Trump and the Jews, #6: Ramping up the hate (and paranoia) as we approach the finish line

Kevin MacDonald

With precious little time left to go in the election, it seems like Jewish angst is ramping up, although of course, not all Jews see Donald Trump as a disaster (see previous articles in this series). Here’s a typical Trump rally as imagined by New York magazine writer Jonathan Chait.

Much of the recent furor concerns Trump’s final ad, a 2-minute masterpiece of populist rhetoric that depicts a “global power structure” that is “bleeding America dry” with horrible trade deals that enrich elites and open the gates to mass immigration. Activist Jews watching it focused on the people depicted as behind this globalist takeover: George Soros, Janet Yellen, Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and Lloyd Blankfein, Chairman of Goldman Sachs, with the implication that Clinton is their minion. As he noted in his famous West Palm Beach speech which also triggered activist Jews and cucks like Rick Wilson:

The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure. We’ve seen this first hand in the WikiLeaks documents, in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors.

This was enormously triggering for the ADL which tweeted:

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

But of course, this is an egregiously stupid tactic for Jews and cuckservatives to take. Why call attention to Jewish involvement in international banking when their involvement and their general commitment to a globalist model for Western countries is well-known? As Jonathan Taylor  noted in Counterpunch:

For our tiny size, we are by far the most politically influential. The worlds of finance, media, journalism and law are home to extremely disproportionately high numbers of Jews. Leading globalist institutions like the World Bank, IMF, and WTO have high numbers of Jewish executives and staffers, as do organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, which one informal estimate claims is around 50% Jewish. Half of the US’s billionaires are Jewish. Jewish donors play an enormous role in funding Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The normally Republican and predominantly Jewish neoconservatives have thrown their support behind Hillary. … Bringing up anti-Semitism then just reminds people of how much influence and power Jews have.

A November 7 article at JTA focuses on Jewish responses to these statements by Trump as tapping into a wellspring of anti-Semitism that will unleash another holocaust (“Anti-Semitism unleashed by Trump followers chills Jewish voters“). It begins ominously: “Pieties? Out. Passports? In. Paranoia? On its way.”

I’d have to say that paranoia is already here if this is any indication. Another sample:

“My sister and her son didn’t have passports, but I pushed her to get them this summer,” said Suzanne Reisman, 40, a New York City-based writer who has been harassed by anti-Semites on Twitter. “My grandparents were Holocaust survivors. I hope it won’t come to it, but if we have to flee, we are ready.”

At the extreme (psychiatric case) end of this paranoia is an article in the Forward (“How Do I Explain My Trump Nazi Nightmare to My Mexican American Daughter?”) that begins by recounting the author’s nightmare of a naked Trump appearing with a swastika headband and saying things like “I’m deporting your daughter even though she was born in New York.” For her, it’s the 1930’s all over again, and we all know what that means:

I watch the news. Here is what I see: On a recent interview with CNN Trump says that he is for a ban on Muslims coming into the United States. I check the date to see if it’s still 2016 and I’m living in New York City or if it’s 1936 and I’m living in Nazi Germany, because for one to say, “Muslims shouldn’t be allowed into the United States,” to me is the same thing as saying “Jews should wear a yellow star when they walk down the street.”

This paranoia is an integral part of Judaism’s bunker mentality — a marker of strong ingroup identification and central to Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy. As I noted in Chapter 7 of A People That Shall Dwell Alone (pp. 218-219):

A permanent sense of imminent threat appears to be common among Jews. Writing on the clinical profile of Jewish families, Herz and Rosen (1982) note that for Jewish families a “sense of persecution (or its imminence) is part of a cultural heritage and is usually assumed with pride. Suffering is even a form of sharing with one’s fellow-Jews. It binds Jews with their heritage–with the suffering of Jews throughout history.” Zborowski and Herzog (1952, 153) note that the homes of wealthy Jews in traditional Eastern European shtetl communities sometimes had secret passages for use in times of anti-Semitic pogroms, and that their existence was “part of the imagery of the children who played around them, just as the half-effaced memory was part of every Jew’s mental equipment.” …

Woocher (1986) shows that Jewish survival in a threatening world is a fundamental theme of Judaism as a civil religion in contemporary America. Within this world view, the gentile world is conceptualized as fundamentally hostile, with Jewish life always on the verge of ceasing to exist entirely. “Like many other generations of Jews who have felt similarly, the leaders of the polity who fear that the end may be near have transformed this concern into a survivalist weapon” (Woocher 1986, 73). Thus, for example, Woocher (1986) notes that there has been a major effort since the 1960s to have American Jews visit Israel in an effort to strengthen Jewish identification, with a prominent aspect of the visit being a trip to a border outpost “where the ongoing threat to Israel’s security is palpable” (p. 150).

Self-deception is another important aspect of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy and the focus of Chapter 8 of Separation and Its Discontents. Perhaps the most self-deceptive comment comes from Julia Ioffe, a journalist who was offended by Twitter comments after her hit piece on Melania Trump appeared in GQ. Ioffe, who writes for Foreign Affairs and Politico, said she was “personally glad to see the outpouring of antisemitism” because it restored Jews’ status as a persecuted minority.

For a long time I was very frustrated by the discussion on kind of the liberal side of the political spectrum, where Jews, like Israel, were no longer seen as the underdog, no longer seen as the persecuted minority, in fact, this kind of scurrying line of anti-Semitic stereotype of us as the establishment, and people who run and control everything.

