On the SPLC and Their Lies: The Harassment of Andrew Anglin

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

“The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”
Polish Proverb

In what is sure to be the biggest legal assault on free speech this year, news has emerged that the Southern Poverty Law Center is orchestrating a lawsuit against leading Alt-Right media figure Andrew Anglin. The text of the suit alleges that Anglin orchestrated a harassment campaign against Tanya Gersh, a Jewish realtor residing in Whitefish, Montana, that involved “invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of Montana’s Anti-Intimidation Act.”

That the SPLC, of all organizations, should be pressing forward on such grounds is ironic to say the very least. Aside from scare-mongering among old, wealthy Jews in order to solicit donations and bequests, the SPLC’s entire modus operandi has for some time revolved around ‘exposés’ of Nationalist figures. Although these doxxings are dressed up as “Intelligence Reports” forming part of an overall “Hatewatch” strategy, in reality they are little more than grubby, sensationalized, and often libellous attempts at political intimidation. Indeed, the efforts of the SPLC in this regard are rooted in a desire to invade privacy and inflict emotional distress — precisely the kind of actions they are presently accusing Andrew Anglin of encouraging.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Of course, the efforts of the SPLC go far beyond revealing identities and peddling propaganda. An excellent example of the SPLC’s track record of intensive harassment is the hounding of Kevin MacDonald. MacDonald recalls:

The Southern Poverty Law Center initiated a campaign against me. The controversy started in September, 2006 when someone not connected with CSULB emailed all the full-time people in the Psychology Department — except me — alerting them to a comment about me at the SPLC website. Heidi Beirich of the SPLC came to Long Beach from November 12–15 2006 to interview faculty and administrators about me. During the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 academic years there was also a great deal of discussion and debate about my work and associations on faculty email lists. Eventually several departments issued statements dissociating themselves from my work and, in some cases, condemning my work. I was an active participant in these debates and I have replied to the statement of the History Department. (The History Department statement was the only departmental statement that included specific charges related to my scholarship.) In April, 2008, Beirich returned to CSULB to lead a meeting in which she again denounced me. A speaker from the Anti-Defamation League also participated in this meeting.

Obviously, the harassment of MacDonald went far beyond anything that Anglin was able to muster. The SPLC campaign against MacDonald involved multiple attempts at professional (and therefore economic) harm (including contacting his co-authors and colleagues at other universities), as well as repeated “interviews” with MacDonald’s colleagues and associates designed to encourage an environment of social ostracism. The goals were to remove MacDonald from his job, isolate him from any institutional support he may have had, and to smear his name by writing not one but a succession of slanderous and misleading articles about his work. A campaign like this would of course involve a serious invasion of privacy and the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and the SPLC relies heavily on this as part of its effort at political intimidation.

Another feature of the MacDonald case which echoes in the SPLC’s lawsuit against Anglin is the distortion of truth. MacDonald recalls that “Given Ms Beirich’s poor record in accurately portraying my writings, I had no confidence that she would conduct and report on an interview with me in a non-biased way. Nevertheless, I offered to be interviewed by her if she would answer my concerns about her previous writing about me. She did not respond to this offer.” The propagandists at the SPLC don’t care about truth, and are in fact intimidated by it.

In the Anglin suit, the SPLC are confronted with the possibility that a judge might ask how the situation between the Spencer family and Tanya Gersh first arose. Both Sherry and Richard Spencer have stated that Gersh, who has ties to a local, Orwellian-named activist group, Love Lives Here, was in fact pressuring her to sell her building in downtown Whitefish as part of a general campaign against the Spencers, and threatening pickets and protests if she didn’t. Sherry Spencer also said she and her family were receiving “terrible threats,” all stemming solely from Richard’s role at the National Policy Institute. Even the text of the SPLC lawsuit admits that local activism by Gersh and others had caused Sherry Spencer to be targeted for isolation in much the same way that MacDonald was targeted by the SPLC. The results would clearly have had a negative impact on the social life of Sherry Spencer:

The board of the symphony asked Ms. Spencer to resign and returned her donation. The Wildlife Conservancy rescinded its invitation to her, and the musical school dissolved its advisory committee in part to end its affiliation with Ms. Spencer.

Sherry Spencer is not fleshed out as a human being in the lawsuit, but solely as the mother of “a well-known anti-Semite, racist, xenophobe, and White Nationalist.” She is portrayed as a bewildered but tainted figure whose building “was causing turmoil in the community.” Gersh enters the story like some Hebrew angel: “When Ms. Spencer was lamenting the trouble her building was causing, Ms. Gersh wondered aloud why Ms. Spencer was keeping it and said that if she were in Ms. Spencer’s situation, she would sell the building, make a donation, and issue a statement disavowing her son’s views.” Gersh, in this mendacious narrative, is reluctant to get involved in the affair at all, and only becomes active as a potential agent for the sale of the building because of Sherry Spencer’s constant “imploring.”

After Sherry Spencer went public with her harassment at the hands of Gersh, Andrew Anglin became part of a broad attempt to counter it. Since the efforts of Gersh and her co-activists were intended to bring emotional and financial distress to the wider Spencer family, Anglin and many others reached the conclusion that people like Gersh should be chastened for such activity. Perhaps the most note-worthy aspect of Anglin’s involvement was his insistence that those involved in contacting Gersh to express their disgust should refrain from any kind of communication that would be illegal — a prominent, if little discussed or appreciated, feature of Anglin’s leadership of the “Troll army.” Of course, this point doesn’t feature at all in the SPLC suit.

Following its sanitized rendering of Gersh’s intimidation and attempted extortion of Sherry Spencer, the suit departs even further from the facts of the case and begins employing sensationalized and emotive accounts of the impact that counter-intimidation efforts had on Gersh. She is said to have experienced “serious and severe emotional and physical distress … for which she has received medical treatment. Ms. Gersh has had panic attacks, goes to bed in tears, wakes up crying, startles easily, feels anxiety and discomfort in crowded places, has had trouble leaving her home, and fears answering her phone.” Her physical symptoms are said to include weight gain and hair loss.

With the suit now filed, the SPLC have been crowing. SPLC President Richard Cohen has said: “We intend to hold [Anglin] accountable for the suffering he has caused Ms. Gersh and to send a strong message to those who use their online platforms as weapons of intimidation.” What Cohen refuses to admit is that our political culture has been lowered to the level of spiteful intimidations by organizations like the ADL and his own SPLC. These groups have led the way in employing methods of political activity designed to bring wide circles of social, familial, economic and professional distress to those whose opinions they view as conflicting with their interests. The suit against Anglin is not an effort to clean up our political life or protect individual rights, but rather to protect the Jewish monopoly on some of the dirtiest and retrograde forms of socio-political intimidation any group might engage in.


