Auburn is already a success: We must have a public presence by any means necessary

Kevin MacDonald

Update: Due to the efforts of Atty. Sam Dickson (whose writing for TOO is referenced below), Auburn was forced to hold the event. A video of the event is posted in the TOO video corner.

It’s really great that the Alt Right, led by Richard Spencer, will be holding an event at Auburn today, even after getting canceled by the university. Having a public presence is absolutely critical to any political movement that intends to become mainstream. There is a fairly long history of the left shutting down public events by intimidating hotels, as happened several times with American Renaissance and recently with a proposed conference in Yosemite. And recently we have had the antifa rioting in Berkeley, shutting down the Milo talk, and antifa violence against Trump supporters in several places, most notably at the Trump inauguration and last weekend in Berkeley.

Too often antifa violence and intimidation have been successful. The forces of intolerance, intellectual conformity and hostility to Whites and their interests have succeeded. A sure sign that the left is in an impenetrable bubble is that we read about “Alt Right thugs” on blogs and Twitter feeds. No violence would have happened apart from antifa attacks. The antifa is all about shutting down free speech, Trump supporters, and the Alt Right “by any means necessary.”

And the fact is that, until last weekend in Berkeley, the antifa had been winning consistently. Police typically stood by and did nothing even as antifa were assaulting their victims and burning down stores. When arrests were made, little or nothing has come of it (see Sam Dickson’s “The assault on Richard Spencer: No punishment for crimes against White activists“). They are, indeed, pillars of the establishment. Or perhaps Storm Troopers of the establishment would be a better label.

I vividly remember how the antifa tried, and to a considerable extent, succeeded in intimidating people at the last NPI conference at the Reagan Building in Washington, recounted in Sam Dickson’s “NPI Washington, 2016: Antifa violence, police indifference, and the inevitable media assault“). After running around all afternoon trying to get a restaurant to host us (the scheduled venue canceled under pressure), we finally got a place, albeit under false pretences (there was no other way). Then, realizing that someone in our group was feeding information to the antifa, we met and walked to a subway station without being told where the dinner would be held. So we were already being forced to act like secret agents, furtively and in secret. But as a result of all this subterfuge, we got into the restaurant safely. No antifa in sight.

But of course, it didn’t take long for the antifa to attack. There we were at dinner on Friday night, enjoying ourselves with like-minded people, dressed for conviviality, not violence (men in coats and ties), when suddenly we are told that antifa had stormed the restaurant, fought with restaurant staff and managed to spray Spencer. So we trooped out, dinner unfinished (that dessert looked good, too), down the back stairs, through storage areas, and on to the street, nervously looking to see if the antifa would attack us there.

They didn’t, and the next day, they didn’t get to the venue in time to prevent people from entering. But they massed outside, assaulting cameraman Bryan Christopher Sawyer and spraying Emily Youcis with foul-smelling liquid as she was attempting to interview antifa (see Bryan’s account here). We had a break from the talks for an hour or two in the afternoon, but we were stuck in the building, knowing full well what would happen if we went outside. Intimidation indeed.

The antifa did not succeed in shutting down the event, but the entire weekend sent a clear message that such public meetings were problematic at best. That’s why what happened last weekend in Berkeley is so good. Trump supporters, with many Alt Right in attendance, managed to hold a demonstration and they withstood the antifa violence. Many came dressed appropriately — with helmets, gas masks and even baseball bats, fully anticipating violence. Indeed, the antifa were quite open about their intentions to shut down a demonstration intended to support the president of the United States. One would think that given that Trump won the election, this would be an entirely mainstream point of view and that public demonstrations of support would be at least tolerated. But not in the present polarized climate. Antifa violence was clearly advertised in advance:

The fact that the Trump/Alt Right supporters held their ground and drove off the antifa is huge. We are finally fighting back, and after what I experienced in Washington, it was deeply gratifying to me personally.

So just by showing up at Auburn and coming prepared for a street fight is already a victory. We have to suppose that the antifa, realizing that their ability to keep the Alt Right out of public places is in danger, will respond with yet larger numbers and more violence. But this is a fight that we must have. Even if the antifa win the street fight this time, they will realize that they will take some casualties too and that we are determined to take up public space “by any means necessary.”

Neither side is likely to back down at this point. The left, whether on the streets or in the universities, is absolutely determined to shut down free speech on race, immigration, and White identity. As we near the tipping point demographically — a tipping point where Whites will be unable to elect a government that supports their interests — the left has redoubled their efforts to keep these issues out of mainstream public discussion. (I think a lot of the frustration at Trump’s victory is that a Clinton win would have put a complete victory in sight — a surge in Democrat immigrant voters and domination of the Supreme Court.) And, until very recently, they have largely succeeded.

We can’t let them win this battle.  But given the commitment of the violent, intolerant left, this means that these battles will only escalate in scale and violence. If clubs and pepper spray don’t succeed, the next step is guns. There has already been some bloodshed, but still relatively minor. It’s going to get worse — far worse. It’s only a matter of time.

Weimerica: coming to a place near you.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

65 Comments to "Auburn is already a success: We must have a public presence by any means necessary"

  1. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 18, 2017 - 10:35 am | Permalink

    by any means necessary? Is this a joke? If there is one slogan guaranteed to turn off the public, this is the one…coined by the Black Panthers, first edition.

    Joe Webb

    • MGD's Gravatar MGD
      April 18, 2017 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

      No, you’re the joke Joe. Just like Joe Owens in Britain constantly undermining those that advocate promotion of White interests. Freedom of speech is a right bequeathed to us by our ancestors. Are we only supposed to defend it up to the point where it might offend (((someone))) and no further? Are we supposed let people threaten us into silence because using physical violence to defend our rights will turn off the (((public)))? How much of the public is turned off by AntiFa/Black Block? Did it stop AntiFa/Black Block from coming out in force? Did it stop People of Color from voting in droves for the “Democratic” “Party”? Who do you work for Joe? Soros, Adelson? ADL, SPLC? Has everybody read what Joe wrote??? Don’t fight back! Don’t talk back! That will turn off the “public”! The DNC, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, FBI, ATF will get M.A.D. at you! Just sit and do NOTHING! Then NOBODY will be “turned off”. Of course nothing will get done. The demographic displacement of White people from the country THEY created will continue apace. But, hey, at least Joe Webb won’t wet his pants. Whew I sure am glad we avoided THAT! Bad vibes!

      • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
        April 18, 2017 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

        well thanks for asking those questions.
        1. the public, or the White Public-better, is totally turned off by black mischief, and that is good for us, and bad for blacks. If we behave like blacks…useless.
        2. Many Whites have left the Dem Party exactly cuz of bad behavior of blacks while blacks did and do vote Dem, that knowledge , by Whites, is good for us.
        3. Anti-Fas are Whites, and they are the folks in the streets. Our getting violent with them makes us all look bad. White violence.
        4. I have done plenty…starting with anti-war work 16 years ago with my Uncle Sam act. google Joe Webb and Uncle Sam. See if you can get Indy-media, SF which called for killing me with a baseball bat…my sign “I want you to die for Israel’ turned a huge number of peaceniks against Israel….over about a 3 year period. I also knocked two jew/commies down, thus taking risks spec with the cops out to get me locally for my various shenanigans…on the Jewish Wars Front. ON top of that I write a lot and have lots of folks with me, even on the TOO TOQ front.

        When the street battles start, those that have adults, not childish nazi show-boaters, I will be there. Right now, it is premature, stupid, childish, and has zero effect except to provide fodder for the Jews, Liberals, and race mixers.
        Serve yourself up on a silver platter, to the jewyorktimes, etc. They luv it.

        If anybody is taking money from the Jews, etc, it is Spencer & Co. who fit jew news ultra fit to print.

        The anti-fas should be met with shields only, maybe some pepper spray for back-up, and anyone participating should submit to discipline of prepared cadres…about five to ten people to a cadre, who will enforce non-retaliation by expelling a provocateur.
        By Any Means Necessary must be a joke, I hope.

        Joe Webb

        As for Doing Nothing! what do you do?

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          April 19, 2017 - 10:01 am | Permalink

          An admirable reply, Joe—respectful and dignified but forthright, too. Not that I expected anything less!

        • MGD's Gravatar MGD
          April 19, 2017 - 2:53 pm | Permalink

          1.” If we behave like blacks…useless.”
          Except that defending ourselves against leftist thugs ISN’T “behaving like blacks”. Try again Joey!
          2. ” Many Whites”
          Let’s see the statistics on that. LOL! Actually the reason why Whites have left the Democratic party (including me) is because it didn’t serve our interests. Not unlike the Republican party. Black behavior didn’t have ANYTHING to do with it.
          3.”Anti-Fas are Whites” Antifas are not all White.
          “White violence.” Except that it didn’t stop Whites from joining Antifa. Or stop White authority figures from giving them aid and comfort.
          4. “have done plenty”
          In other words…..just words. And stupid words at that. “BLACKS!”
          “When the street battles start”
          You won’t be anywhere in sight.

          “If anybody is taking money from the Jews”
          I noticed you didn’t DENY it. ;) But just like Joe Owens you falsely accuse Spencer. You are the tricky one!

          “The anti-fas should be met with shields only”
          Which means this just keeps going on and on and on. The AntiFa thanks you for helping them survive.

          “By Any Means Necessary must be a joke, I hope.”
          I’m sure you and your AntiFa friends DO hope that Joe. Because then they can go on with destroying the country!

          “As for Doing Nothing! what do you do?”
          Well I beat the shit out of a helluva lot more cucks, queers and commies than >two jew/commies< LOL!

        • MGD's Gravatar MGD
          April 19, 2017 - 2:58 pm | Permalink

          And Pierre please remove your proboscis from Joe’s anus. There’s a good cuck.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          April 19, 2017 - 11:12 pm | Permalink

          Take your insecurities, MGD, and be good enough to tuck them somewhere that the sun never shines.

          I’ll certainly never allow you to tell me how to address Joe Webb. I don’t take dictation from some guy—viz., you—whose every comment so far has been completely vapid. Your sneers are all worthless clichés from He-Man Central Supply.

          You could hardly have made it plainer that you’re just one more specimen of a dime-a-dozen online commodity: the Internet tough guy with an apartment in Mom’s basement and with courage and brains (IQ = 73?) that are entirely virtual.

          And do get your mind and mouth out of the toilet. This is Kevin MacDonald’s site, not your favorite local gay bar.

        • Roy Flynn's Gravatar Roy Flynn
          April 22, 2017 - 11:41 pm | Permalink

          “If we behave like blacks…useless.”

          Part of negro behavior is breathing air and drinking water.

          If one chooses to eschew all negro behavior, then he must not breathe air or drink water.

        • MGD's Gravatar MGD
          April 27, 2017 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

          “Take your insecurities, MGD, and be good enough to tuck them somewhere that the sun never shines.”

          LOL! Talk about insecurities! Apparently I struck a nerve!

          “I’ll certainly never allow you to tell me how to address Joe Webb. I don’t take dictation from some guy—viz., you—whose every comment so far has been completely vapid. Your sneers are all worthless clichés from He-Man Central Supply.You could hardly have made it plainer that you’re just one more specimen of a dime-a-dozen online commodity: the Internet tough guy with an apartment in Mom’s basement and with courage and brains (IQ = 73?) that are entirely virtual.”

          BLAH, BLAH, BLAH.
          In other words more excuses for your cowardice. And your willingness to promote cowardice in others so you don’t look so bad! And by the way Pierre(smirk) I already DID tell you!

          “And do get your mind and mouth out of the toilet. This is Kevin MacDonald’s site, not your favorite local gay bar.”

          Well since my comments are STILL up apparently Dr. MacDonald isn’t as delicate as YOU! Which certainly explains your interest in gay bars! LOL! Try again “Pierre”.

  2. Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
    April 18, 2017 - 10:46 am | Permalink


    Imagine a meeting of Alt-Righter “peaceniks” with t-shirts, banners, buttons, signs & handouts bearing a very conspicuous message:
    Imagine antifas attacking. Imagine the images going viral!

    • Peter's Gravatar Peter
      April 18, 2017 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

      I consider that an excellent idea and the message should be an accusation critical of them for committing murder (not because it costs too much or some other extraneous reason). They should be accused of doing something terribly wrong and we’re opposed to it.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      April 18, 2017 - 10:52 pm | Permalink

      Your idea is most attractive, Pat. But two doubts niggle at me.

      (1) Surely the odds of “antifas attacking” ever becoming “viral” images are small to nil. Viral images are weapons over which the (((image controllers))) have a virtual monopoly.

      (2) Nothing I’ve seen or read in the past year has diminished my belief that Spencer hungers far, far too much for “respectability” ever to take so plainspoken a stance in opposition to the Enemy Within, least of all to publicly identifying the Jews as the responsible party for the perpetual state of war in which the United States has been since 1941.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        April 19, 2017 - 10:33 am | Permalink

        Being nice is more important than facts or survival. Conservatives are mortified about making a public scene. Only intransigent ruthlessness can save our asses.

        This includes screaming in public. . .

        A Well Respected Man [Kinks, 1965]:

        • MGD's Gravatar MGD
          April 19, 2017 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

          Absolutely right T.J.! A PERFECT example of this is Joe Webb below.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          April 19, 2017 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

          To each his own. Still, I hope that Spencer, however nice he may wish to be seen as, doesn’t listen to this stuff!