This was too much even for Jeffrey Goldberg, who, as a leading pro-Israel journalist (who, as editor-in-chief of Atlantic, also has a perch in the elite media) is quite aware of Jewish power:  “Two things can be true at once,” implying that Jews could be a persecuted minority and yet a dominant part of the establishment. Indeed, one might say that in general Jews as an elite with different interests and attitudes than other sectors of society, are the main cause of historical anti-Semitism.  Without going into a laundry list of Jewish power in America (Jonathan Taylor’s comments above are a good start), let’s just say that writing for elite publications and being attacked by a bunch of mainly anonymous Twitter trolls (some of whom are doubtless on the payroll of the ADL) is not exactly a sign that you are on the outside looking in.

Also in the running for most self-deceptive pre-election comment is the above-mentioned Jonathan Chait, writing in New York magazine (“The GOP’s age of authoritarianism has only just begun.”). For Chait, Trump is a reincarnation of a decades-old Jewish bogeyman in American politics: right wing populism.

The party has grown increasingly reliant upon White identity politics to supply its votes, which has left an indelible imprint on not only the Republican Party’s function but also its form.

Right-wing populism has had the same character for decades — in 1950, Theodor Adorno described the fear of outsiders, and the veneration of law and order, as “the authoritarian personality”; in 1964, Richard Hofstadter described a similar tendency as “the paranoid style” — but until recently, those movements lived outside both political parties.

The work of Adorno and Hofstadter remains central to Jewish intellectuals’ understanding of American politics. Chait’s comments are a good example of how Jewish intellectuals are able to plug into influential pseudoscientific movements led by strongly identified Jews who were pursuing Jewish interests (Adorno and Hofstadter are covered in Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique).  For these Jewish intellectuals, a particularly noxious aspect of populism is distrust of elites and “experts” such as those vetted by the American university system — a view that obviously dovetails with Jewish interests as an elite. Hofstadter’s view that departures from liberal thinking derive from “status anxiety” may seem relevant. However, Hofstadter framed status anxiety as nothing more than psychopathology, while the anxieties of Trump voters are not at all a psychopathology. In fact Trump voters have very real fears about their future in non-White America (here, here, here and here), and for good reason (see comments on David Brooks, below).

In making such statements, Chait ignores research that Trump voters are not actually more authoritarian than non-Trump voters. They are actually populists whose main characteristics are support for American nationalism and distrust of elites — people like Chait and Brooks and their employers. [Trump’s voters aren’t authoritarians, new research says. So what are they? Washington Post, March 6, 2016]

What Chait fails to mention, of course, is that authoritarianism is rampant on the left, most notably in universities where free speech is a distant memory and we even see threats of physical assault.


Then there’s Marissa Robbins in Newsweek

Over the past 16 months, Trump’s campaign has openly and unabashedly stirred up hatred against women, people of color, Muslims and immigrants. He has refused to condemn some of his explicitly White-supremacist alt-right supporters and has even promoted images and tweets created by these individuals on his own Twitter feed.

Trump has also recently incorporated the anti-Semitic trope of an international banker/media/elite conspiracy into his rhetoric, dog-whistling to the White-supremacist, neo-Nazi portion of his base.

It’s pointless to go into what’s wrong here—pretty much everything. But the point I want to make is that there are indeed people on the Alt Right who make statements that are, shall we say, less than refined (I have proposed that people with IQ’s less than 120 and who haven’t read much about Jews should not comment on Jewish issues; all it does is give Jews easy targets to parade in the mainstream media.) However, what is invariably missing in these rants is whether the Alt Right critique of Jewish power has any basis in fact. Context is never provided.

For example, from her statements on the Melania Trump article fallout discussed above, Ms. Ioffe clearly has a very strong Jewish identity, and her article, by all accounts was hostile toward Melania (who said that the article “provoked” the attacks). As I have documented, there has been an outpouring of hostility toward Trump by strongly identified Jews who clearly are motivated by their sense that Trump will be bad for Jewish interests. It is not much of a stretch to assume that Ms. Ioffe was motivated to write her negative portrayal of Melania because of her Jewish identity and sense of Jewish interests. But journalists like Ioffe expect that they will be able to write such things without anyone calling attention to their Jewish identity. Sorry, but those days are over.

And underneath the hostility from many on the Alt Right is the general view that Jews are indeed a critical linchpin of the establishment that is hostile to the entirely legitimate interests of Whites in retaining political and cultural control, particularly on immigration and refugee policy, multiculturalism, and globalism generally.

Again, I won’t rehearse the mountain of data that show how the organized Jewish community and many activist Jews in the media, politics, and academia have been a necessary condition for the present power of the anti-White movement, but Ioffe’s idea that Twitter harassment proves that Jews are not the establishment is ludicrous. If Trump wins it will be in the teeth of a unified establishment, from the far left that dominates academia and much of the mainstream media to the neoconservative right that has dominated conservative media and foreign policy. It would be a yuge defeat for the entire elite class that dominate the US, as Haaretz columnist Chemi Shalev (an Israeli who is horrified by Trump’s statements on immigration) notes:

Trump’s election as president wouldn’t only sully America’s image in foreign eyes, it would crush it in the eyes of many Americans, including the overwhelming majority of its elites. The leaders of America’s cultural, intellectual, academic and financial sectors would immediately be plunged into shock and depression. They would look in the mirror and be hard put to convince themselves that America, with Trump as president, can still be considered great. They won’t leave the country in droves, as some have threatened, but their country would certainly be diminished forever in their eyes.

