Non-White Migrants and the Catholic Church: The Politics of Penitence

Tom Sunic, Ph.D.


German Cardinal Reinhard Marx aka “multikulti Marx”

The word ‘Islam’ seems to have become by now, especially on the rightwing social spectrum, an all-encompassing code word for non-White residents and migrants.  Predictably, the so-called asymmetric or hybrid wars waged by the US and EU against the ISIS are creating a widespread, albeit still muted hatred against Arabs and Muslims among the majority of US and EU White Christians. Scenes of ISIS terror attacks in Europe and the US are additionally provoking feelings of hostility toward non-Whites, with more and more Whites calling privately for the expulsion of Muslims from Europe and the US.

The continuing mass arrival of non-European migrants into Europe and the US, accompanied by almost daily scenes of ISIS terror attacks — real or foiled — cannot be examined from the perspective of the religion only. Understanding the waves of non-White, largely Muslim migrants, as well as ISIS terror attacks, requires different angles of analysis, with each leading to a different and often mutually exclusive conclusion.

Undoubtedly, the easiest method to explain away the mass inflow of Arabs and African migrants in the West is by laying the blame on catastrophic conditions in their war-torn countries ruled by clannish and despotic rulers and plagued in addition by ISIS and Taliban bombers. However, blaming lower-IQ Arab and African migrants, or Muslim radicals as the only cause of political instability in Europe and the USA is a form of self-delusion.

The root causes of African and Arab mass migrations to Europe and the USA can be traced back to the grand scheme on how to reshape the Middle East and North Africa, doctored up in the 90s of the previous century by US neoconservatives. Later, in the early 2000s, as the first “pro-democracy” domestic upheavals started boiling in North Africa the upheavals were rebranded by the EU/US media into a cozy name  of “the Arab spring” as if young North Africans and Middle Easterners were all too eager to be cloned into a copy of happy go lucky White liberal Europeans. No to be forgotten is the earlier  PNAC scheme devised in the late 1990s by the prominent American Jewish neocons, including Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Paul Wolfowitz, and David Frum, whose goal was less the desire to raise the level of political tolerance in Arab states but rather the compulsive wish to double down on Israeli predominance in the  Middle East.  Fifteen years later the chaotic aftermath of the Arab spring is resulting in the surge of incessant local wars, dysfunctional and lawless states, mass migrations, and the global threat of terrorism.

An early example of “fake news” can be traced back to Western propaganda stories about the existence of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” ( WMD) in Iraq, a story which on the eve of 2003 became an excuse for America and later France to launch  expensive punitive military missions in the Middle East and later in Libya.  An always itinerant world-improving and self-promoting Franco-Jewish philosopher-king, Bernard-Henry Lévy, played a significant role in coaxing the late French president Nicolas Sarkozy into bombing Libya.

However, the origins of fake news, which also recently marred Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, go back much further into history. Their crude signs first surfaced on the eve of World Wars I and II when supernatural tales about Germany’s “WMDs” started circulating in the USA, France and Great Britain. Those early tales of weapons of mass destructions took on often bizarre phrasings in the portrayal of German armies allegedly hacking off hands of children in occupied Belgium. On the eve, during and after WWII the language about the weapons of mass destruction culminated in the Allied propaganda consisting of horror stories featuring alleged Germany’s ambitions on enslaving the entire world.

After having failed in the phony effort to export liberalism as a commodity in the war-ravaged North Africa and the Middle East, the end result of contemporary Western/American faked news foreign policy has been to set into motion huge non-White migratory waves. Although Israel and its Western allies certainly bear responsibility for the resulting instability, it is always problematic to speculate about the real or alleged size of the Israeli or US neocon involvement in orchestrating the present migratory tsunami in the Middle East and the resulting mass exodus of Arab migrants.

Instead, one should facilitate the inquiry by posing a rhetorical question:  Cui bono?  Who benefits most from the instability in Northern Africa and the Middle East and the ensuing displacement of millions of locals toward Europe? As long as the main pivot of US and EU foreign policy revolves around the unquestionable support of Israel and its Western fifth column, actors bent on causing chaos will be waiting in the wings.

Chaos on the EU/US doorstep

The geopolitical chessboard is an important field in explaining the current non-European mass migrations, although it carries less weight than dominant political ideas and historical myths that have shaped political decision makers in the EU and the US ever since 1945. Millions of migrants who are waiting now in makeshift camps in Turkey, Jordan and Libya for their entry into the EU may have limited IQ, but they are by no means stupid. They know that they have two powerful allies in the West — the ruling and often self-hating intellectual and political class and the Catholic clergy. Surely, one can blame George Soros and a host of murky NGO’s for flooding the West with African and Asian migrants. Yet the fact remains that these migrants follow first and foremost the unilateral invitation calls from EU high ranking politicians seconded by the Pope and the high Catholic clergy.

The underlying ideology of present day America and the EU is multiculturalism — a new secular religion. Its legal tenets must never be questioned by public officials if they are to avoid professional disgrace and become proscribed individuals. Each African or Arab migrant knows that once he reaches the Western shores he will become untouchable. In modern Western political narrative the African migrant is portrayed as a quasi-saintly figure symbolizing the victimized “wretched of the Earth” whose time has now come to face off with the evil White Man. Should a Spanish, Italian or French border guard accidently utter a word of rebuke against unlawful behavior of a non-European migrant, he will be charged with a “hate crime”—and likely lose his job. All migrants using the Mediterranean Sea route know that it is far better to be than not be apprehended by the European coastal police. When embarking on their rundown boats they know that when fished out of water by a flotilla of EU high- tech warships off the coast of North Africa, they will soon be able to savor first class medical treatment that they couldn’t even dream about back home. Once reaching their desired destination in an EU state, and even if engaging in unlawful activities, the legal process aimed at shipping them back will take years if not decades. Recently, despite being rejected for asylum in Germany, Anis Amri, the Tunisian terrorist who drove a truck into a crowd in Munich, was not deported — because he did not have a passport.

In another TOO article, I noted that communism fell apart in the East because its theoretical tenets have been much better achieved in practice by the liberal West — albeit under different and less polemical title, such as “no more borders” and “multiculturalism.”  Undoubtedly, the mind of Angela Merkel, a chief EU mastermind of open borders policies and the “welcoming culture,” should receive a thorough clinical assessment, although it must be noted that Merkel’s mind doesn’t differ substantially from that of other EU and US politicians. Instead of asking what type of a self-hating, do-good, hypermoralistic politician she is one should rather raise a more apt question: What kind of species Germans and other European peoples have become in order to tolerate politicians who are deliberately working on Europe’s destruction?

One can dispense with antifascists, with Marx, with multiculturalists, and with modern social justice warriors. One can also offer a host of sound arguments or weird conspiracy theories about Jewish intellectual moguls planning to turn Europe and America into interracial cesspools. But most White Americans and Europeans, even those with a strong racial identity, can barely stand criticism of Christian ecumenical and multiracial trappings. It is often overlooked that the higher Catholic clergy, both in Europe and the US, is a prime advocate of non-European arrivals. The German Bishops’ Conference, presided by the influential and appropriately named Reinhard Marx — aka “multikulti Marx” —  stands in the forefront of the multicultural doctrine, openly preaching the gospel of borderless racial mixtures. Unlike liberal or antifascist activists, Cardinal Marx does not even try to hide his transracial pro-immigrant sympathies, which he made quite clear in his interview for the German daily Rhein Neckar Zeitung (on February 6, 2016):

Charity knows no borders, just as it ignores any limitations to our asylum law. Anyone entering European soil needs to be treated decently and receive a fair procedure. The borders of Europe must not become the borders of death. It is a shame that already estimated thousands of refugees have died in the Mediterranean or maybe even more.  … Last year I was at the border between the US and Mexico where I saw this huge fence and barriers. I thought to myself: this must not be the future for Europe’s borders.

Archbishop’s Marx’s words only echo the words of the U.S Conference of Catholic Bishops and its president Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, who openly pledges solidarity with Muslim refugees. “Welcoming the stranger and those in flight is not one option among many in the Christian life. It is the very form of Christianity itself. Our actions must remind people of Jesus.”

Not all Catholic clergy are exuberant about the arrival of non-European migrants, as witnessed by some rebellious Catholic Franciscans in Eastern Europe who are critical of globalism, Islam, and multiculturalism. Yet they seldom dare voice their views in public. The very conservative and nationalist-minded Catholic Church in Poland, Hungary and Croatia is quite racially aware and therefore frequently on a collision course with the prescribed EU refugee quotas, or with their superiors in Rome. They must however respect the Church hierarchy because breaching the Pope’s words is considered a sin.

The Catholic Church in in Poland or Croatia, for instance, is not just a conveyor of a specific religious belief; it is primarily the embodiment of national identity, even among local atheists and agnostics. The local Catholic clergy in Eastern Europe has little in common with more secularized and immigrant-friendly German and Austrian clergy who still suffer from the stigma of the National-Socialist tainted past and who therefore feel obliged to show the entire world feelings of historical repentance. The present Pope himself serves them as a role model; he is quite explicit about his multiracial ardor, additionally baffling and bewildering many traditional Catholics in Europe who are no longer certain whether to follow his multiracial homilies or listen instead to the calls of their native soil.