      • Peter's Gravatar Peter
        April 19, 2017 - 1:11 pm | Permalink

        I think she means verbally attacking, not physically. You might be right about not wishing to identify the Jews when criticizing, but I believe a huge opportunity is being missed by not doing it. The criticism is that Israel is a murderous state that is repeatedly at war with its neighbors and Jewish Neo-Cons repeatedly have the US military kill Arabs for Jews. I believe there is much evidence for this and we have congressmen, senators and historians (Mearsheimer and Walt – “The Israel Lobby”) that can back up those claims. The Alt-Right might even widen its appeal to people that identify with the anti-war positions of the Alt-Right.

        Here are two longtime US Congressmen that would testify to that and also to the fact that organized Jewry had them thrown out of Congress:

        Former US Congressman Paul Findley (1961-1983):

        “Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had
        refused to help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express this conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe the 9/11 catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S. aid until Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

        The U.S. lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating……

        …On Capitol Hill, criticism of Israel, even in private conversation, is all but forbidden, treated as downright unpatriotic, if not
        anti-Semitic. The continued absence of free speech was assured when those few who spoke out — Senators Adlai Stevenson and Charles Percy, and Reps. Paul “Pete” McCloskey, Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard, and myself — were defeated at the polls by candidates heavily financed by pro-Israel forces.”

        Former US Congressman Paul Norton “Pete” McCloskey, Jr. (1967-1983)

        “Until 1980, when I first spoke out against Israel, I had been known as a relative friend of Israel. On issues like Vietnam or a woman’s right of choice, things of that kind, I shared views with most Jews. But once I took a position that was deemed hostile to the state of Israel, including opposition to Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon and its use of cluster bombs, I was a marked man.

        Let me tell you what happened when, after 15 years in the House, I came back to California in 1982 to run for the U.S. Senate. Here’s an example: My finance chairman in southern California was a savings and loan company executive. He was a very loyal man. He’d known my father, and he wanted to help me. He thought I’d make a good senator. In 1982, you may remember, there was a savings and loan crisis. Three of his biggest Jewish depositors came to him and said, “Mr. X, we see you’re the chairman of McCloskey’s finance committee. You get off that committee, or we will withdraw our deposits.”

        In the 1982 primary election race I lost the Republican party
        nomination for the U.S. Senate to Pete Wilson. He went up to the San Fernando Valley and made a promise to the Jewish leaders of that powerful Jewish area that if elected to the Senate he would favor Israel’s annexation of the West Bank and Gaza. That story was reported, but then absolutely hushed up. You’ve never heard the story since. The Jewish community has the power to suppress, either by advertising or control of the media, news reports that are hostile to Israel, and they have the ability to discredit anyone who speaks out. And that’s their purpose.”

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          April 20, 2017 - 12:22 am | Permalink

          Peter: Of course, I agree with what you write here, and I am familiar with both testimonies you quote in extensu. But at least to date, these and similar revelations appear to have gotten us and the white cause nowhere. I think this is so largely (1) because evidence and the capacity to reason from evidence are irrelevant to our opponents, who deal in self-serving and self-glorifying axioms of virtue and power—nothing else; and (2) because these very opponents (as both Rerevisionist and I wrote) have the resources and the will to ensure that those among us who have not yet been fully brainwashed—and thus remain at least theoretically persuadable—are simply not permitted to see the facts and evidence you cite. McCloskey, of course, makes this very point in his last paragraph above.

          Look at it this way: in one respect we live today in an age where facts, evidence, and truth are probably more accessible than at any previous time in human history. Yet even in the sixties, when I was in college and before I was drafted, I used to hear older and more jaundiced readers of the New York Times say that you could always learn the true facts behind a given story if you just had the patience to continue reading till you reached paragraph 50-something, where what actually happened would be mentioned in passing.

          I’d suggest that that wisecrack’s present-day analog would be that even a Google search usually turns up useful, worthwhile material—at least for those with the wit and patience to read well past page 1 of the results! Indeed, if we could somehow induce or persuade people to do that, we might do ourselves some measurable practical good. Having reached that limited goal, then, maybe we might have a crack at getting the same folks to stop using Google as their default search engine—but talk about climbing Everest in shorts and tennis shoes!

          I know how little satisfaction there is in taking baby steps, but believe me, I get no satisfaction in recommending them. And who knows, perhaps what Tom Sunic wrote at the top of this thread is on the money: that willingness to endure “public exposure [and] a certain amount of risk and even job loss” might result in a “significant psychological breakthrough” in the agora. (NB: Although I do not second Dr. Sunic’s enthusiasm for Richard Spencer, I think the latter is very fortunate to have the former as an apologist, friend, and admirer.)

          In closing, I can write truthfully that few things would please me more than to discover, in whatever time remains to me, that you and Tom Sunic, in your differing but related ways, were right and I was wrong.

      • April 19, 2017 - 7:26 pm | Permalink

        Yes, I agree. The “viral images” idea is in the same category as the idea that journalists are falling over themselves to get “scoops” and fame and pay-rises. Wrong image, or wrong story: in either case no publication.
        — I watched Spencer: he may be nice enough but his oratory is bite-free and Jew-unaware. It wouldn’t surprise me if the whole thuggish element being defeated was staged, to make him look serious as an activist. Let’s hope though that at least the probability of police inaction will go down.

  3. Anon's Gravatar Anon
    April 18, 2017 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    Someone should make a Wikipedia page about “criticisms of racial equality” or “criticisms of cosmopolitanism” that fits in here:

    • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
      April 18, 2017 - 8:26 pm | Permalink

      does anybody know when the race equality ideology got really going? I think it is related to commerce, a kind of marxist view that places ideology at the determination by the needs of Capital. Selling requires that you don’t call your potential markets…darkies, and the rest. World Trade may have contributed to the ideology. Of course, equality was invented by the Stoa, 300 years BC. but racial equality is relatively new. In out own time, in the US, it was post 1950. German racialism and Jewish writing and the Negro revolt….all contributed, but if 18th C . de Maistre and the other guy wrote racialist stuff,
      there must have been some enlightenment thinkers who were beginning to argue for race equality. Joe Webb

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        April 19, 2017 - 11:07 am | Permalink

        Hurrah for referring to Joseph de Maistre, Joe!