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

94 Comments to "On the SPLC and Their Lies: The Harassment of Andrew Anglin"

  1. Mark Green's Gravatar Mark Green
    April 19, 2017 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

    The SPLC is a ruthless and truly detestable organization. Its loathsome mission–to defame, silence and, when possible, ruin any critic of militant Judaism–is surpassed only by its false allegiance to democracy, freedom and academic scholarship.

  2. MGD's Gravatar MGD
    April 19, 2017 - 10:06 pm | Permalink


    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      April 20, 2017 - 7:50 am | Permalink

      It’s not “Some” people, it’s always the Same people.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        April 21, 2017 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

        “it’s always the Same people.”
        Franklin, surely you mean the (((Same))) people.

    • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
      April 21, 2017 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

      (((Some People))) Love Cash.

  3. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    April 19, 2017 - 11:41 pm | Permalink

    I once read, although I cannot remember the source, that one of the two guys who formed the SPLC, told the other guy that, “we have to find a way to make a lot of dough fast”. Now, I don’t know if this is true., but It is true that I read it somewhere around ten years ago or so. In any case, it worked…lol

  4. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    April 20, 2017 - 12:31 am | Permalink

    Sherry Spencer has had a first hand experience with the Jew Claw.

    Borat and the Jew Claw

  5. Jez Turner's Gravatar Jez Turner
    April 20, 2017 - 1:48 am | Permalink

    Ten out of ten!

  6. April 20, 2017 - 2:05 am | Permalink

    SPLC and its chiefs Beirich and Cohen are latter-day sanitized communists. Never ever have they written a single line in their “hatewatch reports” about a role of US and European Marxist academics in initiating and normalizing gigantic communist crimes in E. Europe and Russia, from 1918 to 1991. Their meta-language on “human rights” and “tolerance” is a carbon copy of the vernacular used by the communist commissars L. Beria, G. Yagoda and L. Kaganovich in the ex-Soviet Union. However, the communist terror apparatus could not survive one single day without relying first and foremost on the large-scale and tacit consensus among frightened and self-censored academics and journalists. The logical political outcome was the Gulag sewage system with millions of dead citizens, including many former party stalwarts. The new, albeit more dangerous version of the self-devouring communist syndrome can be observed now in SPLC verbal effusions, aka “fake news”, which is daily mimicked by professors in US/EU academia and brought to its perfection by the scared German academic class forced to live in self-denial. To assume that “playing the pc game” or “staying put” or “not rocking the boat” will protect us from this communist syndrome is suicidal. Modern antifascists are not that stupid; the decorative word “antifascism” is now a more marketable locution, a belated euphemism, yet a code word for the all-encompassing syndrome and synonym of culture-destroying and murderous Bolshevism i.e. Multiculturalism.

  7. ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
    April 20, 2017 - 2:17 am | Permalink

    Will the outcome of such a lawsuit against mr. Anglin be a litmus test if Americas First Amendment still is of any value?

    Political court cases have a 50/50 chance of being won, in my experience. If the judges have no backbone (we have seen this with Judge Kriegler in South Africa, who let through the fraudulent ballot papers of the 1994 elections), or even worse as in the case of Horst Mahler, who presently is on the run, who says the judge wants to murder him (may one say they want to pull a Nuremberg on him?).

    Cases like these show that one is not playing childrens games when standing in for the truth. It might cost you life and limb, and that is what happens in a war.

  8. m's Gravatar m
    April 20, 2017 - 3:04 am | Permalink

    My guess is that Anglin has no money for a defense. I’ve never contributed to him, but if he sets up a funding site I’d send him some dollars. Much more deserving than Antifa Porngirl, who I understand is looking for $$ after an alt-righter defended himself against her assault at last week’s Berkeley thing. God knows how much money it will take to mount a defense against these Jews.

    • April 22, 2017 - 9:49 am | Permalink

      An 18-year-old Jew named Michael Ron David Kadar has been formally charged with the wave of threats issued to Jewish Community Centers—and which was blamed on “white racists” by the Jewish lobby controlled media—has been formally charged by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).
      This entire case against Anglin may just be a distraction. I suggest he puts messages and information about Kadar and his handlers, and equipment suppliers, and advisors, and sources of ‘Jewish Community Centers’ and the rest of it — all over his website(s). That may stop them…

  9. Amasius's Gravatar Amasius
    April 20, 2017 - 3:52 am | Permalink

    God speed, Andrew Anglin. These evil liars MUST be defeated.

  10. conradcgaarder's Gravatar conradcgaarder
    April 20, 2017 - 4:38 am | Permalink

    The lawsuit alleges physical harm to Gersh, all of which relies on her own testimony (and maybe her husband’s, if she has one), and thereby gets over the law’s barrier against suits for “words alone.”
    So it gets by the judge and goes to the jury, which, SPLC hopes, contains a number of members who will be suitably “appalled” that this kind of bigotry exists in their community, and who will see the case as their opportunity to “send a message” that Whitefish will not tolerate such despicable activities.
    Then come the punitive damages. The defendant is ruined (they hope) and since it is an intentional tort, the judgement is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.
    After the verdict, the SPLC “lohyahs” (as Michael Savage calls them) will assemble on the steps of the courthouse with the reporters and pronounce themselves “gratified” that the American System of Justice came through.
    These guys are highway robbers, but it’s all done in the courthouse.

  11. Joe's Gravatar Joe
    April 20, 2017 - 6:18 am | Permalink

    I hope Anglin uses this as a springboard to launch the truth into as many faces as possible. It would be akin to Hitler’s trial in 1923 for the infamous Beer Putsch. He used it as a platform to call out the treasonous system which brought about Germany’s malaise and his popularity only grew ever after.
    Of course, Anglin will need financial support, but I think his “troll army” is large enough to fulfill the task at hand. We’ll see.
    The hypocrisy of the jews must be called out and shown to the world so that this kind of injustice cannot happen again.

  12. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    April 20, 2017 - 7:09 am | Permalink

    The Polish Proverb seems very apt. My own feelings are if it were true Gersh experienced such emotional and physical distress, it would be the best thing for everyone. It might have saved Mrs. Spencer the stress inflicted on her if it happened earlier and Gersh wouldn’t try to shakedown anyone else. But I suspect Gersh’s stress is as real as the seizure Jews reportedly suffer when they receive a flashing GIF in a tweet. These snowflakes are the nastiest people on earth, but when they are on the receiving end they cry like babies. They are also the biggest phonies on earth.