Ah the weeping and gnashing of teeth in all the elite enclaves, from the Hamptons to Beverly Hills.

Finally, I want to make a point about how the fact that Trump is supported by working class Whites is used against him. In general, the people who run this unified, oligarchic establishment are more educated than average. But this education gap is used as a self-reinforcing weapon against Trump by writers like David Brooks, another writer who, like Ioffe, is a member of the barred-from-the-establishment persecuted minority. Brooks writes for the New York Times and appears regularly on PBS. As summarized by RealClearPolitics, Brooks noted on PBS that

the less educated and non-college educated Whites are going to vote for Donald Trump no matter what. He added, “people are just going with their gene pool.” Brooks said demographics is the reason why Clinton is making a campaign stop in the state of Michigan, normally a Democratic stronghold, because “there are a lot of White people.”

“Basically, less educated or high school-educated Whites are going to Trump,” Brooks told host Judy Woodruff. “It doesn’t matter what the guy does. And college-educated going to Clinton.”

“Sometimes, you get the sense that the campaign barely matters,” a dejected Brooks said. “People are just going with their gene pool and whatever it is. And that is one of the more depressing aspects of this race for me.” …

“It’s a campaign of hate,” he said of Trump. “Obama is a campaign of at least hope. At least his first campaign was. This is just a campaign of hate. And, you know, people who don’t like Trump really don’t like Trump. And I guess I’m among them.”

Three points:

  • Brooks is being interviewed on PBS, a media outlet with an educated viewership. He is basically telling his educated audience that people like them are voting for Clinton. There is a sense of superiority and the implication that only the unwashed would vote for Trump.

The domination of elite media by people hostile to the traditional White majority remains a problem for those of us in opposition to the establishment. The problem is that intellectually insecure White people look to the elite media for their ideas. Most people are quite insecure about their intellectual ability. But they know that the professors at Harvard, the editorial pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post, and PBS are all on page when it comes to immigration and the benefits of diversity. This is a formidable array, to the point that you almost have to be a crank to dissent from this consensus.

Brooks, then, is appealing to these intellectually insecure Whites, hoping that educated Whites will cast enough votes for Clinton to keep this corrupt establishment going a while longer before it inevitably goes down in flames.

If you’d like to continue the destruction of our manufacturing base, and the jobs that went with it. If you like the uncontrollable immigration, if you like the string of stupid wars from Iraq to Libya to Syria. If you want to say yes to all of that, if you want to keep this all the way it is, fine, then vote for Hillary Clinton.

  • Brooks is clearly saying that White identity politics is driving the Trump campaign (“going with their gene pool”), and I (along with Jonathan Chait, as quoted above) wholeheartedly agree. The problem for Jews is that the forces unleashed by Jewish activism in favor of immigration and multiculturalism have inevitably unleashed a rise in White identity politics, either implicitly, as among most Trump supporters, or explicitly, as among the Alt Right (which has been the only intellectual movement supporting Trump). And once this process starts gaining momentum, it’s only a matter of time before there is a critical mass of Whites who are dialed into the Jewish role in White dispossession.  Psychologically, we expect that racial identity and a sense of racial interests will be increasingly important as Whites become a minority.

This is especially the case given that Whites are routinely subjected to hostility in the media and the educational system. An article in The Federalist by a Jewish writer, David Marcus (no fan of the Alt Right) notes:

Until recently I would have been unlikely to use the term [“anti-White’]. Not because I didn’t believe some people harbored animosity towards Whites, but because that was a fringe attitude removed from power, which represented little real threat. That is no longer the case. Progressive rhetoric on race has turned an ugly corner and the existence of “anti-White” attitudes can no longer be ignored….What started as irony turned into an actual belief that White people, specifically White men, are more dangerous and immoral than any other people.

And a student, “College Republican,” comments on an article in The American Conservative by Scott McConnell, also critical of the Alt Right:

I am in college and nearly all of my conservative friends are at least sympathetic to the alt-right. Even if they don’t openly talk about it, they’re regularly browsing 8chan’s /pol/, The Right Stuff, Radix, VDare, Occidental Observer, AmRen, etc.

How did this come about? It’s harder for older people to understand, but we younger Whites have been vilified all our lives. Throughout elementary school high school, I was regularly demonized for being White. (I attended public and Christian schools and it was even worse at the latter.) And now it’s even more extreme in college. Our entire White race is regularly trashed on a daily basis. … We have the right to oppose our own dispossession and extinction — just as every other race does. It’s time for younger Whites to pick up the gauntlet because we’re the future.

The anti-White hatred originating from the highest moral ground of our culture is palpable, and it is only going to get worse — much worse — if our future is indeed a non-White America.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

48 Comments to "Trump and the Jews, #6: Ramping up the hate (and paranoia) as we approach the finish line"

  1. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 7, 2016 - 12:54 pm | Permalink

    The problem is that intellectually insecure White people look to the elite media for their ideas. Most people are quite insecure about their intellectual ability. But they know that the professors at Harvard, the editorial pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post, and PBS are all on page when it comes to immigration and the benefits of diversity.