        I have some thoughts on your excellent question, but I know from experience that assembling them into a more or less concise whole will take more time than I can now spare—or, what’s more, will take up more space than the Moderator will understandably feel able to tolerate! So suffice to say that I think the “race equality ideology” constitutes what the British linguistic philosophers called a “category mistake” or “category error”—specifically, a mistake whose roots lie in Christian doctrine, its ultimate source there being the failure to grasp, usually culpably but occasionally inculpably, that Christ’s command to the Apostles to make disciples of the entirety of the human race amounted to a radical departure from and rejection of Jewishness as a prerequisite for eternal life (i.e., with God in heaven), not to a concomitant command to ideologize natural affections and preferences away from one’ s family and extended kin and toward humanity as a whole—which now, as in centuries past, has somehow invariably translated into awarding preference to the interests of the Jews, their agents, and their fellow Christophobes.*

        Also, I don’t think that being polite, even deferential, to potential customers need imply preferring the stranger to one’s proper family and brotherhood. Those in commerce and government who demand that we do so are being consciously hostile to us.
        * Apropos which, I recall that several of Brenton Sanderson’s TOO articles directly related self-styled Enlightenment dogma to promotion of Jewish interests.

        • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
          April 19, 2017 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

          Hi Pierre, so any recommended readings? I am just going to start with wiki on de Maistre, and then the other guy, Gobineau. I recall his (?) bit …I have met a German, a Frenchman, etc, but never have I met a Humanity.

          Joe Webb

  4. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    April 18, 2017 - 11:47 am | Permalink

    It will get worse sadly.

    That is the type of thing we in Western Europe have faced for years. It is far worse when you add “hate laws” that are basically anti-white and polls that are “rigged” with postal and ethnic voting blocks. I cannot even read this website without a proxy tool.

  5. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    April 18, 2017 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Trump supporters, with many Alt Right in attendance, managed to hold a demonstration

    Trump isn’t our friend in any way, shape or form.

    • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
      April 18, 2017 - 8:29 pm | Permalink

      not clear. Trump can coddle the jews, but the main deal is to stop immigration, discipline the blacks and browns, and join with Europe and Russia in the White Revolt happening right now. This will not be accomplished overnight.
      The plus in starting more war in syria, etc, is it will further inflame the muzzies, drive more of them toward europe and the rest is more White Revolt.

      call it the Cunning of History. Joe Webb

    • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
      April 18, 2017 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

      not clear. Trump can coddle the jews, but the main deal is to stop immigration, discipline the blacks and browns, and join with Europe and Russia in the White Revolt.
      The Jews can wait
      The historic White Revolt has begun both in Europe and here. Trump contributed to it, whatever his backsliding, etc.

      TheRevolt is happening right now. This will not be accomplished overnight.
      The plus in starting more war in syria, etc, is it will further inflame the muzzies, drive more of them toward europe and the rest is more White Revolt.

      call it the Cunning of History. Joe Webb

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        April 20, 2017 - 12:30 pm | Permalink

        The plus in starting more war in syria, etc, is it will further inflame the muzzies, drive more of them toward europe and the rest is more White Revolt.

        Joe, I really don’t understand what you mean. To carry your positive view of “more war in Syria etc.” to its logical conclusion, we should push Trump to make all-out “total” war (you know, kill everybody like Yaron Brook recommends) in all Muslim countries. Then the inflamed Muslims will enter Europe and Amerika by the tens of millions and then we will all wake up and take decisive and effective action.

        Is this a correct interpretation? Serious question. I can come to no other conclusion from what you say.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      April 19, 2017 - 9:11 am | Permalink

      Barkingmad, you’re right. You distrusted him from the start. I did too initially, but got caught up in the hoopla. Credulity, even though it can be shrugged off as a feminine quality, is nontheless embarrassing.

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        April 19, 2017 - 6:02 pm | Permalink

        Don’t feel bad. I distrusted him, yet the day after the election, I nevertheless felt lighthearted. It wasn’t just “oh thank god Hillary didn’t win!” I can’t articulate it all that well, but thankfully this unexpected euphoria did not last long. I think what brought this about in me was seeing all those liberals losing their shit. Wasn’t that absolutely beautiful?

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      April 19, 2017 - 5:22 pm | Permalink

      but his supporters are

  6. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    April 18, 2017 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

    Your pension money invested in George Soros funds at work. Thats how he pays back for hospitality. After leaving Hungary and getting a welcome mat he repaid Brits by trashing the pound. Thats his pattern.

  7. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    April 18, 2017 - 2:22 pm | Permalink

    These brave people insisting on their right to express themselves publicly deserve great praise and a medal (perhaps one to be instituted in the future). The left, liberals and democrats were portrayed as the decent people while I was growing up, standing for free speech, against war and fairness to all people. Apparently that was only a temporary strategy. This has been turned upside down roughly since the Neo-Cons came into power. Now these people oppose free speech, encourage or say nothing about a new war (I think the right could object more, at least on websites and blogs) and want to wipe the whites out. I think we could take the high road here too and not allow our struggle to be portrayed as against anyone else, except for perhaps the Jews with the money, power and organization to bring about this catastrophe. And if we can stop this disaster without pointing the finger at the guilty party, that might be desirable if that is the only way to achieve victory.

    This is a short speech by Horst Mahler, an 81 year old German that will be heading back to jail again in a few days, where jail awaits those who violate the censorship laws there. He touches on several issues under discussion here.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      April 19, 2017 - 5:21 pm | Permalink

      Peter – good post and terrible at the same time, as it shows who is now in charge. The fact that this video does NOT spread around Titter etc and the fact that the people do not insist he is freed – this means the people do not care about these injustices, and sometimes I think: Are the people worth saving from the fate that awaits them when they become third world? Imagine if this was the other way around and a Jew was sent to prison for ‘telling lies about Germany’. The outcry would be deafening.

  8. E.'s Gravatar E.
    April 18, 2017 - 5:34 pm | Permalink

    In the ’50s & ’60s, it was outspoken pro-racial-group Blacks who had to worry about threats to their lives. Now it is outspoken Whites, & advocating far less aggressively for their distinct interests & space.

    This is another case-in-point for the ramifications of losing wars; one kind or another.

    So, where to go from here? And how?

    One marginally acceptable answer to some problems is, throw money at the problem. But, of course, one needs money. Can’t wage war without an economy.

  9. David's Gravatar David
    April 18, 2017 - 9:00 pm | Permalink

    Every time I am slightly tempted to think maybe I am on the wrong side of history, I simply recall that it was not I who started this war on Whites. For example, I was not brought up anti-Semitic. To the contrary, and for specific reasons I was rather philosemitic. I was not brought up racist and did not hate blacks, and didn’t even know Hispanics. I even went through a period of arguing for expansion of female presence in positions of power. It was the 1970s and I subscribed to Mother Jones magazine and read Leftie books in my spare time. In short, college had made me a good progressive.

    But then something interesting happened. I accumulated experience after experience of Jews, Negroes, Feminist colleagues, liberals, Lefties of all sorts, making unprovoked strikes on me in little and large ways. I just could not recognize it properly soon enough. Few of us could. We were trained to be too big-hearted and abnegating. This did not win them over, no, they grew more blood thirsty each time we took it.

    Did they destroy my career even? Perhaps.

