Are Policies Promoted By Jewish Elites Really “Good For The Jews”?

Beau Albrecht

Today, Middle America is caught between the vice grips of plutocracy and crazy leftist policies.  The two major parties offer us a choice between lukewarm neo-conservatism and cultural Marxist influenced liberalism, and neither cares about the common people.  There’s plenty of blame to go around, though it’s well-documented here that a disproportionate amount of it is from the influence of Jewish elites.  The details are indelicate but unmistakable.

Still, there’s a great difference between ordinary Jews and their elites.  Most of the former are decent people, and most of the latter deserve to be deported and in many cases should be in prison for financial chicanery or treason.  Do the policies of their elites really benefit the common Members of the Tribe?  Since “Is it good for the Jews?” is the primary consideration, let’s see how well it’s been working out so far.  First we’ll explore in a fictional example how that might work out for one of them.

David’s story

1979:  David enters college, with ambitions to be a doctor.  He also wants to start a large family some day.  He soon finds that radical feminism is all the rage on campus.  That began with the Second Wave harpies; a movement that just doesn’t know when to shut up.  Thus, unpleasant attitudes are common.  He supports feminism too – that’s just about equality, right?  After David is shot down hard repeatedly, it leaves him terrified of asking anyone out.  Eventually he gives up trying to find a girlfriend, reasoning that he’ll have more time to hit the books.

1990:  Now a full-fledged doctor, he anticipates a pretty good cash flow.  He looks for a house, but finds out there’s no way in hell he can afford one in Los Angeles, especially with the Federal Reserve’s prime rate at 10%.  At least it’s not 20% like ten years ago!  He gets an apartment in Watts instead.  Being a socially conscious liberal, he considers it his life’s work to serve the underprivileged, and at least here he can be near his clientele.  He figures he’ll fit right in; after all, as Franz Boas and Ashley Montagu revealed, race is only a social construct, right?

1991:  Getting into business was more difficult than he expected.  David still struggles with red tape, something with which he has little experience.  Figuring out how to make a small business work turned out to be a daunting task.  Although the government gives many advantages to big businesses, there’s not much to help a little guy starting out.  Further, he’s paying off a whale of a student loan, as well as an exorbitant premium for malpractice insurance.  He’s a very careful doctor, but malpractice insurance is a necessity because of all the bottom-feeder lawyers and their clients looking to win the lottery in court.  He has to get credit cards to stay afloat, and soon he’s barely able to afford minimum payments.  He begins to loathe bankers.  He wonders, “If banking is supposedly a Jewish institution, like those anti-Semites say, then why am I getting screwed?”

1992:  After a few years in practice, David is breaking even, but still barely chipping away at his millstone of debt.  One burglary and two muggings later, he’s getting just a bit sick of Watts.  He hadn’t fit in as easily as expected, getting angry glares frequently.  A couple times he asks, are they aware of how much the Jews did for them in the civil rights movement?  That gets a pretty bad reaction!  Then in April, the LA riots erupt.  After cowering in his apartment watching the mayhem on TV, he finds that his doctor’s office was torched, just like all the Korean shopkeepers.  He takes the hint and moves.

2000:  David is now doing quite well in plastic surgery.  His credit cards are paid off – still a very bitter experience for him – and his student loan is way down.  In He invests money in some hot new tech stocks that his broker says are soaring.  Soon after, they plummet.  His broker encourages him to hang on; surely they’ll recover.  They do somewhat, then fall even lower.  At the end of the year, he cashes out, incurring a huge loss.

2001:  After the September 11 attacks, David wonders, “Why do they hate us?”  He recalls the words of his grandfather, who had scared the daylights out of him with stories about their people’s past persecutions.  He was told that Gentiles are irrational that way; it’s just what they do.  David, having received no ill-treatment from his peers thus far, thought his grandfather was a bit behind the times.  However, the terrorist attacks make David wonder if perhaps the old man was right.  In response, he starts donating heavily to a group combating “hate”.

2002:  David once again considers starting a family.  Finally he’s financially secure, so why not?  One of his brothers married a Salvadoran, and the other a Filipina; they have agreeable personalities because they grew up in countries not polluted by feminism.  He asked his brothers why carrying on their heritage isn’t important.  One laughed and said, “Aren’t you supposed to be this big liberal?”  The other one told him flat-out that in the 21st Century, ethnicity doesn’t matter.  Besides, everyone will mix together and look the same one day, and that’s “progress”, right?  His objection — “But we’re different!” — falls on deaf ears.  In any case, David hasn’t had much luck so far in the dating arena.  He thought being a doctor would make him a great catch; it turns out that isn’t the case!  This is especially so in Los Angeles, where Hollywood celebrity-worship made everyone want to land a movie star.

2004:  Finally David gets a steady girlfriend, sharing his religion — maybe this could be the real thing!  Destiny intervenes when she gets pregnant.  He’s ecstatic, but she wants to get an abortion — “But what about my career?”  As a doctor, he’s heard plenty about what that really involves.  It’s very hard to break through her feminist programming, but he talks her away from the brink.  To the delight of their parents, they get married.  When she looks into her son’s eyes for the first time, she knows she made the right decision not to kill him.  He will be their only child; the pursuit of career fueled by consumerism robbed her of her most fertile years.  As for now, David decides he’ll need to invest for his family’s future.  His new broker turns him onto the next big thing:  mortgage backed securities.  These were made possible by the repeal of post-Depression measures separating investment banking from commercial banking.

2007:  David operates on a veteran injured in Iraq, his face scarred by an IED.  Afterward, he angrily fumes about Bush the Younger’s military adventures, all to get cheap oil.  On the way home, he fills his gas tank — “What, it’s almost five bucks a gallon now?”  At home, he reads the paper, noticing an op-ed by a Washington neocon, arguing that America should invade Iran and Syria too.  Something just doesn’t seem right about the whole narrative, but he can’t quite put his finger on it…

2008:  Once again, David loses his shirt as his top-quality investments plummet.  His business declines as everyone is cutting their expenses.  He tries to get a bank loan, but they turn him down.  Pressured by the Clinton administration and by lawsuits from “community organizers”, the bankers had been giving loans to anyone with a pulse; but all that changed.  David has to go back into credit card debt to make ends meet, though he’d prefer to chew his liver out.  So much for any hopes of early retirement…  “G­­-d damn Republicans!  I’m going to campaign for Obama!”  Meanwhile, Wall Street billionaires lobby for a huge government bailout; they’re “too big to fail”.  He hears some nasty anti-Semitic talk about Wall Street being a big Jewish casino.  He mutters, “They’re wrong; what the hell good did it do for me?”

