The Assault on Richard Spencer: No Punishment for Crimes against White Activists

Sam Dickson

Washington, D.C., for some years has essentially withdrawn the protection of the law from rightists, White activists, etc.

We have seen how AmRen Conferences can be shut down by terroristic threats. I was assaulted by a masked anti-fa thug at an NPI Conference in the Spring of 2016. She was arrested…but all charges were “dropped.”

It would be nice to find out what has happened with the charges against the 6 thugs who beat a Red Ice cameraman bloody at the last NPI Conference and sprayed the Red Ice correspondent, Emily Youcis, with Raid, which potentially could have blinded her. My guess is that all charges were dropped against them too. There were other assaults as well, as I recounted in a previous article.

The police, the FBI and other police agencies of the System are just not interested in punishing crimes committed against us.

Those with lingering illusions about the fairness of the System, the trustworthiness of the FBI and the police, our being part of the civic debate and so on should wake up and smell the coffee.

Once again on Inauguration Day the anti-fa “protesters” were allowed to appear in their masks. No effort has been made in any of these instances by the D.C. police department to enforce any “anti-mask law” against these cowards who hide behind their disguises as they commit their crimes.

Some were arrested today. It’s a good bet that the charges against most of them will be dropped eventually. The others will get sprung by the judges or the juries, sympathetic as they are to multiculturalism. Any that fall through the cracks and aren’t able to evade justice head on will get derisory sentences.

And now, an open physical assault on Richard Spencer by a masked assailant.

Don’t expect any righteous resolutions from the Methobapterian churches or the Council of Catholic Bishops. Don’t strain your eyes looking for editorials condemning lawlessness in the nation’s capitol from the likes of The New York Times, the Washington Post, The New Republic or National Review. There will never be a statement of outrage from Hillary Clinton or the Black Caucus.

These people play for keeps.

They have no illusions.

They don’t want to be fair.

They don’t want to play nice.

They mean business.

And it’s 100% their way.

Recognize this and think about it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

31 Comments to "The Assault on Richard Spencer: No Punishment for Crimes against White Activists"

  1. January 22, 2017 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    The USA is not alone when it comes to double standards in their policing and justice system. There is a growing enthusiasm by the authorities in Britain to prosecute people who are judged to have broken the law by being racist in speech or writing. This enthusiasm is fuelled by the adoption of political correctness as the elite ideology of the day. Anyone in a position of power and influence is forced on pain of being cast from such circles to at least pay lip service to the creed and the fear of being called racist has those without power or influence in a vice-like grip as they see people who have been accused of racism having their lives turned upside down by the media engaging in hate campaigns against them, their jobs taken from them and, in an increasing number of cases, criminal records put upon them for simply saying what they think.

    The police have become frantically keen on showing their politically correct credentials. Recently the Home Secretary Amber Rudd found the police recording a complaint of racism against her after she made a speech dealing with immigrants as a “non-crime hate incident, a category without any statutory basis that the police have invented. In cases such as this the police cease to act as police and become political commissars.

    The “non-crime hate incident” will be logged on a police computer, quite possibly the central computer the police have. It is unlikely to affect the likes of Rudd but anyone without power or influence could well find the police bringing such a record into play if they end up, for whatever reason, being questioned by the police. Even if it never happens it will hang heavy in the minds of the person to whom such a record refers because they will have become “a person known to the police” despite ever having been charged with an offence. It might well come up on a criminal records check undertaken because of the nature of a job someone is applying for. Even if that never happens to you imagine how your employer or your family might react if becomes public knowledge in some other way such as a newspaper report that you are a person deemed to have been the perpetrator of a “hate non-crime incident”.
    The police are rather less enthusiastic about one class of complaint of racism. Any complaint of a “non-crime hate incident ” to the police which falls outside what the politically correct deem to be a worthy case – basically any complaint involving racial incitement against whites – will not be recorded. I have in the past tried out the police’s willingness to record such complaints, for example, I made a complaint of racial incitement against Greg Dyke when he was Chairman of the BBC following his “hideously white” description of the Corporation. The police refused to record the complaint let alone investigate it. …


    • January 23, 2017 - 6:22 am | Permalink

      This of course is not new; there has been selectivity from and throughout the 20th century: consider ‘Jack the Ripper’ and Leo Frank, just two examples. It’s a bit harsh to blame the police: the trail was laid by lawyers and politicians, following Jews whose intention all along was to bend the system away from themselves and onto whites. Here’s a 1975 booklet put onto Internet by me; again, just an example, in Britain, of what has happened throughout the world.

      • AtomicPope's Gravatar AtomicPope
        January 23, 2017 - 3:44 pm | Permalink

        “It’s a bit harsh to blame the police”

        No it’s not. The police are moral cowards. They deserve 100% of the blame for both their actions and their inactions.