    Professor MacDonald’s point is clear, of course. Yet surely the other side of the coin is that intellectual insecurity is the sole sane stance for most people relative to most of human knowledge! Put otherwise, who in the world is so learned, so omnicompetent, that he has mastered genetics, integration of third-order differentials, the vagaries of the bond market, knitting, the construction principles or methods governing automated assembly or canning machines, and the internal combustion engine? Presumably there are two or three such people to be found, but none of them are in a PBS studio chatting with Judy Woodruff or Charlie Rose.

    Thus it’s fair to say that one of the many problems crippling the mind-set of Jonathan Chait, Julia Ioffe, David Brooks, Scott McConnell, and countless others is precisely that they lack intellectual insecurity—formerly known as intellectual modesty—anent the million and one areas where it would become them the most to acknowledge it. Of course, another of those problems is that all of these people are contemptible liars in failing to admit that maintaining or advancing the interests and power of those in their own gene pool (or in McConnell’s case, those of the gene-pool swimmers whom he has made his career brown-nosing) has ever been Priority Number 1.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      November 7, 2016 - 1:06 pm | Permalink

      A follow-up. I wonder whether this is one of KM’s articles that VDARE would ever republish or link to. I’d love to see Derbyshire twist himself into a sycophantic pretzel in an attempt to laugh it off.

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      November 7, 2016 - 2:13 pm | Permalink

      “. . .they lack intellectual insecurity. . .”

      They have been insulated from the harshness of reality. They can say anything and still have a good income. An engineer tries that and he’s gone.

      The university is much like a mental hospital- lots of strange ideas, and lots of PhDs, with all protected [by White creators] from the cruel world.

    • HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
      November 7, 2016 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

      We are back to the Jewish log in the eye. Brooks et al would admit they are not expert in a million spheres of technical knowledge; their realm of supposed wisdom is much more circumscribed: politics, culture and maybe (to a small degree) economics. What Brooks and his co-tribalists are engaged in is not an honest pursuit of truth in these areas but rather ethnic warfare disguised as moral high mindedness and incisive analysis.

      To what degree this Jewish myopia is hard wired is unclear: along with other traits it does wonders for placing them in the highest echelons of society. The inevitable constraint – negative selection pressure – consists of the inevitable hostile reaction of the host society.

      Brooks’ dejection at the thought of gene pool based conflict is appropriate: his pool comprises only 2% of the population.

  2. Peter J's Gravatar Peter J
    November 7, 2016 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    I can barely believe it. I saw the ad. So standing up against corruption, standing up for the working man, and arguing against crony capitalism and national asset stripping (i.e. imperialism) is clearly “anti-Semitic”. Wow….amazing admission….

  3. A. Yell's Gravatar A. Yell
    November 7, 2016 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    “A November 7 article at JTA focuses on Jewish responses to these statements by Trump as tapping into a wellspring of anti-Semitism”

    The JTA? Oh the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Which according to it’s own logo is “The Global Jewish News Source”. Well I certainly don’t see Jewish involvement in globalism at ALL!

  4. Betty's Gravatar Betty
    November 7, 2016 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

    Very good article by Dr. McDonald. I can blame 99% of problems on Jews, but the 1% composed of RCC/Zioevangizers are the bigger problem.

    The USA bishops have been silent about everything except one thing – immigration. When Podesta’s emails about
    a “Catholic spring” came out, not a peep out of the bishops. But when Trump speaks about a wall, deporting criminal illegals then the bishops and pope Frannie start yapping.

    The “trad” RCC website ChurchMilitant run by RCC cucks has been conducting a rosary Novena to Mary so that Trump wins. These cucks blame the problems of the USA
    RCC on American WASPs, but now they say only Trump can save the RCC from Hilligula. WOW!!! The Zioevangizers are busy promoting a war with Russia (their “Gog-Magog”) villain.
    I can ignore Jewish hysteria about Trump. I am still hopeful that Trump will win. And if he does, the RCC/Zioevangizers will have to be dealt with. Their “universal church,” “universal brotherhood” nonsense has to be stopped. This is what is destroying the USA and
    the West.

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      November 7, 2016 - 9:23 pm | Permalink

      This week we learned that Jewish institutions insist upon the Protestant Church apologising for its founder’s views of the Jews. The Jewish Algemeiner writes that “the 500th anniversary of the Reformation would be the ‘perfect time’ for Protestant leaders to recognise and apologise for the ‘horrific antisemitism’ of their movement’s founder, Martin Luther.” Rabbi Abraham Cooper — associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre – wants the protestants to disown the founding father of their church or at least to “directly address the issue (of antisemitism) in the overall context of what they’re celebrating in terms of this anniversary,” David Michaels of B’nai B’rith insists that the Church reject some of its founder’s teachings. “This reality requires committed Lutherans and other Christians to ensure that there is fitting recognition and rejection of Luther’s hateful beliefs about Jews, wherever these persist.”
      Martin Luther discovered the Talmud. So if we are to judge Matin Luther, shouldn’t we read his book, “The Jews and Their Lies” first? Their paranoia might be their downfall. Will this be a tipping point? There has already been controversy in Protestant churches due to the BDS program being actively discussed within churches, at present only the Presbyterians, Mennonites, World Council of Churches fully divesting, and partial participation by the United Church of Christ. Time will tell.

      • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
        November 8, 2016 - 2:00 pm | Permalink

        @Veritas – Thanks for that incredible news. I read somewhere that the Tribe is very keen on demanding “apologies” for just about everything & everyone who dares to resist the NWO Globalist programme, but these apologies are never sufficient, and the person still gets slung into prison, or driven out of their job, or their home, or their country. We should celebrate Martin Luther for his tremendous courage in trying to reform the church, and celebrate the new Anglican reform movement defending the basic tenets of Christianity against the subversives trying to turn cathedrals into “Multi-faith Centres”, with little side-rooms for Sikhs, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Christians and probably wiccans & Satanists later on. Just like the ones at the UN, only with rainbow flags flying from the church towers, and perhaps the cutesy little butterflies pedophiles have chosen as their “symbol”. Next it will be people complaining of “hurt feelings” because they aren’t allowed to marry their horse in church.

    • Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
      November 7, 2016 - 11:09 pm | Permalink

      No Betty, it is NOT the bigger problem, not even close. The ‘Jewish Problem’ is THE central problem – that is what is destroying the USA and the West.

      Yes, there are plenty of Western idiots, churches front and foremost, who act against us but only because they have been brainwashed by Jewish control of the media, the academic world and the mass culture in general. If the Jews were not here then none of this would have happened, at least not to the extent that it has.

      You don’t solve a problem by dealing with its effects, you solve a problem by dealing with its causes. Deal with the Jewish Problem and everything else falls into place.

      • Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
        November 7, 2016 - 11:29 pm | Permalink

        A further point: I believe that our awareness of the Jewish Problem, and our willingness and ability to deal with it, is no longer just about saving our own Western skins, it is about saving humanity itself.

        All through their history the Jews have played the same deceitful game, using their high intelligence + ethnic cohesion + racial-religious hatred of everything non-Jewish to infiltrate and undermine the societies they live in.

        And each time, thanks to their reckless arrogance, they have over-reached themselves and brought about a backlash. And each time that backlash has been bigger than the one before, until the Nazis attempted to systematically wipe them out.

        This time around it could be even worse. This time they have the most powerful nation the world has ever known, the United States of America, securely in their control, and they also have their own physical nation Israel – a country with a nuclear arsenal almost as big as China’s – to protect.

        Logically then, this time the backlash could be truly horrendous. Israel and the ‘neo-cons’ won’t hesitate to use those nuclear weapons if they feel the Jews are imperiled. In doing so they will take everyone else down with them – what they call The Samson Option.

        The Jews are incapable of changing their ways. They believe in that ‘End of History’ nonsense, that “this time” it will be different, that “this time” the Messiah will come and that “this time” they will create a world they can rule. But, of course, “this time” never comes – the same mistakes are made and the same consequences are suffered.

        I honestly believe we owe it not just to ourselves but to everyone on planet Earth to break the Jewish stranglehold before things go too far and they bring about a disaster none of us may survive. And we won’t do that by focusing on ‘Liberals’, ‘Democrats’, ‘Christians’, ‘Muslims’, ‘Blacks’ or whatever. They are problems but they are not THE problem.

        Focus on the Jewish problem. As a well-known rabbi :) once said: “the rest is commentary.”

        • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
          November 8, 2016 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

          “…I believe that our awareness of the Jewish Problem, and our willingness and ability to deal with it, is no longer just about saving our own Western skins, it is about saving humanity itself…”

          You’re correct and not the only one that thinks this.

          “They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”


        • Betty's Gravatar Betty
          November 8, 2016 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

          Are you a Roman Catholic? If yes, do you accept black/Asian priests-popes? If yes, then what is your interest in the West? The RCC/Zioevangizers are the problems.

        • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
          November 9, 2016 - 2:43 am | Permalink

          “The only explanation, it seems to me, is that with their race as a whole spiritual considerations are paramount, paramount over profit and even over self-preservation. One can foresee the logical end in a future that may not be too distant: one can see the last Jews dying with exultation on the surface of a planet from which they have exterminated all other human beings, all animal, all vegetation, all life–a planet of which they have made “a desolation of desolations.”
          — Revilo Oliver

    • MaryC's Gravatar MaryC
      November 8, 2016 - 2:02 am | Permalink

      Betty, if you truly believe that the, totally demoralised and Masonic-infiltrated Catholic Church, poses a bigger threat to the US and the West than the Jewish elite, I suggest you are in the category cited by Professor MacDonald – those with an IQ below 120 that have read very little about the Jewish issue – who really should not be commentating on such matters.

      • Betty's Gravatar Betty
        November 8, 2016 - 2:03 pm | Permalink

        MaryC – My IQ is over 120. Are you a Roman Catholic? If yes, do you accept black/Asian priests-popes? If yes, then what is your interest in the West?

        • MaryC's Gravatar MaryC
          November 9, 2016 - 3:32 am | Permalink

          Betty – I don’t recognise Francis because he isn’t Catholic. I would accept a black or Asian pope if he taught the true Catholic Faith. I don’t know if you believe in an afterlife, if so, do you believe that there is apartheid in Paradise or that God is a white man?
          However, all that is irrelevant. My point is that to believe the Catholic Church is more powerful than organised Jewish interests, as you seem to imply, is patently absurd

        • Theodora's Gravatar Theodora
          November 9, 2016 - 9:43 am | Permalink


          Have you been raised in protestant anti-Catholicism?