Nordic non-Catholic nations, such as Sweden or Denmark, are the cherished goal of Arab and African migrants. These countries, however, unlike Catholic Center or South, have a long tradition of group-oriented tolerance and civic modesty based on the legacy of Lutheran pietism known as Janteloven.  To a White Central European or a White American visitor this brand of civic modesty and excessive tolerance toward the Africans, often appears pathetic — a far cry from early pagan Vikings who never feared blood or violence.  A stray Arab immigrant in some Eastern Europe down town knows that late at night if walking alone he may be worked over by the local youth. It is often the other way around in guilt-ridden Germany or submissive Denmark.

Hence a dilemma for many racially and ethnically aware White Christians in the US and Europe. One the one hand they are well aware of the destructive nature of multiculturalism, while on the other they cannot ignore early Christian sermons  for a multiracial and global society, as put forward by St. Paul’s Epistles to Galatians (3:28): “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

The task of creating White homelands won’t be easy.

Dr. Tom Sunic is an author. His new book Titans are in Town is to be published by Arktos.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

79 Comments to "Non-White Migrants and the Catholic Church: The Politics of Penitence"

  1. April 29, 2017 - 8:40 am | Permalink

    Yet another in a series of TOO articles showing very little grasp of the Jewish threat. Roman Catholicism and Islam are both more or less successful (from the JQ viewpoint) Jew constructions. The Greek Church lasted until being mostly destroyed by Islam. (For that matter, large chunks of India were ruined by Muslims). Today, Roman Catholicism is dependent on Jew money, and it shows. And to say for example in Eastern Europe … they seldom dare voice their views in public simply ignores the owners and controllers of the media and political machines there.

    • CC's Gravatar CC
      April 29, 2017 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

      “Roman Catholicism and Islam are both more or less successful (from the JQ viewpoint) Jew constructions”

      If what is meant by calling Roman Catholicisms a ‘Jew construction’ is that it was established to promote Jewish interests, that claim is laughable.

      If it is a ‘Jew Construction’, why have Jews always and everywhere hated Christianity (and specifically Catholicism) and tried to attack it?
      E.g. they allied with the Pagan emperor Julian the Apostate to destroy Christianity (so much for the anti-semitic Paganism thesis), the Talmud slanders Jesus and his mother, the Jews supported the Muslim invasions of the Near East and Spain, Jews supported Protestants like the Hussites against Catholicism, Freud viewed himself as a Semitic Hannibal attacking Catholic Rome, Wilhelm Reich had an especial interest in corrupting the Catholic clergy, Jews are the main promoters of atheism and the heads of many atheist organizations to object to public displays of Christianity, Jews of any religion except Christianity can move to Israel and Israeli schoolchildren don’t use plus signs because it looks too much like the Cross

      Secondly, if the Church was established to promote Jewish interests, why has it consistently limited their subversion and attacked Judaism ever since it was created?
      The Bible itself is clearly hostile to the Jews who are consistently in conflict with Christ and his disciples (as it fundamentally rejects the basis of Jewish group identity as God’s ‘chosen people’), and the Church Fathers (e.g. St. John Chrysostom) wrote about their corrupting influence. The subversion by Jews of Europe was limited for the more than a thousand years while the Catholic Church was dominant in Europe. Several attempts were even made by the Church to destroy the Talmud (thwarted by the secular authorities) and to destroy Jewish group identity through encouraging conversion and expelling those who would not. Jewish subversion began on a civilization-destroying level after the Reformation and Enlightenment (in the form of the French Revolution and Napoleon) emancipated them.

      In a literal sense I suppose it was the construct of one Jew (albeit, the ultimate self-hating Jew), but calling the Church a construction of ‘the Jews’ (as a people) is ridiculous.

      • Grauhund's Gravatar Grauhund
        April 29, 2017 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

        My father once asked his childhood friend who had become a priest and missionary if he believed the hierarchy of the Catholic Church was mainly homosexual. He answered that “yes they are almost all gay.” Putting aside the implications of what that means regarding the pedophile scandals, what does this mean regarding their reason for becoming priests? If thier primary reason for becoming priests was to hide their sexuality, what are the chances that they actually believe what they profess to? It might explain why Catholic priests are usually such uninspiring preachers. They don’t believe themselves. And if that’s the case, why not become a social justice warrior to justify your fraud?

        • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
          April 30, 2017 - 3:47 pm | Permalink

          >>>what are the chances that they actually believe what they profess to?<<<

          Slim and Nun. . .

      • Sursum corda's Gravatar Sursum corda
        April 29, 2017 - 9:21 pm | Permalink

        Agreed. The protestant revolution created this hell spawn. The popes segregated the Jews from gentiles for their good and our good. One heretical priest, Luther, helped the enemies of Christ to destroy Christendom.

      • April 30, 2017 - 8:27 am | Permalink

        You’re being naive about Jew lies. They will say anything if they think it suits them at the time. It’s true there are comments on Jesus (a scripted mythological figure) declaiming against Jews, although it’s not of course made clear exactly who ‘Jews’ are. But there are other comments on universality etc implying the opposite. It’s absurd to just pick out a bit that suits you.
        .
        In fact the Roman Catholic Church (Byzantium was different) SUPPORTED Jews by sheltering the Jew money monopoly, in exchange for funds for cathedrals etc — no doubt the debts were made as high as possible, as Jews do now, to keep the Church in hock. The church burned the Talmud – nominally this was because the contents were shocking. In fact of course it prevented the contents becoming known.
        .
        Islam was also made up by Jews, and from the Jew viewpoint was more successful, as it infiltrated more deeply and gave theocracy a summit position, while Christianity was always an optional add-on.
        .
        This is my brief summary, but I’d be interested in serious comment – after all, we’re talking of a millennium or two and vast changes in states, cities, beliefs, technologies–
        big-lies.org/general/early-christianity-bible.html

        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          April 30, 2017 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

          I’m not a historian, by any means, but read copiously. I am not that interested in ancient texts and philosophers unless a healthy retro skepticism can be employed.

          From what i’ve read, Islam was parallel to the Mongol Conquests, the Ottoman and Seljuk Turks, The Huns, etc. Plunder, resources, raping and pillaging were the attractions and motivations. Mohammed was a gang leader, a sociopath, mentally ill, and a figure much like Stalin, clever, cunning, but not intellectual.

          Jews look at something-anything in a totally unique way: that is, how can we profit from this, plunder it, transform it to work for us, or kill it if it impedes their plans. Their success rate is largely due that they are Amoral, as well as immoral. The End Justifies The Means; Anything To Win, etc, etc.

          Like the Led Zeppelin song: “Lying’, cheatin’, hurtin’, that’s all you seem to do”. I’m reminded of the cyborg that was made of fluid metal that kept coming and coming at Arnold, the obsolete model. Relentless, without remorse, as long as it was powered, i.e., alive. I had lymphatic cancer. I had it killed or it was going to kill me. There were no deals, accommodations, or negotiations.

      • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
        May 1, 2017 - 2:16 pm | Permalink

        CC,

        Consider:

        Christianity obviously forms part of European history, but Europe was not born with it. When Christianity appeared, Europe already had five or six millennia of culture and civilization behind it. To speak about the “Christian roots” of Europe amounts to denying that the Latin, Greek, Celtic, Germanic, and Slavic cultures of Antiquity ever existed, which is obviously indefensible.

        Alain de Benoist

        https://archive.org/details/InterviewOnChristianity

    • Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
      April 30, 2017 - 1:54 pm | Permalink

      I thought the same about the eastern Catholics. They’re not conflicted with teachings or even the Pope. If they have hesitancy it’s because of the Jews, government, and media.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 1, 2017 - 8:13 am | Permalink

        Being baptized in the Greek Orthodox Faith, serving as an altar boy, I NEVER heard one word about Jews. There was no Chosen People jive, references to them in the Bible, no “Revelation” of entitlement of Israel. Fro the Orthodox, Jews are simply not germane, relevant, or have anything to do with your relationship to God. They are not special, or above anyone.

        http://www.religionfacts.com/eastern-orthodoxy

        If any of you desire to bring up your children as a Christian, you owe it to them and yourself to investigate Eastern Orthodoxy. It’s straight, full strength original Christian faith. Not watered down, no ice cubes, no spritz, no mixers.

        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          May 1, 2017 - 8:44 am | Permalink

          Some links for an alternative to the churches of the West actively promoting dissolution, preferences of alien invaders of a hostile “faith” over their own members, and a clean break from bastard Christianity, which has become little more than a marketing, sociology, and Marxist patsy of institutionalized drooling, slavering stupidity of Satanism and genocidal Jewry. I’m sure a convert’s experience will be relevant.


