Jewish Privilege Devours Itself

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

Octopus self-cannibalism

Octopuses can sometimes engage in self-cannibalism, eating their own arms in what is thought to be a stress reaction. What initially begins as a nervous biting of one’s own limbs, descends into frenzy, as bacteria take hold in the resultant wounds. As the infection spreads, and the stress levels increase, the octopus savages its own arms at a rate faster than it can heal, or grow new limbs. Survival in such instances is rare. There is only a terminal fate for a cephalopod in which such behavior has firmly taken hold.

Stress-related self-destruction is also relatively common among humans, and not merely in the obvious form of deliberate suicide. Melville captured it best with Moby Dick’s Captain Ahab, a figure so psychologically and spiritually wounded, so bitterly sensitive, that he would give his own life and the lives of others in pursuit of revenge — the only palliative he felt would appease his mental self-gnawing. Rebuking the admonishments of Starbuck, he cries with barely concealed anguish: “Talk not to me of blasphemy, man; I’d strike the sun if it insulted me.” Ahab’s insatiable hate for the white whale was certainly not intended as an allegory for the hatred felt by modern ‘progressives’ for the White man, and yet I feel that such a comparison is apt. These people will do anything to ‘strike the sun,’ to bring down their great opponent, and we may expect self-destructive behaviors to be an aspect of their maniacal pursuit of ‘Whiteness.’

The last few weeks have witnessed a couple of important instances in which the memes of ‘privilege,’ racism, and anti-Semitism, the chief intellectual harpoons forged to pierce the White behemoth, have been turned inward on those largely behind their construction. Very recently, England’s Bristol University has been caught up in a scandal after it emerged that one of its lecturers, Dr Rebecca Gould, who is almost certainly both Jewish and a ‘progressive,’ penned an article for CounterPunch in 2011 in which she argued that “Jews should stop privileging the Holocaust.” Given that such an argument simultaneously infringes upon several taboos, and thus casts Dr Gould into the nebulous category of a ‘self-hating Jew,’ it is a miracle that her career has managed to progress uninhibited for the last six years. Apparently the piece was only brought to light, and subjected to ‘social justice’ action, after one of her undergraduate students unearthed it and initialized a campaign against her.

One of the more amusing aspects of the affair thus far has been the intrusion of the cartoonish Sir Eric Pickles. Pickles, a former Conservative Party chairman and the UK’s ‘special envoy on post-Holocaust issues,’ is a pedigreed Shabbos goy with a reputation that is in equal parts defined by his frequent assistance to the Jewish community and by his frequent misuse of public funds. Pickles has carved out a career for himself by tabling new laws to counter a non-existent rise in ‘anti-Semitism,’ and in one of his more ridiculous pronouncements once stated that “without its Jews, Britain would not be Britain.” Since the last period in which Britain was “without its Jews” (1290-1656) featured, among other things the literature, art, and music of the English Renaissance, the establishment of the Church of England, the defeat of a Spanish Armada, and the beginnings of the British Empire, one wonders if Pickles knows anything about the nation he plays a part in governing. When not cheerleading for a tiny fraction of the British population, the porcine Mr Pickles has made a nasty habit of claiming over £60,000 from parliamentary expense accounts under the heading “biscuits, sandwiches, tea and coffee.” In 2014, Hilary Benn, shadow communities secretary, complained that: “Eric Pickles lectures councils about cutting down on hospitality, but his department’s food and biscuits bill soared by £45,000 last year.”

Eric Pickles

Never one to miss an opportunity to earn some brownie points with the Jewish community, Pickles has rushed to attack Miss Gould with all the vigor one would expect from the obsequious politician. In particular, Pickles has accused Gould of using the “language of Holocaust denial,” insisting that the case is “one of the worst cases of Holocaust denial” he has seen in recent years, and adding that Gould should “consider her position” at the university.

Pickles continued: “To describe the murder of six million Jewish people like this frankly beggars belief. I am all for debate and freedom and speech but this passes into a new dimension.” Pickles appears to have acted in tandem with the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, a rather sinister organization that has called on Bristol University to dismiss Dr Gould. The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism is an obsessive and neurotic organization which places the authorities under almost constant pressure to increase securities for the Jewish population or, in its own words, “we hold the authorities’ feet to the fire, even taking them to court when necessary.” The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism has been holding the feet of Bristol University to the fire, and will presumably continue to do so until Dr Gould finds herself unemployed.