    It took a long time, but I learned. and as they grew emboldened, especially by those cursed Clinton & Obama years, even somewhat the Bush years, I remember suffering more.

    No, I did not start this fight. They did not like my skin-color, my Germanic name, my politics, my sex, my enterprising attitude, my objective, logical and prioritizing approach to problem-solving and my heterosexuality. I was not looking for F**k buddies, I simply wanted to do my work, get married, have several children and be a decent citizen. I have never had privilege, but I am made to bear what seems to be an inordinate amount of punishment for “White crimes.” I deserved it because I had “White thoughts” and did not salute their flags.

    The Left and the Globotyrants never go after the most powerful Whites. Of course not. They slowly chip at the edges of the most vulnerable Whites–in my case, a working-class White trying to make it in a difficult profession. This is their M.O. All the while they compile more legal precedents, more administrative codes, more HR departments captured for their ends, more students’ minds corrupted, more decades brought into their possession.

    And comfortable Whites permitted it, some even encouraged it. churches fostered it, their clergy (given their homosexual orientation) more concerned about non-natalist SJW causes while hiding safely under the cover of what for many is I suspect a phony pro-life shield. Engineers and physicians experienced it the wake up last, as did their professors in the technical and practical colleges. The wealthy business people could think that it was probably just the “weak,” “loser Whites” that were exaggerating the situation.

    Whites, deluded by their maladaptive independent streak toxically mixed with “the-other-is-sacred,” had better get their heads screwed on straight—and fast. The Left will mop up the floor with the blood of privileged Whites too, in due time.

  10. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    April 18, 2017 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    Ah, antifa…. Mostly white, mostly wealthy. What to do when mommy and daddy’s endless money supply gets boring? Become a trendy revolutionary!

    Sadly, though, groups like antifa have their roots in events like 1381’s English peasant revolt, where unfair taxation and class warfare reached an unrivaled fevered pitch. Out of a succession of those ill handled incidents, the Anglo world spawned this “ultimate fairness” monster intent upon destroying all things “unfair”, both real and perceived.

    This monster has pushed its way into every facet of our society, watering down Christianity into an exercise in turning the other cheek and cuckoldry on an ideological scale. Our governments ceaselessly find new and novel ways to undermine white people and raise up our replacements to undeserved and baffling levels. Our social culture is one of ingrained self debasement and ham handed fawning over all things, “other”.

    This monster demands that we constantly knock the legs out from under our own people, and when we’re finished with them, start on ourselves. No other racial / ethnic group does this to itself. In fact this subject leaves other racial groups completely perplexed as to why white people have become our own worst enemy.

    Antifa is little more than a horrendous buboe on the already diseased body that is western man. Antifa has become the equivalent of the whip to a flagellant who mercilessly flogs himself for some perceived wrongdoing that he cannot name, yet is convinced he must do eternal penance for.

    Antifa is white guilt made manifest. It is the balm the jew uses to grease his way easily through our defenses and straight to our exposed hearts. In our attempt to create a truly fair and just society, we have left ourselves completely at the mercy of parasites who prey upon our unending naivete.

    No other race has ever been so formally and universally turned against itself in such a way that a terrorist cell comprising of mostly its own members goes after the rest of the group with violent intent. Antifa is a cancer within our culture that can only be excised, just like the idea of ultimate fairness itself.

    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      April 19, 2017 - 9:59 am | Permalink

      Bingo on that, Fenria. Huge swaths of the White population are indeed intellectually poisoned, due to their innate credulity, a lifetime of mal-indoctrination, and the compounding effects long term Jewish cultural subversion. The racial and political historical process is starting to reach critical mass now, and it’s about time. Finally, the ideologically sound elements of our people are starting to fight back.

    • E.'s Gravatar E.
      April 19, 2017 - 11:49 am | Permalink

      Enjoyable commentary, however I will take issue with the following paragraph:

      “This monster demands that we constantly knock the legs out from under our own people, and when we’re finished with them, start on ourselves. No other racial / ethnic group does this to itself. In fact this subject leaves other racial groups completely perplexed as to why white people have become our own worst enemy.”

      Actually, White Suicide is not unassisted. Nor was it even foremost by Whites, until recently.

      Whites lost one or more battles of literal, and cognitive, cultural, & legal, group self-significance. There are clear others who have benefited from this.

      Now every time Occidental Whites try to understand themselves as a definitive, exclusive, bounded, distinct, biologically-based & understood entity, (“race”), and ethnicity, there are all the Others, the excluded, soon at our throats; figuratively and literally; depending mostly on economic class.

      Race war, (and varying species’ survival), is known existence.

      All the Hope, all the Faith, all the big Dreamers, cannot wish this away. They would be spitting in the eye of Evolution, of God, in doing so. Or, at least they are spitting on the concept of Whites’ race-space; country.

      How this basic understanding of our Origins, has been made irrelevant, anachronistic, discredited, liberalized, and Enlightened away, in & for the minds of White America, has been hard, persistent, & determined efforts by all non-Occidental White America. It has been a project, whether actually understood & conceived of as a coherent theory, or by the mere Invisible Hand of human nature, acting collectively, & racially.

      It is also the result of having been the first of the distinctive world races (viz. not Asians, not Blacks, not Indians, not Semites, etc.), to have lost an ideological, & “modern”, race-based war.

      The war against Nazism, implicated not merely one country, one citizenry, & one culture, but implicated one whole world race; irrespective of being an Axis or Ally, and of differing cultures, countries, & histories.

      Whites, as a race, irrespective of place, lost again when capitulating in the American Civil Rights war.

      Whites now live in a legal system defined by and for the interests of Minority racial victors; who have taken for their own of the conquered. America, as a world superpower, exported/imposed this unique history, to all other racially-applicable countries; those sharing one common variable; an approximate common race; (and particular democracies; systems which would most result in empathy winning over race; systems of White acquiescence).

      Thus, if “Whites”, the autochthonous races of the “Occident”, are going to survive as distinct, viable, & existent kinds of human biological life, looking forward, they cannot lose any more. And that will mean, among many changes/battles, a fundamental ideological reorientation for our global kind. It will mean many of the things that the Left & Others, fear about us, & seek to prevent, with force.

      Yet, that is how we came to exist at all.
      That is how some kinds no longer exist.

      This cannot be wished away, ignored, or discredited, it is “Nature”.
      It came first, no other orientation, or law.

      • David's Gravatar David
        April 21, 2017 - 6:45 am | Permalink

        Our set of Laws, with their high mindedness and propositional jurisprudence, must come to be seen as nested within the provision of our ethnostate borders. Such a culture of laws is only for a people that can restraint themselves and to engage in discourse. They are not laws for tribal people, which is most non-Europeans, including Jews. We must quit thinking that our laws do, or can, apply to others. And generally speaking, non-Europeans cannot be relied upon to care for us. Indeed, many simply wish that we disappear from the Earth.