          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qdr7u6IP6sg

  2. April 29, 2017 - 9:22 am | Permalink

    Paul was not speaking of a present multiracial society in Galatians 3:28, he was speaking of the reality of justification being available to all without regard to race, gender or social status. To draw from what he said that the Kingdom was going to manifested in this time as a multiracial society is a result of an over-realized eschatology, just as taking those verses to override what Paul wrote about gender later is a misreading of those verses.

    • Right_On's Gravatar Right_On
      April 29, 2017 - 7:05 pm | Permalink

      Absolutely right.
      My take has always been that Paul was referring to our “transcendental” Self – the “tat tvam asi” of Advaita-Vedanta. Being beyond duality our true Self transcends distinctions of male and female, etc. It emphatically doesn’t imply that when Paul looked around him he was unable to distinguish between a noble Roman and a degenerate barbarian.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        April 30, 2017 - 3:43 pm | Permalink

        >>>true Self transcends distinctions of male and female, etc.<<<

        (((Who else))) is trying to thwart such distinctions?

  3. Frank C's Gravatar Frank C
    April 29, 2017 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Goetterdaemmerung

    When Spring lightly touches
    With hand green and golden
    The mountains and fjords,
    Then shouts the sea-rover,
    “A-Viking! A-Viking!”

    The hammers are busy
    On weapon and harness.
    Then flashes the broad blade
    In every sea hamlet.
    The dragon ships, thirsty
    For bounding blue water,
    Leap down to the seashore.

    And Olaf of Norway
    And Erik of Gotland
    And Thorwald the Mighty,
    Whose grandsire was Wotan,
    Stand fast on the poop deck
    With golden hair streaming,
    With spear brightly glinting,
    With eye fierce and blazing,
    Sail out on the swan’s bath-
    The grey widow-maker-
    For England or Iceland,
    Byzantium, Vinland,
    Far land or ancient
    And ripe for the plunder,
    The burning of roof-trees,
    The seizing of women,
    The looting of treasure,
    The flowing of red blood,
    And wine for the victors.

    Ah, whence fled those great days,
    The days of our fathers,
    The days of the valiant,
    Of gods and of heroes,
    Or fair maids and foul dwarfs,
    And lindworms and dragons,
    Of Beowulf, Dietrich,
    Strong Harald, grim Hagen,
    Wolfhart and Siegfried,
    The greathearts, the mighty!

    Yea, loathsome today is
    The seed of their strong loins-
    The petty, the small, the clod and
    the crawler.

    The music has gone from the souls
    of our people.
    The thunder has vanished away
    with Valhalla.
    Now meekness and weakness
    And womanly virtues
    Have shackled, degraded
    And shamefully softened
    The sons of our fathers,
    The sons of the mighty.

    And now have we traded
    The lightning of storm gods,
    The arms of Valkyries,
    The halls of Valhalla,
    The kiss of wish maidens,
    For wings and a nightshirt,
    A harp and a halo,
    A psalmbook and psalter?
    Oh, no, my Lord Bishop!

    Mark, grey Galilean,
    The Wolf Age is coming,
    The great fimbul winter,
    When all sick things perish.

    (by Dr. Peter Peel, printed in issue #81 of National Vanguard)

    We Men of the West need to thoroughly reject any and all religious leaders who would weaken our resolve to survive. In these times, we need “white wolves” to lead us, not Christian lambs who would meekly lead us to our slaughter.

    • ettore caterino's Gravatar ettore caterino
      April 29, 2017 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

      Chrstian church had been always strange, we still live yet thanks to our common sense. It’s time to change it and bring back our riches!

  4. CC's Gravatar CC
    April 29, 2017 - 12:36 pm | Permalink

    E Michael Jones deserves an honourable mention as a Catholic combating the Jews and the schemes. The official (magisterial) position of the Catholic Church on the Jews (as expressed in Nostra Aetate) still holds them responsible for Christ’s death and superseded by the Church as the true Israel.

    It’s a shame more Catholics don’t actually read the Bible;
    “You [the Jews] are from your father the devil, and you choose to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies” – John 8:44
    “For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea, for you suffered the same things from your own compatriots as they did from the Jews, 15 who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out; they displease God and oppose everyone” – 1 Thessalonians 2:14-5
    “I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not [the ‘Jews’, for the Church is the true Israel], but are a synagogue of Satan” – Revelations 2:9

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      May 1, 2017 - 2:01 pm | Permalink

      CC,

      Consider:

      Christianity obviously forms part of European history, but Europe was not born with it. When Christianity appeared, Europe already had five or six millennia of culture and civilization behind it. To speak about the “Christian roots” of Europe amounts to denying that the Latin, Greek, Celtic, Germanic, and Slavic cultures of Antiquity ever existed, which is obviously indefensible.

      Alain de Benoist

      https://archive.org/details/InterviewOnChristianity

  5. PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
    April 29, 2017 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

    It has been said before but needs repeating; all the mainline Christian denominations, not only the formerly conservative RCC, have made a knowing and willing alliance with evil. Most of these churchmen really are monsters, they care nothing for the birthright of European infants or the peace and security of those elderly Europeans and the working class who bear the brunt of immigration.
    These elite ecclesiastics can retreat to their lavish palaces while we and our kin are subjected to displacement and dispossession in our homelands. Lands our ancestors have inhabited, sweated, fought and died for thousands of years. This is the thanks we get from these ungrateful bastards. Clearly they couldn’t give a shit about us. Well, these clergymen and their supporters in government have by their actions forfeited any legitimacy. Why are Catholics and Lutherans in Germany still paying the Church Tax? Time to kick these bishops in the butt, or where it really hurts, in their wallets.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      April 30, 2017 - 11:14 am | Permalink

      Not true of the Eastern Orthodox Religions, Sir. Please see my comments here and on the previous article, re: French (Frog Leaping) Elections.

  6. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    April 29, 2017 - 1:29 pm | Permalink

    This obese bozo, Cardinal Marx, is symptomatic of the deep level of intellectual and spiritual poisoning that is afflicting post WWII western Europe. Since there is no real freedom of expression in most of Europe, (and the MSM there is also owned, or intimidated by Jewry and their demented minions), the political stooges have masochistically run riot, so to speak, with no real organized opposition. This horrible state of self-destructive affairs, initially brought about so thoughtlessly by Anglo-American bayonets in 1945, has also had a vengeful multiplier effect on the entire Anglo-White population of the West. Specifically, on those foolish and irresponsible Whites who shamelessly guzzled the toxic ideological ‘kool-aid’ of the great Era of Liberal Illusion.

    The upshot of this lethal beguilement is the inter-racial dystopia that we are all fatally enmeshed in today. The depraved chickens really are coming home to roost, folks, except that this batch is much more simian-like and deadly.

  7. Ray P's Gravatar Ray P
    April 29, 2017 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    The Roman empire incorporated a multitude of subject races and cultures. St. Paul was a Jew of Tarsus, a Greek city in Asia Minor, and a Roman citizen. He famously claimed his civil right to be tried by a Roman and not a Jewish court When Christianity took over the empire it inherited this diversity and indeed had grown within it. Paul and his followers had begun the takeover by using the good roads and ships of the empire to evangelize to races outside the Jewish community, a practice imitated by missionaries of the later European empires.

  8. April 29, 2017 - 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Those Christian leaders betray their church and their own people. But is it any wonder that a fat, intellectually mediocre person like that Cardinal would resent his own people? He did not find a wife and did not fit into a real job, so he became a catholic priest, maybe abusing some child or forcing himself on a housemaid here and there. Those people are free of any courage, any true character, free of a sense of tragedy and urgency and they lack any love for their race and their people. They cling to some intellectual ivory tower that has nothing to do with reality. To them it is more important to help Arabs or Negroes enter Europe no matter what, than to save Europe from those criminal murderers and burdens on the taxpayer. Some abstract ideal is more important than a twenty year old German girl that gets gang-raped or murdered by a “rapefugee”. Thank God that these people will be judged by our Lord one day and thank God there are true Christians with a true sense for their own kin!

    • April 30, 2017 - 8:15 am | Permalink

      It’s important that people should have career possibilities, even if the people are ordinary and ‘intellectually mediocre’. Jews prey on people who have inherited wealth, or are resentful, secretive, ambitious, and whatever. The Church of England, and British Universities and schools, and police and military are havens for many people willing to ruin others. And the Jewish establishment has the same lack of any love for the people they infiltrate.

