Born in Britain: Mass Immigration and the Twilight Zone

Tobias Langdon


If you think that the recent attack by a Black terrorist in London says anything about the harm done by mass immigration, then think again. A great liberal intellectual called Matthew D’Ancona has crushed such racist nonsense with these lines in the world’s greatest newspaper:

As we now know, the attacker, Khalid Masood, was British, born in Kent and brought up as Adrian Russell Elms. His story is one of radicalisation, the question being when and how he embraced extremist Islamist ideology: the path that led him to an act of murderous violence has nothing to do with immigration. (The Brexiteers’ immigration promises are unravelling fast, The Guardian, 27th March 2017)

“Nothing to do with immigration”: A Black terrorist

See? The terrorist was born here. He was 100% British. Immigration had nothing to do with his terrorism. Somehow the concept of second-generation immigrants is far too complex for these intellectuals, so that the ill effects of policies in place for 50+ years can only be discussed within the context of recent immigrants not born in the UK.

Voila! Crime, terrorism and academic failure by second-generation immigrants have nothing to do with immigration. Believing their own propaganda, these intellectuals imply that second-generation immigrants have been entirely shaped by mainstream British culture, so that the cultures immigrants bring with them to the UK are completely irrelevant. It’s the same with personal traits like IQ: Mental ability has nothing to do with the ethnic/racial/religious heritage of immigrants after the first generation. Whatever their performance, it is due to having been born in the UK, with low performance likely due to White racism. It’s like saying that Masood would have been born in the UK even if his parents had stayed overseas.

We saw the same logic applied when Omar Mateen, son of Afghan immigrants, committed mass murder in a gay nightclub in Florida. Gary Younge, another great Guardian intellectual, said this: “Whatever else this is, it’s not about immigration. Omar Mateen, the suspected killer, was born in America. Whatever compelled him to commit such a terrible act cannot be laid at the border of a foreign nation. His hatred was home-grown.”

I responded to Younge’s reasoning like this:

Ignorant haters like Donald Trump might claim that Mateen was only an American citizen because his parents emigrated from Afghanistan. Gary Younge knows better: Omar Mateen would have been born in the US even if his parents had stayed in Afghanistan. His embryo would have materialized from the American air and grown to term thousands of miles from his mother’s womb, nourished by a mysterious process possibly involving quantum nonlocality or Dawkins’s demon. (Sunshine Hate, TOO, 16th June 2016)

“Nothing to do with immigration”: An Afghan terrorist

Now we discover that the same mysterious process could have worked in the UK. Khalid Masood would have been born in Britain even if his Black father had never been allowed to immigrate here, impregnate his White mother out of wedlock, and then, it appears, abandon her in typical Black fashion. And not only that: after Masood’s miraculous birth, Islam would have become powerful here and attracted violent criminals even if Muslims had not entered the country in such large numbers. Masood was destined from all eternity to be born in Britain, become a Muslim and commit those murders. No ban on immigration could have stopped him. Nor could any ban have stopped these other vibrant terrorists: “Even if you look at the last time London suffered a major attack, three of the four 7/7 bombers were born in Britain.”

“Nothing to do with immigration”: some Pakistani terrorists

The British-born London bombers had nothing to do with immigration, just like the British-born Khalid Masood and the American-born Omar Mateen. Or so liberals like Younge and D’Ancona want us to believe. When it comes to a choice between reality and self-serving delusion, liberals don’t hesitate for a second. It’s delusion every time. After all, it’s the little people who usually pay the price for the West’s insane and evil immigration policies. Here is an example, long-forgotten by liberals, from 2005:

Gang forced kidnap girl, 16, to take crack before killing her, court told

A 16-year-old girl was kidnapped, raped and forced to take heroin and crack cocaine before being murdered by a gang of six men. Reading crown court heard how Mary-Ann Leneghan was stabbed to death in a park in May 2005 after she and her 18-year-old friend, who cannot be named for legal reasons, were abducted. The friend survived, despite being shot in the head. On the opening day of the trial, Richard Latham QC, prosecuting, said that six men shared joint responsibility in the girls’ ordeal. Mary-Ann and her friend had been sitting in a car when they were abducted. They were bundled into a car boot and driven to a guesthouse, where the men booked a room.