2012:  David’s eight year old son announces that he wants to try being a girl.  David doesn’t care to have his kid become a eunuch, or his future hope for grandchildren to be washed down the drain of some bathhouse.  So he has to carefully explain to his son that he’s what nature made him to be.  He has a talk with the school administrators, getting quite an education himself about what they’ve been teaching.  “Look, I’m liberal too, but this is going too far.”  They tell him to stop being so intolerant.  Later, he reads news about a new Section 8 housing project in the neighborhood.  He has mixed feelings about that one.

2013:  Things aren’t going so well.  David’s son is getting hassled by newly-arrived Muslim immigrant kids at school.  When he finally fights back, the school administrators punish him and threaten to expel him if he defends himself again.  Further, ever since the Section 8 development came in, the neighborhood has been declining.  Business is doing better again, but moving to a gated community is far out of his price range.  When the car is in the shop, David takes public transit.  Fully immersed in the vibrancy of Los Angeles, he reflects that California doesn’t look much like it did when he grew up.  He always considered diversity a good thing, but how much is too much?  The way things are going, any grandchildren he might have will be living in a Third World country.

2014:  David is accosted by half a dozen members of a Black agitation group.  He pleads, “But I voted for Obama twice, and even campaigned for him.  We should be friends.  I’m not like those other White people, I’m….”  They attack, and ironically, he ends up in the same hospital where he did his internship.

David’s enlightenment

When he gets home, he researches this agitation group, and finds out who’s been funding it and dozens of other front groups.  The truth is horrifying.  He keeps researching, and can’t stop even though he really doesn’t like what he finds.  He discovers the prominent Jewish role in several catastrophic trends.  He even learns that the “watchdog” group he contributed to for years is a scam, run by a degenerate.

Then one of his old friends from high school comes back to town, a long-distance truck driver with a family of four children in Utah.  They go out to a bar and catch up.  Eventually the discussion turns to politics.  David considered his friend to have dreadfully provincial views, but perhaps this goyisches Kopf was on the right track about a few things.  Loosened up by several beers, David discusses what he’s recently discovered.

His friend replies, “I already know about all that.  Word gets around; a lot more than you might suspect.  I haven’t mentioned it before because I didn’t want to hurt your feelings.  If all they wanted to do was make money, I could understand it, but they really need to knock it off with the social engineering.  People are getting angry about it, and I’m afraid it might get worse the longer this sort of thing goes on.  They’re giving your community a very bad reputation.”

“Here’s what I don’t get.  They were doing this all for people like me?  A hell of a lot of good I got out of all that!  They’ve been wrecking everything, even though America was the best home we ever had.  What the hell were they thinking?

“Welcome to my world.”

“What do you mean by that?”

“All those Jewish big shots you mentioned don’t really give a damn about you.  My own politicians and big business figures aren’t working for my best interests either.  Do you really think the Clintons, for example, care about people like me?  And how about Obama?  This ‘Lightworker’ was sold to the public as some big Messiah who was going to heal the country, but are his own people prosperous and happy now?  Did Ted Kennedy care about my family’s future?  I certainly don’t give him a free pass for being Irish like me; think about that one carefully.  The greater question, though, is what we’re going to do to save the society that both of us live in.”

If this was a survival strategy, it completely backfired

Not everyone has gone through the tribulations of our fictional David here.  Even so, it would be hard to find any common people — Jewish or non-Jewish — whose lives haven’t been negatively affected by plutocracy or by cultural Marxism (feminism, racial agitation, GLBT evangelism, and many other flavors of leftist craziness).  Their elites are the greatest producers of all this, but their own people are its greatest consumers too.  Stopping the madness would be a win-win situation for everyone.

For example, Jewish birth rates are even lower than exorbitantly-taxed Europeans.  The main cause of this is toxic feminism, in which they had a pretty big role.  The picture looks even worse for them considering that by far the most fertile section of their population is the ultra-Orthodox, who are basically their equivalent of “rednecks”.  This is true both in Israel and elsewhere.  Looking to the distant future, the mass media one day might be inherited by Al-Jazeera, Univision, or perhaps Scientology.

Their intermarriage rates are also decimating their community.  The ones at the top have been pushing multiculturalism as a sociopolitical battering ram.  Many of their common people didn’t get the memo that this wasn’t supposed to apply to them.  There are voices in the Jewish community who are aware of this.  I’ve seen their anguish.  It’s rather ironic; they want for their people what I want for mine.

About two thirds of the Jewish community is outside of Israel.  Of those, the vast majority lives in urban populations in the USA and Europe.  There, they are the most susceptible to the effects of multiculturalism and racial agitation.  (The Crown Heights incident should be instructive.)  This is especially so in Europe, now swarming with Muslims who dislike Jews even more than the native populations they’ve invaded.  Are these really the smartest people on the face of the earth?

Finally, treachery by their elites is giving everyone in their community a bad name.  Being in control of the media (which is part of that problem) only goes so far to cover it up.  The sooner the ordinary Jews realize that their so-called leaders have sold them out and gravely endangered their future, the better.  Switching to a peaceful coexistence strategy would indeed be good for the Jews, but repeating past mistakes will lead to mutually assured destruction.

Beau Albrecht blogs at Return of Kings.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

76 Comments to "Are Policies Promoted By Jewish Elites Really “Good For The Jews”?"

  1. I.W.'s Gravatar I.W.
    April 1, 2017 - 9:56 am | Permalink

    This is gatekeeping for “ordinary Jews” at its finest.

    • Ttenchant's Gravatar Ttenchant
      April 2, 2017 - 12:49 am | Permalink

      Not lachrymose enough.

    • ariadnatheo's Gravatar ariadnatheo
      April 2, 2017 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

      @I.W. I disagree about “at its finest.” I think it is mediocre at best. I hope the author does not plan to leave his day job and dedicate himself to writing.
      As mehitabel said to archie, paw on breast, he just “doesn’t have it here.”
      It’s all as authentic as a three-dollar bill and as appealing as nails scratching a blackboard back and forth, back and forth.

  2. April 1, 2017 - 11:29 am | Permalink

    Don’t forget you’re chosen by G-d.