          I am afraid you don’t have a clue about true Catholicism and the authentic Church that was founded by Christ himself. You are right that Catholic Clergy at the moment are neglecting their Godly Task: defending God’s Creation and His children against the pharisee synagogue of satan. This is a direct result of the total infiltration by satan’s servants. Vatican II was/is a disaster because it was written by these infiltrators. But Betty, why is it that the Church has been under attack since her foundation? If you only look at the last 1500 years, it has been always the Catholic Church that was targeted, although in a veiled way. The Reformation; the French Revolution; Communism, that targeted the Russian Orthodox Church – which is also Catholic; the Spanish Revolution: the result was always a blow at the Church, plunder of monasteries and a huge loss of Catholic Christians. The A-bomb on Nagasaki was dropped precisely on the oldest Catholic Cathedral of Japan. Nagasaki was called the Vatican of the Far East!! Why is there so much hatred at the CC I ask you? Maybe because the Church – in her true state – is the fiercest antagonist to the satanic power elite? The current Church – hélas!! – is weak because of the infiltration. The current pope is an anti-pope! I do not respect him. He accepted even a worldly price: the Coudenhove Kalergi-price!! which has been renamed the Charlemagne-price. Why would a pope accept a worldly price? And then such an anti-European price? It tells you all about the current masonic pope.

          But Betty, true, traditional Catholicism is the Weapon Christ gave us against the pharisees and we should restaure the Church to her real self to be able to defend ourselves.

    • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
      November 8, 2016 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

      “… I can blame 99% of problems on Jews, but the 1% composed of RCC/Zioevangizers are the bigger problem…”

      I disagree but maybe you’re right. Since the Jews are a lot smaller number let’s get rid of them first then see if you’re correct.

  5. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    November 7, 2016 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

    Should Trump be fortunate enough to win the election, it will be most interesting to see how his adversarial relationship with Jewry plays out. Some Jews, (along with old guard Republican Cucks and Neocons), will obviously try to ingratiate themselves with him, and subvert and neutralize his efforts. My sense is that most of them, considering their hostile nature, will fight him tooth and nail, and his patience with them will be sorely tested.

    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      November 9, 2016 - 4:56 am | Permalink

      Now that he has won we’ll see how his difficult relationship with Jewry plays out. They will be his nemesis, and I stand by my above statement.

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      November 9, 2016 - 5:43 am | Permalink

      Allow me to make a prediction.

      For reference purposes, I will point to a very good book written by Jeff Gates from a few years ago: “Guilt By Association” . I highly recommend this book to every pro-White, jew wise member of our race realist community. In this book, Gates describes in considerable detail the jewish originated tactic known as ‘Game Theory Warfare’.

      This Game Theory Warfare model is a technique of utilizing 4th generation warfare tactics whereby Israel and the jews in the diaspora can stage false flag events or media psy-op provocations against a targeted nation, or individual or group of individuals and then, using a mathematical algorithm method, be able to accurately predict (within a defined and predetermined range of probability) the most likely reaction to the provocation.

      In the case of Trump – and his alleged (and I believe false) accusations of being guilty of anti-Semitism – here is what I am 100 percent certain will unfold between now and throughout the early months of his administration. The jewish owned and controlled media will begin hammering him with never ending articles and news program discussions which will accuse and/or speculate about him being a virulent anti-Semite.

      Every news or press conference or interview with a mainstream media personality will include radioactive questions about whether or not he has an autographed picture of Hitler in his wallet. He’ll be challenged to reveal how much he had to pay to get the rumored Gas Ovens installed in the penthouse of his residence in the Trump Towers.

      He will be asked how many shares of stock he owns in companies that manufacture Zyclon-B and whether or not he intends to divest himself of those shares or at least put them in a blind trust before he assumes office.

      Like Mittens Romney, he will be criticized because his family photo is too lily white and asked why none of his kids or grandkids have chosen to not involve themselves in an interracial relationship, or why hasn’t the Trump family adopted 5 or 10 African orphans so as to ‘diversify’ their family tree and water down their gene pool?

      Trump’s predictable reaction to these accusations of him being an anti-Semite will most likely lure him to do precisely what the jews want him to do. Which is – to start filling up his cabinet with jews, staffing his administration with jews and opening the door to allow massive numbers of jews to swarm into the Trump Administration and gobble up all of the most important positions within the US government, so as to ensure that jews will continue to control all of the choke points necessary for them to continue to control the US Government. Trump will be pressured into doing this in order to PROVE that he is not an anti-Semite. This tactic has been used repeatedly by the jews when they are faced with a new gentile politician who they fear might not be completely subservient to their agenda.

      As for the White guilt tactic – I’m not nearly as certain that Trump will succumb to that and start adopting African AIDS orphans and begin to destroy his family’s gene pool – but, one never knows for sure. Candidates are always affected in strange ways once they are drawn inside the Beltway.

  6. Wilburn Sprayberry's Gravatar Wilburn Sprayberry
    November 7, 2016 - 8:32 pm | Permalink

    Simplified, what this article says, and the objective of the Clinton and media campaign, is to make it socially unacceptable for educated white people to vote for Trump. We will see tomorrow how successful this tactic is.