According to accounts given by the friend, the men [laid] towels on the floor as soon as they entered to avoid leaving traces of blood. The women were subjected to “a concentrated sequence of controlled acts of violence and degradation” over a long period. They were made to strip, were hit with a pole, cut with knives, and raped. A gun was put into the 18-year-old’s mouth while the men laughed. They crowded round her while she was on all fours and told her they were going to cut off part of her genitals and feed it to her.  (Gang forced kidnap girl, 16, to take crack before killing her, The Guardian, 14th January 2006)

“Nothing to do with immigration”: A Black murder-gang

The gang consisted of five Blacks and an Albanian Muslim “asylum-seeker.” Like Khalid Masood, the leader of the gang, Adrian Thomas, was the abandoned son of a Black father. I can remember hearing the father interviewed on BBC Radio about the case and about how much responsibility he bore for his son’s criminality. He pretended to be contrite about being a “fringe father.” But his mask of contrition slipped when the female reporter asked him about his illegitimate children and why he hadn’t used contraception. “Listen, darling,” he said with sudden menace. “Contraception doesn’t always work.”

Black logic, you see. Because contraception doesn’t always work, it doesn’t matter if you don’t use it. And if you have illegitimate children, you won’t have to involve yourself in their upbringing or pay to bring them up. The White taxpayer will take care of everything. This largesse doesn’t just encourage feckless and irresponsible Blacks and Gypsies to have more children: it encourages feckless and irresponsible Whites too, and it subsidizes births in the rapidly expanding Muslim population.

All these groups have strong tendencies towards high criminality, low trust, and low educational achievement, but liberals like Younge and D’Ancona are confident that the laws of evolution don’t apply to human beings. It’s another miracle: feckless low-IQ criminals can outbreed responsible and law-abiding British Whites, but this will have no effect on society. British newspapers are reporting that Khalid Masood was academically gifted in his schooldays as Adrian Elms, but he excelled at crime and violence as an adult, not at intellectual achievement. He was bad for Britain long before his murderous attack in London.

But let’s look on the bright side. Securicrats are using his attack to argue for even more surveillance of the entire British population:

The UK government is right to back electronic surveillance as it is our first line of defence

The challenge is to strike a balance between protecting us from evil, and enfolding us in a security blanket so heavy that it would stifle the very liberties we are striving to preserve.

So far in this century, I would suggest that governments have got this pretty right. They have provided lavish new funding for MI5, MI6 and, above all, GCHQ [the British equivalent of the NSA].

They have backed electronic surveillance, which some foolish libertarians denounce as the machinations of a police state, but which represents our first line of defence in detecting terrorists. I have visited GCHQ’s headquarters in Cheltenham and roamed its gigantic underground level, where hundreds of computers churn 24/7, monitoring data and keywords from countless millions of phone conversations and internet communications.

Libertarians such as The Guardian newspaper find such scrutiny intolerable, but I — and probably you, too — are more than happy to have my own phone conversations tapped as the price of empowering our spooks to pinpoint such a man as who carried out yesterday’s savage killings. (The UK government is right to back electronic surveillance as it is our first line of defence, writes Max Hastings, The Daily Mail, 23rd March 2017)

Max Hastings, who may be part-Jewish, is talking nonsense when he calls the Guardian “libertarians.” The Guardian ruthlessly censors comments at its website and fully supports harsh laws against thought-crime on race and immigration. The newspaper is right to question the surveillance state, but it doesn’t admit the full truth. The same liars and traitors who opened Britain’s borders to the Third World are also behind the surveillance state. Like cholera, mass immigration is a gift that goes on giving, generation after generation.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

44 Comments to "Born in Britain: Mass Immigration and the Twilight Zone"

  1. Drake Corrigan's Gravatar Drake Corrigan
    March 30, 2017 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

    There is an obvious reason why Japan has no Muslim terror problems.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      April 1, 2017 - 3:11 am | Permalink

      No Jews!