        • January 23, 2017 - 8:10 pm | Permalink

          They are moral cowards. But so are almost all politicians, academics, media workers, teachers, and military people. So it seems to me a bit harsh to criticise the police, but ignore the rest.

        • Frontierland's Gravatar Frontierland
          January 24, 2017 - 10:27 pm | Permalink

          Set aside the non-whites, they are obviously not going to rush to our aid. The remaining White Police are restricted by Policy, just as we are restricted from self-defense against non-whites. Most Police agencies get Fed Funds, that comes with stipulations, on affirmative action hiring and on Policing tactics. Police on the beat are given orders, hands-off non-whites.
          After 2008, with many cities budgets being leveraged out, they’ve had to seek donations from NGO’s, this comes with limitations and requirements. Once a Police force takes money from those NGO’s, they are given even more hiring directives, even more limitations on who they can go after and who they can’t.
          They are also bombarded with Anti-White Training Directives like Diversity Training, Anti-Bias Training and Inclusive training.

          If a White cop on the beat steps out of line, they are legally liable and or gone.

          It’s a far deeper, complex problem. I do understand what you’re saying, but I think the day the White Cops, refuse Anti-White Orders is the same day they tell us what they’re doing in Antarctica.

          I do have some hope in the Trump Administration.
          I hope we will see a reversal of these Anti-White Policies.

          Check out “Downtown White Police”
          Jay wrote a great book too, lots of good stats.
          Red Ice interview:

          youtube channel

  2. Darren Jackson's Gravatar Darren Jackson
    January 22, 2017 - 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Not surprising as the state in the UK is nothing but a pandering police state, as most institutions are now cowering to both semitic groups. Just look at this, it could have been Tommy Robinson if the state had its way:

  3. tadzio308's Gravatar tadzio308
    January 22, 2017 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Hitler’s Brown Shirts were created to protect freedom of assembly and speech from Jewish led communists. It has been said that history does not repeat itself though it often rhymes. How would that work out as a color scheme. Green Shirts? Yellow? Aqua? Solid or pin stripes? It will come to a defensive solution that will demand violence or the threat of violence. It cannot be avoided.

  4. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    January 22, 2017 - 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Now that the Talmudically driven ‘people of the double standard’ are riding high and setting the agenda, voila, we also have a de-facto legal double standard to contend with. Tolerance, fair play and the rule of law are now only illusions of the awestruck dispossessed Whites. This is what it has come to in the West, an anti-White democratic tyranny, with a police state presence to back it up.

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      January 23, 2017 - 7:00 am | Permalink

      On the spot. I cannot name a single white country that is not infested with the (((angelic))) vermin agenda. I think it is nowadays not far-fetched to claim that we Goyim have succumbed to the dictatorship of the untouchables, as even those fully aware of the true identity of our enemy comprehend that this special mafia structure is invincible.

  5. JM's Gravatar JM
    January 22, 2017 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    Why GO to their meetings? Silly, almost childish, strategy. Just make sure you have security to defend your own meetings, with interest. When you cannot do that, you’ve lost.

  6. Brett's Gravatar Brett
    January 22, 2017 - 7:50 pm | Permalink

    Do we need to bring mace, bring security, bring a club, bring something to defend ourselves. If anything put a youtube of an antifa taking a bat to the face and made aware of what awaits them. I hope Trump boosts law enforcement for free speech of our group with protection.

  7. Jack Highlands's Gravatar Jack Highlands
    January 22, 2017 - 8:55 pm | Permalink

    It is critical that the Alt Right judge Donald Trump and his AG Jeff Sessions on whether this attitude toward attacks on White advocates changes. By their actions we will know them.

    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      January 23, 2017 - 10:44 am | Permalink

      How right you are, Jack. It will be the racial acid test of their sincerity. Whether they are serious, or just play acting “civic patriots”.

  8. RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
    January 23, 2017 - 4:51 am | Permalink

    Mr. Dickson, as usual, as well as most of the comments, is/are correct.

    One of the hallmarks of Jewish Criminal Proclivities is to commit crimes in the “grey areas”.

    Somewhere between the first contamination of America with the Jewish Plague Migration and the mid 1970’s,
    the Criminally Psychotic Jew had convinced many Whites that if they uttered their well founded assertions that Jews were a Collusive, Conspiratorial Race of Psychopathic Maniacs, the Whites
    (or anyone for that matter…, it just so happened that mostly only Whites were capable of seeing and/or willing to speak about what was happening)
    were to be regarded as Delusional Conspiracy Theorists.