Gould’s original arguments are of course worthy of note. The academic has argued that the Holocaust narrative is “available to manipulation by governmental elites, aiming to promote the narrative most likely to underwrite their claims to sovereignty.” Gould goes on to say that casting the Holocaust as a “holy event” allows it to be used as a tool by the state of Israel to “whitewash its crimes. … Israel must find a way of not passing on the crimes the Nazis introduced into the world onto the next generation of its citizens. … Perhaps the time has come to stop privileging the Holocaust as the central event in Jewish history.”

It’s clear looking at these comments that they are fairly anodyne. Rather than arguing that Jews exert ‘privilege,’ or suggesting that the Holocaust narrative is itself a tool of privilege, Gould’s argument was merely that the Holocaust narrative was given pride of place in Jewish history and identity, and was useful to Jews and to the State of Israel in particular. Such comments are problematic to those at the core of the Jewish establishment because they acknowledge that Jewish influence/power and Jewish victimhood narratives are intertwined. By calling the latter into question, the former is placed in jeopardy. While there is nothing truly new here, the language and socio-political trajectory of ‘progressivism,’ involving terms like ‘privilege,’ is clearly unpredictable and uncontrollable enough to wound even those that wield them.

Another, even more pertinent, instance of the Jewish head eating the Jewish tail has emerged in France in what has recently been termed “the new Dreyfus trial.” Georges Bensoussan, a French Jewish historian, has been put on trial accused of committing a hate crime after implying that Arabs are “innately anti-Semitic” during a 2015 radio interview. Apparently referencing the work of an Algerian sociologist, he asserted that “in Arab families in France and beyond, everybody knows but will not say that anti-Semitism is transmitted with mother’s milk.” Bensoussan’s case has divided the French equivalent of the ADL, the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism, or LICRA, which accused him of inciting racial hatred and independently initiated the criminal trial against him. Essentially, the division revolves around the oft-posed question of ‘what is best for the Jews.’

According to the Jerusalem Post:

The trial is already pitting anti-racism activists against one another, including within LICRA. One of France’s most revered thinkers, the philosopher Alain Finkielkraut, resigned from its honorary board in protest over what French media are calling ‘l’Affaire Bensoussan’ … . Sammy Ghozlan, founder of the center-right National Bureau of Vigilance Against Anti-Semitism, condemned the prosecution as ‘shocking.’

In January, Finkielkraut announced he would be resigning from LICRA over its decision to pursue Bensoussan. He later stated that the move for criminal proceedings had “dishonored” LICRA, an organization he accused of “opting for inquisition” against Bensoussan. Finkielkraut continued: “I call on all activists, followers and sympathizers to draw their own conclusions [about LICRA] from this ignominy,” before calling the prosecution an exceptionally grave event politically, judicially and historically.”

The participation of LICRA in the prosecution highlights the increasing complexities that Jews will face as the vanguard of multiculturalism, in increasingly diverse nations that will play host to extremely volatile and ersatz ethnic alliances. In particular, Jews are caught between their strong desire to continue enabling the ongoing mass immigration into White nations of Third World, and often Muslim, populations, and their increasing fears surrounding their own group security. In this respect, it is interesting that LICRA initiated criminal proceedings against Bensoussan along with a co-plaintiff, the Collective Against Islamophobia. The Collective Against Islamophobia has been accused — including by LICRA itself — of issuing anti-Semitic propaganda against Prime Minister Manuel Valls, whose wife is Jewish.

The division over the Bensoussan case is thus an argument over which strategy or approach should take priority — the elimination of any hint of racial discourse in order to facilitate ongoing mass immigration, or ensuring the security of the Jewish population even if it involves the critique of migrant populations. Alain Jacubowicz, the current head of LICRA, made his priorities clear in an op-ed published earlier this month, in which he accused Bensoussan of “benefiting extremists” with his statement on Islam. By ‘extremists,’ Jacubowicz was undoubtedly referring to White identity groups, and more especially the Front National. Thus, even though Bensoussan’s comments may have been perfectly sensible in highlighting the threat posed to Jews by the Muslim population, his sin was in providing even the most tangential support to the interests of French Whites. Bensoussan, by way of response, wrote that the Front National was actually being fueled by “a denial of reality, a suicidal strategy of blindness and silence.”