  2. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    March 31, 2017 - 2:02 am | Permalink

    “Here is an example, long-forgotten by liberals, from 2005:” This deliberate and extended murder is long forgotten, meanwhile the MSM carry regular stories about black teenager Stephen Laurence to this day – he was stabbed by a gang of white men in 1993 (not tortured to death) and died from the stab wound. HIS MOTHER HAS BEEN MADE A DAME ie she sits in the House of Lords ie she has been made part of the British government.

    • Red Chili's Gravatar Red Chili
      March 31, 2017 - 9:48 am | Permalink

      A dame is given upon being knighted, the female equivalent to “Sir.” Dames don’t sit in the House of Lords.

      • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
        April 1, 2017 - 3:57 am | Permalink

        She was made a ‘Life Peer’ in 2013 and is indeed a member of the House of Lords.

      • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
        April 1, 2017 - 9:11 am | Permalink

        Quite right. But, perhaps unsurprisingly as the truth is barely believable, Pterodactyl just made a mistake with the title of the honour. In fact, plain West Indian woman Doreen Lawrence, Stephen Lawrence’s mother, does now sit in the British House of Lords, as she was made, not a Dame, but a BARONESS – “Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon, OBE”, a very much higher (and much more political) Honour than Dame.

        This to the undying shame and disgrace of a fawning, spineless British liberal elite political establishment – infested through and through with invisible, powerful Jews like cancer through a kidney – as a desperate attempt to show how all-inclusive, racially-integrated and class-sensitive post-modern Britain has become, even to the ludicrous and debateably illegal point of awarding a Baronetcy to a woman purely on the grounds that her son was murdered. I have yet to hear of any single White British woman whose son, murdered by Black thugs, has been awarded the same recognition for her pain.

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          April 3, 2017 - 3:05 am | Permalink

          Dave Bowman – correct- and they also knighted Robert Mugabe to show whose side the British establishment were on (later withdrawn when he went too far even for them, and that takes some doing).

  3. Nice Guy Eddie's Gravatar Nice Guy Eddie
    March 31, 2017 - 4:16 am | Permalink

    I think it is worth spelling out, in words of as few syllables as possible so even the most gullible of goyim can understand, why Islamic terrorists are attacking us on our own streets. It comes down to two closely related reasons:

    (1) ‘Neo-conservative’ Jews have hijacked Western foreign policy and are using our military might to subjugate Arab nations, leaving them broken and divided so they have no hope of standing up to Israel. Many Muslims, not surprisingly, are deeply unhappy about this.

    (2) ‘Cultural Marxist’ Jews have, as part of their wider plan to undermine and destroy Western civilisation, against which they have a deep-seated hatred, thrown open our borders and invited millions of Muslims and other non-Whites to come aboard.

    As a result many Muslims living within our borders, be they recent refugees, economic migrants, second or even third generation British, American and French, now hate us – and with good reason.

    Broken families, low IQ, criminality, drug abuse and radicalisation may in individual cases play a part but overall they are secondary factors.

    We need to wake up to the fact that the real war is not with Islam, a billion-and-a-half strong yet so weak it cannot even deal with tiny little Israel. The real war is with our own Jewish masters. Anyone who does not recognise that fact is either dumb or dishonest.

    ps: Nice to see the ‘J-word’ make an appearance in the above article, even if it is in the last paragraph and of dubious merit. Max Hastings, “part-Jewish”, really? I would like to see some evidence for that claim.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      March 31, 2017 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

      Hard to take these stories of master-terrorists seriously, given the average IQ of British muslims.

  4. Anon's Gravatar Anon
    March 31, 2017 - 4:30 am | Permalink

    While I don’t disagree with general thrust of this article, the inclusion of the alleged 7/7 bombers in the list indicates that the author has not done enough homework. Its very likey that two of the bombers were MI5 informants who were probably duped into thinking they were on some sort of sting operation when they exploded.

    At the time Blair was in dire straights over his Iraq War policy with massive anti-war demonstrations in London against it. The 7/7 bombing stopped all this in its tracks and left Blair in the clear. Blair promised a full enquiry and the publication of all the facts but of course the opposite happened. Virtually no facts about the case were published at all, only an official ‘narrative’.

