The French Election: Adieu, la France

Peter Baggins, Ph.D.


Mainstream media: Macron saving France (depicted as a White woman) by leading her to the glorious future of “openness and diverse modernity”

As anticipated by most observers, liberal globalist Emmanuel Macron and populist nationalist Marine Le Pen were selected by French voters to move on to round two in France’s presidential election, scheduled for May 7th.  For the first time in the 59-year history of the French Fifth Republic neither of the country’s two main parties, the Socialists and the Republicans, made the second round of presidential balloting. Either the socialists or the center right have run France since the 1950s, but with this election the old model has been shattered.

When the two-round system was created, it was expected that the main candidates of right and left would get around 30% in round one, and then rally satellite parties to their side for the run-off. But this time there were four candidates — with four very different versions of what to do next — all split nearly evenly at around 20%, so whoever is elected will be a minority candidate. The latest figures from the French Interior Ministry have Macron at 24%, Le Pen at 21.3%, while conservative François Fillon missed the runoff at 20%, Left-wing Jean-Luc Melenchon at 19.6% and Socialist Benoît Hamon at a paltry 6.4%.

By all accounts Macron, is likely to pick up the most votes in the runoff and will almost certainly become the next president. Marine Le Pen will fight a hard campaign, and her totals will rise, but it is almost inconceivable that she will win, according to the French and International press. Apart from this speculation, what conclusions can be drawn thus far?

First, last Sunday’s vote has shown France to be deeply divided. Four candidates with markedly different views came within a few points of one another in the vote on Sunday, suggesting that the fight about what vision of France will dominate the future is far from over.

Second, many voters are angry at current policies, including economic policies and open borders, which are seen as responsible for an endless series of terrorist attacks. For the first time ever, neither of the top two candidates represents the establishment parties. Le Pen campaigned stridently against Muslim immigration, linking it to security threats, and she may have benefited from a final surge of support after a terrorist attack in Paris two days before the election, the latest in a string of atrocities that have beset France over the past two years.

Third, the socialist left has been left in ruins. Just five years ago the Socialist party of President François Hollande achieved electoral dominance in the National Assembly and Senate as well as the Elysée palace. Benoît Hamon won the January primary vote convincingly, defeating the former prime minister, Manuel Valls but he was completely rejected by the French electorate, attracting just 6.35% of the vote.

Finally, and most importantly, the French have a real choice in the May 7 runoff, as the two remaining candidates present stark alternatives for the future of the French Republic. From an American perspective, it looks a lot like globalist Hillary-Obama squaring off against nationalist Donald Trump.

Nowhere is this stark contrast between the two more apparent than their reactions to the latest act of terrorism on French soil. As reported by The Guardian, Macron, has described terrorism as an  “imponderable problem” which will be “part of our daily lives for the years to come.”

In contrast to Macron, Le Pen had been highlighting the fact that crime and security had, in her view, been “completely absent” from the presidential campaign in a live debate just minutes before news of the Kalashnikov attack broke. “It’s a major subject that nobody has mentioned,” she complained. “We must take control of our national borders to know who is coming in. We must reorganize the intelligence services, reinforce the means at the disposal of police and gendarmes, and attack the evil at its roots — that’s to say the communitarianism and the development of Islamic fundamentalism.”

Comparing Macron vs. Le Pen

Macron, a former Goldman Sachs banker and economy minister under Hollande represents the status quo. Although he has successfully distanced himself from Hollande, he fervently believes in the EU. As the only openly Europhile candidate, he told his supporters: “We need Europe, my friends, so we will rebuild it. … I will rebuild a strong and balanced alliance, thanks to you, with Germany in order to give back Europe a real dynamic.”

Macron has praised German Chancellor Angela Merkel over her generous policy to asylum seekers that has seen more than a million new arrivals since 2015. He has pledged to speed up the review process for asylum requests to France to a maximum of six months, including appeals.

He wants to keep open borders, backs the free market, and is calling for pro-business measures such as slashing corporation taxes. He is generally supportive of international trade deals and he backs the treaty with Canada. Macron also wants a three-year suspension of housing taxes for 80 percent of French households.

Macron is Obama resurrected and clothed in an expensive and elite French suit. He has the full support of the EU establishment, the French President and Prime Minister, as well as the pledged support of several prominent candidates. Finally, a senior French Muslim leader has called on the country’s nearly 5 million Muslims to “vote massively” to make Macron president.

In contrast, Le Pen condemns the EU insisting that she would not appear before a European Union flag in an interview with the TF1 television channel.

I want to be President of the French Republic, not of the European Commission. All the more so since I consider that the European Union has done a great deal of harm to our country and to our people, be it in economic matters, in social matters, or in the matter of the disappearance of borders. This will be my first measure: to restore national borders to the French, to regain mastery in order to know who is entering our country [in order] to fight against the danger of Islamist terrorism [and] migrants [who] come and hit us in the heart.

Le Pen wants to suspend immigration, introduce new measures to curb conservative Islam and deport radical Islamists. She would curtail policies that let migrants bring relatives to France, while also making it impossible for illegal migrants to secure residency status. Foreigners convicted on terror charges or any other crime would be automatically deported, and she would abolish a law that allows children with migrant parents who are born in France to eventually become French. She would also ban the wearing of “ostentatious” religious symbols such as Muslim head scarves and veils in public, having routinely warned against the “mortal danger that is fundamentalist Islam.”

Echoing the recent campaign of Donald Trump (if not the Trumpian reality), she is for France first and rejects globalization, vowing to protect French jobs and condemning liberal policies that have left many workers struggling. Le Pen would impose a 35% tax on goods by companies that move production outside France, and would penalize groups that hire foreign workers.

Both candidates see a need for more police. Macron wants to create 10,000 more police jobs, while Le Pen wants 21,000 more police and customs officials.

A snap Ipsos survey late on Sunday suggested that Macron, who’s aiming to be the country’s youngest head of state, would win by 62% to 38% for Le Pen.

But will either candidate be capable of carrying out their programs?  Quite possibly not, because Macron has no MPs, and Marine Le Pen has only two. The new president must appoint a prime minister who can command a majority in the 577-seat National Assembly (the lower house of parliament). That could be a problem for either Macron or Le Pen, because the assembly is currently dominated by the Socialists (271 seats) and center-right Republicans (193). So to have any power to push through their proposals the next president will need their party to perform well in legislative elections on 11 and 18 June.

Then there is the judiciary to consider. A report by the leftwing BBC sums up the absurd situation facing French patriots in their courts better than any analysis I’ve seen:

A far-right French mayor has been fined 2,000 euros for inciting hatred, after declaring that there were too many Muslim children in his local schools. Robert Menard, mayor of the southern town of Beziers, is an ally of the anti-immigrant National Front party. On 1 September 2016, France’s first day back at school, he tweeted that he was witnessing the “great replacement.” The divisive term is used to describe the alleged eviction of France’s white Christian population by migrants.

On 5 September Menard said on LCI television: “In a class in the city centre of my town, 91% of the children are Muslims. Obviously, this is a problem. There are limits to tolerance.”

French law prohibits data based on people’s religious beliefs or ethnicity. Menard defended his comments, saying: “I just described the situation in my town. It is not a value judgement, it’s a fact. It’s what I can see.”

In addition to the fine, a Paris court awarded 1,000 euros (£0.85-£850; $1.1-$1,100) in court costs to anti-racist groups that had brought the case. The fine was higher than the 1,800 euros called for by the public prosecutor, who said Menard had “pointed the finger at kids, whom he describes as a weight on the national community.”

Finally there is also the media to consider. As we saw with Obama/Clinton vs. Trump, the mainstream media in France and abroad openly favor the liberals and show hostile contempt for conservatives. The account above by the BBC is obviously riddled with biased and pejorative phrasing. Here’s another sample of the BBC’s bias with respect to the two candidates.

On Macron:

“And yet somehow Emmanuel Macron read the zeitgeist. He found an untapped reservoir of support among the young, the disillusioned-but-optimistic, the anti-cynics. Through his energy, his youth, and his incomparable charm and articulacy, he has pulled off a political coup that will go down in the annals.”

On LePen:

Bernard Cazeneuve, the sitting Socialist prime minister, called Ms. Le Pen’s project “dangerous and sectarian” and said it would “impoverish, isolate and divide” the country. “It will inevitably lead to the end of Europe and of the euro, and, eventually, to France’s relegation,” he said. “The National Front cannot be the future of our country.”

From French mainstream media:

Macron : «Je veux être le président des patriotes face à la menace des nationalistes» (“I want to be the president of the patriots facing the threat of the nationalists”).

From the EU:

The EU’s unelected executive is quietly terrified that a Le Pen presidency could bring the European project to a screeching halt. “From the [European] Commission’s point of view, success for Marine Le Pen is a disaster and an existential threat to the European project,” an anonymous high-ranking official confessed in March 2017. “We can survive a Brexit, but not a Frexit.”

Like Trump, Le Pen must appeal directly to the people, bypassing a largely hostile media. Having watched both Trump and Le Pen campaign rallies I am struck by their similarities — hard-hitting direct speech before large enthusiastic crowds. In front of her cheering supporters, Le Pen declared that she embodies “the great alternative” for French voters. She portrayed her duel with Macron as a battle between “patriots” and “wild deregulation” — warning of job losses overseas, mass migration straining resources at home and “the free circulation of terrorists.”

“The time has come to free the French people,” she said at her election day headquarters, adding that nothing short of “the survival of France” will be at stake in the presidential runoff.

As election results were being broadcast, French police detained 29 people in Paris after “anti-fascist” demonstrators became violent — hurling glass bottles and firecrackers and setting cars ablaze. The left-wing protesters said they were angry that far-right leader Marine Le Pen is advancing to the French presidential runoff. Like the antifa in the US, they prefer violence to voting. Six officers and three demonstrators were injured during the protests at the Place de la Bastille and several businesses sustained damage (Agence-France Presse).

The day after the election Macron came under fire for acting as if victory next month was already his. Macron’s visit to a chic Left Bank brasserie on Sunday night after his first round triumph handed ammunition to his opponents who described it as shallow, arrogant behavior. “They were patting themselves on the back with the whole celeb crew,” Le Pen remarked while visiting a wholesale market near Paris on Tuesday. “It shows that this arrogant cast thinks it’s already won and can do what it wants with the country.”

Surveying the dismal French political landscape following the election, James Delingpole writing for Breitbart news had this pessimistic comment:

While many French — and pretty much all the global commentariat — appear to have made up their minds that they have just dodged a bullet because they are not, after all, going to end up with a Presidency in the hands of the “far right”, they really have very little to celebrate. All France has done is to guarantee the election of a lame-duck caretaker president — Continuation Hollande — who will ensure that France’s ongoing decline will continue unabated. Its industries will stagnate; its social unrest will intensify; ever greater numbers of its citizenry will be murdered in homegrown terrorist attacks; its economy will tank; the country that was once arguably the most civilised and beautiful and sophisticated in all the world will descend ever deeper into chaos, ugliness, and despair.

Salut, President Macron. Adieu, la France.

Over the next two weeks “The great debate will finally take place,” Ms. Le Pen said on Twitter. “French citizens need to seize this historic opportunity.”