  3. BlackedOut's Gravatar BlackedOut
    April 1, 2017 - 11:31 am | Permalink

    We keep hearing about how smart they are. Why haven’t more than a handful figured this out by now?

  4. Dan marotta's Gravatar Dan marotta
    April 1, 2017 - 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article which I shall share, All the best.

  5. Tom Paine's Gravatar Tom Paine
    April 1, 2017 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

    I appreciate the intent of the article but I seriously doubt there are very many Jews, if any, at any educational level, that are as naive as the guy portrayed here. The “little” Jew may not share the same objectives as “big Jew” but in the final analysis, they all enable one another. For example, a non-religious Jew may feel the quaint customs of “chicken twirling” (kapparot) and mohels performing fellatio on newly circumcised baby boys are way over the top personally, but he’ll fight tooth and nail for his coreligionists to continue such practices because they’re Jews. I deal with Jews the same way I deal with “people of color”. Avoid them when you can, tolerate them when you have to and never, ever turn your back on them.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      April 1, 2017 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

      This “little Jew” is portrayed as a naive individualist, which is what Jews never are. They are cunning and help each other. Thus they are able to avoid most disadvantages of their own policies. Trying to appeal to a sense of “betrayal” of the little Jews by the Big Jews is in vain. They will help each other no matter what, all for the Higher Purpose of the ultimate Jewish victory over the Goyim. It is like a nation in war. Ordinary citizens will accept certain inconveniences if it helps the war effort. The Jews consider themselves “at war” with us already for 3000 years. They cannot be talked out of that idea.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      April 3, 2017 - 10:43 am | Permalink

      Tom, you are too kind in characterizing this voodoo-like chicken-twirling as a quaint custom. Though it is my favorite Exhibit A.

      Exhibit B is the briefest of CNN shots of a very common-looking Jewish female senior, speaking straight into the camera, while Madoff is being led off, handcuffed, right next to her. That he had impartially stolen from Jewish charities as well was disclosed shortly before:


      Nothing written over millennia can add to this simple Talmudic sentiment. Left or right, rich or poor, Zionism or idealistic Judaism, this is a religious and racial MISCHPOCHE. [ Yiddish for ‘ family ‘: not to be confused with that other one, though similar in organization and methods employed to attain goals ].

      • PPight1931's Gravatar PPight1931
        April 3, 2017 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

        Excellent @Charles Frey! But I’m not leaving it without further embellishment :)

        Not only that but Madoff was a monumental shande far di goyim AND not forgetting
        “Madoff wife says “‘Gentiles Are Responsible For This'”

        In fact unless I missed it, I did not hear it in that 4:37 clip but I have a vague recollection of a much shorter audio circulating around the same time of the wife herself actually saying as much, which clip I had till a RAID array died. It’s out there… somewhere.

        So we can add chutzpah and psychological projection too!

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          April 4, 2017 - 9:45 am | Permalink

          Your link is ” MUST ” viewing; incredible, were it not documented and filmed; thanks. It additionally reminds one of the two sons of {{{Robert Maxwell}}} who also pled ignorance of what their father was doing. They ended up being defended by tax-payer funded Legal Aid.

          It corroborates that which is not in need of corroboration: making it a ‘fact’. To make it a ‘non-fact’ we spend hundreds of millions in the entire West annually to fight ” anti-Semitism “: from Special Envoys at the White House, State, DOJ, DOD, Congress, Brussels, Berlin, London, Paris; including their legislating Legislators: defecating, at {{{their}}} behest, on our civil liberties. Thanks again ! Your closing line is more than valid.

        • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
          April 4, 2017 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

          So we can add chutzpah and psychological projection too!

          The Jew has a genetically-based spell cast over him:

          “Thy shall perceive the world as hostile, and thyself as merely engaging in defensive action against it. Thus, thy shall be unfettered in thy aggression, whilst being as deceptive to the world as thy is to thyself. In this manner, thy shall conquer the world.”

  6. quackademic's Gravatar quackademic
    April 1, 2017 - 2:07 pm | Permalink

    “He hears some nasty anti-Semitic talk about Wall Street being a big Jewish casino.” According to the former president of Brazil Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva it’s the “blue-eyed” bankers dominating Wall Street who caused the recession. Google this Guardian article from 26 March 2009 titled ‘Blue-Eyed Bankers’ to Blame For Crash, Lula Tells Brown’ to read more about his absurd statement.

  7. Peter J's Gravatar Peter J
    April 1, 2017 - 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Where there’s muck, there’s brass…

    The Jews know that there is plenty of brass handy (asset stripping and exploitation) in a state of anarchy…but that the situation needs to be navigated carefully…

    They always come up smelling of roses…don’t worry for them…they know the score (because they write it)…

    All this crap about reaching an entente with the Jews or with the Muslims or with the Commies is bullshit…it isn’t going to happen. There is real animosity here (and not from our side) and plenty of lucre…appeasement isn’t clever….

  8. Maple Curtain's Gravatar Maple Curtain
    April 1, 2017 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

    I’m not sure whether to label this Jew apologia as incredibly naive or laughable agitprop, but, whatever it is, it doesn’t belong on TOO. I’m with Tom Paine above: never turn your back on a Jew.

  9. Mike R.'s Gravatar Mike R.
    April 1, 2017 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    I went to med school with quite a few tribe members and none of them were this naive. Not to mention they had a much easier time getting into med school and during residency because of the tribal insider status.

    I’m sure some get gyped by the frauds on wall st. from time to time, but you can’t even begin to argue they’re having as hard a time as white goyim in the same socioeconomic class. Whites suffer exponentially more from the poz because any group or organization that would oppose poz for whites is forbidden. Jews on the other hand have a hundred such organizations and they’re actively celebrated.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      April 3, 2017 - 9:46 am | Permalink

      Mike, with respect to your second sentence. You may recall, that ca. 8 years ago Vanderbilt was in a heap of trouble for having put out an official paper, stating that they preferred Jewish applicants. These, apparently, were better-read, intellectually more original, productive and a host of other heavenly things.

      Compared to whom ?

      Obviously the children of {{{furniture factories’}}} workers hardly able to put food on the table, with their wives working as well.

      Of course Vanderbilt draws from their wide choice of applicants, nationally and internationally, many of whom come from comparative affluence similar to that of Jews, affording leisure time for pre-college reading.

      Even so, the Jewish applicants were OFFICIALLY declared more valuable by an Administration that was undoubtedly equally co-opted by their own. A microcosm of what ails the world.

