Final Statement of Geert Wilders at his Trial

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

14 Comments to "Final Statement of Geert Wilders at his Trial"

  1. November 24, 2016 - 3:56 am | Permalink

    The English translation is also on Mr Wilders’ website, here.

  2. Jeff's Gravatar Jeff
    November 24, 2016 - 5:58 am | Permalink

    Wilders is calling out for a Nexit- the Netherlands out of the EU!

    It’s totally unfair that taxpayers in the West have to carry the heaven burden of the failed economies of the East.
    Hungary’s Orban is gonna to grant Hungarian citzenship to 5 K Arab millionaires. Anyone can buy an EU passport in Romania, Bulgaria….Google “how to buy EU-citzenship”.

    Give them hell Geert!

  3. November 24, 2016 - 11:55 am | Permalink

    As a law student, I have been following the developments of the trial against Wilders closely, and I find there is great bias against him. Mr. Wilders chooses his words carefully in English, and they sound great, but he could express himself more wisely in Dutch and I would like him to express himself more rationally in Dutch. He does, however, deserve the freedom of speech even if his Dutch way of expressing himself may not be perfect. No one is perfect, after all. What I am personally concerned about is Wilders’ ties to Israel. If he wants to make the Netherlands an ethnonationalist country like Israel, that is fine. But if he wants to make it a country to worships Israel, then that is another thing entirely. Furthermore, Wilders’ policies would be way too moderate to turn back the demographic clock in the Netherlands. I love the Dutch people, language and culture but things are not looking great for the Dutch. I am very worried about their future as a people and culture.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      December 2, 2016 - 9:33 am | Permalink

      I love the Dutch people, language and culture but things are not looking great for the Dutch. I am very worried about their future as a people and culture.

      Dear CNM: I quite agree with the sentiments quoted above. Allow me to add, however, that you are mistaken in thinking that Wilders spoke in English to the court. He spoke in Dutch.

      It is not impossible, of course, that the English translation presented here and at the (((Gatestone))) site is Wilders’s own work. I have met or known dozens of Dutch men and women, and all of them—even the ones who abashedly preface what they say with “my English is not so good”—have spoken English with greater fluency and understanding than two-thirds of those under fifty who were “educated” at US public schools. (This last sentence is not an exaggeration for effect; how I wish it were!)

  4. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    November 26, 2016 - 4:24 am | Permalink

    This is an excellent statement on free speech.
    I think however that it would be wrong to ban publication or distribution of the Quran. It needs to be read and criticized.
    The key political issue is to prevent sharia-law autonomy for Muslims in “our” House of Conflict, since traditional Muslims should not make a permanent abode overseas without such accommodation; and it is consistent with a free society to deport illegal entrants, criminals and terrorists.
    The Gatestone Institute is pro-Zionist but its articles on the damage multicultural immigration has been doing to Europe, especially Sweden, Germany, France and England, are worth reading and passing on.

  5. ilena's Gravatar ilena
    November 26, 2016 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    Please don’t let the “Gatestone Institute” fool you. The owner, Nina Rosenwald, is a self-professed Zionist, who sits on tons of “boards” including Council on Foreign Relations, and she donates regularly to AIPAC. John Bolton, is a rabid Zionist-Christian, who supports chemical weapons and torture. They are working both, or all, sides of the Muslim question. What is happening in Europe regarding the ‘refugee’ crisis, which is an Extension of the Bush Administration’s policy of invasion/war into the Middle East, has serious Agenda of clearing out (genocide?) the regions surrounding Israel. There is a lot of factual evidence that backs this up.
    Mr. Wilders, like Marine Le Penn, are being used by a larger game that is taking place behind the curtain. The power-elites play both the left and the right. Wilders is being used to build up the anxiety and nationalism necessary to eventually create a civil war (which the Muslims will obviously be wiped out).

    The people doing this are very cunning and smart. This a very well-orchestrated strategy they are using to genocide many peoples of the Middle East, as well as destroy White culture. What is their final intention? I think it follows this time line below.