What’s best for the Jews? They can’t decide, and they are biting themselves.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

30 Comments to "Jewish Privilege Devours Itself"

  1. Gilbert Huntly's Gravatar Gilbert Huntly
    March 2, 2017 - 7:51 am | Permalink

    Apt article! Jews, having assimilated among and throughout the rest of us, are certainly prone to self-examination from same – as well as self-condemnation. They cannot remove themselves from the trends they initiate. It is pervasive, just like a poisonous gas, or fog.

    • RoyAlbrecht's Gravatar RoyAlbrecht
      March 3, 2017 - 10:43 am | Permalink

      Don’t kid yourselves…, Jews…, on a per capita basis, have ten times or more money than the second most financially hoarding and wealthy ethnicity on the list…, that being Hindus.

      IMO, since Jews basically control the narrative,
      are governed by a secretive and centrally positioned Criminal Family (Rothschilds) and are therefore poised to get forewarnings of impending acts before they actually occur
      (911, Hitler’s house cleaning prior to WW2, Sharon and 7/7, etc…) Jews can “disappear” in the nick of time, change their names, and reappear in a different place until the fighting is done and return on a dime to clean up the mess.

  2. Dutchman's Gravatar Dutchman
    March 2, 2017 - 7:53 am | Permalink

    “What’s best for the Jews? They can’t decide, and they are biting themselves.”

    In the interests of reciprocity, after all the Jews are always willing to give us unsolicited advice, I’d be more than willing to tell them what to do. I have a feeling they wouldn’t appreciate my suggestion.

  3. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    March 2, 2017 - 9:04 am | Permalink

    With the intelligence units of NGOs such the Southern Poverty Law Center, IHRA and LICRA it’s surprising that arrests haven’t been made involving threats against Jewish community centers and the tumbling of Jewish grave markers in the United States. The longer time passes without a resolution the more the origins of the problem will be questioned.

    • Dan's Gravatar Dan
      March 2, 2017 - 1:09 pm | Permalink

      Keeping those hate crimes going to maintain victim status, sometimes they get caught out!

      • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
        March 3, 2017 - 2:37 pm | Permalink

        Dan, don’t forget the fourteen year old German girl who etched a six inch swastika on her forehead and cheeks, ca. ten years ago. She wasn’t even Jewish. She did it with the intellectualism available to all who are still watching Disney after coming home after school. She displayed her scar on world wide MSM. Her later admission of inflicting it herself was followed up by an inch of print, here and there, on the last pages.

  4. B.J.'s Gravatar B.J.
    March 2, 2017 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

    Love this – When not cheerleading for a tiny fraction of the British population, the porcine Mr Pickles has made a nasty habit of claiming over £60,000 from parliamentary expense accounts under the heading ‘biscuits, sandwiches, tea and coffee.

    That statement says it all. These collaborators support and care more about Jews than their own people because that’s the ticket to money, power and influence. They may “believe” it – like I believed that a $1,500 vacuum cleaner was really a great buy when I sold them door to door to get through college (but interestingly never bought one myself). If they stand up for the truth they’ll be commenting on the OO forum instead or getting punched like Richard Spencer instead of spending loads of money on themselves. The system produces these people. And it’s nothing new. There will always be people who sell out the group for their own selfish interest when an oppressive system is in place that rewards treasonous behavior. And that’s why Trump has such an appeal. He seems like a different type of guy (and I really believe he is). Will be interesting to see where it all goes.

  5. B.J.'s Gravatar B.J.
    March 2, 2017 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    This guy is supporting Jews and is gaining huge personal (and unethical) personal advantage. That says it all. These collaborators support and care more about Jews than their own people because that’s the ticket to money, power and influence. They may “believe” it – like I believed that a $1,500 vacuum cleaner was really a great buy when I sold them door to door to get through college (but interestingly never bought one myself). If they stand up for the truth they’ll be commenting on the OO forum instead or getting punched like Richard Spencer instead of spending loads of money on themselves and being in front of TV cameras. The system produces these people. And it’s nothing new. There will always be people who sell out the group for their own selfish interest when an oppressive system is in place that rewards treasonous behavior. And that’s why Trump has an appeal the establishment doesn’t get. They cannot get someone who stands up for the group and pays a huge personal price. It’s not about self-interest but community interest (which is the opposite of the elites).