      ” Kissed better ” by a few scholarships to those unable to afford tuition and attendant costs, as long as they are
      ” promising” applicants. ” Promising ” what ? To ever after revere and support their benefactors’ politics; either in general or in particular ?

      • Don's Gravatar Don
        April 5, 2017 - 4:36 pm | Permalink

        I can understand this point of view regarding Jewish polish. At a dinner party type situation, I prefer the company of Jewish professionals over most “Christians” who are shallow, poorly read and more interested in beer and football than in any serious subject. Most Jews I know are high end people (not wall street billionaires) by which I mean white collar and not blue collar. That being said, they are much less interested in professional sports than goyim, read more, are more historically aware and have a strong sense of ethnic identity. The people in the WN “movement” are exceptions, but there are not enough of us to pull the white race across the finish line…at least not yet. Hopefully that will change. I have more hope for younger whites than for older ones. Younger ones, who have been mugged in the school bathroom by MUDS, are far more realistic on racial issues and seem less interested in sports than older generations. I find this encouraging.

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          April 5, 2017 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

          Please don’t invite this dumb goy to your next dinner party. I fear I may not be able to keep up with Harvard polished intellectuals of the caliber of Derschowitz, Kagan and Summers, who demonstrated their scholarly and lawyerly respect for the First Amendment, integrity and highmindedness by ganging up on iconoclast Finkelstein and having him terminated as Professor. The vino-swilling mob would not sink that low.

          The same goes for the faculty of Harvard’s Economics Department, which was foremost and instrumental in stealing the pitiable Russians blind; for the second time in a century, through their privatization program blueprint, entirely without a prerequisite legal framework: just like Dodge before Dillon. While polished white collar Professor Sachs of Columbia also couldn’t keep his long fingers out of the cash register.

          You might even prefer the extremely polished Jewish election fixers imported to Russia from New York to raise the 15% popularity of that drunk Yeltsin to 73% to get him elected to effect your polished friends’ grand theft of the majority of the Russians’ resources; though state-owned, accumulated under unimaginable individual hardships and wholesale murder under your other polished, preferred friends, starting in 1917.

  10. tadzio308's Gravatar tadzio308
    April 1, 2017 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

    This article is going in the direction of teaming up with some good Jews. No thanks. There is no future in setting oneself up for a double cross. Put some on security and soon the city’s gates will be opened. Jews are a people who choose to live apart. Let them. Require it.

  11. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    April 1, 2017 - 6:34 pm | Permalink

    I have read only the title and have no time to read the rest. Jewish policies are often monumental disasters for Jews. Most obviously looking at history, their policies brought enormous disgraces upon them. They remind me of Thomas Sowell hotep that says the following. Stupid people do only a limited amount of damage. In order to have a monumental disaster you need high-IQ people.

    It is pointless to advice Jews, they are ill-advized by their own Borderline Personality Disorder (sociopaths). No disgrace that has visited them has taught them anything at all. Thinking back, when I visited Israel in 2004 for 4 months, Jews did have this air of superiority that I have never seen anywhere else in the world.

    If only Jews managed well their commanding positions upon us, that would be less disaster for us and for them. But there is no point. We must take them down one way or another, assimilation or expulsion, or limitation of rights of Jews, whatever works. Affirmative Action is known to discriminate against Whites. Why are Jewish quotas that bad? Jewish quotas would actually accelerate Jewish assimilation. Whoever can’t get a position in US, would emigrate to Israel. The fewer and smarter left behind would assimilate at an increased rate.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      April 4, 2017 - 12:29 am | Permalink

      Alas, the musts, shoulds, woulds, and if onlys in the third paragraph above serve primarily as wry reminders of the wisdom of Mother Goose:

      If “if”s and “an”s were pots and pans,
      There’d be no work for tinkers!

      Were Mother Goose given to plainer speech, she’d probably note dryly that Jewish assimilation won’t happen till at least a week after hell freezes over.

      What’s more, since we all ought to be thanking our lucky stars that it will never happen, why even raise the point as if it were a desideratum?

  12. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    April 1, 2017 - 8:58 pm | Permalink

    Are the policies pushed by Jewish elites good for “average Jews”? Who cares? The fact that their tendencies to prey upon Gentiles eventually causes the majority population they are preying upon to respond with violence against them, is of absolutely no consequence for us as Whites.

    Are we to take some solace in the fact that the their scheme to destroy our civilization will also destroy their own? The last place we need to look for allies is among the Jewish community. To even consider making common cause with any of them is to expose yourself to their machinations.

    The attitudes of Jews should be assumed to be hostile toward our interests, regardless of what any particular Jew says or does. Their very presence within our societies IS THE PROBLEM. How they feel about our desire to expel them from our midst is not particularly important…or relevant.

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      April 1, 2017 - 11:59 pm | Permalink

      “The last place we need to look for allies is among the Jewish community. To even consider making common cause with any of them is to expose yourself to their machinations. ”

      My sentiments exactly, Bob. When I started reading this article and came upon this paragraph:

      “Still, there’s a great difference between ordinary Jews and their elites. Most of the former are decent people, and most of the latter deserve to be deported and in many cases should be in prison for financial chicanery or treason.”

      I lost all interest in proceeding any further. And, it reminded me that this is the second time in recent weeks I’ve seen an article posted on TOO, ostensibly written by someone who claims to be jewish and which appears to be attempting to persuade (con) racially healthy Whites into believing that we should allow jews to worm their way into our ‘alt-right’ movement and actually buy into the idea that they are sincere and can be trusted as dependable allies in this epic battle for White European racial and cultural survival.

      Well, I don’t believe it. Throughout world history, jews have repeatedly used deception to snooker Whites into believing that they’ve reformed and have even pretended to become loyal Christians – and every time Whites have bought into that con, and dropped their guards and relented on the issue of giving jews their walking papers – these devious jews have gone right back to doing what they always do – subverting, exploiting, and working to undermine and destroy White nations.

      I would recommend that the author of this article set aside a half hour of his time and listen to the ADV broadcast by Dr. Pierce titled: ‘The Scorpion and The Frog’

      The Scorpion And The Frog by Dr. William Luther Pierce

      Oh, and by the way. I am open the idea that there could be rare cases whereby a tiny number of jews might not support the White genocide agenda which is being pushed by the jewish elite and some of these jews feel motivated to try to help fight against this agenda. If so, I welcome their help – but, with one caveat. They should form their own groups and organizations and fight alongside the Alt-right – but do not expect the Alt-right to let them join our movement.