    The smoking gun which wrecks the official story is the fact that the bombers could not have made the bombs described. According to the police specialists, the four bombs consisted of hydrogen peroxide (oxidiser) and pepper (fuel). This type of bomb had never been seen before. The bombers were total amateurs, and from their recorded conversations not particularly bright either, about what you would expect from working class suburban Pakis, but all four bombs detonated successfully with massive effect.

    The key to this type of bomb is ‘high-test’ hydrogen peroxide (over 70% hydrogen peroxide in water). Less than this concentration of peroxide and the bomb does not work. This high concentration is unstable and not straightforward to make. You can make up to 50% peroxide in a boiling pan but over this level requires special equipment and methods. No special equipment of the type required to make 70%+ peroxide was found in the bomb making workshop.

    In the official Inquiry which had been delayed by 5 years probably for this and other reasons, the police specialists barefacedly lied to the court about this issue. They stated that the bombers had used common frying pans etc as found in the workshop to make the bombs, which was physically impossible.

    There are a number of other issues about this fascinating event. A few weeks later a similar bombing attempt was made by Islamists, this time using hydrogen peroxide with flour as the fuel. These bombs did not go off, and the Crown essentially argued the opposite of what it would argue in the 7/7 inquiry.

    The books on the subject are fairly dire and there is a great deal of mumbo-jumbo to wade through. Its a sort of cheaper version of 911.

    • March 31, 2017 - 9:47 am | Permalink

      For various reasons, I’m happy 7/7 was a false flag. You sound unusually clued-up on the technicalities, unlike media hacks and junk commentators generally. If you have a write-up of this event I’d like to host it on my site big-lies.org (though I’d ask questions to check). Just a suggestion.

      • Floda's Gravatar Floda
        March 31, 2017 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

        British MI6 spooks posing as London Police to Arab looking youths on the morning of 7/7: “Hey Kid! How’d you like to make a hundred Quid?’ ‘All you have to do is take this sealed package to Euston Station by Rail, we’ll give you fifty pounds now and you’ll get the other fifty when you get to the station”

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          April 1, 2017 - 3:24 am | Permalink

          It would be easier simply NOT to stop one of the twelve or so major plots a year that they do stop. (And which costs the government 9 billion a year).

          The government in Britain want to stop the muslims kicking off too soon as that will force the government to end their open-door-to-the-third-world immigration policy, as the government would be forced to close the door (like Trump is trying to do) if these twelve plots were to succeed, due to the public mood changing.

          As for further down the line when the muslims are the majority, the treacherous government will not try and hold them back any more. But for now the traitors in government who are keeping the door wide open to the third world do not want the host population to switch from ‘passive’ (as they are now – in fact more like prostrate on the floor) to ‘objecting’.

          Those who go too far with their conspiracy theories weaken the credibility of the alt-right. In fact it is ridiculous to think that anyone in the intelligence services would (even if they could, which they cannot) ‘frame’ some muslims to set off a bomb when there are plenty of them who are desperate to do that anyway and all the authorities need to do is ‘not discover’ one of their many plots.

          If the ‘secret services’ operated as you describe, then they would have also been able to easily plant weapons of mass destruction on Saddam Hussein. They did not, so it shows this is not how they operate either in Britain or the USA.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      March 31, 2017 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

      John Hill aka Muad’Dib sent his 7/7 Ripple Effect video to the judge of the “bombers’ ” trial. He was in turn charged with a criminal offense. The jury in his trial saw Ripple Effect, and acquitted him. That a jury of his peers believed his version of events over the “official” narrative is a fairly clear indication that a fair chunk od the common people don’t believe anything the government tells them.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        April 1, 2017 - 3:03 am | Permalink

        So why does the British government spend 9 billion a year stopping them letting off their bombs (ie monitoring their phones and internet usage), and then sneakily give them a bomb? Those who control the MSM downplay all their acts of terrorism, and the government and the MSM sing from the same hymn sheet. Eg the latest one in London outside Westminster – the official line was ‘he was working alone’ then the next day they made numerous arrests. The official line – agreed by the government and MSM – is that these are lone fanatics, British-born, and nothing to do with the ROP – all due to mental illness etc. That is why in the USA when that muslim rang up to say he blew up the gay nightclub, the MSM cut out the part of the phone call where he said his allah akbar bit. (In the end there was an outcry and they released the whole tape).

