Juan Thompson was not the Perp they were Hoping for

M. Jaggers

Juan Thompson

I don’t want to say that the revelation of the identity of the perpetrator of multiple bomb threats against Jewish schools, community centers and museums is “funny,” because of course bomb threats are nothing to joke about.  And if such threats were made by someone “on our side,” which is rarely the case, it would not do us any good in our eternal struggle against Cultural Marxism.   But we’ll have to admit that the whole affair is steeped in irony; and as usual, the MSM is left with some egg on their face (not that they would ever acknowledge said egg).

Let’s try to map out the sequence of events: “hate crimes” and threats are perpetrated against the Jewish community (but no actual bombs).  Outrage ensues and Trump is called upon to denounce these actions with just the right level of intensity. And his denunciation must be phrased with just the right words — because apparently we’re not even allowed to choose our own words anymore.

Somehow he is responsible, the media seems to suggest, because of the environment of rampant hatred that he has created.  While Trump has done nothing but lavish praise on Jews, the fact that he has hinted that not every last human being is a boon to America has seriously rubbed the Jewish community in particular the wrong way; and they somehow infer that this leads directly towards anti-Semitism and indeed, a holocaust.  Indeed, any hint of nationalism or populism is taken rather personally by the Jewish community, to the extent that they have identified members of such movements as dire political enemies.  As a result of this dialectic, they assume that they are in turn identified as enemies by followers of populist or nationalist movements, with a bit of psychological projection and paranoia in the mix.  In my opinion, this can lead to somewhat of a vicious cycle, to the point where these two sides may become enemies in fact, so that it is no longer a matter of paranoia and projection.

Trump, meanwhile, affirms himself to be “the least anti-Semitic person you’ve ever seen in your entire life.”  More media rage ensues.  Trump then suggests it might be some type of false flag (“Sometimes it’s the reverse”).  Even more media rage ensues.  On February 28th, Trump opened up his excellent Joint Address to Congress with a more full-throated condemnation of the anti-Semitic activity:

Recent threats targeting Jewish community centers and vandalism of Jewish cemeteries, as well as last week’s shooting in Kansas City, remind us that while we may be a nation divided on policies, we are a country that stands united in condemning hate and evil in all of its very ugly forms.  (Applause.)

Mainstream conservatives were gratified by this new obsequious tone.  But still no love was forthcoming from the MSM.  Shortly thereafter, the threats were confirmed as a hoax of sorts, and the Alt Right was vindicated (not to mention that Trump too was vindicated, at least in his earlier, more frank thoughts on the matter.)

Juan Thompson is perhaps the perfect foil for all that we have been preaching so patiently this last decade or two.  Can we not take some delicious satisfaction in how this all transpired?  The media was waiting anxiously for their great White defendant, drumming up this calamity of anti-Semitic incidents daily on NPR, et al, assuming the perpetrator to be a David Duke fan, perhaps a reader of the Daily Stormer, at minimum a Trump voter. And then…this guy.

Mr. Thompson simply made up quotes and stories in his career at the news website The Intercept.  As is often the case, his lack of a moral framework is accompanied by a low intellect.  The bomb threats were made to implicate his race-mixing, estranged White girlfriend, a scheme that perhaps only a low-IQ Black would attempt; but alas, he should stick with more straightforward criminal enterprises such as mugging, which requires less forethought and cunning.  He was discovered by the FBI.

Further indicating his sociopathy, Thompson also falsely claimed to be running for mayor at one point to solicit donations on GoFundMe, and railed against the “White liberal media.”  This is not even a matter of low IQ, or high-crime propensity; this is a disturbing disconnect from reality, and that special brand of malice such delusional individuals propagate

So how did the “anti-hate” Jewish organizations respond?  Of course Thompson was condemned by the ADL, but their statement was strangely qualified: “While I cannot speak about what is in Mr. Thompson’s mind or certainly in his heart,” and, “while the motive is unclear,” ultimately they deem that this was an anti-Semitic act.  That is as if to say, “this is not quite the perpetrator that we were hoping for, but we’re still not pleased with him.”

Back to Trump’s response, what is especially ironic is the pat on the back he received from Peggy Noonan over at the Wall Street Journal for his genuflections to political correctness and antiracism in his speech.  Note that this editorial preceded the FBI’s identifying Mr. Thompson as the one responsible for the anti-Semitic incidents.  It would seem that in Noonan’s eyes, this was truly the best part of the speech:

It was good that the president began the speech damning bigotry of all kinds: “We are a country that stands united in condemning hate and evil in all of its very ugly forms.” This is not a hard thing to do rhetorically, yet is always important and necessary, because it reminds everyone in this fractious, bubbling, stressed and many-cultured country that we owe each other respect and regard, not only tolerance but affection. We won’t continue as a people unless we get this right.