      We do not want to see or allow hyper-aggressive jews to flood into the Alt-right, elbow aside the White leadership and take our movement over – which has been a tactic jews have used throughout their history to take control of any movement that they perceive to oppose their own racial group’s agenda.

      • April 3, 2017 - 3:22 am | Permalink

        I wish you were wrong and that we could welcome right-minded Jews as brothers-in-arms. Sadly you’re not wrong.

    • Paul Harvey's Gravatar Paul Harvey
      April 2, 2017 - 1:45 am | Permalink

      Jews embody a variety of mindsets and values but the one that is most consequential for America is the one that takes pleasure in destroying the old gentile mores and institutions. It seems to be paying off handsomely for its devotees. The problem may be that gentiles still haven’t learned how to argue effectively against cultural Marxism. The deference shown to the pseudo-science of psychology stands out in particular. Why does nobody ever challenge the intellectual authority of this subject that can predict nothing and is third-rate physiology at best? Ironically, Hitler discusses at length the need to anticipate the other side’s arguments and replies and have simple, accessible refutations ready, yet those who are said to be his contemporary devotees show no interest in this skill.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        April 2, 2017 - 11:45 am | Permalink

        The problem may be that gentiles still haven’t learned how to argue effectively against cultural Marxism.

        This remark implies that we have a free society with free and open debate.

        95% of all research is funded by the Federal government, which is jew controlled. Who controls textbook publishing? Them again. Media? Them again.

        The first amendment is almost gone at the universities.

        Psychology a pseudo-science? Why? Please elaborate here or submit an article.

        • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
          April 3, 2017 - 6:09 am | Permalink

          Spot on, T.J. Our options to argue are even more miserable in Europe, as we hardly can name the Jew in other circumstances than clearly flattering to the Tribe. When it comes to Gentile adherents of cultural marxism, most of them are selected for their low IQ.

      • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
        April 2, 2017 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

        ”The deference shown to the pseudo-science of psychology stands out in particular”

        Psychology is not a pseudo-science, just think about the power of the word racism to think if psychology is pseudo in any instance.

      April 2, 2017 - 8:39 am | Permalink

      So what to do about them. A mass revolt would be a start, flying the Nationalist banner and dont be intimidated by the marxist filth. They want violence, they can have it. Either you wake up,white people, or your kids are doomed to a life of usury and slavery. 14

    • April 2, 2017 - 8:56 am | Permalink

      Their very presence within our societies IS THE PROBLEM.
      Well said, Bob. We do not need to care whether the foreigners are friendly. Their presence is the problem and might well be the cause of the extinction of the white race/the European folks.
      We have that same problem with foreigners in Germany. In the open they say: “We are all human beings, let us live together in peace and harmony.” But when we Germans are not present, of cause they acknowledge to their brethren that they are a distinct group. “Political Correctness” (forced upon the German folk) hinders most Germans to fight loud and clear against this situation.

      If we allow non-white foreigners to come into our land and stay here, than our childen/grandchildren will loose their country, their folk, their identity, their chance to find a partner and to have children which are lookalikes of them.
      We want our country for us. We need it for us. There is no other way, because otherwise we cannot survive.

    • Don's Gravatar Don
      April 5, 2017 - 4:28 pm | Permalink

      You’re right about the Jewish community being the “last place” to recruit for he cause of WHITE survival. If they want to escape the doom brought by their fellow tribesmen (and tribeswomen) let them police their own and take down the ADL, SPLC, etc. Until that happens, forget it and dont’ be deluded by the mystique and myth of the “good” jew.

  13. Ttenchant's Gravatar Ttenchant
    April 1, 2017 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

    None of the Jews I have known or grew up with – even the objectively less successful ones – had as little Jewish self-consciousness as this “David”, a goyische projection, I dare say.

    As to the question posed by the article, the answer must be: yes, they are good! Jews occupy the commanding heights in all major Western nations, and they won’t be ceding that position voluntarily (insert preferred apocalyptic scenario). Loser Jews can be shucked off to the greater benefit of the core.

  14. Ttenchant's Gravatar Ttenchant
    April 1, 2017 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

    “After the September 11 attacks, David wonders, ‘Why do they hate us?'”
    Legitimate question, best put to Ehud Barak. (Sprat to catch a mackerel).

  15. Ttenchant's Gravatar Ttenchant
    April 1, 2017 - 10:44 pm | Permalink

    “Finally David gets a steady girlfriend, sharing his religion…”

    Similar casuistry will get short shrift here.

  16. Sloppy Joe's Gravatar Sloppy Joe
    April 2, 2017 - 12:28 am | Permalink

    April Fools Article?

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      April 2, 2017 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

      I’d say so.

  17. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    April 2, 2017 - 2:03 am | Permalink

    Mr. Alethia, you need to stop writing articles under different aliases.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      April 2, 2017 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

      You are probably right. There is a consistent attempt at pleading for the “good Jews” in his writings. Here it is the proverbial “innocent little Jew”. He says he is not trying to “infiltrate”, but he is doing just that.

  18. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    April 2, 2017 - 2:42 am | Permalink

    April Fools!

    • I.W.'s Gravatar I.W.
      April 2, 2017 - 10:31 am | Permalink

      @Karen T

      “April Fools” were yesterday dear. We’ve learned much since then, the old-fashioned way.

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        April 2, 2017 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

        The article was posted April 1st.

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        April 2, 2017 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

        I feel so precious and beloved today. You are the 3rd person to address me as “dear”. The first was the clerk at the grocery, the second the waitress at brunch.

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          April 3, 2017 - 4:46 pm | Permalink

          And I am the fourth to call you ‘dear’, though a day late.

          I feel remorse for not having answered you after you recommended that I expand my comment into an essay on March 27, under Wald’s Neocons etc. I do have time however, to make good on a glaring omission with regard to my thesis that the two MH flights were downed as a message to Mahathir Mohammad [ for reasons named ] with the bonus of sweeping the MH 17 downing before Putin’s door.

          Consider this additional incident and its at minimum plausible connection.

          ON MARCH 17, 2015, the WSJ announced:
          ” The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank is seen as challenger to Washington-based World Bank. Germany, France and Italy followed the UK’s lead in applying to join a China-led international development bank, lending the weight of Europe’s largest economies to the project despite US opposition “.

          [ The WSJ was silent on the Russian geographic and functional link; particularly in selling it westward ].