  7. November 7, 2016 - 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Jews are the leaders of the cry-bully club. People that attack and then cry victimhood when you defend yourself.( Moslems also have this trick down pat.)

    • November 8, 2016 - 11:44 am | Permalink

      This behavior is exemplified by an ancient polish proverb, to wit: “The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”

  8. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    November 8, 2016 - 2:10 am | Permalink

    If Trump is elected I hope that he does grab ZOG by the p*$$y and march that Jew bought and paid for warpig back from every single theatre of the ZOG wars for Greater Israel.

    The longsuffering veterans should come home with honor and receive the best assistance the nation can give – but the shabgoy traitor class of political / money elites that executed these wars for the Judaic Supremacy should be netted when the Swamp is drained and made to stand trial.

  9. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    November 8, 2016 - 3:30 am | Permalink

    “The problem for Jews is that the forces unleashed by Jewish activism in favor of immigration and multiculturalism have inevitably unleashed a rise in White identity politics, either implicitly, as among most Trump supporters, or explicitly, as among the Alt Right (which has been the only intellectual movement supporting Trump). And once this process starts gaining momentum, it’s only a matter of time before there is a critical mass of Whites who are dialed into the Jewish role in White dispossession. ”

    Andrew Anglin appeared as a guest on the incredibly loathsome Alan Colmes radio show. Here is the youtube link:

    Andrew Anglin Interviewed on Allan Colmes Show

    I could only stomach listening to about 5 or 6 minutes of this 13 minute clip. Colmes, to me, is the epitome of the sort of demonic, obnoxious, snide, snarky, venomous and gloating hate-filled jew and he inspires within me emotions that tend to jar my sense of self-control.

    If and when SHTF Day arrives, I fervently hope that our two paths never cross.

  10. francis's Gravatar francis
    November 8, 2016 - 7:37 am | Permalink
  11. Rickie's Gravatar Rickie
    November 8, 2016 - 8:47 am | Permalink

    “For our tiny size, we are by far the most politically influential. The worlds of finance, media, journalism and law are home to extremely disproportionately high numbers of Jews. ”

    The Jews are not “tiny.” There are probably 100 million of them globally, and perhaps 30 million in the US alone. Most of them self-identify as “white” or atheist/no religion on census data to hide their identities.

  12. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    November 8, 2016 - 8:58 am | Permalink

    Most people are intellectually secure about their intellectual skills.. What they are wrong is about how intellectually smart they are and many times the cognitively smarter (IQ) of all this asymmetry between intellect/thinking skills and cognition/technical skills is even higher.

  13. Florian's Gravatar Florian
    November 8, 2016 - 10:50 am | Permalink

    Jews will still have some control over Trump. They like to play both sides. I was watching John Bolton praising Trump.

    Meanwhile more rubbish from the English and their Scottish and Irish servants.

    Prince Harry a dunderhead is sleeping with an American mulatto. Like mother like son. The race-mixing loving British left millions of mulattoes in Africa like Jerry Rawlings the half Scottish mulatto/mongrel and former president of the West African country of Ghana. The Irish have already honored two “Black Irishmen” i.e. Obama and the boxer Muhammad Ali.

    • Emperor of Dune's Gravatar Emperor of Dune
      November 9, 2016 - 9:28 am | Permalink

      I’ve seen John Bolton praising and vilifying Trump. Talk about playing both sides. I’m actually more sickened at White cucks who do the same. Cucks like Megan Kelly and her election night performance, or Stirewalt and the others. I guess I should stop here. At least we know the Jews work against us. Our own working against us is even worse.

  14. T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
    November 8, 2016 - 11:01 am | Permalink

    “One of the more overlooked aspects of the 2016 presidential puppet show is the fact that both candidates have offered up their daughters to the Money Power Jews to gain their approval…”

    • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
      November 9, 2016 - 1:42 am | Permalink

      Nevertheless all the evidence against Trump, the way I see it, is that the proof lies in the eating of the pudding. What and how will he deliver? So far he has made all the right noises, and he acts like a renegade against the establishment in which he grew up.

      Like someone who has discovered his real roots late in life.

      Some would call this wisdom as a result of a life time of experience.

      Will he make short term populistic changes that easily can be undone after his term of office, or hit there where it will hit the hardest on the long term, that is, change the course of history?

      Perhaps this is where the intellectuals within the Alt-Right movement will have to come into the picture. To suggest what should be the best way forward.

      The establishment will not give up its privileges voluntarily.

    • Emperor of Dune's Gravatar Emperor of Dune
      November 9, 2016 - 9:26 am | Permalink

      We have no way of knowing if Trump is unhappy that the tribe has infiltrated his family. The Jews actively target wealthy and powerful gentile families (Kennedys, Clintons are just two examples).

      Trump opens the door for even harder and much more pro-White men to openly make their moves in the political scene. The game is still in the first couple of minutes, we have a long way to go.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        November 10, 2016 - 10:57 am | Permalink

        Organized Jewry, rather than Jews, appear to be Trump’s target. Trump has referred to his “good friend” Carl Icahn, a Jewish money man. It should be remembered, however, that Icahn was on the Chrysler Corp. board when the Daimler Benz takeover occurred. Icahn opposed the deal and spend a wheelbarrow full of money trying to prevent it, in the belief that foreign ownership of such a large American company was a bad idea, and that it would hurt the Chrysler brand. That mindset was certainly contrary to the (((organized))) mindset.