But will they?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

115 Comments to "The French Election: Adieu, la France"

  1. Robert Maune's Gravatar Robert Maune
    April 27, 2017 - 8:09 am | Permalink

    This pessimistic writing seems entirely based on a summary of the Lugenpresse’s recent output. I am hearing quite different conversations from my French family, conversations that suggest the FN is being considered by many for the first time ever despite decades of propaganda designed to ensure this never happened. As a European living in the States it feels as if many of our people are so dismayed by Trump’s embarrassing flaccidity that their anger is being displaced onto a French woman who has the arrogance to think she can do better. She has been schooled for this moment her entire life, she can do very much better. We should all be wishing her well. Shadenfreude is ugly and far out of our price range.

    • April 27, 2017 - 8:45 am | Permalink

      For some reason, Baggins doesn’t mention that the French media are controlled by Jews. Or that his quotations are taken from Jew-run media in the US and UK. Maybe he’s trying to get a job with Murdoch.

      • Occidental Fan's Gravatar Occidental Fan
        April 28, 2017 - 2:17 am | Permalink

        You know, Rerevisionist: every comment I read by you seems designed to undermine rather than assist. Maybe you’re trying to get a job with Soros?

    • Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
      April 27, 2017 - 9:56 am | Permalink

      I would wholeheartedly second your comments, Robert. I would love to see the French people come to their political senses, and hope that they do. Furthermore, I hope that Le Pen doesn’t betray them like Trump is doing to his White base here in America. I remember commenting on this site last year that Jewry would never let Trump ever get near political power without cutting a “deal” to their over riding advantage first. (He always did shill for them, as the record shows.) And now, Bingo, volte face Trump is suddenly intellectually and politically circumcised! Trump has obviously been neutralized by organized Jewry, and will likely be known henceforth as Trump the double dealer.

      • Laoyan's Gravatar Laoyan
        April 28, 2017 - 4:23 am | Permalink

        How could any sane voter in America expect Trump to keep any of his promises? The guy has been an utter fraud since the very start. So gullible! I hope the French are more intelligent. But the reality will disappoint, of course.

    • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
      April 27, 2017 - 11:33 am | Permalink

      Bravo..!! Robert.. and well said indeed. Frankly, I’m not just surprised, but actually shocked, and fairly appalled, to see the deeply depressing, defeatist tone of this article on TOO of all places – bastion of the undefeated White will to win against the (((odds.)))

      Even if Mr Baggins really sees the current situation this way, I personally would have urged caution, as any type of edItor, for an outlook as bleak as this. This is simply because, quite apart from the defeatist message and it’s tone, I really don’t understand how he can have so completely overlooked one very simple, essential, unavoidable, game-changing fact: Go on. You know very well what it is. I dare you.

      Regardless of ALL the polls, the career pollsters, the cynical jaded journalist pundits, the thousand television talking heads, and the absolutely “final” political, social and societal “received wisdom”, Trump WON, and he won against an almost identically-rigged table – rigged by exactly the same people, for exactly the same reasons, as we see with Ms. Le Pen. He WON – just exactly as some of us had been saying he would, ever since the day he formally entered the race. He WON – and so the rest is simply irrelevant.

      And so, although I don’t normally throw either my hat into the ring or my money on the table, right now I feel something is needed to offset this skewed article and its terribly lost – and wrong – tone. TOO readers deserve better right now and we all deserve and need hope. Therefore I tell you now: Ms Le Pen will WIN. You read it HERE first. An historic, glorious, timeless, barely-believable and drunk-for-a-month victory of Right over Wrong and Right over Left is coming to La Belle France against ALL the (((odds))). She will WIN – and not just because she is radiantly beautiful or because she is possessed of enough burning, immovable intelligence to make a grown man weep for joy. She will win because the wheel has rolled round, and the table has shifted just enough, and because she MUST win. She will win because the time is perfect and right for a second, decisive, and final blow to the ugliness and wickedness and ruthlessness of the Jewish White-replacement multicultural unification laboratory in White Europe. And because her historic victory, never to be forgotten in the annals of time, will bring about the full Jewish nightmare of the slow-burning collapse of the European Unification and all it’s works, still reeling from Brexit, it will be rather less of a hammer blow, and rather more of a stake through the heart of the vampire parasite at the critical, most perfect moment.

      Or, to put it another way: After Brexit, and Trump – Do you seriously imagine 60 million French people are that stupid ?

      Long live Marine Le Pen. Roll on Frexit. Death to the (((EU))) and all it brings.

      And of course – Vive La France.

      • Chinook Wind's Gravatar Chinook Wind
        April 27, 2017 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

        I’m not sure if my choice of composer is appropriate. But I could swear I heard Wagner played loud as I read your comment. I absolutely agree with you, she will win,,,,Bigly.

      • David's Gravatar David
        April 27, 2017 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

        Mr. Bowman, I agree. This was the position that I maintained during the Trump campaign. Even my Alt-Right friends, actually the ones who got me hooked on Trump in the first place, were almost throwing in the towel in the Summer of 2016. One must look at the energy in the field. Turn off those damnable commentators and those blasted TV sets.

        And the French need to get active chatting, pressing and making the undecided squirm. Come on, this is important stuff.

        Furthermore, the French need Le Pins on their LaPels proclaiming Le Pen! (One must wonder seriously why I have a hard time getting jobs with THAT kind of talent, don’t you agree?)

        Anyway, I tolerate cheerleading–even insist on it during a campaign. Okay, afterwards, our team needs to hold Trump’s feet to the fire. This is a different stage of battle. Actually, I suspect that a seasoned negotiator like Trump expects his base to put up a fuss when Trump seems to veer off course. He needs to veer for tactical reasons, and he needs us to give him cause to say to his opponents: “Sorry, I just can’t do anymore, I have a base to please.” He cannot come out and tell us that, but he has to hope that we are smart enough to figure it out.

        So, despite things that I do not like, I am sticking with Trump as someone that we have potential of influencing for the right causes. HRC would have been an absolute disaster and I would have already been scheduled to be politically euthanized in some “clinic” run by some type of crazies.

        By analogy then, there is no reason to despair of Le Pen winning. If you do, then she will lose for sure. And if you are French and you let this happen by a cowardly despair, then you disgust me. But you do not disgust me. I have faith in you. Fight!

        I am part French-German. I wish we could put some testosterone pills in the water that the French leader’s drink, and in the water that the men drink as well. See, when I get frustrated with the inanity and stupidity of a presently lifeless bunch in need of arousal, I figure that one might as well provoke them to generalized anger first, then directed anger following that–what harm could there be? If provocation works–then I hope to make you, Mr. Frenchman, angry—angry enough to make sure that Le Pen, and France, and us all, are winners.

        LePin! LaPel! Le Pen! Yes, yes, yes, this could replace that evidently useless, “Liberte, Fraternite, Egalite!”

      • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
        April 28, 2017 - 3:11 am | Permalink

        Beautiful passion, wonderful comment – but please don’t make the mistake the Fuhrer made of allowing wishes and ideology to replace cold calculation. Marine will lose, France will lose, Europa (a better term than “Europe”, which these days connotes the EU) will lose. See my new comment above. The White race is not brainwashed, the old blame-the-Jews canard. We are evolutionarily maladapted to this bottleneck in history. If Whites passionately did not want diversity, they would never have allowed it. Now, it is nearly too late. Our race, and therefore nation(s) and whole civilization, are all headed to extinction. The ONLY hope, outside of global civil war across Europa, after which all pre-war calculations will be nullified, is White Zion – the territorial ingathering of all White preservationists into a sovereign majority.

        • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
          May 1, 2017 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

          “If Whites passionately did not want diversity, they would never have allowed it.”

          My experience with persons wanting diversity is that they are totally naive. They live in a mainstream media indoctrination (this includes liberal universities and schools) bubble, and are not able to see outside this world, except if they for example have stayed in Africa for a prolonged period of time, without some kind of financial cushion which protected them from the harsh realities.

          In South Africa we had the joke going around – what is the difference between a racist and tourist? One week.

    • MGD's Gravatar MGD
      April 27, 2017 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

      Robert Maune-

      Excellent post. I must say that I was disappointed in the first round results and my prediction then was a 70/30 Macron win in the second round. But I’ve been reading some things from Franco-American observers that say Macaroni hasn’t doing so great this week. I’m still skeptical about the outcome but I sure hope your right.

  2. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    April 27, 2017 - 8:46 am | Permalink

    The French male is too passive, as are, most European males. We need to be much more assertive.

    The first question for a Frenchman to ask is, “can hipster and hennetaster like Macron help promote our genetic continuance?” If the answer is no, send him home to mommy!

  3. Peter Baggins's Gravatar Peter Baggins
    April 27, 2017 - 10:44 am | Permalink

    I hope you are correct Robert, and I do wish Marine Le Pen well. Her discourse makes sense to me, and to most of TOO’s readers I suspect.

  4. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    April 27, 2017 - 11:57 am | Permalink

    French nationalism is a contradiction in terms, according to Varg Vikernes (Scandinavian, who lives in France with his French wife, who are busy cranking out lots of babies). He sees it as an issue of true Gauls vs invaders of previous eras (so why bother voting for any party that doesn’t recognize this).

    He talks here about the uselessness of voting. There is no political solution, according to Varg. I guess some of you will disagree.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8x4QfXf1yl4&index=4&list=PLV1Xd_c5-wtbl2l-8BWp9wUI0zVccUbT- (5:53)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cCBcvGrWMU (9:27)

    • George's Gravatar George
      April 27, 2017 - 9:47 pm | Permalink

      There should be no HOPE put in the political process, but it doesn’t mean that you don’t do everything you can, after all, how much trouble is it to vote? People act like spurned lovers with voting, as if their hearts will open and then be crushed by the about-faced politician. Just do what Evola said to do when asked in 1974 – “Choose the least of the evils, and side with the moderate”.

    • Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
      April 28, 2017 - 2:42 am | Permalink

      Invaders of previous era were the… Scandinavians! They left us the cider.
      FN are mainly the Gaulois who drink wine.

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        April 28, 2017 - 9:24 am | Permalink

        Also the Romans and Franks (barbarians) were major invaders. What did they introduce by way of liquid refreshments, I wonder?

        • Frozy's Gravatar Frozy
          April 29, 2017 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

          It was the Romans who introduced wine, like they did in England. As to the Franks, not sure … I think Gauls already had beer.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      April 28, 2017 - 3:13 am | Permalink

      The French as ethnic group exist.

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        April 28, 2017 - 9:36 am | Permalink

        Yes, but they are a Mulligan’s stew, no longer pure. Not that it matters, since they’ve had over a thousand years to stabilize into a new variety. I wonder how long it will take this “new” French ethnic group, mixing with the new, darker, input, to become an entire new but much transformed ethnic group once again. But hey, they’re still French, right…

        I am not saying I agree with Varg’s conclusions. Not sure what to think. I mean, he is pure Scandinavian, yet he’s mixing with an ethnically French woman (who may have Scandinavian blood, too). I think we’ll have to settle on Just Plain White at this point in our tribulations without getting too flossy about it. I am told that in England you can still identify various ancient ethnic groups who have not been mixed with any other – so maybe in France, also. Wikipedia has some sly and interesting observations about just who and what the “French” are.

        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          April 29, 2017 - 6:17 am | Permalink

          You are a really humorous person. I just love abstractions and magical thinking, surrounded by a vacuum of logic, practicality, reason, empiricism, and a thumb nose at what merely works. How pedestrian are those of us who actually made something, did something in the Real World, and were disabused of those fancies and fairie thoughts of pixies.

          A pure, “Nordic” strain for the rescue of White heritage? Sure. An island in Puget sound, excluding Vancouver should be more than adequate for the collection of souls, the vast majority of whom will have IQs well within a SD of the mean IQ of 100, for this starchy, salty, and artificially sweetened advocacy.

        • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
          May 1, 2017 - 7:22 am | Permalink

          The French are the French – they exist and make up 90% of the population of France. French-Algerians are French-Algerians, they are a handful and not a political factor. Gauls do not exist.

          Enough obstacles exist already against White nationalisms. Nationalists don’t need to invent new and outlandish ones.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      April 28, 2017 - 3:39 am | Permalink

      I think Varg’s sober conclusion is correct for all Western democracies.

  5. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    April 27, 2017 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    The question becomes, “Have the people of France had enough yet?” Just like a beaten up, abused, co-dependent spouse who appears in the emergency rooms regularly. She-or he-keep returning, grasping the thin thread of yet another promise: this time it will be different going forward; I’ve changed and will consider your interests, needs, and feelings. It’s a closed loop feed, Dear Readers.

    Socialism, an almost exclusive French creation-like ballet, but refined and promoted elsewhere-seems wired into the French collective DNA. This DNA comes from a people who have always defined themselves as superior at abstract meaninglessness, whether it was fashion, circular and peculiar philosophy, and swoon for the abstract-even when it had no connection to the concrete.

    You can judge the competency of a country, I maintain, by the quality of its machinery in design, integrity, innovation, robustness, and efficiency. I’m not talking about circuits and software, but machines. Cars, industrial motors, pumps, pneumatic, hydraulic, metal works. That shows that a people, a nation can think and create what works and stands up to performance parameters and success-failure paradigm. No gray area of smoothing the edges of failure. The French make lousy machines, have a low status among major machinery producers. It’s as if they didn’t concentrate long enough and were not apt to tolerate pain and seriousness to achieve the maximum. This is Japanese culture and formerly German and Northern European. All of these people have a re-population replacement deficit, as of course all Caucasians do.

    Marine LePen (why hasn’t anybody on her side made the comparison and parallel) is the Joan of Arc, the Wielder of Excalibur, God’s Knight against the twilight and onset of permanent darkness of France. The strength, the consistency, the grace, and the fire of this AMAZING woman is stupefying. She is a Thatcher, a Reagan, or more likely, an Andrew Jackson for these pitiable people for whom the epithet, Frogs, seems a compliment.

    In Texas, we used to play with “pill bugs”, who when touched, would roll up and form a perfect ball. The French are so easy to manipulate because they and they alone believe they are supremely knowledgeable and smart. Most who know them perceive them as a Snickers Bar in a vending machine. Just press the buttons and…plop, there is your predictable result.

    • April 27, 2017 - 6:46 pm | Permalink

      Don’t forget France was an early victim of Jewish viciousness and theft, during and after the (((French))) Revolution. Its fate was something like the USSR in the 20th century under Jews. You’re like someone saying the Russians are lazy and stupid and undeveloped – without talking about the mass killings of Russians. All whites are in a difficult position, and I can’t see much point in describing any group of them without taking their history into account.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        April 28, 2017 - 9:54 am | Permalink

        Yes, but everybody has an excuse. Take “my people”, the Greeks. They are truly a sorry, sordid lot. They vote for a Communist know-nothing sellout to the EU, with the universal knowledge that the country makes nothing of value and is totally bankrupt. Do you think I support them in any conversation or communication? NO! I don’t want to be associated with them. They are not Hellenes, and they are not the caliber of my emigré grandparents. The Greeks that stayed behind and did not leave a pitiable country in the 20th century were the least of everything.

        I do not allow some Greeks to explain away the cowardice, dysfunction, and dishonor today by saying, “Well, it was the long domination of the Turks that created such problems (such as jive-assing), dishonesty, laziness, and adherence to the Something For Nothing School of Modern Thoughtlessness.

        I’m an Asian fan, admirer, and believe that this incarnation is a detour of instruction and appreciation for the Orient, my past and future home of my heart.

        The West needs to face up to it: the Asian, Oriental is superior to the Caucasian on several spectra. Besides the usual comparisons on aptitude, you might have noticed the built in inoculation to the Cultural and Social Marxism of the Hebrew International Frankfurt Hotdog School. White’s are somewhere between Negroes and Asians on most measures that count for survival.

        See Fred Reed’s “Fred on Everything” page: Why White Men Prefer Asian Women: The View From A Sushi Bar. They are better machines. Pump longer, higher output, more reliable, less maintenance, and run quieter. Better design.

        • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
          April 28, 2017 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

          A fan of the Asians, are we, then. Not too long ago, I saw a video of a chink boiling a dog alive on a busy street over there, while those superior Asian people just walked past, picking their noses. Happens every day, this was not some kind of anomaly.

          Now about Fred Reed’s claims. He’s got it backwards: white men are easily taken in by the wily Asian woman, she who has an agenda that the white man can’t see, because he is looking for a woman who he sees as sexually compliant and obedient. Heh, heh. That is, until he finds himself married into the entire clan and things go south.

          Nice, too, that you compare women to machines. No wonder feminism (right or wrong) won’t be disappearing anytime soon.

      • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
        April 29, 2017 - 8:31 am | Permalink

        Dear Rerevisionist, it’s always a sight to my sore (Slavic) eyes to read your insightful posts. The genius tribe is indeed behind many of our tragedies.

    • Robert Maune's Gravatar Robert Maune
      April 27, 2017 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

      Hello Poupon, my French wife is part of the management of a French engineering company whose products are used by Boeing, Sikorsky, Bombardier, and Raytheon.

      (They are also found on Eurofighter and in Airbus).

      This French company is actually the world leader in their field.

      Understandable many Americans are feeling rudely humiliated by the ‘leader of the free world’ entering the White House like the Lone Ranger and almost immediately becoming Midnight Cowboy, that’s still no excuse for taking out your sours on a woman who has far bigger balls.

      Vive Marine! Vive La France!

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        April 28, 2017 - 9:38 am | Permalink

        OK, RM, 10% of France is competitive, useful, and is world class. Hooray. What about the remainder, and the total control by the (((Hostile Elite)))? What percent do (((they))) have invested in your wife’s firm and is it tied in with Mossad?

        • Maximos's Gravatar Maximos
          May 1, 2017 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

          Nonsense… French make some of the best machinery around. Often, it’s a pinnacle of an industrial design and sets standards for the rest ( paint spraying equipment comes to mind) yes, it can lack the robustness of some other producers, but at the end of the day, if you take good care of it, it will take very good care of you.
          Also, most of the time, it looks beautiful and sophisticated as well, though it may cost more but hey, you get what you pay for.

      • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
        April 28, 2017 - 5:43 pm | Permalink

        Is it true she dates an Algerian Jew? That is not a good sign at all. Her father was vastly better. But no matter. White preservationists are now minorities in every electorate in the White world. We are doomed to extinction as things stand.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          April 29, 2017 - 6:40 pm | Permalink

          Louis Aliot’s maternal grandfather was Jewish; halachically he is not (despite self-identifying as such @ 6:15).

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      April 28, 2017 - 6:23 am | Permalink

      It seems to me, that you have never driven a French car. I’ve owned, rented, and/or driven cars from all over the world, from Mercedes and Jaguars to Skodas and Trabants, and even a Moskvitch. I’d prefer a Peugeot or Citroen rather than almost all of the American vehicles I’ve owned. The engineering is every bit as good, if not better than, as American cars.
      As for thinking, an American Occupational Therapist, with whom I am acquainted, once told me that her family moved to France when she was a teen. Her mother was French, and she spoke French before relocating. While a top flight student in the US, she was astounded by the amount of work she had to do to even approach, but not attain, that level in France. By the way, France is a world leader in microbiology.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        April 28, 2017 - 9:41 am | Permalink

        Question: were either or both private schools? When was this? Being leaders in microbiology, are they working on a sterilizing agent that specifically targets Muslims? I mean, if it can be done with releasing sterilized mosquitoes……….

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          April 29, 2017 - 12:04 pm | Permalink

          “Question: were either or both private schools?”
          Both were public schools. She was stating that there were higher standards in France.

      • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
        April 28, 2017 - 9:55 am | Permalink

        and they had thier very own Space Agency. And Aviation. Science and industry, Agriculture science. Foreign activities and territories. They live in a global world and preserve France at the same time. They walk and chew gum at the same time. They mix the traditional and the modern beautifully.

        We want the French to know how Great they are. How great their Future is. They could just be beginning. The world needs Le France and Le French People preserved whole, potent and healthy and rearing to go. For the 21rst Century. A future without them isn’t a future. It’s death. That’s how unique and irreplaceable and special they are. They forget and we want them to remember always. No matter what. My favorite French heroes are Louis Bleriot and the Montgolfier Brothers. and thats just for starters.

        There has always been a France or a Germany or a Netherlands or a Britain or a Poland. Some people can’t conceive of a world where those places, cultures, histories, people and language don’t exist anymore. They think they still have time to think about something other than thier sacred sovereignty and very existence. but I live in the future- California. They will not like it. And know how fast a country can go from being fully sovereign with 80+ percent traditional Americans to 39 percent in 35 years. ( less if you dont count MENA, Jews, North Africans and Persians, Armenians as white). Its one thing to lose California, it’s a Crime against Humanity to lose France.

        It is treacherous evil leadership that is perpetrating this Crime. Marine Le Pen is the only leader even acknowledging this sadistic crime is occurring. She is the only leader worthy of France.

        Macron is a criminal of humanity and a traitor of France. I don’t know how to say that any straighter. If it is a crime to blow up a world treasure like Palmyra or the Buddha Statue in Afghanistan or deface The Pieta with a sledge hammer. The UN can set up an agency like UNESCO to protect World Treasures. But then UN officials like Peter Sutherland human traffics en mass for the total destruction of entire European nations and Peoples. It is a bigger crime to end the World Treasure of the Nation of France and the French People by mass immigration and desecration of it’s culture, heritage and future. It is a Crime. and the Media, the military, the police, academics, politicians, now union bosses, ngo, churches, -all the authorities- are complicit and perpetrating in that sadistic Crime. …………………..Only Marine Le Pen voters will not be complicit. They alone vote to save France and give that incomparable Nation and it’s people a Future. They are the modern day heroes of France. and the world.

        I hope they fill back up thier Cathedrals and churches and dust off their Bibles. The local Pastors, Priests and Nuns will be delighted to see them again. And thier lonely and discarded Saints and Heroes Joan, Genevieve and Therese and Martin, Denis, Michael and and all the others will greet them.

        Americans sometimes call people by what they eat. Krauts, Limies. We call them “frogs” because of their exotic cuisine choices? They like to eat snails too. See, white people don’t need to bring in colorful menus from swarthies of far abroad when we have the French. Who go out into their back garden and see what’s for dinner- cook it up with some garlic and butter. Could be worse, the Belgians eat their French fries …..chips…… um..Freedom Fries….with mayonnaise. That’s just wrong on so many levels. It’s like ketchup with hot dogs or socks with sandals.

        Vive Le France. and i will be wearing my Bic ball point pen with tricolor in solidarity with Madame Le Pen. Le Pen.

        • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
          April 28, 2017 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

          I”m not Catholic, just pro-French and they are Catholic.