        • April 1, 2017 - 11:37 am | Permalink

          Why did the (((British))) government under Churchill bankrupt itself and lose its empire and assets?

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      March 31, 2017 - 5:26 pm | Permalink

      Anon – We all know there are thousands of muslims in every Western country who approve of the 7/7 bomb – so another theory apart from you M15 one is that is was just a group of these who were better at chemistry than you imagine. They are only doing what thousands of muslims do all over the world every year.

      Besides, if M15 did want to turn public opinion against them (which is actually the opposite of government policy), all they have to do is NOT to stop one of the 12 or so major bomb plots that are discovered every year. PS this costs 9 billion a year in a country of 60 million (Britain) to monitor these extremists – think what the same is costing the USA.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        April 1, 2017 - 2:57 am | Permalink

        “12 or so major plots” – so the government that lies about virtually everything (weather included) is to be trusted on these totally unsubstantiated claims?

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        April 1, 2017 - 3:04 am | Permalink

        That $60 million p.a.money is spent largely to monitor you, Mr, Keyboard, not Mohammed. It just wouldn’t do to tell you so.

        • Ttenchant's Gravatar Ttenchant
          April 1, 2017 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

          Erratum corrige: $9 billion p.a..

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          April 3, 2017 - 2:45 am | Permalink

          This is correct – the government have a dual aim (a) Stop the muslims kicking off too soon which might change the mood of the people and force the government to close the door to mass immigration from the third world (b) Set up a 1984 type monitoring system, so that one day they can simply stop internet access for everyone committing hate crimes (that means you and me, not the left or their allies the muslims).

          The link for the cost of monitoring plots in Britain (Tommy Robinson)
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFYfxoHqBN8

          Soon all videos like this will be banned.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        April 1, 2017 - 3:19 am | Permalink

        Who can forget the sheer technical wizardry that sprang from the cave at Tora Bora, or, indeed, the hatred of those five Muslims seen dancing by locals in New Jersey as the Towers came down?

        • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
          April 3, 2017 - 3:01 am | Permalink

          So how was it the authorities ‘have authorisation’ to carry out these sorts of tactics, but could not manage to plant weapons of mass destruction on Saddam Hussein, which would have been quite a simple thing to do – IF THEY DID THIS SORT OF THING.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      March 31, 2017 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

      As with 7/7, the facts first must be carefully scrutinized before any sensible conclusion can be drawn. In spite of his kooky name, Muab’Dib’s video analysis of 7/7 bears watching.

    • PPight1931's Gravatar PPight1931
      April 1, 2017 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

      “Explosive used in bombs ‘was of military origin'”
      By Jason Bennetto, Crime Correspondent
      The Independent: Monday, 11 July 2005.
      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/explosive-used-in-bombs-was-of-military-origin-498495.html

      ‘Terror on the Tube: Behind the Veil of 7/7’ by Nick Kollerstrom, 2011. See also p 93 about the South London News press report of shooting, on the day, of a suspected bomber outside HSBC tower in Canary Wharf financial district and another nearby. The office workers in HSBC were told to stay away from the windows.

      I don’t have the impression that the techniques it alludes to were employed on the patsies here, but Walter Bowart’s ‘Operation Mind Control’ (1978) does contain some extraordinary explanations of how some major ‘events’ were executed by individuals-as-automatons. Valuable if only for its extensive bibliography.

      Overall, more ‘problem-reaction-solution’ as Mr Icke (or his handlers) might say.

  5. March 31, 2017 - 4:45 am | Permalink

    I wish you’d mention Jews more. And their policy to support invasion of white countries. And false flags. And the arms trades and their finance.
    .
    However, another point: ‘Tzedek’ is ‘Jewish Action for a Just World’ Registered Charity 1016767, in London N10. I’ve seen that name in the comments.

  6. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    March 31, 2017 - 5:37 am | Permalink

    Through (((internal subversion))), Western/White nations have devolved into depraved systems of state sponsored dysgenics. The neo-Marxist libtards at the ‘Guardian’ paper are guilty-as-hell, co-perpetrators of the destructive racial problems that flourish in their wake. To state the obvious, White liberalism is essentially a racial death wish !