  9. fromChristianToPagan's Gravatar fromChristianToPagan
    April 29, 2017 - 5:30 pm | Permalink

    it does not matter wether you are a southern catholic or a northern protestant (in fact, most people relate to the catholic church or to the evangelical faith not because of real faith, but because of nationality). The real point is the following: you believe in your culture (which implies, you are ready to fight for it) or you dispise your culture. That the actual Pope behaves more as the mufti of Rome than as the Shepperd of the Chistian faith points to the reality of the Christian faith, in which the people needs some kind of saviour, instead of trying to understand by themselves the reality of this world.
    Just as the peoples of Northern Europe nationalised their churches, in the same way as the gobernments of nowadays nationalise their fossil fuels. we, the people of Southern Europe should nationalize our morality, in order to keep our assets far away from the traitors who want to turn our churches into mosques. Our Pope is not any more than an actor, who should be not in Rome, but in a reality show, be it in England, Holland or Russia. In the end, he is just an actor, playing the role of the Mediterranean noble, who tries to seduce the nordic blonde. But the real point is that he is not anymore than a Mediterranean pirate, who is trying to sell the blondines and the brunettes of the whole of Europe to the pirates of those who sell themselves as the new faith, the one who is ready to pay for the purpurean clads of this outdated followers of Baal:

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      April 30, 2017 - 11:10 am | Permalink

      @fromChristianToPagan: On your road to the Pagan Temple, you missed the turnoff for the Eastern Orthodox Church, which can be excepted from the true and accurate generalizations of ALL THE WESTERNS CHRISITIAN FATIHS, who are indeed under varying controls and influence of the (((Virus/Parasite))). The Southern Baptist Convention is the latest casualty in the long line of capitations and surrenders.

      I find the Paganism of the Pre-Christian Northern Tribes to be underdeveloped and stunted-at least compared to the Greek Gods. If you are truly interested in ANIMISM, on the strength of quality and depth, I would encourage you to investigate the Shinto Religion of Japan. But that would require acknowledgement that these slant-eyed people have something to offer us Whites. An objective overview of Asian and Oriental Peoples and their total institutions and heritage has made it apparent to me that they have much to offer a White Race that cannot muster the wherewithal to save itself and encourages masochism and perverted, malignant altruism.

      Part of any solution is identifying AND ACKNOWLEDGING the problem. This is at least 80% of a solution. We Caucasians are a mentally, spiritually sick and stupid people who have grown intellectually, morally, and spiritually flabby.

      I find that the damage done to us comes, in the main, FROM US, actively and passively. The dozens, if not hundreds of remedial and restorative White salvation sites excel, overall at describing our problems, detailing it, with very few actually PROPOSING CONCRETE, EMPIRICAL, AND STRATEGIC plans. Exclude National Socialism, Retro Nazism, Nordic Purity and Beauty Contests, and general nostalgia and living in the past phantasmagoric thinking of a revival and chest thumping.

      To save “Whites”, we need solutions and people that think like and have either an appreciation of an engineering background or thinking and proportions that pass through this kind of crucible.

  10. Sandy,'s Gravatar Sandy,
    April 29, 2017 - 10:46 pm | Permalink

    I was surprised to see a guy with a Phd misusing St Paul’s quote regarding there being neither this nor that. The obvious fact that from the time Paul said it men remained men and women remained women would suggest that Paul was talking about a spiritual concern, like you know, a biblical thing. It’s as daft as praising the vikings for being real men for selling our best women and children to the Muslims. All organizations have been infiltrated at the top and are working for the new world order.

  11. SFC Steven M Barry USA RET's Gravatar SFC Steven M Barry USA RET
    April 29, 2017 - 11:06 pm | Permalink

    Marx is no more Catholic than the author of this article.

    In fact, it would be fair to say that Marx is a student of “Evolutionary Psychology.”

    S//

  12. JM's Gravatar JM
    April 30, 2017 - 2:36 am | Permalink

    TS: “In another TOO article, I noted that communism fell apart in the East because its theoretical tenets have been much better achieved in practice by the liberal West — albeit under different and less polemical title, such as “no more borders” and “multiculturalism.” ”
    That’s not true. It fell apart because the economic aspirations of Marxism failed to be met in the new phase of consumerist society. There wasn’t any aspiration (nor likely ability if the viewpoint of Francis Parker Yokey is taken) to attack race and national culture as happened in the West. There were big population movements, but these were largely based on political control rather than this. And there was no attempt at mass Third World “Immigration”.

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      May 1, 2017 - 7:50 am | Permalink

      @JM, the communism might have fallen apart in the East but many of the prominent families from the communist era have never lost their influence.

  13. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    April 30, 2017 - 4:28 am | Permalink

    “The Bible tells us to be like God, and then on page after page it describes God as a mass murderer. This may be the single most important key to the political behavior of Western Civilization.” -Robert Anton Wilson

    • Ray P's Gravatar Ray P
      April 30, 2017 - 11:32 am | Permalink

      The ancient Greek city-states e.g. Sparta waged war ruthlessly as did the pre-Christian Roman empire. European barbarian tribes fought one another savagely in the absence of Christian teaching. Would Wilson have blamed the violence of the Japanese samurai clans (prior to the dominion of the Shogun establishing peace through superior firepower) upon Buddhism? The native religion Shinto treats corpses and blood as spiritually unclean yet the clans fought brutal wars involving much bloodshed and many dead.

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        April 30, 2017 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

        The Aryan, not the Oriental or African or Hebrew, race was destined to evolve, to lead all of mankind to a grander vision, higher consciousness and improved material existence. The Hebrew bible, steeped in middle-eastern superstition and Judaic self glorification, polluted this destiny, pushing forward their own materialistc, mundane and unevolved position. Look where we are today. The greatest race has become for the most part shuffling penitents, while fundamentalists preach the honor of sending their sons to die for Israel, the pope washes the feet of black savages, and anglicans ministers call for the black invasion of once white lands. The Earth and the gods must be weeping.

        • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
          May 1, 2017 - 3:27 am | Permalink

          May I remind you that it was not pagans, but CHRISTIAN WARRIORS who saved European civilization time & again from the Islamic Hordes: Christian Warriors such as Charles Martel of France, who saved Europe no less than three times, Jan Sobiewski of Poland, and the Christian Bulgarian & Russian Warriors at the Battle of Shipka. All the modern Christian weakness in “KISSING MUSLIM FEET” is just more of the Crypto-Jewish Infiltration that has subverted the Church since 325 AD, when the Jewish “Popes of Alexandria” seized control, murdering & exiling anyone adhering to the original Antioch faith, now held only by the Assyrian Church of the East, targeted by ISIS, strangely enough.

        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          May 1, 2017 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

          Who are the Aryans? The word itself is of Hindu origin. Millenia migrations patterns show varying genetic similarity from India to Norway. The pure Aryan, “Nordic” race is a political statement, a propaganda set piece, produced for the not-so-bright, or self-deluded.

          The Nordic Heidis and Helgas migrate their knees more often and less discriminatorily than almost any other women. And they have been that way, pin cushions for whomever pays for the drinks.

          See Indo-European migrations and language similarity.

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          May 1, 2017 - 5:05 pm | Permalink

          @Bramble and Poupon Marx, both of you have either evaded or misunderstood my comment in order to sermonize your own religious and racial views. Again…..Look at where we are at today.

    • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
      May 1, 2017 - 3:13 am | Permalink

      Christianity begins with Christ & the New Testament, Christ & the New Covenant, and the compassionate Heavenly Father of whom Christ teaches. It has NOTHING TO DO with the Bloodthirsty, Genocidal Jewish Old Testament Yareah the Moon God of Jericho = Allah the Moon God of Islam, just as the Jewish Kaballah = Q’aba Allah the “CUBE GOD” of Islam, like that Black Cube Muslims run around naked in Mecca, like that Black Cube Jewish men strap to their foreheads. There is no such thing as “Judeo-Christianity”, only Judeo-Islam.

  14. anarchyst's Gravatar anarchyst
    April 30, 2017 - 4:48 am | Permalink

    There are still old-line Catholics that do recognize the culpability of jews in Christ’s death, jewish rejection of the “new covenant” and the (eventual) damnation of the jews.
    Vatican II drove traditional Catholics underground, but was unsuccessful in stamping out TRUE Catholicism. For example, until recently, it was forbidden to celebrate the old (Latin) Tridentine Mass, except by official permission (that was rarely given), but as of late, official permission is no longer needed. The pendulum has begun to swing the other way; traditional Catholics are once again gaining strength against the evil forces of the jews and their “fellow travelers”. Of course, today’s Catholic Church will not speak out against the evils of the world, especially when it recognizes the jews as being of Magog. It will be traditional (pre-Vatican II) Catholics that usher and nurture the REAL CAtholic Church in the future…

  15. April 30, 2017 - 6:41 am | Permalink

    Comments are well taken; I’ve read them all with interest. Here is my response to a gent who sent me a private email. I am posting my answer in TOO too:
    However, the problem we all Whites have with the present day Church sermons about “helping the poor migrants out” is not just of an institutional order. Such a behavior is the logical outcome of Christian universalism, ecumenism, and “turn thy other cheek” even when the enemy slams you into the face. (Apart from Vatican II, 1962-65, a major Church event which was more the result of the Allied and Jewish pressure, both from within and from without). These are fundamental issues many of our people either overlook or do not wish to address. Unlike Judaism, which in different historical times and places functions either as a vehicle for a distinct and separate race, or as a separate religion, or as a separate ethnicity, and therefore providing a distinct and separate Jewish identity, we Christians do not have a luxury of juggling freely with our identity. The distinction/fusion between/with the spiritual legacy of Athens and Jerusalem is a part of our neurotic White identity (cf. J. W. Goethe, “Two souls, alas, are dwelling in my breast.” Faust I). It is naïve to assume that Jews are not aware of our split selves. It is also inappropriate to make jokes in public about Arab Muslims – considering the fact that Christianity also originated among the same gene pool, i.e. the Levantine, Semitic, Middle Eastern populace —and not in the forests and mountains of Europe.

