saying “we think its worth it” in reference to the thousands of Palestinian children slaughtered by Israel?

    Is it not time Israel begins showing the compassion for which they are famous? We think this campaign will show white Europeans at their best in helping Israel see the hateful racism of their apartheid immigration policies.

    Should questions arise from Jews about this campaign, they should be heavily and repeatedly queried about about their current racist polices that do not allow intermarriage or immigration of non-Jews.

    The call needs to go out loud and clear: What’s good for Europe is good for Israel! Vibrant diversity for Israel – NOW. Multiculturalism for the monolithic, racist state of Israel to help them overcome their virulent, hateful racism!

    Jews no longer need be victims of their own special brand of racism. Won’t you help – please?

    • Outin Theopen's Gravatar Outin Theopen
      October 28, 2016 - 9:01 am | Permalink

      This kind of intelligent satire is truly valuable to our cause. With your permission, I’ll print it out and spread it around. Thank you!

  15. October 28, 2016 - 7:22 pm | Permalink

    It has impressed me for years. How come these “refugees” commit the most unspeakable crimes like rape, enslavement and even grinding one White girl in UK into kebab, and never get more than a slap in the wrist. Well, apparently that’s what (((the establishment))) wants from them: cut Whites to size by all means necessary. They are doing the work of (((the establishment))), why should they be deported? The excuses for letting them free are the cookbook of excuses of students before exam. The criminal has the right to family life, therefore cannot be deported. The criminal must be released in the streets again because he wouldn’t be safe in his country of origin. And what else not. Yet again, White Brits, Americans, Canadians deserve to be cut to size, for their participation in the Holocash, on the wrong side.

    Today at my university I had finished my share of work and was volunteering to help a Jewish girl. She took a 1-minute break, sneaked and talked to the professor, and dumped on me another five hours work that should have been hers to begin with. I confronted her on this, she simply didn’t give a fuck, on my face.

    Was thinking today. Nazis brought us to the Moon, not Jews. Ever since we’ve done nothing. Jews have their own merits, like chutzpah, pornography, prostitution, diversifying Whites to extinction, but the Moon is not yet in their list of achievements.

    Here is one of my most loved books ever, for free.

  16. Yeoman Archer's Gravatar Yeoman Archer
    October 29, 2016 - 1:26 am | Permalink

    @ Ghero Tzedecco Itagliano da Sassari
    October 28, 2016 – 7:22 pm |
    Don’t use the Amazon link there is charge.
    Go instead to the Katana site, who is also a commentator on TOO.
    Jews must live pdf

  17. Free Thinker's Gravatar Free Thinker
    October 29, 2016 - 5:58 am | Permalink

    Welcome to the NWO . Guilty until proving innocence. Fear is the backbone of the NWO , and show trials are the stocks of the NWO . Pleasure or pain is your choice animal .

  18. Donna T's Gravatar Donna T
    October 31, 2016 - 8:16 am | Permalink

    I’ve never heard of any of the muslim ‘refugees’ being bussed into Stamford Hill? Why doesn’t Lord Dubs Advocate a ‘refugee facility’ there? He knows too well that the shomrin police would oppose it!

Comments are closed.