        I did not come to this conclusion easily. I had to be dragged here. But I was dragged here principally by Jews, Negroes and the various Moslem peoples. I accept them for what they are. I do not feel superior, but I am proud who we are. Now is the time that we need to fight for our lives, our people and for nations that are our own. We need to tell our neighbors this regardless of how we think they may react. We must become zealots, I reluctantly admit. We must steer conversations towards this topic as long as we do not lose effectiveness.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      April 19, 2017 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

      Re the amusing first paragraph – They are like this not because they are being trendy, rather because of their genes, and they are just the worst examples, and nothing can cure them. Even if they went to live in Somalia for a while or another of the places they admire so much, even what would happen to them would not shift their views.

  11. Wilburn Sprayberry's Gravatar Wilburn Sprayberry
    April 18, 2017 - 11:17 pm | Permalink

    The ironic thing about the Washington, D.C. restaurant episode during the NPI conference last November, is that, had the antifa actually penetrated into the banquet room where the Alt-right was dining, the antifa would have gotten the hell beat out of them. The room was full of strong, aggressive young men who would have made mince-meat of the antifa girlyboys and gender ambiguous whatevers. But such was Richard Spencer’s commitment to being a good customer, and non-violence, that we – given a dignified way to retreat, after our dinner (I got my dessert – sorry, Kevin!) had been mostly consumed – left, peaceably, in good order, rather than face off with those who would gladly have killed us, given the chance.

    I would strongly advise the antifa, for their own safety, to avoid such situations in the future.

  12. MGD's Gravatar MGD
    April 18, 2017 - 11:41 pm | Permalink

    Look this up on youtube: Paddy Tarleton – The Ballad Of Raunch-Vag Rosie It’s about the bitch who got bopped in the Battle of Berkeley by Nathan Damigo.

  13. Laguna Beach Fogey's Gravatar Laguna Beach Fogey
    April 19, 2017 - 6:26 am | Permalink

    You did it! Well done, goys. All you needed was some encouragement to fight back. Some of us have been providing that encouragement for years. See? It works!

  14. April 19, 2017 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Richard Spencer made a significant psychological breakthrough in the System regardless whether one agrees or not with his views or his wordings. He deserves credit for civic courage. It’s time to supplement the laptop warfare by physically reaching out to liberal- Marxist- infested colleges and put on display our own academic know-how. Holding private and closed conferences for the initiated, aka preaching to the quire, doesn’t help very much. Fighting for freedom of speech always involves public exposure, a certain amount of risk and even job loss. That’s the price we must pay in our troubled American/European times. Also, many of our anonymous computer warriors, let alone self-proclaimed white leaders must tone down their ego and join forces in order to improve our chances of survival.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      April 19, 2017 - 2:54 pm | Permalink

      American/European? When has America ever been an ally of Europe? American/Israeli is more honest.

      • Sheila's Gravatar Sheila
        April 20, 2017 - 4:34 am | Permalink

        To Karen T…I do not understand your post. Can you speak more deeply regarding your second question?

        • April 20, 2017 - 2:43 pm | Permalink

          @Sheila – I’d guess she meant (1) In the American Revolution, the Bank of England got its hold on the new USA. (2) After WW1 started, the USA joined because Jews wanted them to. (3) In and after WW2, the (((USA))) acted for Jews and their money, not Europeans.

    • pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
      April 19, 2017 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

      Tom – but one thing any keyboard warrior can do is mention sites like this one in comments sections eg on Youtube, as well as make donations to sites like this one. I found this site via a comment on Breitbart (I no longer go there as I have been banned).

  15. Ricki's Gravatar Ricki
    April 19, 2017 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

    The police have showed that they are not going to protect whites against Antifa/BLM. I’ve seen a lot of these protest videos on Youtube, and invariably, I see whites attacked by leftists while the police stand by idly. But Auburn is in the Deep South, so the cops down there probably hate Antifa as much as we do, so that is encouraging. Sadly though, most of these protests take place in liberal areas like NYC and Berkeley, and the cops seem to have no interest in protecting whites.

  16. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    April 20, 2017 - 2:35 am | Permalink

    Antifa want a big scrap in the restaurant (even if they lose) as they know the MSM is on their side and will portray the Alt-right as violent thugs. Many of the police will secretly be on your side, but they ignore the violence of the antifa side eg did nothing when Spencer was assaulted on camera because they realise that the far-left control the authorities and they think if they appease the lefties in the authorities they will not get into trouble. They are worried that if they favour the right in any way they know there is a huge noisy backlash from the media and the legal system ready to drop on them like a ton of bricks. Remember those cops who hit a black man a few years ago after a 20 min chase. The media did not show any of the preceding 20 min resisting arrest and instead just played the clip of the cops beating the black man ALL DAY LONG on the news. So the cops are scared of the left and are bowing down to them.

    What is NOT important is beating up a few individual antifa lefties. What IS important is that millions of voters via alternative news get to realise that the left are against them and want to make their country third world.

    However it is great when Trump supporters defend right of speech with force, as it is no longer ‘the far right’ versus antifa, it becomes mainstream majority versus the far-left.

  17. Jeff B.'s Gravatar Jeff B.
    April 20, 2017 - 5:49 am | Permalink

    We should be as patient as we can with leftist students and avoid gratuitous violence against them. Inevitably many of these kids—the white ones at least– will have their “Road to Damascus” moment. Working them over with an oak table leg—as tempting as that might be—risks creating an insurmountable obstacle to their racial re-bonding. Indeed, suppose Dr. K had been sucker-punched by some Okie from Muskogee while playing front man for the Jews in one of his Vietnam anti-war protests.? Whom would he be writing about now? Likely not as much about Jewish issues; or, when so, in arguments couched in ambivalence and guilty qualification: “Yes, Jewish propagandizing and activism reduced the white demographic 30% in a generation but only a goy broke my nose.” Or worse, irreparably fixed to the Jewish cause: “Ha! What that Okie needs is few hundred Somalis and Hondurans swamping his neighborhood and schools, followed up a good dose of gangsta rap, porn, MTV, and mongrel grandchildren. Just wait until I get my law degree!” Besides, I myself was once a leftist, zealously so, and am thankful I lived among people who listened to me amicably and left me free to see the error of my thinking. Today that youthful indiscretion freely outgrown allows me to regard the most radical student leftists—including those who rioted at Middlebury and Berkeley—as so many white nationalists waiting to happen—and at some level to sympathize with them. Though they’ve inverted their predicates, their cry for “safe spaces” and “triggers warnings” has a basis in fact. How many of us could have used these when the Jews, post-WWII, were mobilizing their media and legal networks full on to destroy our traditions and deracinate all vestiges of our racial identity. Did not some of us mistakenly displace our anger against our own race for letting this happen? And are not these media masters in New York and Hollywood still at it now, hijacking the aspiring idealism of these students with violence, degeneracy, and racial self-hatred? Consequently, I’m saving my oak table leg for the adults in the room—that is, the adults in certain board rooms in New York and Hollywood who overwhelmingly control the narrative that portrays us of the alt-right as the only acceptable target by which a nation can avenge the traumas these greasy, rich pimps have themselves inflicted.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      April 20, 2017 - 8:56 am | Permalink

      Jeff B.,

      Your comment is certainly worth a listen and your ‘pimp’ comparison is correct. As far as the Alt-Right, it’s a movement still in planning. So, we might recall Robert M. Citino:

      “You want to hold territory, build an army.”