  16. Forever guilty's Gravatar Forever guilty
    April 30, 2017 - 6:51 am | Permalink

    Unfortunately its quite possible, that Christianity was designed to tame , to domesticate, to enslave White men.

    Worshiping false Jewish god.

    “But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also”.

    “And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also”.

    “But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,” (Priceless)

    And what about “original sin” ? “slaves of the sin” So White man Always guilty, always have to kneel and plead for forgiveness. How convenient.

    Until White people reject false prophets and Call to ours true numerous, ferocious Gods: Odin, Perun, Thor.. Until Temples are erected and proper sacrifices are made…

  17. Ray P's Gravatar Ray P
    April 30, 2017 - 7:34 am | Permalink

    Christianity has certainly laminated itself onto numerous peoples and their cultures each of which has imparted a particular style e.g. Orthodox (based on Ancient Greek), Roman (Latin) and the Celtic church of Europe’s far western isles and in the post-Reformation period the translation of scripture into vernacular tongues – the English of the Authorized version of the Bible by the Anglican Church, the German of the Lutheran etc. This has furthered its spread and yet also diluted it. It also means that from the start of St. Paul’s missionary journeys it has not featured any barrier based on race or culture provided the new follower of Christ accepts his gospel. Hence we have Christian Jews, Christian Africans, Christian Central & South American Indians, Christian Arabs, Christian Malaysians, Indians, Vietnamese, Koreans, Chinese and Japanese all of whom can continue largely in their original language and culture with some modifications although in some cases (Aztecs) the original culture was obliterated. In others, there has been a very broad accommodation of non-Christian practices and belief e.g. Santeria. It seems remarkable that it has managed to spread itself to such a diverse array of people very far-removed from its starting point in Judea.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      April 30, 2017 - 10:39 am | Permalink

      I, as an Eastern Orthodox Christian by birth, have come full circle from agnostic to reverential of the undiluted, constant, and faithful adherence to the Original and One True Christian Faith. Everything else is watered down, adulterer, and infused with alien elements.

      The EO Church has NOT advised leaders to specific actions, has not acted as a sociology, political science, or economics squadron of imperative carpers. It has remained a RELIGION, whose sole purpose and focus is the relationship, directly between the person and God. It composes and teaches “frameworks” and context of an EO Christian, never telling one of the Faithful, you “must” do this.

      The “Eastern” in Orthodoxy is more than a geographical denotation. It is closer in its canons and practice to the Eastern Religions than any other Christian religion. All other Christian religions are an open wound into which the (((Parasite, Virus, and Foreign Body))) has entered the Western Christian Caucasian Man body and spirit, taking over the DNA and RNA of his capacities and actualities.

      Orthodoxy does not vary, does not mutate, is immune to fads, trends, subversion, and diversion. It is tough AND strong.

      • Bramble's Gravatar Bramble
        May 1, 2017 - 3:01 am | Permalink

        Tragically, the original Antioch Christianity was subverted by the Nest of Crypto-Jewish Infiltrators based in Alexandria, who brutally suppressed 300 years of belief in the Hierarchy of the Trinity (God Almighty is OF COURSE greater than His Divine Son, who is greater than the Holy Spirit), turning them all into “Triplets of Equal Standing” in 325 AD, in order to elevate the human Mary into a “Mother Goddess Theotokos Above Almighty God”. The only Christians in the world who uphold the original faith are the ASSYRIAN CHURCH OF THE EAST, which rejects the Blasphemous Triplets idea and its consequent Blasphemous Worship of Mary. Maybe that’s why (((The Tribe))) have been trying so hard to wipe out the Assyrian Church, from the massacres of Tamerlane, instigated by his Crypto adviser Sayyid Baraka (“Sid Barak”?), to the modern attacks of ISIS in the same area.

        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          May 1, 2017 - 9:20 am | Permalink

          Well, what you say may be wholly or partly true. But here we are in the twilight of the West, with the termites close to destroying the pillars and firmament of the Edifice of the West.

          In engineering, you work with what you have, can get, and make it work. Anybody who says engineers are not creative is ignorant and insolent. So, as I have elucidated in some degree of success, the Eastern Orthodox Faith is the “only game in town”. All the rest are “knock-offs”, phonies, pretenders, imitations, and many are outright frauds and Satanic. IOW, they are not religions but crowd controllers.

          All Western Christian religion have lost their way, their markers, their maps and guidance, which is supposed to be Eternal. Did God change? Did the writers of the Church at the time of its founding mean something else? (This is parallel to the tension regarding the US Constitution, between “Originalists”-the Constitution means what its says in plain language-or the “Living, Breathing Document, that has to be “interpreted” in the light and context of modern, progressive thought and existence; endlessly malleable and mutable, meaning what the present prelates say it means.

          Then there are the Martyrs of the Orthodox Faith. Did they suffer and sacrifice for a Church referred to as “the Old Whore”, with Jewish Popes, Satanic Rituals, open violations of sacred beliefs by Popes, Popes with two feet in the Material World with one toe in the Spiritual? Would you eat slop and garbage for food made with little more than salt, sugar, and schmaltz? Why would you “put up with” the equivalent in the spiritual realm of timelessness and eternity?

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          May 1, 2017 - 2:09 pm | Permalink

          Poupon Marx’s ever more insistent comments on so-called Eastern Orthodoxy are historically untenable and otherwise silly. Almost the only matter on which there is any genuine unanimity of thought or “doctrine” among the twenty or so national splinter groups that make up “Eastern” Orthodoxy is hatred of Rome and emotional rather than theological rejection of the Apostolic origins of the primacy of Peter and his successors. One of the billion or so errors made by Pope John Paul II was wasting so many years trying to reach a rapprochement with Eastern leaders, for whom spleen and centuries-old bad blood trumped any appeal to brotherhood in Christ.

          I pass over in silence the utter corruption by (((Bolshevik Moscow))) of the Russian branch of “Orthodoxy”—then and now, I believe, the largest in the world. In becoming the Soviet Union’s state church, it contributed more apostates than martyrs to the logbook of Christian history.

  18. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 30, 2017 - 10:40 am | Permalink

    “…considering the fact that Christianity also originated among the same gene pool, i.e. the Levantine, Semitic, Middle Eastern populace —and not in the forests and mountains of Europe.”

    Tom, agree with most of your analysis,but there are always outliers. In this case, and claiming no expertise in regard to the religious times @ of Christ, and of agnostic “belief” myself, the historical facts of Hellenism which was in some large part a result of the failure of the Polis system (Pelopponesian Wars aftermath, etc.) , include the dramatic reversals of Thought in the Stoics, who invented Universalism, Humanity, and much of the claptrap that we have with us today.
    macabbees in jewish histsorymacabbees in jewish histsory
    This was White Man genes talking, one part of us anyway. OK. Outliers are always around, and I suggest that Christ and his jewish disciples were outliers amongst the Jews, just as there are outliers today amongst various racial groups, who do not fit the general character of their group.

    The ideas of Hellenism took hold in some large way in enough of the ancient jews to trigger civil war. It was “Greek” and indeed “Jew” in cultural terms amongst the Jews. Culture war leading to real war. Just like now.

    Joe Webb

  19. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 30, 2017 - 10:49 am | Permalink

    trying to get the wiki article on the Maccabees…did not work on my first post. here goes again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maccabees

    There …Joe Webb

  20. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 30, 2017 - 11:03 am | Permalink

    somewhere in the TOQ journals is a piece by a Trask on the Turn-the-other cheek. I have also seen it claimed similarly elsewhere…that the NT was written in ancient Greek and that the Greek had two words for “enemy”….one was private enemy as in family and friends, and the other was the pubic enemy.

    The other cheek turned…was to your intimates…private sphere. The public enemy was to be checked by violence if need be, presumably.

    I have also read that the Latin had a third word for ‘enemy’, and that was your “rival”…neither other cheeked, nor killed, but simply dealt with in civil terms.

    So, this is important. Christian armies seem to have understood matters correctly. Joe Webb

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      April 30, 2017 - 1:27 pm | Permalink

      Joe, exactly.
      It’s the same with the word “proximus”, Latin for “the closest” to you. The closest being your relatives, your friends and acquaintances, not those coming from the outer corners of the world.
      In reality, and as recent events in Italy are dmomstratimg, all the talks about
      immigrants and so on, by apostates like Marx, are simply a matter of money.
      They are serving Mammona, not Our Lord.