    * 9/11 – A massive emotional wave of anti-Muslim fervor takes over the citizens of USA.
    * Bush backing Neo-Cons, many who were Israel/USA dual citizens, build their case for Invasion of Iraq/Afghanistan, appealing to the emotions of the devastated American population.
    * The invasions into the M.E. begin based on lies.
    * The majority of American people support the invasions, believing we were attacked on 9/11 because the Muslims hated “our freedoms”.
    * The minority of Americans who were against the invasions, believed the Bush Regime was invading for ulterior motivations, such as to gain access to the Resources and for purposes of “American Empire” hegemony.
    * A very small minority of people who were against the invasions, were talking about the Israeli links to 9/11 and their influence in the invasions. This view was always called Anti-Semitic.
    * Obama continues what Bush had started and actually spreads it across the Middle East, North Africa, and into Ukraine, using “Humanitarian Crisis” as the appeal to the LIBERAL leftists, to get them onboard. Color Revolutions and BLM, funded by people like Soros.
    * Hillary Clinton’s disastrous influence over Libya, Benghazi, etc.

    * The “refugees” that were created by these invasions are sent to EU and North America. As noted by many, including DONALD TRUMP, many of these refugees are of Military age males and were given money, cell phones, etc, to migrate. Terrorist Attacks increase on EU and N. American soil.

    The FINAL GOAL is to clear out the regions surrounding Israel and to basically cause civil unrest throughout the West, destroying any continuity in White cultures.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      December 1, 2016 - 4:53 pm | Permalink

      Exactly. The contrast between Israeli Jews’ support for Trump and American Jews’ lack thereof corroborates your theory.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        December 1, 2016 - 9:47 pm | Permalink

        To Trenchant’s comment I would add only that the mind-set and loyalties Ilena rightly calls out are by nature less Zionist than Jewish pur sang.

        Also, note below how, as usual, Jeff cheers on the man (Wilders) who, wittingly or otherwise, serves the Jews’ ends though he may not be consciously working to achieve them. Meanwhile Jeff calls upon us to look with alarm at a relative handful of Arab millionaires who, whatever their wealth, will have minuscule influence in Hungary (or anywhere else in the West for that matter) without the full-bore support of powerful and even wealthier Jews.

  6. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    November 27, 2016 - 8:29 am | Permalink

    I see mention over on the Daily Stormer that Jared Taylor is being accused of ‘throwing Richard Spencer under the bus’. Taylor did an interview, which isn’t available for downloading – so you have to listen to online, or figure out a way to record it and then listen to the mp3 at your leisure. The host doing the interview is someone I have never heard of: Kristoffer Ronneberg.

    By the way, despite the fact that I am not a huge fan of Spencer – primarily because of his tendency to adopt a clownish approach to our struggle – I made a prediction a month or so ago, about the looming battle within the Alt-right with regards to the jewish question and compared it to what happened to the old National Review under the loathsome, race treasonous rat Bill Buckley. I predicted that the Alt-right would soon experience an internal battle over this all important issue and if jews were not specifically excluded from our movement – they would do the same thing they’ve repeatedly done, whenever pro-White organizations or movements allow them inside.

    They would try to elbow aside the White leadership, take over the movement and steer it into jew friendly directions. In other words, directions which derive zero benefit to the pro-White cause and which continue to serve jewish interests. Or, failing to do that, they would work from the inside to stymie the movement in various predictable ways, such as sowing seeds of dissension, spreading rumors about its members and leaders, arranging provocative public charades designed to help demonize and cast disrepute upon the movement in the eyes of the public. Tactics that jews have repeatedly used against every pro-White movement for the last 60 plus years – tactics that, by now, our leaders should see coming from a mile away. After all, they are 100 percent predictable.

    I also predicted that either Brimelow or Jared Taylor would assume the Bill Buckley role of ‘purging’ the voices within the Alt-Right who were critical of jews and who were firm in their opposition to allowing jews to worm their way into our movement. And, while I have not yet listened to this recent interview that Taylor gave to this mysterious Kristoffer Ronneberg character – from what I read on The Daily Stormer, it appears as if Taylor has morphed into the new Bill Buckley.

    Keep this point in mind. Inviting jews to worm their way into our Alt-right movement equates to planting the seeds of destruction for the Alt-right movement. This statement is backed up by, and based upon, historical fact and the experience we have, or should have gained from making this same mistake countless times in the past.