    • April 20, 2017 - 2:38 pm | Permalink

      If I’m reading your multiple ironies correctly, you seem not to know that Jews made fortunes from their invasion of Vietnam, and there was and is a very legitimate case against the (((USA))). Again, if I’m reading you correctly, the USA is still largely polarised into naive people who still believe chunks of the (((narrative))) even after years of Internet.

      • Sheila's Gravatar Sheila
        April 22, 2017 - 4:17 am | Permalink

        To Rerevisionist: I did not receive your reply to my comment to Karen T until a short time ago. Thank you for your insight into what you think this person was talking about. I appreciate your consideration, though I find it odd this person must have chosen to not expand on his or her vague comment after making it. I can only assume s/he was referring to the comment posted above that remark by *Tom Sunic*: “That’s the price we must pay in our troubled American/European times…”, of which I find myself quite in agreement. In thinking of your comments, I can only wonder how we can know this for certain considering that in both world wars America drafted most of its soldiers. There is most assuredly something to your comment about England’s banking system at the time of which you refer though I am not in a position that would allow me to comment upon it due to my own lack of sufficient knowledge regarding this item in our economic history and background. I watched the video with much interest, and from what I could tell the audience seemed to me to be mostly in support of what Spencer had to say or at the very least supportive of his right to speak of his beliefs. I would be interested in knowing how many people were in attendance and what the response was outside. Perhaps, that was addressed in another video and I did not see it.
        Thank you again for your courtesy in offering your take on the meaning of that comment.

        • April 22, 2017 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

          .. in both world wars, America drafted most of its soldiers.. Yes, important point; same in Britain, (and Russia), though I think there was an initial burst of enthusiasm, unless that was Jewish newspaper crap, as of course is likely. But of course it’s also true that once there, vast war crimes were carried out. I think this is where another K Mac theory, of ”high trust societies’, isn’t accurate: whites tend to do what they’re told quite well, within smallish bounded coteries, as is consistent with evolution in small groups who need concentrated attention much of the time, but I suspect other races are less enthusiastic about risk-taking. I’m pleased Spencer speaks out, and pleased at anyone else who does, but they ought to mention Jews. I saw the same omission with Nick Griffin in England, who is now more or less forgotten. NB thanks for your politeness – I’m afraid exasperation often enough leads me the opposite way…

      • Sheila's Gravatar Sheila
        April 25, 2017 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

        To Rerevisionist…I am using this post reply because there is none at the end of your comment to me…I was at table with RS and recall a comment I made to him; I said that it must be easy to be a WN where he is from but I see, after reading about his mother’s difficulties that I was wrong…not terribly wrong as I live in a blue city in a red state in the deep south but wrong enough. This cosmopolitan movement is quite ancient and yet Karl Marx revised it in his own way at a time when American intellectuals and leaders had the opportunity to know his writings and philosophy before America’s Civil War due to the contribution of Gutenburg and Lenin further modernized it for the masses at the time of radio thus making it even more available for the word to know that the western tradition ultimately THE WHITE RACE would be desirable only if it is destroyed hence we deal with what former President Obama and his Attorneys Generals and appointed judges and BLM and thousands of other like-minded radical leftist groups all over the world have committed themselves to bringing about such an end. At times these strange and hate filled mentally ill people pretend they are merely saying it is the concept of privilege (WP certainly) that they wish to destroy; what they claim is an unfair advantage of the whites over the colored races of the world…it is clear the intent is to literally and in all ways on all levels to actually bring about the death of the white race. I think people, thanks to the writings of KMac and many others, cannot be unaware of what he calls the machinations of the *hostile elite* over many centuries by way of using the very words of many of the leaders of this *group*…so I don’t know that it is really essential at this point in time to overstate the obvious at every turn. Yes, it is all very frustrating but it is in consideration of that *framework* in which we have no other choice than to operate for now…it is to my way of thinking that the race simply concentrate on how to survive these times without allowing anyone to create a wedge through conflict of lesser matters that will cause the race to fracture in many ways…after all that is exactly what our enemies have always done. I suppose there can be only one agreed upon objective at this time…simply how to organize in order to *survive in this hostile world*…I hate to see Scotts and Irish and English at each other’s throats when the “boot-heels of the savages are already on our collective white throats”…but as a Southerner, I understand what you are saying and how you feel. I have long realized the necessity to put aside that which is local or regional for the greater need. This also causes me to have less frustration…

  18. Bennis Mardens's Gravatar Bennis Mardens
    April 20, 2017 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Spencer isn’t on the tribe’s payroll. His family is wealthy.
    And Antifa are not all upper class whites; Antifa has many greasy Jews, angry hateful Hispanics and blacks, druggies, drunks, and even homeless people. I’m pretty sure that some of them are paid via Soros, SPLC, etc. and they have 1st and 2nd teams….1st team are hardened criminals willing to do violence, and when the police arrive 1st team runs away, leaving 2nd team which is composed of the sissy whites and Jewish kids and dumb college girls.

  19. Santoculto's Gravatar Santoculto
    April 21, 2017 - 10:02 am | Permalink

    Call them Agent ((($mith)))

  20. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 22, 2017 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

    I am reminded of Michael O’Meara’s material in TOQ in which he writes about myth, a mobilizing, non-rational (not irrational ) belief that must obtain for any successful uprising against any particular status quo. It is an attractive argument to me.

    The whole Liberal Myth remains powerful: equality, racial equality, meritocracy with plenty of mercy within to handicap whites of course, a large demand for Fairness, Punishments for anyone challenging the Myth, and a also a strong belief in The Future, that all will be well when Racism is eliminated and every child goes to college , one of Obongo’s non-negotiable demands back in about 2014.

    The liberal Myth must die before Whitelands can live, or at least, it must become very sick. Arguably Liberal Myth IS sick, but not yet sick enough.

    Nevertheless, the difference between now and even two years ago is remarkable. The White Revolt has clearly started, mostly in Europe over Migrants, and here as well with the Trump ascendance.