          Of course this would re-establish the old Silk Road overland; out of reach of aircraft carriers.

          We are made to believe that the ” pilot suicide crash ” of Germanwings 9525 [ Barcelona-Duesseldorf ], which happened, YES, ON MARCH 24, 2015, ONE WEEK AFTER THE WSJ ARTICLE, is a coincidence. While all adults know that such an additional crash of an airliner belonging to one offending applicant to the Asian International Development Bank downed over the territory of another, is a more effective and unmistakable ” message ” than a hundred pound document sent by diplomatic pouch.

          Yes, but how can you do that you ask ?

          Assume you have a credit card with a very generous limit or none at all and access to a computer.

          You then go to Systems Planning Corporation in Arlington and click on contact. Then, with a little recommendation from your friends, you order one of their Radar Physics Laboratory’s ” USER FRIENDLY ” FLIGHT TERMINATION SYSTEMS.

          Have it shipped to drug-import Customs-corrupted Marseilles, rent a little fishing trawler and lie in wait at the place where Germanwings gains full altitude, just before it reaches the Alps; for a guaranteed return on investment, such as faces pealed off skulls, and tiny parts of corpses; including those of 16 returning German school-children among the 150.

          One victim was an American woman, whose accompanying mother was an employee of then Booz-Hamilton, defense contractors with research into the Ebola virus. Booz also employed Snowden. The ordained, dual-citizen rabbi Dov Zakheim, son of a Polish immigrant rabbi, was on the Board of Booz; CFO of the Pentagon when it lost 2.3 billions, according to a video by Rumsfeld. He ran the company that repaired the Trade Towers after 1993, giving him access and blueprints. Notice, if you will, the difference between his Wikipedia description and the slightly more comprehensive and entirely correct one on, including his co-authorship of PNAC.

          MH 370’s disappearance, for Mahathir Mohamad’s audacity to create the 57- member Organization of Islamic Cooperation, with its economic and monetary union, is most likely explained as well by these motivations and weapons of mass destruction, albeit in {{{benign}}} hands. I would be happy to add to the disappearance of MH 17 in the Ukraine, if you are interested, with greater involvement by triple-citizenship, Kiev-appointed Jewish multi-billionaire Kolomoysky.

          I didn’t consult my washed crystal ball this time ’round. It’s all on the net, ready for connecting the dots plausibly.

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          April 4, 2017 - 7:05 pm | Permalink

          My apologies. The ordained rabbi, as CFO of the Pentagon did not lose 2.3 Billion, but
          2.3 TRILLION.
          As reported by Rumsfeld on national news one day prior to 9/11, [ youtube ] which latter naturally and conveniently dominated the news and our attention.

          This represents ca. 10% of our National Debt. Did the business savvy Trump ever think of the cost/benefit factor in commissioning a small forensic auditing firm in his vaunted effort to drain the swamp ?

          On the other hand such firm would have to count on its vengeful destruction for its alleged anti-Semitism when it came across fit fighter aircraft having been ” sold ” to Israel for peanuts, which the American taxpayer also provided to them.

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      April 2, 2017 - 4:23 pm | Permalink

      ”Most of the former are decent people”

      Define most statistically…

      but they are … just like silent german people during nazi era, ;)

      • April 3, 2017 - 7:33 am | Permalink

        Silent people in Germany at that time were Jews and Jew-supporters. They weren’t decent people.

  19. Jud Jackson's Gravatar Jud Jackson
    April 2, 2017 - 4:39 am | Permalink

    I find it implausible that doctors (in the US anyway) could ever be short of cash especially if they are Jewish and single. Actually, I find it impossible. I never made anywhere near as much as a doctor and Ilived in LA but I didn’t have to live in Watts.

  20. m's Gravatar m
    April 2, 2017 - 5:50 am | Permalink

    As far as I know, throughout history all attempts to integrate Jews into the White order, attempting to make them helpful and productive citizens, have resulted in grief for Whites. The guy down the street making your pastrami sandwich at the deli is not your private enemy…as long as he is just making you a sandwich. However, you can bet that when the rubber meets the road, the interests of the Tribe will always come first, for him, and that makes him society’s public enemy number one.

    Public policy can never be based upon the needs of any individual. White folk get confused and worry about this sort of thing, because they somehow “feel” it is not “fair.” But we need to move away from feeling concepts such as fairness, and think rationally about justice in the classical sense–that is, giving to a people (and individuals) what is their due, based upon their nature.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      April 2, 2017 - 10:42 am | Permalink

      Public policy can never be based upon the needs of any individual.

      Except for this guy:

    • Don's Gravatar Don
      April 5, 2017 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

      Well said. And spot on. They’re harmless and friendly until there’s a conflict in which they have an interest. Note how many “conservative” Jews went off the rails when Trump proclaimed US Nationalism. They’re ok with platitudes about “limited government” “low taxes”, blah, blah, blah. But the minute you start talking about a wall or deportations, then the truth comes out. “You can’t deport 11 million people…” blah, blah, blah. Jew “conservative” lawyer Jay Sekulow is one of these. A pretty good guy on constitutional issues and 1st Amendment rights, but he’s opposed to deporting anyone. Charles Krauthammer is anotherone. Hates “nationalism.” Only Jews have a right to their own country and then if it is subsidized by American goyim.

  21. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    April 2, 2017 - 7:00 am | Permalink

    I don’t want to knock the author but ordinary Jews given a chance they would be as destructive as co-ethnics of the ruling class. Its is their nature.

    As for events like the financial crash of 2008, some investment banksters, many from the Tribe, reaped huge fortunes by short selling shares/stock and buying up distressed assets making billions by selling high later that get channelled into pro-Tribe foundations.

    The Neocon wars enriched the Military Industrial Complex with many shares owned by investors from the Tribe.

    For mass migration, Jews still rule because of money bags. You may be shocked to learn Londonistan’s mayor S Khan is kosher after being installed by Red Ed Miliband. Once a pauper Khan will need the same support to become Prime Minister. Khan knows his “limits.” He can attack the natives e.g. calling Scottish nationalists “racists” but cannot say a word against his kosher sponsors.

  22. Brent G's Gravatar Brent G
    April 2, 2017 - 9:16 am | Permalink

    The inter-marriage claim is at best weak. If anything this has allowed them to gain power through strategic couplings with Ivy League now desposed gentiles. After all you only need a Jewish mother to be a club member and the other tool is conversion e.g. ex-shiksa Ivanka’s kids will be Jewish technically.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      April 4, 2017 - 5:21 pm | Permalink

      Plus they got into the white house (an unanticipated windfall); they didn’t even have to wait for the mishlings to grow up.