    • March 31, 2017 - 9:40 am | Permalink

      It isn’t ‘white’ liberalism. It’s Jewish. (The whole point of Dr MacDonald’s work is to identify what Jews think of as their ‘interests’). It appears to be a Jewish death wish for whites.

      • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
        April 1, 2017 - 3:29 am | Permalink

        It is more like someone saying ‘I live in a nice house, I think I will destroy my own house’, and then his neighbour, who never liked him, saying ‘good idea, I will give you a hammer – or, rather, you can hire the hammer from me and I will enjoy watching you destroy your house and pocket the money for the hire at the same time’

  7. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    March 31, 2017 - 6:53 am | Permalink

    An interesting article and spot on. Here’s an example of intellectualism (or the lunatic fringe) in the US.

    http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122963

    What the authors don’t understand is that they have made two opposing arguments: if European Americans effect the health of African Americans in a negative way than could it be said that latter effects the former in the same way?
    (And two) if either case is correct than “separatism” is the solution right?

    • March 31, 2017 - 9:37 am | Permalink

      Michael Adkins – Many readers seem to assume Jews have some regard for truth. They don’t. Any garbage will do to muddy the water while harm is done. You can’t seriously imagine that David H. Chae, Sean Clouston, Mark L. Hatzenbuehler, Michael R. Kramer, Hannah L. F. Cooper, Sacoby M. Wilson, Seth I. Stephens-Davidowitz, Robert S. Gold, Bruce G. Link (listed as authors) believe anything they write? It’s like imagining neocons believe what they say about 9/11.
      .
      The correct approach is to analyse the ways truths are hidden and falsehoods promulgated. That, or ignore Jews, as many recommend.

  8. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    March 31, 2017 - 8:11 am | Permalink

    “feckless and irresponsible Whites”

    Mr. Langdon the time of that rhetoric is long gone! Please reread:

    the lesser educated worker and the White dispossessed become our natural constituency. A key task in the years to come will be to better cultivate connections with this constituency.

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/11/what-next-the-alt-right-in-the-age-of-trump/

    • March 31, 2017 - 9:31 am | Permalink

      I agree. Some unfortunate white woman was impregnated, very likely through fear: the author felt menaced, even through his radio or TV. Women who had invaders forced on them by Jews are not in a strong position.

  9. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    March 31, 2017 - 10:36 am | Permalink

    Obviously they want a Neo-Bolshevik tyranny and they will tell whatever lies and create whatever environment they need to to justify ushering in total Jew dominance under the guise of “protecting the citizenry”. Sorry Jews, the goyim know!!!!!!!!!

  10. JRM's Gravatar JRM
    March 31, 2017 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    “Somehow the concept of second-generation immigrants is far too complex for these intellectuals, so that the ill effects of policies in place for 50+ years can only be discussed within the context of recent immigrants not born in the UK.”

    No, the “intellectuals” are actually cognizant of this constructed device to reduce the overall number of terrorist attacks being discussed at any given time.

    It’s their readers who are expected to be so dense.

    Additionally, once you have everyone on-board with calling a second-gen Muslim a “British”, “German”, or “French” man, the only come-back is to mention race. The intellectuals are confident the reader will self-censor on that topic, and the pseudo-Enlightenment fiction of calling a “Khalid” a “true European” by virtue of birthplace will keep the unreconstructed White folks silent until it is too late for them to do anything about demographic trends.

  11. Sir Charles Pipkins's Gravatar Sir Charles Pipkins
    March 31, 2017 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

    My father was a dog
    My mother was a dog
    All my ancestors were dogs
    Before they evolved into dogs my ancesors were wolves
    I look like a dog
    I act like a dog

    I was born in a stable
    Therefore I am a horse

  12. March 31, 2017 - 6:10 pm | Permalink

    A gun was put into the 18-year-old’s mouth while the men laughed. They crowded round her while she was on all fours and told her they were going to cut off part of her genitals and feed it to her.

    Gosh, I wonder where such predatory ideas come from. Could it have come from the people who brought Germany this?

    or this?

    or this?

    and this?