    • Andy's Gravatar Andy
      April 30, 2017 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

      Thank you Joe Webb for that post about there being two words in the New Testament Greek for ‘enemy’. I found that post most interesting and helpful along with the other information.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      May 2, 2017 - 12:29 am | Permalink

      H.A. Scott Trask covers the philological points you raise here:
      http://www.unz.org/Pub/AmRenaissance-2001jul-00001

  21. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 30, 2017 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    impressionistic thinking here , but….the Pelopponesian wars lasted about as long as our two world wars…25 plus years.

    The collapse of Greece followed. Our two world wars, at least in Europe, can be seen as very similar. In both cases, the turn to dreamy ideas of Mankind, Internationalism,Humanity, and of course now the Mother of All Crazy Ideas, racial equality, has been the result of WW2. Stoicism on the march.

    Stoicism dreamed up the equality ideas then, and the corollaries therefrom, universal world citizenship, etc.

    The general racialist character of the White West, always present despite lots of Hellenistic Bad Ideas, was delivered a powerful Stoicism in our time, by our Pelopponesian wars: The Solution to our problems is Equality in all respects.

    So, while the basics of equality, race equality, etc. were laid down by Greeks 300 BC, we survived it and just did what comes naturally…in this case, racialism.

    The racialism of World War Two, particularly the German type, was to be picked up by the Dreamers , liberals and leftists, as the Next Big Thang with which to attack the West. The Jews piled on, never to miss an opportunity, and wrote almost all the books on race equality and its corollary, Whites Bad, somehow evading the racialism of Jews and Israel. (The main reason this sleight-of-mind caper by jews has been successful, is that jews are the prodigal sons particularly of Protestants, God’s chosen etc. They thus get a special dispensation)

    So, Christianity has had a love-hate relationship with the jews. Meanwhile, our self-flagellation , with jews handing us the whips, continues.

    Greece, fundamentally racialist in spades, nevertheless continues to set the standard for anybody capable of Thought.

    Can one continue the historical thread and remark the history of Alexander’s Empire of Greek civilization, Rome, etc?

    When the Roman West collapsed, there were more Greeks (Germans) there to save Europe. Today, the Germans( us )are doped up real bad on Stoic ideas.

    It is starting to change but…this is it. Now or never..

    Joe Webb

  22. Art's Gravatar Art
    April 30, 2017 - 2:12 pm | Permalink

    @Tom Sunic,

    thanks for focusing on the reasons of the “western pathology”, called in the Newspeak “Judeo-Christianity”.

    There was an article by Tobias Langdon about Zombie Ants, controlled by a brainless fungus.
    The behaviour of an infected ant that becomes a Zombie is a very good metaphor to describe the suicidal behaviour of the Western civilization.
    Maybe the metaphor of a vulnerable operational system, that you install on your laptop or smartphone, is also a good analogy?
    Christianity is like an Operational System (OS), the weakened Roman Empire “borrowed” from one of their desert provinces. This OS was not fully compatible to the “hardware” of Europe, it had to be adapted by Constantine, and the whole Western Civilization was built upon this borrowed basis that was at the beginning a very positiv and unifying factor.

    The problem is that this borrowed OS had no “firewall”, speak no protection from “hacking”. A Jew could easily become a Christian, and at the same time be proud of his “Jewish race”.
    In other words, Christianity was open to subversion, while Judaism was protected from any “viruses”.
    So if we use the Newspeak Term “Judeo-Christianity”, then this word just means subverted Christianity, because only Christians believe that Christianity and Judaism are compatible. Jews do not believe that Christianity is compatible to Judaism.
    Here is one quote that proves this:
    —-
    ZIONISM versus BOLSHEVISM
    Disraeli, the Jew Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to his race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.” Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia, where of all countries in the world the Jews were the most cruelly treated, and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country, which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times, we must admit that nothing that has since happened in the history of the world has falsified the truth of Disraeli’s confident assertion.
    By Winston S. Churchill.
    ___
    Churchill does not see any contradictions: the Christian Disraeli is still a Jew who openly supports the interests of his race. And the Christian Churchill believes that Yahweh punished Russia because the “God chosen people” did not have in Russia those privileges they had in the UK.
    Maybe Churchill sincerely believed that if he blindly supports the agenda of his Jewish financiers, the power and magic of Yahweh will protect the British Empire. It is obvious that the Christian Churchill was no exception. There are millions of Christians who base their decision not upon logical reasoning, but upon superstition, and many of these Christians are in leading positions.
    In other words many Christians behave like infected Zombie ants, because the “Operational System”, called Christianity, that was from the very beginning vulnerable to hacking, and is now fully subverted and infiltrated by the original owners/programmers of this system.
    Judaism cannot be hacked, it a closed system with a very good “firewall”.
    Christianity is the reason why Jews have a disproportional power in Western societies. Christian Zombies need the “God chosen people” not only as their “elder brothers”, but also as bailiffs and financiers. Christian kings believed that if their own Jews do usury and tax collection and share the profits with them, then God will close an eye on this sin. So the financial system gradually became the job of Jews in Christian societies.
    That is why the descendants of Slavs and Khazars that converted to Judaism in the Middle Ages had such a big success in Christian societies.
    The other reason of their success was the dysgenic character of Christianity. Most educated and intelligent people could not have children in Christian societies (celibate). In a Jewish ghetto the children of a Rabbi could marry a successful merchant, which was a eugenic process.
    As a result, the inbred Christian aristocracy, that was isolated from the people, degenerated and was eventually incorporated (via intermarriage with the former financiers) into Jewry. The Jewish elite remained isolated from the influence of Christians and due to eugenic process produced a high IQ elite that could easily fool the corrupt and degenerate western Christian elite.

    • Ray P's Gravatar Ray P
      May 1, 2017 - 4:41 am | Permalink

      Read Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson.

    • Alicia's Gravatar Alicia
      May 1, 2017 - 7:35 am | Permalink

      Spot on, Art. In my country of birth, Poland, this dam… Judaeo-Christianity, poses a special threat as ordinary Poles are naive enough to believe in the myth that the (Judaized) Catholic church is the most reliable ally of the Polish nation.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 1, 2017 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

        Yes, Alicia. No more Polish jokes. The jokes are not the rest of the West which is NOT the best. A good friend of mine, retired Army officer of high rank, devout Catholic, upstanding and patriotic cannot accept any truth contra to Jews as the Chosen People. There are other ex-military that cannot cross this rubicon. It breaks my heart.

        The (((Virus-Parasite))) grows in the devout, righteous Polish Nation. The Catholick Church of today is not the National Church of yesteryear, their tether and preserver of Godliness. May they see through the curtain of deception and perhaps establish a “National Polish Catholic Church”, as the Orthodox have wisely done through thousands of years.

  23. Reich's Gravatar Reich
    April 30, 2017 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Had the churches taught the same thing before the advent of political correctness and liberalism, the White race would have been bred out of existence long ago. Hint: they didnt.

    Dr. Sunic’s assessment is just senseless. The Paul-quote at the end of the article means, that we are all one in being saved, i.e. there are no exceptional nations and peoples, such as the jews had been before Jesus came.

    How and why the modern churches have been subverted is an interesting, albeit sad story (hint: it had to do with jewish infiltration). But it wasnt always the case. He implicates Christinaity as a whole for being responsible for the sad state we’re in.

    Dr. Sunic comes from an anti-christian neo-pagan background (GRECE), hence the short-sightedness or outright blindness, that makes his article irrelevant.

  24. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    April 30, 2017 - 2:38 pm | Permalink

    My take on this is a bit more banal but often it’s banality that drives societies to engage in national suicide. One idea that comes to mind is that the west became fat, lazy, and rich and adopted wholesale the elite values that surmise that competing and contradictory cultures can co-exist beneath the umbrella of a society earmarked by consensual hedonism.

    Another idea is that we take our feminist women, and western women are almost universally feminist to one degree or another, much too seriously. European women, unlike men, don’t have the same in-bred caution toward external dangers and the unknown. We have given women great credibility when they are basically helpless and dependent on men – ultimately. And even though feminist women often forsake their natural biological yearnings relative to family life and children, the yearnings themselves haven’t disappeared but are perhaps channeled by childless women into a nesting and mothering scheme involving those that are targeted as unfortunates and in need of care – like their own children would so need. Migrants become the ersatz children of feminist maternalism.

  25. Betty's Gravatar Betty
    April 30, 2017 - 5:20 pm | Permalink

    The RCC is gone. It is time for pope Frannie to move to the Congo. A new Caucasian, European church will have to be created for the West.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      May 2, 2017 - 12:44 am | Permalink

      No, it won’t. The Eastern Orthodox Church cannot be equaled by a new, RCC replacement startup. Pope Francis cites doctrinaire Marxists and Communists as his “mentors”, and wholly embraces the materialistic doctrine and economic determinism, where on the other hand, all Pops before him rejected Marxism as an abomination.
      https://spectator.org/pope-franciss-communist-mentor/

      He was elected by the College of the Cardinals, more aptly called the Red Robins, it would so appear.