    Is there a White Myth developing yet? I doubt it. Nevertheless the older ‘race-realism’ continues to operate not only at the intellectual level, but at the popular level as well. O’Meara criticized the race-realism project and welcomed White Nationalism as a corrective.

    The issue is which, if either…is more conducive toward the development of a White Myth? My sense is that WN is the US is not behaving itself and is turning more white folks off than “on.” In Europe, the Identity movement avoids head-on collision with Racialism, and allows for wiggle room aplenty, thus keeping race in the shadow. With its experiences of WW two, and Germany, race is a very emotion-laden topic.

    Is it any different in the US? I don’t know, especially since I am not European, but Europe’s suspension of free speech over racialism issues, seems to suggest that they get more upset, that is, their liberals, than do our liberals.

    We have been dealing with race forever. Arguably our country was founded on a very racially conscious basis…from citizenship only for white males, to all the struggles over blacks for at least 200 years now, if you start counting from the days of Abolition to the present. In this sense, maybe Americans are far more used to it, than Europeans. And despite our swerve of the last 50 years or so toward race-equality, the thing can be turned around. The setbacks of the Dem Party suggest that it is turning around. Even White women are less now for Dems. 53% or so voted for Trump.

    I don’t know, but to get back to the idea of a White Myth that goes beyond race-realism (IQ tests, HBD, Evolutionary psychology, etc) remains problematic.

    What will it take for American Whites to get really riled up….like the terrorism in Europe that is unquestionably mobilizing at least the beginning of a Myth…that Whites, or at least Frenchmen, etc. have a certain…something beyond the normal rational considerations, that makes them French or White , etc.?

    More Black Insurrection and more terrorism will help a lot. Another strong economic shock will help too. The ladies….female genital mutilation amongst the coloreds has got to, shall we say, resonate with the ladies.

    Needless to say maybe, any Myth based on non-American sources, or at least recent European events, is counter-productive. Violence is completely invalid now and in the forseeable future.

    The historical record in the US is that of constant struggle against Blacks. And now add Mexicans, etc. That will have to revive….along with other shocks we can imagine. When people come together in crisis, think Katrina, that throws Whites together better than anything else. The antecedent event must be the dissolution of the Liberal Myth of Race Equality. That is starting to happen despite our Enemies in the liberal media, etc. That is what the Trump phenomenon means, even if he betrays us more or less.
    Most white people see the sea-change in demographics, and they don’t like it.
    Joe Webb

  21. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 22, 2017 - 10:19 pm | Permalink

    I just watched the full speech of Spencer at Auburn. Not bad. Still, he sounded a lot like a leftie and an inspirational speaker on the make. Sorry, Not much White Nationalism there except for the Evola romance of heroes, and so on

    The Black Cloud, the poor injuns, we done it, we whites, the darkies we enslaved, etc. I expected a darkie to sing out…you still own us White man!
    Spencer ‘owns’ all these bad things Whites did. Mea Culpa. Then he urges that we just get on with scaling the heights…No list of harms against Whites, except our Black Cloud of (Guilt?)

    Sorry. “Richard Spencer made a significant psychological breakthrough in the System regardless whether one agrees or not with his views or his wordings.”

    Don’t agree with Tom Sunic. What psychological break thru? Please explain, a la Tucker Carlson. I just want to understand.

    At least he did not heil hitler…that would be over the top. I liked Dickson’s talk…but I am just an old fuddy duddy dude who likes specificity,. Also , from a rhetorical standpoint, you don’t try to get your audience out of their seats without a fair amount of specificities. With all the White Crimes Spencer listed….the antifas should have been cheering.

    Joe Webb

    Joe Webb

  22. Forgetolerance's Gravatar Forgetolerance
    April 23, 2017 - 1:04 pm | Permalink
  23. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 23, 2017 - 5:20 pm | Permalink

    forget tolerance just put me in mind of the character of Myth, or, at least the Negative Myth, as opposed to the positive.

    I have remarked often lately that the muzzies and the jews and the liberals are doing our work for us. Drive more moors and Africans into Europe, and get a
    huge backlash. The Negative Myth is what we got today, everywhere. The
    Blacks got their Myth of White Oppression. The Jews got their Anne Frank Myth.,..killed by nazis I was informed last night on TV…negative again. Ditto
    just about everybody these days with a complaint, as opposed to a Vision, or Positive Myth.

    Everywhere it is similar. Arguably Whites are now developing our own Myth of Death by Immigration. Anhti-Immigration is safer than direct attack on Blacks, Jews, Mexicans, etc. Ok.

    With regard to Spencer’s coddling of blacks, injuns, etc. at his talk…that he ‘owned’ white injustice to the colored folks, etc., besides the weirdness of the word ‘owned’ , like some New Age pop neologism, he should have simply said that Amerindian IQ is 83, and that their civilization was Stone Age, and due to be taken over by folks like us or the chinks. That they were lucky it was us.

    Ditto the Blacks, better off here as slaves with their then probable IQ of 70, like today, before the admixture of white blood over the last couple hundred years.
    And that they are today immeasurably better off today, here, than in Africa.

    This sets the stage for a Positive Myth, that whites have invented almost everything, starting with free speech in ancient Greece and that the blacks and injuns never got close to inventing it. Ditto the Jews.

    Lets tell the Truth in other words. Then there is the absurdity of homosexuals leading White Nationalism. Yeah that ought to go down well with our brothers and sisters. LGBT and PN.

    It looks like it is going to be primarily Negative Myth…that our story today is dispossession by low-life unless we stand our ground. When I talk to folks, I always call a spade a spade…the absolute superiority of Whites, also with regard to smart chinks, the zombie dirt-huggers before their emperors. etc.

    Joe Webb

  24. Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
    April 24, 2017 - 3:39 am | Permalink

    Great article. We on the Occidental Right should be under no illusions. War is coming, a kind of global intra-Western civil war between patriot Right and race traitor Left. This will be a genomic war (a war between utterly incompatible psyches within the White race, as well as a race war between White and nonwhite), and therefore, not one that can be subject to any type of “laws of war” or historical combat norms. It will be a true war of annihilation. We patriots, who tend to be far more ethical than our Left opponents, need to start contemplating and theorizing and ethicizing mass extermination of our enemies, for our enemies will have no moral compunctions in so dealing with us. This will be a war of pure good versus pure evil, more so than any war in history.

  25. Brad's Gravatar Brad
    April 24, 2017 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

    The right has 300 million guns and are known to be much tougher guys with the old Viking spirit that conquered all other people on Earth. The right has just been too nice, too passive for too long to Yvette Felarca and Antifa. No way Antifa ever wins again. Antifa had 300 people TradYouth had 30 and TradYouth still won!! Imagine if 150 to 200 were there versus 300 Antifa. Half instead of 10 times less people and the fight would be a disaster for Antifa starting it.

Comments are closed.