    This speech by Michael Hoffman of how Jew Deborah Lipstadt and her supporters whipped up hatred against her trial opponent David Irving in their libel trial might be instructive. Using language and religious terms only Jews would be familiar with (or an expert on Judaism like Michael Hoffman) Lipstadt and company were making threats on Mr. Irving’s life, unbeknownst to Mr. Irving. And the discussion reveals that when the trial judgement was pronounced, unbeknownst to the defense, the Israeli Ambassador to Great Britain was in the courtroom to hear the judgement and the ambassador was surrounded by armed guards. This is forbidden in British courts but for the first time an exception was made for this case. The judge himself was aware of the presence of the ambassador and the armed men when he pronounced judgement and no doubt this fact was on his mind when he pronounced the verdict in Lipstadt’s favor.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      April 21, 2017 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

      Thanks for the video Peter. ABSOLUTELY INDISPENSABLE FOR THE AVERAGE VIEWER; to be enjoyed twice- without distraction.

      Hoffmann is brilliant; I would not enjoy him opposing me in court. He gave structure to the difference in the use of English, as between us ordinary mortals and the significance and different connotations, even injunctions to murder, to those adhering to the Talmud.

      • Peter's Gravatar Peter
        April 21, 2017 - 10:07 pm | Permalink

        You’re welcome Charles. It’s fascinating.

    • Peter's Gravatar Peter
      April 21, 2017 - 10:12 pm | Permalink

      Correction: I wrote “And the discussion reveals that when the trial judgement was pronounced, unbeknownst to the defense,…”

      It should say “And the discussion reveals that when the trial judgement was pronounced, unbeknownst to the plaintiff,…” The plaintiff was David Irving.

  13. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    April 20, 2017 - 7:30 am | Permalink

    From the SPLC report :

    “…Gersh agreed to help sell the building after Sherry Spencer reached out to her…”

    That is a Big Lie. In reality Gersh threatened Ms. Spencer with demonstrations in front of her building if she refused to sell it. Then she offered her to “help” her sell it. In (non-Jewish) truth-speech this is called extortion. A pure Mafia kind of action. But the SPLC itself is a kind of Jewish Mafia.

  14. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    April 20, 2017 - 9:54 am | Permalink

    Perhaps I’m overlooking something here, but instead of reacting to these never ending streams of law suits and smear campaigns from the SPLC and ADL, why do we not take the initiative to target them directly with our own campaign?

    It would seem to me that both organizations are extremely vulnerable legally for their past and current activities. In fact, it is only the political power of organized Jewry that has allowed the ADL to continue to exist long after it was shown to be operating as an extension of the Israeli intelligence services (remember the FBI raiding the ADL offices in CA years ago?).

    Perhaps it is time to start an initiative to go after these two infamous groups. We could start a fund to which people could donate, look for Alt-Right friendly attorneys (surely Sam Dickson isn’t the only one out there) who would be willing to work on such a project, and to generally marshal what resources we can bring to bear.

    I would much prefer to read about how the ADL and/or SPLC are reacting to lawsuits against them for a change. Let’s let them explain in a court of law how they spy on Americans, how they maintain dossiers on Americans, how they generate “intelligence reports” and disseminate them to law enforcement, all to harass anyone who gets in the way of Jewish power.

    Some would argue that you couldn’t win lawsuits against these groups in American courts, but as the ADL and SPLC know, these types of suits are an effective way to harry your opponents and force them to expend their resources defending themselves…Whether you win or not.

    We could combine such legal efforts with a massive “trolling” campaign (of the type that Anglin has proven so adept at) that would target specific individuals associated with the ADL/SPLC. The idea is to make them pay a price, economic and in their social lives, for engaging in these anti-White campaigns.

    It seems to me that such strategy would be an excellent way to shine a light on these groups in particular and Jewish power in general.

    • Forever guilty's Gravatar Forever guilty
      April 20, 2017 - 3:28 pm | Permalink

      Yes. Exactly. Some kind of active defense.

    • David's Gravatar David
      April 20, 2017 - 7:01 pm | Permalink

      I agree with you completely.

      When I raise the matter with lawyers who are somewhat sympathetic in theory, they nonetheless respond timidly in practice.
      They cite fearing the loss of their licenses, being reprimanded by the bar association, losing their jobs, and so on. Basically, this is everything that the over-bureaucratization and guildification of society is meant to do: bring about social and political control and, as eventually happens whether intended or not, tyranny.

      But blast all that–we need to demand that lawyers help us. Sam Dickson is a good example in how he represented Richard Spencer at Auburn University just days ago.

      Yes, we need to fund these legal-defense organization–a whole phalanx of them if possible. We need to get to where we fund chaired professorships in law schools. We need to establish and fund scholarships, research fellowships and other scholarly activities in Law–certainly–but even in other disciplines that we might, out of ignorance, consider arcane. These things all matter and conservative donors are–I am sorry to say–not the best judges of recipients of their money.

      The Right is often reluctant to do this cultural warfare because the Right is in many, but not all, cases just a teensy weensy bit anti-intellectual (present company at Dr. McDonald’s site excepted, I am sure). The moneyed Right often views academia as a useless or frivolous activity compared to tough, money-making, practical and respectable business.

      And so the sad story happened and continues to happen: the Right abdicates the scholarly sphere, the arts, journalism and now we have what we have. The Left filled the vacuum and took over these things and they have been kidnapping the minds of the children that we send to them on campuses along with hefty tuition checks.

      We can fix this, but we have to begin to plan. We have to make the philanthropists, large and small, in our midst aware of these things and of our need to re-conquer the academy. Give them specifics.

      Even if these people you know are not players on the order of J.D. Rockefeller, smaller ones still make legacy gifts to all sorts of crazy projects thinking that they are doing good and that these “conservative” causes, foundations and institutions are all that there is. Unfortunately, these people who were so successful in business because of their determination and strong wills, are not always the most creative when fighting a war–especially a culture war,

      We have to help them. There is a lot of work to do. Let’s work together, Europeans.

  15. Aitch.'s Gravatar Aitch.
    April 20, 2017 - 9:57 am | Permalink

    When is someone going to say something about UKIP’s candidate for Manchester’s mayoral election, the Bible-burning orthodox rabbi Shneur Zalman Odze, who says his religion forbids him to shake hands with women? I used to think UKIP were on our side.

      April 21, 2017 - 12:30 pm | Permalink

      With jews you lose. Ukip is controlled or at least on a jewish leash. Forget ukip as a nationalist or pro -British political party.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      April 21, 2017 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

      UKIP is a front. It’s purpose was/is to divide the nationalist side by destroying the BNP. They aren’t anti non-White immigration, they are opposed to not being able to choose which ones.

      • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
        April 21, 2017 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

        UKIP is the best so far. They’ve got the results, we’ve got the visionary clarity. What do I care what they say? I care what they obtain.

  16. inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
    April 20, 2017 - 10:39 am | Permalink

    Unfortunately i know what i am looking at when it comes to this story. Its brilliantly diabolical and frankly, i am afraid to say it out loud. Unless i put on my fools hat with the bells to protect myself. That is how intimidation works. And I don’t have the vocabulary to do it and i”m not smart enough anyway. No one would believe me even if i tried. Does the SPLC know? I dont know. Maybe. Maybe not.
    Sometimes the right hand doesn’t tell the left hand what it is doing.

    Anglin has done alot of things that his organization has gotten away with. So have many other websites,networks, groups and individuals. For a reason. Not a good one even if they justify it that way. That calling of harassment of the girl with acid in the face was one fag troll operation too many for me.

    No one would believe me even if i could explain it. I would sound quite nuts,. and there is no one in authority to report it to.

    If people only knew they would not be able to process it. They know that and make sure that even when incomplete info is leaked- it is presented in such a way that does not register with the public. Much harm has been done to an unsuspecting public by people who are trusted.

    • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
      April 20, 2017 - 10:53 am | Permalink

      The normal brain. The regular person doesn’t think like that. and can’t process it fully. So unless a person blunders across it or unless those engaging in it enjoy to show the blunderer becuase they trust them to appreciate thier astonishing handiwork or want to scare the person- a regular person cannot know. Even if it is presented to them in all it’s glory- out in the open.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        April 20, 2017 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

        I think events at Berkeley and Spencer’s Auburn visit have shocked the puppet-masters and created a need for some colourful diversion. A faux battle where no one gets hurt to drain attention from the real one.

    • Armor's Gravatar Armor
      April 22, 2017 - 5:42 pm | Permalink

      Strange comment! Is it me, or is it gibberish?

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        April 23, 2017 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

        It’s not you, Armor, or at least not you alone!

        As I frequently find myself doing, I was here counting on Trenchant, m, Charles Frey, or you to divine what the good inspector was talking about and explain it inferentially by way of commenting upon it. As two of my just-named preux remain so far unaccounted for, perhaps it’s too soon for me to despair of deliverance!

        Trenchant’s actual comment is predictably thoughtful and provocative, but with no disrespect meant to my friend, I have a nagging sense that what he expatiated upon in clouseau’s crypsis was intrinsic less to its substance than to its accidents. Yet as I have no sure grasp of which is which, maybe I should just pour myself another virtual single malt and call it a day.

        • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
          April 23, 2017 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

          I speak fluent Gibberish and I didn’t understand what you said either, Pierre.

        • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
          April 24, 2017 - 6:16 am | Permalink

          Pierre, I put a high polish on the divining rod but it proved inadequate; apparently its ‘ which is which ‘ analytical function malfunctioned through overload. Must get a new and improved model. Hope your single malt will help you over your despair, rendering at least a modicum of deliverance. Cheers !

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          April 24, 2017 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

          Dear inspector: I’m delighted we have achieved a meeting of the minds here!

          Thanks for your high-spirited reply.

        • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
          April 24, 2017 - 4:04 pm | Permalink

          Pierre, you write like a person who has read Renaissance and Restoration type poetry since you were little.
          Pierre, you use 20 words you could have said in 4. Especially given your command of the language. An ornamental writing style. Baroque. Rococo with gold guilt filigree. Musical flourishes. fioritura and tassels and pretty dingle dangles and curly ques. Not the surrey with the fringe on top. But Her Majesty’s carriage.

          When you defend our Lord here on TOO, that same writing style becomes like the beautiful columns that hold up the baldachin that covers and protects the Alter at Saint Peters Basilica. And the Shield of Faith, Helmet of Salvation and Sword of The Spirit. as per Ephesians.

          and i think that’s pretty cool.
          it doesn’t work when i try it.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 25, 2017 - 1:40 am | Permalink

          I’m hazarding a guess that this sort of thing is what has upset our Delphic inspector:

          Not a lot of charity on show for the unfortunate victim.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 25, 2017 - 1:46 am | Permalink

          Or more precisely:

          This sort of inflammatory material is pure grist to the SPLC’s mill. Join the dots.

  17. AT's Gravatar AT
    April 20, 2017 - 11:22 am | Permalink

    Yeah, just as Spencer has gained some ground, the invigorated A-R puts some reasonable defence of Anglin-in-the-mainstream-news as here, Anglin’s six out of top seven posts at this moment at DS are: hitlermemorabilia. Check for yourselves. That’s even a better foot-shot than “Hail victory!,” aint’t it. And if anyone wondered, it all dovetails nicely in Whitefish, MT… Tired of losing yet?

    • m's Gravatar m
      April 20, 2017 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

      The Punjab and AT’s comments highlight the difference between Jews and whites. And underscore why whites will never win, unless they stick together like other racial/ethnic groups.

      That is: a Jew attempts actual extortion on an innocent white woman, and other Jews circle the wagon around the Jew, and actually attack the white woman and her defenders via lawsuits and intimidation.

      A white man who attempts to point out the Jew’s extortion, is criticized by other whites for coming on too strongly, and for celebrating The Real Hitler’s(TM) birthday–all done in words, on his blog.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      April 20, 2017 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

      Anglin’s vitriolic words about “white people” only a few years ago (without retraction, to my knowledge), and the way The Daily Stormer is functional to SPLC’s fundraising efforts amongst wealthy, older Jews, makes for an interesting courtroom drama. And maybe that’s just the point.

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        April 21, 2017 - 11:13 am | Permalink

        Didn’t this man insert a dildo into his rectum on you tube? Him calling out Anglin is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Neither of these men are prime specimens of White manhood. Anglin constantly berating White women as dumb sluts, though in many cases true, is another pot & kettle example. We Whites need to shape up, clean up, reject nihilism, stop allowing others to define us and and realize that the Jews and their colored minions are the enemy. The so-called alt-right is becoming a joke and the Jews, even if claiming to be on our side, as history has proven, cannot be trusted. They plan to undermine White Nationalism. Strong, self-respecting, focused Whites stand between them and world domination. Nick Dean’s comment summed it up nicely.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 22, 2017 - 2:51 am | Permalink

          @ Karen T.:
          Indeed, a pox on both houses! Your point is well taken on the quality of would-be leaders.