So in this increasingly racialized, “many-cultured country” we are supposed to love everyone and somehow pretend that we are a people?? A people? This is elite dogma on steroids. Despite the long and bloody history of ethnic and religious conflict around the world and despite the  obvious racialization of American politics, the left develops a utopian theory that America can somehow retain a national identity and that all conflict will magically disappear — despite the history of racial strife in America. The mainstream right is either too intimidated or too profit-minded to object, so we plunge headlong into a future that can only end in disaster

The president has taken to doing this lately. Why did he resist so long? Maybe in part because a man who believes himself unbiased will find it grating that others insist he personally, publicly, repeatedly oppose the ugly isms. Maybe he feels he has nothing to prove and suspects bowing to the demand is tantamount to conceding that he does. But Mr. Trump did have things to prove, because of the views of a highly vocal sliver of his supporters. In any case, presidents should say the right things.

That “highly vocal sliver of his supporters” with those deplorable views?  Yeah, that’s us, the  only people with enough balls to stand up to this absurdity.  Noonan is an eloquent writer, she has conservative instincts — although it would be hard to guess that  from these passages.   She goes on to hypothesize that nationalist movements need to tone it down in order to be more successful:

There is something the leaders of populist, nationalist movements here and in Europe do not understand. They are not powerful, because they are perceived, on some level, by some people, to be racist or narrow or anti-Semitic. They fail to win power—they have low electoral ceilings, or fail to win half the votes—because of this perception. It doesn’t help them, it kills them. Because the majority of people don’t like the smell of sulfur.

Nationalists should actively and publicly reject and rebuke the forces of darkness. “We need them to win”? No, they’re the reason you lose. They’re not numerous, they’re only loud. Draw a line between them and you, raise your ceiling, get yourself a chance at winning. Which, if you are serious about your programs, vision and philosophy, is the point.

Completely left out of this is the constant chorus of propaganda in the media and the school system since World War II characterizing nationalism and populism as the epitome of evil, even without any explicit racial analysis and even with vehement denials of anti-Semitism. The smell of sulfur is imputed by the media and the educational system.

If Ms. Noonan’s goal is to further the electoral success of nationalist parties, this advice has already been taken. The main nationalist parties in Europe already reject ant-Semitism, are staunchly pro-Israel, and have eschewed any kind of explicitly racial analysis — Geert  Wilders and Marine Le Pen are good examples. They are vilified nonetheless simply for wanting to end immigration. Exactly what  kind of nationalism are we left with if we can’t exclude such people?

But doesn’t the revelation of Juan Thompson as the perp throw cold water on Noonan’s analysis vis-à-vis the importance of denouncing bigotry?  After all, said “bigotry” was essentially a hoax; therefore, the nature of this perceived problem is different.  Must we continue to “repeatedly oppose the ugly isms” as our core mission, when, as it turns out, it was a wayward Black, typically anti-Trump in his orientation, who caused all this mischief in the first place?  If anything, and I hate to say it, this incident has confirmed all of our “ugly isms.”

Email Malcolm Jaggers, follow him @malcolmjaggers


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

17 Comments to "Juan Thompson was not the Perp they were Hoping for"

  1. Antidote's Gravatar Antidote
    March 9, 2017 - 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Fifteen years ago we witnessed the Jayson Blair fiasco which alerted us to the dangers and problems of affirmative action-diversity demands in the newsrooms. Apparently in that time a pool of capable, responsible reporters could not be developed. Can we forget about the whole deal now?
    I’m intrigued about Frances Rossi; I wish she would step forward to speak about the case. We have been told over and over that the Negroes are such Romeos and are filled with such romance and tenderness that “once you go [email protected], why you’ll never go back!” Yet Rossi tried it and didn’t like it.
    I don’t know, but I sense that his very name is a fraud. I believe he stole ‘Juan Thompson’ from the son of the late journalist, Hunter Thompson.

  2. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    March 9, 2017 - 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Noonan is an establishment conservative in a system within which the establishment is viscerally anti-White and, dare I say, anti-American. Her advice is not directed toward helping us change or overthrow the (((system))), but rather how we could better compete within it. All that is required is that we accept without question the Jewish agenda of destroying the once homogeneous societies of White nations.

    So according to Noonan’s prescription, the goal should not be the survival of our people (or our nation state), but to gain a seat at the tables of power where we will be free to express our support for our own destruction with as much enthusiasm as we can muster…certainly any discussion of White nationalism is intended to remain forever beyond the limits of acceptable public discourse.