  6. MGD's Gravatar MGD
    March 2, 2017 - 5:02 pm | Permalink

    “Apparently the piece was only brought to light, and subjected to ‘social justice’ action, after one of her undergraduate students unearthed it and initialized a campaign against her.”

    The soul of Hitler is laughing hysterically!

  7. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    March 2, 2017 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

    I say this all the time so that people will understand the danger they are in. The Jews are a tribe of psychopaths. No all, maybe not even the majority, but a large number. All of the Jews ancient writings are nothing more than a manual for psychopaths to live by. The Talmud is nothing but one psychopathic thought after another. The Talmud “great enlightenment” basically says that everyone not Jewish is there to serve Jews. All their property is really the Jews. No one is really human unless they’re Jews and their lives don’t matter. A psychopathic religion for a psychopathic people.

    They’ve been thrown out of every single country that they’ve been to in any numbers. Psychopaths having no empathy themselves can only go by the feedback they get from the people they are exploiting. So they push and push to see what they can get away with. The normal people build up resentment towards them. Thinking “surely they will reform or repent” like a normal person who does wrong. Of course the Jews do not. They don’t have the mental process for reform. Then in a huge mass outpouring of hate for the Jews, fed up with the refusal to reform their behavior, they attack and/or deport them. In this stage of the cycle the Big/Rich Jews escape and the little Jews are attacked.

    Start over.

    Even if it’s wrong if you assume the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths you will never be surprised and Jew’s behavior will make sense.

    In order to predict Jews behavior read the great book on Psychopaths by Hervey Cleckley, “The Mask of Sanity”. Here’s a chapter you should read. It’s about the psychopath Stanley. Who does all kinds of manic bullshit and spends all his time feeding people the most outrageous lies. Look at the astounding array of things he’s able to get away with. Maybe it will remind you of a certain tribe. New meme. “They’re pulling a Stanley”. The whole book is on the web and worth reading.

    I use the simplest of logic to determine this. Form follows function, Occam’s Razor. Their behavior is exactly like psychopaths. Their religious beliefs are exactly like the internal dialog of psychopaths. I don’t know but if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck. It’s a duck and the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths. The MOST IMPORTANT PART is that the behavior of the Jews as a group over time can not be reliably separated from the behavior of psychopaths. Even if I’m wrong their behavior is the same so they should be treated as psychopaths. A very dangerous, powerful group with no empathy towards anyone but other Jews..

    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      March 3, 2017 - 5:21 am | Permalink

      You pretty well nailed it, Sam. By their sociopathic behavior, psychopaths reveal themselves.

      • March 3, 2017 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

        I think I’m right in saying they were not thrown out of Scotland. This may explain many things, such as their odd religious history, invasions of England and manoeuvrings at the time of Cromwell and Charles of the regicide, Adam Smith, the ‘procurator fiscal’, and down to people like Gordon Brown and Tony Blair, J K Rowling, and the present SNP.
        . . . Here’s an unfinished attempt to look at all this.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 3, 2017 - 10:22 am | Permalink

      They don’t have the mental process for reform.

      What about reform jews? Aren’t they on our side?

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      March 3, 2017 - 3:28 pm | Permalink

      And they never learn.. i think they are more sociopath than psychopath because they are over-emotional and have real ”neurotypical” emotions while seems typical psychopath simply no have emotions, s/he all the time try to emulate neurotypical behavior, while sociopath have the advantage to be already neurotypical BUT psychopath.

      Years of conflicts and expulsions = psychopathic behavior, never learn with their mistakes, blame others, act always as victims specially when they are the perpretators, have extremely huge for materialism…

      Very evident that, if not most jews, no doubt their elites are mostly by sociopaths, the psychopathic neurotypical.

      Sociopaths are more parasitic than predators while violent psychopaths are evidently the latter. Maybe there are overrepresentation of ”non-violent” psychopaths among them.