    Surely all this intense hatred for the Europeans, especially the Germans, and murderous violence is merely coincidence. After all, “copycat” crimes happen all the time although there is no traceable or apparent connection.

    A spineless, cowardly race that refuses to stand against murderous violence levied against their women and offspring will most assuredly perish.

  13. Joe's Gravatar Joe
    March 31, 2017 - 7:41 pm | Permalink

    “The terrorist was born here. He was 100% British. Immigration had nothing to do with his terrorism.”

    This is the most blatant, yet ignored part of the overall insanity that afflicts ALL egalitarian-addled nations of the West. Races other than the caucasoid/Celtic/Nordic admixture can NEVER be true “British”.

    The whole idea is patently ridiculous. And the (((people))) who foist this nonsense upon us KNOW this – which makes them all the more evil. It’s like bringing a German Shepherd into Ireland and saying, “From now on, you’re an Irish Setter”. Utterly ridiculous.

    • Eonic's Gravatar Eonic
      April 1, 2017 - 3:02 am | Permalink

      Ridiculous it is but it flourishes as “Magic Dirt” theory, ie that your location almost alone determines your abilities.

  14. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    April 1, 2017 - 12:43 pm | Permalink

    The globalists who spout this, “Everyone born here is one of us.” drivel have an agenda and a narrative to protect. I doubt they even believe it themselves. As the soppy, saccharine sweet Google homepage of cartoon people all holding hands and being ever so thrilled to be in such different company proves, globalists live in a fantasy land.

    It’s a fantasy fueled by the very real fear that non-adherence will quickly lead to social ostracization. The motivation to keep up the pretense that it’s working, or will eventually work, is strong. After all, the architects of this agenda and narrative have everything riding on its promulgation. They cannot allow it to fail.

    Thus, their lackeys feel the pressure to write and speak ever more asinine, threadbare, ridiculous promotions of this narrative. It’s as if a narrative that the sky is green came into fashion, and even though you can clearly look up and see that the sky is not at all green, you’re instructed to never do so, and woe be it unto you if you dare to utter that you see blue, and not green.

  15. Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
    April 2, 2017 - 8:09 am | Permalink

    Tobias Langdon makes the most crucial point of all: that Ethnic Identity has nothing to do with nationality, citizenship or where your mother happened to be when you popped out into the world. Britons born in Hong Kong will never be Chinese. Ethnic Identity means your ANCESTRAL HOMELANDS, where your ANCESTORS have lived for more than a thousand years. The ancestral homeland of European Australians, Americans, South Africans, and “white people” all over the world is Europe, no matter where they were born, and the same goes for the other 3 main ethnic groups on the planet, whose ancestral homelands are in Africa, the Orient, and the Indian Subcontinent/Middle East.

    Another crucial point is that, due to a reluctance to educate themselves about the 1400-year history of Islamic Imperialist Invasions, and about the most basic tenet of the Islamic Sex Slave Death Cult, many westerners fall for the Marxist/Globalist propaganda that terrorist attacks are somehow “all our fault”, as if their poor darling little innocent Muslims wouldn’t swarm here and hate us if “we” hadn’t bombed their countries. When did we ever bomb Somalia, Ghana, Senegal, etc., etc.? Somalians are taking over Minnesota, yet nary a bomb was dropped on Somalia!

    We need to understand that the Globalist wars in the Middle East were deliberately designed as PRETEXTS to create fake refugees, while CULLING THE GOYIM at the same time, and that the VAST MAJORITY of all those killed and maimed in those wars, like all modern wars, have been Europeans. We must RESIST WHITE GUILT TRIPS being shovelled onto us by Pro-Muslim westerners pretending to be patriots, while undermining us at every turn.

  16. John's Gravatar John
    April 3, 2017 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    Very good article from Tobias. All you can really do is ridicule these cuck intellectuals.

  17. Winston S Mythe's Gravatar Winston S Mythe
    April 7, 2017 - 1:30 am | Permalink

    Isn’t this globalised world wonderful? If I were born in China and committed a crime, I’m sure the police and the media wouldn’t treat me any differently, as I’d just be another Chinaman like everybody else.

Comments are closed.