      • April 28, 2017 - 4:06 pm | Permalink

        Britain is/ was a world leader in some fields. So was Germany. So was the USA. But white genetics seems unable to rise above smallish groups of enthusiasts, who concentrate on their own interests, including religions, often very skillfully, BUT never take an overview, and are helpless against skilled mind-changing parasites, including Jews and no doubt Muslims too.
        http://www.big-lies.org/jews/guide-for-the-perplexed-about-jews.html#jew-parasite-evolution

        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          April 29, 2017 - 6:08 am | Permalink

          Excellent link! All of our wishes, hopes and dreams for at least a continuation of the “White” race is all for naught if White Women Wombs do not produce an average of 3 children. Everything else is sticks and stems.

          There are National Socialism, Aryan, sites that spell out our troubles and divisions and deficiencies, but note well they all skirt the issue of just what is White. Is it blond hair, blue eyes and freckles? Does it exclude Mediterranean ancestry?

          I have written on this topic and my idea of future racial salvation. Being an engineer (retired), approaching my 7th decades and a lifetime of travel and living abroad and in Amurka has given me a perspective basis that has not been repudiated or invalidated.

          In fact, most discussions and arguments on White racial qualification are emotion laden, retroactive, nostalgic, and totally non-efficacious and DOA. If interested, follow my Disqus comments. The latest on this was on Amren.

          Rr, please say hello to all my friends at Darkmoon.

        • April 29, 2017 - 9:34 am | Permalink

          @Poupon Marx – I googled ‘Poupon Marx disqus’ and found many of your comments, but one-sided – I mean without the original articles, or opposing/countering comments. None of my business, but I do feel you place epithets and anecdotes above clarity in getting your views across.

        • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
          April 29, 2017 - 4:12 pm | Permalink

          MacDonald’s ‘Culture of Critique’ deals with secret Jewish propaganda. It’s not published by a mainstream publisher [from biglies site]

          The publisher is Praeger- (((surname))) is found on this list:

          http://www.avotaynu.com/csi/csi-result.html?page=next

      • Floda's Gravatar Floda
        April 29, 2017 - 9:27 pm | Permalink

        I agree with you on French Cars, my wife has owned a small Peugeot SUV for two years and LOVES it, every time I drive it, it puts a smile on my face,

      • Maximos's Gravatar Maximos
        May 2, 2017 - 12:21 am | Permalink

        French also leaders in AF ablation medical procedures as well, aerospace technologies and NUMEROUS other. On other hand, Asians often lack creativity and ability to think out of the box. To a great many of them, material success is the only purpose of life.
        Lack of altruism, greed and selfishness also comes to mind.

    • Drake Corrigan's Gravatar Drake Corrigan
      April 28, 2017 - 7:20 pm | Permalink

      Bravo !!

  6. Art's Gravatar Art
    April 27, 2017 - 3:07 pm | Permalink

    Do not forget that Marine Le Pen is a pro-Zionist shill, she supports the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. And she supports the Commie-like censorship in France.

    How can somebody, who refuses to see the reasons of a disease, supports laws that prohibit a free discussion about the disease, cure this disease?

    Just talking about the symptoms, ignoring the reasons, will not change anything.

    If she is really elected, she will be played by the globalists as easily, as Trump is played today.

    If I was French, I would not vote for any candidate.

    • MGD's Gravatar MGD
      April 27, 2017 - 7:15 pm | Permalink

      Art I agree with you but not voting helps Macron who is orders of magnitude worse than Le Pen. Are we now going to take the “worse is better” view of the Communists? Le Pen is the dam buster. She won’t fix the system but if she wins (which is unlikely) she will help slow the decline while still helping to break up the old corrupt liberal globalist system. She’s by no means perfect she just beats the hell out of Macaroni.

    • Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
      April 27, 2017 - 9:00 pm | Permalink

      I don’t care pro-zionist or not. We don’t have that luxury. Thinking everything, Trump is a victory for us, no matter what piece of shit he is.

    • George's Gravatar George
      April 27, 2017 - 9:43 pm | Permalink

      The only reason anyone needs to vote for Le Pen is to crush the EU. If that’s all she achieves, it would be a mighty blow.

    • Occidental Fan's Gravatar Occidental Fan
      April 28, 2017 - 2:13 am | Permalink

      If I was French, I would not vote for any candidate.

      If you were working for the ADL or Soros, you would say the same thing. Don’t vote, goyim folks. It’s hopeless! Hopeless, I tell you.

    • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
      April 28, 2017 - 3:23 am | Permalink

      And yet, she was the only hope for France – and maybe Europa, too.

    • Laoyan's Gravatar Laoyan
      April 28, 2017 - 4:10 am | Permalink

      Agree. Both candidates look to be controlled. They never mention the real issue that has been beseting France, the de-generation of social morality and lack of Catholic religious belief. Law only works on a sound moral foundation of a society. Without the moral foundation no law can stop chaos and France is fastly degenerating into it.

    • AN ONIMOUS's Gravatar AN ONIMOUS
      April 28, 2017 - 7:41 am | Permalink

      Yes, she is a Trojan horse.

      She has been dating Louis Aliot, an Algerian Jew, for almost a decade.

      Needless to say he is an ultra-Zionist responsible for pussifying the party most notably by naming a homosexual as spokesman (Philippot)0

  7. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    April 27, 2017 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

    “Like Trump, Le Pen must appeal directly to the people, bypassing a largely hostile media.”

    But there is no real way to bypass the media, and the French media is nastier than the US media. We are told that Fox News was a false ally of Trump, but it wasn’t a hundred percent hostile. France doesn’t have an equivalent to Breitbart either. The pro-White internet is stronger in the USA.

    “the socialist left has been left in ruins”

    There wasn’t any grassroot movement behind the Socialists anyway. So, nothing has been destroyed. Hollande had become unpopular. Many people switched to Macron thinking he was someone new. But Macron was actually launched by Hollande himself. His new political party will be dominated by the Jewish establishment, just like the socialist party. So, there will be a lot of continuity under the new arrangement.

    Hamon’s low score is not a repudiation of the socialist party. It’s just that Macron and Mélenchon were being promoted by the media and had a more realistic chance of winning. People thought a vote for Hamon would be wasted. Anyway, all three candidates, Hamon, Mélenchon and Macron, want more immigration.

    On the phony right, Fillon was an immigration restrictionist, but he has now endorsed Macron. Under ZOG, the phony Right would rather ensure the domination of the Left than accept to work with the National Front. A number of voters probably switched from Fillon to Macron because the media described Macron as a “centrist” and denounced Fillon as corrupt (and Le Pen as evil). So, everything is really decided by the media. They are able to manipulate how the candidates are perceived.

    “Macron, a former Goldman Sachs banker “

    He likes Merkel, open borders, free market, etc. But I don’t think most of the voters realize that.

    “There will be a real choice in the May 7 runoff”

    It will be like a referendum on race-replacement. But there is no understanding of that in the population. Everyone is against race-replacement, but the majority is still expected to choose Macron. It can only mean that they don’t understand the stakes. They lack moral and intellectual clarity because of the lack of free speech.

    People know Le Pen is anti-immigration, but they fail to understand that the opposite side is pro-replacement! They have never heard of “hostile elites”. And after all, Macron doesn’t look particularly evil, and he never says he supports race-replacement, even though he does.

    I hope Marine Le Pen will destroy Macron in next week’s TV debate. If she fails to get elected, her party can still win seats in the parliament in June.

    • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
      April 28, 2017 - 5:54 pm | Permalink

      “Everyone is against race-replacement, but the majority is still expected to choose Macron. It can only mean that they don’t understand the stakes. They lack moral and intellectual clarity because of the lack of free speech.” -Armor

      You know more about French politics than I do, but I rather doubt your assertions here. (See my lengthy comment at the top of this thread.) There is no more room for such White Preservationist wishfulness. The vast majority of Whites are either in favor of race suicide; utterly indifferent to it, as long as they themselves are not overly discomfited by the Not-Great Replacement; or have been brainwashed into believing that a) White preservation (which must include the “ecology” for such preservation, said ecology including strict, or near-strict + White-dominant, White apartheid) is “racist”, and b) that racism is morally wrong. Since the advent of the internet, the number of simply racially ignorant Whites has dramatically fallen.

      Whites are evolutionarily maladapted, and White Zion remains the ONLY solution for ultimate White survival.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 2, 2017 - 1:05 am | Permalink

        “….and White Zion remains the ONLY solution for ultimate White survival.”
        Exactly what I have said many times before. White Women Wombs must produce an average of 3 children for Whites to turn stop the death spiral spin, analogous to an airplane in such a state with an appointment for an abrupt impact with terra firma and the fire.

        Wear the label “White Nationalist”, “White Separatist”, and even “White Supremacist with pride and dignity. I tell people that all races deserve their own homeland. Many Blacks are demanding same, and I say GIVE IT TO THEM. Encourage them to split off, sequester into an all Bleck nation. If they can have theirs, we will surely get ours.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      May 3, 2017 - 7:44 am | Permalink

      This-just as in Amurka-might be the LAST chance for the salvation and preservation of the French people, culture, and heritage. With continuing waves of illegals, and the already ensconced high birth rates, the patriots and French Nationalist will fall even shorter of votes for restoration. Just as in Amurka, had Hillary Shillary Crock won, the borders would have been abolished and millions more of backwash, stinking bilge, questionably human waves would have invaded.

      Like Us, this is France’s ultimate, win-or-lose stand, the OK Corral.

  8. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    April 27, 2017 - 8:59 pm | Permalink

    How curious that the “far right” is depicted as an African gorilla. One for the chutzpa.

  9. Florian's Gravatar Florian
    April 28, 2017 - 1:08 am | Permalink

    European or French politics is not the same as US or other Anglo-Saxon countries.

    This is not an election but a pre-selection. The aim is to keep out Le Pen not about the two party system like the UK or US. Macron is a banker, pro-EU, pro-diversity, pro-multiculturalism, pro-muslim, anti-white etc. The same thing happen to Geert Wilders, Hofer in Austria and will happen in Germany. After Donald Trump and Brexit they cannot take chances.

  10. Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
    April 28, 2017 - 1:18 am | Permalink

    There is a dark sentiment in France since last year:
    ‘La France est foutue’,
    “La France est foutue : On ne sauvera pas la France sans les musulmans modérés”, Publié le 21 août 2016 – par Jacques Guillemain
    @http://therese-zrihen-dvir.over-blog.com/2016/08/la-france-est-foutue-on-ne-sauvera-pas-la-france-sans-les-musulmans-moderes.html
    And more recently:
    “Les musulmans votent Mohamed Macron, forcément ! Publié le 25 avril 2017 – par Sophie [email protected]://therese-zrihen-dvir.over-blog.com/2017/04/les-musulmans-votent-mohamed-macron-forcement.html:
    ‘Dans un communiqué publié le 24 avril, «la Grande Mosquée de Paris et sa fédération nationale appellent les musulmans de France à voter massivement pour le candidat Emmanuel Macron qui, dans le respect des valeurs républicaines et de l’application stricte des principes de la laïcité, incarne la voie de l’espoir et de la confiance dans les forces spirituelles et citoyennes de la Nation».
    Allons enfants….

  11. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    April 28, 2017 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    To add to Robert Maune, there is a slim possibility. The French unlike appeasement-ladden Britainistan or Swedes or the massively oppressed Germans are less politically correct and more proud of being French. Cultural Marxists haven’t yet destroyed French identity. Muslims or Africans are not given Danegeld like in Britainistan or Swedenabad.

    Second like the Yanks France has a presidential system where personality matters more than a party line unlike parliamentary set ups. That way someone like Le Pen or her father can easily emerge.

    However, demography points to a clash sooner or later regardless of a Le Pen win. Like Bradford or Birmingham in Britainistan some French cities like Marseille have already fallen. France is already under virtual civil war. With more Jihadis returning from Syria and AK-47s from the Balkans it is a matter of time.