        • stevieb's Gravatar stevieb
          April 27, 2017 - 9:31 am | Permalink

          Jews have controlled the white nationalist movement from it’s inception. In fact it can be argued it’s always been Jewish controlled opposition. Just calling a nationalist movement “white” is a victory for the racialist Talmudists, imho. Nations aren’t created simply by skin colour…

      • William Shock's Gravatar William Shock
        April 21, 2017 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

        Sorry Trenchant, but I have no trust for Zionist shill Gavin McInnes whatsoever when he attacks and labels Andrew Anglin an agent provocateur. We must stand behind Andrew Anglin in this case; it is a matter of free speech and ultimately defending Anglin is in all of our interests.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 22, 2017 - 2:09 am | Permalink

          I think McInnes is on solid ground with that accusation, whatever his sexual preferences be. And on glass houses…

      • Armor's Gravatar Armor
        April 21, 2017 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

        Trenchant: “Anglin’s vitriolic words about “white people”

        What vitriolic words? His website is dedicated to the defense of White people.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 22, 2017 - 2:22 am | Permalink

          Well, I certainly hear vitriol (skip right to 05:45 and 51:28 and tell me that’s not his voice). N.b.: Were there some sort of retraction or explanation maybe I would revise my opinion of him and, by extension, his enterprise.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 22, 2017 - 2:27 am | Permalink

          Does anyone really pay attention to mission statements alone? (Fox News: Fair & Balanced, etc..)

        • Armor's Gravatar Armor
          April 22, 2017 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

          In that short recording of Anglin, no one knows who was arguing with him about what. In any case, whatever he said in that conversation doesn’t invalidate his website’s pro-White propaganda. If you discover that Archimedes cheated on his wife, it won’t invalidate his method for calculating the value of PI (3.14159…). Before you wrote your comment, you didn’t produce any proof that you didn’t cheat on your wife or husband. So, according to your own reasoning, how do I know if your comment has any value? I think it makes more sense to judge your comment on its own lack of merit.

          Scott Roberts (who made that podcast) has done useful work explaining the Jewish problem. But his criticism of Anglin is just as stupid as his crusade against Trump during the presidential campaign.

          “Were there some sort of retraction or explanation maybe I would revise my opinion of him and, by extension, his enterprise.”

          Daily Stormer (active since 2013) = 3.5 years * 365 days * 10 hours of daily pro-White activism.

          But maybe you think it’s just a trick to hide his desire to destroy the White race!

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 23, 2017 - 1:11 am | Permalink

          Indeed, I do believe the exercise is a ruse. Moreover, recent history is not short of similar examples. (((Heil Hitler!)))

          Were Archimedes hosting a website purportedly championing fidelity and monogamy, then, yes, his personal record would very much interest me before I’d vouch for his character or donate.
          I’d want him to do a Jim Bakker and ‘fess up.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 23, 2017 - 1:55 am | Permalink

          Anglin is convinced, apparently, that the Saudis did 9/11. Guess that makes him reliably pro-white like Alex Jones.

    • Wolf Disney's Gravatar Wolf Disney
      April 21, 2017 - 4:38 am | Permalink

      Hitler is a hero, period. End of story. Only the boring, unimaginative and uptight WASP boobs of the “White Nationalist/Race Realist” era could possibly think otherwise. And as far as winning goes, they didn’t exactly do much of it. What did they achieve? I mean, other than running their movement into the ground? Absolutely nothing!

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        April 21, 2017 - 8:52 am | Permalink

        Hitler lost. That suffices.

        • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
          April 21, 2017 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

          He lost. That does not suffice. Just imagine a world with millions more Jews. Hitler is the reason Soviet Union fell, half a century later. He was an excuse for the creation of Israel, although Balfour Declaration predates WW2. Just imagine a world without Israel, with so many more millions of Jews among us.

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          April 22, 2017 - 3:32 am | Permalink

          Hitlers loss was white Europes loss.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          April 22, 2017 - 11:44 am | Permalink

          Just imagine a world with millions more Jews.

          Can this sentence be read as anything other than a ringing endorsement of the Six Million fable, starring AH as the arch-villain?

          Hitler is the reason Soviet Union fell, half a century later.

          The Soviet Union didn’t fall. Rather, having been reduced to an empty shell, it was pushed—by the (((people))) who first stripped the old Russian empire bare and then shifted their focus westward to speed up the selfsame process that they had already put in train in Europe, Oceania, and the once white Christian nations of North America.

          He was an excuse for the creation of Israel, although Balfour Declaration predates WW2.

          The subordinate clause in this sentence being true renders the main clause false.

          Just imagine a world without Israel, with so many more millions of Jews among us.

          See prior comments 1 and 3. As Hitler’s actions—like them or loathe them—had effectively no impact on Israel’s existence, imagination might be employed to far better purpose. Besides, there is every reason to consider Israel first and foremost a DBA operation—a storefront set up as a distraction. It has certainly distracted Ger Tzedek!

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 23, 2017 - 1:24 am | Permalink

          The USSR’s failure was inevitable and predicted by (((Mises))) in his classic 1920 article Economic Calculation in the Soviet Commonwealth. Were it not for constant and copious aid from the West and the flourishing internal black market, the USSR would certainly not have endured as it did.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 23, 2017 - 1:35 am | Permalink

          “Hitlers loss was white Europes loss.”

          Whether he underestimated the extent of Jewish strength worldwide or made other tactical errors is irrelevant. He lost and others paid, yet others still paying.

        • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
          April 24, 2017 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

          @Trenchant. (((Mises))) predicted that Soviet Union would fall. I predict that China, USA, Israel, Iran, Egypt, everybody will one day fall. All I have to do is live enough and wait to see them fall. Soviet Union underwent so many internal reforms that there was left little of the initial Jewish communism. Even Jews were put on lash with Jewish quotas. Then Jews were practically expelled to Israel. So, anything that accordingly evolves could last forever. Soviet Union’s last straw was Chërnobyl that broke the back of the camel. The really biggest hit to the back of the camel was Hitler.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 25, 2017 - 1:21 am | Permalink

          With respect, I suggest you read that paper of Mises, it’s not long. Without money prices, no economic calculation is possible. Producers don’t know whether to make a car out of titanium, steel, or indeed gold, absent cost accounting. The Soviets, of course, used world market prices to have *some* idea of value and mitigate the waste to an extent.

          The same economic argument applies to any regime which features heavy central planning.

  18. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    April 20, 2017 - 11:55 am | Permalink

    Talk is cheap but what we need is a pan-nationalist solidarity defence fund.

    Anglin has been on their radar since the Luciana Berger affair that resulted in the arrest of Garron Helms.

    It is also not a conviction they want but to impair any opposition with massive legal fees, another way they abuse the courts.