    No thanks Ms. Noonan. The truth is that this Jewish agenda is pushing us towards a collapse of the current social order. Whites have a choice to make. We have essentially three options… We can fight now while we are still the majority, we can wait until later when we are persecuted minority, or we can passively accept our destruction as “progress”. What kind of White man (or woman) can look their young child in the eyes and tell them that they are doing this so that they will have a more “vibrant” future as a member of a minority surrounded by peoples who hate them?

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      March 10, 2017 - 3:56 am | Permalink

      Incidentally, over on AmRen – the moderators are now removing any use of the three ‘((( _ )))’ when mentioning jews in a comment that is even a tiny bit critical of them.

      Jared Taylor continues to dutifully run cover for our #1 enemy.

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        March 10, 2017 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

        This is the way I see it.

        Will AmRen grow or survive with a full frontal? Vice versa: will they survive or grow when not going for a full frontal attack? It is a gamble when one is not yet in charge, and time will tell which one is the better approach. I would say that one has to grow to beyond a certain size and influence before the playing field is levelled.

        Most probably the slightly softer approach will initially work better, and be a door opener for moving on to the next level of insight. This effect must not be underestimated.

        The danger however is always there that one might compromise ones position by being too accomodating, and loose focus of the intial purpose. This I notice with the influential South African white labour union Solidarity, which slowly is softening up so much, that one wonders what exactly is their position (some leaders show up in photos with the traitor F.W. de Klerk, and grow their black support base on the one hand, and on the other hand spend a lot of money in pro-white court cases for court inderdicts, which are ignored). The small up to now pure white Freedom Front party (FF+) has lately opened its ranks for the coloureds/mestizos in the Western Cape so as to gain influence in that province for a independant white homeland, and already is running into trouble with this policy. Source (Afrikaans):


        The leader of the FF+, Dr. Pieter Mulder, under whose leadership this policy of opening up has been intiated, has stepped down, and Dr. Pieter Groenewald, has now replaced him. It will be interesting to see which approach he will follow.

        This is what happens when there is compromise when taking up a foreign influence. It remains a gamble. One must take care not to overextend oneselves.

        I can imagine it is an extremely difficult decision when being in the position of a decision maker, and less difficult for the followers, which advocate a mix of both, and some will be influential hardliners (often not considering all realities!).

  3. Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
    March 9, 2017 - 2:34 pm | Permalink


    Another highly vocal sliver:

    “When Jilted Lovers Commit Hate-Crime Hoaxes”
    (Jim Goad at TakiMag)
    — [ http://takimag.com/article/when_jilted_lovers_commit_hate_crime_hoaxes_jim_goad/ ]

  4. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    March 9, 2017 - 2:40 pm | Permalink

    “apparently we’re not even allowed to choose our own words anymore.”

    In actuality it’s much harder for a European man or woman seeking an identity to have their case heard.

    One more time, from Uniting the Right (article), by Stanislav Vysotsky and Eric Madfis:

    Using the sociological concept described herein, an individual, group, or action may be considered illegitimate if it is considered outside of the bounds of normative politics as defined by individuals and groups in positions of power or pluralities of actors and organizations operating in the public sphere. Therefore, even legal and socially acceptable forms of protest and political action may be considered illegitimate if they are carried out by individuals or groups who fall outside of the bounds of normative political categories.

    by any other name, in my opinion, the above paragraph could be considered controlling the narrative at what ever cost or just plain Stalinism.

  5. Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
    March 9, 2017 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

    I can’t imagine Noonan to be able to even identify the odor of sulfur. Certainly not from the water- fountain in her WSJ offices.

    I suspect she plagiarized Hugo Chavez’s remark during his speech at the UN GA, when he referred to the lingering smell of sulfur and the devil, since Bush 43 spoke immediately before him. For which humorous conjured-up visual he was rewarded by considerable laughter.

  6. steven clark's Gravatar steven clark
    March 9, 2017 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

    Michael Savage said Peggy Noonan was the kind of woman who would wear white gloves to bed. I remember back in the nineties, she made a speech about race, arguing that all these blacks in gangs, jail, and rioting were potential saviors of America. ‘I believe in my heart that these kids will save the country some day,’ she rhapsodically wrote, ‘ I just know they will.’
    As we see, this is the voice of the establishment…the gated, miles-away-from-the-inner-city establishment. Juan Thompson is typical of a new kind of people who lie without thinking, and also who the Jews can’t scare with a guilt trip. There are more and more of them in America, and it’s curious to see what will happen when there is no more center holding the system together, and every ethnic group in what was once America and Europe goes for their piece of the pie. Which piece will whites claim for their own?

    • Gilbert Huntly's Gravatar Gilbert Huntly
      March 10, 2017 - 12:27 am | Permalink

      Either whites assert their right of “free association”, or they will lose all other rights and privileges. There is no honor without courage, and no distinction or freedom without the resolution to associate or dissociate with whomever one chooses – with no apologies.