  12. Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
    April 28, 2017 - 3:33 am | Permalink

    Very disappointing results from France. Just terrible.

    Yes, Le Pen made it to the second round. That is something. But she will be crushed in that round by a 39 year old, OPEN BORDERS, pro-EU lunatic (married to a 63 year old woman). After all the gang rapes; all the Muslim and African crime in France (most French convicts are nonwhite, in a country which is still 3/4 White); all the horrific terrorist attacks …

    After all that the French people have endured at the hands of disgusting diversity, this White race of liberal douchebags STILL cannot bring itself merely to say “NO MORE”. No more immigrants, no more Muslims. How about, at the very least in a French nation with over 10% unemployment, and over 25% youth unemployment – “NO MORE FOREIGN JOB SEEKERS”?

    I have known this for over 15 years – no later than the defeat of Le Pen ‘pere’ back in 2002.

    The White race is in the grips of a global suicidal death spiral called “diversity”. This is now a new religion, a kind of post-modern pagan cult that has infected weak minds across the White world; a mental virus to which Whites alone are uniquely susceptible.

    Over a decade ago I said that the White race had reached its limits. I predicted the rise of something like what is today called the “alt-right”, but I also predicted that it would never be enough to make any real difference. The problem lay in the genetic maladaptedness of Whites to this evolutionary bottleneck we are now passing through. White liberalism is a collective mental defect. This can be proven via liberalism’s embrace of not merely nation- changing immigration, but nation-killing invasions – invasions by those (Muslims) who are inherently as well as ethnically and sociologically hostile to the very liberalism which welcomes them. This is the greatest instance of mass insanity in history I know of.

    The problem is the distribution of the defective genomes which give rise to susceptibility to liberal mental infection. It is now clear that the genes predisposing one to liberalism are fairly evenly distributed across Magna Europa (my term for the White-developed or majority-occupied portions of the Earth), and very possibly their genomes summed up constitute a racial majority. Political evidence clearly suggests that more than half of all planetary Whites are “actively indifferent” to the survival of the White race (and by extension, the values and ways of living characteristic of Western {White} Civilization).

    The fundamental problem is not this genetic defect per se, but the very evenness of its geographic or transnational distribution. If 75% of French were suicidal race liberals, but 75% of Germans were racial preservationists, the White race itself would not be in danger of impending extinction. White France would over time be submerged by race aliens (and domestic miscegenation), but White Germany would endure, and thus the White race would endure.

    It is now clear that majorities of Whites everywhere (ie, majorities in all “advanced” White nations –> meaning that it is probably only a matter of time until the more “regressive” [ie, racial/national-survivalist] peoples of Eastern Europe reach similar levels of liberal infection) have succumbed to liberalism (whose essence it is now clear is, as I have always maintained, RACIAL treason: gays, abortion, climate fanaticism, socialism, criminal coddling, etc, are all elements of liberal mental insanity, but the key arena of liberal psychodrama, where liberalism is at its most ‘liberal’, is race – racial abasement and racial treason). As the problems caused by liberal idiocy accumulate and worsen, there is (exactly per my long held prediction) and will continue to be, ever greater reactions to liberalism (eg, Trump and the American alt-right).

    But those reactions will never be enough. Geographically evenly distributed defective White genomes are now political majorities in all White nations (outside of the less ‘advanced Eastern Europe’, as mentioned – but give the East another 25 years of “modernity”, and then see how racially conservationist its peoples are). White preservationists will never come to power in any White nation, at least not democratically. As more Whites move to the (Racial) Right due to worsening racial and national realities brought about by failed liberalism, they will never be enough to outnumber the also constantly increasing numbers of nonwhite colonizers stealing the West from its indigenous (White) citizens.

    Outside of exterminatory civil race war “resetting” the racial situation (this assumes Whites will win such civil wars, which is becoming ever more problematic, given falling White birthrates, modal aging of the White population, and continued and worsening immigration invasions), the White race is doomed to either biological extinction via mass miscegenation and/or conquest and extermination, or to minoritarian enslavement and/or complete powerlessness and irrelevance across the entire White world.

    Either way, Western civilization, the world’s master civilization which was the sole product of the White race, will disappear from the planet. And that in turn will mark the end of everything of value on this Earth, possibly heralding tens of thousands of years of planetary regression and eventual global “neo-primitivism”.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      April 28, 2017 - 8:58 am | Permalink

      The age-gap between the Macrons certainly has raised eyebrows. Pas de coming-out?

    • April 28, 2017 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

      You’ve forgotten to mention it’s Jewish policy.

    • Drake Corrigan's Gravatar Drake Corrigan
      April 28, 2017 - 7:10 pm | Permalink

      Excellent analysis.

    • Kaos Andy's Gravatar Kaos Andy
      April 28, 2017 - 9:37 pm | Permalink

      My personal research indicates this suicide phenomenon is needed to terminate redundant civilizations to make way for thee next one. In cellular biology, built-in suicide is called APOPTOSIS. This current civilization termination is, I alledge, programmed within the RNA DNA matrix. Meaning this is no accident. Must happen. I don’t know if knowing that apoptosis theory makes any difference? But I agree, its a mathematical certainty.

      • April 29, 2017 - 8:53 am | Permalink

        The late Harold Hillman, ‘alternative’ biological theoretician (who essentially got nowhere with his ideas) maintained that apoptosis is just another piece of junk science, and does not exist. For people tempted to quail before more BS.

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        April 29, 2017 - 12:12 pm | Permalink

        The fact that species are able to procreate, indicates that nature intended them to survive, not to wither and die without seeding first.

        National suicide is thus not build into the genes. It was not meant so by nature/Creation. A flower/culture however has to grow in befitting fertile soil, in order to bloom and prosper.

        Currently we are being transplanted into infertile soil, or for that matter the current soil is being poisoned, if this is an useful analogy for you.

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        April 29, 2017 - 12:17 pm | Permalink

        I would not be too hasty to call it “suicide”. Suicide implies you’ve gone nuts. Neither the cell nor the body has gone crazy; instead, it’s the logical response to severe toxicity and resulting weakness – of that I am sure. The load is too great, the body says, “Shut er down!” We were designed to live right and be healthy on every level. When things get to be too much, it is right that our Creator decided that composting the inferior is the next option.

        One cell, one organism, whole civilizations, entire races. Doesn’t matter. But it’s not “suicide”. It’s totally rational and meaningful.

    • Occidental Fan's Gravatar Occidental Fan
      April 29, 2017 - 2:02 am | Permalink

      Very disappointing results from France. Just terrible.

      Yes, let’s despair and give up. Imagine how upset Soros and the ADL would be if we do that.

      Over a decade ago I said that the White race had reached its limits. I predicted the rise of something like what is today called the “alt-right”, but I also predicted that it would never be enough to make any real difference.

      Your ego does not control the future. You are preaching a Gospel of Despair and harming the cause you claim to support. Either you are too stupid to see this or you don’t really support the cause.

      Outside of exterminatory civil race war “resetting” the racial situation (this assumes Whites will win such civil wars, which is becoming ever more problematic, given falling White birthrates, modal aging of the White population, and continued and worsening immigration invasions), the White race is doomed to either biological extinction via mass miscegenation and/or conquest and extermination, or to minoritarian enslavement and/or complete powerlessness and irrelevance across the entire White world.

      We’re doomed! Give up, goyim folks. You know it makes sense.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        April 29, 2017 - 1:26 pm | Permalink

        A race war, which by definition invests all citizens, will have a very different complexion to its conventional analogue.

    • joe six pack's Gravatar joe six pack
      April 29, 2017 - 4:30 am | Permalink

      Yeah great comment!
      What is wrong with YT that he can’t do tenth? grade math and extrapolate present trends to his own replacement?
      I, idiosyncratically, think it has to do with YT’s own recessive genetic nature.
      The recessiveness of his genes carry over and control his synapses and unless YT is ABSOLUTELY sure he is on the side of right and good(Like pre WW1 Christian civilization showing the world how to live) then he is very susceptible to second thoughts, hesitation and guilt. And that is the present situation, YT is inundated with White Guilt on the media from the time he arises until he sleeps and so he gives in to the mass ‘right way of thinking’ and thus will some day his recessive genes will be dominated and replaced
      Anyway great comment.

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      April 29, 2017 - 8:13 am | Permalink

      @Leon Haller. When it comes to the subject of people replacement, I only can speak of Poland, as I follow the situation there (where I was born and bred, but live in Sweden since 40 years). The civic oppostion to migration from Muslim countries is rather marginal in Poland. Since the neoconservative government poses itself as nationalist, promoting xenophobia is in its interest, provided that the “tribe of Jesus” remains out of reach. As most Catholics (not only those of the tribe but also the Slavic ones) had bought into the sham of Jews being “our elder brothers in faith”, anti-semitism has no natural nourishment by ordinary Poles (slavic “boors”). This fact doesn’t mean that anti-semitism, or in much cases rumors of a such, cannot be created by the clique that owns/controlls the MSM. As Poland is since a while flooded with folks from Ukraine (far from all Ukrainians), there is no money to grant the kind of benefits that would be accepted by the choosy “refugees” from MENA. That is the main reason why not so many want to “enrich” Poland by staying there. Those from MENA who arrive to Poland, “flee” to Germany with reference to the state of “starvation” they find themselves subjected to. In other worlds, that Poland has few “enrichers” from MENA has very little to do with the boorish oposition to Islam , but very much to do with the low level of benefits. Unlike people from MENA, who prefer the German standard of living, those who have come – and continue coming from Ukraine (many Chechens among them) seem not bothered by the poverty in Poland.

    • Leon Haller's Gravatar Leon Haller
      May 3, 2017 - 3:19 am | Permalink

      The purpose of my post was to make White Preservationists understand the TRUE racial ‘stakes’: that our race is dying because few Whites care enough to preserve it (specifically, care enough to preserve the social, political, etc., “ecology” necessary to its preservation). This cavalier attitude to racial survival has many, many causes. I don’t pretend to understand or even to have identified them all. But I do recognize that the ONLY solution to ultimate White extinction is territorial ingathering of all racially committed Whites (or at least enough to gain control of a sovereign polity and its machinery of government, which in turn must be reorganized along racial preservationist lines – a “Teleological Racial State”). I call this “White Zion”, the final place of refuge for our people.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 3, 2017 - 7:38 am | Permalink

        No matter what the structure, form, or framework, without an average of 3 children per woman, White numbers will decline to irreversible self-genocide. First, the primacy and exclusive supremacy of Western White Culture must be established, our enemies and foes banned, and the full attention paid to genetics-both quality and quantity.

        In my opinion, general and automatic rejection of Asians and Hindus of similar IQ and “CQ” (civilization quotient) should not be totally excluded. Selected individuals from these groups constitute an upgrade for Caucasian (Western, European derived peoples). I’ve been observing the success and full integration of these groups in all aspects for over 50 years, in several places around the World.

  13. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    April 28, 2017 - 8:45 am | Permalink

    Once France puts this worthless, globalist lackey, Macron in office, I don’t EVER want to hear the French complain about anything ever again. When more terrorist attacks occur, and they will, I don’t want to hear a peep out of the French. Shut up and take it.

    When you’re run out of the neighborhood you grew up in by hostile invaders who hate you simply for being alive, don’t complain. I don’t want to hear it. As your society become less French and more African / muslim, don’t you say a damn word. Keep it to yourselves. I don’t want to hear ANYTHING out of the mouths of the cowardly French.