  26. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    April 30, 2017 - 7:01 pm | Permalink

    “Do you know who’s in command here?”
    After SWIFT brought down Benedict XVI the answer should have been patently clear.

    • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
      April 30, 2017 - 10:22 pm | Permalink

      please make it more clear to me…not aware of most religious matters. JW

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      April 30, 2017 - 11:01 pm | Permalink

      Difficult also to believe that Pope Benedict XVI’s letter of resignation (“Ingravescente Aetate“) was, in fact, written by him, containing, as it does, a couple of elementary errors in Latin.

    • Jerry's Gravatar Jerry
      May 2, 2017 - 6:57 am | Permalink

      SWIFT
      I am searching to get a definition of SWIFT.
      thanks,
      Jerry

  27. Gaylord Retclyffe's Gravatar Gaylord Retclyffe
    April 30, 2017 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

    After forty years in academia and the ministry I can state, with confidence, that, what poses as Christianity (ALL Christianity, Eastern Orthodox included), is one gigantic fraudulent enterprise. Ask any number of clergy or laypeople what they think the “gospel” is, and you’ll get a smörgåsbord of answers. After 2000 years, nobody knows! That’s why we have, in the US alone, more than 500 sects, each with its own claim to absolute truth. They quote scripture but don’t know why, say, John xyz should trump Mark abc, let alone why parts of the Hebrew bible need to be omitted while others are “salvific”. The Jesus who found His Abba and His own sonship in wilderness and on mountaintop, who wrote NO scripture, organized nothing, had nothing but contempt for hierarchy – this Jesus fell victim to one of the greatest betrayals in human history. It’s “amazing grace” that despite His dimwitted (((disciples))) and the sly (((S(P)aul))) a smattering of veritas survived, buried in the gospels. Churches are filled with people who manufacture their own religion: a quarter pound Ten Commandments (not all, not all of the time, and mostly for others); one cup of angels (oh, angels are BIG); a sprinkling of goodytwoshoe-ism, a pound of hell (for the others) and heaven (for them and their dogs), and a pinch of tears shed at weddings and funerals: presto, this is Christianity! Had He not risen, Jesus would turn in His grave at this monstrous travesty: fat, homo “dignitaries” lecturing a mostly secular population on what Jesus wants. These people need to be exposed as naked clowns, bereft of intellectual gifts and moral instincts. Those who care for The Way, the Truth, and the Life will turn their backs on Rome, Wittenberg, Lambeth, and Constantinople. They will go alone (or with a maximum of one or two more – when He will be in the midst of them) to a mountaintop and cherish the freedom of Abba and the rarefied air of unmediated sonship.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      May 1, 2017 - 8:22 pm | Permalink

      Your years spent in whatever are wasted if you believe the Eastern Orthodox Church to exist in the same toxic miasma as Western Christianity. Ignorance or agitprop on your part. Which is it?

  28. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 30, 2017 - 10:20 pm | Permalink

    there is another unremarked factor in our current crisis of race bewilderment.
    Ordinary well intentioned white liberals MUST perceive their own personal hypocrisy…claiming to be anti-racist but living day to day only with whites.

    It is done thru realistic assessment of how to negotiate one’s way in a white world. Say one thing, and do another. Survival.

    Survival means money first. The coin of the realm is race-equality in word to fit into the Globalist one-world racial order. Globalism is contradicted by any nationalist or racialist feelings/actions/words.

    Hence the endless repetitions of lies, everywhere in media, and in politician’s Words, and, and, and.

    I recently described to a young 30 ish gal …the frequent sighting of single young white women with “niglet” and no adult black male to be seen. She exclaimed, ” Joe!” as her protest. Then she calmed down and listened, at least a bit, to Reason.

    The only way to a middle class money living, is thru the Coin of the Realm….race equality salutations.

    Shut-up at least. This is a Marxist view…the economic base (globalism) determining the superstructure of morality….race equality. This is at least a significant factor among several, including youthful Optimism, stockholm syndrome, peer acceptance, simple stupidity…being so stupid that one cannot discern the deficits in coloreds, cowardice, Christianity these days, and of course, the seductions of sex/porn and darkies.
    Joe Webb

  29. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    April 30, 2017 - 10:34 pm | Permalink

    more on where the myth of race equality emerged in recent history.

    Anti-racism as an ideology, or Counter-Myth, (The Myth of Race Equality), seems to have gotten started with the immigration debates of early 20th century in the US. The assault on normal White standards of racial hygiene, or race realism, was begun by the folks trying to beat their way into the US. That would be the Jews.

    Franz Boas started it and the rest is history. There is an article in this, or more. Of course, the whole campaign got-up steam after Hitler and Jewish propaganda and Jewish pseudo-social science. For those who want to read up on the intellectual times in this regard, Carl Degler’s In Search of Human Nature is good, not perfect.

    But it is a kind of intellectual history of Darwinism in this regard in the US anyway. It never was completely stamped out by our enemies, jew and liberal, and rose again with socio-biology and now HBD, etc.

    this book is indispensable for historical reasons.

    Joe Webb

  30. MaryC's Gravatar MaryC
    May 1, 2017 - 4:52 am | Permalink

    So, why is Byzantium preferable to Rome? Surely it was equally remiss in accepting the “scripted mythological figure” – presumably invented by “the Jooooos” – as Rome was.

  31. MaryC's Gravatar MaryC
    May 1, 2017 - 5:10 am | Permalink

    I believe there already exists a religion in which ethnicity, rather than God, is worshipped. I think it begins with a “J”. Can anybody help me out?

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      May 1, 2017 - 9:11 am | Permalink

      Jews for Jesus.

  32. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    May 1, 2017 - 6:41 am | Permalink

    Cardinal Marx (a real hennetaster) and feminist hipsters need to be taken to task for what’s been called “a confrontation of silence.” One example, the endless rape of European women by Africans (36,000 yearly in the United States).

  33. May 1, 2017 - 7:12 am | Permalink

    The mainstream Churches have become corrupted and support the jew world order.

    The simple fact is that the mass flow of non-Whites is the result of a jewish “conspiracy” to destroy our countries, and that organized jewry uses various religious groups to achieve that aim, is an obvious part of their strategy.

    Sunic, in this article, unfortunately shifts the blame from organized jewry, the cause, to one of its effects, the corrupted Churches and others who carry out the dirty work.

    That said, he does rightly point out these effects, that many Christian leaders and their followers encourage themselves to accept, and in many cases, champion their own racial and cultural destruction, for whatever biblical quotation they can come up with.

    These types of people are traitors to our race, despite their good intentions in many cases.

    ————–

    The Realist Report Interviews Alfred Schaefer – April 2017 — TRANSCRIPT

  34. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    May 1, 2017 - 2:37 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Crayon: Forgive me for not making the effort to retort your fallacious, fictitious, comment on the Eastern Orthodox Church. Comparing the Church of Rome, on virtue, fidelity to Fathers of the Christian Church, based on history and actuality, does not need an argument or rebuttal, but an appeal to you to return to the firmament of Reality, Concrete Evidence, and Facts. I’m too old to indulge in bar talk.

    You imply heavily that somewhat and somehow the Church of Rome was a participant and progenitor of the marvels of creation of Western Civilization. I disagree. Aside from commissioning art in its name for glorification, I rather believe the Catholic Church should be renamed as The Catheter Church, an institution that bled away the flower of Europe’s manhood as the agitator-manipulator of wars and destruction. The state of YourRope is linked directly to Western Christianity, its structural inherent weaknesses.

    Finally, it is clear to me that the RCC was a SPECTATOR AND ATTENDANT during the creative periods of the West, which progressed IN SPITE of the contra force of this Old Madam with the cheap perfume, overdone make-up and self-deception of its virtue and even relevance.

    Shame.