    No matter what the Jewish Crime in Question
    (I.e. assassination of presidents, Twin Tower Take-Downs, False Witness [{-Redacted-}, Nuremberg Trials, espionage, etc… ], )
    the facts, perpetrators, forensic evidence, etc…, were almost always difficult to obtain.
    This left the Whistle-blower at a huge disadvantage because not only had Jews weaseled their way into the halls of power where (((they))) could both impede and profit from the jurisprudential process, (((they))) also worked behind the scenes and behind multiple degrees of separation between themselves and the hands-on criminals who took the orders and actually carried out the crimes that Jews deemed necessary for (((their))) Anti-Spiritual Plague to spread.

    If the Australian Broadcasting Corp. is anything like the BBC or the CBC in Canada then it is a proxy controlled Entity of the Rothschild Family of Criminally Psychotic, Racially Related Jews.

    Hindsight is 20-20 so they say.
    But today, due to the Internet, the number of people who have signed on to “Our” (WN/S/A groups) version of reality is too numerous for the Jews to convincingly paint us as delusional in the eyes of other Whites.

    Moreover, thanks to Trump, the links between the Jewish Racial Crime Families and the boots on the ground criminals have also been well established…, even though Trump is either too cowardly, stupid or hopefully cunning to connect the Jews directly to the source of almost ALL Global Problems…, so far!

    We also know in no uncertain terms that the Jewish MSM is Criminally Culpable in most criminal acts (BLM, DNC, Neo-cons, etc…) even though (((they))) cannot be successfully prosecuted because Jews control the Judicial Systems throughout the West.
    Furthermore, seeing that Jews have most, if not all, of their power due collusive criminal behaviour,
    regardless of whether or not they have legalized such thefts,
    it follows then that Richard Spencer, for whom I do respect for doing his part for his people,
    should have expected some kind of attack while being interviewed by a Jew proxy controlled Media Syndicate.
    After all, most WN/S/As refuse to even grant these Jewish False news Proponents interviews,
    but since the new meme of the Alt-right is;
    “any press coverage, no matter how skewed, is good press coverage”,
    the Jews have also realized the above to be true and may well now be using the newly internalized meme of the Alt-right as a platform from which to step up their attacks against us in more direct ways.

    So Richard, I’d like to ask you,
    after possibly having your ear drum perforated by one of these BLM-type, Jew-educated and possibly funded thugs and that this unfortunate event is something that will not really hit you until you reach your 50’s or 60’s,
    do you still think that:
    “All press is good press”?

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 23, 2017 - 11:51 am | Permalink

      Twin Tower Take-Downs

      Triple Tower Take Downs. . .

  9. gwen's Gravatar gwen
    January 23, 2017 - 6:04 am | Permalink

    Whatever happened to suing people that come up and hit you? I know I would have.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      January 23, 2017 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

      gwen, bless you for your old-fashioned and once reasonable approach. The futility to the first part of your question is answered, here among these comments alone, in spades.

    • Frontierland's Gravatar Frontierland
      January 24, 2017 - 9:51 pm | Permalink

      There is a WeSearcher Crowd-Funding Campaign on now, to raise money to find and prosecute this degenerate who hit Spencer.
      Anyone that can give, please do.

      Expose The ANTIFA Who Sucker Punched Richard Spencer

  10. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    January 23, 2017 - 7:50 am | Permalink

    I would suggest that this latest assault incident involving Richard Spencer as a victim and the degree of consternation that it has caused from people in our community should be viewed as a perfect illustration of how naive far too many White racial realists remain.

    I always think back to something I heard John de Nugent say once during an interview he was giving to a pro-White web radio show. John commented that “We are not fighting an enemy who is restrained by any sentimental notions of chivalry”. Those are qualities – and, I believe, suicidal characteristics – of Aryan, Anglo-Saxon Celtic or Germanic peoples. This enemy does not believe in fair play, folks.
    They believe in winning and they define victory as the completion of their white genocide agenda. And, if they have to cheat, use dirty tricks, lie, connive, manipulate, gouge out our eyeballs or kick us in that other set of balls in order to win – they will not hesitate to do so.

    Our people, and especially those who are courageous enough to take a front and center role as spokesmen for our pro-White community and who, therefore, are likely to find themselves in the limelight – need to stop expecting our enemies to treat us fairly or respectfully.

    Ensuring the physical security and personal safety for our spokesmen – whether it be at a conference or a press interview with the hostile, enemy controlled media – has to become a top priority. No more of these ‘man in the street’ interviews. If the press wants to interview any of us – pick a place indoors and make sure it’s been swept in advance for any security concerns.

    And, Spencer should recruit some bodyguards to provide him with a little security.

  11. Lorenz Kraus's Gravatar Lorenz Kraus
    January 23, 2017 - 7:56 am | Permalink

    The whole idea of engaging with Anti-fa, interviewing them to get their point of view, meeting in cities, or marching down mainstreet with machine guns and Hamas, is ridiculous. Spencer should have asked Trump and Congress to get rid of post-war propaganda to end fake news and fake history. That’s meta-politics.