    • March 3, 2017 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

      Uh yeah, I see your point, only I think you left out a few adjectives like – insane, lying, thieving, avaricious, bloodthirsty, hateful, scumbelly, parasitical, cultural carcinogenic pathogen. Otherwise you pretty much be gotten yur glasses on.

  8. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    March 3, 2017 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    Pickles is feckless and is probably a crypto as can be seen from his tweets.

    Once in a while a member of the Tribe will openly condemn Jewish privilege. The late Gerald Kaufman is another exmaple – he was Jewish but a “critic” of Israel – spot the contradiction. It is all smoke and mirrors to beguile the host and deflect from anomalies like 0.5% of the total population yet having so much power.

  9. Jez Turner's Gravatar Jez Turner
    March 3, 2017 - 5:58 am | Permalink

    Tony Greenstein, a prominent Jew from Brighton, (East Sussex, South East England), has started a campaign to get The Charities Commission to remove charitable status from The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, (CAA), because it targeted him and other Jews as being guilty of anti-semitism; note he didn’t care about said charity targeting non-Jews!
    By annoying, harassing, hassling and persecuting large numbers of independent thinkers and hence pushing them into ‘the anti-semitic camp’, the CAA is creating a lot of sympathy for our cause and is really doing our work for us. The numbers of people suffering persecution by the CAA, which is surely Soros funded – we don’t know for sure, because it is one of the few charities that is allowed to keep its donors and board members secret – is now running into triple figures. Alison Chabloz, the chanteuse, is appearing at Marylebone Magistrate’s Court, London, on Friday 24th March as the subject of a private prosecution launched by the CAA against her and her songs. Do come along and support her. I myself, the day before, am in court elsewhere at the instigation of the same ‘charity’ for a speech I gave two years ago in Whitehall opposing The Shomrim (Jewish uniformed and government funded vigilante organisation). Exciting times to be alive. Let’s put our heads together and see how we can encourage and help along the self-devouring process? Thinking caps on ladies and gentlemen!

  10. James Bigglesworth's Gravatar James Bigglesworth
    March 3, 2017 - 6:05 am | Permalink

    Interesting article about Richard Spencer after his adventures in Washington during Donald Trumps Inauguration. In response to Richards interview by a Jew whom as usual threw in all the key words.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      March 3, 2017 - 4:31 pm | Permalink

      Enoch, on the other hand, showed great aplomb in dealing with his rather prickly interviewer.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        March 4, 2017 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

        I use the Opera browser, and it won’t allow me to open this link. I get a warning page that says “This site can’t provide a secure connection. uses an unsupported protocol.” I get the same refusal for the main site portal. When I change “biz” to “com”, I get a stern warning that if I proceed, I will be endangering my computer’s security.

        Do you know of a safe way around this problem? Should I download another browser—a somewhat more tolerant one, perhaps, in the Chrome or Firefox family?

        • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
          March 4, 2017 - 6:32 pm | Permalink

          It works with Internet Explorer and Chrome. These two support the protocols.

        • March 4, 2017 - 6:49 pm | Permalink

          There’s no problem with Mozilla/Firefox. And I have a paid malware scanner which seems reliable and gives no warning message.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          March 4, 2017 - 10:48 pm | Permalink

          Thank you both.

  11. Last Saxon's Gravatar Last Saxon
    March 3, 2017 - 10:16 am | Permalink

    Finkelstein does the same thing without serious consequences. Choamsky is also allowed to criticise Israel but twists it around claiming Israel is a victim of America. Max Keiser is also allowed to call his bankster cousins “parasites.” This is their privilege and excludes goyim cattle like Pickless who is another money-controlled prop like Blair.

  12. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    March 3, 2017 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    Her accuser is probably a Mossad spy planted to spot non-conforming gentiles.

    She on the otherhand is a typical Cultural Marxist aka Pro-Third World et al. No help from that quarter.

  13. March 4, 2017 - 3:44 am | Permalink

    Incredible what’s happening.

    The Jews are a very interesting people: ethnocentric and intelligent, but also very formed by their history in Europe (which wasn’t nice…).