  19. Punjab Bob Chapati's Gravatar Punjab Bob Chapati
    April 20, 2017 - 12:24 pm | Permalink

    The usual scare tactics but Andrew Anglin does us some harm with his brutish and megaphone methods. In contrast Professor MacDonald and writers like Dr. Joyce are more helpful to our case.

    I want to thank the Trump Administration for action on H-1B visa abuse.

    • Maple Curtain's Gravatar Maple Curtain
      April 20, 2017 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

      You’re 100% wrong. MacDonald and Joyce are indispensable intellectually, but Anglin and his type are the ones moving the culture. I’m guessing that you, like me, are a generation or more older than Anglin and you think that genteel methods are going to work against the Jews and Antifa. History tells us otherwise.

      • William's Gravatar William
        April 28, 2017 - 12:34 am | Permalink

        I’ve seen all sorts of sincere and kind attempts to befriend the Jewish community over the last 40 years. They will never forgive us and they will never give up taking every opportunity to undermine us.

        Yeah, they hate Germans and beat up on them the most as bullies to show what could happen to others and they invite other Whites to beat up on Germans as well but they also hate the Russians, Poles and Ukrainians.

        Scratch them and they’ll have a reason to resent us and justification to undermine us and humiliate us. Immigration, Inter racial porn, fake refugees, man and family hating feminism.

        They also hate the Swedes, they hate the Swedes simply for being White.

        Resentments, myths and hatred are so deeply embedded in their culture it is impossible to remove. A Jew I know can often recall as family history something the Spanish or Russians did to their family directly even if it can be historically proven these things didn’t happen.

        They invent their own myth and then they believe it.

        It’s human nature,,we know I, we just don’t understand the depth of it which is 10x what normies can marine.

        We have to omtake this head on, without compromise.

  20. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    April 20, 2017 - 2:50 pm | Permalink

    It should not be left out of the record that Kevin MacDonald seemed to nod in agreement when Peter Brimelow stated flatly at the last ‘altright’ conference that Anglin was not altright but rather one of those neo-nazis (that we should presumably ignore). Spencer offered no rebuttal.

    What the heck is the altright, anyway?

    Which is it, TOO? Is your loyalty to the altright or White Nationalism or to anti-Neo-Nazism? Or to White people?

    Or is all this extraneous terminology and splitting ultimately designed for the purpose of being argued endlessly into meaningless cul-de-sacs?

    Just be White Nationalists, Anglin and MacDonald. And if you can’t just do that get out the way. You’re playing into the arms of non-White Nationalists like Spencer, Taylor, Brimelow, Sailer and even non-Whites like Gottfried and Unz and Shapiro, with this eternally malleable ‘altright’ loyalty.

    You won’t ever outpace the Jews with your rebranding efforts. So stake a place and brand and defend it: mere “White Nationalism.”

    • AT's Gravatar AT
      April 21, 2017 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

      “all this extraneous terminology and splitting ultimately designed for the purpose of being argued endlessly into meaningless cul-de-sacs?”

      Well observed. There are “microaggressions” — and there can be microdefinitions, defining down… “alt-right” can be looked at as an example of defining down… “paleoconservatism” was another one… it’s gone… Both tags originated with the same (((ally))), didn’t they

  21. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    April 20, 2017 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

    We can use proverbs like this in debates. I plan to use them. Like,

    A Polish proverb says “Some people cry out in pain as they strike you.” You seem to fit the bill very well.

    Anytime Jews brag about how awesome it is to be Jewish, I say “that’s self-perception.”

    Happy Birthday Uncle Adolf! You are very sorely missed!

  22. JR Kiping's Gravatar JR Kiping
    April 20, 2017 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

    Anglin can win this easily. There are dozens of decent people who have been harmed by the SPLC and can testify to how they operate. I bet Gersh was contacted by Beirich and they strategized on how to intimidate Ms. Spencer in her own home. There are no doubt phone records linking Montgomery Alabama and Whitefish Montana. This plan to harass and bully was long before Anglin entered the picture. There are plenty of witnesses to Beirich’s viciousness and they would all love to testify in court. . Lets get it all on video and up on You Tube.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      April 21, 2017 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

      Anglin better be the recipient of considerable crowd-sourcing, as all his willing witnesses’ considerable expenses will go on his tab.

      It would merely corroborate my personal similar experience, if the Co-Plaintiffs themselves have pro-bono lawyers knocking on his door, to sabotage his case, so unnoticeably as to make an Appeal all but impossible. Lawyers oaths are issued by bubble-gum machines. That profession would equally assure their commitment to ” Justice being done “, as ” doin’ it “””to””” justice “.

      With these facts of very low ” complexity ” he needs a good tactician, rather than an adept book-keeper as counsel.

      I don’t even know how to cut and paste: which doesn’t prevent you or anyone else here from forwarding some relevant comments from this thread. He’ll need all the help he can’t afford, to overcome the hurdles unrelated to law or fact.

      Imagine the in themselves innumerable side-bars required to get disclosure of PRIVATE, but differentially adhered to information regarding phone calls, interrupting the main case, since this evidence would almost certainly add the additional federal charge of CONSPIRACY.

  23. James Reinfeld's Gravatar James Reinfeld
    April 21, 2017 - 2:15 am | Permalink

    Any white man who thinks he can disarm Jewish hostility by denouncing his fellow white men and refusing to help them in their time of trouble is a fool.

    Stand firm, white men, and be loyal to those who are loyal to the white race. You don’t have to agree with everything. We just have to help each other.

    • April 21, 2017 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

      the SPLC is a disgrace.. so what else is new?

      but if this is the demented response:

      “Stand firm, white men, and be loyal to those who are loyal to the white race.”

      humanity has a much greater problem with the whites-jews-americans who believe they are the master race of self chosen people..check reality, especially toilets where your mental excrement ought to accompany the other more normal waste as it flows into sewers.

      • Peter J's Gravatar Peter J
        April 22, 2017 - 2:56 am | Permalink

        Surely all the previous poster said was that we should – as Europeans – put aside our differences and defend ourselves from a clear targeted attack? I think that you are over-reacting…

        • William's Gravatar William
          April 28, 2017 - 4:17 pm | Permalink

          Anyone that practices ingratiation and sycophancy towards the organised Jews is betraying their race. Anyone attacking a fellow White who is taking hits from organised Jews for ’embarrassing’ them over the fact he is out in the open about staunchly pro White is clearly irrational or a hasbarat troll.