  23. JRM's Gravatar JRM
    April 2, 2017 - 9:18 am | Permalink

    I agree with others who think “David” here is too innocent by half.

    The huge problem that tempts me to write this essay off as subtle satire is that it does not address Jewish hatred of the Gentile/White. If it is an attempt to really get inside the mind of “David” it fails to deal adequately with the Jewish drive for nihilistic destruction.

    If you want a simple analogy, imagine Western White Civ as a car; a Jew is at the wheel, and we current living goyim are passengers in the backseat. The driver is headed toward a cliff. Our problem: we don’t have a rational figure at the wheel, but a clever psychopath. As we plummet over the cliff, we realize our chauffeur is going to die right along with us, but all we can hear is his maniacal, hate-filled laughter.

    • I.W.'s Gravatar I.W.
      April 2, 2017 - 3:31 pm | Permalink


      Spot on!

  24. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    April 2, 2017 - 11:38 am | Permalink

    There’s one glaring problem I have with the, “good jews” canard, and that’s this: No matter what political or social beliefs a jew holds, whether he be on the so called right or left, and even those jews who agree with the tenets of National Socialism, they ALL toe one common line; they all believe that they should live in white lands with white people.

    Even if they believe that no other racial group than themselves and whites should live in white lands, they still believe they have a “god given” right to be here with us, and we’re simply not allowed to say no.

    This means that even in the best of scenarios, you still have a parasite in your house. A parasite that is willing and able to destroy your house the minute you do something it doesn’t like. The jew is a time bomb, and keeping him around is akin to nursing a wound. The reality of the jew is that his ideological, racial, and social differences make him incompatible with whites on ANY level. There is no such thing as, “the harmless jew.”

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      April 3, 2017 - 5:36 am | Permalink

      I couldn’t agree more, Fenria. I was born in 1951 and have lived in three European countries, but am still waiting to come across a harmless Jew, as all the major blows in my life – and the lives of my relatvives- were closely connected to the “Jewish genius”. Unfortunately, I didn’t know who was who until quite recently (autumn 2015) since so many of them survived the “Holocaust” and despite our European anti-Semitism have all these years after WWII been thriving in Europe, naturally only revealing their true background in circumstances they expect to be beneficial for the Tribe.

  25. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    April 2, 2017 - 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Most comments here are ‘spot on’. Glad to see such savvy rejoinders guys, most of you are indeed Jew wise.

  26. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    April 2, 2017 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

    The economic patriotism of Steve Bannon is actually a genial contraption. It completely bypasses mentions of blood and honor. It rallies everybody to the cause. We can do to Jews with )))economic patriotism((( what Jews did to us with (((fairness))).

  27. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    April 2, 2017 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    This details are not “indelicate” only because it’s “anti Semitic”??

    No, sir. “Disproportionate amount of Jews in both” no doubt is not the same than “they reinvent both to attend their goals”. Two very different things.

    It’s already your second text where you try manipulate this “indelicate details”.

  28. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    April 2, 2017 - 3:39 pm | Permalink

    The Jewish phoenix is orthodox and while decadence increase the most fertile and tribal of Jews increase their numbers. Cohencidence?

  29. JM's Gravatar JM
    April 2, 2017 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    It appears the jury has decided as can be seen by reading the interesting and insightful comments.
    On the other hand, it still has to be said that it is almost impossible to imagine the severity of the coming events and the way in which these might shift Tribal allegiances which, however, would only happen if the current relative insulation from its effects of large numbers of them was severely diminished.
    It would be more convincing if, instead of just a couple of individual writers, an organisation was set up with the specific purpose of attempting to convince their fellows of the ‘error’ of the project and supporting all means of reversing the tragedy.
    In the meantime people will no doubt do as they see fit.

    • April 3, 2017 - 5:58 am | Permalink

      …it is almost impossible to imagine the severity of the coming events and the way in which these might shift Tribal allegiances…
      The 20th century had atrocities and population shifts and bombings and political lies and the rest of it on a colossal scale; it’s only Jewish censorship that allows Americans to largely ignore them. But through it all (((Tribal))) allegiances remained solid, including tactical killings of (((Tribalists))) for their supposed common good. I think the experiment has been tried.
      I agree though that when a Jewish Action League is set up to prosecute and punish Jewish criminals and liars in the style of the SPLC etc I might take them seriously. The total failure of anything like it to appear in the 19th and 20th centuries, and for that matter the squashing of most Jew-aware organisations, shows it is preposterous. It will never happen.

  30. Gjjd's Gravatar Gjjd
    April 2, 2017 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    The biggest problem of the alt-right and the manosphere is the low quality of their contributors. These movements are victims of the Dunning-Kruger effect: the dumbest people overestimate the usefulness of their ramblings, which are mostly either unfactual nonsense, reiterations of an original idea from Richard Spencer, Kevin MacDonald, etc., or just flat-out crude and offensive hate speech that serves to only cause harm. The smartest people will never contribute for fear of doxxing.

    Everything about this article was wrong.

    Firstly, they made it sound as if it is darned near impossible to even pay for a life in America, even if you are a doctor. The reality is that doctors live damned well, and do not have financial problems. Also, doctors do not usually have to open up their own practices.

    He made it sound as if it is damned near impossible to get a girl. It is not that hard, especially if you are liberal. You have to be a really socially inept, pessimistic manboob to think it is impossible to get a girl. It might be tough, but most people do it. Rather than complaining about this issue, you should understand that learning to woo-or not scare off- a woman is a valid test of your social skill and emotional control that women use to select for good mates. Just accept modern dating for its silver lining, no one really wants to go back anyways.

    The fact that everything possible went wrong for David is stupid. The article is generally ridiculous and unlikely.

    Lastly, David is of course not representative of Jews. Jews are not that innocent and illiterate about politics and society. They are informed cosmopolitans who are into politics from a young age.

    • Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
      April 3, 2017 - 3:33 am | Permalink

      Women select on avg for avg joeys, period.