    Go to power. Lobby. Do real things to influence policy. Protesting is a sign of weakness. Getting beaten by anti-fa or getting pissed on, like Heimbach, doesn’t attract anyone. The average person thinks, “I’ll pass.” Or, “they got what they deserved.” Win the countryside and let the cities stew in their juices; or go directly to power. If you don’t have the law on your side, you can’t win direct confrontations with anti-fa. Big Clang. Direct, slam-dunks, don’t work. Indirect, jump shots, soft touch will go a lot farther.

    Jews go to Kings and Presidents. Dumb Goy do protests. The tactics of the blacks (sit-ins, protests, marches, riots) don’t work for whites because the media won’t cover it sympathetically and use it to SHAME THE SYSTEM.

  12. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    January 23, 2017 - 8:01 am | Permalink

    I suggest not using the opposition’s vocabulary – things like “anti-fa or antifa.” Give them a name that helps our efforts.

    Also, it could help to know where these “folks” get their funding and where those funding them have their stocks. Follow the dollar!

    (Mod. Note: Good idea, Mr. Adkins. How about suggesting some alternative vocabulary in another post.)

    • James Hallman's Gravatar James Hallman
      January 23, 2017 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

      Give people a name, address, phone number and where they work. I’m tired of these criminals hiding behind masks and apparently committing crimes at will with no consequences.

    • Catherine Carson's Gravatar Catherine Carson
      January 24, 2017 - 7:55 am | Permalink

      I suggest calling them what they are, anti-white.
      Anti-fascist is just a codeword for anti-white.
      When they call you a Nazi or Fascist, just say, “You’re just saying that because I’m white. Anti-fascist is just a codeword for anti-white.”

      • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
        January 25, 2017 - 9:18 am | Permalink

        Catherine Carson,

        First things first, I see where you’re coming from with anti-white, but again that’s letting them (the enemy) name us. We are not “white” we are European (genetically).

        Now as to naming the antifa, our history might call them “shralls” (Norse for slaves) and the 16th and 17th century Netherlander would have called them “hoorndragers” and “hennetasters” (mostly the old ones). So, in marking these boys and girls we will need a European word our people can recognize quickly and use quickly. This is going to be a little harder.

  13. January 23, 2017 - 8:05 pm | Permalink
  14. WunderHund's Gravatar WunderHund
    January 23, 2017 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    I suggest Shitheels.

  15. Der Amalek's Gravatar Der Amalek
    January 23, 2017 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

    Jacobites describes it, but is a little outdated.
    Red Front thugs. Marxist mercenaries.

    Maybe something new?

  16. royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
    January 24, 2017 - 4:48 am | Permalink

    What’s more…, since you were punched in the ear, you may be predisposed to developing turrets syndrome later or even immediately.

    If you come out with this revelation, you can be sure the jews will fault you for that too and use it as a discrediting device along the lines that;
    “The guy hears ringing in his ears…, he is crazy!”.

    First they cause the damage,
    then they deny they had anything to do with it,
    then they fault/discredit you for symptoms developed later in life because of the damage they caused.

    Believe it or not, at the age of 18, I had the same sucker punch to the ear that Spencer got.
    The damage has just become noticeable within the last few years.

    It is for this reason and many other similar reasons that I do not advocate talking to these people anymore.

    I have more permanent solutions for them, but Iceland is still behind the rest of the West when it comes to dealing with these scum, so acting without backing in a foreign country is just not sensible for me.

    • Paul Harrison's Gravatar Paul Harrison
      January 28, 2017 - 3:56 am | Permalink

      Given this documented health risk, couldn’t someone in Spencer’s position claim his civil rights have been violated if the police don’t enforce the law against his assailant? There are a number of incidents where one feels that with a good lawyer and witnesses one could score an important victory against the left, and inspire further similar efforts.

      • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
        January 29, 2017 - 7:18 am | Permalink

        Your idea is sound, but I am unsure of its success possibility. In my case it happened in the “Jew-minion of Kafkada” (AKA the Dominion of Canada)…, a wholly Jew-proxy controlled nation populated by a largely backstabbing, cowardly and domesticated herd of “Royal subjects”.

        Second generation German Refugees and Holocaust Whistle blowers in Canada get about the same amount of respect as BSE (bovine spongiform encephalitis) infected cattle.

        I get the impression that the American Justice system is somewhat better. It is the main reason why I left Canada and comment almost exclusively in American forums.

  17. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    January 24, 2017 - 8:22 am | Permalink

    In Cleveland a Trump protestor has been released from jail with no charges after spitting in a police officer’s face. Apparently these idiots are being protected by City Hall. The police union is not happy. At least the usually clueless local media is questioning this.

Comments are closed.