  35. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    May 1, 2017 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

    “Know who your friends are”, is a wise saying. Knowing who is NOT going to help you, or worse, who is actively contributing to your destruction is just as important. Past behavior is usually a good predictor of future lack of performance or detriment. Take for example this institution, which calls itself a Church of Jesus:

    http://listverse.com/2007/08/17/top-10-most-wicked-popes/

    1. Tiberius-Reigned during the time the “Church” believed that Jesus was just a man, not divine. Pope John XII committed incest with his sisters. Pope Formosus had his body dumped in a river after his death. Read more incredible stories in Dark History of the Popes at Amazon.com!
    2. Honorius-Condemned and excommunicated for heresy. Believed that Jesus was God and not God-man. Popes just seem to make stuff up as they go along.
    3. Steven VI-xcommunicated for leaving the Papal seat and “conspiring to destroy the papal see”. He was eventually forgiven and returned to Rome. When Stephen VI came the Papal Throne, he had the body of formosus exhumed and put on trial (this is the famous Cadaver Synod). Formosus was accused of transmigrating sees in violation of canon law, of perjury, and of serving as a bishop while actually a layman. Stephen had Formosus’ papal vestments removed and two fingers from his right hand cut off. Formosus’ body was thrown in to the Tiber. After the Synod, public opinion turned against Stephen. He was deposed in an uprising and strangled to death. (Bugsy Siegel based his values on this one, I believe).
    4. John XII-“…during his pontificate he virtually turned it into a whorehouse. Moral corruption in Rome became a major problem. After crowning Otto I Emporer of Germany in order to secure his support in a war against Berengar II of Itlay, he changed his mind and began communicating with Berengal.”
    An account of the charges against him in the Patrologia Latina states:
    They testified about his adultery, which they did not see with their own eyes, but nonetheless knew with certainty: he had fornicated with the widow of Rainier, with Stephana his father’s concubine, with the widow Anna, and with his own niece, and he made the sacred palace into a whorehouse. They said that he had gone hunting publicly; that he had blinded his confessor Benedict, and thereafter Benedict had died; that he had killed John, cardinal subdeacon, after castrating him; and that he had set fires, girded on a sword, and put on a helmet and cuirass.
    5. Benedict IX- “St. Peter Damian described him as “feasting on immorality” and “a demon from hell in the disguise of a priest” in the Liber Gomorrhianus, a treatise on papal corruption and sex that accused Benedict IX of routine homosexuality and bestiality”. He was also accused by Bishop Benno of Piacenza of “many vile adulteries and murders.” Pope Victor III referred to “his rapes, murders and other unspeakable acts. His life as a Pope so vile, so foul, so execrable, that I shudder to think of it.”Benedict gave up his papacy for the first time in exchange for a large sum of money in 1044. He returned in 1045 to depose his replacement and reigned for one month, after which he left again, possibly to marry, and sold the papacy for a second time, to his Godfather (possibly for over 650 kg /1450 lb of gold). Two years later, Benedict retook Rome and reigned for an additional one year, until 1048. Poppo of Brixen (later to become Pope Damascus II) eventually forced him out of Rome. Benedict’s place and date of death are unknown, but some speculate that he made further attempts to regain the Papal Throne.
    6. Boniface VII-“Due to the King of France (Philip IV) taxing the clergy of the Church to help finance his wars, Boniface VIII released one of the most important papal bulls of Catholic History: Unam Sanctum. It declared that both spiritual and temporal power were under the pope’s jurisdiction, and that kings were subordinate to the power of the Church.”
    7. Urban VI-“Urban VI was the first Pope of the Western Schism (which ultimately lead to three people claiming the Papal throne at the same time). Urban VI was the last Pope to be selected from outside of the College of Cardinals. Once elected, he was prone to outbursts of rage. The cardinals who elected him decided that they had made the wrong decision and they elected a new Pope in his place (he took the name of Clement VII and started a second Papal court in Avignon, France).” “The conflict quickly escalated from a church problem to a diplomatic crisis that divided Europe. Secular leaders had to choose which pope they would recognize.”
    8. Alexander VI-“Born Rodrigo Borgia, Pope Alexander VI is so famous for his debased reign that his surname has become synonymous with the debased standards of the papacy in his era. Alexander’s elevation did not at the time excite much alarm, and at first his reign was marked by a strict administration of justice and an orderly method of government. But it was not long before his passion for endowing his relatives at the church’s and his neighbours’ expense became manifest. To that end he was ready to commit any crime and to plunge all Italy into war.” “Alexander VI had three sons in addition to his famous daughter Lucrezia. During his pontificate virtually everything he did was to further the position of his children and family in the world. In order to dominate the Sacred College of Cardinals more completely, Alexander, in a move that created much scandal, created twelve new cardinals, among them his own son Cesare, then only eighteen years old, and Alessandro Farnese (later Pope Paul III), the brother of one of the Pope’s mistresses, the beautiful Giulia Farnese.The death of the Pope is well recorded by Burchard: Alexander VI’s stomach became swollen and turned to liquid, while his face became wine-coloured and his skin began to peel off. Finally his stomach and bowels bled profusely. After more than a week of intestinal bleeding and convulsive fevers, and after accepting last rites and making a confession, the despairing Alexander VI expired on 18 August 1503 at the age of 72.”
    9. Leo X-Pope Leo X is known primarily for his papal bull against Martin Luther and subsequent failure to stem the Protestant Reformation, which began during his reign when Martin Luther (1483–1546) published the 95 Theses and nailed them to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg. When he became Pope, Leo X is reported to have said to his brother Giuliano: “Since God has given us the papacy, let us enjoy it.”
    Under his pontificate, Christianity assumed a pagan character, which, passing from art into manners, gives to this epoch a strange complexion. Crimes for the moment disappeared, to give place to vices; but to charming vices, vices in good taste, such as those indulged in by Alcibiades and sung by Catullus.” Alexandre Dumas
    His extravagance offended not only people like Martin Luther, but also some cardinals, who, led by Alfonso Petrucci of Siena, plotted an assassination attempt. Eventually, Pope Leo found out who these people were, and had them followed. The conspirators died of “food poisoning.”
    10. Clement VII (Giulio di Giuliano de’ Medici)- brought to the Papal throne a high reputation for political ability, and possessed in fact all the accomplishments of a wily diplomat. However, he was considered worldly and indifferent to what went on around him, including the ongoing Protestant reformation.The Pope’s wavering politics also caused the rise of the Imperial
    party inside the Curia: Pompeo Cardinal Colonna’s soldiers pillaged the Vatican City and gained control of the whole of Rome in his name. The humiliated Pope promised therefore to bring the Papal States to the Imperial side again. Soon he found himself alone in Italy too, as the duke of Ferrara had sided with the Imperial army, permitting to the horde of Landsknechts led by Charles III, Duke of Bourbon, and Georg von Frundsberg, to reach Rome without harm.Charles of Bourbon died during the long siege, and his troops, unpaid and left without a guide, felt free to ravage Rome from May 6, 1527. The innumerable series of murders, rapes and vandalism that followed ended forever the splendours of the Renaissance Rome. Clement was kept as a prisoner in Castel Sant’Angelo for six months. After having bought some Imperial officers, he escaped disguised as a peddler, and took shelter in Orvieto, and then in Viterbo. He came back to a depopulated and devastated Rome only in October 1528. Subsequently the Pope followed a policy of subservience to the Emperor, endeavouring on the one hand to induce him to act with severity against the Lutherans in Germany, and on the other to elude his demands for a general council.”

    11. Barack Obama-Though not formally declared and enthroned as Pope or religious leader in the normal meaning, he was declared the High Priest of the Church Liberalism and Spiritual leader of all the WESTERN WORLD’s religions. He was rejected as an Emissary of Satan by the Eastern Orthodox. Many Jews who had been self-identified as Atheist accepted him as their Pope and earthy representative of the Fallen Angel. The actor playing the Pope of Rome shared a homoerotic attractive to Poup Obama, creating new Catholic doctrine and canon as had most if not all of his “infallible” predecessors. Though Obama did not sit on the throne in Rome, his Church today can be termed “The Army of Ants”, “The Willing Witless”.

  36. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    May 1, 2017 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    The American River Ganges, by Thomas Nast. Ever wonder why the bishops’ hats resemble……
    https://thomasnastcartoons.com/irish-catholic-cartoons/the-american-river-ganges-1871/

  37. Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
    May 2, 2017 - 8:22 am | Permalink

    Doctor Sunic’s overall theme is supported by the fact, that the militant atheist Angela Davis was cordially invited by the residually Jesuit Marquette University to lecture.

    All the readers here, but particularly those too young to remember her activities in Moscow and East-Berlin, and those out-of-country readers unfamiliar with her contemporaneous US ” fame “, may wish to read of her Marquette appearance at the INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW, a few articles from the top.

    A spot or two below is an article about a Jewish Harvard graduate who submitted incontinent comments to a site to discredit it. It reminded me of the text of the suit [ claim ] by Gersh v. Anglin, which endlessly cited, verbatim, e-mail and mailed threats against Gersh. One such unmistakable death threat was initialed A.A., certainly Anglin’s initials, and referred to as such in the text; PROVING NOTHING other than the well-known ingredients of the pudding.

  38. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    May 2, 2017 - 3:09 pm | Permalink

    If I were to skip the article and jump straight to the first half of comments to date, I would have to assume the thrust of the article blamed White Christians, wrongly, for White racial problems today, when it’s known that Jews are at bottom of of our travails. That’s some bad propaganda you’re putting out TOO!

    Oh, it’s Sunic. That explains it.

    Sunic, indlessly running on ‘European New Right” ideas is no shock – even though the European New Right, non-controversially, is a creation of the Jewish-controlled anti-nationalist left. See for confirmation the discussions between Sunic and ADB for VOR at archive.org. Mere fact. Known to Sunic himself.

    Sunic can’t stay focused on race when this is a racial movement – he constantly must introduce confusion, as principle – because he thinks ideas matter more than biology. So does Johnson.

    Both are poison no matter what positives they offer.

Comments are closed.