    The Jews often had strong interests as an ethnicity and as a result of a strong in-group selection for intelligence, the intelligent ones reproduced more successfully. This led to the creation of the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ. As a result of their interest conflicts with the native Europeans, they repeatedly became the target of aggression.

    As a survival mechanism against this, they created intellectual movements within Europe and the West which caused the Left to dominate academia and later politics, education and the media. And that’s where we are right now…. This Soros figure is an example of such a figure. Ethnocentric, moulded by his history and therefore deeply afraid of the West or even for the “white race”.

    Political Correctness (or Cultural Marxism) are what we are stuck with in the current situation, as a result of the Jewish ethnic defence mechanisms. Somewhat contradictory, this leads to a lot of Muslim migration into the West, which is NOT beneficial for the Jews living in the West either. *sigh…*

    Currently, the following steps have taken place in our Western countries.

    1. Indoctrinate the population with a feeling of guilt.

    2. Create an in-group morality based on the idea of making up for this guilt by living up to certain universal morals, such as caring for the entire world, the idea of tolerance; and the idea that every culture is equal (cultural relativism); which will lead to the in-group supporting multiculturalism and mass migration.

    3. The media and academic world must support the in-group morality, creating the illusion that the in-group is very large and therefore powerful.

    4. The media and academia must also demonize, degrade and ridicule the own culture. The own culture and history is seen as “evil”. Other cultures are seen as “exotic”, “interesting”, etc. This goes further than cultural relativism. This is cultural marxism. The own culture is “evil” and “nothing special”, so the way to solve this is by multiculturalism.

    5. Not agreeing with the universal morality of the in-group will leads to social exclusion from the in-group. Those outside of the group are immoral and must be demonized (“nazi”, “hiter”, “racist”, “white supremacist”, etc).

    Once this climate has been established, the trick is to gradually flood the country with mass migration from outside of the Western world. It is the best to do so in a gradual, but constant and consistent manner, so that the new reality becomes “normal”.

    The own country and culture can be destroyed the fastest by importing Muslims, because they carry a very strong negative ideology with them.

    This is how you destroy a culture and it’s currently happening to the West. This is real and this is the process.


    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      March 4, 2017 - 11:44 am | Permalink

      What’s the local weather like today in Tel Aviv, Mr. Nielsen? Is it keeping you indoors and away from your Mossad class in Learning Idiomatic English 201?

      I can’t speak for Kevin MacDonald or for his several comment thread moderators, of course, but I can speak for myself. In this capacity, please be so kind as to accept my well-meant invitation to take your half-truths (e.g., “Not agreeing with the universal morality of the in-group will leads [sic] to social exclusion from the in-group”), your corruptions of thought (e.g., “media and academia must also demonize, degrade and ridicule the own [sic] culture”), and your outright lies (e.g., the entirety of your paragraphs 2 and 3), and file them somewhere that the sun never shines.

      I also warmly invite you to consider returning to TOO when and only when you are prepared to accept the following definition: an anti-Semite is someone who declines to accept the Jews’ demands that, alone among the peoples of the earth, they not be held responsible for the consequences of their actions (most especially their crimes) nor be bound to any moral dimension of the principle of cause and effect nor be required to accept that any standard whatsoever deemed binding on other human beings is applicable to them, too.

      Nor is it lost on me that naming what I take as your own website “debate the left” is an open invitation to all and sundry to join Brenda Walker, Michelle Malkin, and like-minded others in a picnic lunch.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        March 8, 2017 - 1:14 pm | Permalink

        “What’s the local weather like today…”
        Very concise response Pierre, and clever as well. The only thing I hear more often than the trademarked “redacted event” weather report, is my own local one.

    • Peter J's Gravatar Peter J
      March 7, 2017 - 2:13 pm | Permalink

      Very precise analysis of our current situation…sadly. I’ll look at the link…

  14. Sally's Gravatar Sally
    March 4, 2017 - 6:32 am | Permalink

    Extremist anti-zionism is just another form of jewish colonialism and occupation of Europe. Some jews recognize that they need to pretend to make peace with the arabs, as both european leftists and palestinians unite against Israel in Europe. If Israel is seen as not the exclusive homeland of the jews, then the jews can continue to claim Europe is. And some jews recognize the complex dance this balancing act requires.

Comments are closed.