    If you can’t even muster the bravery to simply go to a ballot box and VOTE for the smallest bit of protection and change, then you don’t even deserve to continue existing. Charles Martel turns in his grave over the pathetic state of modern France. Cuckoldry on a national scale.

    • Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
      April 29, 2017 - 10:33 am | Permalink

      Hard to disagree.

      But we must fight on – and win the war for our survival regardless. If necessary, regardless even of the result of the French election. We must win the war – and the battle of France is not a battle we can afford to lose. If nothing else, amidst your understandable and admirable rhetoric, have a little compassion for the despairing millions who WILL vote for the new Joan of Arc, Marine Le Pen – and will seriously contemplate suicide if she loses. They are our White brothers and sisters – and we MUST stand with them regardless, or all of this is just so much worthless hot air.

      And I STILL believe she will Win.

  14. Derek's Gravatar Derek
    April 28, 2017 - 9:40 am | Permalink

    I also don’t see the Establishment letting Marine Le Pen win. They have already tried to use Russia against her and now “anti-semitism” when infact muslim immigrants she opposes are hostile to French Jews. The Jewish hostility shows the futility of her kosher gambit in contrast to her father.

    Macron is not only a Rothschild bankster, elitist, a Merkel pawn but rumour has it he is actually a faggot and his marriage a sham. He is believed to be going out with Mattieu Gallet the head of Radio France.

  15. Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
    April 28, 2017 - 12:18 pm | Permalink

    I agree with Dave Bowman that she will win, and agree with Art & An Onimus that she is just another Trojan Horse like Drumpf, because she kicked her own father out of the party he founded, just for exercising his Freedom of Speech in criticizing The Tribe, and photos of her rousing speeches often show Tribal members in skull caps sitting quietly behind her. Remember how everyone said Hillary was the Globalist choice, just as they are now touting Marcon, elevated out of nowhere to promote teacher-pupil pedophilia?
    The Globalist game seems to be: “The peasants are revolting and calling for patriotic leaders, so let’s choose some to keep them quiet, while continuing the Communist policies of their predecessors, and culling the goyim in more foreign wars.”

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      April 29, 2017 - 7:11 am | Permalink

      @Bramble. That is excactly what happened in Poland. With this kind of “nationalists” in power, a nation/country gets ruined in rapid time, not only financially.

  16. Art's Gravatar Art
    April 28, 2017 - 12:52 pm | Permalink

    @Occidental Fan,

    If I was a globalist shill, I would say go and vote for the “lesser evil”.

    But that is precisely what white people were doing for decades, while they were losing their countries.

    And now the Globalists can say that the process of self-destruction of white people has a legal basis, the people voted for their government, and therefore they deserve their destiny.

    That is what they call “democracy”, you elect a leader, like Reagan or Trump, and then these leaders just shit on you and do the agenda of globalists.

    Now imagine tomorrow is election, and nobody goes to this rigged show.

    Could the Globalists still claim that what is happening to the white people has a legitimate basis, if say 70% of voters did not show up and just boycotted the spectacle, that is called “election”?

    Mark Twain was right:

    ‘If voting made any difference they wouldn’t let us do it.’

    The so-called “Western Democracy” is a big scam, because you cannot elect the owners of the MSM and in many “democratic” countries there is no freedom of speech.

    The only difference between the elections in the former Soviet Block countries an in the Western Countries is that in the West you can elect one of many “pre-elected” candidates.

    And Le-Pen is pre-elected too, she has the sign “kosher” on her forehead, like it was the case with Trump, despite the rhetoric of the MSM.

    If Le Pen really could change anything, she would have been politically finished a long time ago.

    Le Pen is as controlled, as it was/is the case with Trump.

    These candidates say “outrageous” to the left and liberals things, but they will never risk their own asses, and therefore they are just controlled opposition.

    If Le Pen is elected, she may close an eye on some crazy things Israel is going to do, but she will not change anything in France or the EU.

    • Occidental Fan's Gravatar Occidental Fan
      April 29, 2017 - 1:56 am | Permalink

      When whites vote for someone who, like Trump or Le Pen, is demonized as racist, fascist, etc, they are taking a step in the right direction and preparing the way for someone who isn’t “controlled.” If your “Don’t vote!” advice had been followed by white Americans, the Wicked Witch would now be in the White House and the situation would be far worse.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        April 29, 2017 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

        Situation far worse in what sense? Was not the blatant hostility of the Obama administration towards whites wind in the Alt-Right’s sails? Clinton certainly would have ushered in the beginning of the final, existential struggle, ending all complacency.

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      April 29, 2017 - 6:49 am | Permalink

      I couldn’t agree more, Art. The rheotoric on the MSM part in Mr Trump’s case has proved itself a brilliant tactics, since the voters that were yet not kosherized enough at the election have now no other option than facing the fait accompli. Even though Marine le Pen probably is a more honorable person than Donald Trump, her prospects to carry out any changes that would make France French again definitely will be non-existent, even if she wins. The confusing thing about the globalist agenda is that the methodes to achieve it differ from land to land. In Poland the globalists appear to have allowed the controlled opposition, PiS (Law and Justice) to take power from PO (Civic platform), because the power shift was only in name. Both parties are run by the communist cliques that had in 1989 – at the sham round-table conference with the communist agent (“Bolek”) Lech Walesa – agreed on a thorough turning of their coats, which included putting on religious/nationalist shoes and opposing any kind of Lustration. Poles are now at liberty to travel abroad and work there for slave wages. Naturally, they also have Jesus Christ as their King. How this goes along with the fervent hatred for the nowadays rather Christian Russia, one must be subjected to the kind of brainwash that reigns supreme in Poland, to get a grip on.

    • May 1, 2017 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

      “Now imagine tomorrow is election, and nobody goes to this rigged show.”

      The problem is that there will always be plenty of deluded Whites and the usual suspects who’ll vote. Our not showing up will just give them a more clearcut majority.

  17. Drake Corrigan's Gravatar Drake Corrigan
    April 28, 2017 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

    G-d Bless Marine Le Pen.
    Victory.
    Save France.

    • Occidental Fan's Gravatar Occidental Fan
      April 29, 2017 - 2:04 am | Permalink

      No, Dave. You’re supported to despair and advise everyone to give up. That’s the only way to fight back against Soros and the ADL.

  18. Pierre's Gravatar Pierre
    April 29, 2017 - 4:45 am | Permalink

    In the interest of full disclosure: I am French and I live in France. Long time TOO reader, but first time commenter.

    I have been having similar ideas as to whether most Whites harbor a genetically-inherited maladaptation, whose phenotypic presentation is what it often called “pathological altruism”. Having travelled in almost 50 different countries, including a substantial number of non-majority-White ones, I readily accept the obvious fact than non-Whites do not exhibit said pathological altruism. In fact, not only non-Whites are not altruistic to other races, or even other non-White groups that differ from theirs only very small nuances of brown (cf. the Mestizo/Castizo caste system in Latin America), they also appear to not be altruistic at all, which creates extremely dysfunctional hellholes at worst (Latin America, Africa) and semi-totalitarian phalansteries at best (Singapore, Japan, China). This is based on my own observations but also on extensive reading on the subject.

    In the case of France where I was born and still live (for how long?), on the other hand, altruism has taken a completely crazy turn — with Chesterton’s “Christian ideas gone crazy” forming the collective psyche of this formerly Catholic country. This is become especially evident now, because Macron has been entirely clear about his agenda: unlike his predecessors like Hollande or Sarközy, or even Chirac for that matter, he is not even trying to conceal his extreme liberal agenda. He explicitly said that “LGBT rights” would be amongst his top priorities, that there is no reason to curb brown skinned immigration, that we have to accept the presence of islam in France — although what historically has defined France is her success at rolling back the Moors, unlike Spain; France was for many centuries the Last Frontier before the Dar-al-Islam.
    Macron also made it clear to everyone listening that he wanted to destroy whatever remains of the traditional family: not later than today did he announce that for the first time in this country, married couples will be allowed (probably before being compelled with tax deduction incentives) to file their respective income tax statements separately.

    Without going into the details of the Front’s program (with which I have a lot of reservations, by the way, after several years of “normalization” under the leadership of former socialist and current faggot Florian Philippot), everyone by now who has an IQ over 90 (and I know, that criterion excludes a lot of non-White “French” people) shall see that she represents, in the context of acceptable discourse in a Western European nation of today, the antithesis of Macron.

    In other words, the French are being presented with a very clear alternative, for the first time since 1940 maybe: extreme liberal globalism versus populist nationalism. I don’t think this has happened since Montoire and the infamous handshake. Even 1958 was a faux choice organized by the no less faux “general” (actually a colonel who was only nominated a general pro tempore in 1940 for a mission to England) de Gaulle. At any rate, the French must make a choice, and the mere fact that probably most of the White ones are going to vote for Macron who embodies their ethnic suicide, sustains the “inherited pathological altruism” argument, for it is no longer possible to blame it on incomplete information propagated by (((the elite))) in order to conceal the truth from the masses. The truth is out there to be seen by everyone who has eyes to see.

    All that being said, remains a question — a question that has nagged me for a very long time: if it is true that Whites suffer, in their majority at least, of such a grave genetically-inheritable mental disorder, then it follows that the whole argument about the superiority of the White race is, like the rumors about Mark Twain’s death, greatly exaggerated. In fact, if the White race is, in its majority, not only opposed politically to, but also and more importantly, mentally incapable of grasping race-realism, then what is the point of defending the White race after all? Why should it matter to us, as we believe that evolutionary pressure will inevitably do away with such a mortally flawed sub-specie? There is somewhat of a paradox there, and I must say that it makes me quite uncomfortable, because the argument can be pushed further to more extreme conclusions, which more often than not have practical consequences.

    For instance, if most White French are going to be pro-abortion of Whites, pro-immigration of non-Whites, apologetic for rapist “migrants”, and all the rest of the SWPL that is so dangerous to my beautiful blonde White daughters, and if, at the same time, Han Chinese hate the list of the things I just described and insist on maintaining a society which, albeit semi-authoritarian, is safe for my girls, why shouldn’t I associate with Han Chinese rather than with my own folk? From a purely evolutionary standpoint, the former looks better than the latter because my girls are more likely to reach reproductive age in Singapore than in today’s France, especially the region where I live (also known as the Caliphate of Marseille). Following that line of argument would thus make me favor association with non-Whites (Chinese in that example) rather than Whites (the majority of French Whites who are mudskin enthusiasts).

    I am going to end this ramble at that point; but at any rate I would very much enjoy to read the opinion on these questions from TOO readers, especially from the New World. Merci !

    A confused “Frog”

    • Lani's Gravatar Lani
      April 29, 2017 - 9:41 am | Permalink

      I’ve thought about this a lot, the “Are whites really superior?” question. At one time they were, but no more. In recent circumstances, I’ve been siding with the jihadis wreaking havoc all over Europe. They are much, much stronger and will prevail, savages they may be. The Euros are pathetic cowards. White Americans in certain states, ones that haven’t lost touch with nature, are more racially aware, but is it enough? At this point I don’t think so. Unlike their Euro counterparts, they are obese and drug addicted, and hopelessly enamored of prole Christianity.

      Incidentally, I lived in France for a couple of years in the early nineties. I was shocked at the amount of negro worship or glorification of anything with brown skin. It was uncanny, like the French were repulsed by blondness.