          Organised political Jews have a solid track record that can be examined to predict their future behaviour and have shown they will never stop with their thinly disguised anti-White agendas because they understand the truth: this is a zero sum game: what is bad for Whites is good for the Jews. Ayn Rand, neoconservatism, Trotsky, the extension of Laissez-faire economics to morality, open borders. No amounts of sincere kindness or grotesque ingratiation will change their ultimate direction.

          Cuckservatives such as Paul Ryan, McCain and the philosemtic ‘left wing’ traitors to the American working class rationalise their servile, unprincipled sycophancy and benefit in the currency of the day. Good publicity and moderated criticism.

          Paul Ryan and McCain like cucks may benefit as individuals

  24. Randy's Gravatar Randy
    April 21, 2017 - 8:22 am | Permalink

    I’m not a lawyer, but it seems to me that Anglin should countersue and seek Rule 11 sanctions.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      April 21, 2017 - 10:22 am | Permalink

      The differences between harmonized jurisprudence in Commonwealth jurisdictions and America are minimal: at times interchangeable to the point of integrating American upper Courts’ decisions into Canadian judgments.

      Anglin will have to make a flexible but total game-plan for his Defense in any case. This Outline alone would suffice to file for a Motion for Dismissal for lack of Merit. Win or lose this would ease him into his litigation and lend him some familiarity with his new life; for some time to come.

      A not uncommon combined Defense and Counterclaim, as you suggest, is also a good idea but gets into a full-blown battle from day one; without an opportunity to get his feet wet in a potentially less disadvantageous Motion for Dismissal.

      I wish him luck in being ” impartially ” allocated to a given Judge, willing to forego his next promotion for adhering to his oath !

    • William's Gravatar William
      April 28, 2017 - 12:12 am | Permalink

      Learn bitcoin and donate. Donate a lot. The 1st Amendment will be eroded and the White race depends on it.

      Butcoin is easy. You create a wallet, you can then send and receive. There is also crowd funding.

      Keep donating to occidental quarterly.

  25. E.'s Gravatar E.
    April 21, 2017 - 1:54 pm | Permalink

    One day after Anglin’s lawsuit & a copy of the Complaint is made available on national media networks, courtesy of the SPLC, GOOGLE puts up a new Logo.

    Today’s Logo that features a frog…, hmm, … and the end picture has a frog, a brown fox, and a BLaaaCK cat, all sleeping under one Earth. “One Earth” (TM). The Brown (Curry) Fox was the main actor in most of the slides.

    When clicking on the “learn more” button, it redirects to an earth image with the heading, “Let’s make a happier planet!”

    I can’t help but to wonder, if the Anti-White-Whites, & foreigner immigrant-invaders at GOOGLE, are attuned to our small, powerless, & dispersed movement. I think it is possible.

    No safe space, for Whites’ racial self-advocacy.

    So, if there is indeed a connection here (Anglin & Google, and perhaps/likely hostile viewers of this very site too), then the planet is more happy when pro-White advocates are decimated.

    The harassers cry out in pain (Oh the “Haters!”), as they destroy their enemy; all who Hate; all who have separate interests.

    And the Complaint itself reads like media / journalistic sensationalism. It’s ridiculous, …but it was meant to be more than a mere legal complain. It is witch burning. It is a public affair.

    And this is how life works.

    “Peace & Love!”, means compliance; White Genocide.

    When the Establishment Speaks, Whites Obey.

    This is what it means to lose wars.

    The alleged damages are inflated. There is much that would be needed to prove all the permanent damage claimed. The accountability is inflated as well. If there was murder involved by one or more unidentified “Haters!”/Part(ies), it would be Anglin’s alleged fault.

    Whatever happened or not, regardless of the severity. Regardless of the actual diction used by the class of unnamed parties that actually, and directly, culminated in the alleged damages.

    …Will this case establish that no group or class of people can express a group’s opinions, at the suggestion of one person, without that one person being sued for “intimidation” due to the actions of members of the group; and not specifically of the one’s suggestions?

    The suggestion was only for expression of opinion, it was encouragement to intimidate. And, in fact, the Plaintiff is more indicative of initial intimidation. And, clearly the SPLC, in all the extraneous “facts” involved about non-parties.

    Or, will this case be predictably, targeted, to the most accepted enemy of this era, the White Racial Advocates. Nazis, esp. The defenders of a Germany for racial Germans, and no other immigrant race, ethnicity, or religion. A Germany, that means “Germany”, and not “One Earth”.

    No Nazis, no country the European race(s); not even in/of “Europe”.

    No laws, and no powers, exist to protect our unique kinds; to protect & preserve our distinctive, exclusive, biological diversity.

    A GOOGLED future awaits all Whites in contemporary democracies under the post-war, UN & Am. Civil Rights, historically particular, ideological, & Victorious, regime.

  26. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    April 21, 2017 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    This link about someone going to prison for displaying a tattoo of a banned image is from the most popular ‘right wing’ newspaper in Britain (right wing but not right-wing enough to support Trump or Farage, and which uses the phrase ‘far-right’ for anyone who opposes mass immigration from Africa etc).

    It is definitely MSM but it does allow comments to a certain extent despite being heavily moderated (I am banned for a start without breaking any of its house rules).

    The point is that the green and red on the comments on the article below are encouraging as they suggest that the readers do NOT approve of sending a person to prison for offending jews or the left.

    Eg this comment:”8 months for displaying a tattoo in the swimming baths yet molesting children gets you nothing.” was agreed with 725 to 41 against”

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3915968/German-neo-Nazi-jailed-eight-months-Auschwitz-tattoo-spotted-went-swimming.html#ixzz4evgUQqOA

  27. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    April 21, 2017 - 4:55 pm | Permalink

    One feature of the “SPLC” lawsuit that I cannot get my (non US) mind around, is how they are part of the complaint. It’s one thing to state that you will fund a lawsuit against someone, but it is quite different to become part of a lawsuit as a 3rd party (and a distant one at that). If they are part of the lawsuit, then they are seeking to enrich themselves, unjustly, at Mr. Anglin’s expense. Natural justice would dictate that they must be severed from the suit and given no standing. It seems to me, allowing them be be involved is like me hearing, 2nd hand, of a car accident, entitles me to sue one of the drivers involved.

    • Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
      April 22, 2017 - 5:49 pm | Permalink

      Hi again: I too, with my [non US] mind [some claim none at all] was perplexed by the same questions. I think I found the answers; namely:

      01 Mrs. or Ms. Gersh as they name her, is the sole Plaintiff.

      02 Morrison, Sherwood, Wilson, & Deola, of Helena, MT.,
      [ licensed in-state ], according to the SPLC site, serve as co-counsel, which denotes that the SPLC attorneys have
      ” carriage of the matter “.