  15. Lee's Gravatar Lee
    November 8, 2016 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    Check the ‘Jewish Journal’–they are a nasty bunch.

    I am posting this bc I heard a talk at (((youtube))).
    Guy says Trump has associated with Kissinger, Soros and Bloomberg.

  16. Lee's Gravatar Lee
    November 8, 2016 - 6:10 pm | Permalink

    “The Jews are not “tiny.” There are probably 100 million of them globally, and perhaps 30 million in the US alone. Most of them self-identify as “white” or atheist/no religion on census data to hide their identities.”

    I read 10-20 million Jews. I dont know how many are observant. Human population is 7 BILLION so jews are 1/700th of total [at 10 million] or 1/70th at 100 million.

    • Emperor of Dune's Gravatar Emperor of Dune
      November 9, 2016 - 9:22 am | Permalink

      This is true. I’m not the only one who has noted that in private conversations with Jews who were a bit more open than most, the Jews admitted that their population numbers (in the US and Europe) were at least quadruple of what they admit to publicly. They would always add that this was to avoid anti-semitism. Mark Twain even remarked on the tribe lying about their population numbers, and that was over a century ago. I should note that two of the Jews who mentioned their “real numbers” to me were college professors.

    • Kyra Nelson's Gravatar Kyra Nelson
      November 12, 2016 - 9:12 pm | Permalink

      Try 15 million. That’s all.

  17. November 8, 2016 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

    Congratulations!!! and many, many thanks to Professor MacDonald and the entire TOO team!!! President Trump could not haven done it without your support!!!

    Again, thank you and congratulations to you all!!!


    (Mod. Note: Yes, Congratulations to all the TOO people, and most especially Dr. Kevin MacDonald. This tiny corner of the Internet has definitely had an influence, and will continue to do so. Take a bow, Kevin! We love you.)

  18. American's Gravatar American
    November 9, 2016 - 1:24 am | Permalink
  19. Alison's Gravatar Alison
    November 9, 2016 - 5:55 am | Permalink

    There’re lots of phobias in America right now. “Putin is ruling America!” (, now it’s jews’ conspiracy. Make up your mind, fellas!

  20. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    November 9, 2016 - 7:42 am | Permalink

    “people are just going with their gene pool.”

    David Brooks

    Mr. Brooks, that sounds a little like “hate”!

    “What started as irony turned into an actual belief that White people, specifically White men, are more dangerous and immoral than any other people.”

    One has only to recall the U.S. television programs Dateline and 48 Hours for examples of how white males have been demonized weekly for more than two decades.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      November 9, 2016 - 9:54 am | Permalink

      Prompted in part by Michael Adkins’s reference to it, I have just now read the Federalist article by David Marcus that KM links to. What needs saying is that the article as a whole is far, far worse than what a casual reader might assume from the sympathetic-sounding excerpt offered by KM. Marcus has written a typically deceptive and utterly toxic Jewish fable that paints mere white self-awareness—let alone what Marcus calls white nationalism, racism, and tribalism—as uglier and more evil than the “Progressive rhetoric on race” that is the article’s putative object of scorn.

      Take the specific sentence quoted by Mr. Adkins. In the larger context of the article, it plainly implies that antiwhite irony has just recently turned malignant, yet every habitué of this site knows that any such implication is rubbish. What is more, it strains belief that so self-important a Jew as Marcus is unaware that Susan Sontag’s infamous and totally irony-free statement “The white race is the cancer of human history,” published in Partisan Review, was written as long ago as 1967! As KM is a year and a half older than I am, I’m sure that he recalls as well as I do that Sontag’s indictment, figuratively speaking, went double platinum among the chattering classes within days of its publication, nor has the quote ever shown any sign of emulating Sontag’s own exit from the spotlit stage of life by passing into a quiet retirement at the Rest Home for Pretentious Platitudinous Slanders.

      In one sense we did indeed see, in KM’s words, the hate and paranoia ramp up as the electoral finish line grew nearer. But in another sense we might be described as having finally cleared away enough of the camouflaging underbrush to understand that the hate and paranoia have been operating at the max for more than fifty years.

  21. chris Perrien's Gravatar chris Perrien
    November 9, 2016 - 1:24 pm | Permalink

    “(I have proposed that people with IQ’s less than 120 and who haven’t read much about Jews should not comment on Jewish issues; all it does is give Jews easy targets to parade in the mainstream media.)”

    Good lord , I have been blasting them on their sites (US MSM) for the past few years(and very seriously the past few months). Didn’t know I needed an IQ License. LOL Guess my 154 gives me a pass. But honestly to argue with them them “commies”, PC liberals, echoes, etc. you have to use KISS(keep it simple).

    I certainly did have fun with the “2 minute dog-whistle bit”. Don’t know how many I suggest to move to their “other country of citizenship” or why want they wanted to move to Canada instead of their (homeland).

    Anyway nothing is over, Trump being elected was the second battle(nomination was the first). Now it is time to press the battle to get HRC indicted and survive the maximum disasters (they) will plan for their organ grinder’s monkey, Obama to do for the next 3 months. Let us pray and also expect even up to nuclear(real) terrorism from them, or at least a lot of bad stuff before Jan20. I do not put it past them.

Comments are closed.