    • JM's Gravatar JM
      April 3, 2017 - 5:23 am | Permalink

      “The biggest problem of the alt-right and the manosphere is the low quality of their contributors. These movements are victims of the Dunning-Kruger effect: the dumbest people overestimate the usefulness of their ramblings, which are mostly either unfactual nonsense, reiterations of an original idea from Richard Spencer, Kevin MacDonald, etc., or just flat-out crude and offensive hate speech that serves to only cause harm. The smartest people will never contribute for fear of doxxing.”
      Pompous claim proposing that the talented are cowards devoid of principle.

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      April 3, 2017 - 6:13 am | Permalink

      This article is satire.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      April 3, 2017 - 8:54 am | Permalink

      I have known many Jews in my lifetime, including those who have married into the extended family. These Jews have been everything from taxi drivers to financial planners/traders to lawyers and doctors. Some have been ardent Zionists, others cool to the idea. Some of the ardent Zionists complained that the UN Partition plan doomed Israel to fighting its neighbours, because the partition was too complicated. In short, the Jews I have known in my lifetime – several dozen – are not a monolithic block. Most, but not all, of the “ordinary” Jews – those that are in non-professional or lower level professions like occupational therapy, nursing, etc. are pretty much like “ordinary” Whites. They don’t make buckets of money, they have to work shift work, and they face the same hazards as their White peers. The only thing that seems to bind all levels is the Event-Whose-Name-Must-Not-Be-Questioned. Even the most secular of the Jews, with whom I am acquainted, openly accept the narrative without a semblance of a solitary critical thought.
      As for doctors living well in the US. My cousins may disagree with you. Better than most people to be sure, but one of my cousin doctors continues to work at age 69 because he has to, not because he wants to, and places the blames squarely at the feet of the insurance companies who, since Obamacare, have an even tighter grip on the declining US health care system.

      • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
        April 4, 2017 - 12:10 pm | Permalink

        ” They don’t make buckets of money, they have to work shift work, and they face the same hazards as their White peers “.

        Yes, but only those who didn’t get their internal memo that informal community funds are available to those with even half-assed business plans, well below going interest rates.

        By tradition, everyone of their own is entitled to such preferential financing at least once. Twice if they have a plausible, audited explanation for their first failure.

        A friend lived in a high-rise apartment complex in Toronto; in bad need of repair and maintenance, both in the common and private areas.

        He responded to my queries with the fact, that this eight story structure, with 10-12 apartments per floor, was owned by an older recent Russian-Jewish female immigrant who had arrived without buckets of money, indeed penniless, i.e. the beneficiary of the traditional start-up arrangement.

        Half of the tenants, given the time of day, dress, etc., were working at low-paying jobs, the other half was senior Jewesses and a few Jews. These same Jews congregated for hours in a large local pizzeria, unable to converse with their servers in English, indicating that they were recent arrivals, and given their retirement age, would have to have been financially vouched for by their necessary sponsors.

        This sponsorship obligation could be, and probably is abrogated by purposeful divorces, making neither party responsible singly, or by personal bankruptcy, throwing their sponsorees on the public purse, while their free medical care continues, financed by a program they never paid into.

        Either way the high rents in a landlords’ market go into the Jewish kitty, to repeat and grow the process. I did not observe any similarities between the glittering Jewish-renaissance accoutrement of these retired fraudulently free-loading immigrants and the dress of their White working peers.

      • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
        April 4, 2017 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

        I’d say that while Jews aren’t monolithic, they are semi-monolithic.

        For example, gun control. While a majority of Jews are pro-gun control, there is a minority who are not. And this is true of everything (except the Holocaust(tm), like you pointed out.)

        Being semi-monolithic works to their advantage— at the group level, the Jews heavily promote gun control, but can deflect charges of being monolithic by highlighting individual Jews who support the 2nd amendment.

        Also, in my view, the Jews are near-monolithic on the issue of immigration. It seems like the vast majority of Jews support mass immigration and oppose immigration restriction, at least to some degree.

        That’s what I see. Monolithic on the Holocaust(tm), near-monolithic on immigration, and semi-monolithic on everything else. And their near/semi monolithic nature comes in handy, for it is a powerful tool to deflect criticism.

  31. sirlancelot's Gravatar sirlancelot
    April 3, 2017 - 6:38 am | Permalink

    Growing up in the Northeast in a large urban area all my interactions with Jewish people have been common and routine.

    With the exception of being bad tippers (actually they don’t tip at all ) have not had any serious negative effects dealing with them. Know two Jewish doctors personally and while their not exactly one step from homelessness they do have their own financial problems.

    Think the reason you don’t see more Jewish people on the right is the left has effectively labeled us as racist and white supremacists.

    Perhaps this last election will convince them to join forces against the globalists and their insane obsession to flood every country with suicidal, medieval lunatics.

    • April 3, 2017 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

      The Jewish model of their man-made race is a spread over other groups, unlike most groups, which of course are geographical. Jews network, using their common language, in a way which straddles the known world at any time, or as much of it as they can encompass.
      Your comment is laughably naive (or disingenuous). No wonder Jews, mutually in touch with much of the oral evidence of their crimes, laugh at people like you. Whatever wars and frauds are being carried out, there are always people in their little corners who say “They didn’t do me no harm”. Jews control who is labelled ‘white supremacist, ‘racist’, ‘patriotic’ or whatever. They are not ‘left’ in any serious democratic sense:- that’s just a label to hide anti-whiteness, or anti-Russian or anti-German or anti-whoever plans they’re temporarily following.

  32. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    April 3, 2017 - 8:41 am | Permalink

    Although I am not a National Socialist I believe Dietrich Eckart’s essay “Jewishness in and Around Us” offers a good definition of Beau Albrecht’s subject (available online as part of the book, Nazi Ideology Before 1933: A Documentation).

  33. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    April 4, 2017 - 8:29 am | Permalink

    Look how well inviting Jews into the Black civil rights movement has worked out for Blacks… The Black civil rights movement has been extraordinarily successful at advancing Jewish interests, not so much so when it comes to actually improving the lot of Blacks. Why would we expect inviting Jews into our movement would do anything other than advance the interests of Jews?

  34. Winston S Mythe's Gravatar Winston S Mythe
    April 9, 2017 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    David Icke is also a promoter of the theory that the Jews at the bottom of the ‘pyramid’ are just as much victims of the elite Jews at the top as the rest of us.

    I recall in his interview on Red Ice, he was saying that the point about our predatory elites is not that they are predominantly Jewish, but that they are basically all members of secret societies. What he can’t explain (or want to explain) is why all these elite secret society members are Jewish to begin with.

Comments are closed.