      03 The SPLC is NOT a Plaintiff.

      04 Its Dees, Cohen and Dinelli have an Application pending for Pro Hac Vice. This is described as : ” A legal term usually referring to a practice in common law jurisdictions, whereby a lawyer who has not been admitted to practice in a certain jurisdiction is allowed to participate in a particular case in that jurisdiction “.

      05 The in-state Helena firm has to Apply for the court’s permission to be assisted by the SPLC . A mere pro-forma affair; given the ‘special’ parties !

      06 The complete text of the suit can be found AT THE BOTTOM of its preceding narrative under ” SPLC sues neo-Nazi leader who targeted Jewish woman in anti-Semitic harassment campaign “.

      When you take into account that at the very apex of these organizations sits the relatively new super-secret Israeli MINISTRY OF STRATEGIC AFFAIRS, headed by Gilad Erdan and mandated exactly for this type of furor, one needs to ponder whether the whole thing, to this day was scripted from its very beginning. Haaretz mentioned, that the very address of said Ministry and its staffing remained secret and only trickled out.

  28. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    April 21, 2017 - 7:54 pm | Permalink

    Was thinking now about a White Islam. One where the Grand Mufti of Stockholm is Sven Svenson, not kosher Mullah Krekar, or kosher Sukhail Khan. There are many differences between Christianity and Islam, but the towering one difference is that Christ was killed by Jews, and Muhammad figured Jews out. Muhammad was White, with red hair, and detested Blacks, in the written. The difference between White Islam and Arab Islam will be greater than the difference between Coptic and Protestant Christianity. Iranians actually show the way. They show that you can officially have Quran in your own language, and can call to prayer in your own language as well. The towering benefit of adopting Islam en masse is that it puts Jews to their place: “protected” (like mafia protection) people rather than domineering masters vying for our extermination. I am not talking about inviting in hordes of Muslims or raising the status of those who are already in. There is too much room in Islam for tribal interest. We can assimilate some minorities of our choice, and keep the rest of them to their place. My favorite minority is obviously Jews.

    Would be karma for Jews. Not the first time, certainly the last time.

    • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
      April 21, 2017 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

      Not an Islam where everybody is called Muhammad bin Muhammad, not a vehicle of Arab imperialism, rather a vehicle of White interest.

    • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
      April 22, 2017 - 6:34 am | Permalink

      I must be missing something. What does any word of this comment actually have to do with the article it is posted against ?

      • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
        April 22, 2017 - 3:49 pm | Permalink

        You are missing something.

    • April 22, 2017 - 9:12 am | Permalink

      There’s plenty of evidence that Islam was invented by Jews, just as Jews invented Christianity, for their own purposes. Perhaps you can square that circle?

      • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
        April 22, 2017 - 3:50 pm | Permalink

        Jews are cursed so many times in the Quran that Islam is a very bad deal for Jews. Then, Jews have figured out the leaders of the Muslim world, but that’s always a slippery slope.

        • stevieb's Gravatar stevieb
          April 27, 2017 - 9:19 am | Permalink

          Yes but Jews have no problem pretending to be onside with the opposition – and that means attacking Jews for credibility. They have no problem with that as example after example shows…

      • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
        April 23, 2017 - 7:29 am | Permalink

        You are kind of right, and it makes sense. The point is, Islam might have well gotten out of hand. Jews and Muslims also collaborated in… the Muslim conquest of Spain. They are collaborating now in the invasion of UK and White countries. The point is, Muslims see Jews as temporary allies. Only the top of the top of Muslims collaborate. The vast majority of Muslims hate Jews, also because of Palestine. Jews have gotten too many things wrong.
        There is this perchance similarity between Cohen and Khagan.

        • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
          April 24, 2017 - 6:00 am | Permalink

          Ger Tzedek,

          Can any reasonable person say that the Abrahamic religions have been helpful to the genetic continuance of the European peoples?

        • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
          April 24, 2017 - 9:16 am | Permalink

          Michael Adkins, yes, occasionally. Like with the crusades. The point is this. You are being like Hitler. He pioneered and used the parachutists in the battle for Crete. He won because of that. The cost was high, he cancelled the program. Impressed Americans and Brits learned from him and launched the program, using many parachutists in the D-Day. Same here. Whatever it was, it looks like a good idea to surpass our enemy on the right. How much will Islam stick in Europe? How will that Islam look? Certainly it won’t take Somali pirates and crown them grand muftis of Stockholm. Whatever.

  29. phil white's Gravatar phil white
    April 24, 2017 - 2:04 pm | Permalink

    This timing from the article is interesting. “Heidi Beirich of the SPLC came to Long Beach from November 12–15 2006 to interview faculty and administrators about me.”

    In my 2012 civil suit against SPLC I stated under penalty of perjury that SPLC began their preparations to gang stalk me in December of 2006. A black “reporter” photographed me at an December 2006 abortion protest and the stalking began the next month.
    Of course they dragged it from Florida court to Federal court.
    It looks to me like the head guys at SPLC must have made a major policy decision in the fall of 2006. They went after me and McDonald about the same time.
    P.S. The FBI list SPLC victims as “subjects” in a “domestic terror investigation.” Thus under Patriot Act rules the “victim/subject” has no attorney client privilege and can’t hire a lawyer as a result.
    My guess is FBI head Frie started paying SPLC under the table in 1998 or there abouts for intelligence on white nationalist.
    So the FBI has to protect SPLC from civil suits by their victims.

    Only In America!!! :-)

  30. April 24, 2017 - 4:27 pm | Permalink

    There are some interesting articles in http://www.blindlight.org
    on (for example) the Berkeley punch, which looks staged [good framing of the shot, implausible punch, catching the girl before falling] and the Jewish girl pretending to be a white slut, and other such things, including Andrew Anglin, who may be less upright than might be supposed. (I don’t really like blindlight, as its owner/writer doesn’t impress me, personally, very favourably). However it’s worth reminding oneself that *anyone* promoted in the Jewish media is suspect.

  31. Nathan Krumm's Gravatar Nathan Krumm
    April 28, 2017 - 11:19 am | Permalink

    Very well written article.

    I don’t see how the $PLC shows (or plausibly pleads under Iqbal and Twombly) causation. What facts have they plead showing that any of the people who contacted Gersh would not have done so but for Anglin’s articles? Similar complaints, in medical malpractice and toxic tort cases, have been dismissed. That should probably be the first motion filed here.

    Also, I would direct anyone interested in helping Anglin to the wesearchr bounty that has been posted on this: https://www.wesearchr.com/bounties/daily-stormer-vs-splc-legal-defense-fund

Comments are closed.