      • Pierre's Gravatar Pierre
        April 29, 2017 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

        Bonsoir.
        Thank you for your response. From both sides of the Atlantic we are reaching similar conclusions. “My” people have become hedonistic degenerates in many respects. They might not be obese like White Americans (although obesity is reaching proportions completely unknown in my youth in the 1970s when pretty much everyone was lean), but sexual deviancy in one form or another has become the norm — and it that, I include divorce and destruction of the families as a result of White French men and women’s overall immorality. Bestiality (a.k.a. “homosexuality”) which had always existed of course, but was kept in check by both social and religious pressure, has reached epidemic proportions is undermining the very ability of White French to reproduce themselves. Case in point: the police officer who was assassinated by a muslim thug last week was living in a same-sex arrangement with another man, and his funeral was a showcase of homosexual sentimentalism and “let us stay united” gibberish. This is really tragic: is it all we have to oppose to jihadists, homosexual police officers whose boyfriend (Himself the father of one child ! Which means that he previously had a wife or at least a girl friend, whom he left to in order to practice homosexuality with the now deceased cop. How crazy is that?) has only to offer pleas for universal love amongst incompatible ethnic groups?
        http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2017/04/25/l-hommage-national-au-policier-xavier-jugele-tue-sur-les-champs-elysees-a-debute_5117108_3224.html
        So, when you write that the jihadis will most likely prevail, I must say that I share your pessimistic outlook.

        I am gravitating within traditional catholic circles: the ones who refuse the (((new mass))), and also the authority of faux pope Francistein. In these groups there is a lot of ethnic awareness as well as a healthy understanding of the evangelical order to “love’s one’s neighbor” : neighbor, from the Latin proximus, means the person that is close to you. That is, first and foremost, your immediate family, then your more distant family, then your local community, then your next of kin. Black kids in Africa come last in this succession of concentric circles with increasing radii. My obligation towards my beautiful girls (of which I have 5) are enormous; on the other hand, my obligations towards muslims from Mali are essentially equal to 0. This is what “love thy neighbor” actually means.

        The problem is that the French traditional catholic circles are small, compared to the overall White French population. Most of the latter are absolutely NOT interested in joining the former, because that entails sacrifice as opposed to instant gratification. So we gather in our little enclaves, running our independent schools, and try to survive that way. My prediction is that it will become Lebanon-style in the long run.

        What you wrote about the early nineties is quite interesting. At the time I was finishing my studies in Paris. The air was still breathable though. You would be shocked as to how much it has changed since then. Paris has become third word dump, except if you have a lot of money and power like little faggot Macron and his ilk.

        Very often I think this is atonement for the murdering of king Louis, and the genocide of the Vendée, the first industrially-planned genocide which, as Solzhenitsyn often said and wrote, was the “matrix” for the (((communist))) genocides of the XXth century. Maybe we French deserve it after all, to atone for these horrible sins, and for having “given” to the world the poisoned gifts of the revolution.

        Amicalement

        • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
          May 1, 2017 - 2:13 am | Permalink

          Pierre- You should also worry about your son, because if there’s one thing the (((Globalists))) hate, it’s tall, strong, handsome blond men, and if they don’t eliminate them from the gene pool by pumping them full of “vaccines”, they try false “cancer” diagnoses, or Muslim gang attacks, or “accidents”. You need to get your family out of Marseilles, deep into the countryside of your own land, amongst your own people.

        • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
          May 5, 2017 - 4:59 am | Permalink

          Pierre,

          And now we have Obama interfering in a foreign election by supporting Macron publicly!

    • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
      April 29, 2017 - 9:59 am | Permalink

      Han Chinese have many very serious problems and moral issues of their own to work out. They do really well in the new world for a reason. It’s because, for the moment anyway, it’s still our system not theirs.

      • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
        April 29, 2017 - 10:23 am | Permalink

        An example is that they have 30 million more men than women because they aborted the little girls.

        They have similar ideas about girls as the Illuminati of the Alt-Rightopshere/Manosphere/Goonosphere

        So if you do decide to hop over there because you prefer the Asians to your own- your little girls will have millions of Chinese guys to choose from for husbands when they grow up.

        The only way you get French people is with a French Mommy and Daddy.
        Come to USA and live with your long lost Cajun relatives. Or Quebec in Canada. Instead.
        Your girls are precious.

        • Pierre's Gravatar Pierre
          April 29, 2017 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

          Cher inspecteur Clouseau,

          What a nice pseudonym! Clouseau was my hero, a long time ago. That was before the muslims came to invade my country, and when I started to understand that a (((hostile elite))) was only here to exploit us. Now I am referring to my hero using 1488 and other not-so-subtle hints, because the French STASI might retrieve my IP for merely posting this TOO, and come into my house to arrest me — and God knows what else? Maybe declare me incompetent to raise my girls. I also have a boy by the way, but I am not worried for that one. He his tall, intelligent, handsome, and very strong. He’ll do fine I am sure. But for the girls I worry night and day, and this not an exaggeration.

          Regarding my first post, thank you for your response: I realize that I was unclear, please excuse my English that evidently is not very good. What I meant was a purely theoretical case. I do not have any intention to go live in Singapore, although when I was there I very much appreciated the many benefits of an orderly society. I had very similar impressions in Japan. I never went to mainland China, though, and I am assuming that after many decades of (((communism))) that place must be have a lot of problems — moral in particular. But I think the Hans will swallow this; look, Hans where even able to swallow their Mongol conquerors and to build an astounding civilization after Qubilai, I think (((the usual suspects))) are just a minor annoyance to the them in the long run. I agree with you that the Hans are thriving in a system that WE created, but I read this as further proof of their superiority. Imagine how well they would be doing in a system that they created themselves!?

          At any rate, indeed, the example I came up with was only meant to be theoretical. I really apologize for having been unclear. I have absolutely no intent to bring my little tribe to Singapore, or even anywhere else for that matter. From a theoretical standpoint I would love to live in the USA, the Land of the Free. But at the same time I am against immigration, so how consistent would that be? I guess I have no other choice than just try do my best every day at trying to preserve what can be; or, as what is written on Mgr Lefebvre’s thumbstone, /Tradidi quod et accepi/, I have transmitted what I have received.

          Thank you for my girls. Yes they are.

          Cordialement

        • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
          April 29, 2017 - 10:30 pm | Permalink

          Congratulations on your big family! Salute. Way to go!

          You are being overtaken by Muslims and Africans. Where i live whites are only about 10 percent, if that, because we are being taken over by Han Chinese colonists and strategic investors, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai and other East Asians. There is almost no Christmas on my street anymore. and no Halloween anymore. All this happened in less than 35 years. and now a sort of Asian Tammany Hall Machine is occurring.

          So I’m not as excited about the Chinese and what have you and their systems and ways of doing things as you guys are.

          i am for the white people and no other at the moment. We are in big trouble and peril.

        • inspector clouseau T's Gravatar inspector clouseau T
          April 30, 2017 - 10:38 am | Permalink

          I read Marco Polo’s book. You talking about how the Chinese swallowed up Mongolia reminded me. It was making me try to remember this guys’s name. He was a wild white man with an amazing true story. His name is Roman von Ungern-Sternberg.

    • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
      April 29, 2017 - 11:42 am | Permalink

      The way I see it, for the better or the worse.

      “The whole argument about the superiority of the White race is, like the rumors about Mark Twain’s death, greatly exaggerated.”

      The superiority of the White race alwas lied in its stars, not in the masses. The masses were the stabilisers of society, and great personalities moved them ahead.

      Today mediocre political personalities run the Western world, and those with ability are carefully filtered out.

      Didn’t Hitler say if he fails, Germany will have to wait another five hundred years (or was it a hundred years – haven’t got my “Hitlers War” at hand) for one of his caliber to turn up again?

      It is not everyday that France was gifted with personalities like Charlemagne or Napoleon. Many things have to fall in place for that to happen, usually events that endanger the very survival of a nation. Obviously the French, Germans and so on do not feel that level of threat yet. Nor do the white South Africans in general. The mass media and panem et circenses keep them at bay, and it is up to the leadership personalities within their ranks to show them the way ahead.

      Predictably it will happen very slowly when the threat is not perceived as terminal, but when the writing is on the wall, and thousands die very fast in a major upheaval, that is when the sports really starts.

      Farseeing personalities of note must prepare themselves for these time, so as not to be caught unaware, for they will then miss a window of opportunity to take charge and move the masses forward, and then the waiting starts afresh. Then their time has come, and they will write history forged in blood, with far reaching consequences.

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        April 29, 2017 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

        When times are difficult and the mood is dark, I tap new energy from our heroic past. Division Charlemagne:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1YsN71Yvt8

        I suppose we were not too bad either (SADF/Rhodesia on Youtube).

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      April 29, 2017 - 1:07 pm | Permalink

      @ Pierre:
      Thank you for your insight.

      Do you think that far worse economic times and a withering of State largesse would end the present complacency and re-awaken the French revolutionary spirit?

      Devil’s Advocate asks is it not also the case that the State’s Daltonism makes it impossible for the average citizen to argue, except anecdotally, the case against Third Worldization on the basis of crime statistics?

      Doesn’t the banlieue‘s geographic containment of social disorder make it easier for the middle-class citizen to ignore the problem, except at an intellectual level?

      Doesn’t the extraordinary high Jewish population per capita figure in your musings on the French Problem?

    • Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
      April 30, 2017 - 8:00 pm | Permalink

      Cher ami,
      You do not seem confused at all. It is comforting to see that there are still people who have ‘des idées claires et distinctes’. I assume that this is due to the fact that you are ‘Une grenouille de bénitier’ (I have seen it in Narbonne, in one of my fragmented travels along segments of the Chemin de Saint Jacques). I believe ‘dur comme fer’ that Saint Paul-Serge was indeed the disciple of Saint Paul the Apostle (and Saint Denis, Dionysius the Areopagite!). I believe also that the seven bishops who founded the Church in Gaul did it in the Apostolic times and it is primarily for that reason that “La France est la fille aînée de l’Église”.
      But, « France, fille aînée de l’Église, es-tu fidèle aux promesses de ton baptême ? »
      Les Francais doivent reprendre le Chemin de Saint Jacques.
      A bon entendeur, salut.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      April 30, 2017 - 8:06 pm | Permalink

      @ Pierre: If you are confused, then I am confused as well. I have written extensively on this total acceptance of Asians as a branch of Whites. My background: going on 70, travelled all my life, lived in various places in the world, including the “Far East”, long associations with Asians and Orientals, many Caucasian-Asian marriages as friends, neighbors, colleagues, AND family. Marine mechanical engineering background. I’ve been everywhere.

      No commentary on this subject is worth a spit on the sidewalk unless one has seen and lived what I have seen. “Eurasian” meets or exceeds manufacturer’s White specifications and standards.

      I say to you, go for quality. I am descended from Greek parents, but Greece is far below my standard. I prefer Singapore much more. I feel at home, at ease, continuous with the zeit, and frameworks of that place.

      I have always had an affinity for the Orient, finally accepting that it was my home in former incarnations. I have never felt the West to be my milieu except when I was taking a range and quality of psychedelics in college. Everybody has a center that speaks to them; sometimes it is disturbing and disruptive. It is best to sort that out before making lifelong commitments.

      I say let your girls be exposed to the Orient, and let it all settle out naturally. Their having Chinese and Japanese girlfriends will likely be an enriching experience.

  19. Art's Gravatar Art
    April 29, 2017 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre,
    Russian Orthodox Christians have the same DNA, like other Europeans.