  7. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    March 10, 2017 - 4:34 am | Permalink

    Surprise, surprise, it be a genuine, dyed-in-the-wool Negro, ‘and shit’, man…

    Seriously, the searing blowback is truly ironic, but not really surprising, and don’t worry, the (((media))) will soon make the unwanted story disappear. Those paying attention know this, of course, but most of the sleep walking ‘Goyim’ will never learn about it.

  8. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    March 10, 2017 - 6:12 am | Permalink

    Funny how these people (like Noonan) keep “forgetting” the 100 million killed by Communism in the 20th Century and the indisputable fact that the “fascisms” of interwar Europe arose as a reaction to Communist thuggery and murder. It’s pretty clear that the kind of nationalism she’s disdaining is not the kind of nationalism that (in part) created the pointless slaughter of World War I.

  9. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    March 10, 2017 - 9:56 am | Permalink

    This Jew must think we are stupid. When Israel illegally and deceptively gives birth control to black Jews to limit their population and rabbis praise the destruction of Europe via Islamization, this Jew has some chutzpah. History teaches us that the only way to deal with Jews is to remove them from your nation. Let world Jewry be exiled to Madagascar where they can PRETEND to have conquered the earth and killed all the Gentiles. They should have ZERO contact with the outside world. It will be as easy as pretending the Holocaust actually happened. The parasites should take this offer as the other option is total annihilation. Why would Europeans respect a Jews right to exist, when that respect is not mutual.

    • Peter's Gravatar Peter
      March 10, 2017 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

      As long as they control the mainstream media and the movie making business, they will continue to be able to do whatever they want and behave like complete hypocrites in the process. That’s why the censorship laws were passed in Europe against revisionist history. The truth is out, but it’s bottled up in history books which are denounced by the Jews and their press while simultaneously often being praised by fellow historians. If the truth became widely known, the narrative of the innocent Jew victimized by the evil German and other Europeans would be destroyed and anti-Semitism could explode out in the open again.

      How could such a radical change in attitude toward Jews occur? If the people realized Jews passed censorship laws to hide the fact that they were the leaders of the murderous communists and the bloodiest regime in history (the USSR) and they paid bribe money to Churchill to attack Germany and start WW II, then there is a very good chance the world would be angered by the lies the world has been told for many decades, the Jews lies, enforced thru censorship laws.

      If instead of the current narrative, innocent Jew is persecuted in Germany for no reason at all by the German state is changed ever so slightly to German state felt threatened by World Jewry and expressed their fear Jews were pushing other countries to attack Germany and they were correct in those fears (payments made by various Jews to Churchill in 1936 become known to the general public), that has the potential to completely change the perception as to who was guilty. It could certainly remove the halo the Jews all wear on their heads.

      Here is a prime example. Jew pressures college to remove David Irving’s biography of Winston Churchill which goes into detail of the Jews payments to Churchill.


  10. Devon's Gravatar Devon
    March 10, 2017 - 10:31 am | Permalink

    I love this story, because it shows their blatant hypocrisy towards whites…. but this next one is even more amusing.

    Those Jewish headstones that were toppled in a Brooklyn cemetery? Yeah, it was THE WIND, not Neo Nazis like the Jews want everyone to believe. you cannot make up this s***.

    BROOKLYN, NY — The NYPD has determined that gravestones damaged at a Jewish cemetery in Brooklyn were not vandalized.

    Police investigated the reports of possible vandalism at Washington Cemetery, a Jewish burial ground.

    Investigators said the damage was likely caused by maintenance and environmental factors (wind), and the cemetery operators concurred with the findings of the detectives.

    New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind tweeted photos of the gravestones.


    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      March 14, 2017 - 8:11 am | Permalink

      The wind is clearly racist. Nature is very insolent sometimes, completely ignoring the legislation of the left. It also constantly violates the sexism legislation by not making more women who want to drive lorries.

  11. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    March 10, 2017 - 2:37 pm | Permalink

    When I read this story, I was moved to write a wise guy comment on a certain large political forum. I also stated that this guy was not what the left, democrat party types were hoping for as the perpetrator. They thought it would be a white guy, living among other radical white guys in places like Idaho or Montana. The key to recognizing these radicals, is to look for the guys with beer on their breath who are working on old classic American trucks or rebuilding a muscle car of the sixties or seventies of the last century. Those are the really dangerous white dudes..(sigh… if only that kind would wake up…)

  12. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    March 11, 2017 - 3:21 am | Permalink

    (Mod. Note: Trenchant gets the “eagle eye” award for spotting obscure typos. Thanks for your help, Trenchant!)

Comments are closed.