    It also makes me wonder if those jews who participated in the NPI Conference and who made sure their pals in the hostile media were able to capture their Nazi Salutes on video were part of some pre-arranged internal coup attempt within the Alt-right by elements who were looking for a way to ostracize Spencer? Set Spencer up to appear like some kind of Nazi SS Stormtrooper – then these elements rush to give interviews to (((media sources))) to disavow, disavow, disavow? And, this gives the enemy (((media))) the platform they crave to start issuing ‘demands’ and ‘dictates’ to the Alt-right that, to be taken seriously, they must purge these nasty and evil ‘Nazis’ from their midst. This is the same tactic that the left has effectively used on the RINO right and they are also using on Trump and from what I can see, it is working.

    I want to make it clear that I do not condone any of this WW2 Nazi or National Socialist baloney being able to work its way into our Alt-right movement. No Nazi symbolism. No worshipful diatribes about Hitler – these are things that can be revisited if and when Whites are finally able to secure our future and to get the steel boot of the jews off our necks. Past experience has repeatedly shown us that jews are almost always the ones who will inject these Nazi symbols into the pro-White movements of the past – and they do it, because of the negative connotations these symbols generate within the minds of millions of our own people who have not yet been red pilled.

    Remember what F. Roger Devlin advised here on this very website just recently:

    “If resistance to the nation-killing globalist system is to grow, it can only be by attracting curious outsiders disaffected with the dominant ideology but, inevitably, still partially programed with it. Some regard must be had for their sensibilities.”

    But, returning to the JQ issue. If the red pilled Alt-right wishes to defeat what I suspect is an internal coup attempt, the first step that must be taken is to get off this WW2 Nazi obsession and to lay down strict rules that anyone who attends a conference who attempts to inject it into the gathering must be immediately shown the door. The probability is very high that they are an enemy agent provocateur. Or, they are an imbecile and in either case, deserve the boot.

    • Counter Spiral's Gravatar Counter Spiral
      November 27, 2016 - 4:48 pm | Permalink

      So you think Mike Enoch and all of TRS are Jewish conspiracies? Lighten up a little, man. If we start enforcing a bunch of rules booting people from public gatherings for what is a personal expression of free speech, the press will just take pics of that and say it’s more proof of ebil nazis everywhere. The meaning is in the eye of the beholder, and those that shape and define narratives that emerge from any action. Bear in mind that no one on the left is wringing their hands over the criminal behavior of antifa, or even paying attention to it. Just ignore the gestures and get on with our work.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      December 2, 2016 - 6:15 pm | Permalink

      @ Luke: Click on “More” and you’ll get a drop-down menu with “Download” as an option.

  7. November 27, 2016 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

    I hope you know that Geert Wilders is kosher. Just saying. That said, we are open to people with whom we share some but not all viewpoints. Besides, my own opinion is that the existence of Israel is a very good thing. It took 6,000,000 parasites out of our lands. Notwithstanding the >$120 billion that Israel has plundered to evil White man, they’d do bigger damage should they be among us. Besides, the creation of Israel reinforced the Muslim hostility against Jews.

  8. TheDruid's Gravatar TheDruid
    November 29, 2016 - 2:52 am | Permalink

    From the comments here it is obvious that there are some concerns about who is or is not a legitimate stateman for European causes. This is a recurring phenominon and we need to discuss how trust can be verified. At a minimum we can say that the freedom of speech is extremely important for a European society and the continuation of European culture. On that we can all agree. I will take a wait and see approach to Spencer. I think Jared Taylor is definitely questionable on many levels. In particular doing robocalls during the election could have had a negative effect on Trumps chances. The larger question here is how do we know who to trust? What is the criteria to be used? Thinking logically about this we cannot conclude that someone is betraying us simply because they are widening the tent. They might simply believe that we need a larger coalition to rule politically. Likewise we cannot conclude someone is trustworthy simply because they are restricting the tent. They could simply be doing this in order gain credibility by playing a gatekeeping role. On technique is to look at outcomes or the fruits of the tree as you will, and see if the approach is really consistent with Europeans gaining or losing actual power from the actions of these individuals. I think strong views against other communities that are not white certainly should not be used as a criteria. For one thing our adversaries actually have disrespect for nonwhites as well. Let’s keep that in mind!

  9. Tony More's Gravatar Tony More
    November 30, 2016 - 5:22 am | Permalink

    now freedom of speech is suppressed. that’s the very moment. We’re selling our lands to migrants and our women. There’s even a course for migrants on how to sleep with german women. That’s unbelievable

Comments are closed.