    But their religion was not subverted, they do not live in a “Judeo-Christian” civilisation, and therefore they do not suffer from an altruistic pathology… they are like Chinese…

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      April 30, 2017 - 10:42 am | Permalink

      As an Eastern Orthodox Christian, The One True Fatih, The Only Authentic Church, I have been of late saying the exact same thing.

      You can refer to my similar comment on the latest article, “Non-White Migrants and the Catholic Church: The Politics of Penitence”, by Dr. Tom Sunic
      An excellent piece.

  20. cecilhenry's Gravatar cecilhenry
    April 30, 2017 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

    It never occurs to liberals to recognize that many people’s free choice involves ethnic and racial interests and homogeneous communities. It is an active free choice.

    They know this, and hate it, and want to destroy it. To admit that would be to confess not just their error but their evil intention

    The sole issue Liberals will not compromise on is the urgent need to replace the White population of all nations with the Third World asap,

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for Everyone IS White Genocide. Its a crime, not a ‘policy option’.

  21. Pierre's Gravatar Pierre
    April 30, 2017 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Thank to all who responded to my questions, especially about how we can handle the fact that the Whites are evidently not prepared mentally to resist to their own racial submersion, and whether this is genetically-inherited or if it rather a product of the toxic (((culture))) that dominates Western nations.

    I would like to begin this message by responding regarding Russian Orthodoxy, by saying that I have immense respect for this National Church which is in fact the essence of what Russia actually is. As a matter of fact, I have visited several times the RO church in Nice, oftentimes called the “St Nicholas Cathedral”, although it technically isn’t a cathedral, for it is not the see of a bishopric. Dedicated to the Czarevich Nicholas who died in Nice in the 1860s, this church is absolutely splendid and the liturgy there is impeccable. I have met there some Russian faithful and it is more than obvious that then Russian church, despite its many truly remarkable achievements, suffers of similar ills as its Latin/Roman counterpart, in particular utter corruption of its elites and weak and tepid faithful at the base. The dismal demographic rates of Eastern Orthodox peoples is a case in point. Please do not get me wrong on this subject: I am not trying to say that there is no true holiness within the Russian Orthodox church; all I am saying is that as a corporate entity it is afflicted with very grave ills that appear to be just as bad as those that afflict the Roman church — and these ones are very grave indeed. That being said, nothing would make me happier than to see the Russian folk practice their religion /en masse/ and return to the very foundations of their ethnostate, namely, Byzantine orthodoxy actualized in Rus/Slav ethnics. In fact I think that would possibly the greatest possible development for Europe as a whole. But it does not seem that at this point very many Russians be interested in this; last time I checked, Russia still had abortion rates much higher than, for example, German or French ones (and the latter is already terrible!).

    In addition to that, although the Russian Divine Liturgy is heavenly indeed, it is plainly foreign to the French ethnic group. One cannot be French and Russian Orthodox at the same time. It is an either/or proposition. By the same token I also maintain that French Protestants cannot be truly French. As a matter of fact that have been perceived for centuries as being, and rightfully so, “un état dans l’état”, an estate within the State, a sort of foreign-born tumor whose very existence was a direct threat to the survival of the nation as a whole. And indeed, Protestants have been overly represented in the Révolution “française”. So, despite my great admiration for Russian Orthodoxy, it cannot be a realistic path for racially-aware White French folk. Only traditional catholicism, i.e., pre-Vatican II council, is historically, culturally, and more importantly, spiritually connected to the very roots of this nation, to the baptism of Clovis and the actual birth of Francia Occidentalis.

    Regarding the question of economics and whether a more degraded economic situation could provoke some sort of national awakening: I think that a deepening of the economic conditions will automatically decrease the number of dark-skinned invaders because these ones only come to feed on the system; they are pure consumers and not producers. If aggravated economic conditions lead to diminished government welfare, “allocations familiales”, free housing for “migrants”, free schooling, and generally a reduction in all the forms of transfer of wealth from the White French in favor of newcomers, then it will become less attractive for Africans to come here. However this will take such a dramatic decrease in economic conditions before the socialist system actually goes bankrupt that by that point many Whites will have already had no other choice than just to leave. In addition, I think that if it were true that only a massive economic collapse was able to provoke a form of White awakening, then this would reinforce the argument about maladaptive-ness of the Whites: how well adapted is a people that cannot defend its own amazing economic achievements, and needs to become as poor as its own enemies before it can realize that it needs to defend itself? Certainly not well adapted at all.

    Speaking of economic conditions, someone made a comment regarding the fact that the French would be incapable of producing quality machinery. With all due respect, I will submit that this person does not know what he is talking about. I have been working for a little over a quarter of a century in the sector of armament and suffices to say that French-made weaponry is universally recognized as amongst the best by all its global competitors. In fact, this happened /despite/ the POS “européistes” governments that have succeeded one another in this country for the past 40+ years and have systematically undermined the French defense sector in favor of their utopian European integration, thereby systematically giving away national gems (such as Aerospatiale) to (((multi-national groups))).

    Aside from the sector of armament, I am not saying that French machinery is the best of the world. All am I saying is that it is not worse than anything else produced on average in any other western nation of today. German cars in terms of reliability are a mere shadow of what they used to be, and if you compared different models /by price category/ (it is not fair to compare a 60k+ BMW to a 30k Peugeot), then you will see that all consumer statistics show that German cars are no longer more reliable than their Euro (or even American, for that matter) competitors. On the other hand, if you want truly amazing cars in terms of reliability, you will need to buy Asian ones.

    Inspector Clouseau: yes, the baron von Ungern-Sternberg was quite an astounding character. He might have been a little bit on the crazy side, but it must have been quite entertaining to ride horses at the pursuit of red vermine with him. And of course, the soviet prosecutor of the show trial that lead to his execution, was a member of our (((favorite religion))). Nihil novi sub sole.

    Cordialement

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      May 4, 2017 - 7:09 am | Permalink

      @Pierre. I read you comment above and feel several of your points are well made and supported. On the moral and intellectual strength deficiencies of Whites, there is a tendency to externally blame the (((Historical Parasite and Cytocidal Virus))) that enters a host sequestering its internal resources and life giving nutrients and actually enters the individual cells and changes the DNA and RNA of the cells to change function that is beneficial to the virus. IOW, the same as changing the OS and software of a computer system.

      The disagreement that divides critics, commentators, and observers is the active/passive role of the host on a spectrum of victim on one end to active participant on the other. Most are resistant to acknowledge the capitulation, obedience, and participation to the Host (Whites) to this deadly foreign body.
      Dr. Kevin McDonald has repeatedly proclaimed that the participation of Whites to the ongoing relentless genocidal activities of the (((Hostile Elite))) bear a heavy burden for the death spiral. We allow and do to ourselves enormous and essential harm for the (((Parasite))) to be successful and have access.

      Think about it. When, even in the last 150 years, have White countries gone on record and disseminated the knowledge of Jewish murderousness, hate, and genocidal action and intent? They did not take over financial, commercial academic, and intellectual assets overnight. We’ve always had numbers on our side, overwhelmingly, but small measure of courage, foresight, and prescience of what (((The Parasite))) was planning and executing. We have encountered the enemy, and it is us.

      Why is it that Asians and Hindus are resistant to the Jews and their machinations. They seem to have an inherent vaccination against this affliction. Have any Whites written about this in a comparative way, i.e., what they have that we evidently lack. No, most spent inordinate amounts of time on the external and reliving the glories of White accomplishments and heritage. And along that line, where has the pushback and resistance to eliminating whole blocks of teaching Western heritage in the academy, with whole areas of World, National history, “Civics” courses, analytical social sciences (non-weaponized for Marxist purposes)? Where have and what have non-Jewish parents thought or done when their student children return home on their first visit from university, filled with fantasy, caprice, untruths, agitprop and an entirely new belief system? Nothing matching the threat in scope and severity.

      Eastern Orthodoxy is more than the Russian branch. While I believe your reporting that the Church officials and the “faithful” congregants fall short on Godliness and religiosity, the Eastern Orthodoxy Churches have, in the main, arrived at our epoch intact, faithful to their founding principles. There may be damage to the exterior of the edifice, but the core components and machinery are intact and running well. The same cannot be said for the Western Churches; one action alone is sufficient to remove their legitimacy: the active subversion of the general will of native populates against unbridled, illegal flooding of poor, pitiable low quality hordes of the Left of the Mean of the Bell Curve. These are not religious institutions anymore.

      Regarding the quality of French machinery, I concede my over-generalizations. In the past, I have been unimpressed with the quality of Peugeot cars, kitchen appliances, electrical switchgear and controls, etc. Where France has done well is in the area of government subsidized armaments and related military materiel. In some other areas of endeavor such as F1, rally cars and equipment, and other areas, there is impressive production. In the marine machinery field, big powerful machines, there is and absence of French supply. It’s all Northern Europe and the Japanese. The French culture somehow is anathema to Harley-Davidson ownership and riders. Most people of the world see France as a feminine culture, with a large portion of the culture invested in fantasy, outward appearances, and somewhat closed-mindedness regarding corrective or edifying ideas. Maybe it’s that “Cartesian Logic”, which is a closed system. I did take note of the line of Citroen cars and was impressed by their value, quality, and pricing. Very astute, with excellent owner reviews.

      There seems a dynamic tension about France, as if were a Left Brain-Right Brain tug of war and conflict. France is a Northern European country and a Mediterranean one, as well. It probably should be two different countries, just as the United Socialist States should be divided into 3 to 5 different countries, or at least autocephalous. Against a many times myopic natural culture that is too quick to self congratulate itself, comes formidable thinkers like Bastiat and other clear-eyed, stupendously objective, penetrating, and profound observers and writers/commenters.

      French national character is down the list from my favorites, but I have met enormously impressive people of France, directly and vicariously, from the very same culture.

      Final note: The French have a rather bad record of winning wars or fighting for their interests, in more recent times. Perhaps its to do with to much dependency of the appetites of the senses.

  22. Sir Charles Pipkins's Gravatar Sir Charles Pipkins
    April 30, 2017 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    If MacRothschild didn’t shave he could name his beard Brigitte.

  23. May 1, 2017 - 2:22 pm | Permalink

    Whites were superior to all others until this little guy got hold of them.

    http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2014/02/perhaps-i-can-be-of-assistance-here.html

  24. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    May 4, 2017 - 7:33 am | Permalink

    When I read that “the socialist left has been left in ruins” after the first round, I reason to myself that Macron is simply the continuation of the socialist scam. Nothing much has changed.

    But I’ve seen a projection of next June’s parliament election based on the first round of the presidential election (here), and even though I don’t know what it’s worth, it says that in the case of the Left remaining disunited (no electoral agreement between Communists, Socialists, Mélenchon, “Greens” to have a single candidate in each voting district), you can end up with a situation where the socialists would be almost entirely wiped out from the parliament.

    The website imagines scenarios like this (number of seats in parliament) :

    1. If the Left remains divided:
    Phony Right: 281
    Macron: 241
    National Front: 24
    Mélenchon: 24
    Socialist Party: 7

    2. If the Left is united:
    Left: 225
    Phony Right: 182
    Macron: 89
    National Front: 81

    I would like the Socialist Party to completely disappear because that would make the voters realize that everything has simply been transferred to Macron’s party, even though some members of the phony right have also joined him.

  25. Henri Lacoste's Gravatar Henri Lacoste
    May 5, 2017 - 9:55 am | Permalink

    Vive Le Pen!

Comments are closed.